Crown that in the Kings Case they shall go with the Crown to the successor and not to executors as in case of common persons as appears in 7 H. 4. 43. and 44 E. 3. 42. Neither yet doth every warrant serve for the issuing of the Kings treasure for it cannot be done by Parol or by the privy Signet but ought to be done under the Great Seal or Privy Seal It was also further resolved in this Case that albeit Sir VValter had thus received the Quéens treasure to his own use yet inasmuch as he received it without lawful warrant he knowing that it was the Quéens treasure the Law makes privity in the Quéens Case and therefore she might charge him as an Accomptant And so it was also adjudged in the Exchequer in Jurdens Case P. 31. Eliz. Rot. 150. Neither yet is it of necessity that the Kings money or goods should come into the hands of the Testator for if he were onely a mean or Instrument whereby the King was put to loss or damage he shall be charged with so much as he hath so endamaged the King and shall be compelled at the Kings Suit reddere rationem thereof which is in nature of an Accompt for which there is a notable president in M. 30. E. 3. Rot. 6. Porters Case which sée in Co. l. 11. 92. b. in the Earl of Devonshires Case And therefore it was also resolved in Sir VValter Mildmayes Case that the Quéen might either charge the executors of Sir VValter or those that made such unlawful warrant at her election And if they were dead their executors c. for in as much as they were in their life-time chargeable by the Law in that Case if they die before judgement against them without question their executors shall be charged because where the Testator is by the Law chargeable to satisfie the King for losse or dammage done unto him his death shall not dispence therewith but that his Executors shall be also chargeable to the King c. F. N. B. 5. l. 65 In a Praecipe in Capite the Tenant shall not plead Protestaâ—â— that the Tenements are not holden of the King albeit the writ supposeth as much but he ought to take it by protestation and to plead other matter in barre if he have any matter to plead â—ender Di. â—ark 66 In a writ of Right F. N. B. 5. m. the Demandant ought to count of his own seisin or the seisin of his Ancestor c. yet the seisin is not traversable but the tenant may tender a Di. mark to enquire of that seisin c. and if it be found with the tenant that the Ancestor was not seised the Demandant shall be barred Howbeit if the King be party Demandant the Tenant shall not tender a Demy Mark to enquire of the seisin but he ought to plead in bar and there the tenant shall not imparâ— without the assent of the Kings servants The King may â—â—cuse appeaâ—â—nce 67 The King by a writ de warrantia diei may command the Iustices to excuse the Defendant of appearing at the day F. N. B. 17. b. whereunto he was adjourned to appear in proper person And whether the Cause alledged in the writ be true or false it is not material when the King certifies that he is in his service for it séems by the words of the writ that the King by his Prerogative may warrant that default for a day And so also it séemes that if the tenant in a Praecipe quod reddat at the great Cape or petit Cape returned make default that before judgment upon that default the King may command such a writ to the Iustices rehearsing that the tenant was in his service c. and commanding them that his default should not turn to his prejudice And it stands with reason that the King may do it because every one is bound to serve the King in his affairs c. â—â—nipresence 〈◊〉 his Courts 68 If false Iudgment be given for the King in any Action or Suit F. N. B. 21. b. 107. q. Finch 81. the party grieved shall have a writ of Error and assign Errours without suing any Scire facias against the King ad audiend errores because the King is alwayes present in Court and that is the cause that the form of Entry in all Suits for the King is Edvardus Herbert Miles Attornatus Domini Regis generalis qui pro domino Rege sequitur venit hic in Curia c. And doth not say Dominus Rex per Edvardum Herbert Attornatum suum c. And therefore it is also that the King cannot be Non-suit that all Acts of Parliaments that concern him are general and the Court must take notice of them without pleading them for he is in all and all have their part in him c. â—ake Attorâ—ys 69 It séems that before the Statutes which ordain F. N. B. 25. c. e. â— 26. a. that a man may make Attorneys c. the Iustices neither would nor could suffer the Plaintiffe or Defendant Demandant or tenant to make Attorneys in any Action or Court whatsoever yet the King by his Prerogative even before those Statutes might grant to a man power to make Attorneys and by his Writs or Letters might command the Iudges to admit and receive them c. and that without any cause shewed in the writ c. â—â—e King canâ—â—t be Jointâ—ant 70 In the Register there is the form of a writ F. N. B. 32. g. wherein a common person is joyned with the King in a Quare Impedit which runs thus Rex vice comiti c. praecipe R. de C. quod justè c. permittat nos P. de T. praesentare c. But Fitz. saith in his N. B. that the common opinion in his time was that the King should have the whole presentment sole and should have a sole Action c. although he séems to hold the contrary himself Ideò quaere â—sent again 71 If the King recover by a Quare Impedit F. N. B. 34. f. and after ratifie the Estate of the Incumbent yet at the next avoidance the King shall present because the Recovery and Iudgement for him were not executed â—â—â—sent by 〈◊〉 72 In a Frée Chappel of the Kings F. N. B. 34. â— where the Dean ought to give the Prebends if he make not collation within six moneths unto them then shall the King present unto them by Laps as Ordinary F. N. B. 34. k. 73 If the Bishop make collation and die before induction Not inducted or instalment and the King seise the temporalties he shall have that presentment because the Church is not full against the King until the Parson or Prebend be inducted or installed F. N. B. 35. a. 74 If the Kings tenant hath title to present to an Advowson Advowson Ward Present which is void
King hath an Interest in the Land or shall lose Rent c. or services then the Court ought to cease until they shall receive a procedendo in loquela from the King c. F. N. B. 154. d. e. 85 If the King by his writ certifie the Iustices Justices to surcease upon the Kings Certificat that the Lands are in his custodie by reason of the nonage of some heire taken by Inquisition and returned into the Chancery commanding them that they shall not procéed Rege Inconsulto In that Case it séemes that the Iustices ought to cease for the present albeit there be no such Office found nor returned for they are bound to give credit to the Kings certificate albeit that it be not true c. And in Assise de Novel disseisin if the King send his writ to the Iustices that the Defendant holds the Land put in view of the Kings gift for term of life by the Kings Charter commanding them not to procéed Rege Inconsulto here although the Tenant will not plead this yet it séemes that the Iustices ought to cease by that writ So if the King rehearse in the writ that the Tenant is in his service in warre beyond Sea or in Scotland and that he holds by Charter of the Kings grant for term of life commanding that they shall not procéed Rege Inconsulto but to continue the Assise untill a certain day there also it séems they shall surcease Because the Tenant cannot plead it for if the Escheator will say that he seised the Land into the Kings hand in an Assise brought by any person the Court shall surcease for that saying and by force of the Kings Certificate c. F. N. B. 106. c. 86 Men and Women of Religion are to be excused from appearing at the Sheriffs turne or at Leets unlesse it be for some great cause Men of Religion And if they be distrained to come unto them they may have a writ De exoneratione sectae c. out of the Chancery to discharge themselves of such service c. F. N. B. 159. c. 87 If Land descend to Coperceners Suit of Copeceners for which onely one suit ought to be done In this Case if the Land be holden of the King then all the Coperceners ought to make a suit as well after the partition as before But if the Land be holden of another Lord then the eldest Sister or her Feoffée shall onely make the suit c. And if the Lord do distraine the other Coperceners for that suit they shall have a writ De exoneratione sectae c. to discharge themselves of it c. Pl. Co. 76. b. in The Lord Willoughbies Case 88 If the King direct his writ Coronatoribus in Com. L. this is to be understood in the Kings Case Coronatoribus de Com. L. for the Kings writs in such Cases The Kings Writ will admit a favourable construction for the fulfilling of the Kings full intent c. Finch 81. 89 For the Kings prerogate see Finch 81. c. and elswhere throughout his whole Book under the several heads when there is any difference betwéen this Case an that of a subject Finch 83. 90 The King never dieth Demise Le Roy. but in Law it is said the demise of the King and a gift unto the King without more trencheth to his Successors 91 The particular prerogatives due to the King by the Common Law may be for that most part referred to one of the eight heads hereafter following notified in the outward margent by their several and respective letters as followeth 1 Divine perfection A 2 Infinitenesse B 3 Majesty C 4 Soveraignity power D 5 Perpetuity F 6 Justice G 7 Truth H 8 Omniscience I Ideot 92 Because every subject is by Law in the protection of the King Co. l. 4. 126. a. 2. in Beverleys Case who therefore is of right bound to defend his subjects persons and Estates and for as much as an Ideot is not able to governe himselfe or order his Estate The Law of England hath provided the King to be his Tutor to Govern and order both his person and Estate For the Statute of Praerogativa Regis made in the 17 of E. 2. cap. 9. was nothing else but a declaration of the Common Law c. Rent reserved 93 It is a Maxime in Law that the Rent must be reserved to him Co. Inst p. 1. 143. b. 4. from home the State of the Land moveth and not to a stranger but some do hold that it is otherwise in the Kings Case Upon a joint purchase tenement in common 94 If Lands be given to A. de B. Bishop of N. and to a secular man Co. ibid. 190. a. 4. to have and to hold to them two and to their heires In this Case they are joyntenants For each of them take the Lands in their natural capacity But if Lands be given to the King and to a subject to have and to hold to them and to their heires yet they are Tenants in Common and not Ioyntenants For the King is not seised in his natural capacity but in his Royal and Politique capacity in Jure Coronae which in respect of the Majesty of his Kings Person cannot stand in jointure with the seisin of a subject in his natural capacity And therefore if there be two joytenants and the Crowne descend to one of them the joynture is thereby severed and they are become Tenant in Common c. Grant in Mortâ—aine 95 It appeareth by Littleton § 140. Co. ibid. 99. a. 3 which my Lord Coke saith is a secret in Law that in the Kings licence to grant land to a Corporation there needs not any non obstante of the Statutes of Mortmaine for the King shall not be intended to be mis-conusant of the Law and when he licenseth expressely to alien to an Abbot c. which is in Mortmaine he needs not make any non obstante of the Statutes of Mortmaine for it is apparent to be granted in Mortmaine and the King is the head of the Law and therefore praesumitur Regem habere omnia Jura in scrinio pectoris sui for the maintenance of his grant to be good according to the Law Descent of â—etrage to Feâ—ales 96 When an Earldome or Baronie descends to one Daughter or other heire Female she shall solely enjoy both the Dignity and Lands Co. ibid. 165. a. 3. but where it descends to more heirs Females then one the Lands shall be divided as amongst other Coperceners Howbeit in that Case the dignity cannot be divided neither shall the Eldest have it as to be a Countesse Baronesse c. But in such case the King who is the Soveraigne of Honor and Dignity may for the uncertainty conferre it upon which of the Daughters he please this is to be intended when the Ancestor dies seised of Peerage in Fée-simple
he had been admitted and instituted to a Church whereof any subject had béen lawful Patron the Patron in that case had no other remedie to recover his Advowson but by a writ of right of Advowson wherein neverthelesse the Incumbent was not to be removed And so it was also at the Cōmon Law if an usurpation had béen had upon an Infant or a feme covert having an Advowson by descent or upon tenant for life c. the Infant feme covert and he in the reversion were driven to their writ of right of Advowson for at the Common Law if the Church were once full the Incumbent could not be removed And plenarty generally was a good plea in a Quare impedit or an Assize of Darrein presentment And the reason of all this was to the intent that the Incumbent might quietly intend and apply himselfe to his spiritual charge F. N. Br. 36. k. 143. a. Stat. 35. E. 3. 3. 13. R. 2. 1. 4 H. 4. 21. Howbeit at the Common Law also if any had usurped upon the King and his presentée had béen admitted instituted and inducted for without induction the Church had not béen full against the King the King might have removed him by Quare impedit and been restored to his Presentation for therein he hath a prerogative Quod nullum tempus occurit Regi neverthelesse in that case also he could not present for the pleanarty barred him of that neither could he remove him any way but by Action to the end the Church might be the more quiet in the meane time neither yet did the King recover damages in his Quare impedit at the Common Law But now the Statute of Westm 2. cap. 5. hath altered the Common Law in these cases And by that Statute the King is bound though not named 35 H. 8. 60. because it concerns the Church and Religion A Juris utrum taken against one tenant 6 Where a Juris utrum is brought against several tenants by several summons in the writ F. N. Br. 50. m. it may be taken against one tenant onely for that parcel and after against the others but it is otherwise in an Assize of Novel disseisin if it be not in some special case In a Quare Impedit a Non-suit peremptory 7 In a Quare impedit if the Plaintiff be non-suit after apparence Co. Inst pars 1 139 a. the defendant shall make title and have a writ to the Bishop and this is peremptorie to the Plaintiffe and is also a good barre in another Quare impedit and the reason of this is for that in this case the defendant in favorem Ecclesiae hath the said writ by judgement of the Court And therefore the Incumbent that cometh in by that writ upon such non-suit shall never be removed that being a flat barre as to that presentation And the same Law and for the same reason it is in case of a discontinuance c. A general accusation against a Parson or Vicar not good 8 In a Quare impedit against the Bishop it is not a good plea to alledge that the presentée is a Schismatick in general Co. l. 5. 58. b. Specots case but he ought to express Schisme in particular because it concerning the cure of souls is traversable and requireth more care and circumspection It is otherwise for the putting a Coroner out of his office for there a general suggestion in the writ that he is persona minus idonea is enough and not traversable But the reason is because this is but the keeper of the Rolles of the Crowne the other hath the cure and guard of souls Intire services remains after purchase of part by the Lord. 9 There is a diversitie concerning intire services to be reduced to the Lord as a spurre horse or the like Co. l. 6. 1. b. in Bruertons case Co. Inst pars 1. 149. a. for when they accrue to the sole benefit of the Lord and to the charge of the tenant if the Lord purchase part of the land the whole service is thereby extinct But when such intire services are reserved for works of devotion piety or charity as to marry a poor virgin yearly as you have it in 24 H. 8. Br. tenures 53 or to find a Preacher in such a Church or to provide ornaments for such a Church which tenure is in 35 H. 6. 6. In such case albeit the Lord purchase part yet the intire service remaines Protection 10 A spiritual person shall have a protection cum clausula nolumus to protect him his goods his farmers Co. Inst pars 1 131. b. and their goods from the Kings purveyors and carriages See the Stat. of 14 E. 3. Priviledge of Clergie 11 Before the Statute de articulis cleri cap. 15. Co. l. 11. 29. b. Alex. Poulters case he that confessed the felonie could not have the priviledge of Clergie because he could not make his purgation And although the Statute speakes onely of Abjuration and of an Approver yet the Iudges in favorem Ecclesiae extend it to all other confessions upon the Arraignement of the offender Tithes not extinct by unity of possession 12 If the Parson of a Church purchase a Mannor within his Parish here by this purchase and unity of possession the Mannor Dyer 43. p. 21. 30 H. 8. which was tithable before is now made non decimabilis because he cannot pay tithes to himself but if the Parson make a lease of his Parsonage and Rectorie to a stranger in this case the Parson himselfe shall pay tithes of his Mannor to the Lessée of the Rectorie or if the Parson make feofment of the Mannor the feoffée shall pay tithes to the feoffor being Parson because tithes cannot be extinct by any unity of possession as rent charge may which is issuing out of land but tithes are due by the law of God ex debito for the manurance and tillage of the occupier in whosoever hands the land comes unless it be in the hands of the Parson himselfe And therefore if the Parson let part of his Glebe land for yeares or life reserving rent the lessée shall pay the Parson tithes because they are due of common right vide Br. dismes 17. 2 Nunquam prosperè succedunt res Humanae ubi negliguntur Divinae Humane Affairs never succeed well where Divine Rites are neglected Co. Inst pars 1 246. a. 1. 1 Laches shall not prejudice an Infant in point of descent Laches shall prejudice an Infant c. but it shall be adjudged in him if he present not to a Church within six moneths for the law respecteth more the priviledge of the Church that the Cure may be served than the priviledge of Infancy F. N. Br. 160. c. d. 2 Men of Religion ought not to appeare at the Sheriffes turnes Clergy men not subject to personal charges nor the leet of any other without great cause and
right of Inheritance or Frank-tenement which is supposed originally to commence by Livery shall not be transferred or be extinct without some Ceremony as first by re-entry upon the Disseisor and then by giving Livery or by that which doth tant amount viz. by release or confirmation to him 13 H. 7. 13. 20. c. And therefore it is commonly said in our Books that accord with satisfaction is a good Plea in personal Actions where Damages onely are to be recovered but not in Real Actions Co. l. 4. 55. b. 56. a. In the Case of the Sadlers in London 29 Ass 31. Pierce Partifields case 12 In Pierce Partifields case cited in the case of the Sadlers of London in the 4 Report fol. 55. An office found for the King cannot be quasht but by petition matter of record of as high nature b. it was found by office by force of a Diem clausit extremum after the death of one that held houses of the King in London that the Tenant died without heir whereupon the King grants them to Pierce P. for life who sueth a writ to the Major to put him into possession the Major returnes that the Tenant made his Will and gave them to his wife for her life who was yet in life and seised of the said houses together with one Jo. Digle her then husband P. P. outs Digle and his wife who thereupon bring a Scire facias against P. P. who demands Iudgement of the Writ because in as much as he was but Tenant for life and the reversion was in the King they ought to sue the King which they could not do but by petition And it was adjudged by all the Justices assembled in the Chancery that the Writ should abate and that Digle and his wife should sue by petition because for as much as the Kings Title was found by inquest of office upon oath the Title of the Subject ought also to appear by Record of as high nature viz. by like inquest of office upon oath and not by return of the Major onely for albeit that return be matter of Record yet is it not of so high and great regard in the Common Law as an office found by oath Co. l. 4. 55. a The Case of the Sadlers in London 13 At the Common Law The like when the King was seised of any estate of Inheritance or Frank-tenement by any matter of Record were his Title by matter of Record judicial as attainder c. or ministerial as office or by conveyance of Record by assent as fine Déed inrolled c. or by matter in fact and found by office of Record upon oath as alienation in Mortmaine purchase by Alienée the Kings villein escheat by death without heire c. he that had right could not have any traverse whereupon he might also have an Amoveas manum but was alwayes put to his petition of right to be restored to his Frank-tenement and Inheritance Howbeit he might have his Monstrance de droit and was not forced to his petition when the King was intitled by matter in fact as Villein Mortmaine Escheat Alien c. found by office and by the same office the Title of the party did also appeare as if a Disseisor did alien in Mortmain or to an Alienée or to the Kings Villeine or did die without heire in all these cases the party grieved might have his Monstrance de droit at the Common Law And so are the Books to be understood in 9 E. 3. 51. 13 E. 4. 8. a. 4 E. 4. 21. 33 E. 3. title Travers 36. Co. ibid. 14 It was found by office that T. by the Kings Licence married the Kings Niefe The like and that certaine Lands descended to the same Niefe which the Baron had aliened without the Kings leave his wife being the Kings Niefe to another and for that cause the land was seised whereupon the Alienée comes into the Chancery and sheweth all the case as it was found by office And therefore because all the truth of the case viz. the Niefe maried by his Licence the descent to the Niefe after the Coverture c. did appeare in the Office it was awarded that the Baron for that cause should hold by the Curtesie and that the Feme by his alienation should be put to her Action and thereupon by award the Alienée had restitution The like 15 It was found by Office that I. held of the King 30 Ass Pl. 28. Co. ibid. 56. a. and that M. his daughter and heire was of full age and had Livery and by another Office it was also found that the same I. had another daughter K. which was yet within age whereupon a Scire facias went out against M. and her husband c. who said that the land was given to I. and to his first wife the Mother of M. in taile and that K. was his issue of another wife and so M. sole heire but by award of all the Iudges all the land was seised into the Kings hand because the entaile was not found by any Office but onely that M. was general heire A Noble woman by marriage made ignoble 16 If a Woman be noble as Dutchesse Countesse Baronesse Co. l. 4. 118. b 4 Acton case Co. l. 6. 53. b. 2. The Countess of Rutlands Case c. by descent although she marie under the degrée of Nobility yet her birthright remaines For that is annexed to her bloud and is Character inde lebilis But if a Woman attaine Nobility by mariage viz. of a Duke Earle Baron c. and after the death of her first husband take another under the degrée of Nobility by this last mariage with one that is ignoble she hath lost the dignity unto which she attained by her first marying one of the Nobility for eodem modo quo quicquid constituitur dissolvitur And Quando mulier nobilis nupserit ignobili desinit esse nobilis Ecclesiastical Law founded by the Common Law 17 If it be demanded what Canons Constitutions Co. l. 5. Part 1. 32. b. The case of the Kings Ecclesiastical Law Ordinances and Synodals provincial are still in force within this Realme the answer is that it is resolved and enacted by authority of Parliament That such of them as have béen allowed by general consent and custome within the Realme and are not contrariant or repugnant to the Lawes Statutes and Customes of the Realme nor to the damage or hurt of the Kings Prerogative Royal are still in force within this Realme as the Kings Ecclesiasticall Lawes of the fame Now therefore as consent and custome hath allowed those Canons c. So no doubt by the general consent of the whole Realme any of the same may be corrected inlarged explained or abrogated Writing annulled by writing 18 Although Indentures being made for the declaring of the uses of a subsequent Fine Co. l. 5. 26. a. The Earle of Rutlands
and the same law be parcel of the lawes of England as well as of all other Nations and is immutable and that post-nati we of England are united by birth-right in obedience and ligeance which is the true cause of natural subjection by the law of Nature It cleerly followed that Calvin the Plaintiffe in that cause being borne under one ligeance to one and the same King could not be an alien borne And there is great reason as it was then alledged that the law of Nature should direct that Case wherein five natural operations were remarkable 1 The King had the Crowne of England by birth-right being naturally procreated of the bloud Royal of this Realme Secondly Calvin the Plaintiffe was naturalized by procreation and birth-right since the descent of the Crowne of England Thirdly Ligeance and obedience of the subject to the Soveraigne due by the Law of Nature Fourthly Protection and government also due by the Law of Nature Fiftly It was presently said that this Case of Calvin in the opinion of divers was more doubtfull in the beginning but the farther it procéeded the cleerer and stronger it grew and therefore that the doubt did arise from some violent passion and not from any reason grounded upon the Law of Nature quia quantò violentus motus qui sit contra naturam appropinquat ad suum finem tantò debiliores tardiores sunt ejus motus sed naturalis motus quantò magis appropinquat ad suum finem tanto fortiores velociores sunt ejus motus And for as much as in case of an alien Borne you must of necessitie have two federal ligeances to two several persons but in this Case one person alone is head of both and the post-nati and we now joyned in ligeance so that one head which was copula tanquam oculus of that Case And ligeance of the subjects of both Kingdomes being due to their Soveraigne by one and the same Law viz. by the Law of Nature the post-nati cannot be aliens of either Kingdome but ad invicem naturalized subjects of both for Non adversatur diversitas regnorum sed regnantium non patriarum sed patrum patriarum non coronarum sed coronatorum non legum municipalium sed Regum Majestatum c. Mother guardian 1◠If the Grand-father hath issue a Sonne F. N. B. 1◠and the Sonne take Wife and hath issue and die the Mother of the issue shall have the Wardship of the issue which is her owne Sonne and not the Grand-father Albeit the issue may have the Land which ought to descend unto him from the Grand-father that the Mother shall not have it c. No champerty in the Sonne 13 The Statute of Articuli sup cartas cap. 11. provides Pl. Co. 88. b. 3. Partriges case that no Minister or other whatsoever to have part of the things which are in Plea shall undertake businesses which are so in plea yet if the Tenant hanging a percipe quod reddat against him enfeoffe his Sonne and heire apparent this shall be out of the danger of that Statute as it is taken in 6 E. 3. 274. in a writ of Champertie see it also in Fitz. Champertie 10. and the reason of this is for that the Sonne cannot be said a Maintainer of the Father because he is bound to aide and assist his Father when and as often as he may being enjoyned so to do by the Law of nature c. The Son may a bet his mother 14 By the Statute of West 2. cap. 12. it is ordained Pl. Co. ibid. that in an appeale it shall be inquired who were the Abettors and that they shall render damages to the partie acquit Neverthelesse if the heire abet his Mother to bring the appeale although it is within the words of that Statute yet shall he be out of the danger of it And so Herle tooke it in 6 E. 3. 274. For Common Law and reason say that he ought to be aiding to his Mother and may also abet her Considerations to raise uses 15 Affection for the provision of heires male that one shall engender Finch 25. Co. Inst p. 1. 21. b. 1. Brotherly love c. are good consideration to raise an use But long Acquaintance and familiarity are not Howbeit consideration of Mariage is more favoured in Law then any other Maintenance 16 The Sonne may maintaine his Father and one Brother another c. Finch ibid. 17 Brothers or Cofins shall not wage Battel in a writ of right Finch ibid. c. The Wife may relieve her Husband 18 A Statute Finch ibid. that maketh it Felonie to receive or give meat and drink to one that committeth such or such an offence the partie so receiving or giving having knowledge thereof stretched not to a Woman that receiveth or giveth meat and drink to her Husband in such a Case c. Privitie in Bloud strongest 19 You shall finde three manner of Privities spoken of in the Law Co. l. 8. 42. b. 4. 44. a. 4. in Whittinghams Case viz. Privitie in Bloud Privitie in Estate and Privitie in Law Privite in Bloud is that between the Ancestor the Heire Privitie in Estate as between Iointenants Baron and Feme Donor and Donée Lessor and Lessée c. Privies in Law are as when the Law without Bloud or Privitie of Estate casts the Land upon one and makes his entry Congeable as the Lord by escheate the Lord that enters for Mortmaine Lord of a Villein c. Now of these three sorts of privities onely the first which is by bloud and therefore most natural shall take advantage of Infancie Coverture non sanae memoriae c. and not the other two And therefore if an Infant Tenant in Fée-simple make a Feoffement and die his Heire shall enter There is the same Law also of heires special and of heires general and special unto whom the right of entry descends per formam doni or by the Custome as all Lands in Gavelkind Borough-English c. It is otherwise of privies in Estate and in Law And therefore if the Donée in tale within age make feoffment in Fée and die without issue the Donor shall not enter Because there was onely privitie in Estate betwée them and no right accrued to the Donor by the death of the Donée So if there be two Iointenants in Fée within age and the one makes Feoffment in Fée of his moitie and dies the sur-vivor cannot enter by reason the Infancie of his Companion Because by his Feoffment the joyntenure was severed so long as the Feoffment remaines in force and therefore in such Case the Heire of the Feoffor shall have a dum fuit infra aetatem or shall enter into the moitie In like manner Privies in Law as the Lord by escheate c. shall never take advantage of the Privitie of Infancie because they are strangers to it And in that
and Talbois Case because he did not in answering that suit take such advantages as the Law allowes in such Cases as vieu essoine and the like but immediately appeares and suffers the Demandant to recover by nihil dicit For the Law presumes unlesse there be covin or other neglect or restraint which cannot be avoided that the party interessed will take all advantages that the Law allowes to make good his owne cause which advantages are the birth-right of the subject as Lands or other Inheritance and when they are waved or neglected the Law implies covin or some other miscarriage Co. Inst p. 1. 46. a. 4. 34 The King grants lands to A. in taile Tenant in â—aâ— Lease Primer seisâ— to hold by Knight-service A. makes a lease to B. for 31 yeares reserving rent A. dies his son and heire of full age and all this if found by Office now here as to the King this lease is not of force for he shall have his primer seisin as of land in possession but after livery the Lessée may enter and then if the issue in taile accept the Rent the leafe shall bind him for the Kings primer seisin shall not take away the Election of the issue in taile because it may be the Rent was better then the land and so the Law will presume that his acceptance tended to his advantage and therefore he shall be bound thereby Co. ib. 46. b. 1. and Pl. 437. a In like manner Tenant in taile makes lease a for 40 years reserving a Rent to begin 10 years after Feofment Tenant in taile dies the issue enters and enfeoffes A. the ten yeares expire the lessée enters now in this Case also if A. accept the Rent the lease is good for he shall have the same Election that the issue in taile had either to make it good or to avoid it But because the lessée accepts the Rent the Law presumes it was for his advantage so to do and therefore thereupon adjudged the lease still good notwithstanding such entry of the heire before it commenced Litt. §. 559. 35 If there be Lord and Tenant and the Tenant take Feme Acceptance good attornment and after the Lord grants the services to the Feme and her heirs and the Baron accept the Déed In this Case after the death of the Baron the Feme and her heirs shall have the services for the acceptance of the déed by the Baron is good attornment albeit the services are in suspence during the coverture Litt. §. 573. So likewise if a man let land to another for term of life and after confirmes by his déed the Estate of the Tenant for life the remainder to another in fée and the Tenant for life accepts the déed this is a good attornment in law to make the Estate in remainder good Co. l. 3. 86. b. 2. in the Case of Fines 36 Every fine levied shall be intended to be levied with proclamations according to the Statutes in that behalfe provided Fines because that is most beneficial for the Conusée Dier 244. 59. 8 Eliz. 37 There were four Defendants in an Assise or plaint of thrée Messuages Assise thrée of them severally undertake the Tenancy of the several Messuages and plead several barres and to the residue Nul tort the fourth takes upon the intire tenancy of all without that c. and pleads also barre at large In this Case the Plaintiffe at his peril is to choose his Tenant because the law presumes that he will do it for his best advantage 117 And therefore the Law believeth against the party whatsoever is to his prejudice Co. Inst p 1. 52. a. 4. 1 If one as Procurator or Attorney to another present to his owne benefice he puts himselfe out of possession Present Benefice because it is his owne act and the presentée comes in by the institution an induction of the Ordinary Co. ib. 55. b. 3. 2 If Lessée at will or for life sow the land Tenant for life or wil Grant Sowet and the lessor determines his Will or dies before the graine is ripe yet the lessée shall have it because in either of the said Cases the end of the term is uncertaine either upon the Will or death of the lessor which cannot come within the lessées power to prevent but if lessée for yeares who may know the end of the term sow the land she shall not have the graine Litt. §. 68. Co. ib. 56. a. 4. because his term is certain And therefore the Law will attribute the sowing of the land to his owne folly So if lessée at will sow the ground with Corne c. and after he himselfe determines his will and refuseth to occupie the ground In that Case the lessor shall have the grain for otherwise the lessor should lose his Rent and the lessée hath determined it by his own act In like manner if a woman that holdeth land durante viduitate low the ground and taketh husband the lessor shall have the emblements because the determination of her Estate grew by her own act So likewise where the Estate of the lessée being uncertaine is defeasible by a right paramount or if the lease determine by the act of the lessée as by forfeiture condition c. there he that hath the right paramount or that entreth for any forfeiture c. shall have the Corne causa qua supra â— and Teâ—â—â—dship â—ease 3 If there be Lord and Tenant by Knight-service Co. ib. 83. b. â— and the Tenant dieth his heire being within age the Lord waiveth his wardship as he may and taketh himselfe to his Seigniory In this Case the Lord shall not have reliefe at his full age because he might have had the wardship of the body and land if he had not neglected his time 〈◊〉 emptor 4 By the Civil law every man is bound to warrant the King Co. ib. 102. a. â— that he selleth or conveyeth albeit there be no expresse warranty but the Common Law bindeth him not unlesse there be a warranty in déed or in Law for the Common Law believeth against the party things done to his prejudice and therefore in such Case Caveat Emptor â—â—nage by â—â—ssion 5 If a man being brought into a Court of Record by course of Law will there acknowledge himselfe to be a Villein albeit he was not a Villein before he shall be for ever after a Villein in grosse Littl. §. 185. Co. Inst p. 1. 122. b. 2. and therefore if a praecipe be brought against one he may confesse himselfe Villein to a stranger and that he holds the land in Villeinage of him and this is good and shall bind him and if in that Case the Demandant replie that the Tenant the day of his writ purchased was a Frée-man and thereupon issue is taken and he is tried to be frée yet he shall remain
ought not for any such writ to have ceased to serve the Exigi facias without commandment from the same Court out of which it issued and thereupon the Sheriffe was amercied Dyer 170. 1 2 Eliz. and another Exigi facias issued out Nor by the Escheator The Escheator also ought not to desist from the execution of his office notwithstanding any such command to the contrarie from the King And therefore we find in 1 Eliz. That after the death of the Lord Powes a Mandamus being directed to the Escheastor of Salop to find the office he takes the presentment of the Iury in p per and adjournes them over to another day to take it in Parchment and by Indenture before which day the Quéen sends a Supersedeas at the suit of one Herbert and his wife And it was adjudged that the Escheator ought not to have obeyed that Supersedeas 7 The Law disfavoureth an excomunicate person Excommunication Jury 1 It is a good plea in abatement of a writ to say Litt. § 201. Co. Inst pars 1 133. b. Co. ibid. 158. a. that the Plaintiffe is excommunicate Doct. Stud. l. 1. cap. 6. 2 The old Bookes have said that if a man be excommunicate he ought not to serve of a Iurie Jews 3 A Iew born in England took wife a Iew borne also in England Co. ibid. 31. b. Rot. Parl. 26 E. 1. Rot. 1. the husband was converted to the Christian faith purchased lands and enfeoffed another and died the wife brought a writ of Dower but was barred thereof and the reason yeelded in the record is this Quia verò contra justitiam est quod ipsa dotem petat vel habeat de tenemento quod fuit viri sui ex quo in conversione sua noluit cum eo adhaerere cum eo converti c. 4 Infidels are accounted in Law to be perpetui inimici Infiels with whom a Christian ought to have no peace but perpetual enmitie and hostilitie according to that of the Apostle 2 Cor. 6.15 Quae autem concordia Christo cum Belial Co. l. 7. 17. a. b. in Calvins case aut quae portio fideli cum infideli And the Law saith Judaeo Christianum nullum serviat mancipium nefas enim est quem Christus redemit Blasphemum Christi in servitutis vinculis detinere Regist 282. Infideles sunt Christi Christianorum inimici and herewith agréeth the book in 12 H. 8. fol. 4. where it is holden that a Pagan cannot have or maintaine any action at all and upon this ground there is a diversitie betwéene the Conquest of a Country of a Christian Prince and the Conquest of a Country of an Infidel The power of a Conquerour for if a Prince obtaine a Christian Country by Conquest seeing that he hath vitae necis potestatem he may at his pleasure alter and change the Lawes of that Nation but untill he do make an alteration the ancient Lawes thereof shall remain Howbeit if a Christian Prince should conquer a Country of an Infidel and bring them under subjection there ipso facto the Lawes of the Infidel are abrogated for they be not onely against Christianitie but against the Law of God and nature contained in the Decalogue And in that case untill certaine Lawes be established amongst them the Prince by himselfe or such Iudges as he shall appoint shall judge them and their causes according to natural equity and original Iustice in such sort as Kings in ancient time did within their Kingdomes before any certaine municipal Lawes were established But where a Prince hath the Government of a Nation by descent seeing that by the Lawes of the Nation he doth inherit that Authority he cannot change the Lawes thereof without the consent of the People assembled in Parliament II Maximes of Reason taken from GRAMMAR 8 The Rules from Grammar are infinite in the Etymologie of words and in the Construction of them what their nature is single what joyned with others c. A Lease with condition to take the profits 1 IF a man make a Lease for yeares reserving a rent with a condition Co. Inst pars 1 203. a. that if the rent be behind the Lessor shall re-enter and take the profits untill thereof he be satisfied in this case the profits shall be accompted as parcel of the satisfaction and during the time that he so taketh the profits he shall not have an action of debt for the rent for the satisfaction whereof he so taketh the profits but if the condition be that he shall take the profits untill he be satisfyed and paid of the rent without saying thereof or to the like effect there the profits shall be accompted no part of the satisfaction but onely to hasten the Lessee to pay it and untill he be satisfied he shall take the profits to his owne use Commencement of a Lease 2 If a lease be made Habendum sibi à die confectionis Col. l. 5. 94. a. in Barwicks Case the day of the making is excluded for a vel ab is dictio significativa primi termini à quo sicut dictio usque termini ad quem a vel ab accipitur excl sivè Vide infra 1â— Max. 34. 2. Possession derived 3 Possessio is derived à Pos and sedeo Co. l. 6. 57. b. in Bredimans Case because he that is in possession may sit down in repose and quiet so also seisina is derived à sedendo for untill he hath seisin all is Labor Dolor vexatio spiritus but when he hath seisin he may sit down and rest Howbeit Quaere whether or no possessio be derived of Post and sedeo because he that hath possession sits downe last and seisina seemes to be derived of the French word seiser which signifies to lay hold on Tempus semesâ—â—e 4 Tempus semestre being spoken in the singular number as appears in the Dictionaries signifieth half a year or six moneths Co. l. 6. 62. a. in Catesbies Case viz. such six moneths qui conficiunt dimidium anni there is a great diversitie in our coÌ„mon spéech between a Twelve-moneth being the singular number wch includes a whole yeare according to the Kalender and twelve moneths in the plural number which shall be computed according to 28 dayes for every moneth Vide 31. 13. Co. l. 8 85. b. in Sir Richard Pexhals Case 5 A. deviseth to B. 100 Shéep and ten Bullocks Devise and 10 l. issuing and payable yearely out of his lands here the last and disjoynes the rent from the Shéep and Bullockes It is otherwise if he had devised them thus 100 Shéep ten Bullockes and 10 l. yearely for then the and connexeth them all together and then they are all to be paid yearely out of the lands Co. l. 10. 133. a Osborns Case 6 Words which passe under the name of Latin are of four
it till the debt be satisfied and therefore the discharge of the debt which is the cause dischargeth the execution which is the effect Co. ibid. 76. b. 3 6 If the tenant makes a feofment in fée of lands holden by Knights-service to the use of the feoffee and his heires The town performed the Wardship ceaseth untill the feoffor pay unto the feoffée or his heires an hundred pounds at a time and place limited The feoffée dieth his heire within age the Lord shall have the wardship of the body and lands of the heire of the feoffee but it shall be conditionally for he cannot have a more absolute interest in the wardship than the heire hath in the tenancie Therefore if the feoffor pay the money at the day and place and entreth into the land in this case the wardship both of the body and lands is divested because the Lord hath no absolute interest in either of them but that interest which he hath doth depend upon the performance or not performance of the condition Littl. § 103. Co. ibid. 78. b. 4 7 Littleton tells us that by the Statute of West 1. cap. 22. The Wardship of the body severed from the Land cannot have the benefit of the two years after 14. If an heire female be within the age of 14 yeares and not married at the time of the death of her ancestor then the Lord shall have the ward of the land holden of him untill her age of 16 yeares to the end within those two last years he may tender her convenient marriage yet in this case if the Lord before the age of 14 granteth over the wardship of the bodie the grantee thereof cannot enjoy the benefit of the two yeares because he cannot hold the land over and the Lord which hath the wardship of the land onely shall also lose the benefit of the two yeares because he hath the lands onely and cannot tender any mariage Therefore in this case the heire female shall enter into her land at her age of 14 yeares So if a tenant holdeth of one Lord by prioritie and of another by posteriority and dieth his heire female within the age of 14 years the Lord by posteriority shall have the lands but until her age of 14 yeares because the mariage belongeth not to him Also if the Lord marieth the heire female within the two yeares her husband and she shall presently after the mariage enter into the lands For cessante causa cessat effectus cessante ratione legis cessat beneficium legis Co. ibid. 102. b. 3. 202. b. 1. Co. ibid. 103. a. 3. Littl. Sect. 147. 8 Where there is Homage Ancestrel betwixt an Abbot and Covent and their tenant If that body be once dissolved Homage ancestrel after alienation gone though a new be founded of the same name and all the possessions be granted to them yet the Homage Ancestrel is gone So it is likewise if a man in his natural capacity holds by Homage Ancestrel and sells the land to another although he repurchase the land again yet is the Homage Ancestrel dissolved Co. ibid. 104. a. 4. 9 If Homage be due to be done by the tenant The Land being aliened the Homage is gone if the tenant alien the land to another the Alienor cannot be compelled to do Homage The delay being pardoned the amerciament is also gone 10 The cause of an amerciament in a plea real Co. Inst pars 1. 126. b. 4. a Plowd 401. Coles case 37 H. 6 21. Co. l. 5. 49. Vaughans Case personal or mixt where the King is to have no fine is for that the tenant or defendant ought to render the demand as he is commanded by the Kings writ the first day which if he do he shall not be amerced so that for the delay that the tenant or defendant doth use he shall be amerced And albeit the amerciament cannot be imposed nor the King fully intitled thereunto untill judgement be given because by the judgement the wrong is discerned yet a pardon before judgment shall after Iudgment given discharge the partie because the original cause viz. the delay c. is pardoned A wife after coverture a Niefe again 11 If a Niefe marry a frée-man Co. Inst pars 1 136. b. 2. 137. b. 3. she is priviledged during the coverture but not absolutely enfranchised for if her husband die she is a Niefe again No Juror after his land gone 12 If a Iuror after his returne selleth away his land or if he Co. ibid. 157. a. 1. 2. 272. b. 2. for whose life or his wife in whose right he holdeth it die or if an entry be made upon his land for a condition broken so as his frée-hold is determined in any of these cases he may be challenged for insufficiency of frée-hold for when his land is gone his feare to offend to have his lands wasted and the like c. which is one of the reasons of Law is also taken away No damage fesant out of the soil 13 If a man come to distrain for Damage fesant Co. ibid. 161. a. 3. Co. l. 9. 22. b. 4. Case of Avowrie Co. ibid. 164. a. 3. and sée the beasts in his soile and the owner chase them out on purpose before the distresse taken the owner of the soile cannot then distraine them and if he doth the owner of the cattle may rescue them for the beasts must be damage fesant at the time of the distresse Where coparceners shall join and relieve not 14 If one coparcener die her part shall descend to her issue and one praecipe shall lie against them and this is propter unitatem juris derived from one common Ancestor so if a man hath issue two daughters and is disseised and the daughters have issue and die the issues shall joyn in a praecipe likewise the issues of two coparceners which are in by several descents being disseised shall joyne in an Assise Howbeit in the same case if the two daughters had béen actually seised and had béen disseised after their deceases the issues shall not joyn because as to that purpose the unitas juris is severed for now several rights descended to them from several Ancestors and yet when they have severally recovered they are coparceners againe and one praecipe lyeth against them and release made by one of them to the other is good Frankmariage Hotchpot 15 If lands given in frank-mariage be impleaded Co. ibid. 177. b. 2. the tenant shall not have ayde against the other parcener but if she put the land into Hotchpot she shall have it for then the lands are become as other lands which descended from the common Ancestor Prescription or Custome extinct by interruption 16 If tenant by homage ancestrel maketh a feofment in fée upon Condition and entreth for the Condition broken Co. ibid. 202. b. 1. it shall be never holden by
County where he is Iustice Power lost and he takes him in the other County In this case he is his prisoner in the County where he takes him and ought there to be imprisoned and he cannot send or convey him to the Gaol of the County where he committed the felony for he is not his prisoner there and being out of his proper County his authority ceaseth as to that other County So if the Marshal hold plea of a thing done out of the verge or the Admiral of a thing done in the body of the County it shall be void for their authority extends to a certaine place and within a certain precinct and not elsewhere and if he which takes Sanctuary goes out any man may take him because he hath lost his priviledge Plowd 72. b. Sir Thomas Popes case 54 If the Conisée of a Recognisance according to the Statute of 23 H. 8. cap. 6 sell several parts of his lands to several feoffées No discharge by the Conusees purchase of part reserving also part thereof to himselfe if execution be sued against his part in an Audita quaerela he shall not compel any of the feoffées to contribute And therefore by the same reason the purchase of part by the Conisée shall not discharge the execution for the execution of the Conisée shall be discharged in consideration that he shall be contributory if he were Feoffée and not Conisée and then in as much as he shall not be contributory if he were Feoffée and not Conisee his purchase of part shall not discharge the execution being Conisée quià cessante causa c. Co. Inst pars 1 70. b. 3. 55 If the King had given lands to an Abbot and his successors to hold by Knight-service this had béen good Lands held by Corporations in Knights Service and the Abbot should have done homage and found a man c. or have paid escuage But there was no wardship or reliefe or other incident belonging thereunto yet if the Abbot with the assent of his covent had conveyed the land to a natural man and his heirs now wardship and reliefe and other incidents belonged of common right to the tenure And so it is if the King give lands to a Major and Communalty and their successors to be holden by Knight-service In this case the Patentées shall do no homage neither shall there be any wardship or reliefe onely they shall find a man c. or pay escuage But if they convey over their lands to any natural man and his heires now homage ward mariage reliefe and other incidents belong thereunto quià cessante ratione legis cessat ipsa lex Lord and Villain 56 If villanage be pleaded by the Lord in an action Real Co. ibid. 127. b. 4. 18 E. 4. 6. 7. personal or mixt and it is found that he is no villaine the bringing of a writ of errour is no enfranchisement because thereby he is to defeat the former judgement and if in the mean time the plaintiffe or demandant bring an action against the Lord he néed make no protestation so long as the record remaines in force for at that time he is frée but the Lord shall be restored to all by the writ of errour Waste 57 If lands be given to two and to the heires of one of them Co. ibid 247. b. 3. he that hath the fée simple shall not have an action of wast upon the Statute of Glocester against the Ioyntenant for life but his heir shall maintaine an action of waste against him upon that Statute So that in this case the heir shall maintaine that action which the Ancestor could not Dower 58 If the husband alien his land Co. Inst pars 1 33. a. 4. and then the wife is attainted of felony now is she disabled but if she be pardoned before the death of the husband she shall be endowed Also if the sonne endow his wife at her age of 7 yeares ex assensu patris if she before the death of her husband attaine to the age of nine yeares the dower is good Office and Rent 59 The King granteth to one an office at will Finch 8. Co. ibid. 42. a. 4 3 E. 4. 8. and ten pounds yearly rent during life pro officio illo here if the King put him out of his office the rent shall cease 21. 4. Guardian in Soccage 60 The executor or husband after the death of the wife guardian in Soccage shall not retain the wardship 7 El. 293. b. Finch 9. Co. Inst pars 1 89. a. 1. for the guardian hath it not to his owne use but for the benefit of the heire and the executor or husband by common intendment beare not such affection to the Infant as the testator or his wife did which was the cause that the law gave them the wardship A Pardon 61 If a stroke be given the first day of May 13 El. 401. Finch 9. and the King pardon him the second day of May all felonies and misdemeanors the party smitten dieth the third day of May so as this is no felony till after the pardon yet is the felony pardoned for the misdemeanors being pardoned all things pursuing it are also pardoned Livery 62 The King hath a Ward pur cause de gard 13 E. 4 10. b. Finch 9. and after maketh Livery to the first Ward the second Ward shall not sue Livery Coparceners 63 If two coparceners make a lease reserving a rent Finch 9. they shall have this rent in common as they have the reversion But if afterwards they grant the reversion excepting the rent they shall be from thenceforth Ioyntenants of the rent Challenge 64 It is no principal Challenge to a juror 14 H. 7. 2. Finch 9. that he hath married the parties mother if she be dead without issue for the cause of favour is removed Entry 65 If an Infant tenant in taile make a feofment in fée and die Co. Inst pars 1 337. a. 2. his issue may enter but if after the feofment made he be attainted of felony and dieth the entry of the issue is taken away for his entry is not lawful in respect of his estate onely but of his bloud also which is corrupted Formedon and therefore in that case he is driven to his Formedon Villain 66 Si mulier serva copulata fit libero c. partus habebit haereditatem Bract. lib. 4. fol. 298. b. Idem l. 1. c. 6. mater nullam dotem quià mortuo viro suo libero redit in pristinum statum servitutis nisi haeres ei dotem fecerit de gratia Co. Inst Pl. 1. 123. a. 2. Co. Inst pars 1 174. a. 4. 67 If one coparcener maketh feoffment in fée Coparceners and after her feoffée is impleaded and voucheth the feoffor she may have aide of her Coparcener to deraign a warranty
alive he should have gone quit by the acquittal of A. because he could not be a Receiver of a felon when A. was no felon And remoto impedimento c. Vide plus ubi supra 21 Things are construed according to that which was the cause thereof Vide 31. 9. Tenant by courtesie 1 If the King give lands to a man and a woman and to the heires of their two bodies and the woman die without issue Co. Inst pars 1 21. b. 4. 9 H. 3. Dower 202. yet shall the man be tenant in taile after possibility c. But if the King give land with a woman of his kindred in frank-mariage and the woman die without issue the man in the Kings case shall not hold it for his life because the woman was the only cause of the gift but otherwise it is in the case of a common person Frankmariage 2 If lands be given to a man and a woman in special taile Co. ibid. 7 H. 4. 16. a. and they are divorced Causa praecontractus both shall hold the lands for their lives a 13 E. 3. Tit. Ass 19 E 3. Ass 83. 12. Ass 22. 19 Ass 2. But in case of frankmariage if they be so divorced the woman shall enjoy the whole land because she was the cause of the gift So if lands holden in c Plowd Carzibs case soccage be given in special tail and the Donées die the issue being within the age of 14 yeares e 17 H. 3. Gard. 146. 27 E. 3. 29. Co. ibid. 29. b. 3 Co. ibid. 42. a. 4 the next of kinne of the part of the father or of the part of the mother which can hap the custodie shall have it but in case of frank-mariage the heire of the part of the mother shall have it because she was the cause of the gift as aforesaid Co. ibidem 88. a. 4. Formedon 3 If a woman tenant in general tail maketh a feoffment in fée and taketh backe an estate in fée and take an husband and hath issue and dieth the issue may in a Formedon recover the land against the father because he is to recover by force of the estate taile as heire to his mother and is not in that case inheritable to his father the estate tail being the cause and ground of his title An Office 4 A man may have an estate for life determinable at will 3 E. 4. 8. b. as if the King doth grant an office to one at will and also grant a rent to him for the exercise of his office for terme of life this is determinable upon the determination of the office which occasioned the grant of the rent 19. 59. Co. ibid. 85. a. 2 5 If a man make a Lease for yeares of a villeine this cannot be done without déed neither can the Lessée assigne it over without déed Grant of a Villain by deed because it is derived out of a fréehold that lyeth in grant which indéed is the material cause of the grant but a wardship is an original chattel during the minority derived out of no fréehold and therefore as the Law createth without déed so may it also be assigned over without déed Co. ibi 102. a 4 9 E. 2. execut 249. 6 Vpon a judgement in debt Judgement execution the Plaintiffe shall not have execution but onely of that land which the defendant had at the time of the judgement because the action was brought in respect of the person and not in respect of the land But if an action of debt be brought against the heire and he alieneth hanging the writ yet shall the land which he had at the time of the Original purchased be charged for that the action was brought against the heire in respect of the land Co. bid 102. b. 1. 22 Ass Pl. 32. 7 If a man be nonsuit the land onely Amerciament Issues of Jurors which he had at the time of the amerciament assessed shall be charged and not that which he had at the finding of the pledges for the amerciament is not in respect of the land but for his want of prosecution which was a default in his person But the issues of a Iuror shall be levied upon the feoffee albeit they were not lost before the feoffment because he was returned and sworn in respect of the land 8 A tenure of the King in Capite Tenure in gross is said to be a tenure of the King a Bract. f. 87 as of his Crown that is as he is King c Co. ibid. 108 a. 4. ubi Vide praedict Author And therefâ—râ— if one holdeth land of a common person in grosse as of his person and not of any Mannor c. and this Seigniory escheateth to the King yea though it be by attainder of treason he holdeth of the pâ—rson of the King but not in Capite because the original tenure was not created by the King Vide infra M. 25. ca. 10. Co. ibid. 158. a. 3. 15 H. 7. 9. 14 H. 7. 31. 18 E. 4. 3. 9 If the cause of challenge alleaged by the Plaintiff against the Sheriff be pâ—rtiality to either party Challenge and processe be once awarded for such partiality though there be a new Sheriff yet processe shall never be awarded to him but to the Coroners and therefore in that case the entry is Ita quòd Vicecomes se non intromittat But if the cause of Challenge be for that the Sheriff was tenant to either party or the like in that case the processe shall be directed to the new Sheriff and not to the Coroners Co. ibid. 161. a. 2. 44 E. 3. 20. 6 R. 2. Refc 11 11 H. 7. 4. 21 H 7. 40. 34 H. 6. 18. 16 E. 4. 10. Co. l. 9. fol. 22. Case of Avowry Co. ibid. 169. b. 2. 15 H. 7. 14. 29 Ass 23. 29 E. 3. 9. b. 10 If the Lord come to distreine cattle Distress which he séeth then within his fée and the tenant or any other to prevent the Lord to distreine driâ—es the cattle out of the Lords fée into some other pâ—ace not within his fée yet may the Lord freshly follow and distreine the cattle and the tenant cannot make rescous But if the Lord comming to distreine had no view of the cattle within his fée though the â—enant drive them off purposely or if the câ—ttle of themselâ—es after the view goe out of the fée or if the tenant after the view remove them for any other cause then to prevent the Lord of his distresse then cannot the Lord distrein them out of his fée and if he doth the tenant may make rescous 11 If there be thrée Coparceners and they make partition Rent in Coparcenary and one of them grant 20 s. per annum out of her part to her two sisters and their heires for egaltie of partition the grantées are not joynt-tenants of this rent but
default yet may the tenant give evidence and the Recognitors of the Assize may find for the tenant And therefore in these or the like cases the tenant or defendant non amittit per defaltum as the Statute and Littleton speak and they cite F.N.B. in the point Littl. Sect 674 675. West 2. c. 4. Fitz. 155. e. Neverthelesse others do hold the contrary because albeit in the writ of wast judgement is not given only upon the default yet the default is the principal and the cause of awarding the writ to enquire of the wast as an incident thereunto and the Law alwayes hath respect to the first and principal cause of a thing from whence it takes the first rise and being Co. ibid 364. a. 4. 10 H. 6. 10. 31 H. 6. Entry congeable 54. 22 Where Ioyn-tenants or Coparceners have one and the same remedie if the one enter the other shall enter also Joyn-tenants and tenants a common but where the remedies be several there it is otherwise As if two Ioyn-tenants or Coparceners joyne in a real action where their entry is not lawfull and the one is summoned and severed and the other pursueth and recovereth the moity the other Ioyn-tenant or Coparcener shall enter and take the profits with her because their remedie was one and the same But where two Coparceners be and they are disseised and a descent is cast and they have issue and die if the issue of the one recover her moity the other shall not enter with her because their remedies were several and yet when both have recovered they are Coparceners againe So if two Ioyn-tenants seised of lands the one of full age the other under age be disseised c. And the disseisor die seised and his issue enter the oâ—e of the Ioyn-tenants being still under age And after that he comes to full age the heir of the disseisor lets the lands to the same Ioyn-tenants for their two lives This is a remittor of the moity to him within age because his entry was congeable but the other Ioyn-tenant hath but an estate for life in the other moiâ—y by force of the Lease because his entry was taken away Lit. l. § 656. c. as you shall find it in Littleton Sect. 696. If A. and B. Ioyn-tenants in fée be disseised by the father of A. who dieth seised his sonne and heire entreth he is remitted to the whole and his companion shall take advantage thereof Otherwise here in the case of Littl. for that the advantage is given to the infant more in respect of his person than of his right whereof his Companion shall take no advantage But if the Grand-father had disseised the Ioyn-tenants and the land had descended to the father and from him to A. and then A. had died the entry of the other would have béen taken away by the first descent and therefore he should not have entred with the heir of A. c. Warranty that begins by disseisin 23 If A. de B. be seised of an house Littl. § 368. and F. de G. enter into the same house clayming it to him and his heires and make a feofment thereof with warranty to certaine Barrettors in the Country to be maintained by them by reason whereof A. de B. dare not stay in the house but goes out This is warranty that beginnes by disseisin because that feofment was the cause why A. de B. left the possession of the same house Tenant in tail the reversion in the King 24 If a subject make a gift in tail Co. ibid. 372. b. 3. the remainder to the King in fée Albeit the words of the Statute of 34 H. 8. cap. 20. be whereof the reversion or remainder at the time of such recovery had shall be in the King c. yet séeing the estate taile was not originlly created by the King the estate taile may be barred by a Common recovery So likewise if Prince H. sonne of H. 7. had made a gift in taile the remainder to H. 7. in fée which remainder by the death of H. 7. had descended to H. 8. So as he had the remainder by descent yet in this case also a Common recovery would have barred the estate taile No fine before admitance 25 Popham Chief Justice said that it was adjudged in Sands his case Co. l. 4 28. a. 3. Copihold cases Hubbert and Hamons case that no fine was due to the Lord either upon surrender or descent untill admittance For the admittance is the cause of the fine and if after the tenant denie to pay it that is a forfeiture And so it was also resolved by Wray and Periam in a case betwixt Sir Nich. Bacon and Flatman The cause must be shewed why the Bishop refuseth to admit 26 If a Clerke be presented to a Bishop to be admitted to a Benefice and he refuseth him in pretence of insufficiency or other defect Co. l. 5. 58. a. â— Specots case In a Quare impedit the Bishop ought to alleadge some particular crime or cause why he did not admit him and not generally quòd non est idoneus quod est criminosus schismaticus inveteratus or the like For although it belongs not to the Kings Court to determine schismes or heresies yet the original cause of the suit being matter whereof the Kings Court hath conusance the cause of the schisme or heresie for which the presentée is refused ought to be alleadged in certaine to the intent that the Kings Court may consult with Divines to know whether it be schisme or no and if the party be dead may thereupon direct the Iury which is to try it Felons goods for flying cannot be forfeited by prescription 27 If a man flie for felony his owne goods are not forfeited Co. ibid. 109. b. 1. Foxlâ—yes case untill it be found by the indictment before the Coroner in case of death or otherwise lawfully found upon record that the felony was the cause of his flight For if the goods of any shall be forfeited onely by reason of this flying without more then a man may have such goods so forfeited by prescription as he may have waifs estrayes treasure trowe c. but in as much as bona fugitivorum are not forfeited untill the flight be lawfully proved upon record and because things forfeited by matter of record cannot be claymed by prescription which is a matter in suit for this cause they cannot be claymed by prescription 28 Deodands are the goods which caused the death of the party killed by misfortune Co. ibid. 110. b. 4. and are not forfeit Deodands not forfeited by prescription in England untill it be found upon record that they were the cause of his death and therefore they cannot be claimed by prescription no more than bona fugitivorum for which Vide suprà 27. M. 30 31. El. Co l. 6. 47. b. Dowdales case Co. Inst pars 1
servitium c. amisit So that the original Act is not the cause of his action but the consequent upon it viz. the losse of his service and the same reason holds in the case of a Common as above said A release of remainder of a temr good 41 Quando diversi desiderantur actus ad aliquem statum perficiendum Co. l. 10. 49. a. 14 Lampets case plus respicit lex actum originalem quia cujusque rei potissima pars est principium And therefore if A. possest of a Lease for the terme of 500 yeares demiseth the terme to B. for life the remainder to C. and the heires of his body and makes B. his executor and dies and after B. is possest of the Lease C. releaseth to B. all his right in the terme In this case although it was objected that the release was void because C. at the time of the release had no estate in him but onely a possibility the whole estate and terme of yeeres being in B. so that after the death of B C. might enter upon the Lease againe notwithstanding the release yet it was resolved that C. by that release had extinguished all his right and title in the term and had fixed it in B. because the devise by A. and the assent of B. the executor appearing by his acceptance of the release were as the original and fundamental causes of the interest of C. and the death of B. is but a meane to bring the Lease in possession and gives nothing at all for that the whole interest accrues by the devise and is executed by the assent of the executor and therefore C. had not onely a possibility Fulwoods case Co. l. 4. 66. b. but likewise such an interest as might well be released c. But in that case a grant by C. to a Stranger had béen void The Commissioners of Sewers 42 Every Statute Ordinance and Provision Co. l. 10. 140. a Kigheleyes case which is to be made by force of the Commission of Sewers ought to consist of 4 causes 1 The Material cause which is the substance 2 The Formal cause and that is the manner with convenient circumstance 3 The Efficient cause and that is their authority according to their Commission 4 The Final cause and that is pro bono publico nunquam pro privato The consideration whereof will be as so many Sea-marks to direct the Commissioners how to stéere in the execution of their charge and how to order the liberty which is given them by the Statute of 23 H. 8. 5. viz. to make such Ordinances c. according to their owne wisedomes and discretions c. which words are meant and ought to be interpreted according to Law and Justice For every Iudge or Commissioner ought to have duo grana salis viz. unum sapientiae ne sit insipidus alterum conscientiae ne sit diabolus And discretion is well described to be scire per legem quid sit justum Fine in a Leet ought to be distinct and not joynt 43 In a Léet a fine of 6 li. put upon all the Iurors joyntly Co. l. 11. 42. b. Godfreyes case by the Steward because they would not present a thing which by the custome of the Mannor they ought to present is not duly imposed but ought to have béen assessed upon them severally for that the cause which occasioned the fine is several because the refusal of each of them is several and personal and the refusal of one is not the refusal of another and therefore if some of them refused and the rest be readie to present onely those that refuse are to be fined c. Damage feasant 44 If a man take beasts damage fesant Fitz. 69. g. and the other offers sufficient amends and he refuseth c. Here if he sue a replevin c. for the Beasts he shall recover damages onely for the detinue of them and not for their taking for that the cause of taking them was lawfull Fitz. 79. h. 45 The Peace ought no be granted against any without good cause Binding to the Peace and therefore by the ancient course of the Law the party complaining used to make oath before a Master of the Chancery that he was in feare c. of some corporal damage and did not take that oath for malice against his adversary the like ought to be observed by the Iustices of the Kings-Bench and of Peace Fitz. 95. d. 46 If a man winne anothers money with false dice Cheating at Dice he that is deceived may have an action of Deceit against the party so deceiving him And in this case although the Defendant do not entice the Plaintife to play yet it séemes he may well maintaine that action against the Defendant because the excitation to play at dice is not the cause of the action but the casting of the false dice c. by which he wonne the money c. Fitz. 104. l. 47 If a man acknowledge a Statute Staple Dures or Statute Merchant by dures c. he may have an Audita quarela to avoid it because the imprisonment was the cause thereof Plowd 19. a. Fogassaes case 48 If a man by dures be compelled to seale a bond Dures or other compulsion he shall avoid it So if a mans arme be drawne by compulsion and by that occasion the weapon in his hand kills another that is not felony Likewise if an infant under the yeares of discretion or a man de non sane memory kill a man they shall be excused because their ignorance and not any wicked intention was the cause thereof M. 20. H. 7. 12. per Rede Plowd 26. b. 4. Colthrist and Bivishams 49 If one retaine another to serve a yeare for 20 s. wages here Wages for a years service if the servant demand the 20 s. he ought to shew that the time is past viz. that the yeare is expired and he ought to plead certain because his action is given in respect of the yeare past and of a thing done in time and the time is parcel of the cause of the demand and precedes the demand Plowd 98. a. Matters of the Crown 50 In Olivers case in the Commentaries All principall in Murder those that stood by and abbetted the Murderers were as well principals as those that killed him because the number of them then present and ready to strike him shall be adjudged the cause of his terror and of the abatement of his courage and an occasion to make him despaire of defending himselfe and by consequent that terror was the cause of receiving his wounds and the wounds the cause of his death Plowd 99. b. 101. a. Matters of the Crown 51 Amongst the matters of the Crowne in the Commentaries Murder though the party intended not killed divers persons having a malicious intention to murder Doctor Ellis killed his
servant unto whom they bare no former malice yet was it adjudged Murder because of their murderous intention which was the cause of his death it is otherwise when one having no malicious intent joynes himselfe with others that commit a murder for that is but Man-slaughter in him that so suddenly joynes with them 44 E. 3. 14. b. 14 Ass Pl. 20. Finch 10. 52 A man makes me sweare to bring him money to such a place Terrour or else he will kill me I bring it accordingly this is felony So if he make me swear to surrender my estate unto him and I do so afterwards this is a disseisin to me 21 E. 4. 68. b. Finch 10. 53 One imprisoned till he be content to make an Obligation at another place and afterwards he doth so being at large The like yet he shall avoid it by dures of imprisonment 3 E. 3. 84. Finch 10. 54 Outlawry in trespass is no forfeiture of land Outlawry in trespass in forfeiture as Outlawry of felony is for although the not appearing be the cause of Outlawry in both yet the force of the Outlawry shall be estéemed according to the heinousness of the offence which is the principal cause and foundation of the processe Villenage 55 A man and a feme sole have a villein Finch 10. and afterwards enter-marry and the villeine purchaseth land they shall not have the land by entierties but by moities Ioyntly or in Common as they had the villein An action for goods bailed 56 If one deliver goods to another 22 H. 6. 1. Co. l. 10. 51. b. Lampets case and after the Bailor release to the Bailée all actions the Bailée dies in a writ of Detinue brought against his executors they shall not take advantage of that release for that determines by the death of the Bailée and the action given against the executors is a new action although of the same nature grounded upon their own deteiner Election of an Annuity or distress 57 If a rent charge be granted to A. and B. and their heires Co. Inst pars 1 146. a. 1. A. distreineth the Beasts of the Grantor who sueth a Replevin A. avoweth for himselfe and maketh Conusance for B. A. dieth and B. surviveth Here B. shall not afterwards have a writ of Annuity for the election and avowry for the rent of A. barreth B. of any election to make it an annuity albeit he assented not to be the avowry because in that case the act of one joyn-tenant barreth the other and the election takes his rise from several causes viz. the land or the person and therefore when the election once fixeth upon the land it cannot afterwards charge the person It is otherwise when a man may have election to have several remedies for a thing that is méerly personal or méerely real from the beginning 28 E. 3. 98 b. 27 E. 3. 89. b. As if a man may have an action of accompt or an action of debt at his pleasure and he bringeth in an action of accompt and appeares to it and after is non-suit yet may he have an action of debt afterwards because both actions charge the person The like Law is of an Assise or of a writ of Entry in the nature of an Assise and the like 15 E. 4. 16. 10 E. 4 5. Co. Inst pars 1 295. a. 3. Wager of law 58 In an action of accompt against a receivour upon a receipt of money by the hand of another person for accompt render unlesse it be by the hands of his Wife or Commoigne the defendant shall not wage his Law because the receipt is the ground of the action which lyeth not in privity betwixt the Plaintife and Defendant but in the notice of a third person and such a receipt is traversable a 33 H. 6. 24. 13 H. 7. 3. a. 22 H 6. 41. 1 H. 6. 1. b. 8 H. 6. 11 c. But in an action of debt upon an arbitrament and in an action of Detinue by the bailment of anothers hand the Defendant shall wage his Law because the Debet and the Detinet is the ground of those actions and the contract or bailment though it be by another hand is but the conveyance and not traversable Descent to Daughters yet no Coparâ—eners 59 Land is given to a man and his wife and the heires of their two bodies and they have issue a daughter the wife dies Littl. § 662 663. the husband takes another wife and hath issue another daughter and discontinues the taile and after disseiseth the discontinuée and so dies seised Here the land shall descend to both the daughters but yet they are not Coparceners because they are in by several Titles viz. the eldest is remitted by force of the intaile to the one moity and the other hath Fée simple by force of the descent from her father but in this case the eldest shall out the youngest by her action of Formedon Recovery in value 60 If the heir of the part of the mother of land Co. Inst pars 1 13. a. 1. Pl. Co. 292. 515 whereunto a warranty is annexed is impleaded and vouch over and judgement is given against him and for him to recover in value and dieth before execution the heir of the part of the mother shall sue execution to have in value against the vouchée for the effect ought to pursue the cause and the recompence shall ensue the losse Co. ibid. 201. b. 3. 61 He that will take advantage of a re-entry for non payment of rent must make demand of the same upon the land Demands upon the land because the land is the principal debtor for the rent issueth out of the land and in an Assise for the rent the land shall be put in view and if the land be evicted by a title paramount the rent is avoided and after such eviction the person of the Feoffée shall not be charged therewith for the person of the Feoffée was onely charged with the rent in respect of the grant out of the land c. Howbeit Homage or any other special corporal service must be done to the person of the Lord and the tenant ought by the Law of convenience to séek him Co. ibid. 210. a. 1. to whom the service is to be done in any place within England for that and the like services are due and issue out of the land in respect of the person c. F. N. Br. 150. d. 62 If a man recover in value against the baron by warranty of the ancestor yet the feme of the baron shall be endowed Dower because the recovery was had by force of the warranty made and not by reason of any eigne title to the land Dyer 13. 62. 28 H. 8. 19 E. 3. 63 If land be given in Frank-marriage Divorce and after the Donées are divorced the party by whom the
cause of the Divorce was first moved shall lose the land as if the feme sued for it the baron shall have it è contrà Tamen quaere for one book saith that the land shall be divided betwixt them per Fitzherbert F.N.B. 121. p. 64 If a man be condemned in trespasse or debt upon an obligation Capias pro fine where he denies his déed at the suit of the partie and after he that is condemned is taken by Capias pro fine at the suit of the King and committed to the Gaole here if the Gaoler suffer him to escape the party shall have an action of debt against the Gaoler for this condemnation and yet he was not committed to him at his suit but at the suit of the King Howbeit within the yeare after the condemnation and judgement given this suit for the King shall serve as well for the party as for the King because the King was entitled to it by the party for his suit and judgement was the cause of the Kings fine It is otherwise after the yeare because it will be intended they are agréed and then the party is put to his Scire facias c. Co. Inst pars 1 245. b. 2. 65 If a Bastard eigne after the deceease of the father entreth Bastard Muâ—â— and the King seiseth the land for some contempt supposed to be committed by the Bastard and the Bastard dies and his issue is upon his petition restored to the possession for that the seisure was without cause In this case the Mulier is barred for ever for the possession of the King when he hath no cause of seisure shall be adjudged the possession of him for whose cause he seised But if after the death of the father the Mulier be found heire and within age and the King seiseth In that case the possession of the King is in right of the Mulier and vesteth the actual possession in the Mulier for that she was the cause that occasioned the seisure and consequently the Bastard eigne is in such case fore-inclosed of any right for ever So it is likewise when the King seiseth for a contempt or other offence of the father or any other ancestor for in that case also if the issue of the Bastard eigne upon a petition be restored for that the seisure was without cause the Mulier is not barred for the Bastard could never enter and consequently could gaine no estate in the land but the possession of the King shall be adjudged in the right of the Mulier and the rather for that the father or other ancestor of the Mulier was the cause of the seisure Dyer 100. a. 70 1 Mar. 66 If the King grant land by Charter probis hominibus villae de Islington rendring rent Kings Chancâ— this is a good and perpetual Corporation for that intent but if the King release or give them the rent and fée-farme it séemes the Corporation is ipso facto dissolved for the rent and farme were the cause of their incorporation 22 Cujus est dare ejus est disponere A proviso imports a condition 1 A. bargaines and sels the Mannors of D. unto which an Advowson was appendant with the appurtenances unto B. and his heires provided alwayes Co. l. 2. 71. b. 2 The Lord Cromwels case that B. regrant the Advowson to A. during his life B. dies not having regranted the Advowson to A. who enters for the Condition broken Here whereas it was amongst other things objected that this Proviso could not import a Condition because the Bargainor did onely covenant with the Bargainée and therefore the Bargainée should also be understood onely to Covenant with the Bargainor and so that Proviso onely to import a Covenant and not a Condition It was resolved that it had the force of a Condition because it was not unjust or unequal that the Bargainor from whom the land moved should annex what Condition soever he pleased to the estate of the land for Cujus est dare c. Feofment to the use of a Will 2 If a man seised of lands in fée makes feoffment to the use of such person and persons and for such estate and estates Co. l. 6. 18. a. 1. Sir Edward Cleres case as he shall apppoint by his will here by operation of Law the use rests in the feoffor and he is seised of a qualified fée viz. until declaration and limitation be made according to his power so also when a man makes feoffment to the use of his last will he is in the mean time seised to the use of himselfe and his heires Legiantia naturalis acquisita 3 Legiantia naturalis may be properly said to be pura indefinita Co. l. 7. 5. b. 4. Calvins case but Legiantia acquisita may be limited according to the will of the King that grants it as to an alien and his heires or to him and the heires of his body or to him for life onely or upon Condition c. for Cujus est dare c. A stranger may take advantage of a condition 4 If A. grants lands to B. for life the remainder to C. for life Plowd 24. b. 4. 31. a. 4. Colthrist and Beinshin ibid. 34. â—â—1 and if C. die living B. that then they shall remaine to D. for life here although it was objected that the remainder to D. was void because limited to commence upon a Condition whereof none can take advantage but privies yet it was adjudged good For that God hath committed all wordly things to the order and dispose of men So that when any doth lawfully enjoy such things he may order or convey or give them where when and how he pleaseth according to his intent and meaning so that his intent be not against Law against Reason or repugnant And therefore in this case when the Lessor appoints the remainder to the Defendant ut supra his intent is plainly discovered thereby and reason requires that his intent should be performed viz. that the remainder should take effect in manner and forme as he hath appointed Liberty given to the tenant to pay which he will 5 If there be Lord and Tenant and the Lord holds by a Capon Plowd 96. a. 4. Woodlands case or an Egge or 12 d. rent Here the Lord shall not come to the land and take a Capon and Egge or 12 d. being arrere although he find it there but the onely remedie is to distrein for it Howbeit in that case if the Tenant have 20 Capons 20 egges or 20 s. of Silver it is in the power of the Tenant to give the Lord which Capon Egg or twelve pence he pleaseth So that the liberty is not given to the Lord to take which of them he will but to the Tenant who is to pay the thing Hedgboot c. by assignment 6 The Lessor covenants Dyer 19. 115â— 28 H. 8.
case and the Earle of Leicesters case Plow 400 c. Quae malo sunt inchoata c. A void presentment Fitz. 35 f. 6. 32 A presentment made by a stranger to an Advowson which is appropriate to an Abbey is void be the presentment in the Abbots time or during the vacation and albeit the Clerke be afterwards admitted instituted and inducted yet that cannot make the presentment which was void at first to take effect For Quod initio non valet c. It is otherwise if the Abbot himselfe present c. Co. l. 1. 15. b. 3. Sir William Pelhams case 33 A tenant for life remainder in tail remainder in fée bargains and sels the land in fée to B. who after the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 31. A void recovery and forfeiture by tenant for life and before the Statute of 14 El. cap. 8. suffered a recovery wherein A was vouched and vouched over c. and after Iudgement was entred and execution sued upon that recovery yet was the entry of the tenant in tail adjudged congeable for albeit the recovery was not had immediately against A. yet was it adjudged a forfeiture within that Statute of 32 H. 8. and then the suffering of the recovery being a forfeiture it could not afterwards be salved by entring Iudgement and suing execution thereupon Co. Inst pars 1. 46. a. 4. 34 If the Patron grant the next avoydance and after Parson A void grant of Glebe Patron and Ordinary before the Statute had made a lease of the Glebe for yeares and after the Parson dieth and the grantée of the next avoydance had presented a Clerk to the Church who is admitted instituted and inducted and dieth within the terme the Patron presents a new Clerk who is also admitted instituted and inducted here albeit he commeth in under the Patron that was party to the Lease and was Admitted Instituted and Inducted yet because the Lease had no good beginning but was avoided by the Grantees Incumbent who had the whole estate in him it shall not be againe revived but shall be extinct for ever and shall not be maintained against the last Incumbent Co. Inst pars 1 31. b. 4. 35 If a man be Tenant in general taile The last feme not endowed and take a wife and hath issue by her and she dies and after he taketh another wife and dies the last wife shall be endowed because she may have issue which by possibility may inherit But in this case if the husband during his first wives life alien the land in Fee and takes an estate back to him and his wife and the heires of their two bodies and the wife dies the second wife shall not be endowed because during the Coverture when her Title of Dower should take beginning he was seised of an estate taile special and yet here also the Issue that he may have by the last wife is inheritable Co. ibid. 9. a. 1. 36 B. having divers sonnes and daughters Grant to children before birth not good A. giveth lands to B. liberis suis and to their heires the Father and all his Children do take a Fee simple joyntly by force of these words their heires but if he had no child at the time of the Feofment the Child or Children born afterwards shall not take Dyer 58. a. 4. 35 H. 8. 37 Cestuy que use after the Statute of 1 R. 3. 1. Cestuy que us◠and before the Statute of Uses makes a Lease for yeares and after during the terme makes Feofment of the land and gives Livery c. In such case nothing passed by such Feofment because he had nothing in Vse or Possession and then the Statute of R. 3. would not aide him 29 Quod non habet principium non habet finem Where there can be no presentment by lapse 1 If the Bishop be named in the Quare impedit Co. Inst pars 1 344. b. 4. he shall never afterwards present by lapse and then shall neither the Metropolitan nor after him the King do it For the Bishops presentment falling which was to be the first step and begining their power of presenting which should successively follow his must néeds also fail according to the Rule Quod non habet principium non habet finem Right without action no remitter contra 2 Regularly a man shall not be remitted to a Right remedilesse Co. ibid. 349. a. 4. for the which he can have no action And therefore Littleton saith Sect. 661. that the principal cause of a Remitter is when the issue hath no person but himselfe against whom he may bring his Action by which it appeareth that he ought to have just cause of Action for neither an Action without a Right nor a Right without an Action can make a Remitter as if Tenant in tail suffer a Common Recovery In which there is error and after the Tenant in tail disseiseth the Recoveror and dieth here the issue in tail hath an action viz. a Writ of Error but so long as the Recovery remaineth in force he hath no Right and therefore in that case cannot be remitted Idem 3 If B. purchase an Advowson Co. ibid. 349. b. 3. and suffereth an usurpation and six Moneths to passe and the usurper granteth the Advowson to B. and his heires B. dieth his heire is not remitted because his Right to the Advowson was remedilesse viz. a Right without an Action 4 Vide infra M. 38. 1. 7. and 162. 49. Co. Inst pars 1 31. a. 4. 30 He that claimeth Paramount a thing shall never take benefit nor hurt by it Dos de dote peti non potest 1 If there be Grandfather Father and Son Co. Inst pars 1 32. a. 4. and the Grandfather is seised of thée acres of land in fée and taketh wife and dieth this land descendeth to the Father who dieth either before or after entry now is the wife of the Father dowable yet shall she have the thirds but of two acres onely and the wife of the Grandfather shall have for her Dower the other acre intirely because the Dower of the Grandmother is Paramount the Title of the Fathers wife and the seisin of the Father which descended to him be it in Law or actual is defeated and now upon the matter the Father had but a Reversion expectant upon a Fréehold and in that case Dos de dote peti non potest although the Grandmother die living the Fathers wife Dower according to the improved value 2 If the wife be entitled to have Dower of thrée acres of March Co. Inst pars 1 32. a. 3. every one of the value of twelve pence per annum the heire by his industry and charge maketh it good meadow viz. every acre worth ten shillings per annum the wife shall have her Dower according to the improved value and not according to the
Tenant for life A feofment by two and he in the Remainder or Reversion in Fée joyn in a Feofment by Déed the Livery of the Fréehold shall move from the Lessée and the Inheritance from him in the Reversion or Remainder from each of them according to his estate Co. Inst pars 1 303. b. 2. 5 Every man shall plead such pleas Pleas proper as are pertinent for him Secundum subjectam materiam viz. according to the quality of his case Estate or Interest as Disseisors Tenants Incumbents Ordinaries and the like Co. Inst pars 1 200. b. 3. 6 One Tenant in Common may enfeoffe his Companion Feofment Releases but not release because the Fréehold is several Ioyn-tenants may release but not enfeoffe because the Frée-hold is joynt But Coparceners may both enfeoffe and release because their seisiin to some intents is joynt and to some several Co. l. 3. 50. b. 4. Sir George Browns case 7 The words of the Statute of 11 H. 7. cap. 20. Statute of 11 H. 7. 20. interpreted for discontinuances which prohibits a Feme to alien the lands of her deceased husband are these that she shall not discontinue alien release or confirm them with Warranty where Warranty seems to be referred to any Discontinuance or Alienation as well as to release and confirmation So that if a Feme Tenant in special taile after the decease of her husband make a Lease for three lives not warranted by the Statute of the 32 H. 8. cap. 28. without Warranty he in the Reversion or Remainder by force of the said Statute of 11 H. 7. shall not enter but it was adjudged in Sir Geo. Brownes case in the 3 Report that in that case he might enter and that these words with Warranty shall be onely referred to Releases and Confirmations which indéed do not make a discontinuance without Warranty for the intent of the said Act of 11 H. 7. was not onely to prohibit every barre but also every manner of discontinuance which might put the heire to his real action whereby he might perhaps be disinherited or at least greatly delayed And therefore in regard Releases and Confirmations do not make discontinuance without Warranty these words with Warranty are to be construed Secundum subjectam materiam and shall be referred to them onely to make them equivalent to such an estate which passeth by Livery and which of it selfe without Warranty makes a discontinuance Co. l. 4. 10. b. 4. Bevils case 8 The Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 2. which provides 32 H. 8. 2. interpreted for rents that none shal have any Avowry or Conusance for any rent suit or service unlesse seisin were had within 40 years before the Avowry made extends not to any such Rent or Service which by common possibility cannot happen or become due within 60 yeares as if the Seigniory consists upon Homage and Fealty onely for the Tenant may live 60 yeares after he hath done them So also if the Service be to cover the Hall of the Lord or to go to Warre with him when the King maketh Warre against his enemies such casual Services which by common possibility cannot happen within 60 yeares are not within that Act c. Likewise writs of Escheat Cessavit or Rescous are not within those branches of the same Statute which limit the seisin of land because in those writs the seisin is not traversable but the tenure and in those writs of Escheat and Cessavit albeit they demand the land yet néed they not alleadge any seisin in the same lands c. as the said Statute requires because that Act onely extends to such a writ where the Demandant or his Ancestors may have seisin of the land in demand within the time of limitation prescribed by the Act and the Statute doth not force them to any impossibility c. Scandalum Magnatum 9 The Lord Cromwell brings an Action de scandalo magnatum upon the Statute of 2 R. 2. cap. 5. against Vicar Delmy Co The Lord Cromwels case for speaking these words unto him You like of those that maintaine sedition against the Queens proceedings unto which the Defendant pleades special justification that the Plaintife procured two to prea h in his Church which enveighed in their Sermons against the Book of Common Prayer and because the Defendant did prohibit them the Plaintife said to the Defendant Thou art a false varlet I like not of thee to whom the Defendant said It is no marvel though you like not of me for you like of those inuuendo the two that should have preached that maintaine sedition innuendo seditiosam illam doctrinam against the Queenes proceedings And this was adjudged a good justification For in case of slander for words the sence of the words are to be taken and the sence of them doth best appeare by the cause and occasion of speaking them according to the Rule Sensus verborum ex causa dicendi accipiendus est sermones semper accipiendi sunt secundum subjectam materiam And therefore in this case the Council of the Defendant was said to have done well in shewing the special matter whereby the sence of this word sedition might appeare upon the coherence of all the words taken together viz. that the Defendant meant the seditious doctrine against the Quéens proceedings in the Act of 1 Eliz. by which the Book of Common Prayer was established and that he did not intend any such publique or violent Sedition as was alleadged by the Plaintife and as ex vi termini per se the word it selfe would import c. And it was said Quae ad unum finem loquuta sunt non debent ad alium detorqueri c. Common 10 If Common be said to be appertaining to a Mease Land Co. l. 4. 37. a. 4. 38. a. 3. Tirringhams case Meadow and Pasture time out of mind that shall be adjudged Common Appurtenant and not Common Appendant for it is against the nature of Common Appendant to be Appendant to Meadow or Pasture And therefore in that case the subject matter and the circumstance of the case ought to direct the Court to give Iudgement whether the Common be Appendant or Appurtenant 11 In Appeal of Murder against A. as principal Co. l. 4. 43. b. 4. Bibithes case and against B. as accessory before the fact Accessary in manslaughter A. was found guilty of Man-slaughter but not of Murder in this case B. was acquit because there cannot be an Accessary before the fact in Manslaughter which allwayes happens upon a suddaine debate or effray for if it be premeditate it is Murder Joint warranties or words 11 Ioynt words of the parties shall by construction of Law be taken respectively severally according to the several interests of the Grantées as Warranty made to two of certain lands Co. l. 5. 7. b. 4. 16 H. 6. 63 64. shall enure as
pursued in suppression of the mischiefe and advancement of the remedy as by this case it appeareth A Fine levied by the husband onely is within the letter of the Statute of Glocester 6 E. 1. cap. 3. but the mischiefe was that the heire was barred of the inheritance of his mother by the warranty of his father without Assets And this Act intended to apply a remedie viz that it should not barre unlesse there were Assets and therefore the mischiefe is to be suppressed and the remedy advanced 31 E. 3. Joynder in aid 10. Finch 13. 10 The Vouchée cometh into the Court to be viewed View of vouchee and being viewed is awarded of full age yet he shall not be driven to answer till he come in to the same intent by other processe 19 E. 4. 3. Finch 13. 11 The Vouchée upon a Grand cape ad valentiam Apparance of vouchee shall not loose the lands though he cannot save his default because the processe is onely to this end viz. that he should appeare Finch 13. 50 Ass Pl. 2. Finch ibid. 12 A man that is warned by Writ to answer to a matter Not forced to answer to two several things shall not be driven to answer any other matter than is contained in that writ though the King be party As if by Office it be found that lands in Chiefe descended to I. S. a fool natural and that A. occupieth them whereupon a Scire facias goeth out against A. to answer why the lands should not be seised into the Kings hands for the Idiocy of I. S. upon which A. commeth in and pleads that I. S. when he was of perfect memory made a release to one B. who enfeoffed A. This is good enough without shewing any licence of Alienation to discharge himselfe for the purchasing of those lands Fine with Proclamations 13 Tenant in taile general having issue a daughter Co. l. 3. 50. b. 3. â—u slowes case levies a fine in Trinity Terme and dies in August following the issue immediately brings a Formedon and hanging the Writ the Proclamations are made yet in this case the issue is barred for the end of making the Proclamations is not to barre the entaile because that is barred before by the fine but the onely end of making the Proclamations by the Statute of 32 H. 8. is to distinguish the fine that shall barre the estate taile from a Fine at the Common Law for the Fine that shall barre such an estate shall be levied according to the Statute of 11 H. 7. viz. with proclamations c. Statute 32. H. 8. 17. 14 The Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 37. saith Co. l. 4. 51. b. 4 Andrew Ognels case that the husband shall have an action of debt for the arrearages due in the life time of his wife out of any estate which he held in her right And this is to be understood as well of arrearages due before as after mariage for in that Statute the end of naming the Feme wife is onely to declare and describe the condition of the Feme and not to imply that the arrearages ought to incur after the coverture Where a Writ is to be returned and where not 15 There is an apparent diversity betwéen a Capias in processe Co. l. 5. 90. a. 3. Hoes case Tres 33 El. Mounts case and a Capias ad satisfaciendum for if the Capias in processe be not returned the arrest is torcious because there the end of the arrest is that the party may appeare and answer the Plaintife But in all Writs of execution when the Sheriffe alone doth execute them as a Capias ad satisfaciendum habere facias sesinam or possessionem fieri facias liberat c. if the execution be duly served it is good although the Writ be not returned for there the Plaintife hath the end and effect of his suit and then nothing else is to be done on his part afterwards But in case of an Elegit because the extent is to be made by inquest and not by the Sheriffe alone that ought to be returned otherwise it is nothing worth Collation no disseisin 16 If a Bishop collate without Title to a Church presentable Co. l. 6. 50. a. 1. Boswels case and his Clerke is inducted yet this shall not put the right Patron out of possession for that is nothing else but a provision to the end divine Service may be celebrated untill the Patron present and it is no more than belongs to his Office to do Dignity entailed forfeited 17 If the Dignity of an Earledome had béen intailed to the heires male Co. l. 7. 34. a. 4. Nevils case it might have béen forfeited for Treason before the Statute 26 H. 8. cap. 13. by reason of a secret Condition in Law annexed unto it for Earles are created for two purposes viz. Ad consulendum Regi tempore pacis ad defendendum Regem patriam tempore belli and therefore they wear a Cap of honour and a Robe as they are Councelors and are girded with a sword to represent them gallant Champions and Cavaliers Now then when such a person against his duty and the end of his dignity commits Treason against the King his dignity though entailed is forfeited by that Condition implicitly annexed to his estate Vide 42. 7. The end to be pursued 18 The Scope and end of every matter is principally to be considered and if the Scope and end of the matter be satisfied Pl. co 18. a. 1. Fogassues case then is the matter it selfe and the intent thereof also accomplished And therefore in Fogassues case in the Commentaries because the King had meanes of being intitled to the Custome of the Woad viz. by causing it to be weighed and the end and Scope of the Statute being in that case performed he was not to incurre the penalty of forfeiting the Woad 19 To let a prisoner in execution go at large upon bond c. is expressely against the Statute of 23 H. 6. Plowd com 67 a. 4. Dive against Maningham cap. 10. Sheriffs bond void because the end and intent of making that Statute was to prevent all such bonds c. made for that purpose that abuse having béen much practised by Sheriffes before the making of that Statute Dyer 48. 19. 32 H. 8. 20 If the Plaintife importune a Iuror to appeare and passe upon the verdict according to his conscience Juror albeit he was not summoned by the Sheriffe or his ministers to appeare yet this is not any unlawfull practise or cause of challenge of the Iuror because the end why he was impanelled was to discharge a good conscience upon the verdict Co. l. 5. 87. a. 3. In Blumfields case 21 In debt when the Plaintife hath had execution of the Defendants lands and after the lands are evicted Execution in such case before the Statute of
cause of deprivation as it appears 9 E. 4. 34. So likewise if a Prior suffer dilapidations that is a sufficient cause to deprive him as it was holden 29 E. 3. 16. 20 H. 6. 36. Neverthelesse if in these or the like cases there be but an endeavour or enterprize without doing any such act there can be no cause of deprivation for in such cases Voluntas non reputatur pro facto 37 Acta exteriora indicant interiora Secreta Co. Inst pars 1. 257. b. 1. 10 H. 7 12. 1 One may commit a forcible entry in respect of the armour or weapons which he hath that are not usually born Forcible enâ—â— what and when or if he do use violence and threats to the terrour of another And if thrée or four go to make a forcible entry albeit one alone use the violence all are guilty of force So also if the Master cometh with a greater number of servants then usually attend on him it is a forcible entry Co. l. 8. 146. a. 4. The six Carpenters case 2 When entry authority or licence is given to any by the Law Upon entry by Law if treâ—passe be committed he is a trespasser ab initio and he misuseth it he shall be a trespasser ab initio but where entry authority or licence is given by the party and he misuseth it there he shall be punished for the misdeed but shall not be a trespasser ab initio And the reason of this diversity is because in case of generall authority or licence given by the Law the Law judgeth by the act subsequent quo animo or to what intent he entred for Acta exteriora c. but when the party gives authority or licence himselfe to do any thing he can for no cause subsequent punish that which is done by his owne licence and authority And therefore when as the Law gives authority to enter into an Inne or Tavern to the Lord to distraine to the owner of the soile to distrain damage fesant to the Reversioner to sée whether wast be committed to the Commoner to enter into the land to see his Cattell or the like vide 12 E. 4. 8. b. 21 E. 4. 19. b. 5 H. 7. 11. 9 H. 6. 29. b. 11 H. 4. 75. b. 3 H. 7. 15. 28 H. 6. 5. Here if he that enters into the Inne or Taverne commit trespasse as if he cary any thing away from thence or if the Lord that distraines for rent or the owner for damage fesant weary or kill the distresse or if hee that enters to view the wast do hurt to the houses or stays there all night or if the Commoner cut down a trée c. In these and the like cases the Law will adjudge that he entred for that purpose and therefore in as much as the Overt act which he doth is a trespasse he shall be adjudged a trespasser ab initio as it appears in all the aforesaid Books 3 If a Purveyor take my Cattle for the Kings houshold by force of his Commission A purveyor a trespasser that is lawfull but if he sell them in the Market Co. ibid. b. 3. then is the first taking of them forcious and with this accords 18 H. 6. 19. b. The use of a recovery may be declaimed afterwards 4 In many cases an Act subsequent shall declare the intention of a generall Act precedent as Peter Vavasor octabis Hill suffers a recovery Co. l. 9. 11. a. 3 DowmaÌ„s case and by indenture made 15 of February betwéen him and the recoverors limits the uses and dies Dowman and his wife the daughter and heire of Peter c. brings an Assise against him unto whom the use was limited but could not recover because the subsequent Indenture did sufficiently declare the intention of the parties at the time of the precedent recovery So if Tenant in taile hath issue two daughters and die and the eldest enter into the whole and after thereof make feoffment with warranty this is lineall warranty for the one moity and collaterall for the other for the feofment subsequent doth declare the intention of the general entry viz. that it was onely for her selfe or otherwise it would be warranty which should begin by disseisin for the one moity A distress sold makes it a trespasse and with this agrees Littleton cap. Garr fol. 160. If the Lord come upon the tenancy and take and drive away an oxe if he impound him the taking of him shall be adjudged as for a distresse but if he kill him that subsequent act declareth what his intention was ab initio and so shall he be déemed a trespasser c. as aforesaid and with this agrées 12 E. 4. 8. b. 28 H. 6. 5 c. Lord Mesne and Tenant distresse 5 If there be Lord Mesne and Tenant Co. l. 9. 22. b. 3. The case of Avowrie and the Mesne payes his rents and doth his services due to the Lord and yet the Lord will distrain the Tenant peruvail and put his cattle into the pound for them In this case the Mesne at the Tenants instance ought to take out his cattle and to put his own into the pound and then if the Lord will not suffer the Mesne so to do the Lord shall be déemed a trespasser ab initio for the Lord doth not then use the cattle in the nature of a distresse c. and with this accords 13 E. 4. 6. Intention may be adjudged murder 6 Roper the father of Agnes the wife of Gore Co. l. 9. 81. b. 3. Agnes Goreâ— case in love to his sonne in law Gore being sicke procured an Electuary of one Martin an Apothecary by the advice of Doctor Grey into which Agnes did secretly put Rats-bane with purpose to poyson her husband and May 18 gives part thereof to her husband who thereupon became very sicke Roper also eate thereof and likewise became very sicke add last of all Martin being taxed for it stirs it and eates it May 21. and May 22 dies This was adjudged murder in Agnes albeit she intended nothing against Martin and that peradventure the stirring of it by Martin might make it have more force to kill him For in this case the Law joyns the murderous intention of Agnes in putting the poyson into the Electuary to kill her husband with the event which ensued thereupon viz. the death of Martin for the putting of the poyson into the Electuary is the cause and the death of Martin is the event Quia eventus est qui ex causa sequitur dicuntur eventus quia ex causis eveniunt And the stirring of the Electuary by Martin without the putting of the poyson therein by Agnes would not have caused his death A delivery to the party without words 7 An actual delivery of a writing sealed to the party himselfe Co. l. 9. 136. b. 4. Thorough goâ—dâ— case without any words at all is a
Retraxit cannot be acknowledged by an Attorney Co. lib. 9. 75. b. 4. Combes case 10 There is a diversity betwixt a general and absolute power and authority as owner of the land Surrender by Attorney and a particular power and authority by him which hath but a particular interest as a Copiholder being owner of the land according to the custome may surrender his Copihold land by Attorney but if A. be Tenant for life the remainder in taile c. And A. hath power to make leases for 21 yeares rendring the ancient rent c. he cannot make a lease by letter of Attorney by force of his power because he hath but a particular power which is annexed to his person And so it was resolved in the Lady Greshams case at the Assises in Suffolk 24 Eliz. by Wray and Anderson Chiefe Iustices and Iustices of Assise there Co. lib. 9. 76. a. 1. Combes case 11 Some things are so inseparably annexed to the person of a man Villein that he cannot do them by another as the making of Homage and Fealty So it is holden in the 33 E. 3. tit Trespass 253. that the Lord may beate his Villein for cause or without cause and the Villein shall have no remedy but if the Lord command another to beate his Villein the Villein shall have an action of Battery against him that so beats him Co. Ibid. 12 If the Lord distrain the Cattle of his Tenant Wrongful â—â—â—stresse when nothing is behind the Tenant for the respect and reverence which belongs to the Lord shall not have an Action of Trespass vi armis against the Lord but if the Lord in that case command his Bailiff or Servant to distrain him when nothing is arrear the Tenant shall have an Action of Trespasse vi armis against the Bailiffe or Servant c. 2 H. 4. 4. 11 H. 4. 78. 1 H. 6. 6. 9 H. 7. 14. Fitz. N.B. 25. c. 13 It séems that before the Statutes No Attorney allowed by the common Law which grant that a man may make an Attorney c. the Iustices would not suffer either Plaintiffe or Defendant Demandant or Tenant to make attorney in any suit or in any Court c. because the words of the Writ command the Defendant to appear which ought alwayes to be understood in proper person and at this day also a mans reall suit at a Leet or Sheriffs turne cannot be done by Attorny but ought always to be in proper person c. Howbeit before those Statutes the King by his Prerogative might have granted to a man to make an Attorney in every action or suit as well to the Tenant or Defendant as to the Demandant or Plaintiff and might have directed his writs or letters to the Iustices for that purpose c. F.N.B. 25. d. 14 If the Tenant for terme of life be impleaded in a praecipe quod reddat No receipt by attorney he in reversion may pray to be received to defend his right in default of the Tenant or upon his faint pleading but in this case he cannot pray by his Attorney to be received without a Writ out of the Chancery directed to the Iustices for that purpose upon some cause alleadged in the said Writ c. 22 E. 4. 34. Finch 16. 15 A man cannot excuse himselfe of a contempt as of not serving the Kings processe Answer of a contempt peâ—sonal of rescuing a Prisoner from the Sheriffe or other Officer or the like by Attorney but he ought to appeare thereupon in proper person c. Co. l. 9. 96. b. 4. Sir George Reynels case 16 The office of Marshal of the Marshalsie cannot be granted for years because it is an office of great trust annexed to the person The office oâ— the Marshâ—â— personal concerns the administration of Iustice and the life of the Law which is to kéep such as are in execution in salva arcta custodia to the end they may the sooner pay their debts And this trust is individual and personal and therefore cannot be transferred to Executors or Administrators For the Law will not confide in persons unknown for the ordering of Matters which concern the administration of Iustice c. 45. 6. â—ersonal serâ—â—ce not apâ—ortioned or â—ultiplyed 17 If a man hold land by the personal service of being Sewer Co. l. 8. 105. b. 4. in John Talbots case Carver Butler c. to his Lord or when the Tenant is bound by his tenure Ad convivandum Dominum suum familiam suam semel in anno or ad aequitandum cum Domino suo in Com. N. sumptibus suis propriis vide 10 E. 3. 23. in John de Bromptons case by alienation of parcel of the land the service shall not be apportioned or multiplyed because such services are personal and are to be personally performed by one man only Howbeit purchase of parcel by the Lord shall extinguish them â—ilizers office â—ersonal 18 The office of Filizer cannot be extended upon a Statute Dyer 7. b. 28 H. 8. 10. or Elegit albeit it is a Franktenement for which an Assise lyeth because it is an office of trust and personal â—everal torts â—everal actions 19 An action upon the Case was brought by two Dyer 19. 112. 28 H. 8. for that the Defendant called them two false Knaves and Thieves Here the action was not well brought joyntly for that the wrong done to the one was not the wrong done to the other and therefore they ought to have severed in actions as in case of false imprisonment A thing in action cannot â—e transferred 20 The reason why a thing in action cannot be transfered or granted over to another is because it is so annexed to the person Dyer 26. a 16â— 28 H. 8. 282. 28. 11 Eliz. 300. 36. 13 Eliz. that it cannot be severed from him nor by any meanes prosecuted but in his name as an Obligation Statute Recognizance or the like So if a man hath an Advowson and when it is void the Patron grants proximam nominationem Presentationem Institutionem cùm primò proximè vacuerint In this case the Grantée shall not have that Presentation because it is a thing in action which the Patron could not transfer but the next to it he shall have which was the first that could be granted 45 They cannot be granted or transferred over as matters of pleasure ease trust and authority To hunt way â—o dyet c. 1 A licence to hunt in my Parke to go to Church over my ground 12 H. 7. 25. 7 H. 4. 36. to come into my house to eat and drinke with me cannot be granted over So of a way granted for life over my ground Finch 17. Personal offices of trust 2 The Patentée for life of an office of trust 11 E. 4. 1. as to be a Chamberlain of the
that which is to be done in that particular wherein the said Commissioners have authority to proceed according to their discretion which neverthelesse is to be limited and bounded with the rule of Law and Reason For discretion is a science or understanding to discern betwixt falshood and truth betwixt wrong and right betwixt shadows and substance betwixt equity and colourable glosses and pretences and not to proceed according to a mans own will and private affections because Talis discretio discretionem confundit c. Common of â—iâ—â—nage 50 If the Commons of the Town of A. and of the Town of B. are adjacent Co. l. 7. 5. b. 3. Sir Miles Corbets case and that the one ought to have common with the other because of vicinage and in the Town of A. there are 50 acres of Common and in the Town of B. 100 acres of Common In this case the Inhabitants of the Town of A. cannot put more Cattle in their Common of 50 acres than that will féed without having any respect to the Common within the Town of B. nec è converso for the original cause of this Common for cause of vicinage was not for profit but for the preventing of Suits in a Champian Country by reason of the reciprocal escapes out of the one Town into the other And therefore if the Common of the Town of A. will depasture 50 Cattle and that of the Town of B. 100 Cattle it can be no prejudice to the one or to the other if the Cattle of the one Town do reciprocally escape and depasture out of the one Town into the other For if all their Cattle depasture promiscuously together per my per tout that can be no prejudice to the one or to the other c. â—an slaughter 〈◊〉 the day or â—ght diversiâ— 51 It is a good exposition of a Statute to expound it according to the reason of the Common Law For example at the Common Law Co. l. 7. 6. b. 3. in Milborns case if one had béen slain in a Town in the day-time viz. while there was yet full day-light and the Man-slayer had escaped the Town was therefore amercied and so it is holden in the 21 E. 3. Coronae 238. Dum quis felonicè occisus fuit per diem nisi felo captus fuit tota villata illa oneretur And with this also agrees 3 E. 3. Coronae 293. But if such a murther or homicide had béen committed in the night the Town should not then have béen amercied by the Common Law because then no follie could be imputed to the Inhabitants of the Town for letting him escape c. For the Scripture saith The day is ordained for man to labour in Psal 104. and the night to take his rest And the Poet saith Ut jugulent homines surgunt de nocte latrones And from this resolution of the Common Law the Statutes of Winchester 13 E. 1. and of 27 Eliz. cap. 13. are to be expounded For albeit no time be specified in those Statutes when the robbery should be committed for which damages are to be answered by the Hundred yet it is adjudged in 29 Eliz. in the case between Milborn and the Hundred of Dunmow in Essex that for a Robbery done before day the Hundred shall not answer but onely for that which is committed in the day time betwixt light and light And howbeit at the Common Law as is aforesaid the Inhabitants in great Towns were not to be amercied albeit the Man-slayer escaped when the Murther or Homicide was committed in the night Yet at this day since the said Stat. of Winchester by which it is enacted that in Cities and great Towns that are enclosed the gates shall be shut at Sunne-set until Sun-rising next morning Now the Inhabitants of such Cities and Towns are amerciable if such Man-slayer escape although the Murther or Homicide happen to be committed in the night as well as if it were committed in the day For now that act hath changed the reason of the Law and therefore the Law it selfe is also changed Ratio est anima legis mutata legis ratione mutatur lex For at the Common Law before the Statute if a man were slain in the night as is said before there was no fault to be imputed to the Citie or Town but now if they do not kéep their gates shut according to the Statute by reason whereof the offender escapes then is the fault and negligence in them and this agrées with the book in 3 E. 3. Coronae 299. which see also in Co. pro ut in margine Vide 149. 35. Co. l. 7. 32. The case of a fine per le Roy. 52 Inasmuch as the King is bound by the Stat. De donis conditionalibus as it is adjudged in the Lord Barleys case in Pl. Co. 240. Stat. De dâ— binds the Kâ— and thereâ— he takes bâ—fit of 4 H. 7. â— 32 H. 8. by which Act the King is restrained from alienation for it is provided by the same Act Quod finis ipso jure sit nullus Reason requires that the King shall take benefit of the Acts of 4 H. 7. and 32 H. 8. which enable the Tenant in tail to barre his â—â—â—es For it is agréed in all our Books that the King shall take benefit of any Act although he be not named 12 H. 7. 21. 35 H. 6. 60. Pl. Co. ubi supra And it would be hard if the King being issue in tail of a gift made to the Subject should be in worse condition than if he were not King Co. l. 8. 173. b. Virgil Parkers case 53 The Kings Tenant by Knight-service conveyeth half his land for the joynture of his wife that shall be Equality of the third 〈◊〉 descending and after marriage he demiseth the other halfe for years for the payment of his debts and legacies and deviseth 1000 l. to his younger Children In this case it was resolved that inasmuch as the advancement of his wife is as well within the Statute of 27 H. 8. Co. l. 10. 84. a. 4. Leonard Leveis case as the payment of his debts and the preferment of his children and for that the operation of that Statute doth principally take effect by the death of the Kings Tenant For that cause albeit the estate of the Feme hath the precedency yet the Kings third parâ— shall he taken equally out of both those halfs and not out of the half so demised onely And so it was also resolved M. 41 42 Eliz. betwéen Remington and Savage and the 23 Eliz. in Thynnes case And agrées also with the common experience of the Court of Wards Co. l. 95. a. 4. Connys case 54 In a writ of Mesne the Parol shall not stay for the nonage of the Plaintiff for it is not reason In a writ of Mesne the â—rol shall 〈◊〉 stay for lâ—â—y that the Infant shall be distrained for the services of
99. b. 4. Matters of the Crown c. 35 Divers persons were accused for murthering of a man Principal and Accessory whereof some did actually murther him and were fled others stood by aiding and abetting those that committed the murther and these last were taken and arraigned as principals c. Besides these there was one Gittin indicted as accessary unto them all but stay was made of his arraignment until he might be arraigned as Accessary to them all at one time for he could not be arraigned as Accessary to them that were escaped because they were not yet attainted c. Co. Inst pars 1. 96. b. Littl. § 137. 36 Where the Common or Statute-law giveth remedy in soro seculari whether the matter be temporal or spiritual the Conusance of that cause belongeth to the Kings temporal Courts onely Remedy is foro seculâ—i for spiritual things unlesse the jurisdiction of the Ecclesiastical Court be saved c. As if an Abbot or Prior hold of his Lord by Divine Service certain and that service is not performed the Lord hath his remedy in foro seculari for if he distrain for not doing it he shall upon his avowry recover damages at the Common Law viz. in the Kings Temporal Court for the not doing of it And if issue be taken upon the performance of the Divine Service it shall be tryed by a Iury of twelve men because albeit the service be spiritual yet the Seigniory as also the damages to be recovered are temporal It is otherwise of service by Frankalmoign which is always uncertain Co. ib. 96. a. 4. for there the right being méerly spiritual and the remedie onely by the Ecclesiastical Law the Conusance thereof doth belong to the Ecclesiastical Court c. Co. l. 11. 27. b. 3. in Henry Pigots case 37 In 30 E. 3. casu ultimo a deed of feoffment A letter of â—torney void though read right to one unlettered in which a warrant of Attorney to deliver seisin was inserted was read to him that was to be the Feoffor being a man unlettered in the form of an estate tail but was indéed a feoffment in fée and the warrant was read truly as it was writ and both were sealed and delivered and seisin given accordingly Howbeit in this case the déed was adjudged void because read in another form c. and the warrant of Attorney albeit it were truly read was adjudged void also because it depended upon the feoffment and had relation to the estate in fée Vide 84. 8. A Villeins estate not the lands before â—ecovery of the Villein 38 Servi fugitivi dicuntur esse in statu libero Bract. l. 5. cap. 10. § 3. fo 7. a. donec dominus versus eos sibi perquisirit per legem terrae nec habebit potestatem aliquam in eis vel liberis suis terris aut aliis bonis ipsorum donec corpus quod principale est disrationaverit A condition or â—ovenant runs â—ith the land 39 A lease is made to Baron and Feme by indenture Dyer 12. 65. 28 H. 8. in which there is a Proviso that if they or their Executors shall be disposed to sell and alien the terme that then the Lessor shall have the first offer he giving for it as much as another will give And here the question was whether this was a condition or a covenant and the better opinion séems to be that it is rather a condition than a covenant Howbeit whether it be the one or the other it runs with the land So as albeit the Feme joyned not in the Indenture nor was party thereunto yet if she survive the Baron she shall hold the land charged with the condition or covenant as an accessary thereunto So in 38 E. 3. a feoffment was made by déed with divers covenants and one of the Feoffées sealed it and the other not but yet occupied the land and survived and it was resolved the Survivor should be bound by the covenants and seale of his companion Qui sentit commodum sentire debet onus Vide M. 236. A penalty for â—ot singing â—asse c. 40 An Abbot with the assent of his Covent grants for them and their Successors to a man and his heires Dyer 24. 149. 28 H. 8. to finde one of his Monks to sing Masse Mattens and Vespers every Holiday in such a Chappel and grants over that toties quoties defectus fuerit in aliquo c. that they will forfeit to him and his heirs five pound In this case if by a failer of the service the nomine poenae of 5 l. be forfeit the heire shall have an action of Debt for it and not the Executors for the heire having an inheritance in the penalty it follows the nature of the land given to the religious house as an accessary thereunto â—isseisor and â—isseisee 41 After regresse of the Disseisée Dyer 31. 219. 28 H. 8. the Disseisée shall have the grain of the Disseisor albeit they be severed from the land by the Disseisor per totam Curiam and in B. R. in Sayes case â—rincipal and â—â—ettor 42 At the Common Law before the Statute of 2 3 Edw. 6. 24. Dyer 38. 50. c. 29. H. 8. in an appeal of Robbery the Abettors were to be prosecuted in the same County where the Robbery was committed and where the Principal was attainted and not where the abetment was proved to be But that Statute hath now setled it in the County where the Abettors shall be taken â—uardian 43 If a man be seised of a Rent-charge Rent-secke Co. Inst pars 1. 87. b. 3. Common of pasture or such like Inheritances which lie not in tenure and die his heire within the age of fourtéen years In this case the heire may choose his Guardian But if he hold any land in Soccage the Guardian in Soccage shall take into his custody as well the Rent-charges c. as the land holden in Soccage because he hath the custody of the heir which is the Principal â—â—rrender 44 By surrender of the Letters Patents themselves Dyer 179. 44. 2 Eliz. the Duplicate thereof though it bée also under the Great Seale is also gone 45 Vide Hob. 4. Musgrave against Wharton 64 Things accessary are of the nature of the Principal 40 Ass Pl. 25. 1 A servant procureth another to kill his Master No accessary this is no petty Treason in the servant because it is but felony in the other which is the principal Finch 23. 7 H. 6. 19. b. 2 A Parson grants an Annuity with a Nomine poenae A Parsons successor chargeable the Successor shall be charged with the Nomine poenae due in his Predecessors life and not his Executors Finch 23. 26 H. 8. Dy. 7. Finch 23. 3 The profits of the office of a Filizer Profits of a Filizers office not chargeable Lop
not titheable c. cannot be put in execution upon a recognisance statute c. because the office it selfe being an office of trust cannot 26. El. Molins Finch 23. 4 Tithe is not payable of Oaks usually topped and lopped though it be every seven or eight years for the branches are of the nature of the principal viz. the Oake it selfe for which no tithe is to be paid Co. Inst pars 1. 13. a. 1. 5 A man seised as heire on the part of his Mother The effect ensues the cause and the recompence the losse maketh a feoffment in fée to the use of him his heirs Here the use being a thing in trust and confidence shall ensue the nature of the land and shall descend to the heire on the part of the Mother So likewise if a man hath a Seigniory as heire of the part of his Mother and the tenancy doth escheat it shall go to the heir of the part of the Mother Also if the heir of the Mothers part of land whereunto a warranty is annexed be impleaded and vouch and thereupon judgement is given against him and also for him to recover in value and dieth before execution Here the heire of the Mothers part shall sue execution to have in value against the Vouchée for the effect ought to pursue the cause and the recompence shall ensue the losse Co. ib. 42. a. 4. 6 A man may have an estate for term of life determinable at will An estate for life deterâ—â—â—able at will As if the King doth grant an office to one at will and also grants a rent to him for the exercise of his office for the term of his life this is determinable upon the determination of the office Co. ib. 53. a. 3. 7 If Glasse-windows though glased by the Tenant himself be broken down or carried away it is waste for the glasse is part of the house Waste And so it is of wainscot benches doors windows fornaces and the like annexed or fixed to the house either by him in the reversion or the Tenant Co. ib. 122. a. 1 8 Nothing can be properly appendant or appertenant to any thing Advowson appendent 〈◊〉 Demesnes unlesse the principal or superiour thing be of perpetual subsistance and continuance For example an Advowson that is said to be appendant to a Mannor is in rei veritate appendant to the Demesnes of the Mannor which are of perpetual subsistance and continuance and not to resists or services which are subject to extinguishment and destruction Co. Inst pars 1. 124. a. 4. 9 If an Executor hath a Villein for years A perquiâ—â—â— shall accrâ—â— the Executâ— Termor 〈◊〉 and the Villein purchaseth lands in fée the Executor enters In this case the Executor shall have the whole fée-simple of the lands Howbeit because he had the Villein en auter droit as Executor to the use of the dead it shall be assets in his hands as the Villein is And therefore note a diversity betwéen the quantity of the estate and the quality of it for in this and the lik cases the Law respecteth not the quantity of the estate for not onely Tenant in taile and Tenant for life of a Villein shall have the perquisite of the Villein in fée but Tenant for years and Tenant at will also shall have it in fée but it principally respecteth the quality of the estate For in what right the Executor hath the Villein in the same right shall he have the perquisite So it is also in the case of a Bishop that hath a Villein in right of his Church Also if a man hath a Villein in right of his wife he shall have the perquisite also in her right But if the purchase be after issue had then the Baron shall have the perquisite to him and his heirs because by the issue he is entitled to be Tenant by the Courtesie in his own right c. Distresse for owelty of partition 10 Littleton saith § 219. Co. ib. 144. b. 4. that for a Rent-charge the Grantée hath his election either to bring his writ of Annuity or to distrain c. Howbeit of a rent granted for owelty of partition a writ of Annuity doth not lie because it is of the nature of the land descended and therefore for that the Grantée shall onely distrain c. Assise redisseisin 11 If a man recover land in an Assise of Novel disseisin Co. ib. 154. b. 3. whereunto there is a Common appendant or appertenant and after is re-disseised of the Common he shall have a re-disseisin of the Common for it was tacitely recovered in the Assise Coparcenary of rent for owelty c. 12 If there be thrée Coparceners and they make partition Co. ib. 169 b. 2. and one of them grant 20 s. per annum out of her part to her two sisters and their heirs for owelty of partition Here the Grantées are not Ioyntenants of this rent but the rent is in nature of Coparcenary and after the death of the one Grantée the moity of the rent shall descend to her issue in course of coparcenary and shall not survive to the other for that the rent doth come in recompence of the land and therefore shall ensue the nature thereof And if the grant had béen made to them two of a rent of 20 s. viz. to the one ten shillings and to the other ten shillings yet shall they have the rent in course of coparcenary and joyne in action for the same Coparcenary of rent 13 If two Coparceners by déed indented alien both their parts to another in fée Co. ib. 169. b. 4. rendring to them two and their heirs a rent out of the land they are not Ioyntenants of this rent but they shall have the rent in course of coparcenary because their right in the land out of which the rent is reserved was in coparcenary Joyntenancy for life and several Inheritances 14 If land be given to two men and the heirs of their two bodies Co. ib. 183. b. 4. they have joynt estates during their lives and afterwards several Inheritances and therefore if one of them have issue and die the other shall have all the land during his life by right of Survivor but after his death that issue shall enjoy his fathers part and if that issue die without issue the Donor shall enter into that moity and not the issue of him that survived For in as much as originally the inheritance was several the reversion is also several And therefore upon the several determination of the estate in tail the Donor may enter for as upon one joint and intire gift or lease there is one joint and intire reversion so upon several gifts or leases there be several reversions c. Rent reserved enures to both the Joyntenants 15 If two Ioyntenants make a lease for life Co. ib. 192 a. 3.
cannot be defeated without entry and therefore by entry they ought to be made void Co. l. 7. 42. a. 3. in Beresfords case 2 Such an Exposition of a Déed must be made An entail good wiâ—â— menti 〈◊〉 the body â—â—gotten that all the parts thereof may well stand together and that withall it may stand with the rule of Law So if lands be given to the use of Aden and of the heirs male of the said Aden lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of divers others in remainder c. Here albeit there wants the words of the bodie yet is this a good limitation of an estate taile For otherwise it would be against the intent of the Donor and all the remainders over would be void and if these words should be turned into Latine they ought to be rendred thus Et haeredum masculorum de praefato Adeno legitimè procreat and not haeredum masculorum praefati Adeni which is cléerly proved by the subsequent clause and for default of such issue c. For issue cannot be of Aden unlesse the words should be De dicto Adeno and so in this case the one clause is well expounded by the other c. Co. l. 8. 93. a. 1. in Frances case 3 In Replevin the Defendant avows for damage fesant The Plaiâ—â— plea in 〈◊〉 destroyed 〈◊〉 yet recoveâ— the Plaintiff pleads in Barre that the said lands were holden in soccage and that I. S. being thereof seised in fée by his last Will devised them unto him for sixty years if he should so long live c. Vnto which the Defendant pleads that it was true there was such a devise made but after the said devise I. S. enfeoffed certaine persons thereof to the use of the Plaintiff for sixty years if hee should so long live c. whereupon the Plaintiff demurs And in this case it was resolved that although it appeared that the title by which the Plaintiff claimed in his barre to the Avowry was utterly destroyed for the Plaintiff claims by the Will of I. S. which Will appears to be afterwards countermanded by the feoffment which the Avowant afterwards pleads and which the Plaintiff confesseth by his demurrer yet shall the Plaintiff have judgement because his Count is good and the Avowant in his replication to the barre of his Avowry hath done two things For first he hath destroyed the title which the Plaintiff made by the Will And again he hath given to the Plaintiff another title viz. to have the land for 60 years by force of the uses declared upon the feoffment And therefore in as much as upon the whole record according to which the Count ought to judge it plainly appears that the Plaintiff hath a lawful terme in the Lands and that the Defendant had taken his Cattel wrongfully for that cause judgement was given against the Avowant and for the Plaintiff albeit the title which the Plaintiff made for himself was destroyed c. â—etters Paâ—ents and Acts â—f Parliament â—est expoundâ—d by themâ—elves 4 The best Expositor of Letters Patents and Acts of Parliament Co. l. 8. 117. a. 4. in Doctor Bonhams case are the Letters Patents and the Acts of Parliament themselves by the construction and conference of all the parts together Optima statuti interpretatrix est omnibus particulis ejusdem inspectis ipsum statutum Et injustum est nisi tota lege inspecta una aliqua ejus particula proposita judicare vel respondere The count made good by the barre the barre by the replication c. 5 In Doctor Bonhams case in the eighth Report Co. l 8. 120. b. 1. in Doctor Bonhams case although it was admitted that the Plaintiffs replication was not material and the Defendants had demurred thereupon yet in as much as the Defendants had confessed in the barre that they had imprisoned the Plaintiff without cause the Plaintiff had judgement And this is the diversity there taken that when the Plaintiff replies and by his replication it appears that he hath no cause of action there he shall never have judgement but when the bar is insufficient in matter or amounts to a confession of the point in debate and the Plaintiff replies and shews the truth of his matter to enforce his case and in judgement of Law it is not material yet in that case shall the Plaintiff have judgement For 't is true that sometimes the Count shall be made good by the barre and sometimes the barre by the replication and sometimes the replication by the rejoynder c. Howbeit the diversity is that when the Count wants time place or other circumstance that may be made good by the barre so it is also of the bar replication c. as appears in 18 E. 4. 16. b. But when the Count wants substance no barre shall then make it good so likewise of a barre replication c. and with this agrées 6 E. 4. 2. Bone cas nota ibidem dictum Choke Vide 18 E. 3. 34. b. 44 E. 3. 7. a. 12 E. 4. 6. 6 H. 7. 10. 17 H. 7. 3. 11 H. 4. 24 c. But when the Plaintiff makes replication sur-rejoynder c. and thereby it appears that upon the whole record the Plaintiff had no cause of action he shall never have judgement albeit the barre rejoynder c. be insufficient in matter for the Court ought to make judgement upon the whole record and every one shall be intended to make the best of his own case Vide Riegeways case in the third Report 52. And these diversities were also resolved and adjudged between Kendal and Helier M. 25 26 Eliz. in B. R. and M. 29 30. in the same Court between Gallis and Burbry â—he like 6 Albeit the replication be insufficient Co. l. 8. 133. b. 1. in Turners case yet if the bar be also insufficient in matter upon the whole record the Plaintiff shall have judgement It is otherwise when by the replication it appears that the Plaintiff hath no cause of action for there the Plaintiff shall never have judgement although the barre be insufficient As in Debt upon an Obligation with condition to perform covenants in an Indenture the Defendant pleads performance of all the Covenants generally when it appears to the Court that divers of them are in the negative or disjunctive and so the plea in the general affirmative insufficient Yet if the Plaintiff reply and shew a breach of one of the Covenants which by his own shewing is no breach upon which the Defendant demurs judgement shall be given against the Plaintiff because upon the whole record it appears that the Plaintiff hath no cause of action For the Obligation is endorsed with condition to perform Covenants so that the Plaintiff hath no cause of action until there be a breach of Covenant and by the shewing of the Plaintiff himself there is not any breach sufficient in
Law to give him cause of action and it is alwayes intended that every one will shew the best of his case c. But when the barre of the Defendant is insufficient in substance and the Plaintiff replies and shews the truth of his case whereby he produceth no matter against himself but matter explanatory or peradventure not material there the Court shall judge upon the whole record and the Count being good for insufficiency of the Barre without any regard to the replication judgement shall be given for the Plaintiff As if a man plead a grant by Letters Patents in Barre which are not sufficient the Plaintiff by replication sheweth another clause in the said Letters Patents which clause is not material the Defendant demurers in Law In this case judgement shall be given against the Defendant sic in simililibus Co. l. 8. 163. a. 3. in Black-amors case 7 Among the misprisions remedilesse by the Statutes made for the amendment of records this is one Misprisions 〈◊〉 Clerks that albeit the verdict upon issue tryed be given for the Plaintiff yet if upon the whole record it appears to the Court that the Plaintiff hath no cause of Action he shall never have judgement and so it hath béen often adjudged Co. l. 9. 53. a. 2. in Hickmots case 8 In debt upon an Obligation A release pleaded wiâ—â— exception the Defendant pleads a release of the Plaintiff c. which was in this manner A. doth acknowledge himselfe satisfied and discharged of all bonds debts c. made by B. the Defendant and it is agreed that A. shall deliver all such bonds as he hath yet undelivered unto B. except one bond of 40 l. not yet due wherein B. and C. stand bound to A. c. The Plaintiff replies that the obligation excepted and the obligation in Curia prolata are one and the same whereupon the Defendant demurres And in this case it was resolved that the exception extended to all the premisses because all the words before make but one intire sentence and the one depends upon the other For it is reason that when Bonds are satisfied that they should be delivered and exceptio semper ultimò ponenda est It was also reason that this bond of 40 l. should be excepted because it was not due when the release was made c. Co. l. 10. 99. b. 3. in Beawfages case 9 M. 10. Jac. upon a motion at the Barre it was resolved Bond taken by the Sheâ—â—â—â— not within 〈◊〉 the Statute 〈◊〉 23 H. 6. that an obligation to the Sheriff upon a Fieri facias for the payment of the money in Court c. was not void by the Statute of 23 H. 6. cap. 10. For the first branch of that Statute is that he shall let to baile by Writ or Bill c. which he could not do before as appears 19 H. 6. 43. The second shews the form of the body c. The third contains a penalty that if the Sheriff take an obligation in any other form c. than is there prescribed that it shall be voyd so that upon consideration of all the branches together and upon their coherence and dependance one upon another it plainly appears that the said Statute doth extend onely to obligations of such as are within their guard and custody and not otherwise Co. l. 10. 138. b 1 in Chester Mills case 10 Always such construction ought to be made of an Act af Parliament that one part thereof may agrée with the rest Exposition an Act. and that all may stand well together c. Co. l. 11. 44. a. 4 in Richard Godfreys case 11 The Iustices shall assesse the Fines of Copiholders upon the due consideration of all circumstances Copihold Fines Quà m rationabilis debet esse finis non definitur sed omnibus circumstantiis inspectis pendet ex Justiciariorum discretione And so it was adjudged in Communi Banco Inter Stallon Plaintiff and Brady Defendant P. 9. Jac. 1845. Rot. Co. l. 5. 79. b. in Fitz-herberts case 12 Tenant for life Warranty that comâ—ceth by dâ—sin the remainder to his sonne and heire apparent in taile by covin and agréement betwixt him and A. and B. to the intent to barre his son of his remainder by a collateral warranty makes a lease for years to A. who makes feoffment in fée to B. to whom the father releaseth with warranty and all this is by covin and consent betwixt the parties to the intent aforesaid After this the father dies and the warranty descends upon the sonne being then of full age Resolved per totam curiam that this warranty shall not barre the sonne because the feoffment of the Lessée for years is disseisin and the father himselfe is particeps Criminis and agréeing thereunto then albeit the release with warranty is made after the disseisin yet in as much as the disseisin was to such an intent and purpose the Law will adjudge upon the whole Act as it is agréed in 19 H. 8. 12. If a man disseise another with intent to make feoffment with warranty albeit he make the feoffment twenty years after the disseisin yet the Law will adjudge upon the whole act and the disseisin and warranty shall be coupled together according to the intent of the parties and therefore in such case the law will adjuge the warranty to begin by disseisin albeit they are made at several timâ—s So if a man make a lease of lands in two several Counties reserving an intire rent abeit the livâ—ry be made at several times first in one County and then in another yet the rent is issuing out of the lands in both Counties So likewise if a man make a charter of feoffment of certain lands with warranty and deliver the déed and after make livery of the land secundum formam cartae Here also the Law will adjudge upon the whole act and albeit the déed be delivered at one time and the livery of the land at another time and although a warranty ought to enure upon an estate yet upon the whole matter the warranty is good Eldest childe 13 The use of a recovery was limited by a Latin déed to the use of H. viz. he against whom the recovery was had for life Dyer 337. 36. 16 Eliz. the remainder Seniori puero de corpore H. in taile c. Afterwards H. covenants by an English Indenture to levy a fine to the use aforesaid wherein the use was limited to the use of the eldest child of the bodie of H. c. H. hath issue two children whereof the elder was a daughter and the younger a sonne And in this case it was adjudged that the daughter should have the land for albeit the word puero be indifferent to each sex and then the Male for dignity should be preferred yet because the English indenture hath declared the construction to be the eldest child the daughter shall have
before the more remote though great estate in fée c. And with this accords 24. E. 3. 32. in Pierce Grimsteads case Co. l. 11 99 a. 4 in James Baggs case 5 If a Major and Aldermen of a Town corporate Upon a faâ— return the Court caâ—â—â— proceed which have power by Charter or presciption to dis-infranchise do dis-infranchise one of their members and upon motion in the Kings Bench the Iudges there do award a writ unto them to restore him or otherwise to signiffe the cause c. and they certifie sufficient cause to remove him but it is false In this case the Court cannot thereupon award another writ to restore him neither yet can any issue be taken thereupon because the parties are strangers and have no day in Court Howbeit the party grieves may well have an Action upon the special matter against those that made the certificate and aver that it is false And if it be found for him and he obtain judgment against them so that if may appear to the Iustices that the causes of the return are false then shall they award a writ of restitution and not before and this is proved by the reason of the Book in 9. H. 6. fol. 44. where it is holden that upon a Corpus cum causa if the cause returned be sufficient but indéed false the Court ought to remand the prisoner and he is thereby put to no mischief for if they had no authority to imprison him or that the cause certified be false he may have a Writ of false Imprisonment against them c. Vide Fitz. Tit. corpus cum causa p. 2. the case of 9. H. 6. well abridged F. N. B. 19. i. 6 In a Writ of false Judgment upon a Writ of right patent No errour bâ—fore all câ—â—fied c. or a Writ of right close the plaintiffe shall not assign his errors before all the Record be certified viz. not onely the original but likewise all the residue of the Record F. N. B. 20 e. 22 f. 7 In a Writ of Error when the Record is removed When erroâ— are to be â—signed the Plaintiffe shall assign his Errors before he shall have a Scire facias against the Defendant ad audiendum errores c. Howbeit he shall have a Scire facias before the Record shall be entred for it shall not be entred before the parties have day by the Scire facias c. F. N. B. 38. o. 8 Vpon a Quare Impedit if the Sheriff return tardè and the Defendant appears and the Plaintiff is demanded and comes not in Upon a 〈◊〉 return no 〈◊〉 to the Bishâ—p in this case the Defendant shall not have a Writ to the Bishop c. because no Writ was served against him for he ought to have the Writ served against him before he can have that priviledge c. F. N. B. 39. e. 9 When a man sues a Quare Impedit against another A Certificâ— of an accâ— before 〈◊〉 admittaâ— and after they hanging the suit he sues a ne admittas to the Bishop c. and after they accord in the Co. Pl. to present by turn to that advowson in this case a special Writ shall issue out of the Chancery to the Bishop to admit the Clerk of him who ought by that accord and composition to present to the first turne but first the King ought to send a Certiorare to the Iustices of the Com. Pl. to certifie him in his Chancery of the accord there and upon that Certificate the King shall send his Writ to the Bishop as aforesaid c. A Writ de secunda super oâ—eratione 10 In a Writ de admensuratione pasturae F. N. B. 126. 1. all the Commoners shall be admeasured viz. as well those that were not parties to the writ as those that were but yet if any of them which where not parties c. surcharge the Common after admeasurement they shall not forfeit their cattel nor yet the value of them which were in the pasture above the due number because they were not parties to the first writ neither shall the party that complains recover dammages against them in that writ for such surcharge for a writ de secunda super oneratione lieth not save onely against him against whom the first Writ was sued c. 11 In an Assise of Fresh-force in London against Jekef Foxley and Agnes his wife Matter of fact first to be found and then that in Law to be resolved and eleven other whereof ten appeared by Baily Pl. Co. 91. a. 1. in the Case of the Fresh-force in London against Foxley and others and plead No such Agnes the wife of Foxley in rerum natura and demand judgment of the plaint quod inquiratur per Assisam si c. Nul tort nul diss c. and the others plead the same plea by Attorney And the Plaintiffes as to the plea in abatement of the Plaint demur in law and as to the other plea they pray the Assise And whether the writ should abate or not was argued at Guild-hall by the Councel of both parts before the Assise was taken but afterwards the Councel of the Plaintiffs perceiving that the matter was argued before time for the Assise ought first to have inquired all the matter and if they had found the exception and had also found a disseisor and tenant then would it have been time to have disputed what the Law have determined in that case and not before they therefore prayed the Court when the Assise was sworn that they might first inquire of the matter pleaded in abatement of the Plaint which was done accordingly c. for the course formerly run was preposterous and not suitable to such orderly procéeding as the Law requires And so it was found that there was no such Agnes c. and yet the writ did not abate for the rest c. 75 A digniori fieri debet Denominatio Resolutio Quod ei deâ—rceat for teâ—ant in Dowâ—r and by the â—ourtesie 1 It hath been a question in our Books Co. Inst p. 1. 353. a. 4. whether upon a Recovery had by default in an Action of Wast against tenant in dower or by the Courtesie a Quod ei deforceat lyeth by the Statute of West in cap. 4. For some have holden that in an Action of Waste although it be brought against a tenant in Dower or by the Courtesie that have a Frée-hold yet the damages are the principal because they were recoverable against the tenant in Dower and by the Courtesie by the common Law and the Statute of Glocester gave the place wasted but for a penalty so as the nature of the Action say they remaineth still to be personal for that the dammages are the principal c But the best opinion is conceived to be that albeit in that Action the dammages may be the more
her consent and the working of it shewes that the Plaintife so conceived it 79 Nemo praesumitur alienam posteritatem suae praetulisse Collaterall Warrantie 1 If the Tenant in taile discontinue the taile and hath issue and die Co Inst p. 1. 373. a. 3. Litt. § 709. and the Vncle of the issue release to the discontinue with Warrantie c. and die without issue this is Collateral Warrantie and shall barre the Issue in taile albeit the Vncle had no right at all to the land intailed because the Law presumeth that the Vncle would not un-naturally dis-inherit his Lawfull Heire being of his owne bloud of that right which the same Vncle never had but came to the Heire by another mean unlesse he would leave him greater advancement some other way For nemo praesumitur c. And in this Case the Law will admit no proofe against that which the Law presumeth And so it is likewise of all other Collateral Warranties no man is presumed to do any thing against nature 〈◊〉 conveyance â—ot within the â—â—at of Wils 2 If a man make a voluntary Conveyance of his Land to the use of any of his collateral bloud who is not his heire apparent Co. l. 6. 77. a. 3. in Sr. Geo-cusrons Case that is not within the Act of 32 H. 8. of Wills For it cannot be intended that he will dis-inherit his heire on purpose to defeat the King of his Ward seeing every one hopes to live to see his heire attaine his full age much lesse to defraud him of his Primer seisin Vide Dier 307. 71. 80 The Law esteemeth and judgeth of all things according to their nature and quality Co. Inst p. 1. 91. b. 4. 1 Where the tenant holds of his Lord by fealty and a pound of pepper or a pound of Cummin or a certain number of Capons Certain services not doâ—bled for relieâ— or hens or a pair of Gloves or certain bushels of wheat or the like the Lord shall have so much for relief as he receives in rent viz. a pound of pepper a pound of Cummin or the like But if the tenant holdeth of the Lord by doing certain work-dayes in Harvest or to attend at Christmas or the like he shall not double the same for of corporal service or labour or work of the tenant no relief is due It being onely payable where the tenant holdeth by such yearly rents or profits which may be paid or delivered c. Co. ib. 92 a. 2. Litt. §. 128 129. 2 When the tenant holdeth by such yearly rents or profits Not to be distrained for presently as may be presently delivered the relief is due to be paid to the Lord immediately upon the tenants death and upon non-payment thereof the Lord may distrain for it presently Howbeit if the tenant holds of his Lord by a Rose or by a bushel of Roses to be paid at the Feast of St. John Baptist if such a tenant die in winter the Lord shall forbear to distrain for the Relief untill the season of Roses for Lex spectat naturae ordinem Lex non cogit ad impossibilia And therefore it is observed by my Lord Cook that Littleton puts a diversity betwéen Corn and Roses for Corn will last and therefore the tenant must deliver the Corn presently before the time of growth and so of saffron c. but Roses and other flowers that are fructus fugaces cannot be kept and therefore are not to be delivered until the time of growing neither is the tenant driven by law artificially to preserve Roses for the Law in these cases respected nature and the course of the year c. Co. ib. 121. b. 4 Co. l. 4. 36. b. 4. in Tyrringhams case Pl. Co. 168. Hill Granges Case 3 Prescription although never so ancient cannot make any thing appendant or appurtenant Things properly appeâ—dant and appurtenant unlesse the thing appendant or appurtenant agrée in quality and nature with the thing whereunto it is so appendant or appurtenant as a thing corporeal cannot properly be appendant to a thing corporeal nor a thing in-corporeal to a thing incorporeal but things incorporeal which lie in grant as Advowsons Villains Commons and the like may be appendant to things corporeal as to a Mannor house or lands so also may things corporeal be appendant to things incorporeal as Lauds to an Office but yet these also ought to agrée in nature and quality for Common of Turbary or Estovers cannot be appendant or appurtenant to Land but to an house to be spent therein nor a Léet which is temporal to a Church or Chappel which is Ecclesiastical Neither can a Noble man Esquire c. claim a seat in a Church by prescription as appendant or belonging to land but to an house for that such a seat belongeth to the house in respect of the Inhabitancy thereof and therefore if the house be part of a Mannor yet in that case he may claim the seat as appendant to the house for the reason aforesaid Co. ibid. 129. a. 4. 4 A man cannot be naturalized either with limitation for life Naturalization or intail or upon condition for that is against the absolutenesse purity and indelebility of natural Allegiance Co. ib. 130. a. 4 5 Corporations aggregate of many are not capable of the Protections of Profecturae or moraturae Corporatiâ—â— because the Corporation it self is invisible and resteth onely in consideration of law Ca. ib. 144. b. 4 6 Littleton saith § 219 that the Grantée of a rent charge hath election to bring a writ of annuity Rent-chaâ—â—â— and so changing the person onely to make it personal or else to distrain upon the land and so to make it real but this is to be understood with some limitation for of a rent granted for owelty of partition a writ of Annuity doth not lie because it is of the nature of the land descended Also of such a rent as may be granted without déed a writ of Annuity doth not lie although it be granted by déed c. 7 If there be two Ioynt-tenants Co. ib. 192. b. 3. Litt. §. 302. and the one lets his moity to another for life â—oynt-tenants In this Case the Ioynture is severed so that if the Ioynt-tenant which still retains the frank-rent of his moity have issue and die the issue shall have that moity by descent because a frank-tenant cannot by nature of Ioynture be annexed to a barâ— reversion c. Divine Serâ—ice frank-almoigne 8 Where the Common or Statute Law giveth remedy in foro seculari Co. Inst p. 1. 96. b. Litt. §. 137. whether the matter be temporal or spiritual the Connusance of that Cause belongs to the Kings temporal Courts onely unlesse the Iurisdiction of the Ecclesiastical Court be saved c. as if an Abbot or Prior hold of his Lord by Divine Service certain and
in the Case of a common person Co. ib. 31. b. 4. 2 If a Common Person take an Alien to Wife and die An alien albeit he were seised of Lands in Fée or Fée taile yet shall not his Wife be endowed but if the King take an Alien borne and die she shall be endowed by the Law of the Crowne And yet Edmund brother to E. 1. married the Quéen of Navarre Rot. Parl. 26 E. 1. Rot. 1. and died And it was resolved by all the Iudges that she should be endowed of the third part of all the Lands whereof her husband was seised in fee. Co. ib. 90. a. 4. F. N. B. 33. p. q. r. 3 If a Bishop hath an Advowson and the Church becomes void Bishop Advowson and the Bishop dies neither the Successor nor the Executors shall present but the King because it is but a Chose in action Co. ib. 388. a. 2. F. N. B. 33. p. q. r. 4 A man holds the mannor of D. whereunto an Advowson is appendant of the King by Knights-service the Church becomes void Advowson Wardship Eâ—ecutors and then the Tenant dies his heire under age in this Case the King shall present and not the Executors of the Tenant And this is by reason of a prerogative that belongeth to the King to provide for the Church being void for where the tenure by Knight-service is of a Common Person the Executors of the Tenant shall present c. Co. ib. 108. b. 2. 5 Tenure by rendring yearly to the Lord a Bow a Sword Petty Serjeancie Soccage a Dagger a Gantlet or such other small things belonging to warre in Case of a Common Person is nothing else but plain soccage ab effectu because it had such effects and incidents as belong to soccage and neither ward nor marriage c. But in the Kings Case in respect of the dignity of the Kings Person it obtaineth the Name of Petie Serjeancie c. Co. ib. 118. a. 2. Litt § 177 178. 6 If a Villain purchase Land and alien it before the Lord enter Villein pâ—â—chas Land 〈◊〉 goods seisâ—â— the Lord is barred for ever For before the Lord enters he hath neither jus jure nec jus ad rem but onely a possibilitie of an Estate which Estate he must gaine by his entry And therefore if the Villain doth by way of prevention alien before the Lord doth enter the Lord is for ever barred of the possibilitie which he had to enjoy the Land Si autem servus vendiderit feodum Fleta l. 3. c. 13 Britt fol. 98. a. 19 E. 2. Dow. 171. quod sibi haeredibus perquisiverit antequam Dominus seisinam inde caeperit valet donatio Dominus sibi ipsi imputer quod tantum expectavit saith Fleta Howbeit if the Kings Villain purchaseth Land and alieneth before the King upon an Office found for him doth enter yet the King after Office found shall have the Land Quia nullum tempus occurrit Regi And yet after Office found the King shall not have the mean profits because the title commenceth by the seisure Litt. §. 178. It is otherwise of Goods in the Kings Case For if the Kings Villain acquire any Goods or Chattels the property of them is in the King before any seisure or Office And it is well said of an Ancient Author Mirr cap. 3. Britt fol. 88. Al Roy quant al droit de la Corone on á franch Estate ne poet nul temps accurre and another speaking in the Person of the King saith Nul temps nest limit quant á mes droits c. â—â—narty 7 Where a Church is presentative Co. ibid. 119. b. 4. 344 a. 4. it is full by admission and institution against any common Person but against the King it is not full before Induction â—â—een purâ—â—s sue 8 By the Common Law the Wife of the King of England is an exempt Person from the King Co. ibid. 132. a. 4. Co. l. 4. 23. b. 2. Clerke Pennyfathers Case and is capable of Lands and tenements of the gift of the King as no other Feme covert is and may sue and he sued without the King for the wisedome of the Common Law would not have the King whose continuall care and study is for the Publique circa ardua Regni to be troubled and disquited for such private and petty causes So as the wife of the King of England is of ability and capacity to grant and to take to sue and to be sued as a Feme sole by the Common Law Also the Quéen of England hath many other prerogatives viz. She shall find no pledges for such is her dignity as she shall not be amerced â—â—ince Neither she nor the Kings Son are restrained by the Statute of 1 H. 4. c. 6. concerning grants by the King In a Quare Impedit brought by her some say that plenarty is no plea no more then in the Case of the King â—â—enarty Baiâ—â—â—e Hundred If any Bailiffe of the Quéenes bring an Action concerning the Hundred he shall say In contemptum Domini Regis Regiâ—ae The Quéen shall pay no toll c. â—enancie part â—â—iened diâ—â—â—ain in all 9 If the Quéenes Tenant alien a certain part of his tenancie to one Co. ibid. 133. b. 1. and another part to another the Quéen may distraine in any one part for the whole as the King may do but other Lords shall distraine but for the rate Ane therefore where the Quéen so distraineth there lyeth a writ de onerando per rata portione â—rit of right â—â—rected Also the writ of right shall not be directed to the Quéen no more then to the King but to her Bailif otherwise it is when any other is Lord. â—yde counterâ—leaded 10 In case of Ayde prayer of the Quéen Co. ibidem it is Domina Regina inconsulta and the cause of the Ayde prayer shall not be counterpleaded no more then in the Kings Case And see where the ayde shall be granted of the King and Quéen and where of the Quéen onely and she of the King 14 E. 3. Voucher 110. 21 E. 3. 53. 22 E. 3. 3. b. 17 E. 3. 65. 10 E. 3. 17. 5 E. 3. 4. 15 E. 3. Ayde del Roy 66. 10 E. 3. 18. 26 H. 6. Ayde le Roy 24. â—â—otect Marleâ—â— distresse 11 A protection shall be allowed against the Queen Co. ibidem but not against the King neither shall the Quéen be sued by petition but by a praecipe The Quéen is not bound by the Statute of Marlebridge for driving a distresse into another County â—eath treason â—â—wag 12 If any do compas the death of the Quéen Co. ibid. 133. b. 2. and declare it by any over fact the very intent is treason as in the Case of the King No man may marry the Quéen Dowager without the
be in better condition then the subject from whom the claimes and in that case shall have the priority and so shall his grantée also c. as is holden in 24 E. 3. 65. Fitz. tit gard 27 47. Co. l. 5. 91. b. 3. in Semaynes Case 39 In all cases when the King is partie Sheriffe 〈◊〉 open dooreâ— the Sheriffe if no doore be not open may after notice given of the cause of his coming request made to have the door opened break open the house of the partie either to take him or to make other execution of the Kings process if he cannot otherwise enter into it but so it is not in the case of a subject c. So for felonie or suspicion of felonie the Kings officer may breake the house to take the felon because in every felonie the King hath an Interest and where the King hath Interest Felonie the writ is Non omittas propter aliquam libertatem and therefore the libertie or priviledge of an house shall not hold out against the King besides it concernes the Common Wealth that felons be apprehended and in that respect also the King hath a special Interest being the head of that body c. Co. l. 5. 104. a. in Bakers case 40 T. 42 E. in B. R. in Ejectione firmae it was resolved Demurre that if the Plaintiffe shew in evidence any matter in writing Record or Sentence in the Ecclesiastical Court whereupon Question in Law may rise and the defendant offers to demurre c. the Plaintiffe cannot refuse to joyne in demurrer unlesse he will waive his evidence so if the Plaintiffe produce witnesses and the defendant admit their testimonie to be true he may demurre c. So also may the Parliament demurre mutatis mutandis Howbeit upon evidence in an information for the King his Council shall not be compelled to demurre But in that Case the Court may direct the Iury to find the special matter and thereupon they shall adjudge the Law as appeares in 34 H. 8. Dier 53. And this is by reason of the Kings prerogative who may also waive the demurrer and take issue at his pleasure Nota bene Co. lib. 5. 106. a. 4. 108. b. 1. in Sir Henry Constables case 41 Originally the Common Law gave unto the King all such things as were In nullius bonis as Wrecke viz. Goods Things 〈◊〉 liuâ— boâ—i quae naufragio ad terram appelluntur Flotsan viz. When the Ship is drowned or otherwise perished and the Goods flote upon the Sea Wrecke Jetsam as when the Ship is in danger to be drowned and to dis-burden the Ship the Goods are cast into the Sea and after notwithstanding the Ship perisheth Estrayers Lagan vel potius Figan as when the Goods so cast out are so ponderous that they sinke and the Mariners to the end they might find them again fasten a piece of Corke or a Boye to them that will not sinke and therefore this séemes to be called Ligan à Ligando It gave also to the King Estrayes which Bracton calles Animalia vagantia and others Animalia vacantia quia Domino vacari debent Also treasure trove and the like Because by the Rule of the Common Law when none could claime a property in any Goods the King was to have them by his prerogative And therefore Bracton saith Sunt alia quaedam quae in nullius bonis esse dicuntur sicut Wreccum maris Bract. l. 3. c. 3. Grossus Piscis sicut Sturgio Balena aliae res quae Dominum non habent sicut animalia vagantia quae sunt Domini Regis propter privilegium Mare Clausum And note that the King shall have Flotsan Jetsan and Lagan by his prerogative as well as wrecke Albeit they be in or upon the Sea for the Sea is of the Kings Ligeance and parcel of this Crowne of England as it is holden in 6 R. 1. protection 46. and Britton cap. 33. agrées well with the opinion of Bracton that wrecke c. are things in nullius bonis and come into the hands of the subject Originally by Kings grant his words are these Britt c. 33. Et ausi purchas lou per franchise grantee par nous de choses trovves en nulluy biens si come de wrecke de neer bestes estrayantes of Conies Levres pessons Fesants Pertris autres Bestes sauvages par franchise de aver wrecke de meer trouve en son soil waife estray trouve en son fee garrennes en ses demesnes terres c. Lady Peere â—rest 42 A Countesse by descent or mariage cannot be arrested for debt or trespas 1 In respect of her dignity 2 The Law presumes Co. l. 6. 52. b. 3. in the Case of Isabel Countesse of Rutland that she hath sufficient in Lands and Tenements so hereby to be distrained for albeit in respect of her sex she cannot sit in Parliament yet she is a Péere and shall be tried by her Péeres as appeares of 20 H. 6. cap. 9. which was nothing else but a declaration of the Common Law So it is also of a Baron that is a Péere of Parliament 11 H. 4. 15. In homine repligiando against the Lady Spencer it appeares that the said Lady was a Peere of the Realme â—pon account Lady not exâ—ined 43 In 3 H. 6. 48. Co. ibid. 53. a. 1. A Writ of debt upon arrerages of accompt was brought by the Lady of Aburgavenie against another the Defendant pleads Rien luy doit and is ready to make his Law and prayes by force of the Statute of 5 H. 4. cap. 8. that the Parliament might be examined which Act is generall viz. that examination shall be made which is alwayes intended upon oath And there Cokein who gave the Rule said La Dame d'Aburgavenie est un Peere del Realme ne sera bien fait de luy faire venir d'estre examine Car par mesme la reason nous Dames faire venir chescun Duke on Countee d'Angliterre Rolfe Serjeant purquoy nou Sr. Le dit Statute est general est fait pur chescun home haut base A que Cokein dit le ley voit over diversity pur enter Seignior ou Dame c. auter Common Person By which book it may be observed that a Lady which is but the wife of a Baron is a Péere of the Realme and is in equipage as to Nobility and priviledges incident to their dignities with Dukes â—duo Juror Earles c. 44 In 48 E. 3. 30. Co. ibid. 53. a. 3. Sir Ralfe Everden Knight brings a writ to the Chancery and also a writ of the Privy seale to the Iustices rehearsing that he was a Baron and commanding them to discharge him of his oath in juratis accessis recognitionibus quibuscunque because the Barons ought not to be sworne upon Inquests and Recognitions
and the six moneths passe and after the Kings tenant dies before the Bishop presents by laps and leaves his heir within age and in ward to the King In this case the Bishop shall not present by laps but the King shall have the presentment by reason of the ward c. F. N. B. 35. p. 75 In a Quare Impedit for the King Not stopt albeit the Defendant hath a writ to the Bishop against the King yet the King may sue a new Quare Impedit against the party of the same avoidance and make another title F. N. B. 37. f. 76 The King may sue a Ne admittas after the six moneths past Ne admittas where he hath a Quare Impedit or an Assise de Darrein presentment depending because Nullum tempus occurrit Regiâ— It is otherwise in the Case of a common person because the Bishop may then present by laps the title of presentment being devolved to him c. F. N. B. 38. e. 77 In a Quare Impedit betwéen two strangers The Kings title if the title appears to the Court for the King they award a writ to the Bishop for the King accordingly F. N. B. 60. i. 78 Vpon grant of a Reversion Wast Attornment although it be by fine the Grantée cannot bring an Action of wast against the tenant before Attornment but if the King grant a Reversion by his Letters Patents the Grantée may have an Action of waste before Attornment F. N. B. 85. a. 79 At the Common Law every man may go out of the Realm for Merchandizing Peregrination Ne exeâ—s regâ— absque lier 〈◊〉 Regis or other Cause whatsoever pleased him without the Kings licence and he was not to be punished for it Howbeit because every man is by Law bound to defend the King and his Realm therefore the King at his pleasure may by his Writ de securitate invenienda quòd se non divertat ad partes exteras sine licentia Regis command that he shall not go out of the Realm without his licence c. And if he doth it he may be punished for dis-obeying the Kings Command And it séems that this Commandement may be made by the Kings Writ under the Great Seal Privy Seal or Privy Signet For in this Case the Subject is bound to take notice of every Seal the King hath as well as of the Great Seal F. N. B. ibid. c. The King may do the like by his Proclamation in Case he cannot be found to have the Writ served upon him which if he obey not it is a contempt for which he shall make fine to the King Note that by the Statute of 5 R. 2. cap. 2. it was ordained that none should go out of the Realm without the Kings licence which continued in force until 4 Jac. and then by the Statute of 4 Jac. cap. 1. that Clause of that Statute was repealed So that at this day it séems that the Subject hath the same liberty that he had at the Common Law Dier 296. 19. yet by the words in the beginning of the writ which are these Rex A. de B salut c. Quia datum est nobis intelligi quod tu versus partes exteras absque licentia nostra clà m destinas te divertere It séems he cannot go out of the Realm unlicensed by the King c. As Dyer observes 165. p. 6. Ideo quaere de hoc Protection 80 If after the King hath granted to one his protection F. N. B. 92. b. c. any man takes his Goods or enters into his Lands c. or beats his Servants c. the partie grieved shall have a special writ directed to the Seriffe to inquire of them and to certifie it before the King c. And it séemes that the King shall make processe against them by venire facias as upon an Indictment and that they shall make fine hereupon Sea-banks Sâ—wers 81 The King ought of Right to have and defend his Realme as well against the brâ—akings in of the Sea F. N. B. 133. a. as against enemies that it be not drowned or wasted and to provide remedy for it And also to provide that his subjects have their passages throughout the Realme by Bridges and safe Wayes And therefore if the Sea-bankes be broken or Sewers and Gutters be not scoured that the fresh waters may have their direct Course the King may and ought to make a Commission to inquire thereof c. And to hear and determine those defaults But now matters that concerne Sewers are regulated by direct late Statute viz. 23 H. 8. 5. 13 El. 9. c. Priority Wardship 82 If a Man hold of the King by Posteriority F. N. B. 142. f. and of another man by priority and after the King grants to the Quéen the Seigniory for terme of life and after the Tenant dies his heire within age In this Case the Quéen shall have the wardship of the body having no regard to the Posteriority Because the Reversion of the Seigniory remaines still in the King It had béen otherwise if the King had granted it in remainder to another in Fée for then it seemes they should not have had the priority c. Annuity 83 If the King grant an Annuity to one for terme of life or yeares F. N. B. 152. k. it ought to be expressed in the grant by whose hands he shall receive that Annuity as to say by the hands of the Sheriffe of S. or by our Baylife of the Mannor of S. and then the Sheriffe or Baylife shall have allowance upon that Patent shewing if he pay it And if there be not such words in the grant of the Annuity then the grant is void For he cannot sue to the King for it and no person is bound to pay it unto him if he be not named and expressed in the Patent c. â—yde â—â—ayer Procedendo 84 If a Man pray in Ayde of the King F. N. B. 253. e. f. and the Ayde is granted then shall it be awarded that he shall sue to the King in the Chancery And the Iustices of the Common Pleas shall cease until a Writ De procedendo in loquela come unto them c. And then they may procéed in the Plea until it go on so farre that Iudgement ought to be given c. For the Plaintiffe And then also the Iudges ought not to procéed to Iudgement until another Writ De procedendo ad judicium be brought unto them And if the King certifie the Iustices by his writ that the Lands are seised into the Kings hands then also shall they surcease until a writ De procedendo loquela be sent into them c. And if it appeare to the Iustices upon Record that the Tenements are seised into the Kings hands or if it appeare to the Court by the pleading and shewing of the Parties that the
Alien that is condemned in an information shall have a writ of Error to relieve himselfe Et sic de similibus â—â—eading 12 If an Alien that is no Alien Enemy Co. ibid. b. 2. in Calv. Case ubi suprà commence a suit the Tenant or Defendant may plead in dis-ability and ought at last to demand Iudgement Si il sera respondue But if an Alien Enemy bring a suit he shall conclude to the Action by saying Judgement si action Co. ib. 156. b. 4 and 129. a. 1. 13 It is a principal Challenge to the Poll Juror that the Iuror is an Alien born and that is propter defectum Patriae or rather ligeanciae as Littleton hath it or Subjectionis as Bracton Co. l. 7. 6. a. 4 in Calvins Case 14 It is to be observed that it is nec Coelum nec Solum Ligeance makes a Subject born neither the Climate nor the Soil but ligeantia obedientia that make a man to be a Subject born for if enemies should come into this Kingdome and possesse a Town or Fort and have issue there that issue is no Subject to the King of England though he be born upon his Soil and under his both Climate and Meridian because he was not born under the ligeance of a Subject nor under the protection of the King Co. ib. 15 If an Alien of a Countrey in league with the King come into this Kingdome and here commit Treason An Alien in league shall be indicted It is otherwise of an alien Enemy who shall be punished by Martial Law c. he shall be indicted for it and procéeded against according to the municipal Law of the land and the indictment shall begin and end as other indictments do viz. the beginning shall be contra Dominum Regem c. and it shall also end thus Contra ligeantiae suae debitum c. Onely in the middle these words shall be omitted naturalem Dominum suum c. as it was resolved in Hill 36. Eliz. in the Case of Stephano Ferrara de Gama and Emanuel Ludovico Tinoco two Portugals born who comming into England under the safe Conduct of Quéen Elizabeth and living here under her protection joyned with Doctor Lopez in treason against her Majesty But if an alien enemy come to invade this Land and be taken in war he cannot be indicted of treason for it because the indictment cannot conclude Contra ligeantiae suae debitum for he never was in the Kings protection nor ever ought any manner of ligeance unto him but malice and enmity and therefore in that Case such an Alien shall be put to death by Martial law And so it was in 15 H. 7. in the Case of Perkin VVarbeck who being an Alien born in Flanders feigned himself one of the sons of E. 4. and invaded this Kingdome with intent to take upon him the Royal Dignity but being taken in war it was resolved by the Iustices that he could not be punished by the Common Law but before the Constable and Marshal according to Martial Law and so he was according to that Law adjudged to be hanged drawn and quartered and was in that manner executed accordingly Co. ibid. 17. a. 16 Every Alien is either a friend that is in league An alien friend and enemy c. or an enemy that is in open war c. Every alien enemy is either so pro tempore a temporary enemy for a time or perpetuus perpetual or specialiter permissus permitted in a special manner An alien friend so long as he so continues to be may acquire by gift or purchase Lands c. but cannot hold them he may also have Leases and Goods for Trade and Commerce sake maintain personal actions c. as is above-said But if such an Alien become an Enemy as all Aliens friends may then is he utterly dis-abled to maintain any action or get any thing within this Realm but a perpetual enemy though there be no Wars by fire and sword between them cannot maintain any Action or get any thing within this Realm such as are all Infidels which are in law estéemed perpetui inimici because the Law presuming that they will not be converted that being remota potentia betwéen them as with Devils whose Subjects they are and the Christian there is perpetual hostility and can be no peace For as the Apostle saith 2 Cor. 6.15 Quae autem concordia Christo cum Beliali aut quae portio fideli cum infideli And the Law saith Judaeo Christianum nullum serviat mancipium Nefas enim est quem Christus redemit Blasphemum Christi in servitutis vinculis detinere Register 282. Infideles sunt Christi Christianorum inimici And herewith agréeth the Book in 12 H. 8. fol. 4. where it is holden that a Pagan cannot have or maintain any action at all And upon this ground there is a diversity betwéen the Conquest of a Kingdome of a Christian King and the Conquest of the Kingdome of an Infidel For if a King come to a Christian Kingdome by Conquest séeing that he hath vitae necis potestatem he may at his pleasure alter and change the Lawes of that Kingdome but untill he doth make an alteration of them the ancient Lawes thereof shall remain Howbeit if a Christian King should conquer a Kingdome of an Infidel and bring them under his subjection there ipso facto the Lawes of the Infidel are abrogated for that they be not onely against Christianity but against the Law of God and Nature contained in the Decalogue And in that Case until certain Lawes be established amongst them the King by himself or such Iudges as he shall appoint shall judge them and their Causes according to natural equity in such sort as Kings in ancient time did within their Kingdomes before any certain municipal Lawes were given But if a King hath a Kingdome by title of Descent there séeing by the Lawes of that Kingdome he doth inherit the Kingdome he cannot change these Lawes himself without consent of Parliament c. As for an Alien Enemy that is inimicus permissus he is an Enemy that comes into the Realme by the Kings Conduct c. Vide 7. 4. The Defendant pleaded an Alien 17 In an Action brought by a Subject against an Alien Co. ibid. 25. a. 4. in Calvins Case the Subject shall plead that the Defendant is an Alien born for the benefit of the King to the end that the King upon Office found may seise that whereof the Alien is seised or possest and also that the tenant may yield the same to the King and not to the Alien because the King hath best right thereunto Flea against an Alien 18 In an Action real against an Alien born Dier 2. 8. 6 H. 8. it is a good plea in dis-ability of the person to say that he is an Alien born otherwise in Actions personal but against an
as it were by way of excuse to give the special matter in evidence as to say that it was se defendendo or in defence of his house in the night against Theeves and Robbers or the like Co. l. 3. 11. b. 4. in Sir Will. Herberts case 16 The liberty of a man is of such high estéeme in the consideration of Law that he could not at the Common Law he imprisoned At the Common Law to capias for 〈◊〉 c. unlesse he were guilty of committing some force for the Law being the preserver of the Common peace of the Land abhorres all force as one of her capital Enemies and therfore as concerning such as commit force the Common Law subjects their bodies to imprisonment as to one of the highest Executions of Law whereby they lose their liberty until they have made agréement with the party and fine to the King for which cause it is a Rule in Law that in all Actions Quare vi armis a Capias lies and where a Capias lies in process there after judgement a Capias ad satisfaciendum lies and there also the King shall have a Capias pro fine And with this agrées 8 H. 6. 9. 35 H. 6. 6. 22 E. 4. 22. 40 E. 3. 25. 49 E. 3. 2. and divers other Books But at the Common Law if a common Person had sued a recognisance or judgement for debt or damages he could not have the body of the Defendant nor his lands unlesse in some special case in execution but was onely in such case to have execution either of his goods and chattels by fieri facias or of his graine or other present profits which encreased upon the land by levati facias both which writs were to be sued within the yeare after the judgement or recognisance acknowledged and if he had neither the one of the other within the yeare the Plaintiffe or Conusée was then put to his writ of debt c. And then by the Statute of Westm 2. cap. 45. a scire facias was given and by cap. 18. cum debitum fuerit recuperatum c. an Elegit of the moity of the land which was the first Act that subjected land to the execution of a judgement or recognisance and with this agrées F. N. B. 265. q. And then by the Statute of 13 E. 1. de Mercatoribus 27 E. 3. cap. 9. and 23 H. 8. cap. 6. In case of a Statute Merchant or staple all the lands which the Conusor had the day of the conusance shall be extended in whose hands soever they come c. Also by the Statute of Malbridge cap. 23. and of West 2. cap. 11. A capias was given in accompt for at the Common Law processe in accompt was distresse infinite and after by the Statute of 25 E. 3. 17. the like processe was given in the debt as in accompt before which two last recited Statutes the body of the Defendant was not liable to the execution in accompt or debt c. neither yet was the land liable in debt as afore-said save in the Kings case and in the case of an heire in by descent and chargeable by the Obligation of his Ancestor c. Co. l. 4. 40. 2. 3. Darleys Case 17 In P. 25 E. Wotherel brings an appeal against Dorley of murder the Defendant pleads not guilty and he was found guilty of homicide Life shall 〈◊〉 be twice 〈◊〉 in jeopardy for the same offence and had his Clergy and after he was indicted of murder and thereupon arraigned at the Quéens suit and he pleaded the former condition in the appeale at the suit of the party And it adjudged a good barre because the life of a man is so precious in judgemedt of Law that it shall not be twice put in jeopardy for one and the same offence The like is agréed in Brooks Case H. 28 El. and P. 33 El. in Vaux his Case which sée Co. l. 4. 45. a. Nâ—â— compos â—â—tis shall not lose his â—ife for felony 〈◊〉 murder 18 Every Act that a man de non sanae memoriae doth Co. ibid. 124. in Beverleys Case either concernes his life his lands or his goods also every Act that he doth is either done in pais or in a Court of Record All Acts which he doth in a Court of Record concerning his lands and goods shall bind himselfe and all other persons for ever Also all Acts which he doth concerning his lands and goods in pais in some cases shall bind himselfe onely during his life and in some case shall bind for ever c. But as for his life the Law of England is that he shall not lose that albeit he kill a man and thereby make himselfe subject to be indicted for felony or murder c. The death of a â—an grievously punished by the Law 19 The Law surpriseth the life of a man Co. ibid. 2. 4. in Beverleys Case that it inflicteth grievous punishment upon them that are guilty of taking away and destroying it for the malefactor in that case shall 1. Lose his life 2. Lose it after an ignominious and odious manner viz. by hanging for he shall be hanged betwixt heaven and earth as unworthy of both 3. He shall lose his bloud both in respect of his ancestry for he is estéemed as a Terrae-silius without any Ancestor and also in respect of his posterity for his bloud is corrupt and he leaveth behind him neither heire nor posterity 4. He loseth his lands 5. His goods And in such case also the King shall have Annum diem vastuna to the intent that his Wife and his Children should be cast out his houses demolished his trées eradicated and stockt up his meadowes broken up and ploughed and all that he hath for his comfort delight and sustenance wasted and destroyed because he hath in such a felonious manner offended against the Law and all this is ut poena ad paucos metus ad omnes perveniat c. Upon an Arâ—â—st the cause 〈◊〉 be shewâ—d 20 The Law so provideth for the preservation of a mans liberty Co. l. 6. 54. 2. 4. in the Countesse of Rutlands Case that no general arrest is déemed legall without shewing the particular cause wherefore he is arrested And therefore the Sheriffe or any other by his authority which makes an arrest of the person of another ought upon the arrest to shew at whose suit out of what Court for what cause he doth it and when the processe is returnable to the intent that if it be upon an execution he may pay the money and so frée his body from imprisonment and if it be upon a mesne processe may either agree with the party or put in baile according to the Law and so make his apparence accordingly c. â—he Coll. of â—ys cannot â—â—mmit 21 An Act of Parliament Co. lib. 8. 120. a. 3. Doctor Bonhams Case that gives power of
Sessions quod non legit Dier 205. b. 3 4 â—l and the prisoner is for some cause reprieved yet he may read at the next Sessions and shall have his Clergy in favorem vitae Vide 36 H. 6. that a Prisoner shall have his Clergy under the Gallows Life goods 44 If two men tilt before the King Hob. 134. Weaver and Ward or two Masters of Defence be playing their Prizes and one of them happen to kill the other this is not Felony because not done animo felonico and besides if it should be questioned as an Offence the life of the Offender which the Law much tenders would be brought into jeopardy there is the same Law also of a Lunatique that kills a man Howbeit in Trespasse which intends onely to give dammages according to hurt and losse it is not so And therefore if a Lunatique hurt a man he shall be answerable in Trespasse So likewise if in training for exercise in re militari one Souldier happen to hurt another he shall be answerable in Trespasse because it extends no farther then to his goods to satiâ—â—e dammages yet if the accident were inevitable he shall be excused c. 93 Things in the Realty more then those in the Personalty In waste the place wasted â— more respect then the dammages 1 It hath béen a question Co. Inst p. 1. 355. a. 4 c. Note that it is holden per Curiam 9 H. 5. 15. that the personalty is the principal Ideo quare Vide Co. l. 2. 68. b. 1. in Tookers case whether upon a Recovery had by default in an Action of Waste against tenant in Dower or by the Courtesie a Quod ei deforceat lieth upon the Statute of West 2. cap. 4. And some hold that it doth not in regard the dammages as they say are the principal and not the place wasted because the dammages were recoverable upon that action against such Tenants at the Common Law and the place wasted was afterwards given by the Statute of Glocester as a penalty so as the nature of the Action say they remaineth still to be personal for that the dammages are the principal c. But in that Case others are of opinion and say that albeit in that Action the dammages may be the more ancient recompence yet the place wasted being in the realty must néeds be the more principal And therefore upon a Recovery by default in such an action a Quod ei deforceat lieth as well as in any other c. And this last séems to be my Lord Cooks opinion because put last according to his own Rule in his Comment upon Littleton â— Lien real â—nd personal 2 There is a diversity betwéen a Lien real and a Lien personal Co. ib. 386. b. 3 11. E. 3. det 7. for a Lien real as a warranty doth ever descend to the heir at the Common Law but the Lien personal doth binde the special heirs as all the heirs in Gavelkind the heir on the part of the mother c. when such an heir being charged by the Obligation or other act of the Ancestor is in by descent c. So if two men make a Feoffment in Fée with warranty and the one die the Feoffée cannot vouch the survivor onely but the heir of him that is dead also Howbeit it is otherwise where two do joyntly bind themselves in an Obligation for if one die the survivor onely shall be charged c. Release of one Joynt-tenant no Bar. 3 In personal actions the one Ioynt-tenant may release all Co. l. 2. 68. 24 in Tookers ca. per Popham but if the personalty be mixed with the realty it is otherwise as in an Assise by two the release of all actions personal by the one is no bar against the other for albeit an Assise is an action mixt in the realty and personalty yet omne majus trahit ad se minus as it is adjudged 30 H. 6. Bar 59. Also a Ioynt-tenant shall not prejudice his Companion as to any matter of Inheritance of Frank-tenant but as to the profit of the Frank-tenant the one may prejudice the other for there is a privity and trust betwixt them and therefore if one of them take all the profits of the Land or all the Rent the other hath no remedie c. Things in the Realty may be intailed not those in the Personalty 4 By force of the Statute of West 2. cap. 1. Co. Inst p. 1. 19. b. 4. which createth estates tail under this word tenementa not onely all corporate Inheritances which are or may be holden may be intailed but also all Inheritances issuing out of any of those inheritances or concerning or annexed to or exercisable within the same though they lie not in Tenure as Rents Estovers Commons or other profits whatsoever granted out of land or Vses Offices Dignities c. which concern lands or certain places All these I say may be intailed within that Statute because they savour of the Realty But if the Grant be of an Inheritance meer personal or to be exercised about Chattels and is not issuing out of land nor concerning any land or some certain place such Inheritances cannot be entailed because they savour nothing of the Realty For example in 7 Ass Pl. 12. and 7 E. 6. 1. the Office of the fourth part of the Serjeant of the Common Pleas is liberum tenementum and therefore may be entailed In 18 E. 3. 27. the Office of the kéeping of the Church of our Lady of Lincoln was intailed and a Formedon brought thereupon by the issue intail In 5 E. 4 3. and 10 E. 4. 14. The Office of Marshal of England was intailed In 11 E. 4. 1. the Office of one of the Chamberlains of the Exchequer intailed In 1 H. 7. 28. the Office of a Fostership intailed In 4 H. 7. 10. and 9 E. 4. 56 b. Charters intailed In 19 H. 8. 3 An Vse intailed In 1 H. 5. 1. The nomination to a Benefice intailed c. Co. l. 7. 33. 34 Nevilâ— Caâ—â— 28 H. c. the Lord Vesceâ—â— Case Also the name of Dignity may be intailed within that Statute as Dukes Marquesses Earls Vicounts and Barons because they are named of some County Mannor Town or place In 14 Ass Pl. 2. if the issue in tail in a Formedon in a Descender be barred by false Verdict his release is no bar to his issue albeit the action is at the Common Law The like Law is of a writ of Error 3 Eliz. Dier 188. If a gift in tail be made with warrantie the Donée releases the warranty this shall not binde the issue in tail for to all these Cases and the like the said Statute doth extend But if I grant to a man and to the heirs of his body to be Kéeper of my Hounds or Master of my Horse or to be my Faulconer or the like with a fée therefore yet these cannot be
being heir in appearance and he is not bound to dis-able himselfe â—â—ministratiâ—â—â—oid and â—â—able 6 If an Ordinary of a Diocesse commits Administration of Goods Co. l. 5. 29. b. 4. in Princes Case Were and Jefferies Case when they are bona notabilia such Administration is méerly void but Administration committed by the Metropolitan when the defunct had not bona notabilia is onely voidable because he hath Iurisdiction in all the Diocesses within the Province and therefore hath sufficient colour to do it Co. l. 6. 65. a. 3. in Sir Moile Finches Case 7 In 41 E. 3. 19. Rich. Tompson had Issue by Joan before mariage one Agnes and after he marries Joan and makes feofment in fée A Bastard takes by yâ— chase and retakes the Estate to himselfe for life remanere inde Agnetae filiae praedict Rich. Johanne and it was agréed that this was a good remainder without any averment that she was known to be their Daughter for albeit by the Common Law she was not their Daughter yet in as much as she had colour by the Ecclesiastical law which saith subsequens matrimonium tollit peccatum procedens this colour is sufficient in Case of a conveyance to make the remainder good and so note the diversity betwixt descent and purchase c. Co. l. 8. 101. per tout in Sir R. Lechfords Case The better opinion per Coke 8 If there be Bastard eigne and Mulier puisne Mulier beyonâ— sea c. and the Father die seised the Mulier being beyond Sea within age in Prison or of non sanae memoriae and the Bastard enter and continue in peacable possession of the Lands and hath Issue and dies and the lands descend to his Issue here the right of the Mulier is for ever bound because he hath colour of legitimation by the Law of Holy Church and the Common Law respects legitimation before the above-said Imperfections Vide plus ibid. Co. l. 10. 76. b. in the Case of the Marshalsea 9 If a Sheriffe holding his Torne after Michaelmas moneth takes there an Indictment of Robbery it is utterly void Things done by warrant contra being coram non judice But if the Court of the Common Bench in a plea of Debt award a Capias against a Duke Earle or c. which by the Law lyeth not against them and that appeares in the writ it selfe here if the Sheriffe arrest them upon the Capias albeit the writ be against Law yet because that Court hath jurisdiction of the cause the Sheriffe hath colour to do it and shall be excused and herewith accords Dier 60. b. 38 H. 8. So also if a Iustice of Peace make a warrant to arrest one for Felony who is not indicted albeit the Iustice erre in granting the warrant yet he that makes the arrest by force of that warrant shall not be panished by writ of false imprisonment because the Iustice is Iudge of the Cause Plow 83. b. 1. in Strange and Crokers Case 10 In 9 H. 6. it is said that if I grant to B. Maintenance that if my Tenant for life die during my life that then B. shall have the Land for 10 yeares Here if my Tenant be impleaded B. may lawfully maintaine in respect of the Colour of title he hath to the Land Co. Inst p. 1. 148. b. 4. 11 Entry into Religion and profession of a Disseisor shall not cause a descent to toll the entry of the Disseisée Bastard Mulier because it is the Disseisors owne Act and not the Act of God as death is yet if there be Bastard eigne and Mulier puisne and the Bastard before claime enter into Religion it is said such a discent shall toll the entry of the Mulier by reason of the colour of title that the Bastard had to the land and such an heire shall also have his age 114 It prizeth the Acts of God and of the Law more then those that are done by the party Co. Inst p. 1. 18. a. 4. 1 Fée-simple being as Littleton saith the largest Estate of inheritance that is Two Fee-simples one Fée-simple cannot depend upon another by the grant of the party as if Lands be given to A. so long as B. hath heires of his body the Remainder over in Fée here the Remainder is void yet in several persons by Act in Law a reversion may be in Fée-simple in one and a Fée-simple determinable in another by matter ex post facto as if a Gift in taile be made to a Villein and the Lord enter the Lord hath a Fée-simple qualified and the Donor a reversion in Fée but if the Lord enfeoffe the Donor now both Fée-simples are united and he hath but one Fée-simple in him â—â—ires female â—ill not take 2 When a man giveth lands to another man and the heirs female of his body dieth having issue a son a daughte◠〈◊〉 daughter shall inherit for the will of the donor the Stat. working 〈◊〉 it Co. ib. 24. b. 3 25. b. 3. 26. b. 4. which is upon the matter an act in law shall be observed but in case of a purchase it is otherwise for if A. have issue a son a daughter a lease for life is made the remainder to the heirs females of the body of A. A. dieth the heire female can take nothing because she is not heire for she must be both heire heire female which she is not because the brother is heire and therefore the will of the giver cannot be observed because here is no gift and therefore the Statute cannot work thereupon so it is if a man hath a son and a daughter and dieth lands are given to the daughter and the heirs female of the body of her father the daughter shall take nothing but an Estate for life because there is no such person she being not heire but where a gift is made to a man and to the heirs female of his body there the Donée being the first taker is capable by purchase and the heire female by discent secundam formam doni â—â—tes may 〈◊〉 altered 3 Regularly Estates cannot be altered from one to another Litt. §. 33. Co. ib. 28. a. unlesse all that have interest joine in the alteration thereof but by the Act of God estates may be changed without any act done by the parties that are interessed as if lands be given to a man and the heirs that he shall engender of the body of his wife here the wife hath nothing and the man is Tenant in special taile therefore in this Case if the Feme die without issue on her body begotten by the Baron the estate in special tail is by the act of God charged into tenancy in tail after possibility of issue extinct â—â—ging of â—â—tes 4 If a feofment in fee be made to the use of a man and his wife for the term
his Office is to determine secundum allegata probata and the duty is to acquaint him with their grievances and with all the Causes of their differences which if they or either of them omit to do the Law presumes it is for their own advantage to conceal them And therefore such Concealment shall not annul the award that is made albeit it be made onely of part Co. l. 8. 120 b. 3. in Doctor Bonhams Case 24 It is presumed that every one will make the best of his own Case And therefore in any suit or action Pleading when the Plaintiff makes Replication Surrender c. whereby it appeares that upon the whole Record the Plaintiff hath no cause of Action he shall never have Iudgment albeit the Barre Rejoynder c. be insufficient in Matter for the Court ought to judge upon the whole Record and will suppose that the Plaintiff hath managed his own Cause as well as he can Co. l. 8 133. a. 4. in Turners Case So in an Action of Debt brought against an Executor he pleads two Recoveries against him in a Court of Record which amount to the whole in his hand but sheweth not that the Corporation had jurisdiction to hold Court either by Prescription or by Patent And it did also appear by the Count in that Court that the Action of Debt was brought for 100 l. without mentioning any Obligation and therefore it was to be intended that there was no Obligation and then the Executor was not chargeable in an action of Debt upon a single Contract And in this Case albeit the Defendant in his Barre acknowledged that the Debt was by Obligation yet that shall not make the Count good which the Law presumes the Plaintiff hath made as full as he could Co. ibid. b. 2. 25 In Debt upon an Obligation with Condition to perform Covenants in an Indenture Pleading the Defendant pleads performance of all the Covenants generally and it appeares to the Court that divers of them are in the Negative or Disjunctive and so the Plea being in the general Affirmative is insufficient yet if the Plaintiff reply and shew a breach of one of the Covenants which by his own shewing is not any breach upon which the Defendant demurres In this Case judgment shall be given against the Plaintiff because upon the whole Record it appeares that the Plaintiff had no Cause of Action and it will be alwayes intended that every one will make the best of his own Cause Co. l. 8. 135. a. in Sir John Nedhams Case 6 In Debt to Administrators upon Administration committed by the Bishop of R. the Defendant pleads Administration committed to himselfe by the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Administraâ—â—on because the Intestate had bona notabilia the Plaintiff replies that that Administration was repealed In this Case because the Defendant did not shew in his barre that the Intestate had bona notabilia in certaine It shall be intended that he had not bona notabilia in divers Diocesses yet the Administration committed by the B. of C. is not in this case void but onely voidable â—â—ving a 〈◊〉 27 It is not expected that Tenant by Statute or Elegit c. should a déed of the land because they come to the possession thereof by execution of Law and against the will of the terre-tenant Co. lib. â—â—4 b. 4. in Doctor Leyfeilds Case but Tenant by the courtesie ought to shew a release made to his wife for the law presumes he hath both that and her in his power 〈◊〉 Paâ—â—â—â—â— â—â—gestion 28 The suggestion of the party being inserted in Letters Patents raiseth alwayes suspicion Co. l. 10. 110. a. 2. c. in Legats Case because the Law presumes it is inserted to work him some advantage So if the King by his Letters Patents grant White-acre and Black-acre to I. S. with this clause quae quidem praemissa c. à nobis concelata detenta fuerunt c. This in judgement of Law is the suggestion of the Patentée and shall make the grant void So in 19 E. 3. tit Grant 58. the King by his Letters Patents grants licence to appropriate the Advowson of D. to the Prior of C. quae quidem advocatio non tenetur de nobis and in truth the Advowson was held mediately of the King here the licence was held void for the Booke saith the suggestion was falfe vide plus ibid. â—â—son 〈◊〉 Christian 29 If a Parson or Vicar hath a pension out of another Church F. N B. 51. B. and the pension is with-drawne or another parson takes or claimes it in this case the Parson or Vicar that ought to have may sue for it in the Court Christian and he shall not be stopped by a prohibition but shall have consultation Also upon the prescription he may have a writ of Annuity for it at his Election but if he once bring a writ of Annuity for it he shall never after sue for it in the Court Christian 〈◊〉 â—â—change 30 If the Baron exchange land and after die F. N. B. 149. n. if the Feme hath dower of the land taken in exchange she shall not have dower also of the land given in exchange â—â—â—t-charge â—â—â—y 31 Vpon grant of an Annuity out of land for yeares for life F.N.B. 152. a. or in fée which clause of distresse the grantée hath his Election if it be behind whether he will distraine or bring his writ of Annuity for it Howbeit if once he do either he is for ever after concluded for doing the other for the Law supposeth he will make choise of that which tends to his best advantage The time is â—im that 〈◊〉 benefit 32 Where a man is to have benefit upon an act Pl. 16. a. 4. in Fogassaes ca. which is first to be done by himselfe and no time is limited when it shall be done the Law saith that he may do it at his pleasure as if a man make a feofment upon Condition that if he pay the Mortgagée 20 l. that then he shall re-enter here in as much as no day of payment is limited the Mortgager may pay it when he pleaseth for he is to have the benefit viz. the land again So if one grant to another that when he shall take his daughter to wife he will give him 20 l. in this Case because no time is limited for the taking of his daughter to wife he may take her when he will So in Fogassaes Case in the Comentaries in as much as the payment of the subsidie was to be made unto the Collector upon the weying of the woad and a time is limited for the weying the Law referres the time thereof to the will of the Collector â—â—â—antages â—â—lected â—â—â—covin 33 In Wimbish and Tabbois Case in the Comentaries one argument to prove covin in the Feme there was Pl. 55. b. 2. in Vimbish
and part against him or all or part against one of the Tenants or Defendants and nothing or but part against the other the Demandant or Plaintiff shall be amercied except no default be found in the Demandant or Plaintiff And therefore in Trespasse of Battery against Baron and Feme supposing the Battery to be done by both and the Feme is onely found guilty c. and the Baron acquit yet the Plaintiff shall not be amercied for the Plaintiff cannot have any other Writ in such case and therefore because no default was found in him he shall not be amercied in this case The Kings ward dyes before homage 42. The Kings Tenant in Capite under age is to remaine in Ward Co. l. 8. 172. a. Hales case Prerogativa Reg. cap. 3. and the King is to receive the profits of his land untill he do his homage and that cannot be untill he have sued out his Livery And if at his full age he tender his Livery he is to have three moneths to perfect it Howbeit if after such tender by the Act of God viz. death he is prevented to perfect it the King shall not receive the profits after such tender but the next heire shall have them and after such tender he might in that case sell the Land or any part thereof and the sale shall be good notwithstanding the Kings hands upon it Co. l. 9. 87. a. 4. in Pinchons case 43. It is a Rule in Law Where wager of Law in the Testator Executors not chargeable that where the Testator might have waged his Law his Executors shall not be charged with that duty contra because that advantage is lost by the act of God viz. by death and therefore shall not be imputed to any default of his So debt lyeth not against Executors for the dyet of their Testator because he might in that case have waged his Law and so have freed himselfe thereof which advantage being lost by his death and no fault of his his Executors who represent his person shall not be prejudiced thereby Howbeit if a Prisoner in the Tower for treason receive his diet of the Lievtenant and dye the Lievtenant shall have an Action of debt against his Executors for such diet of the Testator and the reason is because in that case the Testator could not in his life time have waged his Law as it is adjudged in 27 H. 6. 4. b. in Thomas Bodulgats case And the reason why no wager of Law lyeth in such case is because every Goaler ought to keep his Prisoner in salva arcta custodiae and so must of necessity finde him victualls c. Vide pl. ibid. Co. ibid. 87. b. 4. 44. In 14 H. 6. 19. b. R. G. brings a Writ of debt of ten marks against T.T. and others Executors of W. W. and counted The like that the Testator had retained the Plaintiff to be with him for a yeare in the art of limming of Books paying him ten marks per annum and there Martin held that the Action of the Executors was not maintainable And he took a difference betwixt this case of a Limmer and that of a common Labourer for a Labourer shall be compelled to labour and his salary is put in certaine by the Statute and therefore there is no reason that the Servant should lose by the death of his Master being bound by the Law to serve which shall not be said to be his default but the Act of God and the Law Howbeit in the case of a Limmer he was not compelled by the Law to serve And so when he made the Covenant it was his owne act and folly and no act in Law and he might have taken a Specialty And this is good Law but the true reason of that difference is because in the Case of a common Labourer the Testator could not wage his Law but in that of a Limmer he might c. Vide pl. ibid. Co l. 10. 76 b. 2. in the case of the Marshalsey 45. If the Court of Common Bench in Plea of debt award a Writ of Capias against a Duke Earle Erroneous arrests c. which by the Law lyes not against them and this appeares in the Writ it selfe yet if the Sheriff arrest them by force of the Capias albeit the Writ is against Law neverthelesse the Court having Iurisdiction of the cause the Sheriff shall be excused because there is no default in him but in the Court and with this accords 38 H. 8. Dyer 60. b. So it is likewise if a Iustice of Peace makes a warrant to arrest one for Felony who is not indicted albeit the Iustice ers in the Warrant yet he that makes the arrest by force of that Warrant shall not be punished by a Writ of False Imprisonment because is is not his fault but the Iustices who is Iudge of the cause and with this agrees 14 H. 4 16. Co. l. 11. 27. a 3 in Henry Pigots case 46. If the Obligee himselfe alter the Obligation in any point materiall or not materiall by interlining addition racing or the like An Obligation void or not void by rasure c. that shall make the Obligation void but if a stranger do it without the Obligees privity in a point not materiall that shall not avoid the Deed as if an Obligation be to be made to the Sheriff for apparance c. and in the Obligation after the sealing and delivery thereof these words Vicecom Comit. Oxon are interlined by a stranger without the privity of the Sheriff yet the Obligation remaines good notwithstanding such interlining by a stranger without the Obligees privity in regard it was not conceived to be a point materiall Benedicto Winchcombe his name and sirname being there inserted before and being done by a stranger it shall not in that case prejudice the Obligee Refusall of Clerk 47. Where the Bishop refuseth the Clerke of the Patron for non-ability or crime he shall not present by Laps F. N. B. 35. i. unlesse he have first given notice to the Patron of the insufficiency of his Clerk the Patron neglect to present within the six moneths for in such case after the six months past the Patron shall have a Writ to the Bishop if the Church be void and the Bishop have not in the meane time collated 48. If one sell another a peice of Cloath and warrant it to be of a certaine length in this case if the peice be not of that length F. N. B. 98. k. a Writ of Disceit lyeth against the Vendor albeit the Warranty be but by Parol Custome of Woad uncertaine by tempest 49. In Fogassaes case in the Coment Pl. Com. â— b. 1. in Fogassaes case the storme at Sea being a thing that could by no possible meanes be prevented and that causing the uncertainty of the quantity of the Woad and there being no meanes of knowing the certainty thereof
ut supra Uncertain reâ—â—cation 62. A. seised of the Mannor of D. levies a Fine to uses with power of Revocation upon payment of 40 s. to the Conusee Co. l. 9. 106. b. 2. Lady Greshams case in Marg. Podgers case being likewise seised of the Mannor of S. levies another Fine thereof to the same Conusee but to other uses with like power of Revocation upon payment of 40 s. to the said Conusee Afterwards A. payes 40 s. to the Conusee for revocation of all the uses raised upon both the Fines and this payment was testified in writing under the Seales of the parties In this case none of the uses are revoked but the Revocation is utterly void for the uncertainty because two severall summs of 40 s. should have been tendred and not one summ onely for they were severall Indentures and severall Mannore and could not be satisfied by one summ because it was thereby left uncertain which uses and of which Mannor the Revocation was meant Uâ—certaine plea. 63. In debt against an Executor he ought not to plead Co. l. 9. 109 b. 3. Menel Treshams case Quod ipse non habet c. aliqua bona c. praeter bona c. quae non sufficiunt ad satisfacienda debita predicta but he ought to plead Quod non habet c. bona c. praeterquam bona cattalla ad valentiam of a certaine summe Et non ultra quae eiisdem debitis obligata onerabilia existunt c. for the first plea is insufficient for the uncertainty because the Plaintiff cannot reply thereupon so as a certain Issue may be taken â—ncertainty of â—â—e the perâ—â—n 64. When there is uncertainty in the person Co. l. 10. 51. a. 3. in Lampets case to whom a Release or other Grant is made such Release or grant cannot be good And therefore if a Lease for life be made the Remainder to the right heires of I. S. and the Lessee is disseised and the eldest Son of I.S. releaseth to the disseisor and after I. S. dyes In this case the Release is voyd for the uncertainty whether or no he shal be right heir at the death of his Father So likewise in 17 Eliz a man lets to Baron and Feme for 21 years the Remainder to the survivor of them for 21 yeares and the Baron grants over this term here also the grant is void for the uncertainty of the person for albeit of all Chattels reall which are the Femes the Baron may dispose yet in this case neither the Baron nor Feme had any thing untill the Survivor c. Co. l. 10. 90. a. 3. in Doctor Leyfeilds case 65. The reason why colour is given in a Writ of Entre sur disseisin Colour in pleading Writ of Entre in the nature of an Assize and Assize Trespasse c. is for that the Law which prefers and favours certainty as the mother of quiet and repose to the intent that either the Court may adjudge upon it if the Plaintiff demur or that a certaine Issue may be taken upon a certaine point requires that the Defendant when he pleads such a speciall Plea notwithstanding which the Plaintiff may have right shall give colour to the Plaintiff to the end that his Plea should not amount to a generall Issue and so leave all the matter at large to the Iurors which would be uncertaine and full of multiplicity and perplexity of matter Co. l. 10. 117. b. 2. in Rob. Piâ—folds case 66. In Trespasse the Plaintiff counts for damages twenty marks Uncertaine Verdict the Defendant pleads not guilty the Iurors tar damages and costs joyntly at twenty two markes In this case the Verdict cannot stand for it appeares not how much is for damages and how much for costs and therefore the Plaintiff can have Iudgement but for twenty marks for the uncertainty Co. l. 11. 25. b. 1. in Hen. Harpers case 67. An Ejectione firmae brought de omnibus omnimodis decimis in W. without saying garborum faeni lavae c. Uncertaine allegation this is not rightly layd for the uncertainty because there is no certainty alleadged of the nature or quality of the tithes whereupon a certaine Iudgement may be given or execution by habere facias possessione had And this also appeares in an Assize brought de quadam portione decimarum c. in 7 E. 6. Dyer 84. F. N. B. 41. a. 68. The Bishop shall not cite or distraine any to appeare before him to make oath at the pleasure of the Bishop against the will of him Citations that is so summoned or cited for such generall citations which the Bishops make to cite men to appeare before them prosalute animae without expressing any cause in speciall are against Law for which the party greived may sue a prohibition against the Bishop and thereupon an Attachment if the prohibition be not obeyed And such cause ought to be onely Matrimoniall or Testamentary Plow 56. a. 1. Wimbish and Talbâ—ies case 69. A Bar which is certaine to a common intent is good Replicationâ— must be certaine but Replications Titles Pleas in Abatement of Writs and Estoppels ought to containe Certainty for the Law which is grounded upon reason ordaines that Replications which make the Issue should be certaine to the end that neither the Court nor Iurors who trie the Issue should be misled or enveigled by uncertainty and therefore albeit a man may plead in Bar Que estate without shewing how he comes by the estate yet in a Replication if he plead Que estate generally it is not good as it is held in 2 E. 4. but he ought to shew how he comes by the estate for the cause aforesaid Pl. 65. a. 3. Dive and Manninghams case 70. Where a Recovery is had of two hundred Acres An uncertaine Plea upon occasion of pleading that Recovery to plead a Recovery of one hundred Acres inter alia is not good for the uncertainty as in 22 E. 4. in a Scire facias to have execution of two hundred acres of Land the Tenant pleads that since the Scire facias sued I.S. brought a Formedon of one hundred Acres inter alia and recovered and had execution Iudgement of the Writ for that parcell and this Plea was not held good for it is not the right forme of pleading such a Recovery because a Recovery ought to be certainly pleaded to every intent and these words inter alia are certaine to no intent but there it is held that he ought to have pleaded that I. S. brought a Formedon of two hundred Acres whereof those one hundred Acres now in demand are parcell and hath recovered and hath had execution Certainty in Law proceedings 71. The proceedings of a Suit Pl. 84. a. 4. Partridges case the allegations ought to be certaine in one part or other according to the nature of the Suit viz.
awarded he comes too late after for non constat Curiae Alien that he is an Alien Spinolaes case 174 Vigilantibus non Dormientibus Leges subveniunt Co. Inst pars 1. 139. b. 1. 1 At the Common Law upon every continuance or day given over before judgement the plaintif might have been nonsuted Non-sute and therefore before the Statute of 2 H. 4. cap. 7. after verdict given if the Court gave a day to be advised at that day the plaintif was demandable and might have been Nonsuted for vigilantibus non dormientibus c. Co. l. 4. 82. b. 3. in Sir Andrew Corbets case 2 A. deviseth land to B. till 800 l. be raised for the preferment of his daughters dies C. the heir of A conceals the will enters dieth Devise Notice In this case B. shall have alloâ—ance for the time that the will was concealed but albeit B. had not notice of the will yet if a stranger had occupied the land the devisee ought to take notice of the devise at his peril for vigilantibus non dormientibus c. And in such case none is bound to give him notice Co. l. 5. 76. a. The Earl of Pembrooks case 3 Where the defendant shewes a deed to the Court Deed entred the plaintif may pray the same Term that it may be entred in haec verba And so he may demurr or take issue at his pleasure But if he neglect to pray it that term he shall never have it so entred afterwards Co. l. 7. 27. b. Sir Hugh Portmans case 4 In a Quare impedit if the plaintif be nonsute after appearance Quare Impedit or discontinue the sute that is peremptory and the defendant becomes Actor and shall immediately have a writ to the Bishop c. Co. l 6. 8. b. 1 in Ferrers case 5 At the Common Law before the Statute of Westm 2. cap. 4. Recovery by default If any had suffered a Recovery in any real action by default if he were lawfully summoned and there were no error in the proceeding he could not have the case of an Infant only excepted any remedy but by writ of right And therefore the writ of Quod ei deforceat was by that Statute given to tenant in tayl by the Curtesie in Dower and for life after recovery had against them by default F.N.B. 20 g. 6 In a writ of Error when the record is come into the Court Error if the plaintif all that Term do not assign his errors and albeit he then assign the errors yet if he do not then also sue out a Scire facias ad audiendum errores against the defendant returnable the same term or the next term following all the matter is discontinued Dyer 232. 9. 7 Eliz. 7 An Infant at full age brings an Audita querela in Chancery to avoid a recognisance in the nature of a Statute staple by him made within age Infant but because his age was to be tried by the inspection of the Court it was adjudged that it did not lie so also it had béen if he had died within age for in such case he should have brought the Audita querela before his full age Dyer 241. 48 7 Eliz. 8 A Quare Impedit issued against the Archbishop of Canterbury Quare Imp. the Bishop of Lincoln and the Incumbent who made default to the great distress whereupon the plaintif made title that he might have a writ to the Bishop and a writ was awarded to enquire de damnis de plenitudine ad cujus praesentationem quantum temporis elabitur a vacatione et quantum Ecclesia valet per annum all which points were returned by inquisition and accordingly Iudgement was given that the plaintif should recover the presentment and should have a writ to the Bishop of Lincoln and damages to the value of the Church by half a year and the defendants in misericordia Error 9 If a writ of Error be delivered to the Chief Iustice of the C. B. or the Clerk of the Treasorie there this is a Supersedeas in Law Dyer 244. 63. 8 Eliz. and a stop to award execution Howbeit if the plaintif do not crave the removal of the record before the return of the writ of Error the Iustices may then award execution Vide 6 H. 7. 16. 175 It favoureth speeding of mens Causes And therefore Protections 1 In antient time Co. Inst pars 1. 130. b. 4. when Noblemen and others purchased by Letters Patents from the King protections either Profecturae or Moraturae to go or remain beyond the Grecian sea or elsewhere they were also by other Letters Patents to purchase licence to make their general Attorneys in all Courts so as no actions or sutes should be thereby delayed which Britton commends to be bien et sagement fait fol. 282. Protection 2 In an Assise of Novel disseisin a Protection is not allowable Co. ibid. 131. a. 1. Co. l. 8. 50. a. 2 in Jehu Webbs case nor yet in a Certificate upon an Assise because an Assise is festinum remedium to restore the disseisee to his freehold whereof he is wrongfully and without Iudgement disseised And therefore in this action the defendant shall not be essoined nor pray in aid but only of the King nor vouch a stranger nor any party to the writ unless he will immediately enter into the warranty there is the same Law also of receipt neither shall the Paroll stay for the non-age either of the plaintif or defendant and in many other respects an Assise is remedium maximè festinum Dower Appeal Assise 3 In Dower Co. l. 9. 30. b. 3. in the case of the Abbot of Strata Mercella or in appeal brought by the feme of the death of her husband or in an Assise brought by a feme which was the wife of B. if the tenant or defendant plead that the baron is in full life the tryal thereof shall not be by the Iury but by the Iustices upon examination made before them and that course is taken for the greater expedition Nonage inspected 4 If the tenant in a real action vouch A. as heir within age Co. l. 9. 30. b. 4. The same case or if the tenant for life be impleaded and pray in aid of A in reversion within age and pray also that the Paroll may demurr c. In both these cases if the demandant reply that he is in full age this shall not be tried by the Country for the great delay of the demandant but a writ of Venire facias shall issue to the Sherif to bring A. before the Iustices to be inspected by them whether he be of age or no. Assise 5 Of all actions an Assise is most favoured in Law Pl. Co. 75. b. 4. Wimbish and the Lord Willoughby because it gives the most speedy remedy And therefore the Statute
of Westm 2. cap. 25. saith of it quia non est aliquod breve in Cancellaria per quod querentes habent tam festinum remedium sicut per breve novae disseisinae c. And as the Law favours an Assise so likewise it favors all such things as may speed and expedite it and abhors any thing Pl. ibid. 89. b. assise of Fresh force in London that may hinder or retard it And therefore upon a bare surmise that the Sherif is allyed fo either party the writ shall be at first directed to the Coroners and this shall be no exception to abate the writ and many other exceptions which abate other writs shall not abate an Assise because it is much favoured in Law by reason of the expedition and dispatch which accompanies it and wherein the Law takes much delight and satisfaction Vide Dyer 84. b. 83. Co Inst pars 1. 155. a. 2. 6 Albeit the writ of Assise command the Sherif Assise Quod faceret duodecim liberos et lega les homines de vicineto c. videre tenementum c. yet by antient Course the Sherif must return 24 and this is for expedition of Iustice for if twelve should only be returned no man should ever have a full Iury appear or be sworn in respect of Challenges without a Tales which would be a great delay of trials 176 Hateth Delayes Co. Inst pars 1. 32. b. 4 1 Some say that the demandant in a writ of Dower Dower who procureth or suffereth delays in that sute shall not recover damages Co. ibid. 126. b. 4. 2 The cause of an Amerciament in a plea real Amerciament personal or mixt where the King is to have a fine is for that the tenant or defendant ought to render the demand as he is commanded by the Kings writ the first day which if do he shall not be amerced so as for the delay which the tenant or defendant doth use he shall be amerced Co. ibid. 128. a. 4. 3 If the defendant plead in disability of the person an Outlawry of the same Court he shall not need to shew it forth presently Outlawry or if he plead an outlawry in barr and it be denied then he shall have a day to bring it in But if he plead an Outlawry and offer withall to shew it to the Court he must shew forth the record of the Outlawry maintenant sub pede sigilli because the plea is but dilatory Co. ibid. 158. a. 2. 4 After challenge to the Array and trial duly returned Challenge if the same party take a challenge to the Polls he must shew cause presently so if a Iuror be formerly sworn if he be then châ—llenged the party challenging must shew cause presently and that cause must rise since he was sworn likewise when the King is party or in an appeal of felony the defendant that challengeth for cause must shew his cause presently Co. ibid. 161. a. 3. 5 To Counterplead the plaintif in an Assise Counterplea by which he is delayed maketh him that pleadeth it a disseisor Otherwise it is if he had pleaded Nul tort c. Co. ibid. 260. b. 3. 6 If a man be out of the Realm Recovery and a recovery be had against him in a Praecipe by default In this case he shall not avoid such recovery because by such means a man might be infinitely delayed of his freehold and Inheritance whereof the Law hath so great regard and few or none go over but of their own freewill neither is he in such case without his ordinary remedy either by his writ of an higher nature or by a Quod ei deforceat Howbeit it is otherwise of outlawry in a personal action for de minimis non curat lex Outlawry Imprisonment and he should otherwise be without remedy Also as to a recovery there is a difference betwixt being beyond sea and imprisonment c. Co. ibid. 390. b. 3. 7 If a man be convicted of felony by verdict Voucher and delivered to the Ordinary to make purgation he cannot be vouched for that the time of his purgation if any should be is uncertain and the demandant cannot be delayed upon such an incertainty besides the tenant is not without remedy for he may have his warrantia cartae Co. l. 4 35. b. 1. in Bozouns case 8 If the King grant a protection in a Quare Impedit Protection or an Assise with a non obstante of any Law to the contrary that grant is void for by the Common Law a Protection lieth not in either of these cases for the damage that may happen to the plaintif by such great delay and a non obstante cannot avail when by the Common Law the King cannot grant the thing it self Stat. 36 E. 3. â— 9 The Statute of 36 E. 3. Stat. 1. cap. 13. Co. l. 4. 58. a. 2. in the Sadlers case which gives traverses to offices of lands seised into the Kings hands shall be taken generally according to the letter and intention of the said Act because it is for the advancement and execution of Iustice against grievous and tedious delays Ad admittend 〈◊〉 10 In a Quare Impedit if the defendant do not come in at the distress returned against him F.N.B. 38. n. the plaintif shall have a writ ad admittendum clericum directed to the Bishop without making any farther title â—â—cedendo 11 If the Iudges of any Court as well of record as other do delay the party plaintif or defendant F.N.B. 153. b c d. and will not give judgement for him when they ought to do it In this case the party grieved may have a writ de procedendo ad judicium directed to such Iudges or Iustices and thereupon an alias and pluries if they will not procéed to give Iudgement and after that an attachment if they please directed to the Coroners and returnable into the Kings Bench or Common Pleas. Assise 12 The Law favours all things Pl. Co. 75. b. 4. Wimbish the Lo. Will. which have spéed and expedition in them and abhorrs all delayes which retard or delay Iustice and therefore an Assise which by the Statute of Westm 2. cap. 25. is said to be festinum remedium is much favoured in Law so as a writ of Assise upon a bare surmise shall be at first directed to the Coroners without first directing it to the Sherif and then upon a challenge to the Array to have it afterwards directed to the Coroners which is the ordinary course for other writs 177 Unnecessary Circumstances And therefore Frustrafit per plura quod fieri potest per Pauciora The entry of the issue conâ—eable after discontinuaâ—ce 1 In a praecipe where the demandant is to recover damages Co. Inst part 1. 362. b. a. if the tenant plead non-tenancy or disclaim there the demandant
sutes Co. l. 10. 48. a. 3. in Lampets case great oppression of the people principally of terre-tenants and the subversion of the due and equal execution of Iustice the wisdom and policy of the Sages and Founders of our Law have provided that no possibility right title or thing in action shall be granted or assigned to strangers and as they cannot be granted by the act of the party so right of action cannot be transferred by act in Law as unto the Lord by escheat neither shall the Lord of a Villein have things in action as appears in 22 Ass pl. 37. c. Co. l. 3. fol. 1. And in the Marquess of Winchesters case Right of action to land was not given to the King by an Act of Attainder And all this was for the quiet and repose of terre-tenants Howbeit all rights titles and actions may by the like prudence and policy of the Law be released to the terre-tenant for the same reason of his repose and quiet and for the avoidance of contentions and sutes and that every one may live in his vocation in peace and plenty Ecclesiastical livings 26 To preserve Ecclesiastical possessions from alienation in prejudice of the Successor Co. l. 10. 60. a. 3. in the Bish of Sarums case the prudence of the Sages of the Law did provide that no sole Corporation should be trusted with the disposition of his possessions as to bind his Successors but in such case they were to have the consent of others as the Bishop was to have the consent of his Dean and Chapter the Abbot of his Covent the Parson of his Patron and Ordinary sic de caeteris Auditor of the Court of Wards 27 The Law to prevent any miscarriage in matters of Iudicature hath provided Co. l. 11 4. a. 2. in Auditor Curles case that no judicial office shall be granted in reversion and the rule of Law in this point is Officia Judicialia non concedantur antequam vacent And the reason is to prevent a great inconvenience which may insue thereupon for that he who at the time of the grant in reversion may be able and sufficient to supply the office of Iudicature and to administer equal justice to the Kings Liege people may before the office fall become unable and insufficient to perform it And therefore the Kings grant of the office of Auditor of the Court of Wards unto John Churchil and Iohn Tooke in reversion after the death of Walter Tooke and William Curle was adjudged void because it was an office of Iudicature in that Court and therefore could not be granted in reversion Error in London 28 If a man hath judgement given for him in London in the Sheriffs Court F.N.B. 24. a. or before the Maior and Sheriffs in the Hustings of London and the defendant to delay the execution of the judgement sues a writ of Error to remove the Record before the Maior c. in the Hustings or before certain Commissioners if the judgement be given in the Hustings c. and afterwards the defendant eloyns his goods goods out of the City or wasts them to the intent that the plaintif should not have execution of those goods In this case the plaintiff may have a special writ directed to the Maior and Sherifs to take order that so many of the goods of the defendant as amount to the value of that which is recovered may be safely kept to satisfie the plaintif if he shall have the judgement affirmed for him so as execution of the former judgement may be made c. of the same goods c. Security of the Peace 29 Before a man can have security of the Peace against another F.N.B. 79. h. lest the cause of his complaint may arise rather from malice than any just ground of fear the party complainant ought first to make oath that he requires the Peace against the other for the safeguard of his body and not out of malice And this course is stil used in the K. B. and before Iustices of Peace And it was also the usual course in the Chancery to make such oath before a Master of that Court before he could have it granted but of later times that course hath been left in Chancery which Fitzharbert saith is not well done because such prosecution for the most part procéeds rather from malice than any just cause of fear F.N.B. 113 a. 30 The King of right ought to save and defend his Realm as well against the Sea as against Enemies Oyer Terminer for Nusances that it be not surrounded and laid waste and to provide remedy for the same and also to take order that his subjects may have their passage throughout the Realm by bridges and safe wayes c. And therefore if the banks of the Sea be broken or the Sewers and drains be not scowred that the fresh waters may have their direct course the King for the prevention of such damage as may happen by reason of such defaults might by the Common Law before any Commissions of Sewers c. grant commissions to inquire hear and determine such defaults Pl. Co. 67. a. 2. in Dyve Maninghams case 31 The persons mentioned in the second branch of the Statute of 23 H. 6. 10. viz. such as were in ward by Condemnation Bailment exemption Capias utlagatum or excommunicatum surety of the peace or committed by command of the Iustices or Vagabonds refusing to serve were not bailable by the Common Law before that Statute for the Inconveniences which might ensue thereupon Co. l. 5. 83. b. in the case of Market overt 32 No sale of stoln goods but in a Market overt Market overt alters the property And therefore if stoln plate be openly sold in London or elswhere in any other market overt in a Scriveners shop that sale alters not the property because it is no market overt for plate it is otherwise if it be openly sold in a Goldsmiths shop but if the sale be there behind a hanging or Cupboard or in a ware-house or other part of the house and not openly that passengers may observe it such sale alters not the property And this the Law hath ordained to prevent felony c. Vide Max. 191. 3. 134. 14. Co. Iâ—st pars 1. 6. b. 4. 31 It was resolved in the C. B. Pasc 10. Feme covert no witnesse for the Baron Iac. that a wife cannot be produced as a witness either against or for her husband and one of the reasons of that resolution was in respect it might be a cause of implacable discord and dissention betwixt the husband and wife and a mean of great inconvenience H b. 36. Druries case 32 Drury brought a Quare Impedit against Kent the Incumbent and others and upon surmise made to the Court Prohibition that Kent did fell timber upon the Glebe and upon the lands of
just cause the Mulier is barred for ever for the possession of the King when he hath no just cause of seisure shall be adjudged the possession of him for whose cause he seised But if after the death of the Father the Mulier be found heir and within age and the King seiseth In such case the possession of the King is in right of the Mulier and vesteth the actual possession in the Mulier and consequently the Bastard eigne is foreclosed of any right for ever so it is likewise when the King seiseth for a contempt or other offence of the father or of any other ancestor In that case if the issue of the Bastard eigne upon a Petition be restored for that the seisure was without just cause the Mulier is not barred because the bastard could never enter and consequently could gain no estate in the land but the possession of the King in that case shall be adjudged in the right of the Mulier Vide 2 Ass pl. 9. Copyhold 2 If a Copihold estate fall into the Lords hands by escheat Co. l. 4. 31. a. 2. in Frenches case forfeiture or the like and the Lord make a lease thereof for years life or other estate by deed or without deed or if the Lord make a feoffment thereof in fee upon condition and enter for the condition broken or if the Copyhold so forfeited or escheated before any new grant thereof made be extended upon a Statute or Recognisance acknowledged by the Lord or if the feme of the Lord in a writ of Dower hath that land assigned to her In all these cases and albeit these last impediments are by acts in Law yet for as much as all these interruptions are lawful the lands can never after be granted by Copy because after such disposition thereof it was not demised or demisable But if the interruption be tortious as if the Lord be disseised and the disseisor die seised or if the land be recovered against the Lord by a false verdict or erronious judgement In these cases until the land be recovered or the judgement nulled or reversed by the Lord of the Manor the land was not demised or demisable and yet after the land is recontinued it is again grantable by Copy because the interruption was tortious for Non valet Impedimentum quod de jure non sortitur effectum quod contra legem fit pro infecto habetur Restraint to alien 3 If a man make a gift in tail upon condition that the donee shall not alien yet in such case if the donee suffer a Common recovery Co. l. 6. 41. b. 2. in Sir Anthony Mildmayes case that is no breach of the Condition because it is a Conveyance allowed by Law in respect of the intended recompence but if he make a feoffment in fee or any other estate whereby the reversion is tortiously discontinued the donor may enter for the Condition broken for every act which is prohibited by Law or is a tort may be prohibited by condition vide 10 H. 7. 11. So if a feoffment be made to Baron and feme upon condition that they shall not alien yet that doth not restrain their joint alienation by fine because it is lawfull and incident to their estate But their feoffment or alienation by deed is restrained by such a condition for that is tortious and against Law Also if a man enfeoff an Infant in fee upon condition that he shall not alien this cannot restrain him to alien at his full age but during his minority it doth because that is tortious and prohibited by Law Co. l 7. 6 a. 3. in Sendâ—ls case 4 One of the reasons Robbery why the robbing of an house either in the day or in the night is not within the Statute of Winchester for the Hundred to satisfie the damages is for that it is not lawfull for any man to enter into the house of another for the safeguard thereof Co. l. 11. 74. a. 3. Magd. Coll. case 5 Albeit the Friers Carmelites were of a Profession of Religion Carmelites and had not any habitation so as it seemed to be a work of piety and charity to provide an habitation for them yet non facias malum ut inde fiat bonum F.N.B. 36. f. 6 If a man be disseised of a Manor to which an Advowson is appendant Usurpation and the disseisor suffers an usurpation by a stranger to the advowson and after the disseisée re-enters into the Manor he shall present to the advowson when it happens to be void notwithstanding such usurpation Dyer 168. 19. 1 Eliz. 7 Bronker Sherif of Wiltshire to prevent perjury in his office Sheriffs oath did neglect to be sworn in incepto officii which he ought to have done by the antient Common Law of the Realm for which contempt he was fined and imprisoned by decrée in the Star-chamber Dyer 219. 10. 5 Eliz. 8 A man is bound to deliver the key of an house Livery of seisin and quiet possession to the Maior of London to the use of the obligee no person being in the house he locks the door and delivers the key to the Maior out of view A stranger pretending title enters into the house This séems to be no delivery of possession yet verdict was given for it which was afterwards affirmed in Attaint And the reason séems to be for that the impediment was unlawfull 196 Praetextu liciti non debet admitti illicitum Co. l. 11 88. b. 1 in the case of Monopolies 1 The Charter of making and importing Cards being adjudged in the 11 Rep. a Monopoly had a glorious preamble and pretext Monopolies yet was repealed as derogatory to the Kings honor and very pernicious to the Commonwealth And indeed it is true Quod privilegia quae revera sunt in praejudicium Reipublicae magis speciosa habent frontispicia et boni publici praetextum quam bonae et legales concessiones but Praetextu liciti non debet admitti illicitum Dyer 35 6. 33. 29 H. 8. 2 If a lessée hath liberty to fell trées to repair the house Waste and he fells 4. Oaks for that purpose and sells them and buyes 4. other Oaks as good and imployes them towards the repair of the house yet that is waste for the cutting of them down and selling them was a tort so if a man sell the distress which he hath caken and impounded and afterwards finding his error buyes them again and impounds yet their sale is a tort and the impounding of the Cattel afterwards shall not excuse it Dyer 36. b. 38. 29 H. 8. 3 If the lessor be bound to a man in 100 l. and the lessée cuts down 20 Oaks sells them and payes the obligée for the lessor Waste yet an action of waste lyeth against the lessee for felling the trees albeit the money arising upon the sale was converted to the
goods and chattels for the great regard that the Law hath to the life of a man Howbeit if Thieves assault a mans house to robb or murther him and the owner or his servants kill any of the Thieves in defence of himself and his house this is not felony neither shall he lose any thing thereby And with this agrées 3 E. 3. Tit. Corone 303. 305. 26 Ass pl. 23. So likewise it is held in 21 H. 7. 39. that a man may justifie to assemble his friends and neighbours to defend his house against violence but not to go with him to the Market or elsewhere to guard himself from violence And all this to establish quiet and tranquillity in the Commonwealth Co. l. 5. 125. a. 2. in the cases of Libels 14 Every Libell which is called famosus Libellus Libels seu infamatoria scriptura is made either against a privat man or against a Magistrate or publique person if it be made against a privat person it deserves a severe punishment for albeit the Libel be only made against one yet it invites all of the same family kinred or society to revenge and so tends by consequence to quarrels and disturbance of the peace and quiet of the Commonwealth and may be the cause of effusion of bloud and of great inconvenience If it be against a Magistrate or other publique person that is yet a greater offence for this concerns not only the breach of the peace but the scandal of Government because what greater scandal can there be to Government than to have corrupt and wicked Magistrates to be substituted by the King to govern his Subjects under him Neither can there be greater imputation to the State than to permit such corrupt men to sit in the sacred seat of Iustice and to have any medling in or concerning the administration of Iustice which conceit being fixt in the minds of the people may be a cause of tumults and sedition to the great disturbance of the quiet and repose of the Commonwealth F N.B. 81. d. 15 Albeit Iustices of Peace have not express authority given them by their Commission to take recognizance for the keeping of the peace yet the Law gives them thereby that power ex congruo in order to the publique quiet of the Commonwealth for that they are thereby Constituted to be Conservatores Pacis and impowred to cause men to kéep the peace and to hear and determin offences committed against the peace and quiet of the Realm The Common Law giveth also power to the Sheriff either upon a writ of Supplicavit or without such a writ to take a Recognizance for the kéeping of the peace because he also is Conservator Pacis and to that end and purpose hath the guard and custody of the County committed to him for the time that he continues Sheriff as appears by the words of his Commission and Patent Rex c. Commissimus vobis Custodiam c. And what the Iustices or he do in that behalf is matter of Record and so ought to be déemed for that it concerns the Publique peace and tranquillity of the Commonwealth A man may go beyond sea 16 By the Common Law any man may go out of the Realm to imploy himself as a Merchant or to undertake a pilgrimage F.N.B. 85. a. or for any other cause at his pleasure without demanding license of the King neither shall he incurr any punishment for so doing Howbeit because every man in right is bound to defend the King and his realm and to preserve the publique repose and tranquillity of the Common-wealth from forein invasions from abroad and intestine sedition and insurrection at home the King may at his pleasure command by his writ De securitate invenienda quod se non divertat ad partes exteras sine licentia Regis under the Great Seal Privy Seal or Signet that he shall not go beyond sea without the Kings license And if he do he shall be fined for disobeying the Kings command Vide 3. Uses 17 In case of a Feoffment or other conveyance Co. Inst pars 1. 237. a. 2. whereby the feoffée or grantée c. is in by the Common Law a Proviso for a power of Revocation is meerly repugnant and void but in a voluntary conveyance which passeth by raising of Vses being executed by the Statute of 27 H. 8. 10. and now become very frequent by such a Proviso it is lawfull for the Covenantor at any time during his life to revoke any of the said Vses c. And these revocations are alwaies favourably interpreted bâ—cause now to interrupt that Course would disturb the Publique quiet of the Realm many mens Inheritances depending thereupon Warranty collateral 18 In 50 E. 3. Rot. Parl. 77. it was attempted in Parliament to have a Statute made Co. ibid. 373. b. 1. that no man should be barred by a warranty collateral but where Assets descend from the same Ancestor but it could never take effect because it would weaken common assurances and by consequence disturb the peace and quiet of the Commonwealth Remainders 19 For as much as in coveyances Co. Inst pars 1. 299. a. 2. limitations of Remainders are usual and common assurances it is dangerous by conceipts and nice distinctions to bring them in question as hath of late time been attempted lest thereby the quiet repose of the Commonwealth may be interrupted Descent to toll Entry 20 The Statute of the 32 Hen. 8. 33. concerning descents to toll entries shall be understood of a descent upon any disseisin Dyer 219. 7. 5. Eliz. albeit the words are of entries with strength And this large interpretation of the words is given for the better preservation of the peaâ—e and quiet of the Country By the Opinion of all the Justices Descent of the Royal line 21 In the Starre-Chamber the Countesse of Shrewsbury was fined 1000 l. and committed to the Tower Hob. 235. for that being called to the Council Table and Interrogated what she knew or had heard or thought of a supposed child which was rumored that the Lady Arrabella should have had she refused obstinately to make any answer because it was judged that this was a question of State and proper for the Council Table to take cognizance of for there is not one thing that doth more concern the peace and quiet of a kingdom than the certainty of the Royal line c. 201 Conventio seu beneficium privatorum non potest publico juri derogare Vide supra 198 29. Co. Inst pars 1. 166. a. 4. Littl. §. 244 1 No privat contract or agreement Partition which varies from the ordinary course of Law and sounds in prejudice of the Commonwealth or Common right shall be deemed good in Law as if a Castle that is used for the necessary defence of the Realm descend to two or more Coparceners and they by agreement choose
Law since the making of the same Act did in the said 12 year of E. 4. give judgment that in such case an estate tail should be barred And in Scholasticaes case in 12 Eliz. Pl. Com. 403. it was not thought fit to stand with the honour and gravity of the Court that the question concerning the restraint of a Common recovery which had béen so often debated and resolved should be once moved Vide supra 6. Co. l. 11. 87. a. 3. in the case of Monopolies 9 The Queen grants to one of the Privy Chamber the only making Monopolies and importation of Cards This was adjudged a Monopoly and therefore void and one of the reasons was because the grant was primae Impressionis for no such was ever seen to pass by Letters Patents under the Great seal to that very day And therefore because it was a dangerous Innovation without president or authority of Law or Reason and the Queen deceived in their grant it was adjudged void Dyer 135. 15. 3 4. P. M. 10 A Dedimus Potestatem was granted to Iustice Saunders to receive an Attorney for the defendant in a Quid juris clamat Quid juris clamat but because there could be found no former president for it it was with much difficulty and after long debate allowed by the Iudges and that upon great necessity and weakness of the party 205 Communis Error facit Jus. Co. Inst 1. 52. b. 2. 1 In a deed of feoffment beginning with Omnibus Christi fidelibus Livery by Attorney c. or Sciant omnes per praesentes c. or the like a Letter of Attorney may be contained for one continent may contain divers deeds to several persons But if it be by indenture between the feoffor on the one part and the feoffee on the other part there a Letter of Attorny in such a deed is not good unless the Attorney be made a party in the deed indented howbeit because it hath been commonly used to insert it in the Indenture without making the Attorny party thereunto it hath been permitted to pass but the other way is safest and more legal Communis Error facit Jus. Co. l. 6. 67. a. 4 in Sir Moâ—â—â—inches case 2 Where it is required by the Statute of 1 H. 5. 5. that in every writ original c. in which Exigent shall be awarded Additions Stat. 1 H. 5. Additions should be given to the defendants of their estate degree mystery c. It so fell out that one who was by birth but a Yeoman was commonly called Gentleman And in that case in such a writ brought against him he may have the Addition of Gentleman albeit in truth he is no Gentleman but only by vulgar reputation for in as much as the intention of the Act is that he should have such a name by which he may be known it is sufficient to satisfie the Act of Parliament for Communis error c. 206 So doth a Custom which is reasonable unreasonable contra Co. Inst â—pars 1. 59 b. 4 1 Of fines due to the Lord by the Copyholder Copyhold fines some be by the Change or alteration of the Lord and some by the Change or alteration of the tenant the change of the Lord ought to be by the act of God otherwise no fine can be due but by the change of the tenant either by the act of God or the act of the party a fine may be due for if the Lord do challenge a Custom within his Manor to have a fine of every of his Copyholders of the said Mannor at the alteration or change of the Lord of the Mannor be it by alienation demise death or otherwise This is a custom both against the Law and Reason as to the alteration or change of the Lord by the Act of the party for by that means the Copyholders may be oppressed by multitude of fines by the Act of the Lord But when the change groweth by the Act of God there the custom is good as by the death of the Lord And this was resolved upon a Case in Chancery by all the Iudges and Serjeants of Serjeants Inn in Fleetstreet Trin. 39 Eliz. and so certified into that Court But upon the change or alteration of the Tenant a fine is due unto the Lord because that custom is reasonable 2 Of fines taken of Copyholders some be certain by custom and some be uncertain The like but that fine although it be uncertain Co. ibid. yet ought it to be rationabilis and that reasonablenesse shall be discussed by the Iustices upon the true circumstances of the Case appearing unto them And if the Court where the cause dependeth adjudgeth the fine exacted unreasonable then is not the Copyholder compellable to pay it And so it was adjudged P. 1 Iac. C. B. rot 1845. for all excessiveness is abhorred in Law 3 In former times it hath been doubted whether or no if a Copyholder had béen ousted by his Lord Copyhold custom he might have any other remedy therein than only to sue to his Lord by petition for it seems Co. ibid. 60. b. 3. Littl. §. 77. that if the Copyholder might have any other remedy he could not be properly said to be Tenant at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the manor But Magistra rerum experientia hath made this cléer and without question that the Lord cannot at his pleasure put out the lawful Copyholder without some cause of forfeiture and if he do the Copyholder may have an Action of Trespasse against him For albeit he be tenens ad voluntatem Domini yet it is secundum consuetudinem manerii And Britton saith speaking of these kind of Tenants Et ascuns gents sont qui tout franks de sank et tenent terre de nous en villeynage et sont proprement nos sokemans Britton fo 163. Co. ibid. 140. a. 3. et ceux sout priviledges en ties manere que nul ne les doit ouster de tiels tene ments taut come ils font les services que a lour tenements appendant et nul ne poit lour services accressre ne changer a faire autres services ou plus autrement que ils ne solaient And herewith agreeth Sir Robert Danby Cl. Inst of the C. Pl. M. 7 E. 4. 19. and Sir Thomas Brian his Successor M. 21 E. 4. 80. That the Copyholder doing his customs and services if he be put out by his Lord shall have an Action of trespasse against him Consuetudo 4 Consuetudo contra rationem introducta potius usurpatio quam consuetudo appellari debet Again Co. ibid. 113. a 4. Consuetudo ex certa causa rationabili usitata privat communem Legem And Consuetudo praescripta et legitima vincit legem Villeinage fine to mary 5 All customs and prescriptions that are against reason are void Co. ibid. 139. b. 4. Littl.
time out of mind and so hath held in severalty there that proves that it was but in nature of Shack originally because of Vicinage and so continues And therefore in such case he may inclose and keep it in severalty and seclude himself from having Shack with the rest of the Commoners Antient Demesn 13 Lands in antient demesn Dyer 72. b 4. 6 E. 6. which were partable between heirs male were aliened by fine levied at the Common Law nevertheless it seemed to be the better opinion that hereby the course of the Inheritance was not altered and made descendable at the Common Law but that they shall still remain partable as before Custom unreasonable 14 A Custom Dyer 199. 58. 3 Eliz. that the Lord of a Manor hath used to have the best beast of his tenant there dying and if such beast be eloigned before seisure that then the Lord hath used to take the best Beast of any other levant and couchant within the said tenure was adjudged void for the unreasonableness thereof Vide 3 4 Eliz. Rot. 1496. Lands in London 15 Lands in London may be bargained and sold in London by paroll without Indenture or enrollment Dyer 229. 50. 6 Eliz. as before the Statute of 27 H. 8. and this by a Proviso in the same Statute Chilborns case Custom 16 A Custom was alleged Dyer 357. 46 19 Eliz. that the tenant in fée could not make a lease for above six years and it was adjudged a void custom because repugnant to fée and unreasonable Salfords case Co ps 17 A Custom for the Incumbent or Churchwardens of a Parish to be paid for the burial of a Corps of one who is no parishioner Ho. 175. The Lady Ferâ—ars case but only passing that way by accident lodging in an Inne or other lodging or the like is an unreasonable custom and void 207 Licet Consuetudo sit magnae Authoritatis Nunquam tamen Praejudicat manifestae veritati Co. l. 4. 18. a. 1. Oxford and Crosses case 1 The plaintifs bring an action in London Slander for that the defendant called the wife of the plaintif Whore the defendant removes it by habeas corpus into the Kings Bench and it was moved to have a Procedendo to remand it because the action was maintainable in London for the said words but not at the Common Law Howbeit the Procedendo was denyed per per totam Curiam for such a Custom to maintain actions for such brabling words is against Law Licet Consuetudo c. Co. l. 6. 6. b. 1. Sir John Molins case 2 Ed. 3. Lord an Abbot Mesne Records the tenant is attainted of Treason the King grants to Sir John Molins to be holden of him and other chief Lords of the fee by the services c. In this case the Mesnalty is revived and albeit divers Offices licences and other Records were produced to prove the Kings immediate tenure yet the Barons before whom that cause depended said in as much as by construction of Law upon the Letters Patents it appeared that there was no immediate tenure in the King albeit it had been otherwise found in offices or admitted in licenses or other Records yet that could not alter the true tenure which originally appeared to them as Iudges upon Record And it was then also said Licet consuetudo c. Co. l. 11. 75. a. 2. in Magdalen College case 3 In Magdalen College case in the 11 Rep. Grants by Ecclesiastical persons Stat. 13 El. 10 where the Master and Fellows of that College had granted to Queen Eliz her heirs and successors an house in London with proviso that if she did not regrant it within some short time to Bened. Spinola and his heirs that then the grant to her should be void with intent thereby to defraud the Statute of 13 Eliz. 10. it was objected that since that Statute there had been a great number of such grants made by Masters and Fellows of Colleges Deans and Chapters Masters of Hospitals c Howbeit to this it was answered that such grants had been made rather ex consuetudine Clericorum who imitated presidents of such grants made before that Statute than by the sage advice of men learned in the Law and Multitudo errantium non parit errori Patrocinium F. N. B. 118. c. 4 It appears by the Register Accompt Prison that if a man be found in arrearages upon his accompt and the plaintif arrests him in London for those arrearages that then the plaintif may sue forth a writ in Chancery directed to the Sheriff rehearsing this matter and commanding the Sheriff to detain the Accomptant safe in prison until he hath paid the arrerages And it seems also upon the same reason that if a man sue forth a writ of debt upon arrearages of accompt before Auditors and hath the party attached c. that he may have a writ out of the Chancery directed to the Sheriff to keep him in prison until he hath satisfied the arrearages but it seemeth to Fitzherbert that such a writ cannot stand with Law which shall command a man to be kept in prison before he shall have answered to the sute commenced against him 5 Hob. 17. Dr. James his case concerning holding the Court of Audience in the Borough of Southwark which is within the Iurisdiction of the Bishop of Winchester 208 Husband and wife are one Person And therefore Rebutter 1 If a feme heir of a disseisor enfeoff me with warranty Co. Inst pars 1. 365. b. 3. and then marry with the disseisee if after the disseisee bring a praecipe against me I shall rebutt him in respect of the warranty of his wife and yet he demandeth the land in another right So likewise if the husband and wife demand the right of the wife a warranty of the collateral ancestor of the husband shall barr them because the husband and wife are one person in Law Protection And for the same reason it is Co. ibid. 130. a. b. 1. F. N. B. 116. 1. that a protection for the husband shall serve also for the wife Conspiracy 2 A writ of Conspiracy must be brought against two at least for if there be such occasion of action only against one an action upon the case lyeth for the falshood and deceit because one cannot conspire with himself and therefore a writ of Conspiracy for indicting the plaintif of felony lyeth not against Baron and feme only because they are but one person but it may lie against Baron and feme and a third person Accompt 3 In an action of accompt receit made by the Baron by the hands of the feme is the Barons own receit F. N. B. 118 f. and both the writ and Count shall suppose that he received it himself without saying by the hands of the feme Debt Feme covert 4 If a man take
severance of estate of inheritance in the Lands 608 Patron and patronage shall not charge the Glebe 73 Partition 746. 149. 200. 209. 369. Not avoided for inequality 437. Where made not to be impeached 174. Avoided by Eviction 175. Makes no Discontinuance 438. Egality of it 552 460 Particeps Criminis 163 Peace and War 298 Parson and Vicar his ability 4. Not to be removed after institution 4. Ought to be resident 6. Their Alienation no Discontinuance 339 Peeres and Peereage not to be sworne on Juries 740. Tryall of them 741. In Coparcenory 267 268 Piracy 547 Plaints in Copy-hold Courts 132 Pleadings and Pleas 456. Guardian may plead without shewing a Deed 445. Of Non est factum or Judgement if Action 101. Truth and Certainty must be in them 604. dictatory 644. In bar to a common intent good 710. Not to be holden in the night 488 Plenarty 291 294 Pluralities 21 787 Perquisites 159 Shal accrue to executors 236 Perpetuities 711 753 757 void 243 688. Post nati Antenati 158. Not noble without creation 46 Possession fratris 141 Pâ—ssibility 401. 406. may be forfeited 405 remote is never intended in Law 620 621 Post fines 268 Prescription where insufficient 17. Extinct by interruption 32. Felons goods not forfeitable by prescription 45. Where saved 72. In a water course 144. Of Estovers 144 quashed by a record or writing 222. for Felons goods not good 225. To repaire Sea Bancks 671. for tithes 698. where void 478. Repugnant void 644 Presentation and nomination 717 771 89 145 147. 469 By Symmony 73 By laps 294 their difference 559 Precipe in capite 331 Priviledge of Bailee of goods detained 34 of Tenant by the curtesie lost 125. Lost by purchase 126. Of impeachment of waste gone by altering the Estate 197. Of a person in one Court not allowed where another Court is seised of the plea 471 of the Clergy 5. of Tenant by the curtesie 61 Priority and posteriority 160 307 Privity of blood title 178 179. of contract 190 of estate contract 190 favoured in Law 172 173 destroyed the action is gone 173. Homage extinct for want of privity 173 In blood and estate 177 193. between the Ancestor and the Heir the Testator and Executor 176 177 Procedendo 675 Prohibition 681 682 Of Waste not against Tenant in dower 125. against waste 213. upon a suit for Orphans goods in the spirituall Court 681 To the spirituall Court for examining a thing triable at Common Law 487 Power of Revocation annulled by Feoffment or Release 69 Protection 307 688 702 Quia moratur in Walliam 35 Repealed by Inotesimus 41 72 By whom must be disallowed 68 Cast for the vouchee 174 by whom it may be cast 595 Incertain void 623 In what cases not allowable 673 in what actions not 673 674 not for the demandant 688 quia profecturus quia moraturus 732 not for above a year 489 Profession 576 makes no discent 571 dischargeth wardship 576 Proof 597 Proviso where it makes a condition 13 Proximity of Estates respected 272 Purchase of a Feme Covert not good without the assent of her husband 772 Principal accessory 231 232 233 234 241 Q. QVare Impedit 141 172 329 341 681 467 451. Causes or refusall of a Clarke 45. Not without alledging a presentment 717 Quare non admisit Out of what Court 234 Quare incumbravit 682 Queen Is a person exempt from the King and may grant or take 732 Quit Rents 157 Quid Juris clamat 427 Quod ei deforceat 34. Whereupon a Recovery had upon default in Wast Et e contra 44. For Tenant in Dower and the Curtesie 273 Quo minus 599 Quo warranto 713 R. RAtionabile parte bonorum 477 Ravishment of Gard 335. The guardian shall have it 103 Rebutter 191. 687. 763. Without privity 187 Recovery By default 19. 316. Where it is no Discontinuance 19. In value 51. 413. Feined 118. Not avoidable by error 417. Bind being by consent of parties 481 Recognizance 151 Records removall of them 351 Recaption 681. 501 Recusancie 245 Redisseisin 682 Refusall Of goods in pais 455. Of the Clarke 591 Reparation of Sea bancks 671. 591. Felling of Timber for Reparation 733 Rleases 33 58 105 115 116 182 183. Of Actions 480. By Executors before probate 507. Excuseth Execution 32. Of a Remainder of a Terme 49. Before an Interest void 56. To disseisors how it enures 57. To the Baile not good 58. Of a Conusee of a Statute of his right in the Land yet he may sue Execution 59 By the Donor to the discontinuee of Tenant in Taile 60. To Lessee for yeares where void 73. For a time good for ever 115. To privies where good 180. Before Entry where void 181. To Tenant at Will and sufferance the difference 181. without privity is void Of a writ of Error 187. of all demands 217. Of a future Interest where void 242. In Fact and in Law 440. Of a Right 450. To one Disseisor 563 Relation 165 167 326. Protection and Subjection relate from the birth 165 Of offices and fees 165. of damages and wrong 166. Of processe 166 Remainder 705. Where good where void 15 117. 128. 608. Of a Rent void 55. 119. of a Terme not grantable 59. good when the particular Estate failes 99. Must vest during the particular estate 119. To a mans right heir a limitation to himselfe 128 Upon an Estate taile not valuable 417. against his own alienation 554 Remitter 84 159 311 313 314 705 667 668 763 768 Of the wife is the Remitter of the husband 508. Of an Infant where not 67. avoyds a Rent 74. Right with action no Remitter 79. The reason of because no person against whom to bring a Writ 169. 485. Suspended by warranty and assets 412. Favoured in Law 506 Releife Services not doubled for it 254. remedy for it 550. Paid by no Enfant 575 Reversion seperated for yeares good without attornment 365 Reservation of Rent not exchanged by altering Names 20 Rents 24 325. Extinct by feoffment 55. 119 161 253 Devisable e contr 60. 166. Apportioned 130. 253 289. 569. 435. Incident to the Reversion 130 131 132 A summ reserved to a stranger no Rent 242. Charge becomes Seck 253 254. Extinct by Recovery and purchase of part 254 322 548. Not to go out of things incorporeall 286. Suspended in all 322. paid by the Lessee no prejudice to the Tenant of the Land 328. In Esse after a Release 329. By encroachment 373. Service made seck 464. May passe without Deed 437. When to be demanded 490 Replevin 334. 391. For cattell not distrained 560. A plaint must be entred before the writ can be good 689 Resistance must be by some over tact and not by word 107 Resignation 603 Rescous where lawfull 73 Retraxit 151 Revocation 151. Shall be strictly taken 379. The power of it 192. 298 377 Right cannot be transferred 69 196. ancient not barred 82. Left after a Recovery 143. Of possession