Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n apostle_n speak_v word_n 1,386 5 3.9429 3 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A28280 The sufficiency of a standing revelation in general, and of the Scripture revelation in particular both as to the matter of it and as to the proof of it : and that new revelations cannot reasonably be desired and would probably be unsuccessful in eight sermons preach'd in the Cathedral-Church of St. Paul, London, at the lecture founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle, Esq., in the year MDCC / by Ofspring Blackall ... Blackall, Offspring, 1654-1716. 1700 (1700) Wing B3055; ESTC R6615 150,254 268

There are 5 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the Copies thereof that ●ere generally in Mens Hands In which there is ●en to this Day an admirable Agreement in all Mat●●rs of Moment And from that general Agreement ●●at always was in all the Copies of this Book ex●●pt those few that were sometimes corrupted by He●●ticks to serve a Turn their Attempts of this kind ●●ve been always rendred successless and those false ●octrines that were justified only by their own false ●opies of this Book solidly confuted 3. It is further answered that not only there is no ●●idence that there has been but that 't is morally ●●possible that there should be a general Depravation 〈◊〉 the Copies of this Book either designedly or by ●ance in any Place of great Consequence either Point of History or Doctrine For when was it possible that this Corruption should be Was it in the Copies that were given out in the Days of the Apostles and while they were living This can't well be supposed Or if it had been done then it can't be thought but that the Authors of these Books being living would have taken Care to have had such false Copies of their Books suppressed or well corrected or at least have given publick Notice in order to their Correction of those Faults that had been committed in the transcribing which did either obscure or spoil their sense Was it then in the Times immediately after the Apostles were dead But neither could this be for by this time an infinite Number of true Copies had been made and dispersed in all Parts of the Christian Church And besides the Autographs of the Books themselves were then probably all in being For Tertullian who lived in the Third Century witnesses that some of them were extant and to be seen even in his Time So that by comparing of the new false Copies with the ancient true ones or with the Originals themselves then extant the Fraud would have been quickly discovered or the Mistake easily rectified Was it then in the Times after this when the Originals were lost or worn out This was still less possible For by this Time not only a greater Number of true Copies thereof in the Original Greek were dispersed and in the Hands of all Christians but several Translations thereof had been likewise made into other Languages several Commentaries had been written thereupon and the most material Passages thereof had been occasionally cited by the Christian Writers of those or the foregoing Times And the further we go on downwards 't was still for such Reasons as have been given already more impossible that the Copies of this Book should be generally corrupted in any Place or Matter of Moment as well as more likely that there should be every Day an Increase of such small and literal Mistakes as could hardly be avoided by the greatest Care and Faithfulness And these are the Various Readings before spoken of Concerning which and in Answer to the before-mentioned Objection so far as it is grounded upon them it is farther said 4. In the fourth Place That they are no other than such as are to be met with in Comparing the Manuscripts of all other Books That these various Readings if they be compared together with Judgment are more like to lead us to understand the true Meaning of the Writers than to endanger our mistaking their Sense it being very probable that when there are several Readings one of them is the right and easier by their Help to rectifie the Mistakes that may have been made in some Copies than it would have been if all Copies had agreed in the same Mistake And lastly that it is hardly in any Place of which there are such various Readings very material which is the true Reading there being no Point that is of the Substance either of the History or Doctrine of Christianity that is grounded upon any Text of which there are in different Copies various Readings but which may be proved by some other Texts in the Reading whereof all Copies do agree 5. And Lastly In Answer to this Objection that the Text of the New Testament is depraved and corrupted and consequently of uncertain Authority it is further said That supposing these Books to be written by the Apostles and by divine Direction and Inspiration which must be supposed or at least for Argument sake be allow'd by those that make this Objection Or else the Objection is trifling it is by no Means credible that the same Goodness of God which took Care for the Writing has not likewise taken Care for the preserving of these Books so free at least from Corruption that they may be sufficient to answer the Ends for which they were written that is fully to instruct Men in all Points of Christian Faith and Practice to make them wise unto Salvation and throughly to furnish them unto all good Works And now from all that hath been said I hope it appears that we have sufficient Reason to believe that the Books of the New Testament were written by those Persons whose Names they bear or to whom they are ascribed viz. by the Apostles of Christ or other inspired Men Which was the first thing I was to make good Whether there be sufficient Reason to give them Credit in the Matters of Fact which they have related and whether the Doctrine of the Gospel be well proved by the History of it shall God willing be hereafter enquired In the mean Time supposing their Testimony to be credible what has been said upon this first Head may serve to shew in some Measure the Unreasonableness of those Men who are not satisfied with the Scripture Revelation For I believe there are few that have heard anything of the Manner of the first Preaching of the Gospel but who think that they that lived in those Times and heard the Apostles themselves had sufficient Reason to receive their Testimony And this perhaps they 'll say is what they could with for themselves viz. That they might have heard the Apostles themselves or that they might now have as good and sure Grounds of Faith as those had who were converted to Christianity by the Preaching of the Apostles which if they had they make no Doubt but they should be not only almost but altogether such as the Primitive Christians were both in Belief and Practice But if they are not such now 't is much to be doubted whether they would have been such if they had lived then For by what has been now said it appears that the Books of the New Testament being as we have very good Reason to believe they were written by the Apostles themselves are their Words their Sermons that therein the Apostles themselves being dead do yet truly speak to us the very same things tho' not just in the same Manner that they spake before while they were living and that their Testimony written if indeed it be theirs which I have shewn there is no Cause to doubt of is as credible as their living Testimony
in the Holy Scripture it must be either in the Matter of it or in the Proof of it And if it be in the Matter of it it must be either that it does not give us sufficient Directions what to do or that it does not propose sufficient Motives to persuade Men to do what it requires And therefore in speaking to this Head I shall shew 1. That the Holy Scripture gives us sufficient Directions what to do 2. That the Motives which the Scripture proposes are sufficient to persuade us to do what it requires And 3. That we have sufficient Reason given us to convince us of the Truth and Authority of the Holy Scripture and consequently of all the Doctrines which are taught by it 1. I shall shew that the Holy Scripture gives us sufficient Directions what to do And of this there can be little Doubt among those that believe the divine Inspiration and Authority of the Holy Scripture because to them its own Testimony of its own sufficiency is a Proof thereof beyond all Exception For if as the Apostle says 2. Tim. 3.16 it be profitable for Doctrine and for Reproof and for Correction and for Instruction in Rigteousness it is plainly profitable for all the Purposes for which we can desire a divine Revelation And if as he says in the next Verse it was given to make perfect the Man of God that is the Man whose Business it is to teach and instruct others and throughly to furnish him unto all good Works it cannot be deficient in delivering all such Rules and Directions as are necessary to be given by a Pastor to the People committed to his Care And if as the same Apostle had said at the 15th Verse of that Chapter it be able to make us wise unto Salvation we have no Reason to desire to be wiser than this excellent Book can make us And if all this could truly be said by the Apostle before the Canon of the New Testament was compleated if it could be said by him of those Holy Scriptures which Timothy had known from a Child that is of the Books of the Old Testament only much more may it be now said of the Books of both Testaments together But to speak at large of this Point at present would be too great a Digression from the Design of these Lectures which were intended only against Infidels not against any Sect of Christians and such they pretend to be such because they hold the Foundation Christ Jesus they may in Charity be allow'd to be who do chiefly differ from us in this Article and deny the sufficiency of Scripture only because they are resolved to maintain some gainful Doctrines and Practices of their own Church which they are sensible have no Warrant from Scripture and so can be maintained no other Way but by affirming that they have been delivered down to them by Tradition and that unwritten Tradition is a necessary Supplement to the written Word and of equal Authority with it For between us and Infidels who reject the Scripture the Sufficiency of the Scripture as a Rule of Faith and Manners is hardly Matter of Controversie for these do not reject the Scripture because it teaches too little but rather because it teaches too much because it teaches Doctrines above their Reason and commands such Duties as they do not like to practise and if it taught less than it does they would be more ready to own its divine Authority But nevertheless even these Men that they may leave no Stone unturned will be sometimes discoursing upon this Point and altho' those Books of Holy Scripture which are now extant and which are now generally receiv'd do teach much more than they themselves are willing to believe and practise yet that they may as much as they can unsettle the Belief of others do not stick to argue againast the Christian Religion from this Topick and to affirm that the Books of Holy Scripture which are now receiv'd do not contain the whole Will of God For there were say they in former times several other Gospels and Epistles and other Tracts designed to instruct Men in the Christian Religion which were written by the Apostles or other inspired Men and which were consequently of the same Authority in themselves with those which are now receiv'd into the Canon of which nevertheless we have nothing now left but the Names and Titles or some imperfect and uncertain Fragments so that it may well be doubted whether those few Books which are now remaining are sufficient to instruct us in all necessary Points of Knowledge and Practice And of this Matter of Fact there is they say some Evidence even from the Scripture its self For St. Luke in the Beginning of his Gospel takes Notice that many before him had taken in Hand to set forth a Declaration of those things which were surely believed among Christians that is had written and published Narratives of the Life Actions Miracles Preaching Death and Resurrection of our Saviour But there are no Histories of this Kind no Gospels now extant that were written before St. Luke's except only St. Matthew's and St. Mark 's and if there had been no more extant at that time it would have been very improper they say for the Evangelist to have said that many had written upon this Subject when he spake only of those two And that there was Matter enough for several such Narratives so that tho' they were very different Gospels they might nevertheless be all true we are told by St. John who wrote his Gospel the last of the Four Evangelists Joh. 20.30 Many other Signs truly did Jesus in the Presence of his Disciples which are not written in this Book and again Ch. 21. Vers 25. There are also many other things which Jesus did the which if they should be written every one I suppose that even the World its self could not contain the Books that should be written Now if it be true that there were several other Books formerly extant but which are now lost that were written by the Apostles and other inspired Men and consequently by divine Inspiration either these were needless when written and it is unreasonable to suppose that any Book written by divine Inspiration was needless or else the Loss of these Books is a Loss to Religion and we cannot be well assured that those which we have now remaining do sufficiently instruct us in all Points of Christian Faith and Practice But admit the Truth of this Matter of Fact viz. that more Books were written by the Apostles or inspired Men than are now extant which I will not now dispute because I think it needless because I think it may be granted without any Prejudice to the Christian Cause altho' there be none or at most but very slender Evidence of it nay admit more than is upon any good Grounds alledged viz. not only that several but that every one of the Apostles and immediate Disciples of
by so many different and far distan● Nations without some good Grounds is not conce●vable because it can neither be imagined that th● Christians of the present Age dispersed in all Countri● should combine together to say that they receiv'● these Books from their Fathers as the genuine Wr●tings of the Apostles if they had not so receiv'd them nor that their Forefathers in any of the Ages pa●● should have all agreed together to put a Cheat upo● their Posterity by delivering down to them the●● Books as written by the Apostles when they themselves had no good Reason to believe them so or wh●● they knew the contrary It is a further Satisfaction to us to observe and consider that the Authority of these Books is as well proved as it can be not only by oral but also by the best written Tradition The Christian Writers of all Ages citing them as they had Occasion as the genuine Writings of the Apostles And that as well before the Canon of the New Testament was defined and declared by Councils as since And lastly It gives us very good Satisfaction that these Books are the genuine Writings of the Persons to whom they are ascribed that we do not find they were ever excepted against as spurious and counterfeit in those times when it would have been most proper to have made the Exception and by those Persons whose Cause and Interest it would have served very much to have proved them Spurious if it could have been done For the proper time to have made this Exception to these Writings was when or soon after they were first published when it would have been easie to have proved them Spurious if they had been so and no less easie to have brought positive Evidence of their being Genuine if indeed they were Genuine either by the living Testimony of the Authors themselves or of others that knew their Writing or by producing the original Copies under their own Hands And therefore their being then received as the Writings of the Apostles by those who were best able to know whose Writings they were and their being not for ought appears excepted against upon this Account at that time ●s a very good Argument that there was no just Ground for any such Exception And the most likely Persons they whose Cause and Interest it would have served most to deny that these Books were written by the reputed Authors thereof were the Enemies of our Religion The Jews or the Heathens who neither of them wanted either Malice or Wit to alledge any Fact that they could have justified the Truth of in Disproof of the Christian Religion It is therefore no small Satisfaction to us to observe that they never argued against the Christian Religion from this Topic that they never denied that the Books which the Christians received as written by the Apostles were genuine Nay that Julian himself one of the subt'lest as well as of the bitterest Adversaries of the Christian Faith did yet expresly own that the Books read by the Christians as the Books of Peter Paul Matthew Mark and Luke were indeed theirs After all indeed it must be owned that we have not such Demonstration that the Books of the New Testament were written by the Apostles as is self-evident and cannot possibly be contradicted for the Matter it self is not capable of such Demonstration But we have such Demonstration of it as cannot be contradicted with any Reason We have as good Assurance of it as we have or can have of any Matter of that kind We have as good Evidence of the Truth of it as supposing it to be true we could have of it and more than this cannot be desired We are as morally certain that these Books were written by the Authors to whom they are ascribed as we are that any other ancient Book was written by the Person who is said to be the Author of it There being no Argument by which it is or can be proved that any ancient Book was written by the Person who is said to be the Author of it which does not prove the Authority of these Books rather more strongly than it does the Authority of any other Book And there being no Argument that is or can be urged against the Authority of these Books which may not with as good Reason be urged to disprove the Authority of any other Book of the like Antiquity nay indeed of all the Books in the World ancient or modern the Authors of which are not now living or of whose Writing the Books ascribed to them no living Evidence can be produced For what is there that can be said to disprove or to render suspected the Authority of these Books but only that there is a Possibility that Things may not be as we believe them to be It may be the Atheist or Infidel will say that these Books were not written by the Persons under whose Names we receive them but by some others It may be he 'll say for Instance that there never was such a Man as Matthew the Publican afterwards an Apostle of Christ Or if there was yet it may be that the Gospel that goes under his Name was not of his Writing but is a Book of a much later Date It may be that it was written by some crafty Priest no longer ago than the last Age And that he and some others in Confederacy with him at the same Time that they forged this Gospel in the Greek Tongue did likewise make and contrive all those Translations of it into several Languages that are now extant some of which pretend to very great Antiquity and which are all made with such an Appearance of Truth and with such Congruity to the several Times in which they are said to be made that none of the Learned Men of the present Age have been able to discover the Fraud And It may be also that when they forged the Gospel it self they forged likewise all the other Books that are pretended to be written by several Historians and Divines in divers Languages and in several Ages of the World for Sixteen Hundred Years past in which this Gospel is either testified to be written by St. Matthew or is cited or commented upon as his And it may be likewise that at the same Time that they trumped up all these Books in one Countrey they had their Confederates and Correspondents that did the same in all the other Countries where they are now found not only exposing them to publick Sale as Books of ancient Date and venerable Antiquity but likewise slily conveying an infinite Number of written and printed Copies of the same into all Libraries both publick and private unknown to the Keepers and Owners thereof And it may be that all these things were done so secretly that none of the Confederacy did ever confess nor any besides ever discover the Cheat And it may be that all the rest of the World was so much asleep at that time as to have
disproved but that there has been no such History cannot with certainty be affirmed This therefore say they is our Unhappiness that tho' we have a good Cause we are destitute of Means to support it and are in the Condition that the Israelites are said to have been in in the Days of Saul 1 Sam. 13.22 when they had War with the Philistins It came to pass in the Day of Battel there was neither Sword nor Spear found in the hand of any of the People But what was the Reason of this Why the Philistins had disarmed them Ver. 19. they had taken away the Weapons they had before and would not permit more to be made And this say the Infidels is exactly our Case In the War we have now with the Christians we are forc'd to fight without Sword or Spear And tho' for other good Reasons we are confident the Gospel History is false and are resolved never to believe it and make no doubt but that in former times it has been opposed and contradicted yet in this the Christians have been too hard and too cunning for us that while they have kept their own Weapons they have slily taken away ours for they have been careful to preserve the ancient Books that were written by those of their own Party in Defence of their Superstition but the Books of their Adversaries they have been as careful to suppress and destroy And they have had such good success in it that of all the Books or Discourses of the ancient Champions of Judaism Paganism or Deism Trypho Celsus Porphyry Julian and other great Names not much is now remaining besides Fragments and those perhaps imperfectly or falsly cited to be picked up out of the Books of those who have written Answers to them who we may well presume took notice only of those Passages therein which they thought were easiest to be answer'd But this is no unusual thing for the powerful and prevailing Party to stifle that Evidence which they know not how to disprove and to sup●ress those Books which they cannot answer And ●his say they we take for a good Argument that ●here was something very considerable in these Books ●nd not easily to be answer'd because otherwise the Christians of former times would have been more willing that they should be preserv'd and transmitted ●o after times that so Posterity upon a fair Hearing ●f all that had been said on both sides might be ●ble to pass a right Judgment upon the Case and ei●her to chuse or to reject the Profession of Christia●ity with Prudence and Discretion This is what has been sometimes suggested by ●he Enemies of our Religion and indeed I know not ●hat else can well be said to invalidate that Proof of ●he Gospel History which I am now upon But what ●ender ground there is for this Suggestion and how ●ery little the Christian Cause is affected by it a few Words will suffice to show For 1. Whereas 't is said that tho' indeed there ●●e no Histories now in being whereby the Gospel ●istory can be disproved 't is possible however there ●ay have formerly been several Narratives extant that were perfectly contradictory to it and those too perhaps better attested and confirmed than the Gospel History was To this I answer That t is never allow'd to be a good Proof that a thing is to say that 't is possible it might be And besides if this surmize or suggestion of a thing barely possible be a good Objection against the Gospel History it is as much an Objection against all other ancient Histories If for this Reason the Gospel History be not credible no other History is so for there is no ancient History in the World now extant which we can be sure was never contradicted by some other as ancient History that is not extant But 2. As there is no Evidence that the Gospel History was contradicted when it was first publish'd that is when if it had been false it might most easily have been disprov'd so there is on the other Side as good Evidence as such a Matter is capable of that it never was thus contradicted or disproved Because if the Facts recorded in the Evangelical History had been then denied or disproved by any competen● and credible Witnesses 't is impossible that the Christian Doctrine which was grounded upon and chiefly established by these Facts should ever have spread so fast as by the Confession of all Parties it did from the time that it began to be preached by the Apostles Nothing but the strong Evidence that there was of the Truth of the Gospel History and strong it cannot be accounted if there was stronger and better Evidence on the other side could have supported the Profession of Christianity when it had nothing t● recommend it self by but its Purity and Truth against that violent Opposition which it met with every where in the World And 3. Whereas 't is further suggested that the Loss of those ancient Books which are supposed to have been written to disprove the Gospel History is owing to the Power and Subtlety of the Christians of those early times who thought it best to stifle that Evidence which they could not gainsay or refute this Suggestion is manifestly as groundless as 't is malicious For many Books of all sorts and of all sides have perish'd by Accident or been worn out by Time without any formal Design of any Party or Persons to suppress and destroy them And I see no Reason why these Books written in contradiction to the Gospel History if indeed any such were ever written may not have perished one of these ways as well as many other Books have done Or if a Reason must needs be given why some Books and why these in particular have been lost while others of the same or greater Antiquity have been preserv'd I think the little Value that Men generally had for those Books that are lost is the best Reason that can be given why they were suffered to perish and that the most probable Cause of Mens having so little value for them was because the Matter of them was so evidently false or the Reasoning of them so manifestly weak and fallacious that no Man thought it worth his while to be at the Pains or Charge of getting them transcribed Or if the Men we are now arguing with will not allow this to be a good Account of the Loss of such very valuable Books as they think these Anti-Gospel Histories were let them find out a better But I 'm sure that that before suggested by them viz. that it was by Design the first Christians purposely abolishing and destroying all Testimonies and Records that made against them is a much worse Account of it and infinitely more improbable than that which I have given For it must be supposed either that these Anti-Gospel Histories were written very early as soon almost as the Gospel History was published by the Preaching or Writing
Mat. 26.31 He told the rest of the Disciples that they would all forsake him when they every one profess'd themselves resolv'd to suffer with him Joh. 3.14.8.28.12.32 rather than leave him He signified before by what Death he should die and who should be instrumental therein Mat. 16.21.26.32.28.16 He assured his Disciples that after three Days he would rise again and appointed them a Place in Galilee where they should all see him He Prophesied that notwithstanding the Contempt he was had in and the greater Contempt that his ignominious Death would bring upon him his Religion should by their means a Company of poor illiterate Fishermen be preached with good success in all Parts of the World Mat. 24.14.3.19 He foretold likewise the utter Destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple Mat. 24. Mar. 13. Luk. 21. before that Generation passed away and the Dispersion of the Jews into all Nations And several other things which it would take up too much time now to mention he foretold should be just in that manner in which they afterwards came to pass Concerning which it may be noted that some of his Prophecies were fulfilled soon after they were spoken the punctual Accomplishment whereof was to those that both heard them spoken and saw them fulfilled an evident Proof of his Prophetical Spirit and a just Ground of expecting the Accomplishment of all his other Prophecies in their Season and that others were not to be fulfilled 'till a good while after the Accomplishment whereof at the time foretold and long after the Predictions thereof had been recorded by the Evangelists was a good Evidence to those that lived then and is also to us that live now and either read the Accomplishment thereof in History or see the same with our own Eyes that he was endued with a Divine Spirit and likewise takes away all reasonable Ground of a Suspicion which we might otherwise have had that in those Instances wherein both the Prophecy and the Accomplishment of it are related by the same Authors the Prophecies were forged after the Events were come to pass Now if this be true and it is certainly true if the Gospel-History be so that our Saviour did foretell many things which afterwards happened and those very casual and contingent things depending upon the free will of Men this was an evident token that he had a divine Spirit for none can certainly foretell such things but God only or those whom he enlightens with his Spirit And therefore the Prophet Isaiah made this Challenge to the Idols of the Heathens Isa 41.23 Shew the things that shall be hereafter that we may know that ye are Gods And if to this it should be objected that future Events have been sometimes foretold by such as have not been true Prophets of God nor enlightned by his Spirit as by Diviners Astrologers and South-Sayers and by the Oracles of the Heathens this may be granted without any weakning of the Argument I am now upon for the Proof of our Saviour's divine Mission For there may be some future Events upforeseen by us and yet depending so intirely upon the Course of Natural Causes that unless hindred by a Miracle they will as certainly come to pass as the Sun will rise tomorrow And these the Devil who understands much better than we do the Power and Course of Nature may foresee and consequently foretell and When such a thing is foretold we who understand very little of Nature may think it a Prophecy whereas in truth there is no more of a Prophetical Spirit in the Devil when he foretells such things than there is in a skilful Astronomer when he Calculates and foretells to a Minute for several Ages to come the Motions and Eclipses of the Sun Moon and Planets And even in future Contingencies 't is no wonder that the Events have sometimes verified the Predictions of the Devil and his Prophets for this also may well enough be accounted for without allowing that any Being hath a certain Foreknowledge of future Contingencies but God only if we do but suppose as we may very reasonably do that the Devil hath a perfecter Knowledge than we can have of the Counsels Intrigues and Interests of Men that he understands their Tempers and Inclinations that he hath lived a great while and made very exact observations that he hath had a long Experience of things and hath also a notable sagacity much beyond what is in any Man for so even a wise observing and experienc'd Man may without a Spirit of Prophecy see much further before him than Men commonly do and may foretell by a Guess that shall rarely fail a great many things which a less thinking and experienc'd Man would never have thought of And when the thing happens that was foretold it may be past the Skill of others to judge whether it was foretold by a Sagacious Guess or by a certain Foreknowledge of what would be And that the Predictions of Diviners and the Oracles of the Heathens concerning future Contingencies have been no more than only probable Conjectures unless when they have been borrowed from divine Prophecies as they may have often been is evident by their uncertain Accomplishment Some things indeed have happened as they have been foretold but others have not so happened and because the Devil could not always certainly tell what the Events of those things would be which he was Consulted with about he commonly gave out his Oracles in ambiguous Expressions that so whatever happen'd he might be thought to have foretold it And when the Predictions of any Person pretending to Prophecy have fail'd in some Instances tho' in others they have been accomplish'd this is a certain Argument that he did not Prophesie by a divine Spirit according to what is said Deut. xviii 21 22. If thou say in thine heart How shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken When a Prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord if the thing follow not nor come to pass that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken but the Propheth hath spoken it presumptuously In which words it seems to be implied tho' it be not expresly said that if the thing foretold did come to pass and especially that if of many things which the Prophet had foretold and which could not be fore-known by the greatest Skill in Natural Causes such as are the Actions of a free Agent not one thing fail'd but his words were made good by the Event in every particular they might then depend upon it that he was a true Prophet except only in one Case mentioned in Deut. 13. Deut. 13.1 2 3. viz. When he made use of that Credit which the Accomplishment of his Predictions had gain'd him to draw Men from the Worship of the true and only God to the Worship of Idols And accordingly 't is observ'd in 1 Sam. iii. 19 20. that because the Lord did let none of Samuel's