Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	action_n	body_n	soul_n	1,426	5	5.4689	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A61550	The doctrine of the Trinity and transubstantiation compared as to Scripture, reason, and tradition. The first part in a new dialogue between a Protestant and a papist : wherein an answer is given to the late proofs of the antiquity of transubstantiation in the books called Consensus veterum and Nubes testium, &c.	Stillingfleet, Edward, 1635-1699.	1688 (1688)	Wing S5589; ESTC R14246	60,900	98

the_o courage_n to_o defend_v the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n in_o point_n of_o reason_n but_o i_o see_v you_o be_v a_o bold_a man_n and_o will_v venture_v far_o then_o wise_a men._n pr._n it_o may_v be_v other_o have_v not_o have_v the_o leisure_n or_o curiosity_n to_o examine_v a_o mystery_n believe_v to_o be_v so_o much_o out_o of_o the_o reach_n of_o our_o understanding_n or_o have_v confound_v themselves_o and_o other_o so_o much_o with_o school-●erms_a as_o to_o leave_v the_o matter_n rather_o more_o obscure_a than_o it_o be_v before_o but_o i_o shall_v endeavour_v to_o make_v thing_n as_o clear_a as_o they_o will_v bear_v and_o that_o which_o i_o insist_v upon_o be_v that_o the_o absurdity_n be_v not_o to_o appearance_n so_o great_a as_o those_o of_o transubstantiation_n and_o therefore_o i_o desire_v you_o to_o produce_v those_o which_o appear_v the_o most_o dreadful_a p._n i_o shall_v reduce_v all_o to_o these_o two_o which_o comprehend_v the_o rest_n 1._o how_o there_o can_v be_v three_o person_n and_o but_o one_o god._n 2._o how_o these_o can_v agree_v in_o a_o three_o and_o not_o agree_v among_o themselves_o for_o the_o first_o it_o seem_v very_o absurd_a that_o there_o shall_v be_v three_o person_n real_o distinct_a whereof_o every_o one_o be_v god_n and_o yet_o there_o shall_v not_o be_v three_o god_n for_o nothing_o be_v more_o contradiction_n than_o to_o make_v three_o not_o to_o be_v three_o or_o three_o to_o be_v but_o one_o pr._n i_o hope_v now_o you_o will_v give_v i_o leave_v to_o make_v a_o answer_n to_o your_o difficulty_n as_o distinct_a as_o possible_a we_o do_v not_o say_v that_o three_o person_n be_v but_o one_o person_n or_o that_o one_o nature_n be_v three_o nature_n but_o that_o there_o be_v three_o person_n in_o one_o nature_n if_o therefore_o one_o individual_a nature_n be_v communicable_a to_o three_o person_n there_o be_v no_o appearance_n of_o absurdity_n in_o this_o doctrine_n and_o on_o the_o other_o side_n it_o will_v be_v impossible_a there_o shall_v be_v three_o god_n where_o there_o be_v one_o and_o the_o same_o individual_a nature_n for_o three_o god_n must_v have_v three_o several_a divine_a nature_n since_o it_o be_v the_o divine_a essence_n which_o make_v a_o god._n but_o to_o make_v this_o more_o plain_a do_v you_o make_v any_o difference_n between_o nature_n and_o person_n p._n yes_o pr._n wherein_o lie_v it_o p._n excuse_v i_o sir_n for_o you_o have_v undertake_v to_o explain_v these_o thing_n pr._n i_o will_v begin_v with_o person_n which_o name_n be_v original_o take_v among_o the_o roman_n from_o some_o remarkable_a distinction_n of_o one_o from_o another_o either_o by_o some_o outward_a appearance_n as_o a_o vizard_n or_o habit_n or_o some_o particular_a quality_n or_o disposition_n and_o from_o hence_o it_o come_v to_o be_v apply_v to_o those_o inward_a property_n whereby_o one_o intelligent_a be_v be_v distinguish_v from_o another_o and_o from_o those_o property_n to_o the_o person_n who_o have_v they_o thus_o person_n be_v use_v even_o by_o tully_n himself_o at_o least_o twenty_o time_n in_o his_o book_n of_o rhetoric_n and_o the_o old_a civil_a law_n speak_v of_o personal_n right_n and_o personal_n action_n so_o that_o the_o critic_n such_o as_o valla_n and_o other_o have_v no_o cause_n to_o find_v fault_n with_o boethius_n for_o apply_v the_o notion_n of_o a_o person_n to_o a_o intelligent_a be_v subsist_v by_o itself_o and_o so_o the_o soul_n be_v no_o person_n in_o man_n but_o the_o man_n consist_v of_o soul_n and_o body_n have_v some_o incommunicable_a property_n belong_v to_o he_o therefore_o i_o can_v but_o wonder_v at_o the_o niceness_n of_o some_o late_a man_n who_o will_v have_v the_o name_n of_o person_n and_o hypostasis_fw-la and_o trinity_n to_o be_v lay_v aside_o since_o themselves_o confess_v boëthius_n his_o definition_n of_o a_o person_n to_o be_v true_a enough_o but_o they_o say_v it_o belong_v to_o the_o creature_n and_o not_o to_o god_n for_o it_o will_v make_v three_o gods._n which_o be_v to_o suppose_v without_o prove_v it_o that_o the_o divine_a nature_n can_v communicate_v itself_o after_o no_o other_o manner_n than_o a_o create_a nature_n can_v this_o be_v now_o to_o be_v more_o strict_o inquire_v into_o and_o it_o be_v very_o well_o observe_v by_o boëthius_n de_fw-fr trin._n l._n 1._o principium_fw-la pluralitatis_fw-la alteritas_fw-la est_fw-la that_o diversity_n be_v the_o reason_n of_o plurality_n and_o therefore_o in_o the_o trinity_n so_o far_o as_o they_o be_v different_a they_o be_v three_o i_o e._n in_o regard_n of_o personal_a property_n and_o relation_n but_o so_o far_o as_o they_o agree_v they_o be_v but_o o_o n_o e_o that_o be_v as_o to_o the_o divine_a nature_n it_o be_v very_o true_a that_o according_a to_o arithmetic_n three_o can_v be_v one_o nor_o one_o three_o but_o we_o must_v distinguish_v between_o the_o bare_a numeration_n and_o the_o thing_n number_v the_o repetition_n of_o three_o unit_n certain_o make_v three_o distinct_a number_n but_o it_o do_v not_o make_v three_o person_n to_o be_v three_o nature_n and_o therefore_o as_o to_o the_o thing_n themselves_o we_o must_v go_v from_o the_o bare_a number_n to_o consider_v their_o nature_n wherever_o there_o be_v a_o real_a distinction_n we_o may_v multiply_v the_o number_n though_o the_o subject_n be_v but_o one._n as_o suppose_v we_o say_v the_o soul_n have_v three_o faculty_n understanding_n will_n and_o memory_n we_o may_v without_o the_o least_o absurdity_n say_v there_o be_v three_o and_o one_o and_o those_o three_o not_o confound_v with_o each_o other_o and_o yet_o there_o be_v but_o one_o soul._n p._n but_o the_o socinian_o object_n that_o there_o be_v a_o difference_n between_o three_o property_n and_o three_o distinct_a person_n because_o a_o person_n be_v a_o individual_a be_v and_o so_o three_o person_n must_v be_v three_o individual_a being_n and_o therefore_o as_o there_o be_v but_o one_o divine_a be_v there_o can_v be_v but_o one_o person_n pr._n this_o be_v the_o main_a strength_n of_o the_o cause_n to_o which_o i_o answer_v that_o although_o a_o person_n be_v a_o individual_a be_v yet_o it_o imply_v two_o thing_n in_o it_o 1._o something_o common_a with_o other_o of_o the_o same_o nature_n as_o three_o man_n have_v one_o and_o the_o same_o nature_n though_o they_o be_v three_o person_n 2._o something_o peculiar_a and_o incommunicate_a to_o any_o other_o so_o that_o john_n can_v be_v peter_n nor_o peter_n james_n p._n but_o what_o be_v it_o which_o make_v one_o not_o to_o be_v the_o other_o when_o they_o have_v the_o same_o common_a nature_n pr._n you_o ask_v a_o hard_a question_n viz._n about_o the_o principle_n of_o individuation_n but_o if_o it_o be_v so_o hard_a to_o resolve_v it_o as_o to_z create_v being_n there_o be_v certain_o far_a less_o reason_n for_o we_o to_o be_v unsatisfied_a if_o it_o appear_v difficult_a to_o clear_v the_o difference_n of_o nature_n and_o person_n in_o a_o infinite_a be_v yet_o all_o mankind_n be_v agree_v in_o the_o thing_n viz._n that_o there_o be_v a_o community_n of_o the_o same_o nature_n and_o a_o real_a distinction_n of_o person_n among_o man_n though_o they_o can_v tell_v what_o that_o be_v which_o discriminate_v the_o humane_a nature_n in_o john_n from_o the_o same_o humane_a nature_n in_o peter_n and_o james_n and_o it_o be_v observable_a that_o as_o being_n arise_v in_o perfection_n above_o each_o other_o it_o be_v still_o so_o much_o hard_a to_o assign_v that_o which_o be_v call_v the_o principle_n of_o individuation_n in_o gross_a and_o material_a being_n we_o can_v discern_v a_o number_n of_o accident_n or_o peculiar_a mode_n and_o property_n which_o distinguish_v they_o from_o each_o other_o but_o it_o be_v much_o hard_a to_o assign_v it_o in_o spiritual_a and_o intellectual_a being_n who_o nature_n and_o difference_n lie_v not_o so_o open_a to_o our_o understanding_n if_o so_o be_v than_o it_o appear_v more_o difficult_a in_o a_o infinite_a and_o incomprehensible_a be_v what_o cause_n have_v we_o to_o wonder_v at_o it_o but_o we_o must_v always_o make_v a_o difference_n between_o what_o we_o have_v reason_n to_o believe_v and_o what_o we_o have_v a_o power_n to_o conceive_v although_o we_o have_v all_o the_o reason_n in_o the_o world_n to_o believe_v that_o there_o be_v a_o god_n i._n e._n a_o be_v infinite_a in_o all_o perfection_n yet_o we_o must_v yield_v that_o his_o essential_a attribute_n be_v above_o our_o comprehension_n as_o for_o instance_n 1._o we_o must_v believe_v god_n to_o be_v eternal_a or_o we_o can_v believe_v he_o to_o be_v god._n for_o if_o he_o once_o be_v not_o it_o be_v impossible_a he_o shall_v ever_o be_v and_o therefore_o we_o conclude_v necessary_a existence_n to_o be_v a_o essential_a attribute_n of_o the_o divine_a nature_n but_o then_o how_o to_o