Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	adam_n	sin_n	sin_v	1,755	5	9.4959	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A96805	The abridgment of Christian divinitie so exactly and methodically compiled, that it leads us, as it were, by the hand to the reading of the Holy Scriptures. Ordering of common-places. Vnderstanding of controversies. Cleering of some cases of conscience. By John Wollebius. Doctor of Divinity, and ordinary professor in the University of Basil. Now at last faithfully translated into English, and in some obscure places cleared and enlarged, by Alexander Ross. To which is adjoined, after the alphabetical table, the anatomy of the whole body of divinity, delineated in IX. short tables, for the help of weak memories.; Christianae theologiae compendium. English.	Wolleb, Johannes, 1586-1629.; Vaughan, Robert, engraver.; Ross, Alexander, 1591-1654.	1650 (1650)	Wing W3254; Thomason E1264_1; ESTC R204089	204,921	375

God yet for our better understanding the Will is considered as the cause efficient the Decree as the effect Now whereas this word Will is taken diversly it is divers wayes distinguished by Divines to wit into the will of his good pleasure and the will of the signe into an antecedent and consequent into absolute and conditional into secret and revealed But these are not real distributions of the Divine will but distinctions only of the name For to speak properly there is in God but one only will which is called the will of his good pleasure because out of his most free good pleasure he hath decreed what shall be done It is called also his antecedent will because it had existence before any creature and from eternity with God it was established It is named also * A. R. The Schoolmen take Gods antecedent will in another sense for his velleity and they call it conditional they make his consequent will absolute and which is alwayes fulfilled the other not alwayes absolute because it depends upon Gods good pleasure and not from the things which are done in time Lastly it is called secret because in respect of priority it is known neither to men nor Angels But these things are improperly stiled by the name of Divine will which are comprehended in that ordinary verse Praecipit prohibet promittit consulit implet Commands forbids promiseth consulteth fulfilleth For as the Magistrates commands are called his will so the name of will is attributed to precepts prohibitions promises to effects also and events And this is it which is called the will of the signe because it signifieth what is acceptable to God and what he would have done by us It is also called his consequent will because it follows that eternal antecedent will And 't is a conditional will because Gods precepts prohibitions comminations and promises have the condition of obedience and disobedience annexed Lastly his revealed will because it is daily set forth in Gods word This distinction of the will is duly to be observed lest we should imagine that there are in God either really different or contrary wils III. What things are done against the will of God are not done besides his will For many things may be done against his revealed will which notwithstanding are consistent with his secret will or will of his good pleasure God by his revealed will desired not mans fall but most severely forbid it yet he did will and decree the same by the will of his good pleasure as it was a means for manifestation of his glory IV. Therefore by the decree and will of God good and evil come to passe Good by efficiencie Evil by permission V. Yet the decree or will of God is not the cause of evil or sinne although what God hath decreed necessarily comes to passe For when evil is decreed by Gods will not effecting but permitting it this decree of God is not the cause of evil neither again is the will of God the cause of evil because his decrees are without repentance and unavoidable for they come not to passe by the necessity of coaction but by the necessity of * A. R. Gods will is immutable because his substance is unchangeable and his knowledge unalterable therefore God changeth not his wil though he wils change in the creatures neither can God wil evil because it is not appetible and 't is repugnant to his nature and goodnesse immutability VI. The necessity of Gods decrees takes not away the liberty of the rational creature The reason is because there is no necessity of coaction but of immutability The fall of Adam if we look upon Gods decree came to passe necessarily In the mean while Adam sinned freely being neither commanded nor constrained nor forced or moved by God but rather most severely admonished that he may not sinne VII Nor doth this Necessity take away Contingencie in the second causes For many things are contingent in respect of the second causes which in regard of Gods decree come to passe necessarily VIII No moving or impulsive cause can be given of Gods decree except Gods most free will and good pleasure IX The chief end of Gods decree is his own glory X. Gods decree in it self is one and most simple neither is there priority or posteriority in it XI But in respect of the things which are decreed is so distinguished that in what manner or order they come to passe God is said to decree them that they should thus come to passe These are idle questions Whether God decreed this or that first Whether he first ordained the end or the means For whereas the decree of God in it self is one and a most simple action there is neither priority nor posteriority in it but it is distinguished only in regard of the things which are decreed in which respect we say that God 1. Decreed to create man 2. To bestow his Image upon him but so that it might be lost 3. To permit his fall 4. Of those who were to fall some he decreed to leave to themselves and others he appointed to raise and to save them eternally CHAP. IV. Of Predestination GOD's Decree in respect of the Creatures is either general or special The general Decree is that by which he appointed to declare the glory of his power wisdom and goodness in the creation and conservation of all things The speciall Decree called Predestination is that by which he appointed to manifest the glory of his grace mercy and justice in the Election and Reprobation of the reasonable Creatures The RULES I. Although Predestination in the minde of God be one and a most simple act yet by reason of the weakness of our understanding it is distinguished into that Predestination which decrees the end and that which decrees the means II. He that is predestinate to the end is predestinate also to the means Predestination is either of Angels or of men The Predestination of Angels is that by which God appointed to save eternally some of them in their first happiness and that in Christ their head but to leave others to themselves and to punish them eternally fOr deserting their station voluntarily this for the manifestation of the glory of his grace justice The * A. R. Predestination is a part of Divine Providence differing in this that Providence hath respect to a natural end Predestination to a supernatural man therefore being subject to Providence is also subject to Predestination Predestination of men is that by which God appointed out of the race of mankinde created to his Image but falling into sin voluntarily to save some through Christ eternally but others being left to themselves in their own misery to damn eternally and that for the manifestation of the glory of his mercy and justice The parts then of this Decree are two Election and Reprobation The RULES I. Predestination is a Decree partly absolute partly not II. It is

absolute in respect of the efficient impulsive Cause which neither is Faith in those which were to be elected nor sin in those which were to be reprobated but Gods most free will Foreseen Faith or Holiness is nor the cause of Election for man was not elected because he was to believe but therefore he believeth because he was elected Act. 23.48 And they believed so many as were ordained to life eternall Neither are we elected because we were to be holy but that we might be holy and unblameable before him through love Eph. 1.4 Neither is foreseen sin the cause of Reprobation for so we should be all reprobate but that God according to his most free good pleasure hath done what he did as manifest by that Luke 12.32 It is your Fathers pleasure to give you a Kingdom and Rom. 9.16 I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy and ver 18. Therefore he will shew mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth III. It is not absolute if we consider the matter or object and the means by which he puts this decree in execution IV. For the matter or object of election and reprobation is not man considered absolutely but as he was to fall into sin of his own accord The reasons are most evident because the decree of manifesting mercy wrath or justice presupposeth sin for there can be no mercy but towards him that is in misery and there can be no justice or just indignation but towards him that is a sinner 2. Because that onely can be reprobated which may be reprobated but man is reprobable or may be reprobated not as by God he was created but as by Satan he was defaced V. Sin therefore is not the impulsive cause of Reprobation but a necessary condition of the matter or object for though it be not the cause of Reprobation yet it is the cause of reprobability or why a man should be reprobated For Reprobation and reprobability differ as the act and possibility All men are reprobable or are liable to Reprobation for sin but all are not therefore actually reprobate VI. Reprobation then presupposeth the decree of mans Creation 2. Of the donation of Gods image upon him which Image was to be lost 3. Of the permission of mans fall VII But the means of execution are so ordered that albeit God worketh most freely and according to his good pleasure yet neither have the Elect any just cause to brag nor the Reprobate to complain for to those undeserved grace was bestowed and on these deserved punishment is inflicted VIII These are different questions 1. By what right doth God reprobate man which is his creature 2. Why did he not choose all but some and reprobate others 3. Why did he choose this man to wit Peter and reprobate that man to wit Judas To the first we answer from the materiall cause in that Adam as he was to fall was liable to reprobation To the second we answer from the end because God was willing to manifest the glory of his mercy and justice But to the third from the cause impulsive because it so pleased him To use the Apostles simile If it be demanded why the Potter out of the same lump makes vessels of such different conditions it is answered from the end because there be different uses of these vessels in the house If again it be demanded why out of one peece of the lump a vessel of honour is made and out of the other a vessel to dishonour it is answered from the cause impulsive because it so pleased the Potter IX Christ is to be considered either as God or as God and man the Mediator In the former respect he is with the Father and Holy Ghost the efficient cause of our election but in the latter respect he is the means of execution thereof We are then said to be elected in Christ Eph. 4. because by him we were to be saved The decree of saving us is called Predestination to the End but the decree bestowing Christ upon us as our Head is named Predestination to the Means X. Although these words of Predestination Prescience and Predetermination are sometime taken for the same yet or understandings sake they may be thus distinguished Predestination signifieth the very purpose of God to save us Prescience that free bounty by which he acknowledgeth us for his own but Predetermination imports Predestination as it hath reference to Christ and the other means of salvation Rom. 8.28 29. But we know that to those who love God all things work together for their good to those I say who are called of his purpose for whom he foreknew those he predestinate that they might be conformable to the image of his Sonne c. XI They are altogether * A. R. Predestination is a part of Providence so is Reprobation For as God by his providence hath ordained some to life eternal so by that same providence he was to suffer some to fall away from that happinesse foolish who acknowledge Election and deny Reprobation Because the Scripture teacheth that there is Reprobation as well as Election Esa 41.9 I have chosen thee and not cast thee away Mal. 1.3 Jacob have I loved and I have hated Esau Rom. 9.18 He will have mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth Rom. 11.7 The election hath obtained it and the rest have been hardened 1 Thess 5.9 God hath not appointed us to wrath but to salvation 2 Tim. 2.20 Vessels to honour and to dishonour Jud. v. 4. For there are certain men crept in which were before of old ordained to condemnation XII As Christ is the cause not * Christ is the efficient cause of Election as he is God equal with the Father He is the meritorious cause as he became our Mediator As head of the Church he is also the cause of Election Joh. 15.16 I know whom I have chosen and Joh. 13.18 I have chosen you In respect of his active and passive obedience he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the outward moving cause And if he be the cause of salvation he must needs be the cause of election on which salvation depends Causa causae est causa causati But because we are said to be elected in him as he became our Surety he is called the medium or mean of election rather then the cause As he is God we are elected by him as Mediator in him As God he is the principal efficient as Mediator the secondary or mean of election of Election but of Salvation so Infidelity is the cause not of Reprobation but of Damnation Damnation differs from Reprobation as the means of Execution from the Decree XIII Damnation is not the end of Reprobation but the manifestation of the glory of Gods justice Therefore to say that man was created that he might be damned is to say amisse for damnation is not the end but the means of execution of which man by his

for us The latter branch confounds his holiness or innocency with his obedience or actual justice which differ as much as the habite and privation Innocency indeed is necessarily required in Christs Sacrifice but his actual obedience is not onely required in Christ as a Priest but it is also a part of his satisfaction and merit for if Adams actual disobedience was the meritorious cause of damnation why should not the actual obedience of the second Adam be the meritorious cause of salvation except we will say that the first Adam was more powerful to damn us then the second was to save us II. The Fathers command which Christ obeyed was special and general Special in respect of the end that he should obey not for himself but for us But general in respect of the object for he was subject to the same Law which was prescribed to us and in all things which the Law enjoyned us to They who only make Christs passive obedience meritorious pretend that it was performed so onely by a special command from the Father that he should die for us But this were not a special command only but a partial For Christs obedience doth as far extend it self as the Law doth Whereas then the Law obligeth us both to the punishment and to obedience he did satisfie both these requisites III. Life eternal is considered either in it self as it is a full participation of celestial joy or in opposition to damnation as it is a freedom from damnation in the former sense the perfect Justice of Christ is the cause of eternal life but in the latter the suffering of the punishment is the cause of life eternal It is one thing to describe Life eternal privatively and another thing positively To speak properly there is no other cause of eternal Life but perfect Justice according to the Law Do this and live Yet Christs death is called the cause of eternal Life so far as it is a delivery from all evil neither is freedom from damnation and heavenly joys parts of life but onely different relations Hence it is apparent in what sense Christ promiseth that he will give his flesh for the life of the world Joh. 6.51 Two things here are objected 1. If Christs active obedience is the cause of eternal Life then he suffered in vain 2. If Christ obeyed for us then we need not yield obedience But in the first Argument there is no consequence for there is one end which is common to both parts of satisfaction to wit our salvation another proper to each one for the end of his suffering was our delivery from evil but the end of Justice is the procuring of right to eternal life The latter Argument against the merit of active obedience is such a one as Socinus frames against the merit of passive obedience If quoth he Christ died in our stead then we need not die But there is no consequence in either there is one death of Christ another of the godly that was joyned with a curse this with a blessing Christ did undergo that as the wages of our sins but we undergo this as a passage from this life to a heavenly so there is one obedience of Christ another of man that was perfect Justice which he performed in our stead to purchase life for us but this is imperfect and is performed to shew our gratitude for our redemption IV. The active Justice of Christ in the Old Testament was shadowed out by the glorious robes of the High-Priest as a type They who deny the merit of active obedience ask By what type it was shadowed out For if say they it is a part of the Priests office in what thing did the High-Priest type it out But to what purpose was all that glorious attiring of the High-Priest in which he appeared before God if it was not to shadow out Christs righteousness Hence we read that not only were the filthy garments of Jehosuah taken off from him in signe of our sins removed from us but that new garments were put upon him and a mitre or crown set upon his head Zach. 3.4 5. So much of Christs Satisfaction His Intercession in the state of Humiliation was whereby he offered Supplications and Prayers not without tears and groans to his Father for us The Evangelical storie tels us of whole nights that Christ spent in prayer but he performed this office chiefly in the time of his Passion Joh 17. Heb. 7.5 Who in the days of his flesh offered with strong cries and tears supplications and prayers to him who was able to deliver him from death The RULES I. They annihilate Christs Incarnation who seek other Mediators of Intercession as they call them besides him The Pontificians distinguish between the Mediator of Redemption and mediators of Intercession and this latter office they ascribe to the departed Saints but it is no lesse sacriledge to ascribe his Intercession to the secondary Intercessors then to impart his Sacrifice to subordinate Priests and whereas they feigne that the Saints profit us not by their Intercession onely but by their merits also their distinction fals to the ground seeing they divide the glory also of Redemption between Christ and the Saints while they se●gn that by their merits as it were by an auxiliary aid our sins are purged and the defect of Christs passion supplied Hitherto of his Priestly office His Regal office he administred in the state of his Humiliation in gathering together a Church by his Word and Spirit so that in it there appeared no signe of Regal Majestie The RULE I. In vain do the Jews dream of the Messiah's earthly Kingdom Isa 42.2 He shall not cry nor lift up nor cause his voice to be heard in the streets Isa 53.2 3. But he shall grow up as a branch and as a root out of a dry ground he hath neither form nor beauty when we shall see him there shall be no form that we should desire him he is despised and rejected of men he is a man full of sorrows and hath experience of infirmities we hid as it were our faces from him he was despised and we esteemed him not Zach. 9.9 Behold thy King cometh unto thee he is just and saved himself poor and riding upon an asse CHAP. XIX Of Christs Exaltation THus of the state of his Humiliation the state of his Exaltation is that wherein Christ being raised from the dead was exalted to Heaven and being set down at his Fathers right hand was crowned with the highest degree of glory The RULES I. The efficient cause of this Exaltation was the whole Trinity II. But Christ considered according to dispensation is the object thereof III. The exaltation of Christs person was according to both natures IV. According to his humane nature he was exalted by laying aside the infirmities which he assumed and by obtaining those gifts which before he wanted For he attained as great a perfection both in his body and soul as

for it is one thing not to account us unrighteous and another thing to esteem us righteous Which that we may the better understand we must know how these terms are different Not just and just Unjust and just Not just and unjust Not unjust and just Not just and just are contradictories Vnjust and just are partly privatives partly contraries Not just and unjust also Not unjust and just are diversa We must also know that Unjust and Just are not immediate contraries for the medium is innocent who is neither unjust nor just Now whereas the remission of sins is a removing or putting away of our sins but the imputation of justice is the adjudging of it to be ours by that we are accounted for not unjust or innocent by this for just Now who knowes not that it is more to be just then to be innocent only and not only to have done no evil but also to have done good But although these two now in man differ not in subject but in some respect only yet heretofore they differed in subject also For Adam in Paradice was innocent but not just for he was at length to attain justice by his perfect obedience 2. They differ in their proximate and proper causes for Christs death and passion are the cause or remission of sins which are expiated by them Heb. 9.22 Without blood there is no remission 1 Joh. 1.7 The blood of Jesus Christ cleanseth us from all sin But the cause of the imputation of justice is Christs perfect obedience Rom. 5.19 For as by the disobedience of one man many are made sinners so by the obedience of one many are made righteous We have shewed above Cap. 18. that this obedience is that actual by which he fulfilleth the whole Law for us 3. They differ in their proper effects for by remission of sins we are freed from damnation Rom. 5.9 Much more then now being justified by his blood we shall be saved from wrath through him But by imputation of righteousnesse we attain over and above life eternal Rom. 5.17 Much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousnesse shall reign c. so Gal. 4.5 both effects are put Made under the Law that he might redeem them that are under the law that is under the curse of the law and that wee might receive adoption It is then a greater benefit to redeem a Slave and being redeemed to adopt him then onely to redeem it is a greater favour to give and forgive then barely to forgive therefore that justification is lame by which onely Christs passion is imputed and which onely consisteth in remission of sins Here divers things are objected 1. The Scripture in many places makes mention of Christs Passion or Remission of sins onely But this is no wonder for in many places it speaks Synecdochically its sufficient that it explains it self in the above-cited places 2. The Apostle promiscuously useth these phrases as equavalent to forgive sins and to impute righteousnesse Rom. 4.5 6. But we answer that it is one thing for propositions to be equivalent and an other thing for one proposition to follow upon or to conclude another as Paul out of this phrase of David Psal 32.2 Blessed are they whose sins are forgiven them c. collects this that David doth describe him to be blessed to whom righteousnesse is imputed without works The reason of the consequence is because if the remission of sins be free then so is also the imputation of justice Although then that is not formally spoken by David which Paul affirmeth v. 5. yet it is spoken by way of consequence yea it is an argumentation as Chrysostome saith from the lesser to the greater for if he be blessed whose sins are forgiven then much more blessed is he to whom besides righteousnesse is imputed 3. To whom sins are forgiven to him also righteousnesse is imputed and whosoever is freed from damnation he is inheritor of life eternal therefore these benefits are not different Ans Those things are not the same which are in the same subject together For so it would follow that Vocation Justification and Sanctification are not different benefits because every man that is called is also justified and sanctified 4. In the pardon of sins there are the sins of omission pardoned and therefore by that man is made perfectly just They adde the reason of the consequence Because he performs all things who omits nothing Ans The consequence is false because there is one cause why we are said to have omitted nothing another why we are said to have done all things We are said to have omitted nothing because Christ hath suffered for our sins also of omission But we are said to have performed all things because he hath for us performed all things Besides to have omitted nothing and to have done all things differ in respect of punishment and reward for although the fault and the punishment are remitted to him who omits what he should do yet for this there is no reward due to him 5. It is absurd that the same debt should be paid twice If therefore satisfaction is made for sin by Christs suffering satisfaction also is not to be demanded by active obedience Ans Here is Ignoratio Elenchi for there is is not a double payment of the same debt but two parts of one payment Neither is Christs active obedience required to make satisfaction for sin but to satisfie for our interest in the Kingdom of heaven 6. If it be the same thing to be liberal and not to be prodigal nor covetous then it is the same thing to be just and not unjust Ans The Assumption is false because these are not immediate opposites for there are men who are neither covetous nor prodigal nor liberal 7. If it be the same thing to be clothed and to have nakednesse covered then it is the same thing to have our sinnes remitted and justice imputed because by the garment of Christs righteousnesse our sins are covered Ans This is an unfit simile for the sinner must not only be clothed but he must be first unclothed to wit from the rags of sin Therefore as Joshuah the High-Priest had his filthy garments taken from him first then new garments were put upon him and a crown on his head Zac. 3.4 5. So we also first must be divested of this dirty garment of sin then we are clothed with the glorious garment of Christs righteousnesse XVI The form of Justification taken passively is whereby believers lay hold on Christ with all his merits by the hand of faith and apply him to themselves XVII The end of that benefit is Gods glory and our salvation XVIII Out of this commemoration of causes we firmly gather That man is not justified before God by his good works and merits Reas I. For to be justified by grace and by merit are repugnant Rom. 3.24 They are justified freely by his grace v. 28.

With the heart we beleeve unto righteousnesse and with the mouth we confesse unto salvation 1 Pet. 3.15 Be ye alwayes ready to answer to every one that shall aske a reason of the hope that is in you To this is contrary 1. A dissembling of the truth 2. The open denial of it 3. An unseasonable confession thereof An example of dissembling is in the Jews that would not professe Christ for fear of being excommunicate Joh. 12. v. 34. Peter is an example of an impefect denial proceeding of infirmitie Mat. 26.69 c. Concerning unseasonable confession Christ warns us Matt. 7.6 Give not that which is holy unto Dogs neither cast ye your Pearls before Swine lest they tread them with their feet and turn upon you and tear you Thus we have shewed how Gods name is sanctified in words it is sanctified in fact when our life and actions answer our holy profession Matt. 5.16 Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorifie your Father which is in heaven To this is opposite the omission of that action which agrees with our Profession and Impiety An example of the former is in Moses and Aaron who are said not to have sanctified God in the sight of the children of Israel when he gave them the water of strife out of the rock Num. 20.12 An example of the latter is in the Jews of which Paul speaketh Rom. 2.24 For the name of God through you is blasphemed among the Gentiles CHAP. VII Of Works appertaining to the Fourth Commandment HItherto of the Parts of Gods worship Now follows the Time peculiarly appointed for Divine worship This is handled in the Fourth Commandment the summe whereof is That we sanctifie the Sabbath There are two parts of this Precept the Precept it self and the Confirmation thereof The Precept is that we sanctifie the Sabbath which is illustrated 1. By an Admonitory particle Remember c. by which it appears that the Israelites before this had been warned to sanctifie it but that it had been slighted and neglected by reason of Pharaohs oppression 2. By declaring the Precept in opposing by an antithesis the works which were to be done the six dayes to those that should not be done the seventh day 3. By a distribution of the subjects for they are either men or beasts The men are either natives or strangers and both are either superiours or inferiours Sixe dayes saith he shalt thou labour and do all thy work but the seventh is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt do no manner of work thou or thy sonne c. The Confirmation is grounded on Gods example For in six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth the sea and all that therein is and rested the seventh day Wherefore c. The Sanctification of the Sabbath is whereby man rests from his external works and labour that he with his family and cattle might be refreshed and that day spent in Gods service The RULES I. The Precept of sanctifying the Sabbath was not first given on Sinai but in Paradise shewing that the manner of Divine worship was prescribed to Adam even in the state of innocencie II. To sanctifie the Sabbath is not to make that day holy but to separate it from profanenesse and to dedicate it to divine worship III. The impulsive causes of this Sanctification are 1. Gods command 2. The equity of the command 3. The promises made to them that obey This fourth Command is urged also in Lev. 19.3 23.1 Jer. 17.22 and elswhere The equity is seen in two things 1. In that God hath separated only one day of seven for Divine worship 2. In that he goeth before us by his own example The Promises are in Isa 56.2 c. 58.13 IV. The matter or object of this Sanctification is the Sabbath or seventh day in the Jewish Church to which succeeded the first day called from Christs resurrection the Lords day from the Lords supper the Day of bread and from the administration of Baptisme the Day of light anciently V. In the Precept of sanctifying the Sabbath we must distinguish between that which is Ethical or moral and that which is typical or ceremonial It was Ceremonial 1. To sanctifie the seventh day precisely 2. By this means to separate Jewes from Gentiles But Moral in that one day of seven must be sanctified for Gods service Now the Church hath sanctified the first day by the example of Christ who hath sanctified it by his resurrection and apparition Joh. 20.19 26. By the example also of Apostolical Church Act. 20.7 1 Cor. 16.2 Rev. 1.10 VI. The forme of sanctifying this day consisteth in omission and action VII Things to be omitted are the works of our outward and temporal callings These are opposed to the works of divine worship in that six dayes we must labour VIII Yet some things are permitted which without great damage cannot be put off till another day Luk. 14.5 Which of you having an oxe or an asse fallen into a pit will not take him out on the Sabbath-day The Macchabees knew this Mac. 2.41 For having received an overthrow on the Sabbath they resolved to defend themselves against the enemy In such cases of necessity Christs rule must be observed The Sabbath was made for man not man for the Sabbath Mar. 2.18 IX On the Sabbath those works must be done for which that day was appointed to wit to repair to the Church to meditate on Gods word to receive the Sacraments to invite one another by exhortations and example to godlinesse to visit the sick to help the poor c. X. The end of this sanctifying of the Sabbath is either natural or spiritual XI The natural end is that men and beasts might rest and be refreshed XII The spiritual end peculiar to the Jews was 1. To shadow out to the Jewes that rest which they enjoyed in the Land of Canaan after their toylesome labours in Egypt and troubles in the Desart 2. That by this part of their beggerly rudiments they might be led to Christ the Author of our spiritual rest from sinne and the workes of the flesh XIII But now the spiritual end of it is 1. That the Congregation may be seen and that the faithful may flock together into the Church as into the Arke of Noah 2. That by meditating on this new birth of the world and Christs resurrection we might praise God our Creator and Redeemer 3. That by our rest from labour we might be admonished of our rest from sinne 4. That we might more and more aspire and raise our selves for the enjoyment of that perpetual rest and Sabbath in the life to come Hence ariseth a threefold Sabbath a typical or temporary a spiritual but onely begun here and a heavenly or eternal XIV The Sanctification of the Sabbath belongs to all chiefly to Magistrates and Pastors The Magistrate by the example of Nehemiah must take care that the