with natures work IV. Mans soul is immortal not simply as though God could not annhilate it but by Gods ordination and that it cannot be destroyed by second causes V. The faculties of the soul are realâ—y different from the soul as qualities or proper accidents from their subject The reason of this is taken from the event because the essence of the soul remains entire when the faculties are shaken and weakned VI. The souls faculties are either meerly organical as the vegitive and sensitive facultie or are such onely in part and for a time as the understanding and will the former appears not when the body is corrupted but these without the help of the body can exercise themselves and appear when the body is destroyed VII Liberty from coaction is an essential property of the will Otherways the will were no will CHAP. VI. of Gods actual Providence GOd's actual Providence is that by which not only he preserveth his creatures but also according to his great wisdom goodness power justice and mercy he governs all things The RULES I To deny this Providence is to deny God himself II. Actual Providence differs from eternal as the execution from the Decrees III. As in God's eternal â—rovidence the will of his good pleasure so in this his revealed will is chiefly seen IV. Providence doth not only consist in knowledge but also in the Government of all things both great and small V. Gods providence takes not away but establisheth the second causes VI. What things are contingent in respect of the second causes are necessary in respect of Gods providence but this necessity is of immutability not of coaction VII Gods providence is far different from the Stoicks fatall necessity For the Stoical fate ties God to the connexion of secondaâ—y causes but the Christian fate makes a subordination of the second cause to Gods most free will of which he makes use voluntarily not of necessity out of indulgence rather then indigence VIII By Gods Providence both good and evil are governed IX Good things are ruled by an efficacious action or effectual working to which belong the preventing concomitant and subsequent assistance of Divine power X. Evil things are ruled by an actual permission and so they are permitted directed and determined XI Gods Providence remaineth ordered and undefiled even in those actions that are disordered and sinfull For in evil actions two things are observable the action it self and the irregularity thereof The action it self as all naturall motions is performed by Gods effectuall operation but the irregularity or vitiosity comes to passe by Gods actual permission For sin is ordered 1. By permitting it 2. By determining and containing it within its bounds 3. By directing it to a good issue Now God cannot be said to be author of sin by any of these wayes Not by producing the matter of it or the natural action for as there is one cause of the horses motion another of his halting even so it is one thing to be the cause of the action and another thing to be the cause of the adhering vitiosity Not by permitting the evil action because God is not forced by any law to hinder sin Not by determining it for as he who quenches a fâ—â—e that it may not spread further is not the cause of the fire so he that setteth bounds to sin is not the cause of sin Not by directing it to a good end for as it is a main skill to prepare wholsom Medicines out of venomous creatures so it is the glory of God to create light out of darkness good out of evil Hence it is apparent how frivolous their device is who that they might vindicate God from any contagion of sin they flie to a bare and idle permiâ—sion of sin XII Though the Scripture ascribes many times the same action and the same work to God to the devil and to wicked men yet sin cannot be in any wise imputed to God In this case we must not have recâ—uâ—se to a bare permission but we must give an estimate of these actions according to their scope and end for in one and the same action God hath one purpose Satan another and wicked men another Iob's affliction is imputed to God God gave saith Job and God hath taken the same is ascribed to Satan to the Sabaeans also and Chaldeans but according to the end we must judge of each of them â—t was Satans purpose to make Iob despair It was the Chaldeans intent and Sabeans to enrich themselves by plundring that holy man but God determined to try and make manifest the faith of his servant So in the crucifying of Christ it was Pilates purpose to continue in the favour of Caesar and of the Jews the Jews drift was to satisfie their desire with hatred and revenge but Gods end was to redeem mankind Hence they are said to do nothing but what the hand and counsel of God had determined Act 4.28 XIII The hardening of the wicked is ascribed to God as a most just Iudgment so as God can neither be blamed as faulty nor can the wicked be axcused The wicked are in this inexcusable because God onely hardeneth those who harden themselves neither doth he harden the soft hearted but in his just Judgment he increaseth the hardnesse of them who were hardened before Now they hardened themselves by abusing those graces which should have softned them I. Gods long suffering Rom. 2.4 5. Or dâ—spiâ—est thou the riches of his bounty patience and long suffering not knowing that the bountifulnesse of God leadeth thee to repentance But thou after thy hardnesse and heart that cannot repent heapest unto thy self wrath II. Gods Word 2. Cor. 2 15. For we are unto God the sweet savour of Christ in them that are saved and in them which perish to the one we are the savour of death unto death to the other the savour of life unto life III. Gods correction rod by which as an Anvil they are made harder Ier. 5.3 Thou hast stricken them but they have not sorrowed thou hast consumed them but they have refused to receive correction they have made their faces harder then a stone and have refused to return For this reason then are they most justly hardned by God who harden themselves who so often said of Pharaoh I will hold I will make obstinate I will harden his heart For not only doâ—h he harden by permission but also 1. By letting loose the bridle with which he held in their exorbitant lusts Rom. 1.24 He dilivered them up to their own lust and v. 28. God gave them up to a reprobate mind II. By delivering them to Satan as to a Hangman 1 King 22.21.22 And there came forth a Spirit who stood before the Lord and said I will perswade him to wit Achab and the Lord said to him where with And he said I will go forth and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets
how great evil and misery he brought upon himself VI. The happiness of man being yet in his integrity consisted chiefly in the Image of God VII The soul is the principal subject of this Divine Image the body is the secondary so far forth as the operations of the soul do manifest themselves in it VIII The gifts of Gods Image were partly natural partly supernatural IX The natural gifts were the simple and invisible substance of the soul with its faculties the intellect and will X. The supernatural gifts were the clearness of the understanding the liberty and rectitude of the will the conformitie of the appetites and affections the immortality of the whole man and dominion over the inferior creatures XI Such was the clearness of Adam's understanding that he knew all natural things which had a possible existence in the first principles which are of themselves known An excellent proof of this was shewed by Adam when he gave every creature its name according to its nature Gen. 2.20 XII The will was free indifferent to good or evil so that man might have persevered in uprightness if he had pleased he received power if he would but not wiâ—â— and power There is a fourfold liberty of will according to the fourfold state of man In the first man the will was free to good or evil In man lapsed the will is only free to evil In man regenerated or in the state of grace it is free from evil to good by the grace of God but imperfectly In the state of glory iâ— shall be free from eviâ— to good perfectly In thâ— state of innocency he could not sin In the state of misery he cannot but sin In the state of grace sin cannot reign in man In the state of glory he cannot sin at all XIII The inferiour appetites and affections agreed with reason XIV Man even in respect of his body was immortal but not simply as though his body being composed of the elements could not be resolved into its principles but by Divine Covenant not as though it could not die but because it had a possibility not to die XV. Mans dominion over the inferiour creatures was not onely intire in respect of possession but milde also and gentle in respect of use and execution XVI That labour which was injoyned to Adam to keep and dresse Paradise was not toylsome but most pleasant CHAP. IX Of the fall of our first parents the beginning of Mans misery SO much concerning the government of Man in the state of innocency· The government of Man in the state of misery is whereby God in his just Judgement hath subjected Man to divers miseries who of his own accord fell into sin This state of Man consisteth in sin and in the miseries which follow upon sin Sin is a transgression of the Law or whatsoever is repugnant to Gods Law 1 Joh. 3.4 Under the name of Law in this place are understood both things commanded and things prohibited in the beginning proposed to man as also the Law of nature printed in his heart But concerning the restoring and enlarging of the Law after the fall we are to speak in its own place The RULES I. By sin is meant either the subject of transgression with the transgression it selfe in the concrete or the transgression alone in the abstract II. The definition of sin by thought word and deed is too narrow For so it is defined by the Pontificians but as it shall appear afterward this definition belongs nothing to original sin III. God cannot be called the author of sin without blasphemy IV. One and the same thing in a divers consideration may be both sin and the punishment of sin Sin is either primitive or derivative Primitive is the disobedience of our first Parents whereby they transgressed Gods Commandement concerning the Tree of Knowledge of good and evâ—l The RULES I. Neither God nor Gods Decree nor the denial of special Grace nor the permission of sin nor the stirring up of natural motion nor finally the government of that sinne were the causes of Adam and Eves transgression Not God because he most severely prohibited the eating of that fruit Not his Decree because that infers a necessity only of immutability not of coaction neither doth it force any man to sin Not the denyal of speciall Grace by which man should continue in his integrity for God was not bound to give that grace to man which he gave him for he received possibility if he would although not a Will to that possibility Not the permission of sin for he was not bound to hinder it as before pag 58 Not the stirring up of naturall motion because motion of it self is not sin Not the government of his fall because to turn evil into good is rather to be the author of good than of evil II. God did both will and nill the first Sin He nilled it so far forth as it was sin he willed decreed it as it was a means of manifesting his glory mercy and justice III. The Procatertical or external cause was the instinct and perswasion of Satan that subtile Serpent IV. The Proegumene or internal cause was the will of man of it self indifferent to good or evil but by Satans perswasion bent to evil V. There be certain degrees of that sin by which Adam fell from God not at once but by little little viz. 1. Incogitancy and curiosity of Evahs talking with the Serpent her husband being absent 2. Incredulity by which she began by degrees to distrust God and to give assent to Satans lies who called in question Gods good will towards man 3. An inordinate desire to the forbidden fruit and an affectation of divine glory 4. The fact it self 5. The seducing of Adam and an inordinate affectation raised in him also VI. If you consider the parts of this sin you may justly call it the transgression of the whole Law of Nature For man sinned by incredulity diffidence ingratitude idolatry whereby he fell from God and of himself indeavoured to make an idol of himself by contemning Gods Word by Rebellion Homicide Intemperance Theft by laying hand on that which was anothers without the owners consent by assenting to false witnesse Lastly by an ambitious affectation of too high an honour yea of that glory which belongs onely to God whence the definition of this sinne by Intemperance Ambition or Pride is too narrow VII Therefore with the blessed Apostle we rightly call this sin a transgression an offence and disobedience Rom 5.14 18 19. VIII Adam in this business is to be considered not as a private but as a publique person and consequently as the Parent head and root of all mankind IX VVhatsoever therefore he received and lost he received and lost it for himself and posterity As the head contains Reason both for it self and the members as a Gentleman keeps or loses his Copy-hold for himself and posterity so Adam lost that felicity for himself
to the earth sometimes to the visible heaven and to this purpose is that which Peter saith of righteousnesse which shall dwell there For it is certain that after this world justice shall dwell no where but in heaven To the first reason they answer that there is no consequence from the Flood to the last Judgment because the Flood brought not with it the end of the world so likewise in the other reason they deny the sequel from man to the world because the world will be no wayes available to man when he is advanced to life eternall for it was made onely for him whilest he was a traveler here Now although in controversies of this nature which overthrow not the articles of Faith it be lawful to suspend oâ—r assent yet without prejudice to other mens judgments the understanding reader may subscribe to the latter opinion for it is one thing to be restored and changed unto a better estate and another thing to wax old like a garment to vanish like smoak to be dissolved to melt to be burned to passe away to be no more as the foâ—mer testimonies affirm So much of the end of the World Life eternal is the highest degree of blessedness in which we shall be made partakers of Christs glory enjoying the sight of God and Heavenly joyes for ever and ever The RULES I. The general efficient cause of life eternal in the whole Trinity but particularly Christ our Lord who by his merit obtained life for us and by his efficacy applies it to us and bestows it upon us Hence he is called the everlasting Father Isa. 9.6 and metonymicaly Life it self Ioh. 14.6 II. Good works are not the meritorious cause of life eternal although life is promised to them as a free reward A reward is promised to good works not as a due debt but as a free gift not that by them we can merit life but that we may be provoked to do them III. That eternal happinesse consisteth in our freedom from all evill in the variety magnitude and eternity of joyes Rev. 21.4 And God will wipe all tears from their eyes and there shall be no more death nor sorrow nor crying nor shall there be any more pain for the first things are past IV. The variety of joys is considered in the glorification of man in the delights of Heavenly mansions in the blessed society of the Saints but chiefly in the union with God V. There shall be a glorification both of body and of soul. VI. In the body shall be 1 Clarity 2. Impassibility 3. Subtilty 4. Agility VII The soul shall be far more perfect than it was in the state of innocency for in it shall be understanding without error light without darkness wisdom without ignorance reoson without obscurity memory without oblivion the will also shall be without perversenesse joy without sorrow pleasure without pain In the state of innocency there was in Man a possibility not to sin in the state of glory there shall be no possibility to sin VIII The beauty of â—eavenly mansions was shaddowed by the type of Solomons Temple and Jerusalem â—sal 84 1 c Rev 21. and 22. IX The communion of Saints which be with joy is expressed by the similitude of a feast Matth 22 2 c. X. Neither shall we have communion only with the â—ngels but we shall be also like the Angels Maâ—th 22.30 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luk. 20.36 XI There shall be such a communion with God that we shal see him without end love him without tediousnesse and praise him without wearisomnesse XII So great shall be that joy that neither our tongues can expresse it nor our mindes conceive it For in this life neither had the eye seen nor ear heard nor minde conceived that which can equall that glory 1. Cor. 2 9. XIII Neither shall any bounds be set to this hapinesse nor shall we ever fall from it but it shall continue for ever Psal. 16.11 Thou shall shâ—w me the path of life for in thy presence is fulnesse of joy and at thy right hand are pleasures for evermore XIV There shall be degrees of eternal happinesse This is gathered from Daniel cap. 22. v. 3 They that be wise shall shine as the brightnesse of the firmament and they that turn many to righteousness as the Stars for ever and ever Neither is this opinion overthrown by that place of Matth. 13. v. 43. whereas the just in general are said to shine as the Sun for though the glory of the Elect being considered in themselves is likened to the brightnesse of Sun and Stars yet in Daniel c. 12. this is promised to Doctors above other men neither can any other reason be given why there mention is made chiefly of them that instruct others that place 1 Co. 15.39 40 41 is alleadged but to little purpose for proof of this for the simile concerning the diversity of brightnesse in the Stars dâ—th not prove the degrees of future glory but the â—ifference only that is bâ—twixt a mortâ—l anâ— a glorified body as it appeaâ—s by what followes In the mean while we aâ—low not that manner of different glory which the Papists teach to wit diversity of merits For as the gift of Faith and Sanctâ—fication acâ—ording to Gods meer grace is unequally distributed to the Saints so he will according to his gracious pleasure impaâ—t glory but so that no man shal have cause to complain of any want of glory in himself or why he should envie it in another The SECOND BOOK Concerning the WORSHIP of GOD. CHAP. I. Of the Nature of good Works IN the former Book we have spoken of the Knowledge of God now we are to speak of his Worship The true worship of God consisteth in true holiness and righteousness or in the study of good works which good works are performed by the grace of the Holy Spirit out of true Faith according as the Law requires to the glory of God the certainty of our salvation and edification of our neighbour The RULE I. Good works are called Vertues But we take this word vertue in a larger sense than it is taken by Philosophers for here we call vertues holy affections holy thoughts and actions II The same Synecdochically are called by the name of Charity For so Christ saith that the whole Law consisteth in the precept of love towards God and our neighbour whereas love towards God belongs to the first Commandement but love to our neighbour to the second Table III The principal efficient cause of good works is the Holy Ghost in respect of beginning continuation and perfection For it belongs to the same power to begin in us a good work and to perfect it Phil. 1.6 as also to give both to will and to be able or to do cap. 2.31 IV Their instrumental cause is Faith the root of good works Rom. 14 â—3 what is not done of faith is sin V. The matter of good works are the affections and
hope as it is a verâ—ue we have spokâ—n before 1 Cor. â—3 7 Love suffereth all things believeth all things hopeth all things c. Phil. 1 7. To this is opposite disordered hope when we place more trust in our selves and neighbours than is fit Jeâ— 17.5 Cursed is he that putteth his trust in man Ordered fear is whereby we walk carefully neither trusting too much our selves or others Prov. 14 8. The wisdome of the 〈◊〉 to understand his way To this is opposite disordered fear whereby man fears himself and others too much Mat 10.28 Fear not them that can kill 〈◊〉 body c. Ordered anger is whereby we are offended or displeased with our selves or others upon â—ust cause yet moderately and with hope of amending Ephes. 4.26 Be angry but sin not To this is opposite inordinate anger whereby we are incensed upon light causes or more than is fit or when we intend private revenge Jam 1.20 For the wrath of man worketh nâ—t the righteousnesse of God So much of the ordering of concupiscence Wrestling against tentations and the assaults of an evil conscience is whereby a Christian man denies an evil conscience crucifying his flesh with the lusts thereof and against the assaults of the flesh the devill and the world watcheth and stoutly fighteth There are many reasons that induce us to wrestle stoutly 1. Because the Scripture forbids evil desires lusts Prov. 6.25 1 Cor. 10.6 Gal. 5.16 â—6 Col. 3.5 1 Thes 4 â— 2 Because he that is given to lustâ— loves nor God 1 Ioh 2 15 16. 3 Bâ—cause lusts in regenerate men aâ—e hatefull 2 Gal. 5.16 17. 4. Because they stir up the wrath of God Col. 3. v. 5 6. 5. Because the Apostle furnâ—sheth us with the whole armour of God against them Eph 6 Invisible lusts are oveâ—come by us saith Austin 6. Because the fiâ—e of lusts is most huâ—tfull and breaks out into most sad events Scâ—ipture is full of examples there was never yet any sin committed which did not spring â—â—om evil lust To this is opposite carnal security whereby man flatters his own flesh whereby he willingly entertaineth lusts whereby he gives himself to idleness and sloth which is the devils cushion whereby he omits holy exercises whereby he burdens his soul with intemperance covetousness and such like vices There are three deâ—rees of our wrestling against lusts to wit against suggestion delight and assent To understand these degrees that of Iames helps c. 1.14 c. Every man is tempted when he is drawn away of his own lust and enâ—iced then when lust hath conceived it bringeth forth sin and sin when it is finâ—shed bâ—ingeth forth dâ—ath We must then first resist suggestions thoughts which are either ascending from the fewel of concupâ—scence or descending beâ—ng suggested elswhere the fiâ—st are not without sin the latter are not sins being cast in by Satan if so â—e we let them passe and entertain them not But if we cannot avoid the first degree let uâ— shun the second lest we come to cherish evil thoughts with delight But we must chiefly beware of the third degree that we give not our assent For the more we obey the sinne of concupiscence the more it increaseth Which that we may more and more avoid wâ— beseech God the Father in his Sonne through the holy Ghost to which one God in Trinity he praise honour and glory for ever and ever Amen FINIS * A. R. Divinity is more speculative than practical because it principally handles divine things and in the second place humane actions But as it is a practical science it is the most noble of all practical sciâ—nces because the end of it is beatitude to which the ends of all other sciences are ordained Divinity also may be called wisdom or sapientia because it considers the chiefest of all Causes not only as He is known by his effâ—cts but as He is known in himself also * A. R. He means that which is called principium cognoscendi which is the first instrument by which we come to know the end and media of Divinity and out of which all the precepts of Divinitâ— are concluded But there is another principle of Divinity which is called principium effendi that is God * A. R. The knowledge we have of God here is nominal not real 2. Confused not distinct 3. From his effects à posteriori 4. By way of nâ—gation we know what he is not rather than what he is 5. By way of eminenciâ— we know that what perfection is in the creature is more eminently in him 6. By the motions of things we gaâ—her there must be a chief mover 7. From the degrees of entity truth and goodnesse in the creatures we collect that there must be one chief entity truth goodnessâ— c 〈◊〉 From the possibilities and contingencies that are in all things we inferre there must be one cheif necesssary entity * A. R. There is no composition in God neither Physical nor Logical nor Metaphysical because in him there is no priority nor posteriority as in composition where the compositum is posterior to the parts compounding 2. In composition there is act and possibility but God is all act 3. In composition the parts differ from the compositum but in God there is no difference 4. There is no composition in the form but God is a most simple form 5. Whatsoever is compounded hath a cause of that composition but in God there is no cause * A. R. Whereas to understand is to comprehend the thing understood God doth not properly understand that is comprehend himself for so he should be less than himself but he understands himself negatively that is he is not ignorant of himself * A. R. There is in God a twofold power the one absolute the other ordinary by that he can do all that may be done by this he can do onely those things which his justice and will commands to be done * A. R. Though this name Person be common to all the three yet it is not predicated as genus or species because the Persons of the Trinity differ not numeâ—ically much lesse essentially as they must of which genus and species are predicated * A. R. The number numbring may be understood essentially God or the Soul or an Angel for so Plato calls the soul a number or number numbring may be taken accidentally for those discreet quantities which we call numbers as two three four and in this sense the Trinity is not the number 〈◊〉 because this is an accident * A. R. The Son is from the Father not as an effâ—ct from the cause for that were to infer a priority 2. A dependency 3. A diversity of substances in the Trinity but he is from the Father as the understanding is from the soul the River from the spring or the thing proceeding from its original a Act. 2.23 b Act. 4.28 c Eph. 1.9 Nâ—w this is called his Eternal
antecedent will And 't is a conditional will because Gods precepts prohibâ—tions con mi. nations and promises have the condition of obedience and disobedience annexed Lastly his revealed will because it 's daily set forth in God's word This distinction of the will is duely to observed left we shâ—uld imagine that there are in God either really different or contrary wils III. What things are done against the will of God are not done besides his will For many things may be done against his revealed will which notwithstanding are consistent with his secâ—et will or will of his good pleasure God by his revealed will desired not mans fall but most severely forbad it yet he did will and decree the same by the will of his good pleasure as it was a meanes for maniâ—estation of his glory IV. Therefore by the decree and will of God good and evil comes to passe good by efficiency Evil by permission V. Yet the decree or will of God is not the cause of evil or sin although what God hath decreed necessarily comes to passe For when evil is decreed by Gods will not effecting but permitting it this decree of God is not the cause of evil neither again is the will of God the cause of evil because his decrees are without repentance and unavoidable for they come not to passe by the necessity of coaction bâ—t by the necessity of immutability VI. The necessity of Gods decrees takes not away the liberty of the rational creature The reason iâ— because there is no necessity of coâ—ctions but of immuâ—ability The fall of Adam if we look upon Gods decree came to passe necessarily In the mean while Adam sinned freely being neither coâ—manded nor constrained nor foâ—ced or moved by God but rather most severely admonâ—shed that he should not sin VII Nor doth this Necessity take away Contingencie in the second causes For many things are not contingent in respect of the second causes which in regard of Gods decree come to passe necessarily VIâ—I No moving or impulsive cause can be given of Gods decree except Gods most free will and good pleasure XI The chief end of Gods decree is his own glory X. Gods decree in it self is one and most simple neither is there priority or posteriority in it XI But in respect of the things which are decreed is so distinguished that in what manner or order they come to passe God is said to decree them that they should thus come to passe These are idle questions whether God decreed this or that first VVhether he first ordained the end or the means For whereas the decree of God in it self is one a most simple action there is neither priority nor posteriority in it but it is distinguâ—shed only in regard of the things which are decreed in which respect we say that God 1. Decreed to create man 2. To bestow his Image upon him but so that it might be lost 3. To permit his fall 4. Of those who were to fal some he decreed to leave to themselves and others he appointed to raise and to save them eternally CHAP. IV. Of Predestination GOD's Decree in respect of the Creatures is either general or special The general Decree is that by which he appointed to declare the glory of his power wisdome and goodness in the creation and conservation of all things The special Decree called Predestination is that by which he appointed to manifest the glory of his grace mercy and justice in the Election and Reprobation of the reasonable Creatures The RULE I. Although Predestination in the mind of God be one and a most simple act yet by reason of the weakness of our understanding it is distinguished into that Predestination which decrees the end and that which decrees the means II. He that is predestinate to the end is predestinate also to the means Predestination is either of Angels or of men The Predestination of Angels is that by which God appointed to save etenally some of them in their first happiness that in Christ their head but to leave others to themselves and to punish them eternally for deserting their station voluntarily and this for the manifestation of the glory of his grace and justice The Predestination of men is that by which God appointed out of the race of mankinde created to his Image but falling into sin voluntarily to save some through Christ eternally but others being left to themselves in their own misery to damn eternally and that for the manifestation of the glory of his mercy and Justice The parts then of this decree are two Election and Reprobation The RULES I. Predestination is a decree partly absolute partly not II. It is absolute in respect of the efficient impulsive Cause which neither is Faith in those which were to be elected nor sin in those which were to be reprobated but Gods most free-will Fore-seen Faith or Holinesse is not the cause of Election for man was not elected becaus he was to believe but therefore he believeth because he was elected Act. 13.28 And they believed so many as were ordained to life eternal Neither are we elected because we were to be holy but that we might be holy and unblamable bâ—fore him through love Eph. 1.4 Neither is foreseen smâ—the cause of Reprobation for so we should be al reprobates but that God according to his most free good pleasure hath done what he did is manifest by that Luk. 12.23 It is your Fathers pleasure to give you a Kingdom and Rom. 9.16 I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy and ver 18. Therefore he will shew mercy on whom he will and whom he wils he hardeneth III. It is not absolute if we consider the matter or object and the means by which he puts this decree in execution VI. For the matter or object of election and reprobation is not man considered absolutely but as he was to fall into sin of his own accord The reasons are most evident because the decrees of manifesting mercy wrath or justice presupposeth sin for there can be no mercy but towards him that is in misery and there can be no justice oâ— just indignation but towards him that is a sinner 2. But because that onely can be reprobated which may be reprobated but man is reprobable or may be reprobated not as by God he was created but as Satan he was defaced V. Sin therefore is not the impulsive cause of Reprobation but aâ— necessary condition of the matter or object for though it be not the cause of reprobation yet it is the cause of reprobability or why man should be reprobated Foâ— Reprobation and repâ—obability diffeâ— as the act and possibâ—lity All men are reprobable or 〈◊〉 liable to Râ—probation for sin but all are not therefore actual Reprobates VI Reprobation then presupposeth 1 The decree of mans Creation Of the donation of Gods Image upon him which Image was to be lost 3. Of the permission of mans
and his posterity As out of a venemous root nothing can proceed that 's wholsome so all that are come of Adam naturally are born guilty of that primitive sin X. That primitive sin therefore is not only personal but natural also because by it whole Nature is destroyed of which also Adams prosterity is held guilty to wit all that are naturally sprung from Adam Christ then is excepted from this guilt for he was born of Adam but not by Adam not by naturall generation but by the vertue of the Holy Ghost XI As therefore the Person infected Nature so afterward Nature infected the Persons XII We religiously believe that our first Parents were received into favour by God CHAP. X. Of Original Sinne and Free-will THat Sin which is derived from the first or primitive Sin is either original or actual original Sin is that native corruption derived into the whole man and to the whole race of man naturally descending from Adam whereby man having utterly lost his freedom to good becomes prone to evil The RULES I. This sin in Scripture is named by way of excellency Sin and the Body of sin Sinful-sin Inhabiting-sin The law of our members The Old-man Flesh II. It is called also Concupiscence Rom 7.7 I had not known lust or concupiscence unlesse the Law had said thou shalt not covet or lust or Jam. 1 14 15. III. Therefore the Papists doe erroniously exempt it from being a sin reckoning it among the works of God By the name of Concupiscence is understood either that natural faculty of desire which was in man even before his fall or that corruption which naturally adheres to it as it is in it in the first act and as it inclines man onely to evill IV. The proximate cause of Original sin is the guilt of the first sin in respect of which it is a most just punishment from God to wit a part of that death which God threatened to man V. Although the soul is immediately infused by God into man yet being united to the body it is made guilty presently of the first sin imparted to the whole man and therefore is infected with Original contagion VI. Neither for this cause doth Original sin cease to be sin in that it is not wittingly nor willingly committed for it is sufficient that the irregularity of our nature is present though spontaneousnesse be absent VII From this Original sin except Christ alone no man is free not the blessed Virgin Mary Neither is it only in Infants but it is in the Embryo scarce as yet conceived and before the birth and it appears still more and more as the rapacity of Wolves shews it self in their whelps Psal. 51.7 Behold I was borne in iniquity and in sin hath my mother conceived me 2 Cor. 5.21 For he hath made him to be sin for us who knew no sin VIII Original sin doth consist not onely in an impotency and inaptitude to goodnesse but also in pronenesse to evill neither is it onely the amission of Original good but also the immission of the contrary evill IX By Original sin our natural gifts are corrupted but supernatural are utterly lost X. The Vnderstanding remained but darkened the Will remained but depraved the inferiour Appetite remained but altogether vitiated XI Hence it is that in natural and civil actions an irregenerate man can do no good without special grace XII Without this special grace no excellent thing could be performed by the Gentiles XIII Whatsoever good then that was which they did it was mixed with much vanity so that their chief vertues were in Gods sight but glorious enormities XIV For those are not good works which are good in themseâ—ves but which are done well A work is said to be good either univocally or equivocally univocally so such a work is simply good in respect of all circumstances equivocally a work is good in it self but withall vitious either in respect of the subject or object or means or the end for if we look upon the actions of the Gentiles we shall finde that they aimed more at their own than at Gods glory in them XV. Although the affections of the wicked are kept in by God as with a Bit yet they are not healed XVI But supernatural gifts were utterly lost to wit the claritie of the intellect the rectitude of the will and the conformity of the appetite with reason XVII Hence there is no principle of knowledge or performance of spirituall things in us either in act or in possibility XVIII They seek then the house in the ashes who ascribe to an unregenerate man free-will or other faculties by which he may do well or prepare himself to his own conversion or to the acceptation of Gods grace For this is the errour of Pelagians and Semi-pelagians XIX Mans will remained free from coaction but not to good and evill XX. Yea it is free to evill onely and therefore deserves rather to be called servile than free As for the understanding the natural man comprehends not the things that are of Gods Spirit 1 Cor. 2.14 If you look upon the will the imagination of mans heart is onely evill Gen. 8.21 Finally the Scripture cries out that the whole man having lost his spiritual life lieth dead in sin Ephes. 2.1 Col. 2.13 XXI Although this sin is pardoned in the sanctified Parents notwithstanding by generation it is tansmitted to posterity The reason is because the corruption dwelling in us is not altogether taken away by pardon although the guilt be done away and as faith is the gift not of generation but of regeneration so man not as he is regenerate but as man begets man even as seeds being winnowed from the ears chaff and husks do spring up again with the same CHAP. XI Of actual Sin SO much of Original sin Actual sin is whereby Gods Law is broken by thoughts desires words or deeds The RULES I. According to the diversity of circumstances there are diverse sins II. From the efficient cause sin is either of publique or of private persons as they are in more or less dignity III. From the matter which are things thought desired said or done IV. From the form it is either of commission or omission V. From the end it is either of incogitancy or of affectation and against conscience and that rather of malice than of infirmity or contrarily rather of infirmity than malice VI. From the subject it is of the soul chiefly or of the body or of both VII From the object it is either committed against God or our neighbour VIII Sin committed against God is either with a kind of unwillingness or with a full desire this later sin the Scripture cals the sin against the holy Ghost and to death Matth 12.32 1 John 5.16 IX The sin against the Holy Ghost or to death is when one is convicted in his conscience by the testimony of the Holy Spirit resisteth notwithstanding the same
the end of the Law Rom. 10.4 when it is called a School-master to lead us to Christ Gal. 3.24 and when the Law is said not to be contrary to him who doth the works of the Spirit Gal. 5.22 23. For that righteousness which the Law requires that the Gospel exhibites in Christ to the Believer and albeit we cannot in this life yield full satisfaction to the Law yet the regenerate begin to obey it by the grace of sanctification CHAP. XVI Of the Person of Christ God and Man THe parts of the Gospel concerning Christ our Redeemer are two the first is of his person the other of his Office In respect of the Person the Redeemer is God and man that is Gods eternal Son being incarnate or made man in the fulnesse of time John 1.14 And the word was made flesh and dwelt amongst us Gal. 4 4. But after the fulnesse of time came God sent his Son made of a Woman 1. Tim. 3 16. and without controveâ—sie great is the mystery of godliness God made manifest in the flesh The RULES I. The Incarnation of Christ originally is the work of the whole blessed Trinity but terminatively or in respect of the object it is the work of the Son alone For the son onely assumed mans nature which the father in the Son by the Holy Ghost formed of the substance of the blessed Virgin II The person of Christ is considered either disjunctively as the Word and the eternal Son of God or conjunctively as God and man the first consideration is according to Divinity the latter according to Oeconomie or Gods gracious dispensation III. Likewise the divine nature is considered either in it self and simply or relatively as it is in the Person of the Word by dispensation IV. Althâ—ugh then it be true that Christ-God is become man yet it follows not that therefore the Divinity is incarnate or because the Son is Incarnate that the Father also and Holy Ghost are Incarnate V. The matter out of which the Incarnation was effected is the seed of the Woman or of the blessed Virgin Gen. 3.15 VI. The forme of it consisteth in the Personal Vnion whereby the word was made flesh and Christ remained the same he was and became what he was not VII The end is Gods glory and our salvation VIII Both the truth of God as also our salvation do evince the necessity of Christs incarnation IX The truth of God because in the Old Testament it was uttered by divers Prophesies and was shaddowed by divers types These are the chief Prophesies Gen 3.15 I will put enmity between thee and the Woman and between thy seed and her seed it shall bruise thy head and thou shalt bruise his heel Gen. 22.18 In thy seed all nations shall be blessed Esa. 7.14 Behold a Virgin shall conceive and bring forth a Son and they shall call his name Emanuel Esa. 9.6 7. For unto us a child is borne and unto us a Son is given Jer. 23.5 Behold the dayes shall come in which I will raise to David a righteous branch and a King shall reign and prosper and shall execute judgement and justice on the earth In his dayes â—udah shall be saved and Israel shall dwell safely and this is his name whereby he shall be called The Lord our righteousness But his types were the Tabernacle the Arke of the Covenant and such like of which we have said but chiefly Melchisedeck without father without mother Hebr. 7.3 and that humane shape or form in which he appeared of old frequently to the Fathers X. Our salvation for this cause doth evince and prove the necessity of his Incarnation in that we could not be saved but by such a redeemer who was both God and Man in one Person or God-man XI That he should be God was requisite in respect of both parties on the one side the Majesty of God required it on the other side our wants the greatness of the evil that was to be removed and the good that was to be restored Such is the Majesty of God that no man could interpose himself but he who was one with the Father the very Angels durst not do this because they also stood in need of Christ the Mediator Col. 1.16 17. Because they being compared with God are unclean Ioh. 15.15 and for this cause they cover their faces in Gods presence Isa. 6.2 How much lesse then could any man intercede whereas there is not one just person Rom. 3.10 The evill that was to be taken away was sin and the consequents of sin the wrath of God the power of Satan both temporal and eternal death Now I pray by whose suffering could that infinite Majesty be satisfied which was offended unlesse by his suffering who was also Infinitâ— By whose Intercession could the wrath of God be appeased but by his onely who is that best beloved son of God By whose strength could Satan with the whole power of darknesse be overcome except by his who in power exceeds all the Devils who finally could overcome death except he who had the power over death Heb. 2.15 But the good things that were to be â—estred were perfect righteousness adoption into sons the Image of God the gifts of the holy Ghost life eternal and such like but now who could bestow that righteousness on us except he who is justice it self Who is so fit to make us the sons of God as he who is by nature the Son of God Who was so fit to restore in us the image of God as he who is himselfe the Image of the invisible God who can bestow on us the holy Spirit so assuredly as he from whom the spirit proceedeth Who at last can give us life eternal but he who is life it self Iohn 1.4 XII That he might be man the justice of God required which as it leaves not sin unpunished so it punisheth not sin but in that nature which sinned The first branch of this Rule is plain both by the justice and by the truth of God By his justice because God by this doth not onely resist but also punish sin Psal. 5.4 5 6. For thou art not a God that hast pleasure in wickednesse nor shall evil dwell with thee the foolish shall not stand in thy sight thou hatest all workers of iniquity thou shalt destroy them that speak lies the Lord will abhor the blody and deceitful man Now by the truth of God because the threatning which was given before the fall could not be in vain therefore Socinus is idle and foolish who that he might overthrow the merit of Christ feigns such a justice of God which doth not necessarily inflict eternal death or require satisfaction and which in this respect can be content to loose its own right but if sins were to be punished they were surely to be punished in our nature for to man the Law was given and to man death was threatned therefore it lies upon man to suffer the punishment
pledge by those who were in suit of law is not unfitly applyed in the Church to the signes of Grace For by Sacraments as it were by solemn oaths we are bound to observe what is promised in the Covenant and the same are to us pledges of grace promised in the Covenant II. It is called also a Mystery as it signifieth some secret and divine thing proposed in signs and types yet the word Mystery is further extended than the word Sacrament seeing every sacrament is a mystery but all mysteries are not sacraments III. Sacrament sometimes is taken properly for the whole action as it containes both the signe and thing signified but Synecdochically it is onely taken for the signe IV. According to the first sense it is already designed but in the other sense it is defined a visible signe of an invisible grace V. The principal efficient cause is commonly the whole Trinity but particularly Christ that Angel of the Covenant VI. The instruments of administration are the Ministers lawfully called VII The instrument by which the Sacraments are effected or by which the signs are consecrated is the Word of Institution consisting chiefly of two parts to wit a precept of the due administration and receiving and a promise of the fruitful efficacie of Sacraments VIII The word of institution doth not change the quality or substance of the elements but only their use and that not by any secret vertue inherent in the words themselves as the Papists say but by Gods ordination As a stone by the Magistrates appointment is changed into a landmark the substance and qualities thereof still remaining so as Austin saith the Word being joyned to the element it becomes a Sacrament the quality and substance remaining onely the common use is changed into a sacred IX It is false also which they teach That the Ministers intention is of such absolute necessity that without this there can be no Sacrament For if the Sacrament depend not more on Gods institution than on the Ministers intention wretched consciences will be deprived of all comfort who know not the Ministers thoughts whilst he administers X They do also foolishly set in opposition the Word preached and the Word of Institution for these differ not really but in some respect onely seeing a Sermon is but the explication of the Word therefore the Word of Institution belongs to the â—ssâ—nce of of the Sacrament but thâ— Word Preached to the manner of administration XI The outward and terrene matter of the Sacrament is the visible Signe or Element XII The inward or heavenly matter is the thing signified to wit Christ with all his benefits XIII The external form consisteth in the lawful administration and participation of the Sacrament according to Gods command XIV The internal forme is the analogie of the sign and thing signified XV. Therefore the union of the sign and thing signified is not physical or local but habitual as the signe represents the thing signified and while the signe is given by the Minister the faithfull receive the thing signified from Christ. XVI Yet we deny not the presence of Christ and of his body and blood in the action of the Sacrament for besides that he is present in his Divine Person he is not wanting in the presence of his Spirit to his own body and blood not locally but sacramentally There is a threefold presence besides that which is local 1. Symbolical when things are represented to the mind by some sign or symbol as things by words or voices man by his image 2. Spiritual when we represent to our selves by faith some spiritual thing nor present as Abraham represented to himself and saw the day of Christ Ioh. 8.56 3. A Virtual when that which is distant in place is present in power and efficacy as the Sun These three ways of Presence meet in the Sacrament for the body and blood of Christ are present to us 1. Symbollically as they are represented by an external sign 2. Spiritually as we apply by faith to our selves Christs body and blood with his merits 3. Virtually as we perceive the fruit thereof by faith in our hearts The first degree of Sacramental presence belongs also to infidels the second and third to the faithfull only Therefore although Christs body by local presence is far distant from the symbole as heaven is from earth yet there is a sacramental presence Presence is not opposed to distance but to absence XVII Neither are therefore Sacraments empty signes because the symbole and thing signified are not locally united for there remain notwithstanding 1. The signes signifying 2. Exhibiting 3. Applying 4. Sealing We must carefully observe these four sorts of signes against those who cry out that we have nothing in the Sacraments but empty signes Signes then are either significant only as a painted image signifieth a man or exhibiting also as a scepter keys and such like which being exhibited regal power is also conferred and leave to enter the house or they are besides applying signes as that promise of God to preserve the 144000. this the Angel applieth to each one by setting a mark on his fore-head Rev. 7.3 Or lastly they are confirming and sealing signs as earnests seals and such like Now these four degrees meet in Sacraments for 1. The outward symbols do signifie and represent Christs body and blood 2. Together with the signe the thing signified is exhibited yet not in the signe but in the Sacramental action the Minister exhibiting the signe and Christ the things signified 3. The thing signified generally promâ—sed to the faithful in the Gospel by the exhibâ—tion of the sign is applied to every one of the faithfull 4. The same promise is confirmed by the Sacrament whence they are not onely called signs but seals also Rom. 4.11 XVIII From the union and relation of the thing signified with the sign there ariseth a sacramental phrase or speech in which the thing signified is predicated of the sign In this manner of speech is expressed what these outward signs signifie rather than what they are in themselves or in their own nature Gen 17. 19. Circumcision by a sacramental phrase is called the Covenant but v. 11. properly the Sâ—gn of the Covenant Exod â—2 11 the Lamb is called the Passeover which place is vindicated from our Adversaries exceptions by the like sayings Mar. 14.12 And the first day of unleavened â—read when they killed the passeover Luc. 22.7 The day of unleavened bread camâ— in which the Passeover was to be killed ver 8. Go and prepare the Passeover for us that we may eat ver 11. There is an Inne where I must eat the Passeover with my Disciples and v. 12. There prepare the passeover verse 15. I have desired to eat this Passeover with you To this purpose serve all those places in which Expiation is attributed to sacrifices and purification to water and washings also in which the name Iehovah is given to the Ark or to Ierusalem
different men but also in one and the same man so that sometimes it is weaker sometimes stronger but so that it can never be utterly lost Isa. 42.3 He shall not break the bâ—used reed nor quench the smoaking flax Phil. 1.6 I am perswaded that he who hath begun a good work in you will perfect it until the day of Iesus Christ. Heb. 12 2. looking unto Iesus Christ the Author and finisher of our Faith CHAP. XXX of Iustification THe mediate effects of Vocation proceeding from faith are Justification Sanctification Assurance of salvation and Christian liberty Justification is Gods free action whereby the Elect through the most full satisfaction of Christ are absolved from their sins and are declared rightous and inheritors of life eternal The RULES I. Iustice in Scripture is either of the Cause or of the person Iustice of the cause is when a man otherwise sinfull is said in this or that particular to be innocent and just Iustice of the person is either begun or it is perfected This is called Legal as it is required by the Law and Evangelical as it is shewed in Christ by the Gospel Begun justice is that which the Holy Ghost begins in the faithful in this life and perfects it in the other The perfect righteousnesse of Christ then is the gift of Iustification but that which is begun is the gift of Sanctification II. To justifie in this place is not to punish nor to infuse inherent righteousnesse as the Pontificians will have it but in the sense it is taken in the Courts of justice it is to absolve from sin and to pronounce one just Prov. 17.15 To justifie the wicked and to condemn the just both are abomination to the Lord. Isa. 5.23 which justifie the wicked and take away the righteousnesse of the righteous Matth. 11.19 wisdome is justified by her children Lu. 7.29 when these things were heard all the people and the Publicans justified God Luk. 10.29 He willing to justifie himself III. The efficient cause of Iustification actively understood is the whole Trinity 2 Cor. 5.19 God was in Christ reconciling the world to himselfe 1. Cor. 6.11 But you are washed but you are sanctified but you are justified in name of the Lord Iesus and by the Spirit of our God IV. The internal moving cause â—is meer grace or Gods free favour That this is a free favour and not an infused grace will appear by these testimonies Rom. 3.24 For they are justified freely by his grace Ephes. 2.8 you are saved by grace through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God Tit. 3.4.5 But after the goodnesse and love of God our Saviour appeared towards man not by the works which we had done but by his mercy he hath saved us V. The external moving cause is Christ God and man Christ as the Son of God is the efficient cause of justification in common with the Father and Holy Ghost but as he is God-man and our Mediator he is the outward moving cause because by his merit he hath procured this gift for us VI. The instrumental cause of this is the word of the Gospel For it is the power of God to every believer Rom. 1.16 VII If we take Iustification passively in reference to man who is justified it hath no other cause but faith the instrumental VIII This phrase We are justified by faith is metonymical and equivalent to this We are justified by Christs merits apprehended by faith IX Faith only is said to justifie in respect of works which are effects following upon faith but not the causes of Iustification for they do not precede him that is to be justified but follow him that is justified Although this particle alone in so many letters and syllables is not found in Scripture yet it is expressâ—d by like phrases Such are Without works freely by grace Rom. 3.24 27 28. But by faith Eph. 2.8 Gal. 2.16 Though then faith be not alone but is joyn'd with works yet it justifieth alone As the Sun is not in Heaven alone yet he alone makes day X. Faith doth not justifie as if it were a work or by its own dignity but as it is an instrument apprehending Christ. The Papists grant that we are justified by faith but then they take faith here as a work Now faith in Scripture hath nothing ascribed to it but as it aprehends as a Gold-ring bears a high price for the Jewel in it And hence it appears how finely those places of Scripture do agree in which we are said to be justified now by grace then by Christs merits then by faith for we are justified through Gods grace for Christs merits apprehended by faith XI The matter of justification taken actively is Christs whole satisfaction whereby he suffered the punishment due to our sins and yielded perfect obedience to the Law We have shewed above cap. 18. that Christs satisfaction is placed both in his suffering and in his actual obedience XII The matter of this taken passively is man miserable in himself but elected by God called and indowed with faith Though then vocation naturally is before faith and faith before justification yet in time there is no difference For as soon as man is effectually called he is endowed with faith and justified by faith XIII The form of it actively understood is in the imputation of Christs whole satisfaction whereby it is made all ours as if we had performed it our selves That justice which is imputed to the believer is in Christ by inhesion in us by imputation Our adversaries deny that in Scripture there is any mention of this imputation But what can be cleerer than these ensuing places Rom. 4.6 As David calleth that man blessed unto whom God imputeh righteousnesse without works Phil. 3.8.9 I account all things dung that I may gain Christ and may be found in him not having my own righteousnesse which is of the Law but that which is by the faith of Christ that is the righteousnes which is of God by faith This is chiefly seen in that antithesis whereby our sins are imputed to Christ and his justice imputed to us 2 Cor. 5 21. He made that he should be sinne for us who knew no sin that we might be made the righteousness of God in him The Papists also think it as absurd that we should be justified by the justice of another as if one would be called learned for the learning that is in another But these examples are not like for one man is not so united to another as the faithfull are to Christ their head Againe they will not have Christs justice imputed to them and yet they stick not to say that the merits of dead men and the Justice of Monks are imputed to them XIV Yet for understandings sake the form of justification is expressed by two acts by remission of sinns and imputation of justice by judging our sins to be none and our righteousnesse to be perfect XV.
And although these two benefits be the same in subject and time yet they are indeed distinct For they differ 1. In definition for it is one thing not to account us unrighteous and another thing to esteem us righteous Which that we may the better understand we must know how these terms are different Not just and just Unjust and just Not just and Unjust Not Unjust and just Not just and just are contradictories Unjust and just are partly privatives partly contraries Not just and unjust also Not unjust and just are diversa VVe must also know that Unjust and just are not immediate contraries for the medium is innocent who is neither unjust nor just Now whereas the remission of sins is a removing or putting away of our sins but the imputatâ—on of justice is the adjudging of it to be ours by that we are accounted for not unjust or innocent by this for just Now who knowes not that it is more to be just than to be innocent onely and not onely to have done no evill but also to have done good But although these two now in man differ not in subject but in some respect only yet heretofore they diffeâ—ed in subject also For Adam in Paradise was innocent but not just for he was at length to attain justice by his perfect obedience 2. They differ in their proximate and proper causes for Christs death and passion are the cause of remission of sins which are expiated by them Heb 9.22 without blood there is no remission 1 John 1.7 The blood of Iesus Christ cleanseth us from all sin But the cause of the imputation of Justice is Christs perfect obedience Rom. 5.19 For as by the disobedience of one man many are made sinners so by the obedience of one many are made righteous We have shewed above cap 18. That this obedience is that actuall by which he fulfilleth the whole Law for us 3. They differ in their proper effects for by remission of sins we are freed from damnation Rom. 5. â— Much more then noâ— being justified by his blood we shall be saved from wrath through him But by imputation of righteousnesse we attain over and above life â—ternal Rom. 5.17 Much more they which receive abundance â—f grace and of the gift of righteousnesse shall reign c. so Gal. 4.5 both effects are put Made under the Law that he might redeem them that are under the Law that is under the cuâ—se of the Law and that we might recieve adoption It is then a greater benefit to redeem a Slave and being redeemed to adopt him than barely to redeem it is a greater favour to give and forgive than onely to forgive therefore that justificatâ—on is lame by which only Christ passion is imputed and which onely consisteth in remissions of sins Here divers things are objected 1. The Scripture in many places makes mention of Christs passion or Remission of sins onely But this is no wonder for in many places it speaks Synecdochically itâ— sufficient that it explaines 〈◊〉 selfe in the above cited placeâ— 2. The Apostle promiscuously useth these phrases as equivalent to forgive sins and to impute righteousnesse Rom. 4.5 6. But we answer that it is one thing for propositions to be equivalent and another thing for one proposition to follow upon or to conclude another as Paul out of this phrase of David Psal. 32.2 Blessed are they whose sins are forgiven them c. collects this that David doth describe him to be blessed to whom righteousnesse is imputed wiâ—hout woâ—ks The reason of the consequence is because if the remission of sins be free then so is also the imputation of justice Although then that is not formally spoken by David which Paul affirmeth v. 5. yet it is spoken by way of consequence yea it is an argumentation as Chrysostome saith from the lesser to the greater for if he be blessed whose sins are forgiven then much more blessed is he to whom besides righteousnesse is imputee 3. To whom sins are forgiven to him also righteousnesse is imputed and whosoever is freed from damnation he is inheritor of life eternal therefore these benefits are not different Answ. Those things are not the same which are in the same subject together For so it would follow that Vocation Justification and Sanctification are not different benefits because every man that is called is also justified and sanctified 4. In the pardon of sins there are the sin of omission pardoned and therefore by that man is made perfectly just They adde the reason of the consequence because he performs all things who omits nothing Ans The consequence is fals because there is one cause why we are said to have omitted nothing another why we are said to have done al things We are said to have omitted nothing because Christ hath suffered for our sins also of omission But we are said to have performed all things because he hath for us performed all things Besides to have omitted nothing and to have done all thinges differ in respect of punishment and reward for although the fault the punishment are remited to him who omits what he shold do yet for this there is no reward due to him 5. It is absurd that the same debt should be paid twice If therefore satisfaction is made for sin by Christs suffering satisfaction also is not to be demanded by active obedience Answ. Here is ignoratio Elenchi for there is not a double payment of the same debt but two parts of one payment Neither is Christs active obedience required to make satisfaction for sin but to satisfie for our interest in the Kingdome of Heaven 6. If it be the same thing to be liberal and not to be prodigal nor covetous then it is the same thing to be just and not unjust Answ. The assumption is false beâ—ause these are not immediate opposites for there are men who are neither covetous nor prodigal nor liberal 7. If it be the same thing to be clothed and to have nakedness covered then it is the same thing to have our sins remitted and justice imputed beâ—ause by the garment of 〈◊〉 righteousnesse 〈◊〉 sins are also 〈◊〉 Ans. This is an 〈◊〉 simile for the sinâ—â—r must not onely be clothed but he must be first unclothed to wit from the rags of sin Therefore as Ioshuah the High-Priest had his filthy garments taken from him first then new garments were put upon him and a crown on his head Zach. 3.4 5. So we also first must be divested of this dirty garment of sin then we are clothed with the glorious garment of Christs righteousnesse XVI The form of Iustification taken passively is whereby believers lay hold on â—hrist with all his merits by the hand of â—aith and apply him to themselves XVII The end of that benefit is Gods â—lory and our salvation XVIII Out of this commemoration 〈◊〉 causes we firmly gather That man is 〈◊〉 justified before God by his good works 〈◊〉 merits
The instrumental cause of this is Faith III The matter or subject are faithful men IV. The matter about which this is conversant are the Law the service of sin and death affliction of conscience in things indifferent and mens commandments V The form is expressed by divers conditions as the objects are various VI. We have shewed above in the doctrine of the Law how we are freed from the Law VII We are not quite in this life free from the inherence of sin in us but we are freed from the guilt and dominion of it from that by justification from this by sanctification Rom. 6.12 Let not sin therefore reigne in your mortal bodies that you should obey sin in the lusts thereof VIII From indifferent things that is such as are neither commanded nor prohibited we are so freed that our conscience is not bound to keep or break them Rom. 14 2.3 For one believeth that he may eat all things another who is weak eateth hearbs let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not and let not him that eateth not condemn him that eateth IX Now in these cases a special care must be had of Faith and charity of faith lest we take things not indifferent for indifferent of charity lest we offend our weak brother Of Faith Paul spakes Rom. 14·23 He that doubteth if he eat he is already condemned because he eateth not of faith but what is not of faith is sin of Charity cap. 14. ver 1. He that is weak in the faith receive you but not unto doubtfull disputation c. X. The same care of liberty is about mens commandements for our conscience is not obliged to those things which are against Gods commands or being adiaphorous are obtruded as necessary but we must not for conscience refuse obedience to those things that are consonant to Gods command XI The end of this liberty 1. Is true consolation arising out of our freedom from sin death and solicitude in things indifferent 2. The service of righteousnesse which indeed is true liberty 3. The true worship of God free from superstition or the scandal of our neighbour XII Contrary to Christian liberty is the â—iberty of the flesh and wantonnesse Jud. v. 4. there are some men crept in now of old ordained for this condemnation ungodly men turning the grace of our God into wantonnesse CHAP. XXIV Of the coming of Christ and Resurrection of the flesh which go before the last Iudgement HItherto of the State of Grace now follows the State of Glory To this belongs the doctrine of the last Judgment The parts whereof are three 1. Of its Antecedents 2. Of the Judgement it self 3 Of the Consequents thereof The Antecedents are Christs coming and the Resurrection of the flesh Christs last coming is his return from Heaven to which he ascended to judge the Earth The RULES I. It is most certaine that Christ will returne to Iudgement This was revealed even in the Patriarks times Iud. v 14 Enoch also the seventh from Adam prophesied of these saying Behold the Lord commeth wiâ—h ten thousand of his Saints to execute judgement upon all and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him The rest of the Scripture is full of such testimonies Psal. 50 3 c. Dan. 12. Matt. 24. and 25. Act. 17. Rom. 2. and 14. 2 Cor. 5.10 1 Thess 4. and 5. 2 Pet. 3. Rev 19 c. II. Although no man knows the time of Christs coming exactly in respect of the day and hour yet there are signes set down by Christ and his Apostles showing that that day is not far off III. These Signes are either common or proper IV. Those are common which were to signifie both the destruction of Ierusalem and Christs last coming Such were those predictâ—ons of Christ Mat. 24.4 5. c. when he speaks both of his own comming and of the destruction of Ierusalem as the type thereof to wit False Prophets false Christâ— wars pestilence famine earthquakes persecutions for Christs sake treacheries want of faith and charity c. V. The proper signes are extream security and impiety the revealing of Antichrist and his destruction by the breath of Christ mouth The ruine of Rome with the forsaking and burning of the Whore VI To these signes some adde A visible and generall uniting of the Iews to the Church of Christ which they teach must be expected in the last times This opinion is plausible if it were found in Scripture The Prophetical testimonies which they alledge were fulfilled in the Apostles times when upon the breaking down of the partition-wall the Jews and Gentiles were united into one body In the Revelaâ—ion we find nothing that doth solidly confirm this opinion Their chief hold is in that of Rom. 11.25.26 For I would not breâ—hren â— that yee should be ignorant of this mysterie lest â— should be wise in your own conceit that blindness in part is happened to Israel until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in and so all Israel shall be saved The Apstles scope in this is to dehort Christians from insulting over the Jews that are rejected because they themselves are called The reason is because by their ruine the gentiles have received salvation ver 11. Yet so that all hope of reconciliation is not cut off from the Jews ver 1â— Nor are they exempted from being rejected who being Christians onely in name are puffed up in their mindes ver 20.21 That former passage of the rejection of the Jews which was not altogether without hope of pardon doth shew in a mystery that the Jews were not totally but in part onely rejected not in respect of time for it was to last onely awhile but in respect of that part of the Jewish Nation which contains the Reprobates so that the meaning is this blindness hath hapned not to all the Jews but to a part only that is to the Reprobates Neither have these words until the fulness of the Gentiles come in this meaning that there shall be such a plausible calling of the Jews after the fulness of the Gentiles is come in For there is nothing more usual than that thâ—se particles till or untill and while being denyed or affirmed signifie the same that never or alwayes As we shewed above c. 19. Neither doth that which the Apostle subjoyns v. 26. hinder anything this interpretation And so all Israel shall be saved For by the name of all Israel he understands the elect which indeed are the true Israelites as above c. 9.7 c. he sheweth And also in the following places v. 28. c. 11 he explains saying As concerning the Gospel they arâ— Enemies for your sakes but as touching the Election they are beloved for their fathers sakes The summe of the whole place is this the rejection of the Iews Nation
actions of a regenerate man VI. The form of them is their agreement with the precept of the Decalogue For sin is a transgression of the Law 1 Joh. 3.4 that must needs be sin which deviates from the Law VII Therefore those are not good works which are conformable te the commandments of men and not of God Isa. 29.13 Matth. 15 9. In vain do they worship me teaching for doctrines the commandments of men VIII Neither are those good works which the Papists call works of Supererogation by which they say more is performed than by the Law is required IX This opinion is grounded upon their conceit of Councels or things not commanded but left to our liberty the omission of which is not punishable but the performance is greater than legal obedience and therefore meritorious They say such Councels may be seen Mat. 19. v. 11. where they teach that the counsel of single life is not contained within the command and. ver 21. where they say that to the young man a-counsel was given not a coÌ„mand that he should sell his goods and give them to the poor and then follow Christ and 1 Cor 7. where they say that the single life is counselled But this opinion of Councels and works of supererogation is false 1. Because so the Law is made imperfect whilst the performing of councels is preferred to the fulfilling of the Law 2 Because if no man is able to fulfill the Law much less able is any man to fulfil that which is heavier than the Law 3. Because to beg daily for pardon of our sins and to brag of such works are things inconsistent The places above alledged are to be understood of commands and not of Councels which do not oblige men these commands indeed are particular and given only to certain men according to the exigence of their condition and gifts yet they are subordinate to general precepts Matth. 29.11 Single life is not only counselled but commanded two conditions being required 1. If the kingdom of Heaven doth so require it 2. If any be assured that he hath the gift of continency so ver 2.1 It is not a counsel but a command that is given to the young man that his hypocrisie might be unmasked who bragg'd that he was able to fulfil all the Law And 1 Cor. 7. Celibate is injoyned to them that have the gift of continency not simply but because it was expedient for the difficulty of those times Now I pray what is more consonant to Gods Law than to renounce all earthly things for the glory of God therefore in these places nothing is counselled but what by the Law is commanded X. The end of good works is threefold to wit the glorifying of God and the testifying of our gratitude towards him the certainty of salvation and our Neighbors edification We are taught Matth. 5.16 that we must study to do good works both for Gods cause and our Neighbours Let your light â—o shine before men that they may see your good works and glorifie your Father which is in Heaven They are to be performed for our own sakes because we can have no assurance of salvation election vocation and justification but by good works as the effects of Faith â—ustification and Sanctification whence Iohn saith He that doth well is of God 1 Ep. 3. v. 10. XI The subject of good works is man regenerated This was proved in the former Book cap. 10. out of our natural corrupt on whence appears the vanity of the School-nens Doctrine concerning merit of congruity condignity they ascribe that to the works of an unregeneâ—at man before the first grace but this to his works done after the first grace is received I hat they call the merit of congruity because it is fit or congruous that reward begiven to him that worketh virtuously this they call merit of condignity because there is a proportion between the merit and the reward of which opinion Bellarmine and Stapleton were ashamed XII The adjuncts of good works are their imperfection and their necessity neverthelesse XIII The good works of the Saints are imperfect while they are travellers here but they shall be perfect in the state of glory hereafter This Doctrin is not thwarted by those places iâ— which the Saints are said To walk perfectly and not to turn towards the right hand or to the left hand For in those places is understood not so much perfection it self as the desire of it and the perfection of parts rather than of degrees or their sincerity integrity are meant whereby the faithfull though the Scripture elswhere speaks of their sins study to serve God in the simplicity of their heart without hypocrisie XIV Yet this imperfection is covered with Christs perfection hence our half perfect works and which are joyned with infirmities are reputed for perfect in this respect the Church is said to be without spot or wrinckle XV. Good workes are necessary by the necessity of precept and of the means but not by the necessity of the cause or merit By the necessity of precept they are necessary because the study of good works through al the Scriptures is most severely injoyned to us They are necessary in regard of the means because they are sure marks of Vocation Election and true Faith because they are the way and means to attain heavenly blisse As if a man should make a journey from York to London to obtain an inheritance the way or journey is the medium or means but not the meriting cause or the inheritance even so it is in this matter Works would be truly meritorious if they had these three conditions as exprest in the following distich Da tua 1 sed quae non 2 debes propoâ—tio 3 adsit Non aliter meritum diâ—eris esse tuum 1. If they were our own 2. If they were not due 3. If they were proportionable to lâ—fe eternal But in our good works these conditions are wanting 1. Though good works be done by us yet they are not of us 2 Cor. 3.5 2 We are bound to do them so that is we should do all yet we must confesse We are unprofitable servants Luk. 17.10 3. They have no proportion if they be compared to life eternal CHAP. II. Of Vertues and Works pertaining to the whole worship of God and to the Decalogue VErtue or good works are either general or particular Those belong to the whol worship of God so to the whole Law these to either of the Tables or to each Command The vertues of the first Command are either of the Understanding or of the Will The vertues of the Understanding are Wisdome and Prudence Wisdome is that vertue by which we know Gods will and our own infirmity that we may do what is conformable to Gods will and may seriously beseech God for strength to perform this will Rom. 12.2 That you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God Psal.
providâ—nce that it may be distinguished from Actual providence which is nothing else but the execution of Gods decrees * A. R. The School men take Gods antecedent will in another sense for his velleâ—ty and they call it conditional they make his conâ—equent will absolute and which is alwayes fulfilled the other not alwayes * A. R. Gods will is immutable because his substance is unchangeable and his knowledge unalterable therefore God changeth not his wâ—ll though he wils change in the creatures neither can God will evil because it is not appetible and 't is repugnant to his nature and goodnesse * Predestination is a part of divine providence differing in this that Providence hath respect to a natural end Predestination to a supernatural man therefore being subject to Providence is also subject to Predestination * A. R. Predestination is a part of Providence so is Reprobation For as God by his Providence hath ordained some to life eternal so by that same providence he was to suffer some to fall away from that happinesse * A. R. Christ is the efficient cause of Electiâ—n as he is God equal with the Father He is the meritorious cause as he became our Mediator As head of the Church he is also the cause of Election Joh. 13.18 I know whom I have chosen and â—oh 15.16 I have chosen you In respect of his â—ctive and passive obedience he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the outward moving cause And if he be the cause of salvation he must needs be the cause of election on which salvation depends Causa causae est causa causati But beeause we are said to be elected in him as he bâ—came our Surety he is called the medium or mean of election rather than the cause As he is God we are elected by him as Mediator in him As God he is the principal â—fficient as Mediator the secondary or mean of election * A. R. The reason is because an infinite power is required to produce things out of nothing 2 Because enâ—ity or being 〈◊〉 an universal effect and therefore must be produced by an universal cause which only is God who created that is gave simply being to the creature * A. R. If the Angels were corporeal the world were imperfect because there would be wanting incorporeal creatures 2 God made men and Angels to his own image which consisteth not only in will understanding but also in immateriality and immortality * A. R. The soul could not be produced out of any preexistent matter neither corporeal because it is not a body nor incorporal because spirits and incorporeal substances admit no change or transmutation * A. R. For he could not be God if he did not order things to their end but this is Providence 2. He were not God if he were not good but this is seen as well in the ordering as in the creating of the world 3. He were not God if he were not prudent but Providence is the chief part of prudence * A. R. The world were not perfect if all things weâ—e necessary nothing contingent therefore God would have contingencies to depend from conâ—ingent causes and necessities from causes necessary therefore what falls out necessarily is because God hath so disposed it * A. R. There is in the evil Angels a twofold knowledge the one is by nature which they have not lost at all for their nature being simple admits no diminution therefore that knowledge which in thâ—m depends from their nature as their other natural faculties do were not lost nor diminished Hence they knew how to produce Frogs in Egypt and do the other wonders that Moses did onely they could not produce the Lice not as if they were ignorant of the occult seeds and causes of such production for the knowledge of the Lice was not more difficult than that of the Froges but because they were hindred by the power of God Their other knowledge is by grace that is either speculative or practical the former is not totally lost but much diminished for of Gods secrets they know very little But the practick knowledge which is joyned with the love of God detestation of evil is totally lost in them for such knowledge cannot consist with obstinate malâ—ce yet as they naturally know God so they naturally love him as an Entity but not morally as he is the Fountain of all happiness of which they know themselves to be eternally deprived * A. R. When it is said here that in the state of misery man cannot but sin is not meant that man is forced to sin for he is free from compulsion both in the state of sin and of grace but he is not free from necessity for freedome and necessity may be together in the same will so it shall be in heaven when we shall necessarily yet freely will that only which is good as the Angels do and even here the will is necessitated when it is determinated by the last act or practical judgement of reason why then may not grace in our conversion necessitate as well as reason determinate but man by his voluntary fall hath brought the necessity of sinning on himself So that with Saint Paul we do the evil which we would not do in that we have lost by the abuse of our free-will both our selves and our free-will * A. R. The direct cause of sin was mans owne will the indirect cause was Satan by perswasion and suggestion For no externall thing can necessarily move the will but the last end onely Satan may internally work upon the phantasie by representing forms to it and upon the appetite by moving it to passion by means of the spirits and heart but he cannot work upon the understanding and will a Rom. 6.6 b Rom. 7.13 c Rom. 7.17 d Rom. 7.23 e Rom. 6.6 f John 3.6 Gal. 5.17 a A. R. When it is said here that supernatural gifts were utterly lost is meant that Faith was utterly lost and Faith is the chief of all supernatural gifts now that Faith was utterly lost in our first Parents is plain because they gave credit to the Serpent therefore they believed not that God was either true or omnipotent they thought to hide themselves from him therefore they believed not his omnipresence and in a manner Adam accused God for giving him the woman that made him sin and in this he lost the faith of Gods goodnesse and justice yet though man lost his Faith he did not utterly lose all other spiritual gifâ—s for he did not utterly lose the knowledg of God nor did his posterity for that is learned by the things that are made Rom. 1.20 nor did he utterly lose the fear of God for Adam confesseth Gen 3. that when be heard the voice of God he was afraid which Fear though servile yet it is a supernatural gift but of an inferiour rank b When it is said here that there is no spiritual knowledge in us this must
withal our mortification so the rising out of the water is a shadow of his resurrectiâ—n our spiritual vivification 2. Water is a cheap and common element therefore obvious and easily obtained 3. In the beginning the spirit moved on the waters and was the cause of generation so in the baptism of water and the spirit is effected our regeneration 4. Water washeth away the filth of the body so doth baptism the spots of the soul. I will pour upon you clear water and you shall be cleansed from all your iniquities Ezek. 36. by this water Eph. 5. Christ cleanseth his Church 5. Water quencheth the thirst of the body so doth Baptism the thirst of the soul. 6. water cooles the heat of the body so doth baptism the beat of Gods wrath the fire of our lusts 7. Baptism is the Sacrament of illumination Hâ—b 6 4 10.32 Therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to illuminate is used for baptising and bapâ—â— sm is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 illumination and the dayes of baptisme weâ—e caâ—led the dayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of light Now water is a diapharâ—nt â—ody by which light is transmitted to us so â—s mental illumination by the water of baptiâ—m in which now we are not dipped but besprinkled which is all one for the gâ—fts of the Spirit are expressed by the sprinkling of clear water in Ezekiel and by the sprinkliâ—g of water in the old purifications and by the sprinkling of the Lambs blood in the Passeover to which the Apostle alludes Heb. 10. having our hearts besprinkled from an evill conâ—cience a Mat. 18.15 16 17. If thy brother should trespass against thee go tell him his fault between thee and him alone if he shall hear thee thou hast gained thy brother but if he will not hear thee then take with thee one or two more that in the mouth of one or two witnesses every word may be established and if he shall neglect to hear them tell it unto the Church but if he shall neglect to hear the Church c. b Mat. 7.6 Give not that which is holy unto dogs nor cast your pearls before swine c 1 Cor. 5.5 Let such a man he delivered over to Satan to the destruction of the flâ—sh that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Iesus d 1 Cor. 16.22 If any man love not the Lord Iesus Christ let him be Anathema Maranatha 1 Joh. 5.16 There is a sin unto death I do not say he shall pray for it a Ezech. 36.26 I will give you a new heart and I will put a new spirit in the midst of you and I will take away the heart of stone and will put in you a heart of flâ—sh 2 Cor. 4.6 God who commanded the light to shine out of darkness hath shined in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Iesus Christ. b Joh. 3.3 If a man be not born again he cannot see the Kingdom of God c Joh. 6.44 None can come to me except the Father draw him d Joh. 6.45 It is written in the Prophets they shall be all taught of God whosoever theâ—fore haâ—h heard of the Father and hath learned cometh unto me e â—oh 5.25 Verily verily I say unto you the time cometh and now is when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God and they that hear it shall live * A. R. The Pelagians absurdly teach that by grace is meant our natural abilities This is true if we take grace in that strict sence as it is used in Scripture for the grace of vocation justification or salvation by Christ which is no part effect or property of nature but altogether different from nature for by nature we are the fons of wrath saith the Apostle But by grace we are saved saiâ—h the same Apostle by grace I am what I am saith he not I but the grace of God with me 1 Cor. 15.10 without me saith Christ you can do nothing What have we which we have not received Of our selves we cannot think a good thought saith Saint Paul Here nature and grace aâ—e distinct yet in a large extent grace may be called natural and nature may be called grace The fiâ—st is plain because whatsoever perfects nature may be called natural and such is grace 2. Whatsoever is in nature as in its subject is natural but so is grace for nature is the subjâ—ct of grace 3. Whatsoever we bring into the world with our nature is called natural Thus sin is natural and hereditary diseases are natural because we bring them with us So Adams original justice is called natural and so are all Angelical perfections because they were created with them So the sannctification of those in Scripture who were sanctified from the womb may be called natural Again nature may he called grace for whatsoever is not of due debt is of grace such is nature and all natural powers and actions for it is of grace that we live move and have our being in God who is the prime and universal cause without Whose influence the second subordinate causes cannot work and therefore â—ven for the actions and faculties of nature as eating drinking sleep life health c. we are bound to give thanks and to beg their continuance and preservation to which duty we are not tied if these be of debt and not of grace But saving grace is distinguished from nature as the garment from the body the one may be lost without the other And so when the Fathers speak of Adam's original justice they say he lost his garment and was stripp'd naked a 1 Tim. 1.19 Holding faith and a good conscience which some having put away coâ—cerning faith have made ship-wrack b Jam. 2.19 Thou believest there is one God thou doest well the Devils also believe tremble This faith then whâ—ch consisteth in a bare assent iâ— common to the Elect and Reprobate c Matth. 13.20 He that reciveth the seed into stony places the same is he that heareth the word and â—â—on with joy receiveth it yet hath he not root c. d Mat. 17.20 if you had faith but as a grain of mustard seedâ— you would say to this mountain remove hence to yonder place and it would remove This hath been given for a certain time even to Reprobates as we see by Iudas who had this gift of miracles with the rest of the Apostles Matth. 10.8 e Saving faith which is proper to the Elect is that which we defined a Psal. 34.14 Isa. 55.7 b Eph. 2.1 Col. 3 9 10. c Rom 6.2 c. Gal. 2.20 a Of that day and hour knoweth no man not â—he Angels of heaven excepâ— my Father only Mat. 13. 32. Nor the Son himself but the Father alone 1 Thess. 5. 1. 2 c. concerning the times and seasons brethren it is not needfull that I write unto you for you your selves know well that