this constant total Communion doth not only include a conscientious Observance of all things appointed to be done by the Rules or Canons in those Assemblies but a Renunciation also of all other ways and means of Edification by joint Communion as unlawful and Evil. And it will be hard to prove that on a Concession of the Lawfulness of Communion in some Acts of Divine Worship it Will be necessary for men to oblige themselves unto total constant Communion with a Renunciation and Condemnation of all other ways and means of joint Edification It may also be lawful to do a thing with some respects and Limitations at some times which it may not be lawful to do absolutely and alwayes It may be necessary from outward circumstances to do that Sometimes which is lawful in itself though not necessary from itself it can never be necessary to do that which is unlawful Of the first sort they esteem occasional Communion and the other of the latter Some time is spent in taking off an Exception unto this Inference from the Practise of our Saviour who had occasional Communion with the Jews in the Temple and Synagogues which he proves to have been constant and perpetual and not occasional only and that he prescribed the same Practise unto his Disciples But I think this labour might have been spared For there is nothing more clear and certain then that our Lord Jesus Christ did joyn with the Jews in the Observance of Gods Institutions among them on the one hand and on the other that he never joyned with them in the observance of their own Traditions and Pharasaical Impositions but warned all his Disciples to avoid them and refuse them whose Example we desire to follow for concerning all such Observances in the Church he pronounced that sentence Every plant that my Heavenly Father hath not planted shall be rooted up But the Doctor proceeds unto a second Argument pag. 163 to the same Purpose from as he calls it the particular force of that Text Phil. 3.16 As far as we have already attained let us walk by the same Rule mind the same things This is the Text which gave the first occasion unto this whole Dispute The Doctors Intention is so indefensible from this place that I thought however he might persist in the Defence of the Cause he had undertaken he would have forborn from seeking Comtenance unto it from these Words of the Apostle But it is fallen out otherwise and I am here in the first place called unto an Account for the Exceptions I put in unto his Application of these Words of the Apostle in my Vindication of the Non-conformists I will spare the Reader as much as is possible in the Repetition of things formerly spoken and the Transcription of his Words or my own without prejudice unto the Cause itself After a Reflection of some Obscurity and Intricacy on my Discourse he repeates my sense of the Words according unto his Apprehension under four Heads about which I shall not contend seeing whether he hath apprehended my Mind aright or no or expressed the whole of what I declared belongs not unto the Merit of the Cause in hand Nor indeed do I yet know directly what he judgeth this Text doth prove or what it is that he inferrs from it though I know well enough what it is designed to give countenance unto and what is the Application that is made of it And therefore he issues his whole Dispute about it in this Enquiry how far the Apostles Rule hath an influence on this case But whosoever shall come unto a sedate Consideration of this Text and Context without Prejudice without preconceived Opinions without Interest in Parties or Causes will judge it to be a Matter of Art to apply them unto the present Controversie as unto the Imposition of an Arbitrary Rule of walking in Churches on all that are presumed to belong unto them But to clear these things the Doctor proposeth three things to be debated 1. Whether the Apostle speaks of different Opinions or different Practices 2. Whether the Rule he gives be mutual Forbearance 3. How far the Apostle's Rule hath an influence into this case The two first of these belong not at all unto the present Argument and the last is but faintly proposed and pursued though it be the Foundation of his whole Fabrick The Reader if he will put himself to so much trouble as to compare my former Discourse with what is here offered in Answer or Opposition unto it he will easily see that nothing is pleaded that may abate the force of what was insisted on For indeed the Discourse on these things consists for the most part in Diversions from the Argument in hand whereby an Appearance is made of various Arguings and the Proof of sundry things which belong not unto the Case in hand Without any long Deductions artificial Insinuations or diverting Reasonings without wresting the Text or Context these things are plain and evident in them 1. A Supposition of Differences among Believers in and about Opinions and Practises relating unto Religion and the Worship of God So is at present between us and those of the Church of England by whom we are opposed 2. In this state whilst these Differences do continue there is one common Rule according unto which those who so dissent among themselves are to walk in the things wherein they are agreed Such is the Rule of Faith and Love which we all assent unto and are agreed in 3. This Rule cannot consist in a precise Determination of the things in Difference with an Authoritative Prescription of Vniformity in Opinions and Practise because it is directed unto upon a supposition of the continuation of those Differences between Believers 4. That during the continuation of these Differences or different Apprehensions and Practices whilst on all hands they use the means of coming unto the Knowledge of the Truth in all things that they should walk in Love mutually forbearing one another in those things wherein they differed Untill it be manifested that these things are not the Design of the Context and to contain the sense of the Words they are not only useless unto the Doctors Design but opposite unto it and destructive of it But nothing is here attempted unto that Purpose To draw any Argument from these Words applicable unto his Design it must be proved 1. That besides the Rule of Faith Love and Worship given by Divine Institution and Obligatory unto all the Disciples of Christ or all Churches in all times and Ages that the Apostles gave a Rule concerning outward Rites Ceremonies Modes of Worship Feasts and Fastings Ecclesiastical Government Liturgies and the like unto which all Believers ought to conform on the Penalty of being esteemed Schismaticks and dealt withal accordingly For this only is that wherein we are concerned 2. That because the Apostles made such a Rule which we know not what it is or what is become of it that
the Guides of the Church and that in such a Church state as the Apostles knew nothing of have Power to frame such a Rule as that described and to impose the Observation of it on all Believers on the Penalties before mentioned It is manifest that no Advantage unto the Cause of Imposition and Uniformity as it is stated at present can be taken from these Words of the Apostle unless these two things be contained in them But that either of them are so our Author doth not say nor go about to prove in his large Discourse on this Place I might therefore forbear any farther Examination of it without the least disadvantage unto our Cause But that I may not seem to wave the consideration of any thing that is pretended Material I shall enquire into the Particulars of it He proceeds therefore to answer his own Quaries which he judged conducing unto his Purpose The first of them is whether the Apostle speakes of different Principles or of different Practises And I find nothing in the Discourse ensuing that hath the least respect unto this Enquiry until towards the close of it where he grants that different Apprehensions are intended such as were accompanied with different Practices But in Order hereunto he gives us a large Account of the scope of the Place and Design of the Apostle in it The Substance of it is That the Apostle treates concerning Judaical seducers that the things in difference were the different Apprehensions of men about the Law its Ceremonies and Worship with the continuation of them and the different Practises that ensued thereon Be it so What is our or his concernment herein For it is most certain the Apostle designed not the Imposition of these things on the Churches of the Gentiles nor did urge them unto an Uniformity in them but declared their Liberty from any Obligation unto them and advised them to stand fast in that Liberty whatever others did practise themselves or endeavour to impose on them What this conduceth unto his Purpose I cannot understand But on the Occasion of that Expression being otherwise minded He demands what sense can Dr. O. here put upon the being otherwise Minded Otherwise then what As many as be perfect be thus minded to pursue your main End but if any be otherwise minded did any think they ought not to mind chiefly their great end that is incredible Therefore the Apostle must be understood of somewhat about which there were then very different Apprehensions and that it is certain there were about the Law among Christian Churches Neither do I well understand these things or what is intended in them For 1. I never gave occasion to him or any else to think that I would affix such a sense unto the Apostles Words as if they gave an Allowance to men to be otherwise minded as unto the pursuit of their main End of living to God in Faith and Love with mutual Peace among themselves 2. What then do I intend by being otherwise minded even the same that he doth and nothing else namely different Apprehensions about some things in Religion and particularly those concerning the Law and its Ceremonies For 3. Let it be supposed that the Apostle in particular intends Dissentions about the Law and the Observance of its Institutions yet he doth not determine the case from the especial circumstances of that Difference so adjudging the Truth unto one of the Parties at variance but from a general Rule how the Disciples of Christ ought to deport themselves towards one another during the continuation of such Differences But 4. The Truth is the Apostle hath dismissed the case proposed in the Beginning of the Chapter ver 1.2 3 c. and upon the occasion of his Expression of his own voluntary Relinquishment and Renunciation of all the Priviledges which the Jews boasted in and of his Attainments thereon in the Misteries of the Gospel ver 12 13 14. he gives a general Direction for the walking of all Christians in the several Degrees and Measures of their Attainments in the same kind And herein he supposeth two things 1. That there were things all the fundamental Doctrines of the Gospel concerning the Person Offices and Grace of Christ which they had all in common attained unto Whereunto we have already attained Wee all of us in general 2. That in some things there were different Apprehensions and Practises amongst them which hindered not their Agreement in what they had attained if any one be otherwise minded one than another We that are perfect and those which are weak let us walk by the same Rule Wherefore although I cannot discern how any thing in this Discourse hath the least Influence into the Case in hand yet to give a little more Light unto the Context and to evidence its unserviceableness unto the Doctors Intention I shall give a brief account of the Judaical Teachers of those days The Jews were by this time distributed into three sorts 1. Such as being obdurate in their Unbelief and Rejection of the Person of Christ opposed persecuted and blasphemed the Gospel in all places Thus was it with the Generality of the Nation And the Teachers of this sort advanced the Excellency Necessity and Usefulness of the Law in contradiction unto Christ and the Gospel These the Apostle describes 1 Thes. 2.13 14 15. The Jews Who both killed the Lord Jesus and their own Prophets and have persecuted us and they please not God and are contrary unto all Men forbidding us to speak unto the Gentiles that they might be saved to fill up their sins alway for the wrath is come upon them unto the uttermost 2. Such as professing Faith in Christ Jesus and Obedience unto the Gospel yet were of the Mind that the whole Law of Moses was not only to be continued and observed among the Jews but also that it was to be imposed on the Gentiles who were converted unto the Faith They thought the Gospel did not erect a new Church state with a new kind of Worship but only was a peculiar way of proselyting men into Judaisme against which the Apostle disputes in his Epistle unto the Hebrews especially in the 7th and 8th Chapters The Teachers of this sort greatly troubled the Churches even after the Declaration of the Mind of the Holy Ghost in these things by the Apostles Act. 15. Those who continued obstinate in this Perswasion became afterwards to be Ebionites and Nazarenes as they were called wholly forsaking the Christian Church of the Gentiles These were generally of the Sect of the Pharisees and seem to be the least sort of the three For 3. There were others who acquiescing in the Liberty of the Gentiles declared by the Apostles Act. 15. yet judged themselves and all other Circumcised Jews obliged unto the Observation of the Law and its Institutions These legal Observances were of two sorts 1. Such as were confined and limited unto the Temple and unto the Land of Canaan
differences of lesser Moment whilst the general Rule of Faith and Love is attended unto 4. To be quiet and wait for further Instruction is the Direction given unto both Parties whilst the Differences did continue between them and that in opposition unto mutual Impositions 5. A Church that is really so or so esteemed may break the Peace with its own Members and others as well as they with it and where the fault is must be determined by the Causes of what is done 6. For what is added about gathering of Churches it shall be considered in its proper place But as unto the Application of these things unto the present Case there lies in the bottom of them such an unproved Presumption of their being the Church that is according unto Divine Institution for in their being so in any other sense we are not concerned of their Church Power and Authority by whom such Orders and Rules are made as we can by no means admit of I can more warrantably give this as the Apostles Rule than that of our Author What you have attained unto in the Knowledge of the Doctrine and Misteries of the Gospel walk together in holy Communion of Faith and Love but take heed that you multiply not new Causes of Divisions and Differences by inventing and imposing new Orders in Divine Worship or the Rule of the Church casting them out who agree with you in all things of divine Revelation and Institution He adds from my Words If the Rule reach our Case it must be such as requires things to be observed as were never divinely appointed as National Churches Ceremonies and Modes of worship to which he Replies And so this Rule doth in Order unto Peace require the Observation of such things which although they be not particularly commanded of God yet are enjoyned by lawful Authority provided that they be not unlawful in themselves nor repugnant unto the Word of God Answ. 1. Let the Reader if he please consult the place whence these Words are taken in my Discourse and he will find this Evasion obviated 2. What is intended by this Rule is it the Rule given by the Apostle Who that reads the Words can possibly pretend unto any such conception of their meaning If he understand a Rule of his own I know not what it may or may not include 3. I deny and shall for ever deny that the Rule here intended by the Apostle doth give the least countenance unto the Invention and Imposition of things not divinely instituted not prescribed not commanded in the Word on the Pretence that those who so invent and impose them judged them lawful and that they have Authority so to do He Objects again unto himself out of my Discourse that the Apostles never gave any such Rules themselves about outward Modes of Worship with Ceremonies Feasts Fasts Liturgies c. Whereunto he Replies What then I say then 1. It had been happy for Christians and Christian Religion if those who pretended to be their Successors had followed their Example and made no such Rules at all that they would not have thought themselves wiser than they or more careful for the Good of the Church or better acquainted with the Mind of Christ in these things then they were For that Multiplication of Rules Laws Canons about the things mentioned and others of an alike nature which the Apostles never gave any Example of or Encouragement unto which afterwards ensued hath been a principal means of altering the state of the Church from its Original Institution of corrupting its Worship Administring occasion unto scandal and endless Strifes 2. If the Apostles gave no such Rules themselves it may be concluded safely that it was because in their Judgement no such Rule was to be given Other Reason hereof cannot be assigned for if it might have been done according to the Mind of Christ and by vertue of the Commission which they had from him innumerable Evils might have been prevnted by the doing of it They foresaw what Differences would arise in the Church what Divisions the darkness and corrupt Lusts of men would cast them into about such things as these and probably knew much whereunto the Mistery of Iniquity tended yet would they not appoint any Arbitrary Rules about things not ordained by our Lord Jesus Christ which might have given some bounds unto the Inclinations of men in making and multiplying Rules of their own unto the ruine of the Church 3. Then I say we beg the Pardon of all who concern themselves herein that we scruple the Complying with such Rules in Religion and the Worship of God as the Apostles thought not meet to appoint or ordain But he addes It is sufficient that they gave this general Rule that all Lawful things are to be done for the Churches Peace Answ. What is to be done for the Churches Peace we shall afterwards consider To be done is intended of Acts of Religion in the Worship of God I say then the Apostles never gave any such Rule as that pretended the Rule they gave was that all things which Christ hath commanded were to be done and observed and for the doing of any thing else they gave no Rule Especially they gave not such a large Rule as this that might serve the turn and interest of the worst of men in imposing on the Church whatever they esteemed Lawful as not by vertue of any Rule of the Apostles but in an open Rejection of all they gave it afterwards fell out in the Church This is a Rule which would do the Work to the Purpose of all that have the Reputation of Governours in the Church be it the Pope or who it will For they are themselves the sole Judges of what is Lawful the People as it is pretended understand nothing of these things Whatever therefore they have a Mind to introduce into the Worship of God and to impose on the Practice of men therein is to be done by vertue of this Apostolical Rule for the Churches Peace provided they judge it Lawful and surely no Pope was ever yet so stark mad as to impose things in Religion which he himself judged unlawful Besides things may be Lawful in themselves that is Morally which yet it is not Lawful to introduce into the Worship of God because not expedient nor for Edification Yea things may be Lawful to be done sometimes on some occasions in the Worship of God which yet it would be unlawful to impose by vertue of a general binding Rule for all times and seasons Instances may be multiplied in each kind Therefore I say the Apostles never gave this Rule they opened no such Door unto Arbitrary Imposition they laid no such Yoke on the Necks of the Disciples which might prove heavier and did so then that of the Jewish Ceremonies which they had taken away namely that they were to do and observe all that should by their Rulers be imposed on them as lawful in their Judgement This
3. This therefore is that which he opposeth namely that there was a Deviation in various degrees and falling of from the Original Institution Order and Rule of the Church until it issued in a fatal Apostasie This is that which on the present Occasion must be further spoken unto For if this be not true I confess there is an end of this contest and we must all acquiesce in the State Rule and Order that was in the Church of Rome before the Reformation But we may observe something yet farther in the Vindication and Confirmation of this Truth which I acknowledge to be the Foundation of all that we plead for in point of Church Reformation As 1. That the Reasons and Arguings of the Doctor in this Matter the Necessity of his Cause compelling him thereunto are the same with those of the Papists about the Apostacy of their Church in Faith Order and Worship wherewith they are charged namely when where how was this Alteration made who made opposition unto it and the like When these Enquiries are multiplyed by the Papists as unto the whole Causes between them and us he knows well enough how to give satisfactory Answers unto them and so might do in this particular unto himself also but I shall endeavour to ease him of that trouble at present Only I must say that it is fallen out somewhat unexpectedly that the Ruins of the principle Bulwark of the Papacy which hath been effectually demolished by the Writings of Protestants of all sorts should be endeavoured to be repaired by a Person justly made eminent by his Defence of the Protestant Religion against those of the Church of Rome 2. But it may be pleaded that although the Churches following the first Ages did insensibly degenerate from the Purity and simplicity of Gospel Faith and Worship yet they neither did nor could do so from an Adherence unto and abiding in their Original constitution or from the due Observation of Church Order Rule and Discipline least of all could this happen in the Case of Diocesan Episcopacy I Answer 1. That as unto the Original of any thing that looks like Diocesan Episcopacy or the Pastoral Relation of one Person of a distinct order from Presbiters unto many particular compleat Churches with Officers of their own with Power and Jurisdiction in them and over them unto the Abridgement of the exercise of that Right and Power unto their own Edification which every true Church is entrusted withal by Jesus Christ it is very uncertain and was introduced by insensible Degrees according unto the effectual working of the Mistery of Iniquity Some say that there were two distinct Orders namely those of Bishops and Presbyters instituted at first in all Churches planted by the Apostles But as the contrary may be evidently proved so a supposition of it would no way promote the cause of Diocesan Episcopacy until those who plead for it have demonstrated the State of the Churches wherein they were placed to be of the same nature with those now called Diocesan Wherefore this Hypothesis begins generally to be deserted as it seems to be by this Author Others suppose that immediately upon or at or after the Decease of the Apostles this new Order of Bishops was appointed to succeed the Apostles in the Government of the Churches that were then gathered or planted But how when or by whom by what Authority Apostolical and Divine or Ecclesiastical only and humane none can declare seeing there is not the least footstep of any such thing either in the Scripture or in the Records that remain of the primitive Churches Others think this new Order of Officers took its occasional Rise from the Practice of the Presbyters of the Church at Alexandria who chose out one among themselves constantly to preside in the Rule of the Church and in all matters of Order unto whom they ascribed some kind of Preheminence and Dignity peculiarly appropriating unto him the namâ— of Bishop And if this be true as unto matter of Fact I reckon it unto the Beginnings of those less harmful Deviations from their Original Constitution which I assigned unto Primitive Churches But many Additions must be made hereunto before it will help the Cause of Diocesan Episcopacy What other occasions hereof were given or taken what Advantages were made use of to promote this Alteration shall be touched upon afterwards 2. Why may not the Churches be supposed to have departed from their original Constitution Order and Rule as well as from their first Faith and Worship which they did gradually in many successive Ages until both were utterly corrupted The Causes Occasions and Temptations leading unto the former are to the full as pregnant as those leading unto the latter For 1. There was no vicious corrupt disposition of Mind that began more early to work in Church Officers nor did more grow and thrive in the Minds of many then Ambition with desire of Preheminence Dignity and Rule It is not to be supposed that Diotrephes was alone in his Desire of â—reheminence nor in the irregular actings of his unduly â—ssumed Authority However we have one signal Instance in him of the Deviation that was in the Church with him from the Rule of its Original Constitution For he prevailed so far therein as by his own single Episcopal Power to reject the Authority of the Apostles and to cast them out of the Church who complyed not with his humour How effectually the same Ambition wrought afterwards in many others possessing the same Place in their Churches with Diotrephes is sufficiently evident in all Ecclesiastical Histories It is far from being the only Instance of the Corruption of Church Order and Rule by the Influence of this Ambition yet it is one that is pregnant which is given us by Amâ—rose for saith he Ecclesia ut Synagoga Seniores habuâ—â— quorum sine consilio nihil agebatur in Ecclesia quod qua neglâ—gentia obsoleverit nescio nisi forte doctorum desidia aut magis superbia dum soli volunt aliquid videri In 1. ad Timoth. cap. 5. It seems there was some alteration in Church Rule and Order in his Time whose Beginning and Progress he could not well discover and trace but knew well enough that so it was then come to pass And if he who lived so near the Times wherein such Alterations were made could not yet discover their first Insinuation nor their subtle Progress it is unreasonable to exact a strict account of us in things of the same nature who live so many Ages after their first Introduction But this he judgeth that it was the Pride or Ambition of the Doctors of the Church which introduced that Alteration in its Order Whereas therefore we see in the Event that all Deviations from the Original Constitution of Churches all Alterations in their Rule and Order did issue in a compliance with the Ambition of Church Rulers as it did in the Papal Church and this Ambition was signally noted
distributed the Faithful at Rome into distinct Titles or Parishes with distinct Presbyters of their own For it is apparent that in those days wherein Persecution was at its height the Meetings of Believers were occasional with respect unto their Security oft-times by Night sometimes in Caves under the Earth or in deserted Burial places at best in private Houses And they had for what they did the Example of the Apostolical Churches Acts 1.13 14. Acts 2.46 chap. 4.24 31. chap. 12.12 chap. 18.7 chap. 20.8 chap. 21.18 Instances of such Meetings may be multiplyed especially in the Church of Rome And to manifest that they took this course upon Necessity when Peace begun to be restored at any time unto them they designed Temples that might receive the whole Multitude of the Church together The Distribution mentioned into Titles and Parishes began a long time after and in very few places within 300 years In this State it is easie to conceive what Alterations might fall out in some Churches from their Primitive Order especially how the People might desert their Diligence and Duty in attending unto all the concerns of the Church And if those things which the Apostles wrote unto them in their Epistles the Instructions Directions and Commands how in all things they should act and deport themselves in the Church be esteemed to be Obligatory in all Ages I cannot see how after the second Century they were much complyed withal unless it were in the single Instance of choosing their own Officers or Rulers But Secondly After these there ensued greater Occasions of greater Variations from the Primitive Institution and Order of the Churches on the Part of the People For 1. Such Numbers of them were received into a Relation unto particular Churches as was inconsistent with the Ends of their Institution and the Observance of the Communion required in them as will afterwards appear And the Reliefes that were invented for this Inconveniency in distinct Conventions supplyed with the Administration of the Word and Sacrament from the first Church or by stated Titles did alter the State of the Church Among those Multitudes which were added unto the Churches especially in the fourth Century many if not the most did come short inexpressibly in Knowledge Gifts Grace Holiness and uprightness of Conversation of the Primitive Christians as the Writers of that Age complain And being hereby uncapable of walking according unto the Order Rule and Discipline of the Apostolical Churches there seemed to be a Necessity of another Rule of other ways and means for their Government without their own concurrence or consent then what was at first appointed which were gradually introduced Whence the original of a Multitude of those Canons which were arbitrarily invented afterwards for their Rule and Government is to be derived And it may be made to appear that the Accommodation of the Rule yea and of the Worship of the Church in the several Ages of it unto the Ignorance Manners and Inclinations of the People who were then easily won unto the outward Profession of Christian Religion was one means of the Ruine of them both until they issued in downright Tyranny and Idolatry But much more of the cause of the Deviation of the Churches from their Primitive Rule and Order is to be ascribed unto the Ambition and Love of Preheminence in many of the Clergy or Rulers of the Churches But this is no Place nor Season to manifest this by Instances besides it hath been done by others I shall therefore enquire only into one or two things in particular which are of principal consideration in the Declension of the Churches from their Primitive Institution Order and Rule And 1. It is evident that there was an Alteration made in the state of the Church as to its Officers For it issued at last in Popes Patriarchs Cardinals Metropolitan and Diocesan Bishops who were utterly forreign unto the State and Order of the Primitive Churches and that for some Ages Nor were these Officers introduced into the Church at one or in one Age nor with the Powers which they afterwards claimed and assumed unto themselves It was done gradually in many succeeding Ages working by a Design to accommodate the State of the Church unto the Political State of the Empire in the distribution of its Government 2. The Beginnings of this great Alteration were small nor at all perceived in the days wherein they were first acted Nor is it agreed nor as far as I see will it ever be agreed among Learned Men when first a Disparity among the ordinary Officers of the Church in Order Degree or Power did first begin nor by what means it was brought about The Apostles were all equal among themselves no one had either Office or Office-Power above others So were all the ordinary Bishops and Presbyters mentioned in the Scripture as shall be proved afterwards No intimation is given of any Preheminence or Superiority amongst them of one over others Yet afterwards in the third and fourth Centuries much of that nature appears It begins to be granted that the Bishops and Elders mentioned in the Scripture were the same and that there was no difference in Name Office or Power during the Apostles times which was the Judgment of Hierome and our Author seems to me to be of the same Mind p. 267. But they say that after the Decease of the Apostles there were some appointed to succeed them in that part of their Office which concerned the Rule of many Churches And this they say was done for the prevention of Schisme but with ill success For as Clemens affirms that the Apostles foresaw that there would be Strife and Contention about Episcopacy even when it was confined unto its Original Order because of the Ambition of Diotrephes and others like him so it became much more the cause of all sorts of Disorders in Schismes and Heresies when it began to exalt it self in Dignity and Reputation The first express Attempt to corrupt and divide a Church made from within itself was that in the Church of Hierusalem made by Thebulis because Simon Cleopas was chosen Bishop and he was refused Euseb. lib. 4. cap. 21. The same Rise had the Schismes of the Novatians and Donatists the Heresies of Arius and others Neither is there any thing certain in this pretended Succession of some Persons unto the Apostles in that part of their Office which concerns the Rule of many Churches by one Overseer No Intimation of any such Appointment by the Apostles or any of them no record of the concurrence of the Churches themselves in and unto this Alteration can be produced Nor is there any Analogy between the extraordinary Power of every Apostle over all Churches and care for them and the ordinary Power of a Bishop over a small Number which Lot or Accident disposeth unto him Besides it cannot be proved no Instance can be given or hath been for the space of 200 years or until the end of the
second Century of any one Person who had the care of more Churches than one committed unto him or did take the charge of them on himself But whereas this change did fall out and appears evidently so to have done in the fourth Century we may briefly enquire into the Causes and Occasions of it Churches were originally planted in Cities and Townes for the most part not absolutely for the Word was preached and Churches gathered by the Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Clemens testifieth In such Cities there was but one Church whereunto all Beleivers did belong I mention this the rather because our present Author who is pleased frequently to mistake my Words and Principles affirms that the thing which I should have proved is that there were more Churches at first planted in one City than one I know not why I should be obliged to do so because I never said so I do believe indeed that there may be more particular Churches than one in one City and that sometimes it is better that it should be so then that all Beleivers in the same City should be kept up unto one Congregation to the Obstruction of their Edification But that there were originally or in the days of the Apostles more Churches than one in any one City or Town I do wholly deny though I grant at the same time there were Churches in Villages also as will appear afterwards But though there was one Church only in one Town or City yet all the Believers that belonged unto that Church did not live in that City but sundry of them in the Fields and Villages about So Justin Martyr tells us that on the first day of the week when the Church had its solemn Assemblies all the Members of it in the City and out of the Country the Fields and Villages about met together in the same place In process of time these Believers in the Country did greatly encrease by the means of the Ministry of the City-Church which diligently attended unto the Conversion of all sorts of men with some extraordinary helps besides But hereon the Example of the Apostles was overseen For on this account of the Conversion of many unto the Faith in the Towns and Villages of any Province they erected and planted new Churches among them not obliging them all unto that first Church from whence the Word went forth for their Conversion But those who succeeded them being hindred by many Reasons which may be easily recounted from Thoughts of the Multiplication of Churches chose rather to give the Beleivers scattered up and down in the Countrey occasional Assistance by Presbyters of their own than to dispose them into a Chrch State and Order But after a while their Number greatly encreasing they were necessitated to supply them with a constant Ministâ—y in several Parcels or Divisions The Ministers or Elders thus disposed amongst them for their Edification in the Administration of the Ordinances of the Gospel did still relate unto and depend upon that City first Church from whence they came But the Numbers of Beleivers dayly encreasing and a Succession of Presbyters in their distinct Assemblies being found necessary they came to be called Churches though continuing in dependance both for a supply of Officers and for Rule on the first or City Church whereunto they esteemed themselves to belong This was the way and manner of the Multiplication of Christian Assemblies throughout the Roman Empire And hereby all the Bishops of the first Churches became by common consent to have a distinction from and Preheminence above the Presbyters that were fixed in the Country and a Rule over those Assemblies or Churches themselves And therefore when they met together in the Council of Nice among the first things they decreed one was to confirm unto the Bishops of the great Cities that Power over the Neighbouring Churches which they had enjoyned from this occasional Rise and Constitution of them Hereby was a Difference and Distinction between Bishops and Presbiters between Mother and Dependant Churches introduced equally almost in all places without taking any notice of the departure which was therein from the Primitive Pattern and Institution But these things fell out long after the Days of the Apostles namely in the third and fourth Centuries there being no mention of them before But Secondly There was another Occasion of this Alteration which took place before that insisted on For in many of those City Churches especially when the number of Beleivers much encreased there were many Bishops or Elders who had the Rule of them in common This is plain in the Scripture and in the ensuing Records of Church Affairs And they had all the same Office the same Power and were of the same Order But after a while to preserve Order and Decency among themselves and in all their proceedings they chose one from among them who should preside in all Church Affairs for Orders sake unto whom after a season the name of Bishop began to be appropriated Whether the Rule they proceeded by herein was to choose them unto this Dignity who had been first converted unto the Faith or first called and ordained to be Presbyters or had respect unto the Gifts and Graces of those whom they chose is not certain But this way began in those Churches wherein some extraordinary Officer Apostle or Evangelist had long resided It cannot therefore be doubted but they had some Design to represent hereby somewhat of the Dignity of such an Officer and a Resemblance of the continuance of his Presence among them And this I suppose fell out early in the Churches though without Ground or Warrant And the Principal Pastors of other Churches which had not any great Number of Elders in them yet quickly assumed unto themselves the Dignity which the others had attained Justin Martyr in the Account he gives of the Church its Order Rule Worship and Discipline in his Days mentions one singular Person in one Church whom he calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who presided in all the Affairs of the Church and himself administred all the sacred Ordinances every Lords Day unto the whole Body of the Church gathered and met out of the City and the Villages about This was the Bishop and if any one desired this Office he desired a good work as the Apostle speaks Whatever Accessions were made unto the Church these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which were either the first converted to the Faith or the first ordained Presbyters or obtained their Preheminence non pretio sed Testimonio as Tertullian speaks upon the account of their Eminency in Gifts and Holiness were yet quickly sensible of their own Dignity and Praelation and by all means sought the enlargement of it supposing that it belonged unto the Honour and Order of the Church it self Under this State of things the Churches encreasing every day in Number and Wealth growing insensibly more and more indies magis magisque decrescente disciplina into a form and
to give place unto severe Thoughts of the Church of England and its Communion and withdrawing themselves into forreign Parts openly avowed a Separation from it And if the extremities which many had been put unto for their meer Dissent and Nonconformity unto the Established Rule which with a good Conscience they could not comply with were represented it might if not excuse yet alleviate the Evil of that Severity in Separation which they fell into 6. But hereon a double Inconvenience yea Evil did ensue whence all the Advantages made use of in this Story to load the present Cause of the Nonconformists did arise For 1. Many of those who refused to conform unto the Church in all its Constitutions yet thought it their Duty to wait quietly for a National Reformation thinking no other possible began to oppose and write against them who utterly Separated from the Church condemning its Assemblies as Unlawful And herein as the manner of men is on such Occasions they fell into sharp Invectives against them with severe Censures and Sentences concerning them and their Practice And 2. Those who did so separate being not agreed among themselves as unto all Principles of Church-Order nor as unto the Measures of their Separation from the Church of England there fell out differences and disorders among them accompanied with personal Imprudencies and Miscarriages in not a few Neither was it ever scarcely otherwise among them who first attempted any Reformation unless like the Apostles they were infallibly guided These mutual Contests which they had among themselves and with the Nonconformists who abode in their private Stations in England with their Miscarriages also were published unto the World in their own Writings and those of their Enemies Hinc omnis pendet Lucilius These were the things that gave advantage unto and are the Substance of the History of our Author concerning Separation wherein all I can find unto our present Instruction is that Iliacos intra muros peccatur extra There are and ever were Sins Faults Follies and Miscarriages among all sorts of Men which might be farther evidenced by recounting on the other hand what were the Ways Acts and Deeds at the same time of those by whom the others were cast out and rejected And whereas it was the Design of the Reverend Author to load the Cause and Persons of the present Nonconformists with Prejudice and contempt it is well fallen out in the Merciful disposal of things towards and amongst us by the Providence and Grace of God that he is forced to derive the principal Matter of his Charge from what was done by a few private Persons three or fourscore years agoe and more in whose Principles and Practises we are not concerned And as for the Difference that fell out more lately among the Divines in the Assembly at Westminster about the Ways Means and Measures of Reformation and mutual Forbearance which he gives us a large account of in a long Transcription out of their Writings I must have more Health and Strength and Leisure than now I have which I look not for in this World before I esteem my self concerned to ingage in that contest or to Apologize for the one side or other The things in Agitation between them had no Relation unto or present Dissent from the Church of England being here insisted on meerly to fill up the story with Reference unto the General End designed Neither to my Knowledge did I ever read a Book wherein there was a greater Appearance of Diligence in the Collection of Things Words Sayings Expressions Discourses unto other Ends which might only cast Odium on the Cause opposed or give advantage for Arguings unto a seeming Success very little or no way at all belonging unto the Cause in hand than there is in this of our Reverend Author though much in the same way and kind hath been before attempted But Separation it is and Schisme which we are all charged withal and the Evil thereof is aggravated in the Words of the Author himself and in large Transcriptions out of the Writings of others Schisme indeed we acknowledge to be an Evil a great Evil but are sorry that with some a pretended unproved Schisme is become almost all that is Evil in the Churches or their Members so that let men be what they will drenched yea overwhelmed in Ignorance Vice and Sin so they do not separate which to be sure in that state they will not do for why should he who hath Plague Sores upon him depart from the Society of them that are infected they seem to be esteemed as unto all the concerns of the Church very unblameable The Truth is considering the present State and Condition of the Inhabitants of this Nation who are generally Members of the Church of England how the Land is filled with sin against the Holy One of Israel God giving us every day renewed Tokens and Indications of his Displeasure no compliance with his Calls no publick Reformation being yet attempted it seems a more necessary Duty and of more importance unto them upon whom the care of such things is incumbent to endeavour in themselves and to ingage a Faithful Ministry throughout the Nation both to give a due Example in their Conversations and to Preach the Word with all diligence for the turning of the People from the Evil of their ways then to spend their time and strength in the Mannagment of such Charges against those who would willingly comply with them as unto all the great Ends of Religion amongst men But this must be farther spoken unto I say therefore 1. In General that whereas the whole Design of this Book is to charge all sorts of Nonconformists with Schisme and to denounce them Schismaticks yet the Author of it doth not once endeavour to state the true notion and nature of Schisme wherein the Consciences of Men may be concerned He satisfies himself in the Invectives of some of the Antients against Schisme applicable unto those which were in their days wherein we are not concerned Only he seems to proceed on the general Notion of it that it is a Causeless Separation from a true Church which departs from that of the Romanists who will allow no Separation from the Church but what is Causeless To make Application hereof unto us it is supposed 1. That the Church of England is a true Church in its National Constitution and so are all the Parochial Churches in it which can be no way justified but by a large extensive Interpretation of the Word True For there is but one sort of Churches instituted by Christ and his Apostles but National and Parochial Churches differ in their whole kind and therefore cannot both of them be of a Divine Original 2. That we are Members of this Church by our own Consent How we should come to be so otherways I know not If we are so by being born and baptized in England then those who are born beyond Sea and baptized there
Church and nothing else But it was the Will of God that there should be all those things in the Gospel Church-State also or else why do men contend about them And if this were the Will of God if they were not all revealed appointed prescribed legalized by Christ where is his Faithfulness in Answer to that Moses But no Instance can be given of any Defect in his Institutions that needs any supplement to be made by the best of men as unto the end of constituting a Church-State Order and Rule with rites of Worship in particular 4. How it is derogatory unto the Glory of the Scripture as unto its Perfection shall be elsewhere declared 8. There is no more required to give Authority obliging the Consciences of all that do believe unto any Institution or Observation of Duty or Acts of Rule in the Church but onely that it is made evident in the Scripture to be the Mind and Will of Christ. It is not necessary that every thing of this Nature should be given out unto us in form of a Law or precise Command in express words It is the Mind and Will of Christ that immediately affects the Consciences of Believers unto Obedience by what way or means soever the knowledge of it be communicated unto them in the Scripture either by express words or by just consequence from what is so expressed Wherefore 9. The Example and Practice of the Apostles in the Erection of Churches in the Appointment of Officers and Rulers in them in directions given for their Walking Order Administration of Censures and all other holy things are a sufficient Indication of the Mind and Will of Christ about them We do not say that in themselves they are Institutions and Appointments but they infallibly declare what is so or the Mind of Christ concerning those things Nor can this be questioned without a denial of their Infallibility Faithfulness and Divine Authority 10 The Assertion of some that the Apostles took their Pattern for the State and Rule of the Churches and as unto divers Rites of Worship from the Synagogues of the Jews their Institutions Orders and Rules not those appointed by Moses but such as themselves had found out and ordained is both temerarious and untrue In the pursuit of such bold Conjectures one of late hath affirmed that Moses took most of his Laws and Ceremonies from the Aegyptitians whereas it is much more likely that many of them were given on purpose to alienate the People by Prohibitions from any compliance with the Aegyptians or any other Nation whereof Maimonides in his Mene Nebuchim gives us sundry Instances This Assertion I say is rash and false For 1 As unto the Instances given for its confirmation who shall assure us that they were then in use and practice in the Synagogues when the Apostles gave Rules unto the Churches of the New Testament We have no Record of theirs not one word in all the world of what was their way and practice but what is at least 250 years younger and later than the writings of the New Testament and in the first of their writings as in them that follow we have innumerable things asserted to have been the Traditions and Practises of their Forefathers from the days of Moses which we know to be utterly false At that time when they undertook to compose a new Religion out of their pretended Traditions partly by the Revolt of many Apostates from Christianity unto them especially of the Eliâ—nites and Nazarenes and partly by their own Study and Observation coming to the knowledge of sundry things in the Gospel Churches their Order and Worship they took them in as their own undeniable Instances may be given hereof 2 Wherein there is a real coincidence between what was ordained by the Apostles and what was practised by the Jews it is in things which the light of Nature and the general Rules of the Scripture do direct unto And it is dishonourable unto the Apostles and the Spirit of Christ in them to think or say that in such things they took their Pattern from the Jews or made them their example Surely the Apostles took not the Pattern and Example for the Institution of Excommunication from the Druids among whom there was some things that did greatly resemble it so far as it hath its Foundation in the light of Nature CHAP. III. The Continuation of a Church-State and of Churches unto the end of the world what are the Causes of it and whereon it depends THAT there was a peculiar Church-State Instituted and appointed by Christ and his Apostles acting in his Name and Authority with the infallible guidance of his Spirit hath been declared But it may be yet farther enquired whether this Church-State be still continued by Divine Authority or whether it ceased not together with the Apostles by whom it was erected There was a Church-State under the Old Testament solemnly erected by God himself And although it was not to be absolutely perpetual or everlasting but was to continue onely unto the time of Reformation yet unto that time its continuation was secured in the Causes and means of it The Causes of the continuation of this Church-State unto its appointed period were two 1. The Promise of God unto Abraham that he would keep and preserve his Seed in Covenant with him until he should be the Heir of the World and the Father of many Nations in the coming of Christ whereunto this Church-State was subservient 2 The Law of God it self and the Institutions thereof which God appointed to be observed in all their Generations calling the Covenant the Statutes and Laws of it perpetual and everlasting that is never to cease to be abrogated or disannulled until by his own Soveraign Authority he would utterly change and take away that whole Church-State with all that belonged unto its Constitution and Preservation 2. The Means of its continuance were three 1 Carnal Generation and that on a twofold account For there were two Constituent Parts of that Church the Priests and the People the continuation of each of them depended on the priviledge of Carnal Generation For the Priests were to be all of the Family of Aaron and the People of the Seed of Abraham by the other Heads of Tribes which gave them both their foundation in and Right unto this Church-State And hereunto were annexed all the Laws concerning the Integrity Purity and Legitimacy of the Priests with the certainty of their Pedegree 2 Circumcision the want whereof was a bar against any advantage by the former Priviledge of Generation from those two Springs and hereby others also might be added unto the Church though never with a Capacity of the Priesthood 3 The Separation of the People from the rest of the World by innumerable Divine Ordinances making their Coalition with them impossible From these Causes and by these Means it was that the Church-State under the Old Testament was preserved unto its appointed season Neither
duely discharged the Office of Episcopacy Other distinction and difference of ordinary Officers besides that of Bishops or Elders and Deacons the Church at Rome in those days knew not Such ought to be in every particular Church Of any one single person to preside over many Churches which is necessary unto the Constitution of a Church-state distinct from that which is Congregational Clemens knew nothing in his days but gives us such a description of the Church and its order as is inconsistent with such a pretence 6. I shall add no more from this excellent Epistle but only the account given in it of the first constitution of Officers in the Churches 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Our Apostles therefore knowing by our Lord Jesus Christ that there would contention arise about the name of Episcopacy that is Episcopacy itself For this cause being indued with a perfect foresight of things they appointed those fore-mentioned their first Converts unto the Office of the Ministry for the future describing or giving order about the course of the Ministry that other approved men might succeed them in their Ministry These Elders therefore who were so appointed by them and afterwards by other famous men with the consent of the whole Church c. Sundry things we may observe in this Discourse 1. The Apostles foresaw there would be strife and contention about the name of Episcopacy that is the Office itself and those who should possess it This Episcopacy was that Office which the deposed Elders had well discharged in the Church of Corinth This they might foresee from the nature of the thing itself the inclination of men unto preheminence and the instance they had seen in their own days in such as Diotrephes with the former Divisions that had been in this very Church about their Teachers 1 Cor. 1.12 But moreover they were instructed in the knowledge of it by our Lord Jesus Christ through his Divine Spirit abiding with them and teaching them all things This therefore they sought by all means to prevent and that two ways 1. In that for the first time themselves appointed approved persons unto the Office of the Ministry not that they did it of themselves without the consent and choice of the Church whereunto any of them were appointed for this was directly contrary unto their practice Act. 1.15 22 23 26. Chap. 6.3 Chap. 14.23 But that the peace and edification of the Churches might be provided for they themselves spiritually tryed and approved of fit persons so to lead the Church in their choice Wherefore that which is added afterwards of the consent of the whole Church is to be referred unto those who were ordained by the Apostles themselves 2. They gave Rules and Orders namely in their Writings concerning the Offices and Officers that were to be in the Church with the way whereby they should be substituted into the place and room of them that were deceased as we know they have done in their Writings 3. After this was done by the Apostles other excellent persons as the Evangelists did the same These assisted the Churches in the Ordination and Choice of their Officers according unto the Rules prescribed by the Apostles And I know not but that the eminent Pastors of other Churches who usually gave their assistance in the setting apart and Ordination of others unto the Ministry be intended I have insisted long on this Testimony being led on by the Excellency of the writing itself Nothing remains written so near the times of the Apostles nor doth any that is extant which was written afterwards give such an Evidence of Apostolical Wisdom Gravity and Humility Neither is there in all Antiquitie after the writings of the Apostles such a Representation of the State Order and Rule of first Evangelical Churches And it is no small prejudice unto the pretensions of future Ages that this Apostolical person handling a most weighty Ecclesiastical cause makes not the least mention of such Offices Power and Proceedings as wherein some would have all Church-rule and order to consist The Epistle of Polycarpus and the Elders of the Church at Smyrna with him unto the Church of the Philippians is the next on Roll of Antiquity Nothing appears in the whole to intimate any other Church-state or Order than that described by Clemens The Epistle is directed unto the whole Church at Philippi not unto any particular Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This was the usual style of those days so was it used as we have seen by Clemens 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so it was used presently after the death of Polycarpus by the Church at Smyrna in the account they gave unto other Churches of his death and Martyrdome 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the same was the Inscription of the Epistle of the Churches at Vienna and Lyons in France unto the Churches in Asia and Phrygia as we shall see immediately And these are plain Testimonies of that Communion among the Churches in those days which was held in and by the Body of each Church or the Community of the Brotherhood which is a clear demonstration of their State and Order And those whom the Apostle writing to the Philippians calls their Bishops and Deacons Polycarpus calls their Presbyters and Deacons It behoves you saith he unto the Church there to abstain from these things 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being subject unto the Elders and Deacons Nor doth he mention any other Bishop among the Philippians And it may be observed that in all these Primitive Writings there is still a distinction made after the Example of the Scripture between the Church and the Guides Rulers Bishops or Elders of it And the name of the Church is constantly assigned unto the Body of the People as distinct from the Elders nowhere to the Bishops or Elders as distinct from the people though the Church in its compleat state comprehendeth both sorts Unto this time that is about the year 107 or 108 do belong the Epistles ascribed unto Ignatius if so be they were written by him For Polycarpus wrote his Epistle unto the Philippians after Ignatius was carried to Rome having wrote his Epistle before in Asia Many are the Contests of Learned Men about those Epistles which remain whether they are genuine or the same that were written by him for that he did write Epistles unto sundry Churches is acknowledged by all And whereas there have in this Age been two Copies found and published of these Epistles wherein very many things that were obnoxious unto just exception in those before published do not at all appear yet men are not agreed which of them ought to be preferred and many yet deny that any of them were those written by Ignatius I shall not interpose in this contest only I must say that if any of his genuine Writings do yet remain yet the Corruption and Interpolation of them for many Ages must needs much impair the Authority of what is represented in them as his nor am
and Interest of the Papal See having no bottom for or supportment of their Church state and Order but Regal Favour and mutable Laws there have on such Causes and Reasons which I shall not mention ensued such Emulations of the Nobility and Gentry and such contempts of the Commonâ—People as leave it questionable Whether their Adherence unto the Government be not more burdensome and dangerous unto it than were their antient Contests and Oppositions CHAP. VII No other Church-state of Divine Institution IT may be it will be generally granted I am sure it cannot be modestly denied that particular Churches or Congregations are of a Divine original Institution as also that the Primitive Churches continued long in that Form or Order But it will be farther pleaded that granting or supposing this Divine Institution of particular Churches yet there may be Churches of another Form and Order also as Diocesan or National that we are obliged to submit unto For although the Apostles appointed that there should be Bishops or Elders ordained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in every City and Town where Christian Religion was received and Clemens affirmeth that they did themselves constitute Bishops and Deacons 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Regions or Villages and Cities yet there was another Form afterwards introduced Theodoret Bishop of Cyprus affirms that there were eight hundred Churches committed to his care Epist. 113. whereof many were in Towns and Cities having no Bishop of their own The whole Country of Scythia though there were in it many Cities Villages and Fortresses yet had but one Bishop whose Residence was at Tomis all other Churches being under him as Zozomen declares lib. 6. cap. 20. So it is at this day in divers Provinces belonging of old unto the Greek-Church as in Moldavia and Walachia where they have one whom they call the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Leader or Ruler that presides over all the Churches in the Nation And this Oâ—der of things that there should not be a Bishop in smaller Churches was first confirmed in the sixth Canon of the Council of Sardis in the Year 347. In Answer hereunto I shall do these two things First I shall shew that there is no Church Order State or Church-Form of Divine Institution that doth any way impede take away or overthrow the Liberty Power and Order of particular Congregations such as we have described Secondly I shall enquire into the causes of Churches of another State or Order as the Power of Magistrates and Rulers or their own choice and consent 1. There is no Form Order or Church state Divinely Instituted that should annul the Institution of particular Congregations or abridge them of their Liberties or deprive them of the Power committed unto them It is such a Church-state alone that we are now concerned to enquire after Whatever of that kinde either is or may be imagined that entrenches not on the State Liberty and Power of particular Congregations is not of our present Consideration Men may frame and order what they please and what advantage they make thereby shall not be envied unto them whilst they injure not any of the Institutions of Christ. But 1. These Churches as they are Churches are meet and able to attain the Ends of Churches To say they are Churches and yet have not in themselves Power to attain the ends of Churches is to speak contradictions or to grant and deny the same thing in the same breath For a Church is nothing but such a Society as hath Power Ability and Fitness to attain those ends for which Christ hath ordained Churches That which hath so is a Church and that which hath not so is none Men may if they please deny them to be Churches but then I know not where they will finde any that are so For instance suppose men should deny all the Parochial Churches in England to be such Churches as are intrusted with Church-Power and Administrations what Church in the first Instance could they require our Communion withal Will they say it is with the National or Diocesan Churches neither of these do or can as such administer Sacred Ordinances A man cannot Preach nor hear the Word but in a particular Assembly The Lord's Supper cannot be Administred but in a particular Congregation nor any presential local Communion of Believers among themselves like that described by the Apostle 1 Cor. chap. 12. and chap. 14. be otherwise attained No Communion is firstly and immediately required or can be required with Diocesan Churches as such Wherefore it is Parochial particular Churches that we are required to hold Communion with We say therefore these Parochial Churches are either really and truely so endued with Church-Power and Liberty or they are not If they are or are acknowledged so to be we have herein obtained what we plead for if they are not then are we required to joyn in Church Communion with those Societies that are not Churches and if we refrain so doing we are charged with Schism which is to turn Religion into Ridicule For 2. It is utterly forreign to the Scripture and a Monster unto Antiquity I mean that which is pure and regardable in this Cause that there should be Churches with a part half more or less of Church-Power and not the whole neither in Right nor Exercise or that there should be Church-Officers Elders Presbyters or Bishops that should have a partiary Power half or a third part or less of that which entirely belongeth unto the Office they hold Let one Testimony be given out of the Scripture or that Antiquity which we appeal unto unto this purpose and we shall cease our Plea But this is that which our Understandings are set on rack withal every day There is a National Church that is entrusted with Supreme Church-Power in the Nation whereof it is Here at the entrance we fall into a double disquietment For 1. we know not as yet what this National Church is here or in France nor of what Persons it doth consist 2. We know not whether this National Church have all the Power that Christ hath given unto the Church or that there is a Reserve for some Addition from beyond Sea if things were well accommodated Then that there are Diocesan Churches whose Original with the Causes and Occasions of their Bounds Limits Power and manner of Administrations I think God alone knows perfectly we do but guess for there is not one word mentioned of any of their concernments in the Scripture And we know that these Churches cannot be said to have all the Power that Christ hath entrusted his Church withal because there is another Church unto which they are in subjection and on which they do depend but it seems they have the next degree of Power unto that which is uppermost But whatever their Power be it is so administred by Chancellors Commissaries Officials in such ways and for such ends that I shall believe a dissent from them and it
sufficiently weak in itself yet what it is lies against the foundation of all that we are pleading about But to reduce things into the lesser compass I shall first confirm the Truth by those Arguments or Considerations which will defeat all the Pleas and Pretences of them by whom it is opposed and then confirm it by positive Testimonies and Arguments with all Brevity possible First therefore I shall argue from the removal of all causes whereon such a Cessation of Churches and Ordinances is pretended For it is granted on all hands that they had a Divine Original and Institution and were observed by all the Disciples of Christ as things by him commanded If now therefore they cease as unto their force efficacy and use it must be on some of these Reasons 1. Because a limited Time and Season was fixed unto them which is now expired So was it with the Church-state and Ordinances of old they were appointed unto the time of Reformation Heb. 9.10 They had a certain time prefixed unto their Duration according to the degrees of whose approach they waxed old and at length utterly disappeared chap. 8.13 until that time they were all punctually to be observed Mal. 4.4 But there were many antecedent Indications of the Will of God concerning their cessation and abolition whereof the Apostle disputes at large in his Epistle unto the Hebrews And from a pretended supposition that such was the state of Evangelical Ordinances namely that they had a time prefixed unto their Duration did the first opposition against them arise For Montanus with his Followers imagined that the appointments of Christ and his Apostles in the Gospel were to continue in force only unto the coming of the Paraclete or the Comforter promised by him And adding a new Phrensie hereunto that that Paraclete was then first come in Montanus they rejected the Institutions of the Gospel and made new Laws and Rules for themselves And this continues to be the principal pretence of them by whom the use of Gospel-Ordinances is at present rejected as that which is of no force or efficacy Either they have received or do speedily look for such a Dispensation of the Spirit or his Gifts as wherein they are to cease and disappear But nothing can be more vain than this Pretence 1. It is so as unto the limitation of any Time as unto their Duration and Continuance For 1. there is no intimation given of any such thing either in the divine Word Promise Declaration about them or the nature of the Institutions themselves But whereas those of the Old-Testament were in Time to be removed that the Church might not be offended thereby seeing originally they were all of immediate Divine Institution God did by all manner of ways as by Promises express Declarations and by the nature of the Institutions themselves foresignifie their removal as the Apostle proves at large in his Epistle to the Hebrews But nothing of this nature can be pretended concerning the Gospel Church-state or Worship 2. There is no Prediction or intimation of any other way of Worship or serving God in this World that should be introduced in the room of that established at first so that upon a cessation thereof the Church must be left unto all uncertainties and utter ruine 3. The principal Reason why a Church-state was erected of old and Ordinances of Worship appointed therein that were all to be removed and taken away was that the Son the Lord over his own house might have the Preheminence in all things His Glory it was to put an end unto the Law as given by the Disposition of Angels and the Ministry of Moses by the Institution of a Church-state and Ordinances of his own appointment And if his Revelation of the Will of God therein be not compleat perfect ultimate unalterable if it be to expire it must be that Honour may be given above him unto one greater than he 2. It is so as unto their Decay or the loss of their primitive Force and Efficacy For their Efficacy unto their proper Ends depends on 1. The Institution of Christ This is the Foundation of all Spiritual Efficacy unto edification in the Church or whatever belongs thereunto And therefore whatever Church-state may be framed or Duties ways or means of Worship appointed by Men that have not his Institution how specious soever they may appear to be have no Spiritual Force or Efficacy as unto the Edification of the Church But whilst this Institution of Christ continues irrevocable and is not Abrogated by a greater Power than what it was enacted by whatever defect there may be as unto Faith and Obedience in men rendring them useless and ineffectual unto themselves however they may be corrupted by additions unto them or detractions from them changing their nature and use in themselves they continue to be of the same use and efficacy as they were at the beginning 2. On the Promise of Christ that he will be present with his Disciples in the observation of his Commands unto the consummation of all things Matth. 28.20 To deny the continued accomplishment of this Promise and that on any pretence whatever is the Venome of Infidelity If therefore they have an irrevocable Divine Institution if Christ be present in their Administrations as he was of old Revel 2.1 there can be no abatement of their Efficacy unto their proper ends in the nature of Instrumental Causes 3. On the Covenant of God which gives an infallible inseparable Conjunction between the Word or the Church and its Institution by the Word and the Spirit Isai. 59.21 God's Covenant with his People is the Foundation of every Church-state of all Offices Powers Priviledges and Duties thereunto belonging They have no other end they are of no other use but to communicate express declare and exemplifie on the one hand the Grace of God in his Covenant unto his People and on the other the Duties of his People according unto the Tenor of the same Covenant unto him They are the Way Means and Instruments appointed of God for this end and other end they have none And hereon it follows that if it be not in the power of men to appoint any thing that shall be a means of communication between God and his People as unto the Grace of the Covenant on the one hand or the Duties of Obedience which it requires on the other they have no Power to erect any new Church state or enact any thing in Divine Worship not of his Institution This being the state of Churches and their Ordinances they cannot be altered they cannot be liable unto any decay unless the Covenant whereunto they are annexed be altered or decayed And therefore the Apostle to put finally and absolutely his Argument unto an issue to prove that the Mosaical Church-State and Ordinances were changed because useless and ineffectual doth it on this ground that the Covenant whereunto they were annexed was changed and become useless This I suppose
Testimony produced is that of Calvin A large Discourse he hath Institut lib. 4. cap. 1. against Causeless Separations from a true Church and by whom are they not condemned No determination of the Case in hand can be thence derived nor are the Grounds of our refraining Communion with Parochial Assemblies the same with those which he condemns as insufficient for a total Separation nor is the Separation he opposed in those days which was absolute and total with a condemnation of the Churches from which it was made of the same nature with that wherewith we are charged at least not with what we own and allow He gives the Notes of a true Church to be the pure Preaching of the Word and the Administration of the Sacraments according unto Christs Institution Where these are he allows a true Church to be not only without Diocesan Episcopacy but in a form and under a Rule opposite unto it and inconsistent with it And if he did at all speak to our Case as he doth not nor unto any of the Grounds of it why should we be pressed with his Authority on the one hand more then others from whom he differed also on the other Besides there is a great deal more belongs unto the pure preaching of the Word and the Administration of the Sacraments according unto Christs Institution then some seem to apprehend They may they ought to be so explained as that from the consideration of them we may justifie our whole Cause Both these may be wanting in a Church which is not guilty of such heynous Errors in Doctrine or Idolatry in Worship as should overthrow its Being And their want may be a just Cause of refraining Communion from a Church which yet we are not obliged to condemn as none at all Calvin expresseth his Judgment N. 12. I would not give Countenance unto Errors no not to the least so as to cherish them by flattery or Connivance But though I say that the Church is not to be forsaken for tristing Differences wherein the Doctrine of the Gospel is retained safe and sound wherein the Integrity of Godliness doth abide and the use of the Sacraments appointed of the Lord is preserved and we say the same And this very Calvin who doth so severely condemn Separation from a true Church as by him stated did himself quietly and peaceably withdraw and depart from the Church of Geneva when they refused to admit that Discipline which he esteemed to be according to the Mind of Christ. It is certain therefore that by the Separation which he condemns he doth not intend the peaceable Relinquishment of the Communion of any Church as unto a constant participation of all Ordinances in it for want of due means of Edification much less that which hath so many other Causes concurring therewith For the other Learned Men whom he quotes unto the same purpose I see not any thing that gives the least countenance unto his Assertion that our Principles weaken the Cause of the Reformation It is true they plead other Causes of Separation from the Church of Rome than those insisted on by us with respect unto the Church of England and indeed they had been otherwise much to blame having so many things as they had to plead of greater importance Did we say that the Reasons which we plead are all that can be pleaded to justifie the Separation of the Reformed Churches from the Church of Rome it would weaken the Cause of Reformation For we should then deny that Idolatry and fundamental Errors in Faith were any Cause or Ground of that Separation However we know that the Imposition of them on the Faith and Practise of all Christians is more pleaded in Justification of a Separation from them then the things themselves But allowing those greater Reasons to be pleaded against the Roman Communion as we do it doth not in the least follow that our Reasons for refraining Communion with Parochial Assemblies doth weaken the Cause of the Reformation However let me not be misinterpreted as unto that expression of destroying our Faith which the Communion required with the Church of England as unto all the important Articles of it doth not do and I can subscribe unto the Words of Daille as quoted by our Author out of his Apology If saith he the Church of Rome hath not required any thing of us which destroys our Faith offends our Consciences and overthrows the Service which we believe due to God if the Differences have been small and such as we might safely have yeilded unto then he will grant their Separation was rash and unjust and they guilty of the Schisme He closeth his Transcription of the Words of sundry Learned Men who have justifyed the Separation of the reformed Churches from the Church of Rome wherein we are not in the least concerned with an Enquiry What Triumph would the Church of Rome make over us had we no other reasons to justifie our Separation from them but only those which as is pretended we plead in our Cause I say whereas we do plead confirm and justifie all the Reasons and Causes pleaded for the Separation of the Reformed Churches from them not opposing not weakning any of them by any Principle or Practise of ours but farther press the force of the same reasonings and causes in all Instances whereunto they will extend I see neither what cause the Papists have of Triumph noâ— any thing that weakens the Cause of the Reformation He adds further how should we be hissed aâ—d laughed at all over the Christian World if we had nothing to alledge for our Separation from the Roman Church but such things as these I answer that as the Case stands if we did alledge no other Reasons but those which we insist on for our refraining Communion with our own Parochial Assemblies we should deserve to be derided for relinquishing the Plea of those other important Reasons which the Heresies and Idolatries and Tyranny of that Church do render just and equal But if we had no other Causes of Separation from the Church of Rome but what we have for our Separation from our Parochial Assemblies at home as weak as our Allegations are pretended to be we should not be afraid to defend them against all the Papists in the World and let the World act like itself in hissing Whereas therefore the Cause of Reformation is not in any thing weakened by our Principles No Argument no Reason solidly pleaded to justifie the Separation from the Church of Rome being deserted by us neither Testimony Proof nor Evidence being produced to evince that it is weakned by us I shall in the Second place as was before proposed prove that the whole Cause of the Protestants Separation from the Church of Rome is strengthened and confirmed by us There were some general Principles on which the Protestants proceeded in their Separation from the Church of Rome and which they constantly pleaded in Justification thereof The first
impartial Consideration he chargeth on us with great Solemnity as we Love our own Souls Now although that passage in that great and Holy Person be not new unto me having not only read it many a time in his book but frequently met with it urged by Papists against all Protestants Yet upon the Drs. intimation I have given it again the Consideration required The Words as they Lye in the Author are to this purpose We shall also judge them who make Schismes being vain qui sunt immanes or inanes not having the Love of God rather considering their own Profit than the Vnity of the Church who for small or any causes rend and divide the Glorious body of Christ and as much as in them lyes destroy it speaking Peace but designing War straining at a Gnat and swallowing a Camel For there can be no rebuke of things by them to equal the mischief of Schisme Lib. 4. cap. 62. I know not why he should give us such a severe Charge for the impartial Consideration of these words that as we love our souls we should impartially and without prejudice consider them We hope that out of Love to the Truth the Glory of Christ and Care of our own Souls we do so Consider and have long since so considered whatever belongs unto the Cause wherein we ingaged and the Oppositions that are made unto it Nor will we be offended with any that shall yet Call on us to persist and proceed in the same way But why such a Charge should be laid on us with respect unto these words of Irenaeus I know not For although we greatly value the Words and Judgment of that Holy Person that great Defender of the Mystery and Truth of the Gospel and of the Liberty of the Churches from unwarrantable impositions yet it is the Word of Christ and his Apostles alone whereby we must be regulated and determined in these things if we Love our own souls Besides What are we Concern'd in them is every Separation from a Church a Schisme Our Author shews the contrary immediately Is refraining Communion in a Church state not of Divine Institution and in things not prescribed by the Lord Christ in the Worship of God holding Communion in Faith and Love with all the true Churches of Christ in the World a damnable Schisme or any Schisme at all hath the Reverend Author in his whole Book once attempted to prove it to be so though this be the whole of the matter in difference between us is our Forbearance of Communion in Parochial Assemblies upon the Reasons before pleaded especially that of humane impositions of the same Nature with the Schisme from the whole Catholick Church without pretence of any such Impositions Doth he judge us to be such as have no Love unto God such as prefer our own profit before the Unity of the Church I heartily wish and pray that he may never have a share in that profit and advantage which we have made unto our selves by our principles and practise Poverty Distress Ruine to our Families Dangers Imprisonments Revilings with Contemptuous reproaches Comprize the profit we have made unto our selves Is our refraining Communion in some outward Order Modes and Rites of Mens institution our want of conscientious submission unto the Courts of Chancellours Commissaries Officials c. a rending and destroying of the glorious Body of Christ is it Cemented United and Compacted or fitly framed together by these things They formerly pretended to be his Coat and must they now be esteemed to be his glorious Body when they no way belong unto the one or the other Is the Application of these things unto us an effect of that Love Charity and Forbearance which are the only preventive means of Schisme and whereof if men are void it is all one upon the matter whether they are Schismaticks or no for they will be so when it is for their Advantage Wherefore we are not concerned in these things Let whosoever will declare and vehemently assert us to be guilty of Schisme which they cannot prove we can cheerfully subscribe unto these Words of Irenaeus It may not be impertinent on this occasion to desire of some others that as they Love their own Souls and have compassion for the Souls of other men they would seriously consider what state and Condition things are come unto in the Church of England how much Ignorance Profaneness Sensuality do spread themselves over the Nation what Neglect of the most important Duties of the Gospel Yea what scoffing at the power of Religion doth abound amongst us What an utter decay and loss there is of all the primitive Discipline of the Church what Multitudes are in the way of Eternal Ruin for want of due Instruction and Example from them who should lead them How great a necessity there is of an universal Reformation and how securely Negligent of it all sorts of Persons are What have been the pernicious Effects of imposing things unnecessary and unscriptural on the Consciences and Practises of men in the Worship of God whereby the Church hath been deprived of the labour of so many faithful Ministers who might have at least assisted in preventing that Decay of Religion which every day encreaseth among us How easie a thing it were for them to restore Evangelical Peace and Vnity amongst all Protestants without the loss of their Ministry without the diminution of their Dignity without deprivation of any part of their Revenues without the Neglect of any Duty without doing any thing against their light and Consciences with respect unto any Divine Obligation and thereon set themselves seriously to endeavour the Remedy of these and other Evils of the like nature under a sense of that great Account which they must shortly give before the Judgement seat of Jesus Christ. He proceeds to Consider the Cases wherein the Scripture allows of Separation which he affirms to be three The First is in Case of Idolatrous Worship This none can Question they do not see from whom yet we all separate as from Idolaters The second is in Case of false Dostrine being imposed instead of true which he confirms with sundry Instances But there is a little Difficulty in this Case for 1. It is uncertain when a Doctrine may be said to be imposed Is it when it is taught and preach'd by the Guides and Governours of the Church or any of them without controul if so then is such preaching a sufficient cause of Separation and will justifie them who do at present separate from any Church whose Ministers preach false Doctrine How false Doctrine can be otherwise imposed I know not unless it be by exacting an express Confession of it as Truth 2. What false Doctrine it is which is of this Importance as to justifie Separation is not easily determinable 3. If the Guides and Governours of the Church do teach this false Doctrine who shall judge of it and determine it so to be and that ultimately so as
from the beginning However this is no part of our present contest namely whether some while after the days of the Apostles in Churches that were greatly encreased and many Elders in them there was not one chosen as at Alexandria by those Elders themselves to preside among them who in a peculiar manner was called a Bishop But if I mistake not that alone which would advantage his cause is to prove that there were in one City or any where else many not occasional Assemblies of Christians or Church Members but many stated fixed Churches with Officers of their own peculiarly related unto them entrusted with Church Power and Priviledges at least as much as he afterwards pleads to be in our Parochial Churches all under the Government of one single Bishop making up a new Church state beyond that of particular Congregations by their Relation unto him as their common Pastor This I take it is that which should have been prov'd All the difficulty wherewith our assertion is accompanyed ariseth from the multiplication of Believers and the encrease of Churches in the Apostles time or presently after For this seems to be so great as that those in one City could not continue in one Church notwithstanding the advantages of occasional Assemblies The Church of Jerusalem had 5000 in it at the same time the word grew and prevailed at Ephesus and other places whereto I shall briefly answer as hastning unto a close of this unpleasing labour I say therefore 1. Whatever difficulty may seem to be in this matter yet in point of Fact so it was there was no Church before the end of the second Century of any other species nature or kind but a particular Congregational Church only as hath been proved before let any one instance be produced of a Church of one denomination National Provincial or Diocesan or of any other kind then that which is Congregational and I will give over this contest But when a matter of Fact is certain it is too late to enquire how it might be And on this occasion I shall add that if in that space of time namely before the end of the second Century any proof or undoubted Testimony can be produced of the Imposition of the necessary use of Liturgies or of stated Ceremonies of the practise of Church discipline consistent with that now in use in the Church of England it will go a great way in the determination of the whole Controversie between us 2. The admirable prevalency of the Gospel in those days consisted principally in its spreading it self all the World over and planting seminaries for farther conversions in all Nations It did indeed prevail more in some Cities and Towns then in others in some places many were converted in others the tender of it was utterly rejected how be it it prevailed not unto the gathering of such great numbers into any Church solely as might destroy or be inconsistent with its Congregational Institution For not all not it may be half not sometimes a third Part of them who made some Profession of the Truth and attended unto the Preaching of the Word and many of whom underwent Martyrdom were admitted as compleat Members of the Church unto all the parts of its Communion Hence there were many who upon a general account were esteemed Christians and that justly where the Churches were but small 3. It doth not appear that in the next Age after the Apostles the Churches were any where so increased in number as to bear the least Proportion with the Inhaâ—itants of the Cities and Towns wherein they were The Church of Smyrna in the dayes of Polyicarpus may justly be esteemed one of the greatest in those dayes both from the Eminency of the Place and Person who was justly accounted the great Instructer of all Asia as they called him when he was carried unto the Stake But this Church giveth such an Account of it self in its Epistle unto the Churches of Pontus about the Martyrdom of Polycarpus as manifest the Church there to have been a very small number in Comparison of the multitude of the other Inhabitants so as that it was scarcely known who or what they were Euseb. lib. 4. cap. 15. So in the Excellent Epistle of the Churches of Vienna and Lyons unto the Churches of Asia and Phrygia concerning the Persecutions that befell them as they declare themselves to have been particular Churches onely so they make it evident that they bore in number no proportion unto the Inhabitants of the places where they were who could scarce discover them by the most diligent search Euseb. lib. 5. cap 1. 4. As for the Church of Hierusalem in particular notwithstanding the great number of its original Converts who probably were many of them strangers occasionally present at the Feast of Pentecost and there instructed in the knowledge of the Truth that they might in the several Countries whither they immediately returned be instruments of the propagation of the Gospel it is Certain that many years after it consisted of no greater Multitude then could come together in one place to the Mannagement of Church Affairs Acts 15.20 21. Nor is it likely that Pella an obscure place whose name probably had never been known but on this occasion was like to receive any great Multitudes nor doth Epiphanius say as our Authour pretends that they spread themselves from thence to Coelosyria and Decapolis and Basanitis For he affirmes expresly that all the Disciples which went from Hierusalem dwelt at Pella Only he says that from thence the Sect of the Nazarenes took its original which spread it self afterwards in Coelosyria Decapolis and Basanitis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 speaking of that Sect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They dwelled all at Pella Sect. 7. p. 239. He quotes another saying of mine namely that I cannot discern the least necessity of any positive Rule or Direction in this Matter seeing the Nature of the thing and the duty of Man doth indispensibly require it And hereon he Attempts to make advantage in opposition unto another saying as he supposeth of mine Namely that the Institution of Churches and the Rules for their disposal and Government throughout the World are the same stated and unalterable from whence he makes many inferences to countenance him in his Charge of Schisme But why should we contend fruitlesly about these things had he been pleased to read a little farther on the same page he would have seen that I affirm the Institution itself to be a plain Command which considering the Nature of the duties required of men in Church Relation is sufficient to oblige them thereunto without any new Revelation unto that purpose which renders all his Queries Exceptions and Inferences of no use For I do not speak in that place of the Original Institution of Churches whose Laws and Rules are Universal and Vnalterable but our actual gathering into particular Churches for which I say the necessity of Duty is our Warrant and the
was that the Scripture the Word of God is a perfect Rule of Faith and Religious Worship so as that nothing ought to be admitted which is repugnant unto it in its general Rule or especial Prohibitions nothing imposed that is not prescribed therein but that every one is at liberty to refuse and reject any thing of that kind This they all contended for and confirmed their Assertion by the express Testimonies of the Writers of the Primitive Churches To prove this to have been their Principle in their Separation from the Church of Rome were to light as they say a Candle in the Sun It were easie to fill up a Volume with Testimonies of it After a while this Principle began to be weakned when the Interest of men made them except from this Rule things of outward Order with some Rites and Ceremonies the ordaining whereof they pleaded to be left unto Churches as they saw Good Hereby this Principle I say was greatly weakened For no certain bounds could ever be assigned unto those things that are exempted from the Regulation of the Scripture And the same Plea might be mannaged for many of the Popish Orders and Ceremonies that were rejected as forcibly as for them that were retained And whereas all the Reformed Churches agreed to abide by this Principle in Matters of Faith there fell out an admirable Harmony in their confessions thereof But leaving the Necessity of attending unto this Rule in the Matter of Order Ceremonies Rites and Modes of Worship with the state of Churches in their Rule and Polity those Differences and Divisions ensued amongst them which continue unto this day But this Perswasion in some places made a farther Progress namely that it was lawful to impose on the Consciences and Practises of men such things in Religious Worship provided that they concerned outward Order Rites Rule and Ceremonies as are no where prescribed in the Scripture and that on severe Penalties Ecclesiastical and Civil This almost utterly destroyed the great fundamental Principle of the Reformation whereon the first Reformers justified their Separation from the Church of Rome For whereas it is supposed the Right of them who are to be the imposers to determine what doth belong unto the Heads mentioned they might under that pretence impose what they pleased and refuse those whom they imposed them on the Protection of the aforesaid Principle namely that nothing ought to be so imposed that is not prescribed in the Scripture This hath proved the Rise of all endless Differences and Schismes amongst us nor will they be healed until all Christians are restored unto their Liberty of being obliged in the things of God only unto the Authority of the Scripture The Words of Mr. Chillingsworth unto this purpose are Emphatical which I shall therefore transcribe though that be a thing which I am very averse from Require saith he of Christians only to believe Christ and to call no man Master but him only let those leave claiming of Infallibity who have no Right unto it and let them that in their Words disclaim it disclaim it likewise in their Actions In a word take away Tyranny which is the Devils Instrument to support Errors and Superstitions and Impieties in the several Parts of the World which could not otherwise long withstand the Power of Truth I say take away Tyranny and restore Christians to their just and full Liberty of captivating their understandings to the Scripture only that universal Liberty thus moderated may quickly reduce Christendom to Truth and Vnity Part 1. chap. 4. Sect. 16. This fundamental Principle of the first Reformation we do not only firmly adhere unto rejecting all those Opinions and Practises whereby its force is weakened and impaired but also do willingly suffer the things that do befal us in giving our Testimony thereunto Neither will there ever be Peace among the Churches of Christ in this World until it be admitted in its whole Latitude especially in that Part thereof wherein it excludes all Impositions of things not prescribed in the Scripture For there are but few Persons who are capable of the subtilty of those Reasonings which are applied to weaken this Principle in its whole extent All men can easily see this that the sufficiency of the Scripture in general as unto all the ends of Religion is the only Foundation they have to rest and build upon They do see actually that where Men go about to prescribe things to be observed in Divine Worship not appointed in the Scripture that no two Churches have agreed therein but endless contentions have ensued that No man can give an Instance in particular of any thing that is necessary unto the Rule of the Church or the Observance of the commands of Christ in the Worship of God that is not contained in the Scripture and hereon are ready to resolve to call no man Master but Christ and to admit of nothing in Religion but what is warranted by his Word Secondly The second Principle of the Reformation whereon the Reformers justified their Separation from the Church of Rome was this That Christian People were not tyed up unto blind Obedience unto Church Guides but were not only at Liberty but also obliged to judge for themselves as unto all things that they were to believe and practise in Religion and the Worship of God They knew that the whole Fabrick of the Papacy did stand on this Basis or Dunghil that the Mistery of Iniquity was cemented by this Device namely that the People were ignorant and to be kept in Ignorance being obliged in all things unto an implicite Obedience unto their pretended Guides And that they might not be capable of nor fit for any other condition they took from them the only means of their Instruction unto their Duty and the Knowledge of it that is the Use of the Holy Scripture But the first Reformers did not only vindicate their Right unto the Use of the Scripture itself but insisted on it as a Principle of the Reformation and without which they could never have carried on their Work that they were in all concernments of Religion to judge for themselves And Multitudes of them quickly manifested how meet and worthy they were to have this Right restored unto them in laying down their Lives for the Truth suffering as Martyrs under the Power of their Bishops This Principle of the Reformation in like manner is in no small degree weakened by many and so the Cause of it Dr. Still himself pag. 127 128. denies unto the People all Liberty or Ability to choose their own Pastors to judge what is meet for their own Edification what is Heresie or a pernitioâ—â— Error and what is not or any thing of the like nature This is almost the same with that of the Pharisees concerning them who admired and followed the Doctrine of our Saviour 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 7.49 This Rabble which knows not the Law Yet was it this People whom the Apostles directed