holdeth his Lands and things by the Lawes of the Land wherein hee liveth and this commonly called the law of proeprty Nihil dat quod non habet Arist nemo potest plus juris in alium transferre quam ipse habet Coke com f. 309. b it is a common erudition in the Law that no man can grant that hee hath not Perkins f 15. for that is requisite that he who by his contract shall make another possessor of any thing should bee the proâ—rietor of the thing it selfe otherwise his contract is void Ployd f. 432 b. as if I possessed of an horse sell the Horse upon condition to another that he pay to mee at the feast of Christmas forty shillings for it and before the said feast I sell the horse to another and after the feast the first Vendee failes of payment by which I reseise the horse the second Vendee shall not have the horse for at the time of the second contract I had neither interest nor property nor possession of the horse but onely a condition which is not sufficient to make me able to contract for the property and possession therefore it is meerely void Ployden So if a man grant a rent charge out of the Mannor of Dale and in truth he hath nothing in the Mannor of Dale and after purchaseth the Mannor of Dale yet hee shall hold it discharged Perkins H. 15. So if one not seised of Lands maketh a Lease to another it is a good Plea for the Lessee to say that the Lessor had nothing in the Tenements at the time of the Lease Litt. and the reason of this is for that in every contract there must be quid pro quo for contractus est quasi actus contra actum and therefore if the Lessor had nothing in the land the Lessee hath not quid pro quo nor any thing for which he should pay his Rent and in that case he may plead that the Lessor non dimisit Coke Com. ibidem f. 41. b. vide ibidem plura If the Conusee of a Fine before any Attornement bargaineth and selleth the Signiory to another the Bargainee shall not distraine because the Grantor could not distrain for no man can transfer more right to another then he himselfe hath Coke Com. 309. b. Coke l. 6. f. 57. b. He that hath no seisin in the Land charged cannot give seisin of Rent vide plura Bredimans for no man can give that he hath not The King pardoneth one for making a bridge this is onely good for the fine and he must make up the Bridge because the Kings Subjects have interest in it 37. H. 8.4 Da tua dum tua sunt post mortem tunc tua non sunt Ployd 280. a. when one hath property in goods the property cannot be in him no longer then he liveth for after his death the goods belong unto another Nemo videtur rem amittere cujus propria non fuit Reg. I. C. no man can loose that of which he hath no property and therefore in a Replevin if the Defendant claim property the Sheriff cannot proceed for it is a rule in Law the property ought to be tryed by writ and therefore in this case where the tryall is by plaint the Plaintiff may have a writ de proprietate probanda directed to the Sheriff to trye the property and if thereupon it be found for the Plaintiff the Sheriff shall make deliverance Coke Com. f. 145. b. F. n. b. f. 77. If A. endict B. for stealing of Horses or other goods he must say de bonis catallis cujusdam A. For if there were no property there could be no stealing or injury for nemini vim facere videtur qui suo non alieno utitur Reg. I. c. Nemo reditum invito domino percipere possidere potest Coke Com. 303. b. no man can receive or possesse another mans Rents against the will of the Lord as if one hold of me by Rent which is service ingrosse and another which hath no right claimeth the rent and receiveth it of my Tenant by coertion of distresse or otherwise yet by the payment of my Rent to a stranger I cannot be disseised or ousted without my will or election but that I may distrain my Tenant for the Rent or have an assize against the â—ernor Lit. for a man cannot be disseised of a a Rent-service in grosse Rent-charge or Rent-seck by Attornment or payment of Rent to a stranger but at his election for the rule of the Law is no man can receive or possesse an other mans rent against his will Coke ibidem Quod meum est id amplius meum esse non potest Coke Com. f. 49. b. And therfore if lessee for years enter he is in actuall possession and then Livery cannot e made to him that is in actual possession whereby the Franke-Tenement or fee may inure to him in the remainder for that which is once mine cannot be more mine ibidem Thirdly From the Anteprecedents Aequivocum and Univocum AEQuivocum denoteth words of ambiguous and many significations which as Boetius signifies nothing nisi ad quasque res secundum voluntatem significantis applicetur unlesse they be applyed to the thing according to the will of him that declareth or expoundeth them of which the Law taketh notice and giveth these grounds and maximes Nobiliores benigniores presumptiones in dubijs sunt praeferendae Reg. P. C. And Coke l. 4. f. 13. b. Benignior sententia in rebus generalibus dubijs est praeferenda In doubtfull speeches and sentences the more favorable presumption and opinion is to be perferred As if one doth charge another that he hath forsworne himselfe by the Law it is not actionable for it may be he hath forsworne himself in usuall conversation but an action is onely maintainable against him that hath forsworn himself in Court of Record so ibidem f. 21. An Action upon the case was brought for these wordes for my Lands in Dallinson they seek my life adjudged not actionable because he may seek his life upon just cause which are the more favorable constructions So verba accipienda sunt in meliori sensu Hub. f. 106. Coke l. 4. f. 13. Wordes are to be taken at the best for the speaker though some of them cannot stand with that construction As thou art a Theefe and hast stolen a Tree it shall be adjudged of a Tree standing not felled which is not actionable But as it is said there in Hubberd 106. This rule holdeth not in Deeds and Pleas for in those words are taken more strongly against the speaker of which this reason may be given because commonly words in common language proceed of a sudden from choler and heat whereas words in Deeds and Pleas are grounded upon mature deliberation and consideration and therfore in Deeds this is a general ground Ambiguum pactum contra venditorem interpretandum est Reg. I. C. and Ambigua verba contra
generall words imply no certainty and with that accordeth 21. E. 4. If a man be bound to be nonsued in all Actions that he hath against him in the Common Bench he may say that he hath no action therein otherwise if the condition be particular to wit that he shall be non-sued in a Formedon c. so as that it appeareth that generall words imply no certainty neither do they conclude any person to say that he hath nothing there vide ibidem plura Cok. lib. 8.78 a. Bospols Case In an arbitrament when the submission is generall of all Actions and Demands c. that may well stand with the generality of the words that there was but one cause depending in controversy between them For generall speeches imply no certainty and the awaâ—d for one is good notwithstanding the generality of the words for though there were many matters in controversy yet if one onely was made known to the Arbitrator he may make an award of it For the Arbitrator is in place of a Judge and his office is to determine secundum alligata probata the duty of the parties which are greived and know their particular greifes is to make known the causes of controversy to the Arbitrator for they are privy to them and the Arbitrator is a stranger and every one is to do that which lyeth in his knowledge but when the condition is in speciall and with a proviso and condition that an award shall be made of the premises or words which amount to so much there the Arbitrator ought to make Arbitrement of all or else the award is void Generalibus semper specialia derogant Reg. f. c. Derg 180. Quando charta continet generalem clausulam posteaque descenâ—it ad verba specialia quae clausulae generali sunt consentanea interpretanda est charta secundum verba specialia f. 134. b. in Edward Althams Case Which rule is almost word for word put and agreed of by both parties In. 7. E. 3. f. 10. Margery Mortimers Case to wit where a Deede speaketh by general words and then descendeth to special words if the words special agree with the words general the deed shall be understood according to the words speciall As if a man grant a rent in the mannor of P. to be taken in an hundred Acres of Land parcell of that Mannor with a clause of distresse in those hundred Acres the Rent shall issue out of the hundred Acres onely and the generall words shall be construed according to the words speciall so if a man grant a Rent and go no further those generall words shall create an estate for life but if the Habâ—ndum be for years that shall qualify the words generall 7. E. 3. So if a man give Lands to one and his Heirs Habendum to him and the Heirs of his body He shall have onely an estate tayle and no fee expectant for the Habendum qualifieth the generall words precedent Ployd f. 541. a. A man maketh a Feoffment by Deede to one to have and to hold to him and his Heirs and if it happen that the feoffee dyeth without heire of his body that then the Land shall revert The generality of that gift to him and his Heires shall be corrected by the speciall branch after so as the Donee shall have but an estate tayle 13. R. 2. in Formedon Dyer 261. b. A man seised in fee deviseth all his Lands in one village and in one of the two Hamlets by name and there were two Hamlets in the said Village The opinion of divers Justices was that none of the Lands in the other Hamlet should passe for it is intendable that the intent and meaning of the devisor was that nothing more should passe then what he had expressed A. acknowledgeth a fine of the mannor of P. with an advowson and regrants the mannor with the Appurtenances the advowson shall not passe Temp. E. 1. F. title grants Ployd 173. b. If I give or lease all my Lands to one and stay there he shall have all my Lands in England but if I say further in the manner of Dale there it is now restrained but if the specialty limiteth a thing which is void and so appeareth it is otherwise as if I lease to one all my Lands in Dale which I have by descent of the part of my mother and in truth I have no Lands in Dale which I have by descent of the part of my mother if the Lessor have other Lands in Dale he shall not have those Ployd 160. a. A man giveth Lands to two Habendum to one for life and after his decease to the other and his Heirs the one shall have the entierly for his life onely notwithstanding the Joynture given in the Premisses by the better opinion in terme M. 8. E 3.427 Generalibus sempâ—r specialia insunt Reg. f. c. Specialls are alwayes contained in the generals and the universalls allwayes comprehend the particularâ— Ployd f. 68. a. The plurall number containeth the singular and more and therefore was it resolved by all the Judges That a pretensed right and title was within the penalty of the Statute of 32. H. 8. for the buying of pretensed rights and titles for pretensed rights and titles in the plurall number did containe a pretensed right and title in the singular number And whereas the Statute of 5 R. 2. c. 5. forbiddeth that none make entry into any Lands or Tenements unlesse in case where entry is given by the Law yet if one enter into a Tenement he shall be punished though the Statute speaketh in the plurall number and likewise whereas the Statute of 1. H. 5. speaketh of false Deeds in the plural number yet if one bring but one false Deed he shall be punished by the Statute as it is holden in many Bookes Ployd f. 467. b. The Statute of Gloucester giveth an Action of Waste against him which holdeth for years which is spoken in the plural number yet may it be taken for him which holdeth for a year or half a yeare vide ibidem plura Generalis clausula non porrigitur ad ea quae sunt specialiter comprehenfa Coke l. 8. 118. b. It is a ground and maxime in the Law that a generall clause is not extended to those things which are specially comprehended Doctor Bonhams Case by the Statutes of 10 14. H. 8. it was enactd that no man should exercise the faculty of Physike within the City of London or within seven miles of the said City unlesse he be admitted thereunto by the President and Colledge of the faculty of Physike and there is another speciall clause contained in the said Acts that any who evilly and not well exercise the said faculty c. shall be punished by Fine and imprisonment c. and it was adjudged that the said generall clause that none should exercise the said faculty of Physike unlesse he be admitted c shall not be extended to the speciall clause
renunciaverit amplius repetere non potest n. f. 139. a. As a Retraxit is a bar of all other actions of the like or inferior nature for he which once renounceth his action can no more renew it It is a generall rule that non-suite before appearance is not peremptory in any case for that a stranger may purchase a writ in the name of him who hath cause of action and regularly a non suit after appearance is not peremptory but that he may commence an action of like nature againe for it may be he hath mistaken something in that action or was not provided of his proofes or mistaken the day or the like But yet for some speciall reasons non-suit in some actions is peremptory as in a quare impedit if the Plaintiff bee non-suit after apparance the Defendant shall make a title and have a Writ to the Bishop and this is peremptory to the Plaintiff and is a good bar in another quare impedit and the reason is because the Defendant had by the judgement of the Court a writ to the Bishop and the incumbent which commeth in by that writ shall never be removed which is a flat barre as to that presentation and for the same law and upon the same reason so it is in the case upon a discontinuance Coke com f. 139. a. vide ibidem plura Actio personalis moritur cum persona a personall action dieth with the person Went. off of executors f. 1. 97. As if a keeper of a Prison suffereth one in execution to escape and dieth no action lyeth against his Executors If Lessee for yeares doth wast and dieth an Action of wast lyeth not against his Executor or Administrator for wast done before that time Coke com f. 53. b. so if the tenant doth wast and he in the reversion dieth the heire shall not have an Action of wast for the wast done in the life of his Ancestor nor the master of an Hospitall or a parson for wâ—st done in the life of the predecessor ibidem The Lessor covenants to pay quit rent during the terme and dieth his Executors shall not pay it because it is a personall covenant in the Lessor onely Dier 114. Yet if there be three copartners and they Lease the land and one of them die and hath issue and the Lessee commit wast and one of them die and hath issue the Aunt and the issue shall joyne in an Action of wast and the issue shall recover one moyety of the Land wasted and the Aunt the other notwithstanding that actio injuriarum moritur cum persona But in favorabilibus magis attenditur quod prodest quam quod nocet in indifferent and favourable things that which profiteth is more respected then that which hurteth Relatio tunc fieri non debet si per eam actus destruatur Reg. I. c. Decius 363. Quando dispositio referri potest ad duas res ita quod secundum relationeÌ„ una vitiatur secunduÌ„ aliaÌ„ utilis sit tunc facienda est relatio ad illam ut valeatdispositio semper ita fiat relatio ut valeat dispositio C. l. 6. f. 76. b. a. A relation then ought not to be when by it an Act is destroyed As in the statutes of 32. and 34. H. 8. concerning Wills whereof is provided that every person having any Mannors Lands c. holden in capite shall have full power c. to dispose by his last will in writing or otherwise by any Act or Acts lawfully executed in his life two parts of the same Mannor c. for the advancement of his wife preferment of his children and payment of his debt or otherwise at his will and pleasure any Law statute c. those words or otherwise at his wil pleasure have reference relation only to the last wil not to the acts executed for otherwise none might have devised two parts but onely for the advancement of his wife and preferment of his children or payment of his debts which is not the intention of the Act but that he may devise two parts to whom he will so that the third descend and it was in vaine to referre those words or otherwise at his will and pleasure to Acts executed for he can do that without any authority given to him by that act And therefore when the disposition may be referred to two things so as according to the relation one of them may be destroyed and according to the other shall be commodious then the relation is to be made to that that the disposition may be of force and alwayes the relation is so to be that the disposition may availe in Sir G. Cursons case So Coke l. 3. f. 28. b. Butler and Bakers case relation is a fiction in law to make a nullity of a thing from the beginning to a certaine intent which in truth had being and the rather for necessities sake ut res magis valeat quam pareat As if a man make a gift in taile to Baron and feme and afterwards grants the reversion of those Lands and since the Baron dies and the feme to have her dower waiveth and disagreeth to the estate taile now in regard of her it is a nullity of the estate from the beginning and to such an intent the Law faineth that the estate was onely made to the baron but as to the grant of the reversion that is a collaterall Act and her refusall shall not have such relation for she may be endowed though that estate stand and so no necessity and therefore without necessity ut res magis valeat the Law will not faine any nullity but in a destruction of a loyall estate vested the law will never make any fiction vide ibidem plura So relation shall make things have been as if as if they never had been 1. H. 7. 16 The husband disagreeth to a Feoffement made by his wife it is void from the beginning so that he may plead ne infeosse pas so 14. H. 8. 10. A devise is that the Executors may sell land c. when they sell all meane charges made by the heire in the interim shall be avoided by relation to the time of the death of the Testator so 14. H. 8 18. I disseise A. to the use of B. the dissiesee releaseth to mee and then B. agreeth with the disseisee this agreement by relation shall be as if he had agreed before the release and so shall defeat it Jurors alien their Lands away between the teste of the Writ of attaint and judgement yet they shall be charged to the King for the estreptment by relation 22. E. 3. 16. Caufe of Assise brought for rescuing a distresse taken for rent and then an Office is found which entitleth the King who seiseth the Land and then an Ouster le maine is sued the Assise is gone for ever because the King shall be said to be in possession at the time of the rescous
making of the banks of a River to be contributory to it for Qui sentit commodum c. Coke l. 7. f. 39. b. If a man grant a Rent-charge for life out of his land and the rent is behind and the Grantor enfeoff A. and the rent is behind in his time and after A. enfeoffeth B. and the rent is behind in his time and then the Grantee dyeth the Executor shall have an action of debt against every of them for the rent behind in his time for qui sâ—ntit commodum c. and so was it holden in Ognels case l. 4. f. 49. a. 50. Barons uses f. 27. If a man bind himself and his Heires in an Obligation or do covenant in writing for him and his Heires or do grant an annuity for him and his Heirs or do make a Warranty of land binding him and his Heires to warranty in all these cases the Heir after the death of the Ancestor is by Law charged with this Obligation Covenant Annuity and Warranty yet with these three cautions 1. That the party must by speciall name bind himself and his Heires 2. That some action must be brought against the Heir whilest the land or other inheritance rested in him unaliened except the land was conveyed away by fraud and one purpose to prevent the Suit intended against him And 3. That no Heire is further to be charged then the value of the land descended unto him from the same Ancestor c. nor to be sold out-right for the debt to be kept in extent at a yearely value untill the debt or damage be run out Neverthelesse for his false plea shall he be charged of his own lands for this Deed of his Ancestor and the reason of this charge is Qui sentit commodum sentire debet incommodum onus vide ibidem plura Dilationes sunt in lege odiosae Ployd f. 75. b. Delaies are tedious in the Law and therefore doth the Law favour Assise because they are the more speedy Suits the Law hath given as the Statute of W. 2. c. 25. in its recitall saith Et quia non est aliquod breve in Cancelaria per quod quaerentes habent tam festinum remedium sicut per breve Nove disseisinae And therefore because it is the more speedy Suit the Law the more greatly favoureth it ibidem For for speed to the Plaintiff the Jurors shal have the view before appearance by the words of the Writ And though Warranties are favoured in Law yet none shall vouch in Assise any one if he be not present and that is for the speed of the Plaintiff No. Nat. br f. 178. And a protection will not defend the party against an assise but assises are accepted by the words of protection p. 2. H. 6. 42. Bâ— protection 53. And all things and pleas which go in retardation or abatement of Assises are esteemed odious and therefore exceptions which will abate other Writs shall not abate Assises if it be so that there is a Disseisor and a Tenant for it is the substance of the Suit and therefore the misnaming of one of the Defendants shall not abate the assise if there be another Disseisin and Tenant and yet the Writ was alwaies false Ploâ—d f. 98. a. b. And if the Tenant plead Joynt-tenancy with a stranger not named although the Plaintiff confesse it yet it shall not abate his assise but for it onely for the remnant the Writ and Plaint shall stand in his force and yet the Plaint was altogether false and if there be a Disseisor and Tenant for any part then it sufficeth for other verity in the Writ or Plaint the Law requireth none and to say that one named in the Writ is dead before the Writ purchased or that there was never any such in rerum natura is alone and shall be adjudged no plea in abatement of the Writ but if there be another Disseisor and a Tenant the Writ shall be good against them Ployd f 90. a. vide ibidem plura And though in actions reall as the weight of the cause requireth there are longer times given in their proceedings then in personall actions yet it appeareth by Fortescue de lib. l. A. c. 5. 3. that they are not too long nor admitted without just cause Crebro enim saith he deliberationibus iuâ—icia matur scunt sed in accelerato processu numquam And as Hobert saith f. 133. Festinatio jâ—stitiae est nâ—verca infortunii Festination of Justice is the step-mother of mischief but many times by deliberations Judgments grow to ripenesse but in over hasty processe never yet the Demandant shall come to a finall end by these actions which he shall never do by prosecution of personall actions for the tryall of a Freehold or Inheritance Co. ep ad lectorem lib. 8. And in all cases the Law favoureth speeding of mens Causes and hateth delayes as 3 H. 6. 15. b. He that pleadeth a Record in delay as to prove the Plaintiff excommunicate must have it ready to shew but otherwise it is if he plead in bar In dilatory pleas both Defendants must joyne 12 H. 7. 1. A Plea in bar that is dilatory must be good to every common intent 8 H. 7. 9. One who is in Court ready to joyn with the Defendant may do it without processe As the Vouchee the Plaintiffs Lessor being prayed in aid of when the Defendant in a Replevin avoweth upon him or the Mesne when the Lord Paramount voweth upon him But Joynder in aid cannot be by an Attorney without processe 2 H. 6. 1. b. One who is a Debtor to the King of Record in the Exchequer if he be seen in the Court may be brought in to answer 2 H. 6 4. b. An assise of Darrein presentment was brought and it was pleaded in abatement of the Writ that the same Plaintiff had brought a Quare impedit against the Defendant for the same Church and the Court was of opinion that it was a good plea for the Quare impedit is of an higher nature for the right and possession and the Statute of W. 2. l. 5. saith that it may be in the election of one to have an assise of Darrein-presentment or a Quare impedit ergo not both And it was adjudged p. 15 Jaco that one cannot have two Quare Impedits of one Church for one avoidance Hutton f. 403. When the Law giveth a man severall remedies for a thing he cannot have both of them together as Littleton saith for then he should recover one thing twice which should be a double charge and a double vexation to the Defendant Co. Com. 145. a. as if I grant by Deed a Rent-charge to another the Grantee hath election to bring a Writ of Annuity and charge the person onely to make it personall or to distrain upon the land and make it reall but he cannot have both after the Grantee hath determined his election but this determination of election must be by action in
7. Quicquid non excutitur justitia non putatur Reg. I.C. Coke l. 6. f. 52. a. Quicunque aliquid statueret parte inaudita altera aequum licet statuerit haud aequum fecerit whatsoever is not discussed and tried is not to be reputed Justice and if any one shall decree any thing one of the parties being not heard though he doth decree that is right yet hath he not done that is just and equall in Bosewels case where it was resolved that no Incumbent shall be removed by a Quare Impedit or an Assise of Darrein presentment purchased within the six moneths unlesse the Incumbent be named in the Writ although the Incumbent be in a defeasible Title for then he shall be removed and adjudged not being heard Quicunque aliquid c. So Coke l. 11. f. 99. a. in James Baggs case though the Mayor and Counsel-chamber of Plymmouth have lawfull authority either by their Charter or Prescriprion to remove any one from his freedome and that they have just cause to remove him yet if it appear by the return that they have proceeded against him without hearing him to answer to what is objected or that he was not reasonably warned such a removement is void and shall not bind the party In ancient times where any were found guilty by the good people by Inquest for any mortall Offence the King gave order to execute them without any answer Mirror of Justice which custome may seem to be derived from the Dictators power among the Romans who had authority to cast any into prison and to punish him with death indicta causa And which also was a custome among the Gauls De Laud. l. Aug. 4. 82. whom now we call French which as Fortescue saith in his time remained among them to wit That the King usually calling his Nobles into his Counsel-chamber without any form of judgment were adjudged criminous by the Conscience of the Prince and thereupon were they presently by the Marshals servants put into Sacks and in the night by them precipitated into deep rivers and so drowned And which custome also was used in Almaine But King Alfred in compassion of the frailty of man who cannot keep himself from sinning without the assistance of the grace of God abrogated that custome and decreed that no Appelle or Inditee should be condemned or executed without answer Mirror of Justice l. 2 f. 3. which still continueth and therefore saith Coke l. 2. Epist ad lectorem are our Lawes commended above other which punisheth not the greatest Offenders though it be for Treason but by just and equall proceedings in Law according to the ancient Lawes of England declared by the generall Charter Nulli vendemus nulli negabimus justitiam rectum And therefore saith Fortescue De Laud. l. A. f. 122. It is part of the charge of the Judges Oath not for any command of the Prince either by Letters or by word of mouth to deviate from Justice or to deny right to any but to minister justice and right indifferently to all as well enemies as friends and accordingly saith he Queen Elizabeths charge to the Justices was That for no commandment of hers common right should be disturbed or delayed Whereas in other Countries the Judges had rather misconster the Law and do injustice then to displease the Kings humour according to the old Sarchasme Ad libitum regis sonuit sententia legis For which unlawfull and wilfull perversness some of our later Kings have been blamed and for which as Frossard saith l. 2. c. 3. Edward the second was condemned quod in audita causa aliquos proceres de medio tollebat that he did punish with death some of his Nobles without hearing their case neither was the stupendious proceeding of Henry the eigth against his new created darling the Lord Cromwell commendable Hen 8. f. 71 or allowable though acted by Parliament who being accused of high Treason and Heresie as Godwin saith inauditus damnatur is condemned without hearing his answer Neither is David's unjust judgment in condemning Mephibosheth being absent 2 Kings 16. and unheard upon the false accusation of Siba approved for whosoever shall decree any thing the other being not heard though the decree be right yet it is not just and equall Quicunque jussu judicis aliquid fecerit non videtur dolo malo fecisse quia parere necesse est Coke l. 10. f. 70. b. He that doth any thing by commandment of the judge seemeth not to have done any thing with a fraudulent intent because he needs must obey And therefore the Officers and Ministers of a Court are not to be punished for executing the precept and warrant of the Court whereas if they had refused to do it the Court would have punished them for their disobedience As in 16 E 3. 70. it is taken for a Maxime that the thing which the Officer doth by Precept or warrant of the Court cannot be said to be against the peace Dr. Stud. f. 150. The Officers of the King are bound to execute the Writs of the King at their perill But this diversity is to be taken that when a Court hath jurisdiction of a Cause and proceedeth erroniously there the party who sueth or the Officers and Ministers of the Court that execute the precept and proces of the Court are not liable to an action but when the Court hath no jurisdiction of the Cause and all the proceeding is coram non Judice actions do lye against them without any regard to the precept or proces for when he hath no jurisdiction he is no judge and it is not of necessito obey him who is no judge no more then a meer stranger for it is a rule Extra terratorium jus dicente non paretur impune He that obeyeth in prescribing Lawes beyond his jurisdiction shall not go without punishment Co. ibid. f. 57. A B. And therefore 22 E. 4.33 Pigot said that if the Court hath not power and authority their proceeding is coram non Judice As if the Court of the Common Bench hold plea in an appeal of death robbery c. and the Defendant is attaint it is coram non Judice but if the same Court in an a plea of debt award a Capias against a Duke c. which by the Law lyeth not against him and it appeareth in the Writ it self yet if the Sheriff arrest him by force of that Capias because the Court hath jurisdiction of the Cause the Sheriff is excused though the writ is against the Law And so if a Capias commeth unto him without an Originall and he serveth it it is excusable in false imprisonment Dyer f 60. pl. 26. So if a Iustice of Peace make a Warrant to arrest one for felony which is not indicted though the Iustice of Peace erre in the Warrant of it yet he that maketh the Arrest by force of that Warrant shall not be punished by a Writ
manerium and if there bee two distinct Mannors then shall they bee taken in the plurall number tota illa maneria that the grant be not void and 32. E. 3. A Fine was levied de maneriis B. and H. and the conclusion was quare praedictum manerium B. and H. ingressus est and good by averment that B. and H. were but one Mannor and though a Writ shall abate for false Latine because any one may purchase a new Writ at his pleasure yet in a grant it shall not because hee cannot purchase a new grant at his pleasure As 4. H. 6 f. 16. the Writ was Henricus dei gratia Rex Angliae Dus Heberniae whereas it should have beene Dns and for it in congruity the Writ did abate but in a Deed that should have beene good enough and so in a fine 9. E. 3. warranty was made in a fine eidem galfrido uxori suae where that should have been iisdem and yet good vide ibidem plura Co. l. 11. f. 3. and Coke com f. 146. ab but because such exceptions doe properly appertaine to Writs Deeds and Fines which have heretofore been composed and levied in the Latine tongue and that by the Act of 9. April 1651. it is enacted that all Patents commissions and all proceedings whatsoever in any Courts of Justice within the Common-wealth of England and which concerne the Law and administration of Justice be made and framed into the english tongue I will cease to heape more cases upon this rule they being chiefly in use for preterite Deeds conveyances and proceedings though not altogether uselesse in our English language for it also hath its grammaticall constructions and sometimes abreviations and therefore it is also in the above said Act enacted that mistranslations or variation in forme by reason of Translation or part of proceedings already begun being in Latine or part in English shall bee no error or avoide any proceedings by reason thereof Sect. 3. THe Law hath little relat ionto Rhetorick and is too strict an argumentative for that copious various and tropicall art Ornari res ipsa negat contenta doceri Doctum genus in doctorum hominum ad doceberniam vix docti But like ruggid and knotty tymber rejects the rhetoricall plaine and outward ornament which moved the critticke Erasmus to deride it and the civilian Hottaman to despise it not apprehending the depth and profundity of it for the Law as Sir Edward Coke is a deep well out of which every one drawes according to the strength of his understanding Cok. com f. 7.1 a. he which reacheth deepest seeth the admirable secrets of the Law which though in the beginning it seemeth difficult yet when the student diveth to the depth it is delightfull and therefore as the same Author in another place saith The generous student Cok. com f. 5. a. ought not to bee discouraged when he meeteth with knotty cases nescit enim generosa mens ignorantiam pati but will proceed on his reading with alacrity to know how to worke into with delight those ruffe Mines of hidden Treasure Coke com f. 235. to which worke as he also saith the knowledge of the liberall arts is requisite especially the art of Logick to labour in that various and intricate Labyrinth for it teacheth a man not onely by just argument to conclude the matter in question but to discover between truth and falsehood and to use a good method and reasonably to speake to any question for it is nothing else but ars rationandi the act of reasoning Coke com f. 344. h. and then wee are said to know the law when wee apprehend the reason of the law from whence arise these grounds and maxims and first from notations which by the consent of all Writers appertaine to Logick Notationes sunt quasi verae rerum notae Fons log and Bracton L. 4. c. 20. Ideo imposita sunt nomina ut demonstrent voluntatem dicentis utimur notis vocis ministerio notations are as it were the true notes of things sor therefore were they imposed that they might demonstrate the will of the speaker and wee use them as notes in the ministry of our Language as Socage is servitium socae i.e. carucae the service of the Plow because that the word soca was used for the Plow and the name of the court of Pypowders was derived from the dusty feet of the commers markets and faires being most frequented in Summer Lam. Arch. so religious houses were called monasteria of the solitarie life therein led which in latter daies was nothing lesse quia as one pleraque monasteria nihil minus sunt quam solitudines Dod. so the feudists in the civill law deduce homagium from hominium for by that name hee doth professe himselfe his man and Client And such notations and etymologies are not to be wrested but must bee answerable to the sound of the words and applied to the sense of which it is said by Coke com f. 68. b. that the right interpretations and etymologies of words are necessary which not only demonstrate their native conceptions but from them often produced arguments which are frequent among the Civilians as well as by the common Lawyers as Cicero arguing for Opimius then Consul useth this notation si Consul est qui consulit patria quid alius est Opimius Ployden 343 b. Testamentum est testatio mentis for of those two words is it compounded and there is no other testation of the Testators mind here but for the twelve Acres in Rigdens case So Cok l. 8. 37. a. a Barrator is derived of two legall words bar which signifieth the bar in Court where causes are debated and retium which signifieth a crime and offence because a common barrator is chiefely an offendor in moving and maintaining of quarrels at barres in Courts and Coke l. 10. f. 128. a. reditus dicitur a reddendo quia retro it to wit to the Lessor or Donor and that is the reason that the Rent so reserved is not due before the day of payment because it is to be rendred and restored of the issues and profits vide Yet as Doderidge such arguments are not to be used at all times and occasions but when necessity requireth the same or apt consequence doth offer a fit occasion or rather as Coke l. 7. f. 27. b. Calvins Case Arguments drawn from Etymologys are too weake or too light for Judges to build there Judgments on yet when they agree with the Judgment of the Law Judges may use them for Ornaments From the Predicable GEnerale nihil ponit generale nihil certum implicat Cok. l. 2. f. 33.34 in Doddingtons Case a generality determineth nothing and a generality implyeth no certainty as if a common person be bound to devise or grant all his Lands which he hath within the tenure of I. B. in W. the Obligor may say that he hath no Land there for
incurreth for which day the husband maketh an acquittance supposing the receit of the rent for the said yeare last past and notwithstanding that acquittance his servant distraineth for the rent of half a yeare of the first year being behinde but though the last arrearages before the last terme were due to the feme dum sola fuit yet Harper and Dyer were of opinion that all the arrearages were discharged by the acquittance of the last terme because it is an antient principle That all the arrearages are discharged by the acquittance of the last terme and we ought not to deny principles Coke l. 10. f. 40. a. No man ought to dispute against recoveries the legall pillars of common assurances because we are not to dispute against principles and which St. Germins Doctor and Student c. 26. approveth to binde both in Law and conscience and by the Statute of 23. Eliz. C. 4. That for the avoyding of the dangers of assurances of Lands and the advancement of common recoveries it is provided that any common recovery shall not be avoided for any want of forme in words and not in matter of substance And Sir James Dyer then chiefe Justice did with great gravity and some bitternesse reprove an utter Barrister who rashly inveyed against common recoveries not knowing the reason and foundation of them and said that he was not worthy to be of the profession of the Law who durst speake against common recoveries which were the sinews of assurances and inheritances and founded upon great reason and authority Mary Portingtons Case vide ibidem â—lura Coke Com. f. 343. a. Principium est quasi primum caput a principle is as it were the first head from which many cases have their beginning which is so strong as it suffereth no contradiction and therefore is it said in our Books that ancient principles of the Law ought not to be disputed 11. H. 4. 9. 2. As that of every Land there is a fee-simple and that every Land in fee-simple may be charged in fee by one way or other Littleton ibidem Cessante statu primitivo cessat derivativus Coke l. 8. f. 34. a. The primitive state ceasing the derivative doth cease As if Tenant in taile maketh a lease for lives according to the Statute of 32. H. 8. c. 28. and then dyeth without issue the lease being derived out of the Estate taile shall not continue longer than the Estate taile against the opinion in 33. H. 8. 48. Dyer which was granted by the whole Court Derivativa potestas non potest esse major primitiva Noy max. f 4. A derivative power cannot be greater than it fâ—om which it is derived As the Attorny of one that is disseised cannot make claime of the Land it the disseisee durst have gone to the Land Littleton The Bayliff of a disseisor shall not say that the Plaintiff never had any thing in the Land for the Master himselfe shall not have that Plea because he is not Tenant of the Free-hold 28. Ass Pl. 4. The Servant shall be estopped to say the Free-hold is his Masters by recovery against his Master though the servant himselfe be a stranger to it for he shall not be in better condition tâ—an he whose right he claimeth 2. E. 4. 16. He that gaineth a thing on high shall neither have gaine nor losse thereby Noy Max. f. 11. As if one Joyn-tenant maketh a lease of his Joyntee and dyeth the heire which surviveth shall have the reversion of his Joynture but not the rent because he cometh in by the first Feoffor and not under his companion Dyer 187. So when the Husband is Lessee for years in the right of his wife reserving a rent if he dyeth the wife shall have the residue of the terme but not of the rent ibidem An executor recovereth and dieth intestate Administration of the goods of the Testator is committed to I. S. I. S. shall not sue execution upon this recovery Dower cannot be assigned reserving a rent or with a remainder over for shee is in from the husband and not from him who assigneth Dower Finch f. 13. Quod dignius est prius est minus digno The Law preferreth every thing according to its worthinesse Ployd f. 169. a. and therefore is every thing placed in Writs by the rule of the Register according to its dignity as the Messuage is placed before Lands the Land before Meadow and the Meadow before Pasture and the like and this dignity is taken from necessity for to have an house to inhabite and to defend his body from tempest and violence of weather is more necessary than to have Land to plow it for bread and also to have Land for bread is more necessary than to have Meadow for Hay to feed Cattell and likewise to have Meadow for Hay which will serve all the yeare is more necessary than Pasture c. ibidem And so in the Register the entire thing which is more worthy shall be demanded before the moyety part or parts As in a Replevin if it be of two beasts the one quick the other dead the living thing shall first be demanded Register Quod prius est verius est quod prius jure est potius est tempore Coke Com. f. 347. b. As in a remitter the Law preferreth the first and antient right before the latter and a sure right though it be little before a great estate by wrong which jumpeth with the rule of the Civill Law Quoties duplici jure defertur alicui successio repudiato novo jure quod ante defertur superest vetus Paulus 17. quest As if Tenant in taile discontinueth the taile and after disseiseth the discontinuee and so dyeth seised This is a remitter to the tenant in taile because the Law shall put and adjudge him to be in by force of the tayle which is his antient title for if he should be in by force of the descent then the discontinuee may have a writ of Entry sur disseissin in the per against him and recover the tenement and his damages but being in by force of the taile the title of the discontinuee is quite nullified Qualis causa talis effectus Ployd f. 292. a. Things are construed according to that which is the cause thereof as if an Executor assigne Auditors to one who was accountant to the Testator and the Auditors finde him in arrearages the Action of debt which the Executors shall have shall be in the detinet onely for the debt shall be in them as Executors and have respect to the foundation and cause 11. H. 6. f. 16. by Paston and Newton So if one have a villaine for years as Executor if the villaine purchase Land and the Executors enter the Land shall be to the use of the Testator and it shall be assets in his hands because the villain who was the cause of it was to that use Ibidem Pas 32. H. 8. E. villenage 146. Ployd f. 524. 525.
b. a. If Tenant for years of Land granteth a rent-charge to another for the life of the grantee the grantee shall not have an estate of Frank-tenement in the rent in that he cannot have an estate of Frank-tenement derived out of the Chattell reall but he shall have the rent during all the years though the Lessee had forty years in the Land for terme of life is greater then years and therefore the Grantee shall have all the rent for all the years if he shall live so long And f. 525. b. An Executor cannot devise a terme to another which he hath as Executor for so soone as the Executor is dead the terme is to the use of the first Testator and his Executors have it as Executors to the first Testator and to his use and not as Executors of the last Testator nor to his use for the Executors have them by relation as immediate Executors to the first Testator A. Covenanteth with B. and his Executors to make a lease of white acre before Michaelwas and the Covenantee dyeth before and A. maketh a lease to his Executor the lease shall be to the use of the Testator and assets in the Executor for the Covenant which was the cause of the Lease came to the Executor in right of the Testator and to the same use shall the lease be Ployd f. 292. a. Chap-mans case Cessante causa cessat effectus Ployd 268. Sir John Radcliffs case the cause ceasing the effect also ceaseth An office was found that after the decease of Robert Earle of Sussex and Mary the Countesse his mother certaine Lands did descend to Sir John Radcliff Knight as Son and Heire male of the body of the said Robert engendred and the body of the said Mary and Sir John Radcliff Knight was then of the age of eighteen years before the finding of the office and the Lands were holden of the King and Queene by the tenth part of a fee of Knights service in Capite And when Sir John Radcliff became of full age he prayed his livery but the Court of wards required of him for the Queene the valew of his marriage but it was alleaged that because he was made Knight before the title of the Wardship accrewed and the Wardship was due to the Lord in respect of his imbecility to doe the service of a Knight and that the making him a Knight did admit him able to doe the service of a Knight his body ought not to be in ward for defect of such ability for the cause ceasing the effect also ceaseth and that if his person was not in Wardship no marriage nor value for it shall be due to the guardian and so was it adjudged by the Court contrary to Magna Charta c. 4. which was said to be made for the advantage of the Lords vide ibidem plura Coke Com. 312. a. Cessante causa vel ratione legis cessat lex The cause and reason of the Law ceasing the Law also ceaseth as at the common Law no aid was grantable of a stranger to an avowry because the avowry was made of a certaine person and now the avowry being made by the Statute of 21. H. 8. upon no person therefore the reason of the Law being changed the Law it self is also changed and consequently in an avowry according to that act aid shall be granted to any man vide ibidem plura Coke Com. f. 76. a. Cessante causa cessat causatum As if the Lord after he hath the Wardship of the body and the Lord doth release to the infant his right in the signiory or the signiory descendeth to the infant he shal be out of ward both for the body and the Land for he was in ward in respect he was not able to doe those services which he ought to doe to his Lord which now are extinct for the cause ceasing the thing caused ceaseth and there must be a tenure continuing or no Wardship So if the Conusee in a Statute merchant be in execution and his Land also and the Conusee release to him all debts this shall discharge the executiâ—n for the debt was the cause of the execution and of the continuance of it untill the debt be satisfied therefore the discharge of the debt which was the cause discharged the execution which was the effect Coke Com. f. 76. a. So if the heire female within the age of fourteen years be in ward and after the age of fourteen years expired the Lord by the Statute of W. 1. c. 22. hath two years more to tender her a convenable marriage but if the Lord marry her within the two years her husband and shee shall prefently enter into the Lands for the cause ceasing the effect also ceaseth Coke ibidem 7 5. b. The King granteth an office to one at will and ten pound fee during life pro officio illo now if the King put him from his office the fee shall cease 5. E. 4. 8. b. The executor or husband after the death of the wife guardian in socage shal not retain the Wardship for the guardian hath it not to his owne use but to the benefit of the heire and the executor or husband hath not that affection which the testator or wife had which was the cause that the Law giveth them the Wardship 7. Eliz. 293. b. If a stroke be given the first day of May and the King pardon him the second day of May for all felonies and misdemeanors the party smitten dyeth the third day of May so as this is no felony till after the pardon yet the felony is pardoned for the misdemeanor is pardoned and therefore all things pursuing are also pardoned 13. E. 401. If two coparceners make a lease reserving a rent they shall have this rent in common as they have the reversion but if afterwards they grant the reversion excepting the rent then they shall be Joyntenants of the rent Finch mono. f. 9. It is no principall challenge to a Juror that he hath married the parties mother if shee be dead without issue for the cause of favor is removed 14. H. 7. 2. The King disparking the Parke the office of the keeper is determined and all such offices as are presumed in Law to be for the commoditie of the King as well as the Patentee and if one granteth a Stewardship of a mannor and dismembreth that mannor the office is determined if a corporation granteth the office of a towne-clark and surrendreth their patent to be renewed all their offices are determined Huttons Reports Upon a divorce the woman shal have the goods given in marriage not being spent for the goods were given in advancement of the woman and therefore it is reasonable that shee should have them in that the cause and consideration of that gift is now defeated for the cause ceasing the effect also ceaseth Dyer f. 13. p. 61. Coke l. 5. f. 59. b. Vaughans case The originall cause of the amercement being pardoned the
kill her hushand part of which her husband and her Father having eaten were greivously sick whereof her Father complaining to the said Martin Martin stirring the electuary did eate part of it the one and twentieth of May and dyed the 22th of May and it was resolved that Agnes was guilty of the Murther of the said Martin for the Law conjoyneth the murtherous intention of Agnes in putting poyson into the electuary to kill her husband with the event that followed upon it to wit the death of the said Martin for the putting of poyson in the electuary was the cause of the poysoning and death of the said Martin was the event for that is the event which followeth the cause and are called events because they come from the cause and the stirring of the electuary by Martin without putting in the poyson by Agnes could not have been the cause of his death ibidem Frustra expectatur eventus cujus effectus nullus sequitur it is in vaine to expect the event where no effect followeth Coke l. 5 f. 15. b. Cawdrys case As if an excommunication under the Popes bull is not of force to disable any man in England and that if it being the extreame and finall end of any suite in the Court of Rome be not to be allowed in England it consequently followeth that by the antient common Law of England no suite for any cause though it be spirituall arising within this Realme ought to be determined in the Court of Rome for in vaine an event is to be expected of which no effect followeth and that the Bishops of England are the immediate Officers and Ministers to the Kings Courts ibidem Plus virium habent argumenta ex effectis Fons Log. Arguments from the effects are of greater force and therefore doth the Law commonly conster things according to the effects As if a Deed be delivered by an infant it cannot be delivered againe at his full age for it took some effect before and was but voydable 1. H. 6. 4. But a deed delivered by a Feme-covert or a release delivered to one who had nothing in the Land may be delivered againe to wit when shee cometh to be sole or the party to have somewhat in the Land for the first delivery was meerly void and of no effect at all From the whole and the part TOtum praefertur unicuique parti the whole is preferred before either part Coke l. 3. f. 41. in Ratcliffs case As the blood which is between every Heire and his Ancester maketh him Heire for without blood none can inherit and therefore it is great reason that he who hath the whole and entire blood shall inherit before him who hath but part of the blood of his Ancester because by the order of nature the whole is to be preferred before the part And therefore saith Bracton Proptâ—r jus sanguinis duplicatum dicitur haeires tam ex parte matris quam ex parte patris propinquior soror quum frater de alia uxore that from the double right of blood as well from the part of the father as from the part of the Mother the Sister is said to be the neerer heire then the brother of the other wife and Britton saith that the right of blood in this case maketh the Female to exclude the male ibidem And therefore by the common Law of England if a common person have issue a Son and a Daughter by one venter and a Son by another venter and dyeth seised of Lands in Fee-simple and the eldest Son entereth into the Land and dyeth without issue the Sister of the whole blood shall inherit to him and not the brother of the halfe blood Coke ibidem 40. b. Vbi major pars ibi totum where the major part is there is the whole 21. E. 4. 27. 14. H. 8. 27. The Deane and major part of the Chapter maketh the Croporation and their act is the act of the Corporation though the others doe not agree which accordeth with the rule of the Canon Law authoritas potestas capituli consistit in majore pare ejus saniâ—ri sic totum capitulum facere dicitur quod facit major sanior pars Panorâ—â—tanus The authority and power of a Chapter consisteth in the greater and sounder part and so the whole Chapter is said to doe what the major and sounder part doth But here this difference is to be taken that in Colledges and Corporations the major part of the Members ought to give their voices in a distinct number and not in a confused and incertaine number as in the election of the Knights of Parliament or the Coronors or Virderors in the County Court the greater voice and acclamation is sufficient to shew the assâ—nt of the greater part of the Free-holders who make the election Ployd 126. a. So as the major part of the Chapter doth consent in making this confirmation and this consent ought to be expressed by the fixing of the Seale 14. H. 6. 17. So ought they to sit in one place and at one time for otherwise it may be called an assent and not a consent where the lease ought to be confirmed by the assent and consent of the Deane and Chapter for as the body naturall cannot make any perfect act if it be dismembred no more can a body politique but the persons which are members of it ought to be capitulariter congregati in a certaine place otherwise if they be scattered or dispersed in severall places that which they doe shall not be said to be the Act of the Corporation but factum singulorum as 15. E. 4. 2. a. where the major part of the Monkes had subscribed their hands to a deed of the Abbot but it was not expressed that it was done with the assent and consent of the Covent it was said to be done by those particular persons which had subscribed and not by the Corporation and such a deed shall not bind the house yet the Deane and Chapter are not confined to their Chapter-house but they may meet to and make their Acts elsewhere and therefore it is holden 21. E. 4. 26 That where a Deed did beare date in domâ— capituli averrement might be that the deed was delivered at another place yet the major part ought to be present in the same place and therefore the election of Coroners ought to be in pleno comitatu as appeareth by the Writ de coronatore eligendo So the consent of the major part of the Chapter ought to be at the same time simul semel and not scatteringly and upon severall daies for it is not a consent unlesse it be simul for consensus est voluntas multoâ—um ad ques res pertinet simul juncta for consent is the will of many joyned together concerning those things which appertaine unto them Davis f. 48. vide ibidem plura Turpâ—s est pars quae cum suo toto non convenit It is a foule and deformed
Ward within Lond. but God forbid but that the Jurors may find assets by descent in any other county within England for the Law is that the Plaintiff in such case shall have execution of all the Lands the heire had and peradventure he might have Lands in diverse counties and therefore though a place be named for necessity sake yet the Jurors may find all that which by law may be chargeable in such a case in whatsoever City and County it lyeth and so was the principall case resolved after in 10. Eliz. though it be not reported there and with it agreeeth 10. H. 6. 13. And the conceit of Brook 2. Mar. Attaint 104. that the jurors of one county are not compellable to find transitory things in another county was altogether denyed by the whole Court for they are bound under the paine of attaint to finde assets in any other county whatsoever for it may be that the executors have goods of the Testators in divers severall counties and that in none of those counties had by him there is assets vide ibidem plura And if the Excutors have any goods of the Testators in any part of the world he shall be charged in respect of them or if Merchants and others which have goods of great value beyond the Seas be indebted in England if those goods should not be liable to their debts it would be a great defect in Law Ib. Coke com f. 282. a. It is an ancient principle of the Law that for transitory actions the Plaintiff may alledge the same in what place or county he will and the Jurors upon not guilty pleaded are to be made to find for the Plaintiff neither can the assault battery or finding of goods c. alledged in another county be traversed without special cause of justification which extendeth to some speciall place as if a Constable of a towne in another County arresteth the body of a man that breaketh the peace there he may traverse the County but he must not rest there but all other places saving in the town where he is Constable vide ibidem plura But in the case of felony the triall shall be by the common Law in the same place where the offence was and shall not be supposed in any other place for in criminall causes the rule holdeth Ubi quis deliquit ibi punietur Coke l. 6. f. 47. b. where one offendeth there he shall be punished yet this rule faileth in treason to adhere to the enemy of the King without the Realme which is declared to be treason by the common Law by the statute of 25. E. 3. de proditionibus for least there should be a want of triall in matter of such consequence the adherence without the Realme must be alledged in some place within England and if upon the indictment they shall find any adherences out of the realme they shall finde the Delinquent guilty 5. R. 2. triall 24 but commonly they did indite him in that county where his Lands did lie which were to be forfeited and so it is declared by the statute of 35. H. 8. c. 2 vide Coke com 261. f. b. Saepe locus in delcto auget vel minuit culpam Reg. I. C. The place doth often augment or diminish the offence as he who striketh a man in Westmin Hall shall have his right hand cut off his Lands Chattels forfeited so if he strike a Juror and besides shall be committed to perpetuall Prison Finch Nâ—mot f. 25. If men tilt or turney in the presence of the King and if two masters of defence play their prizes on the stage and kill one another it is not felony Heb. Rep. f. 89. So tâ—e felonious taking of goods out of any Church or Chappel is sacriledge and a felony more hainous then ordinary and therefore more severely punished It was King Alureds Law Qui in templo quid clepscrit valorem solvito mulctampretio rei congruam pendito manum quacumque furatus est praecidito nec redimere manum potest nisi propria capitis aestimatione whosoever shall steale any thing in a Church let him restore the value let him pay a fine answerable to the worth of the thing let that hand with which he did steale be cut off neither could he redeem his hand but with the price of his life which in those antient times wherein offences were not so frequent was a grievous punishment wherin their was chiefly censured with satisfaction but in the succeeding worser times by the statute of 23. H. 8. It was made capitall without the benefit of Clergy So to kill the Kings Chancellor Treasurer Justices in Eyre and Assise of Oyer and Terminer being in his place and doing his Office is high treason Dalt 226. Si desit obedientia non adjuvat locus Coke l. 7. f. 24. b In Calvins case If obedience be wanting the place furthereth not Samaria in Syria was the cheife City of the ten Tribes but being conquered by the King of Syria and the Jews taken Prisoners and carried away into captivity was after inhabited by the Paynims yet because the people of Samaria were not under actuall obedience by the judgement of the chiefe Justice of the whole world they were adjudged alienigenae Aliens Luke c. 17. Where one of them who was cleansed of his Leprosy by our Saviour being a Samaritan returned and gave praise to God and is by our Saviour called an alien that is a stranger borne because he had the place but wanted the obedience and where obedience is wanting the place helpeth not And this agreeth with the divine saying Si locus salvare potuisset Satan de coelo pro sua inobedientia non cecidisset Adam in Paradiso non cecidisset Lot in Monte non cecidisset sed potius in Sodom If the place could save one Satan for his disobedience had not fallen from heaven Adam had not fallen in Paradise and Lot in the Mountain had not fallen but rather in Sodom A Paribus from equals PArium eadem est ratio things are to be construed according to equality of reason Coke l. 3. f. 12. b. As upon a recognisance acknowledged by the Ancestor or in a judgement upon an action of debt given against him if he dieth sâ—ised of two Acres whereof one is holden in Burrough english or having issue two daughters which make partition in this case if one be onely charged the other shall have contribution because they are in aequali jure in equall right So if a man be bound in a statute or recognisance and after his death some of the land descendeth to the heir of the part of the father and some to the heire of the part of the mother in this case one onely shall not be charged and if he be he shall have contribution against the other So in dower if the tenant vouch the heire in three severall wards every one shall be equally charged as it is agreed 11. H 7. 22. Ibidem
by his Will or grant a rent-charge out of it for shee hath an estate in it before and at the time of his death which shall prevent the Devisee and shee surviving is remitted to the terme and therefore shall avoide the rent-charge 14. Eliz. Ployd 418 b. If Lessee for yeares granteth his terme to a Feme-covert and another or if a feme-sole and another are Joyn-tenants for years and shee taketh an husband the Joynture is not dissolved but continueth and the Survivor of the feme or the stranger shall have all the terme because the terme is a Chattell reall and the marriage of the feme shall not devest the terme out of the feme but shee had an estate in it as shee had before so that if an estranger oust them the feme ought to joyne with the baron in the suite of ejectione firme and the feme shall have judgement as well as the baron Ployd ibidem So in an action of debt upon arrearages of account against one who was receivor to the feme whilst shee was sole they both must joyne though the Auditors were assigned during the coverture for the very cause of action that is the receipt was in her right 16. E. 4. 8. The husband hath power also to dispose of things in action and his release of an obligation made to the feme or where goods were taken from her whilst shee was sole shall be good against the wife and he dye 87. H. 8. 1. But if he dye without making such a release the Wife shall have an Action upon the Obligation and not the Executors of the husband likewise the wife or her Executor if shee dye shall have those things in action and not the husband but shee may make her husband her Executor and then he shall recover them to her use 39. H. 6. 27. The wife is unable to contract with any without the consent of her husband and upon a Feoffment to a feme covert shee taketh nothing unlesse her husband will agree and where one is bound to enfeoff the husband and wife the husbands refusall is the refusall of them both Finch Nomot f. 44. And where the husband and wife are joynt Purchasers the husband may make a Feoffment and livery upon the Land which shall worke a discontinuance though the wife be in presence upon the Land and will not agree But if the husband and wife bargaine and sell the wives Lands by Indenture and the Vendee grant unto them for the same a yearly rent her acceptance of this rent after her husbands death doth not bar her of the Land although the acceptance be an agreement to the bargaine but the bargaine being but a contract is the bargaine of the husband onely and not of the wife for a wife is sub potestate viri cui invita contradicere non potest and therefore is the Writ cui invita given to the wife by Law for the recovery of her Land after her husbands death being aliened by him and therfore it is that Judges when a woman is to acknowledge any fine of any Lands doe examine her apart from her husband to know whether shee be willing or come to doe it by compulsion of the husband Offi of Ex. f. 210. And upon a joynt purchase of the husband and wife during coverture if the husband alien shee shall recover the whole after her husbands decease unlesse shee acknowledge a Fine and a cui invita is given to the feme by the Statute of Westminster 2. c. 3. upon a recovery by default against baron and feme and by the equity of it a feme divorced shall have a cui ante divortium to recover the Land lost by baron and feme by default before the divorce Ployd f. 58. a. And if Lands be given in Frank-marriage and a divorce had afterwards the feme shall have all the Land ibidem the reason that he there giveth is because the marriages of women and their advancement by it are much favoured in Law as if a woman give Lands to a man causa matrimonij praelocuti and he will not marry her shee shall have a Writ to recover the Land ibidem and Dyer f. 13. A man giveth certaine goods to his Daughter in marriage upon a divorce the feme shal have al the goods so given that are not spent because they were given for her advancement so as it is regularly true In omnibus fere uxori sub potestate viri succurritur Coke l. 9. f. 84. b. In all things almost the Law helpeth the wife because shee is under the power of her husband as if baron and feme as in right of the wife have right to enter into Lands and the Tenant dyeth seised the entry of the husband is taken away upon the heire which is in by descent but if the husband dye the wife or her heires may well enter upon the issue for the laches of her husband shall not turne to the prejudice of the wife or her heires Littl. but otherwise it is if the wrong was done to the feme sole before shee took husband Coke Com. f. 24. a. vide ibidem plura and unlesse it be for the performance of a condition annexed to the estate of Land as if a feme be infeoffed either before or after marriage reserving a rent and for default of non-payment a re-entry in that case the laches of the baron shall dis-inherit the wife for ever ibidem b. Ubi nullam matrimonium ibi nulla dos Bracton Coke com f. 32. a. where there is no marriage there is no dower Ployd f. 375. a. for the marriage of the woman is the principall cause of her dower and though the seisin of the baron and death of the husband are causes sine qua non without which a dower cannot be had yet the procatartique and impulsive cause of the dower of the woman is the paines and burden shee endureth under the power and yoke of matrimony for as Tholosanus Tholosanus Synt. L. 9. c. 11. matrimonium is quasi matris munus a matre potius quam a patre dictum because shee beareth the burden in her wombe and with painfull labour delivereth it and is very indulgent to nourish it and for those reasons as Bracton saith dowers were instituted for a competent livelyhood for the wife during her life to wit propter onus matrimonij ad sustentationem uxoris ad educationem liberorum si vir premoriatur for the burden of matrimony and sustentation of the wife and education of the children if the husband dy before l. 5. c. 22. which Ockam expresseth in a more affectionate terme and calleth her dower praemium pudoris the reward of her chastity and love f. 40. And therfore though it be not necessary that the seisin of the land shal continue during the coverture for notwithstanding the alienation of the husband the wife shall be endowed yet is it necessary the marriage shall continue for if
upon a false consideration the heire shall not be received to aver a false consideration against his ancestor Dier Ex nudo pacto non oritur actio Ployd 305. a. and 308. b. from a bare contract or promise no action riseth for it is not much argued by the laws of England what diversity is betweene a contract and a promise and a gift for the intent of the law is to have the matter argued not the termes A Nude contract is where a man maketh a bargaine and sale of his goods or lands without any recompence appointed for it As if I say to you I sell you all my lands or all my goods and nothing is assigned that the other shall give or pay for it this is a nude contract and is void in law and the vendee cannot bring an action for them Dr. and Student c. 24. And a nude promise is when a man promiseth to give a man certaine mony at such a day or to do him certaine service and nothing is assigned for them As if I promise to give you twenty pound to make your house anew there you shall have no action against me for the 20 l. because it is a nude promise as it is affirmed by Townsend T. 17. E. 4. Ployd f. 308. b. So if a Carpenter by word covenanteth and undertaketh to make a new house and he doth not and for not making it the Plaintiff bringeth an action of covenant against the Carpenter and it doth not appeare that he had any thing for making of the house it was adjudged in 11 H. 4. f. 33. that the Plaintiff should not take any thing by his writ Ployd 309. a. And if I promise to another to keep his goods safely till such a time and after I refuse to take them no action lieth against me but if I take them and after they be lost or impaired through my negligent keeping an Action lieth Doctor and Stud. c. 24. But otherwise it is if he to whom the promise is made have a charge by reason of the promise which he hath also performed then in that case hee shall have an Action for that thing is promised As if a man give land in Frankal-moine they are bound to make prayers to God for him and in consideration of such prayers he is bound to pay to the cheife Lord all the rents and services issuing out of that land Lit. a. Frankal And in 17. E. 4. 5. It is taken by diverse that if I promise a Surgeon a certaine summe to cure such a poor man or if I promise to a labourer certaine mony to repaire such a way which is in the high way that he shall have an action of debt for it for it is a thing of charity and I merit thankes of them for it and therefore shall not be called Nudum pactum Ployd f. 306. a. If I contract with another that if he will marry my daughter that I will give him 20 l. in this case if he take her to wife he shall have an action of debt for the 20 l. 22. E. l. Assi Pl. 70. by Thorp and yet I have nothing for it and if a man hath no regard to nature it shall be nudum pactum but because my daughter is advanced by it that is a good consideration to me Ployd f. 305. a. So Dr. and Stud. c. 24. f. 104. It is a good promise because he hath quid pro quo the preferement of his Daughter for his money But if a man promise to another 20 l. with his daughter in marriage if he marry the daughter and the money be not paid he shall not have an action of debt or an action of the case at the common law but he must sue for his money in the spirituall Court for here is no good forme of contract F. n. b. f. 44. a. And as Bracton saith matrimonium est principale ejusdem juris id est jurisdictionis eâ—â—e debet accessorium matrimony is the principall and the accessory ought to be of the same jurisdiction Gardiner brought an assumpsit and declared that the Defendant in consideration that he was indebted to the Plaintiff in 10 l. for pasturing and feeding of certaine beasts in the Plaintiffs grounds and for wheat and other Marchandises had and received by the said defendant did assume to pay to the said Plaintiff the debt that he had paid Vpon issue non-assumpsit was found for the Plaintiff and upon a Writ of error in the Exchequor-chamber that there must be some certaine cause of the debt assigned for it is not sufficient to say generally he was indebted for it might be for rents upon leases or for debts upon specialties but it was adjudged certaine enough and required not so much certainty as an action of debt upon a contract Hob. rep f. 7. Wolastone brought an assumpsit against W. and declared that whereas W. promised him 30 l. in consideration that the Plaintiff on the twentieth of August 1610. had given day to the said defendant for the payment of the same money untill the ninth of October following the Defendant did assume to pay him the same ninth day and upon issue non-assumpsit it was found for the Plaintiff and damages given Hob. f. 26. Wolastons case vide ibidem L. brought an assumpsit against B. and declared that whereas the defendant had felloniously slaine one P. M. the defendant afterwards required the Plaintiff to labour and doe his endeavour to obtaine his pardon from the King whereupon the Plaintiff upon the same request did labour c. to obtaine pardon for the said defendant and afterwards fi c. in consideration of the Premisses the defendant did promise to the Plaintiff to give him a hundred pounds and that he had not c. upon non-assumpsit it is found for the Plaintiff 100 l. ibidem f. 147. vide ibid. plura B. bringeth an action of the case against C. executor of Reade and counteth that whereas he had in M. terme 14. Jac. presented an attachment of priviledge against Reade rerurn in H. terme the testator knowing of it in consideration that at his request the Plaintiff would forbeare to prosecute the said writ did promise to pay him 50 l. and then averred c. and after verdict for the Plaintiff and exceptions in arrest of judgement the Court gave sentence Bedwels case vide ibidem plura A promise made for a thing past is void as if I promise one ten pounds because he hath builded me an house an action lyeth not there and if I promise to give another 10 l. in recompence of such a trespass that he hath done him an action lieth not against him the reason is because a contract properly is where a man for his goods shal have by the assent of the other party certaine goods or some other profit at the time of the contract or after but if the thing be promised fot a cause that is past by way of a recompence
exhibenda Coke l. 7. f. 4. Many things are constituted in law least the Court of the Lord the King should faile in doing of Justice by the Statute of W. 2. c. 8. It is provided that so often as from henceforth there shall be found in the Chancery that in one case there is found a Writ and in the like case falling under the same right and wanting the like remedy no Writ is found let the Clarkes of the Chancery agree in making a new Writ c. or at the next Parliament let there be a Writ by the consent of the learned in the law and the estate concludeth with the effect of the common law Quod curia domini Regis non debet deficere conquerentibus in Justitia perquirenda That the Kings Court ought not to be slack or deficient to the Complainant in seeking Justice and therefore if there be Lord and Tenant and the tenancy extend into two Counties in this case if the rents or services be behind the Lord may have severall Writs of customes and services for each County a Writ and shall have them retornable at one day in the common bench and there upon count according to his case by the commmon Law because otherwise the Court of the King should be deficient to the Plaintiffs in seeking of Justice Coke com f. 154. a. and Coke l. 7. f. 4. a. b. vide ibidem plura in Bulvers case If there be Lord Mesne and Tenant and the Mesne doth truly his services paramount and yet the Lord distraineth the Tenant paravaile for them at that time the distresse is tortious and the tenant is not distrained in default of the mesne yet in this case if the tenant paravaile request the mesne to take his Cattle out of the ground and to put in the proper Cattle of the mesne in place of them or if the tenant had replevind his own Cattle and requested the mesne to joyne and to acquit him and he refuse by that matter ex post facto the Law shall adjudge that the tenant paravaile was distrained in default of the mesne and in a Writ of mesne the mesne shall plead not distrained in his default and it shall be found against him or otherwise the tenant paravaile who is in no default shall have wrong and yet shall be without remedy and it is all one to the tenant whether the distresse was wrongfull or right if he have not any distresse 39. E. 3.34 c. By which it appeareth that the Judges in those ages did endeavour to put the rule of W. 2. in execution Curia Domini Regis non debet deficere conquerentibus in Justitia exhibenda Coke l. 9. f. 111. a. b. And Coke l. 9. f. 88. b. The Executors which in truth hath the Goods in anothers right to wit to pay the debts c. of the Testator shall not convert them to their private use without paying the just and true debts of the Testator for that shall be against Justice and right and against the Office of Executors which are but the Ministers and dispensers of the Goods of the dead and notwithstanding the death of the Testator yet the debt remaineth for death is not a discharge of debt and it should be a great defect in Law that no remedy shall be given for it curia domini regis de ficeret c. Coke l. 9. f. 88. b. And therefore an action upon the assumpsit made by the testator shall lye against the Executors because in such case the Testator could not gage his Law for by it Justice and right is advanced in that the creditor shall be paid his just and due debt ibidem So Coke com f. 74. a. There are diverse manners of trialls appointed by the Law besides the common tryall by a Jury of twelve men upon oath least the Court of the King should be defective in doing of Justice as in the time of War out of the Realme the tryall shall be by the certificate of the Marshall of the host in writing under his seale which shall be sent to the Justices so in the time of peace out of the Realme as if it be alledged for avoiding an Outlawry that the Defendant was in prison at Burdeaux in the service of the Mayor of Burdeaux it shal be tryed by certificate of the Mayor of Burdeaux and in the like cases such tryalls shall be by the Marshall of the Army or by a messenger of a thing done beyond the Seas 2. Eliz. 176. In Barrys case And for matters within the Realme the custome of London shall be certified by the Mayor and Aldermen by the mouth of the Recorder likewise by certificate of the Sheriff upon a Writ to him directed in case of priviledge if one be a Citizen or a Forrainer And by tryals of Records by certificate of the Justices in whose custody they are by Law So in causes ecclesiasticall as loyalty of marriage generall Bastardy Excommengement Profession and the reason that tryalls by certificate are peremptory because if the Court should re-examine it they have no other remedy but to write to the same officer made the certificate and it is not to be presumed that they would differ from their former certificate Bac. Max. f. 26. A Lord of Parliament upon an enditement of treason or felony shall be tryed by his peeres without oath upon their honors and allegiances but in an appeale at the suit of the Subject they shall be tryed per probos legales homines juratores 10. E. 4.6.8 Customes and Usages of every Court shall be tryed by the Judges of the same Court if they be pleaded in the same Court 11. E. 4.2.9 In dower an appeale brought of the death of her husband or in Assise brought by the feme which was the wife of B. if the Tenant or Defendant plead that the husband is alive the tryall shall not be by Jury but by Justices upon Processe made before them for the greater expedition 6. E. 3. 29. c. In a Writ of Error to reverse a fine for nonage or in an Audita quâ—rela to reverse a Statute or Recognisance for nonage there the age shall be tryed by inspection of the Judges and not by the Country And so it is if tenant vouch A. as heire within age and tenant for life vouch him in the reversion within age and prayeth that the Plea may demurr c If an infant appeare by an Attorny it is Error and shall be tryed by the Country because the making of the warrant of Attorny is the act of the party and yet the appearance of the Attorny is recorded in Court but if the Plaintiff maketh an Attorny in Court and the Defendant pleadeth that the Plaintiff is dead and one appeareth and saith that he is the Plaintiff which is denied by the other party the Judges shall adjudge whether he that now appeareth be the same person who at another time made the Attorny in
case whence springeth this often used assertion Non est regula quin fallit for as Cato saith vix ulla lex fieri potest quae omnibus commoda sit sed si majori parti prospiciat utilis est there can scarce any Law be made which shall fit all men but if it provideth for the greater part it is profitable and therefore the ordainers and interpretors of Laws respect rather those things which may often happen and not every particular circumstance for the which though they would they shall not be able by any positive Law to make provision and for the like reason Mr. Ploydon saith that Law is reasonable that provideth for the multitude though that some persons loose by it f. 369. b. By reason whereof they doe permit the rules actions and propositions of the Common Law upon discourse and disputation of reason to be restrained by exceptions which are grounded upon two causes the one is equity the other is some ground or rule proposed wherein for conformities sake and that no absurdity or contradiction be permitted certaine exceptions are framed which doe not onely knit and conjoyne one rule of reason to another but by meanes of their equity temper the rigor of the Law which upon some certaine circumstances in every of the said rules might happen and fall out omnia bene aequiparat as Bracton saith Nomot f. 14. But as Sir Hen. Fi. saith this crossing and encountring of one ground and maxime with another if the greatest difficulty we finde in the arguing of our cases but to help this we are to prefer those and those are to prevaile that carry the more excellent perfect reason and equity with them and Sir Francis Bacon saith it is a point worthy to be observed generally in the rules of the Law that where they encounter or crosse one another in any case it be understood that the Law holdeth worthier and which rules are of more equity or humanity but now to give you some examples of them which allwayes doe illustrate Coke com 183. It is a maxime in the Law Quaelibet concessio fortissime contra donatorem interpretanda est every grant shall be taken most strongly against himselfe as if Lands be letten or a rent granted an estate for life passeth for that is most strongly against himselfe which is to be understood that no wrong be thereby done for there is another rule in the Civill Law ea est accipienda interpretatio quae vitio caret and a maxime in our Law that legis constructio non facie injuriam the interpretative construction of Law shall wrong no man and therefore if tenant for life maketh a lease generally it shall be taken for his own life or else it should worke a wrong to him in reversion and so it is if tenant in taile should make a lease generally for otherwise it should worke a discontinuance and a wrong vide ibidem So if tenant in fee maketh a lease for life without mentioning for whose life it shall be deemed for the life of the Lessee and shall be taken more strongly against the Lessor but if tenant entaile maketh such a lease for life without expressing for whose life this shall be taken for the life of the Lessor because otherwise it would work a wrong Coke Com. f. 42. a. So if an Executor grant all his Goods and Chattells the goods which he hath as Executor will not passe because it may be a devestation and a wrong yet against the trespassor he shall declare quod bona sua cepit 10. E. 4.1 So it is a rule verba ita sunt intelligenda ut res magis valeat quam pereat words are so to be understood that the matter may prevaile rather then perish as if I give Lands to I. S. and his Heires rendring five pounds yearly to I. S. and his Heires this implyeth a condition to me that am the Grantor yet were it a stronger exposition against me to say the limitation should be void and the Feoffment absolute Bacon Max. f. 15. If the Chancelor dyeth before his servants priviledge discussed in bank 35. H. 6. 3. 172. b. yet it shall be allowed contrary to the rule sublata causa tollitur effectus but there is another rule actus legis nulli facit injuriam the act of the Law prejudiceth no man and for that reason the Court shall not prejudice him where no folly was in himselfe It is a ground qui male agit odit lucem and therefore the Law countenanceth more things done in the day then in the night as the party hath all the day till night to pay his rent and if it be a great sum he must be ready as long before the Sun set as the mony may be told for the other is not bound to tell it in the night and a man must not distraine in the night time for rent behind yet is there another ground in the Law quod necessarium est licitum and therefore when there is a necessity of doing things they may be done in the night time as an arbitrement made and delivered in writing the last day after the Sun set is good enough for judgements and arbitrements require long advice so may goods be distrained for in the night for damage feasant and a man may be arrested in the night for otherwise peradventure he shall not doe it at all It is a ground in the Law nihil agit in seipsum no man can doe an act to himself yet if one of the Chapter enfeoff the Deane and Chapter by that he he himselfe shall take by his own livery because the Law in that case cannot doe otherwise so a feme tenant in Socage may endow her selfe and an Executor pay himselfe It is a ground in the Law certa debet esse natratio counts and declarations must be certaine yet things which containe a necessary implication are good enough for it is another ground non refert quid ex aequipollentibus fiat it mattereth not what is done by equippollent or words which amount to such a sense as in an Ejectione firmae c. In a count of a lease made by tenant for life it sufficeth to say that the Lessor is yet seised without the alledging of his life expresly because it amounteth to the same sense by necessary implication So in an information upon the Statute of usury and he counts that the Defendant took per viam medium corruptae mutnationis by the way and means of corrupt borrowing whereas it should be accomodationis plaudingo and yet good enough It is a ground qui facit per alium facit per se things done by another are as it were done by himselfe yet is there another rule that corporall and personall things cannot be done by another as suite of Court cannot be done by another 7. H. 4.9 Otium est mater omnium vitiorum Coke l 11. f. 53. b. As all vertue consisteth in action so vice
the Law without having regard to the conclusion of the Jurors who ought not to take upon them the judgment of the Law for quod quisque novit c. Ploâ—d Câ—m Amie Townsdens case 5 H. 17. Carus case c. Coke Com. f. 3. b. If an office either of the Grant of the King or subject which concerneth the Administration proceedings or execution of Justice or the Kings revenue or the Common-wealth or the interest benefit or safety of the Subject or the like If these or any of them be granted to a man that is unexpert and hath no skill and science to exercise or execute the same the Grant is meerly void and the party disabled by Law and uncapable to take the same pro commodo regis populi for only men of skill knowledge and ability to exercise the same are capable of the same to serve the King and his people ibidem An Infant is not capable of the Office of a Stewardship of a Mannor either in possession or reversion ibid. and the Civill Law Impubes ab omnibus officiis civilibus debet abstinere Coke l. 11. f. 87. a. The case of Monopolies a Patent made to Sir Edward Bury for the making of Cards was void because he had no skill in making them though the Patent was to him and his Deputy yet if the Grantee himself be inexpert he cannot make a Deputy who is skilfull to supply his place Quia quod per me non possum nec per alium for what I cannot do by my self I cannot do by another Imperitia culpae adnumeratur Reg. s e. Imperitia maxima est mechanicorum poena Co. l. 11. f. 57. a. Ignorance and unskilfulness is accounted a fault and is the greatest punishment of Artists and Mechanicks As 7 E. 3. 65. b. If he that taketh upon him to work be unskilfull and ignorant it is sufficient punishment to him for if any man take upon him to work and doth it amiss an action of the case lyeth against him Ignorantia Juris non excusat The ignorance of the Law doth not excuse Dr. Stud. l. 2. c 46. Ignorance of the Law though it be unvincible that is to say that they have done that in them is to know the truth doth not excuse as to the Law for every man is bound at his perill to take notice what the Law of the Realm is as well the Statutes as the Common Law for all Statutes are made in Parliament and Burgesses are the representatives of the Commons and therefore is alone as if all the Commons had been there present An Infant of the years of discretion may be a Felon and a Trespasser according to the civill Rule Pupillus qui proximus est pubertati capax est furendi injuriae faciendae An Infant who is next to the age of puberty that is of fourteen years is capable of stealing and doing injury though he be ignorant of the Law but that is by the old Maxime of the Law for the eschewing of Murthers Felony and Trespasses Dr. Stud. l. 2. c. 46. vide ibid. plura Coke l. 1. f. 177. a. b. Anthony Mildmay brought an action of the case against Roger Standish because the said Robert had said and openly published that certain lands which lawfully appertained to the said Mildmay were lawfully assured for the terme of a thousand years to Ja. Talbot and Olyff his wife and that they of the interest of that term were lawfully possessed and so for slandring his estate and title shewing all in certain and how he was prejudiced by the said speaking brought his Action And Standish in his plea justified the words upon which the Plaintiff demurred and it was adjudged for the Plaintiff although de facto the said Talbot and Olife had a limitation of those lands by the Will of Sir Henry Sharington in writing for a thousand years which was the occasion that the said Standish being a man not learned in the Law affirmed and published the same yet for that he had taken upon him the knowledge of the Law and interposed himself in a matter not concerned him judgment was given against him for Ignorantia juris not excusat If the Clark mistake Debt for a Detinet in a Writ his ignorance of the Law doth not excuse 20 E. 4. 21. But the Civilians have a Rule In paenalibus judiciis aetati imprudentiae succurritur the Law doth help the party according to his age or ignorance in criminal penal causes which accordeth with the grounds of our Law as if an infant of tender years kill a man it shall not be Felony because he had no scretion or understanding and so it is if a man dedi non sanae memoriae kill another it is not homicide because he hath no memory nor understanding and this as Ploydon saith is properly said to be done ex ignorantia where unvoluntary ignorance is adjudged the cause of the act Ployd f. 19. a. Coke l. 6. f. 54. a. A Capias was awarded against a Countesse by the Court of Common Bench that the Sheriff or his Officer by his warrant without any offence may execute it for they ought not to dispute the authority of Court but they ought to execute the Writs to them directed and to it they are sworn and though it was objected that it appeared by the Capias that shee was a Countesse against whom by Law no Capias in such case lyeth ignorantia juris non excusat and principally the Sheriffs and other Ministers of Law and Justice except in some cases as in cases of contempt yet it was resolved that the Sheriff and his Ministers ought not to examine the judiciall act of the Court but they ought to execute the Writ ibidem in the Countesse of Rutlands case so Dyer fo 60. quod vide Ignorantia facti excusat Coke 2. f. 3. b. in Mansers case the ignorance of the deed excuseth as if an illeterate man be bound to seale a deed he is not tyed to doe it if not any be present to read it if required and also to expound it if it be written in Latine c for ignorantia facti non excusat quae est vel lectionis vel linguae the ignorance of the deed excuseth whether it be of reading or of the tongues Doct. and Stud. l. 2. c. 47. If a man buy an horse in open Market of him that hath no property in him not knowing but that he had right he hath good right to the horse and his ignorance shall excuse him but if he had known the seller had no right the buying in open Market had not excused him So if a man retaine another mans servant not knowing that he is retained by him the ignorance excuseth him both from the common Law and the Statute of 31. Ed. 33. and the penalty thereupon to wit paine of imprisonment if any one retaineth one servant without licence or reasonable cause and so hath the
of Magna Charta c. 11. might enter into anothers Woods and cut the Trees for reparations of Castles but by that Statute he did restrain himself so to do Ployd 3. 22. b. vide ibidem plura A Mil-stone that is lifted up to be picked and beaten cannot be distrained for it remaineth parcel of the Mill which is a thing for the Common-weale weale 14 H. 1 25. Things brought into an Inn Faire or Market shall not be distrained 22 E. 4. 49. No more shall Cloath lying in a Taylors Shop or an Horse that is a shooing shall not be distrained for the rent issuing out of the Shop Coke Com. f. 47. a. When a man and a woman are riding on a horse or Axe in a mans hand cutting of wood and the like they are for that time priviledged and cannot be distrained Valuable things shall not be distrained for rent for benefit and maintenance of Trade which by consequence are for the Common-weale and are there by authority of Law as an horse in the Hostrey nor the materials in a Weavers Shop for making of cloath nor sacks of Corn or meal in a Mill nor in a Market nor any thing distrained for damage feasant for it is in custody of the Law and the like So Beasts belonging to a Plow averia carucae shall not be distrained and no man shall be distrained for the Instruments of his Trade or profession as the Axe of a Carpenter or the Books of a Scholar whilest Goods or other Beasts may be distrained ibidem Coke l. 10. f. 139. b. An action of the case was brought against D. and counts that D. was seised of certain lands in Kent by reason of which his ancestors and all the Ter tenants from the time whence c. have made and repaired when it shall be materiall so many perches of the walls of the Sea in K. c. and for default of repairing c. the water entred and over-flowed the lands ef the Plaintiff the Defendant traversed the Prescription and it was found for the Plaintiff and that there was a default in the Wall for not repairing by which the Plaintiff recovered Damage and a Writ awarded to the Sheriff to distrain B. to repair the wall there where it was materiall Note this judgment in an action of the case and the reason is pro bono publico for Salus populi est suprema lex and therefore is that part of the judgment in this action of the case that the Defendant shall be distrained to repair the wall ibidem Publica utilitas privatorum commodis est praeferenda Reg. I. C Publicum bonum privato est praeferendum the publick utility and good is to be pâ—eferred before private gaine and profit and therefore shall be more favourably expounded by the Law then when it is onely for private Coke comm f. 181. b. As the Tenant holdeth of the Lord by fealty and one grain of wheat c. and the Lord purchaseth part the whole shall be extinct because it is entire but if an entire service be pro bono publico as Knights-service Castle-guard Cornage c. for defence of the Realm or to repair a Bridge or a way or to keep a Beacon or to keep the Kings Records or for advancement of Justice and Fence as to aid the Sheriff or to be Constable of England though the Lord purchaseth part the service remaineth and so it is pro opere devotionis pietatis for works of devotion and piety Coke comm f. 149. a. Coke l. f. 63. a. In the Chamberlain of Londons case the Inhabitants of a Village may make Ordinances or by-Lawes for the reparation of a Church or of an high-way or any such thing as is for the publick good generally and in such case the greater part shall bind all without any custome So Corporations cannot make Ordinanccs or constitution or By-lawes without custome or charter unlesse it be for things which concern the publick good as reparations of Churches common-waies or the like So in Corporations such Ordinances or Bylawes are allowed by Law which are made for the due execution of the Lawes and Statutes of this Realm and for the good or due government of the body Corporate And the Ordinance of the Mayor Aldermen and Comminalty of London that all Citizens Free-men and strangers shall not put any broad cloath to sale within the City before it be carried to Blackwell Hall to be viewed and searched so that it may appear to be vendible and that hallage be paid for it to wit 1 d. was good and allowable by Law because it was for the better execution of the Statutes made in that behalf without deceit and also that the assesment of the said peny for hallage was good and reasonable because it was pro bono publico vide ibidem plura Coke comm f. 181 b. If a Charter of Feoffment be made and a Letter of Attorney to four or three joyntly and severally to deliver Seisin two of them cannot make Livery because it is neither by the four or three joyntly nor any of them severally but if the Sheriff upon a Capias directed to him make a Warrant to foure or three joyntly and severally to arrest the Defendants two of them may arrest him because it is for the execution of Justice which is pro bono publico jura publica privato promiscue decidi non debunt and publick Lawes ought not promiscuously to be decided by the private ibidem Coke com f. 165. a. If a Castle that is used for the necessary defence of the Realm descend to two ot more Coparceners this Castle might be divided by Chambers and Rooms as other houses be but yet that it is pro bono publico defensione regni for the publick good and defence of the Realm it shall not be divided for the right of the Sword as Britton saith which suffereth not division that the force of the Realm do not fail so much but Castles of habitation for private use and that are not for the necessary defence of the Realm ought to be parted between Coparceners as other houses ib. And for the same reason a woman shal not be endowed of a Castle that is maintained for the necessary defence of the Realm because it ought not to be divided and the publick shall be preferred before the private but of a Castle that is for private use and habitation she shall be endowed Co. com f 31 b. vide ibidem plura So a protection cum clausula volumus is of two sorts the one concerneth services of War as a Kings Souldier c. the other wisdome and counsell as the Kings Ambassador and Messenger pro negotiis regni both these being for the publick good of the Realm private mens actions and suits must be suspended for a convenient time for the publick is to be put before the private but the cause of granting the protection must be expressed in the protection to the end
is that which is called Tenure of land in which reservation he had four serviceable Institutions suitable to the state of a Conqueror 1. Marriage of the Wards Male and Female 2. Horse for service 3. Homage and Fealty And fourthly Primer Seisin Bacons uses f. 30. vide ibidem plura But Sir John Davis is of opinion Davis 21. f. 41. that though William the Conqueror made a more absolute and entire Conquest of England then Henry the second did of Ireland yet he did not seise all and had not the actuall possession of all the lands within the Realm of England vested in him by the Conquest yet he acknowledged that the book of Domesday which is an exact discription of all the Realm was made in the time of the Conqueror and that by it appeareth that the Conqueror had certain lands in Demesne which lands were in the hands of Edward the Confessor and are intituled Terrae Edwardi regis and other lands which himself had seised upon the Conquest and are entituled terrae regis and called them the ancient Demesnes of the King and of the Crown of England but he maketh no mention of the lands which he conferred on the Normans which without doubt were very great and whom by Mannors as well as by Honours he made predominant in England as to Hugh Lupus the son of his Mother Lotte and one Hoclewin a Noble man of Normandy whom she had married he gave the Earldome of Chester to hold of him as freely by his sword as he held the Crown of England by vertue of which Grant the said Hugh ordained under him four Barons B. Cr. f. 34. such an honour as no Subject in England ever enjoyed the like which also is manifest by the Grant he made to Warren a Norman of principall qualitie of the Castle of Shirburn in Norfolk B. cr f. 33. which afterwards he restored to the Heir because he had never born Armes against him by which this consequence may probably be inferred that notwithstancting his universall Conquest he had such a moderate respect to those who were neither Actors nor Opposites to his atchievement of the Crown that though upon suspitious informations he had by Grants deprived them of their estates yet in consideration of their submissive homage and fealty he gratiously restored them But to the point in hand upon this Conquest the ancient Lawes did seem to be silent Co. l. 3 71. ad lectorem for he abrogated many of them and in their stead brought in other Lawes which Sir Edward Coke confesseth efficacissima ad regni pacem tuendam were effectuall and forcible to maintain the peace of the Kingdome commanding them to be written in French and also that all causes should be pleaded and all matters of form dispatched in French thereby intending to make the Normans Language as predominant as their persons and therein intimating the Romans who upon their Conquest of any Country as well as England introduced and used their Language in all matters of state and Courts of Judicature both which are altered and changed by our Parliaments as an ancient badge of conquests and servitude So Edward the first made a Conquest of the Dominion of Wales and changed their Lawes and Customs as he hath expressed in his Charter as the Statute of Rutland whereas to their Lawes and Customes he saith Quasdam illarum de consilio procerum regni nostri de levimas quasdam correximus ac etiam quasdum alias adjiciendas faciendas decrevimus c. Some of them by the advice of the Nobles of our Kingdome we have abolished some we have corrected also some we have decreed to add and make Optimi ducis est Scire vincerâ— cerdere prudenter tempori Coke com f. 71. a. It is the part of an excellent Captain to know and to overcome and wisely to yeild unto the time Men must not fight onely with War-like Weapons and Engines but with the force of his wit and ingeny for dolus cunning and policy is much used in military affaires and standeth in equall ballance with strength and might according to the poeticall sentence Nil refert armis contingat palma dolove Nam dolus an virtus surit quis in hoste requiret By might and slight to conquer yea or no It is no matter for either in a foe Who doth require Nay often times prudent subtlety prevaileth more in such War-like enterprises then might and strength of hand and therefore are Stratagems more commonly more commodious then plain and equall encounters which a compleat Generall will alwaies practise upon a convenient occasion as Vegetius prescribeth Boni duces non aperto morte praelium in quo est commune periculum sed ex occulto semper attentant ut integris suis viribus quantum possint hostes interrimant certe vel terreant Good Captains will not fight in open field in which the danger is common and equal but will invade them unawares that with all their forces in what they can they may either destroy the enemy or otherwise put them into a fear and fright And therefore the Lacedominans when they over-came the enemy by Stratagem did sacrifice to Mars an Oxe but when by open strength a Cock of which Plutarch giveth the reason that so they might accustome their Leaders that they should not onely be valiant but also by subtle wiliness which is requisite in an Emperor they should excell in Stratagems And which by the Law of God is more to be desired for God commanded Joshua Josh 8. to lye in ambush for the City of Aye behind it and so did David when he was to fight with the Philistims Thou shalt not go up but fetch a compass behind them and come upon them over against the Mulberry Trees So it is a cunning policy in the besieged that they pretend to abound in those things which they most want So the Romans when the Capitall was besieged by the French and were pressed with the extream necessity of famine did cast down loafes of bred among their enemies Val. Max. l. 7. c. 4. that they might seem to abound in provision by which device the enemy was induced by compact to leave the siege And so in such a siege it is a commodious thing to a Captain to move in treaty of agreement and to make truce with the enemy for certain daies which usually maketh the enemy more negligent so as he may the more easily get out of their hands By this way Sylla delivered himself twice from the enemy and by the same deceit Asdruball in Spain got out from the force of Claudius Nero who had besieged him Match l. 6. f. 89. vide ibidem plura Lib. II. MISCELLANEA or an Hotch-pot Or divers scattered grounds concerning the reasonable construction of the LAW SECT I RAtio est anima legis Coke com f. 394. b. Reason is the life of the Law for then we are said to know the Law
at Westminster to the Church of S. Peter at Rome within three hours that then the Obligation shall be void the Condition is void impossible and the obligation standeth good And so it is of a Feoffment upon condition that the Feoffee shall go as is aforesaid the Feoffment is absolute and the Condition void because it is a Condition subsequent for there is a precedent Condition and a subsequent Condition If a Condition subsequent to a Feoffment in fee be impossible the state of the Feoffee is absolute but if the Condition precedent be impossible no state or interest groweth thereupon As if a man make a Lease for life upon Condition that if the Lessee go to Rome as aforesaid that then he shall have fee the Condition precedent is and therefore no Fee-simple followeth Coke ibid. The statute appointeth that in re-disseisin the Sheriff shall go to the place and there shall take the Inquest If then the re-disseisin is of severall lands in divers Counties so as he cannot be at all at once it is sufficient to take the Inquest at one of them because of the impossibility 40 Ass 23. If a man be bound by recognizance or Bond with Condition that he shall appear the next term in such a Court and before the day the Conuzee or the Conuzor dieth the Obligation is saved And in all cases where a condition of a Bond or Recognizance c. is possible at the time of making of the Condition and before the same can be performed the Condition becometh impossible by the act of God or of the Law or of the Obligee there the Obligation is saved But otherwise in case of a Feoffment as if a man maketh a Feoffment on condition that if the Feoffor shall appear in such a Court the next term that then it may be lawfull for the Feoffor to re-enter and presently after the Feoffor dieth the estate of the Feoffee is become absolute And the reason of this diversity is because the estate of the land is executed and setled in the Feoffees and cannot be returned back but by matter subsequent viz. The performance of the Condition But a Bond or Recognizance is a thing in action and executory and whereof no advantage can be taken untill there is a default in the Obligor Coke com f. 260. a. vide ibid. plura Vltima prioribus derogant Reg. I. C. Leges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant Coke l. 11 f. 62. 63. The last Laws derogate and abrogate the first which are contrary Though the wisdome of the Judges and sages of the Law have all wages suppressed subtle and new inventions in derogation of the Common Law and will not change the Law that hath been used 38 E. 3. 1 so as if it be not altered by Parliament it remaineth still yet as Cato said Vix ulla lex fieri potest que omnibus commoda sit And as Sir Edward Coke rerum progressui ostendunt multa quae initio praecaveri provideri non possint It is impossible for any Law to be which may be commodious to all and the progress and proceeding of things shew and present many things which at the first could neither be presaged nor prevented From whence it proceedeth that no Law can be so absolute but that may in some particulars prove defective and amendable and yet as Ployd f. 369. that Law is reasonable which provideth for the multitude though some especiall persons lose by it which hath been the occasionall cause of the alteration of the Common Law in many points Yet the Common Law hath no controller but the high Court of Parliament and the wisdome and custome of this State hath alwaies had such regard and respect to the Common law that they would by no meanes change it but by the great Councell of Parliament wherein all things are transacted not onely by the prudency of the Prince but by the cheifest and sagest Senators of the whole Nation and that not upon the consultation and declaration of one or two hundred but as Fortescue by more and three hundred elect men by which number the Senate of Rome was ruled who alwaies have been cautious and vigilant not to introduce any forrein Law as Sir John Davis in his Preface observeth That in the Parliament of Merton when motion was made by the Clergy that Children borne before marriage might be adjudged legitimate The great and wise men of England made answer with one voice Nolumus leges Angliae mutari And again in 11 R. 2. when a new course of proceeding in criminall Causes according to the form of the Civill Law was propounded in that unruly Parliament Answer was made by all the States That the Realm of England had not been in former times nor hereafter should be ruled by the Civill Law And therefore for the most part Magna Charta which is the foundation of other Acts of Parliament and other ancient Statutes are but the affirmations and declarations of the Common Law And that whereas the words of the Statute are generall the construction thereof shall be according to the reason of the Common Law Coke com 81 b. 282. b. So cautious have our grave and prudent Senators been not to subject the common-law to any mutations unless for necessary and impulsive causes reasonably arising from the publick mischeifs and inconveniencies which happen in the Common-weal through the injurious abuses of the ancient and former Lawes upon which grounds other Lawes were constituted for the remedy of such mischeifs and inconveniencies which did abrogate the former from whence grew this ground Leges postertores priores abrogant To illustrate this by examples It is regularly true that Statutes in the affirmative shall not take away precedent acts affirmative unless it be in speciall cases As the Statute of Wills 32. 34 H. 8. doth not take away a custome to devise lands as often hath been adjudged So it is enacted that the King shall have Wreckum Maris per totum regnum yet this shall not take the wreck from one who hath wreck by prescription unless the prescription had been per totam Angliam Coke l 5. in Sir Henry Constables case So the Statute of 21 H. 8. c. 13. enacteth that if one â—ath a Benefice of the value of eight pounds and taketh another and is inducted the first is void doth not take away the Law which was before that if one who had a Benefice with cure did accept another the first is void only that in that case no lapse shall incur without notice Coke l. 4. in Hollands case and in this point is the Statute nothing else but a confirmation and affirmance of the Law before ibid. So the Statute of 23 Eliz. that inflicteth the penalty of twenty pounds by the moneth hath not taken away the Statute of 1 Eliz. which hath given the forfeiture of twelve pence for every Sunday and Holy-day but both shall be paid the twelve pence onely to
that it may appear to the Court that it is granted pro negotiis regni pro bono publico for the common profit of the Realm and as Britton saith for our service as to be in our force and defence of us and our people Coke comm f. 130. And it is a rule in the Civill Law which for the reasonableness of it all Nations follow Eorum qui in potestate paiâ—â—s â—unt sine voluntate ejus matrimonia jure non contrahu â—ur sed contracta non solvuntur They who under the power of their Father cannot lawfully contract Matrimony without their will and consent but being contracted are not to be dissolved Contemplatio enim utilitatis publitae privatorum commodis pâ—aefertur For the consideration of the publick good is to be preferred before private profit Fulâ— Pand. f. 28. Finis legis pax est Ployd f. 388. The Justice said that peace and concord were the end of all Lawes and for peace the Law was made And Dyer said that for peace Christ descended from Heaven on Earth and the Divine Lawes of the old and new Testament were given for peace Bacon H. 7. f. 233. And Bacon saith When Christ came into the world peace was sung and when he went â—ut of the world peace was bequeathed And Weston cited S. Aug. Concordia stat augetur respublica discordia ruil diminuitur By concord the Common weale standeth and flourisheth and by discord it is diminished runneth to ruine And Cataline said that the Charriot wherein Peace was carried was unanimity the Rector of the Charriot Love the Horses which drew it Concord and Utility and her company and consorts were Justice and Truth and Diligence and her incidents were the attainment and advancement of all Arts and Sciences and therefore peace which bringeth so many commodities ought to be preserved above all other things And Dyer said that it was one of the Atticles to which the King is sworn at his Coronation to his subjects to do that he preserve the peace for nothing of greater benefit he cannot grant to them And therefore those Lawes which bring the more peace are the more to be esteemed as the Law is touching fines which bringeth to the Possessors of Inheritances security and maketh the certainty and therefore Carus said they were the more worthy because certainty engendereth repose and incertainty contention and to avoid incertainty in Inheritances Fines were devised by the Founders of our Lawes at the beginning of Law for no point of our Law is of greater antiquity and for it Glanvill was cited by Cataline who lived in the time of Richard the first that Contingit aliquando loquelas motas in Curia domini regis per amicabiâ—em compositionem finalem concordiam te minari sed ex licentia regis vel ejus justiciariorum It happened sometimes that Libells and Suites moved in the Court of the Lord the King were ended by a loving composition and finall concord but by the licence of the King or of his Justices And Bracton therefore is it called a finall concord because finis finem litibus imponit because a fine putteth an end to all Suits vide ibidem plura And for the same reason are Recoveries advanced by the Law above all other assurances even fines themselves and as Bacon are the greatest security Purchasers have for their monies for a fine will bar the Heir entail but not the Remainder but a common Recovery barreth as well Estates taile as also all Reversions and Remainders expectant an dependant except in the Kings case where the Remainder or Reversion is in the King and then by the Statute of 34 H. 8. it barreth neither the Estate tail nor the Remainder saving where the King is the Giver of the Estate tail and leaveth the Reversion to himself Bac. Vses f. 52. 53. and Dr. Student l. 1. c. 26. And therfore by the Statute of 23 Eliz. c. 4. It s provided that for the avoiding the danger of assurances and for the advancement of common recoveries that every common recovery shall not be avoided for any want of form in words and not in matter of substance So the common Law is the preserver of peace and abhorreth all force as a capitall enemy to it and therefore is more severe against those which commit any force and subjecteth their bodies to imprisonment whereas at the common Law upon a recognizance or judgement for debts and damages a common person onely shall have execution of his Goods and Chattells and of the Corne or other present profit groweth upon the Land but it is a rule at the common Law that in all Actions Quare vi armis a Capias lyeth and where a Capias lyeth in Processe there after Judgement a Capias ad satisfaciendum lyeth which is the highest execution by which he shall loose his liberty untill he hath made satisfaction to the party and fine to the King and the King shall have a Capias pâ—o fine Coke l. 3. f. 12. a. in Herberts case vide ibidem plura And therefore all actions upon the case for corporall injuries as forcible Entries Assaults and Batteries which tend to the breach of the peace may not onely be pursued by action but Enditement and are more severely and largely taken and punished by the common Law As if foure men enter into Land and one of them entreth by force this is force in them all and may be impleaded by action or impeached by enditement 2. E. 3. 12. Communis error facit jus a common error maketh right Dr. Stud. c 26 f. 46. The Law so favoureth the publick quiet that it will permit a common error to passe for right and therefore though it be objected that common recoveries were fâ—rst had upon feyned and unlawfull ground and against the good order of conscience neverthelesse for as much as they have been used a long time so as they have been taken of diverse men that have been right well learned in manner as for Law that the buyers partly are excused so that they be not bound to restitution and therefore Ployd in Manxells case f. 2. whâ—ther a common recovery barreth an estate taile is not to be disputed because a great part of the inheritance of the Realme depend upon it So an acquittance made by a Mayor in his own name where the Towne is incorporate by the name of a Mayor Sheriff and Burgesses shall be allowed for good if there be an hundred precedents and more of like acquittances that is for common quietnesse and accordingly the Civilian Bodin saith l. 2. de repub Diuturnitas temporis efficere potest ut quod pernitioso more exemplo inveteravit potentius ipsa lege dominetur the long continuance of time may effect that what by pernitious example Custome hath grown old may rule more powerfully then the Law it selfe and therefore as learned Patricius saith Concedendum est aliquid consuetudini