by default against her and her husband had not any other remedy then a Writ of Right before the Statute of W. 2. cap. 3. which gives a Cui in vita and before W. 2. cap. 3. a faint Recovery against Tenant for life bound him in Remainder Litl Release 112. because the Law presumes the Title and case true So a Recovery upon a faint Title by a man of Religion was out of the penalty of the Statute of Religiosis untill W. 2. cap. 23. made a Recovery without Title in such plight as a Feoffment in Mortmain was for the truth supposed by the Law to be therein So here the Recovety is intended to be true and therefore the Plaintiff ought to shew matter if there be any to prove the contrary As in 11. H. 4.19 if the Tenant in a precipe vouch one of the Demandants he ought to shew cause because otherwise the Law will presume that he hath not cause against right So 15. E. 4.4 Contrary entry by Title general averment of Covin by the Plaintiff in Dower was not held good Matter in Law As to the matter in Law it seemeth here that the case is clear out of the words and penalty of the Statute of 11. H. 7. cap. 30. For although 27. H. 8. hath executed the Possession to the use yet this case remains here so as if 27. H. 8. had never been made and the Wife had continued Tenant in Tail in use and out of the words of the first branch because he hath an Estate Tail in the use in the land but hath not an Estate in the land in the use and the Statute speaks of an Estate in the Land and this Hereditament or use which is the matter and substance and the use it self which is the confidence of the thing differ But one may not have the state in Land and use also because suspended yet two may to the use of one of them as Husband and Wife to the use of the Wife and so it shall be intended here Also the first branch speaks of lands c. of Inheritance or purchase of the Husband but here the use is a new thing which Commenceth now and was not in being before and so is not the inheritance or purchase of the Husband and therefore out of the Statute as a Rent granted to one out of lands to the use of the Wife of the Grantor or if the Husband gives a signiory in Tail to the Wife for her Joyncture and the Tenancie Escheat and the Wife suffer a faint Recovery this is forth of the Statute So the Husband makes a Feoffment upon Condition to re-enfeoffee him and his Wife in Tail the Wife suffers a faint Recovery this is out of the Statute because the Feoffment of the Land from the Possession of the Husband and was her purchase and not the purchase of the Husband or his Inheritance for the Condition which is the cause of the gift is a new thing is not within the second branch because the Wife had nothing here of the gift of any of the Ancestors of the husband Nor the third branch because the wife had not possession by the Statute nor by the Feoffees to the use of him in Reversion but he in Reversion hath the present Title and so the Statute shall be intended and therefore he may enter presently If Tenant for Life suffer a faint Recovery but 11. H. 7. saith Enjoy according to their Title intends that he shall not Enter until after the death of his Ancestor because he hath no Title in the life of his Ancestor And therefore when the Wife assents to the Ravisher 6. R. 2. gives title of entry saying habeat titulum intrandi c. intends that he shall not have it in the life of the Ancestor And if the makers of the Statute of 11. H. 7. had intended that the issue in Tail should have entred presently they would have given to him Title by such like words as the Statute of 6. R. 2. hath but the end of the clause which saith That they shall enjoy according to their Title expresses that they intented not so For which causes it is probable that the Defendant is out of the penalty of the Statute and that the Plaintiff might not enter and so shall be Barred Whiddon Serjeant for the Plaintiff Because the Defendant hath said whose Heir he is he shall be taken that he is Heir special for a Plea which hath two intendments shall be taken most strongly against him which pleads it as 3. H. 7.2 in Trespass Release generally is no Plea because it may be taken to be delivered before the Trespass or after So 3. H. 7.8 and 9. and 26. H. 8. Entry to avoid Warranty Collaterall pleaded in Bar is no Plea because it may be intended after the discent for he may enter in the life of the Ancestor or after Also the Plaintiff need not shew how he is Heir because he was once seised by entry But if he had brought a formedon upon the Estate Tail he should because by way of Demand as 6. E. 4.1 Executor brought Trespass for a thing taken out of his Possession he shall not shew his Testament but if he Demands a thing whereof he had not ever possession he shall It is not needfull to shew Covin certainly which is a secret thing and the Law doth not enforce one to shew a thing when by intendment of Law it lieth not in his Conusance as 20. H. 7.7 A woman shall have Dower of a Rent Charge without shewing the Deed of the Grant because it belongeth not to her So the Lord shall have Covin generally for the Ward where his Tenant aliens and re-taketh for life the Remainder to his Heir being it lieth secretly in the breast as suspicion lieth for that he may justisie imprisonment for suspicion of Felony without shewing of the cause of his suspicion So 33. H. 6.5 In Trespass a man buys in a Market Overt the Plaintiff said That the said buying was by fraud between the Defendant and a stranger generally without shewing any thing speciall of the Covin and the Plea the e admitted good So in a Precipe against the Lord of ancient Demeasne and Tenant the Lord shall shew that he is Lord and this Action is brought against him by Covin generally So 9. E. 6.41 He which alleadges Covin ought to shew cause of the Covin and the cause is for that the Recovery or Title was tryed by Verdict because to say that it was by Covin shall not be intended true against a Verdict But Covin generally may be averred against a Recovery not gainsaying or default because this is cause of the Judgement and no Triall Wherefore in this case a man shall aver that this was by Covin generally And as to that which hath been said That execution ought to be shewed of the Recovery that needs not For the Statute speaketh only of the Recovery and without Execution it shall be
end and expiration of the first Term of years the Lessor maketh a Lease for life to the first Lessee for years during the first Term and the second Lessee Enters and upon an Ouster bringeth Ejectione firme and by the Court it well lyeth 1. By the Law by a Grant of the reversion of the Farm the Farm and all the Demeasnes of it pass because it is nomen collectivum and certain in its self and so it was adjudged in the case of Bridges That by the Demise of the Farm the reversion and rent incident to it passeth 2. That the word Reversion shall be intended land reverting in the premisses and the habendum and not the estate in reverter which hath his continuance but in respect of the Term and during it it is a Grant of the reversion habendum the farm or land or reversion after the particular estate ended are all one 3. That the second Lease for years commencing by any determination of the first Lease whether it be in Law or in Deed and the expiration refers to the Term and not to the years Term is an estate in or for years and is finished when the estate is finished and this may finish when the years remain If a man marry with a woman Termor and the woman dies her husband shall have the Term for notwithstanding that the marriage hath not divested this out of the woman during coverture yet by her death this is given to the husband by Act in Law because it is a thing in possession and not in Action The Law is the Common use in Letters Pleas and Judgements and the Common Law is but common use by Anthony Brown fol. 195. Stradling against Morgan EXceptions alleadged in arrest of Judgement 2 El. Exchequer debt upon not guilty pleaded by the Defendant and found against him 1. The Plantiff hath shewed in his Declaration That the Defendant was then receiver c. and saith not That the Mannors were the Queens then and therefore shall be intended more strong against him then it should be to a common person and by consequence the Defendant is Baily to a common person by the Court. 2. That no receiver or Baily accomptant of a common person shall be within the Statute of 7. E. 6. c. 1 but onely of the Queen by the Court. 3. That the Action was not maintainable and the matter well alleadged lieth in the Queens Courts at Westminster notwithstanding the Statute of 34. and 35. H. 8. for Wales for that they are in the Affirmative and not in the Negative 4. That by this Statute an Action of debt by original Writ lieth for the forfeiture in the Exchequer howbeit that the party hath not cause of priviledge there 5. The Plaintiff ought to make mention of the Statute of 38. H. 8. and 7. E. 6. in his count for that the one is founded upon the other 6. He ought to shew expresly in his Count That the Queen was seized and made him her Bedel 7. Jeofails remedies not mispleadings in counts adjudged in Moon and Cliffords case In Debt the Plaintiff counts That whereas he was Bedel and Collector of certain Mannors by vertue of Letters Pattents of H. 8. and had a Fee for it the Defendant being Receiver of the said Mannor in 3. and 4. P. and M. took extortion for the payment of his Fee viz. 4. d. for every pound against the form of the Statute of 7. E. 6. the Defendant pleads not guilty and found against him And yet judgement given against the Plaintiff because the Count was incertain to whom he was Receiver and shall be intended against him then done to a Common person and a Receiver of a Common person is not within 7. E. 6. yet within the words for the intent of the makers shall be observed in the exposition of Statutes and so acts general in words have been expounded to be but particular where the benefit hath been particular As the King shall not have Wardship of lands which discends to the youngest Son but of that which discends to the heir general 12. E. 4. Stamford fol. 8. yet the Tenant dyed seized of others in Fee because the Statute of Praerogativa regis cap. 2. intends where the land is holden of the King and a Common person discended to the same Heir where one is Heir to the Tenant And Praerogativa Regis cap. 3. intends not that Soccage in capite shall give to the King primer seisen of lands holden of a Common person yet the words are general before fol. 109. Stamford Prerogative fol. 13. So Marlebr cap. 4. intends where Signiory and Tenancie are in the same County and therefore the Lord may bring a Distress taken in one County to a Mannor in another County of which the land is holden 1. H. 6.3 30. E. 3.6 before fol. 18. So Glouc. cap. 1. giveth Damages to the Disseisee against him which is found Tenant after the Disseisor for that he is Tenant by his own agreement and therefore the Disseisee shall not recover Damages against him which agrees not to a Feoffment made to him and others by the Disseisor yet he is Tenant but not Tenant by his agreement Litl Remitter fol 153. so long 5. E. 4. fol. 142. if he hath view in a precipe and afterwards abates the Writ for false Latine or for some other cause apparent he shall again have another Writ because there the Court might have abated this without motion For W. 2. cap. 49. although general intends where the Tenant abates the Writ by exception not apparent by 25. E. 3. cap. 16. by non-tenure of parcel no Writ abateable but for the quantity intends if the thing demanded be several as Acres but all the Writ shall abate where the thing demanded is entire as a Mannor before fol. 109. and the intent of the Statute never was contrary to the Text. By W. 2. cap. 25. if one fail of a Record he shall be a Disseisor yet a woman Covert shall not be 11. H. 4.50 nor infant because excepted by the intent yee in words hath included all So extenders shall not pay presently according to the words of Acton Burnel which ought to answer presently c. but shall be debtors presently with the duty and chargeable with the payment and daies payable of the rent or Revenues receiveable So by Exposition it seems against the Text of the Statute and is not because the intent of the makers guides them to it Of the part of the Defendant it was argued That the Action shall be sued there in Wales where the receipt is alleadged although that Wales is united to England by 27. H. 8. because by the same Statute Wales is divided into 12. Counties and by 34. and 35. H. 8. four Justices are appointed for wales viz. one for every three Counties and hold plea of all things within their circuit and one seal appointed for every circuit and all Actions suable there by the words of
Remainder to the right Heirs of I. S. in Life passes from the Lessor presently although it vests not presently but here the Remainder passeth not presently because the Condition precedes the Remainder as 15. H. 7. 1. if A. Grant to B. That when he is promoted to a Benefice or do such an Act he shall have an Annuity there he shall shew his Promotion if he demands his Annuity because it is a Condition precedent and to him which maketh the Grant but if he Grants an Annuity until he be promoted there he shall not shew it because the Promotion is subsequent to the Annuity and will defeat the Annuity and therefore it shall be shewed by the other party which is contray So 7. E. 3.10 A Lessee for eight years rendring 10. s. yearly and if he holdeth over to him and his heirs an action of Debt is maintainable during the Term for the Rent is a Chattle because the Fee passeth not presently for that the Condition precedes the Fee So 6. R. 2. a Lease to two for years upon Condition That if the Lessee aliens within the Term or die he shall have Fee it is holden that the Fee passeth not presently because the Condition precedes it which Cases prove That the Remainder passes not out of the Lessor at the time of the Livery albeit that the Condition precede the Remainder and proves also That the Remainder Commenceth upon Condition and proves also That the Remainder is appointed to begin after the Commencement of the particular Estate the which is contrary to the grounds of Law and therefore and for the said other causes the Remainder shall be void And so for the insufficiencie of the matter of the Bar and Form also the Plaintiff shall recover Cook Serjeant to the contrary As to the two Exceptions which have been moved That the Plea is not good because he shews not that he hath been resiant after the deaths of the Husband and Wife alwaies nor what day he entred Sir I take it That it shall be taken that he entred immediately after the death of the Husband and Wife for the Defendant hath pleaded by way of Bar and if the Bar hath matter of substance and is good to a common intent it sufficeth although it be not good to every special intent and therefore in the Case of 33. H. 6. fol. 24. where the Defendant pleads That the Testator made the Plaintiff and one R. his Executor Judgement c. The Plea was good without shewing that he was made after that the Plaintiff was made sole Executor because it shall be intended after So 10. H. 7. 15. by Keble in Trespas the Defendant pleads his Free-hold good because good by Common intendment yet the Plaintiff might have an Estate for years and it may stand with his Bar and by which he may punish the default but such special matter will not be intended So 6. E. 4.1 in Debt upon an Obligation the Defendant saith That he hath done such things as was contained in the Indenture and at Issue and found for the Plaintiff and spoken to in Arrest of Judgement because the Defendant said not that the two Covenants were all and so had not alleadged the performance of all but held good because by Common intent there shall not be intended more then two Covenants if the Plaintiff shew not the contrary So 3. H. 6.4 in Formedon he gave not prima facie a good Bar because it intends a general gift and yet it may be That the Land was recovered in value and then the Plea is not apt for other Land was given So 3. H. 6.3 In Debt nothing in their hands pleaded by Executors good yet it may be that other goods first not the Testators at the day of his death are come to their hands in place instead of other goods So 21. H. 6.17 In Assise the Defendant was in by discent where he had a mean Title which tolled the Assise of the other shall not be void by the said recovery but this shall not be intended without shewing so discent and entry in Bar good yet it may be that a stranger abated and dyed seised and the Heir could not enter but if shall not be intended without shewing specially but when a thing Commenceth in respect of the time then the certainty of the time shall be shewed fol. 24.27.33 as 20. H. 7.12 by Rede A Servant which demanded 20. s. Sallary for his service by the year ought to shew the expiration of the year because the Action is given in respect of the year past and the time is parcell of the cause of the Demand and precedes the Demand but here the time pursues the Remainder and is not cause of the Remainder and therefore we ought to shew it so certainly as where time gains a thing for here it goeth in defeasance of the thing and therefore the Bar is good notwithstanding the said two Exceptions besides it seemeth to me the Remainder is good For first he hath an Estate here upon which the Remainder may be grounded here the remainder is appointed thereupon but the cause wherefore the Remainder shall not be good is alleadged in two great points viz. because the Fee passeth not presently forth of the Lessor and also for that the Remainder cannot pass upon Condition And it seems to me That the Remainder passeth out of the Lessor presently howbeit that it vests not presently as in Litl 81. A Lease for five years if he pay within the first two that then he shall have Fee the Fee passeth out of the Lessor presently so the Remainder to the right Heirs of I. S. in life and a Remainder may Commence upon Condition as a Lease for life upon Condition That I. S. Marry my Daughter during the state for Life which shall remain to him is good because he hath an Estate upon which it may be grounded So 34. E. 3. Devise for Life upon Condition That if the Heir to whom the Reversion discends disturbs Tenant for Life or his Executors of their Administration That then the Land shall remain to the Daughter of the Devisor and to her Heirs and dyeth Tenant for Life dyeth the Son of the Daughter brings his Formedon against the Heir because he disturbs the Tenant and also the Executors of the Tenant traverse it and at issue and upon this issue is joyned which should not have been so if the Remainder had not been good Also if Assent as 18. E. 4. 12. by Catesby ante 8. post 31. to the Diseisen made before to anothers use may Traverse the Free-hold from one to another à fortiori a condition may namely where the Franck-Tenement precedes to which a Condition may be annexed Morgan Serjeant for the Plaintiff The Plea is not good because it doth not shew the day in certain of the death of W. nor of the Husband and Wife but he argued not this Also it is not good because he shewed not the
intent shall aid the obscurity of the words in Construction of words but if it be not within the words yet it shall be taken by equity because it restrains Liberty that the Common Law gave to the prejudice of another as here of Tenant in Tail to bind their issues by recovery or Warranty So Marlebridge cap. 6. speaks of a Lease for years for to defraud the Lord of Ward yet if it were for Life or in Tail taken by equity So W. 2. cap. 1. speaks of 3. gifts in Tail yet 4. H. 5.6 and 19. H. 6.74 comprise by equity all manner of intails because it restrains liberty of breaking the intention of the Donor suffer by the Common Law So W. 2. cap. 3. gives receipt to the Reversioner by equity to the Remainder for the Common Law which may not suffer him to be received suffers a wrong and this Statute remedies it So 13. R. 2. cap. 17. gives receipt for faint pleading by equity receipt by equity shall be for faint defending So an Administrator shall have account by equity of the Statute where it is given to Executors onely So 1. H. 7.3 gives an Action of Forgery of false Deeds by which the Title and Possession of another are disturbed in the Copulative by equity if the Title onely be disturbed and therefore the disseisee which hath not but onely a right shall have an Action in 4. H. 6.26 because where the Law defective suffers a thing which is a wrong to another and a Statute redresseth it there things in the like mischief shall be taken by equity in the like purview So here because it is made in avoidance of Covin therefore it is beneficial to the Common-wealth Brown Justice argued to the contrary for 2. causes in the Pleading The one was for that the cause of the Covin was not shewed for howbeit that the Statute speaks generally of Covin yet it refers the pleading of this to the Common Law and therefore because the cause of Covin was not shewed the replication was nought The other cause was for that the Plaintiffs have not shewed how the Wife Plaintiff was Heir and therefore may not be seised in Tail as it was pleaded And as to the execution he held that it was not necessary to be shewed And as to the matter in Law he held the case here within the words of the Statute and if it were not yet he held them within the equity for that the Statute was made in avoidance of Covin which is to be abhorred and therefore the Statute is benificial to the Common-wealth But for the said defaults in the replication he held that the Plaintiffs should not recover Montague Chief Justice Title amends not Covin for it may be upon a good Title and therefore the books are If a Wife recover Dower against A. who by Covin enters and outs the Tenant as in 15. E. 4.4 yet she is a Disseisoress and by 8. H. 4.6 where the issue in Tail recovers against A. who by Covin Disseise the Discontinuee yet 18. H. 8.5 is not remitted although his Title good but is a Disseisor by reason of the Covin The Title of a man shall not be tryed between strangers where he which hath the Title is not party nor shew Covin because it is a thing secretly determined to the prejudice of another as Joyntenancie on part of the Plaintiff the Defendant which pleads this shall not shew of whose Feoffment for that that he may have knowledge of it by presumption of Law on his own part here H. 21. E. 4.78 and 19. H. 6.32 So 19. H. 79. he which pleads a Deed which belongeth not to him shall not be enforced to shew it a man may aver Covin generally where averment is given by Statute or Common Law as the Statute of 13. R. 2. giveth receipt for faint pleader and may alleadge it generally when he prays to be received So a Termor for years by the Statute of Gloucestor shall be received and aver Covin generally and faint pleading and Covin is all one So 8. H. 6.7 In Assise the Tenant makes default one shall answer for him as Baily he appears and disallows him and saith That he will make default the Bailiffs comes and Demands Conusance of this default made by Covin for to take away their Conusance generally and holden good So 10. H. 6.15 In Formedon one Demandant agrees with the Tenant in Challenge which he made to a Juror the other Demandant avers the Challenge to be made by Covin generally and good So if one pleads imprisonment in excuse of his default or sale in a Market overt the other avers That it is by Covin generally or if he pleads a Feoffment the other avers That it was by Champerty generally and so may aver Covin given by the Statute or Common Law generally where the cause of it may not be special if it may be special otherwise it is 7. H. 4.15 in scire facias the Wife received pleads a recovery by a stranger upon a not denial and execution against him it is but the acknowledgement of the Tenant and his own Act and so Covenous Faint recovery against Tenant in Tail which dies before execution the issue is remitted and the Recovery not executory against him and so is defeasable yet the Covin in the Recovery which is as a Condition is cause of the forfeiture of the State as a Feoffment upon Condition not to infeoffee I. albeit that he within age infeoffees I. and so the State is defeasable yet he hath broken the Condition And as to the other exception taken for that it was not shewed certainly how he was Heir Montague held the Replication nought for Replications Titles Pleas in abatement of Writs and Estopples ought to comprehend certainty the Replication forceth the party to issue and therefore shall be certain because the Court nor the Jury may not be inveigled or troubled for the incertainty of the Replication which maketh the issue ordained and provided that they should be certain But a Bar which is certain to a common intent is good for a man shall plead in Bar an Estate without shewing how it is not good as it is holden 2. E. 4.26 and every Replication ought to shew contrary matter to the Bar and then ought to take Traverse or confesse and avoid the Bar. And here the Bar is good and the Replication contains a misbehavior of the Wife of the Defendant by which here Estate is void and then the Plaintiff ought to make him able for to take benefit of the misbehavior of the Defendant and here the Heir pleads this ability certainly the Bar which is plainly confessed is not plainly avoided for it appeareth not here how the Plaintiff is cosen to G. T. pretoxtu quorum premissoy refers to him which is said before onely as it is expounded 7. H. 6.51 in a Bill of Debt against the Warden of the Fleet. 4. H. 7.13 where one binds himselfe That he
imbesseling of a Habcas Corpora upon a Formedon between the Plaintiff and another holden good whithout shewing the Original and certainty of the Land and all the Record in certain because the Record is but a conveyance to the suit of Deceit and therefore for this cause cannot be gainsaid as to say Nultiel Record But where a Record is pleaded in Bar all shall be shewed certainly and is Traversable there in Conclusion or general Demurrer as petit judicium if the Plaintiff shall maintain the Action one shall have advantage of all defaults and of every thing mentioned in the Record and of every point that the Law gives him In Conclusion speciall of defaults onely alleadged in certain as here petit judicium if the Plaintiff shall maintain the action there if it be void for another cause then this which is mentioned he shall not have benefit of this of a thing void ab initio as the Obligation here because void by Statute so in avoidance of a Deed That he was not a man lettered and that it was read to him in another form So 24. H. 8. 28. because delivered as an Escrow upon Condition the Conclusion shall be so not his Deed because the matter proves that it was never his Deed of a thing voidable where it was void after because once is was a Deed the Conclusion shall be Judgement if Action because the duty is now extinct as 1. H. 7. 15. by release 35. H. 6. 18. for nonage 7. E. 4. 5. by dures When the Conclusion is nought and the matter in Law good Officium Judicis est for to give Verdict against the Plaintiff if it appeareth that he had not cause of Action howbeit that the Defendant hath lost the advantage thereof as it is here So 7. E. 4. 31. Trespass against B. and C. B. pleads not guilty C. pleads the gift of B. found guilty and found for C. no judgement for the Plaintiff because found against him So. appeal of a woman for the death of her father 10. E. 4. 7. because she shall not have an appeal of the death of any man except her husband or Trespass against the Lord by distress where nothing is in arear because the Statute is Non ideo puacatur dominus abate ex officio although the Defendant accepts the Writ good for the Plaintiff shall be barted by the Court ex officio and shall not have judgement although the Defendant admits his Title or by his Conclusion hath concluded himself of his advantage if it appeareth that he had no Title 1. The first branch is commanding and authorising the Sheriff to let to Bail persons manipernable by the Common Law viz. persons taken by Writ Bill or Warrant upon an Action personall or indictment of Trespass for it was indifferent if they were guilty or not made in affirmance of the Common Law 2. The second Branch viz. The exception was also made in the affirmance of the Common Law before for such persons which were in by condemnation execution Capias ut legat c. were not bailable before 3. The third is onely the purview which relates to the second branch as well as to the first for before refers to all this spoken of before as well the thing excepted as otherwise as a Lease for years of a Mannor except a Close rendring Rent the Lessee binds himself to perform all Covenants Grants and Agreements expressed or recited in the Indenture and after disturbs the Lessor of a thing excepted he hath forfeletd the Obligation because it is an Agreement for when he excepted the Close the other was contented with it and that the Lessor should occupy it and recited goes to the exception as to the rest 45. E. 3. 4. contained and recited goes to every Covenant in the Indenture An Act done Colore officii is extortion as if an Officer takes more for Fees then he ought And an Obligation taken of a prisoner for meat and drink is void because it is colore officii for he nor the Plaintiff are not bound to give him sustenance as he which distrains is not bound to give although he be in for Felony because 7. H. 4. 47. his goods are his untill he be attainted by the Common Law which is confirmed by 1. R. 3. c. 3. Rastal Forfeiture fol. 15. and if he dies for want of sustenance it is his own fault because that by presumption his ill demeanor bringeth him to such imprisonment The Statute of R. 3. restrains the Sheriff and other Officers to take Obligations of their prisoners except the Warden of the Fleet and the Kings Pallace at Westminster A Sheriff lets to mainprise one taken by Capias upon an indictment of Trespass which for the surety of the Sheriff makes an obligation to a stranger to keep his day is 7. E. 4. 5. held to be void because taken to another and not to the Sheriff onely according to the Statute Also there it is held if the Obligation hath not the Conditions expressed in the Statute That it is not the Deed of the party ex quo sequitur that he ought to conclude not his Deed keeping without dammage shall be intended by the generalty for all things Treasons Felonies Accounts and for all times if another thing is added by the Statute to be given it shall make all void as if a Condition be made according to the Statute and hath another thing not according to the Obligation is void So to add other words in a Formedon or Writ of Waste which are given by Statute all is void So to alien all the Land when he hath licence for part the licence is void in all by the Statute of 32. H. 8. because he hath exceeded the Authority thereby given to him The Statute saith That the Sheriff shall let persons mentioned therein to bail upon reasonable surety of sufficient persons in the plural number and because there is but one surety here the Obligation is void Also because the Statute saith That if it shall be taken in any other manner then is contained in the Statute if shall be void Also here by Plowden yet taken by one at large by the words of the first branch and those aid then third branch every person which extends to those at large nor for any person in their Ward which extends only to prisoners Kidwelly against Brand. LEease for years rendring 40. s. Rent by the year at H. out of the Land at the Feast of M. and if the Rent be behind H. 4. 5. E 6. In the Common Pleas. and not paid by the space of 40. daies after the said Feast then it shall be lawfull for him c. for to re-enter the Reversion is granted for Life the Grantee cometh to the Land 40. dales after M. to demand the Rent aforesaid but demanded it not and for not payment re-entred and adjudged lawfull 1. A Grantee for Life of a Reversio is an assignee within the Statute of 32.
day of the entry for a Bar good to a Common intent is not good because parcel of the Substance is left out and because Durante termino is for all the Term for that the time which is parcel of the Substance of the Bar ought to be shewed as the Obligee infeoffees fee another before M. he must shew in certain what day he did infeoff him So 3. H. 7.3 the Lord which Leaseth within the year entred for Mortmain for otherwise it shall not be intended for to enter within the year if he doth not set it forth but the Bar is good where such things are limited because that by special and not by general intendment they are omitted as a Feoffment in Bar is good to a Common intent yet it may be That the Feoffor was within age or in prison but such special things shall not be intended by the Law but shall be shewed As to the matter there are principally two things upon which Arguments may be made viz. Maxims and Reasons the Mother of all Laws and the Maxims are the Foundations of the Law and Conclusions of Reason and therefore are holden as firm Principles and Authorities of themselves One is a Remainder shal not be limitted except it be to a person capable at the time as to a Monk profest which afterwards is deraigned after this the Tenant for life dies the Lessee for life shal not have the remainder because he was not a person able at the time of the remainder limited to take it so a remainder to him That the particular Tenants shall name and after he nameth one yet the Remainder is void for the cause aforesaid But 32. H. 6. if the remainder is limited to the right Heirs of Jo. S. who is living and he die before the particular Tenant is good because I. S. shall be intended then dead also because by all presumption and intendment of Law I. S. may have an Heir which the Law will appoint in despight and so will be certain and therefore the Remainder good but shall not be good where it stands indifferent if he to whom the Remainder is limited will be a person able or not Another Maxim is That a Remainder may pass out of the Lessor at the time of the Livery for that Richel saith in Litl 162. the Remainder is void for this cause amongst others so here it passeth not by the first Livery because a Condition precedes the Commencement of the Remainder viz. if W. die living the Husband and Wife then the remainder to the Defendant and so passeth not at the first Livery and therefore void Brook Serjeant to the contrary As to the uncertainty of the time of the Entry the Bar shall be intended the better for the Defendant which is That he entred immediately and the Bar sufficeth which is good to a Common intent And therefore about 20. E. 3. it is holden That if one plead in Bar That one I. S. died seised and R. S. entred as Son and Heir to him whose Estate he hath this shall make the Bar good and yet it may be that he was not Heir for it is not expresly said That he is Son and Heir but that he Entred as Son and Heir and yet in as much as it is pleaded by way of Bar the best shall be intended for the Defendant so here And he argued besides much in effect as Cook did Sanders Serjeant for the Defendant The Bar is good to a Common intent and the best shall be intended for him which pleads it for a Plea in Bar is alwaies made for two causes The one to enforce the Plaintiff to make his replication The other is to compel him to joyn Issue which cannot be joyned upon the replication as it may upon the Bar and then the certainty shall be in it and not of necessity in the Bar and therefore the Bar good if it be good to a Common intent As in Assise the Tenant pleads in Bar a discent to the Plaintiff and to two others and that he hath the state of one and it is a good Plea because it is intended lawfully yet he may have it by Disseisen and then he is a Disseisor to the Plaintiff also for he cannot be a Disseisor to one except he be so to the other So 27. ass 31. in an Assise by the Heir the Tenant saith That the Father of the Plaintiff being Tenant by the courtesie and now in life Leased his Estate to his Father which died and he is in as Son and Heir Judgement if Assise and held a good Bar yet he doth not say That he was the first which entred and yet good So 21. H. 6. 17. here fol. 26. as to the Remainder it shall be good because it is a principle that it shall be taken most strongly against him which made it and therefore in 31. H. 8. If a man gives to a man and to Heirs without his it is Fee yet he giveth not Fee expresly So 18. E. 3. 28. after 170. A good Remainder by word That after the Decease of Tenant for Life the Lands shall return to A. and B. in Fee So a Remainder to the right Heirs of I. S. in Life passeth presently and shall be in abeyance rather than void and that if shall be to the benefit of the Lessee against his own Livery and limitation as alwaies the Law interprets words strongest against the Speakers as in 40. E. 3. 5. 49. E. 3. 1. A Termor counts that he left this as good as he found it and the Wind blew down the House it is not waste but Covenant lies for the special Agreement alters the Law and maketh his words to be taken more strongly against him So the Law taketh the Acts aforesaid strongly against the Makers And therefore if I. give to B. Land upon Condition That if he Marry my Daughter he shall have Fee if he Marries her he shall have Fee for by the Livery it taketh Commencement and by the performance of the Condition it taketh perfection and in the mean time it is ambiguous So a Lease for years upon Condition That one moneth after he shall have Fee he shall have it after the moneth accordingly for the thing passes according to the Covenant most strong against the Donor So a Lease to two upon Condition That if the one die within seven years that then after the death of the other it shall remain to a stranger good and Privies and strangers are all one 24. and 32. he differs because he hath an Estate first given to which the Condition may be annexed and Livery and by imitation shall be taken strongest against him which makes it Three things one shall have by Remainder First he shall have a Remainder to vest Secondly a Possession in Law and Thirdly a Possession in Deed if he be capable at the time of the Possession in Law cast upon him it sufficeth 28. against it as 17. E. 3. 29. and
D. bringeth an Action of Debt against him and the Abbot his Sovereign the Writ shall abate because he is named Prior whereas he is but one of the Monks where he may not be Debitor But it had been good if the Prior had been omitted and Debt is maintainable without contract between them or privity in possibility upon the escape As 1. H. 7. 8. against the Clark of Hamper upon a Liberate delivered to him when the Comisor hath assets Admitting that it lies not by the Common Law yet it lies by equity of the Statute of Westminster the 2. ch 11. which giveth in Action against the Gaoler which suffers an Accomptant to escape and by the equity of the Statute of 1. R. 12. which gives an Action against the Warden of the Fleet upon an escape for it shall extend to all other Gaolers by equity for although it be penal against the Warden yet it is benificial to many others As 13. E. 1. circumspecte agatis extends to all other Bishops as well as Norwich So the Statute of 9. E. 3. 5. That the Executor which first cometh by distress shall answer 3. H. 6. 14. extends to an Administrator and 9. H. 6. 19. Debt upon an escape of one in Execution was maintainable against the Major of the Staple who in excuse of himself saith That he was imprisoned by force of a plaint and not in Execution the words of R. 2. prohibites the Warden of the Fleet onely to suffer any in Execution to go out of Prison by Baston Mainprise or Bail and by equity all other Gaolers yet these in London use it and it is not an escape in them because they may prescribe against the equity and words of Statutes which is contrary to their Customs and Prescriptions for that their Customs as Prescriptions are confirmed by Statute and contrary to the Statute of Silva cedua and keeping gof Leets at other times then the Statute appoints and so let them in execution to go by Baston within their liberty But others shall be bound by equity of the said Statute and because this Statute extends to others by equity in this point of escape it shall extend also to an Action to charge other Officers as to matters of escape A prisoner marry the Warden of the Fleet this is an escape and he is at liberty for he cannot be under his Wifes Custody So if the Office discends to an Heir which is a prisoner there he shall be adjudged at Liberty although he lieth in fetters because he cannot be his own keeper in prison Baitons case 44. and Ridgwaies case 3. 52. by which it appeareth that the cause here is to be understood of voluntary escapes in the Gaoler for if the prisoner escape to his own wrong the Plaintiff shall have a new Capias ad satisfaciendnm if the Writ of Capias upon which he is not imprisoned be not returned or shall be in Execution to the Plaintiff again if he be re-taken by the Sheriff before an Action brought against him upon the escape Wimbish against Talbois THe Husband makes a Feoffment in Fee to the use of himself 4. E. 6. In the Common Pleas. and his Wife in special Tail the Remainder to the Husband in general Tail the Remainder to him in Fee 27. H. 8. of Uses was made the Husband and Wife entred the Husband dies the Wife suffers a recovery by Confession the first day which is not executed and the Issue in Tail enters for the forfeiture by the Statute of 11. H. 7. c. 10. and the opinion of the Court. 1. That the entry is lawfull and this forfeiture is within the words of the Statute although that the wife had not any estate in the Land in use yet shee had the use in the Land which is all one and this is an Hereditament which will make Possessio fratris by 5. E. 4. and was appointed by the Act of the Husband and was an inheritance and purchase in him and so within the words of the first branch of the Stat. of 11. H. 7. 2. Admitting that it should be out of the words of the first branch because it speaks of gifts to the Husband and wife by any seised to his use and Feoffees are Donees by the Stat. of 27. H. 8. of Uses by 6. E. 6. Formedon 40. 3. Admitting that it be forth of the words of the first branch yet it is within the equity because it is a benificial law and in advancement of justice and suppression of fraud 4. That a remedy by Covin upon a false or true cause is within the Statute although no execution be sued for the Covin is a Condition in Law annexed to an estate which Condition is broken although that Execution is not sued the Statute is general of Recoveries by Covin and includes all recoveries this Condition annexed to the use shall transfer to the possession by the Stat. of 27. H. 8. 5. That he which entred by such forfeiture shall be seised in Tail or Fee as shee should be if the Wife were dead and this in course of discent and not purchase paramount contrary to Hales and that a Son born may enter upon the Daughter which hath entred for such forfeiture contrary of a purchase and that the entry for the forfeiture is maintainable presently in the life of the Wife which maketh it and he which enters may aver generally in pleading That he is that person which ought to take benefit of the forfeiture by all the Justices contrary to Montague Cook Sergeant to the Defendant which saith That the Replication is not good because it shews not how he is Heir in special but hath averred That he is the same person to which c. general abatement for it is issuable and when such Statutes gives entry generally to one yet if he will take advantage of it he shall shew how he is the same person and shall not say generally that he is the same person as upon 6. R. 2. cap. 6. which will enter by assent to the Ravisher 5. E. 4. 6. ought to shew how he is next Heir yet the Stat. is general so for prayee to be received upon default of Tenant for life by W. 2. cap. 3. ought to shew how he came to the Reversion So he which will Intitle himself upon 7. E. 1. for entry upon Mortmain how he is Lord. As to the Obligation That because the Defendant in Bar in saying whose heir he is hath affirmed the Plaintiff to be heir and therefore in the Replication hath conveyed himself to his entry as Heir special and so the Replication ill for default of certainty Secondly for that the Plaintiff hath not shewed that execution was had of the said recovery against the Defendant Thirdly Exception because he hath not evered the Covin specially for otherwise it is not intendable in Recoveries because they are alwaies intended true and upon good cause and therefore the Wife at the Common Law
a Recovery as a Fine is without Attornment for the habere facias seisinam recites cum A recuperavit seisinam suam c. because the Husband raised the use First it is his purchase and so within the words of the Statute and if not yet it shall be within the equity and nevertheless it is penal Sanders for the Defendant The Statute here is penal because it goeth in avoidance of Estates and abridges power and therefore not equitable And for this Statute of W. 2. cap. 14. before fol. 17. expectet emptor for Warranty because he vouches an Infant and yet it is adjudged 18. E. 4.16 If he maketh a Feoffment over this Feoffee shall vouch because penall against one shall not extend to another So by 32. H. 8. cap. 33. The dying seised of a disseisor without peaceable possession before for five years shall not take away the Entry of the disseisee yet if one Abator die seised within five years this discent shall take away the Entry And so if Tenant for life be disseised and the disseisor die within five years and the Tenant for Life dieth he in Reversion or Remainder may not Enter because he was no Disseisor to them and to the discent they had no Title to Enter but the Tenant for Life and taken strictly because it abridgeth the Liberty given by the Common-Law By inheritance is understood Land by dicent as it is proved by a case in 7. H. 4.5 and a cui in vita abated because it was quam clamat esse jus Hereditatem suam whereas it was his own purchase And by 4. H. 5. cap. 3. which speaketh of Lands by purchase or by discent and the disjunctive prove the difference between the words Purchase intends Land by gift or purchase which is by Title Disseisen is not purchase because without Title Now because the Plaintiff hath in the Replication said That the Grandfather of the Defendant was seised in Fee for to prove the Defendant to be within the first Branch the Plaintiff ought to shew here how the Husband of the Defendant came to the Possession for the manner of coming to the Land is Issuable because it may be by Discent Purchase or Disseisen And a Joincture made by a Disseisor to his wife is out of the Statute Recovery without Execution is not a discontinuance Harris Serjeant argues to the same intent And he taketh also that Covin cannot be where the Title is good except that wrong be done by him which hath the Title and this ought to be shewed for here in respect that the Title is confessed to be good in this That it is not traversed nor confessed and avoided this Recovery may not be averred to be by Covin for this avernment is repugnant in it self and it cannot stand together to say that she did right by Covin And as to the Statute he taketh the case here to be out of the words of the Statute And note thou that he argued to all the other points moved to the same purpose that they were arguod before Molineux Justice It is a vain thing to aver this specially which is apparant as the Covin and therefore when the Tenant infeoffes his Son within age by Collusion the Lord shall seise him for a Ward without shewing this Collusion specially So if the Husband will confess an Action the Wife shall have Dower by the Common Law proved by recital W. 2. cap. 4. For it is intendable by the Law to be Covin apparant but it was doubted if the Recovery had been by Default but here the Action had been tryed by the Verdict of 12. men the cause of the Covin ought to have been shewed because the Law giveth credence to it As 5. H. 7.20 Upon an Attaint no Supersedeas shall be granted because the Law presumes the Verdict to be true untill the Reversal be tryed upon Error in Deed or Record so that the Law hath an indifferent judgement of it viz. to be true or false And so the Covin averred in the avoidance of the trial by Verdict shall be shewed certainly for the credence given to the Verdict Also Covin upon a good Title is prohibited because the Statute of 11. H. 7. is generall And so Covin generally averred here without falsifying of the Title is good as 4. H. 7. cap. 20. saith That if a Recovery be pleaded in Bar of a popular Action the Plaintiff may aver it was by Covin generally by the Warrant of the Statute As to the second exception the Stat. expounds it self to be intended of a Recovery without execution Every Fee-simple is an inheritance and then she had an use in the inheritance of her Husband and held that the Wife held the inheritance of her Husband that is to say his Land in use joyntly with her Husband and so within the words of the Statute and if not it shall be within the equity and intent of the Statute and he took without question that the Heir in Tail might enter presently and our the Wife which is Defendant and so held the Plaintiff should recover Hales Justice to the same intent And first to the Covin the Replication is good without shewing cause of it And the Statute is for frail inconstant women and will not make them Judges if the Title of Action be good or not 18. R. 2. cap. 17. gives receipt to him in Reversion where the Tenant for Life is impleaded by Covin of the demandants that the Tenements shall be recoverred and he in Reversion because it speaks generally of Covin 2. H. 6.14 and 11. H. 4.3 For this cause there it sufficeth to say That Tenant for Life pleaded faintly and pray to be received without shewing cause otherwise it is of Covin at the Common Law and 11. H. 7. would have limited the pain to fained recoveries expresly if it had intended so much And the Statute prohibits the Covin onely be the Title good or faint for faint Recoverie by Covin the issue in Tail may falsifie before Warranty made 20. years after the Disseisen yet it commenceth by Disseisen by the intent As if the Father Disseiseth the Son to the intent to make a Feoffment with Warranty to Bar his Wife Recovers against one which outs the Tenant by Covin yet she had not good Title of Dower is a Disseiseress and Covin is apparent here because he never took view voucher essoin or other delays which he might The Statute saith That the Recovery shall be void whereby it is not intended that it shall be executed and shall not be intended to be by Disseisen without shewing The words of 11. H. 7. explain the intent That such Wives who have Lands in use or use in Lands are within the Statute Recovery against Tenant in Tail was good onely for his life before this Stat. and therefore comprises use here because the Stat. shall not be made in vain for Tail in use may do as great prejudice as Tail in possession and so the
Discender if it be out of the words yet it shall be taken by equity although it be penal to some man for here it restrains the Liberty of Tenant in Tail because it was for to redress false Covin for to advance right and justice and benificial to the weal-publick As W. 2. cap. 3. gives a cui in vita upon a recovery by default which was a wrong to the Wife and therefore gave Cui ante Divortium by equity So Marlebridge cap. 6. De primogenith and of Feoffment yet if the first Son dies and he infeoffees the second Son or Levy a Fine it shall be taken by equity because it redresses Covin which the Law abhors So 1. H. 7. cap. 1. gives a Formedon in Remainder against Pernors of Profits and 14. H. 7.31 and after 178. scire facias for to execute a Remainder against the taker of the Profits shall be maintainable by equity No judgement was ever given in this case for this default viz. because he had not shewed certainly how he was Heir and in special for that it was issuable and Title given is certain Note that all the Justices held the case here within the words of the Statute of 11. H. 7. And if it were not within the words that yet it was within the equity of the Statute And they held also that the Heir may enter immediately that is to say in the life of Tenant in Tail but no judgement was given Dive against Maningham ONe was in prison in execution upon a Recognisance of Debt M. 4 E. 6 In the Common Pleas in debt taken according to the Statute of 23. H. 8. cap. 6. and the Defendant being a stranger made an Obligation to the Sheriff indorced with Condition That the prisoner should save him from dammage against the King and the Conusee and also that he should be alwaies at his commandment as a true prisoner to appear before the justices and the King at Westminster or elsewhere within this Realm And it was adjudged a void Obligation by the Statute of 23. H. 6. c. 10. 1. For that the prisoner was not bailable but excepted by the Statute which in this point is not but an affirmance of the Common Law 2. For that That the third branch of the Statute which maketh all Obligations vold taken for any the causes abovesaid against the form there expressed extends as well to the second branch in which the exception is as to the first for the generalty abovesaid and also by the intent of the Statute to suppress the extortion of Sheriffs in this behalf 3. Although it shall not be so yet he taketh the Obligation colore officii as Sheriff of his prisoner and so within the Statute 4. No day or place of appearance is limited in the Condition so the form appointed by the Stat. is not observed 5. Other things are mixt in the Condition with the apparance as that he shall save harmless and this shall be intended there for all things and at all times 6. He had but one surety and the Statute speaks of surety of sufficient persons in the plural number by Montaigue fol. 63. 7. The Obligation here is void by course of the Common Law for that the Condition is against the Law for the party is not bailable 2. H. 4.9 The Extent ought to precede the Liberate here are both in one Writ yet in nature they are several but the Writ remains good for the extent and the other is surplusage 7. H. 4. 44. for Toll not paid the Writ was Tolloneum asportavit illud solvere recusavit asportavit is void because surplusage and it abates not because he refused to pay for that is sufficient and be the Writ good or bad in Law it shall stand in force until it be Reversed by Error because an ancient Record 37. H. 6. 1. the Sheriff took a single Obligation for to let one to Mainprise which is not Mainpernable it was void because he took colore efficii which is taken alwaies in ill part and implies that the thing is done by pretence of Office but not yet duely and their office is but a vail and shadow to falsity Virtute officii or Ratione officii taken in good part because it is alwaies where the Office is just which causeth the thing it is pursuant to the office Obligation is void where the condition is contrary to Law as to be saved harmless if he kils a man or doth commit trespass so here the Obligation is void by the Common Law because it was to save the Sheriff harmless for wrong done against the Law as is the letting the Prisoner at freedom he being one which is not Bailable So 2. H. 4. 9. A Baily by withernam takes the Beasts of the Defendant and afterwards re-delivers them to the Defendant upon Obligation given to him by the Defendant for the saving of him harmless wherefore holden void because it was to aid the Baily for this wrong in the re-delivery of the beasts to the party for he ought to have detained them untill c. And afterward Mollineux Hales and Brown Justices argued to the same purpose Montague Cheif Justice It is likely to me that the Plaintiff shall be barred for an Act which is general in particularity or particular in a generality which is all one as in 13. E. 4. 8. That all Corporations and Licences made by H. 6. shall be void So that all Bishops or Justices shall do such an Act shall be pleaded but a general Act which extends to every man not but the Justices ought to take Conusance thereof but if this Act hath several branches concerning several matters yet contained in one Chapter there he needs not recite all but this onely which concerns him and maketh for his purpose for every branch is a several Act by it self But a Record shall not be pleaded inter alia for it is intire upon one Originall and one Judgement upon it but ought to plead certainly all the Record when it is pleaded in Bar because the Record is the matter of substance and the effect of the Bar which ought to be plain and perfect when the Record is but conveyance and induction to the Bar or Action it is sufficient to reciteithis which is the cause of the Action as 34. H. 6. 48. A Tenant by Elegit makes avow in â—…eplegiare for that he had execution as Tenant by Elegit and made a Lease reserving Rent for which being arear he avowed he needed not shew the Record because the Lease onely is traversable and is the effect of the Avowry and the execution by Elegit is the Record from which it issues which is nothing but conveyance to the effect and therefore it sufficeth to begin at the Execution upon Damages recovered without pleading how lie brought his first Action and what answer the Defendant made or such like So in the 19. H. 6. 29. a Bill of Deceit against an Attorncy for
intent So proviso That the Lessee make such a thing So here it shall enure as a Condition in whatsoever manner it be called it shall enure as a Determination of the Leasee because it was made at the time when the Lease began If the second Lease admit it be a Condition shall be good before re-entry or not Ramsey fol. 133. It is not good because after the Condition broken untill he enters he hath but a Title because he may not grant and the Lease continues and the possession also And therefore 22. E. 4.37 Lesser shall not have Trespass untill entry 14.3 Ass 11. Distress estop his entry because it affirms the continuance of his Term. Where a man may enter he ought to enter or not have the thing and where he cannot enter he ought to make claim before he shall have it As a Reversion granted upon Condition which is broken the Rent is extinct without Claim for that he may not have it by Claim by Stamford and Walsh it is good fol. 136. for that the first Lease for years commenced by words without entry it may be determined by words without entry Lease for life not 2. Mar. fol. 142. because Livery and Seisen which gave the State and Entry which ought to be avoided by entry upon Condition broken it is expressed here how the Lease shall be avoided viz. by entry and there if he enters not or doth an Act which excludes him to Enter as the making of an acquittance or distraining there the Lease is good But the words here are utterly extinct dissolving the Lease without Entry and no Act after shall make it good and the words of the entry here are surplusage and take away the effect of the first words As to 22. E. 4. The Lessor cannot punish him because the entry was first with his assent and when the Lease ended he was Tenant at sufferance but he may make a Lease to another and it determines his will by Gawdy it is not good Void here shall be expounded void by Entry as W. 2. cap. 1. before fol. 82. Finis ipsojure sit nullus viz. to the right yet it is a discontinuance So by 8. H. 6. cap. 10 Outlary shall be void in Indictment or Appeal if no Capias in the County where he dwelleth Common Law 19. H. 6.2 expounds it shall be void by Writ of Error he that hath a possession in Law may Lease before entry after fol. 142. after a stranger hath abated not because another hath possession in Deed. So a Lease by the Husband for years shall not be void of the Wives land after his death before entry of the Wife for possession ought to be defeated by possession and possession ought to be gained by entry Catline fol. 142. b. By the not payment the first Lease is determined without entry because it may be made by word without other circumstance otherwise of Free-hold and therefore may make a Lease but cannot have Trespass without entry as Heir before fol. 137. he may make a Lease before entry but cannot have Trespess before entry 11. H. 7.22 So a Lessee may grant his Term before it commence 22. E. 4.37 yet he shall not have Trespass before entry 37. H. 6.18 To shew two matters where both are effectual and answerable makes a double plea as 3. H. 6.32 Feoffment up-Condition to infeoff the Heir and averment of the Collusion in Wardship of the body So 20. H. 6.7 Seisen in his Ancestor and himself by avowing So 22. H. 6.37 Two continuall claims viz. by the predecessor and the Plaintiff for to avoid a discent So 19. E. 4.4 by Vavisor and Brian Two discents in Fee bars not two discents is not double in Tail because one answer viz. he gave not makes an end of all for if he cannot shew one thing without the other it is not double nor if the one is pursuant to the other as fully administred and so nothing in his hands for the last is but a conclusion of the former But the other Justices held the aforesaid two exceptions effectual for the causes aforesaid and that the Rejoynder was vicious wherefore they said That it was in vain to argue them and therefore in consideration of them onely without respect to the other matters rising upon the Rejoynder and before debate they awarded for the plaintiff Throgmorton against Tracie M. Mar in the Common Plaes second deliverance A Man makes a Lease for life and after Grants the Reversion of the Land habendum the land at Michaelmas after the determination of the first Lease for life for one and twenty years and adjudged a good Lease for years of the Reversion and of the Land Reverting and that the Habendum stood well with the premises because that the land is the degree and state of the Grantor was included in the premises by the word Reversion and the degree and estate excluded by the Habendum and the other part onely granted viz. The land Reverting and so was the intent of both the parties Reversion is compounded of the remnant of the estate which is left in the Lessor and of the land Reverting and carties with him the land to be afterwards happening in possession and the land is the substance of both and by the grant of this both pass So the Mannor which is compounded of Demeasnes and Services and of stegno aqua priscarie 4. E. 3. or gurgite which consists of water and land The Habendum which is not pursuant to the premises is void as a grant of a Mannor Habendum a Rent parcell of the Mannor because in the grant it was Rent service and in the Habendum it is Rent Seck So a Grant of Services Homage Fealty and rent Habendum the rent to the Grantee in Fee this habendum is void because in the grant the rent was contained as a rent Service but here it is rent Seck Grant of it after the death of I. S. void for the nature of a Grant is that the thing Granted ought to pass presently after fol. 155. for it is a thing in possession and is granted as a Reversion where no Reversion was of it If one maketh a Lease of land for years and after maketh a feoffment of the same without livery it passeth not the Reversion by Attornment Quere because the Grant of a thing which includes all interests in it shall make the Reversion to pass but the Reversion granted shall not make the possession to pass 38. H. 6.34 and after fol. 399. The King Grants a Mannor to which an Advowson is appendant for life the Advowson passeth not nor if he grant the Reversion Habondum cum advocatione it passeth not because in gross because it was not mentioned in the first Grant but the Reversion of an Advowson may be parcel or appendant of or to a Mannor in possession not possession of or to the Reversion of a Mannor the Habendum passes not a thing not parcel nor appendant
and the Son and within his Charge So Litl fol. 4. the Donor shall pay Rent untill four degrees past upon a gift in Free-marriage upon another gift not because the Daughter advanced and the husband from thence forth undertakes to find his wife all necessaries I promise 20. l. to one if he marries my Daughter he shall have Debt for it in our Law because the Daughter is advanced and so consideration proceeding from Nature is a sufficient Consideration in our Law 22. E. 3. ass pl. 70. Fitz. nat br fol. 44. a. and 120. r. Doctor and Student 105. And so the Consideration here of A.B. for provision for his issues males good is a good Consideration to change the use of the land Second Consideration For the continuance of the Land in the name of the Baintons good to raise an Use and Males continue their Sir names and Females change them by marriage and the Male is most Soveraign 40. E. 3.37 2. H. 4.1 27 H. 6.8 and the Female and all inheritance is subject to the will of another 17. E. 4.5 I promise 10. l. to a laborer for to repair a high way or to a Surgeon for to cure such a man he shall have an action of Debt because it is Charity Doctor and Student 105. Third Consideration The good will and fraternal love wich he hath to his bloud and his brothers which is the nearest degree of bloud after Parents and issues good considerations here and so it seems by the better opinion in 20. H. 7.10 but is not there adjudged and they that joyn in bloud by nature joyn in love and therefore if the youngest enter after the death of the Father the elder shall have no action against him conrrary to 21. H 6.15 by Portington because the Law intends that he entred as a friend to preserve the inheritance in his absence because so near in bloud the Law intends as near in love So Littl f. 93. and 40. E. 3.24 no discent of the Puisne or any of his issues shall take away the entry of the eldest for the cause aforesaid So Litl f. 160. Warranty Collateral Bars without assets because the Law presumes that he will advance him as much as he hath prejudiced him by the Warranty So no battail between Brothers or Cosens in a Writ of right But a Nuper obiit lieth against Brothers and Sisters in Gavel-kind where their ancestor died seized or a Wriâ— De rationabili part against him which enters into all which Writs are to try bloud onely So a Juror is Brother or Cosen to one party a good challeng in every action for the affection which the Law presumes the one hath towards the other 21. E. 4.33 And Bromley said That 11. H. 4.12 by Tirwit and Cascoigne by the ancient usage all the bloud of him which was Murthered should draw the Felon found guilty in an appeal of Murther by a long corde to execution for the loss which all the bloud had by the Murther of one of them and for the revengement of his death and love that they had to him that was killed Fourth Consideration Consideration was the Marrige had between Edward Bainton and Agnes his wife Remainder upon Natural Consideration shall preserve the particular estate made without Consideration which precedes it but not on the contrary if the estate upon natural Consideration precede the other estate as A. Convenants with B. in Consideration that B. will marrie his Daughter to stand seized at the time of the Marriage to the use of himself for life after to the use of I. in Tail afterwards to the use of B. and his wife the Daughter of A. is a good use to I. without consideration for the Marriage is private and several Considerations for the estate of B. and his Wife because the Remainder to I. precedes the estate to B. and his Wife but if the Remainder to I. had been after the estate of B. and his wives the estate there had been void to I. but money might have been given in Consideration of all the estates In Mordants case 21. H. 7.19 No use was raised there because the Covenant was in the future Tense and also incertain and therefore was put to his Writ of Covenant there Good and sufficient Consideration raiseth an Use without Deed so a Deed raises Uses if there be any Consideration for it is made to some effect or otherwise should be void because you shall not have an action of Covenant here because an action of Covenant lieth upon a Covenant only in the preter or future Tense and not in the present Tense 1. Contract or Agreement for Lands or Chattels is by the Law First by Writing Secondly by Words First An agreement by writing without Consideration is not Nudum because a man hath great consideration and deliberation in passing things by Deed and the writing his sealing and delivery of it signifies fully his will is sufficient consideration that Land shall pass as his will is and shall bind the party without thinking what cause he hath to do it Secondly an Agreement by word without consideration is Nudum and binds not because words passes from a man suddenly and without advisement many times as 17 E. 4.4 I promise to give you 20. l. for to make your sale of new it is Nudum pactum if it be by Deed you may have Action of Debt upon this Deed and the Consideration there is not examinable and the cause of the Deed is not inquirable for every Deed imports in it self a Consideration without the will of the party which makes the Deed. So 11 H. 4.33 A Carpenter by word without writing undertakes to make a new house and no consideration for the making of it is Nude if it be by writing it is good So 45. E. 3.24 for that the Plaintiff demanded a Debt upon a contract for marriage money by Deed an action lies at the Common Law because there it becometh a Lay Contract by the Deed in Court Christian if it had been without Deed because the marriage which is the consideration is a thing Spiritual 14. E. 4.6 15. E. 4.32 which books are against the opinion of Thorp in the said case in 22. ass before fol. 35. Nudum pactum est ubi nulla subest causa praeter conventionem sed ubi subest causa fit obligatio parit actionem Information for Mines THe King shall have all the Mines of Gold and Silver in the Lands of his Subjects H. 10. El. in the Excheq by the Prerogative of his Crown and not by the proprieity of the Soil although it be not recited in the Treatise of Prerogative and albeit the Oar thereof in anothers land toucheth others Free-holds and inheritance which is proved by three reasons First for the excellency of the matter which being more excellent is appropriated by the Law to the person most excellent viz. the King So the King hath by the Common Law Whales and