though we are made partakers of it by a power which is without us yet it is inherent in us as in its proper subject and in that notion is opposed to the righteousnesse of Christ whereby we are justified whereof he is not only the worker but which also is inherent in him as its proper subject therefore the justification of a Beleever is by way of imputation No sinner remaining a sinner when he is justified can be justified otherwise than by imputed righteousnesse but all Beleevers though justified yet remain sinners while they live in this world 1 Joh. 1.8 therefore all Beleevers are justified by an imputed righteousnesse The final cause is the manifestation of the glory of grace The finall cause in a way of Mercy tempered with Justice in a way of Mercy in that he justifieth the ungodly Rom. 4.5 and that freely Rom. 3.24 tempered with Justice in that he justifieth not without Christs full satisfaction unto the Law Rom. 3.26 The instrumental cause or instrument of our Justification The instrumental cause or instrument for faith here is but a meer instrument is faith the fuller understanding of this Proposition followeth in the next particular Here observe the intent and consent of such Scriptures as speak diversly of the cause of Justification we are sayed to bee justified by grace Rom. 3.24 i. e. as the Efficient cause by his Blood Rom. 5.9 i. e. as the Meritorious cause by his obedience Rom. 5.19 i. e. as the Material cause by imputation of his obedience Rom. 4.6 i.e. as the Formal cause by faith Rom. 5.1 i. e. as the instrument This Proposition We are justified by faith is figurative How Faith justifieth i.e. Metonymical whereby that which belongs to the principal cause is attributed to the instrumental cause Faith justifieth not for its own worth but for the worth of the object which it apprehends Faith doth not justifie as an act of ours but all the vertue thereof proceedeth from its object the vertue that healed the Israelites proceeded from the object viz. the brazen Serpent they looked upon not from the looking upon the Brazen Serpent and the vertue that healed the Woman Luke 8.46.48.50 proceeded out of Christ who was touched not out of the Womans touch we are declared righteous upon our beleeving Faith in the matter of our Justification is the instrument apprehending and applying that which doth justifie the proper act of Faith is to receive the righteousnesse of another we are justified by faith correlatively that is we are justified by that which is the correlate of faith namely the obedience of Christ the meaning is it is the Obedience of Christ not Faith that justifieth that which is apprehended not that which apprehendeth Faith alone justifieth that is faith as it justifieth is alone but justifying faith is not alone that is faith as it justifieth is without workes but the faith that justifieth is a working faith We are justified by faith alone 1 Because as it justifieth it is not a work Rom. 4.5 2 Because we are not justified by our own righteousnesse i. e. that righteousnesse whereof we are the subjects 3 Because we are justified by the righteousnesse of another sometimes called the righteousnesse of God viz. that whereof God is the Author and Ordainer sometimes the righteousnesse of Christ viz. that whereof he who is God-man is both the Worker and the Subject 4 Because we are justified by a righteousnesse that is made ours by imputation not by infusion as Abraham was justified 5 Because we are justified by a righteousnesse that is actually procured before we doe beleeve Our righteousnesse is compared unto a garment Reval 19.8 Rom. 13.14 Gal. 3.27 which we put on by beleeving yet faith never took stitch in it What was accounted to Abraham for righteousnesse Zanch. in Phil. 3. Not the action by which but that which he did beleeve or as others speak faith not in respect of it self apprehending but in respect of the object apprehended Zanchy Gen. 15.6 Quid reputatum ad justitiam non actio quâ sed id quod credidit seu ut alii loquuntur ipsa fides non sui apprehendentis sed objecti apprehensi respectu This Proposition We are justified by faith understood legally with the Papists is not true but Blasphemous but being taken correlatively it is true Vrsin Haec propositio Ursin explicat catech part 2. qu. 63 fide justificamur legaliter intellecta cum Papist is non est vera sed Blasphema correlativè autem accept a hoc est Evangelicè est vera Faith as a quality doth not justifie but as an instrument receiving and applying to us the imputed righteousnesse of Christ Rivet Fides pro qualitate sumpta Rivet Cathol orthod tract 4. q. 10 non justificat nos sed justificat tanquam instrumentum recipiens applicans nob is imputatam Christi justitiam Faith justifies relatively to wit by a Metonymy whereby the effect of the principal is attributed to the instrumental cause Faith justifieth not habitually as a quality but relatively Paraeus Fides justificat relatè Paraeus in Rom. 3. phrasi nimirum Metaleptica quâ effectus causae principalis tribuitur instrumentali Fides justificat non habitualitèr ut qualitas sed Relatè Faith justifies not simply but relatively after the manner of an instrument applying Chamier Fides justificat Cham. Tom. 3. l. 22. c. 11 non simpliciter sed Relatè per modum instrumenti applicantis He saith Calvin shal be said to be justified by faith that being excluded from the righteousnesse of workes doth by faith take hold of the righteousnesse of Christ wherewith when he is cloathed he appeareth in the sight of God not as a sinner but as righteous and saith he after a few lines we say that the same consisteth in the forgivenesse of sins and imputation of the righteousness of Christ Contra justificabitur ille fide Calvin institut lib. 3. cap. 11. s 2. qui operum justitia exclusus Christi justitiam per fidem apprehendit qua vestitus in Dei conspectu non ut peccator sed tanquam justus apparet ita nos justificationem simpliciter interpretamur acceptionem qua nos Déus in gratiam receptos pro just is habet eámque in peccatorum remissione ac justitiae Christi imputatione positam esse dicimus Confer Sect. 21. 23. Faith doth not justifie as a work Welleb comp l. 1. c. 30. but as an instrument apprehending Christ Wollebius Etsi igitur fides sola non sit sed cum operibus conjuncta sola tamen justificat Fides non tanquam opus sed tanquam instrumentum Christum apprehendens Justification consists in faith organically Spanh de gr un erot 21. in the obedience of Christ objectively and meritoriously Spanhemius Justificatio consistit in fide organicè in Christi obedientia objectivè meritoriè We say with the Apostle Beza in confe majore c.
11. the Man Christ Jesus Extreams come not together but by their middest From the Nature of a just God unto a sinner God in Christ is a tender Father without Christ a consuming fire Mans way to God is by the Man God for he is the Mediatour between God and man the Man Christ Jesus Christ as Redeemer is the mediate not the ultimate Object of Faith For we believe by Christ in God It is the duty of all that hear the Gospel to believe Mark 1.15 John 3.18 John 15.22 and 16.7 1 John 3.23 Those that never hear of the Gospel shall not be condemned for their unbelief in refusing to obey the call thereof but for the transgressing of the Moral Law precisely taken i. e the first Covenant He to whom Christ was never preached shall not be condemned because he hath refused Christ but he shall be judged by the Law which obliged him to believe in Christ if Christ had been preached to him Object 'T is not in our power to believe How then can God require of us that which we are unable to perform Sol. We are enabled in Adam to believe in Christ If the renewing or recreation of us after the Image of God according to which we were created in Adam doth enable us also with a power to believe then our Creation after the Image of God must necessarily include a power to believe But the renewing us after the Image of God according to which we were created in Adam doth enable us to believe Ephes 4.24 Col. 3.10 Where there was a saving power enabling to discern the revealed Will of God and to put confidence in him accordingly there was a power virtually to believe in Christ But in Adam there was a saving power enabling to discern the whole Will of God and to put confidence in him accordingly Therefore in Adam there was a power virtually enabling to believe in Christ As the Faith of the Angels in the first and second Covenant differeth not habitually so neither doth the Faith of Adam in the first and second Covenant differ habitually That which was implicitely and by consequence commanded in the Moral Law that we were some way enabled to yeild obedience unto But Faith in Christ was commanded implicitely and by consequence in the Moral Law by the first Precept Faith in God is commanded absolutely therefore not only concerning what he was pleased to reveal at present but unto what afterwards he should be pleased to reveal Justifying Faith is considered as commanded directly and expresly or indirectly and by way of consequence So Faith in Christ is commanded in the Moral Law indirectly or by way of consequence Willet on Exod cap. 20. Confut. 1. It will not be denyed saith Doctor Willet but that this faith also speaking of justifying faith is commanded in the Moral Law Because we are bound by the Law to believe the Scriptures and the whole Word of God for this is a part of Gods Worship to believe his Word to be true And here it is not unworthy our observation that though Christ were not then propounded to be believed in yet he was included in what was revealed under the first Covenant For that threatening Gen. 2.17 In the day that thou eatest thou shalt dye is verified as concerning the elect in Christ who dye in their Surety not in themselves If in Adam we were able to believe in Christ as our preserver from sin and Confirmer in a state of life had Christ then been so propounded to us there can no reason be given why we were not able in that condition to have believed in Christ as a Saviour from sin could he have been so propounded in that estate unto us But in Adam we were able to believe in Christ as our Preserver from sin and Conserver in that estate had Christ then been so propounded unto us Therefore in Adam we were able to have believed in Christ as a Saviour from sin could he have been so propounded unto us in that estate The Minor is proved by comparing Adam in innocency with the elect Angels the Image of God in them both being the same in kind their abilities were the same in kind as therefore the elect Angels by Creation had a principle whereby they were able to believe in Christ their Confirmer as appears by experience in that they believed in Christ their Head and Confirmer being commanded so to do without the inspiring of any new principle so in like manner had Christ been propound unto Adam in innocency to be believed in as his Head and Confirmer therein he by the same concreated Image of God with the Angels was able thereby through like assisting grace to have yeilded like obedience without a new principle inspired Either Adam was able to believe in Christ or else God calling upon man to believe requireth that of man which he never enabled him with a principle to perform but it cannot be proved that God requireth that of man which he never enabled him to perform Therefore c. Object Faith in Christ as a Saviour from sin and the state of innocency are inconsistent Therefore Adam had not a power to believe in Christ Ans This proves that Adam in innocency could not actually believe but not that he could not potentially believe that is that he had not a principle able through assisting grace to believe in Christ had the propounding of him been consisting with that estate The cause of Adams not believing was not through an effect of a principle enabling him thereunto but by reason first of the inconsistency of justifying faith with that estate 2. By reason of the not revealing of the Object of Faith Adam in innocency had a principle enabling him to Parental duties though he was never called thereunto as also to duties of mercy and charity which yet were inconsistent with that estate The Saints in glory have a principle whereby they are able to perform the duties of repentance mortification patience for sure the strength of grace is not weakened by being perfected in glory yet is there no place for those duties in Heaven Christ having received the Spirit out of measure had a principle whereby he was able to have performed the service of repentance and mortification Molin Anat. of Arm. cap. 11. Twiss permiss l. 2. c. 4.63 Spanh Exercit de grat univers Annot in Sect. 22. Num. 3. though he were not only not called thereunto but these and the like services were also inconsistent with his estate This is the Doctrine of the Orthodox generally in their disputations against Arminius who that he might prove that God is bound co give to every man power of believing in Christ doth therefore contend that Adam before his fall had not power to believe in Christ Obj. 2. God is said to harden our hearts and to be the cause why we do not believe John 8.47 and 10.26 and 12.39 40. Wherefore it seemeth not so at least
of himself as it is a great sin for the greatest sinner to be without hope in respect of Christ Carnal presumption of mercy because our sins are comparatively little lessens the demerit of sin Despair of mercy because our sins are great lessens the Merit of Christ A mans nearness unto or remoteness from the participation of grace according to Gods ordinary Dispensation is not to be judged according to his Commission of more or fewer sins but according to his proceeding in the preparatory work A man may have committed many sins yet being Ministerially disposed in respect of the receiving of Grace he is near to salvation A man may have committed fewer sins yet being without the preparatory Work of Law and Gospel he is far from salvation 'T is not a mans former commission of sin but his continuance in sin that keeps him far from salvation For the fuller clearing the description of Free-grace some Objections are to be removed the former whereof concern the Freeness of grace in respect of Election the other in respect of the Application of the good of Election i.e. that good whereunto we are elected Obj. 1. Ephes 1.4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the Foundation of the world Here the Apostle seemeth to make Christ the Cause of Election therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Though it be be rendred through in English 'T is in in the Greek Election is not a free act Ans The Particle In is not always taken causally 2 Thes 2.13 Because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation in sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth i. e. in sanctification and belief of the truth as the way not as the cause of salvation True the Apostle saith We are elected in Christ but he saith not That we are elected for Christ We are said to be elected in Christ because Christ is the Meritorious cause of the Application of the good of Election so that in Christ in this place is the same with by Christ 1 Thes 5.9 For God hath appointed us to wrath but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ 'T is here said We are saved for Christ because Christ is the cause of our salvation but 't is not said We are elected for Christ because Christ is not the Cause of Election To be elect in Christ and to be elect for Christ are not to be confounded * Est quaedam Dei Dilectio erga nos unde profecta est Missio Christi John 3. Twiss vind grat de elect lib. 1. part 2. deg 3. Sect. 1. Etenim ex dicto Petri constat ChristuÌ„ ut MediatoreÌ„ qualis hic consideratur non esse praedèstinationis causam sed effectum 1 Pet. 1.20 Pisc de praedest N. 97. Meritum Christi nonest absolutum Cham. To. 3. l. 9. c. 1. S. 7. That we may rightly discern this truth of so spiritual and high a nature we must carefully distinguish between Election and the Application of the good of Election between Gods Act of willing grace and glory to be applyed and the actual application of grace and glory willed by God God electeth that is he willeth grace and glory to be applyed unto his people without any respect of the Merit of Christ as a Cause or Motive of that volition but the actual Donation and Application of that grace and glory is for the Merit sake of Jesus Christ Christ is the Effect of Election or of the Love of God but he is the Cause of the salvation of the Elect. He is the Effect of Election therefore called a Servant and said to be elect of God Behold my Servant whom I uphold my Elect in whom my soul delighteth Isai 42.1 His Incarnation Heb. 10.5 His Office John 6.27 His Acceptation in that Office Jes 53.10 all proceeds from the Love of God Election is God himself electing according to that received and regulating Proposition Whatsoever is in God is God To say then That Christ is the Cause of Election or of the Love of God were to say There might be given a Cause of God yea that God is an Effect and consequently that God is not God God hath ordained that the Merit of Christ should be the cause of our salvation but he hath not ordained that Christ should be the Meritorious cause of his so ordaining which implyeth a manifest contradiction Christ then is the Cause of the gift of Eternal life but not of Gods Will to give Eternal life unto us Christ is the Cause of salvation but not of Gods Decree to save Christ Ephes 1.4 is made the Cause of Sanctification And 1 Thes 5.9 he is made the Cause of Salvation but he is no where made the Cause of our Election Christ is the Meritorious Cause the Application of all spiritual Benediction in Heavenly places but not of Election Obj. 2. Ephe. 1.6 To the prayse and glory of his grace wherein he hath made us accepted in the Beloved If accepted in Christ then loved only in Christ therefore Christ is the cause of Gods Love Ans The Love of God is taken for the Act of Love it self viz. Election or for the effect of his love viz. Vocation Justification c. Christ is the cause of the latter not of the former By Acceptation in this place we are to understand Justification of which Christ is the cause He is the cause why we are justified but he is not the cause of Gods Decree to justifie us Gods special Love is his Will to bestow all saving good upon us All which good he willeth to us without Christ as a cause of his volition but not without Christ as a cause of the application thereof 'T is the same Volition or Act of Willing in God by which he willeth the Being of a Mediatour and the Salvation of the Elect for the Merits sake of this Mediatour The Salvation of the Elect is not the last end of the Merit of Christ but Gods Supream end is the Manifestation of the glory of his grace in a way of mercy tempered with justice whereunto both the Merit of Christ and the Salvation of the Elect conjoyned are the means and make one fit Medium thereunto Like Objections from some other Texts of like nature may receive the like answer Notwithstanding it be a truth That Christ is not the cause of Election yet it is also a fundamental Truth That Christ is the Meritorious cause of the Application of the good of Election 1 Thes 5.9 2 Cor. 1.20 Acts 4.12 Particulo gratis excludu tur merita nostri non Christi Bucan loc 31. quest 16. Foedus graetiae nullaÌ„ propriè dictam aut antecedentem conditimem requirit Med. cap. 22. th 19 Ex tali inquam conditione si pendereÌ„t promissiones Dei actum esset de salute nostra Coron artic 4. cap. 3. Cham. Tem. 3. lib. 15. c. 3. 5. Si feceris hoc vives parâ—icula si est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
in that day that thou eatest therof thou shalt surely dye Gen. 2.17 that is either in thy selfe or in thy surety therefore Christ performed both active and passive obedience If the Law requireth not only passive but active obedience and the Elect by beleeving fulfill the Law then he in whom they beleeve and that as the object of their faith hath fulfilled both active and passive obedience but the Law requireth active and passive obedience as is evident in the foregoing Arguments and the Elect by beleeving fulfill the righteousnesse of the Law Rom. 8.4.10.4 therefore he in whom they beleeve and that as he is the object of their faith hath fulfilled both active and passive obedience This further appeareth in that Christ was to answer the Law instead of the Elect and that the Law pronounceth every one accursed that continueth not in all things which are written in the Book of the Law to doe them Gal. 3.10 If Christ had no done what the Command required of us as wel as suffered for our disobedience unto the command Obedientia Christi est una copulativa Alsted Theol Sect 3 loc 22 how wil it appear either that Christ is a perfect Saviour or that any man can be saved the whole obedience of Christ both active and passive make up one intire and perfect obedience why should any particle of the one or the other be excluded As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous Rom. 5.19 It were too strait an interpretation to restraine the words to his passive obedience only And for their sake I will sanctifie my selfe Joh. 17.19 Obj. Justification is often in the Scripture ascribed unto the death of Christ Mat. 20.28 and 26.28 Act. 20.28 Rom. 3.24 25. and elsewhere therefore not the active and passive but the passive obedience of Christ only seems to be the matter of our Justification Ans 'T is true that Justification is often ascribed in the Scripture unto the death of Christ but to his death as the Meritorious cause not as the material cause of our Justification neither yet is it ascribed to his death as the Meritorious cause wholly but partly a part being put for the whole viz. the passive for both active and passive obedience a trope often used in the Scripture and as in the places alleged the part or at least that which is as a part is put for the whole in respect of the cause so also is there a part put for the whole in respect of the effect of that cause viz. Justification which is but a part of the good of Redemption is put for the whole good thereof Take for example Mat. 26.28 For this is my blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins by remission of sins which is but a part of the good of Redemption we are to understand the whole good of Redemption with the application of it Que. If the obedience of Christ be an ingredient into the Meritorious cause and be also the whole Material cause how then doth the obedience of Christ as it is an ingredient into the Meritorious cause differ from the obedience of Christ as it is the Materiall cause of our Justification Ans In the Meritorious cause it is considered together with the Person Office actual execution of that Office and Merit In the Material cause it is considered as distinct from all these They are distinguished as the cause and effect Obedience considered in the Material cause is in part the effect of obedience considered in the Meritorious cause they are distinguished as the whole and the part Christs obedience is but a part only of the Meritorious but the whole of the Material cause in the Meritorious cause it is both a Legal and Evangelical act Christs obeying the Law is Legal but his obeying it for us is Evangelical in the Material cause 't is only an Evangelical act it is given to us freely Willet Synops cent 4. error 56. qu. 1. in that it is considered formally in this vertually though Christ obeyed the Law formally yet 't is not the formal working of obedience or doing of the command but the good vertue and efficacy thereof that is imputed to the Beleever there it is considered as wrought by him for us here as applied to us there it is as a garment made here as a garment put on there it may be compared to the payment of the Mony by the Surety for the Debtor here to the Mony both payed and accompted unto the use of the Debtor The formal cause of Justification is by imputation The formal Cause Imputation is the actual and effectual application of the righteousnesse of Christ unto the Beleever To impute reckon or account in this place intend the same thing the same word in Greek being translated indifferently by any of these three To impute Perkins in Gal. câ—p 3. ver 6. is to reckon that unto another which in way of righteousnesse whether of Justice or Grace or both belongs unto him Imputation is either Legal imputing unto us that which we have done so the word is used Rom. 4.4 or Evangelical imputing unto us that which another hath done thus to impute is for God in his act of justifying a sinner to account the righteousnesse of Christ which is not ours formally not by debt to be ours by Grace as verily and really as if it were wrought by us and in this sense the word is used ten times Rom. 4. v. 3.5 6.8 9 10 11.22 23 24. The justification of a Beleever is either by righteousnesse inherent or imputed but not by righteousnesse inherent therefore by righteousnesse imputed The righteousnesse whereby man is justified before God is perfect but the inherent righteousnesse of a Beleever is not perfect It were destructive to the merit and righteousnesse of Christ to say we were justified by a righteousnesse inherent in us We are made righteous by the obedience of Christ as we are made unrighteous by the disobedience of Adam But this is by imputation therefore All justification of the ungodly that is such as are under the guilt and power of their-sins is by imputed righteousness but the Justification of a Beleever Justificat impios in sensu diviso non in sensu composito Trelcat sen Justificat impios antecedenter non consequenter Paraeus in Rom. 4.5 is the Justification of the ungodly Rom 4.5 therefore God justifieth the ungodly viz. objectively not subjectively that is such who were ungodly until they were justified but doe not remain ungodly being justified That Justification which is by the righteousnesse of another is by way of imputation but the justification of a Beleever is by the righteousnesse of another that is such the matter whereof is the righteousnesse of Christ as we saw largely in the Material cause of our Justification Paul calleth Sanctification his righteousnesse Phil. 3.9 for