COMMONS by fresh Petitions And in the mean time he hath prepared these Prints to pre-admonish the World And that Just Men may know that James Percy is the true and lawful Heir and of right ought to enjoy the Earldom of Northumberland and that the Estate must attend the Title But cruel Oppression still keeps Possession which forces the Claymant to cry out aloud again again and again for Justice and that Property and Right may be preserved For if his Innocent and Just Cause should be now neglected your Children and Children's Children may be Rejected another Day I pray God to direct our King Parliament and People that they may fore see Things so as to preserve the Cood and prevent the Evils to come AMEN To the Honorable The KNIGHTS CITIZENS BVRGESSES Of The House of Commons IN PARLIAMENT Assembled The Humble Petition of James Percy Esq Sheweth THat it is now almost Nine Years since he put in his Claym as Descended of the house of Northumberland and next Cozen and Heir-Male to Joscelin late Earl of Northumberland All which time he hath Vigorously and Industriously pursued his Right though against so great and unequal Force and Opposition that he hath not been able to prevail And therefore humbly prayes Leave to bring the State of his Case and the Narrative of his Proceedings before this Honorable House Imploring their Assistance to Appear Mediate and Interpose for his Relief And your Petitioner shall Pray c. A NARRATIVE OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PETITIONER Since His Petitions were Dismissed by the Right Honorable the House of LORDS and his Case left to the Law IN Trinity-Term 1674. the Petitioner brought an Action in the King 's Bench against John Clarke Esquire for Scandal and Defamation he had thrown upon your Petitioner Where upon Hearing some of his Witnesses did not appear Nevertheless your Petitioner went so far on with the Proof of his Pedigree and Lineal Discent from the Earls of Northumberland that the Lord Chief Justice Hales said in open Court That the Plaintiff meaning your Petitioner had proved himself a True Percy of the Blood and Family of the Percies of Northumberland legitimate by Father and Mother Grand-Father and Grand-Mother and that he did verily believe your Petitioner was Cousin and next Heir Male of Josceline Percy late Earl of Northumberland But was afraid he had taken his Discent a little too Low and willed him to come better Prepared next Tryal Whereupon your Petitioner suffered a Non-suit A * * 1. The Reason of the Mistake in the First Pedigree was that the Herald-Stainer left out Sr. Ingleram Percy the Great Grand-Father 2. Searching in another Herald-Stayner's Book that had been lent out the said Book was returned the Leaf where the Matches of the Percies Family were set down according to the Alphabet being torn out 3. Therefore his Counsel did advise to fix the Pedigree upon Sir Richard Percy and if he was found the Wrong it would be the means to find out the Right as it did effect at last Mistake I hope all will Pardon to one under those Disadvantages the Claimant was who was forced to Abscond in England for his Loyalty and Travel for some Years and had not an Opportunity to aquaint himself with the Family of Northumberland so as to be informed of his Pedigree The Truth is When he came into England to Claim his Honor and Estate though he knew it was his Right yet it was hard for him to prove his Great Grand-Father as it would be for most perhaps that Condemn him 2 2 Searching in another Herald-Stayner's Book that had been lent out the said Book was returned the Leaf where the Matches of the Percies Family were set down according to the Alphabet being torn out when a Family is so Dispersed and the Pedigree of the Younger Sons neglected by the Herald Upon a Second Action brought iâ—â—â—e Court of the King 's Bench against Sir John Copleston Trustee fo◠〈◊〉 Lady Clifford Sir John sheltred himself under the Priviledge so long as he could When he was forced to a Tryal your Petitioner proved himself Cousin and next Heir-Male of the said Josceline Percy late Earl of Northumberland as followeth For the Claimant James Percy was the Son of Henry Percy Grand-Son of Henry Percy Esquire Great Grand-Son of Sir Ingleram Percy Great great Grand-Son of Henry Percy Fifth Earl of Northumberland So as the Court willed him to proceed to the Title of the Lands Unto which his Counsel replyed That the Lands must attend the Title That the Deeds Evidences Books of Entries and the Records of the Estate were in the Possession of the Defendants So that at present they were not prepared nor instructed to proceed further than the Legitimation and Lineal Discent of your Petitioner 3 3 Therefore his Counsel did advise to fix the Pedigree upon Sir Richard Percy and if he was found the Wrong it would be the means to find out the Right as it did effect at last from the Noble Family of the Earls of Northumberland That upon the Thirteenth of June 1676. your Petitioner brought his Action in Guild-Hall London against John Blackeston Esquire for Scandal and Defamation But the Defendant moved the Court of King's Bench that the Action might be removed and brought into that Court And that a Tryal might be there had which was ordered accordingly And the Seventh of May they appointed to Hear the Cause The Petitioner humbly submitted to the Pleasure of the Court. And your Petitioner and the Defendant having some few Weeks before the said Time of the Tryal by Consent attended the Master of the Office and settled a Jury Your Petitioner prepared for a Tryal and brought up from many and some very remote Parts of the Kingdom Sixty-five Witnesses all in Court whose Travels to and fro upon Calculation amounted to above Four Thousand Miles and had Fourteen Learned Councels at the Bar The Charges of all amounting to about Four Hundred Pound And thus prepared brought on the Cause to a Hearing the Day appointed When imediately the Defendant's Counsel insisted upon the Priviledge of the Countess Dowager of Northumberland in Protecting her Servants and Agents The said John Blackeston being Steward of her Courts and pretended Receiver of her Rents and that he was upon the said Imployment Whereupon all your Petitioner's Counsels refused to Plead although the Court would have Heard them and proceeded to Tryal of the Cause But the Councel replyed They had no mind to go to the Tower some of them having been there before And thus the Tryal was put off Whereupon Mr. Justice Wilde hearing these Things stood up and said in open Court Fye fye Gentlemen Is this a Time to insist upon Priviledges when you forced the Plaintiff to a Tryal and have put him to so great Expence Travel and Labor You do but cast Cold Water upon your Cause It is not the first time this Cause hath been before
this Court When Mr. Blackeston was asked Whether he went to London to look after Percy 's Tryal he said It concerns me not for the Countess of Northumberland is to bear me Harmless Upon the Fourteenth of May 1678. there was a Tryal had at the King 's Bench-Bar Westminster for Scandalizing the Petitioner's Right and Title where-on a Verdict was given for Three Hundred Pound Dammages to the Petitioner and Judgment obtained thereon As by the said Judgment exemplifyed under the Seal of the Court appears Lastly That your Petitioner hath been all a-long perplexed and troubled by many Suits at Law unjustly Commenced against him by the Agents of the Defendants or some of them on purpose to Tire him out and Ruin him by Chargeable Defences For it is now almost Eight Years since he began his Claim And therefore Humbly prayes this most High and Honourable Court to open some way for the Hearing and Determination of this his Just Claim as it shall in your Mature Wisdoms seem meet and convenient for the Preserving Property and Right This further Complaint since the Late PARLIAMENT was Prorogued and Dissolved Percy is Plaintiff Blackeston the Defendant In Banco Regis Mich. Term. MR. Blackeston being Steward to the Lady Elizabeth Percy and the Countess Dowager of Northumberland being her Guardian the said Blackeston stood upon the Countesses Priviledge until upon another Occasion the Duke of Monmouth by an Order of the House of LORDS took off the Countesses Priviledges as to the Guardian-ship Then Mr. Blackeston sheltered himself under the Earl of Essexes Priviledge until the Plaintiff put his Petition into the House of LORDS that Mr. Blackeston might not be Priviledged by the said Earl Upon which the Earl agreed with the Plaintiff's Counsel That if the Ninety Pound Costs that was unpaid upon the Non-suit between Percy Plaintiff and Clarke Defendant were paid that then Mr. Blackeston should not stand upon Priviledge but go to a Tryal which he accordingly did in his Majestie 's Court of King's Bench. Before which time in the said Term the Plaintiff's Councel informed the Court what the Earl had agreed unto Then the Lord Chief Justice stood up and said to the Plaintiff That the Earl of Essex did promise upon his Honor to set aside his Priviledge and that the Plaintiff should have a Tryal against Mr. Blackeston this Term if the Plaintiff paid Mr. Clarke's Costs first And we do promise the Plaintiff shall have a fair Tryal The Plaintiff thereupon paid the said Ninety Pound Costs into the Court accordingly Monday the Eleventh of November the Plaintiff brought on his Tryal The Declaration being read Counsellor Scroggs opened the Cause and upon a Word in the Declaration there was some Debate But it was waved the Declaration allowed and the Scandalous VVords in the Declaration proved Mr. Atturney General moved that the VVitnesses might be heard to prove the Pedigree upward it being the better way to Satisfy the Court and to Inform the Jury And withal said That his Clyant had no better way to prove his Pedigree but by his Action of Slander For he hath delivered Declarations in Ejectment in several Countries and the Lands are all in great Persons Hands which still delay him by Priviledges Then was the Pedigrees delivered to the Judges But the Lord Chief Justice said What need we trouble the Court to Examine all these Witnesses if there be no Lands Therefore let us see first what Lands there are to make good the Declaration The Plaintiff produced Records out of the Tower and other Places which made out That the Lady Lucies Lands in Cumberland and other Countries were settled upon the Heirs-Males of the Percies for ever upon the Payment of Three Hundred Pound to the KING c. and Quartering the said Lucies Coat of Arms with the Percies Here the Defendant's Counsel started up an Attainder which the Plaintiff's Counsel was not ready to Answer the Plaintiff's Sollicitor having made no Provision against the said Attainder being confident that Attainder could not Hurt nor Prejudice the Tryal And this caused the Jury to be with-drawn The Jury appeared three several Times in this Cause which was occasioned by the Delayes and Priviledges which the Defendant sheltred himself under The Plaintiff payd all the Jury and the Ninety Pound was to be continued in Court till there had been a Fair Tryal But upon a Motion of the Defendant's Counsel there was a Peremptory Rule granted to take the Mony out of Court which was accordingly paid to the Defendant The Second Part of the Tryal should have been had in Michaelmass-Term 1678. while the Witnesses were in Town But the Tryal of Mr. Stayley prevented it So that the Plaintiff's Tryal was put off till Hillary-Term following viz. 27th January 1678. The Defendant's Counsel moved the Court the first Day of Hillary-Term for a New Jury and a longer Time pretending they had but Seven dayes Notice When in Truth the Defendant's Atturney had a Months Notice by the Plaintiff and Twelve dayes Notice by the Plaintiff's Atturneys Clark Upon which the Court gave a Rule for Seven dayes longer and for a New Jury which was Appointed accordingly Then the Defendant's Counsel afterwards moved the Court for a longer Day by reason that their Writings were mis-placed by the Fire in the Temple which further Day was granted till Thursday the Sixth of February and no Costs considered to the Plaintiff for keeping his Witnesses in Town all that Time notwithstanding the Plaintiff's Counsel moved for Costs Note The Lord Chief Justice Hales in the Case of Percy Plaintiff and Clarke Defendant The Defendant's Counsel moved the Court for Seven Dayes time pretending they were not Prepared And the Rule of Court was to pay Thirty-Five Pound to the Plaintiff to maintain his Witnesses in Town for that time which was paid Now on the Sixth of February 1678. the Tryal came on again The New Jury did appear the Declaration was read and Councellor Scroggs opened the Cause as he did before And one of the Witnesses was called to prove the Words And when he appeared the Court acknowledged he had proved the VVords sufficiently before And the Defendant's Counsel made no Objection against the Declaration So the Tryal was to go on where it broake off The Records of the Patents in Queen Maries time one for the Barony and the other for the Earldom produced And he that was the Clark that Examined them appeared but was not suffered to prove them upon Oath Note The afore-said Clark of the Rolls not appearing upon the last Tryal was the Cause of with-drawing the Jury Then when the Court saw the Plaintiff was ready to Answer to their Objections declared That the Plaintiff was Descended Paramount the Attainders And did own the Attaint could not hurt the Plaintiff Then Mr. Atturney General moved as at the first Part of the Tryal That the VVitnesses might be Examined to prove the Pedigree VVhereupon the Defendant's Counsel started up an Act
who dyed young 3. William 4. Sir Charles Percy Knight 5. Sir Richard Percy Knight 6. Sir Alan Percy Knight 7. Sir Josceline Percy Knight 8. George Percy Esq Henry Lord Percy 9th Earl of Northumberland Lord of the Honours of Cockermouth and Petworth Lord Percy Lucy Poynings Fitz-payne and Bryan and in his Mothers right Lord Latimer He was Knight of the most Noble Order of the Garter by Qu. Elizabeth in the Year of our Lord 1593. Who marryed Dorothy Daughter of Walter Devereux Earl of Essex by whom he had Issue 1. Algernon the 10th Earl 2. Lord Henry who dyed without Issue Algernon the 10th Earl of Northumberland Lord of the Honours of Cockermouth and Petworth Lord Percy Lucy Poynings Fitz-payne Bryan and Latimer Knight of the most Noble Order of the Garter Lord Admiral of England and General over His Majesties Forces for his Expedition 1640. and one of His Majesties most Honourable Privy Council He marryed Two Wives by the former he had 4 Daughters and by the latter Wife 1 Son viz. Josceline Josceline the 11th Earl of Northumberland Lord of the Honours of Cockermouth and Petworth Lord Percy Lucy Poynings Fitz-payne Bryan and Latimer Deceased Who married Elizabeth Daughter to the Earl of Southampton by whom he had Issue 1. Henry who dyed young 2. Elizabeth who marry'd the Lord Ogle Heirs Males Extinct The Collateral Line Sir Ingelram Percy the 3d. and youngest Son of Henry Percy the 5th Earl of Northumberland who married and had Sons and Daughters as by the Oath of Mr. Henry Champion who kept the Percies Books and Records where he found what he testify'd upon Oath at the Tryal between Vtting Plaintiff and Coppleston Defendant He had Issue 1. Henry Percy 2. Robert Percy and 2 Daughters About 1559. these 4 Children were in the time of Troubles in Queen Elizabeths Days sent out of the North in Hampers to old Dame Vaux at Haraden in Northamptonshire and there were brought up preserved and provided for Therefore it is concluded by all that Sir Ingelram's Lady the Mother of those Children must be related to Dame Vaux's Family The Countess Dowager of Dorset Pembrook and Mountgomery said That if the Claimant James Percy were her Kinsman he must be descended of those Children that were sent into the South in Hampers Note There were but few Coaches in those days Margaret that married the first Earl of Cumberland whom the Countess of Dorset descended from was Sir Ingelram Percie 's own Sister And while the Claymant was with this Lady enquiring and delivering Declarations in Ejectment the Estate was all-begg'd as his printed Book makes appear more at large That which wildernized the Claymant was the rending the matchings of the Percies out of the Herald's Book and likewise the Herald-painter left Sir Ingelram quite out of the first Pedegree Henry the eldest Son of Sir Ingelram marryed the Daughter of one Tibott by whom he had Issue 1. James Percy who dyed about the year 1654. in Ireland without Issue-male 2. William who died young 3. Henry And 3 Daughters Henry Percy married Lidea the Daughter of Mr. Robert Cope of Horton in Northamptonshire by whom he had Issue 1. Henry who dyed young 2. James 3. Henry who dyed young 1 Daughter named Elizabeth James the now Claymant born 1619. of Henry and Lidea his Wife who was 2d Son of Henry who was first Son of Sir Ingelram who was 3d. Son of Henry 5th Earl of Northumberland who was great great Grandfather of the Claymant James Percy who married Sarah the Daughter of John Sayer of Norwich Gent. by whom he hath Issue 1. Anthony Percy married and hath a Son viz. Henry 2. Henry 3. John UPon a tripartine Exchange the Countries from Trent Sir W. Churchil's History fel. 257. to the North-ward was the Lot of the Percies in Memory whereof the same being in the Georgraphical Form of an Malf-moon Crescent for their Cognizance A short Abstract of the fore-going Narrative co-temporizing down from Henry the 5th Earl of Northumberland who had as before the following Issue 6th Earl of Northumberland Henry eldest Son who dyed without Issue Thomas second Son had two Sons both Earls 7th and 8th Earls Thomas and Henry first Cousins unto 9th Earl Henry and his Bretheren second Cousins unto 10th Earl Algernon and his Brother third Cousins unto 11th Earl Joscelin fourth Cousin unto The Lady Elizabeth Percy married to the Lord Ogle 5th Cousin unto Sir Ingelram Percy third Son had two Sons viz. Henry James Henry James Anthony Henry Henry John Robert This may satisfie all wise Men of the Truth of this Pedigree As for the Claymant James Percy he doth acknowledge the mistake of claiming under Sir Richard Percy who was born Anno 1573. And James Percy who was Unckle and Godfather to the Claymant was born 1581. So by this Account Sir Richard must have been a Grandfather at 8 years of Age. This is an impossible thing indeed But here lies the Mystery and the very Truth of this matter and it was his Councels advice to fix upon a wrong party which said they would be the only way to find out the right party For the Matches of the Percies was rent out of the Heralds book and Sir Ingelram Percie 's Name was quite left out of the first Pedegree which wildernized the Claymant and the Councels too which forced the Claymants Councel to tell the Lords in Parliamant that the Cause did not lie before their Lordships but ought to be tryed before the inferiour Courts first and if the Law could not end it then it was to return and come before their Lordships again to debate and to determine Since which time it hath been found out by a Verdict at Law that James Percy is the Legitimate Son of Henry Percy and Lidia his Wife And upon Petitions as in the printed Book may appear The Kings Most Excellent Majesty hath graciously condescended that the Lords in Parliament shall determine the said Cause It is hoped that this just account will abate that mistake of Clayming under Sir Richard for the Lord Chief Justice Hayls said at the first Tryal That the Plaintiff had proved himself Legitimate by Father and Mother by Grandfather and Grandmother but had taken his Descent too Low he must go a step or two Higher And the Lord Chief Justice Rainsford said to the Jury at that Tryal against Wright for Scandal That the Plaintiff had proved himself Legitimate and therefore did not examine the third part of his Witnesses but said His Pedegree was fully proved at a Tryal before that Court. So that the Plaintiff ought to have had a Verdict then when Mr. Henry Champion's Oath did perfect and fix'd the Pedegree as before-declared And the Lord Chief Justice Scroggs at the last Tryal against Blaickstone for Scandal and the whole Court did own the Pedegree of the Plaintiff only said The Declaration was nought When in Truth it was debated and allowed at the first part of the
of Parliament concerning the Exchange of Lands between King Henry the Eighth and Henry Percy the Sixth Earl of Northumberland and others The Plaintiff's Counsel replyed Here is the same Act with several Savings That Saving of the Lady Lucies Lands was read till it came to Sir John Melton Then The Lord Chief Justice replyed This doth not concern you There are no Lands but are all given away by that Act of Parliament The Plaintiff humbly replyed The Melton's could not Claim so long as there was an Heir-Male of the Percies living And the Lady Elizabeth Percy keeps in Possession of the Lady Lueies Lands to which she hath no Right as she is the Heir-Temale For her Agents had Two Tryals against the Tennants and she was Overthrown in both Therefore the Plaintiff's VVitnesses ought to be heard that his Pedigree may be fully proved This will wash the Scandal clear off the Plaintiff from that Brand of an Imposture set forth in the Gazet And present the Claimant's Cause fairly to the KING and the House of LORDS The Lord Chief Justice said VVhat will you prove the Pedigree for when there are no Lands to support the Title The Plaintiff replyed And what have we to do with Lands if we do not prove the Pedigree The Plaintiff prayed That the Saving might be Read concerning Somerset-shire Lands for which Sir John Coppleston is Trustee VVhich Lands were beg'd of His Majesty and kept under pretence that there is no Heir-Male of the Percies living The Lady Elizabeth Percy claimes no Right therein But if she were in Possession of the Lands she would endeavour to keep them as they do by the Lands claim'd by the Plaintiff The Plaintiff also prayed The Record might be Read concerning the Lands the Duke of Monmouth had Recovered at a Tryal against the Countess of Northumberland under pretence there was no Heir-Male of the Percies which was not allowed by the Court to be read although the Duke was pleased sometime to say He had no Right to those Lands if there was an Heir-Male of the Percies living The Plaintiff produces the Patent of Restitution in Edward the Sixth's Time to Thomas Percy the Son of Sir Thomas Percy that Rebelled Likewise the Two Patents of the New Creation of the Barony and Earldom to Thomas and Henry Granted by King Philip and Queen Mary And an Act of Parliament in Queen Elizabeth's Time which Act if it had been Read it would have Encouraged the Plaintiff's Counsel to have pleaded an Abatement to that Act profusely Condescended unto by Henry Percy Sixth Earl of Northumberland in the Time of King Henry the Eighth when the said Earl had no Heirs-Males of his own Body Two Orders of the House of LORDS The First in King Charles the First his Dayes Then Resolved upon the Question Nemine Contradicente That no Person that hath any Honor in him and a Peer may Alien or Transfer the Honour to any other Person Resolved c. That no Peer of this Realm can Drown or Extinguish his Honor but that it Descend to his Descendants neither by Surrender Grant Fine nor any other Conveyance to the KING The Second in King Charles the Second's Time Resolved and Adjudged That no Fine Levied or at any time here-after to be Levied to the King can barr such Titles of Honor or the Right of any Person claiming such Title under him that Levied or shall Levy such Fine Moreover Charles 2d Act of Oblivion The KING 's Gracious Act of Free Pardon Oblivion and Indempnity at Breda If it Extended to Rebels then well may Royalists claim their Birth-rights By the Pedigree from Henry the First Earl of Northumberland to Josceline Percy the Eleventh Earl of Northumberland After every Rebellion in the Head-Line there were still New Creations and New Restitutions in Blood to the Heirs-Males of the Head-Line that was Attainted If so then great Reason the Collateral Line that proves Innocent should claim their Birth-Right after the Head-Line is spent Therefore it is requisite the Pedigree should be fully proved up to his Great-Grand-Father The Defendant's Counsel replyed We own your Pedigree and your Title But would not suffer any more of the Writings to be Read nor the Witnesses to be Examined The Plaintiff replyed What will the Owning signify if you will not suffer him to prove his Pedigree If you will not examine the Witnesses be pleased to Confirm what you own by a Rule in Court The Lord Chief Justice thereupon said Confirm or not Confirm the Declaration is naught Discharge Blackeston from the Suit of Percy Whereupon the Plaintiff was Non-suited And the Costs are Taxed to 100. Marks without any Consideration of the Plaintiff's vast Charge he was put to by the Defendant's Delayes and Puttings-off by Priviledges As by this and the former Tryals doth appear ☞ And the Plaintiffs own Counsel are of Opinion That there is no Relief in this Case at Law but by Act of Parliament And therefore hath prepared his Bill And prayes It may find Admittance A Short ABSTRACT of the Claymant's Proceedings ever since the Death of Josceline Percy late Earl of Northumberland 1. UPon the 11th of October 1670. the Claymant Landed in England First applyed himself to the Senior Countess Dowager of Northumberland And she was pleased to send him to the Junior Countess And then it was Reported she was with Child 2. The Claymant did then forbear till Time made out to the contrary And on the Third Day of February 1671. he put in his Caveat and Claym as followeth James Percy Esq as Cozen and next Heir-Male of the Right Honorable Josceline Lord Percy and Earl of Northumberland lately Deceased doth Claym the Title Stile Honor and Dignity of Baron Percy and Earl of Northumberland Cum pertinentijs and the Annual Rent or Fee of Twenty Pound where-with the said Dignity and Honor was and is Endowed payable by the Sheriff of Northumberland out of the same County And humbly desires a Legal Tryal of his Right herein and that no Grant in the interim may be made thereof being his Inheritance and Birth-Right Dated under my Hand this Third Day of February 1671. JAMES PERCY Copia Vera Entred into the Signet-Office at White-Hall 3. He met with Mr. Henry Champion and Mr. Orlando Gee at Dr. Lamplughs and pray'd them to inform him of his Great-Grand-Father But they rather took Advantage of his Ignorance But Mr. Henry Champion did very honestly upon his Oath at Sir John Coppleston's Tryal declare That Sir Inglexam Percy was Marryed and had Sons and Daughters which did not only time but fix the Claymant's Pedigree Sir Ingleram Percy being left out of the First Pedigree did much Wildernize the Claymant 4. The Claymant petitioned the KING and his Gracious Answer was God Forbid we should hinder an Heir but that he should have the Benefit of the Law 5. Also he Applyed himself to the Earl Marshal supposing to have been Relieved by the Court of Honor but
Claimant's consent or knowledge Then the Duke replied Mr. Percy you shall have a fair Tryal at Law And moreover he did promise he would not stand upon Priviledge but when Percy was ready for a Tryal then Trumpt up Priviledge And Mr. Ross the Duke's Agent said the Duke could not set aside his Priviledge But the Duke said if Percy proves himself Heir I have no Right and forth with sold his Interest for an inconsiderable Sum of Money II. The Lord Ogle that married the Lady Elizabeth Percy would have assumed the name of Percy and put in a Bill to be made an Act to settle the Lands upon him by Act of Parliament III. And it is reported that the Lord of Essex desired that some of those Lands might be settled upon him by Act of Parliament By this account the Lands are yet unsettled Ergo then great reason it is that the true Heir-Male of the Percies Bill should be made an Act of Parliament to settle the Name Title and Estate together again according to the first settlement confirmed by his Ancestors Now your poor distressed and oppressed Petitioner humbly and freely offers for the obtaining of Justice and for the full satisfaction to the Kings most Excellent Majesty and the Right Honourable Lords Spiritual and Temporal and those Honourable and Worthy Members of the House of Commons in Parliament assembled if it be required and thought convenient he being very unwilling to offer any thing that might give the least offence but rather submit to their grave and mature Wisdoms these Proposals following James Percy the Claimant and Plaintiff will pay into the hands of any Trustees that shall be appointed to receive the Money in Trust for Mr. John Blakeston's Costs provided he likewise lay down the 90 l. taken by surprize out of Court before the Tryal was ended And Mr. Vtting's Cost likewise shall be paid for what Sir John Coppleston claims provided likewise that Sir John Coppleston pay the 10 l. down which he got when he ventured the Breach of Priviledge of Parliament provided the whole Merits of the Cause may have a fair Hearing and Determination before the Lords And if the Plaintiff and Claimant James Percy doth not prove himself to be the right true and next Heir-Male in Bloud of the Percies of Northumberland then let them take all the Money and the Plaintiff will freely acquit his Claim for ever and remain till death a Loyal Subject and James Percy Although his Witnesses be dispers'd a Weeks time will bring them to Town again upon the sight of an Order For the Claimant James Percy by Birth ought to enjoy the Place Seat and Priviledge of his Ancestors Earls of Northumberland but now he dares not appear till an Order be had Therefore he most humbly prays That a fair Hearing may be had and that a true decision of his just Cause and Claim may be made according to Justice so that the Innocent may be preserved and that the fraudulent practices not just may march off with shame For Heroick Actions glorifies God Honours the King and makes all the people shout for joy God hath been pleased to make a true decision himself which may be a president for he sent the Claimant from his Mothers Womb with a Crescent into the World which is Gods Ensign of Truth and the very Badge belonging to the Percies Earls of Northumberland In witness to this Truth I have set to my Hand and Seal this 3d. of January 1680 1. JAMES PERCY To the KINGS most Excellent Majesty The Humble Petition of JAMES PERCY SHEWETH THat it is a great grief to your Petitioner's Soul to trouble your Sacred Majesty so often in looking after his Just Right yet cannot help it by reason his Opponents are of so great Power Policy and Force That notwithstanding his Petition to the Right Honourable House of Lords presented the day after his Hearing should have been had the Opponents got that Writ of Error dismiss'd the House well knowing the Errors would have been confirmed against them That thereby they have an opportunity to take out Execution against your Petitioner and so to stop his further publick appearing That if that Writ be not recall'd into the Lords House again your Petitioner can in no wise expect a fair Hearing nor a just decision of his Cause Therefore your oppressed Petitioner most humbly prays That your Majesty would be graciously pleased to see Justice done herein and that a new Day may be appointed according to the Prayer of that Petition that is now before the House of Lords or that your Sacred Majesty will be graciously pleased to call your Loyal Subject by your Royal Writ of Summons to take the Place and Seat of his Ancestors Earls of Northumberland he having proved his legitimate Descent and Pedigree at several Tryals at Law This Petition was presented into his Sacred Majesties hand Jan. 3. 1681. All great and dubious matters the Children of Israel presented and laid open before Moses Even so the Claimant hath done to his Majesty all along knowing that in the King solely lyes the creation and preservation of Honour and Nobility But the King referred the Cause to the Lords to hear and determine and now the two Writs of Error are dismiss'd the Lords House without hearing the said Cause Now the Claimant James Percy finding himself over-powered is forc'd to Appeal and humbly prays for Justice As Prerogative belongs to the King so Property and Right belongs to his People FINIS To the KING' 's Most Excellent Majesty The Humble Petition of JAMES PERCY SHEWETH THat Your Petitioner most Humbly Beseecheth and Earnestly Prayeth Your Majesties Pardon for that Omission on the Ninth of December last which was in truth altogether the Neglect of his Attorny as his Printed Petition sets forth That Your Petitioner Humbly presents these two Books that your Most Excellant Majesty may see the real endeavours of Your Petitioner and the first Book was Prepared for the Right Honourable Lords Spiritual and Temporal to inform their Lordships And the second Book is prepared to make his Complaints known to the House of Commons 〈◊〉 that They â—ay intercede in his Just Cause with Your Royal Majesty and the Right â—onourable Lords in Parliament Therefore Your Majesties Loyal Subject and Petitioner most Humbly Prays That Your Royal Majesty will be Graciously pleased Patiently to Read and Seriously consider the Printed Complaints and do Your Poor distressed Petitioner Justice in restoring him by Your own Princely Power Prerogative and Clemency He having at Law fully proved his Pedigree And therefore hath prepared a Bill that it may be made an Act of Parliament and most Humbly Prays Your Majesties Royal Assent thereunto And that Your Majesties Royal Writ of Summons may forthwith call Your Loyal Subject from the House of Prison to the House of Peers And there to take the Place and Seat of his Ancestors Earls of Northumberland When King Pharao took Joseph out of