him who is neither Author nor accessary but 't is propagated in generation by the first Mans fal or fault through the loins of perpetual posterity one from another It rests to present som gleanings gathered from the said Corollary Treatis which tends to this Theory 1. Creation is a metaphysical production of a Thing out of Nothing immediatly by God so the first Chaos caled Heaven and Earth was made of meer nothing and the rest mediatly out of it but Adams Body of Earth mediatly and his Soul immediatly of nothing by a middle way of Production 2. Propagation is a Natural act or faculty wherby a living Creature begets his like for continuance of the Kind this is the proper perfection of every Animal Vegetant Sentient Intelligent being the most excellent faculty ingrafted in Nature by Gods special charge and blessing of Increas and multiply which is duple 1. Equivocal when Plants or Animals are bred of putrefaction as Weeds Magots Eeles c. 2. Univocal when ech Animat brings its like as Wheat Wheat Whale a Whale Eagle an Eagle Lion a Lion Man a Man This is doon by the seed of generation which contains the whol Nature to continu the Species for ever wheras Individuals are al mortal or momentany So Mans seed Natures quintessence containing the whol Kind is lodged in a place fit for propagation of another conspecifical which generation being Mans perfection he cannot be said propagat either part but the whol or a third consisting both of Form and Matter Hence our propagation from Adam is a deduction of the whol Man according to Natures cours in turning our potential being into act which derivs his Nature to us but if the Soul be fetch'd from Heaven and Body from Earth how shal both ends be brought together or what shal this mix'd action be caled Simple Creation it cannot be nor pure propagation but a Mungrel like a Mule For Creation and Propagation differ divesly 1. One is Gods work by himself of meer nothing wrought by his sole Word and Wil the other Natures of som preexistent matter according to ech Creatures kind by Gods ordinance setled in Nature 2. That is doon in an instant by an infinit essence which requires no time this by previous preparations or gradual perfections which take time tho the very conception is acted in a moment 3. One is performed without any motion or mutation but in the other the same matter is changed or varied into several forms 4. In the first things are not made of one substance with the Creator but in the last both hav the same substance 5. In Creation privation preceds the habit power act and darknes light but in Propagation contrary habit foregoes privation as sight blindnes act power and light darknes The Reasons that Mans Soul cannot be propagated by cours of Creation are thes 1. It impugns Gods Justice to put a 1. Reason pure innocent essence into a condition to be instantly damned for anothers sin which it must be if an Embryo dies before born and baptised To this 't is said the new Soul is guilty by union which is a greater aspersion on divine Justice but no salvo for if it be in no fault why shal it be guilty and punished for Adams fal If it be replied That God so eternaly Decreed this farther aggravats nor doth it appear that he so Decreed which to aver without warrant is most hainous for if he Decreed as Supralapsarians harshly hold that al should sin and suffer death in Adam 't is requisit to be by just means which if it may be doon by Traduction rather then Creation yea by that way and not this then is that to be counted Gods Decree Can Justice it self deal unjustly surely in equity is no iniquity God promiseth and proclameth that a faultless Child shal not suffer Ezek. 18. 20. for his Fathers guilt why then shal a good Soul be so deeply punished for anothers sin to whom it is scars kin sith Adam that sinned was no simple Soul but a Man 2. If the Soul be immediatly created pure it cannot be polluted by a Body which of it self is not the subject of sin nor can defile a spiritual substance being the first mover of al acts in the Body and it should rather sanctify that then be stained by it So it may better be defended that we hav original righteousnes becaus the Soul coms from God then original sin becaus the Body coms from Adam If it should be granted that the Soul is polluted by yeelding to bodily lusts yet this is actual sin not original corruption Nor can it com from a pure created Soul To this 't is said That at the instant of Creation God bereavs al supernatural gifts for Adams laps which though it put not evil into the Soul yet original sin necessarily flows or folows This seems uncouth that God shal at once doo and undoo or make and mar so soon as 't is made or giv goodness and take it away instantly Nay if it be created in infusing 't is void of supernatural gifts and so cannot be deprived of what it never had But if it be created without thos gifts which to us are supernatural he creats it evil as al Men are without such nor can a Soul be good without them If then God makes it so that it must needs be evil he makes it evil sith he makes it that it cannot be good Yet if al the premisses be conceded 't is never the neer to salv original sin sith this is not to sin in Adam but to becom sinful for him So it results that the Soul if created good cannot possibly contract Adams sin nor can al Mens wits or wiles cleerly shew how a Soul created pure can be polluted and al shifts hitherto devised are silly Cobweb Lawns pervious to every ey The last refuge that it coms neither by Soul nor Body but by union of both sith by it we becom Sons of Adam and so his sin made ours is Mr. Calvins curious conceipt but scars satisfactory For it is a spiritual Lepry which hereditarily infects the whol Man with al parts and powers If then the Soul at first union be pure and Body polluted the Child shal be half holy and half sinful Or if both be clean at first how can union make both or either unclean for when two good are conjoined both becom better Hence som say Adams sin is only imputed not inherent and so we only reputed corrupt Indeed Christs righteousnes is realy ours by imputation and a voluntary institution as a Covenant of Grace differs from ordinary Justice in cours of Nature sith 't is free to shew mercy without caus but not to punish without du desert Nor can this sin be justly imputed to al unles the whol Man be propagated for 't is a real infection of the whol Nature both Body and Soul 3. As by Gods Ordinance original sin passeth from one to al
not most part lying in laps predecreed to Reprobation Som slily expound the word World for a World of Elect or Beleevers only which is no wher so taken but either for al Men or al living in som certain place or at som certain time sans distinction of good or bad Or if it be any wher restrained 't is applied to wicked Men wedded to this World Yet if it be somwher limited to the Elect 't is not so here for then the words would bear a sensless sens God so loved the Elect that whoever beleevs in his Son should not perish which imports two sorts of Elect som that beleev and shal be saved others which beleev not and shal perish but Beleevers and Uunbeleevers saved and damned includ al Mankind which S. John cals elswher the whol World as an exposition of the former S. Paul 1 John 2. 2. 1 Tim. 2. â— saith God wil hav al Men to be saved and com to the knowledg of the truth Ergo his wil is that al shal hav the means of knowledg and be saved but none shut up under unbeleef Som by Al understand al sorts of Men but not al particulars in ech sort which is a silly shift Indeed 't is somtimes so taken but not here as the context shews for in the first vers a duty is injoined to make praiers and supplications for al Men and then a motiv annexed God wil hav al to be saved The duty extends to every particular we must in charity pray for al even Tyrans Persecutors prophane Persons Ergo the motiv intends al individuals or els reacheth not home to inforce the duty Others answer That God intends al to be saved by his reveled Wil but millions damned by his secret O beware of ascribing two several Wils to God who is no dissembler sith one must needs be good the other bad For if his Word be his reveled Wil and repugnant to his secret Mind or meaning it must be untru or simulatory and consequently a ly S. Peter saith The 2 Pet. 3. 9. Lord would hav none perish but al com to repentance Som fully it That he means only the Elect or Beleevers but the context flatly contradicts it For the next preceding words speak of patience or long-sufferance toward Men which must be Reprobats rather who dy in their sins as the same Apostle tels That Christ in spirit preached to the spirits which in Noahs dais 1 Pet 3. 19 20 were disobediens and now in prison or Hel for it Yea Reprobats are the most proper objects of his patience as S. Paul saith He useth much patience and long-suffering to them that Rom. 2 4. go on in sin that he might lead them to repentance Again he suffers Rom 9 22. with long patience Vessels of wrath prepared not decreed to destruction See Isai 5. 2. Isai 65. 2. So S. Peters words intend Reprobats so wel as others or rather them then others that God wil hav none to perish by his power or pleasure except by their own fault or folly This is confirmed by som conditional passages If thou seek him he wil be found but if then forsake him he wil cast thee off So God said to Cain If thou doâ— wel shalt thou not be accepted but if thou doo il sin lies at dore S. Paul saith The just shal liv by faith but if any draw back Hebâ— 1â— 38. my soul shal 〈◊〉 no pleasure in him By which conditions 't is clear that God forsakes no Man simply considered in the fal til he first forsakes him The result is That he rejects none by previous Decree sav such as he foresaw would cast him off by continuance in sin and contempt of Grace For Gods acts in time are regulated by his Decrees before time as 't is said He works al according to Eph. â— â—â— the Counsil of his Wil. For ther is an exact conformity betwen the Rule and thing squared by it therfore whatever God doth in the World he purposed before the World and by actual casting Men off when they grow rebellious or impenitent we may be sure he decreed to doo it for foreseen rebellion and impenitence Som obscure Texts may seem to favour the Opinion of free pleasure as Men mis-interpret them which by presupposing prevision are rightly reconciled But S. Austins rule is we must not contradict plain places becaus we cannot comprehend obscure And Tertullian teacheth that a few places are to be understood after the current sens of most part and not contrary to it as in this case for the most part it seems to be 2. It crosseth som chief Attributs of God Mercy Justice 2 Reason Truth Holines which are his perfections wherby he exerciseth his acts among Men conform to them For they are the same in God with thos virtues in Men but infinitly differing in degree sith what is just tru holy or merciful in Men is superlativly so in God Els cannot Man be properly made after his Image nor renewed in Regeneration after the same or made Col. 3. 10. partaker of divine Nature but 't is commanded Be ye perfect Mat. 5. 48. as your havenly Father is perfect and holy as I am holy Nor is soveraign power or dominion an Attribut moraly good in it self sith it may be shewed in cruel unjust acts so wel as contrary But our good God is Justice in the Abstract and wil not exercise it tyrannously contrary to his other Attributs 1. Now absolut Reprobation repugns his Holines making him the chief caus of sin in most Men sith he brings them into a state of sin which they cannot decline For al are guilty of Adams transgression and Natures corruption yet not by natural generation so much as by divine Ordination as Calvin â— 3. Inst â— 23. â— 7â— faith Al Men are held under guilt of eternal death in the person of one Man which cannot be ascribed to any natural caus but must com from Gods wonderful Counsil who would hav it so Doctor Twiss saith the same The guilt of Original sin is derived only by imputation the stain only by propagation and both meerly by Gods free constitution So saith S. Bernard Adams sin is anothers becaus we knew not Serm. 1 Dom. â— past 8. Epiâ—â— of it yet ours too becaus by Gods just though secret Judgment reputed ours This agrees with reason for if we incur guilt of the first sin and Natures corruption only as being in Adams loins when he sinned then are we guilty of al his other sins being virtualy or potentialy in his loins after the fal so wel as before But Scripture intitles only the first sin which entred the World and invaded al Mankind Yea Children should be guilty of al their Progenitors specialy the next Parents sins as being in their loins when they sinned more immediatly then in Adams yet Children partake not their Parents guilt nor punishments unles they hate
heart Christ knew Peter at a silly Dâ—mosels chalenge would deny him and upon his look repent bitterly how Saul would obey his cal and of a bloody persecutor becom a bold blessed Professor God is Exod 8. 15. 32. said to harden Pharaohs heart by witholding his Grace who first hardned his own by disobeying which he would not mollify So he deals with al obstinat obdurant sinners who first refuse or resist Grace offred nor wil use the means prescribed but how far he useth Prescience in al thes works he self only knoweth The similitud of the Potter sheweth that none hath caus to contest or complain against God sith every one by lapsed Nature is liable to condemnation and 't is his meer mercy to sav any The elect are caled vessels of honor and mercy but Reprobats of dishonor wrath and fury both which presuppose sin specialy disobedience and impenitence in thes whom God endured with long suffering as he did the wicked of the old World but being despised shewed his wrath and power on them The salvation of al that are saved and perdition of al which perish is rightly referred to his Wil as suprem universal caus mover disposer and Governor of al who could hav ordered them otherwise if he pleased yet must this chief Agent be considered not as doing al by himsef alone but suffering other created Natures to use their free faculties as his Wisdom Justice Mercy Dominion shal judg fit to apply them holily and righteously after his own Nature Thus he prepared som to life som to death as their several ends but by intervent of their own acts foreseen so wel as his who proceds in his purposes so blamelesly as a Potter in making of the same Clay som Vessels for better and som for baser uses or services For though there be much neernes between the Potter and his Clay to dispose at his pleasure yet is much more betwen God and his Creatures So whom he chose in Christ and willed to sav by him supposing his own acts of giving his Spirit to them and their readines to receiv and obey such are Vessels made to honor But thos whom he rejected and decreed to destruction upon like supposal of their acts in despising his Promises and abusing his Graces such are Vessels made to dishonour and damnation For such supposals are necessary here sith Mankind is not like a lump of Clay sensless and reasonless but a free Intelligent Creature made to work or procure his own ends both good and evil good by working with God who seeks Mans good or evil by forsaking and faling from him in this work But becaus God could hav altered or amended his whol mass or any parcel which the Potter perhaps cannot alwais doo in his therfore he hath a far nobler power over Mankind then a Potter of his Clay to make Vessels of honor or dishonour wherby al is resolved to his Wil as the prime suprem Caus which allows al subordinats to work according to their Natures and applies them to his own glory Nor doth the Potter destroy or cast away his vessels no more wil God his Creatures sans caus Ob. S. Peter saith the Jews took Jesus of Nazaret being Acts 2 23. delivered by Gods Counsil and foreknowledg whom by wicked hands they crucified and slu Ergo c. Sol. It was doon by Gods Counsil but foreknowledg conjoined for the execution of divine Decrees hath two parts 1. An absolut operation to produce al good things 2 Permissiv of any evil to be doon by others which he turns to good ends So Joseph told his Brethren ye purposed evil against me Gen. 50. 25. but God disposed it for good to preserv his People alive Semblably he turned the Jews malice with Judas treason to Mans salvation but 't is not said that he in secret counsil Decreed either but only permitted and turned it to good Calvinians distinguish betwixt the Entity of every act which is good from God and Obliquity which is evil from Man instancing in a bias Bowl and halting Hors whos deviations proced not from the Caster or Rider The Lutherans say such distinctions and comparisons are poor palliations like Cobwebs to catch silly Flies and partial folowers For God decrees no evil either Entity or Obliquity but only foresaw al in his pure Prescience and determined in his secret counsil to permit it only For Decree is the act of his soveraign wil which no creature can resist at any time but he offers sufficient Grace indifferently to al which may be refused or resisted by any and is by too many who hav Freewil on the left hand to evil as al sides unanimously agree Som say Grace flows from God by two Fountains of Purpos and Preaching but that of Purpos flows also from Preaching for Faith cometh by hearing S. Paul reconciles both making Gods foreknowledg the first link which leads al for though his general lov be the sole source whence Preaching Caling and promiss of Grace proceds even to the Elect whos caling he chiefly intended as if he sent his Word only to them yet published it to the rest also that his goodnes to al may be manifested So Preaching is the Fountain of conveying Grace to them that receiv it and might be to the rest which reject it sith Gods purpos from Prescience is the Fountain of Grace to such as hav it but thos who hav it not to whom also the Word is preached want it by their own disdain or disobedience foreknown not for default of divine Predestination For Quos praescivit preceds praedestinavit as Quos praedestinavit doth vocavit justificavit glorificavit which are the successiv links of that Heavenly golden Chain leading to life everlasting Non decet Ingenuos jurare in verba Magistri Dogmata nec pigeat discere falsa retro Free Men should not swear their Teachers Word t' observe Nor griev t' unlearn fals Doctrins or back swerv Ne placido errores exugite lacte latentes Nam cum Vino Homines saepe venena bibunt Suck not up errors hid in Milk most fine For Men drink poisons oftimes mix'd with Wine Reprobatio ex praevisis Reprobation foreknown HItherto the bright side of Predestination or Election hath bin soly shewed now the black Globe of Reprobation shal be succinctly surveied Mr. Calvin who first broched Instit l 3. Câ— 3. 54. 57. the absolut Decree of Adams Fal for which Lutherans so bitterly brand him vents thos peremptory positions That he fel away according to Gods knowledg and ordinance who decreed that he should perish by his own faling away That al Adams Sons fel away by Gods Wil by whos secret Counsil Mans fal was ordained That Men hav nothing in agitation Inst l. 2. c. 17. sec 11. nor bring ought into action but what God by his secret direction hath decreed That Devils and Reprobats are not only held fast in Gods fetters as not to doo what they would
the flesh and make God to decree sin efficatiously with an energetical working wil blaming thos that refer ought to Gods prescience only Permission properly is an act of Gods consequent judiciary Wil by which he punisheth Men for abusing their freedom in committing sins day by day which they might hav declined and 't is caled his long-suffering proceding to punish with a slow unwilling pace See Ps 81. 11 12. Ezek. 18 39. Rom. 1. 21 24. Rev. 22. 11. but Permission by them intended is an act of Gods antecedent Wil exercised on innocent men lying under no guilt whom he eternaly preordains to sin and punishment So tru Permission about whomever exercised is only not to hinder them from faling which are able to stand and supposeth a possibility in the party permitted to sin or not but in their sens 't is a withdrawing or with-holding of Grace needful to shun sin and so infolds an absolut necessity of sinning as the fal of Dagons hous folowed Sampsons plucking down the Pillars which supported it So Maccovius saith Permission is a subtraction of divine assistance necessary to prevent sin so Dr. Whitaker Permission is a privation of that aid which bâ—ing present would hav prevented sin So Pareus That help which God witheld from Adam made that he could not so use his indowments as to persever which he saith is the doctrin generaly defended by their side So their Permission of sin being a subtraction of necessary Grace is equivalent to an actual effectual procuring and woking of it for a deficient caus in things necessary is truly efficient so this devise is a very figleaf to cover the ugly nakednes of their Opinion Others consider two things in every evil act 1. The matter 2 Devise or Entity wherof God is Author 2. The form or Obliquity which proceds from Satan as in a lame Hors This distinction halts wors then the Hors nor holds in al Answer sins sith in many the very acts are sinful as Adams eating the forbidden fruit and Sauls sparing Agag which in others had not bin sin NOE wil it serv their turn for they make Gods Decree caus of al thos means which lead to damnation therfore of sinful actions as sinful and not as bare Entities sith they deserv death not as simple actions but as transgressions of the Law As to their sly Simile that Master or Owner who shal first resolv to kil his Hors and after lames him that he may hav color to doo it is cruel to his Beast and Author both of his halting and death so if God first decree to cast Men into Hel and then bring them into a state of sin that he may effect his purpose justly he must needs be Author of sin so wel as the actions to which it cleavs sith he intends destruction Thes are horrid aspersions Som coin a third evasion that the Wil is determined to an 3 Devise object two wais 1. By compulsion against its inclination so God forceth no Man 2. By complying with its natural appetit or liking So God may lead a Man to what he would yet not be Author of sin but only necessitats it When Men sin 't is tru they cannot chuse and as tru they wil not but sin so 't is not Gods Decree but their own wicked Wil which is caus of their sin and death The Fathers and School-men make Compulsion and Necessity Answer al one denying that God necessitats any to sin for then he is Author of it so wel as if he compeld Men sith therby it must inevitably be committed which els might be declined Nay what necessitats the Wil to sin is more the caus then the Wil it self becaus it overruleth and bears most sway bereaving al tâ—â— liberty to dispos it s own acts which should be free Lord of it self For the Necessitater is Commander Comptroler and Compeller but the Wil a servil instrument determined by divine Decree from which al such acts rather proced then from Mens wicked Wils When two Causes concur to produce an Effect one principal overruling the other instrumental at the principals devotion the Effect is ascribed to the influx or impression of the former and not to the later which is only a subservient Servant See Mat. 10. 20. 1 Cor. 15. 10. Gal. 2. 20. wher the work is wholy imputed to the principal Agent Adams Wil in innocence was whit paper or a clean-Table equaly inclined to good or evil So if God decreed his Fal as Supralapsarians say that necessity was a coaction but al others by depraved Nature are disposed to evil yet determined by divine decree both Elect and Reprobats Wils Though then Mans Wil works with Gods Decree in sinning yet siâ—h it doth it by the commanding power of his irresistible Decree the sin cannot so rightly be attributed to Mans Wil the inferior as to Gods Decree the superior Caus Yea that which makes a Man sin by necessity with and not against his Wil is caus of his sin in worâ— sort then he which constrains him against his wil as he that by powerful perswasion draws one to kâ—l himself is more gâ—osly the caus of his self-homiciâ— then he who inforceth him to it becaus it makes him consent to his own death So if Gods Decree makes Men sin and willingly too which is both to act and wil evil he hath a deeper stroke in the sin Another shift is suggested that sin is considered as sin and 4 Devise so God doth not destinat Men to it Or as a means to manifest his Justice and so he doth decree to punish it yet is not the Author of sin This is a silly slide for a good end cannot justify an il actions Answer Both end matter and maner too must be good els the act is evil If a Man shal steal to giv Alms as Robin Hooa did or commit whordom to beget Children for the Church as the Harlot did which was mother to three famous School-Doctors or the like be his end never so good he sinneth hainously sith 't is a violation of Gods Majesty and directly opposit to divine Good as S. Paul saith We must not doo evil that good may insu If then God willeth evil for ends never so Rom. 3. 8. good yet sith he decrees it with a powerful necessitating Wil he is Author of it For sin simply is a means of punishment If then he wils it as a means of punishment he wils it as simply sin by an absolut Decree Absit omen This Position loads him with three indignities 1. Want of Wisdom which must needs be weak if he can find no way to glorify his Justice but by bringing in sin which his Soul hates that he may manifest it in punishing 2. Want of sincerity or plain dealing as Tiberius purposing to destroy Drusus and Nero sons to Germanicus provoked them to revile him that so he might justly put them to death So if God appointing Men to eternal
God like them and imitat their Exod. 20 5. sins God swears that the Proverb The Fathers hav eaten Ezek 18 2 c. sour Grapes and Childrens teeth are set on edg shal be used no more the Soul that sins shal dy But if a Man be just and doo right he shal surely liv The Son shal not bear his Fathers iniquity nor Father his Sons but the Soul only that Sins shal dy Wretched would be our case on whom the ends of al the World are com if children should be guilty of al their Progenitors sins or liable to their plagues and punishments who can bear it Yet 't is asserted that God decrees to leav Reprobats in this impotent irrecoverable condition affording no ability to rise from sin by Grace which Decree he executs in time of his Free-wil and Pleasure leaving them under a necessity of sinning by the act of absolut Reprobation both Negativ which is a flat denial of Grace and Positiv which is a preordination of them to endless torments Som grant common Graces to Reprobats but not sufficient to sav them So saith Lubbert God reveles not the way of salvation to Reprobats nor givs Faith and Regeneration but leavs them in sin and perdition Nor doth afford them any sufficient means of salvation with an intention of saving them Thes two Positions that God necessitats Reprobats to sin and leavs them in the snds make him chief Author of al their sins for a Caus of the Caus is Caus of the thing produced Causa Cauâ—â— â—â—â— Causa Causati whether Negativ or Positiv acts Ergo if God be chief Caus of their impenitence by want or withdrawing supernatural Grace he is tru caus of their sin according to the saying He that forbids or hinders not what is in his power bids and furthers it as they say God doth effectually wil it 'T is a poor pretext that God by withdrawing his Grace is only accidental not a direct proper caus of their sins For an accidental is when the effect is beside the Agents intention or expectation as if one in digging his ground finds gold But when an effect is expected intended or contrived the caus cannot be caled accidental as a Pilot witholding his care or skil from a Ship when he knows it wil perish by such neglect is caus of casting it away So if God detains Grace necessary not as ignorant what wil insu but precisely determins Reprobats ruin by their impenitence he becoms a tru direct caus of their sins which no wiles of wit sav among their partial poor blind Disciples can possibly decline 2. It opposeth Gods Mercy which is his Nature in the Abstract See Exod. 34 6. Mat. 7. 11. Mat. 23. 37. 2 Cor. 1. 3. Eph. 2. 4. 1 Pet. 1. 2. 1 John 4. 16. But such matchless Mercy cannot stand with a peremptory Decree of absolut Reprobation which if God doth of free pleasure he is rather a Father of Cruelties then Mercies and a Destroier then Saviour What Parent wil destin their Children to eternal death and torments for one only offens and that not committed by them but by others and imputed to them Is Gods Mercy abundant if limited to a few Elect scarsone of a hundred shal be inevitably saved Ponder thes points duly 1. That Adams sin is personaly none sav his but a sin of Nature not committed or consented to by any of his posterity which is derived by traduction but made the sin of Nature by Gods arbitrary imputation not ordinary generation 2. That God as 't is generaly beleeved pardoned Adam who freely committed it Can it then stand with his Mercy to punish others for the same sin not perpetrated by them 3. That his only Son was sent into the John 1. 29 World and suffred death for the sins of the World which might suffice to satisfy his wronged Justice for al Mankind and open a way of salvation to every Man without respect of persons But to damn a world of Reprobats by free Decree only to shew his dominion no way savours of Mercy for he is far crueler to them then any Creature els or to the very Devils who are damned for their own personal pride and rebellion but Reprobats by an absolut Decree for anothers crime The one know their doom and expect it but the other are deluded with hope and made beleev the matter is in their own hand so that if they perish 't is not for want of Mercy in God but oâ— wil in themselfs Yet by their doctrin al depends on the peremptory punctilio of Gods arbitrary absolut Decree So Devils are in better case becaus they are not injoined to beleev in Christ nor to repent fast and pray as Reprobats are Nor punished the more for not beleeving as Men are In al which regards their condition is far more ruful then cursed Fiends who are made the tormentors over them Concerning other Creatures the very basest hav a being though despicable which is better then no being Yet who would not wish if he might chuse to be resolved into nothing then in such doleful direful condition yea that they had been Toads or Serpents then Men Or what Parents wil procreat if they be perswaded they shal beget Children Fire-brands for Hel and Slavs to Satan yet not for their faults nor hav they power to help it Let Prosper shape the period He which saith God wil not hav al to be saved but a few predestinat persons only he speaks harshly of Gods high inscrutable Grace Som say Gods Mercy by this absolut Decree is sufficiently shewed to the Elect and Justice to Reprobats but the one is clothed with partial respect of persons and the other clouded with extrem rigour or severity as shal appeer 3. It is incompatible with divine Justice See Ps 145. 17. Prov. 16. 11. Isai 5. 3. Ezek. 18. 25. but the absolut decreâ— of Reprobation cannot consist with it sith it makes God punish the righteous with rebellious and innocent Men with bad Angels For Antelapsarians say expresly That God decreed Mans Fal or Fate considered without sin and therfore innocent Postlapsarians vouch the same by consequent That he lais a necessity on every Man to be born under original sin decreeing to Reprobat most part for that sin so they make God to doo 〈◊〉 3 Inst c. 23. § 7. 23. by two acts which their brethren impute to one Calvin contests That God may with equal Justice decree Men to damnation the first way so wel as the last for al are made guilty of Adams sin by Gods Decree only why then not he by the same Thes kind Patrons of divine Justice wil seem to stumble at a straw and leap over a block why els wil they not grant that of one Man which they doo of al hence we may see what to judg of this opinion That God cannot justly ordain Men to destruction sans consideration of sin for which is greater to impute another
Humanity becaus when the Body is prepared God hath decreed to infuse a Rational Soul This is soon said gratis but by what warrant or wher doth it appear that God so decreed Repl. Flesh animat is Mans whol Nature not inanimat Ergo the Flesh which he assumed had a Rational Soul at first conception Sol. Som say that Flesh was potentialy animat to be indowed with a Soul in du time Others which hold Soul-creation at conception grant it was actualy animat But as she is caled Mother of God in regard of the Hypostatic union though he had only his Humanity from hir So Parents may be said to beget the whol Man in relation to the union which God hath decreed in du time though they beget only the bodily part apt and apparated to entertain the Soul which sufficeth for denomination Repl. The reason reacheâ—h not right sith Men are Parents to Children becaus the whol Nature is derived from them as Christs Humanity was from the Virgin but she is stiled Deiparent not in respect of his Deity which depends not on hir but for the said hypostatic union of both Natures in one Person having his humanity intirely from hir Ergo the Godhead shal be better tied to his whol Manhood by Traduction of both parts then barely to cloth him with inanimat Flesh Beside she is caled Mother of God for the hypostatic union actualy in being but Parents are said to beget a whol Man in regard of the union to com Sol. He had his whol Humanity from hir in maner foreshewed For when the Body is accomplished and accommoded the Soul shal be necessarily instilled or infused in du time which is al that can be answered in this point of the whol Humanity derived from Parents Ob. The Womans seed shal break the Serpents head but Christ fulfilled this promiss and prophecy chiefly in Soul which descended into Hel to lead Captivity captiv and bind the strong Man in his own Kingdom as his body triumphed over Death in his dominion the Grave by his tridual Resurrection for how is he the Womans seed unless he had his whol Humanity from hir Or how can the Body break the Serpents head Or how could this victory be atchieved if his Soul had not descended Ergo he assumed his Soul also from the Woman by the Holy Ghosts cooperation Sol. Divers Divines deny Christs descent into Hel in Soul but that may rest in debat sith it concerns not the production sav only to shew that by it he brok the Serpents head Touching the promiss and prophecy it was performed principaly by his Soul or rather person and that derived potentialy or preparativly from the Woman in manner foretold but primitivly and actualy from God the Creator or Infuser Ob. To bind up sundry bunches of sour Grapes in one bundle If the Soul be created pure how can it be defiled in an instant by inanimat flesh not capable of sin Or why doth God cast his own workmanship into a stinking Prison purposly to be polluted Or how can a spiritual substance be stained by a material mass specialy sith sin inheres soly in the Soul which is primarily guilty by willing or consenting and the Body only in obeying the one activly as efficient the other passivly as Instrument Upon this ground of the Soul created pure and in capacity to be polluted by lifeless flesh Pelagius built his branded Teneâ— That Children are born free from original sin And S. Austin seeking to crush this Cockatrice in the Eg like such as bow or bend a stick back to bring it right broched another error That al dying unbaptized are infallibly damned or deprived of Beatific vision being liable to the lack or loss of Heavenly happines though not to the pain of Hellish torments whence be is stiled durus Infantum Pater Lastly our Protoparents personal sin becam like sap derived from the root participatly ours not by imputation as Zanchy contests but by tru inhesion infecting the whol Nature which hereditary corruption or conâ—agion is contracted linealy from Parents loins Ergo the Soul as seat source and subject is ex Traduce Sol. This Gordian knot many hav essaied few extricated or cut it asunder like Alexander who shadow it with a vele of windy words but no real resolution Som say the seed is stained ex traduce which like levan sours the whol lump and the Soul supervening receivs stain from it as new Must put into a musty cask which the best Divines disclaim For ther can be no proper physical action of material upon immaterial and the Soul shal be polluted passivly only which sufficeth not to make it guilty unless it be a voluntary Agent yea the similitud halts for ther the Vessel taints the Wine here the Soul was first soiled and principal efficient ther both be material here the chiefest spiritual nor can inanimat flesh be capable of sin before it hath a Soul Zanchy and others hold That as Christs righteousnes so Adams guiltines is ours imputativly only but Natures corruption insuing a just punishment by divine Decree Out alas this sin is a lepry cleaving clos to the flesh and consequently corrupting our whol Nature or els could not beget and bring forth such a serpentin spawn of actual sins Peter Moulin professeth plainly that the Soul is not vitiated by the Body for to incarcerat an innocent Creature his own operature in a plaguy Bridewel purposly to be infected repugns Gods Justice and Goodness but sin being a spiritual vice of the Wil first seizeth the Soul before the Body becoms accessary as Adam first sinned in Wil and Consent yer he stretched his hand to touch or cast so sin passeth from the Soul to the Body not contrarily For the maner of spreading He saith God creats the Soul spotless but destitut of supernatural light which Man lost by his fal hence flows or folows perversnes of Wil purblindnes of Mind and proclivnes to al evil even from inordinat self lov not guided by metaphysical illumination and the temper of Body doth much incens or increas this contagion according to every complexion yet are not humors the causes but incentivs to sin nor doo impress or imprint on the Soul but only incline it therto Quot homines tot sensus so many men so many minds but al driven to sundry shifts how sin can be propagated without traduction of the Soul which being granted wil soon satisfy al scruples Repl. This last devise being newest takes best but is scars soundest for sin is an effect of natural corruption which is more then a defect of supernatural illumination and a positiv depravation of Wil far beyond deprivation of Grace Man indeed lost metaphysical light by his fal yet if our Souls be created spotless they must at first infusion be sinless so al the doubts rest intire how they can so suddenly contract this hereditary pollution diffused over our whol Nature unless the Soul bring that stain with it for
Mankind so by propagation al Mankind proceds out of one and as that sin overspreads the whol Man so both parts being infected must needs be propagated Again as this sin is seated specialy in the Soul so 't is chiefly propagated according to Natures cours Hence three points rest to be proved 1. That original sin passeth only by propagation as Scriptures universaly testify By one man death passed upon al becaus al sinned in him and 't is imputed to his Posterity becaus al were in him as the Root or Stock and al descend out of him so his sin becoms ours both by imputation and propagation but by the first becaus of the last For 't is not anothers sin imputed which is not ours but that made ours by propagation actualy which before was only potentialy This is cleer by the Antithesis between the first and secund Adam as in one al dy so in Christ shal al be made aliv The one being Root of Mankind in whom al are by Nature the other Head of the Elect in whom they are al by Grace Such then are deceived as deem Adams sin only imputed like Christs righteousnes sith this last is the Creators voluntary Institution and work of meer Mercy but the first a necessary operation of the Creature and work of Justice So the Antithesis holds tru thus As in Christ we fulfilled the Law suffered death and attained salvation being members of his Body by Grace So in Adam we eat the forbiden fruit becam Satans bondslaves and were in state of damnation being al members of his Body by Nature So Christ derivs his righteousnes to his Children by spiritual regeneration as Adam did his sin to al Men by natural generation Ergo as Christs righteousnes is not imputed but by means of regeneration wherby we becom members of his Body So Adams sin cannot be imputed but by generation wherby we descend from him as his members If Adams sin be simply imputed becaus we are Men as he was who received or lost for himself and al Mankind then must it be imputed to Christ as Man so wel as to us which is not so for our sinning in him and being sinfully propagated from him makes us liable which Christ was not becaus sanctified in the womb by the holy Ghost at first conception but al els derived from him and his sin to us through one anothers loins 2. Original sin cannot be propagated unles the whol Man and both Parts be which necessarily flows from the premisses for except the whol Man descends from him the whol cannot be infected sith neither Soul nor Body alone is the subject of sin but the Person Or if the whol be not the subject 't is not properly sinful The Law likewise is given to the whol and the Person punished or rewarded 3. The whol Man cannot be propagated unles the Soul be sith the whol consists of its parts To say the Soul coms from Adam quoad existentiam unionem non quoad essentiam is sly Sophistry not real or rational for then Man contributs but the worst part not the whol nor half Nor is it tru that Adam is caus of the union but rather God if he creats the Soul Nor if the Soul be infused can any tel how long time after conception during which space the Woman works alone But if the whol Man be said properly to proced from Adam becaus the body doth much more may it be verified to com from God becaus the Soul doth so the union rather to be ascribed to God as the noblest suprem Agent then to Man the baser and inferior If then the whol Man and both parts be not propagated it results that we were in Adam wherin we are not viz. the Person that we sinned in him without that without which he could not sin viz. the Soul That the whol Man was in Adam yet never cam from him That we lost in him which we never had of him viz. original righteousnes That he shal stil be ful of Souls which he never had That the whol person proceds from him yet not that which makes the whol 4. Christs Soul was not created but his whol Humanity taken from the Virgin for his birth life death are curiosly and circumstantialy recorded by the Evangelists but no Soul creation which they would not omit being so pregnant a proof that he was without sin if it was created pure Nor is any Souls creation since Adams specified in Scripture Christ is caled the seed of the Woman and Davids seed according to the flesh which imports the whol Humanity as opposed to his Deity but if his Soul was created the imputation of Adams sin to al Men must be likewise lâ—able to him as Man Ad hereto That the Soul and Body as 't is in al others were conceived at once for the divine Nature being immediatly united to the Soul and by it to the Body the Soul must be produced in the moment of conception with the Body or els the Deity was first united to a brute Body which is brutish to imagin The truth is his Soul being united with the Body into one Nature at first conception becam one Person with the eternal Word by a miraculous working of the holy Ghost who purified the Womb that the Birth becam exempt from sin So his whol Humanity Soul and Body was deduced from Adam and separated from the Virgin by the holy Ghost But a Soul cannot be produced by Natures ordinary cours no more then a Body without concurrence of both Sexes Souls yet being performed by supernatural power 't is a tru Soul and so is the Body both which joined in one Person make a perfect Man as Eve was a very Woman though taken out of Man and Christ tru Man taken only out of Woman For in Mans quadruple production â—â— a duple concordance Adam made immediatly by God without Man or Woman Eve mediatly out of Man without Woman Christ immediatly out of Woman without Man but al els mediatly by both 'T is said the holy Ghost sanctified part of the Virgins substance assumed by the Godhead to make Christs Person which terms are tru if wel understood For by part of hir substance is meant the whol Nature or both parts not Body only whereof his Humanity was framed By sanctifying is not meant clensing that portion from sin but consecrating it to that holy purpos indowing it with gifts fit for so divine union yet was it free from sin or rather never sinful by reason of this union For al substances were created exceeding good and depend immediatly on God Nor is sin essential to Mans Nature but accidental cleaving to the person by Adams fal and not properly in the substance of Human Nature Nor are evil actions or affections stiled simply sinful but the Man sith sin consists not in any pravity of matter but in the corrupt Wil or intent of the dooer Nor is ther any Law to punish parts or substances
others by Grace if then he requires since Mans fal faith repentance obedience and perseverance to work out our salvation by his Grace certes he givs ability to beleev repent obey and persever by cooperating with it but doth not cross-bar it by any contrary decree which were meer mockery far from Mercy for if one ly on the ground bound hand foot 't is mockery to bid him rise or run away but mercy to loose or let him go The Case is quadratly semblable and aptly applicable Our good God is no mocker but al Mercy nor respecter of persons but receivs al that cal on him 12. God delights not in the death of a sinner but would hav al to be saved he hath spoken it who wil not beleev him so wel as beleev in him But if he hath absolutly and peremptorily decreed from which is no appeal nor repeal that Man shal sin and consequently dy he delights in his death and wil hav but a few saved Hath he made him according to his own Image purposly to make him the wrechedest of al Creatures Surely his Wil and Decree is to reward every Man according to his works Thes twelv stones thus laid like Josuas twelv stones paralel to Jos 4. 20. Israels twelv Tribes set up in Gilgal for a memorial of Jordans retroversion for a fair foundation the fabric wil be the better finished but becaus Mr. Plaifer wel versed in this point hath handled it at large in his Appâ—liâ— Evangelium the chief contents shal be sincerly abstracted or abbreviated and applied to common capacities sans ambiguity He reckons fiv dissident Opinions touching the order of 1 Opinon Predestination 1. Calvin Beza Piscator Whitaker Perkins c. hold that God eternaly Decreed to creat a set number of Men wherof he elected som to everlasting life and reprobated the rest to eternal death of his free wil pleasure only to shew his Grace Goodnes or Mercy on the one and his Justice Power or Dominion on the other To which end he Decreed sin should enter on al that he might justly punish most part for sin and to send his Son for redemption of the Elect in Mercy by free Grace This peremptory position is generaly condemned by Papists Refutation Lutherans Arminians and divers Reformed Divines as perilous and erroneus becaus it makes God the prime Author of sin rejecting Men before they were evil by an antecedent absolut Decree without respect to Adams future fal but elects som before they are considered as sinners sans respect to the ones faith or the others failing as if prescience had no place in Praedestination 2. The Synod of Dort Peter Moulin and many English 2 Opin Theologists defend That God eternaly decreed to make Man holy and good giving him perfect Free-wil but foreseing he would by Satans tentation fal into sin if he hindred it not decreed to permit it and out of this lost lapsed lump chos a certain number to salvation suffering the rest to perish in sin whom he passeth by of free pleasure but punisheth for just demerits Yet decreed to send his Son to redeem or sav the elect and his Spirit to cal or sanctify them that they may be glorified The first sort are stiled Supralapsarians having no respect to Adams fal decreed to send his Son so they grant prescience in order to preced Decree This opinion freeth Gods justice on Infants dying unbaptised which the first doth not who hav no other desert of death but original sin This Tenet is scarce veritable or warrantable which Refut to defend divine justice supposeth mankind corrupted before any Decree of election passed which seems needless becaus ther be good and bad Angels without any corruption or fal and Christ was not in the lapsed lump yet as man elected to life It also supposeth Original sin to be caus of Reprobation which is remitted to many Reprobats condemned for actual sins as Doctor Whitaker avers it likewise teacheth that Christ is sent to sav the elect only as dying for them alone who are to be caled by the Word and Spirit but Reprobats being outwardly caled who are barred from obeying are more deeply condemned for refusing it yet hav no power to embrace it which is harsh doctrin 3. Doctor Overald a late learned Bisshop coined a new 3 Opin Tenet That God decreed to creat man good but foreseeing his fal appointed his Son to dy for al and to cal men by his Word offering Salvation to al with common suffiâ—ient Grace to work Faith by the ordinary means if they be not wanting to themselves but knowing our infirmity that none would beleev by the common Grace decreed to ad a more special effectual to whom he pleased being chosen according to his purpos wherby they shal not only be able but actualy and necessarily beleev being drawn by the Father irresistibly This is plausible but scars solid for that common Grace Refut which savs none is not Gospel Grace offered to al nor deservs that name nor indeed is any such sith it never produced the effect Nor can a special superabundant Grace be it sith 't is rejected by none to whom 't is offered but tru Gospel Grace is received by som and refused or resisted by others Thes three Opinions infer a kind of despair into mens minds becaus none shal be saved by that special Grace given to a few according to Gods secret purpos which whether he intends to giv or not the general promises cannot assure to any Soul 4. The Lutherans with som Papists maintain that God decreed 4 Opin to make Man a free Creature but permit him to stand or fal and to send his Son upon foresight of his fal for redemption of al by a general conditionat Decree of Faith Repentance Perseverance with a special absolut of electing such as he knew would beleev and persever under the means but to pass by and damn the rest whom he foresaw incredulous and impenitent making Prescience or Prevision the occasion on which his Decrees proced This is faulty in som points 1. Becaus ther is no such general Refut conditionat Predestination 2. Becaus the special Decree of Election makes Men chus God first rather then God them which is preposterous 3. Becaus the Decree of Justification and Condemnation is confounded with election and Reprobation which S. Paul distinguisheth 4. Becaus it allows no more Rom. 8 19. Grace given to the Elect then Reprobats nor greater caus of gratitud Yet this opinion rightly extends the objects of Prescience not only to Adams fal but to Christ Incarnat and beleeved on in the World to the last end of al that shal persever in Faith or unbeleef This sutes with Scripture which builds Predestination on Foreknowledg simply and properly taken at large promising salvation to al beleevers which shal persever to the end Thes four opinions ech of which hath som peeces of truth giv great light to this
Adams sons in their time and order to rais them faln and sav them lost which S. Austin terms the Grace of Christ For in Man is no merit of Grace but only an occasion of God to shew it which yet he is free to receiv or refuse Nor is the good use of former Graces any merit or caus of giving mo which are so freely given as the first els Grace were no Grace This Grace being one in essence hath divers denominations according to the difference of relations and effects the most usual distinction is into preventing working or exciting Grace and folowing coworking or helping but to divide it into sufficient and efficacious is an idle buz For how can it be Grace or sufficient which never produceth any effect sith if it becom effectual it loseth the name of sufficient and is one with the other for al Grace in it self is sufficient or efficient alike but the defect in the subject or som other caus Yet Grace may be caled effectual from the event as issuing from Gods special mercy guided by Prescience not els Lapsed Man hath a necessity of Grace as S. Austin maintains against Pelagius who denied original sin or any loss to Adams Of-spring by his fal holding Mankind so sound as God made it as ther needs no Grace al which are gross errors For Man without God can doo no good becaus the Commandments are beyond his strength without Grace to which nothing is impossible and 't is most just the Creature should rely on the Creator that he may stil apply to him The Air is not a lucid body like the Sun for then it would continu so stil in absence of his light So Man is illightned by Gods presence but in his absence immediatly darkned whom we forsake wilfully The power of Grace is glorious such as wrought in Christ when he rose from the dead whence our conversion is Eph. 1. 19 20. caled a new Birth a new Creation and first Resurrection For the power to Wil good is created again as at first sith our indeavors are vain unles they be stirred and void unles helped as Bernard saith The habits of Faith and Lov are no more in our Rom. 7. 18. power then a blind Man can giv himself sight he may hav present to wil but to doo what the Law injoins he finds not except the Spirit help him So that when we are ready to receiv Phil. 2. 12. 1â— Gods mighty power he works and givs our desire hence S. Paul exhorts to work our Salvation having power given to work by him which works both to wil and doo Yet when Man wilfully resists his power he yeelds out of wil not weaknes and lets him fal into a reprobat sens who wil not necessitat or hold up any in obstinat disobedience for that power which builds up supernatural things doth not destroy natural such as is the liberty to disobey being before the Fal. Touching universal Grace Origen extends it to al Men and Devils whom S. Austin refuts Huber held universal Election 2 de Civ 〈◊〉 that Christs death brought al into state of Salvation whom the Lutherans and Synod of Dort condemn Andradius and other Papists say that Ethnics hav sufficient saving Grace by Natures light which if they use wel Gospel Grace shal be reveled to them Al which are evident errors but three Orthodox 1. That 3 Pregnâ—â— Points as Christ took the Nature of Man not of Angels so he paid the price of Redeeming al Mankind as our common Catechism teacheth I beleev in God the Father who made me and al the World in God the Son who redeemed me and al Mankind and in God the holy Ghost who sanctifies me and al the Elect. 2. That the promiss of the Gospel is universal to al within hearing and may be seriously profred to al Men as 't is preached to Pagans for our Church wils al to receiv the Promisses as they be generaly held forth in holy Scriptures 3. That with the Promiss and Word of the Gospel ther goes ordinarily sufficient Grace of the Spirit to work beleef and obedience in al under the Gospel but that al doo not obey proceds from Men being wanting 〈◊〉 Cor. 2. 1 2. to Gods Grace not for any defect on his part as S. Paul plainly provs Now wheras 't is said how Christ laid down his life for his Sheep for Gods Children and for his Church but elswhere that he died for al Men interpret as they list or like yet must such Texts be cautiously and conscientiously construed lest they clash one against another It may wel cohere that God in mercy to Mankind sent his Son to dy for al being no accepter of persons willing primarily to sav al but foreseing the fruit or success of his death that som would thankfully embrace it and the rest not he accepted even thos few and sent his Son by a secundary wil to sav them in whom he would glorify his bounty who could hav changed the cours of his Graces and Government to sav mo if he pleased Hereof S. Chrysostom speaks 't is meet every one be no less thankful then as if Christ cam into the World for his sake only sith he would not refuse it even for one so mightily he lovs every particular with the same measure of affection as he doth al Mankind therfore he was offred a Sacrafice for our whol Nature which he assumed into his Person being sufficient to sav al but wil be useful or available only to Beleevers yet was he not scared from this dispensation for the paucity but as the Feast was prepared for Luke 14. 16. c. al yet such as were invited would not com the Lord did not presently take away what was provided but caled in al sorts of Guests So doth God S. Austin saith as to the valu or virtu of the price so far as concerns al Mankind Christs blood is a Redemption of the whol World but such as liv without Faith and the mystery of new Birth are Aliens therto When therfore by that one Nature of us al which he took for al our sakes we are truly said to be al Redeemed yet not al freed from captivity for the cup of immortality hath enough to profit al yet to such as wil not drink 't is nothing profitable 13. Free-wil is more debated then wel discerned how far the 13 Freewil Liberum ad 〈◊〉 prints remain since Adams fal 'T is a natural power in a Rational Creature to wil or nil chuse or refuse be it good or evil This is looked on with great prejudgment and by Dr. Abbot somtime Bishop of Sâ—rum scornfully stiled Tomsons strumpet but sundry Fathers stifly defend hir as the Hand-maid of Grace against the Manichees and other Heretics 'T is a tru saying If ther be not Grace how shal God sav the World and 't is as tru if ther be not Free-wil how shal he judg the
Creatures without respect to foreknowledg But for Election to Life being his free Gift they more confidently ascribe to his meeâ— Wil without Prescience which they hav more color for if the Saints glory were only a Gift of Grace and not also a retribution of Justice But God makes it a retribution of Justice upon foresight of their laboring to attain the end and a gift of free Grace too knowing what wil bring them to happines if he grant them thos benefits wherby he shal also attain his end even the glory of his free Lov in giving eternal life to whom he wil which is the tru harmony This Judgment being ex praeteritis Predestination must be ex praevisis for the judg ordained by God is the Lord John 5. 22. Jesus that al may honor the Son as they doo the Father John 3. 19. becaus as the Father created so the Son redeemed Mankind even the universality The grand crime for which the World shal be judged is that Men loved darknes more then light and John 12. 48. Christs Word shal judg him at last day whoever rejected or contemned Marc. 16. 16. Christ Since the Gospel is preached the rule of judging is He that beleeveth and is baptised shal be saved he that 2 Thes 1. 7 8. beleeveth not damned Which S. Paul more fully explicats When the Lord Jesus shal be reveled from Heaven to recompence 2 Cor. 5. 10. thos that hav suffred for his truth and in flaming fire take vengeance on them that know not God nor obey his Gospel The severity of this Judgment to render vengeance the specification Rom. 2. 16. of persons we must al appear before his seat the assignation of causes to be judged the very secrets of Mens hearts with the maner of judgment when such as hav sinned without the Law shal perish without the Lâ—w having a Law written in their hearts but thos that hav sinned in the Law shal be judged by the Law semblably such as hav not obeied the Gospel shal be judged by it Al this argues that original sin which is one just caus of death shal be alleged against al who hav no other caus of condemnation but this as Infants which dy having not this sin purged by the Laver of Regeneration either in act or vow of the Church but to lay it unto them that liv to ripe yeers of knowing God obeying the Gospel or haply had forgivnes of sins sealed by Baptism this seemd strange to Doctor Whitaker that any shal be Reprobated for sin remitted so 't is strange that any should be condemned for such sins as he was not Reprobated for sith the sentence of Reprobation is the hardest and heaviest that can be which draws with it the sentence of Condemnation Surely such sins as the wicked shal be judged of at last are the same they were Reprobated for at first being Jude v. 4. eternaly foreseen specialy their final impenitence and inobedience els what needs this exact differencing of Causes or how are the guilty more burdned to hear their several crimes if al be rejected in the common Case of Mankind lapsed and unable to rise having no Saviour to dy for them nor Spirit to cal them nor help to heal them but are excluded or debarred by Gods absolut irrespectiv Decree God wil overcom in Judgment yet not by pleading his Soveraign power or Prerogativ and silencing Men with his dominion els was Abram too bold to expostulat Shal not the Worlds Judg doo right but by Justice and Equity rewarding every one according to his works els he would not put himself on trial Judg I pray between me my Vineyard what more could I doo then I hav doon God wil Isai 5. 3. convince the ungodly putting them to silence and shame by their own stubborn ingratitud against his abundant Goodnes Patience and long suffering not by his own plenipotence or Prerogativ Sadolet to an Objection We being born of corrupt original are by Nature made to perdition that thos whom God passeth by and caleth not might hav no just caus of complaint answers thus I conceiv that Christ Jesus sitting in Judgment for his Father on them whom he hath conâ—emned wil not so pass or pronunce Sentence sith ye proceded from Adams corrupt loins and contracted your Parents guilt doo I condemn you to endless torments but wil say Go ye cursed into everlasting fire for ye saw me hungry and fed me not c. which are not the common sins of al Mankind but particular faults of ech several person which shal be alledged and wherby they shal be judged lest in that sharp torture and grief they presume to ask Mercy of God who denied it to their poor Brethren begging it Mr. Plaifer handles al thes deep points at large wel worth a serious survey which are here succinctly summed up and conduce much to the main subject If any mislike his Tenets as many of different Judgments wil let them seek satisfaction of him who can best resolv al scruples But if I hav misprised any material circumstances through insciousnes not wilfulnes let me bear the blame who undertake to be his faithful eccho Now for fuller application and farther addition take what folows in a more confused maner To found Predestination on Prescience of simple Intelligence best consorts with al conditions consequents and circumstances therof wherby al divine Attributs are best accorded and advanced the sole scruple rests which Opinion best agrees with the Holy Ghosts tru meaning For al Sects arrogat to sens the Scriptures best if they may be Judges or Interpreters to preach the Gospel purest if faith be given to their bare words and to administer the Sacraments sincerest if their new cuts daily varied may pass for current coin as three main marks of their Church caled the little Flock when al others censure or condemn them for fals Teachers as every one doth ech other and al tort or distort Gods Word to serv turns Howbeit for trial of truth the chief Texts shal be brought to test or touchstone for Prescience these places are pregnant S. James saith Known unto Acts 15. 18. God are al his works from everlasting S. Peter To the Elect 1 Pet 1. 2. Rom. 8. 29 30. according to the foreknowledg of God the Father S. Paul Whom he foreknew he predâ—stinated whom he predestinated he caled whom he caled he justified whom he justified he glorified Again Blessed be God who hath blessed us in al heavenly things Eph. 1. 3 4. through Christ as he hath chosen us in him before the Worlds foundation Ergo we are eternally Elect by Faith in Christ foreseen which preceds Predestination To conceiv rightly the maner and order of this high mystery according to Gods Mind reveled in his Word we must consider somthing of his Nature who predestinats and therin revere his infinit â—intellect just Wil matchless Mercy and soveraign Dominion with
is drawn by his own concupiscence 1. John 2. 16. S. John tels us That the lust of the flesh lust of the ey and pride of life is not of the Father but of the World This Tenet makes God wors then the Devil whos tentation may be resisted but Gods powerful effectual Decree cannot be frustrated Prosper saith If this were charged on the Devil he may in som sort cleer himself sith he can compel none to sin what madnes then is it to aspers that on God which cannot justly be imputed to Satan Tertullian saith He cannot be accompted Author of sin who is Avenger and Condemner of it nor can he be a just holy God saith S. Basil nor Judg of the World if he decree sin sith 't is al one to say God is Author of sin and to aver he is not God The defenders disclaim this Tenet in direct terms being so harsh to Christian ears but deliver it in truth by necessary consequence For they avouch the Decree of Reprobation to be absolut and inevitable nor can Reprobats be saved tho they doo al the works of Saints sith God created them to this very purpos that they should sin els he could not attain his principal ends to manifest his mercy in saving the elect and execut his justice in damning Reprobats who are eternaly decreed to sin even to death Thus say Piscator Marlorat Zanchy and many mo This is by cleer consequents to make God the Author of sin which is ordinarily imputed to thos who hav not such interest or influence in production of it as this assertion ascribes to God The Devil is caled the Father of lies and semblably of al sins 1. John 3. 8. 10. els as sinners are stiled his Sons and sin a work of the Devil which the Son of God cam to loos Yet the Devil only egs or excites Men by outward suggestions and inward tentations to sin which is al he can doo but if God necessitats by his absolut Decree and after determinats by his powerful secret working in Mens Souls and disposing or overruling their Wils that they cannot but sin and perish he doth infinitly more then barely suggest intice or perswade which is horrid to imagin So wicked Men are reputed Authors of their sins becaus they plot purpos chuse and commit them as immediat Agents but if God overrules their projects and purposes by an uncomptrolable decree that they must needs doo as they doo and dy tho they would fain doo otherwise and be saved he is chiefly the Author and they only secund Actors or subordinat Instruments under him Haply they hav free power in it self but no free use to doo as they list sith God determins their actions by his Omnipotent Wil. Evil Counsilors and Allurers to sin are also esteemed causers and punished with others which commit crimes by their instigation as Jâ—zabel was guilty of Nabaths murder for counsiling and contriving it but they say God doth even inforce it by an Almighty Decree which cannot be resisted therfore he is much more the chief author and actor then meer abetter or accessary If a King shal procure a Subjects ruin by plotting his offens as Henry 7. is said to seek Edward Earl of Warwicks destruction by contriving his escape out of London Tower al men wil charge him as Author of his crime and death much more God if he design the sin and damnation of Reprobats So saith Moulin who wil not abhor a King that to hang a man by Law plots to make him a Thief or Murderer that he may seem to doo it justly For he shal not only make an innocent wretched but wicked too and destroy him for that offens wherof he is Author So dissembling Tiberius decreeing Sejanus Daughter to death caused the Hangman first to deflower hir because their Laws forbad Virgins to be strangled yet was he chief Author both of hir rape and ruin If then God Decrees to damn millions upon millions and shal caus or permit the Devil first to defile them that he may justly destroy them is not he the chief caus of their sins so wel as sufferings Al Men grant God to be sole Author of Mens conversion and salvation yet doth he no more in procuring it then thes Men ascribe to him in reprobation and damnation For he absolutly and antecedently from eternity decreed to sav the elect and by irresistible means to work faith repentance and final perseverance for their salvation and accomplishment of his Decree semblably he peremptorily decreed as they say to damn Reprobats leading them on by an insuperable power and immutable providence from sin to sin til they hav made up a ful measure and in fine inflicts vengence for acting what he appointed What difference then in thes courses or why shal not God be reputed Author of the ones sins so wel as of the others salvation The Fathers held it a parallel case an therfore made sin an object only of Prescience bending their Arguments against this perilous position of an absolut antecedent irrespectiv irresistible inforcing Decree of Reprobation Dr. Vsher relating the Church â—â—st of Gotâ—â—sâ— p 138. of Lyons answer to Seotus against Gotteschalc hath thes words whoever saith ther is a constraint or necessity of sinning laid on any Man he grosly and grievously blasphems God making him to be the Author of sin nor can al the quaintest wits in the world avoid it Howbeit to shew fair play and scan this point at ful al their Defenses Devises Shadows Similituds Evasions and Elusions shal be amply agitated and aptly answered 'T is said ther is a duple Decree 1. Operativ by which God 1 Devise positivly works his purpos and this would infer him to be the Author of sin 2. Permissiv by which he only Decrees to let it com to pass and this doth not make him Author of sin which is al that they maintain If it be al 't is wel let that be tried Answer Indeed God permits al sin els could be none if he would effectualy hinder it as he left Adam in the hand of his own Alâ—s 14 16. counsil to stand or fal So he suffred the Nations to walk in their own wais And stil suffers al Men to slide into sundry sins not becaus he stands in need of sin to set forth his glory but becaus he is suprem moderator of al knowing how to bring good out of evil and specialy becaus he made Man as Tertullian tels a free creature undetermined either way in his actions til he determins himself and may not be hindered from sinning by Omnipotence becaus he ordained otherwise Nor doth a permissiv Decree caus sin being meerly extrinsecal to the sinner which hath no influence on it If they intend nothing els in good earnest then a bare permission 't is granted but their main conclusion fals to ground and the debat at an end Heâ—ce their chief Coryphees reject this distinction as a fiction of
then the Sun are shadowed with death Thos Ears inured to heavenly Harmony are filled with scofs and scorns Thos Lips that spake as never Man did are wet with Gal and Vineger Thos hands which swaied Heavens Scepter cary the Reed of reproch and are fastned to the Tree Thos Feet to which al powers of Hel were a Foot-stool are nailed to the Foot-stool of the Cross That whol Body conceived by the holy Ghost is scourged wounded mangled yet al this but the outside of his sufferings but the innner part or Soul of his pains is so far beyond thos sensitiv torments as the Soul surpasseth the Body or Gods wrath Mans malice What the infinit sins of innumerable Men committed against an infinit Majesty deserved in infinit durance al this he in a short space of his Passion suffred or susteined which made him cry My God my God why doost thou forsake me he was affrighted with terrors perplexed with griefs distraught with both It was not so much for millions of Men to despair as for him to fear yet never was any so afraid of Hel as he of his Fathers wrath for our sins and in our steads Thus his Incarnation Nativity Birth place Life Death Burial Resurrection Ascention sitting at Gods right hand with many mo circumstanees of Judas treason and reward the Jews rejecting him and crucifying among Theefs were al divinely foretold of the Messias to com and directly fulfilled in or by Christ to whom only they fitly and fully agree For he is the Womans Seed which should break the Serpents head and in whom al Nations of the Earth shal be blessed The other testimonies touching the time and truth of Messias coming that he shal be of Davids linage born of a pure Virgin perfect God and Man yea a Spiritual eternal King no Temporal or Terrestrial make up a cloud of witnesses to convince the Jews that Jesus Christ is the only tru forepromised Messiah to whom be rendred al Glory Honor Prais and Power for ever Al which might be infinitly inlarged but for brevity omitted Supplementum Pietatis In the Practise of Piety THe Souls Soliquy at end of the Practis of Piety in contemplation Conclusion of Christs Passion shal shape a Catastrophe to thes divine Meditations What hast thou doon sweet Saviour to be betraied by Judas sold to the Jews and led bound as a Lamb to the slaughter What evil didst thou commit to be openly arraigned falsly accused and unjustly condemned what was thy offens or whom didst thou ever wrong to be so pitifully scourged with whips crowned with thorns scoffed with flouts buffeted with fists and beaten with stafs Lord what didst thou deserv to hav thy face spit on thy hands and feet nailed thy self lifted up on a cursed Tree to be crucified with Theefs to drink Gal and Vineger yea to hav thy innocent heart pierced with a spear and pretious blood spilt before thy blessed Mothers eys sweet Saviour how much wast thou afflicted to endure al this when I am so affrighted or amazed but to think of it which made thee cry as if God had forsaken thee being al for Mans sake forsaken of God I inquire for thy offens but can finde none no not any guile in thy mouth thy Enemies are chalenged and none dare rebuke thee of sin the Officers sent to apprehend thee testify That never Man spak like thee thy suborned Accusers agree not in their witnes the Judg publicly cleered thy Innocence his wife warned him by a dream that thou was 't a just Man and he should doo no injustice to thee the Centurion confessed thee of a truth to be the Son of God the Theef hanging with thee justified thee to hav doon nothing amiss What then Lord is the caus of thy cruel ignominy passion and death 'T is I am the caus of thy sorows my sins of thy shame my iniquities of al thy sufferings I committed the fault and thou art plagued I guilty and thou punished I deserved death and thou crucified O the depth of Gods lov and unmeasurable measure of his Mercy the wicked transgressed and the just apprehended the guilty escaped and Innocent arraigned the Malefactor acquited and Harmless condemned the Servant did the sin and Master bore the stroke I committed the crime and thou hangedst on the Cross O Son of God who can condignly express thy lov commend thy pity or extol thy prais I was proud and thou humbled I obstinat and thou obedient I ate the forbidden fruit and thou hangedst on the cursed Tree I plaid the Glutton and thou fastedst I tasted the sweetnes of the Garden and thou drankest the biternes of Gal fond Eve smiled when I laughed but blessed Mary wept when thy heart bled and died Now gracious Lord sith thou hast indured al this for my sake what shal I retribut for al thy benefits I ow already for my Creation more then I am able to pay being bound with al my powers to lov and adore thee If I ow my whol self for creating me of nothing what shal I render for giving thy self to redeem me at so deer a ransom when I was wors then nothing Surely Lord if I cannot pay such thanks as I ow for who can pay thee who givest thy Graces without respect of merit or regard of measure 't is the abundance of thy Blessings which make me a Bankrupt being so far unable to pay the principal as I cannot satisfy any part of the interest For Lord thou knowest since the loss of thy Image by our first Parents fal that I cannot lov thee with al my might and mind as I should therfore as thou first didst cast thy lov on me being a Child of wrath and lump of the lost World so now I beseech thee shed abroad thy Grace through al my faculties and affections that though I can never pay such merit of lov as thou meritest yet I may repay in such maner as thou deignest to accept in Mercy that in truth of heart I may lov my neighbour for thy sake and thee abov al for thâ—ne own sake Let nothing be pleasant to me which doth not pleas thee suffer me not to be a cast away whom thy pretious blood hath bought Let me never forget the ineffable benefit of my redemption whitout which it had bin better never to be then to hav any being Sith then thou hast vouchsafed thy holy Spirits assistance suffer me Heavenly Father who art Father of Spirits by thy Sons mediation to speak a few words in the ears of my Lord. If thou despisest me for my iniquities as I deserv yet shew Mercy for thy Sons merits who suffered so much for me Behold the mysterie of his Incarnation and remit the misery of my transgression so oft as his wounds appeer in thy sight let my sins be hid from thy presence so oft as the rednes of his blood glisters in thy eys let my sin be blotted out of thy Book The lust of my
one thousand yeers on Earth Herof see Dan. 7. 14. Luke 9. 11 15. Luke 21. 31. 2 Thes 1. 5. 2 Tim. 4. 1. For the Millenium caled by the Jews and St. Juae the great Day Rev. 11. 15. of Judgment or Judgment of the great Day is the seventh Chiliad current which Christ shal consummat with the general Judgment This is his grand Assises beginning with the seventh Trumpet the process wherof John describes by a duple Rev. 20. 5. 6 12. Judgment and Resurrection beside the millenar reign betwixt both The morning shal be of Antichrist and his adherents whom Christ shal confound at his coming and then shal be 2 Thes 2 8. the first Resurrection the Evening on the remnent of his Enimies Gog and Magog whos number is as the Sea sand which shal end with last universal Resurrection when the last enimy Death being totaly vanquishd he shal yeeld up the Kingdom 1 Cor. 15. 24. 28. his Church to the Father that God may be al in al. This is the one thousand yeers Sabbath in which the Saints shal reign with their King on Earth and ever after enjoy an Eternal rest in the highest increat Heaven not in a new material World of Heaven and Earth as som suppose So saith Irenaeus the L. 5. c. 28. World was created in six dais and in 6000. yeers shal consummat at end of which coms the 7000th or Sabbath to the Saints Thes are his sublime nicities or self-singular novities if Ipse dixit may pass current for warrant He hath many mo but thes the best which shal suffice to shun prolixity His best basis of building beside what is before answered Epilog 2 Pet. 3. 7 8. relies on St. Peters words of one thousand yeers as one day which he stifly presseth to be the precise day of Judgment immediatly forenamed yet Davids one thousand yeers as yesterday and Peters one day as one thousand yeers doo not denote so many solar yeers in special as they dote or dream but only in general that no time dimensions no not thousands of yeers are any way considerable to God who is al Eternity and his works not to be measured by transitory time St. Ibid. v. 9 10. Peters words are directed as an apt answer to Scoffers who instantly ads The Lord is not slack concerning his promiss ac Men count slacknes but long suffering to us ward and unwilling that any should perish but that al should repent But the Day of the Lord wil com as a Theef in the night wherin the Heavens shal pass away with great nois and the Elements melt with servent heat c. Which cleerly indicats that God wil certainly perform the promiss of his coming and is not slack for one thousand yeers to him is but as one day So thos words doo not relat to the preceding Day of Judgment which he toucheth obiter or occasionaly only but is a meer answer to the said Scoffers which is his sole scope or subject as al Orthodox exposiors agree Medi Paraphrasis acuta Medes witty Paraphrase TO set a fairer gloss or garnish on his Devise he givs a Paraphrase on 2 Peter 3. prety Paraphrase on the whol Chapter which shal be curtly contracted St. Peter exhorts the beleeving Jews to Vers 1 2 3 4. mind the holy Prophets words concerning Christs coming to Judgment which also the Apostles confirm but forewarns that in the last dais shal com Scoffers which walk after their own wais or wils saying wher is the promiss of his coming For since the Fathers fel a sleep al things continu as they were from the Creation Thes last dais are the times of the Churches Apostasy under Antichrist as St. Paul speaks in the later times som shal depart 1 Tim. 4. 1. from the Faith giving heed to seducing Spirits and doctrins of Devils They consider not how the Heavens were of old by Gods Word Vers 5 6 7 8. and the Earth standing out of the Waters the great Deep and in or amidst them the Clouds or Floodgates hanging about it wherby the World then in Noahs dais perished but the Heavens and Earth now are by the same Word kept in store reserved unto to fire against the Judgment Day which Irenaeus cals a flood of Fire as the Prophets express it by firy flames and perdition of ungodly Men. But beloved be not ignorant of this that one day with the Lord is as one thousand yeers and one thousand yeers as one day As if he should say Glossa corrumpit Textum wheras I mention the Judgment day lest ye may mistake it for a common day know that one day with the Lord is as one thousand yeers and contrarily for the Prophets speak of Christs coming indefinitly in general not distinguishing first and secund which the Gospel from Daniel more cleerly teacheth but we being rightly instructed in both must apply ech to its proper time The Jewish Doctors writing of this Day cite Davids words one thousand yeers in thy sight are as yesterday yet is not that Day named but St. Peter specifies it and immediatly subjoins his words seeming rather to respect the Jews saying of that day then Davids For they are usaly taken as an argument why God is not slack in his promiss sith 't is not a question whether the time be long or short to God in whos eys millions of yeers are as yesterday but to uâ— who measure by dais and hours Justin Martyr and Irenaeus apply St. Peters words pointly or precisely to the Judgment Day or great Day of the Lord which is to last or continu complet a thousand solar yeers The Lord is not slack in his promiss tho this day be deforred Vers 9 10 to the end but long suffering toward us which is caus of th supposed slacknes not willing that any of Israels seed should perish but that al should repent as he exhorted them at Jerusalem to doo that Acts 3. 19. 21. their sins may be blotted out when the times of refreshing shal com til the restitution of al things which God speaks of by al his Prophets or els they must perish with the rest of Infidels For that Day wil com as a Theef in the night when the Heavens shal pass away with great nois as crakling of fire and the Elements melt with fervent heat the Earth also and works therin shal be burnt up Sith then al thes shal be dissolved or abolished what persons ought ye to be in al godly conversation Which should sute to our faith looking for that Day of God to com if we wil sbun the peril of it Nathelesse whatever thos Scoffers say who doubt or deride the promiss we according to it expect new Heavens and Earth a new refined state of the World wherin dwels righteousnes as Isaiah speaks ch 60. 20. 21. ch 65. 17. ch 66. 22. wherfore beloved sith ye look for such things be diligent to be found