be that can neuer according to you worke your iustification and yet they all speake of a fayth which by Charity profiteth by Charity iustifyeth 2. And if S. Augustine may construe his owne meaning he expoundeth himselfe to meane of the same fayth not to profit without Charity which hauing Charity Augu. l. 15. de Trin. c. 18. worketh by loue so discerning it from that fayth with which the Diuells beleeue tremble But that fayth which worketh by loue that which is so distinguished from the fayth of Diuels is euen in our Protestants opinion true Fayth True fayth then may be but profiteth not without loue of which loue S. Augustine writeth thus in the beginning Aug. ibid. Nuâ—â—um est isto dono excellentius solum est quod diuidit inter filios regni aeterni filios perditionis aeternae VVhitak l. 1. aduers Duraeum Abbotc 4. August ibidem Dilectio igitur quae ex Deo est diffunditur in cordi bus nostris Dei charitas per quam nos tota inhabitat Trinitas VVhitak l 8. aduers Duraeum August l. de nat grat c. 42. Ibid. c. 70. August tract 5. in epist Ioan. of that Chapter No gift is more excellent then this it is the only thing which maketh a difference between the sonns of the euerlasting kingdome and sonnes of eternall damnation And he affirmeth not that of any outward difference or externall diuision of iustification in the sight of men which is another subtile deuise of the Aduersary but of the internall before the face of the highest for he there concludeth of the same gift of Charity The loue therfore which is of God and is God is properly the holy Ghost by whome the Charity of God is diffused into our harts by which the whole Trinity inhabiteth in vs. But the inhabiting of the Blessed Trinity the infusion or dwelling of the Holy Ghost in our soules is not any outward signe distinguishing vs in the eyes of men but an inward seale or hidden stampe of our harts truly iustifying in the sight of God not imperfectly nor defectiuely only as Whitaker Snake-like finds another hole to creep away stopped vp in my former Treatise of Iustification but intierely perfectly Therfore S. Augustine auoucheth of Charity in another place Ipsa Charitas est verissima plenissima perfectissimaque iustitia Charity it selfe is most true most full most perfect iustice And Great Charity is great iustice perfect Charity is perfect iustice Likewise Only Loue discerneth betweene the sonnes of God and sonnes of the Diuell And a little after They that haue Charity are borne of God they that haue not are not borne of God Enioy whatsoeuer thou wilt and only want this it profiteth nothing other things if thou wantest haue this and thou hast fullfilled the Law 3 S. Paul sayth In Christ Iesus neither circumcision auayleth ought nor prepuce but Fayth that worketh by Charity Gal. 5. v 6. If Protestants would stand to the determination of the Apostle this exposition of his were inough to instruct them that the Fayth which he so often commended before the fayth to which he attributed our iustification is not as they imagine sole fayth but fayth formed with Charity and that Charity is the vertue which giueth fayth it selfe motion and actiuity towards iustice and saluation But M. Abbot and his Complices interpreting Abbot in his defence c. 4. sect 22. Perkins in his reform Cath. c. 4. 1. Tim. 1. v. 5. ad Col. 3. v. â—4 Rom. 13. v. 10. 1. Cor. 13. Abbot c. 4. f. 475. 476. Scripture according to their owne fancy will haue the Apostle to teach that Charity is the instrument of Fayth for mouing stirring abroad yet that fayth by it selfe doth wholy iustify which is notwithstanding refuted by the Apostles plaine discourse prouing Charity to be the end perfection and accomplishment of the Law Therefore not the instrument of fayth or inferiour to it but the chiefe and most excellent of all other vertues without which fayth it selfe profiteth nothing comparing it there with Fayth and Hope he affirmeth maior autem horum est Charitas the greater of these is Charity Wherfore to retort the argument in behalfe of Charity which M. Abbot vseth for the patronage of Fayth Seeing with God we cannot thinke that the greater is accepted for the lesse but rather the lesse for the greater not the Mistresse so to speake for the hand maydes sake but rather Abbot c. 4. sect 22. â— 474. 475. protesteth that neuer any translatour could light vpon this the band-maid for the Mistresse sake we must needs make fayth sayth he cleane opposite to the Apostle Charity say I conformable to the Apostle not the hand-mayd not the instrument but the Mistresse the chiefe and principall cause for which fayth is acceptable to God in the way of iustice as the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth import which signifyeth a hidden energy and inward efficacy force operation which Charity ministreth vnto fayth for the performing of vertuous deeds And the Syriacke Interpreter putteth it out of all doubt who maugre M. Abbots protestation to the contrary readeth it heer passiuely haimonuto deme thgameno ve kuâ—â—o Fayth which is made perfect or consumate by Charity Thus Guido Fabricius passiuely also translateth it Fides quae perficitur fayth which is perfected by Charity Fabric in â—â—s booke dâ—dicated to Henry the third King of Franâ—e prinâ—ed Ann. 1 503. laâ— c 2. v. 26. S. Iames explicating what kind of perfection this is calleth it the perfection of life and resembleth sayth without workes that is without Charity the fountaine from whence good workes proceed to a dead corpes without life soule or vitall operation therefore as the soule is not the instrument of the body but the true forme and principall cause which giueth life and motion vnto it so doth Charity likewise vnto Fayth not that Charity is the essentiall forme of Fayth as it is a Theological habit for so it hath her proper forme distinct from Charity but that Charity first aduanceth it to the state of perfect vertue to the preheminence of iustice giuing it the true forme life of iustification to which fayth only disposeth and maketh way before Secondly it affoardeth it the dignity of true and proper merit by giuing vs the spirit of adoptioÌ„ whereby our workes are meritorious and gratefull in the sight of God Thirdly it directeth and leuelleth it to a supernaturall end ordayning all our actions to the honour of God This is the life actiuity and operation which Charity communicateth to fayth to all vertue Abbot c. 4. sect 23. fol. 494. also To auouch as M. Abbot doth that fayth any one of these three wayes is either the seat or fountaine of spiritual life the nest wherin we lay our workes that we may hatch them the mother which breedeth and begetteth them vnto God is Ibid. sect 26. f. 48â—
so great a maister in Israel why blame you vs for approuing what your selues allow Why appeale you to Scripture alone and yet subscribe to such and so many points of fayth not comprised in Scripture Or if these Traditions be necessary to be imbraced what meane you M. Field to renounce others as ancient as behoofull as warrantable as these euen by the rules your selfe prescribe which are Field l. 4. cap. 19. pa. 242 Iran lib. 4. c. 32. â—ulke in his confut of Purgat p. 362. 303. 393. August tract 84. in Ioan. Chrys bo 21. in act Concil Nicen. 2. Damas lib. 4. c. 17. Hiero. con Vigil c. 2. Middlâ—ton Papis pag. â—34 Bils part 2. pag 265. Rom. 10. 17. Basil de spir Sanct. c. 27. Chris ho. 4. in â— Thes 5. Aug. Ep. 119 86. Field l. 4. cap. 20. Rein. conclus 1. pag. â—17 The authority and custome of the Church Consent of Fathers or testimony of an Apostolicall Church By these Irenaeus alloweth the new oblation of Christs body and bloud as a Tradition from the Apostles Why reiect you this Tertullian S. Cyprian S. Chrysostome S. Hierome S. Augustine approue as M. Fulke your great Golias granteth the Sacrifice and prayer for the dead as an Apostolicall traditioÌ„ Why disproue it you S. Augustiue S. Chrysostome admit a memory or Inuocation of Saints in the selfe same sacrifice Three hundred Fathers of the second Councell of Nice defend with S. Iohn Damascen the adoration of Images as a Tradition from the Apostles S. Hierome by the custome of the Church and consent of Fathers D. Fields rules for true Traditions mantaineth against Vigilantius the religious worship of holy Reliques By the same Tradition of the Church and consent of the Fathers M. Middleton auerreth vowes of Chastity to be obserued What meane you to make no reckoning of these Are you only priuiledged to admit or discard what Traditions you please to countenance or deface whatsoeuer you list But an ill cause without cosenage cannot be vpholden I acknowledge the shifts of pouerty and falshood 13. Against these vnanswerable grounds M. Bilson opposeth in this weake and impertinent manner Fayth is by hearing and hearing by the word of God therefore S. Paul alloweth not matters of faith vnwritten How often shall I repeate inculcate a truth that the word of God is partly written partly vnwritten and this as S. Basil S. Chrysostome S. Augustine affirme is as worthy to be credited as the other Which speach albeit M. Whitaker noteth in S Chrysostome as inconsiderate and vnworthy so great a Father yet M. Field approueth it and reason perswadeth it vnles you belieue that letters figured with inke and paper add awe of reuerence to Gods hidden verityes M. Reynolds obiecteth out of S. Iohn These thinges are written that yee may belieue that Iesus is Christ the Sonne of God and that belieuing you may haue life in his name Heereupon M. Reynolds inferreth Ioan. 20. v. vlt. that S. Iohns Ghospell alone is sufficient to faith and saluation What may not be proued where such illations go currant S. Iohn speaketh of signes and miracles M. Reynoldes extendeth himselfe to many other matters S. Iohn writeth there of one principall point of fayth he concludeth all necessary to saluation S. Iohn disputing against Cerinthus who denyed the diuinity of Christ affirmeth that he hath written sufficient to proue that Christ is the sonne of God M. Reynoldes arguing against vs forceth him to say that he hath written inough concerning that and all other necessary articles of our beliefe Againe if S. Iohns Ghospell alone haue sufficient to saluation needlesse are the rest of the Euangelists the Epistles of S. Paul of S. Peter of S. Iude the Reuelations of S. Iohn wholy needlesse If S. Iohns Ghospell alone haue sufficient the Natiuity and birth of Christ his Circumcision Apparition the Institution of our Lords supper and many other thinges of which S. Iohn writeth nothing are not necessary to saluation Which to confesse is vtterly to subuert all Christian Religion to deny is plainely to ouerthwart M. Reynoldes assertion Rein. con â— 1. p. 618 â— 619. 2. Cor. 3. 16. 14. Secondly he alleadgeth out of S. Paul That all Scripture inspired by God is profitable to teach argue c. That the man of God may be perfect instructed to euery good worke Our Aduersaryes boast much of the pregnancy of this place and yet if it made any thing in their behalfe it would conuince that all and euery Scripture euery Epistle euery Chapter euery sentence which is some Scripture were The Greek hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Latin Omnis Al or euery auailable to these foresayd effects Which they perceauing resolue rather to abuse the word of God then loose the force of their argument when insteed of all or euery Scripture they most fraudulently translate the whole Scripture contrary both to the Greeke and Latin text But no deceite will serue to betray the truth The whole Scripture was not finished when S. Paul wrote that Epistle the Ghospell of S. Iohn which by it selfe alone as M. Reynolds auerreth â— sufficient to saluation the Apocalips and other bookes of Scripture were wanting at that tyme he could Rein. loc citat not then speake of the whole Scripture before the whole was extant or if he meant of the whole that was written it maketh nothing against vs. For S. Paul speaketh of the profitablenes of Scripture to instruct argue c. and not of 1. Tim. 4. v. 8. the sufficiency thereof Many thinges are profitable to promote vs to perfection which are not sufficient to atchieue the same Piety as S. Paul writeth is profitable to all thinges yet not alone sufficient nor only profitable You cannot deny but that rayne is profitable for the fruits of the earth yet without the labour of men fertility of soile heate of the sunne not sufficient to make them increase So as when M. Reynolds disgraceth this as a mincing distinction he discrediteth not vs but S. Paul for mincing in this manner 15. Fourthly others obiect That Christ reprehendeth the Traditions of men S. Paul condemneth them and S. Peter exempteth all Christians from them They mistake Christ Mat. 15. v. 9. Colos 2. v. 22. only reprehendeth the fond and friuolous Pharisaicall traditions or deprauations of the law called Deuteroses Of which also S. Peter speaketh or of the superstitious errours of the Gentils from which we are redeemed by the bloud of Christ S. Paul forewarneth vs of the vaine Sophismes 1. Pet. 1. â— 18. and fallacyes of the Philosophers which impaireth not the authority of our soueraigne and holy Traditions deriued from the Apostles and their successours inspired by the holy Ghost 16. Yet M. Field will needs endite vs of two hainous faults 1. That we charge the Scriptures with imperfection 2. Field l. 4. c. 15. That therfore we rely vpon humane interpretations and vncertaine
Traditions Both false depositions both wrongfully imposed crimes A wrongfull crime it is that we traduce the Scriptures as vnperfect We graunt with Vincentius Lyrinensis Vincen. Lyâ—â—nen cap. 2. that the Canon of Scripture is perfect a perfect light and lanterne to our feet a perfect rule and direction of sayth if as he noteth the line of Propheticall and Apostolical interpretation be leuelled according to the square of the Ecclesiastical and Catholike sense As great a wrong that we cleaue to humane and vncertaine Traditions We anker on such as are diuine certaine and infallible authentically warranted by the rules himselfe approueth to descend from Christ or the Church his holy and vndoubted Spouse 17. A like wrongfull crime M. Sparkes fastneth vpon Sparks p. 82. 83. vs when he sayth That we preferre the authority of the Church the wife before Christ the husband that we make the written word of God inferiour in authority to the Church and to haue his Canonicall credit from thence Sure you are as Salomon censureth a guilfull witnesse who furnish your cause Prouerb cap. 14. Testis fidelis non mentitur Profert mendaciâ—â— dolosus testis Io. 4 3. Reg. 3. with such shamefull lyes When many belieued in Christ induced by the speach of the Samaritan woman was her authority prefeâ—â—ed before Christ When King Salomon decreed the infant for which the two harlots contended to belong to her whose bowells were moued at the sentence of his death did he make her therby the mother of the child or declare her to be the mother who was the mother indeed So when we imbrace Gods written word by the externall approbation and testimony of the Church answerable to that of S. Augustine Ego Euangelio non crederem c. I would not belieue the Ghospell vnles the authority of the Church moued me thereunto we extoll not the Aug con ep Fund cap. 5. voice of the Spouse before the voyce of Christ. Nor the Church when it defyneth any booke to be Canonicall Scripture doth giue it thereby diuine and Canonicall credit Bils part 4. pag â—81 Rem cont 1. pag. 619 6â—9 Field l. 4 Stapleton cont 5. de poâ— Eccles quaest â— but commaundeth that to be receaued by others as Canonicall which hath in itselfe Canonicall authority 18. Lastly our Aduersaryes arme themselues with the weapons of the Fathers and M. Bilson marshalleth six togeather in a rancke S. Athanasius S. Chrysostome S. Cyrill S. Ambrose S. Augustine and Vincentius who conformably mantaine the sufficiency of Scripture in all necessary points of fayth Many other to the like purpose are alleadged by M. Reynolds and M. Field To all which I answere First that the Scripture is taught to containe all things necessary to saluation as the vniuersal ground Cyril l. 12. c. vltimo Chrys ho. 3. in 2. Thes 2. Vincent aduersus prophan hae nouit c. 2. Bafil ep 80 Cyril de rect fide ad Regi Hieron in Psal 86. Aug. l 3. con lit Petil Tert. lib. cont haer Athan. l. cont Gent. Aug. l. 2. cap. 9. Rein in his conf c. 2. diuis 2. Aug. l. 10. de Gen. ad lit c. 23. Bils 4. par p. 582. 583. Field in appen 2. p. §. 8. Aug. l. 4. c. 24. Dio. l. Eâ—c bier c. vlt. Orig. in 12. Leuit. bom 8. in cap. 6. epist ad Rom. seed or roote from which whatsoeuer we belieue may either mediately or immediatly be gatheted as S. Cyril and S. Chrysostome auouch Secondly as it teacheth and directeth vs to the authority of the Church and doctrine of her Pastours by which euery point is of may be particulerly and clearely explained Thus Vincentius and others are to be interpreted Thirdly it is affirmed to containe all thinges and that nothing besides the Scripture is to be admitted to wit no priuate customes or particuler Traditions not agreeable or repugnant to the writen word as S. Basil S. Cyrill S. Hierome S. Augustines meaning is in his booke against Petilian Fourthly the Fathers often acknowledge the sufficiency of Scripture to conclude euen in plaine and expresse wordes certaine maine principles of our fayth as that God created all thinges of nothing of which Tertullian against Hermogenes That Christ is the true God That Idolls are not God of which Athanasius writeth Or they teach it clearely comprehends the chiefe articles of our Creed and ten Commandments of which S. Augustine only speaketh in his booke of Christian doctrine so often quoted by M. Reynolds 19. Besides which many other things are necessary to be imbraced as by Fathers Reason and Scripture I haue already conuinced and therfore will close vp my whole discourse with one or two sentences of S. Augustine and Origen S. Augustine sayth The custome of the Church in baptizing Infants is not at all to be belieued vnles it were an Apostolicall Tradition M. Bilson and M. Field haue no other shift to trauerse the euidence of this place then by accusing it of some secret corruption But what was he corrupted also in his booke of Baptisme against the Donatists where he repeateth it againe Was Dionysius was Origen corrupted too who sayth The Church receaued a Tradition from the Apostles to minister Baptisme also to Infants Was this other passage of S. Augustine corrupted likewise Aug. de Bap. con Donat. l. 5â— c. 23. It is an article of faith to belieue this Baptisme to be valide Orig. in c. 3. ad Tit. teste Pamphilo in Apol. prâ— Orig. of the validity of Baptisme ministred by Heretikes The Apostles commanded nothing hereof yet the custome which was opposed herein against Cyprian is to bebelieued to proceed from their Tradition euen as many things be which the whole Church holdeth and are therfore well belieued to be commanded of the Apostles although they be not written I may then conclude with Origen He is an Heretike who professeth himself to beleiue in Christ yet belieueth otherwise of the truth of Christian fayth then the definition of Ecclesiastic all Tradition containeth 20. Notwithstanding to reproue our Aduersaries and satisfy all indifferent Readers that we fly not to the succour of Traditions for want of proofes out of holy writ I will vphold the right of our cause in euery ensuing Controuersy as I promised in my Preface by the irreprouable testimonies of Gods written word THE THIRD CONTROVERSY WHEREIN The Reall Presence is maintayned against D. Bilson and D. Sparkes CHAP. I. AS the vnspeakable riches of Gods infinite loue in no mystery of our fayth appeareth more bountâ—full then in the true and reall Fresence of Christs sacred Body conteyned in the holy Eucharist so the vnsatiable malice of our deadly enemy no where more hatefully bewrayeth it selfe then in seeking to abolish this most blessed dreadfull and admirable Sacrament For besids the Armenians Messalians Grecians and Aquarians Althons de Cast l. 9. adu haer v Eucharist Aug. de haer Epiph haer 26. whose errours
Charity good workes or vertuous life agreable to his fayth Therefore Maldonate had great reason to coÌ„mend this as an excellent place against all them that hold Fayth alone to be sufficient for saluation 4. The second argument is taken out of S. Iames his Epistle which was as S. Augustine sayth specially directed against the erroneous maintainers of only Fayth and contayneth many passages cleane contrary to our aduersaryes assertion as if a man sayth he hath fayth but hath not workes shall Fayth be able to saue him Likewise Fayth also if it haue not workes is dead in it selfe And Yee see that by workes a man is iustifyed not by fayth only Whitaker replyeth that S. Iames treateth of an idle faygned fayth But this is euidently false for he treateth of the fayth of Abraham much renowned in holy Scripture of that fayth of his which was consummated by his works which togeather with works did iustify him before God which must needs be a true fayth for a counterfeit fayth had neuer beene commended by the holy Ghost nor byn sayd to be consummated by workes much lesse could it iustify before the face of God Againe what needed the Apostle labour so much to proue that a faygned and counterfeit fayth nothing auayleth to the gayning of Saluation when none of those Christians against whome he wrote euer imagined any such matter And demaunding thou beeleuest that there is one God how could he haue answered thou dost wel if with a counterfeit Fayth he had belieued which had been rather hypocrisy then well doing Another euasion therefore both he Doctour Fulke and Doctour Abbot deuise that S. Iames speaketh of Fayth outwardly professed which declareth vs iust in the face of men not of inward fayth whereby we are iustifyed before the sight of God But by the same argument this is also refuted for the beloiuing in God is inward fayth Then Abrahams fayth there mentioned was iustifying fayth in the â—ight of God that alone did not iustify him but workes consummated they perfected not another but the same Aug. l. 21. de Ciuit. Dei c. 26 l. de vnic Bapt. c. 10. Cyril l. 10. in Ioan. Chrys hom 2. in Gen. hom 2. in ep ad Philemon Hier. in c. 5. ad Gal. tom 2. in Apol. ad Pammâ— c. 2. Aug. l. 83. q. q. 76. Aug. l. de fide operi c. 14. iustification therefore they also perfected the iustification before God or fayth alone performed it which the Apostle denyeth And thus S. Augustine S. Cyrill S. Chrysostome and S. Hierome vnderstand S. Iames of true Fayth which they also teach not to be auailable to saluation without other vertues Likewise it is cleare that S. Iames taketh Fayth in the same sense S. Paul did when he taught that a man is iustifyed by fayth for which cause S. Augustine noteth that he tooke the same example of Abraham which S. Paul vsed purposely to disproue the peruersity of some who misconstruing S. Paules meaning pleaded the sufficiency of fayth alone of which see S. Augustine in his booke of Fayth and Workes where he auerreth that because this opinion of only fayth sprung vp in the dayes of the Apostles therefore S. Peter S. Iohn S. Iames and S. Iude in their Epistles directed their intent specially against the same earnestly auouching that Fayth without workes auaileth nothing By which it is manifest that S. Iames the rest spake not of the outward profession but of the inward fayth and beliefe of the hart to which S. Paul with charity attributeth iustification or els they all roued from the marke and disputed in vaine or S. Augustine the most faythfull Herald of all antiquity vtterly mistaketh the scope of their intention 5. My third argument I frame in this manner The Protestant who by fayth is iustifyed may after fall into fornication adultery and other damnable sinnes or not He will not seeke to perswade vs that he cannot fall into any sinne for that were to broach a new the Iouinian heresy which S. Austine S. Hierome haue long Aug. ep 29. de haer c. 82. Hier. l. 1. coâ—t Iou. since buryed in the lake of hell Fall then he may as experience teacheth of sundry forward Protestants Ministers also arraigned condemned for their villanies in this kind Wel theÌ„ suppose they may sinne I aske whether falling into these horrible crimes they loose their true fayth which they had before â— retaine it still To graunt that they loose it is to make all sinners not only grieuous offenders but either Atheists Heretikes or Infidells also for he that is bereft of Fayth must needes be infected with Atheisme Heresy or plaine Infidelity It is to deuide and separate them from al vnion with Christ and to cut them off with Wicliffe from being members of the Church it is to depriue them of the patronage of Christs imputed righteousnes or not imputing their sins and to make them sinne like misbeleeuers to death and damnation for Christ couereth not the sinnes of any according to them but of the faythfull only it is against the common axiomes of Fulke Whitaker and their followers who ween that true fayth once gotten can neuer be lost the print thereof according to Caluin can neuer be blotted out of the harts of Gods elect To hold that they still retaine their true fayth notwithstanding they wallow in Cahâ— l. 3. instit c. ◠§. 11. these sudds of vncleanes that their fayth alone doth iustify them is to hold that they still abyde in the state of saluation and may inioy the kingdome of heauen if they should chance to depart in that wretched case which is quite contrary to the Apostle Do not erre neither fornicatours nor seruers of Idols nor aduowterers nor the effeminate 1. Cor. 6. v. 9. 10. nor the lyers with mankind c. shall possesse the kingdome of God I know the iuggling they vse to delude this argument is that in thes sinners fayth is darkned during that tyme like the Sunne ouercast with clouds like the fire couered with the ashes like the tree in winter bereaued of her blossoms But all these exampls warre against them for the tree in winter is truly a tree enioying her vegetiue life the fire raked vp is perfect fire the Sun ouerclouded looseth not the beames of his naturall light although they be hindred from shining vnto vs. Therefore the darkened and Caluin in An â—id ad Canonem 28. sess 6. in Concil Trid â—ffirmeth Particulam aliquam vitiae fidei manore inter grauissimos lapsus couered fayth of the adulterer is true fayth perfect in the nature of fayth looseth not any motion of life or beame of grace which is due to fayth and if that alone be sufficient to iustify remayning in the adulterer it affoardeth to him the benefit of iustification and by necessary consequence also of saluation for no winter barrenes no embers or
wit Christ is truly iust before God by Iustice worthy of heauen therefore he that doth iustice is also iust before God by the like iustice or els the similitude S. Iohn maketh is wholy defeated 1. Againe S. Iohn in both places compareth him that worketh iustice and increaseth therein to the peruerse wicked sinner who still continueth heaping sinne vpon sinne but he that walloweth in the filthines of sinne waxeth more filthy not only before men but also before God by hoording vp wrath and extremity of torments against the day of wrath and indignation Therefore he that goeth forward in the course of Iustice augmenteth the same not outwardly in the eyes of men but inwardly in the sight of the highest by increasing heere his treasure of mercy and reward of glory heereafter which S. Paul punctually confirmeth As you haue exhibited your members Rom. 6 â— 19. to serue vncleanes and iniquity vnto iniquity so now exhibite your members to serue iustice vnto sanctification Lo heer sanctification is all one with iustice or it is as Hugo sayth the Hugo in illum locuÌ„ stay or confirmation of Iustice. Besides they that proceed externall workes of iustice increase the summe thereof and become more gratious vnto God euen as when they were subiect to sinne by continual often sinning they Theophil in â—um loc Tertul. de resur carn c. 47. Orig. l. 6. in e. 6. ad Rom. Chrys ho. 12. in c. 6. ad Rom. Ambr. in hunc loc Cùm hic salus illic damnatio operetur augmented their wickednes waxed more odious and detestable in his presence For those words to serue iniquity vnto iniquity are vttered after the Hebrew Phrase which signify as Theophilact noteth as it were an addition of sinne to sinne the like addition is after required of Iustice to Iustice as Tertullian Origen S. Chrysostome and S. Ambrose expresly interprete the Apostle of such addition and increase of Iustice by which we obtaine saluation saying He hath commanded vs with the same measure or degree of diligence to serue God with which we serued the Diuell whereas we ought more obsequiously obey God then the Diuell because heere saluation there damnation worketh Heerupon the law of God his very Commandements are tearmed our Iustifications Would God my wayes might be directed to keep thy iustifications My soule hath coueted to desire thy iustifications I was exercised in thy iustifications It is good for me that thou hast humbled me that I Psal 118. v. 5. Vers 120. Vers 48. vers 71. may learne thy iustifications And why is this But because the obseruation and keeping of his law doth make vs truly and perfectly iust because it doth quicken reuiue and giue life to our soules which cannot be without perfect Iustice gratious allowable before the throne of grace whereof the Psalmist in the same place is also witnesse Ibidem v. 93. I will not forget thy iustifications for euer because in them thou hast quickened me And Ezechiel When the impious shall turne away himself from his impiety and do iudgment and iustice he shall Ezech. c. 18. v. 27. viuificate or make his soule to liue 2. Likewise S. Paul auoucheth He that ministreth seed to the sower will giue bread also to eate and will multiply your seed will augment the increase of the fruits of your iustice 2. Cor. 9. v. 10. Theophil in buncloc Anselm in bunc loc Where the Apostle resembleth almesdeeds to seed which sowed in the hands of poore and needy persons yieldeth increase of grace sayth Theophilact in this life and glory in the next or they are compared to seed which he that once soweth twice reapeth according to S. Anselme The fruit thereof abundance of temporall goods in this world of heauenly in the world to come Which supposeth it to be the increase of true iustice and of such whereunto the glory of heauen is due as the very Text it selfe declareth both in this and in the former two places Heere the wordes immediatly before are He distributed he gaue to the poore his iustice remayneth Ibid. v. 9. Rom. 6. v. 21. Apoc. 22. v. 12. for euer In the sixth Chapter to the Romans after the forementioned exhortation it is added You haue your fruit to sanctification but the end life euerlasting In the two twentith of the Apocalips the wordes ensuing are Behould I come quickely and my reward is with me to render to euery man according to his workes Therefore by conference of places and connexion of the Text it euidently appeareth that the Apostle spake of the going forward in true Iustice before God for no other remaineth for euer to no other euerlasting life and reward of glory belongeth For this cause S. Paul prayeth for the Collossians that they may walk Coloss 1. v. 10. worthy of God in all thinges pleasing fructifying in all good workes Euery word strengthneth our cause that we fructify in good workes and in workes pleasing God worthy of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of God as the Greeke Text more plainly openeth Salomon Feare not to be iustifyed euen to death because the reward of God abydeth for euer Where although M. Abbot out of Caluin contendeth that the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 betokneth ne differas do thou not procrastinate or delay yet it also signifyeth ne cesses surcease not leaue not off And S. Augustine Eccles 28. v. 23. Abbot c. 4. sect 36. fol. 541. Ang. in speculo ex vtroq Testament ex Ecclesias 1. Pet. 2. v. 2. readeth ne verearis feare not according to our approued vulgar translation S. Peter As infants euen now borne reasonable milke without guile desire you that in it you may grow vnto saluation the * Lâ—â—haije â— Aug. ser 16. de verb. Apost Syriacke hath that in it you may grow to life Both translations import that by going forvvard in vertue vve dayly grovv and increase our saluation our life of grace vpon earth our right and title to the life of glory in heauen vvherupon S. Augustine sayth We are iustifyed but that iustice it selfe increaseth when we profit and go forward Thus he 3. But because the cauilling Protestant will hardly be satisfyed with this expound O Augustine expound yet more playnly what iustice it is in which we increase He telleth you That we proced and increase in that iustification in which we obteyned remission of sinnes by the Aug. ibid. lauer of regneration in that by which we receaued the Holy Ghost in that wherof we haue some part by Fayth some beginning by fayth in that we profit from day to day that is augmented partly by Hope but most of all by Charity as by the most supereminent way demonstrated vnto vs by the Apostle by which our fayth is circumcised and discerned from the fayth of the Diuells And in his second booke against Iulian Iustification in this life according to
as they ought to do which ignorance of theirs partly proceedeth from the weaknes of our Vnderstanding partly from the depth and sublimity of the misteryes proposed partly also from the vnsearchablenes of Gods wayes and secrecy of his vnacquainted motions of which Iob sayd If God come vnto me I shall not see him and if he depart away from me I shall not vnderstand it Wherfore Iob. 9. â—â— Field lib. 4. cap. 7. seeing No man as M. Field doth witnes proueth a thing doubtfull by that which is as much doubted of as it selfe No man can be assured of the true sense and signification of Scripture by the internal working of God in his hart which is as much to be doubted of and alike hard to be discerned as the very sense it selfe and meaning of the Scripture 23. Secondly we are counsailed Not to belieue euery 2â— Ioâ— 4. â— spirit but to proue the spirits if they be of God But if the spirits must be brought to the touch-stone of triall if they must be approued and iudged by some other well knowne vndoubted authority they are not themselues the triall and Iudge of our differences Nay suppose we were assured of the inspiration assured of the holy Ghost speaking in our harts yet that speach is inuisible that motion inuisible that iudgement inuisible it cannot heare the causes examine the arguments or pronounce any desinitiue VVhitaâ—â—â— adu Stâ—pl l. 2. â— 6. sentence at all by which the contentious may be silenced the innocent acquited the guilty condemned The testimony of the spirit sayth Whitaker being priuate and secret is vnfit to teach or refell others if vnfit to teach vnfit to refell then wholy vnfit wholy vnable to cleare doubts decide Controuersyes or end the quarrells of the paâ—tyes in strife 24. Thirdly The rule and guide of our beliefe ought to haue some neere affinity and connexion with that which it guideth The measure as the Philosophers teach must be alwayes proportionable to the thing measured But the inward inspiration hath no such affinity and proportion with our Catholike fayth because that is secret this publique that particuler this vniuersall that meerly interiour and working only in the hart this exteriour Hooker of Ecclesi Policy lib. 1. sect 14. lib. 2. sect 8. lib. 3. sect 8. pag. 149. 147. lib. 2. sect 7 pag. 116. VVhitak aduers Staplet lib. 2. c. 4. pag. 330. p. 29â— ZaÌ„cb in his confess cap. 1. Brent in prolegom Kemnit in exam Conc. Tri. Aug. l. con ep FuxdaÌ„ c. 5 de vtil cre â—en c. 14. also and professed by the word of mouth In so much as that cannot possibly be a competent rule or proportionable measure to mete or square out the misteryes of our sayth Fourthly M. Hooker a Protestant of no smal account constaÌ„tly auoucheth with whoÌ„ M. Whitak other sectaryes heerin agree that the outward letter sealed with the inward witnesse of the spirit is not a sufficient warrant for euery particuler man to iudg and approue the Scripture to be Canonicall the ghospel itself to be the ghospell of Christ but the authority of gods Church as he acknowledgeth is necessarily required therunto Therefore neither are they sufficient to iudge of the sense or meaning of the Scripture for that saith S. Augustin which we obey and belieue testifying this book to be the Ghospell the same must we belieue witnessing this to be the sense of the Ghospel because it were no lesse then madnes to repaire to the Catholike Church for the approbation of Gods word run to her rebells for the sense of his word to her publick censure for that their priuat iudgment for this yea a meer madnes to thinke that euery Sectary should be indued with a diuine spirit to interpret holy writ and that the whole Church of Christ all her pastours and doctors ioyntly vnited should be depriued of the same 25. Fyfthly The ordinary way by which God instructeth vs in matters of belief is by publik preaching Fayth saith S. Paul is by hearing it is to be receaued from the lipps of the preists from the mouth of Saints Ad Rom. 10. vers 17. Malae 2 Luc. 1. Ad Ephes 4. from the pastors and teachers whome Christ hath appoynted in his Church and not from priuate reading of Scripture ioyned with the secret inspiration For that noble man of Aethiopia the Eunuch disigeÌ„tly perused the oracles of God and wanted not without doubt the inward operation of the holy Ghost being so religious as he had bin on pilgrimage at Hierusalem to adore and Act. 8. v. 30. 3â— so deuout as he read the Scriptures riding in his chariot yet when S. Philip asked him Trowest thou that thou vnderstandest the things that thou readest he said And how can I vnlesse some man shew me Therfore besides the outward reading inward working a publike interpreter and expoundeâ— is necessary for the true vnderstanding of holy writ 26. Sixthly The standing to the Iudgment of the hidden Spirit is the very roote of dissention and fountaine of discord in the vain chalengers and boasters therof it affoardeth euery sectary his priuate weights his particuler forge to coyne and allow what doctrine he pleaseth it licenseth the members to controle their heads the schollers to contradict and chang their masters Tertul. de praescript cap. 420 principles which Tertullian reproueth in the Heretiks of his dayes saying That hath bin lawfull to the Valentinians which was lawfull for Valentinus that to the Marcionites which to Marcion of their own accord to alter and innouate their belief Of their owne accord he sayth because the teaching of the holy Ghost is vniforme and the same he could not be author of such chops and changes of such schismes diuisions And yet they al pretended as our Ghospellers August tract 4â— in Ioanâ— Laâ—â—h ep ad Antwerp tom 2. Germ. Ieâ— fol. 10â— do his heauenly illumination There are innumerable sayth S. Augustine who do not only boast that they are Videntes or Prophets but will seeme to be illuminated or enlightned by Christ but are Heretikes And Luther the ring-leader of Protestants conformably writeth There is no Asse in this tyme so soâ—rish and blockish but will haue the dreames of his owne head and his opinion accepted for the instinct of the Holy Ghost and himselfe esteemed as a Prophet Whence it commeth as he immediatly before complayneth That there be as many sects Osiand in confut Script Melancth contra ipsum edit l. cont Nicticor Aug. ep 222. ad CoÌ„sent and Religions among vs as there be men That such variances arise betweene the professours of the same Religion as Osiander a Protestant telleth vs That among the Confessionists only there were twenty different opinions concerning the formall cause of iustification and that euery one is affirmed to be deduced and proued out of the word of God by the holy Ghost surely as they imagined secretly
it had byn long before sweetly song in the East and in all the Prouinces Concil Cart. 2. c. 3. Conc. Agath cap. 47 Conc. Calc act 3. S. Cyril cat myst 5. S. Amb. l. 5. epist 33. Greg. l. 7. Ep. 63. l. 12. Ep. 15. Bed l. 1. hist â—â—cles cap. 19. Aug l. 10. confâ—ss c. 1â— â—o l. 22. de Ciui Dei cap. 8. Chrys l. 6. de Sacer. Bils 4. par pag. 993. Caluin de coen â—ni the like he hath lib de vâ—ra Eccles refor in cap. 7. ad Heb. Magdeb. Câ—nt 2. c. Io. col 107 Cent. â— c. 4 col 63. Cent. 3. c. 4. 5. Mâ—lanct l. 4 Chroâ—iâ— Henr. 4. of Italy Was it not there further enacted that the thrice sacred Anthymne Holy Holy should be repeated in morning Masses in the Masses of Lent or in such as were offered for the dead as it was accustomed to be in solemue Masses Is not our Sacrifice of the Masse or vnbloudly Host mentioned also in the second Councell of Carthage of Agatho of Chalcedon and in many others Did not S. Cyril Patriarch of Ierusalem S. Ambrose Bishop of Millan S. Gregory the great Pope of Rome did they not say Masse 19. And the same S. Gregory did he not send all Priestly ornaments to S. Austen our Apostle Did not S. Augustine likewise the Doctour say Masse Did he not in treat others to doe the same for his fathers and mothers soule And which is more doth he not write of a Priest of his who sacrificed the Body of our Lord in a house infected with euill Spirits and the infestation ceased Doth not S. Chrysostome teach That the Angells themselues with reuerence assist our sacrificing Priest in honour of him that is offered on the Altar Which maketh me wonder how M. Bilson should ouershoot himselfe so farre as to auouch That for twelue hundred yeares after Christ our Sacrifice was not knowen to the world Was he so litle conuersant I will not say in these learned Fathers but in the Century-writers his Companions in Caluin his Coronell in Melancthon and other his Protestant Peeres as not to know what they had written in this behalfe Or was he so bold as against vs against them all to broach this stander Caluin sayth It is well knowen the olf Fathers called the Supper a Sacrifice c. Neyther can I excuse the custome of the ancient Church for that with gesture and outward rite they did set forth a certaine forme of Sacrifice with the same ceremonies in a manner that were practised in the old law saue that they vsed the Host of bread in lieu of a beast 20. The Century-writers blame Ignatius the scholler of the Apostles Irenaeus S. Cyprian Tertullian and diuers others in all ages within the compasse M. Bilson speciâ—yeth for the like Melancthon writeth of S. Gregory the First who liued about the 600. yeare of our Lord He allowed sayth he by publike authority the sacrifice of Christs body and bloud not only for the living but also for the dead M. Bale Bale in his Pageans sal 27. Fulk in his confut of Purgat p. 264. 265. c. Beacon in his Treat intituled The reliques of Rome sol 344. Luth. l. de cap. Baby l. de abrog Missae auerreth of S. Leo the first who florished about 440. years after Christ He allowed the sacrifice of the Masse not without great blasphemy to God M. Fulke reprehendeth Tertullian for the same M. Beacon concludeth The Masse was begotten conceaâ—ed borne auone after the Apostles tyme if all be true that Historiographers write So as it was the badnes only I suppose of M. Bilsons cause which made him bolster that foule report 21. Yet I will examine what he and his associates pretend against vs The Eucharist say they is a Sacrament which we receaue from God therfore it cannot be likewise a Sacrifice we offer to God because it implyeth the same thing should be both offered and receaued I answere that one and the self same thing diuersly considered may be both offered and receaued proceed from vs and be giuen to vs be a sacrament and a sacrifice And so the holy Eucharist is a Sacrament imparted vnto vs in that it is a signe of inisible grace ordained by God to nourish our soules with heaueÌ„ly food It is a sacrifice offered vnto God in that this signe or gift consecrated with sacred Ceremony is surrendred vnto him in acknowledgment of his highest Maiesty in protestation of our lowest duety and allegiance In this sense Cyp. ser de â—â—n Dom. it is called by S. Cyprian Medicamentum simul HolocaustuÌ„ Both a medicine and a sacrifice A medicine to heale our spirituall infirmityes A sacrifice to appease the wrath of God A medicine composed by him for the behoofe of vs A 1. Para. 29. v. 14. sacrifice offered and consumed by vs in honour of him This the Prophet Dauid rightly obserued when he sayd All thinges O Lord are thyne and the things we haue receaued from thy hand we haue restored vnto thee Thus we offer our spiritual Hosts as S. Peter exhorteth we offer vnto God â— Pet. 2. â—ers 5. Iac. 1. v. â—7 the Sacrifice of prayer of prayse of thankefulnes c. yet they are all mercifull guifts Descending from aboue from the Father of Lights from whom euery good motion and thoght proceedeth 22. The second and chiefest bulwarke which M. â—eynolds M. Bilson M. Sparks raise to batter the Forr of our Reyn. c. 8. diuis 4. p. 474. Bils 4. par pag. 695. Spark pa. 7. 23. sequen Haeb 10 v. 12. 14. v. 18. ad Heb. c. 9. v. 28. blessed Sacrifice is that S. Paul often inculcateth to the Hebrewes How Christ by one Host one Oblation once offered redeemed vs all How Christ was once offered to exhaust the sinnes of many I graunt that he was only once bloudily sacrifyced in his proper forme and shape yet vnbloudily sacramentally couered vnder the veiles of his creatures he is dayly offered vpon the Altar of his Church Which S. Paul impugneth not but only the iteration of the former bloudy as may be gathered out of the drift and scope of his discourse in that epistle to the Hebrewes 23. Secondly I answere that S. Paul speaketh of the chiefe generall ransoming Host of the full redeeming Heb. 10. v. 14. sacrifice Which once perfected on the Crosse consumated for euer them that are sanctifyed Yet it is nothing repugnant but altogeather correspondent heereunto that we should likewise haue our particuler Oblation to communicate the priuiledges of that vniuersall For so all generall Melchior Canus l. 12. de lo. Theo. c. 12. 1. Tim. 2. v. 4. causes as Melchior Canus noteth are determined and restrained by their particulers The Sunne is the generall cause of light yet we receaue the benefite thereof by many seuerall and particuler illuminations The will of God
learned then he is of a contrary mind Let no man deceaue himselfe and say I do pennance secretly I do it in the sight of God God who Aug. 50. bom bom 49. pardoneth me knoweth I doe it in my hart Then without cause was it sayd Those things which you loose on earth shall be loosed in heauen Then without cause were the keyes giuen to the Church of God Do we frustrate the Ghospell Do we euacuate the word of Matth. 18. v. 18. c. 26. v. 19. Christ As though all these thinges were in vaine if by God alone without the help and ministery of the Priest our sinnes could be remitted For as the Commandment our Sauiour gaue to his Apostles to baptize saying Goe teach all Nations baptizing them c. had beene wholy in vaine if all men were not bound to receaue the Sacrament Matth. 28. â— 19. of Baptisme if any entrance to Christianity any badge or cognizance of a Christian could be obtained without this lauer and regeneration of water and the holy Ghost Againe as the authority he gaue them to preach were to little purpose if men not sufficiently instructed Marc. 16. v. 15. were not obliged thereby to giue eare to his word so idle and in vaine were the commission he granted to his Apostles to retaine and forgiue sinnes if all who offended after Baptisme be not tyed to submit and make knowne their offences vnto them which for two seuerall reasons they are bound to do 6. The first is mentioned by Boetius If thou desire the Boetius de Consola l. 1. prosa 4. help of thy Phisitian it is requisite thou discouer thy disease But as many as are swollen with the impostume of sinne ought to seeke remedy for the recouery of their soules Therefore it is necessary they lay open their soares to the spirituall Phisitians appointed for their cure The second reason is because Priests are made by the vertue of this Commission not only Phisitians but spirituall Iudges also to vnderstand the quality and haynousnes of our crymes to know what medicinable peÌ„nance they should apply to discerne what sinnes are to be remitted and Arist 8. Polit. what retained Now seeing Aristotle teacheth and naturall reason approueth it to be true That it is impossible for them to iudge discreetly who haue no knowledge of the case all that are entangled with the snares of sin must giue notice of them to the Priests tribunall whome God hath placed in iudgment-seat to pronounce in his person sentence of absolution 7. And least any should gainesay with Caluin this Nazi ora ad Ciues timore perculsos Hier. epad Helio Aug. l. 20. de ciu Dei cap. 9. Apoc. 20. iudiciall power graunted to Priests besides the words of Christ which clearely conuince it the authority of the Fathers maketh it vndenyable S. Greg. NazianzeÌ„ auerreth That the law of Christ hath subiected Princes to his Throne and Empyre S. Hierome sayth That Priests hauing the keyes of the kingdome of heauen iudge as it were before the day of iudgment S. Augustine vpon these wordes of the Apocalips I saw seates and those that sate vpon them and iudgment was giuen vnto them writeth thus This may not be thought to be spoken of the last iudgment but by the seates are meant the Rulers thrones of the Church and the Persons themselues by whome they are gouerned And for the iudgment giuen them it cannot be better explained then in these words Whatsoeuer yee bind on earth shal be bound in heauen and whatsoeuer yee loose on earth shall be loosed in Heauen 8. Hence we inferre the exact enumeration of all Sparks p. 329. 330. 331. grieuous crimes the third point M. Sparkes impugneth For as they that haue many strifs in law to be determined by the examination and sentence of the Iudge ought to vnfold them al in particuler to receaue his iudgment and verdict of them so they that are burdened with sundry faults which be offences and iniuryes committed against God if they will come to an attonement with him they must make them all knowne to such as are ordained to reconcile them to his fauour to such as participate to vse S. Gregoryes words the principality of Diuine iudgment Greg. ho. 26. in Eâ—ang who in place of God may detaine sinnes to some release them to others When a souldiour hath receaued many woundes in warre it is not inough to tell his Surgeon or Phisitian in generall manner that he is wounded but he must shew Aug. serm 66. de tem the seuerall woundes and dangers of them or els no wise Surgeon will venter to apply his plaisters or vndertake to cure them euen so it is not sufficient for such as are wounded in Soule with diuers deadly sinnes to complaine in generall that they are grieuous sinners but they must particulerly specify the number quality and haynousnes of euery mortall crime that their spirituall Phisitian may thereby discerne what holsome salue whatsatisfactory pennance what good counsell and aduise he should minister vnto them And therfore S. Gregory Nyssen sayth That as in corporall infirmityes there are sundry kindes of Nyss epist ad Episco Mytil S. Tho. in Supplem ad 3. p. q. â— art 2. medicines according to the diuersity of diseases so whereas in the disease of the soule there is great variety of affections sundry sorts of medicinable cures ought to be adhibited The reason heereof S. Thomas alleadgeth because one disease is more dangerous by the contagion of another and that medicine which is holesome to that may be noyson to this kind of infirmity So that by the approued doctrin of both these learned writers euery penitent ought to make a particuler rehearsall of all haynous faults euen of such as be secret and hidden To which the same S. Gregory vehemently Nyss orat in muliereÌ„ peccatrie Audacter inquit osteÌ„de illi quaesunt recondita animi arcana taÌ„quam oeculta vulnera medico retege Hier. super Mat. cap. 16. exhorteth in another place that thereby the Priest may be perfectly acquainted with the whole state of their soules vnderstand the manifold varietyes of their spirituall diseases For as S. Hierome sayth Then the Bishop or Priest knoweth who is to be bound and who is to be loosed when he heareth the variety of sinnes 9. And this manner of confessing all particuler offences is that which Christ commanded which the figures of the old Testament betokned which the Apostles meÌ„tioned which in al succeeding ages hath byn deuoutly obserued in the Church of God Touching Christs commandment I haue already shewed that it is impossible for Priests to pronounce iudiciall sentence impossible to apply soueraigne medicines impossible to know what they should loose what retaine and consequently this Commission bootles vnles the Penitent were bound distinctly to name his sinnes vnto him Concerning the figures I let passe the confession God exacted of Adam of
S. Iohn in the desert with habit with meate with voyce with deeds cryed Yield fruits worthy of Penance S. Paul saith If we did iudge our selues we should not be iudged which S. Chrysostome and Venerable Bede expound of seuere iudiciall affliction of our selues that we may not be punished of God Finally Christ himselfe began his preaching with this precept Doe Penance for the Kingdome of heauen is at hand 7. Diuers euasions M. Fulke and the rest of his faction heer seeke They answere that the penaltyes inflicted by Fulke in c. 2. â— Cor. sect 2. in c. 3. Matth. sect 4. c. Caluin l. 3. Inst ca. 4. the ancient Canons by the Apostles or by the hand of God were 1. For the publike discipline of the Church 2. For the exercise of vertue 3. As the fruits of true repentance 4. As cautions to beware of future sinnes Tet no way to saâ—isfy the Iustice of God for precedent faults But the Scripture flatly declareth the affliction I mentioned to haue beene imposed for offences past The Prophet Nathan sayd to K. Dauid Because thou hast made thy enemyes blaspheme the name of our Lord for 2. Reg. 12. v. 14. Exod. 32. v. 34. Hier. epist 12. ad Gaud. this word the Son that is borne to thee shal dye And God himself sayd I in the day of reuenge will visit this their sinne Therfore he meant to punish their offence which notwithstanding was pardoned if we belieue S. Hierome 8. Likewise many innocent babes after the spot of Originall infection is cleansed by Baptisme are daily afflicted with the panges of sicknes with the agony of death not for the exercise of vertue nor for Penitentiall correction or future amendment of which they are vncapable but for the reuenge and chastisement of our first Fathers sinne Neither can we say that the death of King Dauids child was principally sent vnto him as a fruitefull caution or token of sorrow because he with teares with fasting with lying on the ground sought to shun it as much as he could which so vertuous a Prince would neuer haue done if it had beene any profitable caution or fruit of repentance much lesse could it be any Penitentiall correction for the publike satisfaction and discipline of the Church because he was so vnwilling to haue it Psa â— v. 7. Psa 34. v. 1â— Psal 101. ver 10. 3. Reg. 21. ver 27. Ionae 3. v. â— 7. 8. Hiero. in his comm vpon the 3. of Ionas Ionae 3. v. 9. 10. Vid. Fran Riberum in cap. 3. Ionae in cap. 1. Naâ—um Aug. hom 5. ex 50. homilijâ—â— 5 Non sufficit moresin melius c. nisi etiam de his quae facta sunt fatisâ—ias Deo c. Aug. in Enâ—hyr ad Laurent â— 70. Cyp. ser de Lapfis Cyp. tract de oper Eleâ—mosyn Châ—ys hom 41. ad Popul Antio Lact. l. 5. diâ— iâ—sti ca. 13. Orig. ho. 3. in l. ludic Amb. l. 2. de Poenitâ—n cap. 5. come to passe vsing so many meanes to pacify God another way neither is it likely that the Church would haue inflicted such a punishment vpon him the teares likewise he shed in so great aboundance as he washed with them euery night his Couch the humbling of his soule in fasting the minglâ—ng of his bread with ashes the wearing of sackcloth and meruailous humility which King Achab shewed the afflictions and voluntary fastings which the Niniuites their King their children their cattell endured were neither vsed for example to others or for amendment of their liues heereafter or for any other cause to asswage the wrath of God recompence the wrong their sinnes had done already pardoned by the secret Contrition sorrow of their harts as togeather with the interpretation of S. Hierome vpon this place the very wordes of the Niniuites Gods answere vnto them do both make manifest The Niniuiâ—es intention was to satisfy God saying Who knoweth whether God will turue and pardon and returne from the fury of his indignation The Prophet replyeth in his person And God saw their works not the repentance only of their inward harts but the Pennance and Satisfaction of their outward workes and Herepented him of the euill he spake against them Howbeit they after slyding back into their former wickednes the subuersion of their Citty ensued which the Prophet foretold 9. Besides the authorityes of the Fathers are also pregnant that the punishments of which they speake were not only inflicted for exercise of present vertue or preuenting of future euills but also to satisfy God and redeeme offences past as nothing can be more euidently recorded S. Augustine pronounceth It is not inough to chang our manners to the better and decline from euills vnles God be also satisfyed for those things which be past by the griâ—â— of Pennance by the mourning of humility by the sacâ—ifice of a contrite hart almesdees cooperating thereunâ—o And in another place By almesdeeds for offences past God is to be made propitious and fauourable S. Cyprian God is to be implored our Lord is to be pacifyed with our Satisfaction Againe By good-workes God ought to be satisfyed by merits of mercy sinnes should be purged S. Chrysostome Let vs take reueng of our selues so we shall appease our Iudge Lactantius It is lawfull to satisfy God Origen As much tyme as thou hast spent in sinning so long humble thy selfe to God and satisfy him in Confession of Pennance S. Ambrose He that doth Pennance should not only wash away his offence with teares but with perfecter workes ought to couer and hide former faults that sinne may not be imputed vnto him â—asil interro 12. in eg breuioribus Psal 100. 10. S. Basil sheweth the reason heereof saying Albeit God in his only begotten Sonne as much as lyeth in him hath granted remission of sinnes to all yet because mercy and iudgement are ioyned togeather by the holy Prophet and he witnesseth God to be both mercifull and iust it is necessary that those thinges which are spoken of Pennance by the Prophets and Apostles be performed by vs that the iudgments of Gods iustice may appeare and his mercy Greg. Na zian orat insancta luâ—ina be consumated to the condonation of sinners For as S. Gregory Nazianzen sayth It is a like euill remission without chastisment and chastisement without pardon because the one letteth go the raines too far the other restraineth them too much Wherefore that God may carry ouer vs an euen hand that his clemency may be mingled with some seuerity his iustice and mercy may meete togeather although he alwayes of mercy pardoneth the iniquity of repentant sinners yet he often bindeth them ouer to some temporall chastisement to satisfy thereby the rigour of his iustice as in the partiall iudgment of our professed enemyes all antiquity heerein Caluin l. 3. Inst c. 4. §. 8. Calu. 4 c. 12. §. 8. Kemnitius 2. par exam p. 181.
Paul sayd God was in Christ 2. Cor. â— v. 19. reconcyling the World to himselfe because he reconciled it to himselfe by Christ by the obedience and labours of his manhood Or if he take this reconciliation as made by God without the interposing of a third person as one may by himselfe reconcile his enemy vnto him then I say this was no act of mediation but an act of Gods mercy as much belonging to the Father as to the Son So I acknowledge the workes of authority which M. Field loco citato Field mentioneth to be the workes of Christs Diuinity but not the workes of mediation not proper to the Son of God but common to all the persons of Holy Trinity agreable to that principle ratifyed by all Deuines Indiuisa sunt opera Trinitatis ad extra The workes of the Trinity outwardly Field in his 5. book of the Church c. 16. f. 52. M. Fields reply sauoureth too much of Arianisme produced indiuisibly proceed from euery person 14. D. Field replyeth Though their action be the same workedone by them yet they differ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the manner of doing For the Father doth all things auctoritatiuè and the Sonne subauctoritatiuè as the Schoolemen speake Thus he writeth and still dippeth his pen in Arian poyson For yield that the diuine nature of the Sonne of God worketh in a different manner from the nature of the Father there must needes ensue some difference in nature some diuersity of wills otherwise it cannot be conceaued how the Tho. 1. p. â— 19. art 4. same indiuisible essence how the same vnchaÌ„geable wil which is the cause of all thinges should change and alter in manner of working 15. Secondly if the Father and the Sonne differ in manner of doing these outward actions towardes vs their Creatures then they are not both as the Deuines tearme The three persons of holy Trinity are but one beginning or author of thinges them Vnum principium One sole origen or beginning of thinges but the Father causeth and willeth them one way the Sonne another the one createth quickneth and giueth life in this sort the other in that Which is nothing els but to rake vp the ashes of old dead and buryed heresyes to giue way to the Manichees and other followers to maâ—â— diuers Creatours and Beginners of thinges Yet because you affirme the Schoolemen bolster this errour name I beseech you what Schoolemen they are Who vnles he were an Arian presumed to write that the essentiall and externall actions for of them we now speake which the Father and the Sonne essentially produce are different in manner of doing Who in respect of these workes euer vttered those wordes which I quake againe to repeate the one did them auctoritatiuè the other subauctoritatiuè What Is the Sonne according to his God-head an inferiour instrument or vnderling to his Father The Oracle of S. Paul recordeth Christ Iesus when he was in the forme of God thought it no robbery to be equall vnto God and shall this Phil. 2. 6. Sectmates blasphemy take place that he hath power and authority to worke vnder God He answereth his meaning is not the sonne should be an instrument or vnderling Field ibi to his Father but that he receiueth the essence he hath and power of working from the Father though the very same that is in the Father only differing as he noteth before in subsistence 16. Is this M. Field the part of a Christian to sprinkle your writings with words of blasphemy and powder them ouer with a holesome meaning Hath not our learned Soueraigne King Iames worthily condemned Conradus Vorstius that egregious Hereticke for the like abuse K. Iames in his declaration concerning his proceedings in the cause of D. Contradus Vorstius pag. 36. Gen. 19. 24 doth not he teach it vnlawfull to vse in these great mysteries any other phrase or manner of speach then such as the Church hath alwaies vsed How dare you then in his kingdome vnder the sheild of his protection how dare you diuulge in Print such venemous speeches such pestiferous words howbeit you seeke as Vorstius did to strow and couer them with a sugred sense For I confesse the sonne of God receiueth his essence as begotten of his Father and so may sometime by denomination or appropriation of speech be said to work by power receiued from his Father as in Genesis it is written Our Lord raigned from our Lord. But for one person to mediate to another is not only required a different denomination but a reall and substantiall difference a distinction an inferiority in the very essence it selfe in such manner as I haue often inculcated Also I confesse the persons of holy Trinity differ in Subsistence differ to vse the termes of Art in Personall Notions or Notionall Relations Yet hereof to infer an vnder-power or different manner of producing outward and essentiall workes this I say is either to make some diuersity of natures with the accursed Arians or giue scope to the Manichees to establish not a double only but a triple God or threefold cause of things created Now if you tremble to support such wickednes as your words enforce to what purpose was that sacriledge breathed forth How answere you the obiection of the vnity of the works of the Diuine Persons how make you the same action a worke of mediation in one and not in the other 17. For you ought to know good Syr if you dare vsurpe the title or challeng the dignity of a Deuine that albeit the Father Sonne and Holy Ghost ioyntly cooperate and accomplish the workes of authority you mentioned as they are perfectly subsisting in three Persons really distinct yet they performe them not primarily or formally by their personall properties by which they differ but by their will and vnderstanding in which Hâ—â—r de Gandauo quodl 6. q 2. they agree and not by them if we speake precisely as they are Notionally but as they are essentially taken that is as they are one absolute and the same in euery person It was I confesse the errour of Henry de Gandauo that the Nationall knowledge and loue of God did practically Molina in 2. par q. 36. â— 4. disp 2. 5. 6. Altifiod l. 1. summ c 30. Greg. Arimin 1. dist 22. q. vnica Valenâ— in 1. par disp 2. q. 10. punct 5. de person Spiritus Sancti Sâ—oc l. 2. â—st 1. q. 1. produce all outward creatures yet far was he from your impiety far from imagining so maine a difference as to attribute thereby a worke of submission subiection mediation to one person which is not in the other 18. The holy Ghost as the Deuines teach proceedeth from the Father and from the Sonne as they incoÌ„municably subsist by their different relations yet not according to their difference but according to one single or common vertue of spiration which is the same in both In
ep 126. indict 2. l. 11. ep 49. indict 6. l. 2. ep 71. 8â— l. 3. ep 30. l. 5. ep 6. small tokens not of small valew as he accounted them hauing the blessing of S. Peter The like he sent to Ricaredus King of Spayne To Eulogius the Patriarke of Alexandria To the Empresse To other Princes Bishops and Patriarkes and to make the gifts more pretious he put into them a little of the holy Crosse a little dust filed from S. Peters or S. Paules Chaynes some of S. Iohn Baptist hayres S. Laurence gridyron which the aforesayd partyes reuerently wore about their neckes And many miracles as the same Saint Gregory relateth were wrought by those Ambros ser 91. l. 10. ep 85. Nazian orat 3. i. 1 in Iulia Chrys Tom. 5. ser de vire vitijs Ambros l. 10. ep ep 85. Hier. cont Vigilan cap. 3. where he also sayth that if we herein be guilty of Sacriledge Sacrilegus fuit Constantinus Imperator qui sanctas reliquias Audreae Lucae Reliques many at the Inuention and Translation of Saint Geruasius and Protasius bodyes many by the bones dust and shaddow cast from the corps of other Martyrs And S. Hierome auoweth the estimation and honouring of Reliques to haue beene in his tyme the receaued doctrine Non vnius vrbis sed totius orbis Not of one Citty but of the whole world He controlled and suppressed Vigilantius for teaching the contrary Which stirred vp the hearts of sundry Protestants in defence of their Patron to rate and reuile S. Hierome in most opprobrious manner 17. M. Reynoldes sayth He yielded to much too his owne passions He more eagerly then truly not soundly viciously and with vehement rage argueth agaynst Vigilantius M. Fulke He confuteth not Vigilantius with arguments so much as with rayling Osiander Hierome did folishly contend that the Reliques of Saints were to be worshipped Bullinger It is Hieromâ— ouerlashing when he auoucheth that the diuels roare at the Reliques of S. Andrew But was S. Hierome only taxed for Timothâ—i transtulit Constantinopolim apud quas Daemones rugiuÌ„t c. Sacrilegus diâ—endus est nunc Augustus Arcadius qui ossa beati Samuelis c. Omnes Episcopi non sacrilegi sed etiam fatui iudicaÌ„di qui c. this fault No M. Sutcliffe writeth Gregory esteemed much the Reliques of Saints M. Fulke Gregory was superstitious in Reliques Bale Gregory admitted the adoration of the Crosse What then was Gregory and he singular herein No Danaeus a prime Puritan asseuereth That Cyrill and diuers other Fathers were plainly superstitious and blinded with this enchantment of the Crosses adoration The Centurists affirme of Constantine the Great With like superstition he translated to Constantinople in conseruation of that Citty certayne Reliques of the Crosse found by Helen Whome they howbeit Camden our English Antiquary reporteth her to haue beene often registred in antique Inscriptions A most Pious and venerable Empresse for this cause and for going in Pilgrimage to adore the holy Land and other monuments of Christ iniuriously tearme A Superstitious woman 18. And what if God himselfe allow the like Superstition What if many graue and ancient writers defend the like God alloweth it in his owne written word by the reuerence which Moyses vsed to the bones of Ioseph Reyn. l. 1. de Ido Ro. Eccl. c. 6. Fulke in c. 6. Apoc. sect 1. Ofian in epit Centu. 4. p. 506. Bulling de Orig erro f. 67. Sutcl Subuers c. 4. Fulke in c. 6. Apoc. Bale Con. 1. c. 68. Danaeus in 2 1 ad Bell. 5. Cont. respâ—p 1415. Cent. cen 4. Col. 1529. cen 4. Col. 458. Cambden in his English description of Britan. pag. 74. Exo. 13. 4. Reg. 23. Act. 1. Act. 19. Lact. hym de Passio Ruff. l. 10. Hist c. 8. Socra l. 1. c. 13. Paulin. in nata 10. S. Felic Procop. l. 2. de bel Pers Chrys ser de Cruce Aug. orat de obitu Theod. Sozom. li. 1. cap. 8. King Iames his conference at Hamp Court pag. 69. the Patriarch and Iosias to the bones of another holy Prophet by the miracles wrought by the dead bones of Elizaeus by the shaddow of S. Peter by the Napkins of S. Paul The Fathers defend it by the meruaylous wonders achieued by the Holy Crosse of Christ Queene Helen found out and by the exceeding reuerence Christians exhibited vnto it in former tyme. Of which Lactantius Ruffinus Socrates Paulinus Precopius S. Chrysostome S. Ambrose witnesse and Sozomenus chronicleth of the forenamed Constantine whome our noble Soueraygne King Iames vouchsafeth to acquit from all Superstition He worshipped the holy Crosse because he had receyued much help therby in battels agaynst his enemies as by reason also of the heauenly vision he saw of it when that victorious signe as Eusebius writeth appeared Fulke in â— 19. â—o sect 1. Prudent in Apoth Lactan in poem de Passio Redempt vnto him in a cleare and fayre day with this inscription IN HOC VINCE OVERCOME IN THIS PrudeÌ„tius accordingly affirmeth Vexillumue Cruâ—â— summus Imperator adorat The chiefe Emperour adoreth the ensigne of the Crosse Lactantius Bow thy knee and adore the venerable wood of the Crosse Paulinus agreeth with them cited thus by M. Fulke The Bishop of Hierusalem yearly at Easter bringeth forth the Crosse to be adored himselfe being the principall of the worshippers How doth he auoyd this euident testimony Marry he opposeth S. Ambrose against him saying that to Amb. de obitu Theod. worship it Is an Heathenish errour and vanity of the vngodly where S. Ambrose is nothing contrary to Paulinus He saith speaking of Queene Helen she adored the King not the wood verily for that is an Heathenish errour To wit not the Wood as Wood not in regard of it selfe but with reference to Christ as the Crosse on which he dyed So she adored and so Paulinus so S. Ambrose teacheth it deserueth great veneration as I wil incontinently set downe First let vs see what our Opponents vrge besides Rein. de I do Ro. Ec. p. 84. 85. Act. 14. Hester 13. Zuares in 3. p. disput 52. sect 1. Act. 10. Apoc. 19. Hiero. lib. con Vigil August q. 61. in Gen. Talis apparâ—er â—t vt pro Deo posâ—â—t adoraâ—i 19. They obiect That S. Paul and Barnabas prohibited the Lycaonians to adore them and Mardochaeus refused to worship Ammon They did so for iust respects Ammon challeÌ„ged the submission of both knees which the Iewes were woÌ„t to surrender to God alone as Zuares one of the deepest Deuines of our age notably obserueth The LycaoniaÌ„s would haue yielded to S. Paul the honour of Sacrifice which is only due to God For which cause the one piously feared to yield the other to accept any Godly worship But say they Cornelius did not adore S. Peter nor S. Iohn the Angell with any Godly honour and yet they were both reproued for the reuerence they vsed I answere eyther with Saint
Psalme Lord rebuke me not in thy fury nor do thou chastise me in thy wrath Where by his fury they vnderstand the furious flames of Hell by his wrath the chastising correcting fire of Purgatory S. Augustine sayth Purge me in this life and make me such a one as shall not need the amending fire S. Ambrose and Origen proue the like out of that verse of the Psalme We haue passed through fire and water thou hast translated vs into rest to wit through water of Baptisme in this life through fire of Purgatory in the next Heere sayth S. Ambrose by water there by fire By Ambr. in Psal 118. ser 3 20. Rup l. 3 comm in Gen. c. 32. 33. Gen. 3. Pererius l. 6. quaest 4. in c. 3. Gen. explicando vers 24. Field in his Appendix fol. 50. Esay 4. Aug. Ambr. locis citat Aug. l. 21. de ci Dei c. 23. 24. l de cura pro mort c. 1. de 8. quaest q. 2. Origen Cypr. vbi supra water that our sinnes may be washed by fire that they may be burned And the same S. Ambrose togeather with Rupertus testify this to haue beene Allegorically noted by the Prophet Moyses in the fiery sword which our Lord placed before the gates of Paradise to shew that the passage and entrance to the gates of Heauen was now by fire to such as were not wholy purifyed and refined before as Pererius notably declareth in his exquisite Commentaryes vpon Genesis 5. And least some Protestants should weaken the strength of these former testimonyes as M. Field heere doth the authorityes of S. Ambrose S. Hilary expoūding them of the fiery triall of Gods iudgment Isay expresly distinguisheth the one from the other and sayth That God shall purge vs both in the spirit of Iudgment and in the spirit of combustion S. Augustine and S. Ambrose do the like For albeit S. Ambrose as M. Field obserueth doth sometime take the fire mentioned in Scripture for the fiery triall of Gods iudgment yet he purposely also interpreteth it of the fire of Purgatory in the places before cyted and in his exposition vpon the third Chapter to the Corinthians where he teacheth that some of the Iust suffer such pains of fire as the perfidious and damned suffer not which cannot be vnderstood of the examination or triall of Gods Iudgment which the Reprobate suffer as well as the Iust The same I say of S. Augustine when he distinguisheth three sorts of men al tryed by Gods Iudgement and one only that needeth the amending fire The same of Origen S. Cyprian and the rest 6. The last place I will alleadge out of the old law omitting many for breuityes sake is that of Zachary Thou also in the bloud of thy Testamēt hast deliuered thy Prisoners out of Zach. 9. v. 12. the Lake in which there is no water And what lake was this out of which Christ after his death and Passion enfranchised his Captiues but either Limbus Patrum as some hold or rather according to others the Lake of Purgatory Aug. l. 12. de Gen. ad lit c. 33. ep 99. ad Euod In which there is indeed no water of Comfort as there is in Limbo and out of which S. Augustine affirmeth Christ deliuered many when he descended into Hell for so in the new Testament Purgatory is sometim called by the name of Hell 7. In the Acts of the Apostles S. Luke writeth of Christ Whome God hath raysed vp loosing the sorrowes of hell Of Hell Of whom in hell Not of Christ For it was impossible as M. Fulke agreeth with vs he should be Act. 2. v. 24. Fulke vpon this place Aug. l. 12. de Gen. ad lit c. 33. touched with any after death Not the dolours of the damned in the lowest Hell of whome there is no redēption Therefore not without cause I vse the wordes of S. Augustine whome M. Fulke impudently heere auoucheth to haue nothing at all to this purpose it is beleeued the soule of Christ to haue descended to the place where sinners are punished to release them of their torments who me he in his hidden Iustice thought worthy to be released Otherwise I see not how to expound that text c. For neither Abraham nor the Poore man in his hosome that is in the secret of his quiet rest was restrained in sorrowes Phil. 2. v. 10. Thus S. Augustine there where he applyeth to the same end that saying of S. Paul In the name of Iesus let euery knee bow of thinges celestiall terrestriall and infernall and le◠euery tongue confesse c. Which cannot be meant of the Psal 113. damned in Hell of whome the Psalmist sayth The dead shall not praise thee O Lord nor all those that descend into Hell 8. Neither of them can that be meant which was Apoc. 3. v. 3. reuealed to S. Iohn No man was able to open the booke sealed with seauen seales neither in heauen nor vnder the earth For it is not probable the infernall spirits were priuiledged Psal 73. Apoc. 5. v. 13. Suarez tom 4. diso 45. sect 2. in 3. part D. Thom. ◠Mat. 5. v. 26. Luc. 12. v. 58. Tertul. l. de anim c. 35. 58. Cyp l. 4. epist 2. vide Amb. in c. 12. Luc◠Hier. in c. 5. Matt. Eus Emis hom 3. de Epiph. Matt. 12. v. 32. 1. Reg. 28. Aug. l. 21. de cin Dei c. 24. Greg. l. 4. dial c. 39. Fulke in c. 12. Matt. sect 6. Field in appead par 1. pag. 40. Bern. ser 66. in Cant so much as to trye whether they could open that heauenly booke or that they whose pride doth alwayes ascend were comprehended in the number of them whome S. Iohn heard saying To him that sitteth in the throne and to the Lambe benediction and honour and glory and power for euer euer It is likely then S. Iohn spake before only of the Iust as Suarez heereupon inferreth and by them in heauen vnderstandeth the Church Triumphant by them in earth the Militant by them vnder earth the Patient or Church in Purgatory For that is a place vnder the earth a Lake or prison as S. Matthew nameth it saying Be at agreement with thy Aduersary betymes whilest thou art in the way with him least perhaps the Aduersary deliuer thee to the Iudge the Iudge deliuer thee to the Officer and thou be cast into prison Where by the prison Tertullian and S. Cyprian and Eusebius Emissenus expound the prison of Purgatory Againe it is confirmed more strongly by S. Matthew where he sayth He that shall speake against the Holy Ghost it shall not be forgiuen him neither in this world nor in the world to come The ancient Doctours gather from hence that some sinnes may be remitted in the next life For whereas it is written in the first of the Kinges He answered him not neither by dreames nor by the
all kind of sinne another guilty of mortall the third only spotted with some veniall fault The first whither goeth he To Heauen immediatly The second whither goeth lie To Hell no doubt The third whither goeth he Not to Hell because he is departed in the grace and fauour of God Not to heauen immediatly Apoc. 21. v. vlt. because Nothing defiled can enter that kingdome Therfore to some purging place where his soule may be cleansed froÌ„ the staines of infection 22. No such place is necessary sayth M. Field for Field in appen 1. p. fo 65. 66. by the dolours of death at the moment of dissolution all impurity of sinne is purged forth But how can this be so Death is the punishment of Originall and not any remedy against actuall sinne It is the state and condition of our corruptible nature inflicted on the Reprobate as well as on the Elect. And so neither by it selfe nor by the ordinance of God hath force and vertue to scoure out of our souls all the rust of sinne a prerogatiue denyed by you to the holy Sacraments of God And such a prerogatiue as is proper indeed to the excellency of Martyrdome and not common to the departure of euery faythful sinner whose panges are often more short and farre lesse painefull then the grieuous dolours of the cleane and vnspotted 23. Besides to procure this abolishment of sinne Field ibid. fol. 60. M. Field requireth Charity and sorrow in such perfection as may worke our perfect reconciliation to God And may not thousands or some at least with the spot of veniall or remainder of mortall crime be taken out of this world either in their sleep or vnawares before they arriue to that depth of sorrow It being so hard a thing in perfect health much harder in the agony of death impossible in tyme of sleep to attaine vnto it Or if you pretend the prouidence of God to be so carefull of his elect as they cannot be surprised vpon a sudden to what effect I pray are those exhortations of Christ so often repeated in Scripture Matt. 24. Matt. 25. That we pray and be watchfull least death preuent vs before we are aware To what effect the Parable of the foolish Virgins the Parable of Death stealing vpon vs like a thiefe To what effect are the labours and works of Pennance many zealous followers of Christ vndertake to expiate the faults of their former life when euery faythfull belieuer let him be neuer so slouthfull in this behalfe shal be sure in the last houre to haue grace inough to redeeme the debt and cancell the obligation of his sinnes This is a doctrine I graunt sutable to Protestant professioÌ„ it tendeth to the restraint of vertue it tendeth to all vitious and Epicurean liberty it ministreth occasion of slouth to Christian people and maketh God tooto indulgent to their idle sluggishnes But they that make him authour of the horrible iniquityes of the Reprobate what meruaile though they would haue him a fauourer of the smal imperfections and negligences of his Elect And rather then they will iniury as they fondly surmise the bloud of Christ they iniuriously blaspheme and truly wrong heerin the Iustice of God 24. To be briefe Caluin and Plessy Mornay affirme The hereditary naughtines and corruption of Originall sinne drowneth Calu. lib. 2. Iâ—st cap. 1. §. 8. 9. l. 3. inst cap. 15. §. â— Plessy l. 3. de Eucbar cap. 2â— as it were with a deluge the whole nature of man so that no part remayneth free from this filthy contagion Secondly they auouch No worke proceedeth from man be he neuer so perfect but is defiled with the staines of sinne Graunt these assertions true which commonly all Protestants defend how can there be either charity or sorrow in such perfection as is able to purge out all impurity of sinne When the most perfect Charity it selfe is impure and stayned how shall these staynes be taken forth By some other act of charity or worke of repentance But this worke also issuing from the inward rottenes of mans corrupted nature shall still be putrifyed with Originall infection 25. For this cause D. Field is so vnconstant in resoluing Field in append 1. part p. 66. p. 65. ibid. in appeâ— 1. par p. 4. p. â—4 65. how or when the whole vncleanes of sinne is washed from the soule as he wauereth and reeleth vp and downe not knowing where to take hold One while he sayth It is purged out by Charity and sorrow of sinning otherwhile by the dolours of death then by the very separation of soule and body wrought by death but when he dareth not auouch and therefore stammeringly vttereth It is in or immediatly vpon the dissolution of soule and body in the first entraÌ„ce of the soule into the state of the other world What giddines is heere If by the dolours of death al sinnefullnes be expelled how in the moment of dissolution If in that moment how immediatly vpon it How in the first entrance into the next life Or if in that entrance how doth Charity then worke or sorrow procure it Read his wordes Field in append 1. part p. 4. 26. The vtter deletion and full remission of their sinnes the perfect purging out of sinne being in or immediatly vpon the dissolution in the last instant of this life and first of the next and not while the body and soule remaine conioyned Pitty it is great pitty to see vnto what distresse a man of wit and learning may be driuen by the weaknesse of his cause For heere M. Field in these few wordes maketh either two instances immediatly togeather the last of this life and first of the next and so composeth diuisible tymes of indiuisible moments against the principles of Philosophy or he supposeth the instant in which sinne is remitted to be intrinsecall to this life and extrinsecall to the next and so crosseth himselfe in his owne speach affirming this full remission of sinne both to be and not to be while the body and soule remaine conioyned Or he taketh the instant of Purgation to be extrinsecall to this life and intrinsecall to the next And contrary to the whole stream of Sectaryes he alloweth with vs a remission or Purgation of sinne and Purgatory-place after this life at least for a moment For that which is done must be done in some place or els it is not done at all To which of these inconueniences he will yield I know not to one he is constrained And if I may gesse at the meaning of his variable and vnconstant speaches seeing he will not haue the perfect purging out of sinne c. while the body and soule remaine conioyned he alloweth it after the dissolution and so admitteth a remission and purgation of sinne in the next life which his fellowes renounce he himselfe would seeme to impugne 27. But when I pray is this perfect purging out of of sinne
oblations for the dead to relieue soules temporally afflicted in penall estate And this is it which I haue established by the former places of Scripture now I fortify by the testimonyes of many renowned witnesses both of the Greeke and Latin Church 10. S. Chrysostome writeth It was not without good cause enacted by the Apostls that in the Celebration of the reuerent Mysteries a Commemoration of the dead be made for they knew that great profit and much commodity redounded therby vnto them M. Fulke confesseth these wordes of S. Chrysostome in two distinct places and malepartly replyeth in both first he sayth Chrysostome must pardon vs for crediting him Secondly he answereth Without any good ground he affirmeth this memory Tertul. l. de coron miâ—it Cyp. lib. ep 9. Ioan Dam. orat de defunct Athattas Nys a. pud eundeÌ„ Aug. de verb. Apost ser 32. Idem in Enchiridio câ— 109. to be of the Apostles decree Without ground then Terullian S. Cyprian S. Iohn Damascen S. Athanasius and S. Gregory Nissen testifyed the same Without ground S. Augustine sayd It is not to be doubted but the dead are holpen by the Prayers of the holy Church and by the holesome sacrifice Againe without ground he wrote Neither is it to be denyed but that the soules departed are relieued by the piety of their friendes when for them the Sacrifice of our mediatour is offered or almes is giuen Without ground did a Euseb in vita Constant. Constantine the Great Desire to be buryed in a famous Church that he might partake the benefit of many deuout prayers after his decease Without ground b Theod. hist Eccles l. 5. cap. 25. Hier. epist ad obitu vxoris Aug. l. 21. de ciu Dei c. 23. de cura pro mort c. 1. 50. ho. hom 16. Dionys Ec. Hier. c. 7. Tertul. de monoga Chrys ho. 32. in Mat. ho. 41. in cap. 15. 1. ad Cor. Paulinus ep ad Delph Epis Aug. de verb. Apost serm 32. in Ench. c. 110. Idem lib. 50. hom hom 16. Theodosius the younger Prostrated himselfe at the Reliques of S. Chrysostome and made supplication for the soules of his Parents Arcadius and Eudoxia Without ground S. Hierom Commended the piety of Pammachius who not with lillies or purple roses but with the odours oyntments and balme of Almesdeeds refreshed the venerable bones and ashes of his deceased wise knowing that it is written As water quencheth sire so almesdeedes extinguisheth sinne But if the soules departed be thus ayded and comforted by our workes of charity they are in some state of need to vse S. Augustines wordes in someplace of distresse or penall affliction for their former defaults 11. Therfore S. Dionyse teacheth our prayers auaile them to this end That God may remit the sinnes which heereby frailty they committed That the dead may obtaine some ease or refreshment sayth Tertullian That they may purchase some rest or repose sayth S. Chrysostome That their soules may be sprinkled with some droppe of refreshment sayth Paulinus That our Lord may deale more mercifully with them That they may haue sayth S. Augustine more full remission or more tollerable damnation to wit more tolerable punishment in the place of affliction in which they are banished for a while the sight of God vntil as the same Doctour discourseth The due correction of fire hath burned out what the guiltynes of the fault deserued 12. Moreouer the foure sorts of commem orating the Dead which M. Field specifyeth the Church equally made for all who reposed in our Lord for Patriarches Prophets and Martyrs She assisted them in their passage prayed for their consumation gaue thankes for their victoryes and for imitation recounted their names and tryumphes But besides these S. Augustine mentioÌ„eth another Aug. tract 84. in lo. kind of Commemoration behoofull for them for whom it was offered saying Therefore at the table we do not so remeÌ„ber Martyrs as others departed who rest in peace that we may also pray for them but that they may pray for vs. 13. S. Cyril Archbishop of Hierusalem recordeth it Cyr. Ieros in Catech. Mislag 5. his words in Latin are these Maximum â—redentes esse animaruâ— iuuamen pro quibus offâ—rtur obsecratio sancti illius tremâ—ndi quod in altari posituÌ„ est Sacrificij Epiphan bar 75. Extat in 5 â—â—m Chrys Aug. in â—nchyr c. â—â—0 more plainely saying Ouer the Host it selfe of propitiation we inuocate God for the common peace of the Churches c. for Kings for souldiers c. for the sicke and for the afflicted and in summe for all that need help c. After we make mention of them that are departed first of Patriarches Prophets Apostles Martyrs that God by their prayers and intercessions would vouchsafe to accept of ours Then for the deceased Fathers and Bishops In fine we pray for all who haue departed this life amongst vs thinking it a most great help or ease of their soules for whome the obsecration is offered of that holy and dreadfull sacrifice which is placed on the Altar The same appeareth out of Epiphanius and out of the Greeke Liturgy extant amongst the workes of S. Iohn Chrysostom where there is an expresse distinction made betwixt the Sacrifice of praise offered for the Patriarches Apostles Prophets Martyrs and the supplications made for others which S. Augustine also excellently describeth When the Sacrifices sayth he of the Altar or whatsoeuer other almesdeeds are offered for all the baptized departed for those that be perfectly good they be thanksgiuings for such as be not very euill they be propitiations for them that be passing naught although they be not any helpes or refreshments of the dead they be some comforts and consolations of the liuing 14. Behould M. Field the Sacrifices and Prayers of the Church are not only thanksgiuings and grateful remembrances but Propitiations also for dead for them that are not of the worser sort Which you could not find in your hart to gainesay in your answere to M. Higgons who espying a triple difference betweene the Comendation of the dead vsed by the Protestants from that which was practised by the ancient Fathers As 1. Higgons booke 1. part 1. c. 2. §. 6. p. 38. That theirs was at the Altar which ProtestaÌ„ts haue not 2. Theirs in the holy Sacrifice which Protestants admit not 3. Theirs with intention to relieue the dead wheras ProtestaÌ„ts haue no such intention You M. Field to this latter difference deceitfully reply The Fathers did not intend to releeue all them they remembred at the Altar no more do we And who auerreth that they did Field in ap pen. x. part fol. 20. Aug. l. 21. de Ciuit. Dei c. 24. 27 item l. de cura pro mort cap. 1. de verb. Apo. serm 32. Field loe citato fol. 20. 21. Nyss in orat de Baptismo Aug l. 22. de ciu Dei c. 10. Dionys Areopa de Eccles
hier cap. 4. Concil Agâ—â—hens can 14. Aug. ser 19. de Sanctis Optatus lib. cont Parm. Peter Mart. in his com places in English pag. 227. Cartwrig in his 2. reply p. 264. Centurist Centur. 4. col 409. Centur. 3. cap. 4. colum 83. Greg. Nazi in ep 8. ad Simplician Fulke in his reioynder to Bristowes reply p. 28. Calu. in Haeb. c. 7. v. 9. pag. 9. 4. in tract theolog pag. 389. Neither M. Higgons nor any Catholike writer euer maintained any such intention of helping all The Patriarches Prophets and Martyrs are remembred and not desired to be holpen the damned who dye in mortall sin are neither holpen nor remeÌ„bred as you may often read in S. Augustine and generally in all the rest howbeit you guilfully misconstrue some of their sayings to be meant of the mitigation of their paines But there are some of a middle sort who depart this life neither deadlywounded nor perfectly recouered of the infirmityes of sinne these only they intended to relieue as M. Higgons proueth and you without iugling should haue laboured to disproue 15. Your answeres to his former two differences are as full fraught with vntruth as this with fraudulency and deceit For you reply to the first We haue Altars in the same sort the Fathers had c. To the second We admit the Eucharist to be rightly named a Sacrifice Both cunning escheats You haue spirituall Altars only they had corporall and externall By nature common stones by blessing Holy and immaculate S. Gregory Nissen On which we Sacrifice vnto one God which were consecrated with Chrisme and the signe of the Crosse S. Augustine S. Dionyse and the Councell of Agatho Which were seats and receptacles of the body bloud of Christ Optatus Sayings disliked by Peter Martyr M. Cartwright and the Centurists who also affirme That the Altars erected within the first 400. yeares after Christ from Iewish obseruation crept into the Church 16. Secondly they had true and proper Sacrifices vnbloudy victimes propitiatory Hosts as I haue largely demonstrated in the Controuersy of the Masse They had A Sacrifice offered to God the Father wherin the Priest supplyeth as S. Cyprian according to the Centurists superstitiously writeth the roome of Christ. They had a Sacrifice The name whereof as M. Fulke affirmeth they tooke of Iewes and Gentils and not from Scripture They as Caluin sayth forged a Sacrifice in the Lords supper without his Commandment and so adulterated the supper with adding of Sacrifice And in another treatise The ancients quoth he are not to be excused for it is apparent they haue heerein swarued from the pure and proper institution of Christ. 17. Now M. Field haue you I pray such Altars such Sacrifices as these Such Altars as Crept into your Church from the Iewish custome Such Sacrifices as were forged without our Lords Commandment Such as adulterated his supper Such as swarued from the pure and proper institution of Christ If you haue let your hart abhorre these villanous inuectlues pronounced against them by the principal Captaines of your sect If not let your Pen retract your former asseueratioÌ„ Let it disclaime from the Altars and Sacrifices of the Fathers and be content to haue no society with them in these as your men account Superstitious abuses 18. In fine the chiefe Ring-leaders of the Protestants Centu. loc citat profession do not only reiect the Altars condemne the Sacrifices but they controle also the very manner of prayer the Fathers vsed for the Dead Therefore they practised some other kind then those foure which M. Calu. l. 3. Inst c. 5. §. 10. Bulling Decad. 4. serm 10. Field his consortes allow Caluin sayth About one thousand three hundred years ago it was receaued as a coÌ„mon custom to vse Prayers for the dead c. But they were all I confesse beguiled with errour Bullinger writeth I know â—he Ancients prayed for the dead I know the excellent Doctour S. Augustine the eloquent S. Chrysostome and many other old and renowned men what they haue left written of this matter I know the Fathers affirme prayer for the dead to be a TraditioÌ„ of the Apostls And S. Augustine Aug. ser 32. de verb. Aposto Centu. 3. c. 5. col 138. Osiand Cent. 3. l. 1. c. 5. p. 10 Hosp in hist Sacr. pag. 167. Spark p. 371. 372. Fulke in c. 10. 1. ep ad Cor. sect 8. prope finem Fulke in his Confutation of Purgatory pag. 262. writeth It is obserued in the vniuersal Church that Sacrifice be offered for the dead I know Aerius was condemned because he disauowed these Prayers But I aske whether the Fathers did well heerin or no The Centurists and Osiander blame Tertullian because he approued Oblations for the Dead and Anniuersary-prayers in their Obite-dayes Hospinian affirmeth of S. Cyril He sayd indeed according to the preuailing custome of his tyme that the Sacrifice of the Altar is a great help to soules Of S. Augustine D. Sparkes He was both greatly carryed by the sway and opinions of the multitude in determining the auaylablenes of prayers for the dead Whereupon in the very next page he sayth I may lawfully discent from him in that case M. Fulke auerreth Prayer for the dead was the drosse of Augustine and Chrysostome Tertullian sayth he S. Cyprian S. Augustine S. Hierome and a great many more do witnesse That Sacrifice for the dead is the Tradition of the Apostles 19. Another where he sayth But of memories of the Dead and prayers for the dead also we will not striue but that they were vsed before the tyme of Bede Ephrem Ambrose but without warrant of Gods word or authorityes of Scripture Indeed Is this the cause you reproue a custome so general supported by the greatest Pillers both of the Greeke Latine Church because they want the testimonyes of holy Writ for such is your common excuse repeated in another place We must not belieue Chrysostome without Scripture affirming that mention of the dead in the celebration of the Lords supper was ordained by the Apostles Would not a man thinke this Ghospeller meant to imbrace S. Chrysostome and admit those ancient Writers if they countenanced their assertions with the authority of the Ghospell Would not a man thinke he would then submit his iudgement vnto theirs No other sense I wis can be picked from his wordes notwithstanding farre other is his meaning this is a veile to couer his shame a disguised glosse of speach to pretend the awe and reuerence of Gods word when as neither God nor man neither humane writing nor heauenly Oracles doth he regard vnles they sound very tuneable to his straine Which that you may not condemne as a forgery deuised by me read the sayings of these Fathers and confront with them his answeres 20. S. Augustine first proueth that prayer for the dead disagreeth not from Scripture Not from that of S. Paul We ought all to be summoned before the tribunall
of Christ that euery Ibid. pag. 304. 2. ad Cor. cap. 5. Fulke in c. 5. 2. ad Cor sect 1. Matth. 12. S. Chrys in c. 15. 1. ad Cor. ho. 14. Fulke â—-Purg pag. 251. Iob. cap. 1. 4. Reg. 19. Chrys in Ep. ad Philip hom 3. Fulke ibid. p. 236. 237. one may receaue the proper thinges of his body c. M. Fulke answereth Augustine holding that errour without authority of Scripture that prayers were profitable to the dead is driuen to inuent a distinction how they may seeme to stand with this text not be contrary to the Scriptures S. Gregory and Venerable Bede conuinceth prayers for the Dead out of the place of S. Matthew cited aboue M. Fulke Gregory and Bede sought not the true meaning of Christ in this Scripture but the confirmation of their plausible errours S. Chrysostome produceth two seuerall places in confirmation thereof one out of Iob the other out of the booke of Kings M. Fulke to the former replyeth I deny not but that Chrysostome doth alleadge this example of Iob sacrificing for his children for prayers to profit the dead c. Those good men in that declyning state of the Church to superstition c. are driuen to such simple shifts to vphould their plausible errours as it is great pitty to see To the later Chrysostome alleadgeth Scripture but he applyeth it madly and yet he often applyeth it to the same purpose Then cyting the text out of the booke of Kings which S. Chrysostome bringeth he bemoaneth him in this sort Alas good man what manner of reason is this So he O Chrysostome ô Augustine ô Gregorie haue your prayers watchings trauels industry al your naturall tallents and supernaturall guifts in searching the true sense of Scripture beene so meanly imployed as they deserue to be controlled pittyed bemoaned now by the new Ghospellers new Apostles new Peters new Pauls of this our vnhappy age 21. But to pursue this matter against my Aduersaryes could a more shrewd Inditement be drawne to conuict M. Fulke of desperate audacity then this which is Idem in his confut of Purg. pag. 362. c. 303. 393. taken out of his owne wordes In challenging to himselfe the supreme Censour-ship of iudging reiecting and condemning Fathers Scriptures Traditions or whatsoeuer els doth distast his humour Or could a more indifferent Iury be impanelled to giue verdict of M. Fields hypocrisy then these his owne fellow-sectaryes who would neuer haue darkened the foresayd lights of the Church had they taught the same kind of Commemorating the dead which M. Field mentioneth and all Protestants defend For that would Sparkes haue renounced S. Augustine Spark p. 371. 372. Fulke in his confut of Purg. p. 349. in cap. 5. 1. ad Cor. sect 1. Calu. l. 3. Inst cap. 5. §. 10. Zuing. tom 1. Epicheresis de Can. Missae fol. 185. Field in oppend 1. par pag. 13. and deliuer of him He was greatly carryed by the sway and opinions of the multitude He went further then either he had warrant for out of the Canonicall Scriptures or out of any vnforged and vncounterfeited president Of that would M. Fulke haue sayd Augustine blindly defended it Augustine held it without authority of Scripture Of that would M. Caluin write The old Fathers wanted both commandment of God and authenticall example They were carryed away into errour euen as vnaduised lightnes of beliefe is wont to rob mens wits of Iudgement Of that would Zuinglius affirme If it be so as Augustine and Chrysostome say I do not thinke the Apostles for any other cause then to yield to their infirmity permitted some to pray for the Dead Would the fornamed and many other Protestants reprehend the Fathers disgrace the Apostles resist the current of all Antiquity for countenancing a point of Protestants profession No M. Field no man of sense can thinke your men so senslesse as to condemne in their Predecessours which themselues vphold 22. Neither can it be defended that this Prayer for the Dead reproued by your Ghospellers in the ancient Fathers was made by them as you seeke another way to escape Either for the mititagion of the paines of men in hell or for the admittance of the Iust into the Heauenly Pallace and presence of God out of some wrong conceit that no iudgment passed on them vntill the generall day of Resurrection For both these were particuler fancies of priuate men as you M. Field your selfe seem to auoch and it is euident to all that are Field in appen 1. part fol. 4. 12. 13. 16. Bulling Decad. 4. serm â—0 Fulke in his confut of Purg. p. 78. 310. acquainted with antiquity But the ancient Commemoration of the Dead reprehended by our new Reformers was generally receaued by all the Fathers It was as Bullinger writeth obserued in the vniuersall Church It was as M. Fulke sayth the common errour in S. Augustines and S. Ambroses dayes The preuailing custome as * Hospin in hist Sacra p. 167. Vrbanus Regius in 1. par operum in loc Commun c. 18. de Missae negotio f. 7â— Fulke in his answer to a counterfeit Cathol p. 44 Aug. l. 21. de ciu Dei c. 23. 24. de cura pro mort c. 1. another testifyeth in the tyme of S. Cyril The vniuersall obseruation as Vrbanus Rhegius reporteth and ancient custome of the whole Catholike Church Againe this is affirmed by the Fathers to be a Tradition of the Apostles which those errours neuer were 23. For gainesaying this as vnprofitable for the Dead Aerius was condemned as M. Fulke witnesseth yet neuer any was censured by the Church for deniall of those To mantaine this S. Augustine and others distinguish three sorts of men departed and make the middle only as I specifyed aboue partakers of benefit To allow those no such distinction is necessary for none are so euill whose paines may not be mitigated none so good whose ioyes may not be increased or felicity hastned Lastly this is confessed by our * Fulke in his confut of Purgat in the places before cited Kemnitius 3. p. exam pag. 93. 107. Vrbanus Regius part 1. operum in loc Commun cap. Casaubon in the answere to the epist of Card. Peron to the 3. instance fol. 33. in English Aduersaryes to haue beene defended by S. Dionyse S. Gregory Nazianzen S. Basil S. Athanasius S. Cyril S. Gregory Nissen S. Epiphanius S. Chrysostome S. Hierome S. Ambrose S. Augustine and many more who neuer dreamed but some of them stoutly impugned the former errours of which M. Field could not be ignorant 24. Therefore as I cannot but iudge him both a deep dissembler and deceitfull iugler in seeking these grosse and palpable euasions so I truely honour his Maiestyes plaine and sincere dealing who freely protesteth That it was a very ancient custome in the publike prayers of the Church to make commemoration of the deceased to desire of God rest for their soules
the first encounter beaten to the ground 14. For the scope and tenour of the Apostles Analogy doth not consist in the manner but in the cause of Christs being made sinne to the end he might make vs iust albeit in a different sort he made sinne by a meere imputation because it was impossible for him to be truly a sinner we properly and truly iust because it is more Tit. 2. v. 24. Leuit 4. v. 11. 24. Ezec. 44. v. 29. Osee 4. v. 8 honourable and glorious vnto Christ to cleanse to himselfe a people acceptable to enrich and endow vs with the treasures of his inherent iustice then to leaue our filth and ordure ouershaddowed with the mantle of his externall righteousnes Secondly Christ is sayd to be made sinne that is an hoast and sacrifice for the extirpation of sinne So the Hebrew word Chattat peccatum Sinne often signifyeth a victime for sinne as in Leuiticus Ezechiel and Osee peccatum * Hebraicé Chattat Peccatum in the latin it is Pecca ta populi mei comedent they shall eate the sinne of my people that is the hoast or victime for their sinne Therfore as Christ was not by the meanes of another but in his owne person truly and really made a sacrifice for sin so we not only by imputation but truely and really in our selues ought to be the iustice of God in him And the Apostle elegantly sayth that we must be not iust but the iustice of God in Christ to oppose it to sinne signifying withall that it is the effect and likenes of Gods increated iustice by infused and created charity communicated vnto vs as S. Cyril expoundeth it or for that it is giuen vs Cyril l. 22. the saur c 3. August l. de spirit lit c. 18. Chrys Theoph. in bunc loc through the merits of Christ from God according to S. Augustin or lastly to betoken the excellency of the Iustice which leaueth no spot or blemish of sinne but maketh vs as it were wholy Grace wholy Iustice it selfe as S. Chrysostome and Theophilict do insinuate 15. Another argument they take out of the first to the Ephesians He hath gratifyed vs in his beloued Sonne or as they to boulster their heresy corruptly translate he hath made vs Ephes 1. v. 6. 3. acceptable in the beloued As though we were only outwardly accepted by the fauour of his Sonne not in wardly endowed with the participation of his Iustice how beit the In the Bible set forth by his Maiesty Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth not only import to accept as gracious but to make gracious and acceptable indeed by communicating vnto vs inherent iustice in ward ornaments by which God maketh our soule as S. Chrysostome sayth pulchram desiderabilem ac dilectam beautifull Chrys in â—um loc desired and beloued of him 16. Thirdly Whitaker and Fulke obiect out of S. Paul to the Corinthians Christ is made vnto vs from God wisedom VVhitaker in his answere to 3. reason of â—â— Campian Fulk in c. 2. ad Cor. sect 2. 3. Cor. 1. v. 30. righteousnes sanctification and redemption Therefore say they our righteousnes is placed in Christ not heaped vp with our vertues But the contrary is gathered out of the same wordes for Christ is there affirmed to be our righteousnes as he is our sanctification and wisedome now he is our sanctification as they themselues agree by inherent sanctity our wisedome likewise by the habit or guift of wisedome infused into vs Therefore our righteousnes or iustice rather by created iustice imparted to our soules I answere againe that Christ is called our iustice diuers and sundry wayes 1. In the way of Communication because the perfectioÌ„s of the head are communicated to the body 2. In way of Richardus Tap. in explica ar de iustif Stapl l. 7. de iustit imputat c. 9. Rom. 8. v. 29. Bernard ep 190. assimilation for that God the Father hath predestinated vs to be made conformable to the Image of his Sonne 3. In way of satisfaction because he hath fully satisfyed for the debt of our sinnes which satisfaction of his is applyed vnto vs and made ours indeed by imputation as S. Bernard testifyeth yet not without true and inherent iustice also in our selues 4. In the way of merit for that he hath merited and purchased for vs true iustice from the handes of God 5. In the way of causality for that he is also togeather with God the efficient cause of our sanctification and iustice These and other causes which Protestants ignorantly Concil Trid sess 6 c. 7. Aug. l. de spirit â—it c. 9. in psal 30. Hier. dial aduers Pâ—lag mingle and confound the holy Councell of Trent doth wisely distinguish and set downe in this manner The sinall cause of our iustification is the glory of God of Christ eternall life the efficient God the ineritorious his beloued Sonne our Lord Iesus Christ c. the instrument all baptisme c. the only formall cause is the iustice of God not that by which he is iust but by which he maketh vs iust by which he cloatheth man as S. Augustine speaketh when he iustifyeth the wicked or as he saith in another place which God imparteth that man may be iust which S. Hierome S. Bernard and sundry reasons manifestly Bernard epist 290. approue as I shall more plentifully discouer in the Chapter ensuing THE SECOND CHAPTER IN WHICH The former doctrine is confirmed by more reasoÌ„s authorityes and other obiections of our Aduersaryes refuted AS the in-bred naughtynes of Originall infection neuer cleanly rinsed or scoured out is the sluse of filthines in Protestants iudgment and roote of al their impious opinions which I named aboue so the heauenly beame of inhabitant grace which garnisheth the soules of Christs faythfull seruants is the head well-spring according to vs of all the good that proceedeth from vs. This iustifyeth vs before the Tribunal of his highnesse this maketh our works pleasing to his Maiesty this aduanceth them to the dignity of merit this purchaseth the crowne of reward this ministreth power and ability to fullfill his Commandments and whatsoeuer els we do acceptable to him and worthy of his kingdome al floweth from the veines of this celestiall fountaine Therfore I labour to fense and strengthen it further with some other impregnable reasons 2. The first prosecuted by Andreas Vega is to this purpose The iustice which Adam had before his fall was not imputatiue but inherent and true Iustice which made him amyable and gratefull in the sight of God as all the Vega l. 7. in Concil Trid. c. 22. Fathers and our aduersaryes with them generally confesse but the same Iustice is restored vnto vs by the merits of Christ which we lost in Adam therefore true Iustice before God is heere communicated to our soules by the benefit Rom. 5. of his passion The minor
true Iustice consisteth Remission of sinnes sayth he it selfe is not without some merit if fayth do get or impetrate it neither is the merit of fayth none by which fayth he sayd Lord be mercifull to me a sinner and descended iustifyed by the merit of faythfull humility And in the epistle next following But if any man shall say that Fayth doth merit the grace of working well we cannot deny it nay we willingly confesse it c. They therefore that haue fayth by which they obtaine iustification through the grace of God haue arriued to the law of Iustice Likewise in another place This confession sayth he meriteth Iustification 5. The Centurists taxe Tertullian Origen S. Gregory Nissen S. Ephrem S. Hierome for fauouring heerin our doctrine Tertullian say they seemeth to hould that good workes do both goe before and follow fayth for so he auerreth of Patience And in his fourth booke against Marcion he affirmeth the chief cause of Zachaeus iustification to haue been in that he not knowing fullfilled the precept of Isay breake thy bread vnto the hungry In like manner Origen in so many places I cyte their owne wordes ascribeth to workes the preparation to saluation and cause thereof as in his Commentaryes vpon S. Matthew Such truely sayth he as do professe their fayth in Iesus and do not prepare themselues by good workes to saluation are resembled to the foolish Virgins And in his homilyes vpon Iosue The habitation or dwelling of God in vs he attributeth to our merits that is to our merits of congruity as S. Augustine taught whome I cyted before Then they reprehend and labour to refell this saying Cent. 4. c. 10. Colum. 953. Nissen l. de vita Moys Cent. 4 c. 4. Colum. â—94 Ephrem l. 2. de compunct cor cap. 8. Cent. 4. c. 10. Col. 1249. of S. Gregory Nissen The grace of the holy Ghost dwelleth not in man vnles be first mortify in himselfe the force of sinne They accuse S. Ephrem for teaching that Contrition doth merit remission of sinnes Wherupon they reiect this as one of his blemished places Who doth not admire that God by the teares of this short space forgiueth sinnes and that we gauled with the sore of a thousand woundes he at the eleuenth houre cureth vs by teares Againe When he hath healed vs he rendreth the reward of tears S. Hierome also they blame because in his commentary vpon the prayer of Ieremy Nimium tribuit contritioni he attributeth too much to contrition they blame him likewise for houlding That Cornelius receaued the holy Ghost by the works of the naturall law by which Abraham Moyses and other Saints were also iustifyed What S. Hierome there meaneth by receauing the holy Ghost and whether Cornelius were S. Basil reg 224. ex breuior Greg. hom â— in Ezech. iustifyed before the comming of S. Peter I referre my Reader to the expositours vpon that place and certaine it is that S. Basil S. Gregory do insinuate that the almes prayers and other morall good workes which Cornelius wrought were acceptable preparatiues to moue God to mercy and to communicate vnto him the grace of inherent Iustice Which preparation Prosper expresly acknowledgeth and freeth it from the heresy of the Pelagians Prosp l. de lib. arbitr ad Ruffin Beda in hunc locuÌ„ saying that they did not vnderstand that preparation of Cornelius to be made by Gods grace as we do And Venerable Bede out of S. Gregory affirmeth of the same Cornelius He knew God Creatour of all but that his omnipotent Sonne was incarnate he knew not and in that fayth he made prayers and gaue almes which pleased God and by well doing he deserued to know God perfectly to belieue the mistery of the Incarnation and to come to the Sacrament of Baptisme S. Augustine also thus Because Aug. l. â— de Bapt. c. â— whatsoeuer goodnes he had in prayer and almes the same could not profit him vnles he were by the bands of Christian society and peace incorporated to the Church he is bidden to send vnto Peter that by him he may learne Christ by him he may be baptized Wherby it appeareth that all these allowed his preparatiue workes to deserue in a manner by way of congruity the iustifying grace of the holy Sacrament of Baptisme 6. It is bootlesse to demur any longer on the recitall Rom. 4. Ioan. 20. v. 29. Matth. 8. v. 10. 15. v. 8. Luc. vltim 25. Marc. vlt. v. 14. of other sayings in a point so cleare which Protestants themselues could neuer gainesay vnles they would haue vs worke like stockes and stones or like brute and senseles creatures without freedome and election in the most noble and supernaturall act of our fayth wherein they place the summe of our spirituall life For if that be free as the Holy Ghost declareth it to be commending the fayth of Abraham and of many other that belieued rebuking the incredulity of such as belieued not which he would not haue done if it had not beene in their power to belieue or not to belieue Then it must needs presuppose a pious affection of the will to go before and bend the vnderstanding to assent vnto such hidden misteryes as he imbraceth not only because that alone can affoard it the dignity of freedome but also because the vnderstanding being not inclined by nature nor drawne by the euident sight S. Thoâ— 2. 2. of the obiect nor otherwise inforced cannot possibly as S. Thomas the oracle of Deuines reasoneth giue assent to darke obscure and ineuident articles vnles it be bowed and determined by the force of the will which force and Concil Araus c. 5. Concil Tol. 4. c 55. refer c. de Iudaeis dist 45. August tract 26. in Ioan. Ambr ad Rom. 4. in illa verb. Ei autem quioperatur c. inclination the Arausican Councell tearmeth Initium fidei ipsum credulitatis affectum the beginning of Fayth and the affection it selfe or desire of belieuing And for this cause the fourth Toletan Councell sayth Mentis conuersione quisquis credendo saluatur By the conuersion of his owne mind euery one belieuing is saued S. Augustine recyting many thinges that man may do not willingly immediatly inferreth but belieue he cannot vnles he be willing S. Ambrose To belieue or not belieue is the part of the will for he cannot be forced to that which is not manifest Origen No man is depriued of the possibility of belieuing for this is placed in the arbitrement or choice of man and in the cooperation of grace S. Clemens Alexandrinus The kingdome of heauen is yours if you will c. it is yours if you shall only be willing to belieue Which wordes the Centuristes quote and with their proud and audacious pen censure as Origen ho. 2. in diuersa loca sacrae Scripturae Clement Alexan. in paren Cent. 2. c. 4. Col. 59. Iraen Col. â—8 apud Centur. erroneous As also the like of
ad Vitalem and proposed vnto vs. We besides that outward grace and fauour of preaching belieue also an internall grace which inwardly moueth and worketh with vs. For if a way faring man should fall a sleep in a dangerous wood where he were ready to be deuoured and should be so benuÌ„med of his senses or infeebled with trauaile that he could not moue without help it were not inough for another to awake and warne him of the danger to shew him the way by which he may escape vnles he affoard him also his helping hand vnles he succour stay and ayde him to depart so it is not sufficient to heare the word of God thundred in our eares to heare the truth deliuered the examples of Christ of his Saints and followers set before our eyes vnles God himselfe vouchsafe to enlighten our vnderstanding inflame our will touch and open the Act. 1â— vers 14. stringes of our harts as he opened the hart of Lydia to attend â—o those thinges which were sayd by Paul vnles he inwardly inspire moue and cooperate with vs to imbrace the sayth which is outwardly propounded 9. In this therefore and all the former positions of Grace we dissent from the Pelagians as M. Abbot might haue seene in the selfe same places he quoted out of S. Augustine if that passion which ministred to his pen those Aug. l. â— 2. de grat Chri. peccat orig odious comparisons betweene them and vs had not dimmed his sight from discouering these manifold differences of truth from heresy He might moreouer haue read in the foresayd S. Augustine that al beit Pelagius by those ambiguous acceptions of the word Grace deluded many Bishops in the Councell of Palestine yet he neuer could how beit he endeauoured much deceaue or beguile the Roman Church that impregnable rocke against which no heresy can euer preuaile But M. Abbot vbi supra c. 1. fol. 105. 106. 107. Abbot contendeth and struggleth to proue that the RomaÌ„ Church the an cient Fathers and S. Augustine himselfe coÌ„demned Pelagius because he confessed not the habituall quality and guift of renewing grace to be necessary to euery pious and Godly deed although he acknowledged Idem folio 110. the worke of preparation to proceed from the preuenting grace and help which we and the holy Councell of Trent admit yea sayth he this grace of ours the very Heathens Aristotle and Tully allowed saying Neuer any man Arist. de mundo Cicero de natura De orum 1. q. Tuscula proued great and excellent without some diuine instinct I answer he struggleth I confesse and struggleth eagerly to heap vp falshoods and hatefull criminations not to all eadge any grounded proofes or substantiall testimonyes either against vs or that Oecumenicall and venerable Councel For albeit the Heathens acknowledged the diuine concourse or speciall influence of the supreme cause to all heroicall acts yet they still bounded and restrained it within the confines and limites of nature they neuer dreamed of any supernaturall grace of any motion or illumination bestowed vpon vs through the merits of Christ or any speciall succour or inspiration of God ordayned to the remission of sinnes iustification of our soules in this life or to our future glory and felicity in the next For although those heauenly impulses which God gaue to the Pagans were often addressed to that end as S. Augustine affirmeth of the strang mutation made in Polemo by the Aug. ep 230. Araus 2. Can. 5. 7. 15. Aug. ep 105. perswasion of Zenocrates Yet they were not acquainted heerewith they ingulfed in the lake of superstitious infidelity neuer acknowledged the extraordinary benefite of those supernaturall fauours of which we only speake Secondly how falsly we are accused to agree with the Pelagians and how mayne an opposition there is in sundry points betweene vs and them I haue already declared Thirdly that the Roman Church and Ancient Fathers censured Pelagius among the rancke of Heretikes not for his denyall of habituall but chiefly of actual grace Augu. ep 105. 107 l. degra lib. arbi c. 17. l. 1. de praedest Sanctor c. 19. l. 2. de pece merit remis c. 18. in Enchirid c. 32 de nat grat c. 32. l. 1. ad Simpl. q. â— which preuenteth and cooperateth with the consent of our will independent of the merits thereof is so euidently expressed and so often repeated not only in the second Arausican Councell but also by the Pelagians chiefe Antagonist our greatest champion S. Augustine himselfe as M. Abbots paper might haue blushed for him when he wrote the contrary For it is not inough to confesse an habitual or inhabitant grace which S. Augustine calleth the grace of remission of sinnes but we must also sayth he acknowledge a grace precedent which must dispose and prepare vs to obtaine remission styled by him Preuenting and ayding or concomitant grace the one wrought in vs without vs that is without our free consent the other in vs with vs to wit with our free consent 10. But the dust which stopped M. Abbots eyes from behoulding a truth testifyed in so many places was the cause of his mistaking of some of S. Augustines wordes calling Abbot ibid. f. 105. the grace for which he contended with Pelagius the grace whereby we are Christians and the children of God whereby we are iustifyed c. And yet he only graceth with those tearmes the former motioÌ„s or illuminations of the holy Ghost because they moue induce and disspose vs to be iust good and the children of the highest Gab. Vasq 1. 2. disp 18â— c. 1. or because they make increase in the perfection of Iustice already attayned as Gabriel Vasquez solidly interpreteth him And S. Augustine himselfe plainely insinuateth in his epistle to Sixtus a little after the middest saying No man is Aug. ep 105. deliuered and iustifyed from the euills of his transgression or preâ—aâ—ication but by the grace of Iesus Christ our Lord not only by remission of sinnes but first by inspiration of fayth it selfe and feare of God Now in what sort can we by inspired feare by inspired fayth be iustifyed in what sort can we be deliuered from our offences before our offences be forgiuen before remission of sinnes but only by them as by dispositions preparations or certaine merites of congruity to obtaine remission therefore S. Augustine taketh grace by which we are iustifyed for that which moueth or disposeth to iustification in which sense he affirmeth about the beginning of the same Epistle That fayth by some kind of merits August ibid. obtayneth remission and yet that remission is not of merit because fayth is a free guift of God and not proceeding from our selues as the Pelagians boasted of their beliefe S. Augustine also in many other his Treatises cyted aboue speaketh so expresly of preparing preuenting and ayding grace before the infusion of habituall as his wordes can beare no other
c. He also thinketh some whose fayth is enobled with no accesse of works may indeed be * To wit infants and such as by Baptism or contrition being iustifyed are preuented by death before they can accomplish any good workes Method serm de resurr Cuius fragmentum extat apud Epiphan l. 2. tom 1. Tertul. l. aduers Iudaeos Cent. 3. c. eo Colum. â—40 saued but attaine not to the height of the kingdome or liberty which say they what is it other then without works no man to be perfectly iustifyed And the Authour of the homilyeâ—in Cantica maketh a double iustice one of Fayth another of Workes and truly to ech of them â—e imputeth saluation c. Methodius seemeth to hold that we are iustifyed by the obseruation and fullfilling of the naturall law which is performed by the ayde and help of Christ Tertullian sayth The Saints were iust by the iustice * Done by grace and fayth in Christ Cent. 3. c. 4. Col. 80. 81. Cypr. l. 3. ep 25. Serm de eleemos Tob. 4. v. 11. Eccles 3. v 33. Ioan. 5. v. 14. Serm. de eleemos Cent. 4. c. 4. Colum. 292. 293. Cent. 4. c. 4. Col. 292. 283. of the law of nature He attributeth to satisfaction remission of sinnes teaching nothing in the meane tyme perspicuously of the fayth in Christ or of free remission of sinnes as almost no where doth he either touch plainely inough or handleth very slenderly the article of the Ghospell and iustification With which errour Cyprian yieldeth to descipline or strict obseruation of good life That it is the guardian of hope the retentiue or stay it maketh vs alwayes remayne in Christ continually liue in God and to arriue to the heauenly and diuine promised rewards c. So he professedly teacheth sinnes committed after Baptisme by almes deeds and good workes to be abolished At once sayth he in Baptisme remission of sinnes is giuen dayly and continuall doing of good after the imitation of Baptisme imparteth the indulgence and mercy of God which he endeauoureth to proue by words of Scripture as by almesdeeds and fayth sinnes are purged As water extinguisheth fire so almesdeeds sinne also by the saying of Chryst Behould thou art whole see thou sinne no more least some worse thing befall thee he reasoneth that by good workes saluation had is to be kept and lost to be recouered 10. In the fourth hundred yeare they reproue for the same cause Lactantius Nilus Chromatius Ephrem S. Hierome S. Gregory Nissen S. Hilary S. Ambrose and Theophilâ—â— Alexandrinâ—â— Some of their words I will set downe as they are recorded by the Centurists the rest I omit for breuityes sake Lactantius say they auerreth that God giueth eternall saluation for our vertues labours afflictions torments c. Lactant. l. 7. c. 27. l. 3. c. 9. Chrom in conc de beatid Cent. 4. c. 4. Col. 301. Voluntariam paupertatem suo merito diuitias regni caelestis acquirere ait Eadem cent col 192. l. 8. comment in Isa EadeÌ„ cent Col. 293. Ambr. l. 10. ep ep 82. Qui sunt hi Preceptores noui qui merituÌ„ excludunt iâ—iunij EadeÌ„ cent col 293. Theoph. Alexand. l. 3. Pasch Cent. 5. c. 4. Colum. 504. 505. 506. 507. 508. 509. 510. c. 10. colum 1008. Chrys hom 6 in c. 1. Ioan. c. 4. col Cent. 5. c. 4 Colum. 504. Chrysost hom 20. in e. 2. Ioan. eadem cent 506. Cyril c. 18. in Ioan. Eadem cent c. 4. col 505. citant Aug. it a dicentem l. 2. de peccat merit c. 3. 4. c. haec de Aug. cent 5. c. 4. colum 507. 508. To serue God sayth he is nothing els then by good workes to maintaine and preserue iustice Chromatius attributeth so much to voluntary pouerty that he auerrâ—th the riches of the heauenly kingdome to be attayned by the merit thereof Hierome sayth It is not inough to haue the wall of fayth vnles fayth it selfe be strengthned with good workes S. Ambrose What saluation can we haue vnles by fasting we wash away our sinnes When as the Scripture fayth fasting and almesdeeds deliuereth from sinne Who are therefore these new Maisters who exclude or deny the merit of fasting Is not this the voice of the Gentils saying Let vs eate and drinke c. Theophilus Alexandrinus Such as fast that is imitate in earth Angelicall conuersation through the vertue of abstinence by a short and small labour gaine to themselues great and eternall rewards 11. In the fift age are traduced by them in like manner S. Chrysostome S. Cyrill S. Leo S. Augustine Theodoret Sedulius Prosper Hesychius Primasius Theodulus Saluianus Maximus Salonius Thalasius Marcus Eremita Eucherius and Paulinus For in the beginning of that Paragraffe of Iustification thus they write Most of the Doctours of this age ascribe also too much to workes in iustification and acceptation of men before God c. Chrysostome speaketh of many wayes or kindes of iustification c. Chrysostome is an immoderate Encomiast or prayser of humane workes For this he sayth Let vs endeauour withall our forces to attaine saluation by our owne good workes c. Againe Is it inough to life euerlasting to belieue in the Sonne No truly c. Cyrill also contendeth that fayth alone sufficeth not to saluation but fayth and workes Augustin attributeth sometyme too much too workes c. He recyteth some testimonyes by which he proueth euill workes to condemne good workes to merit eternall life As out of the first to the Corinthians the sixt Chapter Out of the first to the Galathians out of the ninetenth and fiue and twentith of S. Matthew Theodoret contrary to himselfe affirmeth Theâ—d quest 63. in Exod. ita asserunt de Theod. cent 5. c. 10. col 1008. Prosp l. 1. de vit contemp c. 19. Cent. 5. Col. 505. that only fayth is not sufficient to saluation but it needeth workes Prosper sayth Neither workes without Fayth nor fayth alone without workes doth iustify Hitherto the Centurists 12. And yet they are not singular in condemning all these Doctours of the Church Pomeran once Superintendent of Wittemberge sayth In the books of the Ecclesiasticall Doctours seldome shall you find the article of Iustification purely expressed not certes in the bookes of Athanasius A little after Touching Iustification they write at a venter whatsoeuer coÌ„meth in their mind Then he concludeth You ought not to beleeue the Fathers because out of the same mouth they blow both heate and could Chytraeus another Protestant complaineth that not Chytr l. de stud theol only Basil and Hierome but most of the Fathers either very sleightly touch or darken and depraue with politicke opinions concerning the iustice of the law the speciall doctrine of the Ghospell touching the grace of God and Iustice of fayth which is the chiefe and proper patrimony of the Church Schnepsius one of the same fraternity sayth Augustine neuer vnderstood the true and settled Schâ—â—ps
in him Or if that work doth not hinder the free grace of iustification in Protestants conceit because it is the gift of God because it doth not iustify according to them as it is an actioÌ„ proceeding froÌ„ man but as it taketh hold and applyeth vnto them the iustice of Christ Why should our preparatiue workes any way preiudicate the freedome of that fauour as long as we acknowledg theÌ„ also the meer guift of the highest and not to dispose vs to the life of grace as they are achieued by our owne forces alone or flow from the drye and barren soyle of Nature but as they are made fertile by the water of the holy Ghost as they are eleuated and inspired by his viuificall motion For if the Beggar which is Cardinall Tolets example who of his owne accord Toleâ— in c. 3. ad Rom. stretcheth out his hand to receaue the offered almes doth not hinder the francke and liberall bestowing of the money much lesse should the cooperation of our freewill which not of our selues not of our owne endeauours but moued and strengthned by God yieldeth to his motions any way withstand his liberall donation and free guift of Iustice 17. In the last wing wherein the only hope of their victory remayneth such sentences of Scripture are ranged as flatly debarre the concurrence of workes from all kind of Iustice to wit By grace you are saued through fayth and that not of your selues for it is the guift of God not of workes that no man glory We account a man to be iustifyed by fayth without the Ephes 2. v. 8. Rom. 3. v. 28. Rom. 11. v. 6. Rom. 4. v. 2. workes of the law If by grace not now of workes otherwise grace now is not grace If Abraham were iustifyed by workes he hath glory but not with God with many others to the same purpose I answere that the Apostle excludeth indeed from the grace of iustification either first or second all workes which proceed from the vigour or strength of nature on which the Pelagians so much relyed Then he excludeth the good vse and exercise of freewil done without Christ to which the Semipelagians ascribed the dowry of grace Thirdly he excludeth the moral vertues performed by the Act. 15. v. 1. Aug. l 5. cont 2. ep Pelag. c. 7. in prâ—f ps 3â— ep 107. tract 50 de verb. Domini secundum Euang. Matth. Hier. l. â— com in c. 3. ad Gal. Prosper cont collat c. 22. Cent. 3. c. 4. Col. 80. ciâ—ant Orig. l. 8. in epist ad Rom. light of reason precepts of naturall Philosophy wherin the Gentils boasted and placed their happines Lastly he excludeth all works achieued by the sole notice of the Law both cerimoniall and morall in which the Iewes trusted so farre as they deemed themselues thereby only assured of Gods fauour and some of them vrged the necessity of circumcision the obseruation of their ceremonyes euen to Gentils conuerted vnto Christ of whome they auouched Vnles you be eireumcised you cannot be saued 18. Against these the Apostle so often inculcateth that neither circumcision prepuce nor any worke either of Iew or Gentill done by themselues or by the knowledge of the law without the grace of the Spirit inwardly mouing is able to saue them but he neuer excludeth the Sacraments of Baptisme or Pennance nor the works proceeding from the help of supernaturall grace to be dispositions to attaine the first true causes of increase in the second iustification whereof read S. Augustine S. Hierome and Prosper who interprete the Apostls meaning in the selfe same manner as I haue heere declared which interpretation the Century-writers haue also espyed and reproued in Origen engrossing these wordes in the Catalogue as they account them of his errours It is to be vnderstood that the workes which S. Paul reiecteth and so often reprehendeth are not the iustices which are commanded in the Law but those thinges in which they boast and glory who obserue the law according to the flesh or rites of sacrifices or obseruation of Sabaoths and new Monnes these and the like are the Concil Trid. sesl 6. Can. 1. Fulk in c. 2. Iacob sect 9. Fulk ibid. Vasq in 1. 2. disp 210. cap. 9. VVhitak l. 1. aduerf Duraeum VVhitak in his answere to M. CampiaÌ„ 8. reason â—ulke in c. 2. Iac. sect 9. Abbot in his defence c. 4. Ambr. in c. 3. 4. ad Rom. Chrys in c. 3. ad Gal. hom 7. in c. 3. ad Rom. Basil serm de humiâ—it Aug. l. 1. cont 2. ep Pelag. c. 21. l. 83. q. 76. Hesich in Leuit. l. 4. cap. 14. Hilar. cap. in Matth. August tract 49. in Ioan. workes by which he auoucheth no man may be saued Hitherto Origen quoted by the Magdeburgians To which purpose the Councell of Trent hath very diuinely decreed If any shall teach man may be iustifyed before God by his works which either by humane nature or by the doctrine of the Law are accomplished without the diuine grace of Iesus Christ let him be accursed According to this authentical exposition S. Paul and S. Iames are clearely discharged from that irreconciliable contradiction M. Fulke imagineth betweene them in our opinion for either S. Paul speaketh of the first iustification and S. Iames of the second which is not as he mistaketh another kind of iustification but the augmentation of the former or they both treate of the first and second also as Gabriel Vasquez thinketh most probable and the one excludeth workes wrought without the inward motion of grace from iustification the other acknowledgeth such workes to cooperate thereunto as proceed from grace which is no contradiction but the true and vndoubted position of our Catholike fayth 19. Although all the sentences of the Fathers which are stumbling blockes in our Reformers way be satisfyed in the same manner as these Texts of Scripture yet to ease the studious Reader from further trauaile I will particulerly set downe how the chiefest of them are to be vnderstood whome our Reformers oppose against vs concerning this point S. Ambrose S. Chrysostome S. Basil S. Augustine Hesichius and S. Hilary when they affirme vs iustifyed by fayth alone without any workes they mean without any workes eyther of our owne or of Moyses law done without grace Or they are to be interpreted of Fayth which is liuely indewed with Charity and accompanyed with other vertues So S. Augustine in his treatises vpon S. Iohn when he sayth Fayth is the soule of our soule Prosper S. Bernard and S. Augustine againe in the seauenth Chapter of his booke of predestination of Saints Prosp de voca gent. l. â— c. 8 9. Bernar ser 22 in cant Aug. de praedest Sanctor c. cap. 7. Leo serm de Epiphaâ— alibi Orig. in c. 3. ad Rom. Chrysost hom de fide lege nâ—turae Vasq in â— 2. disp 210. c. 9. are to be interpreted of fayth alone inchoatiuely S. Leo
ep 29. iudged be found vniust and scant For vniust it is meted with the iustice which is wholy infinit scant in comparison of that Likewise when he sayth That our iustice is right but not pure c. for how can it be pure iustice where fault as yet cannot be wanting he denyeth it to be pure he sayth fault cannot be wanting because it is most commonly conioyned with veniall defaults which although they hinder not the true nature and perfection of iustice yet they darken the luster and brightnes thereof and are lyable to the seuerity of Gods heauy punishment Whereupon S. Augustine Wo be to the laudable life of a man if it be examined without mercy To the other passage of this renowned Doctour where he affirmeth most perfect charity which cannot be increased is to be found in no man in this life we grant it to be true This clause which followeth And as long as it may be increased that which is lesse then it tought to be is of vice of which vice it proceedeth that there is no man who doth good and doth not sinne is to be vnderstood not of formall vice or faulty sinne but of that which is an infirmity weaknes and defect of nature from whence it groweth that there is no man who doth alwayes good and neuer sinneth at least venially sometyme Thus S. Augustine interpreteth August ibid. himselfe a litle before saying Who therefore is without some vice that is without some fomite or as it were root of sinne After which manner I haue shewed aboue in the second Chapter of Concupiscence that not only he but Vlpianus Aug. in l. de perfect iusti◠c. 15. Pliny and Cicero vse the name vitium vice for any defect either in nature or act In the same sense S. Augustine taketh the word peccatum in his booke of the perfection of iustice where he hath these wordes It is a sinne when eyther that Charity is not which ought to be or lesse then it ought to be Otherwise August de spir lit c. vlt. he would haue crossed and contradicted what he auouched before in his booke de spiritu litera That if our loue of God in this life be not so great as is due to his full and perfect knowledg it is not culpae deputandum to be imputed to any fault By sinne then in the former place S. Augustine meaneth a defect only or falling from the brimme of perfection yet no culpable sin So also many prophane writers vse the Plautus in Baceb Si vnam peccauisses syllabam Tull. 2. Tusc Quod in eo ipso peccet cuius profitetur scientiam 1. Ioan. 1. v. 8. Iac. 3. v. 3. August tract 1. epist Ioan. l. de nat gra a. c. 36 38. word peccare to sin for erring and doing amisse in any act or faculty as Plautus sayth If thou hadst fayled in one sillable and Tully If a Grammarian shall speake rudely or he that would be counted a Musitiā sing out of tune he is the more to be blamed quod in eo ipso peccet that he erreth or cōmitteth a banger in the thing it selfe whereof he professeth the skill To Origen to S. Hierome and to the rest of S. Augustine and S. Bernard which Protestants obiect I neede not frame any particuler reply The three last generall answers to the Texts of Scripture sweep all the dust away which they deceiptfully gather out of these or any other of the Fathers writings 4. Lastly it is obiected If we shall say that we haue no sinne we seduce our selues and the truth is not in vs. Likewise In many things we offend all I answere both these places are vnderstood of veniall sinnes as S. Augustine expoundeth them which often creep into the purest actions we do and from which we are seldome or neuer wholy free yet they distayne not the purity of our vertuous actions they are not intermingled with the morall bonity therof but extrinsecally accompany it abating the cleare beames of our soule without defyling the pure action whose adherents they are an assertion manifest amongst Deuines August ep 29. 50. l. de virg cap. 48. 49. l. 4. cont 2. ep Pelag. c. 10. Bonau 3. distinct 3. part dub 1. which Protestants conceauing not run into diuers and those pernicious absurdityes Secondly S. Iohn is interpreted also by S. Augustine of the fomite of sinne which euery man hath how perfect soeuer he be yet he doth not meane that that fomite is properly sinne but materially or the effect or cause of sinne which interpretation of S. Iohns words S. Bonauenture imbraceth and addeth a third exposition that S. Iohn doth not teach no man to be at any tyme without sinne but that no man can say to wit assuredly affirme without reuelatiō that he hath no sinne wherein Lyranus and Hugo Cardinalis agree with him but Caietam vnderstandeth S. Iohn of no sinne neyther actually committed nor originally contracted heertofore This no man the Virgin Mary only excepted as hath beene els where declared can auouch without seduction of his hart without he make God a lyar who sent his beloued Sonne into the world to cleanse vs from our sinnes 5. I proceed therefore to the third Caluinian dotage that all first motions or prouocations to euill are truly sinnes albeit we vanquish them which I haue heere refuted in the Controuersy and second Chapter of Originall sinne and somewhat touched in the Controuersy of Free-wil where I haue shewed that S. Augustine accounteth it a meere madnes and such a barbarical phrensy Seneca l. de mor. Aug. tom 7. l. de na gra ◠67. that man assaulted with temptations should sinne against his will as he sayth the very Poets sheepheards learned and vnlearned yea al the world doth witnes it to be false Seneca a heathen could write Away with all excuse no man sinneth against his will And It deserueth no prayse not to do which do thou caust not But S. Augustine agayne shal decide this matter with a sentence able to seale vp the mouths of Protestant Ministers and quyet the harts of all faythful Christians Whatsoeuer cause quoth he there be of the will impelling it to offend if it cannot be resisted it is yielded vnto Idem tom 4. in expos quarun propos prop. 17. Tom. 7. cont Pela l. 2. circa finem Chry. cited by S. Iohn Damas q. 2. phrall c. 27. Eccles 5. v. 2. c. 18. v. 30. without sin but if it may let it not be yielded vnto there shal be no sinnne committed What doth it perchance deceaue a man vnawars Let him therefore be wary that he may not be deceaued or is the deceit so great as it cannot be auoyded If it be so the sinnes therefore are none for who doth sinne in that which can by no meanes be escaped Likewise not in the euill desire it selfe but in our consent do we sinne Moreouer In as
con 2. epist Pelag. lib. 3. cap. 4. obseruation of the decalogue and in liew of them imposeth a light carriage Aug. ser 9. de verb. Domini not pressing vs downe with weighty loade but lifting vs vp as it were with winges A preceps of loue which is not heauy 10. Furthermore a slaunderous reporte is spread against vs touching the diuision of the Decalogue which I thinke not amisse heere to insinuate as it were by the way that we leaue out one of the commaundments the second as Protestants count it of not worshiping grauen Idolls but this is a meere cauill for we deuide the decalogue with S. Augustine branching the first Table into three precepts which instruct vs in our duty to God the second Table into seaueÌ„ appertayning to our neighbour Aug. de perfect iustit c 15. Sarcinam subleuanteÌ„ vice pennaruÌ„ Aug. de nat gra c. 43. 69. Aug. q. 71. in Exod. and we proue this diuision to be most consonant vnto reason because the internall desire of theft as mainly differeth from the desire of adultery as the externall actes vary amongest themselues in their specificall natures Wherfore as it pleased God seuerally to forbid the outward actes so we distinguish the inward consentes into seuerall commandements making two of the last which Protestants combine in one and vniting the first vpon far better grounds then they distinguish it For seeing he that draweth the pourtraiture or maketh the similitude of any creature to the end to adore it maketh to himselfe a straung God another God besides the liuing God of heauen which is forbidden in the first wordes of the first commandement all the prohibitions appertayning thereunto as thou shalt not make to thee a grauen thing Thou shalt not adore c. are but members and explications of the same precept and so ought not to be deuided from the first This is the cause why in our Catechismes where a briefe summary or abridgement of the comandements is contracted we omit these declarations of the first as likewise of other preceptes for breuities sake and not because they prohibite our adoration of images For we allow euery member word and syllabe of the whole to consist there with as hath bin heretofore expounded 11. Finally they obiect S. Augustine S. Bernard and S. Thomas affirming the precept of louing God to apperteyne Augu. de spir lit c. vltim in l. de pers iustit Bern. serm so in Cant. S. Thom. 3. 2. 444. art 6. to the life to come and that it cannot be perfectly accomplished in this life which S. Augustine also teacheth of that other commandment Thou shalt not couet I answere hey auouch both impossible to be kept in the anagogicall meaning of those preceptes for which they were enacted that is according to the end or supereminent perfection as S. Augustine writeth or deyned by God which is that extirpating by little and little all euill inclinations we may perpetually without intermission be inflamed with the loue of vnspeakeable goodnes this is the marke at which those precepts ayme this is the goale vnto which we must runne and cannot heere arriue vnto it yet they confesse that these and al other commandements taken in their literall Bern. serm 50. in Cant Abbot cap. 4. sect 43. ful 572. Bernar. in l. de praec dispens c. 15. August de spir lit c. 35. Aug. com 3. de spirit lit c. 5. item l. 6. cont luliaÌ„ c. 5. sense may be perfectly accomplished according to the substantiall fullfilling of them and satisfaction of the whole bond they oblige vs vnto Therfore S. Bernard By coÌ„manding thinges vnpossible vnto vs he hath not made vs preuaricators or trespassers as M. Abbot englisheth it but humbled vs impossible he calleth theÌ„ in respect of the vnmatchable inteÌ„ded purity which admitteth not the least mixture of vncleanes possible notwithstanding and easy he accounteth theÌ„ to such as haue tried the sweet yoke of Christ Impossible in respect of the end proposed possible and easy by Gods grace in regard of the obligation exacted ayming at that we increase in humility crying for help to be discharged of the infirmities with which we are clogged performing this we become not trespassers or preuaricators but doers keepers of the law In respect of that there is no example of perfect righteousnes among men S. Augustine In regard of this we cannot deny quoth he the perfection of Iustice to be possible euen in this life And Grace doth now also perfectly renew man altogether froÌ„ al sinnes in respect of that al the commandments are esteemed as kept wheÌ„ whatsoeuer is not done is pardoned vz. * Gabr. Vasquez in 1. 2. disp 212. c. 2. Stapleton l. 6. de perfe iustit c. 23. August de spir lit cap. 36. August de pec mer. remis l. 2. c. â— what soeuer is not done according to some litle precept or smal circuÌ„stance binding only vnder venial sinne In regard of this the whole law is fulfilled nothing is to be pardoned in respect of transgressing the coÌ„mandement because that which is wanting is not to be accounted a breach therof And so I end with this my S. Augustine who neuer maketh end of impugning our aduersaries Neyther doth God command any impossible thing to maÌ„ neyther is there any thing impossible to God for to help assist him to the performance of that which he coÌ„mandeth by this man may if he wil be without sinne ayded by God THE XXIX CONTROVERSY DEFENDETH God from being Authour of sinne against Doctour Fulke and his Companions CHAP. I. BECAVSE some moderne Protestants deeme both themselues and their gospellers maliciously wronged with the false imputation of this detestable Heresie I will set downe the words of a chiefe Ringleader amongst English Reformers that you may apparently Aug. in enchir cap. 100. l. de corr gra cap. 10. Ful. in cap. 6. Matth. sect 6. 4. 3. ad RoÌ„ in sect see I challenge them no further then their owne writings giues me iust cause of combat in defence of his Goodnes who neuer would haue permitted these or any other euils as S. Augustine teacheth vnles he could from them draw forth some good M. Fulke commenting vpon those words Lead vs not into temptation sayth The text is playne lead vs not whereby is proued not only a permission but an action of God in theÌ„ that are lead into temptation Likewise all sinne is manifestly against the will of God reuealed in his word although nothing come to passe contrary to the determination and secret will of God c. it is not against his secret will that there is sinne God worketh not as an euill authour of sinne but as a iust iudge c. Caluin often Caluin l. 1. instit cap. â—8 §. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. l. â— cap. 4. l. 3. cap. 23. §. 4. 7. Fulke in c. 9. ad Rom. sect 1 ibid
haue giuen him to will and to runne if contemning his vocation he had not become reprobate Iudas was 〈…〉 reprobate Origen notwithstanding Orig. l. 8. in ep ad Rom. Chrysost hom 16. in cap. 9. ad Rom. Chrysost hom 4 de laâ—d Paul ad fin Concil Arâ—usican â—ap 25. writeth of him that it was in his power if he wold to haue equalled in sanctitie S. Peter and S. Iohn Pharao was a reprobate of whome S. Chrysostome auerreth that God did what lay in him to saue him who if he were not saued the whole fault was his owne He also teacheth that euery one if he endeauour may arriue to the holines and perfection of S. Paul To which effect it is defined by the Arausican Councell that all the baptized Christ ayding and cooperating with them are able if they will labour faithfully and ought to fullfil the things that appeartaine to saluatioÌ„ 5. In like mannerâ— that the Predestinate may forfeit their saluation loose their grace and be damned we need not seeke any other proof then the testimonies of holy Writ For S. Paul an elect witnesseth of his owne person I chastise my body and bring it into seruitude least perhapes when I haue preached to others my selfe become a reprobate 1. Cor. 9. 27. Sap. 4. 11. Eccles c. 31. 10. Apocalyps 3. 11. 2. Pet. 1. 10. VVhitak cont 2. q. 6. cap. 3. Fulk in c. 6. ad Roman sect 2. 5. Of another it is testified he was taken away least malice might change his vnderstanding and fiction begiule his soule therfore he might haue bin altered and deceiued if he had not bin preuented by God Of a third it is said He could haue transgressed and transgressed not haue done euill and did not 〈◊〉 Iohn in the Apocalyps exhorteth the predestinate to perscuere coÌ„stant least they be frustrated of their hope Behold I come quickly hold that thou hast that no man receaue thy crowne And S. Peter Wherfore my brethren rather endeauour that by ' good works you may make sure your vocation and election But these thinges haue bin sufficiently proued heertofore in the 24. and 25. controuersies 6. The eight heresy falsly supposeth that Predestination according to the whole chaine and lincke of euery effect which followeth theron is altogether of God in so much as neither our iustification saluation nor any execution of his will in this kind dependeth of the sacraments of the Church or of our good Works as their instrumentall or meritorious causes but of Gods election as Whitaker auerreth of his promises and Christs merits And Fulke Neither Baptisme nor any works of Christian religion cause iustification but Baptisme is a seale good workes fruites therof Again the Elect work willingly to their saluation c. but they do not therby deserue their saluation for saluation dependeth vpon their election Howbeit the holy ghost in his sacred Word directly teacheth that by Baptisme and other Sacraments we are truly a Marc. vlt. v. 16. saued b Tit. 3. 5. regenerate c Ioa. 3. 5. new borne d Tit. 3. 7. iustified e 1. Corin. 10. 17. incorporated to Christ f Ioan. 6. 56. made one with him he with vs. That by g Act. 8. 18. theÌ„we receaue the holy Ghost h Act. 2. 38. obteine remission of our sinnes i 2. ad Tim. 1. 6. inhereÌ„t grace k Ioan. 3. 5. entrance to the kingdome of heauen l Tit. 3. 7. Aug. in ps 7â— are made heires of euerlasting life Therfore they are true causes of our iustice and instruments of our saluation To which Saint Augustine subscribeth setting downe the differeÌ„ce betwixt the sacrameÌ„ts of the old law and of the new in these words Some sacraments there are that giue saluation others that promise a Sauiour The Sacraments of the new Testament giue saluation the sacraments of the old Testament Gregor l. 6. c. 3. in prim Regum promised a Sauiour And S. Gregory Outwardly we receaue the sacraments that we may be inwardly replenished with the grace of the holy ghost 7. Likewise the execution of Gods predestination is often furthered and effected by the prayers of Saints or other holy men vpon earth as S. Augustine testifieth If Stephen had not prayed the Church had not enioyed Paul Besids Perchance there are some heere predestinate to be graunted by our prayers Moreouer he exhorteth vs to correct all sorts of Aug. ser 1. de sanct Aug. de bon perf 2. Timoth. 2. 10. 1. Timoth. 4. v. vlt. 2. Pet. 1. 10. 1. Corinth 9. Ther shold be noe iudgenunt at all sayth S. Augustin if men sinned by the will of God Aug. tom 7. ad artic sibi falso impositos artic 10. sinners because correction is a meane that the predestinate may obteine their designed glory The same is also taught by S. Gregory Prosper and others and is grounded on these words of Scripture I susteine all things for the elect that they also may obteine the saluation which is in Christ Iesus with heauenly glory For this doing thou shalt saue thy selfe others By good works make sure your vocation and election So runne that you may comprehend Therfore by running we do comprehend by running we winne the goale of eternall felicity Or if we do not if saluation dependeth of gods election and not of our good endeauous damnation dependeth in like sort of his reprobation and not of our misdeeds the doome pronounced by God against the accursed in the latter day is not for their sinnes as the causes of their perdition but the true cause therof is the will of God his eternalll will which in Protestants conceit vndeseruedly reiecteth and abandoneth them Let the Scriptures theÌ„ be false the generall iudgment peruerse the bookes of conscience brought foorth in vaine their euidences reiected the sentence of our iudge reuersed and called back by you as not deliuering the right cause of mans eternall torments in brief let heauen and earth faile and your phrensies only take place 8. The ninth heresy which springeth from that bastard Fulk in ca. 3. ad Rom. sect 4. root of making God the authour of mans destructioÌ„ setteth abroach the contrary wills which M. Fulke assigneth to God to wit his reuealed and secret will For either he supposeth they are two distinct wills allowing that sacrilegious disunion and diuorcement of affection in our true soueraigne God which Tullie disalloweth as the roote Tull. l. 2. de nat Deorum of dissention euen in his false and heathenish Gods and as he distinguisheth his will so he must deuide the vnity of his nature he must needs confesse one God abhorring sinnes the other approuing them with the viperous Manichees Or doth he meane there is but one wil which as reuealed detesteth sinne as secret and hidden liketh well of it then let him tel me how he liketh or decreeth those thinges with his secret purpose which he hath openly forbidden by
v. 10. Ecclesiast â—6 v. 15. Matt. v. â—2 Matth. 20. v. â— Ier. 31. v. 16. Rom. 2. v. 6. ad Corinth 3. v. 8. Apoc. 22. v. 12. Abbot in his defence c. 5. sect 14 fol. 686. Fulk in ca. 3. 1. ad Corinth sect 2. In â—p 4. 2. ad Tim. sect 4. in c. 25. Matth. sect 6. to all thy mercyes in the Chaldeake it is My merits are lesse then all thy mercies which thou hast shewed to thy seruant And in Ecclesiasticus All mercy shall make a place to euery man according to the merites of his workes And although the Greeke hath only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to his workes yet that importeth the same with the Latine as I shall shew hereafter and the Scripture witnesseth in those places where eternall life prepared to good works is entitled merces a reward or hire which must needes be correspondent to merit or desert Be glad and reioyce because your reward is very great in heauen Call the workmen and pray them their hire Let thy voyce cease from weeping and thine eies from teares because there is a reward for thy worke God rendreth or giueth reward to the iust according to their workes according to their owne labours 3. Our aduersaries make answere to these and the like argumentes First that heauen is called a Crowne a reward secundum quid and in a respect simply and absolutely it is only a gift because it is giuen according to grace according to mercy not according to desert or merit But we reply that although the originall from whence it proceedeth be grace and mercy yet that grace being communicated vpon this solemne bargaine couenant or promise of rewarding our workes performed and dignified therewith it must of necessity include a dignity in them For euery reward hath an absolute and intrinsecall 2. ad Tim 4. Matt. 20. v. 4. v. 13. 14. Aug lib. de saÌ„ct virg c. 26. Hie. l. con Iou. Chrysost Theophil Euthim. in eum locuÌ„ reference to some proportion of worthines or merit Heere is a true and absolute reward therefore a true and absolute merit For which cause the reward is termed a Crowne not only of grace but a Crowne of Iustice due vnto vs by a certaine right of title of iustice Friend I do thee no wrong c. Take that is thine and go Where he speaketh of the day-penny by which S. Augustine S. Hierome S. Chrysostome Theophilact and Euthymius vnderstand the Kingdome of heauen and yet he stileth it his to wit his by couenant his by iustice and not only by gift vpon the same ground S. Paul calleth God a iust iudge in rewarding our workes God is not vniust to forget your workes 2. Tim. 4. ad Heb. 6. 10. Fulk in c. 4. 2. ad Tim. sect 4. Abbot in his defence â— 5 sect 1. 4. 4. The second Answere which D. Fulke D. Abbot and the residue of their fraternity returne hereunto is That the reward is due by couenant and so a debt in respect of Gods promise not of our desert Likewise God rendreth heauen say they as a iust iudge not to the merit and worthines of our workes but to the merit and worthines of Christ imputed by faith vnto vs. These be the guilty shiftes they deuise to entaile all vpon Christ and vpon Gods promise which he by those meanes most bountifully vouchsafeth to communicate vnto vs. For although it be true that the diuine promise and Christs Iustice be necessary to enable vs to merit yet they are not the chiefest thinges which God regardeth in rewarding our workes For the Promise is the same the Imputation the same equally made and attributed vnto all but the Remuneration is diuers in equally assigned more or lesse correspondent to the slacknes Matth. 1â— v. 27. â— ad Cor. 3. v. 8. ad Gal. 6. v 7. â— Ibidem v. 9 or industry of our labours The Sonne of man will render to euery one according to his works Euery man shall receaue his owne reward according to his owne labour What thinges a man shall sowe those also shall he reape For he that soweth in his flesh of the flesh shall reape corruption but he that soweth in the spirit shall reape life euerlasting So that the seede the price and proper cause of euerlasting life is not only fayth nor the promise of God or merits of Christ alone but also our good deedes of piety and deuotion which heere we sowe vpon earth For the Apostle goeth forward in the same Apoc. 22. v. 12. Fulk in â— ad Cor. 3. sect 2. Caluin 3. instit cap. 18. §. â— 7. place Doing good let vs not faile for in due time we shall reape not fayling Therefore whiles we haue time let vs worke good to all Behould I come quickly and my reward is with me to render to euery maâ— according to his workes Fulke reading this phrase so often repeated in holy Scripture graunteth that euery one receaueth the crowne of glory according to his workes according to his labour yet not according to the merit of his labour which others more plainly explicating allow it giuen to our workes as signes of our fayth not as causes meritorious of the same But the latin text of Ecclesiasticus hath that very word according to the merit of our workes Eccles 16 v. â—â— which necessarily implieth a meritorious cause Besides holy Writ affirmeth That we receaue the crowne of blisse as the reward wages and hire of our labours therefore according to the merit of our labours For hire wages and reward haue mutuall correspondence and inseparable connexion with merit in so much as heauen â— ad Cor. 9. v. 24. Mâ—â—â— 11. v. â—2 Matt. 13. v. 45. Aug. in Psal 93. prope finem Basil in hom quam scripfit in initium Prouerb Clem. Aâ—â— in paraenâ—â— is proposed vnto vs as a goale or price to be wonne by running as a Kingdome inuaded by force as an inestimable gemme prized at the rate of our best indeauours as a treasure to be bought by the value worthines or condignity of our workes the true meritorious and morall causes thereof In the race all runne indeed but one receaueth the price So runne that you may obteine The Kingdome of heauen suffreth violence the violent beare it away Againe The Kingdom of heauen is like to a merchant-man seeking good pearles hauing sound one precious pearle c. sold all that he had and bought it S. Augustine Euerlasting life and rest is salable and bought by tribulations for Christ S. Basil We are negotiators or merchantes who trace the Euangelicall path purchasing the possession of heauen by the workes of the commundements Let it not repent you to haue laboured it is lawfull for you if you will to buy most precious saluation with a proper treasure by charity and fayth which truly is a iust price 5. Moreouer I demonstrate it irrefragably in this Syllogisticall manner
When soeuer such proportion is kept in recompensing the labours we achieue as to greater labours greater crownes to lesser lesser rewards are alloted Thē the crownes and rewards are giuen in respect of the workes done not as signes and conditions but truly according to the merit of our labours as causes of the rewardes But this proportion is obserued by our Soueraigne Iudge in remunerating the good deedes of the Iust which flow from his grace Therefore he rewardeth them not as signes but as causes of our heauenly blisse according to the worthines of their merit The maior is cleere for what other then the dignity of the worke doth God regard in ballancing the measure of them The worthines of Christs merits imputed by faith that is not our owne labour not the thinges we do in our body for which we must receaue eyther good or euill as the Apostle writeth that doth not dignify one aboue another but equally as hath beene sayd is referred to al. The promise which God maketh vnto vs If God had his eye leuelled at that alone it were as much broken in a little as in a greater as faythfully kept in recōpensing a small as in a weighty matter Therein he looketh not to the greatnes of our endeauours but to the fidelity of his owne word in fulfilling whereof the equality of recompensation the proportion of workes the repayment of seruice the reward of labours cannot be as the Scriptures so often insinuate the principall markes aymed at by God Further our vertues are rewarded as worthy of their hire but the promise of God begetteth not any worthines or dignity in our workes more then of themselues belong vnto them For as our Schoolemen teach He that shall Gab. Vasq in 1. 2. tom 2. disp 214 cap. 5. others ibid. in q. 114. D. Tho. promise a Lordship or Dukedome in behalfe of some meane seruice or peece of money of small value doth not thereby enhaunce the price of the coyne or estimate of his obsequious seruice but the estate which is giuen in lieu of that plighted faith although it require the performance of the seruice or payment of the money as conditions necessary to oblige him that promised yet it doth as much exceed the rate of the one and desert of the other as if no promise had beene no couenaunt made at all Moreouer the Deuines proue that if God should threaten to punish with eternall paine an officious lye or other light offence that sinne should not mount thereby to the heynousnes of a mortall crime nor be worthy of more punishment then of his owne nature it deserueth wherefore if the commination and threatning of greater torments then sinnes of themselues require doth not augment the guiltines of their default or change a small sinne into the enormity of a greater neither can the promise of aboundant remuneration increase the dignity of our workes to which it is promised nor the remuneration it selfe be called a reward weighed forth as S. Gregory Greg. Na. orat in san Bap. extrema Nazianzen affirmeth in the iust and euen ballance of God nor equally imparted according to our labours as the Holy Ghost often pronounceth but a free gift liberally giuen through the gratefulnes and fidelity of the giuer vnles besides the promise some worthines or value in our works be acknowledged to which an agreable reward be correspondently assigned 6. The Minor that God obserueth due proportion in 2. ad Cor. 9. v. 6. Clem. Alex. l. 4. strom Matth. 10. v. 4. recompensing our seruice more or lesse conformably to the diligence or slacknes thereof is also manifest by the sundry textes already quoted That euery one shall receaue accordinge to his owne labour And by this of Saint Paul He that soweth sparingly sparingly also shall reape and he that soweth in blessinges of blessinges also shall reape Which Clemens Alexandrinus also gathereth out of these wordes of S. Matthew He that receaueth a Prophet in the name of a Prophet shall receaue the reward of a Prophet and he that receaueth a iust man in the name of a iust man shall receaue the rewards of a iust man both receaue rewards yet not both the same but seuerall and vnequall according to the seuerall sanctity of their persons and inequality of their merits whome they receaue Hence the conclusion of my Syllogisme without checke or controle is ineuitably inferred That seeing Almighty God portioneth forth a greater or lesser share of glory answerable to the greatnes or slendernes of our workes as the hire wages or reward of them he truly remunerateth our pious endeauours not as sequells of faith not as meere gifts of grace but as precedent causes or condigne desertes of eternall life Which when our aduersaries gainsay they make our soueraigne God an accept our of persons and not a iust and vpright iudge quit contrary to these texts of holy writ 2. ad Timoth. 4. v. 8. ad Rom. 2. v. 11. 1. Pet. 1. v. 17. Act. 10. v. 34. For acception of persons is a vice directly opposite to distributiue iustice as when a Iudge bestoweth a reward where there is no precedent merit or when he giueth a more large reward then the dignity of the merit in any sort deserueth But God truly recompenseth the labours of his seruants and recompenseth them with due proportion of greater and lesser reward therefore he either presupposeth in thē the diuersity of merits or he violateth Aug. ep 46. ad Valent the lawes of distributiue iustice In so much as S. Augustin◠might well say If there be no merits how shall God iudge the world For take away them and take away Iustice take away iudgement take away that article of our Creed that Christ shall come to iudge the quicke and the dead 7. Another Argument or Enthymeme I frame in this sort The sinnes and euill workes of the reprobate are not eternally punished eyther because they are signes of their infidelity or by reason of Gods commination and threates which he promulgateth of punishing them with euerlasting torments But for that they be of themselues the true cause of damnation merit Gods wrath be iniurious and offensiue to his infinite goodnes Therefore the vertuous actes and good deedes of the elect which flow from the streames of heauenly grace are not only recompensed as fruites of faith or in regard of Gods promise made to reward them but because they be true and proper causes thereof because they be pleasing and acceptable in his sight and do deseruedly purchase and merit his fauour The consequence is inferred out of the words of Christ who attributeth after the same manner and with the same causall propositions the crowne of heauen to the pious workes of the iust as he doth the punishment of hell to the hard and vnmercifull hartes of sinners saying Come yee blessed of my Father possesse yee the kingdome prepared for you from the foundation of the world For I
wine to be turned into the body and bloud of Christ But what strang effect doe our Protestants heere assigne Euen none at all For M. Bilson will haue blessing to be nothing els but earnest prayer to God and no action at all immediatly applyed to worke any effect in the element of bread And so maketh the Euangelists vainly to coÌ„found thankesgiuing to God with blessing of his creatures checketh S. Paul who appropriateth the blessing directly to the Chalice it selfe controlleth S. CypriaÌ„ calling it The cup consecrated with solemne blessing 6. If we vrge some other circumstances the place was miraculously chosen to be betoken a rarer miracle to ensue The time was that very night in which he was betraied Marc. â—4 Luc. 22. a tyme when the Law of figures was to be abolished law of truth begaÌ„ The persons to whom he spak were the twelue Apostles the chiefest Prelates and Gouernours of his Church the matter of which he treated was concerning a law which then he enacted as appeareth by those wordes of commaund Take eate Do this It was touching his last Will and Testament which then he made as himselfe auoucheth This is my bloud of Matth. 2â— the new Testament It was belonging to the perpetuall memory and euerlasting inheritance he then bequeathed to the whole Church his beloued Spouse Excuse vs then O Lord excuse and free vs from the calumniations of our Aduersaryes if we attribute so much wisedom vnto thee as to thinke that in such a place at such a tyme to such persons concerning such weighty affaires thou wouldest not disclose thy mind in any secret hidden or ambiguous tearmes 7. We see all Law-makers most carefull in penning the Statutes Canons and Decrees of their lawes which must be obserued by their subiects according to the natiue sound and construction of the wordes We find all Testatours exact and diligent in setting downe their last Wils and Testaments least any cauils arise after their decease And shall we not graunt this care and prouidence to our Sauiour Christ Shall we either thinke he wanted wordes to expresse or diligence to record or power to performe his will in this behalfe When an earthly Testatour Inleg Non afiter ff delega 3. for examples sake bestoweth a Pretious stone vpon any one of his friends which he determinately nameth the Executors whome the law commandeth not to depart from the proper signification of the words cannot satisfy him with a painted pearle and when our heauenly Testatour namely leaueth and bequeatheth vnto vs the diuine legacy the inestimable Iewel of his own sacred body may we be contented with the signe shadow and seale thereof May we thinke he meant a figuratiue body By conference of places we shal discouer no doubt the drift of his meaning 8. Before Christ instituted this Sacrament he promised it Iohn 6. The bread which I will giue is my flesh which I will giue for the life of the World according to the Greeke 〈◊〉 â— Now what construction can our Aduersaryes heer make of these wordes without appeaching our Sauiour Christ of manifest falshood For he auoucheth that the bread which he will giue is his flesh vsing the word est is in the present tense and yet it was not then a signe of his flesh neither could it take the name of the thing signed which is M. Bilsons common answere For the Sacrament was Bils 4. â—ar pag. 754. c. not then instituted but only promised as the word dabo I will giue doth demonstrate Most falsly then had Christ sayd The bread which I will giue is my flesh to wit is a signe or seale of my flesh seeing then it was neither signe seale or token except you will haue it a signe before it was made a signe before the Sacrament was instituted or Bils 4 par pag. 753. Consecration vsed which is impossible as M. Bilson himselfe will instruct you 9. Againe our Sauiour inculcateth the same with an oath or solemne asseueration saying Amen Amen I say Ioan. 6. vnto you except you eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his bloud you shall haue no life in you And then that no doubt as S. Hilary teacheth might be made of the truth Hilar. l. 8. de Trinit This word verè may be translated truly or indeed Chrys hom 46 in IoaÌ„ hom 60 ad popu 83 in Mat. Cyr. Alex. l. 10. in Io. c. â—â— l. 1â— c. 26. 27. item l. 4. c. 17. of his flesh and bloud he addeth My flesh is meate indeed and my bloud is drinke iadeed Hearken M. Bilson hearken M. Sparkes harken all yee Sacramentaryes my flesh is not figuratiuely nor metaphorically but truely meate and my bloud truely drinke Where S. Chrysostome sayth That Christ vseth these wordes that he might not be thought to speake parabolically And in another place By eating his flesh he reduceth vs as he writeth into one and the selfe same masse with him Neque id fide tantùm sed reipsa nos corpus suum efficit And that not only by fayth but he maketh vs his body indeed S. Cyril of Alexandria Christ dwelleth corporally in vs And a little after He is in vs non habitudine tantùm verùm etiam participatione naturali Not by relation only but by naturall participation also And in other places he affirmeth him to be naturally substantially carnally or according to the flesh vnited vnto vs. 10. As the promise was agreable to the performaÌ„ce the performance answerable to the promise so the practise â— Cor. cap 10. v. 1â— Iren. l. 5. cont haer c. 2. Note his wordes of the Apostles mentioned by S. Paul is correspondent to both The chalice of benediction which we blesse is it not the Communion of the bloud of Christ And the bread which we breake is it not the participation of the body of our Lord Wherupon S. Irenaeus inferreth That our bodyes are capable of incorruption by partaking of the body bloud of Christ not according to the spirituall and inuisible man but according to the true man who consisted of flesh bones and sinewes Againe S. Paul sayth â— Cor. 11. v. â—9 Whosoeuer shall eate this bread and drinke the Chalice of our Lord vnworthily shall be guilty of the body and bloud of our Lord. But how can we incurre this heinous guilt but only as Theodoret affirmeth By taking Christs holy body with vnclean Theod. vpon this place Cypr. serm de laps Chrys ho. de non contâ—m Eccle. hands and by putting it into a defiled and vnchast mouth By offering violence as S. Cyprian teacheth to his body and bloud Yea and villany as S. Chrysostome sayth to Christs owne Person Which cannot be verifyed by our Aduersaryes any more in this Sacrament then in Baptisme in which our Sauiour in their opinion is as much present as heer Let vs now conferre Moyses with Christ the Prophets with the Apostles
the shaddows with the truth and see whether any place sentence or sillable of holy Writ disaduantage our cause The bread and wine of Melchisedech Gen. 14. v. 18. Exod. 12. 16. Deuter. 8. the Pascall Lambe the Manna which God rayned from heauen were figures of this Sacrament as the ancient Fathers witnesse But what Were they figures of any other figure Were they shaddowes of a shaddow only Againe figures are as far inferiour to the thing figured as the Image or picture of the King to the King himselfe For which cause our Sauiour preferreth the Eucharist many degrees before Manna in the sixt of S. Iohn And yet such as make it a signe or resemblance do not preferre it but much debase it beneath the excellent food of Manna whereby the Iewes fed vpon Christ by fayth farre more daintily then the Protestants by their bare Communion of which the Prophesyes also make tooto honorable mention to accord with them 11. The Prophet Esay speaking in commendation of Esa 25. v. 6. this feast calleth it A banquet of fat things of fat things full of marrow of purified and refined wines Zachary tearmeth it The wheat of Gods elect the wine which springeth Virgins Malachy A cleane oblation Iacob The delight of King S Iohn Zach. 9. v. 17. Mala. 1. v. 11. Gen. 49. v. 20. Apoc. 2. v. 17. Psal 77. 110. 71. Hidden Manna Holy Dauid the bread of Angels the memory of Gods meruailous workes the stability or strength in earth vpon tops of Mountaines Now vpon what table did these blessed Prophets looke when they so highly praised this Celestial feast Did they commend the poore and beggarly supper of the Caluinists their Wheaten bread which hath no prerogatiue aboue the Iewish naked Elements their wine of grapes which may be fitlier tearmed wine in which lechery raigneth to vse Saint Pauls phrase then wine which springeth Virgins No no. They looked vpon ad Eph. 5. 18. this diuine and heauenly table of ours This this is that magnificall banquet that memorable Wheat those refined wines that cleane Oblation that bread of Angels those delights of Kings which worthily deserue such Our Reall Presence is manifestly gathered out of the Acts of the 1. Nicen out of the general Councell of Ephesus vo constat ex ep Cyr. ad Nestorium out of the Councell of Chalcedon art 3. admirable titles 12. I will not here speake of innumerable myracles of generall Councels of authenticall Histories of the Sibillian Oracles truely recorded in confirmation of this truth I only adde that the whole Lutheran sect vntil this day the whole Church of England in the time of King Henry euen after his reuolt in publicke Parlament decred the Reall Presence of Christs body in the Sacrament And now of late after the repealing of that and certaine other Articles after the vtter abolishment and manifold condemnation for many yeares of the former doctrine it is with great applause reuiued againe by the Bishop of Ely who writing of the Reall Presence in the holy Eucharist against Cardinall Bellarmine saith We agree with you concerning the obiect all the strife is about the manner And then We beleeue the Presence we beleeue I say the true Presence aswell as you concerning the manner of the Presence we do not vnaduisedly define Which priuate assertion of his Casaubon alloweth in his Maiesties name coÌ„fidently CasauboÌ„ in the answer to the Card. Peron to the first instance fol. 31. in English Moys Ha. com in Ps 36. Symeon l. qui inscribitur Reuelatio sâ—cretor Caha in Gen. c. 49. graceth with this publik approbation This is the fayth of the King this is the faith of the church of EnglaÌ„d which being so I might surcease my paines and spare the search of further proofes in a matter already confessed by the aduerse part 13. But I adde that the ancient Iewish Rabbins ratifie and confirme the same as Rabby Moyses Hadarsan Rabby Simeon Rabby Cahana whose words to let passe many others are these In the Sacrifice which shall be made of bread notwithstanding it be white as milke the substance shall be turned into the substance of the body of the Messias And there shal be in the sacrifice it self the substaÌ„ce of the bloud of the Messias red as wine There shal be also in the sacrifice the bloud flesh of the Messias both shal be in the bread because the body of the Messias cannot be diuided And then he assigneth another reason Because the flesh without the bloud and so againe the bloud without the flesh are dead things But the Body of the Messias after his Resurrection because it shall be glorified shall alwaies liue 14. Doctor Sparkes and sundry others of the learned Protestants vanquished with these euident and irreprouable Sparks in his answer to M. Iohn Albines pa. 108. 10â— 110. c. testimonies confesse the Reall presence of Christs body in the Eucharist but to the faith forsooth of the right Receiuer not to the mouth of euery Communicant D. Sparkes further boasteth That he learned of Christ of his Apostles of all the ancient writers of credit and account in the Church for 700. or 800. yeares togeather to denie our Reall Presence to the mouth of all Receiuers I wonder he blushed not to publish so vaine a bragge when Christ when the Apostles when all the famous writers as I haue already conuinced most manifestly teach the contrary when S. CypriaÌ„ saith speaking of the lapsed That they more offended our Lord with their hands and mouth who vnworthily receiue then Cyp. ser 5. de lap Aug. â—iâ— coÌ„ adu leg Proph. â—ap 9. when they denied him S. Augustine We receiue with a faithfull heart and mouth the Mediator of God and man Christ Iesus giuing vs his flesh to eate and bloud to drinke S. Leo This is taken with the mouth which is beleeued with faith S. Gregory What is the bloud of the Lambe now not by hearing but by drinking you haue learned which bloud is sprinckled vpon both posts Leo. ser â— de iâ—iu 7. menfis Greg. ho. 22. in euan Tertu l. de resur car cap. 8. Nyss ora cate c. 37. Cyril l. 10. in Io. c. 13. Chrys ho. 69. ad po Idem de Eu cha in En. caen Aug. in Ps 33. Cyr. Alex. li. 10. in Ioan. c. 23. when not onely with the mouth of the body but with the mouth of the heart it is drunke When Tertullian writeth That the flesh is fed with the body and bloud of Christ S. Gregory Nissen That the body of Christ is admitted into the bowels of maÌ„ S. Cyril That it is tempered mingled and ioyned with vs like other wax powred into melted wax S. Chrysostome That our hand deuideth his flesh and our tongue becommeth red with his tooto dreadfull bloud And in another place Imagine saith he that wholsome bloud to flow out of the diuine and vndefiled breast