now murmilling somtymes displaying furth his handes now cōtracting them And fynally doeth not els but gaseth vpon the swellowing ouer of a peace of bread and the vglie and shamefull licking of a cuppe without any ciuilytie If in the beholding of this lyeth remission of sinnes in deid they are easie to be pardoned If we shall say that the preist as he taketh the whole to him self so onely obteined he forgiuenes of his sinnes then the people is heauily intreated and at an euill point when the harlote and the ignorant preist shall haue the whole This is mirrie to refresh the reader and yet is moste trew for this wicked and deuillish opinion of remission of snies by masse hath enuennomed all Christēdome and drowned it vp so that she allone wes esteamed to be the lady the plyght and souerane Anchor yea and the porte of all benediction and Saluation What blasphemie and derogation to the blood of Iesus Christ To his dignitie honor and preisthead hath proceaded hereof as it is now manifest to euerie one so in the refutatiō of this we are driuen to speak somwhat And firste wil I demād of this Romish Doctor where did he euer here that theie wes any Sacrifice instituted without a Sacrificer We knowe that the Author to the Hebreues Vendicates the dignitie of preisthead wholy to our Sauioure whose preisthead he calleth there 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say of that nature that it can not be transferred into an other The argument of the Apostle is verie cleir in the 7. Chap. where he giues the cause of the multytude pluralitie of preistes euerie one succedinge other because they were mortal and subiect to death ād so could not remane But no such infirmitie falleth in our preist the Lord Iesus who hath offered vp him self in a ful satisfaction and recōpence for all our sinnes and that ones the vertue whereof remaneth perpetually and yet desisteth not to execute the other parte of the office of the preist euer interreading at his Fathers handes for the offences of the people euer liuing as the Apostle sayeth for that cause How then can this Sacrifice stand without a preist How can there be any oblation without a Sacrificer Secondly we be plainely teached by this same author that there can be no remission of sinnes without effusion shedding of blood In your masse there is no shedding of blood for ye call it on vnbloody Sacrifice but how iustly after shal be cōsidered How then darre ye promise to your selues remission of sinnes thereby Thridly if ye will pertinatiouslie insist and will it to be a Sacrifice necessarly it shal follow that it that is offerred shal be slaine If Christ be Sacrificed in euerie masse then shal he be moste barbarously and cruelly slaine euerie day in ten thousand places for ye affirme plainely that ye offer him vp vnto his Father This is not myne but the Apostles argument in the same Epistle if it had bene neidfull to him to haue offered him self ofter then ones then should he haue suffered oftentymes since the beginning of the world It followeth then cleirly that since ye take vpon you to offer him vp at all tymes in euerie corner that ye do that that is in you to put traterous and blody handes vpon him Your shiftes and subterfuges are well knowene to me firste that ye christ not successors to our Sauioure as if he were dead and vtterly taken away but suffraganes of his Eternall preisthead But if the wordes of the Apostle be well examinat and considdered aryght they do proue manifestly that nether neadeth he a successor nor yet a suffragane seing he is euer leuing and ready to execute yea and executing his office euer present with his Church and neuer intermitting the office laide vpon him by his Father And this his Sacrifice he dide ones offer vp by vertue whereof remission of sinnes is obtened to all that beleued In the office of intercession he is cōtinually occupyed as we haue somwhat touched so that in no part of his office can he be ether esteamed sleuthful absent or so occupied to require a Suffragane ether yet mortal and subiect to death that he should neid a successor Hereby I trust it be sufficiently declared your masse to be no Sacrifice and so your diffinition to fal in that point and so haue ye to lybell new againe To that ye say the Lordes body is really conteined vnder the formes of bread and wyne I wonder ye make no mention of the blood of our Lorde aswell as of the Body but in this ye shaw well where ye learned to wit at Sorbone and not at the Scoole of Christe for Christe instituteth and vseth two seuerall simboles of his body blood bread wyne but you as ye are teached of your maister Sathan doeth think that nawise neidfull In token whereof ye haue debarred all Christianes except a certane shauelinges from the one part of the Lordes table and hath reserued the cuppe all whole to your selues and in deid God be praised it is not euill sent vpon their boched faces Albeit that Iesus Christ the Author hereof doeth plainely command that all shall drink and this wes euer practised in the primitiue Church yea and euer reteined by the ancient Fathers howsoeuer ye take vpon you in your stinking diffinition that it wes so instituted by our Sauioure in remembrance of his death and passion so lyghtly not onely do ye pas by the holy ordinances of God but also the shedding of his blood In the Second diffinition which appeareth to conteine a certane correction of the former Ye call it a commemoration and remembrance of Christes death and passion In deid it is certane that our Sauiour willed and cōmanded that action which he had practised to be done in commemoration of him and after him Sainct Paule giueth charge lykewise that how so oft we shall eat of that bread and drink of that cuppe we annunce and furthshaw the Lordes death till he come But the masse to be that action ether yet to haue any affinitie with it being altogether al 's contrarious as the heauen and the earth lyght and darknes the day and the nyght he is more nor mad that tholeth hī so to be persuaded But of this repugnancie we will haue more ganing occasion to speak when as we shall atteane to that place where of set purpose you do handle the aggreance of the masse with the Lordes table and the diuersitie Where ye pretend the bread the wyne to be consecrated execrated I darre say boldly for consecration haue ye none according to Christes institution I trust there be none that euer hath sene the action of the Lord Iesus practysed ether yet hath red the wordes of his moste blissed institution that will consent or aggre thereto for in his action we read plainely that he take bréad gaue thankes brake it gaiue it
is neuer a syllabe I pas by sindrie maters that might be adduced and should serue properly to this purpose as why at the beginning when this opinion entered in of thy Sacrifice of the masse a loÌ„g time there wes but one in euerie Church yea amonges a great multitude of Monkes and Freares there wes but a preist and an Alter a masse and that but vpon Solemne dayes as we see yet in these dayes but an Alter in the Popes Chappell a masse and that but at certane tymes in the yeare By these thinges I truste it may be easylie espyed of what mynde this Author asceibeth the applycation of the fructes of the Lordes death to the masse euen to foster and manteane all wickednes and impietie to the plaine mockage derision and contempt of God peruersion and supplantation of his holy ordinances defacing and burying of the Sacrifice of the croice fynally to thruste the Sonne of God out of his owen roume to spoile him of his prerogatiue of Eternal preisthead and intruding a preist The Apostle pronounceth that Christe the Sonne of God by his onely oblatioÌ„ ones offered purchased Eternall sanctification to all the Elect of God And in that disputation not onely abbrogateth and wypeth away the Sacrifices of the Law but also fully refuteth your vaine dreame of this sacrifice of the masse Ye affirme your masse to be a Sacrifice by virtew whereof ye haue remission of sinnes and that al 's well to the dead as to the quick The Apostle affirmeth plainely that there is no place now to any Sacrifice since the saying of Ieremie is accomplished and fulfilled when ye are thus vrged ye true to your shift and cryeth that it is no new Sacrifice nor any thing different from the Sacrifice of Christe but the self same The Apostle occurreth to this and denyeth that it oght any wayes to be repeated or reiterat and is not contented to call it a Sacrifice but adioneth that it wes one 's made yea and wholy vendicates the glorie and prerogatiue of the Eternal preisthead vnto the onely anoynted of God so that it can coÌ„uene to none to offer him vp but to him self Your craft to schift you of this is to say that the wordes of the Apostle are to be vnderstand of a bloody maner your Sacrifice say ye is vnbloody but the Apostle affirmeth without any exceptioÌ„ that there can be no Sacrifice by which remission of sinnes is obteined without effusion of blood Last of all ye here affirme that it is a certane applycatioÌ„ of the feuer of that a Sacrifice offered by our Sauiour To this the Apostle answereth for this cause and to this effect the ceremonies and Sacrifices of the Lawe haue bene abbrogated and taken away by the death of Christe because in them there wes memorie and mentioÌ„ of sinnes which they were no wayes able to take away Whereby ye are constrayned and compelled in dispite of your obstinat and indured hart to grant that no such kynde of applycation can haue place as ye haue foolishely deuised Change and turne thee in al 's many formes and figures as the Poyet speaketh of Protheâ—s thou shal be holden so fast and strait by the disputation of the Author that thou shall in no wayes escape He teacheth vs plainely that none is able to offer him but him self what a Sacriledge then is it that euerie preist shall take this vpon him in the masse Secondly he pronounceth this Sacrifice to be one and ones perfited that it can not be repeated in the masse howsoeuer ye affirme it to be the same yet is it offered vp oftentymes yea many myssion of tymes in an hour nothing appearing but a preist euerie where The Apostle pronounceth geue rally that there is no Sacrifice without shedding of blood ye affirme youres to be vnbloody as we haue said heretofore The Apostle when as we shal search remission of our sennes commandeth vs to stay our selues on the passion and death of our Sauiour his Sacrifice and sheweth the difference that is betuix vs and the Fathers to be that they were astricted and bund to a continuall ryte ordaine of offering vp of Sacrifices which we are exempted and deliuered oâ— by the death of our Sauioure Ye affirme plaine against this that the Sacrifice of the croice of Christ can in no wayes serue vs vules the virtew of it be applyed vnto vs by this your Sacrifice 〈◊〉 iudge I besech thee godly Lector of this do not repugne plainely to the wordes of the Apostle and doeth introduce a new iudaisme by pluâ—alytie of Sacrifices and heaping vp of ceremonies Thou goeth about to declaire thy wicked opinion by an exemple drowen out of the medicine where it repugneth nothing that a thing be propyned by sindrie instrumentes This saying is trew but if the medicin shall 〈◊〉 proper instrumentes to entreat handle his patient committed to his cure charge and yet shal take a poysoned Goblet filthy and stinking alwayes trimuâ—e deckt and verie semely without and in it propine to his patient rank poysone making hiÌ„ who hath wholie submitted him self to his faith to beleue that he shall receaue the moste pectoral and confortable potion what shal we think of this medicin what is thy iudgement of him â–ª Is he not worthy of the death This is more proper and pertinent to thy purpose Chrysostome vseth the similytude of the medicine but more properly then ye do as the medicine sayeth he and it be strenthy and of virtew ones being vsed and applyed shall expell the sickenes and is no more to be vsed otherwayes it shall declaire the owen imperfection if it shall neid to be after vsed so sayeth he is the oblation of our Sauiour which in respect of the perpetuall virtew and power of purgation and sanctification ones offered is not to be repeated In that they were commanded to offer Sacrifices as is coÌ„teined rebuke and reprehension of sinnes so in the multitude and repetition of them is tryed the infirmitie of the thinges that were offered Take head now what thou doeth vrgeing this Sacrifice so earnestly and defacing the vertew of Christes Sacrifice which herâ— by â—an not be but impotent since thou will haue it so often reiterat Thou neadeth not to oppen vp our infirmities subiection to sinne and iniquitie to proue the necessitie of this thy blasphemus Sacrifice as we had no other meanes to be assured of our Redemption but by it we haue God be praised Baptisme and the Lordes Supper which we acknowledge to be the holie institutions of Iesus Christe whereby we are fully and perfectly assured 〈◊〉 our deliuerance by Christe and of our coniunction with him Now let vs prosecute the rest Followeth an other obiection made by Iames. Alwayes sayes he all ze quha vses the masse dois not this not is not in the Text that is come to my handes but because the sentence requireth it I
is moste certane we haue the mater expressed by the wordes at large declared in them so that any man that shal here these wordes pronounced incoÌ„tinently knoweth the mater being moste properly and euidently shawen by the wordes But this word masse I pray thee what affinitie hath it with the mater signifieth by it which nether it self is found in the Scriptures nor the mater signified by it I pray thee let me know the signification of it or what cuntrie language is it I know that some of your men trauelleth to draw it from the Hebrew some affirmeth it to be an latine tearme receaued in the great dekay of the latine tongue â–ª What euer it be the Authors can not conuene vpon it some affirming one thing and some an other It is moste probable that it proceadeth from the ryte of the Sacrifices of the Greikes who in the end thereof vsed some certane solempnitie in geuing leaf to the people to depart saying 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to the which ye say Ite missa est crossing the people with an emptie chalice I myght take occasion here to speak somwhat at more large of this mater if my purpose were not to waite vpon this Author nowayes to pas by him Now followeth to intreat somwhat of the diffinition of the masse giuen by this glorious glosare an he giues first which is this That the masse is noght els properly but the Sacrifice of the Lordes body really contened vnder the formes of bread and wine institute by Iesus Christ in his latter Supper in remembrance of his death and passion Hereafter he interiectis this disputation of the name of the masse and then as new hauing digested his wyne he returneth and assigneth an other diffinition which is this The masse I vnderstand to be a commemoration of Christes death passion in the which the bread and wyne are coÌ„secrated according to Christes institution and the body and blood of Iesus Christ vnder the forme of bread and wyne are offered to the Father of heauen and are receaued as the heaueÌ„ly food of our soules This fare this Author any man that conferreth the one with the other may consider easylie how necessarie it wes to this Author to assigne this new and last diffinition because of the great imperfection of the formare Alwayes howsoeuer he is troubled with him self to patche sowe clamp and set together such peaces as will neuer aggre let vs procead to the examinatioÌ„ of the treuth of his sayinges This I vnderstand to be the maner of teaching of the Logique Scooles and namely of Aristotle whome to not without cause the Scoole giueth the praise and prerogatiue in the sext boke of his Topickes where he of set purpose entreateth of the conditions properties and qualities of a laufull diffinition that it shall haue it that they call Senus which being as it were confuse because it extendeth the self to other members nor it that is iÌ„ question they do adde differences which shall so properly apperteyne to the mater that is spoken of that they shall declare the nature and the substance thereof so that there shal nether want nor be superflous any thing therein but deuide discerne and seperate it from all others our inuerted Silenus in the former explication taketh the masse to be a Sacrifice but because there be many kyndes of Sacrifices therefore he addeth the rest that it may be knowen to be a Sacrifice of such a kynde and thus seperated from all others Now haue we to consider how iustly he doeth call it a Sacrifice All Sacrifices whatsoeuer thou shal here of in the Scriptures albeit they be many in nomber yet be they all redacted to this strate that ether they be of the noâ—ber of theÌ„ that the Greik calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yea soÌ„tymes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereby men doeth testifie and oppenly witnes them to receaue all thinges out of the handes of God and for his wonderfull and inestimable giftes and benifites offerreth the Sacrifice of thankesgeuing vp vnto his maiestie Of this sorte were they Sacrifices appointed in the Law and called solide offerringes libations the first stuctes oblations peace offerringes and such others whereby the people sometymes did testifie there Religion sometymes did vse them in maner of supplication to search the fauonâ— of their God now to practise with them selues the obedience and loue that they owe to their God in consideration of his liberalitie yea and now to stirre vp their hartes to the trew and vnfenyed feare of God and all together moste chieflie to renew the remembrance of that blissed and happy couenant which it hath pleased the Eternall to make with them I do think ye wil not minishe the glorie and prerogatiue of this your owne doghter whome ye flatter so busylie as to put her in the rank of these seing ye ascribe vnto her remission of sinnes Er opere operato For thus speaketh your gostly Fathers the Scoole men with the whole rable of Sophisters vnto that vndefyled lady who is ready to ioyne with euery shauilling and also is at all tymes ready deckt to him that hath the price in his hand Of this kynd of Sacrifices ye do not tak the masse to be as may euidently appeare by your boke where ye set her vp euen with the Sacrifice of the croce as we shal after here The other kynde of Sacrifices be when an oblation is offered vp for a sinne whereby it is redeamed before God and this is called a propitiatorie expiatorie an sacrifice of satisfaction as by the which the wraith of God is appeased satisfaction made to his â—â—ste and ryghteous iudgementes so that the sinner purged and restored vnto puritie and iustice is in fauor with God by virtue thereof seing it hath power and force to wype and washe away sinnes And this name had they offerringes in the Law that were ordeined appointed for remission of such sines as were committed euerie one in the own kynde not that they were able of them selues or had that force but because they were appointed to this end figuring that Sacrifice which is onely worthy of that name persyted by our Sauioure Iesus Christ vpon the croce putting end and syne to all Sacrifices If this Iowel and block of yours shal be of this kynde it falloweth well that she forgiueth sinnes And not without cause ye beck and bowe to her so earnestlie that is by virtue of that action that God remitteth sinnes But here wold I glaidly inquire whose sinnes are remitted whither the sacrificer or the beholder of the which I am sure no man knoweth for the moste parte any more but that he sees the murgeons played a disguysed preist somtymes pufting somtymes blawing somtymes dreaming now as it were walking out of his slepe now turning his face to the people now to the Alter now crosing now bowing him self doune
blood of our Sauiour to lurke and so to be expossed to the doggishe appetite and cruell teath of a filthy harlote what a masked Sacrifice is this Augustyne speaketh more reuerently geuing vs a generall reule to discerne proper speaches and thinges that be spoken properly and vnderstand euen as they be written from improper and Metaphoricall that whensoeuer we be commanded to do that which includeth no absurditie nor repugneth not to all humanitie nature then haue we to take this commandement as properly spoken and to be obeyed as it speaketh But where the commandement is giuen against all humaintie nature and reason as to eat the fleshe of man and to drink his blood then let vs think well that the speaking is improper and Metaphorical What wil thou answer to this saying of this godly learned man Thou seeth plainely this godly Father to grant manifestly a figure in these wordes this is my body and that they oght to be vnderstand figuratiuelie and Metaphorically iudgeing it a great impietie til a man to think that he shall eat the body and fleshe of man drink his blood in any wayes really and substantially as ye do fondly imagine But to be mirry with you ye do well that howsoeuer ye do vse this haynus cruel and more nor barbarus boucherie vpon the Sonne of God yet that he sealeth not your horrible intreatment that he being a maÌ„ against the nature of man is made insensible and inuisible some relief and confort hath he God giue you his holy Spirite that ye may ones consider the treuth submit your self vnto it in all humilitie The last defference is in the consideration of the cause wherefore the Lordes body is offerred vp in the Sacrifice of the masse The Lordes body wes offered vpon the croice to obtene euerlasting lyfe satisfaction for sinne redemâ—tion and so furth The Sacrifice of the masse was institute by our Sauiour in the last Supper not as a new satisfaction or redemption but it is a new Sacrifice in coÌ„memoration and rememberance of Christes death and passion be the vse of the quhilk we are made pertakers of the fruct of his death and passion This farre In deid in the practise of the Lordes Table we be teached to celebrate the Lordes death till his comming that is to say to remember and meditat with our selues yea and confesse preach and annunce in presence of the whole world the benefites procured and obteined vnto vs by the death and resurrection of our Sauiour and no dout the faithfull is ioyned with Christe and made participant of his iustice holynes innocencie and so furth Yea and as Tertuliane speaketh the bread and the cuppe are verie pledges of our spirituall lyfe resurrectioÌ„ and Saluation But we acknowledge no such thing to be receaued of thy wicked impius and vngodly masse which thou here decketh vp with the ornamentes of the Lordes holy table not vnlyke to Esops Crawe But since we are atteined hetherto I will not werie to shaw the defferences betuix the two which shall not be altogether without fruct nor yet from the purpose and shall conclude them shortly in four heades 1. First we know Iesus Christe appointed vncted of his Father the Eternall preist according to the ordour of Melchisedec then to haue executed absolued and perfyted the office of his preisthead when as at the will of his Father he offered him self vp in a Sacrifice of sweit Sauour vpon the croice the onely and Eternall Sacrifice which no dout wes prefigurat long before in Melchisedec who being ones in the Scriptures broght in is declared to be the preist of the liuing God without any further mention of him In this blasphemus Sacrifice of your masse ye spoile and rubbe the SoÌ„ne of God the onely and Eternal preist of this prerogatiue of preisthead ioyning to him Collateralles Companions successors and suffraganes to vse his charge and execute his office euen as the same infirmitie were in him that wes in the preistes of the Lawe who by their mortalitie wes driuen to take men till occupy their roumes supplie there absence and so releif their charges The Apostle affirmeth no such imperfection to be in our Sauiour the Eternall preist euer liuing to execute his office of mediation and intercession whose preisthead is of that nature that it can not be transfered into any other And if it be trew that we be teached by the same Author that no man taketh any honour vpon him but he that is called of God as Aron Shaw the place and commandement of appoynting of these new Sacrificers And as I am moste certane that thou shall finde none in the Scriptures so am I assured that thow can haue no suffrage nor testimony of antiquitie thereof For Chrysostomus is plaine and Augustine plainely sheweth it to be the voice of the Antichrist if any man shall call a Bishop a mediator betuix God and man so straitly doeth he ascribe and vendicat the whole honour of preisthead vnto Christe that not one â—ote he will thole to be taken or communicat with 〈◊〉 other 2. The Second difference is that it wholy defaceth and distroyeth the croice and passion of Christe For that is moste certane that assone as euer thou erecteth an Alter that the croice of Christe is vtterly extinguished For ye will not deny but our Sauiour Christe offered vp himself to purches and obteâ—ne perpetuall sanctificaion and forgiuenes to his Elect and faithfull the vertew whereof is Eternal and remaneth other wayes we could iudge no other thing of this Sacrifice of Christe then of them vnâ—er the Lawe the which are tryed by that to be of small value that they wâ—re oft reiterat Wherefore we muste conclude ether that the croice of Christe lacketh the force of Eternall pâ—rgation or els that it is a sufficient Sacrifice whereby he hath fully satisfied for all and that perpetually Now then if place shal be to this thy Sacrifice which isso practised that a hundreth thousand of them are offered vp in a day What can we think but that the passioÌ„ of our Sauiour wherein he offered vp him self to his Father shal be vtterly rased defaced buryed and quenshed I sâ—air to rehears the testimonies of the Scripture because we will haue immediatly after occasion to speak of them 3. The thrid propertie and vertew of the masse is that â—t burieth and obliterateth the death of our Sauioure to the which is attrybuted by the Spirite of God the whole Saluation and Redemption of man For as commonlie â—monges men the Testaments and latter willes of men are of no effect nor strenth to the man that maketh it be depriued of lyfe so we know our Sauiour to haue confirmed his Testament wherein we be written aires of the Eternal kingdome by his death Weknow lykewayes what a Sacriledge it is to alterre change varie and innouate any iote of a Testament Shall this
thou doest it to abuse the Text and wreist the sense of it to confirme thy wicked opinion It is neidfull to shaw thee the absurditie that shall ensew Doutles if thou should vnderstand the wordes referre them to that oblation that wes a lytle after made vpon the croice then should I grant thy sayinges and go with thee moste willingly being assured of the approbation of the wholle Church and consent of the Godlie Fathers But thou that thou may seme to haue inuented somwhat of thy owen head confoundest these wordes to the ignominie of the Eternall Sonne of God spoiling him of his preisthead and intrusinge in his roume a pestilent harlote a shaueling after the ordour of Epicurus Sardanapalus This in deid can not be suffered for being demanded of Iames what thou will inferre of this thou answerest braggest that thou hast gotten thyne intent which is Our Lorde maid ane oblation of his body blude in the latter Supper and gaue his Apostles commaundement to do the same Thou subioynest the cause the gif our Sauiour in the latter Supper had onely institute the cōmunion and not the Sacrifice of the masse then he had said tak ze eat ze this is my bodie quhilk giuen to zow and not for zow because giuen to zow includes onely the communion and giuen for zow includes not onely the cōmunion but al 's ane Sacrifice as the phrase of the wordes plainely declares The horrible blasphemies that be here conteined in these few wordes nether can mynde think nor tongue sufficiently expresse For by these wordes not onely shal we find that he spoileth the Sonne of God the Eternal and onelie preist of his honour trodding him vnderfoote and al 's that he moste craftilie and inuiusly taketh from vs that great infinite treasure of the latter Supper of the Lorde Iesus which we are commanded to practise til his returning and in the which he hath so mercifully and aboundantly disployed his benefites giftes mercies towards man This I say this Author taketh from man for if giuen to you includeth the communion as this Author sayeth and our Sauiour hath pronounced no such thing but giuen for you it followeth well that here there is no such institutiō as the holy communion for by this Author giuen for you is offered for you Christe then offered him self there we be commanded to do the same then followeth that we are commanded to offer him and so to make Sacrifice of him where is there any place to the communion then whiche is no Sacrifice or els of necessitie thou shall grant that the communion and the Sacrifice are bothe one which repugneth manifestlie to thy doctrine but aggreeth in deid with the Ancientes For some of them we obserue to haue giuen this Name of Sacrifice to the Lordes Table but that improperlie because it is instituted and practised in memorie of that Sacrifice which onely is worthy of that name consider how thou art trapt in the same Snaire that thou prepared for others and how craftily to establishe thy impius Sacrifice of the masse thou fraudest the whole Congregation of that great and inestimable confort of the Lordes Table This belyke thou wolde meane howsoeuer thou sayest that in these wordes giuen for you is included not onely the cōmunion but al 's the Sacrifice of the masse for with what Brow can thou deny but I may collect of this thy doctrine that there is no communion at all for as thou sayest giuen to you includeth the communion so say I that giuen for you includeth only the masse It followeth well for giuen for you is asmuch as offered for you and so importeth a Sacrifice then it followeth well that we haue no communion but a Sacrifice onely for thou will not grant the communion and the Sacrifice to be one diuiding and separating the one from the other and collecting two diuers institutions in the latter Supper And so alwayes it is fals that thou assumest to proue that our Sauiour institute two thinges here the holy Table and the Sacrifice of the masse And lykewise it followeth euidently that ether we shal lacke the communion or els the masse This followeth moste necessarly of thy interpretation if thou will say that the communion is conteined in the former parte of the Table he tuke bread brake it gaue thankes and gaue it to his Disciples and in the latter part for so ye of your factiō distinguisheth the wordes this is my body which is giuen for you here he instituteth the Sacrifice the cōmandement apperteaneth equalie to bothe then muste it follow that there be two seuerall actions the former hauing as it were nothing to do with the latter the communion to wit and the masse Secondly hereby we shall collect that there shal be a Sacrament without a promes euerie man I truste wil grāt the Lordes Table to be a Sacrament which can not subsist without the promes For if giuen for you apperteaneth to the wordes preceading this is my body and shall altogether be referred to thy masse and now shal haue nothing to do with the former action of distribution of the bread this Sacrament shall lack the promes and so consequently shal be no Sacrament how vaine and fonde this is let euerie man iudge For I darre affirme that there is no man of iudgement that wil diuide and disseuet this action being all one and what Sacriledge doest thou think it to dissociat distract and put a shunder that which is ioyned by God And to answer you sire in your owen maner what wes the cause if the mynde of our Sauiour wes to institute here a Sacrifice and that such a Sacrifice as your masse that he doeth not take a peice or portion of bread a certane quantitie of wyne erect vp an Altare or at the least withdraw him self some space from the company vse the ceremonies that ye do vse and so to make and offer vp the Sacrifice We know that the wisedome of our God hath forget nothing vncommanded touching the offering vp of Sacrifices in the Law the garmentes and apperrell of the Preist the erecting of the Alter the beast that wes to be slaine and lykewyse of the rest of the circumstances ceremonies then to be vsed when as the preist approched to the practise of the oblation Should this haue bene pretermitted in this Sacrifice where the Sonne of God is offered vp the veritie and treuth of all Sacrifices preceading We obserue with what solicitude studie and cairfulnes the Spirit of God painteth furth the celebration of the Pasouer and with what diligence our Sauiour and maister Christe Iesus celebrated it according to the precept of the Law not passing by a ceremonie And requireth he not the same of vs in obseruation of his ordinances Will ye affirme that there is any obliuion forgetfulnes sleuth or negligence in our God Why doeth he not then say to his company in
of Christes body ones offred vpon the Croce whose fleshe and blood by his death are become the verrie nurishment of our Soules according to his owen promes saying and the bread that I shall geue yow it is my fleshe which I shall geue for the lyfe of the warld Playe thou thy self with thy mearie conceait dreaming that he firste offred his bodye and then he gaue it to be eaten We are assured he did offre it vpon the Croce by which onely oblatioÌ„ we haue obteyned lyfe Searâ—h then what thow lest in thy Sacrificâ— of thy masse lyfe shal thou not fynd in it for that floweth frome Christes death only but maister Doctor if a maÌ„ should demaÌ„de by which wordes is this your Sacrifice of the masse instituted if ye answer by these this is my body Then ye grant that there wes no thing offered before they wordes were pronounced Then if some maÌ„ shuld demaÌ„d were the Apostles obedient to Christes commandiment or not It wel be harde to yow to say that they repined in that caise but plaine it is that the bread being broken Christ said take ye eat ye aÌ„d efter subiuned the other wordes then it appeareth that some of the Apostles were busye with the bread before the whole wordes were pronunced And so wolde some captius man and that not without some iuste cause seing ye deale with the mater so captiuitie say that if his body wes not eaten yet it wes in eating before it wes offred thus ye may espy that we can trouble yow if we list for oure coniecture hes more probabilitie nor hes your bolde affirmation Christes body wes offred before it wes eaten because the pasouer wes offred before it wes eaten But suche anxius and to curious obseruation of euery moment of tyme will not serue to establishe and for vp a new doctryne wicked and impius it that is worthy obseruation of the tyme is this in the oâ—e and the vther that the Lorde our God being of mynde to delyuer his people out of Egypt and to see them at libertie he instituted the Pasouer whiche should be vnto them as a figure and a monument of there fredome and 〈◊〉 to all ginerations in the ages to come and that they should be the more diligent in obseruation of his ordinaÌ„ce at that same tyme there wes no lytle dainger appearing to Egypt and they not as yet delyuered he commanded them to do this for we be more moued affected with those thinges that we be teached in the myddest of a great trouble and calamitie nor with those that be repdited vnto vs in al quietnes and securitie for as solicitude and fear maketh a maÌ„ more attentiue war and able to conceaue so do they make a maÌ„ more thankful and myndful of the benefite receaued Lykewise we obserue that our maister sauiour Christ that same nyght he wes betrayed the displeasour and melancholie hauing occupyed the hertes of his Apostles then did he institute his holy supper whereby they should be admonished of there instaâ—te delyuerance that wes to follow at hande Yet since ye vrge the figure and preisseth so earnestlie at the tyme I praye yow answer to me if any Preiste wee disquieted called vpon appoynted for the Immolation of the Easter Lambe ye knowe I truste the contrarie it wes commaÌ„ded to be eaten in euery housse slayne be the maister of the housse without any Ceremonye or circumstance commanded in otheres Sacrifices as of preiste altare and sofurth whereby it appeareth euidentlie that it wes onely rekned to be a Gratulatorie Sacrifice and of the kynd of suche as were called meat offringes no suche as ye meane and this we will not denye to conueine most properlie to the Communion as hath bene clearlie declared Now then a lytle with yow where of proceadeth this your Papisticall Preisthead by the whiche ye claime Authoritie to offre vp the Lambe of God since ye see no preist called vpon here in the figure but the maister of the housse in this to haue the charge Now apply the figure to the veritie and ye shall perceaue how great a vanitie it is to seik the congruence aggrement and similitude of the one with the other in all poyntes for if that should haue place neuer shall I seik one other argument but the figure to euert thy whole purpose as thow alledgest the Sonne of God should be first offred and sacrificed according to the figure then shall it follow that he wes firste slayne syne eaten yea and efter he wes eaten slayne againe as we know Christe Iesus to haue dead vpon the Crioce efter his holy Supper These are the great absurditeis following vpoÌ„ the figures Forther to inquire of the tyme it is vaine and â—urâ—uâ— yea and foulishe to lead any probation thereby an establishe any thing any wayes doutsum let be it that is manifestlie wicked Here Iames is moued seing this dimne bryng all his probations out of the figures of the olde Testament to vtter his Iudgement and think that the figures of the auld Testament ar noche sufficient confirmatioun of the maters of faith concerning the new Testament As in verrie deid allegoreis how soeuer the Ancients delyted in them are but weak ê“batioÌ„s not mekle to be leaued vnto In some places being vsed modestlie they may be receaued in doctryne of admonition But to this this Doctor boldly pronunceth ze think sayis he all wraÌ„g because zour hart is against the Scripture dois not our Sauiour confirme his burying tyll indure thre dayis and thre nychtis be the figure of Ionas Dois nocht Peter proue Baptisme necessarie be the figure of the Arke of Noie affirminge all thaim tyll haue perissed that wer withoute it Lykewise Paule callis to remembrance the twa Sonnes of Abraham to haue signified the twa Testamentis thus may we perceaue the speciall matters of our faith conteaned in the new TestameÌ„t to be coÌ„firmed be the figures of the auld Testament To proue his intent this glorious diuine adduces thre exemples out of sindre places of the new Testament euen as these places were cyted out of the ould Testament as solide probations When as they are adduced onely to Illustrate the mater which is already decleared to be luke for or then that whiche is already prouen by strong arguments Last to shaw that they haue some figure or similitude in the ould Testament We knowe that our Sauiour to whome and to his holy spirit it apperteneth to expone and declare the conformitie of the figureâ— with the mater represented by them and not to euery one to take vpon him to deuise and ymagine al thing according to us fond faiâ—talie our Sauiour I say againe being in oportuned be the Iowes continuallie calling for signes tokenes wounderous workes according to there ingyne he thus disdanefully trâ—etteth them aÌ„d pronunceth them vnworthy of the thinges they called for moste earnestlie aÌ„d â—o â—urteâ—h them
veritie y t the Disciples of the Apostles had the trew vnderstanding of all the mysteries of the Scripture necessare to be knawin for ane Christiane maÌ„nis saluatioÌ„ speciallie of the profound mysterie of the Supper of the Lorde Quhareof is gathered the Sacrifice of the Masse Quharefor I am desyrus to knaw the sayingis of ye auld wryttars speciallie of thaim y e war Disciples to the Apostles of the Masse giue thay mak mention of it in thare workes Heretofore some releif had I of yow brother But now being becumin no les Inimie to this cause nor the Abbot hiÌ„self here ye must not be offeÌ„ded brother Iames if I shal renuÌ„ce forder amitie to your I trust ye speak not this of your owen head but as your Tutoure hath instructed you Here I must schew to you where ye chope to wit in this that ye do think the trew vnderstanding of the mysteries of the scripture to consiste in proximitie of tyme or in familiaritie with the Apostles foreclosing the graces of God and bynding them to a certane age and tyme meanyng that the familiaritie of the Apostles might make stedfastnes and constancie I wold not any man should think that I speak this in preiudice of the ancients Which I with al my hert reuereÌ„ce But I wold not that the foreconceaued opinion of there authoritie should preinge the action of veritie and that no man shoulde think this to be sufficient to establishe any doctryne to say the man who wes the familiare of Paule and this of Ihon the Disciple sayeth and so to conclude it to be allowed as godlie I am assured there be none of there Disciples of that they wer reached by them wyll establishe any other thing nor the Spirite of God approued in his Scriptures But we know there complaintes and the forewarnyng of the Apostles Ihon in his Canonick they haue passed furth of vs but they were not of vs and S. Paule exhorteth the ouersears of Ephesus to tak head and be vigilant for of them selues sayeth he shall ryse vp men speaking wicked thinges immediatlie efter my departing yea rauenus Wolffes hauing no pitie on the floke and so furth Whereby we may gather that it is not yneugh to haue bene familiare and familiarlie instructede by the Apostles no not by Iesus Christ him self vnles we considdre if they be of there Disciples in dede which is knowen by conference of there writtinges with the doctryne of the Apostles if they aggre not we may wel affirme with Ihon they passed furth frome them but they were not of them This mater is so plaine that it nedeth no forther probation in my iudgement Now cumeth our author and difâ—endeth to the sayinges of the Fathers Which he hath gathered out of there werkes as he thoght they myght serue to his mater and first he recyteth Testimony of Ignatius in his Epistle Ad smirninses It is not leiful to offre nor to mak Sacrifice nor say masse without the Byschops authoritie and consent These wordes of this Ancient doctor ye vnderstande and expone of your vnsauorie Sacrifice altogether prophane Which I am sure if he wer a lyue he should say he neuer knâ—w nor yet ment of any such impietie The sentence and the mynd of this author may be easalie gathered for there his cheif aÌ„d principall studie is that discorde may be auoyded in the assemblies and conuentions of the people The which cryme the Apostle Paule layeth scharply to the charge of the Corinthians Herefore sayeth he it shall not be leiful without any kynde of difference and ordour to all and euery one to conueyne the people to haue publique assemblies and there to offre vp Sacrifice that is to preache the doctryne of Saluation to offre vp prayer and action of thankes in name of the whole Conuention for these exercises according to the custome of the old testament yea the new ar called sacrifices by the fathers the Apostles and there disciples and such others that it should not be leifull to euery man to conueyne the people without a charge to the practeis of the Lordes Supper called there planelie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the Conuention of them that shall practeis the Lordes Table I haue compleyned before of the ignorance of Greik Latine tounges the Ignoration whereof no doute hes moued vs a great part of this busines specialie hauing to do with men that vnderstandeth not the ê“prietie of them It is plaine that Epiphanius vnderstandeth by this miss â— the publique Conuentioun of the people to the seruice of God to here the Preaching the Prayers made thankes geuen and the Lordes Table and such other godlie exercises in which the primitiue Church did exercise them selues as we may be teached by Socrates in the Tripartite Historie recyting the ordour of the Church of Alexandria Where the Scripture wes rede exponed Prayers made the Communion distributed and oblatioÌ„ made that is a certane gathering for the poore and Iustinus in his Apologie for the Christians For as in the old TestameÌ„t the people conuened at certane tymes to offre vp the Sacrifices of Kiddes Lambes and suche others conforme to the commandement made in the law So now in the new Testament by the Superintendents Elders Ministers the people is conueyned for a certane ordoures cause and offreth vp vituios labiorum the Sacrifice of prayse thankes and Prayers Now followeth Clemens whom this author affirmeth to haue bene S. Peters Disciple if he wes I know not I haue recyted the IudgemeÌ„t of Clemens Alexandrinus of him damning him planelie and that out of Eusebius But I fynd not that the wordes of Clemens can any wayes hurte which are Nane of the Preistis sal say Masse in his Paroche nor Baptise nor do ony vther thing without permission of the Byschope thir sayingis the Apostles resauit of the Lorde and gaue tyll vs and we teache y â— sam and commandis zow to hade and teache to al men without reprehensioun These wordes may be euen so vnderstand as the sentence of Ignatius for all tendeth to a scope but this writter in dede because I fynd him full of superstitions ether is he by wicked men adulterate as we know the Papistes to haue interiected many wicked senteÌ„ces in the writtings of godlie and Catholique men or if he writeth of his owen head I dar bouldly affirme that he wes no Scoler of Peter but as Ihon speaketh he passed furthe frome him but wes not of his and this is the opinion of Clemens Alexandrinus Who planely condamned this your Clemens Epistles Followeth Alexander quha wes martyred for the faith of Christe fourtene houndreth 30. nyne zeris bypast wryttis on this maner our Lordis Passion is to be rehears it in all Solemnities of the Masse with sick Sacrifice the Lorde is delyted and pacifeit and wyll forgeue gret Sinnes for amang the Saccrifice thare can be na thing greater than
haue our former rebellion forgiuen and remitted There is no mention of muÌ„dled masses but our author is so addicted to his wicked opinion and so blynded that wheresoeuer any word is made of a Sacrifice one altare one oblatioÌ„ one hoste incontineÌ„tlie thinketh he with him self ha this author maketh for me let me put this in protocolle neuer hauing respect to the custome of the tyme nor sense of the author and so abuseth all to the wrapping vp of him self in obstinacie and blynding and deceauing of the people The oblation and Sacrifice what it wes I haue declared one hoste lykewise what the altare is the author to the Hebrewes and Ihon in the Reuelation declared to wit Iesus Christe who vndoutedlie is the altare vpon the which we haue to offre vp our Sacrifices hostes and oblations of prayer thankes and liberalitie whome by all our actions Sacrifices and oblations are sanctified and he is the verrie Hoste of the whiche Sacramentallie and spirituallie do eat all that offereth them to the holy practies of the Lordes Table and do beleue in him as youre owen Parisien doctor Gâ—gneus doth well say We know none other altare nor the Scripturs of God allow vnles ye wyll set vp a new Iudaisme as ye fetcht in a gentilisine out of Virgile in your obite masse and the moste part of all your proceadinges as I am able to declaire particularlie if tyme and leaser should serue Now sayeth this author giue I wald call to rememberance all the sayingis of the godly Fatheris quhilks treattis according to this purpose our Colloquie sulde extend the boundis and grow tyll ane gret worke quharefore we wyll rehearse the sayingis of the maist notable Counsallis I truste ye haue adduced all myght serue anywayes in your Iudgement to this deuilishe purpose of the defence of the miserable masse but if the mater had bene good and allowed of God I dout not but albeit ye should pereuenture not haue nedeth so many yet we could haue contented with a few nomber but my beleue is that these authors being ryghtlie coÌ„siddred the tyme weyed there myndes graipped out where in we haue takeÌ„ some paine not vnfructfullie God be praysed the lector shal perceaue clearly that they make no thing for your partie Followeth the concile Nicene Towards this purpose sayeth this author The counsall Necene quhilk wes the first generall consal ester y â— tyme of Apostles apê“uin in al ages 1226. zearis bypast writtis and sayis on this maner disponing our selues to the godly table lat vs not luke selenderlie vpon the bread and the cuppe set before vs but lat vs lyft vp our mynd be faith vnderstanding in that holy table to be the Lambe of God takin away the Sinnes of the warld offred vp be the preistis without blude and we receauing verilie his pretius bodie and blude aucht to beleue thaim to be the plage of our resurrectioun The Sacrifice that is here spoken of in the determination of the concile is a Sacrifice of prayse laude aÌ„d thankes geuing whiche albeit it be made by the minister yet since it is made in the name of the whole Church the people doth consent in there hartes to it that is oppinlie spoken by him yea doth approue it to by the saying Amen It is reputed no les to be the Sacrifice of the assisters nor of the minister This then is the Sacrifice the councile speaketh of making no mention of a Sacrifice propiciatorie to be made for remission of sinnes of the deade and quick This propiciatorie and expiatorius Sacrifice wes offred vp by Christe that ones neuer to be repeated aÌ„d reiterat for the way is euer ready prepared his blude euer fresehe as the Apostle speaketh The Churche in dede in memorie of that Sacrifice offereth vp coÌ„tinuallie oblation oforation prayers thankes giuing The wordes of the Concile calling Christe the Lambe of God that taketh away the sinnes of the world are not to be referred to the symboles of bread and wyne whiche the concile disertlie pronunceth to be there but to the Sonne of God Christe him self who wes made the verrie propiciation of our sinnes and the correction of our Peace But here I wyll hear with your falt in the traÌ„slation knowing yow to be ignorant of the Greik tongue aÌ„d should passe by it if it should not serue to the declaration of the mynd of the concile for lest that any maÌ„ should think that this action be a verrie Sacrifice this is added 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is not lyke a Sacrifice or not after the maner of a Sacrifice so the sentence Sacrificed of the preistes not as ye turne it without blood but Sacrificed by the preistes not after the maner of a sacrifice or not lyke a Sacrifice declareth plainely that there is no suche Sacrifice propiciatorie ment of here as ye falslie pretende whereby ye may perceaue euidentlie a great difference betuix the Sacrifice that is offred by the preist and the Sacrifice of Christe who in verrie dede did offre him self after the maner of a Sacrifice that is to the death for the absolution and expiation of the sinnes of the worlde The preist wiâ—â—â—he 〈…〉 and offer vp not after the maner of a Sacrifice as the councile sayeth the action of thankes laude and prayse for that sacrifice cause Where by the wraith of God is anoyded sancâ—ification purchased foâ— his 〈◊〉 wypeth away oure sinnes and not the eating of his body nor drynkinh of his bloode And forber we shall obserue in this that this councile wylleth vs to lyft vp our myndes and not to fixe them vpon the â—ume ElemeÌ„ts that be set before vs we be here I say admonished Christes body naturallie to be in the heauennes and to be no wayes here in this action but as he is in Baptisme as this councile planely doeth declare and we haue alreadâ—y shewen in Chrysostomus Others thinges I passe by that be here to be obserued and are most lyueâ—ie setfurth as the forme of the action the mention of the Table according to the forme practeist and obserued by oâ—r Sauiour the â—yfting vp of 〈◊〉 â—artes by faith â–ª the 〈…〉 made indifferentlie to all of boith the partâ—s â—aâ—e of all in the wordes â—â—â—â—ted by yow that we oght to take but a lytle and sober quantitie â–ª knowen that we do not offre vs thither for the saturâ—â—e aÌ„d filling of the flesche but for sanctification as the councile doeth moste godly conclude Now lat vs cum to the consale of Ephesus haâ—â—â— 1128. zeris byâ—ast â—uhareby wes condemned the 〈◊〉 of Nestorius wryttis on this maner we do offer ane vnbludie Sacrifice and also we cum to the haly Sacrament and ar maid haly being maid partakers of the haly body and binde of Iesus Christe quhilk wes maid redemer of vs all not receauing it as commouâ—â—lesche God forbide nor as the slesche of man maid haly