Summonable none is to be summoned for a personall offence not any one who is not a Free-holder 3 A man is not summonable in all places for no man is summonable nor bounden to receive Summons out of the Fee of the Party who causeth the Summons nor elsewhere but in the Mannour appendant to such a Court where he ought to Answer nor in all places of the Mannour but only at the Tenement in demand 4 How farre one is summonable not out of the Fee of the Court where one is to answer 5 At whose charges at the charges of those who are the first causers of the Summons except in Juries and Enquests taken ex officio for no Free-man is compelable to travell and appeare in Judgements at his owne charges notwithstanding that the Law requireth that every Tenant obey the Summons of his Lord. 6 How often one is summonable but once in one cause neverthelesse re-summoned holdeth place in some case 7 Who may and ought to be Summonors no man is compellable to be a Summonor if he will not agree to it neverthelesse all those may be Summonors who will that are not forbidden by the Law Women not Villaines nor infants nor any infamous Person not any one who is not a Free holder cannot be a Summoner 8 It is a reasonable Summons when it is testified by two loyall free Witnesses Neighbours to the Person or to the House or Tenement contained in the Writ with warning given of the day place party Judge of the Cause and a reasonable respite at least of fifteen daies to provide his Answer and to appeare in Judgement In Juries neverthelesse nor Enquests there need not be so full time or respite given CHAP. II. SECT 30. Of Essoignes ESsoigne is an excuse of a default by any hinderance in comming to the Court and lyeth as well for the Plaintiffe as for the Defendant The Law of every Essoigne is That the cause of the hinderance be enrolled with the name of the Essoigner so that if the diverse Party or his Atturney or Essoignor will traverse the Cause he is to be received so to doe that if he be found false then that the Essoigne be turned to a default All those may be Essoigned who are not forbidden by Law uo Defendant in personall Actions not any after default can be Essoigned not any present in Court nor doth Essoigne lye in a Scire facias nor in a Venire facias nor in a Recordari facias toquelam nor in Admeasurement of Pasture nor after the Parties have joyned issue in Judgement though the Jury appeare not nor in case where the Plaintiffe hath not found Surety to pursue his Action nor where one hath Atturney in Court if both be not Essoigned nor where the Summons is not testified nor after an Essoigne not warranted nor to him who was not named in the Writ or in the Plaint except in Warranties nor any one who is re-summoned in Mort-dauncester and Darrein presentment nor when the day is not come nor where the Essoigner commeth too late nor any one whose adversary is dead or any of his Parceners nor he who is adjourned from day to day nor the Kings Officer as Officer nor he to whom it is commanded that he appeare if he please No Essoigne is justifiable if it be not orderly cast nor is it allowed to Infants within age nor to any who is in custody nor to many having one right if the Cause be not divers All may be Essoigners who the Law forbiddeth not it is forbidden to Women to Infants to Villaires and to all who are in Custody to Mad-men to Idiots to Excommunicated Persons to the Judges and uo the Parties in the Cause Essoigners at other times not warranted 〈◊〉 â—â—ainted of false delayes to criminall Persons and to those who are not of the Christian Faith or in the Kings Alleagiance it is forbidden that they be Essoigners There are chiefly two kinds of Essoignes the one of the Kings service the other of hinderance The first is dividable either into the service of the King of Heaven or of the King on Earth of the King of Heaven in three manners 1 Either for the generall passage of all to the Land of c. and this Essoigne is not otherwise adjournable but that the Parties goe without day and are to appeare againe by Re-summons of the Plaintiffes at the returne of the Defendant This Essoigne is not allowable to Plaintiffes nor to the Defendant reasonably Summoned before his going from his house in a personall action nor in other but in a Plea which toucheth Inheritance nor but in a Writ of Right Patent but not of Dower nor of Burgage The other Essoigne of the service of the King of Heaven is of a common Pilgrimage beyond Sea towards the Holy Land and this lasts for a yeare this holds not buâ— according as the other The third of a Pilgrimage beyond Sea as to Rome or to Saint James De compostella and takes place for halfe a yeare and these Essoignees are to appeare the next Courts following the Termes adjourned After Re-summons holdeth place the common Essoigne De mal venier and also after the terme of Adjournment but this common Essoigne never holds place before the Essoignes before said The Essoigne of the King on Earths service is in two manners 1 The one is of those who serve as Souldiers as Messengers or as Ministers and this Essoigne is not respited but from Court to Court or the common day to the example of a common Essoigne if it be not warranted at the next Court by the Kings Writ it is to be turned to a default 2 The other is of those who serve the King by Tenure of their Land for the defence of the Realme and he hath no day But the Plaintiffe is with out day and the Plea is to be re-continued in the same Estate when his Adversary shall be returned These latter Essoignes are allowable in Pleas summonable to Plaintiffes and Defendants except in Dower Vnde nihil habet Quare impedat Darrein presentment nor to Women nor to Infants nor to Idiots nor to Deaf nor to Dumbe nor Mad-men nor to any in custody nor to any who is not free of himself nor to any Atturney as Atturney nor where the Essoigner acknowledgeth the Cause in Judgement to be false nor after any Cape nor after distresse in the Land After the Essoignes of the Kings service lyeth an Essoigne of Malo veniendi but not è conâ—â—a The Essoigne of disturbance or hinderance is dividable either of sicknesse or of some other hinderance as of those who comming towards the Court are taken by the Kings enemies and so hindered or by Waters Bridges or enemies discovered or by Tempests or other reasonable disturbance so that they have not power to appeare at the day The Essoigne of hinderance and sicknesse is divideable either of languishing which is called De malo lecti and that holdeth place
or otherwise retaine him in his service 90 It is abuse that Villaines are Frank pledges or Pledges of Free-men 91 It is abuse that others suffer Villains to be in their Viewes of Franck-pledges 92 It is abuse that the Lords suffer their Villaines to plead or be impleaded without them for a Villaine is not Amerceable in any other Court because he can lose nothing as he who hath nothing proper of his owne 23 It is abuse to hold Villaines for Slaves and this abuse causeth great destruction of poore people great poverty and is a great offence 94 It is abuse that a man is Summoned who is no Free-holder 95 It is abuse to Summon a man elsewhere then in the Land contained in the demand if it containe Land 96 It is abuse that a man travaile at his owne Charges by any Summons personall 97 It is abuse that a Justice or other make a Summons who is not a Free-holder within the County 98 It is abuse to Summon men without giving them reasonable warning upon what to Answer 99 It is abuse that false Causes of Essoignes are admitted for as much as the Law alloweth falsity in no case 100 It is abuse that an Essoignor is admitted in a personall Action to the Defendant since one is Maine-prised to appeare in Court by Maine-prisors 101 It is an abuse to receive an Essoigne cast in by an infant within age 102 It is an abuse to receive an Atturny where no power so to doe is given by Writ out of the Chancery 103 It is abuse to receive an Atturney where the Plea is not to be judged in the presence of the Parties if not in case where one maketh an Atturney generall 104 It is abuse that none can make an Attuoney in personall Actions where Corporall pnnishment is to be awarded 105 It is abuse to receive Exceptions in Judgements if they be not sufficiently pronounced for from the Order of the Exception early ariseth cleare Judgement 106 It is abuse to allow a warrant of Voucher to a Theife or in other personall Action 107 It is abuse that Judges Assigned shew not the parties pleading their Warrants or of his power when they demand it 108 It is abuse that Justices and their Officers who kill people by false Judgement be not destroyed as other murderours which King Alfred caused to be done who caused forty foure Justices in one yeare to be hanged as murderours for their false Judgements He hanged Darling because he had Judged Sidulf to death 1 Darling for the retreat of Edulfe his Son who afterwards acquitted him of the fact He hanged Segnor 2 Segnor who judged Vlfe to death after susfficient acquittall He hanged Cadwine 3 Cadwine because that he judged Hachwy to death without the consent of all the Jurours and whereas he stood upon the Jury of twelve men and because that three would have saved him against the nine Codwine removed the three and put others upon the Jury upon whom Hachwy put not himselfe He hanged Cole 4 Cole because he judged Jve to death when he was a Mad-man He hanged Malme 5 Malme because he judged Prat to death upon a false suggestion that he committed the felony He hanged Athulf because be caused Copping to be hanged before the age of one and twenty yeares 6 Athulf He hanged Markes because he judged During to death by twelve men who were nor sworne 7 Markes He hanged Ostline because he judged Seaman to death by a-false Warrant 8 Ostline grounded upon false suggestion which supposed Seaman to be a person in the Warrant which he was not He hanged Billing 9 Billing because he judged Leston to death by fraud in this manner he said to the people Sit all yee here but he who assisted to kill the man and because that Leston did not fit with the other he him commanded to be hanged and said that he did-assist where he knew he did not assisted to kill him He hanged Seafoule because he judged Olding to death 10 Seafoule for not answeriâ—g He hanged Thurston because he judged Thurguer to death by a verdict of Enquest 11 Thurston taken Ex officio without issue joyned He hanged Athelston 12 Athelston because he judged Herbert to death for an offence not mortall He hanged Rombold because he judged Lisilâ—ld 13 Rombold in a case not notorious without Appeale and without Endictment He hanged Rolfe 14 Rolfe because he judged Dunston to dye for an escape out of prison He hanged Freburne because he judged Harpin to dye 15 Freburne whereas the Jury were in doubt of their Verdict for in doubtfull causes one ought rather to save then to condemne He hanged Seabright who judged Aihebbrus to death 16 Seabright because he condemned one by a false judgement mortall He hanged Hale because he saved Tristram the Sheriffe from death 17 Hale who took to the Kings use from another goods against his will for as much as any such taking from another against his will and Robbery hath no difference He hanged Arnold because he saved Boyliffe 18 Arnold who robbed the people by colour of Distresses whereof some were by selling Distresses some by extortion of Fines as if betwixt extortion of Fines releasing of tortious Distresses and Robbery there were difference He hanged Erkinwald because he hanged Frankling 12 Erkiu wald for nought else but because he taught to him who vanquished by Battaile mortall to say the word of Cravant He hanged Bermond because he caused Gâ—â—bolt to be beheaded by his Judgement in England 20 Bermond for that for which he was Outlawed in Ireland He hanged Alkman because he saved cateman by colour of Disseisin 21 Alkman who was attainted of Burglary He hanged Saxmond because he hanged Barrold in England 22 Saxmond where the Kings Writ runneth for a fact which he did in the same Land where the Kings Writ did not run He hanged Alflet because he judged a Clerke to death 23 Alflet over whom he had not cognisance He hanged Piron because he judged Hanting to Death 24 Piron because he gave judgement in Appeale before the forty daies pendant the Appeale by a Writ of false judgement before the King He hanged Diling because he caused Eldon to be hanged 25 Dilling who killed a man by misfortune He hanged Oswin because he judged Fulcher to death out of Court 26 Oswin He hanged Muclin 27 Muclin because he hanged Helgrave by warrant of indictment not speciall He hanged Horne 28 Horne because he hanged Simin at daies forbidden He hanged Wolmer because he judged Graunt to death by colour of a Larcine of a thing 29 Wolmer which he had received by title of baylement He hanged Therberne because he judged Osgot to death for a Fact 30 Therbern whereof he was acquitted before against the same Plainetiffe which Acquittance he tendred
in all Actions and some not but in Felonies Every one may Answer without a Tutor who is not forbidden by the Law The Law forbiddeth Married women to Answer without their Husbands but then we are to put a difference in the Cases for if she be within the age of one and twenty yeares she is not admitted to Plead in any Case without her Husband but in Case where her dis-inheriting or that which doth amount to as much doth appeare by the malice or negligence of her Husband if she be of full age then she shall so Anawer alone in cases of death and Felony and so it is of men within the order of Religion and of Villaines and of all those who are in Custody and are not delivered CHAP. III. SECT 2. What Exception is and the order of Exception or Plea APlea or Exception is a thing alleadged for Answer either to delay or barre the Action And there are two manner of Exceptions Dillatories and Peremptories The order to Plead is such that the Peremptory Plea is in the highest degree or the Dillatory may have a recourse to the Peremptory but not è contra And of Dillatories some are principall and some are secondary and from the secondaries there is no recourse to the principalls and according to their degrees are they put in partly to helpe out remembrance And some Exceptions are in Counts in Replications and Re-joynders and so forth untill the truth be cleared in the proceedings of the Pleas whereby one may surely come to give cleare Judgements Voucher to warranty lyeth not in personall Actions although that averrements by Record and Minements and Witneffes availeth CHAP. III. SECT 3. Exceptions Dillatories THere are many Dillatory Exceptions whereof the first is to the Judge and that many waies one unto the power of the Judge and that may be in two kinds by reason of the two kinds of Jurisdictions or because the King or his Iudge Deligate hath no Power or Counsance in the Cause as it is of the person of a Clerke by reason of the Priviledges of the Church or because the ordinary Iudge hath not power or Counsans of a thing done out of his Iurisdiction nor any one within a Franchise of a thing done in guildable nor Kings nor those of one Country or of one Land of things done in another Land or Country CHAP. III. SECT 4 Of Exception of Clergy FOr the Priviledge of Clergy as if a Clerke be ordered in Court before a Lay Iudge to Answer to an Action for a personall Trespasse and especially in a Case criminall and mortall Plead that he is a Clerke the Iudge hath no further Counsans of the Cause for the Church is so enfranchised that no Lay Iudge can have Iurisdiction over a Clerke though the Clerke will acknowledge him for his Iudge and in such a case he is without delay to be delivered to his Ordinary Neverthelesse to give Actions to Plaintiffes against the Accessories in Appeales and Indictments it belongeth to the Iudge Ex officio to enquire by the Oathes of honest men in the presence of the Clerke whether he be guilty or not and if he be 〈◊〉 thereof then he is without delay to be delivered to his Ordinary and the Plaintiffe shall Sue against the Accessories in the Kings Court and in the Spirituall Court against the Clerke and the Clerke after his due Purgation made shall without delay have all his lands and moveables delivered to him CHAP. III. SECT 5. Replication of Bigamy THe Exception of Clergy is sometimes Counterpleadable by a Replication of Bigamy in this manner Sit he ought not to enjoy the benefit of this Priviledge for he hath forfeited the same by the sin of Bigamy as he who hath Married a widow or many wives and note that Matrimony is the lawfull Order of joyning together of a Christian man and woman by their assents and as of the Diety and Humanity of Christ there is made an undissolveable Unity so was Matrimony and according to such Unity was such coupling found to be and therefore none can remaine in that Unity who takes to himselfe a Plurality and of a Plurality ariseth this offence of Bigamy which offence draweth Clerkes nearer the Lay Power And note that Bigamy may be two waies one by a Plurality of 〈◊〉 Vives as he who Marrieth two wives or more the one after the death of the other or out-living the other the other is plurality of Husbands as well as wives as it is of a widow who suffereth her selfe to be Married to another man whether her widowhood came by the death of her Husband or by Divorce and because it belongeth to say in what point a Clerke is Bigamus the Bigamy is triable in the Lay Court if neverthelesse the Jury doubt thereof then the Ordinary is to certifie the same at the Command of the King as in the case of Matrimony when it is denyed On the other side a Clerke is incounterable by other Replications as he is for being a murderer or a notorious lyer or of such a condition as the Church is not to protect him against the Kings Peace CHAP. III. SECT 6. Exception to the Power of the Jadge AGainst the power of the Judge the Defendant may help himself by other Dillatory Pleas in this manner Sir I demand the sight and the hearing of the Commission whereby you claime Juriâ—diction over me and if the Judge doe not deny it or cannot shew it notwithstanding that no Judge Deligate is compelable to shew his power yet may the Party plead thus Sir I appeale from this Commission because it maketh no mention of the Cause for which I was brought to Judgement or not of that point Or because you have no Counsans in such a point or because it is vicious and that may be divers waies as if it be not sealed with the Kings Seale of the Chancery for none is tyed to yeeld obedience according to the Lawes and Customes of the Realme to the Kings Privy Seale or to the Seale of the Exchequer nor unto any other Seale but onely to the Seale which is assigned to be known of the common people and especially in Jurisdictions and Originall Writs if not for the King only Or it may be vicious because the Seale is counterfeited or falsified or because the King is not named in the Writ he not being out of the Kingdome not in Ward or because the Writ containeth Summons in the Action where it is personall or Attachment where the Action is mixt or reall or because the Seale is not fastned to the Parchment but one may remove it and take it from it at his pleasure Or because the Writ was brought too late or too soone Or because it hath rasure or enterlining and diversity of hands and of words or false Latine Or because the Writ is written upon Paper or Parchment which is forbidden Or for default found in the Writ as the omission or transposition of
that they come to the Lords And if any one denieth his service which he ought to do it may be said by the Lords that wrongfully he denieth either part or the whole and that to his wrong and so further count of seisin by his owne hand and that such is his right c. as after shall be said And the Tenant may choose to try his Right by his owne body or by another or joyne issue upon the Grand Assise And pray Conusans whether hee hath the better right to hould such land specified discharged of such service as he houldeth or the said A. to have the same Land indemesure as he claimeth And if the Defendant will try his Right by the body of another Then yee are to distinguish For if the Action be personall the Suit need not be present and if the Action bee Reall and the Tenant hath his Champion present Then may the Plainâ—ife offer his Champion against the Champion of the defendant or he shalloose his Covenant or his Writ And if the Defendant have nochampion then are the parties adjournable if they have joyned Battle that they have their Champions ready at the next Court as appeareth in the case of Saxeling to whom Hustan was bounded in a Bond of 10. li. by a writing Obligatory made at Rome which the said Hunstan denyed That it was not his deed To which Saxeling by way of Replication Answered That hee wrongfully denyed the same and that wrongfully for that he sealed it with his Seale or with the Seale of another which he borrowed of him such a day such a yeare and at such a place and that if he would deny it he was ready to prove it by the body of A. who saw it or by O. and C. who saw the same and if any hurt come to them he was ready to prove the same by another who could prove the same And so it appeareth that it is not needfull to have present Suit in such personall Actions the first day but the Parties may bee adâ—â—urned as it is said And if any one who cannot bee a fit witnesse or who is a Champion bee offered by one of the parties to combate who was not named before to make the Battle and the adverse partie there challenge him and demand Iudgement of the default in such such case the Iudgement is to be given against the profferer And if any ill happen to any of their Champions where by they cannot combate according to their proffer none is resceiveable to try the battle for him but only his eldeft sonne Lawfully begotten as by some is said And if the Tenants champion be vaâ—â—uished The Tenant thereby looseth all Homage and all Alliance and all Oathes of Fealty and all Homage betwixt him and the Lord and the Lord is to enter therein and to hold the same in demesue as if he had recovered by the Grand Assise And if the champion of the Lord be vanquished that them the Iudgement be that the Tenant hold his Land for ever quit of the service in the demand And if the King doth any wrong to any of his free men who hould of him in chiefe the same course is to be holden The Earles of Parliaments and the Commons have Iurisdiction to heare such causes and determine them because the King cannot by himselfe nor by his Iustices determine the Causes nor pronounce their Iudgment where the King is a partie And as the Lords may challenge their Tenants of wrong Or Injuries done to them against the Articles of their Fealtie In the like manner are the Lords challengeable of wrongs and Injuries done by them to their Tenants And if the Lords do not appeare to answer their Tenants Then are the Tenants to be adjudged thatâ—they doe no service for their Lands till the Lords have Answered CHAP. IIII. SECT 12. Of punishments PVnishment is a satisfaction for a Trespasse or an Offence There are two kinds of punishments Voluntarie and Violent Volantatie is that which bindeth the doer of his owne accord as it is in his Compromises to compell the people to keepe their Bargaines But with such punishments the Law medleth not with Of violent punishment wherewith the Law medleth there are two kindes Corporall and Pecaniarie Of Corporall some are Mortall and some Veniall Of Mortall some are by beheading some by drawing some by hanging some by burning alive some by falling from dangerous places and otherwise according to Auncient priviledges and Vsuages The Offences which require punishment of death are the mortall Offences Of Veniall punishments some are by losse of Member As the Fellony of Mayhem in case of wrong Of Member some by the losse of hand as it is of false Notories and of cutters of Purses with the Larcine of lesse then 12. d. and more then 6. d. which King Rich. changed some by cutting out of Tongues as it used to be of false witnesses some by beating some by Imprisonment some by losse of all their moveable goods and not moveable as of false Iudges and it is of userers attainted of usury after their decease but not if they bee attainted thereof in their life for then thy loose but only their moveables because by pennance and Repentance they may amend and have Heires Some by exile and abjuration of their Christianity or of the Realme of the Towne of the Mannor or the Land and their friends as it is of those who are attainted in personall Actions Venialls who are not able to make satisfaction Some by Banishment as it is in contempts in personall Actions Venialls some by other Corporall paines as it appeareth after its place And although one offend indeed or in word in all judgements upon personall Actions 7. things are to bee weighed in the ballance of Conscience that is to say 1. The cause 2. The petson 3. The place 4. The time 5. The Quality 6. The Quantity 7. The end 1. The cause whether it be mortall or veniall 2. The person the plaintiffe and defendant 3. The place whether in Sanctuary or not 4. The time whether in day or in the night 5. The Quality of the Trespaffe 6. The Quantity appeareth in it selfe 7. The end whether the taking were in manner of distresse by a justisiable importment Or in manner of Larine By Allienation unjustifiable CHAP. IIII. SECT 13. Of Insamous Persons ALL those who are rightfull attained of an Offence whereupon corporall punishment followeth are infamous Infamous ar all those who offend mortally or Fellouously all those who are perjured in giving false witnesse All false Iudges All false Vsurours and all those who are attainted of personall trespasses to whom open pennance is joyned by enjudgment of Law Those who Imprison a Free-man against his will or blemith the credit of his Franchise by extortion or by any purchase Those who also bring attaints and cannot prove the perjury whereby honest Iurours are slandered And those who indite or Appeale a man who is innocent of
at the prayer of the Plaintiffe may send the Warden of the Fleet to bring him before them to satisfie the party the money or otherwise commit him to the Fleet. And when he appeareth and will deny that he is the same person then Quaere what shall be done if the Justices may commit him to the Fleet or not And some say not for that they know him not as Judges but as other men by information of the parties and the Plaintiffe cannot mainetaine that he is the same person because he commeth not in but by information of the party Plaintiffe not by Processe of Law Quaere what is to be done in that case And see another difference betwixt the Judges of the one Bench and of the other for it is said That if the Judges of the Kings Bench doe award Processe in a Formedon a Writ of right or execution of Land recovered in value the Sheriffe ought to execute the Writs although they have not any jurisdiction therein But if the Judges of the Common Pleas will grant Processe of Treason c. out of their place the Sheriffe ought not to execute the Processe for that authority is onely of Common Pleas c. The chiefe Iustice of the Common Pleas is made by Patent viz. by these words Constitutimus iâ—â—â—mcapital Iusticiar nostrum de Coi Banco c. Habendum illud own feodis vadiis regardiis eidem officio debit conâ—suet And the other Iudges of the same Bench are made by Letters Patents c. The Chancery ANd note that the Court of Chancery is a Court of a high nature out of which Court issue all originall Writs and there a man shall traverse Offices and such things and in that Court women who are widowes to the King shall be sworne that they shall not marry without the Kings Licence before the time that they be endowed and it is said That of errour there upon a Patent or a Traverse the same cannot be reversed else where but in Parliament Quaere c. And in that Court a man shall have remedy for that which he hath no remedy at the Common Law and it is called by the common people The Court of Conscience And therefore see of matters in Conscience how the party shall have remedy If a man hath Feoffes to his use and maketh his Will and thereby willeth that his Feoffes should make an estate to I. for terme of his life the remainder to C. in Fee if the said I. will not take the estate what remedy is for him in the remainder in conscience and how he shall helpe himselfe in Chancery c. A man shall have remedy in Chancery for Covenants made without writings if the party have sufficient Witnesses to prove the Covenants and yet he is without remedy at the Common Law c. And for Evidences when a man knowes not the certainty of them nor in what they are contained it is usually to be releeved in Chancery for he is without remedy by the Common Law c. If a man infeoffeth another of certaine Lands to his use and the Feoffee selleth the Land to another if he giveth notice to the Vendee at the time of the sale of the intent of the first Feoffment he is bounden to performe the will of the first Feoffer as it seemeth in the Chancery A man was bounden unto another by Obligation in a certaine summe of money and the Oblgee brought an Action upon the same Deed in another County then where the Obligation was made and had Iudgement to recover and the Obligor in Chancery sued to be releeved and it was surmised that by that forraigne Suit he was outed of diverse Pleas which he might have had if the Action had been brought in the County where the Obligation was made and it was conceived a good matter to releeve him in equity In the Court of Chancery a man shall not be prejudiced by mispleading or for want of forme but according to the truth of the Cause judgement ought to be given according to equity and not Ex rigore juris And note that there are two jurisdictions Ordinary and Absolute Ordinary is as positive Law and Absolute is Omnibus modis quibus veritas sciri poterit If a man be bounden by Obligation unto two men unto the use of one of them and one of them viz. is he to whose use it is not releaseth to the Obligor all Actions so as the Obligation is discharged he to whose use the Obligation was made hath good remedy in Chancery by Subpoena against his companion who released him but against the Obligor it seemeth he hath no remedy for every man is bounden to helpe himselfe and it is lawfull for a man to get a discharge of that which he is charged withall and in danger to others And if a man hath recovered against another debt or damages and he hath paid the same without any Acquittance or without having a release and notwithstanding the party taketh execution against him upon the same Iudgement he shall have no remedy by the Common Law and it was then said by the Chancellor that he shall not have any remedy in equity in this case and if the same should be remedied in equity then every Record should be examined before him and thereby the Common Law overthrowne And if I doe infeoffee one upon trust and the Feoffee doth infeoffee another of the same Land upon trust Quaere if I shall have a Subpoena against the second feoffee but where he is infeoffed bona fide there the first Feoffer is without remedy against the second Feoffee as it seemeth It is said That the Chancellor of England wheresoever he shall be in England hath power to command a man to prison and he shall not be bayled Quaere whether the Iustices of the one Bench or of the other out of their Courts have the same authority or nor The Exchequer THe Court which is commonly called the Exchequer is properly for Accomptants Sheriffes Escheators and the like and there they are compellable to make their Accompts according to the usages and customes of the same Court c. and it seemeth to be a Court which is much for the Kings profit for there all remedies are provided how the debts and duties to the King shall be levyed And in that Court the Barons are Iudges betwixt the King and his Subjects and they are sworne thereunto and Fines Issues and Amercements which are assessed in other of the Kings Courts the estreates shall be made thereof to the Court of Exchequer and there they shall write forth Processe against the parties to answer thereunto and to satisfie the King what is due to him and of divers other matters they have power and authority by reason of their Office c. The Cinque Ports THere are also divers other Courts and inferiour places where Iustice is ministred and in those places they have Iudges as in the Cinque
who are not forbidden by the Law Infected Persons Iâ—iots Infants within age cannot accuse or be Plaintiffes without their Guardians nor Criminall Persons nor an Out-lawed exiled or banished Person nor a woman wayve nor a villaine without his Lord nor a Feme Covert without her Husband nor religious Persons without their Soveraignes nor Persons Excommunicate nor deafe nor dumbe Persons without their Guardians nor the Iudges of the Cases whereof they are Iudges nor any one who is nor of the Kings Allegiance so as he hath been more then forty daies within the Realme except Approvers who are suffered to accuse criminally people of his own condition in favour of the peace How lawfull men ought to complaine They ought in friendly manner to shew their offenders that is to say their Trespassours that they reconcile or amend themselves towards them and if they will not doe so and the Cause be Criminall then yee are to distinguish for if any one seeke revenge then it behoveth him to bring his Action by Appeale of Felony and if he seeketh only repaâ—ation of damages then he behoveth to bring his Action by Writ which is to containe the name of the King and of the Parties and the name of the Judge and of the County and the Plaint in the demand if the damages or the demand exceed forty shillings and if not then a Plaint sufficeth without a Writ And because all Suites of the Plaintiffes could not be determined upon the first preferring of the Suits nor the Suiters or Plaintiffes presently releeved in their Suits Therefore Kings used to goe from County to County every seaven yeeres to enquire of Offences and Trespasses and of wrongs done to themselves and to the Crowne and to the Common people and of all wrongs errours and negligences of their Officers and of all false Judgements of paines pardoned or wrongfully Iudged or outragâ—ously of Out-lawes returned and of their Receivers of the valewes of Counties out of Hundreds Towneâ— Manners and of moveable goods which belong to the King and to the Crowne of the Lands of Idiets of alienators of Fees of offences against the Kings Inhibition of Priviledges and Franchises prejudiciall to the Kings of Bridges and High-waâ—eâ— and of all other needfull Articles and they used to doe right to all Persons by themselves or by their Chiefe Justices and now Kings doe the same by the Iustices Commisfaries in Eyre assigned to hold all Pleas. Infante of such Eyres are Sheriff Turnes needfull and viewes of Franck-pledges and when the people by such Enquests were indicted of any mortall offence the King used to Condemnethem without Answers which usage still remaineth in Almaine but of pitty and mercy and because that man by reason of his frailty cannot keepe himselfe from sinne if he abstaine not from it by the Grace of God it was accorded that no Appelee or Indicter should be condemned without answer And Kings had no Jurisdiction but of mortall offences and of the rights of the Crowne and of their owne rights and of the wrongs of their Ministers and of wrongs done against Common Law and Common Ordinances and the Articles of Eyres CHAP. 2. SECT 4. Of Rewards and Fees KIngs used to give Rewards to the cheife of the Stock and to all those who faithfully served them and from the Rewards of Kings others tooke example to reward their servants and because no Free-man was bouden to serve against his will by reason whereof none were bound to serve the King or any other but by the service of his Fee or by reason of his Residence or dwelling in another Fee some are bound to serve the King for a certainty by the yeare And it is not lawfull for those Officers who take wages certaine of the King to take any wages of the people But the Iudges who serve the King it is lawfull for them to take twelve pence of the Plaintiffe after the hearing of the Cause and no more although there be two Iudges or two Plaintiffes in one Action and the Pleader six pence and a Knight sworne a witnesse foure pence and every Iurour foure pence and the two Sumners foure pence Nevertheresse in the time of King Henry the 1. It was Ordained and assented unto That Iurours sworne upon Enquests of Office as in Assizes Recognisances of Assizes Redissessins â—ertisicates of Assize and Attaints and other the like should not take Fees because they did the same Ex officio and to answer these monies and the damages are the Defendants chargeable if Iudgement be given against them And to those who followed any Suit for the Kings profit and were not any of his Ministers â—ing Henry the â— gave to them the twentieth part of the profit with their reasonable â—oâ—â— In like manner the Iudge was not to heare the Plaintiffes Cause if he put not in security to answer his Adversaries damages if he complaine of him wrongfully CHAP. II. SECT 5. Of Countorr or Plaaders THere are many who know not how to defend their Causes in Iudgement and there are many who doe and therefore Pleaders are necessary so that that which the Plaintiffes or Actors cannot or know not how to do by themselves they may doe by their Serjeants Atturnies or friends Countors are Serjeants skilfull in the Lawes of the Realme who serve the common people to declare and defend Actions in Iudgement for those who have need of them for their fees Every Pleader of others Causes ought to have a regard to foure things 1. That there be a person receiveable in Iudgement that he be no Heretique Excommunicate Person nor Criminall nor a man of Religion nor a woman nor within the Orders of a Subdeacon nor a Benificed Clerke who hath cure of Soules nor under the age of 21. yeares nor Iudge in the same Cause nor attainted of falsity in his place 2 Another thing is That every Countor is chargeable by Oath that he shall doe no wrong not falsity contrary to his knowledge but shall plead for his Cliant the best he can according to his understanding 3 The third thing is that he put no false Dilatories into Court not false Witnesses not move or offer any false corruptions deceits leasings or false lyes not consent to any such but truly maintaine his Clyents cause so that it faile not by any negligence or default in him not by any threatning hurt or villany disturbe the Judge Plaintiffe Serjeant or any other in Court whereby he hinder the right or the hearing of the Cause 4 The fourth thing is as his Sallery concerning which four things are to be regarded 1. The greatnesse of the Cause 2. The paines of the Serjeant 3. His worth as his Learning eloquence and gists 4 The usage of the Court. A Pleader is suspendable when he is attainted to have received sees of two Adversaries in one Cause and if he say oâ— doe any thing in dispite or contempt of the Court and if he fall under any of the
a personall Trespasse and requireth a personall punishment and not a simple Amercement CHAP. V. SECT 4. Articles upon the Statute of Westminster the first MAny Chapters are reproveable of the Statute of Westminster For the points touching religious Persons are matter to gaine monies and a purchase upon a foundation of covetousnesse more then for their advantage The Chapter of Clerkes found guilty of felony is reproveable for for want of addition of punishment these Clerkes are not to be delivered to Ordinaries but at the pleasure of the King and of his Justices The Chapter of Wreck is reproveable in as much as the finder is forjudged by the Statute to have part thereof whereas he ought to have part of the profit and so it is reproveable as to the awarding of the punishment Of the points of Amercements is before spoken in the Great Charter The point of takings of distresse is much reproveable Cap. 9. as before is said The Chapter concerning pursuing of Felons to maintaine the Peace is reproveable in the punishment for he is consenting to a Felon who doth not apprehend him when he may In the same manner is it of the Chapter of Coroners contained in the Articles following The point of Election of Coroners was not needfull to have been ordained Cap. â— for it behoveth more the Electors to have wise and loyall Coroners then to the King and it had better have been enacted that the Coroners doe present the points of their Office under the Seales of the Jurours then Sheriffes should make counter parts of the Rolls The point of Enquest of Odio aria is reproveable Cap. 12. for London and other places in Liberties where there are no Knights The point of putting people found guilty of felony who will not put themselves upon the Country to pennance it is out of use that one kill them without having regard to the conditions of the Persons and therein it is reproveable since one may perhaps helpe and acquit himselfe otherwaies then by his Country and in as much as none is to be put to Pennance before he be attainted of the offence for which he ought to be pained The Ordinances of punishments of long imprisonment are to be reprehended as before is said The point of the order of Outlawry of the principalls before the Accessories is no Statute but a revocation of errour The point of Replevisalls is reproveable according as it is said of Actions the punishment of long imprisonment containe Errour as is said before The punishment of Heites males Married as against the King without the consent of their Lords betwixt 14. yeares and 21. yeares is reproveable for then the King should have amends for that for which he hath not any personall Suit for the amends The point of Heires females containeth Errour as appeareth in the reprehension of the point of Marriages in the Great Charter The point of tortious Distresses ought to contain the punishment for the robbery The punishment of Ministers Disseisors by colour of their Office is reproveable for the smalnesse of it as appeareth amongst the Judgements The point which forbiddeth Sheriffes that they take no rewards is reproveable in as much as the King taketh of them and they take nothing of the King The point of Fines of Clerkes and the officers of Justices in Eyre is reproveable for the common grievance of the people without taking of profit The points of imprisonment are reproveable for the reasons aforesaid and the point of Tolls for the punishment of imprisonment and because Tolls are not established certaine The point which willeth that those who dis-use Marriages should lose them was not needfull to have been made for the Law is that he shall lose his Franchise who useth it not The point of the Receivers of the Kings monies and not rendring the same is reproveable for the smallnesse of the punishment according to that which appeareth before The Errours of taking of Carriages and other goods appeareth sufficiently by the reasons before The point which forbiddeth Judgement to be given by Strangers in Counties is reproveable for no Iudgement given by another then an ordinary Judge assigned is to hold The point which maketh mention of Robbery or Disseisins is reproveable for all those are to be seised upon who the Jurours indict of Robbery according to the example of Theeves and other Felons The point of Attaint is reproveable for it should not extend to one case but it ought to comprchend all Oathes taken by twelve men if one of the Parties complaine thereof The point of limitations of Actions is reproveable for the reasons in the Chapter given upon the same matter The point which forbiddeth falsities and abuses used in Courts before this time to false Judges who used not the Law by sufferance of falsities The point of Champions is reproveable for no Champion is to be receiveable as a witnesse The point of not allowing Essoignes in Assizes after appearance is reproveable by the Assize of Novel disseisin where no Essoigne is allowable for the Tenants no more before appearance then after not in no other personall Action The other points of Essoignes are reproveable for no false cause of Essoigne ought to advantage any man The point of delaies in Pleas of Attachment is reproveable in many points accordingas appearethin the chapter of defaults The point to plead upon the surcharge falleth in prejudice of Sheriffes and of Lords of Fees and of Liberties and although the two points of Disseisins that is to say that every one may avoid the damages in the point of personall trespasse done to his Ancesters in as much as his Action lyeth of what age soever the Parties be yet is the first reproveable for as much as the Plaintiffes have no recovery for the damages done to their Ancestors not any Action but to have restitution of the possession The other point is reproveable for the smallnesse of the punishment but according to common right this punishment should have time that he should never doe Homage betwixt them for the Lords forfeiture when he beginneth to dis-inherite his Tenant contrary to the right of Homage The Prayer of the King is reproveable because he ought to aske nothing contrary to Law but it is the prayer of the Justices who desire alwaies to have much to doe The point that if he who is vouched to warranty ought not to warrant although he be bounden by the deed of his Ancestor whose Heire he is in case he alledge that nothing descended to him from that Ancestor by whose deed he is â—ouched is reproveable for according to the old Law Lands remained liable to the Debt of those who acknowledged it to whose hands soever the Lands afterwards came In the same manner it used to be in all other Contracts where the Contracts were adjudged or granted and although nothing descended to the Heire for that he lost not the Tenements for want of Acquittance and if
possessory as Writs of Entre Assize of Mortdamester Cosinage and the like c. And it may also be divided into Actions personals as Debt Trespasse Detinue c. and into Actions mixt as into Assizes and Actions of wast which are as well in the realty as in the personalty A personall plea may be divided into two parts one into a meere personall plea as an Action of debt detinue where none hath interest but the parties themselves the Plaintiffe and the Defendant And the other part is mixt in the Crowne the Plaintiffe and the Defendant have not the sole interest in those Actions but the King hath an interest in them also to have a fine as in an Action of Trespasse Vi armis and that is an Action mixt with the pleas of the Crown c. And note that in matters of the Crown for such for which a man shall suffer death some may be principalls and some accessories as Murder Felony Rape and the like but in High Treason I conceive all are principalls in petit treason there may be principall and accessory as well as in felony In a Premunire all are principalls and in cutting out of Tongues and putting out of Eyes there may be an accessory as well as a principall as is said c. In Robbery all are principalls who are present at the time of the Robbery done otherwise it is in Murâ—et for if one be present and doth nothing he is an accessory and not a principall c. In Mayhem some say that all are principalls as well he who is comforting and abetting as he who giveth the Mayhen as it is in Trespasse tamen quaere for I conceive the Law to be contrary c. And it was said That if a man be present at the death of a man and moveth another to kill the man that he is a principall notwithstanding that he giveth him not any stroke and notwithstanding that the Count in every Appeale is That every principall did mortally strike and wound him c. but those are words of forme and the blow of him who struck is the stroke of him who commanded him when he was present And it is to know that for such things for which a man deserveth death there are two waies to bring him to answer the same one by Appeale which is at the Suit of the party the other is by way of Indictment which is at the Kings Suit c. And for a Mayhem the party shall have an Appeale of Mayhem wherein he shall recover damages and no death shall follow c. and see the Appeale following and first of the Appeale of the death of a man c. An Appeale of Murder IH hic instanter appellat W. F. de morte H. C. fratris sui per eo quod cum predict H. fuit in pace Dei Dom. regis apud D. tali die hora anno tibi venit W. F. uti felo Dom. Regis in assultu premeditat vi armis c. Et in ipsum H. ad tunc ibid. felonicè insultum feoit cum quodam gladio precii 12. d. quem ipse in manu sua dextra ad tunc ibidem tenuit predict H. super caput sunt percussit unam plagam mortalem in longitudine duorum poduwn in auteriori parte Capitis suo usque ad cerebrum eidem H. adhunc ibid. felonicè dedit de qua quidem plaga pred H. per 3. dies kunc proximè sequentes languebat tunc ibid. obiit or imediate obiit Et sic idem Ichanes ut felo Dom. Regis pred H. folonicè interfecit mundravit contra pacem dicti Dom. regis Coronam dignitatem suas quod hoc feo it nequite ut felo contra pacem Dei Dom. Regis pred Iohannes offert hoc disrationar prout curià Dom. Regis hic censideravit c. And it seemes the Appeale of Murder ought be be brought within the yeare and a day after the death of him who is murdered and in an Appeale the party hath two issues to put himselfe upon the Jury to try if he be guilty or not or to wage Battaile and to make the Battaile with the Appellant and if he doe gage Battaile he ought to designe the battaile in his proper person and by no Champion But it is otherwise in a Writ of right c. And there are divers causes to ouste the Defendant in the appeale of Battaile for it is said That if an Infant within age bringeth an Appeale and the Defendant sheweth that he is within age c. the Justices have been of opinion that he shall be put to answer the Appeale of the Appellant being within age and the Defendant hath lost the advantage to wage the Battaile because it was his owne Act. And I conceive that if a Woman bringeth an Appeale of the death of her Husband against another the Defendant shall lose the advantage of Battaile for he cannot Combate or deraigne the Battaile with a Woman c. And if a party be indicted of the Felony or Murder c. he shall not wage battaile And see that in an Appeale of the death of a man against two the one as Principall and the other as Accessory and they waged Battaile and the Plaintiffe demurred upon the plea and it was said That the Accessory should not be put to answer till the Principall was attainted or acquitted yet it is said That the Accessory should answer presently but the issue should not be tryed till the Principall were attainted or acquitted and if the Principall be acquitted the other issue should not be tryed And I conceive that in every case of Felony where a man is indicted as Principall and afterward hath his pardon or forjureth the Realme that in those cases and the like the Accessory shall not be arraigned because that when the Principalls life is pardoned in what manner soever it be the Felony is determined and by consequence acquitted and by the same reason the accessory is discharged But Quaere what the Law is if the Principall have his Clergy And see that where there are three Brothers and the middlemost killeth his eldest Brother the youngest Brother shall have the Appeale and yet he is not his Heire The same Law where the eldest Brother killeth his Father the youngest shall have the Appeale if there be but two Brothers And where the Wife killeth her Husband the Heire shall have the Appeale as it is said Quaere what the Law is in the cases before c. And the Processe in an Appeale of death is one Capias and one Exigent c. but in an appeale of Robbery an appeale of Rape and Mayhem the Processe is two Capias and one Exigent c. And note that a man can never have an appeale of Robbery Rape or Mayhem by discent for the same shall never discend but it is otherwise of Murder And also note that
the appeale shall not abate if in the Declaration be the yeare day and other time when the Felony was done and it shall not abate for want of Fresh-suit if it be not within the yeare and the day and that is by the Statute of Gloucester c. In an Appeale if the Defendant plead that the Plaintiffe is a Bastard and he is certified to be mulier yet the Defendant shall be received to plead not guilty because at the beginning when he alleadged Bastardy he might have pleaded over to the Felony because he demanded another tryall for the one is tryable by the Record and the other by Enquest But of such matter which is tryable by Enquest if he pleadeth to the Felony all the same shall be tryed by one Tryall and by one Enquest In an Assize if the Tonant alledge Basterdy in the Plaintiffe and the Bishop doth certifie muliarity yet the Assize shall be taken to enquire of the seisin and disseisin quaere And quaere if a man in an appeale plead a plea which is tryable in another County if he shall plead over to the Felony because he demandeth two Tryalls Appeale of Robbery THe Writ of Appeale of Robbery beginneth thus A. B. nuper de London generosus attackiatus fuit ad respondendum R. F. generoso simal cum D. nuper de F. in suburbiis London de robberia pace demini regis nunc fracta unde eos appellat sunt plegii de prosequend A. D. et C. Et unde idem R. in propria persona suo instanter appellat pred C. A. de eo quod ubi idem R. fait in pace dei et Domini Regis nunc apud London viz. in parochia sancti Dunstani in Fleetstreet in suburbiis Londonj or apud talem villam in tali Comitatu 20. Octobris Anno Regni Regis nunc 17. circa horam septimam post meridiem ejasdem diei venurunt tam pred W. I. et K. qui modo non comparent quam pred A. qui modo comparet felonicè ut felones Dom. Regis nunc insidiando et insalt praemedatas contraâ— pacem Regis nunc coronam et dignitatem suns die anno hora parochia et wardo pred or villa et com prelict Et pred W. unam galeam precii 26. s. 8. d. et unam crateram argenteam et deauratum precii 40. s. de bonis et catallis pred R. ad tunc ibid. invent felonicè furatus est caepit et asportavit Et pred C. A. et I. K. die anno parochia et warda pred or vile et comitatu pred felonicè confoâ—taverunt sustentaverunt et auxaliaverunt pred W. ad feloniam pred in forma pred faciend et perpetrand ac eum tunc et ibidem ad feloniam illam factam sciente eum feloniam illam sic fecisse receptaverunt Et quam citò idem felones felonias predictas in formâ— predicta fecissent fugierunt predictus R. eos recenter insequitus fuit de warda in wardam if the Appeale be brought in London or de villa In villam if it be brought in any County usque ad quatuor wardas propinquiores Et alterius quousquae et c. Et si predictus felo qui modo comparet feloniam predictam vult contradicere predict R. hoc paratus est verificare et versus eum probare prout curiae c. And the like Declaration is in burning of Houses and of Burglary mutatis mutandis And the Defendant in this Appeale shall have the same tryall as he shall have in the appeale before rehearsed to put himselfe upon the issue tryable by the Enquest or to wage Battaile if he pleaseth But there are certaine things which shall put the same from that advantage that he shall not wage Battaile c. viz. If the Defendant be indicted of the same felony c. and if the Plaintiffe be may hemed by the Defendant or by another as I conceive or if the Defendant be taken in the manner or if the Plaintiffe be within age or above the age of forty yeares or if the Plaintiffe be a woman or the like And note that if the appeale of Murder Robbery or Rape be brought in the Kings Bench and issue be taken before the Justices of Assize if the Plaintiffe be non-suit they have not power to arraigne the Defendant but if the appeale be brought before them and afterwards the Plaintiffe is Non-suit it is otherwise as it is said And there is another difference when a man is arraigned at the Kings Suit and when at the Suit of the party for if he be arraigned at the Kings Suit he shall be put to answer the Felony whether he be of that name or of another name and it shall be no plea for him to say That he is not of that Sir-name nor knowne by such a name but by another name for if a man killeth another and is indicted thereof he shall answer to the Felony and shall not be admitted to plead misnosiner but if it be at the Suit of the party it is otherwise as if a man bring an appeale against another there he shall be admitted to have the plea and that is the difference Note that if a man bringeth an appeale of the death of a man who hath lawfull cause to have the appeale and after Declaration he is Non-suit the Defendant shall be arraigned a new at the Kings Suit but if the Heire of the dead sueth the appeale his Wife being alive and after Declaration the Heire is Non-suit the Defendant shall not be arraigned a new at the Kings Suit because that none could Sue the appeale but the Wife and so the Declaration was withâ—â—t warrant And quaere how that matter may appeare to the Court. And if one be acquitted in Appeale or indictment where in there is no errour in the Originall he shall be arraigned De novo at the Kings Suit although that errour be in the Capias or Exigent But if errour be in the Originall and he is acquitted he shall be arraigned De novo at the Suit of the King because that his Arraignment was never warranted but without warrant for when the King is assertained of a Felon and of the day and yeare if the Felon be not lawfully acquitted of the same Felony he shall be arraigned at the Kings Suits But if he be once lawfully acquitted of the Felony he shall never put his life in hazard againe for the same Felony if it be not for Murder in which case it is said That if a Murderer be acquitted within the yeare at the Kings Suit he may be afterwards in an appeale arraigned within the yeare at the Suit of the party c. And if an appeale of Murder be brought before the Sheriffe and Coroner in the County it is said That it may be removed into the Kings Bench by a Writ which shall be directed to he Coroner and not to the Sheriffe because that