but would seeke to merit their fauour by gratefull offices It was extraordinary in this woman firmly to belieue as shee told the messengers but resting so perswaded a worke of no perfection to make her peace with the Israelites â—ad shee doubted whether their title vnto the land of Canaan had been iust or suspected Gods donation of it vnto Abraham to haue been forged by his successors as Constantines is by the baser Roman cleargy shee might without any iust imputation for want of loue or other good works haue aduentured her life amongst her neighbours in defence of her country Or had she vpon the Israelites misdemeanours distrusted their successe she might at last in worldly policy haue rather hazarded their future displeasure then incurred present danger of death or torture of her Citizens for harbouring spies But whiles she firmly belieues both that the Israelites donation was from God that they would certainly preuaile against her people though her entertainment and concealement of them were acts of kindnesse prudence and humanity yet their omission had been properly not of faith because impulsiuely they were from faith nor could they haue been omitted but through vnbeliefe or distrust vnto Gods promises Worldlings would haue condemned her not for vvant of charitie but for excesse folly rather had shee not done as shee was perswaded By faith then those workes become righteous which without it had been traiterous And if we respect not the cause of our knowledge but the thing knowne faith did perfect the workes the workes only made the perfection of faith knowne to men In this sense it is most true of faith what some misapply to iustification of mens persons workes iustifie and perfect faith not in the nature of the thing but in the sight of man to whom they witnesse the liuelihood and perfection of faith noâ— as causes but effects and signes of our iustifiattion they are not onely signes but conditions concomitant or precedent In the same sense are these other words of the Apostle to be vnderstood As the body without the spirit is dead so faith vvithout vvorkes is dead also For if a humane bodie want spirit breath or motion we rightly gather it wants life yet are breath and motion rather effects then causes of life But the schoole-men dreaming the holy Ghost had been scholler to Aquinas or some chiefe masters of their profession take the sprit in this place for actus primus as the soule by which wee liue and breath and hence they conceiued that grosse error which the Romanist now makes an article of his beliefe to wit that works animate or at least casually perfect faith as the soule of man doth his bodie And wheras Caluin most acutely and orthodoxally infers that if faith without works or charity bedead it is not properly but equiuocally called faith They reply workes or charitie do not informe faith intrinsecally as the reasonable soule doth man for so it would follow that as he is not a man but a dead trunk which hath no soule so it should not bee true faith but an image or dead picture of faith which wants vvorkes or charitie How then do they perfect faith Extrinsecally as the soule doth the body or other halfe of man which remaines a true body though no true man after the soules departure For application of this distinction they adioine when Saint Iames affirmes faith to be dead without workes he tearmes it dead in such a sense as we say a body is dead by the soules absence and yet remains a true bodie Whence sayth Valentian the sectaries haue furnished vs with an argument against themselues Rather this answere is contrary to Valentians and his fellowes assertions for were his illustration true and pertinent workes or faith should constitute one grace and qualitie as the body and soule make one man which no Papist dare affirme of the habite of faith and charitie being graces in their iudgements specifically distinct And Valentian who stands most vpon the former illustration expresly denies that charity much lesse workes can be any proper forme of faith either intrinsecall as the reasonable soule is of man or extrinsecall as whitenesse is of the body Some perfection notwithstanding Charitie giues to Faith in which respect it may by analogie to true and proper formes bee metaphorically said to informe saith The perfection it giues hee so expresseth that the Latine Reader by his words cited at full in the margine for I will not trouble the text with them may plainly perceiue hee was desirous to say somewhat but he knew not what Arias Montanus who better vnderstood Saint Iames his phrase by the analogie of faith and forme of wholsome doctrine then Valentian did himselfe or this fictitious analogie betwixt Charitie naturall formes interprets the former place in part to our purpose To liue as Philosophers say is to operate and vitall operation proceedeth not from the bodie but from the spirit nor doth â—â—e Apostle say workes are the spirit of faith where he speakes only of the appellation or name of life His meaning is that faith without workes is as truely reputed dead as the body without the spirit is rightly sayd as it truely is dead But if wee will not wrest the letter against the Apostles meaning but rather gently apply his words to his intent the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 implies onely breath or motion enspired from the soule for workes in their nature are operations and are more fitly compared to breathings or motions then to the substantiall spirit or soule or the faculty whence these flow which last in proportion best answeres to faith Now as the readiest waie to â—et breath in one fallen in a swound or raise one vp out of a dead â—it is to reuiue the spirits by which vitall motions are inspired and managed so the onely way to bring forth liuing workes or fruites of righteousnes is to quicken or strengthen faith which liuely in it selfe and able to performe it proper acts as firmly to apprehend Gods power iustice and mercie will vndoubtedly giue life to all other powers and affections and impell them to their proper functions The Romanist as ignorant as the Iew of this righteousnesse which is by faith preposterously seekes to make vs new men in Christ not by reuiuing faith which is as the animall spirit by whose influence works become vitall but as if one from this principle in nature man is dead vvithout breath and motion should seeke to bring men out of swounds or dead fits by blowing breath into them with a quill or making them moue by deuises so he grosely mistaking that saying of S. Iames as the body without the spirit so faith without workes is dead also hence seekes to raise vp such as die in Adam after the same manner we haue seene them raised which fall downe dead in an anticke first by wagging one arme then another vntill the whole body moue The anticke
can the faith saue him The conclusion intended in both places as in that whole discourse was no more but thus No man may presume hee is already in the state of iustification or saluation vnlesse hee finde himselfe vnpartially deuoted vnto good workes of euery kinde Or albeit his faith haue once or twice shewed it selfe by his workes or readinesse to doe ods will he must not here let vp his rest or rely on what is past Abraham had obeyed Gods will once in leauing his fathers house and againe in cancelling his owne resolution for making his seruant his heire vpon Gods promise to make his seed like the starres of heauen his beliefe hereof was accounted to him for righteousnesse But did he thus iustified by faith cease to work No his faith by working became more perfect and improued his former approbation of being reputed righteous so farre as to be thenceforth called the friend of God And this was written for our instruction vt qui iustus est iustificetur adhuc that euery one which hath attained to morall hope of saluation should make his election sure by practise of such workes as perfect faith and enapt it for sure reliance on Gods promises Did Saint Paul then euer affirme that a man could be saued or iustified without such workes No he alwaies supposed them as a qualification most necessary in the party which expected finall absolution or benefit of Gods generall pardon In what sence then doth he say we are iustified by faith not by workes Not by workes ceremoniall Not by such as were the best that Abraham or Dauid euer did The forme of Salomons interrogation who can say I haue made mine heart cleane I am cleane from my sinne upposeth his father could neuer haue truely auouched thus much yea Dauid himselfe euen in his best daies and purest thoughts vnfainedly disclaimes all such purity or perfection as this briefe demaund to reserue others and the full handling of this to their proper place is for the present proofe sufficient k Who can vnderstand his faults cleanseme from my secret sinnes This assures vs there is another acception of iustification yet behind most frequent with Saint Paul to wit the actuall sentence of the iudge acquitting or absoluing or for finall absolution or actuall acquittance of the parties so qualified as Saint Iames requires And as we are not capable of Gods promises of eternall life or happinesse without workes and yet we apprehend them not by workes but by faith so this finall sentence of ioy and comfort is apprehended by faith alone although so truely apprehended it cannot be by parties destitute of workes nor doe we onely by faith alone apprehend the truth or deriue the benefit of diuine promises to our selues but by it alone though accompanied with all other sanctifying graces and attended with the whole traine of workes morall or ceremoniall we expect and pray the promises may be fulfilled not for our sakes or for any righteousnesse we haue in vs or can hope for in this life but only for the merits of CHRIST by his sole mediation and intercession 4. The seeming contradiction betweene these two great Apostles is hence easily and cleerely thus dissolued Saint Iames affirming we are iustified by workes and not by faith alone speakes of the passiue qualification in the subiect or party to be iustified or made capable of absolute approbation or finall absolution this qualification supposed Saint Paul speakes of the application of the sentence or of the ground of our plea for absolution the one by his doctrine must be conceiued and the other sought for onely by saith the immediate and onelie cause of both he still contends not to be in vs but without vs and for this reason when hee affirmes that wee are iustified by faith alone he considers not faith as it is part of our qualification inherent or the foundation of other graces but as it includes the correlatiue tearme or immediate cause of iustification wherunto it alone hath peculiar reference or continuall aspect This is that which in other tearmes some haue deliuered fides iustificat relatiue non effectiue aut formaliter faith iustifies relatiuely not formally or by way of merit or efficiency To this purpose he alleageth the Prophets testimony the iust shall liue by his faith Faith then makes him iust and iustifies him in that sence Saint Iames meant as it is operatiue but he liues by it as it vnites him to the Lord of life yea by it alone in as much as by it alone not by it and other parts of grace as ioint supporters he trusts in Gods mercies offered in CHRIST wholly relying on them not partly on them and partly on righteousnesse inherent That the Prophet in faith included this confidence and reliance vpon Gods mercies in CHRIST was a point vnto the iudicious Sasbout so cleere that if the Apostle in the first to the Romanes had otherwise taken it he knew not how they could be reconciled That so much imports in the tenth and eleuenth to the Hebrewes is euident and will so appeare from the very proposall of his speeches Cast not away therefore your confidence which hath great recompence of reward For ye haue need of patience that after ye haue done the will of God ye might receiue the promise For yet a little while and he that shall come will come and will not tarry Now the iust shall liue by faith but if any man draw backe my soule shall haue no pleasure in him But we are not of them who draw backe vnto perdition but of them that beleeue to the sauing of the soule That Paul wheresoeuer he attributes iustificaion to faith alone alwaies includes the principall obiect of true faith as the sole immediate cause whereby of men iustifiable because actually partakers of Gods graces we become actually iustified or absolued his coment vpon these words of Moses Abraham beleeued God and it was counted vnto him for righteousnesse doth put it out of controuersie Was it therefore such righteousnesse as deserued absolution or reward Rather rewarded as such by gracious acceptance as is there implied Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace but of debt but to him that worketh not to the loiterer or idle person No to him that faithfully workes as Abraham did and yet seekes saluation onely by firme beleefe in him which iustifies the vngodly his faith or rather his faith thus set vpon it proper obiects is imputed to him for righteousnesses But the Iesuite demaunds when is it thus imputed After grace infused or whiles it remaines inherent or at the first infusion only Not after grace infused by which in his diuinitie he ceaseth to be impious Was Abraham then destitute of inherent grace before he belieued the promise concerning Isaac Sosome Romanists consequently to their Churches erroneous interpretation of scripture haue auouched whom Bellarmine dares not follow
impertinent because the Moone hath no light but what shee borrowes from the sun Yet if the question were absolutely proposed why the Moone were ecclipsed as no other answere would serue so this alone were sufficient because the body of the earth which is not transpenetrable by any light is directly interposed betweene the sunne and the Moone Or if it be questioned how the Israelites being stung with serpents were saued the reply is good and formall by the signe of saluation which God had erected But some we may suppose died after it was erected what was the reason they did not stedfastly looke vpon it shall we then absolutely say the Israelites were saued not onely by this signe of saluation which God hath giuen them but by their eyesight as it was a faculty or quality inherent This was a qualification indeed so requisite in the subiect to be healed that such as were without it were depriued of ordinary meanes of preseruation yet none to speake properly and absolutely were saued by their eyesight but onely by the obiect of their sight or rather by both as they had relation to him whose victory ouer the great serpent and graund enemy of mankind the manner of the brasen serpents erection represented This last instance will apply it selfe vnto the point in hâ—nd Workes or righteousnesse inherent include no other causalâ—â—â— of iustification or saluation then the Israelites eiesight dido 〈…〉 ety their presence notwithstanding and precedence is in the same rancke or order necessary Christ onely is the true and immediate cause of healing vs from the sting of death as the brasen serpent was of the Israelites temporall recouery from the sting of deadly serpents Thus much of the agreement betweene Saint Paul and Saint Iames now of the agreements and difference betwixt the Romish Church and ours CHAP. VII Of the differences betwixt vs and the Romish Church concerning iustification or the right vse or measure of grace or righteousnesse inherent 1. BOth grant Gods decree or purpose to iustifie sinfull man to be an act of meere mercy Finall absolution or approbation they make no act of mercy but rather of iustice in God because it presupposeth absolute righteousnesse in vs. Both grant Christ to be the sole meritorious and proper efficient cause of that grace which is first infused whose reparation or increase is by their doctrine partly of grace because the foundation of it was meere grace precedent partly of debt because they merit these additions by right vse of their free wil. Whence they cannot without contradiction hold Christ to be the sole meritorious efficient cause of their second iustification or that grace whereby they become more in 〈◊〉 better approoued in the sight of God But about the vse or inâ—â—â—tance of this tearme iustification in Saint Pauls writings we â—â—â—â—ent They contend it it implies as much as to be inherently iust or righteous Many learned Protestants haue copiously shewed it to be a Law phrase equiualent to absolution from the sentence of iustice acquitall or the like To their allegations notwithstanding a wayward Papist will not yeeld because it is sometimes taken in that sence their writers alleadge as may appeare by our late instances or albeit we could by euidence of circumstance or otherwise conuince their vnderstandings that it hath the same valew with Saint Paul as with moderne Protestants yet subtile wits whereof the Romish Church hath plenty would redeeme the disaduantage and recouer their former footing by producing more instances of men absolued through the vprightnesse of their cause then we bring plâ—ces wherein the word iustification is taken for absolution or free pardon of men otherwise obnoxious to condemnation Phinehas resolute and zealous fact was imputed to him for righteousnesse and did iustifie or absolue both himselfe and the host of Israell from the abhomination committed by one of his brethren with the Midianitish woman not by non-imputation but by positiue depulsion of the crime or guilt whose infection would otherwise haue seised on him through conniuence or neutrality Let the Romanist therefore be as way ward as he list or take iustification in what sence he pleaseth that euery sonne of Adam is by nature the sonne of wrath destitute of the glory of God and liable to the sentence of condemnation he neither doth nor can denie that euery sonne of wrath must by his Almighty Iudge be absolued from the sentence of death before he can be admitted vnto life eternall he must vpon the same necessity grant The point then in which will he nill he we must ioine issue is What should be the true immediate and next cause of this finall absolution ought within vs or somewhat without vs By the immediate and next cause wee vnderstand such a cause as is necessarily accompanied by this effect and without whose participation this effect neither doth nor can befall any such a cause as whosoeuer is partaker of is by participation of it foorthwith absolued such a cause as who so can probably hope to be partaker of may vpon the same degrees of probability hope for finall absolution Such a cause as who so doubts or feares least he shall neuer be partaker of in this life must vpon the same tearmes doubt or dispaire of his absolution or saluation We denie he affirmes righteousnesse inherent to be such an absolute cause as hath beene notified of absolution or remission of sinnes of iustification howsoeuer taken Here it will not be amisse to aduise the Reader of a schoole-tricke which one that comes fresh from the arts would easily â—e use though put vpon some graue Diuines by the Romanist The question saith Bellarmine should be proposed not as Chenitius doth of the cause for which seeing that implies the efficient but of the cause by which we are iustified or absolued that is of the formall cause of iustification or absolution CHRISTS righteousnes they grant to be the efficient or meritorious cause for which not the formall by which our sinne are remitted or we iust fied They are indeed bound to assigne a formall cause by which we are truely iust because they hold vs formally iust in the sight of God and seeing they teach remission of sinnes to consist in the extirpation or expulsion of them they may in congruitie affirme that sinne is formally at least immediately remitted by habituall grace or righteousnesse inherent and remitted by CHRIST onely as the efficient cause which meriteth this measure of grace in the same forme of speech that the schooles tell vs that cold is expelled out of the water by the fire as by the efficient but formally or immediatly by the heat which the fire produceth in the water Although perhaps it may be a question whether the expulsion of cold out of the water or of sinne out of our bodies consonantly to their doctrine can haue any proper formall cause or onely an efficient by resultance but to demaund of vs what is the formall
reiteration but we are not to denie that of all which is incompatible onely with some Wee are therefore to consider there is a threefold iustification one radicall or fundamentall which is the infusion of habituall grace or faith and this is neuer but one another actuall which I accompt actuall supplications made in faith for the remission of sinnes committed either before the infusion of faith or after What it is to pray in faith is partly intimated before partly in the end of this Chapter else-where more fully and purposely handled The third is iustification vertuall which consists in the performance of that and the like precepts watch and pray continually which cannot be meant of actuall prayers for hee that so praies continually shall continually vse much babling In this perpetuity of vertuall prayer consists the permanent duration of iustification which yet hath many interruptions A man may haue the habite of faith and yet not alwaies pray in faith either actually or vertually as he may be out of charity with his brother or vnlawfully deteine goods wrongfully gotten without present forfeiture of his estate in grace though to pray in faith it is impossible in the one case vntill hee be reconciled to his brother or haue freely forgiuen him in the other vntil he hath made restitution of those things his conscience condemned him for keeping The perpetuitie of this vertuall prayer or iustification therein consisting depends vpon the continuance of some former resolution or intention made in faith which is not alwaies preiudiced by minding other matters but only by doing things forbidden by the law of God or as S. Paul speakes not of Faith A man intending to go a iourney vertually continues his former intent so he keepe on his way without digression albeit he actually minde not the businesse hee goes about but entertaine such other thoughts or discourse as way or company shall affoord But if through too much minding cōpany or other matters he should chance to wander or for slow opportunities of dispatching his intended businesses his vertuall intention is interrupted and time lost must bee redeemed with double diligence So must such ruptures as actuall sinnes or omission of necessarie duties make in the perpetuity of vertuall praying or permanency of iustification thence depending be repaired with actuall praiers made in faith But here wee may descry the idle curiosity of some wits more acute then subtile at least then sound and rather apt through multiplying entities without necessity to obscure matters in themselues distinct and cleere then to cleere difficulties or obscurities For some there bee which speake of Faith and Repentance as of two spirituall habits or graces really or at least essentially distinct It is one thing indeed to rise another to walke yet both immediate and proper acts of one and the same motiue faculty so is it one thing to belieue and another to repent yet both formall acts of one and the same habite only the later includes a peculiar reference to a slip or fall whence it receiueth a distinct name from the former which specially imports a direct progresse in the way of godlinesse without interruption Better we cannot notifie the nature of true repentance then by restauration of faith to it wonted throne out of which it had for a time bin iustled by sinfull affections though not deposed from it soueraigntie as Dauid was preiudiced by his sonnes rebellion and for a time enforced to forsake the Hill of Sion though not depriued of his kingdome Euen such repentance as vsually goes before regeneration hath a correspondent faith annexed the difference betwixt them onely such as is betweene heate and calefaction which as some good Philosophers resolue vs is heate not acquired or consistent but onely in the motion or acquisition Or briefly to speake more fully Faith alwaies moues vnto repentance which generally taken may in few words not vnfitly be defined to be a sorrow for sin conceiued and moderated by faith and as the faith is such is the sorrow either meerly morall or truely spirituall 4. The summe of all we haue deliuered in these two chapters is briefly but most diuinely set downe by Saint Iohn who though hee vse not the formall tearmes of iustification yet expresseth by nature of it howsoeuer taken by words equiualent or rather more theologicall or significant as by fellowship with God the Father his Sonne CHRIST and his members and by the fruits of it fulnesse of ioy For being iustified by saith as Saint Paul sayth we haue peace with God through our Lord IESVS CHRIST and reioice in hope of his glorie This then is the message sayth Saint Iohn which we haue heard of him and declare vnto you that God is light and in him is no darknesse at all If vvee say we haue fellowship with him and walke in darknesse we lie and do not the truth But if we walke in the light as he is in the light we haue fellowship one with another This walking in the light as God is in the light is that iustification or qualification whereof S Iames speakes whereby wee become immediatly capable of Christs righteousnesse or actuall participants of his propitiation which is the sole immediate cause of our iustification taken as S. Paul doth it for remission of sins or actuall approbation with God The truth of which doctrine Saint Iohn likewise ratifies in tearmes equiualent in the words immediately following And the blood of CHRIST clenseth vs walking in the light as God is in the light from all sin not from such onely as were committed before the infusion of that grace which is the ground of our fellowship with God and amongst our selues the very lamp by whose light wee walke but from all subsequent transgressions of what kinde soeuer Now if we say that we such as S. Iohn then was regenerate and in the state of grace haue no sinne we deceiue our selues and the truth is not in vs. Euen such then as walke in the light are sinners and not iust in themselues but onely as they are besprinkled with CHRISTS righteous bloud Neuerthelesse if we confesse our sinnes faithfully he is faithfull and iust to forgiue vs our sinnes and to cleanse vs from all vnrighteousnesse not from sinnes veniall onely And is there any circumstance either in the matter or manner of his discourse which may occasion vs to suspect the same word sinne should not be of equall importance in both these places last cited and that third following These things write I vnto you that you sinne not What venially only No questionlesse he was more desirous that they should not sinne mortally nor do the authors of this distinction deny that men regenerate may sinne so grieuously as to fall both totally and finally from grace yet sayth S. Iohn If any man sin as there is no man that sinneth not both mortally and venially by our aduersaries grant vvee haue an Aduocate with the Father