perfectly good or imperfectly good such as is now in man mixed with many infirmities and imperfections which is either naturall in man as the coveting and desiring of meat and drink and other things necessary for the use of man or supernaturally wrought in man by grace as is the love and desire of vertue or it is mixed partly naturall and partly supernaturall as Matrimoniall concupisence for procreation which hath both a naturall cause or being and is likewise guided by grace unto a right end and none of these kinds of good and commendable concupisence is sinne Evill concupisence is of three sorts 1. As Idle roving and Evill concupisence of three sorts impertinent thoughts which the mind may easily reject 2. Violent cogitations which sticketh more closely and nearely as the immoderate desire of meat and drink and such things as belong to the necessity of nature as sumptuous apparrell and the like 3. There are filthy and uncleane cogitations as lasciviousnesse envie vain-glory and the like The first of these may be compared to thin Clay that sticketh or cleaveth not the second to tough Clay that sticketh fast and the third to uncleane and stinking Myre and Mud otherwise the first motion is not voluntary as a certaine preparation of the affection the second is with the will but the same not obstinate as when it commeth to ones minde to revenge himself when he is hurt but the third kinde is so outragious that it will not be ruled by reason as when a man is carried to revenge himself without measure The first of these can be no more ruled by reason then such things as hapneth to the body as when one yauneth when he seeth another yaune or suddenly winketh when one putteth their finger towards anothers eye c. SECT 4. Obj. ARe these idle wandrings being without respect to any certaine object sin and so forbidden in the Morall precept seeing the Morall precept aymeth at a certaine object as thou shalt not covet thy neighbours house c. Ans If we doe reject these thoughts at the very first moving of them and yet if so they carry some staine and guilt in them in regard children which have no such evill thoughts yet are not cleane before God being conceived and borne in sin as in Psal 51. 5. and which is also most evidently confirmed by the death of Infants as I have formerly shewed sin being the cause of death Therefore the best solution is that those cogitations which doe vanish before the minde be affected be not comprehended in the precept as actuall sins untill the will of man in some degree give consent till then sinne is only in the conception but not in the birth as the Apostle James saith When lust hath conceived it bringeth forth sin Jam. 1. 15. but as it is the first fruit of originall sinne together with that native corruption they are contrary to the precept for the Morall Law being grounded upon the Law of Nature which was perfect in man by creation before his fall and from which perfection originall sinne being a defect It may well be concluded that though they doe not come to reckoning before God if they presently vanish before the will and affection be inclined unto them yet doe they shew the corruption of our nature and although they breake not into a a flame yet they are sparkes that flye upward but if those sparks doe not break into a flame they shall never burn us nor be laid unto our judgement for if the will assent not concupiscence shall never hurt But this is through Gods meere mercy for otherwise Original sinne enough to condemne us this very originall corruption is enough to condemne us And thus I have shewed the distinction of sinnes veniall and yet not veniall in their proper nature in respect of their greatnesse and smalnesse but not to be permitted for these reasons SECT 5. Why originall corruption is not to be permitted 1 IN respect of the nature of sinne which of it selfe deserveth death Rom. 6. 23. The wages of sinne is death as also in that it is a transgression of the Law 1 John 3. 4. and every transgression of the Law is under the Curse Gal. 3. 10. 2. In respect of the infinite Maiesty of God who to offend can be no veniall sinne of it selfe considering his perfect and absolute righteousnesse which cannot abide the least blemish and imperfection Therefore in regard of the perfect righteousnesse and infinite Maiesty of God no sinne against him can be veniall as in the sudden motion and passion of anger even when it is sudden and unadvised yea though there be no further purpose or intendment of hurt is notwithstanding guilty of judgement Matth. 5. 22. So then we admit of a distinction of mortall and veniall sinnes The distinctâ—oÌ„ of mortall and veniall sinnes if it be understood not of the nature of sinne but of the qualities of the persons for unto them that believe all sinnes are veniall and pardonable through the mercy of God Rom. 8. 1. There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus but to the wicked and unbelievers all their sinnes are mortall Rom. 6. 23. to them the stipend and wages of sin is death Now if we trace this originall and spaune of sinne unto the birth we shall find it in action which action proceedeth from the conception of the will to enioy the thing desired as the Apostle James saith When lust hath conceived it bringeth forth sinne Jam. 1. 15. SECT 6. Five things to be considered in every sinfull act ANd in every sinfull act there are five things to be considered as Actus Peccati Culpa Macula Reatus Poena 1. The very act of sin 2. the fault 3. the blot 4. the guilt and 5. the punishment 1. The act of sin as it is an act is not alwayes evill for there Sin as it is an act is not alwayes evill is the same act in substance in sin as in doing that which is honest as in adultery there is the like externall act as in lawfull Matrimony so that onely the fault which is in respect of the circumstances which are not observed make the difference 2. The second thing to be considered is Culpa the faultinesse of the action which is committed by the not due observing of the Circumstances which are these First Quid what it is that hee Nine things to bee considered in the faultinesse of an action doth whether it be lawfull or not lawfull honest or not honest 2. quantum the quantity must be considered as one may steale much or little or raile sparingly or with a full mouth 3. quoties how often for he that committeth the same sinne often is more blameable then he that doth it seldome 4. qualiter after what manner whether willingly or unwillingly whether he be quicke or slow in doing of it 5. Cum quo with what instrument as he that smiteth with a
then make better tryall of mans obedience then in forbidding that which is good But to the point in question if all were alike saved by the death of Christ why then are the termes of election and Predestination used so frequently in Scripture SECT 5. Object VVHat is meant by the word Election and Predestination Answ Predestination is the eternall decree of God whereby he determined with himself what he would have become of every What election is in the generall man for men are not since the fall of Adam created to the like estate and condition but for some eternall life and for others eternall death is appointed whereby Gods free election is made manifest seeing it lyeth in his will what shall be the estate and condition of every Nation whereof the Lord sheweth a token in the whole issue of Abraham as we may read Gen. 24. 37. Deut 32. 8. Psal 147. 20. There is also a certain speciall election wherein appeareth Of particular election more plainly the grace of God seeing that of the same Stock of Abraham God rejected some as Ishmael and Esau and at length most of the Tribes of Israel unto whom the entery of life were shut before them by his just yet by his incomprehensible judgement In the next place it is requisite to shew the effect that Gods The effects of election and reptoâ—ation election and reprobation worketh and 1. Touching the elect whom God in his mercy hath appointed to salvation for his own righteousnesse sake and not for their desert Those he guideth by the grace of his holy Spirit Rom. 8. 14. c. 9. c. As many as are led by the Spirit of God are the Sons of God as also the Prophet Isai All those that I have called by my name I have created fashioned and made for my honour Isa 43. SECT 6. NOw as the elect are led guided and directed by the Spirit of God so on the contrary are the reprobate by the spirit of Sathan who is the God of the world or worldly-minded men and hence it is that Christ telleth the wicked Jewes That they were of their father the Devill Joh. 8. 44. whose workes they did so that as on the one side the elect indeavoured to doe the will of God their Father so the other the will of their father the Devill And those sort of people are compared by the Prophet Isaiah Sâ—mpromes of the sonnes of Sathan to a raging Sea that cannoe rest whose waters foameth with myre and gravell for they have no peace with God Isa 57. 20. The Prophet David also considering of their estate and condition Psa 73. 4 5 6. giveth this reason for it viz. The Lord suffereth them to come to no perill of death but they are lusty and strong they come in no danger like other folke neither are they plagued like other men Their eyes swell with fatnesse and they doe even what they lust they have riches in possession and they call their Lands by their owne names And this is the cause saith he that they be so holden with pride and overwhelmed with cruelty these are they that talke against the most highest which say Tush how shall God perceive it is there knowledge in the most high Can he heare our Swearings see our secret Wheredomes and Adulteries Doth he take notice of our prophaning the Sabbaths or of our quaffing and drinking of healths of villifying Professors with reproachfull tearmes of Schismaticks and Hereticks and the like surely no. Such as these were Cain Cham Ishmael Pharaoh Ammon Their predecessor Saul Absolom Antiochus Herod Pilate Judas the traitor and many others who brought upon themselves eternall condemnation The same Prophet David also describeth the end of such men with another reason of it in these words namely That the Their end Lord hath set them in slippery places and cast them downe and destroyed them by which meanes how suddenly doe they consume and perish and come to a fearefull end yea even as a dreame so doth he make their image to vanish SECT 7. Object IF God have reprobated and cast them off how can they doe any other the cause of sinning therefore is not in them but in God who leaveth them to themselves how doe those Scriptures agree then where the Lord saith that he delighteth not in the death of a sinner Ezek. 33. 6. And O that Israel would obey me c. with O Jerusalem Jerusalem how often would I have gathered thee together and ye would not Mat. 23. 37. As also that he willeth not the death of a sinner and other while that some are ordained of old to condemnation as in Jude vers 6. Judas also is called the sonne of perdition Joh. 17. 12. Ans To the Answer which hath formerly been made to such Sundry arguments answered touching rejection a question as this may be added this answer of the Prophet Jeremy The Lord is more righteous then to be disputed with Jerem. 28. 6. And the Prophet Isaiah saith We are in the hands of the Lord as the Clay in the hands of the Potter Isa 47. 9. And the Apostle saith Hath not the Potter power over the Clay and of the same lump to make one vessell to honour and another to dishonour Rom. 9. 21. Again Who art thou that replyest against God ver 20. Was there unrighteousnesse in God in loving Jacob and hating Esau God forbid ver 14. For he will have mercy on whom he will have mercy and compassion on whom he will have compassiâ—n ver 15. and whom he will he hardneth so that there is vessels of wrath and vessels of mercy as in ver 22. 23. for otherwise why should these phrases be used in Scripture CHAP. III. Treateth of hardning the heart SECT 1. Objection IF God harden the heart of a sinner how can he chuse but sinne seeing that by nature we are all the children of wrath Ans In every action the â—nd and meanes must goe together the cause doth never follow the effect but the effect the cause and in one and same action there is a double cause as 1. The instrumentall cause moving 2. God separating from the instrument yet giving power of motion to the same and so the wicked may be said to be the instruments of God yet not God the cause of their wickednesse and therefore one saith Deus agit per malos non in malis God worketh by evill men not in evill men God therefore may be said to be the cause of the action but God is no way the author of sinne not of the quality of the action Gods decree is no cause of their sinning but the voluntary inclination of the will unto evill being neither forced nor by any violence compelled and therefore no evill is either to be attributed to God or his decreâ— 2. Again God is no way the author of sinne seeing he neither tempteth nor perswadeth unto it Jer. 1.
13. neither hath he commanded it but forbidden it in his Law neither doth he worke with them that doth evill for all that God doth is good and so there is none good but God Mark 10. 19. neither doth the Lord approve sin being done Psal 84. Thou art a God that hatest wickednesse So then if God neither move to sin nor commend it being done nor yet assist the actors of it he can in no wise be said to be the author of sin 3. If God should cause sin then every man should sin of necessity and so his punishment should be unjust being forced to sin but God who cannot be deceived hath not brought upon any a necessity or willingnesse of sinning for it cannot be that by whom men rise from sin by him they should fall into sin God that is good cannot be said to be the cause of evill for then he should be contrary to himself Again if God should be any waies the Author of sin then it should be no sin for whatsoever God doth is good nay not to doe that which the Lord willeth is sinne Yet seeing 1. God is said in Scripture to harden the heart which betokeneth an action and likewise in other termes as God is said to give some over to vile affections as in Rom. 1. 26. and to send upon some strong delusions that they should not beleeve the truth 2 Thes 2. 11. and to make the heart fat the eares heavie and to shut the â—yes Isa 6. 10. all which phrases implyeth an action or opperation it is therefore requisite to shew what the hardnesse of heart is 2. By what meanes it is effected or procured and 3. In what respect God may be said to work in the action SECT 2. 1. IT may be described negatively by the unaptnesse of it to any The qualities and inseparable adjuncts of a hard heart Reader examine thy selfe by these ten Simptomes thing that is good being neither passive active or apprehensive of any good thing it is neither moved by prayers nor giveth way to threats it is unthankfull for benefits unfaithfull in Counsell unshame fac'd in evill things there is no activity at all to any good thing it remembreth nothing that is past but wrongs and injuries nor hath any fore-cast for the time to come unlesse it be to seeke revenge 2. It may be described by the inseparable companions thereof viz. the blindnesse of the mind for as ignorance blindeth the understanding so hardnesse of heart blindeth the will and affections as the Apostle saith speaking of the Gentiles Having their cogitations darkned through the ignorance that was in them because of the hardnesse of their hearts Eph. 4. 18. both which concurred in Pharaoh who shewed his blindnesse in saying he knew not Jehovah and his hardnesse of heart in adding neither will I let Israel goe Exod. 5. 3. The third property of the hardnesse of heart is thiâ— that it not only a great and grievous sin but also the punishment of sin 1. That it is a sin the Apostle sheweth Heb. 3. 12. where he saith Take heed brethren least therein at any time in you be an evill heart to depart from the living God And that it is a punishment of sin the Apostle testifieth also Rom. 1. 21. because saith he when they knew God they did not glorifie him as God And therefore it followeth ver 29. That God gave them over to their own hearts lusts Now the qualities and inseparable adjuncts of hardning the heart are these viz. 1. Blindnesse of judgement and understanding as Isa 6. 10. where the Lord saith Make the heart of this people fat c. lest Reader examine thy selfe by these Simptomes they should see with their eyes and heare with their eares and understand with their hearts and be converted and I should heale them 2. They are obstinate and wilfull and refuse to be admonished and instrâ—cted and say unto God Depart from us we desire not the knowledge of thy wayes Job 1. 14. 3. They delight in doing of evill and make a sport of sin Prov. 2. 14. which rejoyce in doing of evill and delight in the frowardnesse of the wicked 4. They regard not to doe things honest in the sight of God but contrarily contemne and despise them that doe such things as Prov. 18. 3. When the wicked commeth then commeth contempt 5. They are incorrigible and past all hopes of amendment Prov. 1. 30. They would none of my counsell but despised all my corrections 6. They are not ashamed of most vile sins as Jer. 3. 3. Thou hast a Whâ—res forehead and wouldest not be ashamed 7. When the Lord smiteth them they feele iâ— not neither have they any feare of Gods judgements whom the Wise man compareth to those that sleep on the Mast of a Ship and as drunken men that are stricken and knoweth it not Prov. 23. 24. 25. 8. They are growne to such an evill custome of sinning that they can doe no other as the Prophet saith Can the Black-a-more change his hew or the Leopard his spots then may they yet also doe good that are accustomed to doe evill Jer. 13. 23. So that the sins of such seeme to be inexpiable as the same Prophet saith that the sins of Judah were written with a Pen of Iron and with the point of a Diamond Chap. 17. 1. 9. They wax worse and worse of whom it is said Rev. 22. 11. He that is filthy let him be filthy still and as they increase in sins so doe they treasure up wrath against the day of wrath and so treasure up Gods judgements against themselves Rom. 2. 5. 10. They are rejected and cast out of the presence of God and left to themselves such an one was Saul of whom it was said That the Spirit of the Lord departed from him and an evill spirit from the Lord vexed him 1 Sam. 16. 14. And thus have I shewed what the hardnesse of heart is SECT 3. 2. IN the next place I am to shew by what meanes it is effected How the hardnesse of the heart is effected and procured of which subject there are varieties of opinions I shal give you the most materiall of them Some are of opinion that the Lord hardneth the heart by way of manifestation instansing in Pharaoh where the Lord by his plagues and judgements declared how hard Pharaohs heart was But this cannot be the sence of it for so God might be said to commit any other sins when he doth manifest them and bring to lâ—ght and though the expression might serve upon that occasion yet it faileth in other places as Deut. 2. 30. where it is said that God hardened the heart of Sihon King of the Amorites and Joshua 23. where the Lord is said to harden the hearts of the Canâ—aâ—itâ—s and Rom. 9. 15. God hath mercy on whom he will have mercy and whom he will hâ— hardneth in these places it cannot be expounded that God hardned that is
so that it maketh directly against the Pelagians who deny sinne to be a deprivation of nature but say it is a corrupt imitation whereas it appeareth by the Text that even in the very youth and first age when we are not so apt to imitate there is evill and corruption in the heart Again sinne is the cause of death for if Adam had not sinned he had not dyed but it is most evident that Infants dye which if sinne were not the cause then were the Scriptures false which The death of Infants an evident demonstration of originall sinne saith the wages of sinne is death Now what other sinne can procure an infants death which hath not sinned according to the similitude of Adams transgression viz. actually unlesse it be originall sinne which certainly is a most infallible demonstration that children are borne in originall sinne In the next place I will shew you what it is SECT 3. Originall sinne described ORiginall sinne is an inherent corruption of our nature powred out into all the parts of the minde by the guilt of Adam who was not only the Progenitor but also as it were the root of mans nature for the Lord committed those gifts to Adam which he intended to bestow upon mans nature which when he had lost he lost them not only for himself but also for his while posterity by meanes of which we bring forth the workes which are called the workes of the flesh Gal. 5. 19. Now to the further description of originall sinne we finde in Scripture the cause the subject and the effect of it 1. The cause as I said before was Adams fall as we may see The cause of originall sin Rom. 5. 15. 1 Cor. 15. 21. as also by the suggestions of the Devell Gen. 3. 4. as also through Adams Free-will whereas he might have refused 2. The subject of it we take to be the old man with all his The subject of originall sin power minde will and heart for in the minde there is darknesse and ignorance of God and his Will as appeareth by the words of our Saviour Mat. 12. 34. O generation of vipers how can ye being evill speake good things The Apostle also saith that the carnall minde is at emnity with God for it is not subject to the Law of God neither can be Rom. 8. 7. The Apostle James also testifieth the same in these words Let no man say when he is tempted that he is tempted of God for God cannot be tempted with evill neither tempteth he any man but every man is tempted when he is drawne away of his owne lusts and inticements then when lust hath conceived it bringeth forth sinne c. Jam. 1. 13 14 15. 3. The fruits of originall sinne are either internall or externall The fruits of originall sin internall as ungodly affections or evill concupisence which the Apostle termeth Idolatry 2. Externall as wanton lookes prophaine speeches and devillish actions as in Mat. 15. 19. Out of the heart proceedeth evill thoughts c. which procureth a cauterised conscience the which procureth the wrath of God and eternall damnation as the Apostle testifieth where he saith that the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodlinesse and unrighteousnesse of men that holdeth the truth in unrighteousnesse for which thing sake the wrath of God is come upon the Children of disobedience Col. 3. 16. Joh. 8. 24. Rom. 5. 12. 18. Jam. 1. 15. SECT 4. Of Concupisence THe Pelacians doe hold this tenent in the generall that Concupisence was not sinne in any man and so doe the Papists generally in particulars viz. that concupisence after Baptisme is not properly sinne nor forbidden by Commandement and that it is not verily and properly a sinne in the regenerate but that it is only so called because it comes of sinne and inclineth to sinne each of their Objections shall be propounded and answered Questions propounded and answered touching Concupisence And first in answer to the Pelagians objection that hold it in the generall that concupisence which is the first fruit of originall sinne being to will or to desire without the externall action is no sinne to which purpose they argue thus viz. Obj. Such things as are naturall are not evill but concupisence or to will is naturall therefore it is not evill nor consequently sin Ans The Apostle saith that we are all by nature the children of wrath therefore because we are so by nature by the same reason it should be no discommodity unto us to be the children of wrath which would be a meere madnesse to conceive Obj. Even in our nature as it now standeth corrupt the appetite or desire of such things as tend to the conservation of nature and to decline and shun the contrary are not evill but such is the concupisence to meat and drink and the like ergo Ans Such motions and appetites of themselves are not evill Concupisence how evill and how not evill as they are naturall motions but if they be inordinate motions and exceed a just measure they are evill as to have an immoderate desire to meat and drink for as it was naturall for Eve to desire to eate of the fruit of the tree yet to desire it against the Commandement of God was evill so it is likewise with these naturall motions if they be immoderate and inordinate they are evill SECT 5. How Sinne is to be measured Obj. THat which is not in mans power to avoyd is no sinne but not to covit is not in mans power ergo it is no sin Ans Sin is not measured by the necessity and liberty of Nature How sin is to be measured but by the disagreement which it hath with the Will of God 2. When God first printed the Law in mans nature before his fall then were the precepts of God given unto him in his power to keepe 3. Though man by his voluntary corruption hath lost his power and liberty yet God fore-goeth not his power and right in commanding but that Concupisence is sinne Concupisence is sinne it is most evident by the Morall Law that would not forbid it unlesse it were sinne As also the Apostle who urgeth the same argument saying I had not known sin but by the Law for I had not known lust except the Law had said thou shalt not covit Rom. 7. 7. Thus much touching the objections of the Pelagians next in answer to the Popish objections Obj. The objection which the Papists make touching concupisence is viz. That it is taken away by Baptisme to whom I returne this answer viz. Ans The subjects which they and many other Societies admit Popish objections touching concupisence answered to Baptisme are not at that time of their admittance fit members or subjects to receive that Sacrament of initiation into the Church of Christ which in its due place I shall fully prove But as to such persons as are meete Members
in robbing of the Aegyptians the fornication of Hosea the Prophet Hosea 1. 2. For the Will of God which is most just and the right which he hath in the lives bodies and goods of men maketh these things lawfull being done by the Commandement of God which otherwise would be unlawfull for a man may use his Oxe or his Asse at his pleasure because they are ordained for his use so likewise may the Lord doe with men take away their lives at his pleasure and that by a double right both because man by his sin hath deserved to dye 2. As he is his Creator and may use the creature at his pleasure or as may best serve to his glory And as man may use his owne goods and that which is lent unto him precario freely and frankly during the pleasure of the lender which when he will he may require againe so the earth being the Lords and the fulnesse thereof which he as it were lendâ—th to man so long as it pleaseth him He may justly at his pleasure transfer things from one to another and like as Matrimony maketh carnall copulation lawfull so the Lord may by his Commandement bring and supply the like bond as Matrimony is as in the instance of the Prophet afore mentioned when the Lord bid him take unto him a Wife of fornication the Commandement of God made that lawfull which otherwise was unlawfull and so in the other examples But albeit God can make that which seemes unjust to be lawfull and just yet can he not make a just and a good act to be evill and wicked as that he which worshippeth God aright doth evill or such like and the reason is because God by this meanes should be contrary to himself in commanding one so to worship him and yet counting him for so worshipping him to doe evill Again it is impossible for God to doe that which he cannot will now the Lord willeth no evill to be done therefore he cannot make that which is good to be evill because he cannot deny himself who is only good SECT 3. A difference betwixt the precepts of the first and second Table THere is also a difference to be made betwixt the precepts of the first and second Table God doth dispence with the second which he referred to the good of our neighbour when he seeth it more to make for his owne glory which is the true end and scope of the first and second Table as when God commandeth to dishonour Parents rather then to dishonour him and biddeth them kill and so in the rest But with the precepts of the first Table he dispenceth not because they are immediatly referred to his owne glory for otherwise it were to consent to dishonour himself and thus much for the answer of the first part of the Argument 2. It followeth not if God can dispence that therefore the Though God can dispence the Prelates cannâ—â— Prelates and the Church may 1. Because the dispensation against a Law must be by as great authority as the Law was first made by But the Moral Law grounded upon the Law of Nature was founded by the Author and Creator of Nature and therefore by him only and not by any else may it be dispenced with 2. As in naturall effectâ— ordinarily there must goe before an extraordinary cause a naturall cause as a thing cannot be made hot unlesse fire or some other efficient cause of heat be put unto it so that the Pope himself cannot command a thing to be hoâ— but by such efficient cause of heat Yet the Lord without such â—ediate and â—rdinary meanâ—s can make a thing hot by his infinite power supplying that cause himself So likewise in Spirituall actions the Lord may supply that which maketh the thing lawfull which man cannot doe without some externall cause or circumstance doe concurre in making the act lawfull As to kill is an unlawfull act in it self neither can the Pope or any other man make it lawfull to kill unlesse there be some cause that maketh it lawfull to kill as when the party commanded to be slaine deserveth to dye But God to whom all men are debtors and who is the Lord of every mans life may command to kill without any injustice although there be no such apparant cause or circumstance which should make that act lawfull SECT 4. Obj. BVt they further object thus To restore that which is committed to a mans trust is a naturall duty yet this is dispensed with when as a man refuseth to restore to a Mad-man his sword or weapon which he gave one to keep so the Magistratâ— ordinarily dispenceth with that precept Thou shalt not kill when he commandeth Malefactors to be slaine So also the Maccabees dispenced with the Sabbath when they resolved to fight with their enemies on the Sabbath day 1 Mac. â— Chap. As these precepts then were dispenced withall by men so may the rest Ans For the first instance there is in that particular case no dispensation against the Law of Nature for then by such dispensations it would be made lawfull not to restore that which is committed to trust which cannot be made lawfull by any dispensation for this were to crosse and over-throw the Law of Nature but not to restore a sword to a furious man is but a particular interpretation of that generall Law of Nature wherein the inâ—ent of that Law is kept for it is agreeable to the Law of Nature to render whatsoever belongeth unto another and the reason thereof is because it is just So it is lawfull by the same Law notwithstanding not to give unto a Mad-man his owne sword because it is just Also the meaning and reason of the Law is kept because the furious man would doe some hurt with his weapon and therefore to administer occasion and instrument unto his rage were unjust In the other two particulars there is no dispensation but an interpretation rather or declaration of the Law as that it is no Murther when one is justly slaine And in the other that it is no breach of the Sabbath when necessity compelleth to breake the rest thereof but thus to dispence were a dispensation to make it lawfull to kill where one cannot justly be put to death and to worke upon the Sabbath where there is no necessity 2. Thus to dispence were to make it lawfull afterward which was not before such a dispensation but it was alwayes lawfull for the Magistrate to put to death and upon like necessity to intermit and suspend the rest of the Sabbath 3. Besides these interpretations and declarations of these Lawes they are not devised by man but warranted in Scripture by the Lord himself the Maker and Author of the Law and therefore they are not to be interposed by any humane authority CHAP. XVI Trâ—ateth of their opinions touching â—he Sabbath day c. SECT 1. Objection TO this particular they say That the keeping of the Lords day or the first
more fierce and violent against Christ then Paul and yet a chosen vessell to salvation and a choyce instrument to gaine Soules to Christ it being meerly out of ignorance that he made such havock of the Church Act. 8. 1. 9. 1 2. The like may be also said of the St. Theife who as it appeares by the testimony of Matthew Mat. 27. 44. did first revile Christ as wel as the other until the patience of Christ had convinced his judgement After which he is said to reprove the other as also become a penitent as wil appeare by comparing the two Evangelists together in that relation viz. Mat. 27. 44. with Luk. 23. 40. c. Now for such offenders as these who were amongst the rest of The elect take pleasure in sin before their conversion Rom. 1 32. them which scurged and crucified Christ he might pray for it is likely that Saul whom we call Paul was there and might give consent unto his death as to the death of Stephen Act. 8. 1. our natures being so prone to evill that the very elect before their conversion doe take pleasure in doing many things of which they are afterward ashamed Rom. 6. 21. SECT 5. Obj. IEsus Christ gave himself a ransome for all men 1 Tim. 2. 6. and tasted death for every man Heb. 2. 9. Ans It may as wel be inferred from the words of the Apostle Rom. 11. 33. where God is said to include all in unbeliefe that he might have mercy upon all that all shall be saved for wherein consisteth mercy if not in pardoning offences and where offences are pardoned there is no use of punishment Christ therefore to The word all cannot be meant of every man cleare such scruples betwixt the all of the men of the world and the all of the elect doth thus distinguish them Joh. 17. 10. where he saith All mine are thine and thine are mine and I am glorified in them In which words he doth not say that all men in generall are mine and thine But all mine viz. all them whom thou hast given me as in the 6. ver in whom I am glorified ver 10. but Christ is not glorified by all men in generall viz. by all the world or men of the world for they are of their father the Devill whose commandement they obey Joh. 8. 42. 44. and not Christs therefore the all spoken of in them and the like places cannot be meant of all men in generall Again Christ saith Joh. 10. 27. My Sheep heare my voyce Christ distinâ—uish â—h betwixt the all â—â—â—hâ— wâ—â—ld â—â—d 〈◊〉 of 〈…〉 which doth imply that all are not of his sheep He is also said to lay downe his life for his sheep ver 15. but God the Father did not give him all the men of the world to be his sheep but a certaine number of them which he termeth a little flock in comparison of the generality of men as the Scripture witnesseth Feare not and chiefly intended by the Spirit But so is this spirituall sence as the Prophet expoundeth this place of Gods eternall love or hatred of Jacob and Esau 2. That is the proper sence of the place from which an Argument is framed and a conclusion inferred but out of this spirituall sence concerning everlasting election the Apostle reasoneth and concludeth election to be only of grace not by workes ergo it is the proper sence of the place Obj. How would you cleare Gods Justice in creating some to destruction Ans God created none to destruction but by Adams transgression Gods Justice vindicated and cleared we all became the children of wrath and disobedience now put the case that many Malifactors were found guilty of death for one and the same fault not knowing any other but that they shal all suffer according to the Sentence pronounced against them but it hapneth that the superiour Magistrate doth send a pardon to some few of them by name not because they have lesse offended or lesse deserve to dye then the rest but because it so pleaseth him out of his grace and clemency to save them hath the other therefore whom he doth not pardon cause to say he is cruell or tyranous in that he did not doe the like for them all certainly they have rather cause to extol his clemency in sparing some of them So in like manner Adam having sinned and so made guilty of eternall death if God had taken him away immediately he had â—â—t off the whole race of Mankinde he therefore out of his free grace and mercy suffereth him to live and propagate not to the end that he wil destroy all his Progeny but because he wil provide a meanes whereby some of them shall be saved from that death whereof they all are guilty and that by sending his Son out of his owne bosome to take their sins upon him and to satisfie his wrath for them assigning him a certaine number whom he shal so redeeme not by any externall and visible marke but by some innate markes best knowne to himself Shal therefore the rest of Adams posterity tax God of injustice in that he hath not redeemed them all Certainly they rather have cause to extoll and magnifie the exceeding mercy and compassion in God that did vouchsafe to preserve some of the race and posterity from that eternall destruction which by that sinne of Adam they were all involved SECT 7. Obj. IT was hard that the Lord should for one sinne condemne so many of Adams posterity for the eating of one poore Apple a hard case Ans Because carnall men doe thus extenuate our first Parents The 〈◊〉 of our first Parents transgression sinne I wil briefly shew the greatnesse of that transgression for therein many sins concurred as 1. Incredulity in not beleeving Gods Word to be true 2. Vnthankfulnesse in not being content with their estate 3. Pride in desiring to be like unto God 4. Wantonnesse in sinning without any necessity having all the trees in the Garden besides to eate of 5. The sin of Gluttony in pampering the desire of the belly 6. Disobedience in transgressing of the Commandement 7. Curiosity in coveting to know the opperation of the fruit in bringing them to knowledge 8. Presumption in that they presumed of Gods mercy that they should not dye though they did eate 9. Then followed the concupisence and rebellion of the flesh in being ashamed of their nakednesse 10. They excused their sin 11. They were guilty of Homicide in bringing death not only upon themselves but all their posterity 12. Beside Eve seduced her Husband 13. Adam sinned in his inordinate affection to his Wife in listning to her 14. The easinesse of the Commandement made the transgression greater As one answering to the question why God forbad Adam to eate of the fruit of that tree which was good saith True it is good but I wil not have thee touch it because I wil have thee obedient God could not
declared their hearts to be hard Others expound it by way of permission because those that are hardned God depriveth of his grace and leaveth them to themselves as God is said to shut up all in unbelief and that he gave them 〈◊〉 spirit of slumber eyes that they could not see c Now these sayings say they are not to be taken as though God did these things but that he suffered them to be done As I wil harden the heart of Pharaoh that is suffer it to be hardned as that he gave them up to a reprobate sence is nothing else but that he permitted it as a Captaine leaving his Souldiers in the midst of a Battell may be said to deliver them up to his enemies hands But although this be most true that God suffereth such to continue in the hardnesse of their hearts yet this is not all for so the Lord suffereth all other sins to be done for there is nothing done in the world unlesse the omnipotent God will have it done either by suffering it to be done or doing it of himself againe if so The Lord goeth further in the act then by his permission the Lord might as wel be said to steale or the like because he suffereth such things to be done but the Lord doth not only concurre in the hardning of the heart by permission or suffering it to be hardned but according to his owne power and action not by the which immediately the hardnesse of the heart is made but whereby many things are done by the which a sinner by his own corruption doth conceive the hardnesse of the heart Now the induration of the heart is two waies to be taken or The Induration of the heart two wayes taken considered 1. As it is a sin 2. As it is a punishment of sin In the first of these God hath no part but for the other as he is a just Judge he inflicteth the hardnesse of the heart as a punishment as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 2. 28 For as the Gentiles regarded not to know God so God delivered them up to a reprobate minde And 2 Thes 2. 11. because they received not the love of the truth c. therfore God sent them strong delusions that they should beleeve lyes in which places the Apostle sheweth how the Lord punished them with blindnesse of heart because of their former sins as also Sam. 12. 11. Behold I will raise up evill upon thee out of thine owne house which was verified in Absolâ—m that rose up against his father as also in the act of Shimei in cursing David whom David saith The Lord bid curse him Now concerning this rebellion of Absolom and rayling of Shimei they are not to be ascribed to God as they were sins in Absolom and Shimei but as they were punishments of the sins of David they were sent of God SECT 4. Obj. IF God be the Author of the induration of the heart as it is a punishment of sin then he may as well be said to be the Author of other sins when as a man falleth into them as the punishments of his former sins Ans All such sins proceed from the hardnesse of the heart Popish objections answered that confirmeth and setleth a sinner in his wickednesse and therefore God cannot be said to be a cause of those sins for a man by continuing in sin hath his heart hardned by the just judgement of God and then out of the hardnesse of his owne heart he bringeth forth other sins of himselfe Obj. The hardnesse of the heart as it is a great and horrible sin so is it the punishment of former sins wherefore if God doe cause it to be a punishment he also causeth it as it is a sin Ans In this Argument there are ambiguous termes for in the first clause this note of similitude as is taken for the being of the thing the bardnesse of the heart as it is a sinne so it is the punishment of sin that it could not be the punishment of sin unlesse it were sin this we grant in the first part but the same word as signifieth also the manner of being Therefore if the first be taken in the same sense for one and the same manner of being we deny that the hardnesse of the heart in the same respect is both sin and the punishment of sin It is both in respect of the subject and being but not both in the same quality affection and manner of being Obj. All punishments of sin because they are just stand with the will of God now hardnesse of heart being a sin if it should stand with the Will of God then it would follow that sin should stand with the Will of God Ans If sin should no way stand with the Will of God then it should not be committed in the world for against his will can nothing be so that we must admit a distinction of Gods will which The will of God two-fold is twofold viz. his will of approbation and his will of providence by the first he willeth not sin but by the second he willeth it to be in the world because he knoweth how to dispose of sin even unto good Many things are done without Gods Wil nothing without his providence Providence is that whereby he disposeeth of things Will whereby he willeth or nilleth any thing and therefore it is good that evill should be done because thereby Gods power and goodnesse is seen in turning evill unto good If therefore God did not see how to turne evill unto a good end he would not suffer evill to be done in the world So then retaining the formes distinction stil hardnesse of heart as it is a sin God willeth it not but as it is a punishment of sin it standeth very wel with the Justice of God SECT 5. THere be also severall other opinions concerning the manner Other opinions touching Gods â—â—â—dâ—ing the heart how God hardneth the heart which being very profitable will not be amisse to be rehearsed As that God doth it by way of patience and long suffering because say they the Lord doth suspend his Judgements and doth not presently punish the wicked whereupon they abusing Gods patience As by way of patience and longsuffering and long suffering are hardned and this exposition they ground upon that place of Scripture Rom. 2. 4. Despisest thou the riches of his bountiousnesse patience and long suffering not knowing that the goodnesse of God leadeth thee to repentance but thou after thy hardnesse and heart that cannot repent heapest up against thy self wrath against the day of wrath Of which patient forbearance they make a figurative Locution Like say they as a Simile Master should say to his servant that abuseth his gentlenesse it is I that have made the thing because I did not punish thee Again As the Sun say they hardneth the Clay and mollifieth Why â—he Lord useth such great patience the Wax
creaâ—ing power 2. As a particular direction by his regenerating grace But in the other motion he hath a stroke as a generall mover in the particular act of hardning as it is evill he concurreth not therefore according to that generall power the Lord is only said to be a mover not an hardner of the heart Now of these waies before rehearsed there are three chiefly to be made choise of viz. 1. That God hardneth the heart by leaving it to it self and depriving it of his necessary grace as he is said to have given over the unbeleeving Gentiles to their owne hearts lusts Rom. 1. 24. 2. That God causeth many things to be done which are not in themselves causes of the hardning of the heart yet the wicked take occasion thereby to be further indurate and hardned as the Apostle sheweth that the wicked abuse the patience and long suffering of God thereby to be further hardned 3. That God by his just judgement doth force them to their owne hurt whether they run headlong themselves even to the end For God as a just Judge seeing a mans heart bent upon wickednesse doth as a just Judge inflict upon him the spirit of induration and to this purpose one handling that place Rom. 1. 14. saith that some things there rehearsed are sins and no punishments as the pride and vanities of their minds ver 21. they were not thankfull but became vaine in their imaginations And some also punishments and no sin as eternall death which they were Worthy of veâ—â—â— and that the rest that come betwixt are both sins and punishment SECT 12. Obj. VVHy should God take such a punishment of sin that the sinners thereby commit more sin Ans We answer with the Apostle Rom. 1. 27. where he saith Man with man wrought filthinesse and received such recompence to themselves as was meet for their errors so that God did not send them upon the Gentiles as they were sins but as they are considered as punishments of their sins for as God hath an hand therein he doth incline the wil being evil by its owne fault to sin by his just and secret Judgement as for instance There is but one kinde of heat in the Sun and according to Simile the matter it worketh upon some things it melteth and some things it hardneth the Wax it melteth the Clay it hardneth so God as the Sun hardneth the Clay is said to harden the heart which is earthly and muddy as also by the same worke of the raine the earth being wel tilled bringeth forth good fruit but being untilled thistles which is not of it self as it is raine but by reason of the nature of the thing concurring whereupon it worketh so by the working of God after a most secret and hidden manner the heart of the wicked are hardned but the cause thereof is in themselves Obj. Gods must needs be a worker of evill in hardning of mens hearts Ans God hardneth the heart without any touch of sin as God hardneth the heart without any toâ—ch of sin may be illustrated by this Simile as in the winter quarter the water is frozen until the Sun shine upon it and when the Sun is departed from it it is bound up with cold againe the Sun is not the cause of the freezing of the water but the coldnesse of the water bindeth it self so properly God causeth not the heart to be hardned but by the absence of his grace it becometh hardned Obj. Why doth the Lord suffer any to be hardned Ans That must be ascribed to the Judgement of God which are often hidden but never unjust it should suffice us as the Apostle saith to know and beleeve and that there is no iniquity with God SECT 13. Obj. NO man in this life can become altogether so impenitent incorrigible or without hope of grace or in such a desperate state as to be forsaken for God would have all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth and I will not the death of a sinner c. so then if mercy be offered to all then the way is open to all to repent and turne unto God Ans God indeed offereth himself to all and denyeth not the God offereth grace to all externall meanes to any if they had grace to apprehend them The Gospel hath been preached to all the world and so to the impenitent and reprobate God therefore offereth grace unto all but all will not receive it as one saith the wholsome medicine of admonition must be administred to all though the health of the sick be uncertaine But if he that is admonished belong to the predestinate it is to him a whâ—lsome medicine if he doe not it is a penall torment Againe the argument followeth not God calleth all men to repentance ergo all may have grace to repent for the Scripture saith that many are called but few are chosen Grace doth prevaile with some but with others their obstinate natures resisteth to which purpose the Scriptures are very plentifull as in Act. 2. 41. Act. 16. 14. 13. 45. c. Obj. So long as men are in this life they are in the way and are not deprived of all grace nor utterly forsaken untill they be in Hell Ans Everlasting punishment in Hell is the end and execution Man in this life may be in the state of damnation of damnation but men in this life may be in the state of damnation and be utterly forsaken of Gods grace as Saul and Judas and they whom the Apostle saith God gave over to a reprobate sence Rom. 1. 28. Ergâ— SECT 14. Obj. IF any man in this life had been utterly excluded from grace Pharaoh of all other had been most like yet his estate was not desperate seeing he was in the same case with Nebuchadnezzar who repented and confessed God Ans This reason is flatly against the Apostle who pronounceth Pharaoh as a vessell of wrath prepared for destruction Rom. 9. 17. now if there be hope for a vessel of wrath to come to grace then there was hope for Pharaoh The Apostle maketh these two distinct things God hath mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardneth Rom. 9. 18. so then as God hardneth not those on whom he hath mercy so neither sheweth he mercy on those whom he hardneth 2. Nebuchadnezzar and Pharaoh were most unlike for the one had not so many wonders shewed as had the other neither so often dallied and made shew of repentance as did the other which sheweth their state to be most different for if Pharaoh had been no more hardned then Nebuchadnezzar was he would likewise have repented as Nebuchadnezzar did Obj. We are to despaire of none in this life therefore it is probable for all to repent Ans Such as we see and know commit a sin unto death The sin against the holy Ghost unpardonable which is the irremissable sin against the Holy Ghost
by the example of the Church at Antioch who made choyâ—e of Barâ—â—bâ—s and Paul and the other Brethren which no doubt was the most able men amongst them in that Church As also of the Church at Jerusalem in permitting Peter and James to speake first being the most grave in the Assembly as also in that Churches making choyse of Judas and Silas who was men of eminence amongst them as may appeare by the 26. vers to send in their behalfes to Antioch SECT 5. 2. THat Messengers being so sent ought to behave themselves wisely not making any tumult or disturbance in the Church to which they are sent but only to speake as occasion shall serve and that by the example of Paul and Barnabas who did not interupt Peter but waited their opportunity Obj. Then every one that hath judgement may and ought to speake Ans They may speake if they wil as the rest of the Apostles Who ought to 〈◊〉 in the â—hurcâ— and Elders and the rest of the Brethren might have done but we doe not read that they did speake after that Peter â—â—d James had opened the case but given their judgements 〈◊〉 it being thereby satisfied did aquiesse in the judgement of James Obj. But what if Peter and James had not ended the controversie Ans Then they were to have gone on in the same order and method untill they were satisfied for if order will not doe it I am certaine that confusion cannot And it likely that the Apostle Paul gained this experience at that meeting which he exhorteth the Corinthians to observe and so consequently all Churches in all their enterprises whatsoever viz. that all things might be done with decency and order 1 Cor. 14. 40. for God being the God of order 1 Cor. 14. 33. will doubtlesly require order in his Church 1 Cor. 11. 34. and therefore we are to conforme unto it SECT 6. THe Apostle also exhorteth that if any man speake in the Church it ought to be as an Oracle of God and we know that the manner of speaking by Oracle was gravely and sententiously delivering much matter in few words therefore this ought also to be a president unto our Brethren that though they may speake yet if that they cannot expresse themselves in such a manner as aforesaid they both offend against the exhortation of the Apostle as â—lso make a noyse and disturbe the Church to small or no purpose Againe as each particular Member of the Church hath liberty to speake in the Church concerning the affaires belonging to the Members of the Church so have they likewise power to Prophesie as cleerly appeareth from that text 1 Cor. 14. 31. where the Apostle saith Ye may all prophesie one by one c. and yet we are not hereby to understand that every of the Members of a Church ought to doe so not being able to divide the word aright for in this especially he ought to speake as an Oracle of God The Apostle therefore writeth these sayings to the Churches Wherefore the Apostle exhorteth to prophesie to excite and stir up the Members of each particular Church to covit these excellent gifts and that they should strive to goe one before another by a godly emulation giving them thereby to understand that if the very meanest in quality or condition of the Members of the Church of Christ can by acting the part of a Noble Berean viz. by their study and industry in the Scriptures attaine to the measure of such a gift as to speake as he ought to speake that then he may and ought to imploy his tallent as any of the rest whatsoever doubtlesse it being the very meanes by which Barnabas Simeon called Niger Lutius of Cyrene Manaen Aquilla Prisilla c. attained the gifts which they exercised in the Church of Antioch Act. 13. 1 c. SECT 7. ANd therefore by this president also our brethren of the present It is dangerous medling â—ith edge tooles Churches ought to be very cautations how they medle with such Edge-tooles for feare of the scandal that many arise from such actions whereof there is doubtlesse great cause of complaint in that by so doing the Church doth not receive edifying as also in that it administreth cause to the enemies of God to blasphem who many times commeth on purpose to such meetings to procure themselves Miâ—ch by glorying in our shame Obj. I commend you in that you are no Countenancer of disorder in your brethren for in very deed the boldnes and rudenesse of such members hath made your Churches eviâ— spoken of and disesteemed more then otherwayes they would have beene but yet if a member of your Church have but one tallant will you have him imploy it Ans Yea without all question but not in publike meetings How spirituall 〈◊〉 aâ—e to be â—â—actised for there the most powerfull meanes ought to be used in regard that the unbelievers have liberty to come to the publick Ordnance of preaching as well as any member of the Church And that by our Saviours commands Mat. 28. 19 20. Marke 16 16. who as I have said come for the most part to carpe at the doctrine delivered but in private meetings they ought to imploy their particular tallants for in so doing they may in time become such exspert Proficients in Theology as to teach publickly being called thereunto SECT 8. Obj. SVppose the Magistrate should not condiscend that either the Popish Clergy should be silenced or that such should be sent forth to gather Churches as you would have imployed how would you have the worke carried on Ans I confesse if the Magistrate should be refractory the wheele would be much longer in turning over but yet notwithstanding we are encouraged by the example of the Apostles The worke ought to be carried on though the Magistrate oppose it to imploy such instruments in the worke as are fit for such a purpose viz. for gathering of Churches for albeit that Herod with the Scribes Pharisees and Saduces bent their utmost power to oppose them and their Doctrine yet did they with an undaunted courage vindicate the truth albeit to the hazard of their lives yea and rejoyced that they were thought worthy to suffer for the testimonies thereof as doth evidently appeare by that Book titled their Acts which doubtlesse was written as a president to such as shall labour in the restoring of their decayed Churches by extracting them out of the world and Antichristianisme as the Apostles did out of Judisme and Heathenisme and therefore every one that is so fitted and satisfied in the truth of this assertion ought to apply himselfe to the Apostles presidents in all things to that purpose yea albeit the Heredians Scribes Pharisees and Saduces of these times shall oppose the worke yet ought they be like valient as the Apostles were remembring alwaies that it is better to obey God then men Act. 4. 19. But I hope better things from our present