because aswell it selfe as all things vnto it selfe are intended the other by it selfe intended but not chiefly or first because it selfe indeed is intended but not all thinges therevnto the intent after the first way is Gods â—race after the second Gods iustice The directing of the means disposed â—s an effectuall bringing of them along â—nto the end by the knowne meanes of Gods wisedome whether revealed or â—idden now this directing of the means 〈◊〉 eyther by it selfe or by accident And this is the manner of generall providence which being layed downe â—here is a more easie way and method â—nto the particular meanes thereof according to the particular nature of the Subiects For first of all the nature of thinges whether generall or particular is subiect â—o Gods providence according to al the meanes both of appointment governing and ordayning l Mat. 10.29.30 Luc. 12.6.7 Pro. 16 33 for the appointment governing and ordayning of things naturall so faree extend themselues as the m Causalitas causing of the first agent extendeth it selfe now it extendeth it selfe as farre as vnto all n Entia beings not only as touching the beings of speciall kindes but also as touching the o Individua particular thinges themselues neyther onely as touching the beginnings of things incorruptible but also of things corruptible Secondly the Accidents of Nature whatsoever they are which are of common Nature in their own perfection are subiect to Gods Providence after the manners already remembred but those which are of particular Nature in their defect are subiect to Gods Providence after the manner of Governing and Ordayning p Gen. 37.28 Iob. 1.21 Esa 10.5.6 c. Act. 2.23 Rom. 8.28 Thirdly all ends of things whatsoever whether meane or supreame are appointed governed and ordayned of God Fourthly those which are meanes whether they bee ordinary or extraordinary the first cause vseth even them according to their owne Nature by appointing governing and ordayning them Fiftly concerning things necessary and contingent that we may see thereinto and in few wordes expound the more difficult points therof three things are to be noted First that the Nature and naturall properties of things as they be are from God and that therefore according to the maner which God hath put into things they are subiect to Gods providence q Iob. 10 10.11 Exod. 15 26. Ps 105.17 And thus stands the maner nature of things that some be necessary some contingent those the order whereof betweene the Cause and the Effect is vnchangeable eyther absolutely by themselues and of their owne Nature or by Supposition and relation to the Causes proposed which neverthelesse may eyther not be or be changed these the order whereof is mutable into both partes of it owne nature indefinite such as are the things of nature or thinges particular which haue the conditions of mutability and contingency infolded among themselues in themselues Secondly that it is an effect of Gods providence that any thing happeneth by what manner soever whether contingently or necessarily and therefore that falleth out necessarily which Gods providence hath disposed to fall out necessarily and that commeth to passe contingently because such is the reason or manner of Gods providence hence God being the vniversall beginning eyther mediately or immediately causeth that the things stand both wayes and that out of causes necessary or contingent Effects and Events necessary and contingent are produced Thirdly of what soever things there is a contingency of these there is also a necessity by supposition and therfore nothing is so contingent which may not two wayes be necessary by supposition one way in it owne existence for what was to be contingent the same froÌ„ whence it proceeded must needs preseÌ„tly haue or formerly had a being The other way by the determined decree foreknowledge of God in respect wherof all thinges come to passe infallibly but to speake properly it is one thing that somewhat falleth out contingently another thing necessarily and another thing infallibly the first and the second inferre the order of the Effect vnto the Cause but the third is more common then both because thinges both contingent and necessary come to passe infallibly yet those contingently these necessarily These things layed down it is manifest that all things both necessary and contingent are every way subiect to Gods Providence 1. of Conservation because both haue being and power froÌ„ God 2. of Governing for of both God disposeth according to the liberty of his will whether effecting or permitting 3. of Ordayning because God also hath prescribed an end vnto them according to their Nature and dâ—sposeth them as meanes wisely and bringeth them vnto the same powerfully Sixtly as concerning Actions Naturall and Voluntary it is to be noted that three beginnings of actions must be considered and proportionally distinguished the one Vniversall is God the other Generall is Nature the third Particular and is eyther a Naturall Inclination or Instinct or Will Electiue Of these beginnings there are particular properties the vniversall beginning is finite the Generall is desining the particular is defined in his Subiects the first is from it selfe and to it selfe the second hath a relation vnto God the third vnto both Whence it commeth to passe that those actions which are from the particular beginning mediately are from God by the generall beginning but those which are from the generall beginning are from God immediately Here it is evident that all actions whether naturall or voluntary are subiect to Gods Providence first by way of Conservation for God conserveth the Natures of thinges and the liberty of will which hee hath given man Secondly by way of governing because God as hee is an vniversall beginning effectually moveth all other beginnings to doe or worke thirdly by way of ordayning because he bringeth and directeth all actions vnto the end which hee hath fore-appointed to them whether Naturall or Voluntary r Psal 139.3 The last thing remayneth concerning good and bad actions and that the manner and efficacy of Gods providenâ—e in evill actions for of the good there is no difficulty might according to the degrees thereof the better be knowne two things are to be premised One is that according to the difference of the beginnings whereof wee haue aboue spoken the one the selfe same action is both good evill good as touching the generall as it is from God and common Nature for both God and Nature of themselues doe alwayes bring forth good actions evil according to the particular respect in man as hee is corrupt for every vitious act taketh the necessity of the vice from the neerest cause which is the will of the offender whence is that of the Schoolemen Å¿ Principalitatem Causalitatis omnis in peccato consistere penes voluntatem quae imperat actum that the chiefty of every procurement in sinne consisteth in the power of the Will which coÌ„mands the Act. The other
is that in every Action three thinges are to bee discerned and distinguished the Nature the Subiect the Accidentall quality of them both The Nature is from the Creator which gaue it and moveth the beginnings of naturall properties and actions The Subiect is the moving of the Action which is according to nature in respect whereof every sinne is said to bee in God subjectiuely The Quality is the Accident of Nature and of the Subiect being good indeed according to grace but evill according to the corruption that groweth in nature and in the Subiect which infecteth man and those things which are of man with a bodily and effectual taynt or strayne whence the will which is the inward beginning of actions infuseth the force of that corruption into the actions immediately These things layed downe it is to bee marked that Providence also in evill actions worketh by all the wayes and degrees t Esa 45.7 Lam. 3.37 Am. 3.6 In the way degree of Conservation for it hath put into man both the beginning of Nature which by it selfe by a naturall necessity is limitted as also the beginning of actions which is the will that by it owne power limitteth her motions and freely inclineth them vnto whatsoeuer actions vndetermined againe it sustayneth the will as it moveth the things of nature by a common beginning and the actions naturall and voluntary by a particular beginning By way and degree of Governing for first God bringeth to passe effectually the worke that is evill as farre foorth as it hath a respect of good chiefly it hath that both because it is in good subiectiuely because it is vnto good reduciuely Secondly God remitteth the sinne and prescribeth a bound vnto it according to the liberty of his will u Pro. 16.9 Thirdly hee permitteth evill things not that he alloweth them but that it is no evill to permit evils for sith hee which permitteth hath power to forbid without any obligation as also he to whome it is permitted hath power to doe without any compulsion the Will in both parties is voluntary in the former without fault in the latter without excuse In the way and degree of ordayning for God ordayneth the events of sinnes vnto good x Rom. 8.28 eyther morall that is of punishment and chastisement or Supernaturall that is of his glory in Iustice and mercy y Rom. 5.20 11.33 wherby it is cleare that for a thing to haue being to doe and to bee ordayned it is good but for the same to bee evill to doe evill and to bee carried vnto evill it is euil that God effecth but this God suffereth to bee effected by the creature this is the formall cause of providence The end of Providence which may easily bee gathered from the thinges afore-going is the glory of God conioyned with the salvation of the Elect. z Mat. 6.26 OF PROVIDENCE The Part Confutatiue Distinctions for the Cause Efficient I. FAte or Destiny is eyther true or fayned that without violence this violent The true Fate eyther is Divine or Naturall the Divine is nothing else then the governing and providence of thinges the Naturall is none other then the course and order of naturall thinges The fained Fate eyther is of the Chaldeans or the Stoickes the one superstitiously bindeth and tyeth the actions and eventes of thinges vnto the power and position of the starres the other is flowing from everlasting being such a ranke and knitting together of causes that on it should depend both God himselfe and Gods Providence the Consequent of both is a necessity of constraint II. VNto Providence pertayne two thinges the manner of order the execution thereof the first is Eternall the second Temporall III. GOD governeth the Inferior things by the thinges superior not for the defect of his power but for the aboundance of his goodnesse according to the liberty of his will IIII. THe Nature of the following cause is not onely like to the superior Cause in that it hath somewhat thence but also vnlike it in that it proceedeth from without or outwardly For the Materiall Cause I. ALL thinges subiect to the causing of the first agent are also subiect to the ordinance of the same vnto their end wherefore all things in that they haue being are subiect to Providence II. IT is one thing to treate of the cause vniversall and another thing of the Causes particular Of the Particular Causes there are chances but the Vniversall Cause nothing can escape III. COrruptions and defects in naturall thinges are indeed against the particular nature yet they are from the Intention of the vniversall nature in that they fall out for the good of the whole vniversall IIII. THe manner of the Doer is one and of the Instrument is another that which is of the Instrument and the Creature is disorder but that which is of the doer and the Creator even in things most out of order is order V. SOme things are done by Providence efficiently and causally some other thinges according to Providence permissiuely and determinatiuely For the Formall Cause I. THe Soule alwayes worketh freely which although it depend on the causes yet it selfe is the neerest cause of her own actions for naturall effects haue more likenesse with the neerest causes then with the furthest off II. THere is one necessity from the former or a Constituens that which appointeth another from the latter b Consequens or that which â—nsueth one inward another outward one of constraint another of â—mmutability one absolute another by supposition the distinction of all which in this point of Providence is very necessary III IT is one thing to speake of deedes is they are in act and another thing as they are subiect to the Cause contingent for after the first maner they are necessarily after the second contingently IIII. SInne is two wayes considered eyther properly principally as it is sinne or as farre forth as it hath the respect of good and that two wayes first because it is in naturall motion action Inclination that is in good subiectiuely Secondly because it is vnto good God from evill drawing forth good V. THat thing which being once decreede another infallibly followeth without any other Intermediate Cause is the Cause of the Consequent but God will haue sin to come to passe not immediately but by the wil of man as the meane intermediate VI. OF things being God is the effectuall beginning but sinne to speake properly hath not the manner of an Act or being but of defect for there is a double being of the thing and of the manner vnder the being of the maner not only notions and relations are contayned but also Privations and sinne is a being of the manner not having a being Positiuely but Privatiuely VII IN every sinne there are two things the Materiall or the Subiect and the Formall that is to say the naughtinesse The Subiect is a thing
which is OF CORRVPTION CAP. III. AFter this first state of Integrity the second which is of Corruption by and by succeeded and followed It is The Condition of Man whereby in turning away goodnesse from himselfe and himselfe from goodnesse and in estranging the same into the contrary hee by himselfe as touching himselfe wholy perished And this condition ought two wayes to bee knowne according to the quantity and quality thereof For first wee are to see concerning the corruption which man procured to himself through his owne fault and naughtinesse then concerning the power of man which after that corruption remayned in Man The place concerning Sin containeth and expoundeth the Doctrine of Corruption but the place concerning Free-will containes and layeth open the doctrine of Mans Power OF SINNE The Part Confirming CAP. IIII. SINNE by which name the quality of humane Corruption is wont to be expressed is in Generall defined to be a Ioh. 3.4 a breaking of the law or iniquitie that is a Defect or want of that lawfull good which was given to our Nature by God whereby man declining from good and inclining to nothing but to evill is made guilty of Gods wrath and damnation and everlasting punishment but in Speciall it ought three wayes to bee distinguished defined and through the causes to bee expounded For there are three degrees of Sinne the Beginning of it was in Adam the Propagatton from Adam in vs and the Effect of the same from vs Wherefore wee must by order consider together of the Sinne of Adam Original Sinne and of Actuall Sinne. The Sinne of Adam is an act of disobedience in Adam as in a singular individuall person and generall beginning of all men whereby by violating the Law of God hee destroyed both himselfe and his posterity for ever b Gen. 3. Rom. 5. 2 Cor. 11.3 Originall Sinne is an hereditary vitiousnesse whereby for the disobedience of Adam all men from him either propagated or to bee propagated are made guilty of both euils both of sinne and punishment c Psal 51.7 Eph. 2.3 Rom. 5.12 Actuall Sinne is an iniquity and Lawlessenes whereby wee swarving or going awry in our actions from the straitenesse of the Law dayly increase the guilt of sinne and punishment d Mat. 12.34 Iac 1.13.14.15 Rom. 7.8 The Efficient Cause of Adams sinne or the beginning thereof may bee noted to bee two-fold according to the former and the latter Actiue as wee distinctly speake and Actuall The Actiue beginning is a naturall power to both opposites the morall good and evill e 1◠Tim. 2 13. Rom. 5.12 The Actuall whereby through the act of disobedience the will of man abused that his power to evill lost his power to good and alienated the same into the contrary f Gen. 3.6 Rom. 5.19 Ecle 10.15 The Efficient Cause of Originall sinne ought to bee considered and discerned by three wayes and degrees for there is a double outward cause one inward The outward neerest cause is the actuall sinne of Adam who was as the mediate and common beginning of whole humane nature g Rom. 5 12.19 but the Remote was the justice of God which God had shadowed in nature and expressed in speech plainely vttered or in the word Enunciatiue h Gen. 3. The inward Cause is the very Law of Nature originally passing of which law God layed downe a double ordinance By the one hee commaunded a propagation absolutely by the other hee threatened a punishment conditionally with the former he furnished both man in man Nature with the latter man only Hence it came to passe that by that ordināce of propagation man is begotten but by the ordinance of punishment hee is begotten vitious i Rom. 5.12.16 Heb. 7 9.10 1. Cor. 15.22 Both alike necessarily The Efficient Cause of Actuall sin properly immediately is the wil which commaundeth the Act in which the whole Action of evill resideth as in the Agent or working Instrument k Gen. 6.5 Iac. 1.14.15 The Matter of Adams first sinne which is as the Subject is the whole and entire person of Adam and in him as in the actiue beginning the whole matter of mankind l 1. Cor. 15 22 But that which is of the Object is the taking of the forbidden fruite and the vse or eating thereof m Gen. 3.4.5 both whereof includeth a contempt of Gods commaundement an impious consent of licentious will Briefly a most miserable backesliding from God and a disobedience of the whole man n Psal 51.5 T it 33. 1. Cor. 2 14. Rom. 7.23 Eph. 2. c. The Matter of Originall Sinne which is as the Subiect is whole man and every man according to himselfe wholy and the whole of himselfe for the whole Subject is subjacent to whole sinne both in respect of receyving for whole man receyveth whole sinne and of power and manner for the whole man doth and worketh whole sinne and therefore whole sinne affecteth and infecteth whole man with a corporall and effectuall taint or contagion o Rom. 5.6 7. Rom. 6.6 Gal. 5.16 Col. 2.11 Rom. 8.3 6. Eph. 4.17.18 but that which is as the object is first a defect or want of originall righteousnesse then an inclination or quality contrary to that righteousnesse or vprightnesse which is commonly called naturall corruption or originall concupiscence the former those testimonies of Scripture doe proue which speake of Sinne negatiuely or privatiuely but the latter those which speake of sinne affirmatiuely or positiuely p Mat. 12.34 Mar. 7.31 The Matter of Actuall sin which is as the Subject is man according to his body and Soule and all the faculties of both to witte both of body and Soule p Gal. 5.19 20. c. Mat. 15.19 Rom. 14.1 Eph. 2.3 Rom. 15.18 Col 3.17 Gal. 6.1 Iac. 4.17 but that which is of the Obiect are the thinges spoken done and lusted after against the Law whether they be of omission or commission eyther by infirmity or by malice or whether they bee outwardly or inwardly committed wherevpon many kindes of sinnes arise and those which are neyther mutually matched each with other nor linked together but some more grievous then other yea and oftentimes some contrary each to other q Ioh. 9.11 2. Pet. 2.20.21 Hence also is the difference between sinne pardonable and vnpardonable whereof the one is sayed to be a sinne which is committed against the father and the Sonne that is every transgression of Gods law wherevnto Repentance belongeth and therefore that which is pardonable not by the properties of it own nature but by the grace mercy of him against whome it is committed r Mat. 12.31 the other is sayd to be a sinne which is committed against the holy Ghost and therefore is called by an excellency in Scriptures the blasphemie of the Spirite and a sinne vnto death ſ Mat. 12 31. 1. Ioh. 5.16 Now for the making
Instrumentall beginning thereof In Defence of the Efficient Cause of Actuall Sinne. I. IN Actuall Sinne there are two thinges Being and Iniquitie Of Being God is the Author and Principall Efficient of Iniquity the Will of Man II. A Thing is sayde to be done by Gods permission two wayes eyther by it selfe or by Accident That which is done God permitting it by it selfe hath the respect of good but that which is done by Accident God permitting the selfe same in respect of God permitting it by accident is evill because God permitteth not evill as it is evill but as it is a meane of his glory In Defence of the Matter of the first SINNE That the first Sinne was not Pryde but vnbeliefe against Bellarmine Lib. 3. de Amiss Gratiae Cap. 5. 6. I. EEccles 10.14 There is a fallacy of the sense or vnderstanding of the word For Pride is not the beginning or cause of backe-sliding or departing from God but on the contrary the very backe-sliding departing from God which is comprehended in vnbeliefe is made the beginning and cause of pride II. TO b. 4. Ans The place treateth not of the order of diverse actes in the first sinne but of the Effect of Pride to witte Perdition the beginning whereof is truely and properly attributed to Pride yet not exclusiuely III. ROm. 5. Ans Disobedience comprehendeth the whole Sinne of Adam to witte the violating or breaking of Gods commaundement which if it should bee resolved into it owne parts the first shall bee not Pride but vnbeliefe IIII. THe Testimonies of the Fathers which are alleadged eyther do not â—reate of the order of the first sinne â—ut of the next Adjunct thereof or Synecdochically they vnderstand by pride vnbeliefe it selfe as the immediate â—ause thereof V. THe inner actions are two wayes discerned eyther in respect of the Inâ—ention or in respect of the execution whereof the one properly respecteth the end the other the meanes but when there is speech made of the first sinne it is not inquired what was the first thing in the intention of Adam Eue but what was the first act of committing the Sinne. In Defence of the matter of Original Sin That Originall Sin is a quality or Concupiscence against Bellar. Lib. 5. cap 15. I. THe Positiue cause of original Sin is held to be three-fold the First the actuall sinne of Adam Secondly the Law of Nature originally passing the third the Iustice of God II. THe positiue quality is traÌ„sferred to the posterity after the same manner as the Sinne it selfe is not as a certaine accident of nature concreated or together with it created which should follow or accompany the substance by it self but as a whole corruption of the whole maÌ„ which hath a foundation in Adam as in the first instrument of nature it selfe neyther are the habits gotten convayed into the ofspring as they are personall but as in the name of the whole Nature one for all gotte them III. IN Concupiscence two things concurre the very Act of lusting or coveting which by it selfe is not evil and the deformity of that act of that God is the Author of this he must by no meanes bee the Author IIII. THe first sinne was not onely the sinne of the Body but also of the Soule Wherefore it was not onely the eating of the fruit forbidden but also vnbeliefe and pride in the soule and so whole Sinne is transmitted into body and soule not onely by the law of generation by which man formeth or yeeldeth forth man but also according to the corruption of him that generateth wherby man as hee is corrupt begeteth corrupt man V. THe Quality was not diminished both because then it passed as it were into another nature as also because it cannot eyther bee diminished or abolished but by the singular grace of God VI. THe Concupiscence of the Flesh against the Spirite doth not onely signifie those first motions voyde of consent but also the very roote of evill and the whole corruption which is not onely of the coveting but also of the other faculties of the Soule VII ORiginall Sinne is taken away in this life by the regeneration of Baptisme not that it might not be but that it might not be imputed for sinne In Defence of the matter of Actual sinne against the distinction of Sinne Veniall and Mortall Bellar. Lib. 1. Cap. 9.10 I. THe Testimonies of Scripture doe not proue or confirme the Verity of the distinction according to the mind of the adversary Not the First Mat. 5. for hee treateth of the inequality not onely of sinnes but also of punishments by an allusion to civill or politicke punishments Not the Second Mat. 23. for hee treateth of the nature of Hypocrites who being carefull in small matters doe openly neglect the chiefest things and make not a difference betweene those things which by themselues and alwayes are necessary and those whereof not the want but the contempt doth make vs guilty or culpable Not the Third Luc. 6. for he treateth of them who hunt after prayse by the reprehending of others but doe neyther know nor reproue themselues being in others very quicke sighted but in themselues blind Not the Fourth Luc. 12. for hee speaketh of the duety of loue towardes our neighbour whereby wee are bound after the example of Gods goodnesse to forgiue even the least sinnes Not the Fift 1. Cor. 3. for hee speaketh of doctrine and the manner of teaching that by a supposition applyed to the Doctors of the Corinthians Not the Sixt Iac. 1. for hee speaketh of the degrees of sinnes which are three Vitiousnesse a vitious motion and vitious action And of all these Death is made the reward or wages Not the two Last Math. 12. for hee speaketh of the nature of Sinnes even the least or lightest for which notwithstanding we are presented guilty before God Eph. 5. because both the heavinesse of sinnes and the effect of the same are expounded Synecdochically II. THe Testimonies of Councels and Fathers are either suspected or in controversie as of the Tridentine Councell and of the Popes both Pius and Gregorie or doe treat of the inequality and divers degrees of sins as the Councell of Milevitum and of the Fathers Augustine Origen Chrysostome and Hierome III. THe reasons which are alleadged proue nothing Not the first because it is grounded vpon a double false presupposall Vppon the one that sinnes in the faithfull are not mortall For the Wages of Sinne of whatsoever manner it be vnlesse it bee forgiven is Death Vpon the oâ—her that the sinnes of the faithfull are lighter then the sinnes of the vnfaithfull and so in their Nature Veniall For in that sinnes are Veniall in the faithfull it is not from the nature of the sinnes but from the Grace of God and in that they are not so in the vnfaithfull it is not from God but from the nature both of the sinnes and sinners Not the Second because Sinne is not sayde
sayd to be that whereby one cannot be compelled to do or suffer any thing against his naturall inclination from Vnchangeablenesse is sayd to be that which can frame it selfe indifferently or contingently to both opposites and so can do and not do suffer and not suffer The first freedom is not in man corrupt the Second is in every man of whatsoever state and condition The third was in man before the fall V. ONe freedome is sayd to be from necessity an other from sinne an other from misery The first is of Nature The second of Grace The third of glory VI. FReedome is eyther properly taken for the freedome which is in the Subject to the Object and from the contrary impediment or vnproperly or Synecdochically for one of these Liberties That Man cannot without faith or the speciall helpe of God perform any morall good against Bel. Li 5. de Grat. Lib. Ar. Cap. 9. I. GOod Workes are two wayes vsually considered eyther according to their outward manner or according to their inward In respect of both God is sayde to reward good workes of the one because they carry a shadow of civill goodnesse which also is acceptable to God as touching it selfe but of the other because they are done in faith according to Gods Rule and Prescript to Gods glory Now God rewardeth not according to the proportion of merite but according to the grace of promise notwithstanding those places of Exodus the 1. because there is noted an antecedent but not a cause of Gods blessing towardes the Mid-wiues Of Ezek. 2.29 and Daniel 4. because the Consequence is of no force from the outward rewarding to the quality of the Worke. For God is wont liberally to recompence an outward obedience with an outward rewarding II. A Thing is sayd to be good Equivocally and that two wayes eyther that it is such indeed or that it appeareth such or else that it is eyther good in it selfe as touching the substance of the worke or that it is sayde to be perfectly good in the Object Subiect End and other circumstances The Workes of the Heathen are called good workes eyther according to the appearance onely or because the substance of the worke is good though it be evill in the Subject obiect end other circumstances III. THe Fathers which seemed to attribute any thing to Nature eyther treated onely of those outward Civill and politicke actions as Basil and Augustine or of the natural good as Chrisostomâ— or of Workes according to the common opinion as Hierome IIII. IN the Works of Heathens all and every of those thinges are wanting which are required of the Adversary for the making of a good worke the circumstance of the end is wanting because that is not don for God which is not done for his commaundement according to his rule or for Gods glory The Action is defiled by the naughtinesse of the cause because whole man is whole sinne wholy not onely as touching himselfe but also as touching his actions Neyther hath a good worke any proportion with the strength of nature because to will and to do good is of grace and not of nature and so good workes are not onely hard but also impossible to Nature Neyther do the absurdities proue the contrary because wee are bound of duety to doe good workes nor are they therefore called evill because they are done simply but because they are not well done That there is no Free-will in godly and saving actions against Bellarmine Lib. 6. cap. 10.11.12 THe Freedome of Will is vsually considered two wayes in man regenerate according as there are in him two divers and contrary beginninges the beginning of good which is the Spirite or the parte Regenerate the beginning of evill which is the flesh or the part vnregenerate Hence the freedome of will in respect of the first beginning freely willeth good in respect of the other it freely willeth evill and in this sence is Free-will in man Regenerate diversly pronounced eyther to be or not to be AND THis is the State of man according to Nature and his naturall condition both in his first originall condition and Creation and in his change and corruption which after followed by sinne Now the other state of maÌ„ in this life according to the Grace of Vocation which is aboue Nature is to be known and discerned Now it ought to be discerned two wayes according as the Châ—istian calling and estate or the condition of a Naturall Christian man is in this life comprehended in two principall heades to wit Faith and good Works For these are the two partes of a Christian calling and the two most conjunct dueties of a Christian man namely to Belieue and to Doe for faith imbraceth the Grace of God in Christ good works doe testifie and performe Thankefulnesse for that Grace OF FAITH The Part Confirming CAP. VI. BY the Name of Faith wee doe vnderstand an outward and hypocriticall profession of Religion and Faith a Mat 13 20.21 Heb. 6.4.5 6. not a temporall knowledge and assent concerning Gods Grace b Act. 8.13 Iac. 2.29 Lastly not a certaine perswasion concerning some miraculous effect conceyved by a singular revelation or promise c Mat. 17.20 1. Cor. 13.2 but we meane that which properly and simply is so called and is pronounced by it selfe concerning the onely Elect and them all Wherevpon it is wont commonly to be called the saving iustifying faith d Rom. 3.28 and is a gift of God or a holy habite e Inditus given inwardly by the Spirite of God whereby the godly in their vnderstanding beleeving Gods truth receiue with a sure and firme assent of Wil the promises of the saving good-will and grace of God in Christ to his glory their salvation The Efficient Cause of faith is two wayes vsually expounded Primary or Instrumentally The Primarie Cause of Faith is God who had his fore-going good pleasure and the onely free affection of his will no preparation of our righteousnes going before or merite of our workes accompanying the same f Ioh. 6.29 Eph. 2.8 Luc. 24.32 The Instrumentall Cause of Faith is two-folde the one inward and chiefe the other outward and furthering The inward chiefe Cause is the holy Ghost who begetteth the same in the Elect by a speciall action next and immediately beyond the order of nature partly by disposing the vnderstanding to the saving knowledge and receyving of Christ partly by induing the will with new qualities and by inclining the same that it might particularly and firmely assent and cleaue to that knowledge and receyving g 1 Cor. 12.9 2. Cor. 4.6 Gal. 5.22 The outward and furthering Cause is the preaching of the Gospell by which the holy Ghost ordinarily formeth confirmeth this very worke of Faith in vs albeit God according to the Liberty of his power and will may beget worke faith without the vse of this ordinary meanes when it pleaseth him and is
contradictory which in the Essence of God voide of all falshood and in truth most absolute and perfect haue no place yet not to bee able to doe these thinges is a token of power for hee is exceeding able who enioyeth a constant and vnchangeable power and by no meanes departeth from that very thing which is one for it is a point of infirmity to bee able to doe things opposite and the propertie of one that is altogether powerfull is to abide and persist in the best thing Knowledge in God is that whereby he knoweth both himselfe in himselfe and out of himselfe all and singular thinges by himselfe by an indivisible and immutable act for God alone knoweth and vnderstandeth himselfe x Mat. 11.27 by a most inward and perfect Act he being infinite comprehendeth himseâ—fe being infinite infinitely and yet while by vnderstanding himselfe he comprehendeth himselfe the vnderstanding of God whereby hee comprehendeth is not one and that which he comprehendeth another for to bee to vnderstand to comprehend are reciprocated or made to haue recourse each one to the other Hee knoweth also out of himselfe all thinges and each thing in a common and distinct knowledge y Heb. 4.13 of the matter of the forme and of both their Accidentes even of good and badde thinges but hee knoweth indeede the good thinges by himselfe the evill by the good opposite thereunto Yet hee knoweth both himselfe and other thinges by an indivisible act in that by one act of vnderstanding and a whole looking on at once hee comprehendeth the vniversall distance of thinges both locall and temporall possessing all thinges at once and alwayes which with vs by times are vnfoulded and this indivisible and present knowledge of God is vnchangeable as well of things contingent as of thinges neecessary laying the condition of coÌ„tingency on thinges contingent as also the law of necessity on thinges necessary Will in God is that whereby God freely and vnchangeably willeth his owne glory as the end and all other thinges as the meanes vnto this end this will for that it is of the end and of the meanes is the first and supreme cause of thinges comprehending with all other causes in it selfe and subordaining them to that first cause And albeit there is but one will in one Essence yet by reason of the Obiectes and Effectes of good and evill thinges wee distinguish the same into z Beneplacitum placitum good Pleasure and Pleasure for in respect of the good Effectes whereof God chiefly and by himselfe entendeth the ende and meanes wee tearme that Will his good pleasure a Eph. 1.5 but in respect of the evill effectes in which GOD indeed chiefly and by himself intendeth the end yet not the meanes themselues but for the end wee call it his pleasure b 1 Cor. 10.5 This will of pleasure and good pleasure in God is vnchangeable that it can neyther be deceyved nor deceiue not bee deceyved in respect of that secret will according to which God foreknew determined and willed all things from eternall c Rom. 9.19 Esa 46.10 Not deceiue in respect of that revealed will according to which God hath communicated the knowledge revelation of that eternall will as much as is necessary for our salvation OF GOD AND THE ATtributes of GOD the Part CONFVTING Distinctions for the VNITIE of ESSENCE I. THe name of God is taken eyther properly and that both essentially and personally or improperly that both by way of Concession and Imitation when the Scripture teacheth of false and fayned gods as also Appellatiuely and by a congruency when it treateth of gods not by nature but in respect of divine gifts and office II. ONe and three are not opposed privatiuely because both are truely vttered of God in a diverse respect one in respect of Essence three in respect of the persons Distinctions for the TRINITIE of the Persons and first for the distinction of them I. THere is one respect of those who are both finite and divisible who in this selfe same point are distinguished as in persons so also in Essence but there is another respect of God whose Essence as it is Infinite so is it indivisible also and therefore 〈◊〉 onely II. THose Actions which are common in cause effect are distinguished by the bound of the Action or Effect for the cause of working in thinges belonging vnto God is the same and the worke the same but the manner of working is diverse III. THose names which are given to the persons in the Scripture some doe point out the persons themselues some the properties of the persons and some the operations extra personas out of the persons The Places Ioh 14.9 Ans It is one thing to treate of the order of the persons among them selues and another thing of the order of our knowledge vnto them Ibidem 10. Ans Wee badly proâ—ede from the Phrase and manner of â—peaking concerning the Essence to â—hat which is concerning the person or some thinges are spoken absolutely â—f the persons in respect of the Essence â—nd some thinges relatiuely in that they â—re persons Col. 1.15 Answere There is one â—mage Accidentall and another Substantiall Secondly for the Coessence of the persons I. IT is one thing to treate of the Originall beginning of the Essence which â—n thinges pertayning to God is none and another thing of the originall of the persons the Sonne and the holy Ghost haue onely the originall of person the one by generation the other by procession eternall but neyther of Essence II. HE that hath al things hath them by nature not by grace is not lower then he of whome he hath theâ— for but one of both respects can be granted to be of Inequality III. A Sending and obedience take noâ— away equality of power neytheâ— is he that sendeth and hee that is seâ— distinguished by properties Essentiall but Personall Places of Scripture 1. Cor. 8.6 Eph. 4.6 God alone is called Father in Scripture in a double respect first oppositely to the Creatures and counterfeyted gods not exclusiuely to the Sonne and holy Ghost secondly by an excellency God alone is so called to witte because he is not from another no not in respect of person Luc. 11. the Name of Father is taken sometimes Hypostatically when the Godhead within it selfe is described and the persons of the God-head are among themselues distinguished someâ—es Essentially when the outwarde â—rkes and benefites of God towardes Creatures and the Church are deâ—bed Distinctions for the Attributes for the simplicity of GOD. WHatsoever is simple it is so eyther absolutely or by it selfe comparatiuely and in respect of boâ—s after the first manner God is â—ple after the second manner the â—gels and the Soules are but if any â—mposition seemes to bee given to â—OD it is altogether Accidenâ—l eyther in respect of the actiâ—s or the Subiects on which hee worâ—th or lastly in respect of the Propoâ—ion which
the generall of outward calling Gods good pleasure as the foregoing cause therof Christs Ransome as the meritorious cause therof Out of both ioyntly ariseth that singular and benevolent affection of Gods will whereby hee embraceth vs adopted in his beloved Sonne with his Infinite loue by applying vnto vs his saving grace i Eph. 2.17 19. Ioh. 15.19 Act. 6.14 Eph. 1.5 Of this Inward calling or application there are two inward meanes the Spirite and Faith The Spirite which calleth by the efficacy of the cause k 1. Ioh. 2 17. Ezec. 11 1â— Faith answereth the calling by the office of the instrumeÌ„t l Rom. 8.30 â— Pro. 1.22 Now as the giving of the Spirite so also the bestowing of faith is the singular gift of God m Passe To be possible to haue both is of Nature but to haue both is of Grace The Matter of this Inward calling are those whome God fore-knew and predestinated vnto life for whome hee hath predestinated them hath he called n Rom. 8.30 Neyther can this Inward and effectual calling bee of any others then of them whose also is the Spirite of Christ and saving faith according to the purpose of Gods Predestination in Christ all others are excluded for albeit it be somtimes given vnto the wicked not onely with their sences to perceiue those things which are of the outward Ministery but by them after a sort inwardly to be affected in the heart that is in the vnderstanding and will yet this inward saving calling whereof we here treate doth affect them onely to salvation who liue and are moved by the Spirite of Christ and are ingraffed by faith into Christ to life eternall o Ioh 17 â—0 Eph. 2.20.21.22 The forme of this calling is that inward Information of the faithfull by the spirite and faith for the communicating of Gods grace and glory Of this Information there are two partes the one is that effectuall action of Gods Spirite in vs and according to that the whole renuing of man which in the Scripture is commonly called Regeneration p 1 Ioh. 3.9 Rom. 8.1 The other is the action of Faith whereby both the mind is inlightened that it may know and the Will sanctified that it may apprehend God in Christ q Col. 1. â— Rom. 14.14 The End Remote is the glory of God gratiously calling Neerest the salvation of Man effectually called And this is the maner of the outward and inward absolute calling whereof the one is of good pleasure and election the other of the signe the one of Efficacy the other of Signification tending to Efficacy the one proper to the Elect the other common to all But because the one cannot nor ought to be separated from the other in the Elect in the ordinary way vnto Salvation out of both ariseth a calling which wee tearme Coniunct both ordinary effectuall in the matter of our salvation Now is it an effectuall and gracious action of the holy spirite sealing vp in the Elect by the instrument of true faith the preaching of the word the vse of the Sacraments the communion oâ— Christ and his Church for their salvation and Gods eternall glory The Efficient cause of this calling is God for the calling is of gift not of merite of grace not of nature God calling whome hee will and againe whome hee will eyther not calling at all or not effectually calling but both freely without respect of person or without blame The matter are men elect in whom alone onely this calling is effectuall perticularly and savingly though generally the not elected and Hypocrites may both receyue the vse of the outward calling and seeme openly to declare the sence and feeling of the Inward whence it is that the Effect of the calling of these is called in the scripture a r Heb. 6.5 taste onely but of those a commixture of the Word with faith Å¿ Heb. 4.2 The Forme is that divine manner of divine Information Inward and Outward whereof this is fully performed with the preaching of the Word the vse of the Sacraments and other both private and publicke exercises of faith and charity but that with the saving communion of the Spirite and Faith The End is both the glory of God being mercifull as also the advancing and translating of man from his misery to spirituall grace and glory OF THE CALLING OF MAN vnto Salvation The Confuting Part. Distinctions in defence of the Efficient Cause I. THe Vniversall Calling which is coÌ„monly called Naturall is one and the Politicall or Ecclesiasticall which is called Personall is another Lastly the saving is another of which we treate in this place yet of all these the Principall and onely Efficient is God II. THere is one calling Immediate another Mediate Extraordinary Ordinary That God effecteth by himselfe This by the Ministery of men III. OF the Efficient cause of all callings there is commonly had a two-fold notice the one according to the beginning the other according to the Instrument that is properly of the cause this of the r Concausa fellow cause In Defence of the Matter against the Vniversality of Effectuall Grace I. THe grace and good will of God is eyther noted generally whereby God doth benefite all men or particularly whereby hee doth good to the Elect in Christ but this vniversall and generall grace ought to bee discerned from the singular and particular as also the vniversall and common benefits towards all as they are men from the Particular towardes men as they are Christians II. THe Affirmation is Inconsequent from the Generall to all Particular things for all ought not to bee taken vniversally of every man but generally of all sorts of men III. THe Argumentation holdeth not from the communion of Nature to the communion of Grace IIII. THe quantity of Actiue vertue ought to bee knowne by the Effect of the quantity V. THere is one Efficacy of calling outward another inward the outward is when the sences and corporal things are touched moved by the outwarde Ministery the inward when the vnderstanding and will are touched and moved Both these Efficacies againe are two-fold the one saving proper to the Elect the other not saving but leading the way according to the generall order and generally belongeth vnto all that are called The Places 1. Tim 4 10. Ans The benefites of Christ in the saving of men are distinct by two degrees the one is common to all the other is peculiar to the Church and saving to the faithful Adde further that the word of saving importeth sometimes the benefites of God in this life and sometimes that eternall benefite of salvation aequivocally Ezek. 28.26 God two wayes is called the God of men eyther vniversally and commonly according to nature or particularly according to Grace whereby hee chose them from everlasting in Christ In Defence of the Formall CAVSE I. THere is one Calling by grace naturall and another by Grace supernaturall
grace the other on mans behalfe promising thankefulnesse And in this sence is the word Sacrament wont to bee vsed two manner of wayes eyther for the signe onely the thing signified Synecdochically or properly for both or for that whole holy action which commeth together for the full participation of a Sacrament Now Sacraments are called Mysteries not for that they bee the working of miracles but the ceremonies of a secret and spirituall thing or as Augustine speaketh because they are the Signes of thinges being one thing signifying another thing whence it is that they were also called a Symbola Gen 17.10 11. Mat. 28.19 badges and stampes Now a Sacrament is a holy action ordayned of God whereby God as touching his promise sealeth vp his grace in Christ with a fitte agreement of the signes and the things signified b Rom. 4.11 1. Cor. 10.17 and wee testifie our mutuall faith and godlinesse towards him The Efficient Cause is God and Christ the onely Mediatour of God and men c 1 Cor. 11.23 because the Institution of the Sacraments belongeth to the excellent and divine majesty which onely hath right to promise the thing signified and power to apply the same whence sprung that immoueable and golden rule that nothing hath the Nature of a Sacrament Nihil habere rationeÌ„ Sacramenti extra vsum a Deo institutum without the vse ordayned of God Now God effecteth a Sacrament by the word of Institution which added vnto the Element it becommeth a sacrament not by infusion of a new quality but by changing of the vse Of this Word called Sacramentall there are two partes a commaundement and a promise whereof the one sheweth the authority of the sacrament the other the vse and efficacy of the same The Commaundement is that whereby God commaundeth both that the Sacraments should be administred by prescribing the forme of them as also that they be receyved by giving charge for the vse thereof so in the Supper the forme of Institution is prescribed and the vse of the Supper is given in charge the same in Baptisme also d Mat. 28 19. Mar. 16.15 The Promise annexed to the commandement is as it were the power and life of the Sacrament which the Effect necessarily followeth e Mat. 26.26 1. Cor. 11.24 Rom. 6. 2. Pet. 3. so in the Supper there is promise made of the eternal and spirituall nourishment of the soule in Baptisme of the salvation of the souls and the washing away of sinnes And the consideration of this Efficient cause doth circumscribe the whole dignity of a Sacrament wherefore it cannot be that the same is eyther f Tit. 1.25 Eph. 3 17 abated through the faultes of the Ministers or g Rom. 3.3.4 that any thing is detracted from it because of their vnbeliefe which receiue but the signes onely The Matter of the Sacraments is two-fold the one sensible and outward the other intelligible and inward of these the one is commonly called the Signe the other the thing signified or the thing of the signe Now by the name of Signe in generall we vnderstand every thing the vse whereof is put in signifying in which signification there are two sorts of signes some by Augustine called Naturall and some Given Naturall are those which without will or desire to signifie doe cause somewhat else beside themselues by themselues to be knowne as the dawning is a sign of the Sunne to be neare at hand and the smoake of the fire Given are those which depend on the Will of the Institutor whether God or Man for the signes which are of force by the appointment of the Will are eyther of humane or divine Institution Those which are of divine Institution of which onely our speech is in this place are some miraculous some without miracle those haue respect vnto the extraordinary and vnusuall works of God at which the minds of men are greatly astonished of which sort very many signes eyther of divine Doctrine or wrath or grace doe occurre in Scriptures these are familiar and favourable signes of Gods grace whether they be monuments of things past or whether pointing out or signing a thing present or to come or witnessing the certainty of a thing as it were with a sealed stampe thereon or lastly yeelding that thing which is signified and that by the verity of Gods institution and the hidden vertue of the Spirite And such are these Sacramentall Signes not naturall but given that is of God instituted that they might signifie seale and exhibite Of these signes two partes ought to be considered and declared the one Elemental the other Ceremoniall whereof the one respecteth the Substantiall matter the other the action and the Rite The Substantiall matter is all that in the Sacrament which is set a part from common vse by Gods ordinance and appointed for the signifying sealing and exhibiting of inward and spirituall things such as in Baptisme iâ— the Water in the Supper the wine and bread And these Signes remaine in themselues and their owne Essence both as touching the substance and aâ— touching the Essentiall and adherent qualities h Ioh. 1.26 1. Cor. 10.16 11 26. c. Luc. 22.19 The Action is a Ceremony both of the Minister supplying Gods roome of the faithfull receyving as in body â—he outward thing so also in faith the â—nward or signified thing i 1. Cor. 11.3 For of the actions by God in eveâ—y Sacrament prescribed some agree with them of whome they are adminiâ—â—red doing what they doe in the â—ame of Christ and some with the rest â—hat receiue the Sacrament such as are 〈◊〉 Baptisme the sprinkling and dipâ—ing of the Water in the Supper the â—reaking the distributing and receyâ—ing of the bread wine both signes â—omming vnto our outward senses proâ—ose to our mindes other things altogeâ—her spirituall and heavenly that they â—ight bee vnderstood and by faith seaâ—d vp Those other Things that we may exâ—ound that other part of the matter of â—â—e Sacrament are generally all that â—â—ing which Faith applyeth to it selfe vnto salvation Now it doth properly and most neerely apply Christ himselfe who wholy is and ought to be called the matter of the Sacrament k Rom. 6.3 1. Cor. 10.16 Gal. 3.27 in respect both of his person merit and benefites Of his Person because whole Christ is given in every Sacrament both by reason of his Divinity and Humanity although especially mention bee made and respect had of his Humanity in the Institution of the Sacrament both because according to it he is of the same Essence with vs and our brother as also for that in it Christ merited that for vs which the Sacrament sealeth and lastly in that an entrance is given mediately by it vnto this Divinity and Gods Grace Of his Merite because both the truth and profite of Christs death wherby hee purchased life for vs is chiefly offered and confirmed wherevpon the signes
of this Sinne three thinges concurre First the Deniall of the Truth against knowledge and conscience Secondly an vniversall Backe-sliding from Christ not a particular sinne against the first or second Table of the Law Thirdly a Rebellion sprung from a hatred of the truth conjoyned with a tyrannicall sophisticall and hypocritical oppugning or withstanding and of these conditions there is a mutuall knitting and sequele of the one with and after the other Further it is called a Sinne against the Holy Ghost not in respect of the divine Essence and person of the Spirite but in respect of his office that is of Grace and illumination whereof the holy Ghost is properly the Worker or effecter but it is sayed to be vnpardonable for three causes First because of the just judgement of God who suffereth not his Spirite which is the Spirite of truth to bee reproved of a lie Secondly because of impenitency or the hardnes to repent Thirdly because of the truth and the dignity of redemption purchased by Christ For there remaineth no other sacrifice after men haue forsaken the sacrifice of Christ t Heb. 6.4 Heb. 10.20 The Formall of Adams first sinne is two-fold according as that sinne in a divers respect is eyther a Quality or Relation as it is equality the formall thereof is disobedience u Rom. 5.19 Rom. 5.14.15 1. Tim. 2.13 as it is a Relation The Formall of the same is guilt or obliging to everlasting punishment Disobedience passed by Act but guilt was spread on all the posterity by imputation z Rom 5 12. 1. Cor. 15.22 The Formall of Originall Sinne is likewise vsually taken two wayes eyther for guilt which neverthelesse is rather the necessary consequent of that sinne or the proper accident thereof or for that whole deformity of whole nature which was not infused nor yet gotten by imitation but naturall or as wee speake connaturall or begotten together with vs not by the vice of common Nature but by the vice of the first originall Instrument from which all descended naturally a Psal 52.7 Rom. 5.12 1. Cor. 5.22 Eph. 2.3 The Formall of actuall sinne is an inordinatene adioyned to that which is spoken done and lusted after against the Law which ought to be discerned frō the actions motiues as the defect from the effect For sinne is not formally the very action but the corruption or defect of the action and as the Actions of men are two-fold Immanentes trauseuntes to witte abiding in and passing from Whereof those come from the mind and will immediately but these by the members or Instruments of the body mediately so there is a two-fold inordinatenesse the one Inward the other outward b Rom. 24 1. Eph. 2 3 Gal. 5.16 Rom. 15 15. Col. 3.17 Rom. 6.19 The End of the first Originall and Actuall Sinne ought to bee discerned after one and the selfe same manner and consideration Now it is discerned two wayes First by the Accident in respect of God disposing sinne to the iust end and most wisely shewing forth his glory both by workes of justice against them who endeavour to sinne by workes of mercy towardes them whome he freeth from sinne for Christ Secondly according to it selfe in respect of man in whome sinne is in which respect an end of Sinne cannot properly bee granted but in steade thereof are granted two Consequents or effects guilt punishment c Gen. 2 17. Rom. 6.23 Eph. 2.3 2. The. 1.9 By the name of guilt we vnderstand that bond between sinne and punishment as a meane put betweene whereby the sinner is most strongly bound to the subjection of punishment and in the very subiection to the continuance thereof The punishment is both deathes both of the body temporall and of the soule together with the body eternall Wherevnto are conjoyned afflictions as the fore-goers of both and these through the goodnesse of God are in those which are truely faithfull eyther tryals or martyredomes or fatherly chastisements but in the wicked they are in theyr owne nature torments punishments and these two Effects do altogether hold all men bound being considered in the state of nature without any difference of age yea the very Infants who both haue a guilt and feele a most bitter punishment both of losse and sence vnlesse God gratiously avert it Now hee averteth it for the covenant sake in the Infants of the faithfull in whome sinne is taken away by Baptisme both in the lessening of it selfe and the releasing of guilt yet not that it giveth over eyther to be in all equally or to worke in them that are already of full yeares vnequally for that natiue or naturall corruption remayneth in Act even after Baptisme e Rom. 7.18 Exod. 34.7 Pro. 20.9 Iob. 9.20 OF SINNE The Part Confuting In Defence of the Efficient Cause of the First Sinne. DISTINCTIONS I. IN the Fall of Adam three beginnings concurre which must bee distinguished and discerned one Outward two Inward to witte Generall and Particular the Outward beginning vniversall is God in respect of the action The Inward Generall is nature which moveth man to the action naturall The Inward Particular is the will of man in the power whereof the principalnesse of causing consisteth Principalitas cousalitatis as it is such an action II. ADam is two wayes to bee considered eyther as a particular person or as the roote of all mankinde if after the former manner the disobedience of Adam was his owne proper sinne if after the second it was with him and vs common In Defence of the Efficient Cause of Originall Sinne. I. THe Efficient of this Sinne is eyther Totall as they speake or Partiall that which is partiall is improperly and accidentally sayde to bee a cause in respect of the occasion it selfe and it is the tree of life and the instigation of that old Serpent that which is totall is Man himself through the maner of propagation II. THe Propagation of Sinne is two wayes made partly by the manner of Generation and partly by the maner of Fault Of Generation because Sinne is transfused through the body of the Begetter into the body of the begotten materially but into his soule causally and that partly by Gods forsaking and partly by the contagion of the body into which the Soule is infused of Fault because Adam according to the condition wherein hee was created conveighed through his offence as through a certaine gate whatsoever evill was in himselfe into all his posterity III. THe Soule of Man is two wayes considered eyther according to her Essence or according to her Subsistence according to her Essence shee is from the Man that begetteth who communicateth vnto him that is begotten that singular manner of subsisting in the body IIII. THe whole of Nature should be distinguished from the whole Nature because wee haue that from common nature absolutely by Gods ordinance but this mediately from our Parents as the
concerning God is vtteâ—d For the INFINITNES GOD by speaking properly is not in a place because he is no where â—ontayned yet euery where because he contayneth and reacheth vnto al thing not in quantity but in power For the IMMVTABILITIE WHatsoever change seemes to bâ— ascribed vnto God in the scriptures it is not in God but in the thing and therefore when Repentance is vttered concerning God it signifieth nâ— the affect in God but the effect of Goâ— in men For the ETERNITIE SOmewhat is sayed to bee Eternalâ— eyther properly or Analogically Properly which by Nature hath neyther beginning nor ending Analogâ—cally which having a beginning bâ— the grace and power of God hath noâ— an end after the former manner God is eternall after the second the Angels and the Soules For the KNOWLEDGE THe Act of Knowledge in God is indivisible wherfore neyther foreknowledge nor remembrance are not â—ncident vnto God but in respect of vs. For the POWER POwer in God takes away all that which is eyther of finite power or want of power For the WILL. THe Will of God is eyther absolute or Conditionall neyther are there contradictory Willes in God sith the thinges and persons are both alike or after the same manner The end of the First Booke THE SECOND BOOKE OF THE first Part of Holy DIVINITIE that is of the Workes of GOD or the Causes of our Salvation CHAP. I. AFter that we haue treated of the 〈◊〉 of holy Divinity we must consider concerning the partes thereof Now the partes of Divinity according to the consideration of the end and of the meanes to the end are two the one of the causes of our salvation and so of the works and Effects of God the other of his Subiect to witte of man and of the diverse state of man for salvation which is the nearest end of Divinity is considered two wayes both in it selfe and the causes thereof simply as also by relation vnto the Subiect vnto which it was ordayned for which respect it is diversly modified or measured according to the manifold condition of the subiect wherein it is The workes of God of which wee must treate in the first part of Divinity are of two sortes Inward and Immanent Outward or Going out those are in the very Essence of God by an Internall and Eternall Act these passe from or goe out of God into the Creatures by an externall and temporall act of the first kind is Predestination of the second if you respect the workes of Nature is Creation and Providence if of Grace Redemption and restoring againe OF PREDESTINATION The Part Confirmatiue CHAP. II. PVrposing to speake of Predestination wee must declare first what Name it is secondly what thing it is Whereas to Predestinate is to appoint and ordayne things to their ends a Rom. 8.29 Eph. 1.5 according to the manifold respect consideration of those ends it is wont to be taken diversly among the Doctors of the Church Now the ends generally to which things created are ordayned are two the one is that to which thinges are carried by the order of nature or according to nature by the ordinaÌ„ce of God the other is that which exceedeth the proportion or measure of the created nature and respecteth the state of man out of this temporall and naturall life the one of the Schoole-men is called Proportionate the other Superexcedent In respect of the former end Predestination is a decree of God or a iudgement of Gods vnderstanding aswell in generall of all thinges created b Act. 4.28 as in speciall of all Creatures reasonable which were to be put over to their certaine end And in this signification it is also of others called Providence and by vs was sayde to be a kind of those inward and immanent actions of God in respect of the latter end Predestination is taken two wayes c Synecdochice Synecdochically even as the state of man out of this naturall life is two-fold eyther commonly or Improperly for the eternall decree of God concerning men to bee saved or punished or singularly and properly for the Act of decreeing vnto eternall salvation which was in the minde or vnderstanding of God and in this signification wee take Predestination in this place This Predestination is to bee discerned two wayes or by two degrees first in it selfe and the causes thereof simply secondly oppositely vnto the contraries of the same Predestination therefore is an Act of Gods good pleasure wherby God from everlasting purposed in himselfe out of the vniversality of Creatures to make some and certaine of them partakers of his grace glory in Christ to his prayse and their salvation The Primary Efficient Cause of this Predestination is God in whome and from whome the very Act of Predestination is as it were from his divine vnderstanding and in it fore-shapened altogether or alwayes going before all things and causes d 2. Eph. 1.5 Rom. 8.29 2. Tim. 1.23 secondly Impulsiue which is the benevolent or well-willing affection of the Will of God in Christ which in Scripture is called the good pleasure of the Will of God e Eph. 1.5 And this act of Gods good pleasure which in God is simple and vniforme according to our humane manner of vnderstaÌ„ding hath two as it were distinct Predestinations the former is of the end the latter of the meanes vnto the end that distinctly we vse to cal election or fore-knowledge f 1. Pet. 1.2 Rom. 9.11 8.29 but this by a common name purpose g Prothesis and Predestination but both of them is a fore-ordinance from everlasting before all things and the causes that were in the things h Rom. 9 19. Act. 13.48 Rom. 9.11 11.6 The matter of Predestination or to speake more properly the Obiect is man who out of the common nature of his kind was to bee lifted vp or advanced Of this obiect according to that double respect of the act of Gods purpose there ought to be a double coÌ„sideration for if you respect the fore-ordinance of the end man coÌ„monly absolutly i Rom. 9.20 21.35 is the matter of PredestinatioÌ„ but if of the means vnto the end man is who was to perish of himselfe and in himselfe guilty in Adam k Esa 54.16 Rom. 9.22 1. The. 5.9 The forme speciciall indeed and proper is an adoption into Sonnes by Christ l Eph. 1.5 but commonly that whole manner of order in respect both of decree and execution In respect of Decree the order of degrees m Rom. 8.30 is this Fore-knowledge by which God fore-knew them that were to bee Predestinated afore appointment or a determining purpose by which God hath fore-determined the Predestination of them that were fore-knowne both by electing them from everlasting and by preparing for them elected grace in the present world and glory in that to come In respect of Execution the order of degrees is this an effectuall vocation n
Rom. 8.30 Iustification and Glorification that is a gratious beginning â—roceeding together with a glorious peâ—â—ection of divine blessings by the perfect coniunction of Christ or by the perfect ioyning of them together with Christ The End Remote is Gods glory the o Subalterna meane or indefinite indifferent End is that we should be holy the last end is life and glorification p Eph. 1.6 And this is the manner of Predestination in it selfe and the causes therof simply wee must now consider of the opposites and contraries of the same Of these although there bee a diverse respect yet Sinecdochically it is wont to bee signified and shewed by the common name of reprobation in which significatioÌ„ it is distinguished both from eternall Predestination which abusiuely is called Reprobation as also from that part of Gods decree which eyther Logically is called Non Election or Theologically a q Preteritio passing by which properly is called Reprobation But forasmuch as being opposite to Predestination whereof wee haue treated it signifieth that whole fore-ordinance and maner of order vnto the end wherevnto the Reprobates are appointed of it we must speake in the first signification Now Reprobation is an Act of Gods pleasure or decree whereby God from everlasting hath purposed in himselfe to passe by the greater part of the Vniversality of Creatures as touching the communion of his healthfull and supernaturall grace and glory and the same also before hand to condemne that were not like to abide or 〈◊〉 in the integrity of their first originall estate according to his iustice for their sinnes to the setting forth of his glory The Cause Efficient of this reprobation first principall is God second impulsiue is his owne pleasure and will r Pro. 6.3 Eph. 1.11 Prou. 16.4 But this act which in God is simple vniforme as touching vs in respect of the order vnto the end ought two waies to be considered and distinguished for there is in God first an act of Å¿ Preteritionis passing by called of the Schoolemen a Reprobation Passiue and Negatiue before all thinges and causes that were like to be in the thinges or from the thinges whereof no other reason eyther can be giuen or ought to be sought besides the pleasure and will of God t Rom. 9.11.12.13 Mat. 1.23 Then there is an Act of the preparation of punishment or fore-condemnation from everlasting u 2. Thes 2.9 Rom. 6.23 called of the Schoolmen Affirmatiue and Actiue Reprobation before all thinges indeed but not before the causes fore-known and considered to bee like to bee in the thinges or from the thinges but it is a respectiue Act of sinne as the necessary Antecedent because as God in time iustly punisheth and condemneth man for sinne so God also from everlasting hath iustly decreede to punish man and fore-condemned him by or from the x Ex Hypothesi supposition of sinne The matter of Reprobation or rather the right obiect are all and singular Reprobates and the condition of this matter or obiect according to that double respect of the Act ought two wayes to bee considered for as touching that former Act of God and passing by the matter of Reprobation is considered to bee Man in generall without any respect of any quality y Rom. 9.11 but as touching the latter which is of Predamnation or appointment vnto punishment the matter of Reprobation is man in that he is a sinner or for his sinnes to be punished by the necessity of Gods iustice z Eph. 2.3.5 The form special is indeed the not appointment of theÌ„ into the adoption of Children but in common it is that whole manner of order vnto the end in respect of both the Acts to wit both of Preterition and Predamnation Of Preterition whereof this is the manner of order Prescience or fore-knowledge not that which is of speciall affection and good wil but that of vnderstanding and knowledge in God which otherwise is also called in the Scriptures the Purpose of God whereby God foreknew them that were to be reiected both who and how many they should be fore-appointment by which hee hath determined the Reprobation of them that were forknown in not choosing them by a speciall loue in Christ but in leaving them to themselues in their owne nature which fore-appointment is wont to bee signified sometime by the name of Preordaining sometimes of coagmention and sometimes of hatred a Rom. 9.22 Of Predamnation and the execution â—ereof this is the order a iust forsaâ—ng which is eyther of triall God â—ot giving his grace b Rom. 9.21 or of punishâ—ent God taking away all his saving â—tes and delivering them into the poâ—er of Sathan c Ioh. 13.2 1. Thes 2.9 10. Hardening and those things which â—se to accompany d Rom. 9.18 the same even vnâ—o the guilty condemnation of man which of some are called the Effectes of Reprobation but more fitly and truely â—he Consequents or degrees of order vnto the end The end of Reprobation first remote is the setting forth of Gods glory e Rom. 9. second the meane or Indifferent end the declaration of the liberty of God f 2. Rom. 9.21 the last and neerest g Rom. 9 28. the execution of his iustice in the punishment of the Reprobates OF PREDESTINATION The Part Confuting I. SOlutions or distinctions for the cause efficient Predestination signifieth two thinges the determination of thâ— end and the ordinance of the meanâ— vnto the end of both the first cause iâ—pulsiue is the will of God II. PRedestination is eyther taken moâ— specially for the Predestination oâ— the Saints and differeth not onely iâ— the thing but also in the manner from Election or more generally for every fore-appointment of order vnto the certaine end in which signification the three partes thereof may be put to wit the appointment of the beginning the means and end III. REprobation is taken eyther Negatiuely for not Election or affirmatiuely for the preparation of punishmeÌ„t IIII. IT is one thing to treat of the first act of Predestination and Reprobation which is Gods decree of choosing and 〈◊〉 choosing or passing by which is â—solute and another thing to treate 〈◊〉 the second which is respectiue of â—posing indeed vnto the means wherâ— the cause is in God onely but of â—t choosing vnto sinne whereof the â—use is in man but the ordination from â—od V. THe second Act of Reprobation or the ordination vnto punishment is â—â—stinguished into that which is simple â—â—d compound or comparatiue the one that whereby one is ordayned vnto â—unishment but the other whereby in 〈◊〉 vnequall condition the one is more â—en the other the cause of that withâ—ut God supposeth the merite of man â—ut of this without God no reason can â—e given The Places for faith fore-seene 2. Thes 2.13 Ans The conclusion is â—f no force from the cause of salvation â—nstrumentall to the
the Salvation of the Elect. Of CREATION the Part Confuting Distinctions for the Cause Efficient I. CReation is sayed to bee eyther properly concerning the work of the first bringing forth of thinges or Metaphorically of those things or works which are of no lesse vertue and power both wayes it is attributed to God alone II. THose things are created which are made of no substantiall and materiall beginning but those things are generated which are made of a fore-being matter the Creation of God is by himselfe but the generation of nature next after God III. NO things being apt to generation or corruption which are brought forth of God by second causes coÌ„ming between are properly sayed to be created because to be created is immediately to be brought forth of God IIII. CReation is two-folde Actiue and Passiue the one sayeth that there is a divine Essence and that the Creature cannot exist vnlesse hee put the case that there is a divine Essence the other sayeth that the Creature was really brought forth by God and noteth withall a creating Essence V. TO Create and to make differ because that more strictly taken signifieth of nothing to make somewhat but this more generally importeth not that onely but also to bring forth somwhat out of a matter lying and being before VI. THe thinges themselues and the nature substance of them ought to be distinguished from the evill that comes vnto them and from the Accidents of the thinges and substances For the MATTER I. THere is one respect or maner of the Primary Creation another of the secondary wherefore that generall u Classicum Alarme of the Philosophers of nothing nothing is made may be fitted or applied to the estate of bodily things but cannot bee opposed to the Creation II. NOthing is sayed to bee eyther privatiuely or Negatiuely Negatiuely of the Primary Creation Privatiuely of the second For the FORME I. THe signification of beginning is threefold for it pertayneth eyther to the time or to the thinges and causes or lastly to the order but it is taken in the first signification when wee treate of the beginning of Creation II. THose thinges which of Moses are written down of the forme and order of things created are not to bee taken Allegorically but Physically or Naturalâ—y OF PROVIDENCE The Part Confirming CHAP. IIII. ANd this is the beginning both Primary Secondary of things created acording to their nature now followeth the powerfull coÌ„servation of the same and the most wise ordering of them vnto their end which by the vse of the Scripture and the Doctors of the Church we call Providence Now whereas a double part of this Providence is wont to bee discerned and distinguished the one of decree according to the eternall fore-knowledge and fore-appointment of all thinges in God the other of Execution according to the externall Administration of the same in time and wheras also the consideration of the former properly pertayneth to Predestination which is a kind of Gods operations Immanent wee in respect of this latter doe here consider and treate of Providence properly so called This Providence then is an outward and temporall action of God whereby he keepeth all and several things which are and disposeth â—ll several things which are done to that end which hee hath determined according to the liberty of his will and that to the end hee might in all and severall things be glorified The Efficient Cause of this Providence or governement is the same which is of Creation sith the one and the self fame beginning is of both from by which all things proceed are conserved to witte God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost a Psal 32.13.15 139.78 Ioh. 12.34 The Father or the loue and goodnes of the Father is the first beginning cause The Sonne in that he is the wisedom and word is the working causes The holy Ghost in that hee is the vertue and power of the Father and the Sonne is the finishing cause The nature of God teacheth this whose presence power operation the scripture coÌ„mendeth in both works b Psal 9 4.8 Mat. 10.29 Ier. 10.23 Prou. 6.19 Esa 45.7 coÌ„mon Nature testifyeth it which as the commoÌ„ Instrument of God being stirred by that vniversall beginning stirreth and being moved moveth it selfe and al things according to it selfe Our nature together witnesseth and feeleth it because as in himselfe we haue our being so in himselfe also we liue and are moved c Act. 17.28 And the operatioÌ„s of this efficient cause are according to degrees distinguished now they are distinguished by a threefolde order maner The first is of Conservation the second of Governing The third of Ordayning to the end of which more at large in the formall cause of providence The Matter about which Providence is imployed according to the twofold consideration of the things which are subiect vnto it may be distinguished two wayes one way in respect of those things which are another way in respect of those things which are don for after both wayes respects all and severall things are ruled by Gods provideÌ„ce The things which are ought three wayes to be distinguished first according to their nature secondly according to their Accidents thirdly according to their vse Of the nature of things whether it be that superior or inferior wherof wee treated in the place of creation there is a double knowledge the one common and according to their natural form or kind the other singular acording to the d Individua things theÌ„selues as they are indivisible The Accidents whatsoever they are are either of common nature in its beginning perfection or of singular nature in the defect and condition thereof f Agnata besides the course of nature Of things according to their vse there is a twofold distinction for eyther they are the ends or the means vnto the end but the ends are some furthest off and some intermediate vnto the same the meanes are severally known two waies first after the manner of doing for some are ordinary some extraordinary and both ordained to their proper ends Secondly by the quality and essentiall condition of them for some are necessary and some contingent Of those which are necessary there are two kinds for some are by themselues absolutely necessary by a necessity of the Consequent as they call it and some by the cause from a g Ex Hypothesi Supposition by necessity of the Consequence Those which are absolutely necessary when we treate of things created we distinguish by two degrees The first is in the first and common beginning of nature first by themselues and by all things necessary as when wee say that twice two is foure which vnchangeably and by an infallible necessity are true The other degree of necessity is from nature out of it owne inward beginning whether materiall as when we say that every thing compounded of contraries must necessarily perish
or Formal as when we say that the fire necessarily burneth Those which are necessary by supposition or by necessity of condition or consequence doe put one a necessity eyther from the inward beginning or from the outward or from both together Thinges contingent are those which may be or not be such as properly happen to every Individuum or singular thing for the power is the matter which is capable of things possible or contingent and the matter is of every singular thing and of every Individuum which are limitted in their owne matter And this is the maner of those things which are now those things which are don or the actioÌ„s are distinguished two wayes by their beginnings and qualities By their beginnings because some actioÌ„s are from a common beginning and arâ— called Naturall which eyther nature by it selfe effecteth neyther is the action of will required for the same as to liue to quicken c. or effecteth them witâ— the action of naturall will as to eate drinke c. other some are from a singular beginning and are called Voluntary which our will Intellectiue effecteth not led by the instinct of nature but by the rule of reason whether by advise or deliberation from which is the will electiue or by an vnadvised motion Voluntas per causam from which is the Will by a cause By the qualities because som are good some evill that which is the goodnes or evilnes of actioÌ„s is discerned both by their own coÌ„mon condition according to the beginnings in actions natural and by a singular manner according to theiâ— speciall kinde and circumstances in actions voluntary and all and every one of these as well those which are as those which are done bee subiect to Gods Providence by wayes both common and singular as in the explication of the cause ensuing shall bee declared The Forme of Gods Providence is that perpetuall Act of directing all and singular things vnto their proper ends which act ought two wayes to be considered and discerned to witte common and singular by the one according to the divers degrees of that act of Gods providence by the other according to the singular nature and condition of the subiects vpon which it worketh The Act of Gods providence is generaly discerned by three degrees the declaration whereof is very necessary for the vnderstanding of this doctrine The first degree is of Conservation whereby all and severall thinges are ordinarily sustayned in the same state of Nature and naturall properties in which they were created This conservation according to the distinction of things which either are or are done is both of Existence and of power The conservation of Existence is the continuance of the substance of things which had their being by creation whether they be of a whole speciall kind or of any Individuum h Psa .. 19.12 104 19.20 c. The conservation of Power is whereby God sustayneth and moveth the proper powers of every Creature which pertayne to the operations and perfections thereof by a singular i Iob. 14.4 Heb. 9.27 Psal 134.2.3 beginning which in thinges involuntary is a singular nature in things voluntary is wil. Both of them is from God as from the vniversall beginning on whome the beginnings both common and singular of thinges and actions doe depend In which dependency two things are to bee noted the one is that the same first beginning of the conservation of things doe so worke in the inferiour beginnings that it detracteth nothing from them but ordinarily leaveth their Actions perfect for God so ordereth all thinges which hee hath created that hee suffereth them also to exercise and doe their owne proper motions The other is that that first beginning worketh by those which are inferior after the manner of those Inferiour for as oft as many causes Coordinate or together ordained doe befal the last effect followeth not the first cause by necessity or contingence but the neerest cause Hence is that tearm Fate or Destiny natural so termed by Christians which is a course and order of naturall causes depending vpon the first cause which vnlesse they be hindered by the same of their owne power nature bring forth the same effect The second degree is of Governing whereby God in whose power is supreme authority disposeth of al things consisting in his own power ruling the same according to the liberty of his owne will Of this Governing there is a threefold consideration the one consisting in Commanding the other in Doing the third in not Doing which they cal Permitting the first verily is of Doctrine and Right and therfore not proper to this place the other two properly respect the action of Gods provideÌ„ce the Action therefore of God governing is two-fold the one performing the other permitting The Action performing is that which of the Grecians is called Fore-Knowledge according to good pleasure whereby God effectually performeth in all and severall things that which belongeth to his owne worke Now hee performeth whatsoever is good in Nature both common and particular as the vniversall beginning of Nature The Action permitting is that which of the Grecians is tearmed Foreknowledge according to permission wherby God forbiddeth not the Actions of others but permitteth to the will of the doer the manner of them Of this Permission there are in the Scripture two kindes the one is of a permission Simple and Absoâ—ute when GOD permitteth simply that which hee might simply and immediately hinder as when hee permitted Adam to fall the other k Ex Hypothesi by Supposition when God after a humane manner tempereth his permissions according to the condition of men such permissions as these are very many in the Olde Testament both are in God from his owne will and are moved to the end which the will of God hath fore-appointed The thirde Degree of GODS Providence is of ordayning whereby God by his admirable Wisedome bringeth all thinges though most out of order vnto their due order and proper Ende In this ordayning three thinges concurre the appointment of the End the disposing of the meanes vnto the end and the directing of the meanes disposed The appointment of the End because God limitteth as all Subiectâ— with their formes so the motions of the forms with their ends whether proper or nerest which are of things according to their own nature or that last or furthest end which is aboue nature to witte Gods glory to which all thinges tend by Gods ordayning This supreme end of thinges though according to perfection signified it be one onely yet according to the manner of signifying which manner is from the obiects it is two-fold his most powerfull Iustice and Grace which in God haue the respect of chiefest good Vnto this double End there is a double disposing of the meanes according as there is fitly laied down by the schoolmen a double intent of God the disposer the one by it selfe chiefly or first intended
of nature from God the naughtines came vnto the Subiect by the corruption of man The Places of Scripture which are wont to bee wrested against the truth of this Doctrine of Providence are for the most part these Against the Materiall Cause 1 Of the Corinth 9.9 Ans Providence is eyther generall or speciall A conclusion from the deniall of the one vnto the deniall of the other is of no force 2 Sam. 1.6 1. King 21.34 Ans Providence and chance are not repugnant the one to the other if the respect of divers causes bee distinguished Esay 31. 1. Act. 5.38 Ans according to the divers considerations of the beginninges wee iudge both of the Causes whether neerest or remote and of the qualities of Actions whether good or bad but whatsoever quality is vitious it is from the particular beginning and not from that which is Vniversall or Common Against the Formall Cause Ezec. 18.33 Ose 13.9 Answ a double consideration of the punishmēt of sinne is wont and ought to bee distinctly noted one is of Iustice in God and hath a respect of morall good another of merite and fault in man hath a respect of evill and in this latter signification these places are to bee vnderstood Prou. 16.4 Answer The working of God in respect of the wicked presupposeth three thinges first the limitation of sinne secondly the withdrawing of Grace thirdly the ordayning of punishment Ierem. 10.7 Answ The Prophet speaketh from the feeling of his own infirmity not of an vntruth in doctrine nor of any wickednesse in life but of his vocation vnto which hee was drawne against his will Exod. 4.21 Esa 69.19 Ezek. 14.9 Rom. 1.28 2. Thes 2.11 Answere A Working is one thing and a working permission is another thing That is in good thinges onely this both in good evil for by permitting God worketh foure wayes first as touching the materiall of sinne secondly as touching the withholding of grace which God oweth to no man because it is grace Thirdly as touching the endes vnto which God disposeth sinnes Fourthly as touching the iust punishment of the sinner whereof this is the highest degree by sinne to punish sinne OF THE WORKES OF Grace or of Redemption CHAP. V. THe Worke of God Externall and Temporall which he bringeth to passe in thinges is twofold of Nature and of Grace The Worke of Nature whereof hithervnto we haue spoken is whereby God hath eyther created thinges not as yet being or conserveth governeth and ordereth them being created by his Providence The Worke of Grace is that which God effecteth in the Elect who shall be heyres of Salvation according to the good pleasure of his will And this Worke commonly is called Redemption for the explication of which worke three thinges concurre the beginning the manner and the Effect or the Application thereof The beginning is Christ as hee is God and man from whome there is no power nor healthfull Action which is needefull for Redemption but doth proceed The manner according to which Christ executed this worke is that holy disposing and dispensation of his offices Now the Effect or Application is discerned first by the degrees hereof in this life that is by Calling and by Iustification Secondly by outwarde meanes that is by Gods Covenant and by his Sacraments Thirdly by the Subiect that is the Church which Christ hath redeemed with his blood Wherefore wee must treate first of Christs person secondly of the offices of his person Lastly of the other places pertayning to the application OF THE PERSON OF CHRIST The Part Confirmatiue CHAP. VI. THe neerest singular and determinate beginning of our Redemption is Christ as hee is God and man because by him Man was to be redeemed in whome our redemption was from everlasting Predestinated by him againe to be restored by whom at first he was created in him he ought to bee made partaker of the loue of God who was the Sonne of loue or the beloved Sonne and at last in him to obtayne the right of Sonnes or adoption who by Nature was the Sonne and heyre of God from everlasting Christ therfore being God and man is as the scripture most briefly defineth the Worde made flesh or God made manifest in the flesh that is a person in whose singularity two Natures the properties thereof remayning whole are vnited for the Redemption of mankind For the explication of this Definition we must consider of three things in order First of the Natures and the necessity verity and actions thereof Secondly of the Subject of the Natures or of the person and of both the Vnity and the operation thereof Thirdly of the Hypostaticall vnion of the Natures and of the manner foundation power and efficacy thereof As concerning the Natures whereas Nature is an outward beginning making the thing it selfe and distinguishing it from other things we acknowledge two such natures in Christ according to the Scripture Divine and Humane both in themselues and in their properties distinct a Rom. 9 1 1. Ioh. 5.20 Phil. 2.6 the one from everlasting immutable immortall impassible the other in time conceyved and borne mutable mortall passible Both are Indivisibly necessary for the redemption of mankind or the dispensation of the office of a Mediator the divine Nature that hee might satisfie God that the satisfaction might bee proportionable to our debt that an Infinite good might helpe an Infinite evill by overcomming death and by vndergoing both the heavines of sinne and the infinitenesse of Gods judgement Adde further that whereas the arbitrement betweene God and man is aboue the humanity because no man can bee a chiefe and supreme messenger of divine thinges but God by his God-head because no working aboue nature such as is a sufficient Intercession with God is of or from nature because no beginning but of the Godhead it selfe can bee the beginning of that satisfaction which may stand before God it must needes bee that according to the divine nature in his person hee tooke on him all the partes of Mediation or Mediatorship But the humane that being man hee might according to the Law satisfie Gods justice that hee might sufficiently suffer for the accomplishment of the worke of satisfaction both by obeying made vnder the law and by dying made a curse according to the Law that in all thinges being like vnto his brethren sinne excepted hee might bee a faithfull and vniversall high Priest in those thinges which are to bee performed before God to purge the sinnes of the people b He. 2.17 Now the divine Nature of Christ that wee may in few wordes speake touching the verity of those Natures is that whereby hee obtayneth the same Essence with the Father and the holy Ghost albeit both according to his person whereby hee is distinguished to bee the Sonne of God and according to the dispensation of his office whereby hee is discerned to bee a Mediator hee is distinguished from the essence of God of which nature
and Charity but properly eyther the action it selfe conjoyned with the holy ceremonies or the things which are offered II. SAcrifices some are Typicall or Signifying other some not Typical or signified and both eyther Pacifying or Propitiatory or else Eucharisticall or of Thanksgiving III. THe word Leholam with the Hebrewes importeth not the Infinitenesse of time but the continuance of the same sometimes longer sometimes shorter according to the subject matter IIII. THe Sacrifice of Christ is considered eyther properly or q Symbolice comparatiuely Properly It is one onely in verity and efficacy even that Sacrifice of Christs body on the crosse comparatiuely with the olde Doctors of the church the Eucharist was sometimes called a Sacrifice V. THe Oblation of Christ is one onely not onely in speciall kind but also in number for there can bee no oblation of Christ but by his comming betweene and therefore that distinction of Sacrifice into a bloudy and vnbloody is false In Defence of his Kingly OFFICE THe Kingdome of Christ is taken eyther Figuratiuely or Properly Figuratiuely then both Instrumentally for the Gospell and subjectiuely for the church properly for that Oeconomicall dominion of Christ which is called the Kingdom of Grace for the beginning thereof in this world and the kingdome of glory for the consummation thereof in the other In Defence of the State of Christs Humiliation I. THere is one Subiection naturall another Oeconomicall and by this latter Equality is not destroyed because the thing equall as Cyril sayeth is sayde to be subiect to the equall by way of dispensation II. OBedience is not an Act naturall of nature but voluntary of the person according to both natures Now the consequence is of no force from one speciall kind vnto the other from the Act of Nature to the Act of Will In Defence of his Exaltation I. THe maiesty of the Essence of the Word is one and of the dispensation another II. DIspensation comprehendeth two things one the mystery of the vnion the other the end of the mystery In respect of the vnion Maiesty hath properly respect vnto the nature assumed in respect of the end it fitly agreeeth with Christ according to both natures III. EXaltation is not the abolishing of â—ature but the perfection and all other power given to Christ is of Office and not of divine Essence OF THE CALLING OF MAN vnto Salvation The Part Confirming CHAP. VIII FOr asmuch as wee haue treated of the Beginning and Dispensation of our Redemption that is of the Person and Office of Christ Wee now are to treate according to our appointed order of the Application therof Now the verity of this Application ought three wayes severally to bee marked by the degrees thereof by the outward meanes and by the Subject the degrees according to which God in time applyeth vnto vs the benefite of Redemption are chiefly two Vocation and Iustification Vocation is the first degree of Application on Gods behalfe called therfore by Augustine The entry vnto salvation and the first passage towardes the end Of this Vocation there is vsually had a divers knowledge according as it is distinguished eyther as touching the manner of calling into an Inward and outward or as touching the divers condition of the cause Efficient into a Generall and Particular or Lastly as touching the effect of calling vnto an Effectuall and not Effectuall Vocation Now of this Vocation whether Inward Particular and Effectuall or outward generall and ineffectuall there is a double respect the one Absolute in it selfe the other Ioynt or conjoyned in an ordinary vocation For God calleth outwardly in generall inwardly in particular and joyntly both wayes ordinarily Of both we are orderly to treate according to the course of the causes The outward and generall Vocation that wee may speake of it in the first place is a gracious action of God wherby he calleth men forth by word signe and worke from vnbeliefe vnto faith that both the faithfull might bee disposed to the communion of salvation and that others being coÌ„vinced of the grace offered vnto them by God might become inexcusable The cause Efficient of this Vocation is God because it is from him properly if you marke the true beginning therof and is from him first or chiefly by himselfe and principally if you haue a respect vnto the meanes which God would haue to be vsed eyther extraordinarily or ordinarily for the calling of men The beginning is that loue of God towards man wherby as a lover of soules and the Saviour of Men a Sap. 11.27 1 Tim. 4.10 hee beareth his good will towardes all men and generally offereth his Grace vnto them Now hee offereth the same that wee may in few wordes speake of the means by word by signes and by workes all which in respect of God that ordayneth them are generall by word eyther extraordinary such as was in the first times of the Church b Numb 12.8 Heb. 1.2 or Ordinary by the vniversall Canon of faith and life which wee call the Scripture c Ephes 2.17 Rom. 10.14 by signs by which added vnto the word the Lord being author his grace is visibly sealed vp d Rom. 4.11 Gen. 17.11 by works eyther Ordinary or Extraordinary eyther within the Church or without the Church The matter or Subiect of this vocation are all men without difference of nations sexes or states vnto whome by name the meanes whereof we haue spoken doe extend For God wil haue all men to bee saved both generally because hee calleth forth out of all whomsoever hee will or e Ex singulis generum genera singulorum out of every one of the generall sorts the generall sortes of every one vnto salvation as also because the grace of God is offered vnto all not by the vniversall efficacy of Christ but by a generall signe and power f Mat. 22.14 1. Tim. 2.4 The Forme is that outward Vocation which God mediately effecteth by the ministery of his word by the vse of the Sacraments and lastly by the communion of the Church and the members thereof in themselues and among themselues all which are â—ceyved by the outward senses g Heb. 4.12 The End is two-fold Proper both the inexcusablenes of the Reprobates and the salvation of the Elect Remote the manifestation of the Grace of God h 1. Cor. 15.28 And this is the outward and generall calling The Internall and particular calling is a gracious action of God whereby the elect from everlasting in their due time according to the good pleasure of God for the merite of Christ by the holy Ghost are inwardly informed vnto the receyving and communion of Gods grace for their owne salvation the glory of Gods mercy The Efficient cause of this Vocation â—s God according to the particular beginning and the ordinary means therof The beginning is the saving grace of God for Christ for two things doe distinguish this particular beginning of inward calling from
thereof in it selfe and the manner of the truth thereof in vs. Of the truth in it selfe there are two bounds Righteousnesse and the Imputation thereof between these there is a relation because Christ hath perfect righteousnes for no other end then that hee might impute it nor imputeth any other thing then righteousnesse nor is our righteousnesse any otherwise then by Imputation The manner of the truth thereof in vs is in the Scripture two wayes limitted whereof the former teacheth vs that wee are iust not in our selues not in our owne righteousnesse but by the righteousnesse of Christ which being out of vs is made ours by right of giving Hence wee are sayde to be made the righteousnesse of God in him n Cot. 5.21 the second teacheth vs that we haue righteousnesse as Christ hath our sinne now he hath it not subiectiuely or inherent but by imputation Hence is that o Autithesis oppositioÌ„ made by the Apostle in the place already cited to wit of Christ whome God made sinne for vs and of vs who were made the righteousnesse of God in him And according to this forme of Iustification there is one and alike Iustification in all men though in diverse according to the measure of him that apprehendeth it be after a divers maner modified The former â—efore of Iustification is not an haâ—â—â—al saÌ„ctity inherent in vs for albeit Iustification Sanctification agree in the Efficient causes as well Gods grace as Christs merit in the Instrumentall cause to wit faith by receyving that of the one and by effecting that of the other Lastly in the scope and end for they tend to one end saue that the one is as the cause the other as the way yet they much differ both as touching the substance and as touching the Adiuncts As touching the substance that is as touching all the causes for the matter of IustificatioÌ„ is the obedience of Christ of Sanctification our owne obedience the one perfect the other vnperfect the forme thereof that is the Imputation of Christs obedience but of this the drawing backe of our minds from vnpure to pure qualities Of Iustification there is no neerest and inward efficient cause but of this Sanctification the wil of man is being the beginning of human actions the end of that is the peace of conscience but of this an open testifying of the reconciling of our selues with God As touching the Adiuncts because they differ first in the maner of effecting for that is effected by right of donation this by maner of alteration secondly by the Effects that absolveth vs in the iudgement of God This doth not Thirdly and lastly in continuance for That shall haue an end with this life This shall endure for ever The Forme of Iustification taken passiuely is the application of Faith Hence it is that wee are sayde to bee saved p Per fideÌ„ fide ex fide by faith through faith of faith of which wee haue spoken in the cause Instrumentall q Mar. 5.39 Rom. 3.7 Gal. 1.16 Eph. 2.8.9 Tit 3.5 The End of Iustification taken actiuely is the glory of God in the wonderfull tempering of his Iustice and mercy r Eph. 1.5.6.7 Rom. 3. â—6 Of his iustice that he would haue his Sonne to satisfie it of his mercy that he would impute his sonnes satisfaction vnto vs. Å¿ Rom. 5.1 Tit. 3.7 The End of Iustification taken passiuely is peace of Conscience and eternall salvation OF MANS IVSTIFICATIon before GOD. The Confuting Part. Distinctions in defence of the Definition of the Name or Word I. IN the searching out of the interpretation of a Word the derivation and composition of the Word is not simply to bee looked vnto but the vse and the propriety of the same II. THe vse of the Word Iustification is vsually two-fold for eyther Iustification is taken properly or in a signification translated from the speciall to the generall by an abuse of speech it importeth all those thinges which follow Iustification III. THere are two orders of Testimonies concerning Iustification the one Legall the other Evangelicall the testimonies of the Legall Iustice do teach what manner of iustice standeth before the Tribunall of God the testimonies of the iustice of faith or those which are Evangelicall doe some pertaine to the causes of Iustification some to the outward signes and testimonies of the person iustified Lastly some to the comprobation of the worke done by faith The Places by which Bellarmine prooveth that to iustifie signifieth to make iust cap. 3. lib. 2. de Iustitia Rom. 5.16.18.19 Ans First there is a manifest opposition of condemnation and justification Now whereas thinges opposite are vnder the same kinde Genere it must needes be that iustification as well as condemnation is a judiciall Act. Secondly as condemnation is never taken out of that signification which belongs to places of judgment and pleading so justification which is made before God is never taken from the effect of infused grace Thirdly the judgement of God is according to truth as well when hee pronounceth vs just for the imputed righteousnesse of Christ as when hee maketh vs just by the power and vertue of his Spirite both truely though diversly the one perfectly the other vnperfectly Dan. 12.3 Ans Iustification in the signification belonging to courts of pleading is two-fold the one immediate the other mediate of this speaketh the Prophet whereby God by his Ministers absolveth sinners as by the same hee bindeth and holdeth sinners and it is a Figure familiar in the Scripture to attribute that to the Instrument which is proper to the cause Esa 53.11 Answ First the Hebrew word in the third conjugation signifieth to pronounce one just as in the first it signifieth to be just positiuely Secondly the Text hath not in his Knowledge but in the knowledge of himselfe whereby is declared not the manner of Iustification but the Instrument or faith expressed by a circumlocution a Per Periphrasm Thirdly it is one thing to treate of Christs righteousnes which in him is inherent subjectiuely and another thing of that which by Grace is imputed vnto vs. Fourthly Christs satisfaction is the meritorious cause of Iustification which is become onely ours by benefite of Imputation Apoc. 22.11 Ans Iustification in the iudicial signification noteth out two things according as there is a two-fold Court the one of Conscience before God the other of holinesse before men for it importeth to bee absolved eyther before God by the righteousnesse of faith or before men by the righteousnesse of workes In the first signification the sense is thus Hee that is iust let him be iustified still to witte by applying vnto himselfe the continuall remission of his sinnes and the imputation of Christs righteousnesse In the second the sense is thus Hee that is iust let him bee iustified still that is he that desireth to bee iust let him bee informed more and more vnto Iustice and
cited out of Acts 19. proue the same power of both Baptismes because they are the words of Paul speaking of them who were baptized by Iohn in the name of the Lord. The Second Place is of Marke the last ver 16. Answ It is there declared not why but who should bee saved and withall it is taught what is the Consequent of Baptisme and Faith The Third is of Iohn 3.5 Ans The name of Water is Equivocall For in the Scripture it is vsually taken in a three-fold signification for eyther specially it signifieth Baptisme or the the outward Legall washing or lastly the very Effect of the holy Ghost in vs. If it bee taken in the first signification the sense is that Baptisme is the ordinary Signe of Regeneration in the Church If in the second the sense is that the outward clensings of the Law doe not profite vnlesse the inwarde purging of the Spirite bee added thereto If in the third the Name of the Spirite is added d Exegetice by way of exposition for that the Efficacy of the outward Sacramentall Baptisme dependeth vpon the Spirite The Fourth is Act. 2. Answere To be baptized for the Remission of sinnes properly noteth not the Effect of Baptisme but the end and scope thereof neyther was the Action ordained to signifie the signe but the signe to signifie the action signified The Fift Act. 8. Answere The Particle By signifieth sometimes Efficiency sometimes the Instrument and sometime the Signe And in this place it is taken Symbolically because the gift of the holy Ghost by the laying on of hands is both signified and sealed The Sixt is the 1. Cor. 10. Answ To partake of one Bread is not a cause but a publicke Testimony that wee are of one Body wherevpon it is called one Bread not in number but by the common notion of a Sacrament to wit representing vnto vs that one mysticall body of Christ The Seventh is Eph. 1. Answ by a Metonymy that which is proper to the thing signified is attributed to the signe because Baptisme is the signe of our Consecration indeed effectuall not by it owne power but of him who being one became all things to vs the faithfull The Eight is the 1. of Pet. Answ Salvation is attributed to Baptisme because it is the visible Instrument of Salvation both by the signifying and sealing Adde further that Baptisme as a Counter-paterne is opposed against the deliverance from the deluge not in respect of Efficacy but of the Consequent or the thing signified Neyther is there a difference properly put betweene the Baptisme of the Iewes and ours but betweene the outward and inward Baptisme for asmuch as the Effect of this is Salvation and Peace of conscience Distinctions in Defence of the END Bellarmine proveth by fiue Arguments that the sealing of Grace and Gods promises is not the End of a Sacrament 2. Cap. 14. Lib. 1. De Sacramento I. THe end of the Sealing of the Sacrament is not eyther that wee may bee taught what are Gods promises which the word teacheth or that wee should more belieue the Sacraments then the promises for the Sacraments are for the promises and not the Promises for the Sacraments but that the truth of Gods promises might bee confirmed and sealed II. THe Essence and nature of Sacraments ought to be gathered partly from the words of the Institutor partly from the properties of a Sacrament that the wordes of the Institutor do include a promise it hath beene aboue sayde that the property of a Sacrament is to signifie and seale the thing promised the Nature of every Relation and the vse of all signes doe evidently proue III. THe vse of divine Testimonies dependeth vpon the will of the Institutor whether they bee Signes or workes which being Subordinate neyther ought nor may bee opposed both are effectuall and haue their vse neyther doth the abuse of the Signes in Hypocrites take away the vse of them but such is the nature of things opposite doth more establish the same in the godly IIII. THe sealing of Gods promises hath respect eyther vnto the Faith of the covenant or vnto the Faith of them that are in the Covenant In Infants the sealing of Gods promise is made properly in respect of the Faith of the Covenant but in them that are of ripe yeares in respect of their faith in the Covenant V. THe end of Sacraments hath respect eyther vnto the Institutor or vnto him that vseth the same the end of the Institutor is that Sacramentes should seale but of the vsers eyther that they vse that sealing according to the will of the Institutor to their owne Salvation or that they abuse them to their owne condemnation Which last end being accidentall taketh not away the proper end whether Principall or Secondary OF BAPTISME The Part Confirming CHAP. XII THe Doctrine in speciall concerning the two Sacraments of the New Testament to wit Baptisme and the Lords Supper is next after added vnto the Doctrine touching the Sacraments already expounded in Generall The word Baptisme according to the manner of the true interpretation thereof doth Generally signifie any washing whatsoever especially the Legall and Iewish clensings and purgings or purifying which is done by water but Particularly it is taken eyther Metaphorically for the Crosse and Martyrdome a Mat. 10.38 which they call The Baptisme of bloud or Synecdochically for the pouring out of Gods visible Gifts wherewith the Apostles were furnished b Act. 15. which they call The Baptisme of c Flaminis Inspiration or most properly for the first Sacrament of the New Testament which they tearme the Baptisme of d Fluminis Water in which last signification it is of vs here taken and defined To wit that it is the first Sacrament of the New Covenant instituted by Christ consisting of things Analogicall to wit the Signe and the thing signified as also of the Analogicall relation of themselues betweene themselues together with their action or working by which they which are in the Covenant are washed with water by the Minister of the Church that being ingraffed into Christ they might bee made partakers of the inward washing of the soule by his bloude and spirite The Efficient Cause of Baptisme may bee considered two wayes eyther as the Cause Instituting or as the cause vsing Baptism instituted or the baptizing After the first manner Christ onely by his holy spirit ought to be called accounted the Author of Baptisme in asmuch as who first instituted Baptisme in the person of Iohn the Baptist whose Baptisme Christ himselfe witnessed not to bee of men but of God and from heaven e Ioh. 1.23 31. and afterwardes confirmed the Baptisme of Iohn instituted with the word of commaundement promise f Mat. 28.19 For albeit as touching the Circumstance and manner of Christs manifestation there was some difference betweene the Baptisme of Iohn and of the Apostles yet in kinde it was one and
cited as that of the Councell of Carthage and of Milevitum out of Augustine For those Councels doe treate against the Pelagians who at that time denied the baptisme of children and some are suspected as that of the Tridentine Councell and the Testimonies of the Popes III. INfants ought two wayes to bee considered eyther according to common nature or the singular manner of the covenant and grace that way they are conceived in sin but this way they haue obtayned remission of sinnes by the promise In Defence of the Effects of baptisme against the same Cap. 4 and the rest that follow I. SInne dwelling in vs is by baptisme taken away by three meanes and degrees First because it is not imputed Secondlie because by little and little the body thereof is destroyed Thirdly because in death it shall vtterly bee taken away by the power of the same bloud of Christ wherewith wee are washed in Baptisme II. IT is one thing to speake of the cause of Iustification and another thing of the Instrument thereof lastly an other thing of the sealing the cause is the merite of Christ the Instrument is Faith and the sealing is Baptisme III. THe new and vncertaine devise of the Schoolemen concerning the Character or Marke which cannot bee defaced is with the same facility denyed as it is affirmed chiefly whereas neyther Scripture teacheth nor necessary reason sheweth nor authoritie of Fathers proveth any such Character Adde further that the chiefe reason why Baptisme is not iterated is not the impression of the character but Gods onely Institution OF THE LORDES Supper The Part Confirming CHAP. XIII THe other Sacrament of the christian church immediately instituted of Christ for the perpetuall vse thereof is The Lords Supper whereof though there be divers appellations both in Scriptures and with the Fathers for in the Scriptures it is called The body and bloud of the Lord The New Testament The Communion The breaking of bread The Lords Table The bread and the cup The Communicating of the body bloud of Christ a Mat. 26.28 Luc. 22.20 Act. 20.7 1. Cor. 11.25 1. Cor. 10.21 1. Cor. 10.16 which by the Fathers First it is called a gathering together The Eucharist or Thankesgiving Publâ—â—g Administration Secondly the Latâ—â—â— Offering because of collections and sacrifice for the remeÌ„brance of Christs Sacrifie yet most properly by this appellation Of the Lords Supper the thing it selfe hath most fitly beene expressed and indeed it is called The Supper with respect had both of the thing and of the time because it is a holy banquet of the soule and not of the belly instituted of the Lord and that in the Evening but the Lordes in respect both of the Author who is the Lord and of the End which is the remembrance of the Lord. Now it is defined to be A Sacrament of the New Testament instituted of Christ consisting of the Signe and the thing signified proportionable by an Analogicall Relation and action of themselues betweene themselues whereby the full growne members of Christ and his church are trayned vp and taught in the lawfull vse of the visible signes concerning the true and spirituall communication of the body and bloud of Christ vnto life eternall The Efficient Cause of the Lordes Supper ought to be considered eyther as instituting or as vsing and administring the same that is the principall cause but this is the serving or administring cause The Principall or Instituting cause is the Lord from whome it hath beene customably called the Lordes Supper to wit Christ God and man our onely Redeemer instituting the mystery of his body and bloud by the oblarion whereof hee redeemed vs b Rom. 15 18. 1 Cor. 11.23 Of this mysticall and divine Institution there are two parts Christs Deeds and his Words by the one wherof hee limitted and left an example of Administration by the other a doctrine of Institution Of Christs Deeds wherby the manner of the lawfull publicke office or administratioÌ„ is declared there are three partes according as concerning both signes which Christ receyved he orderly vsed holy and ceremoniall actions c Mat. 26.26 Mat. 14.22 Luc. 22.19 1. Cor. 11 24. The first is Blessing and Thankesgiving for the Scripture vseth those two words the one Mathew Marke vseth the other Luke and Paul both signifying the one selfe same thing to witte how Christ by prayers to God by thanksgiving and all that holy action prepared appointed and sanctified the Bread and Wine to a holy vse that they might bee a Sacrament of his Body and Bloud not by their owne nature but by divine Institution and this is that true Consecration or Sanctification of the Sacrament whereof mention is made among the Fathers The Second is The breaking of the Bread and the powring of the wine into the Cuppe which Christ vsed not onely for the cause of dividing and distributing thereof but for the representing of his death for it is an Essentiall and Sacramentall Ceremony of the Lordes Supper pertayning to the end forme thereof d Mat. 26.26 Mar. 14.22 Luc. 22.19 1. Cor. 11.24 The third is the offering and distributing of the Bread broken and the Wine powred in For Christ gaue not the same to his Disciples that they should distribute but that they should receyue that which was distributed e Mat. 26.26.27 Mar. 14.22 Luc. 22.56 because they were in that Supper not the dispensers of Gods Mysteries but the Guestes But Christ as being the Feast-maker with one labour instituted and with his owne hands dispensed the Sacrament of his Grace and withall sanctified the Ministeriall dispensation thereof And all these Actions are Sacramentall and ought diligently to be considered as farre forth as they are vsed for the signifying and sealing of Spirituall things by divine Institution To these Actions that wee may come to the second part of the Institution Christ added Words whereof some include a Commaundement some a Promise and lastly some an Explication These in Schooles haue vsually been tearmed Preceptiue the other Definitiue and Sacramentall Lastly these Expositiue The Words Preceptiue are those by which hee hath injoyned both vpon the dispensers a necessity of their administration and vpon the communicants a necessity of taking and hath prescribed vnto both a forme of both Administration by his deed whereof we haue aboue spoken and by his commaundement of Imitation ioyned therevnto e Mat. 2 6 26. 1. Cor. 11.24 Of Communicating by a double Precept by the one To take by the other To eate and to drinke The Taking is a Sacramentall Rite prescribed to him that commeth to the Lords Table whereby wee receyue with our hand the Bread and Cuppe of Thanksgiving for it cannot bee gathered eyther from the Story of the Institution of the Lordes Supper oâ— froÌ„ the fashion of Christs sitting down and his Apostles that Christ in the first Supper did put those signes into the mouth of every of the Apostles by which
which not withstanding how needefull it is the Forme End of the Lordes institution as also Tradition doe proue with great likely hood Fourthly they who for heresie or for their dissolute life are lawfully excommunicated for this Supper requireth worthy guests which liue to Christ in Spirit Faith Whence it was that the persons who were excoÌ„municated or did Penance after the Sermon ended were in former time commaunded to goe forth The Matter constituting the holy Supper is two-fold the one Earthly Outward Elementall Visible the other Heavenly Inward and Spirituall wherof that is commonly called the Signe this the thing signified By the name of Signe all that is vnderstoode whatsoever is perceyved by the outward senses in the pure and lawfull administration of the Lordes Supper whether it be the Element or the bodily substance or the action or rite agreeable to Gods institution The Elementall Signes for of the Rites wee haue spoken in the explication of the Efficient Cause are two the Bread and Wine which two albeit materially they are distinguished yet formally and perfectlie as the Schoolmen speake they make but one Sacrament now they so make it that neyther more nor fewer bee required for the entirenesse and perfection of this Sacrament Not more because all refreshing or feeding is by them performed and ours in Christ is perfectly noted forth Not Fewer because if the one fayle or be wanting the Sacrament of perfect refection is taken away And in this defect Offence is committed in the maiming of the Elements or in the communion vnder one kinde onely against the Lords Institution the Apostles Tradition The End and Dignity of the Sacrament and lastly against the Orthodoxall consent of the elder Church Christs Institution because if you respect eyther the action of Christ and of the Apostles in the first Supper both were given and both were receyved or the wordes First Preceptiue of both they include a commaundement Take and Drinke Secondly Definitiue they are pronounced of both the Bread and the Wine This is my body and this is my bloud Thirdly Expositiue In both they propose a promise o Mat. 26.28 Mar. 14 24. Luc. 22.20 Apostolicall Tradition because the Apostle by the authority of the Lord injoyneth vpon the whole Church of Corinth a necessity both of eating the bread and drinking the wine Which p 1 Cor. â— 11.25.26 Tradition that it was proposed not to one age but to all ages to bee observed The consequence of the Text doth easily proueq. The End and Dignity of the Sacrament because the end is to seale the perfect refreshing of vs in Christ which by the cutting off of the other Signe is made vnperfect but the dignity is to set forth the grace of that covenant after a more evident manner then in the olde Testament it was set forth vnto those who did all alike partake of the Paschall Lambe and of the water out of the rocke as the Story and Paules eplication teacheth r 1. Cor. 10.1 2 The Orthodoxall consent of the elder Church because all that ancient and purer Church judged that the communication of both kinds did not pertaine to the Cleargy onely but to the Laiety aswell It knew nothing of Concomitancy which from the bad costome of the Eucharist dipped in the Wine spruÌ„g forth aboue a thousand two hundred and twenty yeares after and afterwards was coÌ„firmed in the Councels of Constance Basil and Trent Now by the name of Bread Wine we specially and properly vnderstand those Elements which by those words are wont amongst vs to bee noted and pointed out To witte being Pure and Common Pure that they be not mingled or confounded together eyther by dipping of the bread in the wine or by adding the same together with the Wine Common or Vulgar that they bee such as are in common vse to wit lest by the matter colour and taste of those signes any superstition should bee bredde in the heart or mind The Thing signified or the matter inward and spirituall in the Supper of the Lord the neerest and principall is the body and bloud of the Lord That as it was crucifyed or broken This as being powred out Then the Secondary is the most strait copling of Christ with vs by faith by the meane whereof wee are made partakers of Christes owne person and all his benefites The First or Principall in the Supper is the Body and Bloud of the Lord both as touching the Substance and as touching the singular Attributes of the Substance As touching the Substance because wee aâ—e made partakers of the true and Essentiall body and bloud of Christ though after a spirituall manner of receyving Å¿ 1. Cor. 10 26. for albeit the Supper be an eating of the body yet it is not bodily but spirituall not in respect of Essence but in the manner of communicating and the spirituall efficacy of nourishing for the Spirite of man by faith alone receyveth the body and bloud of Christ and with them really for even spirituall actions haue also their reallity is nourished to a spirituall life by the effectuall working of the holy Ghost Neyther doe wee exclude whole Christ from the Supper t Gal. 3.27 Rom. 6.3 sith by the denomination of his body and bloud the whole humanity of Christ nay his whole persoÌ„ is synechdochicaly vnderstoode because neyther the humanitie without the Divivity not the Divinity without the humanity nor both without their common Subject can bee a mediatrix The reason of which Synecdoche is that albeit he be the one and the same who suffered for vs even Christ God and man yet suffered he not in the very Divinity but in the Flesh for therefore as sayd Augustine was Christ borne that being man hee might deliver men and being mortal hee might deliver mortall and dead men from death The Particular Attributes of this Substance are the crucifying of his body and the powring out of his bloud u 1 Cor. 11.14 Luc 22.19.20 and the fruit of the merite of Christes Sacrifice conjoyned with these to wit Remission of sinnes Sanctification Redemption whence it is that in the Scripture the whole obedience of Christ and all the benefits thence proceeding haue vsually been signified by one word Death x 1. Ioh. 1.7 1. Pet. 1 19. Mat. â—0 28. The Secondary thing signified in the Supper is the most straite vniting conjoyning of vs all into one mysticall body both with Christ and among our selues y 1. Cor. 10.16.17.12.13 for as wee are tyed among our selues by the holy band of the same faith and brotherly loue as the members of the same body so by the true eating of Christs body wee are most straitely conjoyned with him and from him as from the head life issueth vnto vs as vnto his members z Ioh. 6.5.7 By the meane of this vnion it commeth to passe that wee bee made partakers both of the benefits of Christ and of his
doe in the lawfull vse of the Lords Supper but by neyther of both ways is that Popish consecration proved III. OVr Consecration Christs differ not in Substance but in degree for that which is Christs is nothing else but an appointing or dedicating of the bread and wine to the holy and divine vses made by the word of Institution according to his Free will but that which is ours doth all and wholy depend vpon the verity power and ordinance of God not vpon the secret recitall and muttering of wordes IIII. THe will of Christ consecrating is not to bee separated from the Sacramentall manner and Rite of consecration because as the one is the cause Efficient of the consecration so the other also is the materiall and formall cause thereof If you respect the Efficient Christ consecrated it with his will alone if the materiall and formall he consecrated it with the solemne word of Institution and with those Rites of dispensing which hee himselfe vsed commaunded vs to vse V. TO doe this in the Institution of the Supper is not to consecrate the outward signes or symboles but to doe all that which Christ commaunded his Disciples to doe Neyther did Christ vtter these wordes This is my Body to the end hee might consecrate the signes for he vttered them after the blessing breaking of bread but that he might declare vnto his Disciples the manner or nature of the Sacrament VI. THere is no change made in a Sacrament by vertue of the wordes but of the divine Institution and ordinance And that which is made is not made in Substance in quantity or in naturall qualities but in relation onely that is in vse and office Neyther doth eyther the custome of the church proue any other thing which vsed a shewing holding forth of the Eucharist not for adoration but eyther that they might prepare the people to the communion or that thereby out of the offering of private men a certaine part being set aside for the peculiar vse of the Sacrament might be shewed or the costom of the Greeke Fathers who never vsed this Rite of Elevating since the beginning vnto this day VII IT is manifest that those words which were not spoken over the bread or to the bread but to the Disciples communicating were spoken to instruct the people and not to change the breade neyther doe the most auncient Lyturgies gaine-say this which joyne together the wordes of consecration with the whole action of the Lordes Supper or doe the Fathers who when they affirmed that the Eucharist is made by a mystical Prayer by calling on the name of God by solemne blessing by thanksgiving or some certain consecration had no respect to those fiue wordes alone and that they with them would not haue consecrated the bread of the Sacrament by any Substantiall change their owne most evident expositions doe plainely shew In Defence of the Matter constituting the Lordes Supper and first against Concomitancy Bellar. Lib. 4. Cap. 21. I. AN Argument drawne from the hypostatical vnion of God man and that which is naturall of the Flesh and the Soule to concomitancy is of no force because it is one thing to treate of flesh and bloud which are things substantiall and entire partes of humane nature but another thing as they are given vnto vs for meate and drinke according to the voluntary and Testamentall disposition of Christ neither is therefore the Hypostaticall vnion of God and man broken which was not broken in death howsoever the soule and bloud were separated from the body II. THe spirituall eating whereof onely the order of the Text in the Chapter cited sheweth that mention is made ought to bee distinguished from the Sacramentall eating whereof here the question is neyther ought that which is spoken Synecdochically of eating in some places be taken exclusiuely seeing also in other places there is very often mention made of drinking III. FRom false ambiguous and impertinent Principles a false ambiguous and impertinent consequence is drawn Now the first Principle is false for we doe not acknowledge any reall or visible presence of Christs body bloud in the Supper In respect of the signes it is wholy Sacramentall in respect of the thing signified meerely spirituall IIII. THe second Principle is ambiguous because the body and bloud of Christ are two wayes considered one way as they are the partes of Christes humane nature all which being vnable to bee sundered liveth glorious the other as they are represented vnto vs Sacramentally in this action of the Supper to witte as both the body was offered vnto death for vs on the crosse and his bloud out of the body powred forth for the wordes added to the Institution doe plainely testifie that the body and bloud of Christ as things separated in the sacrifice of the Crosse are offered and exhibited vnto vs in the Supper V. THe third Principle is impertinent and different from the question now in hand because wee treate not here eyther of the vniversall presence of Christs Divinity which pertayneth nothing to the speciall kindes for if the adversary vnderstand the presence of nature Christ shall bee aswell any where else as in the Supper because he filleth all things if the presence of grace he affirmeth nothing that is proper to the bread but what pertaineth to all the faithfull or of the Hypostaticall vnion of the two natures in respect wherof notwithstanding we wil never affirm that the Divinity of Christ is with his humanity by a Concomitancy because that were a Nestorian heresie VI. THe Fathers which are cited eyther spake Synecdochically by the body vnderstanding the whole humane nature of Christ as Cyprian Hillarie Ambrose or of the whole person wherof in the Supper we are made partakers as Basil Hierome Chrysostome Origen the Nicene Synode or Sacramentally they vttered that of the signe which is proper to the thing signified as Augustine Cyril both he of Ierusalem and that other of Alexandria VII The body of Christ vnder the shew of bread is Sacramentally offered vnto vs in the Supper as it was crucified and broken and his bloud as it was shed for Christ instituted the Supper for a remembrance of his death and yet is not his carkasse eaten because Christ by his death purchased merite of life for himselfe and his VIII It is one thing to speake of the body bloud of Christ as touching themselues and another thing according to the manner of a Sacrament as touching themselues the bloud of Christ cannot bee plucked from the body that was done once on the Crosse but as touching the nature of a Sacrament they ought distinctly to be considered partly because in the Supper they represent that vnto vs which was once done and partly also because the perfection of our refreshing in Christ is exhibited in the eating of Christes flesh and in the drinking of his bloud IX MIracles are not to be drawne into vse and rule because every
not by naâ—ure as once the posterity of Aaron the Levites but by Ordinance and Institution But the Office of these Instruments â—s to administer the affaires of the Church according to Gods prescriptiâ—n Now the affaires of the church doe â—oncerne eyther the Doctrine or the â—ignes and Sacraments or lastly the â—cclesiasticall Iurisdiction and Disciâ—line of the Church Wherefore the â—ffice of all Ministers is contayned or â—ounded in the administration of Doâ—trine Sacraments and Ecclesiasticall â—overnement The Administration of Doctrine â—onsisteth in two partes in the assertiâ—n of the truth and in the contrary reâ—â—tation of falshood the right object of â—oth is the word of God y 2. Tim. 2 15 Tit. 1.9 The Administration of Sacraments hath two considerations one of the Persons to whome the Sacraments eyther ought or ought not to bee administred The other of the Manner that they bee wholy conveniently and intelligently administred Wholy as touching the Substantiall and Conveniently as touching the outward quality and forme Intelligently as touching the common Edification of the Church z 1. Cor. 1.23 Luc. 22 19 The administration of Ecclesiastical Discipline is chiefly exercised in two thinges in the punishing of faults and in the execution of Ecclesiasticall judgements as afterwards wee shall shew more at large a 1. Cor. 5.4 2. Cor. 2 8 The Matter of the Church hath respect eyther of the parts or of the Subject The Partes of the Church generally and materially are two The one Superior the other Inferior That 〈◊〉 the head of the Church to which the church is subject and from which alâ— vertue 〈◊〉 into the Church This is the body vnto which the members among themselues and with the head are vnited for the mutuall relation of these partes the one to the other maketh an essentiall manner or nature of the church But particularly the entire parts of the church Invisible are two according as there is vsually had a double respect of this church the one in the Beginning and progresse the other in the Perfection thereof that is commonly called the Militant this the Triumphant both which as touching the Essentiall nature of the church it selfe are but one albeit for the difference of the qualities which are in these partes they are as touching the place very diversly distinguished so that the one is in heaven which triumpheth and the other on earth which is in warfare b Heb. 12 22. Apoc. 21.2 Eph. 6.11.12 but of the church Visible as it is so considered there are two maine partes the Guides and the Flockes the Instructers and the Learners though extraordinarily it often happeneth that the one part is separated from the other the essentiall forme of the church it self still remayning The Subiect of the church Generally is Mankind c Mat. 28.19 Ioh. 10.16 Rom. 1.16 of which partly some are called dayly by the grace of God whosoever are ordained to life eternall and partly others are also called who being convicted of the grace offered might become for ever inexcusable But Particularly the Subject of the church visible are all those in generall which are called and outwardly professe the same faith in which common assembly of the church not onely the godly and elect are but also the vngodly and reprobate Those as touching the verity of the inward and outward forme these according to the shew and resemblaÌ„ce or counterfeiting of godlinesse Those Elect and called these called onely not elect Those the liuely these the dead members of the church d Luc. 8.13 Mat. 22.14 but of the church Invisible are they onely that are predestinated to life who indeed are inwardly affected with the calling of God and perceiue the same by faith according to the election and operation of Grace e Rom. 8.9 Eph. 1.23 Ioh. 14.23 Neyther are eyther the newly catechised Novices though yet not baptized nor those which are excommunicated if they repent excepted out of the visible church not those because albeit they haue not as yet receyved the outward signe yet being indued with faith and baptized with the inwarde Baptisme they ought to be taken for the members of the church according to the perfection thereof Neyther is it lawfull to exclude those from the communion of the church whome the Scripture doth not exclude from the communion of Salvation Not these because as they were conditionally excluded till there be hope of repentance so they must conditionally bee of the Church Now all Reprobates and those that liue wickedly without any pricke of conscience are excluded because whether they seeme to bee inwardly of the church or whether they are outwardly of the church yet they haue beene alwayes separated and continued so from the vnity of this church For this church is the communion of Saintes the Spouse and body of Christ without blemish the Temple of God the holy city c. The Forme of the church both generally according to it selfe wholy and specially according to the double notion thereof ought to be expounded as hath beene done in the causes precedent Generally the Forme of the church is two wayes considered Severally in it selfe and the Efficient cause thereof or ioyntly in her Subject After the former manner the Forme of the church is that divine and precious calling wrought in heaven according to the purpose of Gods will wherby hee decreede from everlasting the communion of himself with the church and of the church with himselfe in his beloved Sonne e Eph. 1.4.5 Ioh 10.27.48 Rom. 8.30 After the latter maner the forme of the church is a divine and gratious calling whereby the church of God is in this world fashioned and waiting vntill after the course of her calling here consummated it be advanced in Christ Iesus to the fruition of the heavenly calling And of this calling as the nature as touching it selfe is most perfect so the manner of the same is also two-fold the one immediate the other mediate that which God by himselfe maketh through the vertue of his Spirite this which he maketh outwardly by speech signe or working ordinarily or extraordinarily as it pleaseth him to make it known vnto men Specially the forme of the church Invisible is an effectuall and inwarde calling and by vertue of that effectuall calling that communion of Saintes both with their head and of themselues each with other g 1. Ioh. 1.12 And of this calling as the nature in respect of God is perfect so the inward and effectuall meane thereof is two-fold the Spirite and Faith the one in respect of him that calleth the other in respect of him that is called by the one God offereth and conferreth the effectuall calling by the other wee take holde of that which is offered and make answere to Gods calling for it is needefull that these two concurre together that the calling bee effectuall to witte the calling of God by the vertue and efficacy of his Spirite and our correspondent
to be Veniall or pardonable for that it is worthy of pardon but for that God vouchsafeth pardon to the Sinne and the Sinner Not the Third because it is false both that Sinne is Veniall of it own nature and that any the least Sinne should not bee against Charity For it is the transgression of the Law the ende whereof is Loue. Not the Fourth because the Nature or consideration of man offended is one and of God is another for according to the party offended the greatenesse of the offence is esteemed Not the Fift for no sinne is vnperfect because every sinne is a perfect iniquity though there bee degrees of this perfection Not the Sixt because though all sins doe not exclude charity yet they offend Now in that they exclude not or are veniall to the faithfull we must impute it not to sinne it selfe but to Gods mercy in Christ OF FREE WILL. The Part Confirming CAP. V. NOw after the Condition of man vnder Sinne followeth the consideration of humane strength which after Sinne remayned in man and is commonly and vsually expounded and noted by the Name of Free-Will But it is needefull we discerne the nature of this Doctrine three manner of wayes First commonly and absolutely according to the causes thereof Secondly in Particular according to the state and condition of man being a Sinner Thirdly respectiuely and comparatiuely according to the diverse estate of Man out of the State of Sinne whether of his Integrity or redemption or glory Commonly and Absolutely Free-will is defined to bee a naturall power or faculty of the Soule by it owne and proper motion without coaction or forcing to chuse or refuse the good or the evill which is proposed or offered to the will by the mind or vnderstanding to bee chosen or refused The Efficient Cause of this Free-will is vsually two wayes distinguished For one is Primary and another Neerest The Primary or Principall is God the beginning not onely of every good in nature but also of Nature it selfe and of the faculties and functions thereof a Gen. 45.8 Pro. 16.1 Ier. 10.23 Phil. 2.13 The Neerest is Free-will it selfe that is the will of mā which by judgement of reason going before of it owne accord choosing imbraceth or refusing shunneth that which was objected by the mind b Esa 1.19.20 Mat. 23.37 1. Kin. 3.5 Of this will there is vsually had a double consideration the one as touching the Speciall the other as touching the Operation As touching the speciall it is sayed to bee a faculty of willing or nilling as touching the Operation it is sayde to bee a function or action of that faculty eyther improperly occupied about the ends or properly about the meanes that tend to the ends The Matter hath the nature eyther of a Subiect or Obiect That which hath the nature of a Subiect as in this place we consider it is a substance created intelligent indued with reason wherein namely the vnderstanding and will are the essentiall parts proportionally but freedome is sayde to consist or be in these parts as the separable accident in the Subject That which is of the Obiect is generally all that which is put or consisteth in election or choice But specially it is the moral good or evil whervnto the will of the Creature is freely carried or which it freely escheweth And as touching Free-will in the cause of Naturall good the question is more Philosophicall then Divine The Forme of Free-will is the very freedome of the mind or of the Electiue will which for learning sake must three wayes be distinguished known For there is one freedome in the Subject another to the Object and lastly another from the lett that crosseth the same which three it is needefull that wee know for the making of this Forme and for the condition of mans Free-will First there is required freedome in the Subiect that is in the will it selfe which from her inward beginning worketh alwayes freely and that by reason of it owne nature according to which a free necessity of willing is laide vpon it So that it is not to bee called a Will which is bereft of this Freedome For the wil hath such a reciprocacy with Freedome as with it owne Essentiall property Then there is required freedome to the Obiect eyther to both opposite by way of disjunction to witte eyther morall good or morall evill whereof the one is chosen or refused before or rather then the other or to eyther of thē when onely one is offered to be taken or refused Lastly there is required freedome from the let that crosseth For the wil of man is freede from compulsion and from necessity From Compulsion for what it doth it doth the same of it owne accord From Necessity for albeit in respect of the Speciall it be necessarily limited to doe eyther good only or evill onely or both yet by it own inward power it freely limiteth it selfe to the bringing forth of it owne act yet it is needefull that both manners of Freedome be distinguished First from the Freedome of right and secondly from the Freedome of slavery That nature hath denied to man This the corruption of nature He hath not freedome of right who of due is Subject to another and according to the will of the same liueth is moved and worketh c Pro. 21.1 Act. 2.23 Wherefore all selfe power or liberty ought to bee given and assigned to God alone he hath not freedome from slavery who through his owne fault hath made himselfe a slaue to sinne and the tyranny thereof d Ioh. 8.34 The End is the glory of God in his Iustice and mercy and the Salvation or inexcusablenesse of man Particularly in the state of Corruption Free will is defined to be a naturall faculty and power freely and without coaction to chuse and performe the evill which by the mind is offered to the will to be chosen and performed The Efficient Primarie Cause is God both in respect of the Will and the freedome it selfe as being the Author and beginning of both as touching the naturall state thereof The neerest cause are the mind and will of man so farre forth as both by corruption of nature are averted from good and converted to evill and the vnderstanding verily proposeth and iudgeth falshood for truth and the will chuseth and followeth the evill in stead of the good c T it 1.15 1 Cor. 2.14 Rom. 8.7 Rom. 5.6 2. Tim. 2.26 The Matter as it is considered in the Subiect is the naturall or carnal man but as in the obiect it is the evill vnto which the actions of both faculties are carried Now the Evill whether you referre it to the inward or to the outwarde actions wee two wayes consider absolutely and in it selfe or Relatiuely as having reference to another thing The Evill absolutely is that which is strictly forbidden of God Relatiuely is that which is evill in the obiect circumstances and end that is which
eyther is not truely good or is inclined vnto those thinges which are not truely good But because when there is mention made of good eyther the naturall and morall good as touching man or morall divine good according to grace is vnderstoode Wee must here obserue a very great difference when there is speech of Free-will For the power of a naturall man if it be referred to the thing which this naturall light respecteth hath indeed her inclinations to naturall good and morall good as touching man f Rom. 1 19.20 Rom. 2.15 Rom. 2.14 but because the communicating of every good proceedeth from iudgement and iudgement from the choice and choyce from knowledge the power of man is limitted to the good according to the measure of the knowledge of that good in man Now that knowledge is not true becaus it erreth in the maner of the truth and strayeth from the true end and scope thereof g 1. Cor. 2 14. Ier. 13.23 Mat. 12.35 Ro. 14.23 Now the morall good according to grace which is supernaturall is not apprehended but by a supernatural knowledge which is not in the natural man therfore man being vnder sinne hath neyther inclinations nor motions to that good for he wanteth all power to supernaturall things even that power which the Philosophers haue called the receptiue or passiue power because every power is from a beginning but there is no beginning in a naturall man when there is speech of divine things â—eyther to doe them himselfe nor to â—ffer them to be done by an other h 2. Co. 3.5 Ioh. 3.19 Phil 2.13 1. Co. 1.18 â—oth being considered in man are from â—at beginning of all aptnes to good â—so of the working thereof which is in â—hrist Whence it is cleare that power 〈◊〉 the supernaturall good is not in the â—turall man and that there is indeede â—me power in him to the natural good â—ut such as straieth in the end maner â—d that therefore to speake properly it 〈◊〉 onely a power to the evill whether it â—e such Absolutely or Relatiueâ— i 1. Cor. 10.31 Rom. 14.20 Tit. 1.15 Ier. 13.23 Mat. 7.18 Rom. 3.10 Ioh. 3.6 The Forme is the Freedome in the â—biect to the Obiect and from the coÌ„â—ry impediment For the will of man 〈◊〉 touching it selfe is most free freely â—itteth it selfe for the bringing forth 〈◊〉 the action of evill without eyther â—y coaction or necessity of the â—ct The End is the glory of God in his iuâ—â—ce and the inexcusablenes or iust condemnation of man Comparatiuely Free-will is two wayeâ— considered according to the twofolde condition of man out of his State oâ— Corruption to witte of his integritie before his fall and of his restoring câ—â— regeneration after his fall In the State of Integrity Man had a Free will or freedome of an Electuâ—â— will to both Objects without any coaction or necessity For he had a power that he might sinne and not sinne But when he came to the act of disobedience by the act he lost the poweâ— to good because this was the nature oâ— man that hee abusing that his poweâ— to good should turne away the good from himselfe and himselfe from thâ— good into the contrary k 1. Cor. 3 12. 1. Ioh 3.12 2. Pet. 1.4 1. Cor. 15.28 In the State of Restoring or Regeneration after the fall free-will oughâ— divers wayes to be considered anâ— expounded For whereas man in thâ— state is the common Subject of grace and sinne Hence it commeth to passe that he hath free-will both to good according to Grace to evill according to Nature which two contraries sith they cannot be in one and the same subject in the highest degree thence â—t followeth that man Regenerate is to be considered according as his regeneration is more or lesse 〈◊〉 excellent As for him that is Regenerate according to the highest degree there can be in such a one no contrary matter as it shall bee with man in the life to come where free-will if we may so speake shall be vnto good onely and that vnchangeably so that a man can will nothing but good and that also after l 1. Cor. 13 12. Rom. 7.18 a good maner but he which is regenerate in the inferiour degree the contraries may be together in him in very deede are together in him the powers therefore of Free-will in man regenerate while hee is in this life ought diversly to be discerned both in the Subject Obiect and manner The Subiect is two wayes considered partly according to the old man in whom he is borne partly according to the New in whome hee is regenerate Of this Subiect there is also a double obiect the naturall evill in respect of the olde man the supernaturall good in respect of the New m 2. Cor. 3 17. 1. Ioh. 3.9 Rom. 8.2 Eph. 2.5 But the maner of all these is free because as the old maÌ„ freely inclineth to naturall things so doth the New man also to thinges which are supernaturall in respect therefore of the matter the Subiect is common but in respect of the Efficient Cause and of the beginning repugnant the one to the other on both sides there commeth a lett to the freedome Whence that strife of the flesh and the Spirite commeth wherof there is mention in the seventh to the Romanes OF FREE-WILL The Part Confuting DISTINCTIONS I. THe Will or Desire is three wayes distinguished for one is Naturall an other sensuall another intellectuall The Naturall is a pure inclination of the Essential forme whereby man naturally laboureth towardes the perfection of himselfe The Sensual is the power of the inferiour part of the Soule led or moved by sense and not by reason to these or those particular things the Intellectual is in the creature indued with reason in respect of the Subiect inclining the will to diverse obiects which is called Reasonable II. THe reasonable will ought to bee discerned three wayes For one is called naturall whereby nature is simplie carried to desire after that thing which it apprehendeth an other Electiue whereby the will chooseth betweene two thinges opposite by a separating of them Lastly there is a will by the cause whereby man straieth from his end voluntas per causá through an accidentall error III. THat which we cal Arbitrium Free-will is sometime referred to the vnderstanding and sometime to the Will to the Vnderstanding eyther Contemplatiue or Actiue in respect of the things which belong to deliberation but to the Wil in respect of the things which pertaine to Election After the former manner it comprehendeth the mind alone after the latter as of vs it is here taken it comprehendeth both mind and will IIII. THere is one Freedom froÌ„ Bondage an other from Coaction an other from Vnchangeablenesse or necessity Freedome from Bondage is sayd to be that whereby one is not addicted oâ— subiect to the slavery of sinne or misery From Coaction is
that it is a naked representation made in the vnderstanding but for that it is a certaine and vndoubted assurance of the will as it may easily bee collected by the places compared the one with the other Psal 39.8 Heb. 3.14 Againe Faith is called an Evidence because it affordeth that certainety of demonstration whereby not onely the mind but also the will is convinced that it might particularly apply vnto it selfe Gods promises vnderstood by the mind Secondly that which is alleadged concerning the vnderstanding of the Creation by faith for besides that there is an other respect of Faith iustifying which properly hath an eye vnto to the benefite of Redemption and not vnto the worke of Creation we must also note that some thinges are pronounced of faith in Scriptures rather in respect of knowledge or assent and some things rather in regard of confidence or assurance neyther doth the vnderstanding exclude assurance but goeth before it Thirdly the example of Noah for the Act of his faith doth not onely respect the deluge and the truth of Gods judgement but also the saving of himselfe from the deluge which hee could not beleeue and embrace but by the Assurance of the wil. Fourthly that which is alleadged concerning the things belonging to God because that same faith whereof the Apostle treateth doth withall suppose both knowledge in respect of the Essence and Nature of God confidence of his gratious rewarding Against Bellarmine Cap. 6. I. ROm. 4. Answ The nature and force of faith is not principally and chiefly placed in knowledge which is of the vnderstanding but in assurance which is of the will For hence first mention of the promise is made which the will properly respecteth that it might bee embraced Secondly Abraham is sayd to haue beene strengthened by Faith not to haue doubted through vnbeliefe or distrust and to haue beene very fully perswaded that God was both mercifull which would and mighty which could do him good all which doe testifie his confidence and not his knowledge onely II COr 1.13 Hope and Faith are sometimes of the same signification and import the same thing sometimes they are distinguished as in the place cited Now they are thus distinguished that Faith is a knowledge assent and assurance but hope an expectation which followeth Faith and is begotten by Faith III. COr 2.10 The Apostle doth not treat of Iustifying faith properly but of the Effects ther of or of that spirituall vertue whereby we renouncing our selues doe bring into captivity all our thoughtes to the obedience of Christ IIII. EPhes 3. Assurance is diversly wont to be considered eyther as the Forme or as the Effect of faith as the forme as it embraceth Christ with a sure perswasion of the heart as the Effect as out of this perswasion it begetteth in vs tranquility of conscience and boldnesse or assurance of Liberty V. THere is one Obiect of faith level another chiefe or speciall that which is levell is the whole word of God in respect of knowledge and assent that which is speciall is the word of Grace in respect of assurance VI. TO beleeue is wont sometimes to be taken largely sometimes strictly being largely taken it signifyeth generally every voluntary assent with a certainety to that thing which is not seene being strictly taken it signifieth a Iustifying faith which doth indeed presuppose a knowledge but formally it is an affection towardes the promise of Grace OF GOOD WORKES The Part Confirming CAP. VII ANd this is the first and principall part of Christian Calling being Inward and Invisible which the other which is outward and visible doth succeed that is good Workes which proue and testifie the truth and life of faith by the outward exercises of Pietie and charity Now it is needefull that the doctrine of good workes bee expounded two wayes first according to their owne common nature and respect secondly according to the chiefe kind of a Christian life and the principall exercises of a Christian man in this life Good Workes according to their own common nature and respect which of vs in this place are indeede considered Theologically and not eyther Philosophically or Politically are defined to be Actions which are done the holy Ghost working the same of the Regenerate by faith according to Gods law to the glory of God the confirmation of faith and our election and the aedification of our neighbour The Efficient Cause of good works is vsually considered eyther as principall or Secondary The Principall is God the Father in his Sonne by the holy Ghost from whome in whom and by whom is the beginning and finishing as in nature so aboue nature a Phi. 2.13 1. Cor. 4.7 Ioh. 3.27 15.5 Eph. 2.4 Now God effecteth good workes partly in respect of the agēt or Instrument which is man regenerate whom hee prepareth informeth and instructeth after a saving and singular manner of the Grace of sanctification that hee might both be willing and able to worke well partly in respect of the action which hee sanct fieth that it might bee good both in the generall and in the speciall and in all circumstances The second Efficient Cause is eyther Externall or Internall both Instrumentall in respect of that former or superiour Cause The Externall is man regenerate Immediately producing good actions according to the measure and degree of his Regeneration For because the Spirite and the flesh are mixed one with an other in a man regenerate it commeth to passe that in one and the same worke the action springeth mixed of both by a mutuall conflict which by the more intentiue quality is vsually named the worke of the Spirite or of the b 1. Ioh. 1.8 Rom. 7 23 Eph. 2.3 flesh Whence is the infection and imperfection even of the best workes The internall is Faith not by the vertue efficacy or efficiency of it selfe but as it apprehendeth that her object instrumētally vnto which it is carried to witt Christ in respect of whome onely the holy Ghost worketh in vs both to will and to doe good and our actions though most vnperfect doe neverthelesse please God and are approved of him The Matter of good works is whatsoever is prescribed by the Law of God for both God alone hath the authority of commaunding and the Law of God alone hath the rule and manner of every commandement which hath respect vnto that which is right and good c 1. Sam. 15.22 Ezek. 20.19 Mat. 15.9 Esa 29.23 Of this Matter according to the distinction of Gods Law into two Tables there are two chiefe and principall parts the former whereof prescribeth and commaundeth the duty of man towards God or godlines the latter the duety of man towards man or humanity The good works which belong to godlinesse are absolutely and necessarily good and cannot be otherwise the consideration whereof is most perfectly set downe in the fowre precepts of the first Table For the works of godlines do properly belong eyther to the