Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	actual_a	death_n	sin_n	1,599	5	6.4008	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A93771	Vindiciæ redemptionis. In the fanning and sifting of Samuel Oates his exposition upon Mat. 13. 44. With a faithfull search after our Lords meaning in his two parables of the treasure and the pearl. Endeavoured in several sermons upon Mat. 13. 44, 45. Where in the former part, universal redemption is discovered to be a particular errour. (Something here is inserted in answer to Paulus Testardus, touching that tenet.) And in the later part, Christ the peculiar treasure and pearl of Gods elect is laid as the sole foundation; and the Christians faith and joy in him, and self-deniall for him, is raised as a sweet and sure superstructure. / By John Stalham, Pastour of the Church at Terling in Essex.	Stalham, John, d. 1681.	1647 (1647)	Wing S5187; Thomason E384_10; ESTC R201450	156,279	216

that universal Redemption whereby he grants to poor sinners a faculty only of salvation that is the natural faculty and power of understanding which with the essential liberty of the will distinguisheth a man from a beast and a stock or stone so it seemeth Christ died to purchase that which sinne destroied not and God restoreth that which was not lost or rather Testardus ●●avels in this Argument to stifle his own conceptions 3. No man e The 53 could justly charge God of injustice if he should have adjudged all men of years to eternall death for f The. 144. Adams first transgression And yet he will not have that first finde nor the actual sins of the Heathen against nature without their sinning as he supposeth also in some sort against a Covenant of grace to be the cause of their eternal condemnation and punishment and his reason is Vt justitiae divinae in iis puniendis habeatur ratio that regard may be had in our thoughts to divine justice in their punishment Is not this interfeering with the former clause and Thesis As if unlesse the Heathen had sinned some way against a Covenant of grace Gods justice might be called in question when he had granted before that God had been most just to have thrown all men into hell for the first sinne And the like self-contradiction he hath about children g The. 53. who dares challenge God for injustice if he should stifle and sting with eternal death the of-spring of sinfull parents for Adams sinne in ipso vita limine at their first stepping into this world And yet h The. 145. he thinks it difficult to define what became of the Heathens children nor doth it appear to him how they are to be punished with the eternal torments of hell when as The. 53. he had made it evident by a similitude of the Serpents egges or young ones which if poor man may crush beri●es for their in bred propensity and poison why may not the Creatour and Lord of heaven and earth doe the like to Infants by nature prone to sinne against him before they put it forth in act 4. i The. 113. Sustentation of nature suspension of divine vengeance c. are fruits and testimonies as he thinks of a Covenant of grace and that with all men And yet k The. 18. elswhere he doubts not but God the Creatour and Preserver of Nature instained Adam and his faculties hi● sight hearing minde will appetite hand and teeth also in the very act of his sinning and as a fundamental proof thereof he ●i●eth that in Act. 17. 28. In him we live move ●●e which to serve his purpose at another time he l The. 162. expounds of God as a Redeemer God can and did saith Testurdus as preserver of nature sustain Adam in to actu q●o peccavit in that act wherein he sinned and why may he not sustain his posterity say I in and under the guilt of that sin and in the actual fruits of that sin as Creatour and Preserver of nature suspending some of his own acts of highest justice for a time And yet that sustentation be no more a fruit of redemption then Adams was in the first act of sinning And so Gods being the Saviour of all men 1 Tim. 4. 10. which Testardus m The. 97. applieth to redemption be no more then what is in Job 7. 20. O thou preserver of men and what we have in Psal 36. 6. O Lord thou preservest man and beast A common act of providence 5. Christ offered himself he n The. 55. saith pro peccatis mundi for the sins of the world and quotes that in 1 Joh. 2. 2. for it whence elswhere o The. 87. he infers that Christ died pro omnibus singulis for all and every one and yet p The. 194. declaring and laying forth the peculiar benefit of Justification he dare not affirm it as belonging to any other but to the elect beleevers and the sheep of Christ who are united to Christ their surety and professedly saith Haec duo conjungit Apostolus The Apostle 1 Cor. 1. 30. joyneth these two together union and justification Now how can that cohere with his doctrine of separating the imputation of sin from the imputation of righteousnesse All mens sinnes are imputed to Christ and yet Christs righteousnesse first or last is imputed but to some Either he must let goe the Doctrine of singular and sole imputation of Christs righteousnesse to the elect which is a glorious truth to be adhered unto for ever or he must desert the opinion of universall imputation of the sins of the non elect unto Christ which is an errour worthy to be exploded and abandoned for ever 6. Man however a sinner q The. 45. hath reliquias qu●s●am primige●ia lucia some common notions of God naturally Imprinted in the heart c. and hath withall extrinsecally a light set before him and added to that imbred qu●lity of his minde viz. Arguments of the God-head his power and goodnesse easily to beperceived in the Creation and administration of the world for proof whereof he quotes Rom. 1. 19 20. Act. 17. 26 27. And r Eaten●s tantum c The. 141. the utmost power exerted or put forth by this naturall light he holds according to Scripture Rom. 2. 14 15. Rom. 1. 21. that having the work or effect of the Law written in their hearts the Heathenish Gentiles did many things according to that Law as to acknowledge God in part to be powerfull good c. to worship him after their manner follow the shadow of vertue feel their consciences excusing and accusing c. Thus farre we have a fair pail of milk but doth he not spill it within a Thesis or two ſ Clarum est gratiam Christi ipsius sub Evangelij quibusdam velut rudimentis illis aliqu●tenùs oblatam The 143. Where he cals these Reliques of natures light as it were certain rudiments of the Gospel offering and holding forth to blinde Heathen The grace of Iesus Christ Is not this a clashing with what he had said before of the whole power of nature Is it not a disparagement to the grace of Christ who it seems by this passage begins with Adams leavings We read of Scripture rudiments the ceremonies Gods positive institutions yet these are but beggarly in the point of justification Gal. 4. 7. And natures-reliques are as beggarly in the work of faith and sanctification but in the office of revelation and manifestation of Christ for righteousnesse and life much more beggarly Now if you will beleeve Testardus in this place where he saith Christ was presented and tendered to the Heathen by those most beggarly rudiments of nature and that every testimony of mercy in a way of providence is the grace of Christ where he speaks unsoundly you must not beleeve him in another place t The. 235. that faith depends

a few Arguments for the due order of election before redemption and for the sole redemption of the elect as a fruit of their election That the decree of election is in order of nature before the decree of redemption 1. The Father hath the first right as he is first in order of subsistence The Son hath it given him from the Father Joh. 17. 6. Thine they were in the first purpose and choice and thou gavest them me to own as mine and being lost not fallen out of election but into a state of non-communion to redeem and bring to God 2. Election is first to glory and election to glory is before the fall and therefore before redemption which comes in after sinne as a means to b●ing to glory by such grace to the praise of the glory of Gods most free grace Eph. 1. 4 5 6. 3. Creation was for Christ Col. 1. 16. and therefore Christ first thought upon as a head of elect Angels and men and as he is before all created things in the counsel of God all things are made for his glorious ends upon his elect had there been no fall but for the further manifestation of Gods love the fall is permitted and ordered to bring in not only God-incarnate but God crucified 3. Love is in order before mercy Eph. 2. 4. The decree of election is an act of meer love That of redemption an act of pure mercy and consequentiall upon love in the decree And in the execution all the tender mercies of redemption are fruits of that love which gave being to election as election gives a Redeemer and redemption 2. That Redemption by Christs death is solely and only of and for the elect as a fruit of their election 1. Christ died for them and them only whom he represented whose names were in the bond of agreement or in the Covenant of his Suretiship and that were virtually in him upon the crosse Some were virtually in him upon the crosse for he was there as a publike person all were not virtually in him but such as are in due time spiritually and powerfully united to him if any more but they then Christs death and crosse loseth some of its vertue Christs power is lesse then Adams for as all sinned in Adam the imputation of his sin is put upon all their persons whom he represented Now not any but true beleevers and the elect seed are in time spiritually and powerfully united to Christ even by Testardus doctrine * The 192 194. nor doe any but such partake of Christs satisfactory righteousnesse by spirituall propagation or union and bond of the Spirit and faith as they that are in Adam by naturall propagation and bond of nature are partakers of his condemning guilt which Testardus pro●eth from Rom. 5. 16 c. as we use to prove it By proportion of the first and second Adam virtuall and actuall union and imputation goe together Now who will say Christ represented more then the elect c 3. If Christ died for more then the elect more then the elect must beleeve in him as an effectuall Saviour or he must be beleeved on as an ineffectuall Saviour by some or other Now not Testardus nor any such Vniversalist will say that his death is or was ever intended to be savingly efficacious to all only such a grosse Atheist or distracted brain as he that put out * A pamphlet sentenced before p. 30. as unworthy of any light but the light fire Divine Light And that which is not nor was intended is not to be beleeved Nor will or dare any bid men beleeve in Christ for half or half a quarter of salvation who are in their found mindes But beleeve we say in Christ for all or nothing when we take the Scripture-scope along with our preaching 3. Christ died for those and those only who shall finde their election by beleeving in his death none can finde their Act. 13. 38. election who first had it not in Gods counsel That representation therefore of Christs death which Testardus makes in some respects common to more then Gods elect doth weaken the hands and hearts of true beleevers shake the faith of Gods elect and obscure Gods election as well as the reasonings of Sam. Oates and I hope with Gods elect at last the doctrine of the one will be received for Orthodox no more then the other but both be rejected as Heterodox Let those who preach hear write reade of Christs death and Redemption beleeve in him for all actuall union and effieacy of communion and the assurance of their election thereby as the cause is known and assured by the effect and you shall finde the Treasure and the Pearl for which the Christian man and merchant sold all he had and bought it As it followeth in the Parables CHRIST THE Gospel-Treasure AND PEARL MATH 13. 44 45. ●●ain The Kingdom of heaven is like unto treasure hid in a field the which when a man hath found he hideth and for joy thereof goeth and selleth all that he hath and buyeth that field ●gain The Kingdom of heaven is like unto a Merchant man seeking goodly pearls c. IT is high time that we come in the wisdom and Part. 2. strength of Christ to set out the right and genuine Scope Explication and Use of these Parables 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the repairing and edifying of your judgements which have been shaken and staggered by the perverting abuses of the late novel The true scope of these two Parables Exposition The Scope for the doctrinall part is to teach and set forth the worth and excellency of Christ and Grace and the Gospel of Grace with a Christians affectionatenesse strongly carried out to him and it And for the Vse it is to advise and excite all that read and hear hereof to be like unto this man and merchant in the Text in affection and action The particular and punctuall Exposition according to this The sense and meaning general scope is as followeth In these two Parables as in all similitudes there are two parts 1. The Proposition holding forth the resemblance 2. The Reddition applying the thing resembled to the resemblance 1. The Proposition or resemblance is drawn forth two waies First of a Treasure hid and found and hid again rejoyced in and purchased by him that found it with all that he had Secondly Of a Pearl found by a Merchant man c. 2. The Reddition so is the Kingdom of heaven as is a Treasure and Pearl in the discovery and purchase of it so is the Kingdom or the Kingdom of heaven is like unto c. that is there is that worth in it and that transaction and management of affairs about it as if a man should finde a treasure in a field or seeking many pearls he should finde one of great price and having found this Treasure this Pearl he goeth and selleth all that he hath and buyeth