remove presentments upon which process may be awarded in this Court The Reason why 't is not sufficient to plead the Tenor of Letters Patents or to shew or produce to the Court the Tenor of Letters Patents as in Pages case is resolved is because the Letters Patents are the private conveyance of a particular person and therefore he must plead and shew forth and produce to the Court the Letters Patents themselves and the Tenor thereof was not sufficient at the Common Law But upon nul tiel Record pleaded a Certificate of the Tenor onely and not of the Record it self hath always béen held a sufficient proof of that issue and the Tenor certified is to be filed in this Court and to remain here always to this purpose onely viz. as a proof of this issue but the Record it self remains where it was before to be made use of for any purposes that may happen hereafter The rest of the Iudges were of the same opinion and so Iudgment was given for the Plaintiff De Termino Sanctae Trinitatis Anno 28 Car. secundi 1676. Banco Regis The King and the President and College of Physicians Plaintiffs against Marchamont Needham Defendant THe President and the College qui tam c. brought an action of debt upon the Statute of 14 H. 8. cap. 5. for so much money against the Defendant for practising Physick for so many months without licence of the College whereby he was to forfeit 5 li. per month one moiety thereof to the King and the other moiety to the President and College The Defendant pleaded as to part of the money in the Declaration mentioned nul tiel Record as the said Act of Parliament and as to the Residue of the money the Defendant pleaded nil debet The Plaintiffs demurred to the Barr. The cause of the demurrer was for that the Defendant's plea was double viz. it contained two matters one whereof alone would go in answer to the whole money in the Declaration mentioned and would of it self be a good and full Barr to the Plaintiffs Action in case the said matter be true as the Defendant alledgeth and that is the matter of nul tiel Record and therefore the pleading of nul tiel Record to part onely and the pleading of other matter viz. nil debet to the residue makes the Defendant's plea in Barr to be vicious and to be an ill plea in Law The Councel for the Defendant did then object that the Plaintiffs Declaration is naught 't is an action of debt brought by the President and College qui tam c. upon the Statute and an action of debt doth not lie the Plaintiffs should have brought an information upon the Statute and not an Action of debt upon the Statute for the Statute doth not give an action of debt and therefore an action of debt doth not lie Twisden Iustice answered that an action of debt doth lie by equity and construction of the Statute Jones Iustice said that in the Statute of Tithes in 3 Ed. 6. no action of debt is mentioned and yet an action of debt lies upon that Statute and so here Thereupon Rule was given by the Court that Iudgment should be entred for the Plaintiffs In Mich. Term. Anno Car. secundi xxvi THe College brought their Action against John Bourne to which he pleaded nil debet and upon tryal of the Cause at Guild-Hall before Iudge Twisden the Plaintiffs recovered 40 li. Trin. xxxv Car. secundi THe President and College c. brought an Action of Debt upon the Statute of the 14 of H. 8. against Frederick Harder for practising Physick and thereupon had a Verdict against him at Westm for 25 li. which he paid and the Costs that were taxed The same Term they had a Verdict against Nathaniel Merry for 40 li. and against Richard Stone for 45 li. College Questions resolved by the Lord Chancellor and Judges in the fifth of King James his Reign An. Dom. 1607. THe King 's most Excellent Majesty having directed his Letters to the Right honourable Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England and to Sir John Popham Knight Lord Chief Iustice of England and one of his Highness's most honourable Privy Council They the said Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Iustice by virtue of the same Letters called unto them Sr. Thomas Fleminge Knight then Lord Chief Baron of his Majestie 's Court of Exchequer Sir Thomas Walmesley and Sr. Peter Warburton Knights two of his Majestie 's Iustices of the Court of Common Pleas and Sir David Williams and Sir Laurence Tanfield Knights two of his Majesties Iustices of the King's Bench and after due consideration had both of the Charter of King H. 8. made unto the said President and College of Physicians in the tenth year of his Raign and several Acts of Parliament thereof made one in the 14 year of the same King and the other in the first year of Q. Mary for the ordering and governing of the said College and of all the Practisers in London and 7 Miles compass did on the first of May 1607. at the house of the said Lord Chancellor called York house resolve the several questions hereafter mentioned as is expressed under every Question Tho. Harries These Questions were resolved as is expressed under every question by the right honorable the Lord Chancellor of England Lord Chief Iustice of England the Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer Iustice Walmesley Iustice Warburton Iustice Williams and Iustice Tanfield being assembled by the King's Majestie 's appointment to examine view and consider of the Charters Statutes and Laws made for the government of the College of Physicians in London and the Practisers of Physick there the first day of May 1607. at the house of the Lord Chancellor Quest 1. Whether Graduates of Oxford and Cambridge may practise in London or 7 miles compass of the same without licence under the said College Seal by virtue of the clause in the end of the Statute of 14 H. 8. and whether that clause hath not relation to the Statute of 3 H. 8. onely or how far it doth extend Resp All resolved that no Graduate that is not admitted and licensed by the President and College of Physicians under their Common Seal could practise in London or within 7 miles compass of the same Quest 2. Whether by Graduates Graduates in Physick onely are to be understood Resp They resolved That the exception in the Statute of 14 H. 8. cap. of Graduates in the two Vniversities is to be understood onely of Graduates of Physick and of no others And all resolved That by that exception those Graduates may practise in all other places of England out of London and 7 miles of the same without examination But not in London nor within the said Circuit of 7 miles Quest 3. If Graduates not admitted to practise in London practise there whether for evil practice or misdemeanour therein they be not subject to the Correction and government
Physitians in the Cittie of London shall be and remayne at all times hereafter for ever persons able and in Lawe capeable to have purchase receive possesse hold and enjoy any Mannors Lands Tenements Liberties Priviledges Franchises Iurisdictions and Hereditaments whatsoever of what name nature qualitie kind or condition soever the same or any of them shall bee to them and their successors in fee and perpetuity or otherwise And alsoe Goods and Chattells and all other things of what name nature quality or kinde soever the same be And alsoe by the same name to give graunt demise alien assigne and dispose the said Mannors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Goods and Chattells And alsoe to doe and execute all other things lawfull necessary and convenient for the common profitt of the said Colledge And alsoe by the same name of the President Fellowes and Comonalty of the Kings Colledge of Physitians in the Cittie of London They shall and may for ever hereafter pleade and be impleaded answere and be answered unto defend and be defended in all and whatsoever Courts and places and before whatsoever Iudges and Iustices and other Persons and Officers of us our heires and successors in all and singular Actions pleas suites quarrells causes matters and demaunds whatsoever of what name nature qualitie or kind soever the same are or shal bee in the same manner and forme as any other subjects of this our Kingdome of England being persons able and capeable in Law or any other body Corporate or Politique within this our Kingdome may or can have purchase receive possesse give grant demise alien assigne and dispose pleade and be impleaded answere and be answered unto defend and be defended doe performe or execute And alsoe that they and their successors shall and may for ever hereafter have a Common Seale to serve and use for all causes matters things and affaires whatsoever of them and theire successors which shall alwayes bee and remayne in the custody and keeping of the President of the said Colledge of Physitians for the tyme being And that it shall and may bee lawfull to and for the President and Fellowes of the same Colledge or the major part of them for the tyme being to breake alter change or make new the said Seale from tyme to tyme att theire wills and pleasures and as to them shall séeme requisite and fitt AND alsoe from tyme to tyme and att all tymes hereafter to use and dispose of the Common Seale of the said Colledge for the time being in and about all things matters and affaires whatsoever of or concerning the same Colledge and Corporation in such manner as to them shall seeme fitt and requisite AND for the better order rule and governement of the said Colledge and Corporation and the matters and things thereof and the due and orderly correcting and punishing of all offences and offenders within the power and jurisdiction of the same Colledge and Corporation WEE doe by theise presents for us our heires and successors will ordeyne constitute declare and graunt that there bee and for ever hereafter shal bee forty Fellowes of the said Colledge and Corporation hereby constituted And that thereof att present and for ever hereafter there bee one President Tenn Elects and fower Censors duely appointed nominated and chosen to bee and shall bee respectively President Elects and Censors of the same Colledge and Corporation And all the same Fellowes President Elects and Censors respectively to bée and shalbée from tyme to tyme nominated elected and chosen and have being and continuance as such respectively in manner and forme and to all intents and purposes as in and by theise presents is hereafter mentioned and declared AND further We doe by theise presents for us our heires and successors will ordeyne constitute and appoint Sir Edward Alston Knight Sir Francis Prujean Knight Baldwyn Hamey Francis Glisson Peter Salmon George Ent George Bate Alexander Frazier William Stane John Micklethwait Nathan Pagett Jonathan Goddard Edmond Trench John King Thomas Cox Henry Stanley Daniell Whistler Charles Scarburgh Thomas Wharton Christopher Merrett Samuell Collins Luke Rugeley John Wilby Sir William Pettie Knight Christopher Terne Sir John Baber Knight John Hale Edward Greaves Thomas Croydon Gabriell Beauvoir Thomas Wolfe Martin Luellin Sir John Finch Knight Thomas Baynes William Quarterman James Hide Humfry Whitmore Robert Waller Peter Barwicke and Robert Morrison Doctors in Physicke the first and present Fellowes of the same Colledge and Corporation And to bée and continue Fellowes of the same Colledge and Corporation and to hold exercise and enjoy the office or place of Fellowes of and in the same Colledge and Corporation respectively for and dureing theire severall and respective naturall lives unlesse in the meane tyme for evill governement or misbehaving themselves in the same office or place or for Nonresidence otherwise than while they or any of them respectively shal bee or continue in the service of us our heires or successors without Licence under the Seale of the Colledge and Corporation aforesaid or under the Privy Seale of us our heires or successors or for any the like reasonable cause they or any of them respectively shal bee removed AND Wee doe by theise presents for us our heires and successors will ordaine constitute and appoint the said Sir Edward Alston Knight the first and present President of the same Colledge and Corporation And to bee and continue President of the same Colledge and Corporation and to hold exercise and enjoy the same office or place of President of and in the same Colledge and Corporation from the makeing hereof untill the morrowe of the feast of Saint Michaell the Archangell next ensueing the date hereof and from thenceforth untill another President shall bee in due manner elected and sworne according to the tenor true intent and meaning of theise presents AND Wee doe further by theise presents for us our heires and successors will ordeyne constitute and appoint the said Sir Edward Alston Sir Francis Prujean Baldwyn Hamey Francis Glisson George Ent George Bate Alexander Frazier William Stane John Micklethwaite and Nathan Pagett to bee the first and present Elects of the same Colledge and Corporation and to be and continue Elects of the same Colledge or Corporation and to hold exercise and enjoy the office or place of Elects of the same Colledge and Corporation for and dureing theire severall and respective naturall lives unlesse in the meane tyme for any reasonable cause as aforesaid they or any of them shall bee removed AND Wée doe by theise presents will ordaine constitute and appoint the said George Ent John Micklethwaite Daniell Whistler and Christopher Merrett the first and present Censors of the same Colledge and Corporation and to bee and continue Censors of the same Colledge and Corporation and to hold exercise and enjoy the office or place of Censors of and in the same Colledge and Corporation untill the morrowe of
Nemo in dicta Civitate c. Also the makers of the Act put a distinction betwixt those who shall be licensed to practise Physick within London c. for they ought to have the admittance and allowance of the President and College in writing under their Common Seal but he who shall be allowed to practise Physick throughout England out of London ought to be examined and admitted by the President and 3 of the Elects and so they said that it was lately adjudged in the Kings Bench in an Information exhibited against the said Doctor Bonham for practising of Physick within London for divers months As to the Third point they said That for his contempt and disobedience before them in their College they might commit him to Prison for they have authority by the Letters Patents and Act of Parliament And therefore for his contempt and misdemeanor before them they may commit him Also the Act of 1 Mariae hath given them power to commit them for every offence or disobedience contrary to any Article or Clause contained in the said Grant or Act. But there is an express Negative Article in the said Grant and ratified by the Act of 14 H. 8. Quod nemo in dicta Civitate c. exerceat c. And the Defendants have pleaded that the Plaintiff hath practised Physick within London by the space of one month c. And therefore the Act of 1 Mariae hath authorised them for to imprison him in this case for which cause they did conclude for the Defendants against the Plaintiff But it was argued by Coke Chief Iustice Warburton and Daniel Iustices of the Common Pleas to the contrary And Daniel conceived that a Doctor of Physick of the one Vniversity or the other c. was not within the body of the Act and if he was within the body of the Act that he was excepted by the said latter clause But Warburton argued against him for both the points and the Chief Iustice did not speak to these 2 points because that he and Warburton and Daniel did agrée that this action was clearly maintainable for two other points But to the 2 other points he and the said 2 other Iustices Warburton and Daniel did speak scil 1. Whether the Censors have power for the Causes alledged in their Barr to fine and imprison the Plaintiff 2. Admitting that they have power to doe it if they have pursued their power But the chief Iustice before he argued the points in Law because that much was said in the commendations of the Doctors of Physick of the said College within London and somewhat as he conceived in derogation of the dignity of the Doctors of the Vniversities he first attributed much to the Doctors of the said College within London and did confess that nothing was spoken which was not due to their merits but yet that no comparison was to be made between that private College and any of the Vniversities of Cambridge and Oxford no more than between the Father and his Children or betwéen the Fountain and the small Rivers which descend from thence The Vniversity is Alma mater from whose breasts those of that private College have sucked all their science and knowledge which I acknowledge to be great and profound but the Law saith Erubescit lex Filios castigare Parentes The Vniversity is the fountain and that and the like private Colleges are tanquam rivuli which flow from the fountain melius est petere fontes quà m sectari rivulos Briefly Academiae Cantabrigiae Oxoniae sunt Athenae nostrae nobilissimae regni soles oculi animae regni unde Religio humanitas doctrina in omnes regni partes uberrimè diffunduntur But it is true Nunquam sufficiet copia laudatoris quia nunquam deficiet materia laudis and therefore these Vniversities excéed and excell all private Colleges tanquam inter viburna cupressus And it was observed that King Henry the 8. his said Letters Patents and the King and the Parliament in the Act of 14 H. 8. in making of a Law concerning Physicians for the more safety and health of men therein have followed the order of a good Physician Rex enim omnes artes censetur habere in scrinio pectoris sui For Medicina est duplex removens promovens removens morbum promovens ad salutem And therefore 5 manner of persons who more hurt the body of men than the disease it self are to be removed 1. Improbi 2. Avari qui medicinam magis avaritiae suae causâ quà m ullius bonae conscientiae fiduciâ profitentur 3. Malitiosi 4. Temerarii 5. Inscii and of the other part 5 manner of persons were to be promoted as appeareth by the said Act scil those that were 1. profound 2. sad 3. discreet 4. groundedly learned 5. profoundly studied And it was well ordained That the professors of Physick should be profound sad discreet c. and not youths who have no gravity and experience for as one saith In Juvene Theologo conscientiae detrimentum in juvene Legista bursae decrementum in juvene Medico coemeterii incrementum And it ought to be presumed every Doctor of any of the Vniversities to be within the Statute sc to be profound sad discreet groundedly learned and profoundly studied for none can there be Master of Arts who is a Doctor of Philosophy under the study of 7 years and cannot be Doctor of Physick under 7 years more in the study of Physick and that is the cause that the Plaintiff is named in the Declaration Doctor of Philosophy and Doctor of Physick quia oportet Medicum esse Philosophum ubi enim Philosophus desinit incipit Medicus As to the 2 points upon which the Chief Iustice Warburton and Daniel gave judgment 1. It was resolved by them That the said Censors have not the power to commit the plaintiff for any of the causes mentioned in the Barr and the cause and reason thereof shortly was That the said clause which giveth power to the said Censors to fine and imprison doth not extend to the said clause sc Quòd nemo in dicta Civitate c. exerceat dictam facultatem c. Which prohibiteth every one to practise Physick within London c. without licence of the President and College but extendeth onely to punish those who practise Physick within London pro delictis suis in non bene exequendo faciendo utendo facultate medicinae by fine and imprisonment So that the Censors have not power by the Letters Patents and the Act to fine and imprison any for practising of Physick within London but onely pro delictis suis in non bene exequendo c. for ill and not good use and practice of Physick And that was made manifest by 5 Reasons called vividae rationes because they had their vigour and life from the Letters Patents and the Act it self And the best Expositor of all Letters Patents and Acts of Parliament are the
before them said that he would not be ruled nor directed by them being such grave and learned men And for that he hath practised against the Statute he was worthily punished and committed for it should be a vain Law if it did not provide punishment for them that offend against it And Bracton saith Nihil est habere Leges si non sit unus qui potest Leges tueri and for this here are four grave and discréet men to defend and maintain the Law and to punish all Offenders against it according to the Statute by imprisonment of their bodies and other reasonable ways and the said four men have the search as well of those men as of other Medicines And the Statute of 1 Mary provides that the Kéepers of Prisons shall receive all which are committed by the said four learned and grave men And though there be great care committed to them by the said Statute and the said Letters Patents yet there is a greater trust reposed in them than this for we commit to them our lives when we receive Physick of them and that not without cause for they are men of gravity learning and discretion and for that they have power to make Laws which is the office of the Parliament for those which are so learned may be trusted with any thing and for the better making of these they have power to assemble all the Commons of their Corporation and the King allows of that by his Letters Patents for it is made by a congregation of wise learned and discréet men and the Statute of 1 Mary inflicts punishment upon contempts and not for any other offences And they hold a Court and so may commit as every other Court may for a contempt of Common Right without Act of Parliament or Information or other legal form of Procéeding thereupon as it appears by 7 H. 6. for a contempt committed in a Léet the Steward committed the offender to Prison and it was absurd to conceive that the Statute will allow of Commitment without cause And it is a marvellous thing that when good Laws shall be made for our health and wealth also yet we will so pinch upon them that we will not be tryed by men of experience practice and learning but by the Vniversity where a man may have his Degrée by grace without merit And so for these reasons he concluded that this action is not maintainable Coke Chief Iustice said That the Cause which was pleaded why the Plaintiff was committed was for that he had exercised Physick within the City of London by the space of a month and did not very fitly answer for which it was ordained by the Censors that he should pay a hundred shillings and that he should forbear his practice and that he did not forbear and then being warned of that and upon that being summoned to appear did not appear and for that it was ordained that he should be arrested and that after he was summoned again and then he appeared and denied to pay the hundred shillings and said that he would practise for he was a Doctor of Cambridge and upon that it was ordained that he should be committed till he should be delivered by the Doctors of the College and upon this was the Demurrer joyned And in pleading the Plaintiff said that he was a Doctor of Philosophy and Physick upon which the Lord Chief Iustice took occasion to remember a saying of Galen that is Ubi Philosophia desinit ibi Medicina incipit and he said the onely question of this Case depends not upon the payment of the said hundred shillings but upon the words of the Letters Patents of the King and the said two Statutes the words of which are Concessimus eidem Praesidenti c. Quòd nemo in dicta Civitate aut per septem milliaria in circuitu ejusdem exerceat dictam facultatem nisi ad hoc per dictum Praesidentem communitatem seu Successores eorum qui pro tempore fuerint admissus sit per ejusdem Praesidentis Collegii literas sigillo suo communi sigillatas sub poena centum solidorum pro quolibet mense quo non admissus eandem facultatem exercuerit dimidium inde nobis haeredibus nostris dimidium dicto Praesidenti Collegio applicandum Et praeterea volumus concedimus pro nobis c. Quòd per Praesidentem Collegii communitatem pro tempore existentes eorum Successores in perpetuum quatuor singulis annis per ipsos eligantur qui habeant supervisum scrutinium correctionem gubernationem omnium singulorum dictae Civitatis Medicorum utentium facultate Medicinae in eadem Civitate ac aliorum Medicorum forinsecorum quorumcunque facultatem illam Medicinae aliquo modo frequentantium utentium infra eandem Civitatem Suburbia ejusdem sive septem milliaria in circuitu ejusdem Civitatis ac punitionem eorundem pro delictis suis in non bene exequendo faciendo utendo illa nec non supervisum scrutinium omnium medicinarum earum receptionum per praedictos Medicos sive aliquem eorum hujusmodi ligeis nostris pro eorum infirmitatibus curandis sanandis dand ' imponend ' utend ' quoties quando opus fuerit pro commodo utilitate eorundem ligeorum nostrorum Ita quod punitio hujusmodi medicorum utentium dictâ facultate medicinae sic in praemissis delinquentium per Fines Amerciamenta Imprisonamenta corporum suorum per alias vias rationabiles congruas exequatur as it appears in Rastal Physicians 8018. 392. So that there are two distinct Clauses The first if any exercise the said faculty by the space of a month without admission by the President c. he shall forfeit a hundred shillings for every month be that good or ill it is not material the time is here onely material for if he exercise it for such a time he shall forfeit as aforesaid The second Clause is that the President c. shall have Scrutinium Medicorum c. punitionem eorum pro delictis suis in non bene faciendo utendo exequendo c. And for that the President and the College may commit any delinquent to Prison And this he concluded upon the words of the Statute and he agreed with Walmesly that the King hath had extraordinary care of the health of his Subjects Et Rex censetur habere omnes Artes in scrinio Pectoris and he hath here pursued the course of the best Physicians that is Removens promovens removens improbos illos qui nullius bonae conscientiae fiduciâ profitebuntur audaces promovens ad sanitatem And for that the Physician ought to be profound grave discréet grounded in learning and soundly studied and from him cometh the Medicine which is removens promovens And it is an old Rule that a man ought to take care that he do not commit his Soul to a
those that belong to the practice of Physick See Entries fol. 463. Pl. 3. Action was brought against one for practising of Medicines and for that cause it was necessary to shew what practice this was scil tam per visus c. quà m interiores potiones And there is another action there where one that practised as Surgeon practised ut Medicus that where the Plaintiff suit aegrotus of the Colick the Defendant ut medicus sed indoctus cupidus lucri saith to the Plaintiff that he was troubled with thrée Imposthumations and administred to him medicinam insalubrem intoxicatam whereby the Plaintiff was in danger of his life And in the same book fol. 463. Pl. 1. it is shewn what a Surgeon ought to do Entries fol. 127. and an appeal of Mayhem 46. Pl. 5. Register trespass fol. 139. The Statute 32 H. 8. was apparent that the Iudgment of the Parliament was that Surgery was a member of Physick And he said there were 2 kinds of Surgeons Barber-Surgeons who were incorporated 1 E. 4. and Surgeons onely He agréed that the Statute against the words may be construed by equity as Stradling and Morgan's case but to whom shall this equity extend Posito that it extends to Surgeons yet it never extended to Empiricks Equity against the letter ought to be grounded upon the intention 30 E. 3. 6. 1 H. 6. 3. The Statute of Marlebridge there are negative words as here that no person shall drive a distress out of the County c. vide the Case But posito that a stranger shall distrain c. the equity shall not extend to him So in our Case although a Surgeon be tolerated yet a Stranger shall not invade the liberty of Physicians 2. The Statute of 34 H. 8. doth not restrain that which is within 14 H. 8. but meddles with the mischief mentioned in 32 H. 8. And it appeareth that the intention of 34 H. 8. was not to raise a new profession but to tolerate the old For the Statute is where many give Medicines without money scil for Charity and neighbourhood And the purview is general that such c. But the difference is if any will within his own house or to his friend give Medicines it is not within the Statute But if he make profession and set up a Bill that he can cure such and such diseases it is otherwise Pl. Com. 463. And if the question had béen put to the makers of the Statute whether they would raise a new profession it would have béen denied to be their intention 8 Rep. fol. 129. Exercise of brewing is not every brewing for his own house alone c. but profession thereof And 11 Rep. fol. 23. So here But posito that every one may exercise within 34 H. 8. yet it is not a Repeal of 14 H. 8. but as it were a licence or dispensation therewith c. And if it were yet 1 Mariae repeals all 34 H. 8. that any way impeaches 14 H. 8. If it was made to such purpose at first this Act 1 Mariae takes notice of 14 H. 8. and provides that staret continuaret c. Any Act Statute c. to the contrary And what Statute can be to the contrary but the Statute 34 H. 8 As to the Objection that there wants staret and is onely continuaret insomuch that cannot be of any force it shall be as if it were absent and then continuaret is not only a confirmation but is to remove the impediment which is the Statute 34 H. 8. as it was before And although that this Statute of 1 Mariae is a private Statute yet the substance being pleaded is sufficient But the plea in barr is ill this is Iustification by virtue of a Statute Law the Statute gives the Iustification in this manner that he c. justifie generally The application of Plasters and giving of Potions to Sores Agues Stone Strangury c. talibus morbis and doth not say secundum formam Statuti and therefore shall not be construed pro reddendo singula singulis 15 H. 7. 10. where the construction is made reddendo singula singulis c. This form of pleading is also a new form quoad those c. he justifies and he doth not say this is the same practice whereof the Plaintiff declares And so to force the Plaintiff to a replication when the thing is intire as here that he had exercised facultatem medicinae he cannot sever his plea and justifie these Et quoad alia c. plead Not guilty But he ought to plead as it is said before or traverse absque hoc c. 2. The Plea in Barr consists of 2 points one is a Iustification the other is a Travers Et he shall not have the Iustification si hoc parat est verificare 22 H. 6. 6. There without Travers it is good according to Dyer 167. But when the justification tends to all it is not so 27 H. 6. 10. and it cannot be amended nor no repleader now after demurrer Then let the Replication be as it will when the Barr is ill and the declaration good this should not be answered Vide Dr. Bonham's Case Francis Case and Turner's Case c. Mich. 6 Caroli primi Communi Banco The Iudges in this case gave their Resolution RIchardson Chief Iustice for himself and for the other Iudges said That he would recite the principal points of the Case which be The Plaintiffs declare that the Charter made to the College did inhibit That none shall practise Physick c. without licence c. and that the Defendant contrary thereto had practised by the space of 12 months for which he had forfeited 5 li. for every month which amounts to 60 li. The Defendant pleads the Statute 34 H. 8. that made it lawfull for any skilfull c. to administer outward Plasters c. or Potions c. and as to any other practice he pleaded Non culpabilis The Plaintiffs reply and shew the Statute of 1 Mariae which confirms their first Charter Any Act to the contrary notwithstanding Vpon which the Defendant demurred in Law and our Ioint Resolution is that the Plaintiffs shall recover It hath béen objected against the Iurisdiction of this Court that by the Statute of 21 Jac. this action ought not to be brought here But it is clear that it cannot be brought in any other place than in the Kings Courts of Record at Westminster For the Statute doth not mention in what Court it shall be brought and the Statute 21 Jac. which giveth power to Iustices doth not give any other thing to them but that whereof they have Power and Iurisdiction before and before this they had not any Iurisdiction of this Cause Ergo. Another Objection hath béen made that the Action hath not béen well brought because it ought to be brought in the name of the President onely To which I answer that the Charter it self is that they may
and doe by all such just and lawfull wayes and meanes as shall be requisite or necessary for the better and speedier effecting of the premises in all things according to the best of their Iudgments and to the truth of the matter appeareing before them AND FURTHER that it shall and may bée lawfull to and for the said Visitors or any two or more of them for the tyme being from tyme to tyme and att any tyme after such cause or matter heard or determined by them or any two of them as aforesaid to remitt and certifie back again to the said President Fellowes and Cominalty of the said Colledge of Physitians their judgment and proceedings therein respectively To the end that due execution and proceeding may bée had and made thereupon according to the tenor true intent and meaning of these presents AND Wee will and by these presents for us our heires and successors doe constitute ordaine declare and graunt that all and every Iudgment Sentence and Decree hereafter made or to bée made by the Visitors aforesaid or any two or more of them upon any Appeale or Appeales of in or concerning the premises shalbée and stand firme and good and bée binding and concluding to all and every person and persons party and parties concerned therein respectively and noe further or other Appeale or releife to bée had sought made or given therein in any Court of Lawe or Equity or elsewhere or otherwise however PROVIDED allwayes and Wée will and by these presents for us our heires and successors doe constitute ordaine and grant that in case of neglect or delay of prosecution of any Appeale or Appeales hereafter to bée had or made in the premisses according to the tenor of these presents or that Iudgment Decree or Sentence bee not from tyme to tyme had and obtayned in all and every such Appeale and Appeales at the prosecution of the partie or parties respectively soe Appealing within six Moneths after every such Appeale or Appeales from tyme to tyme respectively made That then and in every such Case it shall and may bee lawfull to and for the President Fellowes and Commonalty of the Colledge aforesaid and their Successors and to and for the said President and Censors or Vice-president and Censors of the same Colledge for the tyme being in the absence of the President or any three of them as is above mentioned to act and proceed in and upon every such Matter Cause Iudgment Sentence or Decree on which such Appeale or Appeales shall bee soe made as aforesaid and neglected delayed or not determined in tyme by the Visitors as aforesaid in such manner and to all intents and purposes as if such Appeale or Appeales had never byn or byn made Any thinge in these presents conteyned to the contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding AND WEE DOE by these presents for us our heires and successors further graunt constitute and ordeyne that itt shall and may bee lawfull to and for the President Fellowes and Cominalty of the Colledge of Physitians aforesaid and their Successors and to and for the President and Censors or Vice-president and Censors of the same Colledge for the tyme being in the absence of the President or any three of them as is above mentioned to act doe and proceed by way of Action Distresse Imprisonment or otherwise in and upon all and every matter cause and thing judgment sentence and decree whatsoever hereafter to bee made given ratified or confirmed by the Visitors aforesaid or any twoe or more of them in or upon any Appeale or Appeales to them to bée made as aforesaid and by them from tyme to tyme remitted as aforesaid in such and the like manner to all intents and purposes as by these presents they or any of them may or are impowered to doe in the same or the like Cases when noe Appeale or Appeales shall bée had or made therein Any thing in these presents conteyned to the contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding PROVIDED alsoe and our will and pleasure is That noe person or persons whatsoever shall att any tyme hereafter bee ympeached sued fyned amerced or otherwise punished by vertue of these presents or for any offence or other matter cause or thing whatsoever therein specified or conteyned unlesse hee or they respectively bee from tyme to tyme impeached sued fyned amerced or otherwise questioned or punished for such his or their offence or other matter cause or thing aforesaid within one whole yeare next after the same shall be committed or done or such person or persons lyable to bée questioned or punished for the same AND WEE DOE further of our especiall grace certaine knowledge and meere motion for us our heires and successors give and grant unto the said President Fellowes and Cominalty of the Kings Colledge of Physitians aforesaid and their Successors all and singular the Fynes Amerciaments Penalties and Forfeitures and every of them by virtue of these presents or any Act of Parliament hereafter to bee made in pursuance or Confirmation thereof or of any the Letters Patents or Acts of Parliament Ordinances Decrees or Impositions aforesaid hereafter to bee assessed forfeited sett or imposed upon any Physitian or Practizer of Physicke as aforesaid or to bee forfeited sett or imposed upon any Apothecary Druggist or other person or persons whatsoever for or by reason of any misdemeanor offence contempt or default whatsoever before in or by these presents or any the Letters Patents Acts of Parliament Ordinances Decrees or Impositions mentioned or specified to bee ymployed and disposed as hereafter in and by these presents is declared The penalties and forfeitures of the Recognizances hereafter in and by these presents mentioned and directed to bee taken in the name of us our heires and successors allwayes excepted AND that the said President Fellowes and Cominalty of the Colledge of Physitians aforesaid and their Successors shall and may by the name of the President Fellowes and Cominalty of the Kings Colledge of Physitians in the Citty of London att all tymes hereafter and from tyme to tyme in any of our Courts of Record according to the due course of Lawe sue for recover levy and take execution of and for the said Fynes Amerciaments Penalties and Forfeitures and every or any part thereof or otherwise levy or obtaine the same and every part thereof Except the said penalties and forfeitures of Tenn pounds and five pounds per Mensem by Imprisonment of the Bodies or distresse and sale of the Goods of the persons offending as aforesaid in manner and forme aforesaid AND FURTHER Wée will and hereby doe order and direct that all and every summe and summes of money had made accrewing or ariseing by or out of the same Fynes Forfeitures Penalties and Amerciaments any or all of them other then the said forfeitures of Tenn pounds per Mensem and five pounds per Mensem the just and reasonable charges and
c. and the Common Law doth controll it and adjudge the same void as to services and the donor shall have the Rent as a Rent-seck distr of Common right for it should be against Common right and reason that the King should hold of any or do service to any of his Subjects 14 Eliz. Dyer 313. And so was it adjudged Mich. 16 and 17 Eliz. in the Common Pleas in Stroud's Case So if any Act of Parliament giveth to any to hold or to have Conusans of Pleas of all manner of Pleas arising before him within his Mannor of D. yet he shall hold no Plea to which himself is party for as hath béen said iniquum est aliquem suae rei esse judicem 5. If he shall forfeit 5 li. for one month by the first clause and shall be punished for practising at any time by the second clause two absurdities would follow 1. That one should be punished not onely twice but many times for one and the same offence And the Divine saith Quòd Deus non agit bis in idipsum and the Law saith Nemo debet bis puniri pro uno delicto 2. It should be absurd by the first clause to punish practising for one month and not for lesser time and by the 2. to punish practising not onely for a day but at any time so he shall be punished by the first branch for one month by the forfeiture of 5 li. and by the 2. by fine and imprisonment without any limitation for every time of the month in which any one doth practise Physick And all these reasons were proved by 2 grounds or Maxims of Law 1. Generalis Clausula non porrigitur ad ea quae specialiter sunt comprehensa And the Case between Carter and Ringstead Hill 34 Eliz. rot 120. in the Common Pleas was cited to this purpose where the Case in effect was That A. seized of the Mannor of Staple in Odiham in the County of Southampton in Fée and also of other lands in Odiham aforesaid in Fée suffered a common Recovery of all and declared the use by Indenture That the Recoverer should stand seized of all the lands and tenements in Odiham to the use of A. and his wife and to the heirs of his body begotten and further that the Recoverer should stand seized to the use of him and to the heirs of his body and died and the wife survived and entred into the said Mannor by force of the said general words But it was adjudged That they did not extend to the said Mannor which was specially named and if it be so indéed à fortiori it shall be so in an Act of Parliament which as a Will is to be expounded according to the intention of the makers 2. Verba posteriora propter certitudinem addita ad priora quae certitudine indigent sunt referenda 6 E. 3. 12. Sir Adam de Clydrow Knight brought a Praecipe quod reddat against I. de Clydrow and the writ was Quod juste c. reddat Manerium de Wicombe duas carucatas terrae cum pert in Clydrow in that case the Town of Clydrow did not relate to the Mannor quia non indiget for a Mannor may be demanded without mentioning that it lieth in any Town but cum pertinentiis although that it cometh after the Town shall relate to the Mannor quia indiget Vide 3 E. 4. 10. the like case But it was objected That where by the second clause it was granted that the Censors should have supervisum scrutinium correctionem gubernationem omnium singulorum Medicorum c. they had power to fine and imprison To that it was answered 1. That the same is but part of the sentence for by the entire sentence it appeareth in what manner they shall have power to punish for the words are ac punitionem eorum pro delictis suis in non bene exequendo saciendo seu utendo illâ facultate so that without question all their power to correct and punish the Physicians by this clause i ̄s onely limited to 3 cases scil in non bene exequendo faciendo vel utendo c. Also this word punitionem is limited and restrained by these words Ita quòd punitio eorundem Medicorum c. sic in praemissis delinquentium c. which words sic in praemissis delinquentium limit the first words in the first part of this sentence ac punitionem eorum pro delictis in non bene exequendo 2. It shall be absurd That in one and the same sentence the makers of the Act shall give them a general power to punish without limitation and a special manner how they shall punish in one and the same sentence 3 Hil. 38 Eliz. in a Quo Warranto against the Mayor and Commonalty of London it was holden That where a Grant is made to the Mayor and Commonalty that the Mayor for the time being should have plenum integrum scrutinium gubernationem correctionem omnium singulorum Mysteriorum c. without granting to them any Court in which should be legal procéedings that the same is good for search by which discovery may be made of offences and defects which may be punished by the Law in any Court but it doth not give nor can give them any irregular or absolute power to correct or punish any of the Subjects of the Kingdom at their pleasures 2. It was objected That it is incident to every Court created by Letters Patents or Act of Parliament or other Courts of Record to punish any misdemeanors done in Court in disturbance or contempt of the Court by imprisonment To which it was answered That neither the Letters Patents nor the Act of Parliament hath granted to them any Court but onely an authority which they ought to pursue as it shall be afterwards said 2. If any Court had béen granted to them they could not by any incident authority implicitè granted unto them for any misdemeanor done in Court commit him to prison without bail or mainprise untill he shall be by the commandment of the President and Censors or their Successors delivered as the Censors have done in this case 3. There was not any such misdemeanor for which the Court might imprison him for he onely shewed his case to them which he was advised by his Councel he may justifie which is not any offence worthy of imprisonment The second point Admitting that the Censors had power by the Act if they have pursued their authority or not And it was resolved by the chief Iustice Warburton and Daniel that they have not pursued it for 6 causes 1. By the Act the Censors onely have power to impose a fine or amercement and the President and Censors do impose the amercement of 5 li. upon the Plaintiff 2. The Plaintiff was summoned to appear before the President and Censors c. and did not appear and therefore he was fined 10 li. whereas the President hath not any
authority in that case 3. The fines and amercements to be imposed by them by force of the Act do not belong to them but to the King for the King hath not granted the fines and amercements to them and yet the fine is appointed to be paid to them in proximis Comitiis and they have imprisoned the Plaintiff for non-payment thereof 4. They ought to have committed the Plaintiff presently by construction of Law although that no time be limited in the Act as in the Stat. of West cap. 12. De Servientibus Ballivis c. qui ad compotum reddend ' tenentur c. cum Dom ' hujusmodi servientium dederit eis auditores compoti contingat ipsum in arreragiis super compotum suum omnibus allocatis allocandis arrestentur corpora eorum per testimonium auditorum ejusdem compoti mittantur liberentur proximae gaolae Domini Regis in partibus illis c. in that case although that no time be limited when the Accomptant shall be imprisoned yet it ought to be presently as it is holden in 27 H. 6. 8. and the reason thereof is given in Fogossa's Case Plow Com. 17. that the generality of time shall be restrained to the present time for the benefit of him upon whom the pain shall be inflicted and therewith agréeth Plow Com. 206. b. in Stradling's Case And a Iustice of Peace upon view of the force ought to commit the offender presently 5. For as much as the Censors had their authority by the Letters Patents and Act of Parliament which are high matters of Record their proceedings ought not to be by word and so much the rather because they claimed authority to fine and imprison And therefore if Iudgment be given against one in the Common Pleas in a Writ of Recaption he shall be fined and imprisoned but if the Writ be Vicontiel in the County there he shall not be fined or imprisoned because that the Court is not of Record F. N. B. in bre de Recaptione so in 47 F. N. B. a Plea of Trespass vi armis doth not lie in the County Court hundred Court c. for they cannot make Record of fine and imprisonment and regularly those who cannot make a Record cannot fine and imprison And therewith agréeth 27 H. 8. Book of Entries The Auditors make a Record when they commit the Defendant to prison A Iustice of Peace upon view of the force may commit but he ought to make a Record of it 6. Because the Act of 14 H. 8. hath given power to imprison untill he shall be delivered by the President and the Censors and their Successors reason requireth that the same be taken strictly for the liberty of the Subject as they pretend is at their pleasure And the same is proved by a Iudgment in Parliament in this Case For when this Act of 14 H. 8. had given power to the Censors to imprison yet it was taken so literally that the Gaoler was not bound to receive them which they committed to him and the reason thereof was because they had authority to do it without any Court And thereupon the Statute of 1 Mar. cap. 9. was made that the Gaoler should receive them upon a pain and none can be committed to any prison if the Gaoler cannot receive him but the first Act for the cause aforesaid was taken so literally that no necessary incident was implyed And where it was objected that this very Act of 1 Mariae hath enlarged the power of the Censors and that upon the word of the Act It was clearly resolved that the said Act of 1 Mariae did not enlarge the power of the Censors to fine or imprison any person for any cause for which he ought not to be fined and imprisoned by the said Act of 14 H. 8. For the words of the Act of Q. Mary are according to the tenor and meaning of the said Act Also shall send or commit any Offender or Offenders for his or their offence or disobedience contrary to any Article or clause contained in the said Grant or Act to any Ward Gaol c. But in this Case Bonham hath not done any thing which appeareth within this Record contrary to any Article or clause contained within the Grant or Act of 14 H. 8. Also the Gaoler who refuseth shall forfeit the double value of the fines and amerciaments that any offender or disobedient shall be assessed to pay which proveth that none shall be received by any Gaoler by force of the Act of 14 H. 8. but he who may be lawfully fined or amerced by the Act of 14 H. 8. and for that was not Bonham as by the reasons and causes aforesaid it appeareth And admit that the replication be not material and the Defendants have demurred upon it yet forasmuch as the Defendants have confessed in the Bar that they have imprisoned the Plaintiff without cause the Plaintiff shall have Iudgment And the difference is when the Plaintiff doth reply and by his replication it appeareth that he hath no cause of action there he shall never have judgment But when the Bar is insufficient in matter or amounteth as this Case is to a confession of the point of the action and the Plaintiff replyeth and sheweth the truth of the matter to enforce his Case and in Iudgment of Law it is not material yet the Plaintiff shall have Iudgment for it is true that sometimes the Count shall be made good by the Bar and sometimes the Bar by the Replication and sometimes the Replication by the Rejoynder c. But the difference is when the Count wantethtime place or other circumstance it may be made good by the Bar so of the Bar Replication c. as appeareth in 18 E. 4. 16. b. But when the Count wanteth substance no Bar can make it good so of the Bar Replication c. and therewith agrée 6 E. 4. 2. a good case and mark there the words of Choke vid. 18 E. 3. 34. b. 44 E. 3. 7. a. 12 E. 4. 6. 6 H. 7. 10. 7 H. 7. 3. 11 H. 4. 24. c. But when the Plaintiff makes a Replication Sur-rejoynder c. and thereby it appeareth that upon the whole matter and Record the Plaintiff hath no cause of action he shall never have Iudgment although that the Bar or remainder be insufficient in matter for the Court ought to judge upon the whole Record and every one shall be intended to make the best of his own case Vid. Rigeways case in the 3. part of my Reports 52. And so these differences were resolved and adjudged betwéen Kendall and Heyer Mich. 25 26 Eliz. in the Kings Bench. And Mich. 29 30 Eliz. in the same Court betwéen Gallys and Burbry And Coke Chief Iustice in the conclusion of his argument did observe 7 things for the better direction of the President and Commonalty of the said Colledge in time to come 1. That none can be punished for practising
but such onely which are for the better government of the old And also he said plainly that it appears by the Statute of 1 Mariae That the former Statutes shall not be taken by Equity for by these the President and Commons have power to commit a delinquent to Prison and this shall be intended if they shall be taken by Equity that every Gaoler ought to receive him which is so committed But when it is provided by 1 Mariae specially that every Gaoler shall receive such Offenders by this it appears That the former Statute shall not be taken in Equity And so he concluded that Iudgment shall be entred for the Plaintiff which was done accordingly College of Physicians versus Butler Sir William Jones's Reports p. 261. THe President of the College and Comminalty of the faculty of Physick London brought debt against one George Butler The Writ was quòd reddat Domino Regi Praesidenti Collegii ac Comminal ' facultat ' Medicor ' London Qui tam pro Domino Rege quà m pro seipso sequitur 60. li. quas eis debet And the Declaration was in the name of the said President by the said name qui tam pro Domino Rege quà m pro seipso sequitur c. which contained the Charter of H. 8. made Anno Regni sui 10. and confirmed by Act of Parliament Anno Regni sui 14. as it is contained in the Statute of 14 H. 8. and that the said Defendant minimè ponderans the said Statute or the Penalty thereof exercised the faculty of Physick in London although he was not admitted so to do by the President and the College or Comminalty of the faculty of Physick London by the space of 12 months before the said Action brought per quod actio accrevit eidem Domino Regi dicto Praesidenti qui tam pro dicto Domino Rege quam pro seipso sequitur c. ad exigend ' habend ' of the said Defendant pro dicto Domino Rege eodem Praesidente Colleg ' praedict ' 60 li. videlicet 5 li. pro quolibet mense praedict ' 12 Mensium praedict ' Tamen Desendens praedicto Domino Regi Praesidenti non reddidit unde the said President said that he was damnified to the value of 100 li. The Defendant pleaded the Statute of 34 H. 8. whereby liberty is given to every one of the Kings Subjects that hath knowledge and experience of the nature of Herbs Roots Waters or the operation of them by speculation or practice to exercise apply and administer to any external ulcer wound apostumation outward tumor sive morbo alicui alio any Herb Ointment Bath Pultess or Plaster according to the experience and science of the said diseases or other Maladies eisdem consimil or Potion pro calculo Strangury vel febr without any impediment any Statute or other thing to the contrary And saith that he was a Subject and having experience and science by speculation and practice in the nature of Herbs Roots and Waters applied and ministred to divers of the Kings subjects Herbs Ointment Bath Pultess Plasters and Potion to Vlcers Diseases Maladies Strangury and Ague talibus aliis morbis illis consimilibus prout ei bene licuit And to the residue pleaded Not guilty The Plaintiff replied to the first Plea and pleaded the Statute of 1 Mariae whereby the said Charter and the said Act of 14 H. 8. was confirmed in the whole Whereupon the Defendant demurred and shewed for cause of Demurrer that the Replication was a departure from the Declaration And upon Argument in the Common Pleas Iudgment was given by the opinion of all the Iudges for the Plaintiff and thereupon Error was brought in the Kings Bench. Two Errors were assigned the one was the departure the second was because that the Writ was in the name of the King and the President and the Declaration was in the name of the Informer also And after argument at the Bar by Council on both sides the Iudges delivered their opinions The Chief Iustice began and then Jones Whitlock and Crook They all said that Iudgment ought to be affirmed First they agréed that the Writ and Declaration were good and although some Precedents be that upon a penal Law the Writ be to answer the Informer qui tam pro seipso quà m pro Domino Rege sequitur Yet they thought that the most proper and better way of a Writ was to answer the King and Informer for the debt was given to them by moieties therefore it is not so proper to demand all for the Informer and yet to have a several judgment for the King and the Informer for the moieties and so is Partridge and Crokers case in the Comment But when it is by information there it shall be that the Informer informs for the King and himself Another exception was taken to the Writ because it is in the name of the President and not of the College also And also it was contrary in the end of the Declaration where it is said unde actio accrevit to the said King and President for to have 60 li. of the Defendant For the King one Moiety and for the President and College the other Moiety But it was adjudged by the Court that notwithstanding it was good for First although the Incorporation was by the name of President and College notwithstanding the suite is by the Charter given to the President and there may be a Corporation by one name to purchase lands and otherwise yet it shall sue by another name 11 E. 1. a Corporation was by the name of Master Wardens Brothers and Sisters of Rouncevill and by the said Patent it is said they should sue by the name of Master and Wardens of Rouncevill 2. Although that the Action is given by way of suite to the President onely yet the Recovery and money recovered shall be to the President and College therefore the Conclusion for to have the money to the President and College was held good The 3. point was resolved that the Plea in Bar was not good for the liberty given is disjunctive for outward medicines to use Plasters Oyntment Bathes c. and for 3 diseases to wit the Stone Strangury and Agues onely yet they jumble all together that he ministred the Ointments and Potions to all the said Maladies which cannot be for he may not administer a Potion unless to the said 3 diseases and no other 4. It was resolved that it was not any departure but that the Replication was subsequent and pursuant to the Declaration But for the main matter they said nothing to wit whether the Statute of 1 Mariae took away the force of the Statute of 34 H. 8. for they gave their Iudgment upon the Bar by reason it was naught Onely Crook spake to this point and it séemed to him that the Statute of 34 H. 8. is not repealed or avoided by 1 Mariae Butler versus the President of
he petitioned that he might answer the College action without an arrest which was granted provided he would find Sureties to answer the College Suit if he were cast at Law Which being done and this Cause appointed to be heard at the King's Bench Bar 6 of the Fellows of the College were deputed to attend there and after this hearing Dr. Harvey the Treasurer and the 4 Censors were desired to take special care in the future management of the College's cause against Butler who had procured a protection from the Lord Chamberlain upon which account 4 of the Fellows were ordered by the President to wait upon his Lordship to take off his protection that the College might proceed in their Suit against him The Lord Chamberlain upon their application declared his readiness to comply with the College's request and ordered his Secretary to write the following reference against Butler The College of Physicians having represented that one George Butler under colour of being sworne an extraordinary Chirurgion to his Majestie doth take upon him to give Physick and practise Chirurgery without either skill or Licence to the apparent prejudice and endangering of the lives of his Majestie 's subjects and thereupon desired leave to take the ordinary course of Law to inhibite his practice and to prevent the danger which may ensue thereby I do hereby declare and publish unto all such as it may concerne that I have and do give free leave and liberty unto the said College to use all lawfull wayes and meanes accustomed in like cases either by arrest or otherwise for the suppressing and prohibiting of the said Butler's further practice in as free and ample manner as if the said Butler had never been sworne the King's servant Whitehall the 25th of November 1626. About 8 months after several fresh complaints of great mischief done by Butler in his practice were exhibited against him As particularly for giving a sleeping potion to one Patient who was sound dead in his sleep The wife of this man thus murthered applied her self to the Censors and desired that Mr. Butler might be punished for professing that which he did not understand which she pressed the more because she said such a man as he might kill many both Body and Soul every one being not so well prepared for death as her husband She desired a Certificate from the College concerning Mr. Butler and his ill practice After this Butler sent a Letter to the President and College which being read was rejected After this a servant of Butler's acquainted the Censors that while she dwelt with him a woman came to him for Cure who within 3 weeks died and was carried away secretly without tolling the Bell or any Minister being called Upon this information Butler endeavoured to imprison this servant using all arts to take her which occasioned her application to the College for their protection complaining of the many injuries she had received from Mr. Butler since her appearing against him Wherefore the President ordered the following Letter to be drawn up and presented to the Lord Chief Justice in her behalf MAy it please your Lordship to understand that the Petitioner on the 7th of Jan. last past came to our College voluntarily to complain of the evil practice of Mr. Butler as is in the petition specified since which time we are certainly informed that he hath laid heavy actions upon her and kept her in prison as is above specified We conceiving the chief grounds of his violent proceedings against her to have risen upon her complaint made to us In consideration of her misery We having noe power to relieve her doe presume humbly to intreat your Lordship to take such course as your Lordship in your wisdome shall think fit that she may obtain the benefit of her Petition After this Dr. Winston signified to the College that Butler sent a petition to him to be presented to the College which he refused Then Butler sent a Letter to the President after which it was agreed that if he paid in the money recovered and due to the College before the Term then the other Suits depending might be suspended if it pleased the President A Letter about this time in the behalf of Butler was brought from the Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas by Captain Butler directed to the President and Censors of the College the Contents of which are the following Mr. Doctor Argent I Am informed of a Judgment which is obtained against Mr. Butler at your Suit and the rest of the College of Physicians for 60 l. which I find him very willing and ready to satisfie so far forth as his ability will give leave for the present He will pay half the money in hand and the next some time the next Terme which I conceive is no ill payment his estate considered Therefore I desire you and the rest of your College to take him thus far into your consideration And what you do herein I shall take as done in respect of me who am intreated to write in his favour by some whom I am willing to satisfy in this request appearing to me to be but reasonable and little hurtfull to your selves But to animate him of any other against your Government I neither do nor ever will write Your very assured loving friend Ro. Heath Julii 1. 1633. Captain Butler promised that on Friday 36 l. of the money due from Butler should be paid and desired time till the next Term for the payment of the rest The College took time to consider for a few days and then promised him their answer Upon the Friday aforementioned according to promise Captain Butler brought 36 l. from Mr. Butler to whom by Mr. President 's appointment was given the following note It was ordered by Mr. President and Censors the 5th of July 1633. that Mr. George Butler having sent in 36 l. in part of Payment of the 66 l. due to the College by a judgment given against him in the King's Bench in Easter Term in the 7th year of his Majestie K. Charles 1. his Reign at the request of the Lord Chief justice of the Common Pleas should have time given him for the payment of the other 30 l. till the 20th of November next ensuing and in the mean time all prosecution upon the foresaid judgment should surcease Mrs. Bendwell was complained of by Thomas Audley for undertaking his cure in 3 days though in a Hectick Fever she telling him that she had cured those whom the Doctours had left and could not cure She gave him a Purging drink that wrought day and night and brought him to exceeding weakness He said that about the same time she gave his Laundress physick of whom she had Linen to pawn which she was warned to bring in Complaint was likewise made against her by a man and his wife who had bargain'd with her for a cure and had pawned a dozen of Napkins to raise money for her payment c. She