Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	actual_a	death_n	sin_n	1,599	5	6.4008	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A28790	The cure of old age and preservation of youth by Roger Bacon... ; translated out of Latin, with annotations and an account of his life and writings / by Richard Browne. Also, a physical account of the tree of life / by Edw. Madeira Arrais ; translated likewise out of Latin by the same hand.	Bacon, Roger, 1214?-1294.; Arrais, Duarte Madeira, d. 1652.; Browne, Richard, fl. 1674-1694.	1683 (1683)	Wing B372; ESTC R30749	117,539	326

diffused through the Air from the Tree of Life which did render not only Paradise but all the Neighbouring Country most wholesome And there is no need to have Recourse to the Virtues of other Fruits or Plants I answer That probably this might be said nor would it therefore follow that the Air was sufficient to impart eternity of Life because such Vertues diffused in the Air would either be of a different kind from those which rendred Life eternal or if they were of the same kind they had not Intenseness sufficient as those had which the Fruit eaten afforded § 12. Nevertheless I think it more probable they were the Fruits of other Trees First Because if the Tree of Life had those Virtues that were sufficient for Eternal Life it were superfluous to have others that made for the Prolongation of Life And then if we suppose they were the same that were able to render Life Eternal but more remiss it seems that in any Degree whatever they would have made it so For they were of such a Nature and Efficacy that in any Degree whatever they could easily overcome all other natural Agents even the most violent And thence it was we judged before that one Eating of our first Parents was sufficient that these Qualities might be diffused with the Seminal Virtue to their Children their Children's Children and at length to Universal Mankind But of these Opinions every Man may follow that which pleaseth him best a Conimb lib. 2. de Gen. cap. 10. quaest 1. art 3. ad fin b Johan de Barros Decad. 4. lib. 8. c. 9. ad initium c Didac de Couto lib. 1. Decade 5. c. 12. FINIS THE CONTENTS OF the Qualities of the Tree of Life pag. 1 Eight Doubts concerning the Qualities of this Tree ibid. That the Wood of Life was a true Tree and not Metaphorical 3 Whether the Vertue of the Tree of Life to perpetuate Life were Natural 4 The Affirmative part is approved 5 Whether the Vertue of this Tree were such as to keep a Man alive Time without end 6 The Affirmitive part is approved 8 Whether it were sufficient for Immortality to eat only once of the Fruit 16 The Qualities of the Fruit of Life would compensate all Repassion 23 When the Fruit would have produced Qualities to cause Eternity 26 The Fruit of Life would not always have been turned into the Substance of the Person nourished 27 When it would have rendred the Body altogether impatible 27 28 Whether after eating of the Wood there could have been Generation and Propagation of Children 28 Whether by eating of this Fruit a Man would have had the same Qualities in kind which we shall have af●er the Resurrection 29 What way the Qualities of the Fruit did defend the Child from Death before and after its Birth 30 It had been sufficient that Adam and Eve had once eaten to have made all their Posterity immortal 30. Even those that had committed actual Sin 31 Whether the Tree of Life were a Cause adequate to the escaping all occasions of Death 33 The Affirmative Part is approved 42 The Remora or Echeneïs stops a Ship 45 Echeneïdes are of divers kinds 46 50 A wonderful History of a Remora's shaking and stopping a Portugueze Ship 47 An easie way is shown how a Remora may without any trouble stop a Ship 94 What and how many were the Qualities of the Tree of Life whereby it caused length of Life and Immortality 51 The Tree of Life was Food and Physick 52 It might be called a Medicinal Aliment or an Alimental Medicine ibid. It would give to the Body so many and so efficacious Qualities as were sufficient to preserve and repair the Natural Constitution p. 53 This Fruit would give to the Body supra-elementary Qualities which were able to produce Elemental ones only in such a Degree as was agreeable to the Natural Temperament 54 These Qualities were of so great Efficacy that they would preserve that D●gr●e ●ixt against the Activity of any external Agent 55 These Qualities productive of the Elemental ones were a kind of Habit. 56 They are also a kind of those which cure manifest Diseases ibid. It was not sufficient that these Qualities should dispose as a kind of Cause Formal 57 The Tree of Life would also give Qualities which would concur with the Faculties as a kind of Cause Efficient to perform most perfect Actions ibid. Whether one only Quality flowing from the Fruit would suffice to concur with all the Faculties 59 There would have been a particular Quality for each Faculty ibid. The Fruit would defend the Body by these Qualities from Hunger Thirst and want of Air. 60 How this might be done p. 61 A Resistive Quality would have been given by this Fruit to prevent all Diseases in Vnion and Composition ibid. This Resistive Quality would not have been Active but relating to Patible Quality ibid. Whether this Quality belonged to Power or Habit. 67 This Fruit would have communicated Alexipharmack Qualities 62 It is probable that the Wood of Life communicated no Qualities to help the Discerning Powers 66 How the Moisture would have been defended by the Qualities of the Tree of Life that it could not be wasted by the Heat 63 The Qualities of the Tree are distributed into four Ranks 66 Whether the Qualities of this Tree concurring with the Powers were nobler than the Powers themselves 68 All Men that eat the Fruit would have had the same Temperament 69. Yet some would have been Wiser and Iuster than others 70 Why there should have been no Pain when in the Reduction there would a sudden change have been made by the Qualities of the Tree of Life ibid. Whether the Wood of Life had Alexipharmack Qualities 71 It had all Vertues which other Medicines have in healing except those which used without Art do Harm ibid. According to the Opinion which requires the Extraordinary Providence of God to the avoiding external Causes of Death the Tree had not given a Resistive Quality● 72 Whether the Qualities of this Tree would have preserved Women from Pains in Travel ibid. What way they would have preserved Women from Pain 73 After what manner would the Resistance of Qualities defend that Man's Body who eat of the Tree of Life from all external Causes that could hurt it 76 External Causes of Death would not have been hindred by the Qualities of the Wood of Life from approaching the Body 79 Yet they would have been hindred from acting upon the Body ibid. How the Qualities of the Wood defended the Body from Agents producing Elemental Qualities 80 How these Degrees would be preserved fixt by the Qualities of the Wood 81 It is proved that they might be preserved naturally by the Qualities of the Wood p. 82 In what Sta●e would Men have stood in need of M●at Drink snd Respiration after eating of this Fruit 87 The Qualities of the Wood were able to convert any Matter into the Substance of the

and take also of the Tree of Life and eat and live for ever Now therefore of it self it had a Power to render Man eternal without any other Supernatural Virtue Neither can that Interpretation of a very long time be allowed as we have shown § 3. Secondly Because it cannot be that a Spiritual Quality of the Soul can naturally defend the Body from contrary Rëactions For it should either do this by a formal Resistance as a kind of Cause formal or by an active Resistance as a kind of Cause efficient The first it could not be both because a Spiritual Quality could not inhere●in a Corporeal Subject especially since these Authors say it was inherent in the Soul nor by consequence could it inform the Body and resist formally And because the eating of the Tree of Life would have been superfluous for Reparation of what was lost for the natural Qualities of the Body would then have been sufficiently defended by the said Quality of the Soul that they could not be lost Not the second Because if that Supernatural Spiritual Quality performed such an Effect as a Cause Efficient it were able to produce other Qualities in the Body which might formally resist concerning which the same Doubt would return Or certainly they would be supervacaneous seeing they were sufficiently produced by the Tree of Life as we shall hereafter shew § 4. Others distinguish three Causes of our Destruction The first is the different nay and sometimes contrary Temperament of different Parts whereby they mutually act and suffer among themselves as the Brain moist and cold the Heart hot and dry the Flesh hot and moist the Veins Arteries and Bones cold and dry and so of the rest The second is the continual Action of the Native Heat upon the Moisture from which two Damages are considerable One is the Repassion from Food from which Food the Radical Moisture and Members of the Body to be restored do suffer by means whereof a Substance is not repaired which is equal in Perfection to what was wasted The other is the Remission of the Native Heat it self whereby at length it is extinguished The third Cause is from things extrinsick as well altering the Natural Temper as dividing Continuity and finally impeding the Matter whereby the Body should be refreshed as Meat Drink and Air. § 5. And they add that the first Cause must have been avoided in the State of Innocence by a Supernatural Quality of the Soul which we last confuted The second by the Qualities of the Tree of Life when eaten The third three ways First By Humane Providence which in that State would have been most perfect Secondly By Divine Providence which for that State would have been greater and extraordinary Whence it would by extraordinary Concurrence hinder natural Causes offending or would deny its general Concurrence lest they should offend Thirdly By the Protection of Angels § 6. Yet this Opinion also is false And I affirm that for the first Cause the Qualities of the Tree of Life had been sufficient as they were sufficient for the second Wherefore that Supernatural Quality was not only unnecessary but would have been hurtful also First Because as it resisted the Actions of different Parts so it would resist those very Qualities whereof the natural Temperament of the Body is constituted seeing they are of the same kind Secondly Because even from that mutual Action and Passion which is granted among the Parts of the Body the total Temperament doth result which is natural and necessary for the living Creature to perform its Actions wherefore it would be ill impeded by that Supernatural Quality and consequently would be hurtful § 7. And the Remedy which they bring for the third Cause is contradicted First Because the Fruit of Life was able to make good Qualities very sufficient to keep off all the Harms of external Causes therefore the extraordinary Providence of God and every other extrinsick Defence had been superfluous We shall effectually prove the Antecedent hereafter Secondly Because if the Supernatural Providence of God were necessary to what purpose must Man be cast out of Paradise or be deprived of eating the Tree of Life For as that Supernatural Providence had ceased although Man had abode in Paradise and eaten the Fruit of Life yet he had been forthwith subject to Death Which indeed is false For the Sacred Word affirms if he had eaten of the Tree that he should have lived for ever Therefore that Tree was an adequate Cause to secure a Man from Death § 8. Some may reply It is true from the Words of Holy Writ it doth follow that Man should have lived for ever But this eternal Life after Sin would have been contingent from eating the Tree of Life not necessary Wherefore lest Man eating of the Tree of Life should contingently live for ever he was for that Reason driven out by the Lord. But that it was possible that Man might thus contingently live they prove For the Wood would prevent the internal Principles of Death and Humane Providence and the ordinary Protection of God and Angels without the Intervention of another Tutelage might have sufficed to avoid the external Causes of Death as Hunger Suffocation Poyson Falling Beating Hitting against any thing and the Treachery and Mischief of unjust Men. By which means former Men lived near a Thousand Years and by the same means by eating of the Tree might have lived innumerable Thousands being preserved by Reason and Humane Providence from the external Causes of Death § 9. But this Solution is refuted Because if in the State of Innocence wherein Mens Prudence was most perfect their Dwelling in a most pleasant Place the number of wicked Men much less and all the said external offending Causes and Occasions much fewer the extraordinary Providence of God and a greater Guard of Angels was as these Men think necessary that Life might be extended to Eternity or at least to the Time of Translation How in the State of lapsed Nature with much less Humane Providence in so many and so great Concourses of offending Causes amongst so many worst Dispositions of Men could the Life of Man be extended even contingently to infinite Ages of Ages without the particular and Supernatural Providence of God unless by some means else to wit by the Qualities of the Wood Man were secured from Death § 10. Father Molina d supposeth that Mans Body would have been defended from the external Causes of Death by an habitual Supernatural Gift or an habitual Quality extended through the Body which would have defended it from all Corruption For he judgeth Natural Powers can no way be thought of which were able to do this But this Opinion is refuted almost by the same Reasons whereby the former was contradicted First Because in the said Fruit there would have been natural Powers sufficient to defend the Body from external offending Causes as we shall hereafter shew wherefore it is not necessary to

Holy Writ h Lest he put forth his hand and take also of the Tree of Life and eat and live for ever therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the Garden Because if that Vertue as they say were only supernatural that namely they should live that were obedient there had been no need to have turned Adam out of Paradise but as soon as he had sinned God was not bound to keep his Covenant or to make good that Law of conferring Life and Immortality by eating of this Tree § 3. Nevertheless a Man can scarce conclude on this Ground because two ways the Fruit of that Tree might have a supernatural Vertue to prolong Life to Eternity and yet sin might be no impediment of it First If in the aforesaid Tree there were some Supernatural Quality inherent made good by God himself whereby it should prolong Life to Eternity In which Case Sin could not hinder the Activity and Efficacy of that Quality Secondly If God had made a Covenant to give Life Eternal to them that should eat of this Fruit although they should sin § 4. But upon another Ground it may sufficiently be proved that the Virtue of this Tree to give Eternal Life is Natural Namely Because it is not repugnant that in Nature such a Virtue should be found Because the Effect of this Tree of it self is of a natural Order and finite Perfection For it should have preserved Life to Eternity because it would have strengthened all the Faculties of Man's Body restored and preserved its natural Temperament and have kept off all Morbifick Causes as we shall hereafter shew But what may be done by a Power Natural that ought not to be referred to one Supernatural Therefore not this of the Tree of Life a D. Thom. 1 part qu. 97. art 4. b ibique Cajetanus c Gab. in 2 Dist. d Rup l. 3. in Gen. c. 3. e Hug. de Sanct. Vict. in Annot. Gen. cap. 7. Gen. c. 2. f Strab. in Gen. g Durand Scot. in 2 Dist. 19. h Gen. 3. 22 23. DOUBT III. Whether the Virtue of this Tree were such as to keep a Man alive Time without end § 1. THere are two extreme Opinions about this Question The first is theirs who say That by eating of such a Tree a Man would not have been eternal but would only have endured a very long time and he should therefore have been eternal in the State of Innocence because after one or more Eatings before the Virtue of the Tree were spent he should have been translated from the State of Grace to Glory and Immortality as Scotus a thinks § 2. They prove this Opinion First The Virtue of that Tree would have been finite in that it was created Therefore it could not produce an infinite Effect Secondly If that Tree had had a Virtue to preserve Men to Eternity that Virtue would have been useless because no Man in the State of Innocence should have lived for ever in this World but after an appointed Time all Men should have been translated when to wit the Number of the Predestinate was full as these Men hold For at that Time the just should be translated to Glory and the unjust to eternal Punishment Wherefore when this Time were finished the Virtue of the Tree that preserves Men to Eternity would have been superfluous § 3. Thirdly Because the Apple of that Tree taken for Nourishment would have rëacted upon the Body Therefore it could never restore the Radical Moisture and the wasted Substance entire and by consequence could not preserve Life to Eternity § 4. Fourthly Though the Tree of Life might for the most part take away inward Morbifick Causes by restoring intire the natural Heat and Moisture and the decayed Substance so that it should not wax old Yet it could not take away external Causes nor by consequence prevent a Man's being hurt by Wounds or perishing by Hunger or being choak'd for want of Breath Therefore from thence eternal Life could not of necessity follow § 5. Fifthly Because in the State of lapsed Nature at least Man would have been much more obnoxious to morbid Causes whereas in the State of Innocence he lived more temperately without any Trouble and in all Tranquillity all which things after Sin proved deficient But the Tree of Life could not avoid so many Causes of Diseases in the state of lapsed Nature Therefore it could not make Man immortal § 6. Augustine b seems of this Opinion Thomas c holds it Cajetan d Gabriel e Durandus f and others § 7. The other Opinion is That the said Tree had such a Virtue that being tasted by Man it would carry him to perfect Immortality Of this Opinion is Augustine g the Interlineary Gloss h Rupertus i Tostatus k the Author l of the Questions of the Old and New Testament which Author is thought to be Augustine and is quoted under his Name by Thomas m Bonaventure n And the Antient Fathers held it before who affirm that God therefore drove Adam out of Paradise lest he should eat of that Tree and for ever live miserable rather pitying than punishing him For it had been too great a punishment to endure an interminable Evil. § 8. So Irenaeus o Hilarius p Gregory Nazianzen q Hierome r Cyril s Chrysostom t Theodoret u Eucherius w Bede x Strabus y Damascene z Dionysius Carthusianus a● § 9. And all these Authors agree in this That the Tree of Life was able of it self to give eternal Life both in the State of Innocence and in the State of lapsed Nature if Men had eaten thereof The difference among them only is That some affirm it was necessary to eat often of it others that once to have eaten was sufficient And then some thought it an adaequate Cause of Immortality others thought it only kept out the internal Causes of Death Which Questions we shall discuss hereafter § 10. This said Opinion is sufficiently proved from these Words of Holy Writ Lest he put forth his Hand and take also of the Tree of Life and live for ever Therefore for that reason was Adam driven out of Paradise lest he should live for ever as he should have lived in the state of Innocence had he eaten of the Tree of Life Therefore the eating of that Tree must have preserved a Man for ever by reason of the Virtue it had to this end and not only for a long Time § 11. Some make answer to this Argument that God spake Ironically But they give not Satisfaction First because this Solution contradicts the Testimony of the aforesaid Fathers Secondly because Adam's ejection out of Paradise and the Angel with the flaming Sword placed to keep the way of the Tree of Life sufficiently declare that God spake not by way of Irony but properly and in good earnest § 12. Secondly others answer the foresaid Argument thus That the Words for ever ought not to be taken for true Eternity but for a very long Time Which Answer