Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	actual_a	death_n	sin_n	1,599	5	6.4008	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A90293	Theomachia autexousiastikē: or, A display of Arminianisme. Being a discovery of the old Pelagian idol free-will, with the new goddesse contingency, advancing themselves, into the throne of the God of heaven to the prejudice of his grace, providence, and supreme dominion over the children of men. Wherein the maine errors of the Arminians are laid open, by which they are fallen off from the received doctrine of all the reformed churches, with their opposition in divers particulars to the doctrine established in the Church of England. Discovered out of their owne writings and confessions, and confuted by the Word of God. / By Iohn Owen, Master of Arts of Queens Colledge in Oxon.	Owen, John, 1616-1683.	1643 (1643)	Wing O811; Thomason E97_14; ESTC R21402	143,909	187

Christ for us is of the same extent with that grace whereby he calleth us to faith or bestoweth faith on us for he hath called us with an holy calling according to his owne purpose and grace which was given us in Iesus Christ 2 Tim. 2. 9. which doubtlesse is not universall and common unto all Innumerable other reasons there are to prove that seeing God hath given his elect onely whom onely he loved to Christ to be redeemed and seeing that the Sonne loveth onely those who are given him of his Father and redeemeth onely whom he loveth seeing also that the holy Spirit the love of the Father and the Sonne sanctifieth all and onely them that are elected and redeemed it is not our part with a preposterous liberality against the witnesse of Christ himselfe to assigne the salvation attained by him as due to them that are with out the Congregation of them whom the Father hath loved and chosen without that Church which the Sonne loved and gave his life for it nor none of the members of that sanctified body whereof Christ is the Head and Saviour I urge no more because this is not that part of the Controversie that I desire to lay open I come now to consider the maine Question of this difference though sparingly handled by our Divines concerning what our Saviour merited and purchased for them for whom he died and here you shall finde the old Idol playing his prankes and quite devesting the merit of Christ from the least ability or power of doing us any good for though the Arminians pretend very speciously that Christ died for all men yet in effect they make him die for no one man at all and that by denying the effectuall operation of his death and ascribing the proper issues of his passion to the brave indevours of their owne Pelagian Deitie We according to the Scriptures plainly beleeve that Christ hath by his righteousnesse merited for us grace and glory that we are blessed with all spirituall blessings in though and for him that he is made unto us righteousnesse and sanctification and redemption that he hath procured for us and that God for his sake bestoweth on us every grace in this life that maketh us differ from others and all that glory we hope for in that which is to come he procured for us remission of all our sinnes an actuall reconciliation with God faith and obedience yea but this is such a desperate doctrine as stabs at the very heart of the Idol and would make him as altogether uselesse as if he were but a figgetree logge what remaineth for him to doe if all things in this great worke of our salvation must be thus ascribed unto Christ and the merit of his death Wherefore the worshippers of this great God Lib. Arbit oppose their engines against the whole fabricke and cry downe the title of Christs merits to these spirituall blessings in the behalfe of their imaginarie Deity Now because they are things of a two-fold denomination about which we contend before the king of heaven each part producing their evidence the first springing from the favour of God towards us the second from the working of his grace actually within us I shall handle them severally and apart especially because to things of this latter sort gifts as we call them enabling us to fulfill the condition required for the attaining of glory we lay a double claime on Gods behalfe First as the death of Christ is the meritorious cause procuring them of him Secondly as his free grace is their efficient cause working them in us they also producing a double title whereby they would invest their beloved darling with a sole proprietie in causing these effects First in regard that they are our owne acts performed in us and by us secondly as they are parts of our dutie which we are enjoyned to doe so that the quarrell is directly betweene Christs Merits and our owne free-will about procuring the favour of God and obtaining grace and righteousnesse let us see what they say to the first They affirme that the immediate and proper effect or end of the death and passion of Christ is not an actuall oblation of sinne from men not an actuall remission of iniquities iustification and redemption of any soule that is Christ his death is not the meritorious cause of the remission of our sins of redemption and justification the meritorious cause I say for of some of them as of justification as it is terminated in us we confesse there are causes of other kindes as faith is the instrument and the holy Spirit the efficient thereof But for the sole meritorious procuring cause of these spirituall blessings we alwaies took it to be the righteousnesse and death of Christ beleeving plainely that the end why Christ died and the fruit of his sufferings was our reconciliation with God redemption from our sinnes freedome from the curse deliverance from the wrath of God and power of hell though we be not actuall partakers of these things to the pacification of our owne consciences without the intervening operation of the holy Spirit and faith by him wrought in us But if this be not Pray what is obtained by the death of Christ Why a potentiall conditionate reconciliation not actuall and absolute saith Corvinus But yet this potentiall reconciliation being a new expression never intimated in the Scripture and scarce of it selfe intelligible we want a further explanation of their minde to know what it is that directly they assigne to the merits of Christ wherefore they tell us that the fruit of his death was such an impetration or obtaining of reconciliation with God and redemption for us that God thereby hath a power his iustice being satisfied and so not compelling him to the contrary to grant remission of sinnes to sinnefull men on what condition he would or as another speaketh it There was by the effusion of Christs blood a right obtained unto and settled in God of reconciling the world and of opening unto all a gate of repentance and faith in Christ But now whereas the Scripture every where affirmeth that Christ died for our good to obtaine blessings for us to purchase our peace to acquire and merit for us the good things contained in the promise of the Covenant this opinion seemes to restraine the end and fruit thereof to the obtaining of a power and libertie unto God of prescribing us a condition whereby we may be saved but yet it may be thus much at least Christ obtained of God in our behalfe that he should assigne faith in him to be this condition and to bestow it upon us also No neither the one nor the other after all this had it so seemed good unto his wisedome God might have chosen the Iewes and others following the righteousnesse of the law as well as beleevers because he might have assigned any other condition of salvation besides faith in Christ saith

perversly said that originall sinne makes a man guilty of death Of any death it should seeme temporall eternall or that annihillation they dreame of and he said true enough Arminius doth affirme it adding this reason because it is onely the punishment of Adams actuall sinne now what kinde of punishment they make this to be I shewed you before But truely I wonder seeing they are every where so peremptorie that the same thing cannot be a sin and a punishment why they doe so often nick-name this infirmity of nature and call it a sinne which they suppose to be as farre different from it as fire from water is it because they are unwilling by new naming it to contradict St. Paul in expresse termes never proposing it under any other denomination or if they can get a sophisticall elusion for him is it least by so doing Christians should the more plainely discerne their heresie or what ever other cause it be in this I am sure they contradict themselves notwithstanding in this they agree full well That God reiecteth none for originall sinne onely as Episcopius speakes and here if you tell them that the question is not de facto what God doth but de iure what such sinne deservers they tell us plainly That God will not destinate any infants to eternall punishment for originall sinne without their owne proper actuall sinnes neither can he doe so by right or in iustice so that the children of Turkes Pagans and the like Infidels strangers from the covenant of grace departing in their infancie are farre happier then any Christian men who must under-goe a hard warfare against sinne and Satan in danger to fall finally away at the last houre and through many difficulties entering the kingdome of heaven when they without further trouble are presently assumed thither for their innocency Yea although they are neither elected of God for as they affirme he chooseth none but for their faith which they have not nor redeemed by Christ for he died onely for sinners he saved his people from their sinnes which they are not guiltie of nor sanctified by the holy Ghost all whose operations they restraine to a morall swasion whereof infants are not a capable subject Which is not much to the honour of the blessed Trinitie that heaven should be replenished with them whom the Father never elected the Sonne never redeemed nor the holy Ghost sanctified And thus you see what they make of this originall pravitie of our nature at most an infirmitie or languor thereof neither a sinne nor the punishment of sinne properly so called nor yet a thing that deserves punishment as a sinne Which last assertion whether it be agreeable to holy Scripture or no these two following observations will declare First there is no confusion no disorder no vanitie in the whole world in any of Gods creatures that is not a punishment of our sinne in Adam That great and almost universall ruine of Nature proceeding from the curse of God overgrowing the earth and the wrath of God revealing it selfe from heaven is the proper issue of his transgression It was of the great mercy of God that the whole frame of Nature was not presently rolled up in darkenesse and reduced to its primitive confusion Had we our selves beene deprived of those remaining sparkes of Gods Image in our soules which vindicates us from the number of the Beasts that perish had we beene all borne fooles and voyd of reason by dealing so with some in particular he sheweth us it had beene but justice to have wrapped us in the same miserie all in generall all things when God first created them were exceeding good and thought so by the wisedome of God himselfe but our sinne even compelled that good and wise Creator to hate and curse the worke of his owne hands Cursed is the ground saith he to Adam for thy sake in sorrow shalt thou eate of it all the dayes of thy life thornes also and thistles shall it bring forth unto thee Gen. 3. 17 18. hence was that heavie burden of vanitie that bondage of corruption under which to this day the whole Creation groaneth and travelleth in paine untill it be delivered Rom. 8. 21 22. Now if our sinne had such a strange malignant influence upon those things which have no relation unto us but onely as they were created for our use surely it is of the great mercy of God that we our selves are not quite confounded which doth not yet so interpose it self but that we are all compassed with divers sad effects of this iniquitie lying actually under divers pressing miseries and deservedly obnoxious to everlasting destruction so that Secondly death temporall with all its antecedents and attendants all infirmities miseries sicknesses wasting destroying passions casualties that are poenall all evill conducing thereunto or waiting on it is a punishment of originall sinne and this not onely because the first actuall sinne of Adam is imputed to us but most of them are the proper issues of that native corruption and pollution of sinne which is stirring and operative within us for the production of such sad effects our whole nature being by it throughly defiled hence are all the distortures and distemperatures of the soule by lusts concupiscence passions blindnesse of minde perversenesse of will inordinatenesse of affections wherewith we are pressed and turmoiled even proper issues of that inherent sinne which possesseth our whole soules Vpon the body also it hath such an influence in disposing it to corruption and mortality as it the originall of all those infirmities sicknesses and diseases which make us nothing but a shop of such miseries for death it selfe as these and the like degrees are the steps which leade us on apace in the road that tends unto it so they are the direct internall efficient cause thereof in subordination to the justice of Almighty God by such meanes inflicting it as a punishment of our sinnes in Adam Man before his fall though not in regard of the matter whereof he was made nor yet meerely in respect of his quickning forme yet in regard of Gods ordination was immortall a keeper of his owne everlastingnesse Death to which before he was not obnoxious was threatned as a punishment of his sinne In the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die the exposition of which words given by God at the time of his inflicting this punishment and pronouncing man subject to mortalitie cleerely sheweth that it comprehendeth temporall death also dust thou art and unto dust thou shalt returne our returne to dust is nothing but the soules leaving the body whereby before it was preserved from corruption Further Saint Paul opposeth that death we had by the sinne of Adam to the resurrection of the body by the power of Christ for since by man came death by man also came the resurrection from the dead For as in Adam all die so in Christ shall all be made alive 1 Cor. 15. 21. 22.

in his owne image Gen. 1. 26. that is upright Eccles 7. 29. indued with a nature composed to obedience and holinesse that habituall grace and originall righteousnesse wherewith he was invested was in a manner due unto him for the obtaining of that supernaturall end whereunto he was created an universall rectitude of all the faculties of his soule advanced by supernaturall graces enabling him to the performance of those duties whereunto they were required is that which we call the innocency of our first parents our nature was then enclined to good only and adorned with all those qualifications that were necessary to make it acceptable unto God and able to doe what was required of us by the law under the condition of everlasting happinesse Nature and grace or originall righteousnesse before the fall ought not to be so distinguished as if the one were a thing prone to evill resisted and quelled by the other for both complyed in a sweet union and harmony to carry us along in the way of obedience to eternall blessednesse no contention betweene the flesh and the spirit but as all other things at theirs so the whole man joyntly aymed at his own chiefest good having all means of attaining it in his power that there was then no inclination to sinne no concupiscence of that which is evill no repugnancy to the Law of God in the pure nature of man is proved because First The Scripture describing the condition of our nature at the first creation thereof intimates no such propensitie to evill but rather an holy perfection quite excluding it we are created in the image of God Gen. 1. 27. in such a perfect uprightnesse as is opposite to all evill inventions Eccles 7. 29. to which image when we are againe in some measure renewed by the grace of Christ Colos 3. 10. We see by the first fruits that it consisted in righteousnesse and holinesse in truth and perfect holinesse Ephes 4. 24. Secondly An inclination to evill and a lusting after that which is forbidden is that inordinate concupiscence wherewith our nature is now infected which is every where in the Scripture condemned as a sinne Saint Paul in the seventh to the Romans affirming expressely that it is a sinne and forbidden by the Law vers 1. producing all manner of evill and hindering all that is good a body of death vers 24 and Saint Iames maketh it even the wombe of all iniquitie Iames 1. 14 15. surely our nature was not at first yoked with such a troublesome inmate where is the uprightnesse and innocency we have hitherto conceived our first parents to have enjoyed before the fall a repugnancy to the law must needs be a thing sinfull an inclination to evill to a thing forbidden is an anomie a deviation and discrepancy from the pure and holy law of God we must speake no more then of the state of innocency but only of a short space wherein no outward actuall sins were committed their proper root if this be true was concreated with our nature is this that obedientiall harmony to all the commandements of God which is necessary for a pure and innocent creature that hath a law prescribed unto him by which of the ten precepts is this inclination to evill required is it by the last thou shalt not covet or by that summe of them all thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart c. is this all the happinesse of Paradise to be turmoyled with a nature swelling with aboundance of vaine desires and with a maine streame carried headlong to all iniquitie if its violent appetite be not powerfully kept in by the bit and bridle of originall righteousnesse So it is we see with children now and so it should have been with them in Paradise if they were subject to this rebellious inclination to sinne Thirdly and principally whence had our primitive nature this affections to those things that were forbidden it this rebellion repugnancy to the law which must needs be an anomie and so a thing sinfull there was as yet no demerit to deserve it as a punishment what fault is it to be created The operation of any thing which hath its original with the being of the thing it self must needs proceed from the same cause as doth the essence or being it self as the fires tending upwards relates to the same original with the fire and therefore this inclination or affection can have no other Author but God by which means he is entitled not only to the first sinne as the efficient cause but to all the sins in the world arising from thence plainly and without any strained consequencies he is made the author of sinne for even those positive properties which can have no other fountaine but the authour of Nature being set on evill are directly sinfull And here the Idoll of free-will may triumph in this victory over the God of heaven heretofore all the blame of sinne lay upon his shoulders but now he begins to complaine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is God and the fate of our creation that hath placed us in this condition of naturally affecting that which is evill backe with all your charges against the ill government of this new Deitie within his imaginary dominion what hurt doth he doe but incline men unto evill and God himselfe did no lesse at the first but let them that will rejoyce in these blasphemies it sufficeth us to know that God created man upright though he hath sought out many inventions so that in this following dissonancy we cleave to the better part S. S. So God created man in his own image in the likenesse of God created he him male and female created he them Gen 1. 27. Put on the new man which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that made him Colos 3. 10. which after God is created in righteousnesse and true holinesse Ephes 4. 24. Loe this onely have I found that God hath made man upright but he hath sought out many inventions Eccles 7. ●9 By one man sinne entered into the world and death by sinne Rom. 5. 12. Let no man say when he is tempted I am tempted of God for God tempteth no man but every one is tempted when he is drawne away of his own lust Iam. 1. 13. 14. Lib. Arbit There was in man before the fall an inclination to sinning though not so vehement and inordinate as now it is Armin. God put upon man a repugnancy to his law Gesteranus in the Synod Man by reason of his creation had an affection to those things that are forbidden by the Law Corvinus The will of man had never any spirituall endowments Rem Apol. It was not fit that man should have a law given him unlesse he had an naturall inclination to what was forbidden by the Law Corvinus CHAP. IX Of the death of Christ and of the efficacie of his merits THe summe of those Controversies wherewith the Arminians and