sin if he be not the cause of it then is he not the authour of all things Therefore there is no such positiue qualitie at all We answer to the Assumption in that euill positiue quality two things must be respected First the qualitie it selfe or the being of it next the euilnesse or irregularity or deformity therof God is the the authour and principall efficient of the first but the diuell and the euil instrument is the authour and cause of the second This done at last the Iesuit sets downe his owne iudgemēt auouching that original sin consisteth in two things Bellarm iudgment of originall sinne first in the first transgression of Adam not as hee was a certaine priuate person but as being then the person of all mankind next he saith it is also a want of that gift of originall iustice And thus farre he speakes wel affirming that there are two parts of original sin but herein he erreth for that he omitteth that euil positiue quality before mentioned And thus farre of the iudgement of the Aduersaries concerning originall sinne CHAP. XXVI Of Concupiscence BVt because there is some controuersie touching concupiscence which is the third part of originall sinne therefore we be to speake something of it apart The word Concupiscence doth first and properly signifie that coueting or lusting which is said to be in the baser facultie of the soule to wit in the sensible and the naturall power thereof and tropically it signifieth our naturall corruption and that euill positiue quality which resteth not onely in the concupiscible faculty of the soule but in all the powers therof also euē in reason it self For the word Concupiscence in Scripture is as generall as the old man or the flesh for Paule vseth these words indifferently for one and the same matter the old man the flesh concupiscence and the law of the members to wit for the third part of originall sinne which is that euill positiue quality And that concupiscence is properly and truly a sinne appeares plainly out of the Epistle to the Romans ch 7. 7. I had not knowne lust except the law had said thou shalt not lust And this briefly is our iudgment touching Concupiscence Pelagius reckoneth Concupiscence in the number of the good things or benefits of nature for hee denies originall sinne Our aduersaries the Papists by Concupiscence vnderstand nothing els but that concupiscible faculty of the soule which is in it self good or atleast indifferent but euill accidentally and in some respect to wit for that now the bridle or originall iustice is let loose whereby Concupiscence ought to haue been curbed so then this curbe being lost it inclines say they to sinne This is the iudgment of the Councell of Trent The iudgment of the papists concerning concupiscence concerning Concupiscence that it may not be saide truly and properly that it is a sin but that it is so called because it proceedes from sin and inclines to sinne But that Concupiscence is sinne is more manifest by Paules doctrine then that it needes any proofe at all and that it is a sinne not onely in the vnregenerate but also in the regenerate And thus farre of Concupiscence and of originall sinne CHAP. XXVII Of Actuall sinne ACtuall sinne is the fruit and effect and the punishment also of originall sin The first and principall diuision of actuall sin is into Actuall sinne internall and externall The internall I call the sinnes of soule and of the faculties thereof Internall sinne is partly of omission partly of commission A sinne of omission in the mind is the want of a holy and good motion and the roote of this is the want of originall iustice And like as that defect of original iustice is in all the powers of the soule so this internall Sinne of omission what sinne of omission is of all the powers of the soule Of the sinne of omission the Apostle speaketh 1. Cor. 2. 14. when he saith that the naturall man cannot conceiue the things of the Spirit of God Lo here the want of a holy motion in mans nature the fundamentall cause whereof he addeth in the next words saying neither can he perciue them In which words yee haue the want of that power and faculty whence a holy motion doth spring The internall sinne of commission followeth and this is a peruerse and euill motion of the mind And this proceedes from the third part of originall sinne to wit that A sinne of commission euill positiue qualitie or naturall corruption And like as y t positiue quality is of al the faculties of the mind so that internall sinne of commission is of all the powers of the soule in like manner Of this sinne the Scripture speakes euery where Rom. 7. 5. When we were in the flesh the * or affections motions of sinnes which were by the law had force in our members to bring forth fruite vnto death Where three things are to Three things Rom. 7. 5. be obserued first the flesh which is original sin Secondly Affections or motions whereby vnderstand the internall sinne of commission Thirdly the fruit of those motions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or affections whereby he meanes euery externall actuall sinne Againe ye haue the same three things knit together Ephe. 2. 3. Fulfilling the will of the flesh and of the mind 1. the flesh that is originall sin 2. Next the thought or lust of the flesh which is the internall commission of sinne 3. To fulfill the same and this is externall sinne The same things ye haue Iam. 1. 15. When concupiscence hath conceiued it bringeth forth sinne Concupiscence is originall sinne conception is actuall internall sinne the birth thereof is an externall sinne And thus farre of actual internall sinne The externall actuall sinne followeth which is a sinne of the bodie and of the members thereof and this sinne Externall actual sinne also is partly of omission partly of commission The externall sinne of omission is when things to bee done are omitted and this proceedes from the internall sinne of omission And here also like as the internall sinne of omission is of all faculties of the mind so the externall sin of omission is of all the members of the body Of this sin the Apostle speaketh Roman 7. 9. I do not the good which I would do The externall sinne of commission followeth This is when that is done which ought not to be done Externall sin of commission and it proceedes from the internall sinne of commission This is also of all the parts of the body like as the internall sinne of commission is of all the powers of the soule The testimonies of Scriptures before cited proue this Rom. 7. 19. The euill which I would not that do I. The externall sinne of commission is twofold partly of errour and ignorance partly of knowledge It is of ignorance when a man ignorantly committeth any thing This was Paules sinne 1. Tim.
time after this he added the writings of the Apostles And when as the mystery of our saluation was fully reuealed by that liuely voice first and then that full reuelation was written euer since there hath beene no more vse of the liuely voice of any extraordinarie Prophet or Apostle But the Scriptures written first by the Prophets and after by the Apostles remained only without any liuely voice which could not erre Q. Where must wee begin to count the third age of the Church A. Not so much from the comming of Christ and the sending of his Apostles to all nations as from that time when the Apostles ceased to speake with liuely voice aswel to the Iewes as to the Gentiles for euen then the Church catholick came to mans estate full growth and then the Church began to vnderstand and to learne the wil of God by the written word as being a more accurate and perfect manner of reuelation The time then which was frō the cōming of Christ vntil the death of the Apostles was as it were a passage from the middle age of the church vnto the ful growth ripenes of the same Q. I vnderstand what you say cōcerning the causes of additiō of the written word to the liuely voice of the seuerall ages of the Church now I would haue you speake some thing concerning the scripture or of the writing of Gods word A. I will do so Q. What then call you writing or Scripture A. I call scripture or writing the second kind of reuelation whereby God either by himselfe or by the meanes of men extraordinarily reuealed those things which already had beene deliuered by liuely voice before to wit in that first kind of reuelation Q. Who then were they who euer since the beginning haue written A. First God himselfe next men Moses the Prophets and the Apostles Q. This kind of reuelation which was by writing was it not subiect to error like as that kind which was by a liuely voice A. No truly for concerning that which God himselfe did write there is no question and touching men they were so extraordinarily inspired and gouerned by the spirit of God that in writing they could not erre at all Q. When began it then to be written A. In Moses time Q. How long did the word written continue in the Church A. The scripture or the act of writing continued from Moses euen to the Apostles all which time there was almost no age wherein extraordinarily some one was not stirred vp who in deliuering the doctrine of truth by writing could not erre Q. You thinke otherwise of the scripture it selfe then of the act of writing A. I do so for the scripture it self or that which is now written by Moses the Prophets and Apostles yet continues in the Church and shall continue vnto the second comming of Christ Q. Was there any intermission of writing the word from Moses vnto the Apostles A. There was for it appeareth in all that time which was frō Malachy to Iohn the Baptist none was stirred vp either Prophet or writer inspired by God for the books of the Machabees be not giuen by inspiration as we shal shew hereafter Q. You said that writing continued in the Church vntil the time of the Apostles ought it not then to continue euen vnto the end A. Like as since the Apostles time there is no liuely voice heard in the Church which can be said to be so goned by the holy Ghost that it can not erre at all So since the Apostles nothing is written in the church which may worthily be called or said to be giuen by inspiration Q. What then do you think of so many writings of godly and learned men which haue been published since the times of the Apostles from time to time to the great good and profit of the Church A. Verely I thinke of the writings of Pastors and Doctors in the Church as I think of their preaching to wit that both be subiect to errour and neither is so gouerned by the holy Ghost but that in deliuering the truth of God they may erre Q. It seemeth then that the condition of the Church which is since the time of the Apostles is not so good as hauing neither the liuely voice as is afore said nor the writings as now you speak of those very mē who in deliuering the truth cannot erre A. It hath the scriptures of the prophets and Apostles which as pertaining to the substance of reuelation is full and as touching the kind forme of reuelation it is giuē by inspiration not subiect to error out of the which scripture whosoeuer do not learne all things which are necessary to faith and saluation assuredly such would not receiue from the mouth of God himself openly speaking in an audible and intelligible voice the doctrine and instructon of faith and saluation Q. Wherefore did the Lord so continue to record his will by The cause of the continuance of writing Gods word writing in the Church all that time which was from Moses to the Apostles A. There are the same causes of the continuance thereof as are of the addition of the liuely voice vnto writing For both the condition of the church and the measure of reuelation required the same Q. Why the condition of the Church A. Because the church continually increased and grew as in number so in knowledge Q. What then A. The greater number and riper knowledge do require this that the word be written Q. Why the measure of reuelation A. Because the reuelation of the doctrine of saluation was from time to time made more cleare and manifest euen vnto the times of Christ of his Apostles at which time it was in the end compleate and perfected For it was meete that euery reuelation manifested more cleerely fully should be recorded in writing to this end that it might be surely kept and deliuered to posterities Q. Can ye gather by these things the vse of the continuance The vse of writing of scripture in the Church of God A. Yea truly Q. What is then the vse of it A. To passe by the conseruation of the purity of doctrine the first vse was in respect of the Church for the instructiō thereof as being now in place more ample large in knowledge more perfect Secondly it was in respect of the reuelation of the doctrine it selfe that it might cōprehend and keepe it more fully and cleerely Q. By this vse of scripture or writing which you giue it seemes that this kind of reuelation which is by writing is somewhat more perfect high as that which is best agreeing fitting to persons and things that are more perfect A. It is euen so Q. Thus far then forwriting or scripture now I would haue you declare something vnto me concerning the subiect of this writing of the matter it selfe which is written A. As touching the substance the very same is
constancie of the Martyrs which daylie seale with their blood the truth of this heauenly doctrine the persecution raised by the enemies of the Church against it the enmitie of Sathan against it and the preseruation of the diuine oracles of God vnto our times and to be short the testimonie of the true Church of God for it All these are without or beside the Scripture and giue vs a secundarie kinde of demonstration whereby the holy Ghost worketh also as it pleaseth him and openeth the eies of our vnderstanding inlightening vs to see and heare God him-selfe speaking and shining in the Scripture But here we be to obserue that the holy ghost doth God rather by these meanes the testimonie of the Church and couersation of the saints prepareth vs to receiue the pretious faith not beget faith in our harts properlie and principallie by this second kinde of externall meanes for the proper and principall instrument of God to breed faith is the very word of God himselfe for it must be necessarilie either the liuely voice of God or the sacred scripture which serueth vs in steede of the liuelie voice of God himselfe but either prepares our hearts only to receiue faith afterwards Io. 4. 1. Pet. 3. 2. 3. wards by the word of God or to confirme the same in some sort beeing already ingendred in our hearts by Gods word For this cause this second kind of meanes sometimes is sent before the voice of God in the scripture whereby the holy Ghost otherwhiles makes mens minds ready to intertaine faith and grace offred This we reade of Augustine for he speaks it of himselfe I would not haue beleeued the gospell but that the authority of the Catholicke Church moued me thereunto by which words he meaneth that when he was a Manichee he was prepared by the authority and testimonie of the Church to beleeue the Gospell Afterwards notwithstanding the same holie spirit which thus prepared him by the testimonie of the Church I say the same spirit did beget faith in Augustines heart by the very scripture of the gospell whereby he did beleeue that the gospell was the verie word of God For this cause he speaks else where of himselfe And let vs follow them saith he which doe inuite vs first to beleeue that which we cannot behold Augustines wordes as yet that being strengthened by faith it selfe we may be worthie to vnderstand what we beleeue not by the relation of men but by the grace of God himselfe inwardlie confirming and inlightening our mindes So the woman of Samaria Io 4. as a member of the Church did by her kinde of preaching prepare the Samaritanes to the faith of Christ they hauing heard Christ himselfe said to the woman We beleeue no longer because of thy sayings for Io 4. 42 1. Pet. 3. 2. 3. Win them with your conuersation which are without the word we haue heard him our selues and know that this is indeed the Christ the Sauiour of the world By which wordes they plainely testified that they were prepared only by the womans testimonie to embrace the faith and that faith was ingendred in their hearts by the powerfull voice of Christ himselfe Wherefore it is cleere that sometimes this kind of meane and argument as is aforesaide goes before faith is begotten in the heart to prepare vs and sometimes this followes faith for confirmation And sometimes also this kinde of argument goes before faith and followes after it it goes before I say for preparation it followes after for confirmation For the spirit teacheth vs many waies applying himselfe to diuers men in diuers Note well Io. 3. manners as it seemeth good vnto himselfe and as mens infirmities do require And here we be to obserue that there is no absolute necessitie of this secondarie kind of argument which is externall and lesse principall to beget faith in vs. For it ought to suffice vs if the spirit teach vs onely by Gods worde but to helpe our weakenes the same spirit addeth the other secondarie kind of argument as Christ plainly teacheth vs Io. 5. where he sayth the testimonie of Iohn Baptist concerning him was not simply necessarie but that God so prouided to helpe their weakenesse and vnbeliefe ver 33. Iohn gaue testimony to the truth but I desire not the testimonie of man Neuerthelesse these things I speake that ye may be saued And that Iohns testimonie was but a secondarie argument only and that Christs owne record of himselfe was the first he sheweth plainly in the words following ver 36. But I haue a greater witnes then the witnes of Iohn for the works which the Father hath giuen me to finish the same works that I do beare witnes of me that the Father sent me And this is our iudgment concerning this argument whereby we proue the Scripture to be the word of God and our answere to the question wherefore it is so as we auouch it What the Papists thinke in this matter it is easily seene How the Papists proue the scripture to bee Gods word by their words and writings Their iudgement briefly is this The meane and principall argument and in a manner the only way with them to demonstrate the scripture to be Gods word is the testimony of the church not only the catholick as they speak but also those of their church which haue preserued the faith as they speake by contiall successions from the Apostles vnto our times and here they vnderstand principally the Popes who as they say succeeded Peter and his chaire These men will haue the Church the iudge and interpreter of all Scriptures from whose iudgement it may not be lawfull for any man to depart for an appeale to any other iudge And they ascribe this dignity prerogatiue to the testimony of the Church because they will haue the Scripture which is written in the heart of the Church to be the principall Scripture and that we account and esteeme of the voice of the Church as the very liuely voice of God himselfe as if God now spake first principally in his Church and by the voice of his Church If they will haue it so that the voice of the Church bee the primarie voice of God and the primarie Scripture of God it is euident that they deeme the greatest light we haue is to be found in the voice of the Church and the same to be most cleere and demonstratiue not only to vs but also in and by it selfe and therefore that this light inlightens the sacred Scripture not in respect of vs only but in respect of themselues also For which cause one of them hath said that the The blasphemy of Papists Scripture is of no more validity without the authority of the church then AEsops fables For the voice of the church being vnto them the primarie voice of God in all respects for as much as it is liuely and vocall and for this cause both by nature
readest thou saith hee and haue ye not read Haue ye neuer read How is it written Againe the Apostles of Christ for all their assertions bring proofe and testimonies out of the old Testament Apollos was a man mighty in Scriptures He strongly confuted publiquely the Iewes with great vehemency shewing by the Scriptures that Iesus was that Christ Act. 18. 24. 28. The men of Beraea receiued the word with all readinesse and searched the scriptures daily whether those things were so Act. 17. 11. Thus the primitiue Church and the fathers refuted heresies by the Scriptures To conclude this point most memorable is that worthy fact of Constantinus the Great who propounding the Bible to the Fathers assembled in the Nicene councell spake on this manner Here I set before you the writings Euangelicall of the Apostles and the sanctions of the auncient Prophets which can informe vs concerning the sacred law of God To beat back therefore the dint of the sword of the aduersarie let vs learne how to answer all obiections of the aduersarie out of the words which are giuen vs of God by diuine inspiration Lastly this I haue said that the Scripture is in it selfe liuely and vocall for as concerning deafe and dead men that is the naturall neuer taught of God vnto such I say it is but as deade mute Here the aduersaries blaspheme and reply saying that y e sacred scripture is but as a dead letter mute and not able togiue answere to any man not able to decide questions and controuersies in religion And contrarily they glory that the voice of the Church which proceeds from the Scripture as they speake which is in grauen by Gods own Spirit in the hearts of men they boast I say that this is vocall and able to answer the demaunders of all questions appertaining to saluation that this cannot be wrested nor peruerted but euer abides the same in al respects The answer to this calumniation and blasphemy is cleere of that which is before shewed for we made it cleere and manifest that the sacred Scripture is most liuely and vocall in it selfe And whereas controuersies are not so soone decided by the Scriptures the cause is not in Gods word but in men which be either so naturally blind and dull that they cannot heare vnderstand the Scripture speaking answering yea crying in their eares or they be so malitious and obstinate that they will not heare and vnderstand yea that they will full often against their owne conscience wrest the voice of the Scripture into another sense and that to their owne perdition Wherefore we conclude this point that the scripture is in it selfe 2. Pet. 3. and by it selfe most liuely and vocall And further we be to remember that to the end it may speake as a liuely voice vnto vs and to the end we may vnderstand it concerning all controuersies in religion we must vse the meanes before mentioned our very Grāmar Meanes to be vsed for the vnderstanding of the scripture is one speciall instrument for this purpose For our eies eares are opened by such meanes to vnderstand the Scripture and to attend vnto Gods voice speaking in the scripture if it shall seeme good to the holy Ghost to worke effectually by them in our hearts and minds If so be that the spirit worke effectually by the aforesaide meanes then the Scripture shall answer to all controuersies concerning faith and religion with a more cleere liuely intelligible and distinct voice then all the men in the whole Church shall answer who can auouch nothing sound and certaine vnlesse first they haue receiued it from the mouth of the Scripture and answer in the verie words of the scripture For whereas these men say the voice of the Church is liuely and vocall heard of all men and cannot bee peruerted and wrested To this I answer first that the voice of the Church as is aforesaid doth depend on the voice of the scripture Next that the voice of the Church is subiect to errours and change so that they may this day answer one thing and to morrow another and this serues no better in a manner then a Lesbian rule to decide controuersies concerning faith religion As for the church of Rome they haue so long and so corruptly answered concerning faith and religion that they haue caried the world from the truth to lies and errours and infinite heresies that there is now no cause wherefore these men may so put forth to sale the voice and sound of their Church which is become so corrupt and adulterous CHAP. XIII Of the fift property of the Church and of the seuenth controuersie NOw it resteth that we proue that the sacred Scripture is simply most necessarie Here then I say that if by Scripture yee vnderstand the substance and the verie matter contained in the words written it cannot be denied that the scripture is so necessarie that without it there can be no Church in earth for the church is borne and bred not Fift propertie Scripture is most necessarie of mortall but of immortall seede which is the word of God 1. Pet. 1. 23. But if ye vnderstand by the scripture the verie writing and forme of reuelation I say that in this respect also it is so necessarie that without this there cannot be a Church For the liuely voice of God is simply necessarie The scripture after a sort is the liuely voice of God therefore simply necessarie I graunt it that when as the liuely voice of God did sound and was heard in the Church this writing and this forme of reuelation was not then so necessarie but when as God did cease to speake and that the scripture came in place of Gods own voice then the scripture was no lesse necessary then the liuely voice of God For the voice of God must euer be in the Church that the church may haue her being and may continue on the earth yea this voice must be heard by the Church either by it selfe or by that which may best supply the want of the liuely voice of God Before Moses time this voice it selfe was heard after his time this voice sounded and spake in and by the voice and writings of Moses and the Prophets When Christ was come his owne liuely voice was heard After Christs ascension for a time the 2. Cor. 5. 19. 1. Pet. 2. 19. preaching of the Apostles and the bookes of the old Testament were receiued for the liuely voice of God himselfe and of his sonne Iesus Christ Then followed the Apostolicall Scripture which together with the holy scripture of the old Testament continue in the Church to supply not only the liuely voice of the Apostles but also of God and of Christ himselfe By the premisses it is euident y t it is simply necessary at all times that the liuely voice of God sound euer in the Church of God either by it selfe or by this supply which wee
or common prayers of the Church ought to be in the mother tongue Thirdly whether it shal be lawfull for the common people to read the scriptures translated into their owne language or mother tongue To the first question we answer that it is lawfull yea also that it is expedient it should be so and this we proue by some few arguments First the sacred scriptures must be read publiquely before all the people therefore must they be translated into their owne known language for otherwise it were in vain to read them The antecedent is proued Deut. 31. ver 11. 12. The Lord commandeth that the books of Moses be read to all indifferently when they were assembled Men Women and Children with the strangers Ier. 36. chargeth Baruch the scribe that hee should read before all the people the book which he had Translating of the scripture into the vulgar tongues First argument written from his mouth But some will heere obiect that this precept was to indure but for a time I answer the end shewes it must be perpetuall Deut. 31. The end being this that this people may heare learne and feare the Lord. This end is perpetuall therefore so is the law in like manner specially seeing that the reading of the Scripture is the ordinarie and necessarie meanes whereby we be to come to this appointed end So the antecedēt being thus cleered it followeth necessarily that the scripture must be translated into our knowne mother tongue Arg. 2. The people are permitted to read y e Scriptures Second argu therfore they are to be translated into the vulgar tongue for otherwise the common people could neuer reade them The antecedent I proue thus The Sacred Scriptures do furnish vs with weapons against the Deuil as we be taught by Christs example Matth. 4. who gaue Sathan the repulse vsing none other weapons against him but testimonies of Scripture Ioh. 5. chap. Christ commaunded the multitude to search the scriptures Acts chap. 17. the Christians of Beroea are commended for searching the scriptures whether the points were sound and good agreeable to the sriptures which were taught by the Apostles But see more of this antecedent in the handling of the 3. question Arg. 3. The very Papists graunt the scriptures may be read before the people but they say it must be done in an Third argu vnknowen tongue wherefore I reason thus If the scriptures must be read before the multitude in an vnknowen tongue that shall be fruitlesse and without all edification therefore they must be translated into their knowen language The Antecedent is prooued by 1. Corin. 14. 6. If I shal come vnto you speaking in tongues what shal I profit you q. d. nothing And after in the same Chap. ver 19. I had rather speake fiue words with my vnderstanding that I might also instruct others then ten thousandwords in a strange tongue But of this point more hereafter The fourth argument God requires in his people wisdome knowledge and instruction Therefore the scriptures Fourth argu must be read and therefore translated into the vulgar tongues The antecedent I prooue thus Deut. 4. God wil haue his people to be wise of vnderstanding that the nations round about hearing of this might bee smitten with an admiration and say ver 4. Only this people is wise and of vnderstanding and a great nation The Apostle Col. 3. 16. will haue Gods worde to dwell in them richly or plenteously Paul in his Epistles euery where requires the Churches to whom he writes to be filled with all knowledge The aduersaries contend and dispute much against this knowledge which God requires in the common people The fift argument Christ while he liued among the Iewes spake and preached vnto them in their owne mother Fift argu tongue The Apostles of Christ in like manner did preach the Gospell in their vulgar tongue as in the day of Pentecost and after and for this very cause that they might speake to euery nation in their owne knowen language that gift of tongues was giuen them Thus then I reason If to preach the Gospell in the vulgar known languages was no profanatiō of the Gospell then so in like maner to write the Gospel in the vulgar known languages is no profanation of the same for there is like reason of both The sixt argument is from the perpetuall vse and practise Sixt argu of all the auncient Church For in the Primitiue Church the sacred Scripture was translated neere hand into all languages as the Chaldiac the Syriac the Arabian the Armenian the Egyptian the Ethiopian the Indian the Persian the Scythian the Sarmatian tongue There are not a few do auouch this a Homil. 1. in Io. Chrysostome * De corrigend Graecorum Affectib lib. 5. Theodoret c De doctr Chri. lib. 2. cap. 15. Augustine with others And at this day there be extant the Chaldiac the Syriack the Arabick the Egyptian and the Ethiopian translations all which the learned say were done in the Apostles times Chrysostome turned the sacred Scripture into the Armenian tongue as Sixtus Senēsis reporteth Ierom trāslated the scripture into the * Lingua Dalmatica Dalmatick tongue as these men do testify Alphonsus a Castro Eckius Hosius Erasmus Methodius translated it into the Sclauonian tongue as saith Auentine in his Chronicle * Socrates tripartita historia Vlphilas Bishop of the Gothes translated the same into the Gothes language * De ciuitate Dei lib. 15. Augustine writeth that the old Testament was translated into Syriack Harding against Iuel and Eckius write that the Muscouites and the people of Russia had the scripture in their owne mother tongue The historie of England written by Beda affirmeth that the scriptures were translated into the English tongue before his time Beda saith he translated part of the new Testament himselfe Thus far the practise of the old church whereby as by the rest of the arguments afore going it followeth that the sacred Scripture is to be translated into euery countrey vulgar language Now it resteth to see what the Papists answer to this question we haue in hand Some few yeares past they vtterly denied that the sacred Scripture might bee translated into any mother tongue * De choris canonicis Petrus Asoto Censura Coloniensis and Harding before named these write that some are of this iudgment The Scriptures are not to be translated into the vulgar languages And for this cause such as translated Scriptures they were banished and condemned by the Pope and their bookes were prohibited and burnt And when they saw this to be odious to all men these graue Fathers changed their minds and now forsooth they auouch the Scriptures may be translated into the vulgar languages yet by the Popes permission And this albeit it seeme to be something diuers from the former assertion yet in effect it is the verie same For the Pope will permit no man to
all naturall knowledge Whereupon Ephe. 3. 18. 19. it is thus said That ye being rooted grounded in loue may be able to attaine with all Saints what is the length and breadth and depth and height and to know that loue of Christ which passeth all knowledge I doe not thinke that this knowledge was in Adam in his first creation before his fall For all the knowledge in Adams mind Adams knowledge before his fall before the fall as it was holy so it seemeth it was natural it seemeth it was a naturall knowledge of God himselfe it seemeth it was a naturall knowledge of the things created Neither did he before his fall see God in the mediator Christ nor was it needefull he should see him so Besides this light which I speake of is kindled in our minde by looking on the face of Christ the Mediator as it were in the glasse of the Gospell 2. Cor. 3. 18. We all with open face beholding as in a glasse the glory of the Lord are transformed into the same image from gloxy to glory Also 4. chap. ver 6. To giue the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Iesus Christ But Adam before his fall as he heard nothing concerning the Gospell of Christ so he saw not his face in the glasse of the Gospel Besides 1. Co. 15. 45. of Adam it is said the 1. Adam was made a liuing soule but of Christ the last Adam was made a quickening spirit Out of which words the difference betwixt Adam and Christ is seene that Adam was made only naturall yet holy but Christ was made spirituall and supernaturall for spirituall things are supernaturall Againe out of this difference wee gather that that spirituall and supernaturall light which we haue only by the benefit of Christ that is the second Adam was not in Adam before the fall For in the same place vers 48. 49. Our heauenly or spiritual condition is ascribed vnto Christ But of this thus farre and but sparingly Also in the will or heart faith is a supernaturall abilitie put into it by the Spirit of Christ of which * Or the saith of the operation of God Ephe. 3. 20 According to the power that worketh in vs. Col. 2. 12. By the faith of God that worketh mightilie in vs. This power also as I thinke was not put into Adams heart before the fall being induced by the same reasons which wee alleaged before And seeing that light of the mind and efficacie of the heart are supernaturall it followeth also that the functions of that light efficacie namely the knowledge of the mind and the apprehension of the heart are likewise supernaturall Wherefore vnto that definition of saith before set downe we adde this branch supernatural as the last so that iustifying faith in Christ with al his nofits offered vnto vs in the word and Sacraments is not onelie Iustifying faith defined an holie but also a supernaturall knowledge of the mind and apprehension of the wil. Thus thē we define faith as we admonished before as the name of faith is taken for the function and worke of faith For so the Diuines do commonly define it so also in the Scriptures is the name of faith wont to be taken namely for the function or worke of faith as it is tearmed 2. Thess 1. 3. But if the description of faith properly and as it is taken for an infused qualitie do like any man better thus also he may haue it described that Faith is a light of the mind and an * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 effectuall action in the hart supernaturally put into them both for the knowing and apprehending of Christ with all his benefits offered in the word and Sacraments Now it remaineth that we speak something touching the effects of faith That knowledge and apprehension of Christ which we speake of sith the seat of it is in the principall and reasonable faculties of the soule namely the mind and the will it cannot be idle neither doth it Effects of faith in the mind and heart c. containe it selfe within the bounds of those higher faculties of the soule the mind the wil but is effectuall also in the lower heart that is in all the affections and there is not anie of al the affections but is affected some way or other by this knowledge apprehension being not only sanctified by it but also rapt vp aboue it self the nature therof For as we said of faith y t it is a supernatural knowledge and apprehension the same is true also of the functions of all the affections for they are al not onely made holy but also supernatural by a certaine supernatural facultie put into them by the Spirit of Christ But to speake distinctly of the effects of Faith Christ with all his benefits being once knowne and apprehended an hope of good to come a feare of euill to come Note the specivll effects which follow faith the loue of Christ and the desire of him and ioy gladnesse are in a wonderfull manner kindled in the soule as 1. Pet. 1. 8. Beleeuing in him ye reioice with ioy vnspeakeable and glorious Griefe also which is according to God is kindled with grones which cannot be expressed Ro. 8. 26. To conclude the whole heart burnes to Godward By faith also our affectiōs toward our neighbour are stirred vp and that for God Christ as loue of our neighbour and delight in the Saints Psal 16. 3. And these are the first effects of faith and those are inward in the lower heart or affections There be also outward effects of faith hauing their being in the body and in all the members of the bodie and those are outward actions of the body into which the inward motions of the affections breake forth And those are first such as respect God then such as respect our neighbour for Gods cause And thus much of the effects of faith both inward and outward as also of faith which is properly so called which they commonly tearm iustifying faith CHAP. XXX Of the improper significations of Faith IT followeth that we speake of the improper significations of faith For this word faith is Diuerse acceptions of faith ambiguous and signifieth many things Properly 1 it signifieth this faith which they call iustifying for that is properly and simply termed by this name Secondly it signifieth that faith which 2 they call historicall or dead which is nothing els but as it were the carcase of iustifying faith for it lacks the soule that is the full assurance of the mind and the confidence of the heart in the speciall assent of the minde and in the trust and apprehension of the heart Thirdly it signifieth faith which they call temporary 3 which is as a certaine Ape of iustifying faith Fourthly 4 last of al that faith which they terme miraculous These three last significations of faith are
they say that hope is not simply and absolutely certaine for there is nothing more vncertaine then these things in which they place some or rather the chiefe cause of the certainty of hope Concerning the absolute certainty of hope these bee some testimonies of Scripture Psal 31. In thee O Lord haue I hoped let me not be confounded for euer He that trusteth in the Lord shall be as mount Sion which shall not be moued for euer Psal 125. Rom. 5. We reioyce vnder the hope of the glorie of God And after Hope maketh not ashamed Rom. 8. We are saued by hope Phil 1. 20. According to my earnest expectation and hope that I shall not be ashamed Rom. 9. Whosoeuer beleeueth in him shall not be confounded And thus much of hope CHAP. XXXIII Of Charitie or Loue. AMong the principall effects of Faith charitie is reckoned in the next place after hope and Paul knits them together as the three special graces of the holy ghost Faith hope charitie 1. Cor. 13. There are three saith he faith hope and charitie and the greatest of these is charitie The Apostle knits these together and we do not seuer them specially for that Gods loue is a certaine bond vniting vs to God together with the bond of faith which is the primary and principal For this cause Peter saith that our communion with Christ now absent from vs doth consist loue faith And this moueth vs in the third place after faith to intreat of Charitie in this treatise of our effectuall calling And charitie or loue proceedeth from that sweet apprehension and taste of the Lord for that taste stirs vp in the heart an exceeding loue of the Lord VVhence loue proceedeth and of our neighbour for the Lords sake And when as Charitie hath receiued this life by Faith it becomes the instrument of Faith whereby it worketh other effects of the Spirit as the gifts of knowledge of prophesying of tongues and of miracles These also are the instruments meanes wherby iustifying faith worketh but the principal is loue for which cause it is said Gal. 5. that faith worketh by loue and loue with the works or fruits thereof among all signes and testimonies giues the surest euidence Loue the best euidence of faith vnto faith If this be compared with other graces of Gods Spirit it must be preferred before them all for it hath the third place after Faith Therefore if ye set aside Faith and hope loue hath the first place of all the graces of y e holy Chost and is as it were the soule of all gifts which followe after it For this cause the Apostle 1. Cor. 12. 13. hauing numbred diuers gifts of the holy Ghost saith That if these graces wanted loue they were either as dead or as nothing or should profit nothing Whereby he giues vs to vnderstand that all other vertues haue no soundnesse in them if ye seuer them from loue but to be onely certaine dead shadowes of vertues We may therefore iustly call charity the life of all gifts and graces which follow it If the aduersaries had contented themselues with this prerogatiue of Charity they had not erred but for that Popish charitie they auouch it to be also the life and forme of faith herein they sin greatly that faith rather contrarily is the life of charity for that without Faith there is no man hath but the dead shadowe of Loue. Wherefore the faith of Christ is the principall life or soule both of charity and of all other vertues for without it they are all but vaine and counterfeit and very sinnes before God for whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne The primarie obiect of loue is the same with the obiect of faith and hope For what wee first apprehend by faith and next expect in hope the same we embrace in Obiect of loue loue The secondary obiect of loue is our neighbor whō we loue in and for the Lord. The subiect of loue is the heart for we loue with the heart as the Apostle speaketh Loue out of a pure heart 1. Thess 1. 5. The nature thereof is not in knowledge nor in hoping but in louing In loue two things are principally to Nature of loue be respected first a diligent endeuour for the prescruation of that we loue next an earnest affection to be vnited and conioyned with it both which we see are to bee respected in the loue of God and of our neighbour The properties of loue are many 1. Cor. 13. 4. c. For whereas loue is there is a heape of vertues for Charitie is neuer alone in any man but hath euer many other vertues as companions handmaids attending on it Of the premisses ye may gather some definition of faith as namely that Loue is an holy endeuour for the preseruation of that which is beloued whether God or man with an earnest desire Loue defined to be vnited vnto it For loue is that bond as the Apostle speaketh whereby the members of the body are knit together And it serues also in some sort and place to vnite vs vnto God and Christ notwithstanding that the communiō of Christ the head of his body the church be principally to be ascribed vnto faith And in this respect loue goes before iustification and is a branch in our effectual calling euer going together with faith hope repentance For which cause principally I thought good to speak of it briefly in this Treatise after faith and hope for that faith wherein we say consisteth the second part of our effectuall calling hath these for inseparable companions faith hope repentance after which followes our iustification by order not of time but of nature But in another respect loue followes iustification and appertaineth to the grace of regeneration but of this we shal speake in fit place Now to returne to our purpose the definition giuen before is not so much of loue it selfe as of the worke and function thereof For Loue is properly an affection holy A larger definition of loue or sanctified and not so onely but also supernaturall caried vp to loue those things which are aboue nature and exceed all naturall affection for like as faith is of those things which excell all naturall knowledge and apprehension and hope is of those things which excell all naturall expectation so Loue also is of those things which be aboue the reach of all naturall affection For as wee haue often before admonished this our new-birth in Christ Iesus is not so much a restoring of vs to that image of Adam which he had before his fall as vnto the image of Christ who is a spirituall and an heauenly man in whom and by whom we haue not onely so to speake a naturall sanctitie or holinesse but also doe receiue from him a certaine heauenly and supernaturall vertue and efficacie infused into all affections and powers of the soule But this our supernaturall condition as yet
of faith 167 31 The opinion of the aduersaries concerning faith 176 32 Of hope 191 33 Of Charitie or Loue. 198 34 Of Repentance 202 35 How farre a wicked man may proceede in repentance 210 36 What the iudgement of Papists is of repentance 213 37 Of mans free-will 216 38 Concerning the free grace of God 226 39 Of the meanes whereby God from the beginning hath reuealed both his couenants vnto mankinde 238 A TREATISE OF OVR EFfectuall Calling and of certaine common places of Theologie contained vnder it CHAP. 1. Of our effectuall Calling GOds effectual calling is that wherby God calleth out of darknesse into 1. God cals by his word preached his admirable light from the power of satan vnto God in Christ Iesu those whom hee knew from eternitie and predestinated vnto life of his meere fauor by the promulgation of the couenant of grace or preaching of the Gospell Such also as be called by the same grace of God answer 2. Man answers by beleeuing and beleeue in him through Iesus Christ This answer is of faith which is in verie truth the condition of the promise which is in the couenant of grace Wherefore our effectuall calling doth consist of the promise of the couenant which is vnder condition of faith and in faith also which is nothing els but the fulfilling of the condition Therefore there be two parts of our effectual calling the first is the outward calling of such as are predestinate Two parts of our effectual calling vnto life from darknesse vnto light and that of Gods meere grace and that I say by the publication of the couenant of grace or preaching of the Gospell The latter part is their inward faith wrought in them by the same grace and Spirit of God whereby they are conuerted from Sathan vnto God for I cannot see how this second part of our effectual calling can differ from faith it selfe In the first part of our effectual calling first we are to consider the persons calling called The person which calleth vs properly to speake is God himselfe for he only promiseth in his couenant calling those things which bee not as though they were Roman 4. ver 17. The persons called are they whom God knew before and hath predestinated vnto life for whom he hath predestinated them he hath called Rom. 8. Secondly in the first part of our effectuall calling the cause which moued God hereunto is his owne speciall grace for the cause of all Gods blessings vpon vs is in himselfe For as hee did predestinate vs in himselfe according to the good pleasure of his owne will Ephe. 1. 5. so hath hee called and iustified vs in himselfe and shall glorifie vs in himselfe to the praise of the glorie of his grace that all glorie may be wholy ascribed vnto him Thirdly we be to obserue the instrument of our vocation which is the couenant published Instrument of our vocation or the Gospell preached Fourthly in this former part of our effectuall calling we bee to consider the estate from which and the estate whereunto we be called The condition from which we be called is darknesse the power of Sathan and that miserable plight which is without Christ in sin and death The state whereunto we be called is light God himselfe and that blessed condition of man in Christ Hence it is euident that these common places of Diuinitie Of Gods word and of sinne and the miserie of mankind must bee referred to this argument of our effectuall calling as to a most generall head in religion In the second part of our effectuall calling these branches must be noted First that the cause wherefore we answer Gods calling or beleeue in God is Gods own grace which worketh in vs this faith by the holy Ghost which is giuen vs with his word For like as God of his meere grace calleth vs outwardly vnto himselfe so the same his grace and free loue in Iesus Christ kindleth this faith in vs whereby we answer his heauenly calling And in this 2. part of our calling which we say doth 2. Part of our calling faith consist in faith if we desire yet more deeply to search it there is a double grace or working of God in our hearts The 1. is whē he inlightneth vs by his holy spirit pouring a new a heauenly light into our mind before so blind as that it neither saw nor could see the things which doe belong to the Spirit of God 1. Cor. 2. 14. 15. The naturall man perceiueth not the things of the Spirit of God for they are foolishnesse vnto him neither can he know them In the wil which is altogether froward and quite fallen from God he worketh an vprightnesse and in all the affections a new holinesse Hence proceedes the new creature and that new man which is created after God in righteousnesse and true holinesse Ephe. 4. 24. The Papists call this first grace in the faith and work of the holy Ghost not the creation of any new creature which was not before but the stirring vp of some goodnesse and sanctitie which as they say was left in nature Free-will after the first fall of man which they call also free-will which they say was not quite lost in the fall but lessened and weakened But this free-will whereof they speake is in verie truth nothing els but that holinesse of nature and life of God and the spirituall light of man in his first creation and innocencie But of this more in place conuenient This they say then that after the fall man retained not only the faculties of his soule but also the holy qualities of those powers only hurt and weakened And this is that free-will which they say is quickned by Gods preuenting grace which they define to be an externall motion standing as it were without and beating at the doore of the heart In this first grace of God which we call a new creation of diuine qualities in the soule man standeth meere passiuely before God and as the materiall cause of Gods worke For in this first renewing of the soule of man what diuine vertues hath man to work with Gods Spirit or to helpe the worke of grace Yet we say not that man in this new birth is no more then a trunke or dead tree for that there is in man that so I may speake a passiue power to receiue that diuine grace and life of God as also the vse of reason which dead trees haue not The aduersaries say that in quickening of free-will there is a libertie or strength in it to reiect or to receiue that grace which they call preuenting grace Therefore they giue a fellow-working vnto grace and a fellow-working vnto freewil The second grace or the second worke of Gods spirit The action of faith in the second part of our effectuall calling or in faith is the verie act of faith or an action proceeding from this new creature the action of
the mind enlightned in knowing God in Christ of the will sanctified in imbracing and apprehending God in Christ And here the principall agent is that verie Spirit of Christ who after the first grace and creation abideth and dwelleth in vs not idle but euer working some good in vs and by vs. The second agent working with Gods holy Spirit is the very soule of man or rather the new man or the new creature in the soule and all the faculties thereof By this the holy Ghost that so I may speake knoweth God or otherwise to speake the same to know God the holy Ghost vseth the new creature in man and by this the holy Ghost doth embrace and apprehend God in Christ Thus speakes the Apostle Rom. 8. The holy Ghost saith hee maketh intercession for vs with sighes which cannot be expressed Obserue here how he ascribeth this action of sending forth sighes vnto the Spirit as to the principall agent In this second grace which is the action or worke of faith we stand not as meere passiuely but being moued by the holy Ghost we worke our selues as being stirred vp to beleeue we beleeue and in a word we worke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with Gods Spirit working in vs. The Aduersaries say this second grace in faith is an action of free-will when as we by our own free-will dispose and prepare our selues to a iustifying grace in beleeuing in hoping in repenting In this action they say not the holy Ghost is the principall agent or any motion to vse their owne word of the Spirit but free-will it selfe which as they say goes before whē as that motion of God working together with their free-will must follow after They speake not a word here of Gods Spirit either in the first or second grace who works effectually in both as is aforesaid but in steede of the holy Ghost they talk of I know not what motion standing without and knocking at the doore They say this motion stirres vp free-will they say it worketh with free-will when it worketh and prepareth vs vnto the grace of iustice or iustification This their doctrine is strange it sauoureth not the holie Scripture of God nor the phrase of Scripture Thus farre of Gods grace in faith or of the second part of our calling and of the two speciall branches of it Next in it we are to consider of the points or conditions before noted which are the verie same with those in our calling afore-going To this second part of our effectuall calling referre the doctrine of faith which in verie truth is the same with it Hope loue and repentance follow faith and Free-will is a common place in diuinitie subalterne or to bee referred vnto that of Repentance CHAP. II. Of the word of God or of the couenant in generall and of the couenant of workes in speciall THE common place in religion which is concerning The common places of religion how they follow in order Gods word or couenant is to be referred vnto this of our effectuall calling as to a most generall heade next follow these points of sinne and of the miserie of mankind thirdly that of faith then follow hope loue and repentance Now therefore we are to speake of the word or of the couenant of God hauing first set down this ground that all the worde of God appertaines to some couenant for God speaks nothing to man without the couenant for which cause al the scripture both old and new wherein al Gods word is contained beares the name of Gods couenant or testament The couenant of God generally is a promise vnder Couenant defined some one certaine condition And it is twofold the first is the couenant of works the second is the couenant of grace Paul Galath 4. vers 24. expresselie sets downe two couenants which in the olde Testament were shadowed by two women as by types to wit Hagar the handmaide and Sarah the freewoman for saith he these be those two couenants Let vs then speake something of these two couenants and first of the couenant of works The couenant of workes which may also be called a legall or Couenant of works the first ground of it natural couenant is founded in nature which by creation was pure and holy and in the law of God which in the first creation was ingrauen in mans hart For after that God had created man after his owne image pure and holy and had written his law in his minde he made a couenant with man wherein he promised him eternall life vnder the condition of holy and good workes which should be answerable to the holinesse and goodnesse of their creation and conformable to his law And that nature thus beautified with holinesse and righteousnes and the light of Gods law is the foundation of the couenant of works it is very euident for that it could not well stand with the iustice of God to make a couenant vnder condition of good works perfect obedience to his law except he had first created man pure and holie and had ingrauen his lawe in his hart whence those good works might proceed For this cause when he was to repeat that couenant of workes to the people of Israel he first gaue the law written in tables of stone then he made a couenant with his people saying Doe these things and ye shall liue Therefore the ground of the couenant of works was Note not Christ nor the grace of God in Christ but the nature of man in the first creation holy and perfect endued also with the knowledge of the law For as touching the couenant of workes there was no mediator in the beginning betweene God and man that God should in him as in and by a mediator make his couenant with man And the cause that there was no need of a mediator was this that albeit there were two parties entring into a couenāt yet there was no such breach or variance betwixt them that they had neede of any mediator to make reconciliation betweene them for as for the couenant of works God made this couenant with man as one friend doth Note with another For in the creation we were Gods friends and not his enemies Thus far of the grounde of the conant of works The thing promised in the couenant of works is life eternall first not righteousnes for that man in his creation was euen then iust and perfect by that original iustice as they call it vnlesse you will say that the righteousnes of works was promised in that couenant for which righteousnes sake after that man had wrought it God would pronounce and declare him to be iust For we are to vnderstand that in this couenant there is a double righteousnes the first is that originall iustice which is nothing else but the integritie of nature in that first state of man This iustice out of all doubt is not promised in the couenant of works for it is the ground of it The
grace This might appeare by manie arguments which now I willingly passe ouer The end and vse of the promise in the couenant of grace is that men cast downe and humbled in the sight of their owne sinne and miserie by the legall couenant might be raised vp and comforted by hearing and receiuing that righteousnesse and life which is freely promised and offered to the beleeuers in the Gospell Of this vse reade Rom. 5. 1. Therefore being iustified by faith we haue peace with God This is the proper end of the Euangelical doctrine therefore the second and principall part of the Gospell doth consist in the doctrine of the couenant of grace which is properly and principally to beare this title of an Euangelicall doctrine teaching vs what Christ our mediator is what his humiliation first next his glorification and then what benefits life and righteousnes we get by him and these be the speciall branches of the Gospell and of that ioyfull message of our saluation Last of al the vse of those particular promises is that Gods Elect iustified renewed comforted and quieted in their consciences may testifie their thankfulnesse by their holy obedience and good works The Apostle noteth this end Tit. 2. 11. 12. 13. 14. For that grace of God which bringeth saluation vnto all men hath shined teaching vs that renouncing vngodlinesse and worldly lusts we liue soberly iustly and godly in this present world And for that this is the end of these promises they haue also their place in the third part of the doctrine of the Gospell which concernes the life and Christian conuersation of the Saints for which cause ye haue these promises often in the Gospell annexed to exhortations admonitions and instructions concerning manners as Gal. 6. after that vers 6. he had giuen in charge that he which is catechised in the word should minister vnto him which teacheth him of all his goods hee forthwith addeth vers 7. and 8. a promise and a threatning Againe vers 9. hauing warned them not to waxe wearie in weldoing he addeth this promise We shall reape in due time if we faint not So Ephe. 6. after that his charge giuen to seruants to serue their maisters in al vprightnes ver 5. 6. 7. he addeth a promise v. 8. Whatsoeuer good thing euery man doth that shall he receiue of the Lord. The like testimonies are euery where in which ye may find admonitions exhortations and instructions confirmed with promises and threatnings Of this kind then are al those promises before mentioned which must be carefully discerned first from the couenant of works next from the couenant of grace wheresoeuer we find them in reading the new Testament And finally concerning the aforesaid promises wee are to obserue first that the condition of the works of regeneration and grace is required of beleeuers not as merits but as duties only and testimonies of their thankfulnes to God their redeemer like as the conditiō in the couenant of works is not of merits but of duties onely and of testimonies of their thankfulnes to God their creator I grant that the works of regeneration are necessarie vnto eternall life promised in the Gospell but not as merits or meritorious causes but as the means and way wherein we are to proceed on frō iustification and regeneration vnto glorie and life eternall They may also be said to bee causes after a sort for they please God in Christ and in some respects moue him but not as merits but as effects of the only merit of Iesus Christ whereof they testifie But of this wee shall speake in place more conuenient Secōdly note in this third kind of promises that the condition therein is of the works of regeneration which are also most perfect in their kind for the great iustice of God cannot beare the least defect The rule also of all works is the iustice of God whereof ye haue a certaine expresse image in the morall lawe Wherefore the condition here is of works most absolute but not in thēselues but in Christ and in the perfection of his satisfaction and merit If ye obiect Doth not the lawe require that perfection of works which is in works themselues I answer it doth so of them which are vnder the couenant of works vnder the law and without Christ but as for such as be in the couenant of grace and in Christ it doth not require a perfection in the works of regeneration but is content with the good beginnings which the beleeuers haue the perfection of whose obedience is supplied and to be found in Christ Iesus For like as hee iustified vs of his meere grace in Christ and by his merit being his enemies so now much more will he accept vs Note Rom. 5. 9. 10. 11. 12. being iustified and regenerate I say much more will he accept vs being his friends and our obedience in Christ euen for his merit sake For so the Apostle concludeth Rom. 5. 9. Being iustified therefore by his bloud we shall now much more be preserued from wrath by him And thus farre of these three kinds of promises which are distinctly set downe in the New Testament And here this might also be demāded whether these 3. kinds of promises be not as distinctly to be found in the old Testament I answer they may so be found yet not without some difference for that the old Testament did serue specially to prepare men to receiue Christ which in his appointed time was to come For the law was a schoolemaister vnto Christ Gal. 3. Therefore the greatest part of the old Testament is spent in propounding repeating expounding the couenant of workes And because Christ was not as yet manifested in the flesh therefore the doctrine of the couenant of grace is more sparinglie and darkelie set forth in it Finallie as touching the faithfull in the old Testament which embraced Christ the mediator of the couenant of grace howsoeuer then but shadowed before their eies in types and figures to them I say being iustified in him which was to come regenerat by his grace the promises of eternal life were made vnder condition of the works of regeneration as this promise made to Abraham Gen. 17. 1. Walke thou before Rom 4 me and be thou vpright I wil make my couenant with thee This promise was made to Abraham being before iustified by faith and renewed by grace The like promises are often in the old Testament annexed to moral precepts as in the books of the Prouerbs and Ecclesiastes And thus farre of the couenant of grace the ground thereof the promise thereof and the condition thereof Now it remaineth that we answere a question or two concerning this couenant The first whether the couenant of works be abolished and of none effect to such as 1. vse of the couenant of workes or of the Morall lawe be vnder the couenant of grace I answer the couenant of works hath two endes and vses The first and proper
iustification which is by Christ onely by the grace of God only by faith only for al these haue one respect and purpose Obserue then here by the way what the palpable blindnesse of the Papists is in this cleere light of the Gospell Popish blindnes First they see not how nature is plainlie lost as touching sanctitie Secondly they know not the sole grace and mercie of God neither do they vnderstand what the excellency is of Christs merit Thirdly they perceiue not how that couenant of works is abolished to them which are in Christ as touching iustification Fourthly they conceiue not that the only couenant of grace is made with mankinde after the fall speciallie now after the incarnation of Christ in the Gospell and that vnto iustification and life eternall Fiftly they see not that the works of free will as they call them if there were any such to be duties only and testimonies of thankefulnesse according to the first institution of the couenant of works which be done by the strength of nature but ascribe some speciall meritorious vertue vnto them Wherefore we conclude concerning these men that albeit they be not iust of one minde with those old Iewes against whom the Apostle disputed in the Epistle to the Romans yet they hold much on their side striuing to defend that nature is in part good and holy so contending against the pure and only grace of God and to diuide iustification and The popish iustification mans saluation betweene Christ and Gods free grace the vertues and workes of nature whereas notwithstanding these two nature and grace can neuer stand together in the worke of our saluation For whosoeuer shall conioine or make a mixture of grace and nature in this matter shall quite ouerthrow and extinguish grace which either is alone or not at all as Rom. 11. 6. If it be of grace it is no more of works for otherwise grace were no more grace And in the Epistle to the Galathians he doth purposelie dispute against those Iewes which did couple together in the matter of iustification the guifts and works of nature with Christ with the grace of God and with the Gospell And these Iewes as I iudge the Papists seeme most to resemble I meane those Iewes against whom he wrote in the Epistle to the Galathians For in that other epistle to the Romans he disputeth against such Iewes as did openly deny Christ and reiect him but to the Galathians his disputation is against such Iewes as were not content with Christ only but would haue Christ and the law ioined together Thus far of the comparison betweene Paul and vs on the one side the old Iewes and the Papists on the other Now because it will be demanded what Paul thought of the works of regeneration and what we and what the aduersaries thinke also therefore I will touch this question in few wordes Here then some one will say did Paul then in that disputation to the Rom. and to the Galathians oppugne the works of grace and regeneration I answer Paules chiefe purpose in that disputation is against the works of nature which the Iewes thought to be holy and iust and also meritorious he did not reiect the works of regeneration as they be duties and testimonies of thankfulnesse vnto God but in that respect commends them Rom. 6. 7. 8. Chapters and in other places But as touching the cause of iustification he would not haue these workes as we call them of regeneration coupled with the grace of God or with Christ or with faith as anie cause or as part of anie meritorious cause of saluation To this purpose he saith Rom. 4. that Abraham himselfe being regenerate was not iustified before God by anie works of his regeneration And Rom. 6. hauing commended the works of sanctification in the end vers 23. where he attributeth death to the merit of sinne hee doth not there notwithstanding ascribe life eternall to the merit of the works or fruits of sanctification but when he had said that the wages of sin is death he doth clearely auouch it that eternall life is the free gift of God in Christ Iesu In which place if the Apostle had beene of this iudgement that the works of regeneration be in anie respect meritorious assuredly he would not so passe ouer the commendation of the works of regeneration specially for that this heere is principally intended Wherefore the Apostle to the Romans so reiecting the works of nature which the couenant of works requireth yet hee vnderstandeth also all kinds of workes morall and naturall going before grace and faith as also all ceremoniall works and the very fruits of regeneration which follow grace and faith that faith onely Christ only grace only may herein be all in all Thus far of S. Paules iudgment We at this day are of one and the same mind with the Apostle concerning works of regeneration Our aduersaries granting there be such works ascribe too much vnto them for they will not haue them to be duties and testimonies onely of thankfulnesse vnto God but also that they be meritorious causes of that iustification which they call the second iustification Again we are to remember that the aduersaries iudgment concerning works of regeneration is that they proceed not onely from infused grace and first iustice as they speake but also from nature and free-will which works together with that iustice in respect whereof also they account good works meritorious as was before The popish opinion of good works shewed so ascribing their good works in part to that their first grace and in part to free-will And thus farre of this comparison wherby it appeares whether we or our aduersaries haue the better or the more sound iudgment concerning both couenants of the grounds of both nature grace and Christ as also of the effect of both which we call mans iustification And lastly for that this is the most fundamentall point of true religion we may hereby discerne also whether we or the aduersaries haue the religion and worship of God the more purely soundly established amongst vs. CHAP. VI. Of the written Word or of the written Couenant of God THe word in both couenants was for a long time in the world euen from Adams time till Moses vnwritten deliuered as from hand to hand and continued by a liuelie voice for I passe ouer such matters as Ioseph recordes to be ingrauen in columnes before the floud as also the Apocryphals of Henoch And whē as in continuance of time corruptions grew by these traditions and the puritie of the doctrine of the couenant could not thus be preserued and y t God would no longer follow the former course onely he beganne in Moses time to ordaine and to publish another forme to wit this to preserue and to continue the puritie of the celestiall doctrine in written books approued and sealed by diuine authoritie and testimonie the more to commend his written word vnto men
the Church is one The aduersaries withstand this conclusion and infring it with these arguments First the scripture is not written in mens hearts with the finger of God neither is it the primary voice of God Secondly the scripture is of no antiquity Thirdly it is obscure Fourthly ambiguous c. Bellarmine ads more to these of which ye may read in him They conclude that the voice of the Church is the principall and proper voice of the holy Ghost as he is the Iudge of controuersies Their proofe is this The scripture is written in the heart of the Church with Gods own finger this is the primary voice of God And whatsoeuer excellency wee doe ascribe to the scripture that they attribute to their owne Church which is nothing els but a den of theeues And that the spirit being this great iudge is not bound to one sort of men as those of the Ecclesiasticall function the Pope and Councels as they speak but doth performe this office without all respect of persons in whom and by whom soeuer it seemeth good vnto himselfe this is manifest first for if the holy Ghost be not the Iudge both of the very context of the scripture whether it be Gods word and of the interpretation of scripture if he be not I say in man himselfe assuredly there can be no faith For the spirit only begetteth faith in mans heart Secondly the holy Ghost executeth his other offices freely in by any man therefore so may he this function of iudging What is meant by iudging in the holy Ghost For I demand what els is it to iudge but to inlighten to teach that the scripture is giuen of God by inspiration and that this is the naturall sense of this scripture Thirdly the same we be taught by our experience for we find it true by experience that he doth freely iudge in and by whom it pleaseth him Testimonies of scripture proue also this assertion 1. Cor. 12. 11 And all these things worketh euen the selfe same spirit distributing to euery man seuerallie as he will And Esay 54. All thy children shall be taught of God Ier. 31. I will write my lawes in their harts The aduersaries impugne this truth of God with some argumēts of their owne of which ye may reade in Bellarmine And these men binde the holy Ghost to the Pope and to councels confirmed by him which point our men impugne also refute with many arguments of which this is one that of their conclusion this must be the consequent that the Pope and his councels must be aboue the scriptures which thing is absurd to be graunted See more arguments of this subiect in their disputations CHAP. XVI Of the eight propertie and the tenth controuersie LASTLY we auouch that the sacred scripture is of highest authority excellency and 10. Propertie dignity on the earth Here againe by this word scripture we vnderstand both the substance of it and the writing And here wee meane it hath such excellency as makes it most worthie of credit and whereby also it gaines authority and estimation to the Church For which cause the Church is called the Pillar and ground of truth 1. Tim. 3. 15. And it hath many other titles which are giuen to it often in the scriptures This is prooued by the former demonstrations as these The scripture is the word of God it is most perspicuous it is most pure and simple c. Ergo. The aduersaries vary in iudgment touching this authority of Scripture For some of them detract from this soueraigne authority of it affirming that of it selfe it is not authentical but takes authoritie and estimation from the Church Of this minde are these Eckius in Enchiridio Pighius in his booke de Hierarchia and one Hermannus an impudent Papist he with a black mouth auoucheth it that the scripture is of no more validity without the testimony of the Church then AEsops Fables c. Others more late writers and more subtile say that the scripture hath authoritie in and by it selfe and is authentical but not to vs before the church approue it and ascertain it to be so Of this iudgmēt be these Bellarmine Coclaeus Canus Stapleton Canisius c. They which speake thus that the written word of God is not authenticall to vs before the iudgment of the Church be manifested these men I say haue this meaning that we bee not bound to beleeue that the Scriptures bee authenticall before the iudgment of the Church be past of it and that we sinne not at all if wee beleeue them not before the definitiue sentence of the Church But we hold this to be false also to say that the scripture is not to vs authenticall without the authority of the Church For it is the holy Ghost that teacheth euery man to know beleeue that the scripture is authenticall and hath soueraigne authority in it selfe And this he teacheth not by any externall meane How the holy Ghost teacheth vs what authority the scripture hath first but by the very sacred scripture by which alone he properly breeds faith in our hearts to beleeue and apprehend this truth of God And so we resting on this illumination of the holy ghost teaching vs by the scripture that this is the excellencie and authority of the scripture doe beleeue this to be so albeit the whole world did oppose it selfe against vs. And thus farre of the more essentiall questions concerning scripture CHAP. XVII Questions more accidentall concerning the holy Scripture and first of the bookes wherein the same is contained THE first question is concerning the books of holy scripture These bookes are commonly called for the excellency of them The Bible The Bible as it is commonly receiued and caried in hands containes in it two sorts of books the first is of books Canonicall and the second is Apocryphal Regular or Canonicall bookes are such as giue rule and direction touching faith and manners The bookes of Moses are the first Canon or president sent from God First Canon which may not be iudged or tryed by any other externall Canon whatsoeuer For there was no booke extant before the books of Moses The authoritie of the writer so holy and the euidence of the spirit so powerfull and the holinesse of these books to passe by other arguments so great hath gained these books this high estimation and authority in the Church The books of the Prophets make vp the second Canon which bee adiudged canonicall Second Canon by that externall Canon of the Mosaicall books by which they were examined Next they were and are discerned of such as be taught of God inwardly by the holy Ghost by the great euidence of Gods spirit which is manifested in them both in words and matter The third Third Canon Canon are the Apostolical books of the New Testament which are adiudged and approoued as Canonicall partly by the Canonicall books of Moses partly by the
this translation also Caluin approoueth Therefore by Caluins testimony the very Hebrue text is here corrupted I answer the sense shall not de greatly vnfitting if ye read whereby he shal cal him to wit the Lord our righteousnesse The name going before is the name of a people of securitie of a people that dwell safely as Tremelius and Iunius vnderstand and reade the place Thirdly Ieremy leaues it to our free choise Fourthly the Hebrue Doctors Vatable Pagnine Arias Montanus read vocabit he shal cal and yet turne the word vocabunt they shal cal The third place is in the 22. Psalm 17. ver They pierced Caari Iaddai Veraglai my hands and my feete In the Latine edition it is Foderunt they digged or pierced and so read all Christians but the Hebrue is Sicut Leo as a Lion Wherefore in this place the Hebrue text is corrupted I answer y e Masorites testify that they haue read in some Hebrue copies Caru which signifieth to dig into or to pierce They also which haue y e word Caari in their books say it is not to be taken here in Caari the proper and common signification The Chaldee Paraphrast doth knit both particles together As a Lion smites with his teeth so haue these pierced c. But these were before Ierom I meane the Masorites and the Chaldee Paraphraste therefore it is false that this place was corrupted by the Iewes after Ieroms time Ierom in his Psalter keeps this reading Caari and yet he translates the word foderunt they digged or pierced Lastly a certaine Popish writer one Augustine Iustinianus who set forth the book of Psal coliected of many languages doth plainly auouch it this place is not corrupted but that there is a defect of a word which the Chaldee Paraphrast hath supplyed The fourth place is Psal 19. 5. Their line is gone forth Becol haarets iatsa kauuam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 through al the earth Here not only the vulgar but the Septuagint also whom the Apostle to the Rom. 10. followeth doe reade their sound is gone c. therefore this place is corrupted Let Genebrard alone answer this in his obseruations on the Psalmes who saith the Septuagint and Paule did rather expresse the sense of the word then the proper and naturall signification thereof The fift place is Exo. 2. after the 22. ver in y e vulgar Latine edition all this place is read of a second son of Moses And she bare a second whose name he called Eliezer saying the God of my Father is my helper and hath deliuerâ—d me from Pharaohs hand But all this place is not to be found in the Hebrue text Ergo. To this I answere the very Louaine editions haue here their marginal note to put vs in mind that this place hath crept into the text and the better sort of the Papists are of this iudgement that this place is not the natural or very text of Gods worde as Caietanus who writes of this place in this manner All this clause of a second sonne is superfluous Wherefore Bellarmine can not conclude by these places that the Hebrue edition is corrupt and therefore is not authenticall I shall conclude contrarily with this one argument that the Hebrue edition is not corrupt If the Iewes corrupted it it was before Christ or after But not before Christ which point to passe by all testimonies of auncients The Iewes before Christ did not corrupt the Hebrue Christ is witnesse and so the apostle Rom. 3. 1. I make euident with this one reasoÌ„ If the Iewes had corrupted the Hebrue text Christ would haue texed them for so horrible an offence But we neuer find that Christ so chargeth them for any such cause but contrarily we reade that hee sends them to that very Hebrue edition which they had in their hands Search the scriptures saith he Io. 5. 39. The Scripture was not corrupted after Christs time which assertion I proue to passe by the authority of auncients with this one argument The Iewes could not corrupt al the Hebrue copies albeit they were neuer so willing to effect it for that they were now for the most part come to the hands of Christians Hence it followeth that if the Hebrue text was not corrupted neither before Christs time nor after his comming then was it not corrupted at all But happily they will say that the Iewes corrupted it after Augustine and Ieromes The Iewes coulde not corrupt the Hebrue after Christs comming time I answere in what places For as touching Bellarmines 5. places we haue already shewed that both in Ieroms time and before these places were thus read as we read them this day Wherefore we conclude the Hebrue edition is most pure and consequently in the old Testament this edition only is authenticall CHAP. XIX Of the Greeke edition of the New Testament WHereas there bee many editions of the new Testament wee say the Greeke only is the authenticall which first I demonstrate on this manner First in Christs time and the Apostles the Greeke tongue among the Gentiles was of greatest excellency Secondly and as it was accounted of best note so was it most famous and most common in the world For albeit as then the Romane Empire was most large great yet the Latine tongue was not so common as is testified by a good * Cicero in oratione pro Archiae poëta writer of that age Thirdly the Idolatrie and superstition of the Gentiles and all the Philosophy of the Greeks was written in the Greek tongue The Lord hauing these and such like respects no doubt at what time it pleased him to carry his Gospell from the narrow bounds of Iewrie into the great and spacious field of all the world It was the Lords will and pleasure I say at that time that the Gospel should be written principally in the Greeke tongue The writers they were some of them Apostles some Euangelists al which first wrote in Greek except Mathew and the author to the Hebrues For first concerning Mathew a In Synopsi Athanasius saith he wrote first in Hebrue the same saith b Lib. 3. Irenaeus c Incarmine Naztanzen and Ierom d In Praefat. in 4. Euang. ad Damas et in Catalog in Math. who saith that Mathew first in Hebrue in his time Mathews Hebrue copie was reserued in the library of Cesaria which Pamphilus the Martyr built Athanasius saith that Saint Mathews Hebrue edition was translated into Greeke by Iames the Apostle others say by Saint Iohn the Apostle others by Mathew himselfe Thus write the Fathers but their assertion hath no strong grounds For when Christ liued with his Apostles all the Iewes spake Syriack that is a language mixt of Hebrue Chaldaiack Therefore if Mathew had purposed to write in any other language but the Greek he would no doubt haue written specially in the Syriack tongue and some Papists of this age are of the
very same iudgment Wherefore it is vncertaine whether Mathew first wrote in Hebrew Syriack or Greeke yet is it more probable that he did first write in Greeke both for that this tongue was not vnknowne to the Iewes and other Apostles first wrote in it not onely to Iewes and Gentiles indifferently but also particularly to the very Iewes * As Saint Iames and Saint Peter 1. Epist Mathew in Hebrue In Catolog in Paul Well howsoeuer it is the Greeke edition which we haue in the Church at this day is authenticall for that it was both written and approoued while the Apostles were yet liuing For as touching the Hebrue edition if there were any I doubt now it can no where be found And as for this Hebrue copie which is in many hands it is not the true copy As concerning the Epistle to the Hebrues Ierom sayth that first it was written in Hebrue next turned into Greek either by Barnabas or Luke or Clement but it is vncertaine and it is more like to be true that this Epistle also was first written in Greeke Howsoeuer it be this Greeke edition of this Epistle which we haue at this day is authenticall Now the New Testament written in Greek by the Apostles and Euangelists hath beene so preserued by the admirable prouidence of God euen in the middest of persecutions and heresies vnto this age and in all former ages so freed and kept by godly and Orthodoxall writers from the corruption of Heretiques the Lord God I say hath so prouided that it is come into our hands most pure and perfect Thus then I reason That edition of the New Testament which was written in the best language and first and originally written in it to wit the Greeke I say the same must be accepted as authenticall of all men But such is the Greeke edition of the New Testament Ergo. The aduersaries except onely against the purity of this edition For albeit some of them the latter and the better learned as Bellarmine doe not say that the Greeke edition of the New Testament is altogether corrupt as some of them haue blasphemed yet they say it is not so pure that they can graunt it to be authenticall because in some places it is corrupt Bellarmine brings forth seuen places whereby he indeuours to prooue this assertion that the Greek edition is corupt and therefore cannot be authenticall The first place is 1. Cor. 15. 47. The first man is of the earth earthly the second man is the Lord from heauē But in the vulgar 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Latine edition it is the second is from heauen heauenly this reading is approued therfore the Greek edition is corrupt and not authenticall I answer first albeit we read as the Greeke is yet the sense is good and orthodoxall and the same with that which is of the vulgar reading differing in word only and not in matter Secondly the Arabick and Syriack translation so read the place Thirdly the Fathers Chrysostome and Theophylact so reade Fourthly Epiphanius citing * Haereseon 22. 2 all the places which Marcion corrupted yet remembers not this place But saith he Tertullian saith that Marcion * Tert. lib. 5. contra Mar. hath corrupted this place I answer that Tertullian in that booke and place reads these words in the very same manner as we do The Lord from heauen The second place is 1. Cor. 7. 33. He that is maried careth for the things of the world how he may please his wife The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. wife and the Virgin are distinctly set downe So reads the Greek But the Vulgar thus He that is ioined to a wife careth for the things of the world how he may please his wife and he is diuided but the woman that is vnmaried and the Virgin bethinketh of the things which please the Lord both in body and spirit Wherefore the Greek edition is here corrupted and so can not be authenticall I answere First that the sense which is by the Greek is not only sound but also more fitting in this place then that which is by the Vulgar translation Secondly the Syriack translation so reads these words Thirdly Theophylact the Greek Scholies and Basil so read the words But he sayth that Ierom * Lib. 1. contra Iouinan auoucheth it that this Greek reading is not Apostolicall I answer the same Ierom in another place * Contra Heluidium Eustochium reads these words as we doe wherefore seeing he changeth his mind he is not fit to iudge for this scripture The third place is Ro. 12. 11. seruing the time But the old Latin is seruing the Lord Ergo. I answer First albeit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ye read so the place yet the sense is good and sounde Secondly the reading varies in manie Greeke copies as witnesseth Origens Interpreter who reads the Lord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and hee noteth it that in many bookes he founde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the time the same saith Ambrose who reades 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 seruing the time yet saith he in some bookes wee find 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lord. Thirdly the Syriack Chrysostome Theophylact and Basil read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lord which reading wee best like For which cause our Beza translates the word Domino the Lord. The fourth place is Ioh. 8. where in the beginning of that Chap. many Greek copies want the storie of the adulterous woman which the cōmon translation in Latin hath the Church approues it as canonicall I answere First that our Greeke books which we haue and hold for authenticall haue this historie also and our Church receiues it Secondly yet we denie not that this hath beene gainsaid by some and the Syriacke translation hath it not The fift place is Mark. 16. where in many Greeke copies that whole chapter is wanting which notwithstanding the Latine edition retaineth Ergo. I answer first that all our Greeke bookes which we account authenticall haue also this chapter and our churches receiue the same as canonicall Secondly Ierome some-where moues some doubttouching it but to no purpose The sixt place is 1. Ioh. 5. 7. where the seuenth verse which containes a worthie testimonie of the Trinitie in manie Greeke copies is missing but in the vulgar it is retained Ergo. I answer first our Greeke bookes which we hold for authenticall haue this verse and our Church receiues it Secondly we denie not but some haue gainesaid it The seuenth place is Matth. 13. For thine is the kingdome 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. power and glorie Amen But this place is not in the vulgar translation Ergo. L. Valla answereth this place is not added to the Greeke but detracted from the Latine and I pray you what hereticall or vnsound matter hath this place Thus we see then the aduersaries cannot proue by these places that the Greeke edition of the new Testament is corrupted and so not
publike administration of Gods seruice and worship being performed of all or most Churches in one tongue to wit the Latine this might serue well for the preseruation of the vnitie of faith To this I answer this serues notably for the continuance and increase of vnbeleefe and ignorance Againe our verie experience teacheth by Gods good blessing in these times that notwithstanding the great variety of tongues in the reformed Churches yet they agree well to God be praise in the vnitie of faith Next they reason from the little good which hence ensueth as they imagine It profits the people nothing at all that the Scriptures be read in the vulgar tongues for they vnderstand not any sentence of Scripture albeit they know the words To this I answer Euerie one of the vnlearned if they come to heare the Scriptures with Gods feare and reuerence they shall reape and receiue some profit by it Againe from another danger which may happen they reason thus The reading of the Scriptures in a knowne tongue may more hurt then profit the people for deuotion hath rather decreased then increased since publike prayers or seruice of God hath beene celebrated in popular tongues I answer the consequent is not good The sacred Scripture read in the mother tongue hurts manie therfore it is not so to be read at all because accidentally and through the default and corruption of the people it hurts and profits not So the preaching of the Gospell is the sauour of death vnto death vnto manie therefore the Gospell is not to bee preached Furthermore be it knowne that this is no religion nor true pietie which is so coupled with ignorance but a damnable superstition when as the sacred Scriptures are read and prayers administred in a strange and vnknowne tongue Thus far these three Arguments from the finall causes and effects Againe they reason from an inconuenience first on this wise If the scriptures must bee read in the vulgar tongue then translations must bee renewed in euery age for auncient words weare out of vse and this is inconuenient I answere what losse is it if translations be reuised and renewed in euery age for the whole translation needes no renuing but some words which happily are become obsolete and out of vse Againe an other euill which might follow this conclusion is this The Pope vnderstandeth not all vulgar tongues But the publique prayers must be celebrate in a language which the Pope knoweth Ergo. I answere it is not necessarie that prayers be in that tongue which the Pope knoweth This they proue * Vne concesso errore mille consequuntur because he is the vniuersall Bishop And this I deny also Wherefore there is no domage shal follow if publique prayers be contained in a language which the Pope knoweth not And thus far the 2. question The 3. question followeth whether it is lawfull for the lay people as they call them or the vulgar sort to read the holy scriptures We auouch that it is lawfull for euery one euen of the basest of the people to read the holy Scriptures For this point see Deut. 6. Chap. 11. c. and 17. c. Iosh 1. c. and 10. c. 5. Search the Scriptures saith the Lord Christ Acts. 17. the men of Berea searched the Scriptures and for this cause are commended by the holy Ghost Matth. 4. The example of Christ who resisted the Deuill with no other weapons but of the scripture teacheth vs that the scripture ministreth vnto vs such a furniture as euery man must be prouided of to withstand Sathan in his assaults against vs. Lastly this is prooued by the practise of the Church For wherefore were the scriptures in the old church translated into so many popular languages but that they might be read vnderstood of the people And this is our iudgement in few words What say the aduersaries Some yeares past they taught it was not lawfull at all for any of the common and lay people as they vsuallie tearme them to reade the holy Scriptures Afterwards when they saw how odious Vide Censuram Coloniensem this was they changed their minde and now forsooth they say it is lawful to read the scriptures but with conditiō if it be permitted permitted I say of whom They answer by the Pope his Bishops or inquisitors I demaund what of these only They answer not of these only but of them with the aduertisemēt of the parish Priest or confessor Well I vnderstand who be to permit the reading of the holy scripture now I aske to whom is this permitted They answer not to all indifferently but only to such as the parish Priest whom they call the Curate shall well discerne both by their confession and by their whole cariage of their life to be a true Catholick that is a stubborne or stiffe-necked Papist I see then to whom they yeeld thus far the reading of the scriptures I demand in the next place what translations be allowed them They answer they will not haue them to read all translations indifferently but such only as some Catholicks haue published such as at this day the English Rhemish translation of the New Testament is Thus far briefly of that permission which hath so decreed the condition of this libertie of reading the scriptures And this is their meaning according to the decree of Pius Quartus the Pope which decree is confirmed also by the councel of Trent commended by the Rhemists in the preface of their English translation And this is Bellarmines iudgment who differeth in words only a little from the former popish assertion but in matter and purpose is the same in effect for what difference is there if there be no permission at all to be thus permitted with such a condition as is aforeshewed And thus of the 3. question and as touching the controuersies which are moued at this day concerning holy scripture I remember not any that we haue left vntouched We haue therefore spoken of the word of God which is the word of both couenants as also of the sacred scripture which is a certaine meane wherby it pleased God to manifest his word and wil vnto men It resteth now that wespeake of sinne and of mans miserie CHAP. XXIIII Of sinne in generall THE common place of sin as also the former before handled is subalterne to the place or generall head of our calling For calling is the transferring of a man out of the state of sin What our calling is and miserie into the state of righteousnesse and happinesse Therefore we shall speake of sinne first in generall after we shall come vnto his kindes or partes The name of sin signifies a certaine thing compounded of his owne matter and forme The matter of sinne to speake thereof in the first place is a certaine being or thing that is and that being is not a substance but an accident and What sin is that is either a qualitie or action and this
1. 13. For I did it ignorantly through vnbeleefe This ignorance is either of the law or of the fact The ignorance of the law is to be ignorant of Gods will Of this Sin speaketh Christ Luke 12. 48. He that hath not known his masters wil hath done things worthy of stripes shall be beaten with few stripes This was also Paules ignorance when hee blasphemed and persecuted the Church of Christ 1. Tim. 1. The ignorance of the fact is when a man knowes not what he doth And a man may be said not to know what he doth or to erre in the Sin of ignorance fact either when he doth a thing negligently or when a thing is done by him as we say by fortune or chance or rather by the ineuitable prouidence of God An example of sinne of negligence may be this as when a ship is lost by the negligence of the Gouernour or maister thereof An example of a sinne by fortune or Gods prouidence may be as when one casting a stone killeth a man passing by of whom he neuer thought for this sinne in the old Church the cities of refuge were appointed Numb 35. 23. Thus farre of the external sinne of commission which proceedes of errour or ignorance The externall sinne of commission followeth which is committed in knowledge or as we say wittingly and this is when a man knoweth that hee doth euill hereof speakes Christ Luk. 12. 47. That seruant who knoweth his masters will and doth it not shall be beaten with many stripes This sin is either of infirmitie or of contumacie An example Actual external sinne committed willingly of a sinne of infirmitie is in Peter who three times denied his Lord and maister for feare of death and persecution An example of a sin of contumacie we haue in Iudas the traitor Againe a sin of contumacie is either done in hypocrisie as when a man is not openly rebellious but hides his sinne vnder the cloake of hypocrisie this the Apostle taxeth Rom. 2. 5. Thou saith he after thy hardnesse and heart that cannot repent doest treasure vp wrath against the day of wrath Againe it is an open rebellion or pride when a man ioynes to his contumacy pride against God himselfe for which cause he is said to sinne with an high hand Numb 15. 30. This manifest rebellion and Heresie pride is either against the second Table of the law as open murther knowne adulterie and this is the lesser contumacie but if it be a proud rebellion against the first Table the sinne is intolerable And of this latter kind is Open rebellion heresie first when as a man in a proud obstinacy wil defend anie opinion against the manifest truth of Gods word Of all the sinnes before specified this is one property that a man may repent of them or for them all whereupon followes another property that they are all pardonable But if ye adde to knowledge pride frowardnesse a malicious heart striuing against the holy Ghost inlightening a man teaching inwardly then the great sinne ariseth which they call the sinne against the holy Sinne against the holy Ghost Ghost the propertie whereof is this that hee which so sinneth cannot repent him of his sinne whereupon it followeth that this sinne is impardonable And this sin is called irremissible not for that the greatnesse of it exceeds the greatnes of Gods mercy grace in Christ but VVherefore impardonable because finall impenitence is the reward and punishment which by Gods iust iudgment is inflicted vpon this sinne Read of this point Matt. 12. 21. Heb. 6. 4. 5. and chap. 10. 26. 1. Ioh. 5. 16. And thus farre of actuall sinne Now it remaineth to see what the aduersaries say of actuall sinne Here the greatest controuersie is of the diuision of actuall sinne into mortall and veniall We auouch that euery sin by nature is mortall that is that the guilt Sinne mortall veniall a popish doctrine of eternall death followes it And that if any sinne be veniall that is may find pardon of God this commeth to passe not for that it is so by nature but of Gods meere mercie in Iesus Christ Many scriptures approue our assertion Ro. 6. 23. The wages of sin is death He speakes here of sin in generall and of eternall death Matth. 5. 19. Who soeuer shall breake one of the least of these commandements and shall teach men so heshall be called the least in the kingdome of God that is he shal haue be of reckoning in heauen Obserue then here how for the least sin a man deserues to be shut forth out of heauen Deut. 27. 26. Cursed be he that abideth not in all things which are written in the booke of the law Therefore there is no sinne which deserueth not the curse or malediction of God For in that the law denounceth an execration against euery sin there is no exception we see of anie euen the least sinne I am 2. 10. Whosoeuer shall keepe the whole law and yet fayleth in one point hee is guiltie of all Therefore if ye rest in any one sinne against the law ye sinne against the whole law and stand guiltie of all sinnes which are committed any way against the law So there is no cause why wee should measure our guilt by anie one sinne euen the verie least For euen the verie least sinne we liue and lie in without faith repentance The least sinne merits hell caries with it the guilt euen of the greatest sinnes as may clearely appeare by that place of Iames. Matth. 5. 26. Thou shalt not depart thence till thou hast paid the vtmost farthing Therefore God in his accounts respecteth euen the least parts of sinne and the smallest sinnes that are The tenth law condemnes euen the least motions of concupiscence Matth. 22. 37. Thou shalt loue the Lord thy God with all thine heart with all thy soule and with all thy mind Therefore the law requires an exact or perfect obedience Wherefore he that offendeth euen in the least point is a transgressor of the law and that euerlasting curse followeth the breach of the law if redemption be not purchased by Iesus Christ Matt. 5. 18. Till heauen and earth perish one iote or one tittle of the law shall not scape till all things be fulfilled Note here there shal not passe away one iote or one tittle that is the least branch of the breach of the law which shall escape without satisfaction either by our selues or a mediator And thus far touching our iudgment of this matter The aduersaries for actuall sinne respecting it either according to the greatnesse thereof or for the punishment it deserueth they diuide it into mortall and veniall They cal that mortall sinne which doth extinguish charity Mortal sin defined of Papists or iustice making vs enimies vnto God and therefore guilty of eternall death They call that veniall sinne which doth not quench charitie and iustice nor doth not
is he who heareth the word and by and by receiues it with ioy yet hath no roote in himselfe but is for a time and when persecution and trouble ariseth because of the word is offended presentlie To the same purpose reade I. uk 8. 13. Of this faith see also Heb. 6. 4. 5. For it cannot be that they which haue beene once inlightened and tasted of the good word of God and of the powers of the world to come if they fall awaie c. To conclude of this faith ye haue Ioh. 5. 35. He namely Iohn was a burning and a shining candle and ye would for a time haue reioiced in his light The reason of the name is this it is called Temporarie because it endures but for a time and it endureth but for a time because it hath no roote It hath the same obiect with iustifying faith which is properly so called namely Iesus Christ with his benefits offered in the word of the Gospell and in the Sacraments wherein it differs from historicall faith which hath for the obiect thereof the vniuersall truth It hath The subiect of a temporary faith the same subiect with iustifying faith for it hath it scat both in the mind and also in the will and heart Last of all it hath as many parts of nature as the iustifying faith hath For it is a knowledge of the vnderstanding conioyned with both the iudgements of the mind it is the apprehension of the wil or heart whereout follweth also the stirring of the affections as of ioy delight c. But that I may speake a little more largely of this apprehension which is in Temporarie faith and of this ioy First it is certaine by the scripture that these things are in the Temporarie faith For Christ saith in Matth. That hee which is but for a time doth receiue the word and that with ioy And in Ioh. The Iewes are said to haue reioiced for a time in the light of Iohn Baptist And to the Hebr. How the historicall and temporary saith differ one fro another and both from the iustifying there is attributed to this faith not onely the enlightening of the mind but also the taste of the heart and that performed not onely by the word but also by the Spirit for he saith They which haue beene made partakers of the holy Ghost Therefore in Temporarie faith there is indeede a kind of apprehension there is indeede a certaine ioy wherein Temperarie faith differeth from historicall faith For in historicall faith these things are not indeed but he that hath it doth faine and dissemble and lie in his outward profession that he hath these things wherfore he is a shamelesse hypocrite But hee that hath temporarie faith hath these things indeede apprehension I say and ioy after a certaine manner neither doth he so faine or sie as he that hath an historical faith yet he is an hypocrit because this apprehension and this ioy are not sincere albeit after a certaine manner they be true I say they are not sincere because they are not for that cause for which they should be that is they are not for Christ himselfe offered in the preaching of the Gospell they are not for Gods sake they are not for his glory nor for those heauenly benefits of Christ his righteousnes and eternall life but they are for other causes as for the newnesse of the Gospell which is to bee vnderstood in that place Ioh. 5. 35. He was a burning a shining candle and ye would haue reioiced for a time in his light namely for the newnesse of the matter Secondly they be because of a licentiousnesse to sinne which men by and by snatch to themselues vpon the hearing of free iustification by Christ and Christian liberty To conclude they are for riches honours and other commodities of this life Now seeing the Temporizing professor hath these causes propounded to himselfe in hearing and receiuing the word and in reioycing it must needes be that these are not sincere in him For nothing is done sincerely vnlesse it bee Synceritie done in respect of the glorie of God And herein differs Temporarie Faith from iustifying For the iustifying Faith doth all things for Christ himselfe for God himselfe for the heauenly and spirituall benefits of Christ as much as it can for mans infirmity Out of this therfore it followes that the Temporizer is also an hypocrit seeing he is not sincere and that the Temporizer is an hypocrit temporary faith is hypocriticall seeing it is not sincere Out of that againe that it is not sincere another thing followeth namely that it is not sound firme for nothing that is not sincere can be sound For those causes vpon which it depends are not sound as for example those worldly things as riches honours of the world c. In which thing temporary Faith differeth from iustifying Faith for iustifying Faith as it is sincere so it is sound For of that it is said Col. 2. 5. And the stedfastnesse of your The difference betwene a temporary faith and true iustifying faith faith in Christ For iustifying Faith is as it were a solide body consisting of three dimensions length bredth depth for it possesseth the depth and lowest of the heart but temporary Faith is not a body with three dimensions but only a surface sticking in the vpper part of the heart for it is not either a sound light enlightening all the heart or a sound apprehension arising from the bottome of the heart or to conclude a sound ioy possessing the whole body but all these things are only superficiall in the temporary Faith Whereupon Heb. 6. that apprehension of heauenly things which is therein is compared to tasting or sleight touching seeing that the heart doth but as it were with the tip of the tongue lightly tast those heauenly things and not quite drinke them vp and receiue them into it selfe Againe out of this that temporarie Faith is not sound another thing also followeth namely that it doth not endure for euer but onely for a time For that which is not sound is not durable and perpetuall but only temporary Wherein also it differeth from iustifying faith which as it is sound so it is perpetuall and constant From this property this faith tooke her name and was called temporary now this property doth presuppose the two other going before namely first that it is not sounde secondly that it is not sincere albeit it bee in some sort true While I consider somewhat more diligently of the cause of these three properties I found that it is not to be imputed so much to those outward things for which this faith doth apprehend Christ in the word and reioiceth in him as to the inward euill affection of the heart For the heart of man as Christ sayth is stony ground that is it is neither good nor honest of it owne nature Now we measure this goodnesse and honesty
chiefly by simplicity and sincerity which is opposed to hypocrisie and dissembling Therefore a deepe hypocrisie which is contrary to sincerity possesseth the heart of this man Now the heart so affected doth beleeue apprehend and reioice not sincerely for a true cause for which it ought to do these things but for other worldly causes It followeth therefore that the cause of these euils doth lurke in the heart Wherefore if any man will not be a temporizer A good admonition for a temporizer let him aboue all things looke to his heart and sift and examine it diligently night and day so long till hee feele that the faith of Christ takes roote in the bottome of his heart and doth throughout possesse the whole heart as much as may be Out of these things which we haue spoken touching the properties of this faith and of the cause of them a marke may be taken whereby any one may discerne true iustifying faith from temporary And that is in a word sincerity in doing in beleeuing in apprehēding in reioicing Synceritie in doing all things throughout the whole course of the life Now sincerity is knowne by this if all things be done and performed by vs for God and for Christ whether those things be of small or great moment Whether ye eate or drinke or whatsoeuer ye doe doe all to the glory of God 1. Cor. 10. 31. By these things which haue beene spoken it is easie to gather a definition of this faith For Tempor F. defined temporary faith is a knowledge in the minde and an apprehension in the will of Christ with all his benefits but yet tēporary or enduring but for a time And thus much of temporary faith The miraculous faith followeth which is the third vnproper signification of the word of faith Touching this faith these are testimonies Matth. 17. Yf ye haue faith as a graine of mustard seed 1. Cor. 13. If I had all faith so that I could remoue mountaines The reason of the name is this 4. Miraculous faith It is termed miraculous from the effect of it because it is powerfull to doe miracles The obiect thereof is not the bare generall word of God but rather a special promise or reuelation made to some one touching the doing of some certaine miracle Now that the bare generall word sufficeth not it appeareth hereby for because many holy men haue had faith in the generall word yea they haue iustifying faith in the promise of grace and yet could doe no miracles Simon Magus beleeued by an historicall faith in the generall word and yet he could do no miracles therefore hee would haue bought this facultie with money for a price Act. 8. 31. Vnlesse therefore vnto the generall word there be added a speciall promise or reuelation it is no miraculous faith which is a certaine speciall and extraordinarie gift of the Spirit Wherein the Aduersaries do erre verie much who thinke that the generall word sufficeth for this to make a miraculous faith The subiect of it The subiect of a miraculous faith is the mind first vnderstanding and withall iudging the speciall promise and then the will or the heart apprehending that which is promised The parts of the nature thereof are a knowledge with a iudgement of the mind and an apprehension with the will and heart Out of these things now spoken I gather this definition of this Faith that Miraculous faith is a Miraculous faith defined knowledge in the mind and an apprehension with the will of a speciall promise or reuelation for the doing of a miracle Thus farre of miraculous Faith and in summe of the true doctrine of faith CHAP. XXXI The opinion of the Aduersaries concerning Faith IT followeth now that we see briefly what the aduersaries doe hold touching Faith First they do not acknowledge the diuers significations of Faith they entreat onely of one faith and that they terme iustifying that is as they expound the word that The Popish opinion of Faith which disposeth vs to iustice being to be infused after in the time thereof Thus thinks Bellarmine in his Treatise touching faith In this doctrine of faith which they terme iustifying they differ from vs first about the obiect of it Indeede they doe not denie that the obiect of faith is the mercie of God in Iesus Christ offered in the Gospell that is that it is the Gospell and the promises of grace concerning Christ and Gods mercie in him But they will haue the obiect to be not onely the word of the Gospell but equally the vniuersall word of God To confirme this opinion of theirs they alleage that definition of faith which is set downe Heb. chap. 11. 1. Faith saith the Apostle is the ground of things that are hoped for and the euidence of things which are not seene This say they is the definition of iustifying faith But this definition stretcheth it selfe not onely to Christ to the promises of God and to the Gospell concerning him but also to the whole word of God to all things that are contained in the word of God For example it stretcheth it selfe to the word of God which is concerning the creation of the world as is euident by vers 3. which followeth in the same chap. By faith we vnderstand that the world was ordained by the word of God Hence they conclude that iustifying faith hath the whole word for the obiect of it But to this we answer that not onely iustifying Faith is defined by the Apostle in that place but that that definition of Faith is common to all the significations of faith as is plaine enough by that induction of examples which followeth in that place and chapter Neither is that their argument which they gather out of the coherence of the text of anie force They say that that faith is defined of which the Apostle spake in the last verses of the chapter going afore Now the iust shall liue by faith c. But there the Apostle spake of iustifying Faith therefore heere in the 11. chap. iustifying faith is defined I answer this definition I confesse doth belong to iustifying faith but not to that alone but it is commō to it with other significations of Faith as with historicall Heb. 11. 1. A generall definition of faith common to all kinds of faith faith and miraculous c. as is euident by the induction that followeth Seeing therefore that this definition doth not onely belong to iustifying faith it followeth that out of this definition they get not that they would haue namely that the obiect of iustifying Faith is equally the vniuersall word of God Therefore let the obiect thereof properly be that which it apprehendeth and that is the Gospel and the promise concerning Christ Secondly they dissent from vs about this same speciall obiect namely the mercy of God in Christ For we say and affirme that the obiect of iustifying faith is not onely a generall mercy
appeareth not vnto men neither doe we sufficiently feele it and find it our selues but it shall be seene in another life when as we shall put on beare the image of that heauenly man 1. Cor. 15. 49. Now we are called the sonnes of God but as yet it appeareth not what we shall be but we know it shall come to passe that we shal be like vnto him when he shall appeare 1. Io. 3. 2. The Aduersaries spend all their labour in setting forth the commendations of loue and they be too long in extolling charitie For they adorne it with the spoiles of iustifying faith so gracing it with stolen colours and not with it owne proper beautie ascribing the iustification and saluation of man which they take away from faith vnto charitie as shall be seene when we come to speake of the doctrine of free iustification And thus farre shall suffice of charity or loue CHAP. XXXIIII Of Repentance REpentance followeth faith as the effect followeth his cause For that godly sorrow which is according to God and worketh repentance is the daughter of Faith as we shall see afterward Of this benefit there are diuers names in diuers languages The Hebrues do cal it TESCHUBHAH the Grecians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is of a verbe which signifieth to bee wise after a thing is done to retract his sentence to change his mind to returne to a right mind Whereupon Repentance is nothing els but an after wit a reuersing of iudgment and chaunge of determinations The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is of the verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to be carefull and anxious after a thing is done Wherupon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is nothing els but a trouble and disquietnesse of heart after a thing is acted Therefore these two Greeke words differ for that the first concerneth properly the mind or vnderstanding the second the heart and affection They differ also in another respect in that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comprehendeth the whole worke and benefit of Repentance for the change of the mind which is implied in this word doth necessarily presuppose the sorrow of the heart and that same 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is a contrition an axnietie after the fact committed whereas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is rather restrained to signifie only a part of this benefit namely the first which consisteth in sorow in contrition and the disquiet of the heart after a thing is done for it followeth not that wheresoeuer this same cōpunction of of heart be there should presently follow that sound Repentance as it is necessarie that wheresoeuer sound Repentance be found there also must be that compunction of heart Some there are which make a third difference betweene these two affirming that this sound Repentance properly belongs to the godly and to the Elect and onely to them for the elect onely properly and in very truth become wise after their fals and they doe onely change their minds and their purposes returne to a sound mind whereas some compunction and disquietnesse of heart doth not onely belong to the godly and the elect but also to the wicked and to the Reprobates in whom there is found after a sin committed some griefe and disquietnesse of heart not so much for the sinne committed as for the punishment of the sinne But we are to vnderstand that wheresoeuer this same sorrow is attributed to the wicked there is not vnderstood hereby that godly care and sorrow which is according to God but a worldly sorrow and a sorrow which is vnto death In which sense it is attributed to Iudas Mat. 27. 3. Iudas repented himselfe but contrariwise when it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is attributed to the Godly thereby is signified not so much a sorrow for the punishment of sinne it selfe as for the offence and displeasure of God Thus farre of the Greeke names of Repentance The Latines do call it a Conuersion an after-wit to returne to heart and vnderstanding and repentance Conuersion Conuersio Resipiscentia doth fitly answer with the Hebrue word and it is a word which the Prophets haue vsed in the old Testament Teschubbah Conuert me O Lord and I shall be conuerted Ier. 31. Euen as Christ and his Apostles themselues vse the foresaid Greeke words in the newe Testament of Repentance and Compunction of heart A change of the mind is properly signified in the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 change the mind is to begin to be wise after the deede done Penance is signified in the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for it is deriued of the verbe Poenitere which signifieth a punishment for in this kind of repentance that sorrow and anxietie of the heart is a punishment For as the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth differ from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so doth poenitentia penance from the word Resipiscentia Resipiscentia Repentance For to passe by other differences the word Penance signifieth properly one part onely of this benefit to wit sorrow disquietnesse and anxietie after the deed done But the word Resipiscentia which is a change of the mind doth comprehend this whole benefit for the change of the mind and to become wise after our fals doth necessarily presuppose the sorrow of the heart as the efficient cause The old Latine translation doth translate both the Greeke words euery where Poenitentia Penance The aduersaries doe earnestly contend that the word Penance is euerie where to be retained to wit that they may defend the Sacrament of Penance as they call it euen by the very name it self to consist in externall and corporall affliction The word Resipiscentia which signifieth a change of the mind is more vsed by our Diuines when they speake of this grace And thus much concerning the names of this benefit The parts thereof are generally these first sorrow then after sorrow a chang of the mind purpose which Parts of Repentance is properly as is afore said signfied by the Greeke word vsed for repentance Wee are therefore first to speake of sorrow which is the first part of repentance and this sorrow is of two kinds First for the punishment of sin which 2. Co. 7. is called The sorrow of the world and also a sorrow Sorrow twofold which is to death Secondly it is a sorrow for the sinne it selfe and because of the offence which is committed against God which in like manner is called of the Apostle A sorrow according to God Of both these we will speake seuerally The principall efficient of the first sorrow which is conceiued in heart for the punishment of sin is the holy Ghost which Rom. 8. verse 15. 16. is called the spirit of bondage to feare that is to say which testifieth vnto vs of our seruile and miserable condition
attained the temporary faith whose sorrow also doth arise from the Gospel and the acknowledgment of the mercy of God in Christ and the change of the mind vnto good is in some sort for the good it selfe for they tast after a sort the sweetnes of God in Christ and are delighted in it And as concerning the amendment of outward life that also is in them a little longer then in those before described They do also returne and relinquish many sins Of this kind it seemes Herod was of whom it is written Mar. 6. 20. Herod feared Iohn knowing that he was a iust and an holy man and he receaued him when he heard him he did many things and heard him gladly And thus far of these 3. steps of impious men in repentance here also I end the doctrine of sound repentance CHAP. XXXVI What the iudgement of Papists is of Repentance IT followeth now that we consider what the Papists do thinke of their Penance for they reiect the very name of Repentance T heir errours are manie which they hold we will take view of some few of them briefly confute them first they say that Repentance is a Sacrament But A Sacrament I aske if it be a Sacrament what sensible signe hath it They answer that the signe is partly the act of y e penitent person partly the words of the Priest whereby the penitent is absolued But I answer in a sacrament there must be not only an audible signe but also a visible there must be also a certaine element and not a ceremonie onely as in Baptisme and the Supper of the Lord. Besides the ceremonies and rites there are elements water bread and wine Concerning this errour this shall suffice Secondly they affirme that the vse of Repentance is this to abolish mortall sinne committed after Baptisme 2. Errour and to make him who of a friend through sinne was become Gods enemie the friend of God againe that is a iust man To this I answer To the restoring and repairing of man who hath sinned after Baptisme we haue no need of any other Sacrament then Baptisme the force and vertue whereof is perpetuall and effectuall throughout the whole life of man for the washing away of sinne to regenerate men for it is false that in Baptisme these sinnes onely are washed away which were committed before Baptisme seeing Baptisme reacheth to the whole life of Baptisme effectuall to the regenerate all his life man and the remembrance thereof is effectuall for the remission of sinnes and our regeneration euen then when a man giues vp the Ghost and departs this life Thirdly they say that the Repentance which was in the old Testament and before the resurrection of Christ 3. Errour is not the same with the repentance which followed the resurrection of Christ for that was no Sacrament but this is I answer that the doctrine of Repentance and of our conuersion to God is one and the selfe same which all the Prophets Iohn Baptist Christ before and after his incarnation and the holy Apostles haue preached Fourthly they say that the principall efficient cause of Repentance is free-will and the strength of nature stirred 4. Errour vp by a preuenting grace and that grace is but onely our helper working together with nature or free-will I answer that it is cleane contrarie for the Spirit or grace of God is the principall efficient cause of Repentance but the instrument are the faculties and powers of the mind not such as they are by nature but as they are sanctified by the Spirit which may appeare euen by this testimonie Ier. 31. Conuert me O Lord I shall be conuerted where the principall efficiencie cause of the work is giuen to the Lord himselfe and to his grace But of vs it may well be said that we become actiue in repentance being acted and moued by the holy Ghost Fiftly they diuide Penance essentially into the act of the Penitent as the matter and absolution of the Priest 5. Errour as the formall cause I answer that there is no necessitie why repentance should be so parted betweene the penitent or confessing sinner and the Priest absoluing For the sinner who doth repent him of his sinne may priuately confesse vnto God and of him also bee absolued without any conceiued or set forme of absolution by the Priest We repent daily and yet there is no need that the matter should be dayly so perfourmed by the sinner repenting and the Priest or minister absoluing Wherefore repentance is not to be restrained to this forme and dialogue or communication which must passe as they say betweene the sinner repenting and the Priest absoluing Sixtly they diuide Penance materially into Contrition 6. Errour Confession and Satisfaction for these three parts doe as it were appertaine to the acts of their Penitents which be the matter of their Sacrament of Penance I answer concerning Contrition which is nothing els but a sorrow of heart we verily admit of it but without anie opinion of merit which they attribute thereunto And as touching Confession first we say that it is not Signes of Repentance properly any part of Repentance but an outward signe of Repentance which is wrought inwardly in the mind for amongst the signes these are numbred confession of the mouth teares humbling of the bodie and other actions of like kind Againe we say that their auricular Confession wherein all euen the priuate sinnes of a man must be numbred as neere as they can remember and whispered into the eare of the Priest we affirme I say that such a Confession is the inuention of mans braine wherof there is no commandement or example extant in the whole Scripture Yea verily the will of God is that manie priuate sins vnto which we alone are priuy should bee concealed not vttered euen as God doth couer the multitude of our priuate sinnes of his free will and mercie wherewith he embraceth vs in Christ Iesus Notwithstanding this he requireth of vs that we priuately repent of them so oft as we shall remember them To conclude concerning Satisfaction we vtterly condemne and renounce it for by it as they teach we satisfie of ourselues the wrath and iustice of God and that by temporall punishments which we willingly suffer for our sinnes This we do vtterly condemne as an opinion which doth derogate from the merit and satisfaction of Christ whereby alone the wrath and iustice of God is satisfied for our sinnes And as for these temporall afflictions of the godly they are not truly satisfactions for their sinnes but by them God doth mortifie the remnants of sinnes and by that meanes prouoke vs to earnest repentance hereby curbing and keeping vs from falling into sinne againe Finally as all things worke for the best to them that loue God so these things which are not so much punishments as crosses do worke together for the best for the godly Neither is
image of God which is the soule as it were of our soule and without which our soule is as it The image of God were dead For which cause the Apostle saith Ephe. 2. 1. That without this holinesse wee are truly said to be dead in sinnes and trespasses Whence I conclude that the libertie of will is properly a power or facultie which is a consequent of sanctity as of the formall cause and as it were the very soule of the will Wherby it commeth to passe that the will in this state without constraint doth incline onely to good and doth decline from euill for this libertie of a mans will is according to the similitude image of the libertie of God himself Vnto this liberty constraint is opposite proceeding from some outward agent is contrarie to the nature of the will for it is not a wil if it be constrained neither is it said that the will is constrained albeit man himselfe in whom the will is may be said to be constrained I say that constraint is opposite to libertie and not necessity for those things which wee will or nill freely we will or nill those things of necessity first because of the necessity of Gods decree secondly because of the incident forme of the will it selfe as of holinesse of corruption of both As when man was holy in his creation so long as that holinesse continued of necessitie he did will that which was good and nill the euill So the blessed Angels of a certaine necessitie will that is good and nill the euill and at length when man is glorified he shall incline to good and decline from euill So The will of the vnregenerate man being wholy corrupt before his regeneration of a certaine necessitie he wils the euill and nils that is good and notwithstanding after his manner he doth will freely albeit this be not a true libertie as we shall hereafter see To conclude a man regenerate partly of necessitie doth will good in respect of his new birth partly of necessity hee doth will euill for that he is as yet partly corrupt yet in both respects hee willeth freely for we must distinguish betwixt necessity and constraint for necessitie is more generall and large then constraint is for that which is constrained is necessarie but on the contrarie that which is necessarie is not cōstrained And thus much concerning the libertie of the will in generall There is then a foure fould hate of man to diuers conditions 1. State or states of man to be considered The first state of his innocency before his fall secondly the state of his corruption after his fall thirdly the state of regeneration fourthly the state of glorification First then concerning the first state it is a question whether man in his innocency had liberty of will I answere if you follow the former definition of liberry which is a faculty or power respecting inclining to either side I graunt that in things indifferent it had a liberty but in things simply good and euil man had not in that state of innocency that liberty of wil whereby when he did will good he might nill it and when he did nill euill he might will it except you vnderstand a remote power for in respect of his neer power he was inclined to good only because of the form of sanctity and goodnes in the will which was in him according Propinqua potentia to the image of God but if you follow the latter definition of liberty which is when the wil of it self of an inward motion without coaction or constraint of any externall agent is carried to that which is good only if I say you follow this definition I answere that man in the state of innocency had a liberty of will Concerning the second state of man the question is whether man in the state of corruption now hath liberty 2. State of will I answer if you follow the former definition of liberty I doe not deny that in things indifferent he hath his liberty But in things simply good and euill he hath not liberty For man which is wholy corrupt doth not so will euill as that he may or can nill it neither dooth he so reiect that is good as that he may or can will it except yee vnderstand a power remote for in man vnregenerate that neere power of the will is only inclined to euill because of the form of corruption of impurity which doth wholy possesse his will But if you follow the latter definition of liberty then verily we cannot ascribe that liberty of the wil which is according to the image of the liberty of God himselfe and is a neere power or faculty and wherby without constraint he is caried to that only which is good we cannot I say truly attribute this vnto the vnregenerate and his will For a faculty to euil cannot truly be said a liberty but rather a certaine seruitude And in verity the vnregenerate mans will is not free but bound yet because the vnregenerate dooth not will euill by constraint but of his owne accord and meere motion in some sort it may be said that his will is free Here our aduersaries dissent from vs ascribing liberty of wil to the man vnregenerate whereby also of his owne meere power he may will good where as this liberty or Papists of free will selfe power before preuenting grace lyeth indeede a sleepe yet notwithstanding say they it is in him like as a man though he be a sleepe yet he is both a man and liuing From whence it followeth necessarily as they would haue it that there is some holines and integritiy in the will of a man vnregenerate For there is no selfe power of the will to good vnlesse there be in it the form of sanctity and integrity which is as it were the life of the will and quicknes of this selfe power in the will vnto good The Papists therfore erhere two manner of waies first because they will haue some sanctity and integrity to remaine in the wil of man vnregenerat now after the fal secondly because they wil haue this self power of the wil which necessarily is a consqeuent of the formall cause thereof which is holines as is aforesaid they will haue this selfe power I say vnto good to be in the will For as touching holines and righteousnes it is certaine that all the image of God was lost in the fall of man and what portiō soeuer hereof we shal haue in this life it is repaired as it were created a new by Iesus Christ for which cause it is called a new creature And if this in any respect bee old wherefore is it called new And if any sanctity which is the soule of our soule remaine in man after the fall why is man said after the fall before regeneration to be dead and not halfe dead We forbeare to vse testimonies of scripture in this matter which
whereby God fauoureth his creature without any desert of his Th' Apostle Grace described dooth intimate thus much Ephes 1. 9. in that he putteth no difference betweene these words Grace and a good pleasure for whereas he saith in that verse that God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 had elected vs according to his free grace it seemes to bee spoken in the same sense and meaning with that which he said before in the same chapter ver 7. In him we haue redemption according to the riches of his grace for the grace loue of God are taken in differently one for another Ro. 9. 13. I haue loued Iacob This is that loue or that free grace wherewith from all eternity he loued Iacob Eph. 3. 19. That saith he You being rooted and grounded in loue c. And this is that grace whereby he loued vs from all eternity Tit. 3. vers 4. The grace of God as it respecteth mankindis called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or loue towardds Man Againe this word Grace is taken more generally then this word Mercy for whereas mercy doth properly respect such as are in misery sinners grace reacheth vnto al creatures of what kind or condition soeuer they be aswell to the blessed Angels as to sinful mē as may appeare by the salutation which Paul vseth to Timot. in the first second epistle where he wisheth first grace to Tymothy as being a more generall thing then in the second place mercy as a more particular thing restraining it to the Grace more generall then mercy person saluted For although in those salutations Grace and Mercy are taken metoymically for the blessings and benefits which are conferred and conueyed to men of Gods free grace and mercy yet hereby may appeare that the mercy of God which is the cause fountaine of these benefits hath not so generall an acception as grace For the meaning of the words is thus much as if the Apostle had sayd the benefits which God doth giue vs are freely bestowed vpon vs without any desert of ours and not only without desert but to vs which deserue to be punished with all the miseries and calamities that can be That it may further appeare that all the blessings and benefits of God are deriued and conueyed vnto vs by meanes of his grace and same fauour of God wee will search into and consider more deepely of the doctrine of grace God from and before all eternity purposed to be glorified specially in his grace Ro. 11. 32. God hath shut vp all in vnbeleefe that he might haue mercy vpon all In which place we may see the iustice of God to attend on his mercy and grace So in like manner all the other essentiall properties of God as his power and wisdome c. all which be subordained to serue his grace and mercy Hence it is that first of all God before all eternity past his decrees of grace to the praise and glory of his grace Ephe 1. 6. 12. The 1. decree of Gods free grace The first decree of Gods free grace was cōcerning the incarnation of his Sonne and the glorifying of him at the appointed time vnto the praise of his grace Concerning the decree of his Son Christ read Act. 2. 23. 4. 28. oncerning the loue of the father to Christ Colos 1. 29. Because the Father was well pleased in him where you may see that the loue of the Father is the cause why the fulnesse of the deity doth dwell corporally in Christ for it was of his admirable grace that God would haue flesh y t is so base and vile a creature to be vnited vnto God the glorious and incomparable creator The second decree proceeding 2. Decree of Gods free grace from grace was concerning the first creation of man after his owne image then after the fall concerning his restoring by his Sonne Iesus I trust vnto the image of his Sonne that is to say by calling iustifying and glorifying of man to the glory of Christ and to the praise of his own grace in his appointed time For the restoring and repayring of manking after the fall is summarily set downe in these three chiefe points read Eph. 1. 4. 5. Ro. 9. 11. Ro. 11. 5. 6. Hence followeth the execution of these decrees by same grace of God and the first execution was of the decree of God concerning man which by order of Execution of Gods free grace nature had the second place for that which was first in decree and ordination became the second in execution and contrarily that which was the second in decree and ordination became the first in execution Therefore the execution of the decree of God concerning man hath the first place and the same was of the free grace of God vnto the glory praise of the same grace Therfore the execution of the decree of God concerning man to speak some thing thereof was first the creation of man of Gods free grace after the image of his creatour and to the praise of that his grace Then after the fall of man followed the restitution of man of Gods free grace in and by his Sonne Christ to the glory of Christ his Sonne and to the praise of the grace of God the Father This repairing which is one of the parts of the execution of the decree of God concerning man consisteth of many parts all which proceede from the meere grace of God and first tend to the glory of Christ the head and our mediator between God man next to the praise of y e grace of God the father 1. Co. 3. 22. 23. Al things are yours you are Christs Christ is Gods And concerning this restoring of mankind before we come to the parts therof ye must be aduertised that in time it partly went before the execution of that decree concerning Christ the Sonne of God and partly did follow after it For before the fulnes of time came wherein Christ was manifested in the flesh God begā to restore mankind euen from the very fall of the first man that is men were called iustified and glorified and that partly by vertue of that decree concerning Christ which was from euerlasting partly because of the manifestation of the same Christ which was to come But when that fulnes of time came when Christ was now manifested in the flesh had suffered and was glorified this redemption of man was more fully and richly accomplished For Christ being now come works our restitution more effectually by his Gospel I meane his power is more effectually seene and knowne in our vocation iustification and glorification then it was before his incarnation Therefore the execution of the decree concerning Christ the Son of God which was first falleth now as it were into y e midst of the repairing of mankind or of the execution of the decree concerning mans redemption Wherefore we shal also speak thereof in the middle place that so from
beene heard anie liuely voice either of God or of anie extraordinarie man A. None at all Q. Do you gather by these things which you haue spoken concerning the causes of the continuance of a liuelie voice in the Church what was the vse of it heretofore in the Church A. Yea truly for the vse of it was first in respect of the Church it selfe to giue it instruction while it was yet so small for place and so young in knowledge next in respect of reuelation to deliuer it from time to time more cleerly and euidently vnto the people Q. By this vse of a liuelie voice which you haue here mentioned it seems that this kind of ruelatiō which was by a liuely voice was the more simple and the more familiar and the more imperfect and therefore the more fit for persons and things that were of like imperfection A. It is euen so as you haue said Q. Hitherto I haue heard you speake concerning a liuelie voice now I would heare something of you concerning the subiect of it what say you then was taught all that time by a liuely voice A. In al that time and in euery age the selfe same and the whole truth of God was deliuered by a liuely voice The subiector master of the liuely voice Q. Wherefore then said you that the perfect manifestation of that mysterie of godlinesse was not accomplished till the Apostles time A. By that fulnesse perfection I vnderstood not the substance of the doctrine it selfe but the quality that is the clearenesse of one and the same doctrine For the mysterie of Christ was in the Church and was manifested in some measure from Adam vnto Christ and the Apostles but if the comparison be made of times it may be said to be shut hidden in all ages before the comming of Christ Q. Was the paritie of the heauenlie doctrine sufficientlie conserued and kept by a liuely voice A. The historie shewes plainely that the doctrine deliuered by liuely voice was often corrupted and adulterated Q. How then was it restored It seemed good to God afterward by new reuelations to restore the puritie of his word decayed to conserue and keepe it and to giue a more full declaration of it Q. Was the puritie of doctrine sufficientlie preserued and kept so A. Not so verily and therefore it seemed good to God at length to adde hereunto the written word Q. Are there no other causes of writing the holie Scriptures A. There are for first the condition of the Church required that the Scripture should be added vnto the liuely voice and next the measure also of reuelation Q. Why the condition of the Church A. Because at length in Moses time the Church began to be both in place more large as being spred throughout a whole nation and to grow greater and riper in yeares for the time from Moses vnto Christ was as it were the time of the midde age or young yeares of the Church Q. What then A. The written word therefore was first in respect both of place and ripenesse of age for both a whole nation is more easily taught by writing then by voice and the age which is more ripe is more capable of that doctrine which is deliuered by writing that is by that kind of reuelation which is not so familiar and simple and by writing doth more easily conceiue any mans meaning Q. Why doth the measure of reuelation require the written word A. Because whereas before Moses the reuelation of the mysterie of godlinesse was small and very obscure it seemed not good to the Lord to cause it straight waies to be written to the intent it might be kept for posteritie But when in Moses time the Reuelation began to bee much more cleare then before then it seemed good vnto God to commit it to writing to the intent it might be reserued and remain for those which should come after For that which is more perfect and full that wee are to write to this end that it may remaine both for vs and our posterity but that which is more imperfect that we doe not esteeme worthy the writing or to be reserued vnto posterity Q. Before you go anie further I would haue you declaare vnto me the ages of the Church where of you haue so oft made mention A. I will so do Q. How manie ages then say you are there of the Church A. Three the first was from Adam vnto Moses which was the infancy and childhood of the Church the second from Moses vnto Christ which was the youth or middle age of the Church the third from Christ and his Apostles euen vnto the end which may be called the ripe age of the Church if it be compared with the ages past for otherwise we are not men growne vntill we bee gathered together with Christ our head in heauen Q. Do you meane then that God had respect alwaies of these three ages in his proceedings with his Church A. I meane so indeed for that I may so speake hee hath tempered these three things proportionally to these three ages of the Church to wit first the measure of reuelation secondly his holy Spirit thirdly the manner of reuelation Q. Declare I pray you more particularlie what you haue said A. To the infancie and childhood of the Church he gaue the least measure of reuelation to wit first the first principles of religion onely Secondly the least measure of the holy Spirit to wit that which was proportionable to the reuelation Thirdly one onely kind of reuelation which was by liuely voice as being the most fit for the instruction of infants and of such as were weake in the faith Q. I vnderstand what you saie concerning the first age of the Church now I would haue you speake concerning the middle age which you call the youth of it and to applie these three things mentioned to it in like manner To the middle age of the Church he gaue first a greater measure of reuelation Secondly so to speake a greater portion of the holy Spirit Thirdly a double kind of reuelation the liuely voice and the Scripture The liuely voice I say because as yet it was but weake and the written word because it was in age better growne and so more capable in some sort of the word written for God hath tempered these two kinds of reuelations together and of both hath made a middle kind of reuelation according to the time and age which wee call the middle and as it were the temperate age Q. You haue spoken of the first second age of the Church now I pray you speake of the third A. To the third age of the Church which I call the manly or ripe age he gaue first a full measure of reuelation Secondly a most plentifull effusion of the holy Ghost Thirdly both those kinds of reuelation and that now truly containing a full and perfect reuelation hee taught it by liuely voice for a certaine
truth receiued from his Fathers notwithstanding he became an Apostata and an Idolater as is manifest by the historie Next there was an intermission also when the people liued in Egypt for from the death of the Sonnes of Iacob euen to the departure out of Egypt Ezechiel testifieth Chapter 20. that al the people were fallen frō God to the Idols of the Egyptians Lastly there was an intermission from Malachy the last of the Prophets vntil Iohn Baptist in all which time no Prophet was raised vp notwithstanding the word of God was cōtinued amongst the people of y e Iewes by high Priests and the ordinary ministery but not without corruptions so that at the comming of Christ for the more part the doctrine of truth was now corrupted Q. Ought not the liuely voice of God which is not subiect to errour bee continued in the Church vntil the comming of VVhether a liuely voice not subiect to error continues til Christ Christ because you said that this liuely voice did continue in the Church till the comming of the Apostles only A. The liuely voice of Christ continues in the Church I confesse but not the liuely voice either of God or of extraordinary men such as were the Fathers Prophets and Apostles but only the liuely voice of ordinary men of pastours and doctors who both may erre do erre whensoeuer they depart neuer so little from the prescript word of the Prophets and Apostles Q. But God hath giuen a greater measure of his holie spirit to his Church which now is vnder Christ then euer he gaue to the old Church Therefore if in the old Church there was a liuelie voice which could not erre how much more shall there be now in the Church of Christ a liuelie voice which cannot erre A. It is true indeed that together with this full reuelation which is cōtained in the writings of the Apostles a more full spirit was giuen to the Church of Christ which now is then was giuen to the the old Church But hence it followeth not that either the Church or the Pastors and doctors in the Church are so gouerned with that Spirit that they cannot at all erre in deliuering the truth For this was the extraordinarie gift of the holy Ghost which was giuen but for a time but the gift of the Spirit which was giuen to the Church of Christ since the times of the Apostles is ordinarie and perpetuall to wit the gift of sanctification illumination and regeneration Q. The Church then which now is seemes to be in a worse case then the old Church was which had the liuely voice of God of men which could not erre A. That doth not follow for this Scripture of the Prophets and Apostles which nowe the Church hath doth not erre in doctrine and containes also a most full and most cleare reuelation of the truth Q. Albeit I should graunt the condition of our Church to better then of that old Church which was before Moses and which had the tradition and vse onely of the liuely voice and that verie imperfect and obscure notwithstanding I see not how the Church was not in better case which was after Moses euen to the comming of Christ as hauing not onely the vse of tradition and of a liuelie voice but also of the Propheticall Scripture as a light shining in a dark place A. Truly that Church had both that is both the sound of a liuely voice and of the Scripture and written word of God but neither perfect and absolute But this Scripture which our Church alone hath containes a most full and plaine reuelation for euen one forme or maner and kind of reuelation which is perfect and full must be more excellent then two which are both imperfect or which containe an imperfect reuelation of the truth Q. But there is no man who would not say it were better with this our Church if it had some liuelie voice which in speaking and answering to all controuersies might not erre A. They haue Moses the Ptophets and Apostles that is the writings of Moses of the Prophets and of the Apostles and those truely not onely sufficient but most perfect whēce only if they cānot learne the truth by thē and decide and end all controuersies they will not be instructed with the liuely voyce of anie extraordinary man howbeit as I haue said before the liuely voice was to continue onely so long in the Church as some thing was wanting to the full declaration of the mystery of Christ So that if now there should be any need of the liuely voice either of God or of some extraordinarie man in the Church of Christ that truly should plainely argue that the reuelation of the truth and mysterie of Christ is not perfect as yet nor accomplished Q. You conclude then that since the Apostles time there hath beene no liuelie voice heard in the Church which could not erre A. Yea truely Q. Whie did a liuelie voice not subiect to errour continue in the Church all that time which was from Adam to the Apostles A. To speake nothing of the will of God with the which alone we ought to rest contented first the condition of the Church did require this continuance then the measure of the reuelation that then was Q. Whie the condition of the Church A. Because the visible Church in all that time which was from Adam to the Apostles was both in place more streight as being shut vp in one family or in one nation was by reason of age weaker or not so wel growne For the Church before Christ if I may so speake was either as a child or as a young man Q. What then A. The liuely voice doth more easily reach or extend it selfe to a Church which is in place more streight and to the Saints fewer in number the church being as yet vnexpert by reason of the age of it and lesse growne had neede of the liuely voice of a teacher none otherwise then children haue neede of the liuely voice of a maister who as it were stammereth with them but after the comming of Christ when the Church was sufficiently instructed by the liuely voice of Christ and of his Apostles and now come to mans estate there was no more heard anie liuely voice either of God or of men extraordinarie Q. Whie did the measure of Reuelation require this A. Because all that time which was from Adam to the Apostles there remained as yet some thing more clearely and more manifestly to be reuealed and the reuelation of the doctrine was in seuerall ages made more manifest still as pertaining to the substance of it and so long as some thing remained to be more clearely reuealed so long a liuely voice was to continue for euerie new reuelation ought first to begin with a liuely voice Q. Seeing that the last and most full reuelation was by the liuelie voice of Christ and his Apostles hath there euer since