of Action did first arise Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Transitory Actions ought not to be brought within Corporations for their priviledges do properly and onely extend for the tryal of such Actions the causes whereof do arise within their own jurisdictions Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Either an Action upon the Case or an Action of Detinue at the Election of the Plaintiff may be brought for goods detained from him 22. Car. B. r. An Action of Trover and Conversion is in its nature but an Action upon the Case to recover dammages Mich. 22. Car. B. r. An Action upon the Case doth lye by the Statute against the Court of Admiralty for holding Plea of a matter which is not within their jurisdiction Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Where a promise is made by a Fem Covert or by a Servant for the Husband or the Master the Action for breach of this promise ought to be brought against the Husband or the Master for it is their promise and the Wife and the Servant are but instruments Mich. 22. Car. B. r. An Action upon the Case doth lye against one for speaking such words falsly and maliciously of another as if they were truly spoken of the party he might be punished as a Felon or by some Statute fined or imprisoned Mich. 22. Car. B. r. as for calling him Theef c. There is a difference betwixt bringing of an Action and the laying of Action Mich. 22. Car. B. r. It is cause sufficient to ground an Action upon the Case for one to put another to the trouble and charges to Sue for that which is his own Mich. 22. Car. B. r. The cause for bringing an Action upon the Case for the speaking of words against one is the temporal loss or dammage which may accrew to the party against whom they are spoken by the speaking of them and not the words themselves Mich. 22. Car. B. r. An Action upon the Case doth lye for speaking of words against a man by reason of which he lost his marriage Mich. 22. Car. B. r. An Action upon the Case doth not lie for Arrerages of Rent due upon a Lease for yeers because the Law gives a proper Action for it to wit an Action of Debt Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Upon a promise made upon an insimul computaverunt the party to whom the promise is made may either have an Action of Debt or an Action upon the Case at his Election for the thing which was before in dispute and uncertain is by the account and promise reduced to a certainty Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For a Debt certain referred amongst other things to an Arbitration an Action of Debt doth not lye but an Action upon the Case Mich. 22. Car. B. r. It is not safe to be too particular or over curious in the laying of an Action for it is often times a cause that the Action doth fail Hill 22. Car. B. r. An Action upon the Case lies for calling one Whore in London but this is by the special custome of the City Hill 22. Car. B. r. yet 24. Car. Pasc The Court was divided in opinion in this question whether an Action doth lye or not An Action upon the Case lies for a private nusance but not for a publike Rasc 23. Car. B. r. An Action upon the Case doth lie for scandal or for molestation Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Where a Joynt Action doth lie against divers persons of whom some are known to the Plantiff and the rest are not known unto him the Action may be brought against them that are known by their particular names and against them that are not known generally with a Simul cum aliis c. Pasc 23. Car. B. r. In a tryal upon a Trespas and Ejectment or a Replevin touching the title of the Land in question although the Verdict pass against the Plaintiff yet he may bring a new Action for the same Land for such tryals are not final Pasc 23. Car. B. r. because the Land is not recovered in them but the possession In a Case betwixt one Nichols and Webb in the Common Pleas for calling the Plaintiff being an Atturney at Law Knave a Verdict and judgement was given for him and this judgement being afterwards remoyed by a Writ of Error into this Court the Judgement was affirmed in Trin. 12. Car. Rot. 102. Pasc 23. Car. B. r. An Action brought for Rent or breach of Covenant upon a Lease may be laid either in the County where the Lease was made or in the County where the Lands do lie that are let by the Lease Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Vexatious Actions are not favoured in Law nor by the Court but may be referred to the Master of the Office to consider of them Trin. 23. Car. B. r. A violent intendment may bring one within the compass of an Action Mich. 23. Car. B. r. by Rolle One may in some Case bring an Action at the Common Law for that for which he may also have his remedy in the Eclesiastical Court for the Common Law is to be preferred before the Eclesiastical Law where they stand in equal degree in respect of the matter to be tryed Mich. 23. Car. B. r. By a special custome an Action doth lie in some Cases in which at the Common Law no Action doth lie and so was it adjudged 8. and 13. Car. Mich. 23. Car. B. r. The Kings Charter cannot enable the Pattentee to bring an Action which the Common Law allows not Mich. 23. Car. B. r. If one bring an Action upon the Case for divers words spoken whereof some are Actionable and some of them are not yet the Action lies Trin. 24. Car. B. r. The Husband may bring an Action alone for scandalous words spoken against him and his Wife and recover and yet may afterwards bring another Action for to recover dammages done to his Wife by the speaking of the same words Trin. 24. Car. B. r. for the Husband and Wife are both particularly damnified by the speaking of the words An Action upon the Case doth not lie upon a contract which sounds in the realty Q. if the contract be mixt with other matters which are not in the realty whether it will then lie or no Mich. 24. Car. B. r. If one take out a Latitat within the time limited by the Statute for the limitation of Actions it is a good bringing of the Action in due time and he is not barred by the Statute although he do no declare against the party within the time limited by the Statute Mich. 1649 B. S. An Action of the Case doth lie against one that doth Arrest another without cause Pasc 1650. 6. Maii B. S. One may have an Action upon the Case against a Witness that is served with a Subpoena to appear at a tryal and doth not appear but by the Statute Pasc 1650. B. S. 18. Maii 13. Nov. A Joint Action of the Case doth not lie against two several persons for
The Court did take Bail for a prisoner against whom an Appeal of murther was brought because that he did not flee for the murder supposed and had been formerly Indicted for this murder and acquitted upon the Indictment Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Vpon which presumptions they conceived he was not guilty else would not have Bailed him Bail peices are small pieces of Parchment in which is written the substance of the Bail and are filed in the Office of the Court besides the Bail that is filed upon Record Mich. 22 Car. B. r. And are made at the Judges Chamber usually before whom the Bail is taken If the Plaintiff require special Bail he ought to shew his cause of Action before the Judge that takes the Bail or else to declare against the Defendant that it may appear to the Court that there is cause why special Bail should be given otherwayes common Bail is to be filed and if he will not declare against the Defendant till after three Terms then by the course of the Court he must take common Bail what ever the cause of Action be Hill 22. Car. B. r. Trin. 24. Car. 1650. 22. Junii Where one is sued as an Executor he is not compellable to put in special Bail but in case of a Devastavit for wasting the goods of the Testator or where the Action is brought for something done by him since he became Executor Hill 22. Car. B. r. If an Action be brought against Husband and Wife and the Husband is onely Arrested yet the Husband must put in Bail for his Wife if the name of the Wife be in the Writ else he is not bound to put in Bail for her Hill 22. Car. B. r. For it is the Writ that warrants the Bail One may deposite a sum of mony in Court in lieu of Bail if the Court please and they may thereupon order the Plaintiff to waive other Bail 22. Car. B. r. Trin. 23. Car. B. r. If the Defendant do render his body in custody in discharge of his Bail the Plaintiff ought by the Rules of the Court to make his choice whether he will proceed afterwards against the Principal or the Bail Hill 22. Car. B. r. After the Roll is marked to have special Bail common Bail ought not to be entred but if the Roll be not marked for special Bail common Bail may be entred Hill Car. B. r. One that stands Indicted for Felony or for Forgery ought not to be Bailed untill he have pleaded to the Indictment Pasc Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For the parties shall be conceived to be guilty of the Crimes untill they plead If one be committed to prison by the House of Commons in Parliament the Court will Bail the party if in respect of his Fact he is Bailable in Law Pasc 23. Car. B. r. The Court will not Bail one that appears in Court upon the Return of his Habeas Corpus before they have considered of the Return to enform themselves whether he is Bailable by the Law or not Pasc 23. Car. B. r. One committed by a Justice of Peace upon the Statute for having of two Wives and appearing in Court upon the Return of his Habeus Corpus was Bailed upon the prayer of his Councel Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Where the not filing of common Bail will make Error in the Record there the Court will compell the Plaintiff to accept of it Trin. 23. Car. B. r. One that is within Age is not to be admitted to be Bail for another Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For he is not a person of himself responsable at the Law One committed for Felony and brought into this Court by his Habeas Corpus may not be Bailed with less then four Suerties Hill 23. Car. B. r. For the Crime being Capital requires exttraordinary Bail One Judge alone will not take Bail of a prisoner that appears upon his Habeas Corpus Pasc 24. Car. B. r. The putting in of a Declaration and the acceptance of it by the Defendants Attruney with the privity of the Plaintiffes Atturney is counted an acceptance of the Bail Hill 23. Car. B. r. 1650. Pasc 14. Maii. If a priviledged person in this Court do bring an Action against another in this Court he ought by the course of the Court to have special Bail put in to his Action Hill 23. Car. B. r. Whether there be cause for special Bail or not This I suppose is ex gratia Though one be Assigned by the Court to be of Councel on Record for a prisoner that stands Indicted of Felony yet he ought not to move to have the prisoner Bailed Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For he must not move for things against Law One that is Out-lawed ought not to be Bailed untill either the Out-lawry be Reversed or else he hath brought a Writ of Error to Reverse it Pasc Car. B. r. For an Out-lawed person is to receive no favour in the Law One single Judge in Court will not Bail a prisoner in a difficult case but will advise with his Companions Pasc 24. Car. B. r. One that is in Excution in custody of the Marshall of this Court is not compellable to find Bail if another Action be brought against him but if he be in the prison of the Fleet in Execution and an Action be brought against him in this Court he must either be removed and committed unto the custody of the Marshal of this Court or else he must put in Bail to the Action Trin 24. Car. B. r. Before a Supersedas be issued forth upon a Writ of Error brought he that brings the Writ of Error ought to put in special Bail to pay what shall be due if the judgement be affirmed Trin. 24. Car. B. r. It is not sufficient for the Plaintiffs Atturney onely to mark the Roll for special Bail but he ought also to give the Defendants Arturney notice that special Bail is required to the Action Mich. 24. Car. B. r. For the Roll may be marked without notice and so he know nothing of it and plain practice is alwayes the best If the Judgement be Reversed by a Writ of Error which was given against the principal there may be a special Writ taken out to discharge the Bail Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Bail is to be accounted good Bail which is taken de bene esse and before it be filed until it be questioned and disallowed Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Upon examination of it before the Judge Hill 1649. 11. Feb. Bail is so called because the party Bailed is delivered by the Law into the custody of those that are his Bail and who are to answer the party if they do not produce the principal to do it Trin. 1650. B. S. 15. Junii It is derived of the French word Bailler to deliver a thing to another If the Plaintiff do not declare against the Defendant in three Terms after Bail is put in the Bail is not chargeable Trin. 1650. 2. Julii
was committed in custody or did put in bail as aforesaid 21. Car B. r. If the Plaintiffs Attorney deliver a Declaration to the Defendants Attorney and after doth amend his Declaration and tenders another Copy to the Defendants Attorney viz. as he hath amended it the Defendants Attorney is not bound to receive it except the Master of the Office do order him to receive it or that the matter be moved in Court and thereupon the Court do order him to receive it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. The Plaintiff in this Court is not bound by the Law to Declare against the Defendant within three Termes next after his apparance in Court to the Plaintiffs Action but if he do not declare against him in three Termes next after the Plaintiff must then take common bail of him Mich. 22. Car. B. r. and Mich. 1650. B. S. For it shall be presumed if there had been cause for speciall bail the Plaintiff would not have been so dilatory in his proceedings and besides the Defendants imprisonment is made longer by the Plaintiffs delay and is considerable A Declaration must be certain and the Court is not to take things in it by implication and also if it be not certain the Defendant cannot make a direct answer unto it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. and Pasc 24. Car. B. r. As he ought to do The Plaintiff is to enter his Declaration in the Office and all Copies which are made of it and the record it self of the Cause ought to be directed and warranted by it 22. Car. B. r. If an Action upon the Case be brought upon an Assumpsit the Plaintiff must declare upon the whole promise made and not upon part of it else the Declaration is not good Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Where the Plaintiff doth declare upon a Will or upon Letters of Administration he ought to set forth the Probate of the Will and the Letters of Administration granted unto him in his Declaration otherwisy the Declaration is not good but the Defendant may demurre upon it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For without shewing them they do not entitle themselves to the Action brought nor make themselves persons enabled by Law to bring the Action If a Declaration be defective in matter of form only and the Defendant doth take no exception against it but pleads to issue and a verdict is thereupon found for the Plaintiff the Defendant cannot afterwards take advantage of this defect in the Declaration for the defect is helped by the verdict but if the Declaration be insufficient in matter of substance the verdict will not help it but the Plaintiff may take advantage of the insufficiency of it after a verdict Mich. 22. Car. B. r. All matters which do lye in the cognisance of the Court ought to be set forth certainly in a Declaration but it is not necessary to set forth certainly matters of fact which are tryable by the Jury Hill 22. Car. B. r. If the Plaintiffs Attorney cannot finde the Defendants Attorney to deliver a Declaration unto him he may deliver the Declaration into the Office and that shall be accounted a good delivery of it so that if the Defendant do not plead according to the Rules of the Court judgment may be entred against him Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For it is intended that Attorneys ought to attend in the Office and there to inform themselves in the proceedings of their Clyents Causes Q. Whether if he can finde him whether he must deliver the Declaration unto him for the Court held he need not but Hodsden the Secondary held the contrary A thing that is good and warrantable to be put in a Writ is good and warrantable in a Declaration Trin. 23. B. r. For the Declaration is grounded upon and warranted by the Writ If there be words in a Declaration which have no signification the words shall be adjudged to be void words and shall not hurt the Declaration but the Declaration shall be taken as if those words were left out of the Declaration Hill 23. Car. B. r. Pasc 24. Car. B. r. A Declaration in English is not good for all pleadings in Law ought by the Statute to be in Latine Pasc 24. Car. B. r. But this is now altred by a late Statute which doth exact that all proceedings in Law shall be in English An Audita quaerela and a Scir facias are in the nature of a Declaration Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For they do set forth at large the cause of the Plaintiffs Action Declarations which are grounded upon originall Writs as all Declarations in the Court of Common Pleas are if they be faulty they cannot be amended but Declarations grounded upon a Bill as the Declarations in the Court of the Kings Bench are are amendable if they be faulty Pasc 24. Car. B. r. If a Declaration be drawn in one Terme but is not delivered to the Defendants Attorney that Terme but is delivered unto him before the first Essoine day of the next Terme after this shall be accounted for a Declaration of that Terme when it was drawn and not of that Terme when it was delivered Trin. 24. Car. B. r. For before the Essoine day the Terme as to such purposes is not said to be begun A Declaration may be filed in the Office many years after it was first drawn if it appear that it was onely the Attorneys neglect that it was not filed as it ought to have been 24. Car. B. r. 19. Apr. 1648. B. r. If bail be filed for the Defendant the Plaintiff may declare against him in any other matter besides the matter that is contained in the Writ brought by the Plaintiff against the Defendant Mich. 24. Car. B. r. The Defendants Attorney is not bound to receive a Declaration against his Clyent in the vacation time Mich. 1650. B. S. For proceedings in Law ought to be in the Term time A Declaration delivered with a Ly lo is in the language and meaning of Attorneys such a Declaration that is delivered with leave for the Defendant to emparle untill the next Term. Hill 1649. 12. Feb B. S. The words by Ly lo do mean Licentia inter loquendi which is as much as leave to emparle or to advise and speak with his Clyent to know what he should plead for him When one is arrested by a Latitat or Bill of Middlesex out of this Court he is not said to be in custody of the Marshall untill he hath put in bail to the Plaintiffs Action and the bail be filled and if from that time the Plaintiff do not declare against the Defendant in three whole Termes after which he cannot be compelled to do then he must accept of common bail and discharge the former bail Trin. 1650. B. S. The Plaintiffs Attorney is not bound to give a Copy of the Declaration against the Defendant to the Defendants Attorney 13. Novem. 1650. B. S. For the Defendants Attorney may take a Copy of it out of the
also navigation An Endictment that is framed upon a Statute ought to pursue the words of the Statute or else it is not good Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the offence being made by the Statute for which the party is Endicted it is reason the Statute should be punctually recited One that is convicted upon an erroneous Endictment cannot move after his Conviction to have the Endictment quashed but must bring his Writ of Error to reverse the Judgement given against him upon the Endictment Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For after Judgement it is too late for an Endictment is quashed for the insufficiency in it or because no good Judgement can be given upon an erroneous Endictment The Court will not quash an Endictment that is preferred for the publick good although it be not a good Endictment but will put the party Endicted to traverse it or to plead unto it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For it is by the favour of the Court that any Endictment is quashed for if the Court please they may force the party to traverse or plead An Endictment removed by a Writ of Certiorari into this Court may be sent back again into the County or place whence it was removed if there be cause to do it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If an Action upon the Case be brought against one for calling another Theif and the Defendant doth justifie the words and upon the tryal it be found for the Defendant an Endictment may be forthwith framed against the Plaintiff to try him for the Felony Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the Felony appears to the Court by the Verdict found for the Defendant An Endictment doth lie against one that cheates another at play with false Dice Hill 22. car B. r. Or for any other way of cheating at play or otherwise An Endictment doth not lye for a private nusance or other injuries because the nusance or injury done is not made ad commune nocumentum but ad privatum and therefore an Action upon the Case doth only lye for the party that 〈◊〉 damnified by this nusance or injury Hill 22. Car. B. r. 11. Maii. 1651. For Endictments are to punish publike offences onely and done against the publick peace An Endictment lies against one for assaulting and stopping of another in his passing in the High-way 22. Hill Car. B. r. One that it Endicted for Felony may have Councel Assigned him to speak for him Pasc 23. Car. B. r. But such Councel are only to speak for him in matter of Law and not concerning matters of Fact Although a Bill of Endictment be preferred to a grand Jury upon Oath yet they are not bound to find the Bill if they find cause to the contrary and on the otherside although a Bill of Endictment be preferred unto them without Oath made yet they may find the Bill if they see cause Pasc 23. Car. B. r. But it is not usual to prefer a Bill unto them before Oath be first made in Court Every Endictment ought to be preferred against the party for some offence committed by him either against the Common Law or against some Statute Trin. 23. Car. B. r. There ought to be fifteen dayes between the preferring of an Endictment and the convicting the party Endicted Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Q. In what cases for I conceive it holds not in all An Endictment lies against one that makes a false oath in an answer to a Bill in Chancery or in an Affidavit made in a cause depending there or in any other Court of Record Trin. 23. Car. B. r. But Q. for what false oath made in an answer it lieth for it hath been held that though the whole answer be not in all points true yet an Endictment lies not because answers in the Chancery are drawn by Councel and not the party himself Where the party Endicted is Out-lawed upon the Endictment the Court will not quash the Endictment although it be erroneous but will force the party Out-lawed to bring his Writ of Error to reverse the Out-lawry Mich. 23. Car. B. r. An Endictment may be amended the same Term it is brought into the Court by the Clerk of the Peace but the next Term after he cannot amend it Pasc 24. Car. B. r. If onely a word of form be left out in an Endictment yet the Endictment is good but if one word of substance be omitted the whole Endictment is naught Pasc 24. Car. B. r. An Endictment of forcible entry doth lye for a Tenant for years who is forcibly put out of his possession By the Statute of 21. Jac. Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Upon an Endictment preferred against one in the Kings Bench there doth issue out an Attatchment against the party Endicted to force him to appear Pasc 1650. 1. Maii. B. S. Execution An Execution may issue forth out of this Court notwithstanding a Writ of Error be brought in the Exchequer Chamber to reverse the Judgement given here and upon which the Execution is grounded if this Court be satisfied that there is no Error in the Judgement or if the Record be not duly removed out of this Court by the Writ of Error Mich. 22. Car. B. r. One may pray for Execution upon a Judgement given in the Court where it was given although a Writ of Error be brought to remove the Record and to reverse the Judgement if he that brings the Writ of Error do not assign his errors in due time Mich. 22. Car. B. r. The Court may grant Execution upon a Judgement given although a Writ of Error be brought to reverse the Judgement if the Court be satisfied that the Writ of Error is brought meerly to delay the party from his Execution Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the Law doth not countenance delayes but delights to have speedy Justice done to all parties though it loves not to surprise any person by over hasty proceedings If Execution be not taken within two years after Judgement is given in a Cause there must be a Scire facias taken out to revive the Judgement and Execution cannot be taken out Mich. 22. Car. B. r. But this Scire facias may be taken out of course without moving the Court But if Execution be not taken out in seven years after or longer then a Scire facias cannot be taken out to revive such a Judgement without moving the Court but upon motion the Court will grant it The Court will not deliver one out of prison that lies there in Execution upon an Affidavit But the party may have a Writ of Supersedeas to Supersede the Execution if there be cause Trin. 24. Car. B. r. Be the matter contained in the Affidavit never so strong for the prisoner because he lies in prison by matter of Record and must be delivered by an Act of as high a nature which an Affidavit although it be made before a Judge of the Court and is filed in Court is not The Court cannot divide an Execution
remedy whereof he desires and obtains the Kings Writ 21. Car. B. r. And in his Declaration the Plaintiff doth more at large express the same matter unto the Court where he brings his Action A Plaint in an inferiour Court is in the nature of an original Writ Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For upon the entring of it the process of the Court doth issue forth to bring in the Defendant to appear and to plead to the Plaintiffs Action Priviledge One that is a Committee-man of a Committee of Parliament if he be not a Member of the House of Parliament is not thereby priviledged from serving upon the grand Enquests which are returned every Term in this Court to take presentments of misdemeanours done within the County of Middlesex Hill 21. Car. B. r. A Clark of this Court is not bound to lay any personal Action which he brings against another out of the County where this Court doth sit Mich. 22. Car. B. r. But by his priviledge he may lay it here notwithstanding the Cause of his Action did arise in another County and he is thus priviledged in regard of the constant attendance he is tied to give in this Court yet in reall Actions he is not thus priviledged For such Actions are local and must be tried in the County where the Cause of Action did arise A Peer of the Realm cannot claim his Priviledge of Peerage in an endictment preferred against him Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Because an endictment is preferred in the Name of the King against whom the plea of Priviledge is not to be allowed but is only to be allowed in civil Causes and not criminal One that hath a Sute depending in this Court is priviledged by the Court from areâ—…ing in coming hither from his house or lodging to follow his Cause and also in departing from the Court back again directly to his house or lodging and if he be arested in so doing the Court upon a motion made to inform them of it will set the party at liberty and punish him that arrested him if he did know he had a Sute depending here and came hither to attend it The wife of an Attorney of this Court if she be arrested ought not to claim the priviledge of this Court not to put in bail to the Action as her husband may if he be arrested but her husband must put in bail for her and for want thereof she is to be committed to prison Trin. 1650. Jun. 25. B. S. For her husband is priviledged only in regard of his personal attendance upon the Court and of that tye which the Court hath upon him in regard of his relation to the Court. Prohibition In a Prohibition prayed to be directed to the Court of Admiralty to stay their proceedings upon a suggestion that they did hold Plea there upon a promise which was made infra corpus comitatus and so not triable there but at the Common Law It was said by the Court that the surmise must be absolute that the promise was made infra corpus comitatus and not that if there was any promise made it was made infra corpus comitatus for this is incertain and upon an uncertain surmise no prohibition can be granted for no Issue can be taken upon it though it should be false Hill 21. Car. B. r. This Court may by the Common Law grant a Prohibition to the Court of Admiralty to stay their proceedings if they hold Plea of any matter which the jurisdiction of their Court doth not extend unto Mich. 22. Car. B. r. A Prohibition doth lie in all Causes wherein a Habeas Corpus doth lie Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For this Court hath power as well to see Justice done concerning a mans estate as to his person Although it be questionable Whether a Prohibition do lie in the Case wherein it is moved for Yet this Court will grant it so that the parties concerned may appear here and plead or demur as they shall be advised to the intent the matter may come in question here and be decided Whether a Prohibition do lie in the Case or not Mich. 22. Car. B. r. And if it shall appear to the Court that a Prohibition doth not lie the Court will then grant a consultation whereby the party that was stopped in his proceedings by the Prohibition may now proceed in that Court to which the Prohibition was directed Mich. 22 Car. B. r. A Prohibition may be granted to the Prerogative Court to hinder them from granting Letters of Administration against the Law Hill 22. Car. B. r. Where there is a Sute depending in the Ecclesiastical Court for a personal Estate and also for Lands a Prohibition may be granted to stop their proceedings there as to the Lands only and they may nevertheless proceed there as to the personal Estate Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For as to the one thy have Jurisdiction and as to the other they have none If the Common Law and the Spiritual Law do differ in the way of their proceedings in matter of substance and the Ecclesiastical Court will proceed according to the course of their Law this Court will grant a Prohibition to stop their proceedings Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For in things doubtfull the Common Law is to be preferred before the Spiritual Law as being the more general Law and more tending to the general good of the people and the publick peace of the Nation If the Court of the Lord Maior of London shall hold plea of a Cause after it is removed into this Court by a Writ of Certiorari This Court may grant a Prohibition to that Court to stop their proceedings there Trin 25. Car. B. r. For after it is removed they have no further Conusance of the Cause A Prohibition may be granted out of this Court to any other Court that doth proceed in any Cause which doth not lie within their Jurisdiction Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For that is to exceed their Authority which this Court will not suffer but is to keep all other inferior Courts within their own bounds A Prohibition may not be granted to an inferiour Court to stop their proceedings in a Cause which doth not lie within their jurisdiction to try after that the Defendant hath allowed the jurisdiction of the Court by pleading to the Action Trin 23. Car. B. r. For it is then too late to move for a Prohibition for he ought before he had pleaded to have demurred to the Jurisdiction of the Court and then if they had proceeded he might have had a Prohibition or without a Demurrer I conceive he may move for a Prohibition and have it The Defendant in the Court of Admiralty may have a Prohibition to that Court after he hath pleaded there although he cannot have it to an inferiour Court after he hath pleaded for an inferiour Court doth not draw the matter in question ad alind examen but do proceed therein according to the Common Law But
parties concerned in the Tryal will not help it Mich. 24. Car. B. r. For such a Tryal cannot be supposed to be indifferent for none ought to be Judge in his own cause A mis tryall is helped by the Statute of Jeofailes but not a voide Tryal to wit where there is no issue joyned to be tryed but in such cases there must be a repleader that the matter in question may be put in issue to be tryed Mich. 24 Car. B. r. The day for a Tryal ought to be entred into the Clerks book in the Office viz. the Clerk of the Papers Mich. 1649. B. S. And before it be so entred there ought not to be notice given at the Tryal Q. Tamen One that is a priviledged person in this Court ought not by reason of his priviledge onely to have a Tryal at the Bar granted unto him but there must be difficulty in the matter to be tryed or else it must be of great value Hill 1649. B. S. 4. Feb. A Tryal at the Bar ought not to be granted before the Defendant hath pleaded and issue be joyned Hill 1649. B. S. 11. Feb. 12. Feb. 1656. For before that the cause is not ready for a Tryal nor doth it appear that the parties intend to proceed to it Tryall Of latter times there hath been twenty Tryals granted to be at the Bar in Easter Term but not above Pasc 1650. B. S. 1. Maii. But anciently not above half the number Although the Defendant do go to a Tryal without sufficient notice given unto him of the Tryal and there be a Tryal accordingly this Tryal is not binding unto the Defendant but he may if he please have a new Tryal granted for want of due notice Pasc 1650. B. S. 19. Ap. For the Rules of the Court are not to be broken by the consent of the parties By the ancient practice of the Court all the Tryals at the Bar which are had in Easter Term ought to be tryed a fortnight before the end of the Term. Pasc 1650. B. S. 1. Maii. And the remainder of the Term was to be spent in other businesses more proper for the Court. In ancient times there were wont to be Tryals in Parliament by Juries but of latter times no such Tryals have been Pasc 1650 B. S. 24. Maii. The prosecutor in an information brought in this Court ought to bring the cause to a Tryal at his own costs but in an Endictment which is folely at the sute of the King he that is Endicted must bring the cause to a Tryal at his own charges Pasc 1650. B. S. 24. Maii. An information is preferred as well for the benefit of the informer as the King and therefore it is reason he should bring it to Tryal at his own charges If at a Tryal the Court do see that one of the parties is surprised but not by any fault or laches of his own but by some other casualty they may in their discretion put off the Tryal to another time untill the party surprised may be better provided for his Tryal Trin. 1650. 3. July B. S. For this is not to delay justice but to give time that clearer justice may be done In criminal causes Tryals may be at the Bar in Hillary Term and in Easter Term but not in other causes Mich. 1650. B. S. But onely in Michalemas and Easter Term. This was the old course but of late in some special cases Tryals have been granted to be at the Bar in Hillary Term and Trinity Term. The Court of Chancery will not stay a Tryal at Law by an injunction when the parties are ready for the Tryal and have expended their costs for the Tryal but after the Tryal they will grant an injunction to stay Judgement Pase 1652. B. S. If the Plaintiff in an Action of Trespass and Ejectment do bring his cause to be tryed at the Bar he cannot compell the Defendant to confess the Lease Entry and Ouster for the Tryal at the Bar was not granted in favor of the Defendant but of the Plaintiff but if the Defendant bring the cause to be tryed at the Bar there he must confess the Lease Entry and Ouster because the Tryal was granted to be at the Bar in his favor Pasc 1652. B. S. If a cause be appointed to be tryed in one Term and the Plaintiff doth not then proceed in his Tryal but rests for a year or more after if he will after so long time try the cause he must give the Defendant a whole Terms notice before his Tryal Pasc 1652. B. S. If a Tryal be had the last day of a Term Judgement cannot be entred upon that Verdict untill the next Term after By Rolle Chief Justice 1652. B. S. Nor till the four first dayes within the Term be passed for so long time hath the Defendant by the Rules of the Court to speak in arrest of Judgement It was said by Rolle Chief Justice that the City of Bristol will not bring a matter to be tryed here at the Bar no more then the City of London will 1654. B. S. If at a Tryal at the Bar in a Trespass and Ejectment the Plaintiff and the Defendant do consent that the Jury shall have a view of the Lands in question there can no Tryal proceed in the cause that Term. By Rolle Chief Justice 1654. B. S. It is not usual to grant a Tryal at the Bar the same Term it is moved for but the next Term after 1654. B. S. Yet sometimes upon special reasons it is done A voluntary Affidavit made before a Master of the Chancery is not to be given in evidence at a Tryal at the Bar. Pasc 1655. For a Master of the Chancery hath not authority to administer such an Oath and therefore if the party did swear falsly it is not perjury nor can he be endicted for it because it is Coram non judice and therefore such oaths are of little credit to be given in evidence If a Tryal be had and a Verdict thereupon given the same issue may not be tryed again by the Jury that tryed it before 1655 B. S. For it is more then probable they will give the same Verdict Traverse A Traverse ought to have an inducement to make it relate to the foregoing matter or else it is not good and formal Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If the Court shall change the venue and lay it in a County where the cause of Action did not arise the party may Traverse the County if he please and so draw the venue into the right County where the cause of Action did arise Trin. 23. Car. B. r. If one will take a Traverse to a Declaration he ought to Traverse that part of it that the doing thereof will make an end of the matter for which the Plaintiff declares and then is the Traverse good Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Where the Defendant hath given a particular answer in his Plea to all the material matters
Parliament or other payments Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Tithes The rector of a Church shall be accounted the proprietor of the Tithes of that Parish to which the Church doth belong if the contrary be not shewed Trin. 24. Car. B. r. Tithes of Land which do not lye in an Parish do properly belong to the King Mich. 24. Car. B. r. For that which no Subject can justly claim is the Kings Lands which lye in a Forest and are in the hands of the King are free from paying of Tithes although they do lye within some Parish but if they be disaforested and come into the hands of another they ought to pay Tithes for the not paying of Tithes for them whilst they were in the Kings hands is but an immunity for the time and not an absolute discharge Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Tithes are not due to be paid Jure Divino but per legem terrae so held by the Court agreeing with J. Seldons History of Tithes Mich. 1649 B. S. If Lands paid no Tithes before the Statute of Ed. 6. or but very inconsiderable Tithes and afterwards the Lands for which the Tithes were paid are improved by the owner he shall onely pay the accustomed Tithes paid for them before the improvement of them to wit for the seven last years immediately preceding the improvement but if no Tithes were paid for them before the improvement no Tithes shall be paid for them after the improvement 1650. B. S. Venue and Venire Facias AVenire Facias ought to be de aliquo vicineto that is neighborhood and there if the Writ of Venire do say Venire Facias homines Burgi it is not a good Venire for it ought to be Venire Facias homines de Burgo 21. Car. B. r. Q Differentiam inter of and from If a special Verdict be imperfect in matter of substance there must be a new Venire that there may be a new Verdict found because the ill Verdict doth not give the Court power to Judge of the matter in Law and so it is also if a demurrer upon an evidence be not good By Rolle Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Q. A Venire Facias that is filed cannot be altered without the consent of the parties Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the filing of it doth make it a Record In an Action of Trespass and Ejectment the venue ought to be from the Vill or Hamlet where the Lands in question do lye and if the Lands lye in no Vill or Hamlet the venue ought to be de corpore Comitatus that is from the body of the County Mich. 22. Car. B. r. The Judges may alter the venue from the place whence by the Law it ought otherwise to be if they believe there cannot be an indifferent tryal in the County where the venue was first laid Mich. 22. Car. B. r. By reason of the great power that one party hath in the County or for some other cause Where the venue cannot be from a Vill Hamlet or lieu conus there it may be de corpore comitatus Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For if it might not be so the cause could not be tryed A lieu conus is a Castle Mannor or other notorious place well known and generally taken notice of by those that dwell about it and not a close or Pasture ground or such like place of no repute Mich. 22. Car. B. r. In all cases where there is to be a special Jury there the Venire Facias must be special Mich 22. Car. B. r. For ordinary forms are not applicable to extraordinary cases If the matter to be tryed be within divers places in one and the same County the Venire shall be general but if the matter be in divers Countries there the venire ought to be special Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the general form of a venire doth not warrant to return a Jury in one cause out of divers Counties but in such cases to prevent the failer of Justice the Court hath power to vary from the old forms Where a certain place cannot be known whence the venue should be the venue is to be de corpore comitatus and so it is where a custom of the County is to be tryed for the custom runs through the whole County Hill 22. Car. B. r. And therefore may be indifferently tryed by Jurors returned from any part of the County A fault in a Venire is helped after a Verdict by the Statute of Jeofailes but where the venire is wholly insufficient it is not helped for the Statute extends not to such venires Hill 22. Car. B. r. After a Plea pleaded and an issue joyned in the cause the Venire cannot be amended except the parties consent to it Hill 22. Car. B. r. Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Trin. 24. Car. B. r. If the venue be laid in a foreign County and the parties proceed to issue in the cause the Court will not change the Venue afterwards although the Defendant would try the issue afterwards by provisoe Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Where the Verdict is imperfect so that Judgement cannot be given upon it there must be a new venire to try the cause de novo Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For the former tryal is to no purpose If a matter in Law be depending undetermined and an issue also joyned in the cause there must be a special venire awarded tam ad tryandum exitum quam c. Hill 23. Car. B. r. It is not necessary to enter the venire facias before the tryal but the Plaintiffs Atturney ought to give a Copy of it unto the Defendants Atturney before the tryal if he desire it and after the tryal it may be entred Pasc 24. Car. B. r. A Venire de vicineto Civitatis is good without naming of the Parish within the City out of which the Jurors are summoned and so was it said to be adjudged in Gavell and Gippoes case 10. Jacob. contrary to the book of 5. H. 5. For a City may have but one Parish in it The party that will move to have the venue changed he must move for it the next Term after the Action is brought Trin. 23. Car. B. r. This Court ought not to change the venue so that by it the cause cannot be tryed within the jurisdiction of the Court Trin. 23. Car. B. r. If the Defendant will move to change the venue he must make oath that the cause of Action if any be did arise in the County where he would have the venue laid and not in the County where the Plaintiff hath laid his Action and the Defendants Atturney or his Clerk must make oath that he received the Plaintiffs Declaration after the precedent Term and not before Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Or else the Court will not change it Where an Action is brought for a real thing which is called a real Action the venue ought to be laid in that County where the thing is
to defraud the Plaintiff of his appearance but the Atturney ought by the Rules of the Court to appear for him according to the Rules of the Court notwithstanding his Warrant be so repealed Trin. 22. Car. B. r. If an Atturney do practice deceitfully an Attatchment lies against him out of this Court at the prayer of the party grieved if he make it appear to the Court and good costs shall be given against him 22. Car. B. r. An Atturney and his Clerk were both committed by the Court for entring things against express Rules of the Court and after notice of those Rules given them by the Atturney of the other side 22. Car. B. r. One Atturney ought not to suffer another Atturney to practice in his name by reason of many inconveniencies that often happen to the Clyents by this means 22. Car. B. r. One G. H. an Atturney was ordered to be put out of the Roll of Atturneyes for entring a judgement against an express Rule in Court Mich. Car. 22. B. r. but it was not done The proper place for the Atturney General to sit upon any special matters wherein his attendence is required in Court is under the Judges on the left hand of the Clerk of the Crown Mich. 22. Car. B. r. No Under Sheriff ought to be Atturney for it is often the cause of encreasing of Suits and also a hindrance in dispatch of Clyents causes Trin. 23. Car. B. r. If the Atturney of the Plaintiff or Defendant do dye hanging the Suite and the other party whose Atturney is dead have notice given of it and will not retain another Atturney to prosecute for him the other party may proceed and is not bound to hinder his Clyents cause for it Mich. 23. Car. B. r. The Plaintiff or Defendant may change his Atturney pending the Suite without leave of the Court but it is not fair practice to do it without just cause Mich. 23. Car. B. r. It was the old course in proceeding in an Action of Trespass and Ejectment to deliver the Lease of Ejectment to the party to whom the Plaintiff had made a Letter of Atturney to execute the Lease and for the Atturney to deliver possession of the Land upon the delivery of the Lease Pasc 24. Car. reg If one have a Letter of Atturney to deliver a Deed to another and also authority from the party by word of mouth to do it he may make use of which of these he will to do it by but not of both for the first that he makes use of shall be effectual and the other shall be void Pasc 24. Car. B. r. An Infant ought not to appear to an Action by an Atturney but by his Guardian for he cannot retain an Atturney but the Court may assigne him a Guardian Pasc 24. Car. B. r. The Atturneys ought to be ordered in the ordinary manner of their practice by the Master of the Office and if differences arise betwixt them concerning it he is to hear both parties and to order the matters in difference betwixt them and they are to submit to him Pasc 24. Car. B. r. and the Court is not to be troubled but in extraordinary and difficult matters If there be divers Defendants declared against in one Declaration the Atturney in the cause on the Defendants part cannot be compelled to appear for more of the Defendants then for those from whom he hath Warrant to appear 24. Car. B. r. If one retain one by Warrant to be his Atturney in a Suite depending against him in this Court he may appear for him by that Warrant in all Suites which are there depending against him Hill 1649. B. Sup. Atturneys ought to be of some Inns of Court or Inn of Chancery and not to lodge in Inns or Ale-houses or in private places By Roll chief Justice Hill 1649. B. Sup. 8. Feb. Atturneys of the Upper Bench ought to be allowed in all Circuits as the Atturneys of the Common Pleas are although it hath been denyed them in the Western Circuit and ought not to be compelled to pay extraordinary Fees for practising there per Rolle Pasc 1650. 1. Maii. vid. 1. H. 7. f. 12. a. that the Atturneys of the Upper Bench are not Atturneys upon Record Ergo quaere An Action upon the Case lyes for the Clyent against his Atturney if he plead a Plea for him for which he hath not his Warrant Hill 49. B. Sup. The Atturneys of this Court were ordered from hence forth to besworn as the Atturneys of the Common Pleas are by Rolle Pasc 1650. 1. Maii B. Sup. One cannot force an Atturney to be his Atturney against his will by Rolle Chief Justice One may be an Atturney for a Clyent upon Record and yet another Atturney may act all the business for this Clyent An Atturney that hath Warrant to appear for his Clyent may plead for him without another Warrant by Rolle Chief Justice See Q. for divers Clerks in Court said privately that he cannot plead no any other Plea for his Clyent without a special Warrant but a non sum informatus If an Attnrney dye pending his Clyents cause his Warrant of Atturney is determined and his Clerk may not proceed in the Suite without another Warrant by Rolle Chief Justice Actions There ought to be both apparent malice in the Defendant and prejudice also done to the Plaintiff to ground an Action upon the Case upon or else it will not lye for if there be only malice and no dammage done by it there can be nothing recovered and so the Action will be vain and to no purpose and if there be only dammage and no malice it is but damnum sine injuria and not punishable by Law Hill 21. Car. B. r. Where there are two several dammages done to the party he ought to have two several Actions and not to joyn them in one Action Entred Oct. 156. 20. Car. Hill 21. Car. B. r. Although dammage without wrong will not maintain an Action nor malice without dammage yet malice may aggravate the dammages recoverable where there is dammage and wrong meeting together Hill 21. Car. B. r. Where two Actions though of several natures do depend one upon the other the abatement of one of the Actions is the abatement of both Hill 21. Car. B. r. In an Action upon the Case grounded upon a promise the Declaration is Actio in super casum in the singular number although the Action be brought upon divers promises for the word Case includes all 21. Car. B. r. An Action brought against a Constable for a thing done by him by vertue of his Office ought by the Statute to be brought against him in the County where he is Constable and not else where 21. Car. B. r. A Transitory Action may be laid in any County at the will of the Plaintiff yet generally and it seems the better and more indifferent course so to do it useth to be laid in that County where the cause
bar the Plaintiff from bringing an Action of account although he do not bring the Action within the time limited by the Statute for before that Statute one that had once cause of Action might bring it at any time afterward without restriction of time and this Action is not mentioned in the Statute Trin. 1650. 20. Junii B. S. An Action of Account doth not lie for Rent alone due and arrear for the Rent demandable is certain but if Rent be behind and there are also other things mixed with it for which the Action is brought then an Action of Account may be brought for both of them together because it is incertain upon the whole matter what is due to the Plaintiff Trin. 1651 B. S. If one receive money due to me upon an Obligation or for Rent due to me I may either have an Action of Account against him as my receiver or an Action of Debt as owing me so much money as he hath received though in both cases he do receive the mony without my consent Trin. 1651. B. S. Auditor Many things are in charge with the Kings Auditors which are not in the Crown Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Auditors Assigned by the Court upon an Action of Account brought to receive the Account are proper Judges of the cause Trin. 24. Car. B. r. Argument Two that are of Councel on one side ought not to Argue for their Clyent both of them upon one and the same day except it be for concluding of all the Arguments which are intended to be made for that party Mich. 1649. B. S. By the custome of the Court. It is not the usual course of the Court for one Councellor to argue the same Case twice By Rolle Chief Justice 12. Nov. 1650. B. S. Aide and Aide Prayer A Tenant for life may pray in Aide of all such persons as are in remainder of estate in the lands for which he is impleaded 1649. 29 Julii B. S. Baron and Fem. AN Action of Debt doth lie against the Husband for goods that were delivered to his Wife if it may be intended that those goods did any wayes come to the use of the Husband Hill 21. Car. B. r. A Fem Covert cannot submit to an Award for the submission is a free Act of will and the will of a Fem Covert is subject to the will of her Husband and so is not free Mich. 22. Car. B. r. But another person may submit to an Award for a matter which concerns the Fem and such a submission is a good submission in Law A Feofment made to a Fem Covert is a good Feofment in Law to pass the Lands if the Husband do know of it untill the Husband do disagree to it for if he disagree from it the Feofment is not good but if he once agree to it he cannot afterwards disagree from it and if he once disagree he cannot afterwards agree to it Q. Hill 23. Car. B. r. A Fem Covert may take a thing though it be not by Deed. Hill 23. Car. B. r. viz. If her Husband consent to it If a Fem sole be indebted to I. S. and afterward the Fem doth marry this Debt is become by the marriage the Debt of the Husband and of the Wife viz. the proper Debt of the Wife and the Debt of the Husband in right of his Wife and the Wife must be sued for this Debt jointly with her Husband and if the Husband dye pending the Suite yet is not the Debt gone but she may be sued for it after the death of her Husband Pase 24. Car. Trin. 24. Car. B. r. Bar in Actions A Recovery in a personal Action is a Bar in all other personal Actions touching the same matter Hill 21. Car. B. r. That is to say it is a good Ploa in Bar to a personal Action brought against the Defendant to say that the Plaintiff did formerly bring an Action against him for the same matter and did recover against him and therefore he prayes the Judgement of the Court whether he shall be permitted to proceed in his second Action In an Action brought to recover a thing from another if a recovery be there upon had by the Plaintiff the Defendant may plead this recovery in Bar of a second Action brought against him for the same thing 21. Car. B. r. A Plea in Bar which doth not give a full answer to all the matter which is contained in the Plaintiffs Declaration is not a good Plea 21. Car. B. r. viz. If it answer not all the material matter of it If the Plaintiff do reply to the Defendants Plea in Bar this replication is a confession in Law that the Plea in Bar is a good Plea although the Plea be not good Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For the Plaintiff hath slipped his advantage of Demurring to the Defendants insufficient Plea by replying unto it If an Action of Debt be brought against one and he Imparles to the next Term yet after his Imparlance he may plead that the Plaintiff is Out-lawed in Bar of the Action Trin. 24. Car. B. r. Baile One that is in Execution is not Bailable by the Law Hill 21. Car. B. r. For Bail is put in to secure the Plaintiff that the Defendant shall perform the Judgement of the Court and now the Law hath determined the matter and there remains onely for the Defendant to perform the Judgement and for the not performing it he lies in Execution Before a Capias is taken out against the Bail the Principal may render his body to the Marshal of the Court and the entry of this in the Marshals Book is a sufficient ground to discharge the Bail and it is not necessary to enter this upon the Record but if the Principal do render his body after a Capias taken out against his Bail it is in the power of the Court whether it shall be accepted or not and they may if they will give the Plaintiff leave to proceed against the Bail notwithstanding the Principals rendring of his body 21. Car. B. r. Because he did it not in due time but hath put the Plaintiff to the charge and trouble of suing out the Capias One that had been Indicted thirteen yeers before for suspicion of murder in poisoning his servant was brought in Court by a Habeas Corpus and was bailed to answer the fact 21. Car. B. r. Though one that is in Execution do bring a Writ of Error to reverse the Judgement given against him yet the Court will not Baile him except their appear unto them very apparent Error in the Record 21. Car. B. r. For else they will suppose that the Writ of Error is onely brought to gain the parties liberty and so to frustrate the Execution One Arnold James that was Bailed in the 44. and 45. yeer of Q. Eliz. upon a Judgement given against him in the Lord Majors Court of London was brought into Court by a Habeas Corpus Trin. 22. Car. B. r.
it is a litigious title the buying where the Law doth not allow Battery To lay ones hands lightly or gently upon another though he have no occasion so to do is no Battery to ground an Action upon Trin. 24. Car B. r. For the Law will not prosume the party is damnified by it Bill There is difference betwixt an Inland Bill of Exchange and an Outland Bill of Exchange which is made to return moneys beyond the Seas for an Inland Bill is but in nature of a Letter but an Outland Bill is of another nature and more regarded in the eye of the Law 3. July 1650. B. S. Because it is more for the advance of trade Book When Books are delivered to the Judges in causes which are to be argued the Atturnyes that deliver the Books ought to write the number Roll of the Cases to be argued upon the Book otherwise they will not receive them Mich. 22. Car. B. r. That they may know in what yeer and term the causes were entred that they may have recourse to the Records upon any occasion The Books which are to delivered to be the Judges of causes to be argued are to be made at the equal charge of the Plaintiff and the Defendant Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For the Law being doubtful in such Causes which are to be argued whether it be on the Plaintiffs side or on the Defendants the arguing of the Case doth equally concern them and therefore it is reason they should be at an equal charge in bringing the cause to be argued and determined When Books are to be delivered to the Judges in causes which are to be argued the Plaintiff ought to give Books to the Seignior Judges and the Defendant ought to give Books to the puisne Judges Hill 1649. B. S. Courts and their Jurisdiction THe Court of York hath not power to award a Capias in an Action upon the Case by the Statute of 14. H. 7. Hill 21. Car. B. r. Inferior Courts ought not in pleading to shew a thing by implication but they must set it forth expresly and also Surplusage in an inferior Court will make error for they must keep their forms precisely Hill 21. B. r. For if they should be suffered to break their forms it would introduce all barbarism and confusion If a condition of an Obligation for the payment of money do express no place where the mony is to be paid if the Obligee bring an Action of Debt upon this Obligation for non-payment of the money according to the Condition of this Obligation he must make it appear that the money was to be paid within the jurisdiction of the Court where he brings his Action or else the Action is not well laid Hill 21. Car. B. r. The jurisdiction of an inferior Court must be set forth and by what authority it is held whether by Prescription or Letters Patents Hill 21. Car. B. r. For every inferior Court must be held one of those wayes The Court of Admiralty cannot hold Plea of a matter arising from a contract made upon the land though the contract was made concerning things belonging to the Ship Hill 21. Car. B. r. In the yeer of 4 H. 4. there was a petition preferred in the Parliament against the Court of Admiralty for holding of Pleas by the Spiritual Law which they ought not to do but by the Laws of Oleron and so it was held by the House of Commons in Parliament at that time Hill 21. Car. B. r. If goods delivered a Ship-board be embeziled all the Mariners ought to contribute to the satisfaction of the party that lost his goods every one of them particularly according to their proportion by the the Martime Law or custome and the cause is to be tryed in the Court of the Admiralty and in such cases no prohibition ought to be granted Hill 21. Car. B. r. The Court of Admiralty ought not to try whether a fact were done in a place which is comprehended within a League made with a Forraign Prince or whether the place be without or not nor ought to try whether the League were made at the time of the fact done or no. 21. Car. B. r. No Court can set a fine upon any person for such an offence committed by him for which they cannot grant him a pardon for his offence when he hath paid the fine that is so set upon him 21. Car. B. r. 4. H. 7. 5. 21. H. 7. 35. The Court ought Ex officio to take notice of matters contained in the Record of the matter depending before them but they are not tyed to search the Almanack to compute the times of doing of things 21. Car. B. r. An inferior Court ought to Return a Writ directed to them to stop their proceedings although they be not bound to allow the Writ directed to them by giving obedience unto it and in their Return of the Writ they are to shew why they do not allow it but do proceed notwithstanding the Writ directed unto them 22. Car. B. r. That they may not seem to contemn the Authority above them If a Court which hath no jurisdiction of the cause depending in that Court do proceed to Judgment in it the Judgement is good if the Defendant did not plead to the jurisdiction of the Court but admitted it to have jurisdiction of the cause by making his defence 22. Car. B. r. Which was once in his power to allow or disallow as he pleased but not having disallowed it when he might he shall be judged to have allowed the jurisdiction Although one plead in disallowance of the jurisdiction of a Court yet he may afterwards come in and allow the jurisdiction and plead there Mich. 22. Car. B. r. The Court of the Kings Bench is to regulate all the Courts of Law throughout England that they do not exceed their jurisdictions nor alter their forms 22. Car. B. r. In some cases the jurisdiction of the Courts of the Cinque Ports extendeth upon the high Sea Mich. 22. Car. B. r. This Court may commit an Atturney for doing of things against the express Rules of the Court and notice of it 22. Car. B. r. This Court may issue out a Writ to compell one that is elected to the Office of Constable and refuseth to serve to take his oath and to execute his Office Mich. 22. Car. B. r. The superior Courts at Westminster and the inferior Courts elsewhere do differ in their forms in proceeding in many things Mich. 22. Car. B. r. A Court that holts Plea by ventue of Letters Patents ought to proceed according to the course of the Common Law but Courts that are Courts by Custome are not bound to proceed according to the strict Rules of the Common Law but may proceed according to their custome Mich. 22. Car. B. r. So that it be not contrary to Law One may sue in the Kings Bench Court by Original as well as he may by Bill of Midlesex or Writ
shall be accounted to be given for those things only for which Dammages may be given and the expressing the other things shall be accounted idle and void Trin. 24. Car. B. r. If an Action of Trespass be brought and the Defendant pleads and the Plaintiff joyns issue with the Defendant and after issue joyned he is non-suit he shall pay the Defendant Costs for his false vexation of him by the Stat. of 4. Jac. And upon very good reason For it shall be intended that if he had had good cause of Action against the Defendant that he would not have become non-suit When a judgment is given by default then the Court doth assesse the Dammages and not the Jury Mich. 1649. B. r. For there is no issue tryed If an Action of Trespas be brought against divers persons and some of them plead to issue and others do not and the issue is found for the Plaintiff and Dammages are given as well against those that joyned not in the issue as against them that joyned in the issue these Dammages are well given Mich. 1649. B. S. For the Trespas is found and that the Plaintiff was damnified so much by reason thereof If Dammages be assessed and it is not expressed that they are assessed pro Misis Custagiis this is erroneous for it doth not appear by the Record for what the Dammages are assessed as it ought to do Hill 1649. 31. Jan. B. S. For Records ought to be certain and not ambiguous All Costs are given ex assensu partium that is by the consent of the Plaintiff and the Defendant By Woodward Clarke Hill 1649. 4. Feb. B. S. If the Defendant whose title is concerned in an Ejectione firmae will not defend his title to the Land in question and the verdict do pass against the Plaintiff the ejector may release the Dammages 11. Feb. Hill 1649. B. S. For they do properly belong to hiâ—… One that sues in forma pauperis if the Cause go against him yet he shall pay no Costs if he were admitted to sue in forma pauperis in the suit which passeth against him before the suit began but if he were admitted to sue in sorma pauperis pendente lite that is whilst the fuit depended he shall pay Costs By Rolle Chief Justice who said it had been so antiently held and ruled 16. Nov. 1650. B. S. But Q what Costs whether the Costs of the whole suit or only with relation from the time he commenced his suit to the time he was admitted to sue in Forma pauperis In a Writ of Dowr if the Plaintiff recover and yet doth not desire a Writ of enquiry of Dammages to recover the Dammages the Court may tax the Dammages 5. Feb. 1650. B. S. The Court may encrease the Dammages which are found by the Jury upon a Writ of enquiry of Dammages in an Action of Assault Battery and Wounding if they see cause upon the view of the party that was beaten and wounded Trin. 1651. B. S. This was done in the Case of Davis Plaintiff and the Lord Foliot Defendant The Court will not compell the party that is non-suit in a Cause to pay his Costs upon the non-suit but if the party will not pay them when they are taxed the Court will not suffer him to commence his suit again untill he have paid them Pasc 1652. B. S. After judgment is given in a Cause depending in this Court the Court cannot make a Rule for the payment of the Costs which were expended in prosecuting the suit By Rolle Chief Justice 1655. B. S. For after judgment the parties are out of Court for the Cause is determined Q. No other Costs or Dammages shall be given upon a Recovery in an Action brought upon the Statute of 2º Edw. 6. for not setting forth of Tythes than the Dammages which are expressed in the Statute which is treble dammages 1655. B. S. For the course of the Common Law in such cases is altered by the Statute and it shall be intended that the Plaintiff hath better satisfaction thereby Deputies The Common Law doth in many Cases take notice of Deputies but it doth never take notice of under-Deputies Trin. 23. Car. B. r. As of the under-Sheriff who is but the Sheriffs Deputy sub-Almoner or Deputy-Almoner For in many Cases an Officer may be Law make a Deputy but a Deputy hath no power to depute another under him The King by his speciall Commission may make Deputy Escheators to finde an Office after the death of an Honourable Person Pasc 24. Car. B. r. As of a Duke Earl Marquess Viscount Baron c. Q. Whether in some speciall Case he may not do it after the death of one that is not of the Nobility It seems he may Default Before a verdict is taken by Default the Cryer of the Court doth call the Defendant three times and then if the party do not appear the Plaintiffs Counsell doth pray the verdict may be so entred Hill 21. B. r. Debt An Action of Debt doth lye against the Husband for goods which were delivered as sold unto the Wife because the Law doth intend that they were employed and came to the use of the Husband Hill 21. Car. B. r. And the Husband and Wife are but one person in Law If there be an erroneous judgment given for the Plaintiff in a personal Action in the Common Pleas and thereupon he brings an Action of Debt against the Defendant upon the erroneous Judgement in this Court the Action will well lye here until the Judgement in the Common Pleas be reversed by a Writ of Error 21. Car. B. r. For an erroneous Judgement is not void but voidable But when it is made void by a Writ of Error then there is no ground to support the Action of Debt so that then it cannot be maintained If one do assume upon a consideration moving from I. S. to perform a thing which concerns A. B. and do not perform it I. S. may bring an Action of Debt upon the Assumpsit against him that did so assum upon himself Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the Action is grounded upon the promise made and the not performing it to I. S. to whom it was made In some Case an Action of Debt will ye though there be no contract betwixt the party that brings the Action and him against whom the Action is brought Mich. 22. Car. B. r. An Action of Debt lies against a Sheriff for moneys which he hath levyed by vertue of a Writ of fieri facias for the party that did recover the moneys for the Law doth create a privity by the fieri facias betwixt the Sheriff and the party that sued out the fieri facias Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If An Action of Debt be to be brought against an Administrator for Rent which was due by the Intestate upon a Contract made betwixt him and the Intestate in his life time the Action must he brought in the County where the Contract
that doth rescue a Prisoner at the Election of the party who is damnified by this rescous Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Yet the judgments are different in these two Actions Where one may bring an Action of Wast for Trees cut down upon his Land it is at his Election to bring an Action of Wast or else an Action of Trover and Conversion for the Trees Mich. 24. Car. B. r. But both he cannot bring An Action upon the Case or an Assize doth lye against him that doth surcharge a Common at the Election of him that is injured thereby Mich. 1649. B. S. If a Prisoner escape that lyes in prison upon an execution an Action of Debt lyes against the Goaler that suffered this escape for the party at whose suit he was in execution but if he were not a prisoner in execution and do make an escape it is in the Election of the party at whose suit he was a prisoner either to bring an Action upon the Case or an Action of Debt against the Goaler for this escape Trin. 1650. 15. Junii B. r. If the Plaintiff amend his Declaration it is at his Election either to pay the Defendant Costs for this amendment or to give the Defendant an emparlance to the next Terme after the amendment and the Defendant cannot hinder this Election 7. Feb. 1650. For the Defendant is at no prejudice by it Estople A recitall in an Obligation is an Estople against which he that made the Obligation shall not be permitted to plead any thing to the contrary if an Action be brought against him upon this Obligation Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For that were to contradict his own act and Deed. If one enter into an Obligation by the title of an Esquire whereas in truth he is a Knight if an Action be brought against him upon this Obligation and he is named an Esquire he shall be Estopped to say in his Plea that he was not an Esquire but a Knight at the time he entred into the Obligation in abatement of the Writ Hill 1649. B. S. For constat de persona that he was by his own admission the same person that entred into the Obligation and did then admit the title of Esquire to be his true addition Where one hath liberty to confess and avoid the matter which the Plaintiff doth set forth in his Declaration against him there he cannot be Estopped to plead such matter for his defence 29. Jan. 1649. Hill B. S. Extinguishment If one have used to hold a Court by Custome as by Law he may if he do afterwards purchase Letters Pattents to enable him to hold this Court he hath thereby extinguished the Custome and must now hold the Court by vertue of his Letters Pattents Mich. 24. Car. B. r. For the party hath thereby waived the Custome and hath made Election to hold his Court by another Authority Error If a Writ of Error be brought to reverse a judgment and afterwards this Writ of Error is discontinued for want of prosecution of the party yet execution cannot be had upon the judgment untill this discontinuance of the Writ of Error be certified from the Court where the Writ of Error is discontinued unto the Court where the judgment was given 21. Car. B. r. If a Writ of Error be brought meerly to stop execution upon the judgment given and without any probable matter of Error to be alledged against the judgment and this doth appear unto the Court where the Writ of Error is brought the Court will not hinder execution to be awarded upon the judgment notwithstanding the bringing of the Writ of Error to reverse it 21. Car. B. r. For the Law doth require speedy justice to be done The assignment of the generall Error upon a Writ of Error brought is to say that the Declaration was insufficient and that judgment was given for the Plaintiff whereas it ought to have been given for the Defendant and such like generall frivolous matters without alledging any particular colourable matter of Error in the judgment 21. Car. B. r. A Writ of Error doth lye for one that is committed by a Justice of the Peace for a forcible entry committed by him Trin. 22. Car. B. r. For the commitment is grounded upon a judgment given by the Justice against the party committed All parties that are grieved by an erroneous judgment may joyn in a Writ of Error to reverse the judgment but persons that are not damnified by it cannot joyn with others that are damnified by it to reverse it Mich. 22 Car. B. r. For the Law will not favour any to sue who have no cause The Bail cannot joyn with the Principall in a Writ of Error to reverse a judgment given against the Principall 22. Car. B. r. For the principall must reverse the judgment alone if it be erroneous because it was only given against him and not against the Bail Errors to a judgment ought to be assigned upon the Record 22. Car. B. r. No person shall be compelled to bring a Record into the Court to make an Error in another Record Mich. 32. Car. B r. for the Law doth favour matters of Record and will affirm them rather then question them without apparent cause shewn If a judgment given in an inferior Court be entred in this manner ideo confideratum est and the words per curiam are omitted as they ought not to be the judgment is erroneous but if a judgment given in a superior Court viz. in any of the Courts at Westminster be entred and the words per curiam are omitted yet the judgment is not erroneous Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For inferior Courts are tied to observe their antient forms of proceedings and not to vary from them He that hath obtained a judgment if he finde that it is Erroneous may move the Court to have it reversed for his own dispatch which the Court will do when they are satisfied what the Error is Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For till such a judgment is reversed 〈◊〉 Plaintiff cannot bring a new Action for the same Cause for which that judgment was given for if he should the Defendant may plead the judgment in barr of his second Action If the Defendant after judgment given against him do bring a Writ of Error to reverse the judgment but doth not certifie the Record into this Court in reasonable time the Court will grant that the Defendant may have execution upon the judgment but he is not bound to certifie the Record the same Terme in which he brings his Writ of Error but if he do it the next Terme after it is sufficient Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If a judgment be given in any of the Cinque Ports if the Defendant will bring a Writ of Error to reverse it he must bring his Writ of Error before the Warden and Constable of Dover and not in this Court Mich. 22. Car. B. r. This is one of the Priviledges that belong unto those that
the Court of Admiralty do draw the matter ad aliud examen that is to try it by the Civil Law Trin. 23. Car. B. r. And therefore this Court will use their Authority at any time to stay their proceedings in the Admiralty although the Defendant have by his incautelous pleading allowed their Jurisdiction It is not necessary for him that Libels in the Court of Admiralty to shew in his Libel that the Common Law bath no Jurisdiction of the matter for which he Libels but he that prayes a Prohibition to the Admiralty in this Court must suggest something wherein in respect of the Cause depending there and for which he prayes the Prohibition that Court hath no Jurisdiction of the Cause Hill 23. Car. B. r. For the Admiralty cannot determine whether the Common Law have Jurisdiction or not and therefore it would be a vain allegation but this Court can judge of the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Common Law and can determine whether other Courts do intrence upon their Jurisdictions or not If the Court of Admirality do hold plea of any matter which is not maritime although the thing were done upon the Sea yet this Court will grant a Prohibition to stop their proceedings Hill 23. Car. B. r. For the Court of Admiralty hath only Jurisdiction in maritime Causes viz. such as only concern sea-affairs and not of all matters done at Sea as Contracts c. the Tryal whereof belongs to the Common Law This Court will grant a Prohibition to the Admiralty if there be cause for it although that a consultation have been granted in the Court of Common Pleas in the same cause Hill 23. Car. B. r. This Court ought not to deny the party a Prohibition that doth pray it if there appear cause for a Prohibition for it is not a thing arbitrary or ex gratia curiae to grant it or not to grant it Hill 23. Car. B. r. For to deny it were to deny Justice to the party in denying him the benefit of the Common Law which is every free-born English mans birth-right A Prohibition may be granted to the Spiritual Court after a sentence given in the Cause in that Court for which the Prohibition is prayed if there be cause but the Court will not do it untill they have heard Councell speak on both parts to inform their consciences although before a sentence they use to grant it upon a bare suggestion of the party Tuesday 2. July 1650. B. S. and Pasc 1652. B. S. For a sentence in an Ecclesiastical Court is in the nature of a Judgement given at the Common Law and presumed to be given upon mature deliberation and therefore this Court will not but by good advice make a sentence there given void or hinder the execution of it A Prohibition doth not lie to the Court of Admiralty in the cases of Felony yet if there be cause this Court will grant a Certiorari to remove the Cause hither By Rolle Chief Justice in Dothicks Case 29 Oct. 1650. B. S. Q. Tamen quia curia advisare vult Pleas and Pleadings If an Action be grounded upon a Statute there the Statute must be precisely set forth in pleading but if a Statute recited be but an inducement to the action there it is not necessary to recite the Statute precisely Hill 21. Car. B. r. For if the Statute be not precisely recited the Defendant cannot tell how to plead to the Statute As a plea in bar may go per partes so may in like manner a plea pleaded in abatement of a Writ Hil. 21. Car. B. r. A Plea is then said to go per partes as I conceive when one part of it goes to one part of the Declaration and another part of the Plea answers another part of the Declaration One that appears in Court upon a Habeas Corpus ought to plead the same Term wherein he comes in Hill 21. Car. B. r. If the Defendant do not plead according to the Rules of the Court so that the Plaintiff may enter Judgement upon a Nihil dicit yet if after the Rules are out the Defendant do put in his Plea into the Office before the Plaintiff hath entred his Judgement this Plea is to be accepted and the Plaintiff ought not then to enter his Judgement and therefore it behoves Attorneys to be vigilant in their practice 21. Car. B. r. and 23. Car. Hill For a Judgement upon a Nihil dicit is for want of a Plea but in this Case here is a Plea and if such a Judgement should be entred it would be in facto an irregular Judgement If the Defendant in an Ejectione firmae do not plead in time according to the Rules of the Court the Plaintiff may after the Rules for pleading be out move the Court to set a short day for him to plead which will be granted if the Land lie neer at hand and if the Defendant do not plead at the time set by the Court the Plaintiff may enter Judgement upon a Nihil dicit 21. Car. B. r. But now such motions are not usual for Judgement may be entred of course A forraign Plea is to be put in upon Oath of the Defendant that is he must swear his Plea is true or else such a Plea is not to be received Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Mich. 24. Car. B. r. A forraign Plea is when the Defendant doth plead such matter that if it be true the cause cannot be tried in this Court and in regard that thereby the Defendant doth endeavour to hinder the proceedings of this Court and to delay the Plaintiff therefore the Court will make him swear his Plea to be true that the Court may not be deluded nor the Plaintiff trifled with by a false Plea and if he will not swear his Plea to be true the Plaintiff may enter Judgement for want of a Plea Trin. 1650. B. S. If an Action of Debt be brought upon an erroneous Judgement the Defendant may plead Null tyel Record that is that there is no such Record as he frames his Action upon Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For that which is erroneous is accompted in Law as null and void If the Defendant do plead a dilatory Plea the Court at the Plaintiffs motion will order him to plead such a Plea as he will stand to Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the Law favours not delayes whatsoever is vainly babled by the ignorant to the contrary And if he be ordered to put in a Plea to which he will stand and he do it accordingly if such his Plea be not good the Court will not permit him to amend it but the Plaintiff shall take advantage of it by demurring upon it or otherwise as he shall be advised In any Action wherein the Plaintiff in case he recover shall only recover Dammages the Defendant may plead in Barre to this Action an arbitrement with satisfaction thereupon made unto the Plaintiff Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For if the Plaintiff have
cause proceeded in be entred Mich. 1649. B. r. For not till then the Record is made perfect An appearance will help a miscontinuance of Process 9. Nov. 1650. B. S. The bringing of a Writ of Error is a continuance of the Action 10 Feb. 1650. B. S. Hill For the Action is not determined by the Judgement if a Writ of Error be brought but is still depending for the Judgment it may be may be reversed If a cause to be spoken to in Court be entred into the paper of causes for the day in the Office although it be not put into the paper of the causes of the day delivered to the Judges yet the Court will proceed in them if they be enformed of it Trin. 1651. B. S. For it was but a mistake of the Clerk and it may be Councel on both sides are entertained for that day to speak in it Upon a Verdict or a Demurrer sometimes the continuances in the cause are not entred until after a Writ of Error be brought Pasc 1652. B. S. Miscontinuance of Process is where one Process is used for another Process viz. a wrong Process in stead of a right Trin. 1652. B. S. Provisoe A Provisoe in a Deed which sounds in Covenant is Collateral 21. Car. B. r. That is a Provisoe which is so penned that it implies a Covenant in it for there is difference betwixt a Provisoe and a Covenant of a Deed for a Provisoe doth often go by way of destruction of the whole Deed or some part of it or of the estate created by it but a Covenant alwayes stands with the Deed and onely an Action lyes upon the breach of it A tryal by Provisoe was ordained by the Statute to the end that the Defendant might free himself of suits brought against him by trying the issue depending betwixt him and the Plaintiff in case the Plaintiff doth not try it as he ought which he may do the next Term after the Plaintiff should have tryed it or at any time after that when he pleaseth Hill 22. Car. B. r. If a Provisoe in a Deed be insisted upon at a tryal to destroy the Deed in which it is there must be punctuall proof that the thing provided to be done or not done was done or was not done according as the Provisoe directeth Mich. 1650. B. S. For the Law doth not favour the destruction of Deeds or estates but doth favour the supporting and maintenance thereof as much as may stand with the rules of Justice Pledge The Plaintiffs Pledges that he shall prosecute 〈◊〉 suite may be entred at any time pending the suit Trin. 22. Car. B. r. For the putting in of Pledges is now but a meer formal thing but what was the ancient use of putting them in Q. Pardon A general Pardon doth discharge not onely the punishment which was to have been inflicted upon the person of him that did commit the offence Pardoned but also the guilt of the offence it self Mich. 22. Car. B. r. A Pardon may dispence with the burning in the hand of a person that is convicted for Felony but without a Pardon it may not b◠dispensed withall Pasc 23. Car. B. r. The words Pardonavit remisit relaxavit in a Charter of Pardon granted to one for Felony do not restore unto him the goods which he forfeited to the King by his Felony but the word restituit in the Pardon doth restore him to his goods Trin. 23 Car. B. r. For the former words go but only to the Pardoning of the offence but the latter to restoring to the estate forfeited by the Felony A Pardon for treason cannot be pleaded untill the prisoner be charged with the Endictment for the offence committed Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For before he is charged by the Endictment it doth not appear to the Court that he is the person that is pardoned by the Pardon If one have a Charter of Pardon for Felony committed by him the Court ought to allow it upon the prayer of the party that hath it but he must produce it at the Bar and pray upon his knees that it may be allowed 13. Nov. 1650. B. S. And so it was then done in one Goffs case A general Pardon doth Pardon publicke offences done to the Commonwealth but it doth not Pardon private injuries done to particular persons Pasc 1652. B. S. Postea The Postea is the issue or record engrossed in parchment upon which a tryal is had and which is afterwards to be entred in the roll of the Court where the Action tryed was brought when the party enters his Judgement upon the Verdict had at the tryall Mich. 22. Car. B. r. It is called the Postea from the word Postea which begins that which is entred by a Clerk of Assize upon the record that was tryed after the tryal setting forth that Postea that is afterwards after the issue joyned at such a day and place and before such a Judge the Plaintiff and Defendant came c. to hear Judgment that is to try the cause and hear the Verdict and so sets forth the tryal particularly and the Verdict The Court may stay the Postea not suffering the party to enter Judgement upon his Verdict if they find cause to do it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. viz. For undue proceedings in the tryal The Defendant hath four dayes by the rules of the Court to speak in arrest of Judgement after the Postea is brought into the Court and if the party for whom the Verdict passed will not bring it in upon notice given to him by the other party that he intends to move in arrest of Judgement the Court upon a motion setting forth this matter will order Judgement to be stayed untill four dayes after it shall be brought in There is no general rule of Court for the Clerk of the Assize to bring in the Posteas into this Court by a percise time but if he be negligent and return the◠not in convenient time the parties grieved may more the Court and thereupon the Court will make a rule that he bring them in speedily Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If the Clerk of the Assize have mistaken himself in drawing up of the Postea he may amend it by his notes which he took and drew it up by although it be returned Trin. 24. Car. B. r. But it must be before it be filed for then it is a record of this Court After the Postea is entred upon record and the record hath been read in Court in order to the speaking to some matter in Law in it the Atturney in the cause ought not to have the Postea any longer in his custody but it ought to remain in Court Trin. 24. Car. B. r. The Defendant may give rules in the Office for the Plaintiff to bring in the Postea and if he will not do it he shall be non-suite 18. Nov. 1650. B. S. For though he have a Verdict yet he hath no Judgement and so his
a Procedendo that the cause may be removed into London that the Custome may be tryed there for it cannot be tryed here and so if a Procedendo should not be granted the cause would remain untryed and the party that brought the Action would be without remedy Hill 22. Car. B. r. After the Defendant hath filed Baile in this Court a Procedendo ought not to be granted much less after issue is joyned in the cause Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For by admitting of the Bail the Plaintiff hath admitted the jurisdiction of the Court and it is then too late to move for a Procedendo It is not necessary that a Procedendo do agree in form with the Habeas Corpus by which the cause was removed into this Court but it is sufficient if it do agree in the matter with it Trin. 24. Car. B. r. If the Defendant hath put in Bail in this Court upon the removal of the cause hither by Certiorari or Habeas Corpus cum causa if afterwards the Bail be disalowed by the Court if the Defendant shall refuse to put in better Bail such as the Court shall approve of a Procedendo may be granted to the Plaintiff to remove the cause back again to try it where the Action was first said Mich. 24. Car. B. r. For disalowing of the Bail makes the Defendant to be in the same condition as if he had put in no Bail If a Certiorari to remove a cause be returned before a Judge and not in Court and their follows no proceedings in the cause after the Certiorari returned if the party who is concerned will move for a Procedendo he must move for it before the Judge before whom the Certiorari was returned and not in the Court whether the cause is removed Mich. 1649 B. S. Because the Judge hath been formerly acquainted with the return of the Certiorari and may have better knowledge why it was granted and therefore the Court will not intermedle to undo what the Judge hath done Practice If the Atturney for the Plaintiff do tell the Defendants Atturney that he is content to stay for a Plea till such a time and yet doth in the mean time enter Judgment for want of a Plea this is not fair practice but if this be made to appear to the Court the Court will vacate the Judgement and force him to accept of a Plea Hill 22. Car. B. r. For the Law will not countenance fraud and falshood in the proceedings thereof but loves plain and fair practice It is not fair practice for the Defendants Atturney to Demur to the Plaintiffs Declaration without probable cause but onely to gaine time to plead Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For this is apparent cause of delay Peace and Justice of Peace A Justice of Peace in one part of York-shire is not a Justice of Peace throughout the whole County but onely in that division of York-shire where he is authorised by his Commission to be a Justice Hill 22. Car. B. r. This is in regard of the large extent of that County for in other Counties a Justice of Peace in every County is a Justice of Peace throughout the whole County The Peace was granted against one upon an Article sworn in Court amongst others that he did threaten to burn down the Plaintiffs house Hill 22 Car. B. r. For such menaceing words are accounted to be a breach of the Peace and such persons are dangerous persons in the Commonwealth and to be restrained from doing mischief A Justice of Peace ought not to binde a man to his good behaviour upon a general Information and if the party shall refuse to put in sureties for his good behaviour upon such an information yet the Justice ought not to send him to the Gaol for his refusal Pasc 23. Car. B. r. But the information must be particular and shew wherein the misbehaviour consists for accusatio generalis non est applicabilis personae particulari It is the duty of Justices of Peace to attend duly at the quarter Sessions and at the Assizes held for the County where they are Justices Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For there are the most important businesses which concern the Peace and Government of the County managed The Commission of Oyer and Terminer doth extend to Justices of the Peace Pasc 23. Car. B. r. A Justice of Peace may himself actually arrest and commit a Felon for a Felony done in his own view without any Warrant made to another to do it but he may not command one to be apprehended for Felony upon a bare information made against the party but by a warrant under his hand and Seal and not by Paroll Pasc 23. Car. B. r. It is the course used in the Capital Office to continue one that is there bound to the Peace to be so bound during his life but by Rolle Chief Justice this is not reasonable Pasc 1651. B. S. 13. Maii. If the person that is to be bound unto the Peace be a dangerous person and the cause for which he is to be bound do require great security a Justice of Peace may require him to find extraordinary sureties to be bound with him and in what sum he shall judge the cause doth require Pasc 1652. B. S. If this Court do see cause to bind one to the Peace they may do it although no person doth make Oath that he goes in fear of his Life of the party Pasc 1652. B. S. For such Oath is but evidence against the purty that there is cause to bind him to the peace and if the Court be satisfied that there is cause to do it without such evidence the not having of such an Oath is no hindrance unto them to do it If one do swear the Peace in Court against another that is doth make Oath that he goes in fear of his life or corporal hurt of him the party against whom this Oath is made ought to be committed if he do not find sureties for the Peace although there be no Articles exhibited and sworn against him Mich. 1652. B. S. Priviledge A Committee man of Parliament that is not a Member of the Parliament is not Priviledged from serving upon the grand enquest Hill 21. Car. B. r. A Clerk of this Court is not to be compelled to lay his Action out of that County where this Court doth sit Mich. 22. Car. B. r. By reason of the constant attendance he is bound unto in this Court No Priviledge is to be allowed to one that hath an Indictment preferred against him although he be a Peer of the Realm Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For an Endictment is at the sute of the King and against him no Priviledge is to be allowed One that was coming unto this Court to attend upon his cause was arrested as he was coming and was forced to put in Bail but upon a motion and making it so to appear unto the Court he and his Bail were both discharged Mich. 22.
before a Deed can be enrolled the party to the Deed doth acknowledge it before a master of the Chancery that the Deed to be enrolled is his Deed if the Deed be to be enrolled there or before a Judge of that Court where it is enrolled which is a sufficient authority to enroll it and to give credit to the Deed. A provisoe in a Deed which provisoe goes in destruction of the estate passed by the Deed must be punctually proved Mich. 1649. B. S. For the Law doth not favour things which sound in destruction of estates but such things as tend to the affirmance and preservation of them If a Place be named with an alias it is not necessary upon a tryal to prove both the names By Rolle Chief Justice Mich. 1650. B. S. Q Tamen For Crawley when he was Justice was of another opinion A Deed which is enrolled and is not acknowledged before a Master of the Chancery as a Deed which is enrolled act perpetuam rei memoriam and not to pass an estate may be must be Proved by Witnesses if it be given in evidence at a tryal Mich. 1649. B. S. For the acknowledging of it before the master is that which gives credit to the Deed and not the Endorsement of the Enrollment which is but the act of a Clerk in the Office A thing which is Proved to have been and continued for so long time as any one living can remember shall be presumed to have been beyond the memory of man and will be accounted a good prescription Pase 1650. B. S. 11. Maii. Because the contrary cannot be proved Plaint A Plaint is the cause which the Plaintiff doth express in the Writ for which he complains to the King against the Defendant and for which he doth obtain his Writ 21. Car. For as the King denys his Writ to none if there be cause to grant it so he grants not his Writ to any without there be cause alledged for it for as the King is bound to help them to right that suffer wrong so he is bound as much as in him lies to defend his people from causeless vexation A Plaint in an inferior Court is in the nature of an original Writ Pasc 1652. B. S. For therein is briefly set forth the Plaintiffs cause of Action Poor If the Father of Children do leave the Parish where he dwelleth and there is a Grandfather of the Children to be found this Grandfather if he be able is chargeable with the keeping of the Children and not the Parish Mich. 24. Car. B. r. For the tye of Nature is a neerer tye then the Law can or doth enjoyn Presentment A Presentment taken before Commissioners of Sewers was quashed because 1. it did not appear in the Presentment by what authority the Commissioners did sit that took the Presentment And 2. because it did not appear that any of the Commissioners before whom the Presentment was taken were of the Quorum Hill 1649. B. S. As is directed by the Statute that gives them their authority Parliament The Parliament is not accounted to begin untill the first day of the sitting thereof although Writs are returned and many adjournments may be before Pasc 1650. B. S. 21. Maii. The Writs mentioned are meant the Writs directed to the Sheriffs of the several Counties and to the Cities and Borrought to Elect Members for them to serve in Parliament Presidents If there be a special cause to alter the ancient President of a Writ the Cursitors are not to keep the old form but are bound to alter it as the case requires and if they shall refuse to do it this Court will compell them to it Trin. 1650. B. S. Else it would be very mischievous to the people who by that means may have their Writs abated and be put to the trouble and charge of purchasing of new Writs by reason of their willfulness and ignorance Prisoner and Prison One that is imprisoned upon a Capias utlagatum ought to be imprisoned as strictly as he that is in prison upon an Execution Trin. 1650. B. S. 3. Julii For he that refuseth to answer the Law offends in as high if not in a higher nature then he that is condemned by the Law and is to be punished as highly It is the course of the Court when a Prisoner is delivered over by this Court unto the Marshal of the Court to endorse the day of this delivery upon the back of the Writ Mich. 1650 B. r. 20. Nov. This Court may send for a Prisoner out of the Prison of the Marshal Sea without a Habeas Corpus because that Prison doth belong to this Court but they cannot send for a Prisoner out of any other Prison but by a Writ of Habeas Corpus By Rolle Chief Justice Mich. 1650. B. S. Possession If one do make an Entry into the Lands of another and that other doth notwithstanding the Entry keep the Possession of the Lands entred into with his servants and cattel the entry is no entry in Law but if the servants and cattel be put out to gain the Possession he that is put thus out of Possession if he will prove a Possession in himself after this he must prove an actual entry afterward Pasc 1650. B. S. 25. Ap. The proving of ones cattel to be upon the Land in question is not a sufficient proof that he whose cattel they were was in possession of the Land at that time when the cattel were there Pasc 1650. B. S. For the cattel might be upon the Land Dammage feasant Peremptory By the rules of the Court a Peremptory day is not to be given to the Defendant upon a Judgement given against him upon a non sum informatus at the first reading of the record but the Court will appoint a day to hear Councel Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If the Defendant do tender an issue in abatement of the Writ and the Plaintiff doth Demur upon the issue and upon arguing of the Demurrer the issue is over-ruled that is is adjudged by the Court to be no good issue the Defendant is onely to answer over that is to tender a better issue for the over-ruling of the former was not Peremptory to him Trin. 24. Car. B. r. But otherwise it is where such an issue and demurrer is in bar of the Action for there the merits of the cause is put upon it but in the former the validity of the Writ is onely in question and whether the defendant is thereby compellable to plead to the Plaintiff or not If a Peremptory be put off by the Court the party that will take advantage by the putting of it off ought to enter the rule of Court that was made for the putting of it off Trin. 1651. B. S. A Peremptery is when a business is by a rule of Court to be spoken unto at a precise day and if it cannot be spoken unto then by reason of other businesses of the Court the Court in such
avoid trouble and charge which may otherwise befall him by executing the Judgement if he have a violent and malicious adversary After a Writ of Error is brought and allowed by the Court where the Judgement was given for the reversal whereof the Writ of Error is brought the hands of the Court are foreclosed that is stopped from proceeding upon the Judgement any further and there needeth no Supersedeas to be directed unto them nor is it necessary to mark the Rolle Mich. 1049. B. S. For every one ought to take notice of such general Writs as may any wayes concern them If a Writ of Error be brought to reverse a Judgement given upon a nihil dicit the bringing of this Writ of Error is a Supersedeas to stay Execution upon the Judgement notwithstanding the late Statute that enacts that a Writ of Error shall be no Supersedeas to stay Execution upon a Judgement Pasc 1651. B. S. 13. Maii. For that Statute onely extends to Judgements given upon a Verdict and not to Judgements given upon a nihil dicit or upon a non sum informatus or upon a demurrer Surprisal The Court is alwayes very cautious that no person that hath any cause depending before them be Surprised especially in such matters as are finall and penall to the party that is surprised Mich. 1649. B. S. Because by Surprisals the parties Surprised are deprived of making their full defence Setlement If one hath hired a dwelling house in one Parish and be settled in that house but a small time yet this is such a setlement in the Parish where the house is that the Justices of the Peace have no power to make an order to remove the party setled out of the Purish wherein he was so setled except the party so setled be lame or blind or likely to be suddainly chargeable to the Parish where he was so setled Mich. 1650. B. S. 11. Nov. Tryal and Proceedings to it NOtice to an under-tenant of a house or land that there is a Lease of Ejectment sealed and delivered to Try the title of the thing of which he is in possession is no good notice in respect to the upper tenant thereof or to him in reversion whose title is properly concerned and therefore if there be a Tryal and a Verdict and a Judgement in such a case where there was notice onely given to the under-tenant as aforesaid the Court upon a motion and proof of this matter will vacate such a Judgement as a fraudulent Judgement Hill 21. Car. B. r. For it is deceitfully obtained as to him in the reversion whose title is concerned in the Judgement No tryal ought to be had at the Bar the same Term that the Defendants plea is put in but the Term following by the Rules of the Court Hill 21. Car. B. r. Except it be by special rule of Court or in causes depending on the Crown side wherein the King is a party This Court will grant a Habeas Corpus to Try a Felon at the Bar although the Felony was not committed in the County of Middlesex isthere be not a Gaol Delivery in the usuall manner in the County where the Felony was committed Hill 21. Car. B. r. This is done for the expedition of Justice and that the prisoner may not lye long in prison for the Law favors liberty A Tryal in that Court where the issue Tryed was not joyned is not a good Tryal Hill 21. Car. B. r. For there was nothing before them to Try and so it was Coram non judice Where the Plaintiff will not Try his cause in such due time as he ought to do by the Rules of the Court the Defendant may upon warning given thereof to the Plaintiff proceed to the Tryal of it himself Hill 21. Car. B. r. That he may free himself from the Action that is brought against him Justices of Peace may by there Commission Try a murder committed in the County where they are Justices Pasc 22. Car. B. r. But they do not often do it but leave such matters to be Tryed by the Justice of the Gaol Delivery at the Assizes If any of the Defendants Witnesses to be used at a Tryal do live above fourty miles distant from London the Plaintiff by the Rules of the Court ought to give the Defendant fourteen dayes notice of the Tryal before he Try his cause Pasc 21. Car. B. r. That the Defendant be not surprised for want of sufficient time to get his Witnesses to be at the Tryall Upon a Tryal at the Bar when the Jury is at the Bar and the Court ready and the panell of the Jurors names is delivered to the Secondary he bids the cryer call the Defendant which he doth and if his Councel say they appear then the Secondary bids both parties take heed to their challenges and then proceeds to swear the Jurors but if he do not appear after thrice calling by the Cryer the Plaintiffs Councel do pray the Court the Verdict may be taken by default Trin. 24. Car. B. r. It is called a Verdict by default because if it pass against the Defendant where the Defendant had right and might have defended himself it is not the fault of the Court or Jury but his own that would not appear and defend his cause Where a Tryal is had by provisoe the Plaintiff may be called before the Jury is sworn if the Defendant do require it Trin. 22. Car. B. r. For the Plaintiff is as it were in the place of the Defendant because the cause is brought to a Tryal by the Defendant The Court will not grant a Tryal at the bar except there be oath made that the matter to be Tryed is very difficult or of great value Mich. 22. Car. B. r. In which cases it is fit the Tryal should be at the Bar where Tryals are more solemn and where more time may be spent in the Tryal then can be at the Assizes After a Tryal hath been in a cause the Court ought not to order that there shall be a new Tryal of it except it doth appear that there was a surprisall in the Tryal had or some fraudulent miscarriage in it for if they might in any case they please order a new Tryal this would be for the Court to have an Arbitrary power which the Law will not permit Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For this would weaken the Common Laws to the prejudice of the people Where warning is given of a Tryal to the Atturney in the cause and the Atturney cannot give notice of this warning timely enough for his Clyent to prepare for the Tryal the Court will not force the Atturney to go to a Tryal but will give longer time Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Because the Court will not surprise any person and such Tryals very seldome do determine the business but beget more trouble and charges to both parties Where there ought to have been a place alleadged whence the venue should come and there
contained in the Declaration there he needs not to take a Traverse Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Pasc 1648. B. S. For a Traverse is a denyal of a thing and when a thing is answered what need is there of a denyal of it Where there is a Disseisin and a descent alleadged in a Declaration if the Traversing of the Disseisin will make an end of all the matter there the Disseisin is to be Traversed and not the descent that is in such cases where by supposition the party may come to the estate by Disseisin Pase 24. Car. B. r. Where the Defendant hath confessed and avoided all the matter that is contained in the Declaration there he needs not to take a Traverse Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For a confessing and avoiding is a full answer of the matter alleadged and so there needs no Traverse of it Title If there be an Inquisition found by which the King is Intitled unto Lands and the Inquisition is not answered nor Traversed the Lands found in the Inquisition shall be suppossed to be in the hands of the Kings 21. Car. B. r. Because there appears nothing to the contrary to question the Kings Title If one be admitted to traverse an Office this admission of the party to the traverse doth suppose the Title to be in him 21. Car. B. r. If in an Action of Trespass and Ejectment neither the Plaintiff nor the Defendant can make out a good title then the party that hath had the most ancient possession of the Lands in question shall be judged to have the best Title Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Mich. 1649. B. S. For an ancient possession of Lands is a badge of a Title to them In Action of Trespass brought for taking away of goods the Plaintiff needs not set forth his Title to the goods Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For by the bringing of the Action and by the Declaration it is supposed that they were in his possession before the Defendant took them away from him and that possession is Title enough to maintain the Action He that is made Ejector to try the Title of Land is not bound to defend the Title of the Land if he whose Title is truely concerned will not save him harmeless if the tryal shall pass against him but he may confess a Judgement and save himself of the trouble which otherwise may befall him by being made Ejector Mich. 1650. B. S. The Officer of this Court whose title was to be called the Clerk of the Crown is now called and Intitled Coroner and Atturney for the Keepers of the Liberty of England by Authority of Parliament Mich. 1650. 24. Oct. B. S. But now that Title is also altred and he is called Coroner and Atturney for the Lord Protector Tenement A Tenement may be said to be any House Land or other such like thing which is any way held or possessed and it is a word of a very large and ambiguous meaning and therefore not fit to be used to denominate or express any thing which requires a particular description 21. Car. B. r. Tipstaff The Court will not grant an Attatchment against an Officer of the Court for a misdemeanor committed by him as an Officer of the Court but one of the Tipstaffs which are Officers of this Court called by that name by reason of a staff which they carry tipped with silver is to bring him into the Court. 21. Car. B. r. And they are in the nature of Messengers or Pursuivants c. If a Sheriff do commit a misdemeanor in relation to the Court during his Office and afterwards a new Sheriff is elected whereby the old Sheriff is out of his Office the Court may grant a Tipstaff to bring him in to answer the misdemeanor for being out of his Office the Court cannot fine him for his misdemeanor Pasc 24. Car. B. r. A Tipstaff is to be granted for one that is in London or Westminister but if he be in the Country an Attatchment is to be granted and not a Tipstaff Hill 22. Car. B. r. 23. Car. Pasc 1650. For the Tipstaffs are Officers to attend the Court and are not therefore to be sent out of Town Treason An intention of Treason if it can be proved by circumstances is Treason in the eye of the Law Trin. 22. Car. B. r. To shew the odiousness and greatness of the offence of Treason by punishing the very intentions of it which are not punishable in other offences criminal Time Where the Law doth not imply a certain Time for the doing of a thing nor is there any certain time agreed upon between the parties for the doing it there the Law doth allow the party a convenient Time for the doing of it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. To wit such as shall be adjudged reasonable In some cases one hath time during his life for the doing of a thing if he be not hastened to do it by request of the party for whom it is to be done but if he be hastened by request then he is bound to do it in convenient Time after such request made Hill 22. Car. B. r. Trespass An Action of Trespass doth lye for him that hath the possession of goods or of a house or Lands if he be disturbed in his possession Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If goods be taken by the Sheriff in Execution and the goods be rescoued out of his hands an Action of Trespass lies against him that did rescue the goods Hill 22. Car. B. r. viz. By the Sheriff or by the party at whose sute they were taken and the party may be endicted for a rescous also at the sute of King for disturbing the peace and hindring the Execution of the Law One Action of Trespass may be brought for a Trespass committed in Lands which lye in several Towns or Vills Pasc 23. Car. B. r. So that those Vills do lye in one and the same County An Action of Trespass doth lye for a Parson against him that doth take away his Tithes after they are set forth Pasc 23. Car B. r. For after they are set forth the person hath a property in Law in them although the Parson never had an actual possession of them If divers Actions of Trespass be brought for one and the same cause with an intent onely to vex the Defendant if the Court be moved in it and proof thereof made by Affidavit the Court will order the Plaintiff to joyn all his Actions into one Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For the Judges of the Law do not favor unjust vexations of the people If one do carry another with force into the house of a third person he who carries the other by force into the house is the Trespassor unto the third person and not he who is carryed thither by force and so if one do drive my cattel into the ground of a third person he that drives my cattel into the ground is the Trespassor and not I who am owner of
the cattel Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For one shall not be made a Trespassor against his will If a person or goods be rescued out of the hands of the Sheriff which he hath taken in Execution by vertue of his Office it is at his election to bring an Action upon the Case or an Action of Trespass vi armis against him that made the rescous Hill 23. Car. B. r. If one bring a meer Action upon the Case he may declare omitting the words vi armis but if the Action be a bare Action of Trespass there he must declare that the Trespass was committed vi armis Mich. 24. Car. B. r. For an Action of Trespass doth implye a breach of the peace and a capiatur is to be entred in the Judgement against the Trespassor for his fine to the King but in an Action upon the Case it is otherwise for there the Judgement is that the Defendant shall pay the dammages and be in misericordia Trespasses of several natures cannot be laid together in one Action Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Upon a recovery of Lands in an Action of Treft pass and Ejectment the Plaintiff may afterwards bring an Action of Trespass against the Defendant for the mean profits of the Land So it was held in the case between Wilmot and Holden Trin 1652. B. S. The mean profits are such profits of the Land as did grow due betwixt the time of the bringing of the Action and the time of the recovery An Action doth lye at the Common Law for the person for taking away of Tithes after they are severed from the Land Mich. 24. Car. B. r. To wit against the occupyer of the Land Q. tamen Tales Upon a Tryal at the Bar if the Jury do not appear full the Court cannot grant a Tales de circumstantibus but the Court upon a motion will grant a Tales returnable in some convenient time the same Term to try the cause Mich. 22. Car. B. r. 1650. B. r. For the Statute doth not extend to tryals at the Bar which did enable the making of a Tales A Tales de circumstantibus are so many persons which are returned to serve on Juries to supply the places of those that did not appear A Corporation Court cannot grant a Tales Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For the Statute doth not extend unto Corporations A Tales is not to be granted where the whole array or Jury is challenged for want of Hundreders but in such case the whole pannel if the challenge be made good is to be quashed and a new Jury is to be returned Mich. 1650. B. S. For a Tales consists but of some persons to supply the places of such of the Jurors as wanted of the number of twelve and is not to make a new Jury If the Sheriff take Bail of one for his appearance who is not Bailable by Law although the party do not appear an Action doth not lye against the Sheriff but the Plaintiff must proceed against the Sheriff by way of amercements Mich. 1650. B. S. 26. Nov. For in regard that the Sheriff ought not to have taken Bail though he have taken it yet it shall be accounted as if he had not taken Bail Terms The Issue Terms are Hillary Term and Trinity Term onely the other two Terms are not so called and the other Issue Terms are so called because in them are the Issues joyned and made up which are to be tryed at the Lent Assizes and the Summer Assizes which do immediately and respectively follow them Hill 22. Car. B. r. The four dayes in Term are the day of 1. Essoigne 2. Exception 3. Appearance 4. Return Hill 22. Car. B. r. All the Term in construction of Law is accounted but one day and therefore a Plea that is put in the last day of a Term is a Plea of the first day of the Term. Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Mich. 1649. B. S. The Term is said to begin upon the first Essoign day which is three dayes before the Courts of Justice do sit and not at the first day of sitting of the Courts Trin. 24. Car. B. r. Because some businesses of that Term do begin at that time The same day of the week that Michaelmas Term doth end the same day Hillary Term doth begin By Woodward Clerk of the Court Hill 24. Car. B. r. Toft and Croft A Toft is a place where an old house did formerly stand and it also signifies a decayed house not inhabited Pasc 23. Car. B. r. A Croft is a small peices or close of Land that lyes neer a dwelling house Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Trover and Conversion Where the Trover of goods is one County and the Conversion is in another County the Action brought for these goods may be laid in the County where the Conversion was for the Conversion of the goods is part of the cause of the Action Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For the very name of the Action is called a Trover and Conversion and not a Trover onely and the Action is brought as well for the Defendants converting of the goods to his own use as for the finding and deteyning of them Two causes of Action for a Trover and a Conversion cannot be joyned in one Action Trin. 23. Car. B. r. An Action of Trover and Conversion may be brought for goods although the goods for which the Action is brought do come into the possession of the Plaintiff that brings the Action before the Action brought Pasc 1651. 22. Ap. B. S. For the coming of the goods into his possession before the bringing of the Action for them doth not purge the wrong or make satisfaction for that which was done to the Plaintiff by the finding and converting the goods and so he hath still cause of Action although his dammages may not be very great Trust The Chancery will compell one to perform a Trust which he hath taken upon him except it be a Trust taken upon him for the benefit of an Alien Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For to compell that might in many cases prove prejudicial to the Common Wealth and repugnant to the Common Law The way of making conveyances by way of Trust was invented to evade the Statute of uses Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Cestuy que trust cannot take the profits of the Land setled by the Trust but hath onely his remedy for them in equity for the estate in the Land is onely in the party that hath the Trust Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Tenure Lands which are granted by the King to hold of him of his Manor of East Greenwitch in Kent in capite is a Tenure in Sorage and the words in capite in the grant are voide Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For those words are repugnant to the Tenure created by the grant Tender A Tender of Rent to save the forfeiture of a Lease ought to be a Tender of the whole Rent due at the time of the Tender without any deduction of Taxes of
cause of Action to warrant his Declaration or where some material and essential part of the Declaration is omitted such Declarations are not helped by the Statute Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Hill 22. Car. B. r. If a special Verdict be drawn up contrary to the notes agreed upon by the Councel on both sides at the tryal the Court upon a motion will rectifie this if the parties cannot agree between themselves to do it or that the Councel on both sides did formerly consent to such an alteration Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If the Court do direct the Jury to finde a speciall Verdict upon the prayer of the Plaintiff or of the Defendant the party at whose prayer the special Verdict was found ought to prosecute this special Verdict that the matter in Law in it may be determined Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Because the Verdict was directed to be so found in his favour Where the Court doth direct the Jury to finde a special Verdict one of the Councel on both parts are to agree upon the notes for it and to draw them up and to set their hands to them and to deliver them in unto the Jury in convenient time or else the Court will take a general Verdict Mich. 22. Car. B. r. The Chief Justice may in some special case take a Verdict out of Court but then the Verdict must afterwards be pronounced in Court Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If a matter in fact be left out in the notes drawn up by the Councel of the special Verdict found by the Jury this cannot be amended afterwards though the Court be moved in it and although the Councel on both sides do consent Mich 22. Car. B. r. For this were for the Court and Councel to make a new Verdict against the finding of the Jury who have found the matter of Fact already If one of the parties whom a special Verdict doth concern will not joyn with the other in prosecuting of the special Verdict the Court upon a motion will order him to joyn in it and if the Verdict be made up and the party will not bring it in to be entred and proceeded in the Court will grant an Attachment against the party Mich. 22. Car. B. r. The Plaintiff and Defendant ought both of them to appear in Court to hear a special Verdict and the Jury is to be called and to have the special Verdict read unto them by the Secondary and upon the reading of it if there be any mistake in the penning of it the Councel on either side hath liberty to except against it and when the Councel is agreed then the Secondary demands of the Jury whether they agree to find it so and if they answer they do then the Verdict is found Pasc 23. Car. B. r. If the Jury will find against the directions of the Court any thing in matter of Law the Court will not receive the Verdict but compell them to find as the Law requires Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For the Court is judge of matters in Law as the Jury is of matters of fact If in an Action upon the Case brought for speaking of scandalous words the Jury do find that the Defendant did speak words which are Actionable against the Plaintiff and so give a Verdict for the Plaintiff and it appears that the words found are not expressed in the Declaration this is not a good Verdict if there be not other words found which are in the Declaration which are actionable Trin 23. Car. B. r. For the words in the Declaration are onely put in issue to the Jury A special Verdict after the notes are agreed upon by the Conncel and drawn up and their hands set unto them is not a special Verdict untill it is allowed by the Court Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For they are to judge whether the matter in question be rightly stated or not Where a Verdict is imperfectly found by the Jury there the Defendant is not to move upon it in arrest of Judgement for there cannot be any Judgement given upon such a Verdict and by consequence the motion is needless but in such case there ought to be a new venire to summon a new Jury to try the cause again Mich. 23. Car. B. r. Where a special Verdict is imperfectly drawn up and entred the Judges will not argue the matter in Law for there can be no Judgement given in the cause by reason that the Verdict is not good but in such a case there must be a new venire that a new Verdict may be found Hill 23. Car. B. r. Mich. 1649. B. S. 13. Nov. A cause depending in Court upon matter in Law found by a special Verdict ought not by the ancient practice of the Court to be read in Court as a Record untill books thereof be given unto the Judges of the Court and so is the use in the Exchequer at this day Pasc 24. Car. B. r. That the Judges may have sufficient time to consider of and to speak to the matter in Law A misdemeanor of the Jury before they give their Verdict is not a sufficient cause to make voide the Verdict Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Although they are punishable for it If a Verdict be given where there is no issue joyned this is a Jeofaile and there can be no Judgement given upon such a Verdict but there must be a repleader to bring the matter to a tryal Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For there was nothing tryed before for want of an issue joyned A special Verdict ought to be prepared by Councel and delivered to the Jury to consider of before they deliver their Verdict in private to the Judge and not the next morning when the Jury come to deliver their Verdict openly in Court Pasc 1650. B. S. 2. Maii. For then the Court cannot expect till they consider of it In criminal causes if there be any errors in the proceedings they are not helped after a Verdict by the Statute of Jeofailes Pasc 1651. B. S. 11. Mati For the Statute montions not criminal matters and it shall not be extended to equity because it is in abridgment of the practice of the Common Law Although the Court do bid the Secondary Record a non sute yet if be not Recorded the Court may take the Verdict afterwards Trin. 1651. B. S. For the non-sute is no non-sute before it be recorded If the Plaintiff and the Defendant do consent to have the Jury find a special Verdict the Jury ought not to refuse to finde it Trin. 1652. B. S. Q. A Verdict by default is found in this manner in an Action of Trespass and ejectment When the Jury is ready at the Bar to try the cause the Secondary bids the Cryer call the Defendant which he doth thrice and if he do not appear the Plaintiffs Councel do pray the Court to take the enquest by default thereupon the Jury is sworn and the Record is read unto them then the Plaintiffs Councel do
and the Latin word shall stand Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Q Tamen Where senceless words which signifie nothing are used in a Declaration to express things they shall be accounted voide and idle and shall not hurt the Declaration if it be good without them for no dammages shall be intended to be given by a Jury for those things which were intended to be expressed by those senceless words Pasc 24. Car. B. r. The word videlicet is used to explain the foregoing words in the Deed or other wrighting where it is used and if the words which the videlicit doth usher in be contrary to the preceding words they are voide Pasc 24. Car. B. r. One may upon a consideration dissolve by Paroll an absolute contract Pasc 24. Car. B. r. One may give authority by Parol unto another to take Livery and Seisin for him Mich. 1650. B. S. For he is but an instrument or Conduit Pipe to derive the possession of the Land to another Words ambiguous ought to receive such a con-construction as may make them stand with Law and equity Mich. 1650. B. S. A mark made in the manner following viz. A which is to shew where a clause or word left out and interlined in writing should come in is called a tra By Rolle Chief Justice It seems to be derived from the Latin word trahere to draw because by it the words left out are signified to be there where it is placed to be drawn into the writing 1650. B. S. Witness A Witness who by reason of sickness extreme age or other cause cannot come to a tryal may by order of Court be examined in the Country by a Commission out of the Chancery or before any Judge of the Court where the cause depends and the testimony so taken shall be allowed to be given in evidence at the tryal Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If a Witness be served with the Process of this Court to give his testimony at a tryal and will not come the Court may grant an Attatchment against him for his contempt to the Court and the party may have his Action upon the Case to recover the dammages he received for want of his Testimony Mich 22. Car. B. r. The testimony of one single person is a sufficient testimony for the King in a cause wherein he is concerned Mich. 22. Car. B. r. To wit in criminal causes but Q. Whether it be so in civil causes A Witness that is to testifie on the behalf of the King against one that is arraigned for Felony may not be sworn against the King to give his testimony but the prisoner may examine him desire his testimony without giving him his oath Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If divers persons be made parties to a sute and some of them are either found not guilty or else the Plaintiff will give no evidence against them they may be allowed to be examined as witnesses in the cause whereunto they were made parties Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For now it appears they are not concerned in the sute but are as strangers and indifferent persons He that will make use of Witnesses at a tryal must get them thither at his own peril and he shall not delay the other party for lack of his Witnesses Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For he hath his remedy against his Witnesses if he suffer in his tryal by reason of their absence One that hath but a small Legacy given unto him by a Will may be allowed as a Witness to prove that will but he that hath Lands given unto him by a Wil may not be allowed for a Witness to prove that Will Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For that were to suffer one to swear his own title but in the former case the Law will not intend that any one will forswear himself for a small matter It is not requisite for Witnesses to a Will to set their hands unto it Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Nor for Witnesses to a Deed to do it but it is very prudential to do it the better to keep things in memory A man may be a credible Witnesses that is one of good fame and credit and yet by Rules of the Law he may not be a Witness in the cause wherein he is produced to his give testimony Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For he may be for some by respect not indifferent in that particular cause though otherwise accounted of good credit and repute One that is made Executor of a Will is not to be allowed as a Witness to prove that Will Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For his own interest may be concerned in the proof of the Will If the Councel on both sides at a tryal cannot agree what testimony a Witness in a cause did give the Court will examine him again Pasc 23. Car. B. r. That all things may be clear and without dispute Inhabitants within a Corporation if they be not free of the Corporation may be admitted as Witnesses for the Corporation as a tryal which concerns the Corporation Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For their interest is no way concerned and favor is not a good exception against a Witness although it he against a Juror A Witness may not be compelled to answer upon a voir dire touching a Trespass done for the doing whereof he may himself be lyable to an Action Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For nemo tenetur prodere scipsum One that is of Councel in the cause on one side may be examined as a Witness in it on the other side if he be served with Process to give his testimony therein but otherwise he may refuse to be examined Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For in the former case he is enjoyned by Law to do it which is to be preferred before his Clyent but otherwise it is a voluntary act and it is not civil for him to do it nor is he to be pressed unto it Examination of Witnesses which were taken in perpetuam rei memoriam ought not to be made use of at a tryal until the Witnesses so examined be dead Hill 23. Car. B. r. Pasc 24. Car. B. r. 19. Ap. For they were onely examined for their testimonies to be made use of onely in the case of death One that is any wayes concerned in the same Title of the Land in question may not be allowed as a Witness in the cause although he be no wayes then a party to the sute Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For his testimony tends to the corroboration of his own title One that claims any benefit by a Deed may not be allowed as a Witness to prove the Deed. Mich. 1649. B. r. In regard of his interest One that is to be a Witness at a tryal ought not to be examined before the tryal but by consent of both parties Hill 1649. B. S. The Court will upon a motion grant a Habeas Corpus to have a prisoner in prison upon an Execution in the Mareschal Sea to be at a tryal to be
For then the Defendant is to go only upon common Bail If the Plaintiffs Atturney do onely tell the Defendants Atturney that his Clyent is to put in special Bail it is sufficient and there common Bail is not to be admitted although the Roll be not marked for special Bail 3. Feb. 1650 B. S. For the notice that there ought to be special Bail is the thing required and the marking of the Roll is but to give notice If one that lies in Execution do bring his Audita Querela he is Bailable 7. Feb. 1650 B. S. So held in Trittons Case By a Rule of the Court the Plaintiffs Atturney must receive the Bail given before the Judge from the Judge himself the same Term it was put in upon pain of five shillings 21. Feb. 1650 B. S. When one becomes Bail for another in an Action of Debt he doth in Law assume or take upon him to render the body of the Principal if he be condemned or else to pay the Debt he is condemned in Pasc 1652. per Rolle B. S. Untill a Capias be Returned against the Principal the Bail shall not forfeit his Recognizance for the principals not appearance by the Ancient course of the Court but at this day by the indulgence of the Court he shall not forfeit his Recognizance if the Principal come in at any time before the Return of the second Scire Facias against the Bail Trin. 1652. B. S. If one be sued in this Court for twenty pounds or above the Plaintiff may by the course of the Court require special Bail but if he sued for a less some common Bail must be accepted Per Barrell Clerk there Special Bail is not generally to be given in an Action of Battery yet in some such cases the Court will compell the Defendant to put in special Bail viz where they perceive it was a foul Battery and much dammage done by it else an Action of Battery is thought a slight Action and not worthy of special Bail If there be no Writ in the Roll nor any notice given for special Bail and common Bail is filed the Plaintiff cannot by the course of the Court require special Baile By Rolle Chief Justice Bail is not to be accounted Bail properly until it be filed for then and not before it is upon Record By Rolle Chief Justice If the Defendant put in Bail before a Judge and it is allowed and yet he will not file it the Plaintiff may if he will at his own charge file it By Rolle Chief Justice Pasc 1655. To avoid Error If Bail be taken by the Judge de bene esse the Plaintiff ought by the Rules of the Court either to allow the Bail or to shew cause to the contrary By Rolle The sufficiency or non sufficiency of Bail ought to be first exaimed by the judge at his Chamber before the Court is to be troubled with the matter but if the Judge cannot make the Plaintiff and Defendant agree in the giving and taking of the Bail then the Court is to be moved in it whereupon they will order both parties to attend and the Bail also and will examine the cause of Action and the Bails sufficiency and settle the matters in difference according to reason By Rolle Chief Justice The cause of marking the Roll for special Bail in this Court is because the cause of Action doth not appear upon the Latitat by which the party was Arrested but it is to be made appear by the Declaration By Glyn Chief Justice But in the Common Pleas where they proceed upon an Original the cause of Action doth appear Burglary Burglary may be committed by one though he do not break a house open for if he be within the house and steal away the goods in the house and open the door on the inside and go out and carry away the goods this is Burglary 22. Car. Trin. B. r. Bankrupt He that is a Bankrupt to one Creditor is accounted in Law to be a Bankrupt to all 22. Car. B. r. He that is once adjudged to be a Bankrupt is to be alwayes accounted to be a Bankrupt 22. Car. B. r. If one shall with an intent to support the credit of a Bankrupt suffer him to have his goods in his custody and to dispose of them the property of these goods shall be accounted to be in the Bankrupt and the true owner of the goods shall lose the property in them 18. Ap 1501. B. Sup. As a punishment for his false dealing herein and of the mischiefs which may grow by such devises to evade the Laws Bench. Where one brings an Action for a Covenant broken he ought to Assign the breach of it in such manner that the Defendant may justifie or take an Issue Hill 22. Car. B. r. Else the party can make no defence for himself If one bring an Action of Covenant against another for not repairing houses c. demised unto him he ought to Assign particularly wherein the want of reparations do consist and not to declare generally Hill 22. Car. B. r. For reparations do consist of particulars If an Action of Debt be brought upon an Obligation for breach of the condition thereof the Plaintiff is not to Assign in what the breach is untill the Defendant hath pleaded performance of the condition Hill 22. Car. B. r. Baliff A Bailiff may execute a Writ out of the Hundred where he is Bailiff Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For he is Bailiff all the County over if he be the Sheriffs Bailiff and not a Bailiff of some Liberty within the County A Bailiff is a servant or minister of the Law and by consequence he is a servant to the party at whose Suite he is to Arrest any one Pasc 24. Car. B. r. A Sheriffs Bailiff is not an Officer of the Court but the Sheriff himself is the Officer that the Court takes notice of Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Bargain and Sale A Bargain and Sale made by one who is not in possession though it be by Deed inrolled is not good if there be no Livery made thereupon Mich. 23. Car. B. r. If one buy a thing of another he that buyes it ought to pay the money he hath agreed to pay for it before the seller of it is bound to deliver it Pasc 23. Car. B. r. One may upon a good consideration dissolve by Paroll onely an absolute Bargain Pas 24. Car. B. r. One may sell his priviledge given him by the Law as his birthright as a freeborn subject for a good consideration Trin. 24. Car. B. r. If one that is indebted do really and bona fide sell his Lands though it be with an intent to avoid the paiment of his Debts this sale is good if the Vendee be not privy to his intent Mich. 24. Car. B. r. If one Bargain and Sell Lands of which another is in possession and claims title to them this Bargain and Sale is not good Trin 1651. B. S. Because
the Lady Anne Holborne a Juror was Challenged because he was retorned by the Name of Mathew whereas in truth his Name was Mark although he was also called Mathew as he affirmed being examined upon a voire dire to say what his Name was and upon this Challenge the Juror was drawn and the Jury could not be taken for want of him but a tales was granted It is neither a principall Challenge nor a Challenge for favour to say that the Juror challenged was a supernumerary Juror in a former Jury retorned for the same parties in a Cause betwixt them and did receive money for his charges of the party for whom the verdict passed By Glynn Chief Justice Certiorary It is not necessary to have a Judges hand to a Writ of Certiorari to certifie a Writ of Error 21. Car. B r. A Certiorari to remove an Endictment doth lye by the course of the Court without moving the Court to it Mich. 22 Car. B. r. After a Writ of Error is brought there must be a Writ of Certiorari directed to the Court where the judgment was given for the reversing whereof the Writ of Error is brought to certifie the record into this Court Mich. 22. Car. B. r. A Certiorari to remove an Endictment is good although it doe bear date before the taking of the Endictment which is to be removed by the Certiorari Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the date is not materiall When a certificate of a Record is made out of an inferior Court they ought to make the Certifiâ—ate as they will stand to it at their perill and it cannot be afterwards amended Hill 22. Car. B. r. For a Writ of diminution is not grantable to an inferior Court Q. This Court will upon motion grant a Certiorari to remove a judgment given in an inferior Court to the intent that the Plaintiff may have a Scire facias against the Defendant to shew cause why he should not have execution upon his judgement Hill 22. Car. B. r. This was done in the Case of Rooke against Knight to remove a judgement given in Dymchurch a member of one of the Cinque Ports in Kent upon the motion of Lancelot Johnson of the Inner Temple The Justices of Assize may certifie to this Court if a Jury doe finde a verdict against the evidence given them Pasc 23. Car. B. r. That judgement may not be speedily entred upon such a verdict It was doubted whether a Certiorari do lye to the Cinque Ports Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Notwithstanding it was done in the Case of Rooke and Knight If one party pray a Certiorari and have it granted the other party cannot have another Certiorari Pasc 23. Car. B. r. viz. For the same thing If there be cause to certifie the Court touching a custome used in the City of London this Certificate is not to be made in wrâ—ting but the Recorder of London is to certifie the Custome to the Court ore tenus or by word of mouth Trin. 23. Car. B. r. But not if the Custome do concern the Lord Major particularly By Rolle Chief Justice When Justices have authority given them by a Statute within a Liberty a Certiorari lyes to them if the Liberty be not excepted Hill 23. Car. B. r. A Certiorari ought to be granted upon a matter in Law only and not upon a matter of fact Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Out of an inferiour Court the original Record ought to be certified into this Court upon a Certiorari directed to them upon a Writ of Error brought to reverse their judgement but the Common Pleas do only certifie a transcript of the Record before them Trin. 24. Car. B. r. The Pronotaries of the Common Pleas will not make a certificate of any matter before them unto this Court without a Rule of this Court to enjoyn them Trin. 24. Car. B. r. A Certiorari ought to be directed to the Custos brevium and to be retorned by him and is not to be directed to his deputy or retorned by him Mich. 24. Car. B. r. A Certiorari doth not lye to remove a Cause after a verdict is given in it Mich 24. Car. B. r. For then the Cause is determined If a Certiorari to certifie a Record be by some mishap so torn or defaced that the Record cannot be perfectly certified by it the party may have an alias Certiorari Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Vpon motion to the Court. A Certiorari may be granted to remove an Act of Common Councel of the City of London if the Act be made against the Law 6. Maii. 1650. B. S. The Court may grant a new Certiorari to remove a Record before them upon a Writ of Error brought after that in nullo est erratum is pleaded if it be ad informandum conscientiam in affirmance of the judgement but at the prayer of the party that brings the Writ of Error and after in nullo est erratum pleaded they will not do it Trin. 1651. B. r. For judgements are favoured in Law and are to be supported as much as justice will permit Rolle Chief Justice said That he did not use to grant a Certiorari to remove an Endictment but where the party that prayes it doth shew good cause why it should be granted viz. that there cannot be an indifferent tryal had in the County where the Endictment was found And where he doth grant it he orders that it shall be tryed the next Terme following B. r. 24. Car. A Certiorari ought not to be granted to remove an Endictment after the party endicted hath traversed and pleaded to the Endictment By Rolle Mich. 1654. B. r. A Certiorari to remove an Endictment ought not to be made by any of the Clerks in the Capital Office without moving the Judges in it and obtaining a Judges hand to it and a Warrant from the Master of the Capital Office Customes The Customes of London are confirmed by Magna Charta C. 9. Customes which are unreasonable are not good nor to be allowed Trin. 22. Car. B. r. Any Custome which may be intended to have had a lawfull beginning is a good custome 11. H. 7. 14. Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Any thing which may be good and lawfull to be done which had its original from the Consent and agreement made betwixt parties may be good and warranntable to be done by vertue of a Custome Mich. 23. Car. B. r. By the Custome of London an Action upon the Case doth lye against one for calling a woman Whore Hill 22. Car. B. r. But she must be an Inhabitant of London But Q whether it lye or not for by the Common Law it lyes not and Bacon Justice thought the Custome not good And quere it lye for a lodger The Customes of the Universities are confirmed by Act of Parliament Pasc 23. Car. B. r. The Customes of London if there be a question in this Court whether there be such Customes or not are to be
by my acceptance of the rent I have assented to his entry Distress and Distringas The seising of a stray is not a Distress of it for he that doth seise it claims a property in it 21. Car. B. r. And no man can Distrain that which is his own for to Distrain is but to take one thing from another and to put it into the custody of the Law as a pledge for another thing which is due to him that doth Distrain from him that is distrained An amercement lies not against a Sheriff out of his Office for a misdemeanour done by him whilst he was in his Office but a Distringas nuper Vicecomiti lies against him for it Pasc 24. Car. B. r. The Writ of Venire facias for the Sheriff to summon a Jury is retornable by him into the Court and upon the retorne made of it by him there issues out of the Court another Writ called a Distringas Juratores to cause the Jury to appear in Court at the tryal of the Cause if the tryal be at the Barr in this Court or at the Assises in the County where the Action lies if the tryal be to be there Mich. 24. Car. B. r. The Writ of Distringas Jurators ought to be delivered unto the Sheriff so timely that he may warn the Jury to appear four dayes before the Writ is retornable if the Jurors live within fourty miles of the place of tryal and eight dayes if they live further off 13. May. 1651. B. S. Discontinuance A Discontinuance in process is helped if there follow a verdict in the cause and the party do also appear upon the verdict 21. Car. B. r. Q. Whether every discontinuance of process may be thus helped Where a Vouchee may be essoigned and the essoigne is not adjourned this is a Discontinuance but where it is not necessary the vouchee should be essoigned there the want of adjournment of the essoigne makes no Discontinuance Hill 22. Car. B. r. An appeal may as well be Discontinued by the defect of the process or proceeding in it as it may be by insufficiency of the original Writ Hill 22. Car. B. r. The Plaintiff cannot Discontinue his Action after a generall verdict found against him nor after a special verdict is found upon matter of Law arising upon the evidence given at the tryal in the cause 22. Car. B. r. The Plaintiff may Discontinue his Action by the leave of the Court after he hath joyned in demurrer with the Defendant paying Costs to the Defendant if the demurrer was only upon matter of form in the pleading But if the demurrer was as well upon matter of substance as upon matter of form there he cannot Discontinue his Action by leave of the Court Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Except the Defendant will consent unto it A discontinuance of an Action or Suit is not a perfect Discontinuance untill it be entred upon the Roll but if this Discontinuance be to be pleaded it is not necessary to plead the entry of it Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Where a Demurrer is a generall Demurrer whereas it ought to have been a speciall Demurrer this is a Discontinuance and there can be no judgment given in the case upon such a Demurrer Hill 23. Car. B. r. After a Demurrer upon an Arbitration pleaded it is not usual to Discontinue the Action Mich 24 Car. B. r. Demand Where there is a Demand of a thing to be made there the Demand must be a Legal Demand that is it must be made in such manner as the Law requires otherwise he that made the Demand can take no advantage in Law upon this Demand Hill 21. Car. B. r. If there be no place expressed in a Deed where a rent for Land or a nomine poenae or any other thing demandable shall be made the Law doth then direct that the Demand shall be made upon the Land c. out of which the rent or nomine poenae or other thing demandable do issue or go out of Hill 21. Car. B. r. A Demand of a rent reserved upon a Lease made of a Messuage with Lands belonging to it ought to be made at the Messuage because the Messuage is the most eminent part and place of the thing let and most notorious for the Lessee to take the best notice of the Demand 21. Car. B. r. For the Lessee shall be presumed to be more conversant there then in any other place Yet if the Demand were made upon any part of the Land and the Lessor can prove that the Lessee was there and took notice of it I suppose it is a good Demand but if he were not there when the Demand was made Q. whethâ—r it be a good Demand The parties bringing of an Action of Debt for monies due upon an Obligation and the taking of a distress for rent by him unto whom the rent is due is a good Demand in Law of the Debt due by the Obligation and of the rent Trin. 22. Car. B. R. A Demand in a precipe to recover Lands ought to be more certain than a Demand in a Writ of Dowr 18. Nov. 1650. B. S. For Dowr is one of the things favoured in Law Declaration A Declaration may be against one that is in custody of the Marshall of this Court upon an information although he do not appear to an Action Hill 21. Car. B. R. The Plaintiff is not compellable to file his Declararation yet if it be not filed and afterwards judgment is given in the Cause the judgment is erroneous for want of a Declaration Hill 21. Car. B. R. For before it is filed it is not upon record and so there is no Declaration to warrant the judgment If the Plaintiffs Attorney do file a Declaration against the Defendant in the Kings Bench Office the Defendant is bound to take notice of the Declaration at his peril 21. Car. B. r. A Declaration ought not to vary or differ from the Plaint that is the Cause which the Plaintiff doth express in his Writ why he brings his Writ 21. Car. B. r. For the Writ is the ground of the Declaration and that which warrants it If the Plaintiff declare against the Defendant upon a corrupt Contract made against the Statute of 21. Jac. made against Usury he must express in the Declaration that the Defendant corrupte agreavit or else he must shew that the Contract was made pro usura contrary to the Statute 21. Car. B. r. For he must pursue the words of the Statute One may not Declare against one that is in the Kings Bench prison that is not either in custodia Mareschalli or that hath not filed his bail or that is not a priviledged person in this Court 21. Car. B. r. If one be in custody of the Marescall of this Court at the suit of J. S or have put in bail in this Court to the Action of J. S any other person may put in a Declaration against him the same Terme he
Office where the Declaration is filled Yet they usually do it It is not necessary for the Plaintiffs Attorney to set his hand unto the Declaration which he delivers to the Defendants Attorney but the Defendants Attorney must receive it without his hand set to it If he know him to be the Attorney in the Cause 28. Novem. 1650. B. S. If one be in custody of the Marshall of this Court any person may put in a Declaration against him and the Declaration so put in is a good Declaration and the party must plead unto it although he be illegally in custody for the Court will not trouble themselves to enquire how the party came into Prison Pasc 1652. B. S. If a Prisoner be brought into the Court of the upper-Bench by a Writ of Habeas Corpus to answer a Suite there depending against him a stranger cannot declare against him there upon the by untill he be in custody of the Marshall but he that brought the Prisoner thither by the Habeas Corpus may declare against the Prisoner in Court before he is turned over in custody to the Marshall Pasc 1652. B. S. One ought not to declare against a Defendant in this Court untill his bail be filed By Rolle Chief Justice Pasc 1652. B. S. That is if he do put in bail Duty The words foris faceret may create a Duty Hill 21. Car. B. r. For the party to whom a thing is forfeited hath an intrest in the thing forfeited before he recovers it Dammages Dammages ought not to be given for that which is not at all contained in the Plaintiffs Declaration or for that which is immaterially alledged or against Law but onely for that which is materially alledged and set forth in the Declaration Hill 21. Car. B. r. 23. Car. B. r. Where an Action upon the Case and an Action of trespass are both founded upon one and the same Dammage done to the Plaintiff he may recover joynt Dammages upon both the Actions Hill 21. Car. B. r. Where a trespass for which an Action is brought is entire and not severall trespasses there ought not to be severall Dammages given against the Defendant Mich 21. Car. B. r. Where one joynt Action of trespass is brought for two severall trespasses and the trespasses are found severally the Dammages may be severall but if one Action of Trespass be brought against three Trespassers and two of the Trespassers against whom the Action is brought be found guilty and the third is found not guilty there the Dammages may notwithstanding be intire Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the trespass is but one joynt trespass though the Action be brought against divers persons But in the former Case there are severall trespasses found and so the Dammages may be severall though the Action be a joynt Action In an Action upon the Case the Jury may finde less Dammages then the Plaintiff layes in his Declaration but they cannot finde more then is laid in the Declaration Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the Law presumes that the Plaintiff doth best know how much he is damnified by the Defendant and therefore though it may be the Plaintiff will pretend he is more damnified then in truth he is as is often done yet it shall not be presumed that the Plaintiff will say he is less damnified by the Defendant then in truth he is And therefore for the Jury to give more Dammages then the Plaintiff declares upon would be unreasonable which the Law will not suffer Double Dammages given for one and the same Trespass are not well given Mich. 22 Car. B. r. For the Law uses to proportion the amends or satisfaction for an injury done according to the loss which the party to whom the injury is done doth receive by the injury Upon a judgment given upon a demurrer upon an Action of the Case the Court is not to assesse the Dammages but the Jury is to do it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the Court gives the judgment upon the matter in Law but the Dammages are to be given upon consideration of the matter of fact which is proper only for the Jury to enquire of In an Assize the Jury ought to give Dammages pending the Suit because there is no remedy over to the Dammages as in an Ejectione firmae but finall Dammages are to be given Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Upon a demurrer to an evidence the Court did direct the Jury who should have tried the issue if the demurrer had not been to finde Dammages for the Plaintiff if upon arguing the demurrer the Court should give judgment for him Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For the Jury may consider of the matter in fact which should have been tryed if the evidence had not been demurred unto Where Dammages are found severally the Plaintiff may relinquish part of the Dammages and enter his judgment for the rest Hill 23. Car. B. r. But where the Dammages are entire he may not do it without leave of the Court Pasc 24. Car. B. r. 19. Ap. 1648. The Jury ought to finde Dammages in a speciall verdict found in an Action of Trespass and Ejectment for untill the Plaintiffs Title is found which is not done by the speciall verdict the Plaintiff shall be accounted a Trespasser against the Defendant because the Defendant was in possession of the Land when the Plaintiff entred and made the Lease of the Land Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For he that is in possession of Land hath title to it against all the world untill a better title is proved Melior est conditio possidentis Where a debt sued for doth appear certainly to the Court what it is there if the Plaintiff recover the Court doth tax the Dammages and not the Jury but where it doth not appear certainly to the Court there it is left to the Jury to enquire of and to tax them Trin. 24. Car. B. r. A Writ of Enquiry of Dammages in a Cause tryed in the Mareschals Court may be executed by the Judges in the Court there Trin. 24. Car. B. r. Greatr Costs and Dammages may be given in some Cases then the Dammages laid in the Declaration Trin. 24. Car. B. r. For the Plaintiffs Declaration is only for the Dammages due unto him by reason of the injury done him by the Defendant But the Costs are given in respect of the Plaintiffs expences in his suit to recover the Dammages In a Replevin brought and a speciall verdict thereupon found Costs and Dammages shall be given on either side according as the issue shall be found If a judgment be given upon a nihil dicit in an Action of Debt brought in the Common Pleaâ— that Court will give Costs and Dammages and so is it used to be done in inferior Courts Trin. 24. Car. B. r. But Q whether it be so inthis Court If entire Dammages be given in an Action brought for divers severall things whereas it is not possible to have Dammages for some of them the Dammages
Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the Law doth not favor the poor to do injury to others but to help them to recover their right If one that doth doth sue in forma pauperis be non-suite at the tryal he must pay costs to the Defendant or else be whipped Pasc 1652. B. S. For the Law will Judge he had no cause of Action and therefore he must make satisfaction to the Defendant for injustly vexing of him and if he cannot do it by his purse be shall do it in his person If it be proved unto the Court that one who sues in forma pauperis is a vexatious person and hath many frivolous Suites depending the Court will Dispauper him 1654. B. S. For this will be a means to make him less contentious Rolle Chief Justice said That he did not use to admit any one generally to sue in Forma pauperis but onely to sue so in one Cause by vertue of that admittance 1654. B. S. Forfeiture If one take a wife that is Seised of Gavel-kind Lands and she dyeth without issue by her husband her husband shall be Tenant by the curtesie of half of the Lands so long as he shall live unmarried but if he marry again he shall Forfeit his estate in the Lands Mich 22. Car. B. r. This is by the custome of Kent but by the same custome if he had issue by his wife then he shall be Tenant by the curtesie of all the Lands his wife was seised of and although he do marry again he shall not Forfeite his estate Mich. 22. Car. Q. Whether in the former Case he shall forfeit his Tenancy by the courtesie if he do live incontinently If a Lease be so made that it is to be Forfeited if the Rent reserved in the Lease be not paid as the Lease doth provide although the Rent be not paid accordingly yet there is no Forfeiture to be taken if there was not an actual and Legal demand of the Rent made by the Lessor Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For the Law doth not favor defeating of estates If a Copy-holder do deny to pay unto the Lord the fine which is ascertained due unto him by the Copy-holder or do refuse to appear at his Lords Court and to do his Suite there this is a Forfeiture of his Copy-hold estate Trin. 24. Car. B. r. For he holds his Copy-hold of the Lord upon these conditions If a Copy-holder do let his Copy-hold unto another for years and the Lessee do sell the Timber growing upon the Copy-hold yet this is not a Forfeiture of the Copy-hold estate 6. Nov. 1650. B. S. Franchise Nor Franchise shall be allowed in any case where the Franchise doth fail to administer justice within the Franchise but if there be such a failer this Court by their Authority may intermeddle notwithstanding the priviledges of the Franchise to compell them to do Justice Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For priviledges are not granted to protect men in neglecting to do right or to do wrong Fees In such Cases where the Sheriff is to have Fees there he is not bound to execute his Office in returning of Writs c. untill the Fees that are due unto him be tendred unto him 22. Car. B. r. The Statute of 23. H. 5. which doth give Fees to Sheriffs doth onely extend to their executing of Writs of Execution 22. Car. B. r. There are no Fees due to the Sheriff by the Common Law by the Subject for executing his Office but the King ought to pay him his Salary Mich. 22. Car. B r. For as the people do owe Alleigance to their King so the King doth owe Justice and protection unto his people An Action of Debt doth lye for a Councellor or an Atturney for his Fees against him that retained him in this cause Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Q. Whether it lye for a Councellor If a Clyent when his business in Court is dispatched doth refuse to pay unto the Officer in Court the Fees which are due unto hâ—m for doing his business the Court will upon motion grant an Attatchment to the Officer against the Clyent to â—ave him committed untill he pay the Fees due By Rolle Chief Justice 1650. Felony Where one is doing of an unlawful act and the death of any person ensueth upon the doing of that act though the death of the party was not intended by him that did the act yet this is Felony Pasc 23. Car. B. r. If one be committed to the Goal for one Felony the Justices of the Goal delivery may enquire and try him for another Felony for which he was not committed By Bacon Justice Trin. 23. Car. B. r. It is Felony to personate a Baile By Bacon Justice Mich. 23. Car. B. r. Q. Whether the procuring of one to personate a Baile be Felony The receiving onely of stolen goods is not Felony but the receiving of them and comforting the Felon is Felony Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For he may receive them and not know them to be stolen but the comforting the Felon doth prove that he consented to the Felony If one be set upon in the High-way or other place to be robbed and he do cast away his goods with an intent to save them from the robber and the robber doth take them up and carry them away this is a robbery and Felony committed to the person of the party robbed although he took nothing from his person Mich. 1649. B. S. For the party is robbed of his goods and the thief knew them to be the parties goods and came with an intent to take them from him had he not cast them away One ought not to be arrested upon suspicion of Felony except that there be good cause shewed for the ground of this suspicion 1649. B. S. For every foolish fancy or conceit is no ground of a suspicion sufficient to arrest one for so high a crime It is Felony to take a Bill from off the File after a Verdict in the cause for which the Bill was sued forth Mich. 1649. B S. For this is embezeling of a Record The robbery of a servant of his masters money in his custody if it be in the presence of his master is robbing of the master Mich. 1649. B. r. A robbery shall be said to be done in that Hundred where the party robbed is first set upon although his goods be taken from him in another Hundred Mich. 1649. B. S. For there the robbery was begun and the peace first broken A Hundred shall not be charged for a robbery committed within it upon the Statute of Winchester in Crepulsculo or twilight that is when it is neither perfect day nor perfect night but if it be committed by day light although it be before the rising of the Sun or after the setting of it the Hundred shall be charged 31. Oct. 1650. B. S. A Hundred shall not be charged for a robbery committed within it in the night because hue and cry cannot be made in
it is granted and all the Causes which are then depending against him 21. Car. B. r. A Habeas Corpus is either adsubjiciendum granted on the Crown side Or ad respondendum granted on the Pleas side The Court will not grant a Habeas Corpus retornable immediate but in some Cases they will give but a short time to retorne it Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For though the Law doth favour liberty yet it allowes convenient time for doing of things After the retorn of a Habeas Corpus is read and filed in Court it cannot be amended Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For then it is a Record of the Court. None ought to take out a Habeas Corpus for a Prisoner without his consent Trin. 23. Car. B. r. This holds not in all Cases for one may take out an Habeas Corpus without his consent to charge him with an Action A Habeas Corpus to remove one that was committed for debt from one prison to another may be granted retornable immediate or rather in dilate for this is only a Habeas Corpus ad recipiendum in the nature of it A Habeas Corpus was granted out of this Court directed to the Serjeant at Armes of the House of Commons in Parliament for a prisoner committed unto him by a Committee of the House of Commons Mich. 23. Car. B. r. A Iudge of this Court will not grant a Habeas Corpus in the vacation for a prisoner to follow his suit but the Court may grant a speciall Habeas Corpus for a prisoner to be at his tryall in the vacation time Pasc 1650. 24. Maii B. S. The Court will grant a Habeas Corpus to one to have a prisoner out of prison to be a witness for him at a tryall but at the charge of him that desires the Habeas Corpus and at his perill to take care that the prisoner do not make an escape 29. Junii 1640. Trin. B. S. A Habeas Corpus ad subjiciendum is granted on the Capital or Criminal side but a Habeas Corpus ad recipiendum faciendum is granted on the Pleas side 1650. B. S. For so the Court of the upper Bench is divided in the practise of it viz. into Criminal Causes which are between the Protector and the party and the Civil Causes which are acted on the Pleas side and are between one subject and another Habere facias possessionem One may have a new Writ of Habere facias possessionem if a former Writ of Habere facias possessionem in the same Cause be not well executed or retorned Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For that is all one as if such Writ had never been taken out Homage When livery is granted to the Heir at full age of the Lands for which he was in ward to the King during his nonage and which were by reason thereof in the Kings hand his homage which he should do to the King by reason of his tenure at the time when the livery is sued forth is respited for a certain summe of money to be paid yearly to the King by the heir untill the heir shall do his homage and these monies are called respite of Homage because by reason of such monies the Homage is respited or put off from year to year 1655. B. S. Hundred If a robbery be begun in the Hundred of Dale and ended in the Hundred of Sale the Hundred of Dale is chargeable for this robbery upon the Statute of Winchester 1655. B. S. Q. For it seems both should be chargeable Jury THe Court was moved that a Jury of Merchants might be retorned to try an issue between two Merchants touching Merchants affairs and it was granted Hill 21. Car. B. r. Because it was conceived they might have better knowledg of the matters in difference which was to be tryed then others could who were not of that profession A Jury may finde a thing which is not given unto them in evidence if they do know it of their own knowledg Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For they may enform themselves of the truth of the fact they are to try by all possible and lawfull means they can and are not solely tyed to the evidence given at the bare A Jury may take notice of a matter of Record but they cannot try it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For a Record must be tryed by it self In every Case where there is to be a speciall Jury retorned there ought to be a speciall Writ of Venire facias to summon that Jury Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If more then twelve men be returned upon a Jury and do appear the first twelve that stand in the panell are to be sworn and to try the Cause Pasc 23. Car. B. S. If none of them be challenged but if some of them be challenged and the challenge is also made good against them then so many more of those that remained above the number of twelve shall be taken in in order as they are ranked in the panell to fill up the number that wanteth to make it a full Jury If a Juror do inhabit in a house that is in the Parish of Dale and do occupy Lands that do lye in the Parish of Sale next adjoyning and he is retorned upon a Jury as of the Parish of Sale this is well enough although he do not dwell in Sale Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For he shall be said to be as well of the Parish where the Lands lye which he occupieth as of the Parish where he inhabits for he is a parishioner in Sale though an inhabitant in Dale If more then twelve men do appear at a tryall after twelve of them are sworn the rest that are unsworn must not continue upon the stand with those that are sworn but must depart Pasc 23. Car. B. r. The Court may give the Jury leave to drink at the Barr after the evidence is given to them and before the verdict if the Plaintiff and the Defendant will consent unto it Pasc 23. 23. Car. B. r. But they may not drink out of the Court A Jury had leave to drink at the barr after a long evidence given in a very hot day in Easter Term above-said In Cases where it is conceived an indifferent Jury will not be retorned between the parties by the Sheriff of the County where the venue lyes the Court upon motion will order the Sheriff to attend the Secondary of the Office with his book of the Freehoulders of the County where he is Sheriff that he may see an indifferent Jury retorned Trin. 23. Car. B. r. A Jury cannot try a Consideration to ground an Assumpsit if the Consideration was given or acted out of that County where the action is tryed Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Upon a motion and an Affidavit made in Court that the Cause to be tryed at the barr is a Cause of very great consequence the Court will make a Rule for the Sheriff to retorne 48. Jurors upon the Jury Trin. 23.
entred upon the Judgement and so the Judgment in the Trespass and the Act of Oblivion are both satisfied 1651. B. S. One may speak in Arrest of a Judgement given upon a nihil dicit after the Writ of Enquiry of dammages is executed upon that Judgement Mich. 23. Car. B. r. Infant An Infant ought not to appear to an Action brought against him by his Atturney but he must appear by his Guardian Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For he cannot make an Atturney and the Guardian is Assigned but with the consent of the Infant by the Court Trin. 24. Car. An Action of Debt doth lye against an Infant upon his promise to pay for necessaries as meat and drink lodging and apparel but if the Infant and the party from whom he had these necessaries do come to an account and reduce that which the Infant is endebted for them to a certain sum of money and upon this account the party brings an Action against the Infant for the money stated to be due by the account this Action will not lye against the Infant Trin. 24. Car. B. r. For the account upon which the Action is grounded is void for an Infant can agree to no such account Justification Where the Action concerns a transitory thing if the Defendant do justifie the taking or doing in one place this is a Justification in all places but if the Action concern a local thing a Justification in one place is not a Justification in another place Pasc 24. Car. B r. For in the former Case the place is not material but the meer doing or taking of the thing but in the latter the place is material for the Defendant it may be may be able to Justifie in one place and yet may be guilty in another place Jurisdictions The essentiall difference betwixt Free Chappels and other Churches and Chappels is that all free Chappels are free from the Jurisdiction of the ordinary Hill 23. Car. B. r. So that the ordinary is not to intermeddle with them in any thing that doth concern them or to visit them whereas all other Churches and Chappels are within the Jurisdiction of some ordinary and may be visited The Jurisdidiction of a Court where a cause is depending cannot be extended further in relation to that cause by the Consent of the Plaintiff and Defendant then of right it ought to extend Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For this would be for the parties to erect as it were a Court which was not before for the tryal of their cause and by this means the Jurisdictions of every Court would grow to be unlimited This Court hath no conusance of the proceedings in Parliament Pasc 24. Car. B. r. So held in John Lilburns Case because the Parliament is the supreme Court and subject to no other Court. This Court hath a general Jurisdiction to reform the abuses of all persons in their behavior throughout all England and the abuses and miscarriages of all Courts of Justice throughout all England 9. Feb. Hill 1649 B. S. 3. Julii 1650. B. S. If the Court of Chancery do grant a Habeas Corpus to a prisoner that is in the custody of the Marshall of this Court this Court hath not power to restrain the prisoner so long as the Habeas Corpus is in force 3. July 1650. Trin. B. S. In the Case of Sir Arthur Smithes and Workman This Court hath Jurisdiction over all the Courts of England in all Mandatory Writs 10. Feb. 1650. B. S. Injunction An Injunction out of the Court of Chancery doth not lye to stay execution after a Judgement given at the Common Law although the Bill upon which such Injunction is granted were put in before the Judgement given at Law for although the Chancery make a difference between exhibiting the Bill before the Judgement given and the exhibiting a Bill after the Judgement given yet this is no good difference for it is a like in both Cases Trin. 23. Car. B. r. But the Chancery may if there be cause stay proceedings at Law before Judgement given Information If by a penal Statute he that prefers an Information against another for an offence done against this Statute is to have half of the penalty which shall be recovered upon this Information there if an Informer do prefer an Information upon the Statute before any Information is preferred by the King the King cannot hinder the Informer from having his proportion of the penalty given him by the Statute but if the King do first prefer the Information he may Inform for the whole penalty Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For the King is not bound to stay till an Informer prefer the Suit but may sue at any time and if no body Inform none hath right to the penalty but the King and he may pardon it If the Marshall of the Kings Bench do misdemean himself in his office to the prejudice of any person he who is prejudiced by his misdemeanor may prefer an Information against him in this Court Hill 23. Car. B. r. And if he be found guilty upon a tryal thereupon had he may be fined by this Court or put put out of his Office if the Court shall see cause to do it The Clerk of the Crown ought not to set his hand to an Information without examining the cause for which it is preferred Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For if there be not at least in probabilities good matter in Law to ground an Information upon the party that doth prefer it is not to be assisted and encouraged in it for the Law doth abhor vexations and causeless suites An Information may be preferred in this Court against the Inhabitants of any Town or Village in England for the not repairing the High-wayes which by Law they are bound to repaire Mich. 1649. B. S. For this Court may punish offences done against the Weal Publick all England over If an Information be preferred at the Suite of the party there the Endictment ought to be brought to a tryal at the charges of the party that prosecutes the Endictment but if an Endictment be preferred at the Suite of the King there the Endictment shall be brought to tryal at the costs of the party against whom the Information is brought Pasc 1650. 24. Maii. B. S. Although an Information be faulty in the body of it yet upon a motion the Court will not quash it but the Defendant must demur to it for its insufficiency Pasc 1650. B. S 24. Maii. Justice of Peace A man may be a Justice of Peace in one part of Yorkeshire and yet not be a Justice of Peace in every part of the County Hill 22. Car. B. r. For Yorkshire is divided into divers parts called Ridings viz. into the East Riding West Riding and North Riding and he may be a Justice of Peace in one of those Ridings and yet not a Justice of Peace in another of those Ridings but generally a Justice of Peace of a County is a Justice of
which they proceed upon in the Common Pleas. Mich 1649. B. S. Mareschall THe Mareschal of the Mareschalsea of this Court is intended to be alwayes in Court while the Court is sitting 21. Car. B. r. For it is his Office to be alwayes attending upon the Court to execute his Office in relation to the Court upon all occasions that may fall out Monstrance None shall be compelled to shew a thing in pleading which by common intendment they cannot have knowledge of 22. Car. B. r. 38. H. 6. f. 3. Motion to the Court. Monday is a special day for motions in this Court by the ancient course Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Yet motions are made upon any day as the businesses of the Court of the day will permit One ought not to move the Court for a thing against which they have delivered their opinion Trin. 22. Car. B. r. But ought to rest satisfied with the Judgement of the Court. If moneys be upon a motion ordered to be brought into the Court and are accordingly brought in they ought not to be taken out of the Court but upon a motion and rule of the Court made therein Hill 22. Car. B. r. If any thing be moved to the Court upon a Record if the Record upon which the motion is made be not in Court when the motion is made the Court will make no Rule upon such a motion Hill 22. Car. B. r. For the Court will be satisfied by the Record whether the matter of the Record upon which the motion is grounded be so as is suggested by the Councell and will not rest upon suggestions made at the bar If there be divers Rules of the Court made in a Cause and the party intends to move upon these Rules he must produce the Rule that was last made in the Cause and move upon that Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Yet it is necessary also to have all the Rules made in the Cause to satisfie the Court how the Cause stands in Court and how it hath been proceeded in from time to time and how the Rules depend upon one another One party ought not to surprise another by a motion in Court but he ought to move in such convenient time that the other party against whom the motion is made may have time to be heard and to make his Defence Pasc 23. Car. B. r. It is against the Rule of the practice of this Court to move matters in Law upon the last day of any Term except it be where the Case is peremptory or of necessity to be moved then Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Because the other Party cannot have time to make his Defence and that day is also a day appointed for motions One ought not to move the Court for a Rule for a thing to be done which may by the common Rules of practice of this Court be done without moving the Court for it much lesse ought the Court to be moved for the doing of that which is against the common Rules of practice of the Court. 24. Car. B. r. For the Court is not to be troubled with nor the Clyent put to the charge of needless motions nor of motions not to be granted and the former sort of such kinde of motions do savour of ignorance and the latter of too much presumption When a thing questionable between the parties is to be moved to the Court for the setling thereof he that intends to move it must give the adverse party timely notice of the time as near as he can when he will move it Mich. 1650. B. S. And upon what he intends to move that he may be prepared to answer the motion at the time when he moves for the quicker dispatch of businesses If a Rule of Court was grounded upon an Affidavit he that will move the Court to make the Rule void must when he moves produce the Affidavit in Court Hill 1649. 22. Feb. B. S. That the Court may be informed upon what grounds the Rule was made and whether there be cause shewed upon the motion sufficient to induce them to vacate the Rule It is against the course of practice of the Court for any person to make a motion in his own Cause 24. Maii. Pasc 1650. B. S. So said in one Thurston and Masons Case viz. for a Counseller to do it When the Court doth grant a thing to one upon a motion which was in the power of the Court either to grant it or not to grant it the party that hath his motion so granted unto him is by the rules of the Court to pay 12d to the box for it 1650. B. S. Which money is given to the prisoners of the Vpper-bench prison as it is said It is not usual to move for a Trial at the Bar upon the last day of the Term. 2. Julii 1650. B. S. Nor for the Secondary to make a Report nor for a Prehibition nor to vacate a Judgement or such like cases except both parties be in Court and are contented with the motion and prepared to speak in it The three last dayes of the Term if it be not an Issue Term is appointed to hear motions only and not other businesses except they be peremptory or upon other special occasions But if it be not an Issue Term then the two last dayes are only for the hearing of motions 30. Jan. 1650. B. S. The Issue Terms are Hillary Term and Trinity Term and they are so called because though there be Issues joyned in every Term yet not so many by much as in these Termes in regard of the Causes which are to be tried all England over at the Assizes which do follow in the next Vacations after the said Terms viz. the Lent-Assizes and the Summer-Assizes as they are commonly called By Glyn Chief-Justice it is not the custome of the practice of the Common Pleas for a Serjeant at Law to move for a Clark of the Court and afterwards for his Clyent Mich. 1655. B. S. For it seems it is not intended there that he doth move without a Fee for a Clark of the Court and therefore if he should be so heard he would have a double motion at one time which no Court doth allow Manslaughter A grand Jury may finde a Bill of Manslaughter to be Billa vera per infortunium Pasc 23. Car B. r. Mortgage If Lands be Mortgaged to one the interest in Law in these Lands is in the Mortgagee before the forfeiture of them Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For he hath purchased the Lands upon a valuable consideration as the Law will intend and though the Mortgagee may redeem them yet it is not known whether he will do it or no For it is in his power to do it or not to do it and if he do it not then the Estate is absolute in the Mortagee without any other act to be done to passe the Estate Messuage One Messuage cannot be apurtenant unto another Messuage Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For
of Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Except he tye himself by special covenant and agreement to do it for the Law will not put an unnecessary trouble upon any man If one do commence an Action in this Court against another and doth not proceed to a tryal in his action by the space of a whole year next after he began his Suit he ought afterwards by the Rules of the Court to give the Defendant one whole Terms Notice that he will try his cause before he proceed to a tryal therein Mich. 22. Car B. r. For his delay might give occasion to the Defendant to conceive that he intended to let his Action fall and so to neglect to make provision for his Defence at the tryal and therefore it is but reason that he should have more then ordinary Notice in an extraordinary case If the Plaintiff give the Defendant Notice for a tryal against him and do not try his cause the same Term he gave Notice for the tryal he ought by the Rules of the Court to give the Defendant new Notice before he proceed to a tryal afterwards but if the Plaintiff do try his cause the same Term wherein he gave Notice he would try his cause although it be at another day after the day he gave Notice he would try it yet he is not bound to give new Notice before he try it for the Defendant is bound to attend the try-all at his own perill Mich. 22. Car. B. r. So it is where Notice is given for a tryal at the Assizes and by reason of multiplicity of business the cause cannot be tryed at that Assizes but though the cause cannot be tryed at one day of that Assizes yet it may be tryed at another day and therefore the parties must attend all the Assizes at their perill without further Notice If Notice for a tryal be given to the Defendant himself or to his Atturney this is a good Notice but if Notice be given thereof to the Councel of the Defendant it is not a good Notice Hill 22. Car. B. r. For Councel are not bound to take notice of such a warning for a tryal nor to give the Clyent Notice thereof and it may be though one have been formerly of Councel with the Defendant in other business or in the cause to be tryed yet he may not be of Councel at the tryal The Plaintiff and Defendant are both bound to take Notice of such Rules of the Court as do concern the proceedings of their cause at their own perills Hill 22. Car. B. r. For if they know them not yet they may inform themselves by their Councel and Atturneys But this is onely to be understood of the general Rules and not of particular rules made upon the motion of either party for of such rules their ought to be notice given to the party concerned Pasc 24. Car. B. r. When Councel are to argue a matter in Law in Court the Judges ought to have Notice thereof given unto them before the day except it be where the Court have appointed a set day for it or if there be not such Notice given then the cause is to be put in the paper of causes that it may come on in course to be spoken unto Pasc 23. Car. B. r. By putting it in the paper the Judges have Notice for they have a paper of the causes to be spoken to in matter of Law the day before they be spoken to by the Officer of the Court. The Officers in Court ought to take Notice of the proceedings of the causes depending in Court Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For for that cause do they sit in Court If the Plaintiff or his Atturney do give Notice unto the Sollicitor of the Defendant that he intends to try his cause at such a time this is a good Notice of the tryal although it be not given unto the Defendant nor his Atturney Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For it is the duty of the Sollicitor to inform his Clyent of it and if he do it not it shall be accounted the folly of the Clyent to entertain a Sollicitor that is so careless in his business and in this case there is no default in the Plaintiff The Defendant ought to have eight dayes Notice of the tryal of the Plaintiffs cause before it be tryed if he live twenty or thirty miles off from the place where the cause is to be tryed but if he live further off he ought to have fourteen dayes Notice before the tryal Trin. 23. Car. B. r. That the Defendant may have convenient time for his journey and to prepare his Councel and witnesses for his tryal The Plaintiff may if he please give the Defendant Notice when he intends to try his cause the same day that he hath joyned Issue with the Defendant in the cause to be tryed betwixt them Trin. 23. Car. B. r. If one be bound by the rule of the Court to give unto another personal Notice of a thing it is not sufficient that Notice be left at the dwelling house of the party Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For personal Notice is Notice given to the person of the party himself and not to another It is not necessary for the Plaintiff to give new Notice of the tryal of his cause where a retraxit is entred for this is but a forbearance to try his cause hac vice and he may afterwards proceed notwithstanding the retraxit was entred Mich. 23. Car. B. r. The entring of a retraxit is when the Plaintiff after he hath entred his cause to be tryed and hath put in his Record doth make an entry in the Judges book that he hath withdrawn his record and intends not then to proceed to his tryal It is sufficient upon an Action of Trespass and Ejectment brought to try the title of Land if the Tenant in possession of the Land have Notice of the Lease of Ejectment although he be but an under Tenant of the Land and although no notice thereof is given to the upper Tenant or to the owner of the Land whose title is concerned Hill 23. Car. B. r. Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For the possession of the Land is onely recoverable in this Action and that doth chiefely concern the Tenant in possession of it A Clerk of Commissioners of Sewers is such a Clerk as the Law takes Notice of Hill 23. Car. B. r. For he is an Officer appointed by Act of Parliament Q. If the Panel of the Jury Impanelled to try a cause be returned and be afterward altered or changed before the tryal the other party ought to have Notice of it otherwise it is a surprizal of the party Pasc 24. Car. B. r. If the Plaintiff give Notice to the Defendant for a tryal and there is no Jury returned to try the cause so that the cause cannot be tryed at the day appointed if the Plaintiff will afterwards try his cause he must give the Defendant new Notice of this tryal Pasc
Plaintiff but by agreement made afterwards betwixt the Plaintiff and him of which the Court doth not take notice except they be moved in it An Obligation cannot be delivered as an escroe unto the Obligee himself but it may be delivered to another to the use of the Obligee as an escroe Trin. 24. Car. B. r. For the very delivery of it to the Obligee himself and his receiving it makes it work as a Deed in the very instant of the delivery of it according to the effect of the Deed but being delivered to another to the use of the Obligee it cannot operate so because he is no party to the Deed nor can take any thing by it and doth but only take it as an escree and as an instrument to deliver it to the Obligee at such time and in such manner as the Obligor shall direct and if he deliver it otherwise the Obligor may plead non est factum if he be sued upon it by the Obligee If one be bound unto J. S. in an Obligation of twenty pound to be paid unto J. D. this Obligation is not good Trin. 24 Car. B. r. For to J. S. it cannot be good for the Obligor is not bound to pay him the twenty pound in which he is bound for the solvendum is to J. D. and to J. D. it cannot be good for if he pay him not the twenty pound he cannot sue for it For the Obligor is not bound unto him by the Obligation and so the Obligation is void to all intents If money be not paid according to the Condition of an Obligation the Obligation doth thereby become a single Obligation that is it shall be taken as an Obligation without a Condition for the benefit of the Condition which the Obligor might have taken advantage of by the paiment of the money according to the Condition is lost by the not paying of it and so the Obligation rests in force as if it had no Condition Mich. 24. Car. B. r. An Obligation is a good Obligation although it do want a date Hill 1649. B. S. 8. Feb. For the date is not of the essence of the Deed but the sealing and delivery of it For if the sealing and delivery of it be proved although the time precisely of the doing it cannot be proved yet it is a good Deed. Orders This Court may quash any Orders made at any publick or private Sessions of the Peace or made by any other Commissioners if they see good cause for it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For this Court is the superintendent Court over all other Courts and is to regulate their proceedings where they be irregular and illegal If a Cause be put in the paper of Causes that it may be spoken unto in matter of Law by the Order of the Court and the Attorney in the Cause doth not attend the Cause at the day the Cause is to be put out of the paper and not to be put in again that Term. Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Except very good cause be shewed to the contrary This Court doth not take notice of Orders made in Chancery Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Nor in any other Court as to be bound by them but will proceed according to the Rules and Orders of this Court By the Orders of this Court the three last dayes of the Term the Judges have no paper of Causes either of Records or Conciliums delivered unto them for those three dayes are to hear motions Trin. 23. Car. B. r. That is the three last dayes of Hillary Term and Trinity Term which are Issue Terms for the two last dayes of Michaelmas Term and of Easter Term only are for motions Tuesdayes Thursdayes and Saturdayes are the proper dayes by the Orders of this Court to hear matters of Law Mich. 1649. B. S. But chiefly Saturday Outlawry The Court will not reverse an Outlawry although both the parties consent to it viz. the party outlawed and the party at whose sute he is outlawed except there be errour assigned in the Outlawry Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For matters of Record are not to be destroyed without sufficient cause and the Outlawry also doth concern the King as well as the Parties An Outlawry which is grounded upon an Endictment grounded upon the Statute against forcible entries preferred against divers persons may be reversed as to some of the parties endicted and yet may stand good as to others that are outlawed upon the same endictment Hill 22. Car. B. r. For the Outlawries against them are several and not entire and the proceedings to the Outlawry may be good as to the Outlawing of some of them and the proceedings to the Outlawry as to others may not be good An Outlawry that doth not express that the party outlawed was proclaimed as he ought to be is not good but may be reversed Trin. 23. Car. B. r. If the Defendant do not appear upon the quinto exactus made by the Sheriff of the County at his County-Court in the County where the Defendant doth dwell then he is outlawed by the Coroner Pasc 1650 22. Maij. B. S. For the Coroner is the chief Officer in criminal matters in the County Office and Officer The chief Cryer of this Court hath his Office by Patent from the King and this Office may be granted in resersion Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For the Court is the Kings own proper Court where himself used to sit in person and it is for his honour to have such Officers by Patent who are upon the matter to attend his own Person and not to leave them to be disposed of by others and it may be granted in reversion because it is but a ministerial place The Office of Assurance cannot assure the life of one that hath an Office for his life as it may do the life of one that is at Sea or beyond Seas and imployed in Merchants affairs Mich. 1649. B. S. For they have no power to assure the life of any but in case of Merchants affairs by the Statute which gave them their power which is the Statute of 43. Eliz. Oyer of a Deed c. If one be sued upon an Obligation he may pray Oyer of the Obligation and before he hath Oyer of it he is not bound to plead to the Plaintiffs Declaration yet he may plead without Oyer of it if he please But if he do plead without Oyer of it he cannot after his pleading wave his plea and demand Oyer of it 18. April 1650. B. r. To demand Oyer of the Obligation is not only for the Defendants Attorney to desire the Plaintiffs Attorney to reads the Obligation unto him as the word Oyer seems only to import or to have a sight of it but that he may have a Copy of it that his Clyent may consider by it what to plead to the Action Plaint THe Plaint is the Cause which the Plaintiff doth express in the Writ for which he doth complain to the King and for
ruled to put in a better Plea but upon over-ruling of a Plea which is Pleaded in bar of the Action Judgement shall be given against the Defendant for such a Plea is peremptory Trin. 24. Car. B. r. But a Plea in abatement is onely dilatory and is not to bring the matter in question to an Issue but to delay the Plaintiff If a Plea be put into the Office in due time it is well enough although it be not delivered to the Atturney of the Plaintiff Trin. 24. Car. B. r. So that he may not enter Judgement for want of a Plea In an Action of Debt brought for Rent upon a Indenture of Demise for years the Defendant may Plead payment without shewing the Deeds for the Lease shall be intended to be in being at the time of the Action brought Trin. 24. Car. B. r. A colourable Plea ought to be entred but that which is no Plea ought not to be entred Trin. 24. Car. B. r. For a Colourable Plea is a Plea untill it be over-ruled Q Whether one may Plead a Lease for years by Indenture without shewing the Indenture Trin. 24. Car. B. r. In an Action of Debt brought upon an Obligation the Defendant is not bound to Plead untill he have Oyer of the Condition of the Obligation Trin. 24. Car. B. r. But he may Plead without Oyer of it if he please and if he do Plead without Oyer he cannot afterwards have Oyer of it If one Plead a Plea that is not good and the Plaintiff doth demur upon it he cannot afterwards amend that Plea without the Plaintiffs consent Mich. 24. Car. B. r. For the Defendant shall not take advantage of his own ill Pleading to delay the Plaintiff and to put him to more trouble then by the Law he may do A Dilatory Plea ought to be Pleaded upon the giving of the first rule in the Office for the Defendant to Plead and a Plea in the chief must be pleaded after the second Rule given in the Office for the Defendant to Plead and this is the reason that Judgement cannot be entred against the Defendant for want of a Plea untill the time given by the two rules to Plead be past Mich. 24. Car. B. r. The ancient course of practice was for the Defendant to put in his Plea into the Office before that the Defendants Atturney did deliver it to the Plaintiffs Atturney Mich. 1649. B. S. The Master of the Office of the Upper Bench ought not to suffer the original Pleas to be delivered out of the Office but onely Copies of them Mich. 1649. B. S. For by the Pleadings in the Office are the Pleadings made up for the Issue to be tryed and if any question arise about altering of them they are to he examined and rectified if any alteration be by the Pleas in the Office A Plea that is grounded upon a Statute if it be not good is not helped after a Verdict Mich. 1649. B. S. For the Statute being the foundation of the Plea if it be not well laid the Plea is naught in the very substance of it and such Pleas are not helped by the Statute of Jeofailes If an Action be brought in this Court to recover Lands and the Defendant emparls yet he may as it hath been held Plead that the Lands in question are ancient Dernesne and demand Judgement whether this Court may hold Plea of them but if he plead to the Defendant and make a full defence he cannot after that plead to the jurisdiction of this Court Mich. 1649. B. S. 8. Ap. 1650. B. S. Pasc Q. For it hath been doubted and held it could not be after Imparlance Pasc 1650. 4. Maii. If the Plaintiffs Atturney deliver an imperfect Declaration to the Defendants Atturney and he accept of it yet he is not bound to Plead untill the Plaintiff have perfected his Declaration Mich. 1649. B. S. For untill it be perfected it is no Declaration Q. Whether he may not demur to it If it be doubtful between the parties whether a Plea be good or not it cannot be determined by the Court upon a motion made that the Court would deliver their opinions whether it be good or not but there ought to be a Demurrer upon the Plea and upon hearing of arguments thereupon the Court is to judge whether that Plea be good or bad Hill 1649. B. S. Jan. 26. If an indenture be onely Pleaded by way of inducement it is not necessary to say per indenturam suam in curia hic prolat but if the party do derive any title unto himself by the indenture Pleaded he must Plead it so Hill 1649 B. S. Jan. 26. That the Court may judge whether the title he makes by the Indenture be warranted by it and that the other party may consider what answer to give unto it If an Action be laid in London and be afterwards removed by a Habeas Corpus into this Court the Defendant ought to Plead the same Term the cause is removed and proceed to a tryal Hill 1649. B. S. 9. Feb. For the Court will not grant the party to take any advantage by the removing of the cause hither to delay the other party in the course of his proceedings If an immaterial Issue be joyned it is not helped by the Statute of Jeofailes but there ought to be a repleader Pasc 1650. 5. Maii B. S. vid. Issue A Plea that the Plaintiff hath not taken the Engagement according to the late Act ought to be Pleaded in this manner petit advisamentum curiae si volunt procedere quia querens non subscripsit engageamento And when the Plaintiff hath subscribed the Engagement and made it appear to the Court that he hath done it it shall be entred upon the Roll Quod querens subscripsit engageamento and then the Plaintiff may proceed It may also be averred upon the Roll that the Plaintiff hath not taken the Engagement although he have Judgement in the cause and thereby Execution shall be stayed untill he have subscribed it Trin. 1650. B. S. 3. July Now all this Pleading is out of doors by the taking away the Act made for the subscribing of it by an order of the Protector and his Councel If the Defendants Plea do not answer all the matter contained in the Plaintiffs Declaration it is no good Plea but the Plaintiff shall have his Judgement intire against him for want of a Plea although the Declaration be nought in some part of it Hill 1650. B. S. 31. Jan For although the Defendant was not bound to have Pleaded to the Declaration but might have Demurred unto it for the insufficiency of it yet the Defeudant not doing it it shall be intended he had no cause for it and then not Pleading Judgement may be entred against him When a Plea is Pleaded the Atturney ought to set his hand to the Plea and then the Issue is joyned and if he will not set his hand to the Plea Judgement may be entred
for want of a Plea Hill 1650. B. S. 5. Feb. But if it be a special Plea there must he a Counsellors hand set unto it If one be sued by original Writ he must Plead the same Term in which the original is returned Hill 1650. B. S. 6. Feb. If one be compelled to alleadge double matter in his Plea yet if he do insist but upon one of them the Plea is not double Trin. 1651. B. S. For upon that matter onely upon which it is insisted upon shall issue be joyned If the Plaintiffs Atturney will consent unto it the Defendant may waive his Plea without moving the Court. By Rolle Chief Justice Trin. 1651. B. r. But if he will not consent it cannot be done without moving the Court. A special Plea is a Plea although it have not a Counsellors hand set to it and therefore Judgement cannot be entred for want of a Plea although a Councellors hand be not to it without acquainting the Secondary of the Office and obtaining his leave to do it for it may be there was no cause for a special Plea and the Plaintiff must not be his own Judge Mich. 1651. B. S. Per Rolle Chief Justice The Prayer of the priviledge of the Court is not properly a Plea for it was anciently demanded by Writ although it be now usually allowed upon the Prayer of the party who claimes it By Latch Apprentice in the Law If a Declaration be delivered to the Defendants Atturney or put into the Office after the Essoigne day of the Term the Defendant cannot be compelled to Plead that Term but he may Emparle till the next Term. 1652. B. S. For the Term was begun when the Declaration was delivered and so it cannot be accounted a Declaration of the proceeding Term. Pardon He that will take the benefit of a general Pardon ought to plead the Statute by which the general Pardon was granted 21. Car. B. r. 8. Ed. 4. 7. 4. H. 7. 8. That the Court may judge whether his offence be Pardoned or not One that is found guilty of man-slaughter must sue out his Pardon or else his burning in the hand cannot be dispensed withall for man-slaughter is Felony 23. Car. B. r. Penalty This Court will not give the Penalty of an Obligation to the Obligee which was onely made to perform the Covenants of an Indenture 21. Car. B. r. Because the party may recover upon the Covenants of the Indenture whatsoever he can be damnisied by the breach of them and the Bond was given for no other intent but to tye the Obligee to perform the Covenants or to satisfie for the breach of them and not that the Obligee should take advantage of the penalty of the bond which it may be is a great sum for the breach of a Covenant whereby the Obligee is very little damnified Perjury A false Oath taken before a person that hath not authority by Law to give the party his Oath in that cause wherein he is deposed is not Perjury 21. Car. B. r. For the Oath is Coram non judice An Endictment for Perjury may be preferred against one for taking a false Oath rashly and for want of consideration although the party that took the Oath did not do it maliciously and he may be convicted thereupon but the fine ought to be more moderate where the Perjury is committed out of rashness onely then where it is committed maliciously Trin. 24. Car. B. r. For though the Law doth not tollerate offences though they be committed out of infirmity yet they have regard to the weaknest of man and will not therfore punish them so severely as offences committed upon premeditated malice to the party against whom they are committed Process and Proceedings in Law All legal Proceedings ought to take commencement by original Writ or by Endictment or by information 21. Car. B. r. Or by Latitat which is the original Process of this Court and is in the nature of an original although it doth suppose a former Writ in the case for which it is issued forth If a Cepi Corpus be returned in one Term the Defendant ought to Plead the next Term after the return so that the Plaintiff may go a tryal the same Term and so it is if the Defendant be brought into Court by a Habeas Corpus or an alias or pluries Habeas Corpus Mich. 22. Car. B. r. After the Plaintiff is non-suit he must begin his Action again and cannot proceed upon his old Declaration Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For by the non suit the cause as to that Action is determined and the parties have no day in Court After a Verdict there ought not to a repleader but the Plea is discontinued Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Where the Defendant brings a Writ of Error to reverse a Judgement given against him and hath a Supersedeas to stay Execution upon the Judgement directed to the Sheriff of that County where the Execution is to be done and yet he is taken by the Sheriff by vertue of an Execution taken out upon this Judgement upon moving of the Court they will grant him a Writ of Supersedeas to Supersede this Execution quia emanavit erronice Mich 22. Car. B. r. For such Execution ought not by Law to have issued out much less to have been executed A Latitat is called a Bill of Midlesex Mich. 22. Car. B. r. But not all Latitats but onely such as are directed to the Sheriffs of Midlesex as I conceive Where the Defendant did tender unto the Plaintiff the moneys for which the Action is afterwards brought against him before the Action was brought and the Plaintiff refuseth them and will notwithing sue the Defendant for them upon a motion and making this appear to the Court the Court will order the money to be brought into the Court and will stay the Plaintiffs Proceedings Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For the Court will not countenance any one to sue another who may have right done to him without suit for this were to encourage men to be vexatious The continuances of Processes in inferior Courts ought to set forth the manner of the continuances and not to express them generally Trin. 24. Car. B. r. The Proceedings in inferior Courts are not so regular and formal as the Proceedings are in the Courts at Westminster but are entred only in short notes Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Pasc 1648. B. S. If one be arrested by Process of this Court and be thereupon in Custody and the Plaintiff do not declare against him in three Terms after the Defendant is by the rules of the Court to go out upon common Bail Trin. 24. Car. B. r. For the Court will presume the cause of Action is not very great because it is so long before he declares and they will not compell him to put in special Bail but where it appears the cause requires it The continuances in the Process of this Court are not entred untill the Judgement given in the
cases doth use at the prayer of the party who is concerned to dispense with the not speaking to it at that time and doth give the party further time to speak in it without prejudice to him and this is called the putting off of a Peremptory Proclamation At the latter end of the Assizes there useth to be Proclamation made that no more records of nisi prius be put in to be tryed at that Assizes and that they shall not be received after and all persons that are to attend their tryals if the Records of nisi prius to be tryed be not then put in may depart and are bound to give no longer attendance at that Assizes Pasc 1652. B. S. Quashing of Endictments Orders c. THis Court hath authority to Quash Orders of Sessions Presentments Endictments c. made in inferior Courts or before Justices of the Peace or other Commissioners if there be cause that is if they be defective in matter or form Mich 22. Car. B. r. To Quash comes of the French word Quasser or rather Casser which signifies to break in peices to cancel destroy make null or voide But this Quashing is but by favour of the Court for the Court is not tyed Ex Officio to do it but may leave the party to plead unto them and to take advantage of the insufficiency of them by pleading to them as in many cases they use to do An Endictment may be Quashed for false Latine or for having in it insensible words or English words or for defect in the form of it Trin. 23. Car. B. r. But now by the late Act it may be in English The Court will not Quash an Endictment of forcible entry after a Verdict before hearing of both the parties concerned in the cause Mich. 23. Car. B. r. The Court will not Quash an information for a fault in the body of it but will leave the Defendant to demur unto it if he believe it to be insufficient but it is otherwise of an Endictment Pasc 1650. B. S. 24 Maii. Quaere rationem Quo Warranto A Quo Wvrranto was brought for vexation upon fourty eight points and the Court being moved in it did order that the prosecutor should wave that Quo Warranto and should bring a new one and therein insist onely upon three points but that he might proceed to a tryall upon it in such time as he might have done upon the old Hill 22. Car. B. r. Quaere Whether one that is under an Arrest may make an Obligation to the Plaintiff at whose sute he was arrested for his appearance to his Action Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Pasc 1648. B. S. In Leach and Davyes Case If a Lessee for years cut down Timber upon the Land let unto him and carry it away from off the ground Q. Whether the Lessor may bring an Action of Trover and Conversion for the Timber Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Whether a fine levyed of Land shall extend to a contingent use of that Land Mich. 24. Car. B. r. In Thomas and Kemishes Case If there be two Tenants in Common of Land and one of them dye Quaere How his wife shall be endowed of the Land which her husband beld in common whether by metes and bounds or not 16. Nov. 1650. B. S. Return of Writs c. THe Court was moved that a return made upon a Habeas Corpus might be amended before it was filed and it was granted Hill 21. Car. B. r. But after it is filed it cannot be amended for then it is a Record of the Court. If a special Scire Facias do issue forth a nihil cannot be returned upon this Scire Facias Hill 21. Car. B r. For a nihil is a general return which ought not to be in this case because the Writ is a special Writ If an inferior Court do make an ill return of a Habeas Corpus the Court will grant an alias Habeas Corpus and also set an amercement upon them for making an ill return of the former Habeas Corpus Hill 21. Car. B. r. Because thereby viz. by the ill return Justice is delayed and the party grieved is also put to more trouble and charge to obtain it If a Writ out of this Court be directed to an inferior Court which the inferior Court is not bound to allow but may proceed notwithstanding the Writ sent unto them yet they ought to make a Return upon the Writ and in the Return to shew the cause why they do not allow the Writ but do proceed in the Cause notwithstanding the Writ Hill 22. Car. B. r. For the Writs of this Court are to be obeyed if there be not very good reason shewed to the contrary why they ought not to be obeyed A prisoner brought to the Bar upon the Return of his Habeas Corpus may have a Copy of the Return if he pray it that he may take his exceptions to the Return Mich. 22. Car. B. r. But the Return must be first filed If the Under Sheriff of a County may be justly challenged as partial to the Plaintiff or the Defendant in respect of kindred or alliance or some other cause that may render him not to be indifferent between the parties and he be to execute a Venire Facias to summon to a Jury to try an issue joyned betwixt the Plaintiff and Defendant in such cases the Court will upon motion of the party that is likely to be prejudiced if a Jury should be returned by him order that the High Sheriff of the County shall himself Return the Jury Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If one be arrested by the Sheriffs Bailiff and a Bond be given unto the Sheriff that the party arrested shall appear at the Return of the Writ the Sheriff ought not to Return a Non est inventus but a Cepi Corpus and if he do Return a non est inventus the Plaintiff may bring an Action upon the Case against the Sheriff for making a false Return or else the Court may amerce him for it and if the Sheriff do Return a Cepi Corpus and yet the party Arrested doth not appear at the day the Court will encrease amercements upon the Sheriff untill he make the party to appear Hill 22. Car. B. r. For when the party is arrested he is in custody of the Sheriff and he ought to keep him at his peril and bring him in at the day and it is of favour to the party that he takes Bond of him for his appearance for he is not bound to do it and if he suffer by it he may take his remedy against the party upon the bond It is not requisite that the Sheriff in making a Return should insert his title or name of dignity or Christian or surname but onely by his name of office Hill 22. Car. B. r. Yet if he do insert those names which is usually done the Return is not thereby hurt or made defective If the Sheriff Return a Cepi Corpus and
of Error if he do proceed and take out execution upon the Judgment it is no contempt to the court Mich. 1649. B. S. For it shall not be presumed he knew there was a Writ of Error brought yet though it be no contempt in him to take out the Execution yet the Execution shall be superseded quia improvide emanavit for by bringing of the Writ of Error the hands of the Court where the judgment was given were foreclosed from proceeding any further Replevin A Replevin ought to be certain in setting forth the number and kindes of the Cattell distrained or else it is not good because if it be incertain the Sheriff cannot tell how to make deliverance of the Cattel because he knows not particularly what the cattel are that were distrained Trin. 23 Car. B. r. Replication If the Plaintiff do Reply to a Plea in Bar which is not good by his replying to it he hath confessed it to be good Trin. 23. Car. B. r. And so it shall be now taken to be for he hath lost his advantage of demurring unto it by passing by the defects of it and replying unto it If an Action for the breach of the condition of an Obligation be brought and the Defendant do plead that he hath performed the condition the Plaintiff in his Replication must shew in what particularly the Defendant hath broken this condition Pasc 24. Car. B. r. That the Defendant may be able to give a particular answer to the breach assigned and if he do not assign a particular breach his Replication is idle for it sayes no more then what was formerly said in the Declaration Reservation If the Lessee for yeers assign over all his term to another and reserve a Rent the Reservation is void Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For by the assignment of the whole term he hath no interest in the thing let for the which he can challenge any Rent to be due Recovery A Recovery cannot destroy a thing executory which doth depend upon a contingency Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Because it was uncertain at the time of the Recovery suffered whether it would ever be or no and a Recovery will not work upon so remote and uncertain an estate If a Recovery be suffered by Baron and Fem of Lands whereof the Fem hath an estate in Fee Simple although there was no Tenant to the precipe of the Lands yet this Recovery shall be a good estople against the Baron and Fem and their Heirs but it would be otherwise if the Lands had been Entailed at the time of the Recovery By Rolle Chief Justice Mich. 1650. B. S. 8. Nov. It is not necessary for the Judge to examine a Fem Covert when she joyns with her husband to suffer a Recovery of her own Lands yet it is prudential to do it Trin. 1651. B. S. By Rolle and he said that he used to do it Release If the Defendant in an ejectione firmae will not defend the title of the Land in case the Verdict pass against the Plaintiff the Ejector may Release the dammages to the Plaintiff Hill 1649. B. S. 11. Feb. For he is the Defendant in Law although the title do not concern him and it is the others fault that he was not himself made Ejector to defend the title One is not bound to give a Release unto the Sheriff for moneys which he receives from him which he levyed for him by vertue of an Execution but he must give him a note under his hand that he hath teceived it Hill 1650. B. S. By Rolle Chief Justice Q. tamen Whether he be bound to give him such a note for the Sheriff is an Officer of the Law and upon payment of the money the Law gives him his discharge Recital and Misrecital If a Statute be Misrecited in pleading in a matter which goes to the ground of the Action which is brought upon the Statute it is not helped after a Verdict by the Statute of Jeofailes but if it be Misrecited onely in a circumstancial matter and which goes not to the ground of the Action it is helped after a Verdict by that Statute Trin. 1650. B. S. For the Statute helps onely matters mispleaded in matter of form and not matters of substance Report By the custome of the Court the Secondary ought not to make any report of any matters referred unto him by the Court upon the last day of the Term for that day is properly appointed for motions onely Trin. 1650. B. S. Reversion If one have a Reversion expectant upon a Lease for years he may make a Lease of this Reversion unto the Lessee for years for one year and after make a Release in Fee to the Lessee for years of the Reversion and by this conveyance the Reversion in Fee will pass to the Lessee Mich. 1650. B. S. Reference Matters of Fact betwixt the party in a cause depending in Court are not to be Referred to the Secondary for such matters are tryable by the Jury that is to try the cause but matters concerning the due proceedings or undue proceedings in the cause by either of the parties are properly to be Referred unto him and for him in some cases to compose the differences and in others to make his report to the Court how the matters do stand Pasc 1650. B. S. If a matter in difference betwixt the Plaintiff and the Defendant be referred to the Secondary and one of the parties will not attend at the time appointed to hear the business referred the other party may proceed in the Reference alone and get the Secondary to make his report without hearing of the other party Trin. 1651. B. S. For one party cannot compell the other to attend and therefore such References would many times take no effect for want of the presence of both parties if a report may not be made notwithstanding one of them refuseth to attend Right Lands between the high water Mark and the low water Mark do appertain to the Lord of the Manor next adjoyning of Common Right Pasc 23. Car. B. r. By Rolle Q. tamen Whether they do not rather belong to the King for it hath so been held Scire Facias ONe may have a Scire Facias to revive a Judgement upon which no Execution was taken if it be but seven years past since the Judgement was had without any motion to the Court for it and if it be under ten years since the Judgement was had a Scire Facias may be moved for to revive it at the side Bar but if it be above ten years since the Judgement was had a Scire Facias may not be had without moving the Court for it Pasc 24. Car. B. r. But the Court will not deny it if it be moved for The side Bar is a place where a rail or bar is set up neer to this Court below the Court in Westminister-hall where the Judges stand and rest themselves before the Court sits and where they put on their
for which the Action is brought Hill 23. Car. B. r. The Court will not change the venue in an Action brought upon an obligation Hill 23. Car. B. r. Because the Action is personal and transitory and it is at the election of the party to lay it where he pleaseth yet the rules of Court for the laying of personal and transitory Actions have not been very constant of latter times but the Courts do vary as they see cause A Judgment given in an inferior Court was reversed here by a Writ of Error because the Venire was Venire facias c. and not at large Hill 1650. B. S. But such a Venire in the Common Pleas is good For the constant course there is to enter the Venire briefly with an c. The Defendant may move to alter the Venue although the Plaintiffs Declaration be not perfect Mich. 1650. 25 Oct. B. S. For though it be not perfect in all things yet it may be so perfect that he understands where the Venue is laid and that is enough to ground a motion upon to alter it if it be laid where it ought not to be In an Action of Debt brought for Rent due for Land the Venue may not be laid out of the County where the Land lies for which the Rent is due for the Action is a locall action ratione terrae out of which the rent is issuing Hill 1650. B. S. 29. Jan. A Venue cannot be laid in Wales in a transitory Action the Cause whereof did arise in England because this would be to remove the Cause to be tryed out of the jurisdiction of the Court and then this Court can give no judgment in it Trin. 23. Car. B. r. The Venue cannot be changed after the Defendant hath pleaded although the Plaintiff have amended his Plea in a principall and materiall part of it after the Defendant put in his Plea and though the Defendant do imparle by reason of that amendment for all this makes it not a new Declaration 1650. B. S. A Venire out of an inferior Court ought to runne thus Ideo praeceptum est in eadem Curia or per candem Curiam Hill 1649. B. S. 30. Jan. But now those Latine words must be in English It is not necessary to insert the Names of the Jurors in the Venire facias although it was the antient course to do it Hill 1649. B. S. 4. Feb. So that antient forms may be altered upon good reason else not Where the Declaration is good but the Plea is uncertain and yet an Issue is joyned and tryed upon it this is a mis-tryall for there can be no judgment given upon it and therefore there must be a Repleader and a new Venire to summon another Jury to try the Cause again Hill 1649. B. S. 8. Feb. A Venire facias is oftentimes retorned before the Plea be entred and yet it is well enough Pasc 1650. B. S. 24. Maii. For the Plea is a Plea before it is entred so that there is an Issue to be tryed which is a sufficient warrant for awarding and retorning of the Venire A Venue is not to be changed in an Action of Debt brought for Rent or upon an Obligation or in an Action of Covenant or in an Action of Accompt Trin. 1650. B. S. 26. Junii Mich. 1650. B. S. 23. Nov. The Venire ought to be delivered to the Sheriff four dayes before the retorn of it if the Jury do dwell forty miles off and eight dayes if they dwell further off then forty miles from the place where the tryall is to be Pasc 1651. B. S. 13. Maii. If the Defendant do move to change the Venue upon Affidavit made that the cause of Action if any be did arise either in Kent or Surrey for example and not in London where the Action is laid the Plaintiff shall have his election to lay his Action either in Kent or in Surrey upon giving the Defendant notice in which of them he will lay it but shall not lay it in London 1651. B. S. The Attorneys are sworn not to lay personall Actions in forreign Counties but in the Counties where the causes of them did arise and the Statute doth also prohibit it for the laying them in forreign Counties doth put the people to charge for motions to alter the Venues into their proper Counties and therefore it is fit the Attorneys should observe it By Rolle 1650. B. S. But as yet the practice herein is unsetled and inconstant And it may be it is not setled because there might great inconveniences grow by setling of it and tying up the hands of the Court from doing that which the exigency of the case may require Verdict If there be severall ejectors of severall parcels of Land mentioned in a Lease of Ejectment the Jury ought to finde this matter especially Hill 21. Car. B. r. A Verdict which is found against a Record is a void Verdict Hill 21. Car. B. r. For a Record is of a higher nature and more credit is to be given unto it then unto a Verdict If a Verdict may be any wayes construed to make it good there ought not to be made a construction of it to destroy it and make it void Hill 21. Car. B. r. For the Law delights in the preservation of things and would not have things to be done in vain The Court will not take a Verdict by default except the Plaintiffs Councell do pray it Hill 21. Car. B. r. For the Plaintiff may choose whether he will take the Verdict or no and therefore the Court will not take it except he desire it If the Plaintiff doth fail in proving of his Issue the Verdict ought to be found for the Defendant except the Jury do know of their own knowledg that the Defendant is guilty Hill 21. Car. B. r. So that the Jury is not so tyed up by the evidence that they must alwayes give their Verdict according to it If one of a Jury that found a Verdict were outlawed at the time when the Verdict was found the Verdict is not good but may be reversed by error Hill 21. Car. B. r. For an out lawed person is out of the protection of the Law and is debarred from intermedling with any Civil affairs as a person excommunicated is from participating in Divine Ordinances If a Verdict be found for the Plaintiff and he will not enter it if the Defendant move the Court in it they will compell him to enter it and so it is where the Plaintiff doth refuse to enter a Verdict found for him upon the executing of a Writ of enquiry of Dammages Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the Plaintiff ought to rest satisfied with what the Law gives him Or the Defendant may enter it himself if he will A Declaration that is not good is in many cases helped after a Verdict by the Statute of Jeofailes but where the Declaration doth not make it appear that the Plaintiff had some
Ports or to some other priviledged place to enjoyn them not to exceed their jurisdiction but this is not a remedial writ to the party that obtains it conducing any wayes to his obtaining of right in his cause depending there Trin. 22. Car. B. r. An Original Writ is not amendable if it be erronious in substance because he that takes it out may have a new original and so is not without remedy Hill 22. Car. B. r. Though the Writ be abated An original Writ which is defective in form onely is abateable if it be not amendable by the Statute as in some cases it is and in others not Hill 22. Car. B. r. If the Prerogative Court shall refuse to grant Administration according to the Testators will this Court may grant a Writ at the prayer of the party grieved to compell them to do it and the Countess of Bark-shires case 29. Jac. and the case of Saint Burien in Cornwell were cited to prove it Hill 22. Car. B. r. If one bring a Writ of Ejectment and pending the Sute he makes an entry into the Land for which the Action is brought the Defendant may plead this entry in abatement of his Writ Hill 22. Car. B. r. A Writ without a Teste is not good Hill 22. Car. B. r. For the time may be material when the Writ was taken out A Writ issuing out of any of the Courts at Westminster do not run that is are of no force within the County Palatine of Chester or other County Palatine Hill 22. Car. B. r. Because they have jura regalia within their jurisdictions and are not subject unto other jurisdictions The Sheriffs Bailiff cannot execute a Writ directed unto the Sheriff without the Sheriffs Warrant Pasc 23. Car. And if he do he is liable to an action Where the Sheriff is Judge of the Court a Writ which should otherwise have been directed unto him shall be directed to the Serjeants of the Mace Pasc 23. Car. B. r. That is in such places where there are such Serjeants After Judgement in a cause there can no Plea be pleaded in abatement of the Writ upon which the Action was commenced Pasc 24. Car. B. r. In a Writ of Dower the Tenant cannot plead bis petita in abatement of the Writ of Dower Pasc 24. Car. B. r. That is that the Defendant hath demaned her Dower by another former Writ depending for she can recover but once Q. In an Action of Debt it is a good plea in abatement of the Plaintiffs Writ to say that the Plaintiff hath received part of the Debt for which he Sues since his Action brought but it is no plea good in an Action upon the case Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Tria 24. Car. B. r. For in Debt the Plaintiff is to recover the whole Debt he declares for but in an Action upon the ease the Plaintiff is to recover no more then he can prove he is damnified by not paying of what he demands and the money received since the Action brought can but abate the dammages and doth not destroy his Writ for it was incertain at the bringing of Writ how much he was damnified The Writ directed to call one to the dignity of a Serjeant at the Law is a close Writ that is sealed up to signifie it is his duty to keep close his Clyents cause and not to reveal it but the Writ directed to one to call him to the place and dignity of Chief Justice or other Judge is an open Writ and not closed up to shew that his duty is to do open Justice unto all Mich. 24. Car. B. r. A Writ of Error brought by the Baile to reverse a Judgement given against the Principal onely is abateable and so is it by Rolle Chief Justice where the Judgement was given against the Principal and the Bail also Mich. 1649. Q. Tamen In the latter case If the party be sued to an Out-lawry upon an original Writ the Writ is determined by the Out lawry for it hath had its full effect which was to make the party to come in and appear and answer the Plaintiff or else to Out-law the Defendnat if he should not appear By Rolle Chief Justice Hill 1650. B. S. Where the Sheriffs Bond which he took for the Defendants appearance is put in Sute the Writ taken out to arrest the Defendant upon this Bond ought to be directed unto the Coroner because the Bond is to be sued in the name of the Sheriff Pasc 1650. B. S. 17. Ap. And so is accounted in Law to be a Party Writ of Enquiry of Dammages The Court will quash a Writ of Enquiry of Dammages and not suffer it to be filed if the Plaintiff do execute it without the giving of due notice of the execution thereof unto the Defendant and put him to take out a new Writ of Enquiry Hill 22. Car. B. r. If it do not appear to the Court by the Return or by some other way that a Writ of Enquiry hath been executed the Court will grant the Plaintiff a new Writ if he desire it if the former Writ do take no effect Mich. 22. Car. B. r. A Writ of Enquiry is to issue forth where a Judgement is had upon a nihil dicit or non sum informatus or upon a demurrer and not upon a Verdict and this Writ is to summon a Jury to try what Dammages the Plaintiff hath sustained by the Defendant in the cause because the dammages were not formerly assessed the matter not being tryed by a Jury Hill 22. Car. B. r. If there be error in a Writ of Enquiry of Dammages the Court upon the prayer of the party will grant him a new Writ but will not suffer the old Writ to be amended Pasc 23. Car. B. r. If a Writ of Error be brought in this Court to rereverse a Judgement given in another Court and the Judgement is affirmed in this Court this Court may grant a Writ of Enquiry of dammages if it was such a Judgement whereupon a Writ of Enquiry did lye Trin. 24. Car. B. r. If upon the executing a Writ of Enquiry of Dammages the Sheriff do refuse to swear and examine some of the Witnesses produced on either part and yet doth execute the Writ the Court will grant a new Writ to the party grieved for the old Writ was not well executed 1651. B. S. Way and High way There are three Wayes taken notice of to wit Alta Via Communis Via Via by prescription that is a High-way a Common Way and a Way by prescription Pasc 24. Car. B. r. If a High-way lye within a Parish the Parish is of common right bound to repair it except it appear that it be to be repaired by some other person either by reason of tenure or by prescription Mich. 1650. B. S. 24. Oct. If any person do enclose any part of a Way or waste adjoining to a High-way he thereby doth take upon him to keep the Way
this debt at a day to come the party to whom he made this promise cannot bring his Action for the Debt untill the day be passed upon which he promised to pay it By Rolle Chief Justice and by German Justice for he said that the promise is a suspention of the Debt pro tempore 29. Jan. 1650. B. S. If one promise unto a woman that in consideration that she will marry with him he will intermarry with her this is a mutual promise and an Action lies by either party against the other for breach of it 18. Ap. 1650. B. S. Appeal In a Writ of Appeal all the pleadings ought to be in French Mich. 22. Car. B. r. This is since altred by the late Statute that Enacts all proceedings in Law to be in English If in an Appeal the Defendant plead in abatement of the Writ and the Writ be adjudged good it is peremptory and he shall not be permitted to answer over but shall be condemned upon the Writ Mich. 22. Car. B. r. In an Appeal the Appellant ought to appear in Court in person yet upon a motion to the Court the Court may admit him to prosecute his Suite by his Atturney Mich. 22. Car. B. r. The defect in any Process in an Appeal doth discontinue all the Appeal and makes an end of the Action as well as a defect in the Original Writ Hill 22. Car. B. r. Age. If the question be whether the party be of full Age or within Age it shall be tryed by the Court by inspection of the party and not by a Jury Hill 22. Car. B. r. Advantage It is not good practice to take an advantage against the Defendant to obtain a tryal the sooner against him for it causeth clamor from the party and makes him oftentimes press the Court for a new tryal Hill 22. Car. B. r. He that will in pleading take advantage of a particular Statute must shew particularly that he is comprised within the Statute Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Assize An Assize is to be Arraigned in French and first the Defendants Councel doth pray the Court that the Tenant may be called which the Court grants and thereupon he is called by the Cryer of the Court and if upon his calling he do appear then the Tenants Councel do demand Oyer of the Writ of Assize and the Return of it which is granted and thereupon he prayes leave of the Court that he may Imparle which is granted to a short day after and the Jury is adjourned by the Court to appear at that day Hill 22. Car. B. r. Note that the Jurors that are to trye the Assize are called Recognitors of the Assize At the day granted to the Tenant to Imparle unto the Tenant is called and upon his appearance he pleads to the Assize in Latin and upon this an Issue is joyned between the parties and after the Jury or Recognitors of the Assize are examined upon oath upon a voire dire whether they had the view of the land in question and if they say they have had then are they sworn to try the Issue and the Councel do proceed to give them their evidence Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Arraignment If in an Appeal brought the Writ be abated the Defendant cannot be Arraigned upon the count which is grounded upon this Writ Pasc 23. Car. B. r. One Awbry that had been formerly Indicted for upon the Statute for having two Wives and was Out-lawed upon this Indictment was brought to the Bar and Arraigned to this effect First the secondary on the criminal side spake thus Awbry hold up thy hand which the prisoner did then he proceeded thus Awbry thou hast been heretofore Indicted of Felony and thereupon Out-lawed in due course of Law for having of two Wives and hast been Arraigned thereupon what canst thou say for thy self why thou shouldest not have sentence of death pronounced against thee Prisoner I take this exception to the Indictment that it is not said to be found per sacramentum duodecim proborum legalium hominum and I desire I may have Twisden and Hales assigned for my Councel Court You shall have them Thereupon the Councel prayed that the prisoner might bring a Writ of Error to Reverse the Out-lawry Court Let him have it Attaint An Attaint doth lie against a Jury that do give their Verdict contrary to the evidence that is given unto them Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Audita Querela Where the Bail is detained in prison in Execution after the judgement which was given against the Principal is Reversed by a Writ of Error there the Bail may bring an Audita Querela to be discharged Pasc 23. Car. B. r. If one be taken in Execution and is afterwards set at liberty and then is taken again and detained in prison upon the same Execution he may bring his Audita Querela to be enlarged Mich. 24. Car. B. r. If a judgement given in another Court be removed into the Upper Bench Court by a Writ of Error and the party who had the judgement notwithstanding the removal of it by the Writ of Error do bring an Action of debt upon this Judgement in the Court where he obtained the Judgement as he may do if afterwards pending this Action of Debt the Judgement be Reversed by the Writ of Error the Defendant against whom the Judgement was obtained may bring his Audita Querela to be relieved against the Action of Debt brought upon the Judgement 3. Feb. 1650. B. S. One Tritton that was in Execution brought his Audita Querela and prayed he might be Bailed and it was granted and he was bailed by four persons 7. Feb. 1650. B. S. Authority Doctor Cowels book called the Interpreter is not a book of Authority to be urged for Law for it was condemned to be erroneous and scandalous by Parliament and by the authority thereof was publikly burned as erroneous and scandalous A verbal authority given by divers Plaintiffs in an Action of Trespas and Ejectment to deliver a Lease of Ejectment upon the Land though the Lease be signed and sealed by them off of the Land Let in the Lease is a good authority to execute this Lease So held in a tryal at the Bar between Vanlore and Crook Mich. 1649. 7. No. B S. Apurtenant and Apendant Yards Orchards and Guardens are Appurtenances to a Messuage but Lands cannot be said to be Appurtenant to a Messuage though they be used with the Messuage for the Messuage is a Messuage though the Lands be taken away Hill 23. Car. B. r. One Messuage cannot be Appurtenant to another Messuage for they are both entire things of themselves Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Account An Action of Account or an Action of Debt lies at the election of the Plaintiff against one for receiving mony of a third person for the use of the Plaintiff although he had no authority given him to receive it Hill 23. Car. B. r. The Statute of limitations of Actions doth not
the night for that is a time for rest 1650. B. S. If a robbery be begun in the day light but is not ended till dark night yet the Hundred where it was done is chargeable for it by the Statute of Winchester 1650. B. S. Fee simple A Feffment made of Lands to one and his Heirs Males is a Fee simple Mich. 23. Car. B. S. For it is not an estate comprised within the Statute of West 2. De donis conditionalibus False Imprisonment An Action of False Imprisonment doth lye against a Baily by the party that is Arrested by him after the Writ is returned by Warrant whereof he was Arrested Hill 23. Car. B. r. For this is all one as if he were Arrested without a Writ for by the return of the Writ the Sheriffs and Bailiffs power are at an end as to that Writ If a procedendo be unduely obtained and the party against whom it is had be thereupon taken and imprisoned an Action of False Imprisonment doth lye by the party Imprisoned against him at whose Suite he is Imprisoned Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Feoffment A Feoffment made of Lands unto a Fem Covert is a good Feoffment in Law untill the husband do disagree to it Hill 23. Car B. r. Q. If the husband do not know of the Feoffment made and after the Feoffment doth dye what the Feoffment shall operate Foundation None hath power to Found a free Chappel but the King Hill 23. Car. B. r. For it is as much as to create a new Tenure The Foundation of a thing may alter the Law as touching that thing Hill 23. Car. B. r. Fiction of Law The Law ought not to be satisfied with Fictions where it may be really satisfied Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Yet in some Cases Fictions of Law are necessary and to be allowed Gavel-kinde IF one take to Wife a Woman Seised of Gavel-kind Lands and the Wife dye without having had any issue of her body by her husband yet the husband shall be Tenant by the courtesie of half of the Lands during the time he continues unmaryed But if he marry he shall forfeit his Tenancy by the courtesie But if he had issue by the Wife if the Wife dye he shall be Tenant by the courtesie of the whole Land and although he do marry he shall not forfeit his Tenancy by the curtesie Mich. 22. Car. B. r. This is by the custome of Kent Guardian A Gardian of an Infant may acknowledge satisfaction upon Record for a Debt which he hath recovered at Law for the Infant Trin. 23. Car. B. r. But it must be a Guardian that is Assigned by the Court to sue for the Insant The Court will Assigne a Gardian to an Infant to sue for him if the Infant do come into Court and desire it of the Court and name the party he desires to have for his Guardian and produce him in Court Trin. 24. Car. B. r. Good Behaviour If one do affront any Court of Justice this is a good cause to bind the party to his Good Behaviour Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For the affronting of justice is a publike misdemeanor and not a private although it be done but to the person of one man as to the Judge of a Court a Justice of peace c. He that doth upon Articles sworne in Court desire the party against whom the Articles are sworne may be bound thereupon to the Good behaviour must express some speciall matter in those Articles for which he ought to be bound to the good behaviour For if the Articles be only generall the good behaviour is not to be granted upon them Mich. 22 Car. B. r. For a generall accusation is no accusation for the incertainty of it Perjury is not an offence for which the party perjured may be bound to the Good behaviour Mich. 22. Car. B. r. But the party may be endicted for it and fined if he be thereupon convicted One was bound to his Good behaviour for affrighting people in the night in their houses by shooting off of Muskets and for the assaulting of one going in the high way Mich. 22 Car. B. r. A woman that is a common scold may be bound unto the Good behaviour Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For she is a common disturber of the publique peace The Good behaviour was granted against one upon an Article sworne against him that he had maliciously pulled down a piece of anothers house Hill 22. Car. B. r. A Justice of Peace ought not to binde any person to the Good behaviour upon a generall accusation made against the party Pasc 23. Car. B. r. One was bound to his Good behaviour for stopping of a Constable from making pursuit after a felon Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For this is a publike offence against the Common-wealth The Good behaviour is not to be granted against one for speaking of words only against one person but it may be granted against one for speaking of words against divers persons at severall times Hill 23. Car. B. r. For that is a generall misbehaviour The Good behaviour was granted against one upon an Article sworne and read against him that he said that he would burn down another mans house Hill 1649. B. S. Heire THe word Heir is nomen collectivum and extends unto all Heirs Trin. 23. Car. B. r. The Heir is favoured at the Common Law for at the Common Law the Ancestor could not convey away his Lands from his Heir at Law upon his death bed without the consent of the Heir Hill 23. Car. B. r. The Law is the preserver of Inheritances Heriott A Heriott is the fruit of a Rent-service Hill 21. Car. B. R. This is to be meant of Heriott service and not of Heriott Custome Habeas Corpus If a Prisoner appear in Court upon a retorne of a Habeas Corpus to remove him hither and there doth appear by the return that there was good cause to commit the prisoner to prison and to detain him there the Court will remand or send him back to the place where he was first committed but if upon the retorne it doth appear that there was no lawfull cause to commit him then the Court will discharge the prisoner but if it be doubtfull to the Court whether he was lawfully committed or not then the Court will bail the prisoner Hill 21. Car. B. r. Trin. 23. Car. B. r. A Habeas Corpus ad respondendum is when any one is imprisoned at the suit of another upon a legall process in the Fleet or any other prison except the Kings Bench prison and a third person would sue that prisoner in this Court and cannot because he is not in custody of the Mareschall of this Court there he may have a Habeas Corpus to remove the prisoner out of the prison where he is into this Court to answer unto his Action here 21. Car. B. r. A Habeas Corpus cum Causa doth remove the body of the party for whom
satisfaction the Law will not intend that he is damnified and so he hath no Cause of Action When the Court doth order one to plead presently it is to be understood that he shall plead in such convenient time after as the Court shall judge reasonable Mich. 22. Car. B. r. The Defendant may amend his Plea although it be three Terms after it was pleaded if he will pay Costs Mich. 22. Car. B. r. But it must be by leave of the Court because it is against the common Rules of practice Although a Plea do contain divers matters in it upon which an Issue may be taken yet this Plea is not double if the Plea could not have been good without alleadging all those matters in it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For though the Law doth not allow captious Pleas yet it doth not deny the Defendant to plead all such matters that his Case affords for his just Defence If the Defendant Plead an insufficient Plea and there is a good Issue joyned upon that Plea and a Verdict given upon that Islue for the Defendant the Plaintiff shall not afterwards take advantage of the insufficiency of the Plea Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For it was his own sault to joyn Issue upon it when he might have demurred upon it Where one Pleads Letters of Administration which are granted by such an ordinary whereof the Law doth take notice he may Plead that they were granted unto him debito more but if they be granted by an inferior ordinary of whom the Law doth not take notice of he must Plead that they were granted unto him per ordinarum illius loci Mich. 22. Car. B. r. That the Court may the better Judge whether they be well granted in regard of the power of the ordinary that granted them or not If the Plaintiff do alter his Declaration after the Defendant hath Pleaded to it the Defendant may alter his Plea Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For by the amendment of it it may be so altered in matter that it mâ—y require a different answer from what was formerly Pleaded and in that case if he should not amend his Plea he might be triced for want of a good Plea In an Appeal brought all the Pleadings ought to be in French Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Because the Statute which enacted that all Pleadings should be in Latin extends not to this Action and so the Pleadings therein are to be in French as all Pleadings were before that Statute But now by the late Act they are to be in English Q. Tamen Whether that Act do extend to this Action or onely to such Pleas as were formerly in Latin When the Court doth order that the Defendant shall Plead it is intended that he must Plead an Issuable Plea Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the rule is made to quicken the Defendant that the Plaintiff be not delayed by his Dilatoriness and if he might Plead a Dilatory Plea and not issueable the rule would be to no purpose The Court will not upon a motion rule the Defendant to Plead peremptorily by a day before the common rules of the Court for Pleading be out but then they will Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For till then it cannot be said that the Defendant hath delayed the Plaintiff If a Scire facias upon a Recognizance be brought against an Infant he cannot Plead Infancy or nonage to it but he must bring his audita querela and set forth his case therein and thereby his age shall be tryed by the Courts inspecting of him and not by a Jury Hill 22. Car. B. r. If the Plaintiff do release his cause of Action to the Defendant yet the Court will not upon a motion stop the Plaintiffs proceedings in the Action but the Defendant must Plead this release Hill 22. Car. B. r. In bar of the Action for the Court cannot take notice of the release upon a motion It is not a good Plea to Plead a Paroll agreement in bar of an agreement made by indenture between the parties Hill 22. Car. B. r. For an agreement by Indenture is a more solemn agreement and of a higher nature then a Paroll agreement and must be discharged by some act of as high a nature as it is A double Plea is such a Plea that one Issue cannot determine all the matter issuable that is contained in it and also where the Defendant is put to a double answer Hill 22. Car. B. r. And such a Plea is not a good Plea If the Defendant do Plead a frivolous Plea to the intent to delay the Plaintiff and to hinder him from going to a tryal the Court will upon the Plaintiffs motion order the Defendant to plead such a Plea as he will stand to or else to accept of a Demurrer from the Plaintiff unto his frivolous Plea Hill 22. Car. B. r. For it is the Justice of the Court to speed the proceedings in Law and to bring suits to determination as soon as with conveniency and Justice to all parties it may be done By the course of practice in the Court of Common Pleas the principle in a Bond may Plead for his Suerty without his leave or knowledge and acknowledge a Judgement upon the Bond but this Court doth judge it hard practice and will not allow it to be don here Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Now it is said they do not allow it there The practice seemed hard in this respect that the Suerty who intended onely to be bound that the principal should pay the Debt should by the falsity of the principal be presently liable to an Execution for the Debt and be enforced to pay it Where the Defendant may plead the general Issue he ought so to Plead that the whole matter in question may come to be tryed Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For else the Plea is not good because it tenders not such an Issue whereupon the cause depending may be determined which every Plea ought to do for to Plead otherwayes is to no purpose If one bring an Action upon a contract it is a good Plea in bar for the Defendant to Plead quod exoneravit se de Contractu Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For it sounds all one as if he had Pleaded that he hath performed the agreement A Concord by Paroll is no good Plea in bar to an Action brought upon a single Bill which is not penall Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For bare words are not of so great force as agreements put in writting Every Plea must be Pleaded either in bar to the Action brought or in abatement of the Writ upon which the Action is framed otherwise it is but a discourse and not a Plea because the Plaintiff cannot take an Issue upon it and therefore if the Plaintiff do demur upon it and his demurrer be adjudged good he shall have Judgement against the Defendant Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Anciently all Pleadings were in French then by the Statute it was Enacted they should be in