inquit haereses obortae sunt aut nata sūt schismata quam quod Sacerdoti Dei non obtemperatur nec vnus in Ecclesia ad tē pus Sacerdos Iudex vice Christi cogitatur teaching peruerse things to draw disciples after them wherby is euidenced that no priuat man is an infallible interpreter of holy scriptures neither can know certainly that scriptures are the word of God laying aside the Churches authority For example credence is not giuen to the canon or caralogue of scriptures because of scripture testimony which no where attestes that catalogue in so much that Luther and Caluin down from the begining of their defection to the departure out of the world contended about the number of canonicall scriptures and their adherents of these dayes respectiuely continue in the pursuance of the same dispute Moreouer there is greater reason that the christian faith should rely rather on the Church which * S. Cypri in trac de vnitate Ecclesiae adulterari inquit nō potest sponsae Christi incorrupta est pudicae is an infallible ground and piller of truth then of sole scriptures which are liable to mutations corruptions and false interpretations howeuer scriptures cōsidered in themselues precisely do chaleng equall authority with the Church the same diuine spirit that directeth the tongues of the supream pastours in speaking (o) God by his absolute and extrrordinary power can himselfe alone or by an Angel instruct men and reueale matters of faith and christian religion without the ministery of the Church And doubtless the Apostles had noe other master but God himselfe as to sundry mysteries of christian faith and Christ himselfe confesseth that S. Peter came to the knowledge of his diuine nature by reuelation from God the Father Caro Sanguic non reuelauit tibi sed Pater meus guided the pennes of the Apostles and Euangelists in writing and as the Church beareth witnesse of the scriptures infallible doctrine so the scriptures do witness the Churches infalible authority yet so as that faith in order to its acte of assent is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures for noe man can prudently belieue any scripture to be the word of God if the Church that is the ground and piller of truth should not declare it for such howeuer Catholicks who doe infer the Churches infallibility from the testimony of scripture and the authority of scripture from the testimony of the Church are noe more guilty of committing (p) According to Euclide a mathematicall circle taken in the proper sense is the passing of one and the same line from and the repassing vnto the same point and by the same way a circle of errour then are Philosophers that assert mutuall causalities or doe argue from a cause its proper effect and from an effect its proper cause for example from the rising of the sun is proued the existence of the day and againe the existence of the day proueth the risiing of the sun wherin there is noe circle of errour which properly consisteth in the coming again of the same thing vnto the same thing from whence it came and by the same way it came but the way of one cause is not the way of an other cause nor the way of an effect is the way of the cause wherof it is the effect in like manner the way of the Church which is a cleare speaking Iudge is not the way of the scriptures which consiste in mute elements of characters and although we belieue that the Church is an infallible proposer of all matters pertaining to faith because of the scripture testimony neuertheless if the scriptures had borne noe witness therof there is euidence of credibility enough to induce vs prudently to belieue the Churches infallibility which euen before the writing of scriptures was beliued neither do we recur to scriptures to proue it (q) In disputs or conferences with such as deny holy scriptures motiues of credibility haue weight with them and that one which S. Austin vseth l. con Epis Faus cap. 4. seems of greattest moment Many things saith he keepe me fast in the bosom of the Catholick Church for example the vnanimous accord of people and nations authority confirmed by miracles .... by antiquity strengthned and the succession of Bishops dovvn from S. Peter the Apostle to vvhom our lord committed the feeding of his sheepe vnto the present Episcopacy but when we haue to doe with such as admit them and euen then we doe not alledge scriptures as the formall cause the Churches infallibility is known by for that is diuine reuelation but as witness of it only for we doe not belieue precisely that the Church is infallible because the scripturs do say it but in regard of many other motiues which do moue vs to giue our assent thereto neither was the church intended for the vse of the scriptures but scriptures for the vse of the Church besides no man without manifesting extream weakness can except against the mutuall testimony that Christ and S. Iohn Baptist gaue of one another or against the disciples of both who belieued their masters to be such as their masters reciprocally had declared theselues to bee The principall marks or tokens of the true Church * Quatuor illa signa dilucide constant ex sacra scriptura ex symbolis Apostolorum Nicae S. Athanasij expressè habentur in sym Constātinop cuius Patres voce apostolicam diuinitus addiderunt are foure set douwn in that Article of christian faith viz I belieue one holy catholick and apostolick Church Albeit that the true Church consisteth of many members yet it is but one body 1. Cor. 12. of Christ in vnity of faith and baptism One lord one faith one baptism Ep. 4. nor can Christ be an author of diuision that is a God of vnion Likwise it is holy for as much as it is the body of Christ that is the fountain of all holyness and enioyes a sacrifice and Sacraments which confer sanctity neither matters it that sundry members of his body are guilty of mortall transgressions For as such as profess any art are counted artificers though they doe not act according to the principalls or rules there-of so the said members in regard they put on Christ (r) According to S. Austin in psal 85. if all christians and true belieuers are baptized in Christ they haue put on Christ as the Apostle reacheth Gal. 3. and if they be made members of his body and say they are not holy they do an iniury to the head whose members are holy by Baptism and become the chosen people of God by faith are called holy although they doe not obserue the ordinances and lawes of either For example 1. Cor. 1. the Corinthians are said to be sanctified in Christ IESVS and holy neuertheless there were among them both the naturall and carnall men The true Church militant is (ſ) According to the Euangelist
impediment's inconsistent with the enioyment of heauenly blessedness wherfore since not sinn's alone but pain 's due thereunto obstruct the passage to the kingdome of Heauen according to Christ's own preaching Mat. 5. Verily 1 say vnto thee thou shalt not come out thence till thou hast paid the vtmost farthing it is euident that the power of the Church doth not only extend vnto the remitting of sinn's but likewise to the releasing of temporell punishment's due thereunto this catholick Truth is clearly euidenced by S. Paules proceeding with the incestuous Corinthian whom he had commanded afore to be deliuered vp to Satan as to destruction of the flesh that his spirit might be saued 1. Cor. 5. For when the Apostle heard that the incestuous adulterer had exercised great penance for his sin least he should be swallowed vp with ouer much sorow at the earnest request of the Corinthians he for gaue the rest or surplus of the pain he had inflicted on him writing to them thus Whom ye forgiue any thing I forgiue also for if I forgiue any thing to whom I forgiue it for your sakes forgiue I it in the person of Christ 2. Cor. 2. by these words plainly appeares that the Apostle forgaue something and since what he forgaue could not be sin in order to the guilt therof for by the Epistle it is clear that the adulterer had exercised great contrition in consequence of which he had receiued remission of his grieuous offence as to it's malice or guilt It followeth of necessity that the thing forgiuen was part of the temporall punishment which the greatness of the sin had deserued and indeed in order to that alone the Corinthians presented their request Hereby further appeares the authority wherwith Church-gouernours are inuested for the remission of temporall pain 's remaining after sin's are forgiuen which is the power of granting Indulgences proper to the Vicars of Christ in whose room they exercise it And the word 's sett down beare euidently this sense viêªt videlicet In the person of Christ As the Apostle did deliuer vnto Satan the adulterer in the name and by the power of our lord IESVS CHRIST 1. Cor. 5. so 2. Cor. 2. * In 1. Cor. 5. Patianus Epis contra NouatianuÌ„ Vide inquit Apostoli Jndulgentiam proprias etiam sententias temperantis he did moderate his sentence by remitting part of his temporall affliction * S. Ambros l. 1. de poeniten c. 6. agens con Nouatianos ait ex eo quod Apostolus dicit se condonare in persona Christi ipsuÌ„ vendicasse ius à Domino acceptum non indebitum vsurpasse challenging to that effect authority receiued of Christ whose person he represented in the dispensation of that pardon or Indulgence Neither is this doctrine infirmed at all because of the Apostles request directed to the rest of the Corinthians wherby he hearing of the said adulterers exceeding griefe for his sin exhorteth them to pardon and comfort him saying It is sufficient vnto the same man that he was rebuked of many so that now contrary wise ye ought rather to forgiue and comfort him lest exceeding heauiness should swallow him vp Cor. 2. For though it was not said to all the faithfull of the Church ioynt and seperate Whatsoeuer ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in Heauen But to the Apostles and their successours in Priestly function such only being Christ's ministers and Vicegerents to whom the power of loosing is coÌ„mitted properly as to the iuridicall exercise of it (b) A belieuiug Christian that hath nothing of iurisdiction can by way of request or prayer obtaine for an other remission of the pain due to his sin for example a man that is bound to suffer pain or punishment may notwithstanding transfer and apply the prize of that satisfaction to the aduantage of his freind for as the Apostle saith Charitas patiens est Charity is patient wherfore a charitable man is inclinable to suffer affliction vnto profiting his Neighbour whereof the Apostle Collos 1. giues euidence euough saying Novv rejoyce I in my sufferings for you and to fulfill those things that vvant of the passions of Christ in my flesh for his bodies sake vvhich is the Church though Christs Passions were wanting in nothing as to sufficiency for he was made vnto vs iustice sanctification and redemption 1. Cor. 1. that is according to the same Apostle 1. Cor. 6. he was made the Author giuer and meritorious cause of our iustice sanctity and redemption neuertheless as to efficacy there was something wanting viz. the application of Christs merits which is made by the Sacraments of the Church vnto remitting both the guilt and pain of sin and by our own afflictions charitable offered in order to our Neighbour vnto remitting of temporall punishment due to sin remitted afore But no man can satisfye for the sin of an other as to the guilt therof for he diuine Iustice will remit no man his sin that shall not be sorry for and dereste it himselfe according to the holy scripture Luc. 13. Except yee do penance that is except ye haue in ward sorrow and detestation of your sinnes yee shall all perish Besides neither the guilt of a mortall sin nor eternall pain due thereto is forgiuen and taken away without the infusion of sanctifying grace according to the Council of Trent sess 6. c. 7. nay veniall sin according to the common opinion of Catholick Doctours is not purged out of a soul vnless grace be infused into it howeuer neither of both is remitted to those which are come to full yeares of discretion without an act of detestation and sorrow Wherfore when the Popes Bull 's whereby Indulgences are granted mention remission of sinnes they mean remission of the temporall pains due vnto them And indeed the Popes declare in their Bull 's that they grant their Indulgences to such as are contrite and truly penitent Again accordiug to holy scriptures sin is taken sometymes for the paine due thereto namely Machabae 2. neuertheless all the faithfull together with their Pastours forgiue and loose by consent desire (i) The Apostle 2. Cor. 8. in saying Let your aboundance supply their vvant that also their aboundance may supply your vvant gaue hopes to the Corinthians whom he exhorted to furnish Titus and Luke with corporall necessary's that the spirituall aboundance of the same Titus and Luke might supply and enrich their spirituall want through their good work 's prayers and corporall satisfactions And truly this sacred Text shew's euidently that not only worldly goods as Almes may be rewarded through spirtuall riches namely prayers and other holy works but that the Saincts or godly persons may as well applye their aboundant satisfactions vnto supplying the spirtuall want's of others as those which abound with worldly riches may supply with their superfluities the corporall necessities of their Neighbours commiseration outward ward good works and holy prayers offered to God
(i) Ephes 4. One lord one faith one Baptism Christ is our one sole lord vpon the score of generall redemption which he procured by his death and passion Faith is one onely because the object is but one and common alike to all the faithfull Baptism is one onely because by vertue of the fame baptism all men are incorporated in to the mysticall body of Christ which is the catholick Church one alone wheras if it were a Sacrament of sole man it should be many besid's it's cheife product of sanctifying grace wherby man is made a childe of God Heir of Heauen coheire and brother of Christ Ro. 8. in regard wherof it surpasseth circücision that figured only what it is indeed and verity and the (k) The baptism of S. Iohn Baptist was no Sacrament taken in the proper sense being a preparation there vnto onely howeuer Christ thought fit to be baptis'd of S. Iohn his precursor that thereby the water might be sanctifyed through a touch of his sacred body and likewise consecrated as the instrumentall cause vnto giuing ingress into his Church euen then design'd by him to be built forthwith for Christs baptism happened in that very yeare of his age when he began to preach the Gospel baptism of S. Iohn Baptist that prepared only thereunto it doth (l) S. Gregory Nazian Ora. 40. calleth baptism a seale or marke whereby a man is signed and marked for a souldier of Christ and S. Cyril Ierosol nameth it a sacred vndelible seale wherfore S. Austin l. 2. con Epis Parmeni c. 12. affirmes that as the mark 's made with a hot iron in souldiers that run from their colours abide in their flesh so baptism and holy order continue in Apostates that desert their faith and religion wherefore if such rebellious straglers returne after wards to the Church those two Sacraments ought not to be administred again because they imprinted characters which can neuer weare away imprint in the person baptised a Character which is a spirituall Mark wherby the soul is figured and fashioned in conformity to Christ as also known for his and distinguisht from such as are not his Wherfore it is a distinctiue sign and consequently indelible eternally permanent so that after a soul is once charactarised or sealed (m) Anabaptists are so nam'd because such as were baptised in their infancy those sectaries baptise again as soon as they come to perfect vse of reason as if the baptism conferred afore were invalide they ground their Heresy in Christs word 's Mat. 28. teach all nations baptising them c. but without cause as in the character is prou'd with the seale of baptisme it ought not to be sealed again As concerning the ceremonies belonging to the solemnity and meetness of this Sacrament they be outward sensible actions decently and profitably employed before in or after the administration thereof Before the receiuing of baptism as meet preparations required there unto are first * S. Hieron in cap. 28. Mat. non potest fieri vt corpus baptismi suscipiat Sacramentum nisi antea anima susceperit veritateÌ„ Loquitur de adultis instructions in the rudiments of christian religion if the person or persons suing for baptism are grown to full age of reason Math. 28. which scripture doth set down the order therin to be obserued according to the condition capacity or ripeness of each one such as are apt and capable to vnderstand christian doctrine ought to be instructed before they be admitted to the Sacrament which was the practice of the Apostles Act. 2. and 3. S. Philip the Deacon preached vnto the Eunuch Iesus and required credence therunto before he did baptize him Act. 8. and indeed it is impossible for the body to receiue the Sacrament of Baptism vnless the soul receiue afore the verity of faith when there is sufficient ripeness of judgment in the subject to receiue it Howeuer neither instruction nor any other disposition is of necessity as to the nature or essence of this Sacrament Infants in their infancy * Mar. 10. Luc. 18. Christus ait sinite paruulos nolite prohibere illos venire ad me talium â—nim est Regnum Coelorum being capable of heauenly blessedness are not vncapable of baptism though they want capacity for instruction Christ did expresse the necessity of baptism as to the new Testament after the same manner as God did explaine the necessity of circumcision as to the old Testament Gen 17. and consequently since infancy was no hindrance to circumcision neither is it a lâ—t to baptism Secondly * ScrutiniuÌ„ quo fides baptiz andoruÌ„ explorabatur agnoscit Aug. l. de side operibus c. 6. exprimitur hac caremonia in Rituali quande dicit Sacerdos infanâ—ulo quid petis patrinus respondet fidem deinde Sacerdos dicit abrenuncias Satanae Huius ceremoniae meminit Tertull. l. de spectaculis cap. 4. inspection or examination as to faith by interogatories Thirdly * Signi Crucis vsurpati in baptisme meminit Aug. l. de Catech. Rudibus cap. 20. sign of the cross which sheweth that Christ doth not work in this Sacrament vnto remission of sin 's by water only but by water and blood shed on the crosse It was IESUS-CHRIST that (n) Christ is said to come by water because he instituted the Sacrament of baptism in water signifyed by the sacred water that sprung out of his side hanging on the cross and he is said to come by blood in regard the blood of Christ cleanseth from all sinnes 1. Ioan. 10. came by water and blood vnto saluation of all men Io. 1. cap. 5. fourthly * Exorcismi meminit Iustinus Maertyr Dialogo de Tripho exorcism wherby the deuil is hindred so that he cannot obstruct the ministring of baptism or the effect therof Fiftly * Insufflationis qua vtitur Sacerdos solemniter baptizans dicens exi ab eo spriritus immuÌ„de meminit S. Ambros l. de ijs qui initiantur significat expulsionem Daemonis insufflation or breathing on the person that is to be baptized signifyeth the casting out of the deuill for euery one before baptism is a childe of wrath of Hell of damnation through originall sinne Sixtly * Gustus salis memenit Concil Carthag 4. can 5. transfertur ad significaÌ„dam sapientiam Vnde dicitur sal sapientiae salt giuen to tast which doth represent the wisdome of christian doctrine receiued in baptism Seauenthly * Mar. 7. misit JESVS digitos suos in auriculas eius expuens tetigit linguam eius inspiciens in caelum gemuit ait illi surdo muto Epheta quod est adaperire Huius contactus narium aurium meminit S. Ambrosius loco supra citato the putting of spittle into the nostrills and eares which signifyes the receiuing of faith and grace in vertue of the Sacrament And this ceremony is grounded Mar. 7. Eightly * Mar. 1.
knowledg of his own infirmity left of his great pride detested the wickedness that he had committed in the holy Temple of Ierusalem and prayed also vnto God neuerthelesse found no mercy vnto iustification of life because his repentance proceeded from naturall * S. Thomas â—it actum poenitentiae quem exercuit Antiochus fuisse ex motiue purè natutali motiues precisely For he did not cast away from him the thoughts of sins in regard they were offences to God but in respect they were punishments to himselfe In like manner Esau found no place to penance though he sought with teares Heb. 12. because he did not weepe for his sins wherby he had offended God but for the loss of his father Isaacks blessing that by a diuine ordinance was annexed to his Birth right which he had sold afore for one portion of meate Besid's his heart was full of enuy and malice againsT his brother Iacob whose death he had threatned Gen. 27. A sinner that will finde place to penance and blessing to inheritance ought to behold his wayes * Vide vias tuas in conâ—alle scito quid feceriâ— Jerem. 2. in the valley of humility and know what he hath done call to his rememberance the dayes of his life that are passed thinke * Heb. 10. borrendum est incidere in manus Domini viuentis how terrible it is to fall into the hands of the liuing God consider how * Jerem. 2. scito vide quia malum est â—marum reliquisse Doâ—â—inuÌ„ Deum â—num euill a thing and bitter it is to forsake his Creatour and thereby in vertue of an humble and contrite heart to cast away from him the serpent in his bosome the poyson in his stomack the thiefe in his house that is deadly sin which keeps away from him wrongfully the place to penance and the blessing to the inheritance of Heauen CHAR. XIJ. OF CONFESSION THE CONTENTS T' is not enough that a sinner confess his sinnes to God with his heart vnless he tell them to a Priest with his mouth also that is the Minister of Christ to whom the word of reconciliation is committed Joa 20. As secret auricular so intire perfect confession and likewise the seale or obligation to keepe secret what in secret is sacramentally confessed lie claim to a diuine precept according to the practice of some primitiue Churches publick confession of publick sinnes were enioyn'd as satisfactory penances vnto humbling publick sinners the church of God haith laid aside publick confessions for iust reasons those hazard their foul's which defer sacramentall confession of their sinnes till grieuous sicknes seize on them Confession is an outward act of penance wherby a penitent sinner humbly accuseth himself of himself telling his own sins in the eare of a Priest in uested with power of iurisdiction to the end be may obtain full remission thereof in vertue of his absolution Christ when he instituted the Sacrament of penance Ioan. 20. wherein he conferred on his Apostles and their successors in priestly function authority to absolute from sins committed after baptism enioyned also sacramentall confession for by the words set down Io. 20. plainly appear's that Christ euen then instituted an inward tribunall in order to remission of sinnes and constituted Priest's the spirituall Iudges therin wherfore as in an outward Court of Iustice a person arraigned cannot be absolued or punished by a temporall Iudge legally vnless * Prouerb 12. qui iudicâ—t quod noâ—â—t iudex est iustitiae he hath the hearing of his cause so a Priest to whom the keys of authority are giuen as to the opening or shutting the gates of Heauen cannot open to or shut against a sinner iuridically whose sins he hath no knowledg of (a) The Council of Trent fess 14. c. 6. 7. as likewise others more ancient namely Lateran sub Innocent 3. Constant c. haue defined the necessity of sacramentall confession as to mortall sinnes committed after baptism And indeed veniall sinnes importe no such necessity because the Sacrament of penance hath nothing of power to retaine them and consequently confession is of diuine right and an essentiall part of the Sacrament of penance neither matters it that Christ pardoned the sinnes of S. Mary Magdalen and others of whome he exacted no confession for he that searcheth the heart knoweth exactly the state and condition of the spirit albeit nothing be outwardy expressed Howeuer now the Sacrament of penance being instituted after the similitude of an outward Court of Iustice wherein the penitent supplieth the part of the person accused and the Priest of the Iudg in the room of Christ sacramentall confession is of absolute necessity for the remission of mortall sinnes committed after baptism (b) According to S. Austin l. 65. hom 49. c. 3. if to confess our sinnes to God priuately were sufficient vnto the remission of them without cause it is said whatsoeuer yee shall loose in Earth shall be loosed in Heauen c. and in vain the keyes are giuen to the Church of God and thereby as this great Doctour obserues we should frustrate the holy Euangell we should frustrate Christ's own words promising to our selues what he denyeth And according to S. Basil in regulis breuioribus interrog 288. there is a necessity of confession our sinnes to those which are dispensers of the misteries of God it is not enough that a sinner confesse his sins to God with his heart vnless he shall tell them also with his mouth vnto a Priest who is the Minister of Christ to whom is committed * S. Basil in Regulis breuioribus interrog 228. necessario inquit ijs peccata aperire debent quibus credita est dispensatio mysteriorum Dei qua habetur 1. Cor. 4. dispensation of the mysteries of God together with the word of reconciliation A penitent that out of the tribunall of Priests seek absolution from his sins deceiues himself for it is not said in vaine Whatsoeuer yee shall loose vpon earth shall be loosed in Heauen nor the keys of authority in order to the forgiuing of sin's are giuen in vaine to the Church of God which would proue a necessary consequence if the antecedent were granted For the Sacrament of penance which Christ instituted for the pardoning of sins would not be vsefull aâ—ot if sin's might be pardoned without it In the primitiue times two kind's of confession were in practice the one publick the other secret in reference to two kind's of offences the one openly the other in secret committed and the primitiue Bishops in their seuerall Dioceses respectiuely deputed certain speciall Priests for hearing the confessions of such (c) According to Orig. in hom 2. in psal 37. S. Cyprian l. de lapsis and Tertull l. de poenit c. 9. Confession of publick sinnes was publick in the primitiue Church and publick penitent's had a place in the Church a part from the rest of the faithfull whose sinnes
According to S. Austin l. de bono coniug c. 24. euery marriage is in order to generation but christian marriage onely is inuested with the dignity of a Sacrament haue nothing of a Sacrament taken in the proper sense viz for an outward practicall sign of sanctifying grace that is for a sensible ceremony that in vertue of it's institution can effectually sanctify which is an effect proper only to the Sacrament's of the new law wherof Baptism is the doore howeuer they be ciuill contracts conformable to the law of nature and by no diuine law forbidden and therfore lawfull * 2. Cor. 6. Nolite ducere iugum cū infidelibus yet the marriage of a christian belieuer with an infidell of what kinde soeuer when there appeareth danger of subuersion therby is against the dictates of nature which oblige euery one to auoide whatsoeuer tendes to his ruine in consequence whereof such marriages be vnlawfull in respect wherof the Apostle 2. Cor. 6. forbiddeth the Corinthians conuerted to the faith of Christ to beare the yoake with Infidells which is meant in regard of the danger as to subuersion and indeed no diuine ordinance making such marriages vnlawfull appeares either by the old or new Testament for Salomon euen at that time when the old scripture reported him to be loued of God and to walk in all the commandements of his Father Dauid married the daughter of Pharao and though God Exod. 34. prohibited Moses to make any compact with the Amorites and the Cananites which adored false Gods or to take wiues of their daughters for his sons (i) S. Austin l. de fide operibus c. 19. treating of marriages between Catholick's and Hereticks affirm's that in his dayes they were not counted as sinnes because in the new Testament nothing is commanded in Order to such marriages neuerthelesse that diuine prohibition according to the precise form of speech was in reference only to the danger of subuersion which by the law of nature euery man is obliged to auoide for God maketh the eminent danger of their ruine to be the ground of his prohibition adding these words Lest their daughters goe a fornicating after their Gods and make thy sons goe a fornicating after their Gods neither doth the new Testament expresse any speciall law that prohibiteth christians to marry with Infidells Besides in the primitiue times (k) Clodoueus king of France was conuerted to the faith of Christ by the means of his Queen that was a christian Again S. Monica S. Austins Mother preuail'd with her husband and S. Cicily with her spouse Valerianus to embrace the christian Religion which verifies what the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 7. The vnbelieuing husband is sanctifyed by a belieuing wife sundry gallant women for vertue and sanctity were yoked with vnbelieuing husbands and the supream prouidence blessed their marriages with happy success vsing them as a means to bring their said husbands to the marueilous light of christian faith Notwithstanding the catholick Church wisely considering that many spirituall subuersions and other great inconueniences arose from such marriages hath euen anciently prohibited and annulled them that is hath disenabled christians to beare the yoke with Infidells wherby is euident that the marriage of a Catholick with an Heretick is vnlawfull in respect of an ecclesiasticall constitution only * Ex cap. ex literis extra de consuetudine talis cōsuetudo quae est in Polonia aequipollet legi sed lex posterior potest abrogare priorē which in Poland and germany seemeth to be abrogated by a contrary custome introduced with the tacite consent at least of the Churches chief Pastor the Churches consent express or tacite being a necessary requisite to the introducing of a Custome vnto the abrogating of an ecclesiasticall law in regard of Catholicks and hereticks promiscuous liuing together and the toleration of them both (l) As to the marriages of Catholicks with Hereticks that matter of controuersy was at sundry tymes disputed before Pope Clement the 8. by many learned Cardinalls and other famous diuin's which with one accord declar'd that his Holines might lawfully grant leaue vnto a Catholick to marry with an Heretick or Infidel and in Poland and Germany where there is toleration of one and the other profession and where Catholicks and Hereticks liue promiscuously together such marriages are vsuall and common either in regard in those countryes it is a Custome introduced through a tacite consent of the sea Apostolick which hath abrogated the ecclesiasticall law that forbiddeth such marriages and they be forbidden in the Councils Laodis sub Syluestro Carthag 3. and others or because in those Countries which giue freedom in the exercise of euery Christian profession there is no morall apparent danger of subuersion as to to Catholicks And it matters not that when a catholick man or woman marrying with an Heretick knowes that the party he or she that marryes will minister and receiue the Sacrament vnworthily for the marriage thereby no more ceases to be a Sacrament then Baptism ceaseth to be a Sacrament vnworthily receiu'd neither doth the Catholick sinne therby because Vtitur iure suo duntaxat For example a man that through necessity borrow's money of an vsurer whom he knows morally will exact vnlawfull lucre doth not offend because he vseth but his own right and the vsurer if he would might cōmit no sin being in his power to pleasure his neighbour in an vrgent necessity without exacting or expecting gain for the loan of his money which probably taketh away eminent dāgerof subuersion in order to a Catholick man or woman so marrying and his or her children howeuer it doth not lie in the Churches power to loose the knot of christian marriage after consummation hath tied it vpon any occasion whatsoeuer either for adultery or any other enormous crime so as to giue leaue to the innocent party to marry again whiles the other liueth for no humane authority can put a sunder that which God coupled together wherfore the Apostle saies 1. Cor. 7. And to the married I command not I but our lord let not the wife depart from her husband where he expresseth a double departure the one vniust forbidden by the words set downe the other iust in respect of a lawfull cause namely fornication which he alloweth vpon condition only adding But if she depart let her remain vnmarried or he reconciled vnto her husband signifying therby the bond of marriage to be vndissoluble Again Christ Math. 5 reuoking the bill of diuorcement that God had granted to the Iews during the old law because of the hardness of their hearts and reducing marriage to the institution it had in the begining of creation said to the Pharisies Whosoeuer shall put away his wife except for * Nomine adulterij siue formeationis intelligitur omnis copula illicita violans sidem matrimonij per diuisionē carnis cōtra illud erūt duo in carne vna fornication
he saith thus And I would not speake vnto you Brethren as vnto spirituall mem but as vnto carnall men euen as to Babes in Christ I giue you milke to drinke and not meat for you were not yet able to beare it where he layeth the spirituall man against the carnall man that in regard of carnall affection perceiueth not the things of the spirit of God wherfore it seemeth a strang thing that Sectaries should infer from this text of scripture that euery belieuer hath a priuat (b) S. Irenaeus l. 3. cap. 2. con haer sharpely rebuks Valentinus for leauing tradition and following the priuat spirit thereby constituting himselfe sole iudge and rule of faith reuealing spirit of truth wherby he is enabled with authority to discern matters of faith and iudge all controuersies and to be iudged of no man himselfe vnto the excluding of all outward Teachers As to the second Text the true meaning of it is not that his vnction only doth teach but that the doctrines of christian religion which men teach outwardly by speaking * Aug. trac 3. in Epis Joan. magisteria inquit forensecus adiutoria quaedam sunt admonitiones cathedram autem in caelo habet qui corda dotet his vnction teacheth inwardly by inspiring grace wherby men are made apt to harken to what the Church ministers teach and indeed this docility or aptness to harken to the word of God is a speciall prerogatiue giuen by the spirit of grace vnto the children of the new law and prophesied of in the old law by Ieremy and Isaias As concerning the third Text set down the true sense is this that whosoeuer beliueth in the son of God aright hath in himselfe inward faith which is a diuine gift and therfore called the testimony of God in as much as it witnesseth that no man can * Mat. tues Christus Filius Dei viui caro sanguis non reuelauit tibi sed pater meus come vnto the son Iesus-Christ except it be giuen vnto him by the Father and albeit that the inward testimony of God hath been the Iole cause to draw some men vnto the maruelous light of faith for example Saint Peter beliued the mistery of the incarnation in vertue of an inward inspiration proceeding from God immediatly neuertheless the outward testimony of the Church is the ordinary necessary requisit to the conceiuing of christian faith according to the ordinance of Christ that hath constituted outward Teachers to be of necessary and perpetuall vse in his Church to the worlds end that we be not carryed about with euery wind of doctrine which hath been extreme needlesse if he had thought it expedient to supply euery particular belieuer with a priuat reuealing spirit Furthermore from the premises is clearly deducible that the holy scripture cannot lay clame to the dignitie of a supream Iudge because the office therof which is a primary end intended of necessity * Plato in libris quos de repub scripsit Aristoteles in policicis docent in constitutione formatione alicuius reipub vnum ex ijs quae debent 1. per se intentendi esse ipsum IudiceÌ„ pro dirimendis litibus ciuium ad pacem in rep seruandam in the forming of euery common wealth is to declare laws punish peruerse offenders and pronounce sentence of iudgment for the determining all matter in debate that therby vnity and peace may be preserued but the scripturs can chaleng nothing of iuridicall power in order to iudging defining and deciding controuersies of faith these actions importing life hearing and speaking which the scripturs cannot exercise being vnliud things that neither heare nor speak clearly and consequently vnfit to Iudg matters in debate between one and another besids these were not intended in â—he forming of the Church as requisits absolutly necessary to the Gouerment of it for Christ during the time he conuersed on earth writ nothing himselfe nor commaunded his Apostles or disciples to writ and indeed of themselues they were not much (i) According to Eusebius l. 3. hist Eccles cap. 18. the Apoles and disciples of Christ were not greatly solicitous to put down in writing the misteries of christian faith being the employment inioyned them was to preach the Gospel in so much that according to the same Eusebius it was a tradition of those days that they were after a manner necessitated to write and according to S. Hierom de viris illus S. Iohn writ his Gospel in regard of Cherintus and Ebion which denyed the diuinity of Christ And indeed t is euident that the Apostles did not write down the principles of christian religion hauing receiued command ad commission from Christ to preach without any commission to write set vpon writing because of their ingagement in an higher imployment namely preaching of the Gospell and it seems that those few which haue written were vrged or necessitated therunto as was Saint Iohn that writ his Gospell to confute the hereticks Cherintus and Ebion who denied the diuinity of Christ Again among the twelue Apostles Saint Matthew and Saint Iohn only and among the 62. Disciples Saint Luke only only writ the Gospell euen diuers years after Christs Ascention into Heauen insomuch that the christiaÌ„ Church had institutioÌ„ exercised iuridicall authority made lawes exacted obedience vnto them along while before the new scripturs were in being and contrary to the old scripture pronounced sentence of iudgment to the anulling of Circumcision which was a controuersy of faith Wherfore doubtless scripturs were neither primarly intended nor primarly giuen as suprem iudges of all matters in debate concerning faith and religion moreouer Saint Irenaeus who florished in the yeare of our lord 160. expresly (k) Irenaeus l. 3. con haer cap. 4. denyes expresly that christian faith had perished if the Apostles had not left vs the scriptures asserteth that the people of sundry countries without the help of paper or inck had preserued christian faith down from the Apostles to his time the vnwritten supplying the room of the written word for this ancient Father writeth and ascribeth that preseruation vnto apostolicall tradition obserued by the ancient Churches together with the help of inward grace proceeding from the holy Ghost Wherfore as those primatiue Churches did perseruer in the profession of the christian faith for the space of many years without scripturs so the present Church assisted with the like meanes might continue pure without spot or wrinckle although it had nothing of written doctrine and consequently the primary end for which scripturs were intended was not to doe the office of suprem Iudg howeuer all things which were written were written for our learning that wee through patience * L. 1. Machabae cap. 11 Ionathas summus Sacerdos scribens spartiatis dicit se suos in rebus aduersis pro solatio habere libros sacros quod ostendit vsum in quem datae sunt nobis
deadly schism caused by themselues that departed from and not by Catholicks that abided in her In euery ciuill state such as dissobey not such as obey authority such as abrogate not such as conserue the ancient lawes and ordinances such as reject not such as keep the setled customes therof bear the infimous brand to all posterity of being the men that rent and diuided the common wealth but Protestants haue dissobeyed not obeyed abrogated not preserued reiected not obserued the authority lawes and Customes of the Roman Church hauing by their own power only vnder a specious colour of reformation introduced nouell doctrines lawes and rites contrary to the vsage and practice therof wherfore they of necessity bear the guilt of deadly schism and not Catholicks that haue altered nothing Besides Protestants went out of the Roman Church without cause for at the time of their departure the Roman Church retained all requisits necessary vnto saluation for then was there no Christian Church vpon earth Seperated from her so that when the Protestants reformation begun the Roman Church or none was the true Church of God in consequence of which their departure was without cause * Aug. l. 3. de baptis con Donat. c. 2. in fine ait si Ecclesia Romanae sit verae Dei Ecclesia in qua salus haberi potest non habent Donatista sua pracisionis aliquam defonsionem sed exeundo communionem Ecclesiae relinquâ—â—do in quae poteraÌ„t saluari irrucrunt in sacrilegium schismatis For whosoeuer goeth out from a Church wherin he might attaine to saluation goes out without cause and commits sacriledge of damnable schism as the great Doctour S. Austin teacheth in his third book of baptism against the Donatists Moreouer this asserted truth appeares euidently by the foundamentall doctrines of Protestant Religion which are as opposite to the faith of the Roman Church as the ends of a Diameter are ouerwhart and cross For example Protestants commonly teach that good works proceeding from diuine grace can neither iustify nor merit saluation these being prerogatiues of faith only in regard wherof it beares the name of iustifying faith but all ancient and modern Pastors and Doctours of the Roman Church assert that good workes exercised in and by diuine grace doe bring vnto iustification of life and that they are in order to merit causes of euerlasting saluation as wicked workes in order to demerit are causes of perpetuall damnation Protestants commonly teach that the sacrifice of Mass wherin Catholick Priests offer the body and blood of Christ for the liuing and dead is a blasphemous tale and a daÌ„gerous deuise Protestants coÌ„monly teach that confirmation Penance Order Extream-vnction and Matrimony want requisits necessary to an Euangelicall Sacrament Protestants commonly teach that the doctrines of Purgatory Indulgences religious veneration of holy Reliks pertaining vnto and inuocation of Saints are idle fancies and trifles crept into the Church without warrantable authority of scripture testimony Protestants commonly teach sundry other doctrines as foundamentall requisits to their religion clean contrary to the faith of the Roman Church as is manifestly demonstrated in the Characters concerning the outward Sacrifice of Masse Confirmation Penance Order Extrem-vnction Matrimony Purgatory Indulgences and Adoration From the premises is inferred that the Protestant Reformation cannot borrow of the Roman Church visible existence together with continuall succession of Pastors vnto perpetuating that Church in foundamentall Articles of faith vnto excusing from schism Howeuer it cannot be denyed but that Protestants can shew clearly that the whole body of doctrines foundamentall to Protestanism hath been asserted by sundry learned men that liu'd in sundry ages respectiuely long before their reformation began namly Simon Magus taught that faith alone was an expedient sufficient vnto saluation as witnesseth S. Irenaeus and rejected good works as vnnecessary therto as doth attest Clemens Romanus Manichaeus despised the Sacrifice of Masse spoiling Christs Church of all outward sacrifice as witnesses S. Austin Nouatus impugned the Sacraments of Confirmation Eucharist Extrem-vnction and Matrimony as S. Cyprian affirmeth Vigilantius detested the inuocation of Saints and the veneration of their Reliques and likewise single life of Priests as S. Hierom relateth Iulian the Apostat had in detestation the cross of Christ and demolished his statue as Eusebius writeth Aerius condemned prayers and sacrifices offered for the souls departed as S. Austin and S. Epiphanius auerre But that which is exacted of the Protestants is to shew from the first age for 1500. yeares a setled company of Christians and the place country town or village where they liued that taught and preached the whole body of their foundamentall doctrines it is not enough to produce the example of such as at different tymes and in different places agreed with them in two or three of their Articles for that is not sufficient vnto constituting a society of true belieuers because so Turkes and Iewes might be lifted for Protestants these agreeing with them as to sundry Articles namely they deny the Popes supremacy transubstantiation inuocation of Saints and the sacrifice of the Masse Again the fore named sectaries themselues were destitute of visible existence and perpetuall succession and consequently could not deriue either of both vnto the Protestant Church Besides Simon Magus Manichaeus Nouatus Vigilantius c. bear the infamous brand of being condemned Hereticks before the ProtestaÌ„ts reformation begun Howeuer some Protestants there be that endeuour to proue their visible existeÌ„ce in a long line of succession from the Albigenses but vnaduisedly first because this seed of sectaries knowes not to deriue the Genealogy of their own Religion down from the Apostles which is the question in debate wherin satisfaction is expected secondly the Albigenses are condemned Hereticks that taught doctrine impious and blasphemous for example they asserted a good and an euill God denyed originall sin reiected baptism and impugned the resurrection of bodyes By the premises plainly appeareth that Mark Antony de Dominis Bishop of Spalatto his distinction between foundamentall and not foundamentall Articles of faith carrieth nothing of weight with it t' is like a specious building that wantes a good foundation to support it And truly it is as impossible an enterprise to proue the visible existence and perpetuall succession of Protestant Pastours from the Roman Church as it is for Caluinists to shew that the true Church of God laid hid for sundry ages inuisible without perishing which is impossible also for the markes of a liu'd Church are professing of faith preaching of the diuine word instructing of the illiterate and administring of the Sacraments which functions can noe more be executed in a Church that is inuisible then in a Church that is perished FINIS Laus Deo eiusque Matri Sanctissimae omnibus Sanctis Omnia Sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae subiecta sunt