Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	apostle_n	bishop_n	church_n	1,754	5	4.4354	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A39854	Two sermons the first preached in Christ-Church, Dublin, Feb. 19, 1681, at the consecration of the Right Reverend Fathers in God, William Lord Bishop of Kildare, William Lord Bishop of Kilmore, and Richard Lord Bishop of Kilalla : the other, preached in the Cathedral Church of St. Patrick, at the primary visitation of the most Reverend Father in God, Francis Lord Arch-bishop of Dublin, Apr. 24, 1682 / by S. Foley ...	Foley, Samuel, 1655-1695.; Moreton, William, 1641-1715.; Sheridan, William, 1636-1711.; Tenison, Richard, 1640?-1705.; Marsh, Francis, 1627-1693.	1683 (1683)	Wing F1400; ESTC R2994	25,191	58

who did oppose the Superiority of Bishops above Presbyters was Aerius almost 330 Years after our Saviour a very Proud Humorsome Man who because he could not obtain a Bishoprick which he aimed at as Epiphanius informs us (p) Epiphanii Haeress 56. seu utalii 75. Speaking of Aerius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Afterwards Eustathius made him a Presbyter and Master in the Hospital in P●ntus but for all this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And he after much shew of discontent quitted the Place and led many poor people after him telling them that a Presbyters was as good as a Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he resolv'd that a Bishop was not above a Presbyter and for his he was by the good Men of those days condemn'd of Heresie and therefore we cannot but suspect that there is a little too much assurance in the Men of our Times who desire to be thought most Pure and Orthodox and yet will undertake against the whole Church of God for many hundreds of Years to defend a Notorious Infamous Heretick a Heretick who had no Sober Man in those Ages to Countenance him For as for Medina who says That St. Hierome Sedulius and others were of his Heresie the Most Learned Arch-Bishop of Spalato do's prove him (q) In his Second Book De Republ. Eceles cap. 3. Of the difference between the Opinions of St. Hierons and Aerius See the Learned John Forbes his Irenicum Lib. 2. cap. 11. to be very impudent for saying so But all this and much more of this nature makes but little with some in this Cause For when by Learned Men it was demonstrated That Bishops were above Presbyters in the very First and Purest Ages of the Church They whose Passions or Interests had render'd them Enemies to that Order made this Reply That Diotrephes sought the Preheminence in the Apostles times and the Mystery of Iniquity did then begin to work Among others this is the Answer of a Presbyter of great Fame and Repute among his Followers who were deeply Engag'd in the Late Troubles Alezander Henderson (r) Henderson 's First Paper Pag. 157. Of the Edit Anno 1649. and his Second Paper Pag. 170. I wind together Diotrephes and the Mystery of Iniquity the one as an Old Example of Church-Ambition which was also too palpable in the Apostle themselves and the other as a Cover of Ambition afterwards discovered which two brought forth the great Mystery of the Papacy at last in a Letter to the Late King of Blessed Memory and in his First Paper he had the modesty to call our Bishops The (s) His First Paper Pag. 154. It is too well known That the Reformation of Hen. VIII was most imperfect in the Essentials of Doctrin Worship and Government and although it proceeded by some degrees afterwards yet the Government was never Reformed the Head was Changed Dominus non Dominium and the whole Limbs of the Antichristian Hierarchy retained upon what Snares and Temptations of Avarice and Ambition the great Enchanters of the Clergie I need not express Limbs of the Antichristian Hierarchie I shall not positively Charge him with what a Reverend Divine who had been a Member of the Synod of Dort tells us (t) Bishop Hall Of Episcopacy Pag. 52. was Reported of him That when he was Moderator of that famous Assembly at Glasgow (u) See the Large Declaration about the Troubles in Scotland Pag. 237. he said That St. Paul himself by Appointing Bishops was a Worker in that Mystery of Iniquity But 't was not long after that this Answer was Applauded That the Socinians Independents and Anabaptists took confidence from he Example and termed the Mystery of the Holy Trinity the Power of inflicting Ecclesiastical Censures and the Baptizing of Infants The Mystery o Iniquity And truly some Learned Men think that there cannot be more said for the Baptizing of Infants nay for the Cannon of the Scripture and for the Observation of the Lord's Day it self than for Episcopacy However shall we think that our Saviour would be so unkind to his Church as to deliver it up wholly to the Management of Antichrist for fifteen hundred years together Nay if Bishops because Bishops must be Antichrists how can we avoid reckoning St. James himself the Brother of our Lord the Antichrist of Jerusalem Timothy the Antichrist of Ephesus and Titus of Creet And St. John should not have directed his Epistles to the Seven Angels but in our New Stile to the Seven Antichrists of the Churches of Asia Shall we think that Christ's Apostles themselves who Lived to See and to Establish Episcopacy as to the Essential Parts of it as it now stands would betray his Church into the hands of Antichrist and help to exalt the Man of Sin and that many of the most Godly and Faithful Servants of Jesus Christ the Blessed Martyrs of the Primitive Church would be themselves Limbs of Antichrist and rejoyce in him far be it from us to entertain such horrid Imaginations But to take no farther Notice of odious Terms and ill Language Did Christ's Apostles behave themselves Unfaithfully in their Charge and when they had Converted Persons enough to make a Church did they Establish any other Form of Government than what they had receiv'd Commission from their Master to Establish and which was to Endure to the End of the World all which Time we see he has promised his special Presence and Assistance to their Legal Successors And as to those who succeeded the Apostles shall we suspect that such good Men that Men who died for the Gospel durst presume to set up a Government contrary to it and so unanimously agree in so wicked a Contrivance They were doubtless Holy Conscientious and Mortified Persons very Humble and Devout and therefore we cannot honestly say as some would have the first devisers of Episcopacy to have been That they were Covetous Proud Ambitious Tyrannical and Usurpers Was it Honour Riches State and Grandeur that those Humble Patient Men who were always under Persecution could be Corrupted and Allured with in those Days when as the famous Petrus de Marca upon occasion (w) Pet. de Marc. de Concord Tom. 2. Pag. 81. Sect. 4. of Pope Leo his Letter to Anastasius Bishop of Thessalonica truly observes That Episcopatus erat veluti gradus quidam ad crudelissima supplicia a Bishoprick intituled the Possessour only to the Priviledge of being more Barbarously Tormented than othes Nay after that Age the Bishops themselves were so good Men so excellent (x) Calvin's Instit Printed at Geneva 1550. cap. 8. Sect. 53. that Calvin says and we may venture to take his word when he speaks well of any of that Order that a bad Bishop would have been esteemed instar portenti as a strange prodigious thing shall we suppose that these Men would be so abominably ungrateful to their Lord and Saviour as most Sacrilegiously to violate his own Institution and so injurious to their