Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A54308
|
This book makes appear the claim, pedigree and proceedings of James Percy now claimant to the Earldom of Northumberland humbly presented to both Houses of Parliament.
|
Percy, James, 1619-1690?
|
1680
(1680)
|
Wing P1460; ESTC R30769
|
47,400
|
58
|
COMMONS by fresh Petitions And in the mean time he hath prepared these Prints to pre-admonish the World And that Just Men may know that James Percy is the true and lawful Heir and of right ought to enjoy the Earldom of Northumberland and that the Estate must attend the Title But cruel Oppression still keeps Possession which forces the Claymant to cry out aloud again again and again for Justice and that Property and Right may be preserved For if his Innocent and Just Cause should be now neglected your Children and Children's Children may be Rejected another Day I pray God to direct our King Parliament and People that they may fore see Things so as to preserve the Cood and prevent the Evils to come AMEN To the Honorable The KNIGHTS CITIZENS BVRGESSES Of The House of Commons IN PARLIAMENT Assembled The Humble Petition of James Percy Esq Sheweth THat it is now almost Nine Years since he put in his Claym as Descended of the house of Northumberland and next Cozen and Heir-Male to Joscelin late Earl of Northumberland All which time he hath Vigorously and Industriously pursued his Right though against so great and unequal Force and Opposition that he hath not been able to prevail And therefore humbly prayes Leave to bring the State of his Case and the Narrative of his Proceedings before this Honorable House Imploring their Assistance to Appear Mediate and Interpose for his Relief And your Petitioner shall Pray c. A NARRATIVE OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PETITIONER Since His Petitions were Dismissed by the Right Honorable the House of LORDS and his Case left to the Law IN Trinity-Term 1674. the Petitioner brought an Action in the King 's Bench against John Clarke Esquire for Scandal and Defamation he had thrown upon your Petitioner Where upon Hearing some of his Witnesses did not appear Nevertheless your Petitioner went so far on with the Proof of his Pedigree and Lineal Discent from the Earls of Northumberland that the Lord Chief Justice Hales said in open Court That the Plaintiff meaning your Petitioner had proved himself a True Percy of the Blood and Family of the Percies of Northumberland legitimate by Father and Mother Grand-Father and Grand-Mother and that he did verily believe your Petitioner was Cousin and next Heir Male of Josceline Percy late Earl of Northumberland But was afraid he had taken his Discent a little too Low and willed him to come better Prepared next Tryal Whereupon your Petitioner suffered a Non-suit A * * 1. The Reason of the Mistake in the First Pedigree was that the Herald-Stainer left out Sr. Ingleram Percy the Great Grand-Father 2. Searching in another Herald-Stayner's Book that had been lent out the said Book was returned the Leaf where the Matches of the Percies Family were set down according to the Alphabet being torn out 3. Therefore his Counsel did advise to fix the Pedigree upon Sir Richard Percy and if he was found the Wrong it would be the means to find out the Right as it did effect at last Mistake I hope all will Pardon to one under those Disadvantages the Claimant was who was forced to Abscond in England for his Loyalty and Travel for some Years and had not an Opportunity to aquaint himself with the Family of Northumberland so as to be informed of his Pedigree The Truth is When he came into England to Claim his Honor and Estate though he knew it was his Right yet it was hard for him to prove his Great Grand-Father as it would be for most perhaps that Condemn him 2 2 Searching in another Herald-Stayner's Book that had been lent out the said Book was returned the Leaf where the Matches of the Percies Family were set down according to the Alphabet being torn out when a Family is so Dispersed and the Pedigree of the Younger Sons neglected by the Herald Upon a Second Action brought iâ—â—â—e Court of the King 's Bench against Sir John Copleston Trustee fo◠〈◊〉 Lady Clifford Sir John sheltred himself under the Priviledge so long as he could When he was forced to a Tryal your Petitioner proved himself Cousin and next Heir-Male of the said Josceline Percy late Earl of Northumberland as followeth For the Claimant James Percy was the Son of Henry Percy Grand-Son of Henry Percy Esquire Great Grand-Son of Sir Ingleram Percy Great great Grand-Son of Henry Percy Fifth Earl of Northumberland So as the Court willed him to proceed to the Title of the Lands Unto which his Counsel replyed That the Lands must attend the Title That the Deeds Evidences Books of Entries and the Records of the Estate were in the Possession of the Defendants So that at present they were not prepared nor instructed to proceed further than the Legitimation and Lineal Discent of your Petitioner 3 3 Therefore his Counsel did advise to fix the Pedigree upon Sir Richard Percy and if he was found the Wrong it would be the means to find out the Right as it did effect at last from the Noble Family of the Earls of Northumberland That upon the Thirteenth of June 1676. your Petitioner brought his Action in Guild-Hall London against John Blackeston Esquire for Scandal and Defamation But the Defendant moved the Court of King's Bench that the Action might be removed and brought into that Court And that a Tryal might be there had which was ordered accordingly And the Seventh of May they appointed to Hear the Cause The Petitioner humbly submitted to the Pleasure of the Court. And your Petitioner and the Defendant having some few Weeks before the said Time of the Tryal by Consent attended the Master of the Office and settled a Jury Your Petitioner prepared for a Tryal and brought up from many and some very remote Parts of the Kingdom Sixty-five Witnesses all in Court whose Travels to and fro upon Calculation amounted to above Four Thousand Miles and had Fourteen Learned Councels at the Bar The Charges of all amounting to about Four Hundred Pound And thus prepared brought on the Cause to a Hearing the Day appointed When imediately the Defendant's Counsel insisted upon the Priviledge of the Countess Dowager of Northumberland in Protecting her Servants and Agents The said John Blackeston being Steward of her Courts and pretended Receiver of her Rents and that he was upon the said Imployment Whereupon all your Petitioner's Counsels refused to Plead although the Court would have Heard them and proceeded to Tryal of the Cause But the Councel replyed They had no mind to go to the Tower some of them having been there before And thus the Tryal was put off Whereupon Mr. Justice Wilde hearing these Things stood up and said in open Court Fye fye Gentlemen Is this a Time to insist upon Priviledges when you forced the Plaintiff to a Tryal and have put him to so great Expence Travel and Labor You do but cast Cold Water upon your Cause It is not the first time this Cause hath been before
this Court When Mr. Blackeston was asked Whether he went to London to look after Percy 's Tryal he said It concerns me not for the Countess of Northumberland is to bear me Harmless Upon the Fourteenth of May 1678. there was a Tryal had at the King 's Bench-Bar Westminster for Scandalizing the Petitioner's Right and Title where-on a Verdict was given for Three Hundred Pound Dammages to the Petitioner and Judgment obtained thereon As by the said Judgment exemplifyed under the Seal of the Court appears Lastly That your Petitioner hath been all a-long perplexed and troubled by many Suits at Law unjustly Commenced against him by the Agents of the Defendants or some of them on purpose to Tire him out and Ruin him by Chargeable Defences For it is now almost Eight Years since he began his Claim And therefore Humbly prayes this most High and Honourable Court to open some way for the Hearing and Determination of this his Just Claim as it shall in your Mature Wisdoms seem meet and convenient for the Preserving Property and Right This further Complaint since the Late PARLIAMENT was Prorogued and Dissolved Percy is Plaintiff Blackeston the Defendant In Banco Regis Mich. Term. MR. Blackeston being Steward to the Lady Elizabeth Percy and the Countess Dowager of Northumberland being her Guardian the said Blackeston stood upon the Countesses Priviledge until upon another Occasion the Duke of Monmouth by an Order of the House of LORDS took off the Countesses Priviledges as to the Guardian-ship Then Mr. Blackeston sheltered himself under the Earl of Essexes Priviledge until the Plaintiff put his Petition into the House of LORDS that Mr. Blackeston might not be Priviledged by the said Earl Upon which the Earl agreed with the Plaintiff's Counsel That if the Ninety Pound Costs that was unpaid upon the Non-suit between Percy Plaintiff and Clarke Defendant were paid that then Mr. Blackeston should not stand upon Priviledge but go to a Tryal which he accordingly did in his Majestie 's Court of King's Bench. Before which time in the said Term the Plaintiff's Councel informed the Court what the Earl had agreed unto Then the Lord Chief Justice stood up and said to the Plaintiff That the Earl of Essex did promise upon his Honor to set aside his Priviledge and that the Plaintiff should have a Tryal against Mr. Blackeston this Term if the Plaintiff paid Mr. Clarke's Costs first And we do promise the Plaintiff shall have a fair Tryal The Plaintiff thereupon paid the said Ninety Pound Costs into the Court accordingly Monday the Eleventh of November the Plaintiff brought on his Tryal The Declaration being read Counsellor Scroggs opened the Cause and upon a Word in the Declaration there was some Debate But it was waved the Declaration allowed and the Scandalous VVords in the Declaration proved Mr. Atturney General moved that the VVitnesses might be heard to prove the Pedigree upward it being the better way to Satisfy the Court and to Inform the Jury And withal said That his Clyant had no better way to prove his Pedigree but by his Action of Slander For he hath delivered Declarations in Ejectment in several Countries and the Lands are all in great Persons Hands which still delay him by Priviledges Then was the Pedigrees delivered to the Judges But the Lord Chief Justice said What need we trouble the Court to Examine all these Witnesses if there be no Lands Therefore let us see first what Lands there are to make good the Declaration The Plaintiff produced Records out of the Tower and other Places which made out That the Lady Lucies Lands in Cumberland and other Countries were settled upon the Heirs-Males of the Percies for ever upon the Payment of Three Hundred Pound to the KING c. and Quartering the said Lucies Coat of Arms with the Percies Here the Defendant's Counsel started up an Attainder which the Plaintiff's Counsel was not ready to Answer the Plaintiff's Sollicitor having made no Provision against the said Attainder being confident that Attainder could not Hurt nor Prejudice the Tryal And this caused the Jury to be with-drawn The Jury appeared three several Times in this Cause which was occasioned by the Delayes and Priviledges which the Defendant sheltred himself under The Plaintiff payd all the Jury and the Ninety Pound was to be continued in Court till there had been a Fair Tryal But upon a Motion of the Defendant's Counsel there was a Peremptory Rule granted to take the Mony out of Court which was accordingly paid to the Defendant The Second Part of the Tryal should have been had in Michaelmass-Term 1678. while the Witnesses were in Town But the Tryal of Mr. Stayley prevented it So that the Plaintiff's Tryal was put off till Hillary-Term following viz. 27th January 1678. The Defendant's Counsel moved the Court the first Day of Hillary-Term for a New Jury and a longer Time pretending they had but Seven dayes Notice When in Truth the Defendant's Atturney had a Months Notice by the Plaintiff and Twelve dayes Notice by the Plaintiff's Atturneys Clark Upon which the Court gave a Rule for Seven dayes longer and for a New Jury which was Appointed accordingly Then the Defendant's Counsel afterwards moved the Court for a longer Day by reason that their Writings were mis-placed by the Fire in the Temple which further Day was granted till Thursday the Sixth of February and no Costs considered to the Plaintiff for keeping his Witnesses in Town all that Time notwithstanding the Plaintiff's Counsel moved for Costs Note The Lord Chief Justice Hales in the Case of Percy Plaintiff and Clarke Defendant The Defendant's Counsel moved the Court for Seven Dayes time pretending they were not Prepared And the Rule of Court was to pay Thirty-Five Pound to the Plaintiff to maintain his Witnesses in Town for that time which was paid Now on the Sixth of February 1678. the Tryal came on again The New Jury did appear the Declaration was read and Councellor Scroggs opened the Cause as he did before And one of the Witnesses was called to prove the Words And when he appeared the Court acknowledged he had proved the VVords sufficiently before And the Defendant's Counsel made no Objection against the Declaration So the Tryal was to go on where it broake off The Records of the Patents in Queen Maries time one for the Barony and the other for the Earldom produced And he that was the Clark that Examined them appeared but was not suffered to prove them upon Oath Note The afore-said Clark of the Rolls not appearing upon the last Tryal was the Cause of with-drawing the Jury Then when the Court saw the Plaintiff was ready to Answer to their Objections declared That the Plaintiff was Descended Paramount the Attainders And did own the Attaint could not hurt the Plaintiff Then Mr. Atturney General moved as at the first Part of the Tryal That the VVitnesses might be Examined to prove the Pedigree VVhereupon the Defendant's Counsel started up an Act