by a County or a Barony are summoned by Writ to come to the Parliament and the King bears their expences of their remaining and aboad and all the other Deanes Arch-Deacons and Persons are summoned to appear by two sufficient Proctors which come with a duplicate of their Procurations whereof one part remaineth with the Clerk of the Parliament and the other with the Proctors 2. The summons of the Laity as Earls Barons and their Peers which hold Lands and rents to the value of a County or of a Barony viz. 20. Knights Fees every Fee being accompted at 20. l. per annum which make 400. l. or 23. Knights Fees and a half which makes 400. Marks per annum and none of the Laity of lesser condition are namely and particularly called by Writ except their presence be necessary for some special and extraordionary cause 3. Next the King sends his VVrits to the Cinque Ports to chuse Barons to answer alleadge and do for their Baronies as if all were present a VVrit under the great Seal for the VVarden for their expences 20. s. 4. Next the King sendeth his VVrits to the Sheriff of every Shire to chuse two Knights of every Shire a Mark for their expences 5. Then the King sends his VVrits to the Cities of London and Yorke or other Cities that are Counties to chuse two grave Citizens and they must also have a Mark for their expences 6. And then the Kings VVrit goeth to the Bailiffs of Boroughs to chuse two Burgesses There must be two principal Clerks of the Parliament and they must sit in the midst of the Justices to enrole all the Pleas and businesses of the Parliament not being Clerks to the Justices for there is no Justice in England hath any power or Jurisdiction in the Parliament but that the King calleth them thither to assist the Lords and to hear and determine petitions for the two Clerks are immediately subject to the King except the King assigne some of the Justices to examine their Rolls These Clerks enrole all the Judgments given in the Parliament and before the end of the Parliament they deliver them over to the Treasurer keeping a Transcript or Counter-roll to themselves their wages a Mark a day Other Clerks were assigned by the King to the Bishops and others to the Proctours of the Clergy another to the Earls and Barons another to the Knights another also to the Citizens and Burgesses these set down all doubts and answers and are present in their Counsels and being at leisure they assist the two principal Clerks to enrole the Acts of Parliament If a matter of difficulty either concerning Peace or War be moved in Parliament the King wil enjoyn all the several degrees or tribes of the Parliament the Bishops the Proctours the Barons c. to go apart into several places and the case is to be delivered to their several Clerks whereupon they are to debate amongst themselves and to advise and if all or the greatest part do not agree then the Lord Steward the Lord Constable and the Lord Marshal are to chuse thirty five out of the number two Bishops three Proctors two Earls three Barons five Knights five Citizens and five Burgesses and these thirty five men may chuse twelve and these may descend to six these six to three and these three to two and these two to one and so one person may determine a cause except the King gainsay it which he may do during the Parliament otherwise nor There be three Degrees of businesses in the Parliament 1. Wars or matters touching the Kings person the Queen and the Kings children 2. The publick businesses of the Commonwealth 3. The private and particular matters yet these are to be handled as the Bills come in by priority The principal Cryer of the Parliament the Chancellour Treasurer and Barons of the Exchequer shall record the defaults of all those that are summoned A Sermon before the Parliament must be provided by the Arch-Bishop in whose diocess it is holden Proclamation must be made in the Hall or Monastery where it is holden and in the City or Town that all men by a certain day bring in their petitions c. The Chancellor or the chief Justice of England is to declare the cause of the Summons of the Parliament The King in state ever to be present in the Parliament if he be not sick if he be sick to send for twelve persons of the house to see his person and to satisfie the house of the cause of his absence For the session the King sits alone The Arch-Bishop of Canterbury on his right hand Yorke on his left hand and so every man in his degree and the Lord Steward is to see that every man sit amongst his Peers The Ushers of the Parliament stand within the door of the house and the Cryer stands without the door and the Kings guard stands a good way without the door to keep tumults and crowds of people from about the door All sit except he that speaks who must stand to speak that all may hear None is to go in or out of the house but at one door onely The King never requires aide but for war or to make his Son a Knight or to marry his Daughter and that in full Parliament Two Knights of the Shire are greater then any one Earle or Baron and two Proctours then any one Arch-Bishop or Bishop and the King can hold his Parliament without any Arch-Bishop Bishop Earle or Baron with the Commons alone for there was a Parliament before there was any Barons but if the Commons do not appear there can be no Parliament though all the great Peeres of the Realm were present with the King for the Proctours Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the Realm do represent the whole Commons of the Realm but the great Peers of the Realm are present onely for themselves and for no others The Parliament ought not to be dissolved as long as any Bill remaines undiscussed if it be the King is perjured and publick Proclamation is to be made in the Parliament and in the Palace that if any have any petition he ought to come in and if no answer be made it is to be intended that all men are satisfied Any man that will may have a Transcript or Copie of the Acts before they be printed paying for the same 10. l. 5. s. or 10 l. 08 s. 01 d. And the Parliament may be holden in any place where it shall please the King viz. at Oxford at Kennelworth at Marlborough at Gloucester at Acton-Burnel at Leicester at the Blackfryers c. 14 H. 8. DODDRIDGE Of the Antiquity of the Parliament of England THe Ancient and first Parliament that I have read of is that in Polydore Virgil in the reign of H. 1. in the 16 year which was about the year of our Lord 1116. And this was held at Salisbury as he saith where were assembled with the King all the
therefore they shall by their Proxie make their Procurator and depart the House the party indited shall be put to plead to the inditement whereunto if he plead Not guilty he shall be thereof tried by his Peers and first the most puisne Baron shall be examined of his verdict by the Lord Steward and so in order until all they man by man have delivered their Opinion of the matter either in convicting the person standing accused before them or by clearing and acquitting him of the crime if by their verdicts he be thought guilty of the offence thereof is made an Act which when it hath the consent of the King it is then esteemed a Judgement and the Offender thereby is attainted Herein is to be noted that this verdict of the Lords is not upon their Oaths but upon their Honour for persons of so high degree should have so great care for the preservation of their Honour as themselves or any other have for the safe-Guard of their Souls which is admitted in that and in all other Attaynders per Pares by the Peers as well for that they are in that place not onely as Triers of the Fact but also Judges appointed over the fault and never was it used that Judges should verifie their sentence upon attestation thereof upon their Oaths Secondly in this manner of trial they must think that the bread which is broken unto others by them may by the just Judgement of God in like measure be broken unto themselves in that he whom they censure was in equal degree unto themselves Thirdly also for that where the Law requireth at the hands of other persons an Oath it ordaineth that Barons should regard their Honors Secondly it is to be noted that the party so arraigned in Parliament ought to be called to answer for himself for the Law of England is not so unreasonable to condemn any that will defend himself and it hath heretofore been noted as an error in the judgement of the Parliament 21 E. 3.46 b. when they have given a judgment in the cause of any private person he being not called thereunto and that in a civil matter of much less moment then is the cause of life and death wherefore if the party may be had and do not willingly and wilfully absent himself he is thereunto called to answer and therefore the Parliament in 37 and 38 H. 8. was freed of fault herein upon the Attainder of the Duke of Norfolk he then being in the Tower for that it was signified by the Lord Burghley Lord Treasurer in the Star-chamber when as Philip the last Earle of Arundel was called to answer in the Star-chamber to an undutiful Letter written by him to her Majesty that the said Duke was sent unto and would not come to the Parliament and the said Lord Treasurer affirmed that he then being of the lower House was sent thither with others see for this 1 Mar. Dyer 93. p. 24. The Lord high Steward giveth the Judgement upon Attaynder of treason 1 H. 4.1 a. 13 H. 8.12 a. as appeareth by the Judgment given in Parliament 21 R. 2. n. 15 16. The Bills of Attaynder in Parliament are intituled Placita Coronae coram Domino Rege in Parliamento suo Errours in Parliament reversed Now touching the manner how errors in the Kings Courts committed are reversed in Parliament I shall be very brief First the parties that are grieved through any erronious judgment given against them 22 E. 3.3 a. 12 Ass p. 22. 2 H. 7.19 ought to make their petition un-the King or Monarch that it would please him to permit that erronious judgement as is given against them in such Courts from whence they cannot further appeal may be in Parliament reviewed and reversed This their Petition ought to contain the effect of their grief and ought to be endorsed Let right be done unto the parties In this manner Soit Droit fait as Parties Hereupon the Lord Chancellor of England shall make a Writ of error 1 H. 7.19 n. directed unto the Judges of such Courts where the error was committed and now to be reversed by the Parliament by vertue of which writ the Lord chief Justice of England shall in person bring before the Lords in the higher House the said Petition the said Writ of error and the Rolls wherein is contained the judgment and proces wherein error is supposed H. 7.19 2 E. 3.3 and shall there leave the same petition writ and the transcript of the said Record but not the Record it self with the Clerk of the Parliament for that the Record it self shall be brought back again into the said Court for these Reasons 8 H. 5. f. Errour 88. 23 Eliz Dy. 375. First because these Rolls do concern other matter Secondly because if judgment should be there affirmed then the inferiour Court may have Record whereupon to a ward Execution And lastly for that it is a Rule that when a Record is sent from an inferior Court to a higher Court it is never remanded so that if the former judgement should be affirmed in the Parliament and the Parliament after dissolved the party plaintiff should be without remedy wherefore the record is brought back again as aforesaid 1 H. 7.20 And thus the said Petition indorsed the Writ of Errour and the Transcript remaining in the hands of the Clerk of the Parliament the matter shall be signified unto the Lord Steward by whom together with the other Lords Spiritual and Temporal 22 E. 3.3 a. and with the Iudges the same shall be determined or otherwise the King may appoint out a Commission and thereby assigne certain Earles and Barons who together with the Iudges shall determine the same but the Commons shall not intermeddle therewith moreover after that the Transcript is examined with the Record and that the Record is sent back to the former Court the party plaintiff ought to assigne his Error in writing and thereupon shall have a Scire facias against the defendant ad audiendum errores which writ shall be returned the next Parliament ensuing for that the common day of a Scire facias is forty days but because it is uncertain whether the Parliament shall be dissolved or no before that time therefore the said writ shall be returned the next Parliament 8 H 5. f. tit Error 88. but if the writ be sued forth at a Session of Parliament the same shall be returned the next Session after the said errors assigned and the Scire facias pursued the plaintiff shall not enter into Recognisance to satisfie the judgment 1 H. 7.20 if it shall happen to be given against him or to render his body to prison in such manner as is done in a writ of error in the upper Bench sued upon an erronious judgment given in the Common place but he shall still remain in prison for if the party plaintiff should be at large upon such recognisance acknowledged in
Prelates Nobles and Commons to consult for the publick Weale and as he thinketh before that day the King never called the people to consult and make Laws and he deriveth the name from the French word Parler There is an ancient Roll in some mens hands which describeth the whole State and order of the Parliament and the Title of it is De modo tenendi Parliamentum And it is further described Parliamentum Regis Angliae Angles summoneri tenebatur temporibus Regis Edwardi filii Ethelredi qui modus Recitatus fuit Coram Willielmo Duce Normaniae Conquestore Rege Angliae per ipsum approbatum By this it should seem that Parliaments as they are described in that Roll were held in the time of Edward the holy for he was the Son of Etheldred for Edward the elder was the Son of Alphred and this Edward the holy lived about the year 1043. And by this it should also seem that the Conqueror held a Parliament In this it is first set down what Clergy-men were called which were not onely Bishops but Abbots and Priors that held per Baroniam by which I gather that they came not to that place as they were spiritual men but by reason of the temporal honours they enjoy in the Commonwealth for they have a place in the convocation-house in respect of their spiritual function and in that also they are a part in the Court of Parliament We read of a Parliament in 35 E. 1. in which were sixteen Abbots and eight Priors but how many of those were of the higher house I dare not define or rather were of the house ingeneral for I know it is not clear that there was not then a distinction of houses The first Title is De Clericis the second De Laicis the third de Militibus the fourth De Civibus the fifth De Burgensibus all other circumstances of place times orders and such like are recited which I omit to remember particularly because I know it is a thing well know to all and that it differeth from the order of that Court now used The Court of Parliament hath a double power the one to consult by way of deliberation for the good Government of the Common-wealth and so it is Consilium non Curia another power it hath as a Court in Administration of Justice The principal purpose of that Assembly seemeth to be for Consultation for the Writs are ad Consultandum deliberandum but being Assembled they may hold Plea of causes But this difference I find that in criminal causes both the upper house and lower house intermedleth therewith as in Attainders onely and the spiritual Lords do all go out of the house and give their assents by Proxie 10 E. 4.6 But in civil causes as in VVrits of Error sued there out of the Kings Bench the upper house onely medleth as is well described in the case 1 Hen. 7.19 20. in a VVrit of Error sued by one Flowerdue on a Replevin wherein Judgment was given against him in the Kings Bench. But we have an express Authority in the 4 H. 7.18 That in a criminal cause the Commons must assent for there the King and Lords did attaint one and nothing was said of the Commons therefore by the Opinion of the Justices the Act was held void and the party restored The Peeres of Scotland were wont to come to our Parliament for in 39 E. 3.35 in a VVrit of ravishment de Garde against Gilbert Umfrevil he demanded Judgment of the VVrit because he was Earle of Anguish and not so named in the VVrit Anguish saith the Plaintiff is out of the Realm I but said the Defendant I am summoned to Parliament by that name and the VVrit was abated this proveth that the Peeres of Scotland came to our Parliament for Justice but Littleton saith 20 E. 4.6 that we shall implead an Earle or Duke of France by the name of Knight onely I need not dilate of the nature of the Parliament that it is a body politique or of what parts and members it consisteth for that is very well understood of all learned men neither of the order of it at this day for most know that of their own experience the priviledges of it are great and may more safely be discussed what they are without the house in regard of others then what they are in the house for their liberties there Of the Antiquity of Parliament THat which we in English call Parliament I suppose and know to have taken the name from the French or Norman tongue sounding upon the word Parle or Parler to speak or discourse In Latine I find that it was called before the Conquest by two names the one called Synodus taken from the Greek which is used most for the Assembly of spiritual men to treat of Divine causes and so was practised when Augustine came to Canterbury where the King of Kent called Ethelbert gathered his Nobles and people to understand the message and preaching of Augustine and again it is termed Consiliatio as hereafter I shall set down and hereafter in that sence in Anno Dom. 833. Withlasias Dux Wiviorum a great Lord or Peer amongst those of the Frennes called Girrii or Girrogii in his Chapter for the foundation of the Abbey of Ramsey in which he termeth Egberte King and Ahelwolf his son to be Dominos suos he dateth his said Charter thus Datum apud Londini Civitatem ubi omnes Congregati sumus pro Consilio Capiendo Contra Danicos piratos littora Angliae assidue infestantes This mentioneth Ingulphus so as it appeareth when any imminent peril drew neer for the hurt of the Commonwealth that then there were called the Nobility and wisemen called in the History of Eli Duces Principes Satrapae Rhetores Causidici also Convenerunt Agelinum Aldermanum Episcopos Oswynum omnes meliores Concionatores de Com. c. And the same Author sheweth that Brithmothus a most Noble Duke of Northumberland was called Alderman idest senior vel Dux qui synodo magna Constantia restituit Regem Edgarem alios Monachos dicens nequaquam se ferre posse ut Monachi ejicerentur de Regno qui omnem Religionem tenuerunt coluerunt in Regno King Offa in his Charter granted to the Abbey of Chertsey hath these words Hanc libertatem omnia praedicta praefatum Monasterium pertinentia in synodali conventu in loco qui nominatur Aeccleate testes consistentes concensi subscripsi c. in historia Chertsey penes me remanen Canutus the Dane beginning his Laws sheweth plain that he made the same by the Advice and Councel of a Parliament and beginning thus Haec est Consiliatio quam Canutus Rex meditatione vel decreto suarum sapientum consiliatus est cum suis sapientibus apud Wintoniam c. When I observe an old written Copie with a Comment thereupon they are expounded thus Consiliatio id est Institutio multorum facta Consilio