Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n act_n law_n parliament_n 2,185 5 6.6353 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A35648 The case of Sir Robert Atkyns, Knight of the Honourable Order of the Bath, upon his appeal against a decree obtain'd by Mrs. Elizabeth Took, (the now wife of Thomas Took, Esq.) and others, plaintiffs in Chancery, about a separate maintenance of 200 l per ann. clear above all charges settled on Mrs. Took, beside a large jointure Atkyns, Robert, Sir, 1621-1709, defendant.; Took, Elizabeth. 1695 (1695) Wing C999; ESTC R170983 10,525 13

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View original text

reversion_n of_o the_o whole_a after_o her_o death_n in_o this_o bill_n of_o mrs._n took_n in_o the_o chancery_n answ._n answ._n whereupon_o the_o decree_n now_o appeal_v from_o be_v make_v there_o be_v not_o any_o allegation_n nor_o the_o least_o touch_n or_o mention_v of_o that_o bill_n of_o sir_n robert_n in_o the_o exchequer_n nor_o of_o the_o matter_n of_o that_o bill_n for_o have_v it_o be_v allege_v in_o mrs._n took_n chancery-bill_n sir_n robert_n can_v have_v give_v it_o a_o full_a answer_n and_o show_v how_o that_o sir_n robert_n at_o the_o exhibit_v of_o his_o bill_n in_o the_o exchequer_n have_v not_o so_o full_o discover_v the_o fraud_n of_o the_o separate_a maintenance_n as_o he_o have_v do_v since_o but_o believe_v as_o the_o deed_n for_o the_o separate_a maintenance_n do_v allege_v see_v her_o deed_n that_o the_o rent_n be_v sufficient_a to_o answer_v she_o the_o 200_o l._n per_fw-la an._n and_o that_o 160_o l._n per._n an._n over_o will_v have_v be_v leave_v for_o sir_n robert_n which_o by_o her_o proof_n appear_v to_o be_v false_a and_o the_o rent_n short_a of_o make_v good_a her_o 200_o l._n per_fw-la an._n as_o she_o allege_v see_v her_o bill_n a_o court_n must_v proceed_v secundum_fw-la allegata_fw-la 2_o dly_z the_o read_v that_o bill_n of_o sir_n robert_n in_o the_o exchequer_n and_o indeed_o all_o the_o proof_n offer_v at_o the_o hear_n the_o cause_n in_o chancery_n be_v irregular_a there_o be_v nothing_o in_o the_o cause_n in_o the_o chancery_n put_v in_o issue_n by_o the_o bill_n and_o answer_n the_o only_a equity_n of_o the_o plaintiff_n mrs._n took_n bill_n be_v a_o trust_n of_o the_o separate_a maintenance_n and_o sir_n robert_n notice_n of_o it_o both_o which_o be_v confess_v by_o sir_n robert_n in_o his_o answer_n he_o only_o insist_v upon_o it_o both_o by_o his_o plea_n and_o answer_n that_o their_o deed_n be_v fraudulent_a which_o ought_v to_o be_v try_v at_o the_o common-law_n and_o that_o he_o be_v a_o stranger_n neither_o party_n nor_o privy_a therefore_o the_o notice_n be_v not_o material_a here_o be_v nothing_o remain_v that_o require_v proof_n in_o chancery_n yet_o to_o increase_v the_o charge_n the_o plaintiff_n proceed_v to_o proof_n which_o have_v give_v occasion_n to_o sir_n miles_n cook_n to_o load_v sir_n robert_n with_o near_o 200_o l._n cost_n which_o though_o except_v too_o be_v confirm_v by_o the_o court._n 3_o dly_z have_v the_o matter_n of_o sir_n robert_n bill_n in_o the_o exchequer_n be_v the_o least_o hint_v at_o or_o stir_v in_o mrs._n took_n bill_n in_o chancery_n sir_n robert_n have_v be_v awaken_v by_o it_o and_o forewarn_v to_o have_v answer_v to_o it_o and_o make_v proof_n upon_o it_o viz._n that_o his_o bill_n in_o the_o exchequer_n be_v design_v mere_o to_o state_n the_o debt_n owe_v to_o he_o by_o mr._n take_v and_o to_o compel_v he_o to_o a_o redemption_n of_o the_o mortgage_n or_o to_o be_v bar_v of_o his_o redemption_n and_o all_o party_n as_o be_v propose_v to_o sir_n robert_n on_o the_o behalf_n of_o mr._n take_v be_v incline_v to_o get_v a_o act_n of_o parliament_n pass_v for_o the_o sale_n of_o mr._n took_n estate_n and_o to_o have_v the_o debt_n due_a to_o sir_n robert_n upon_o the_o mortgage_n and_o the_o debt_n to_o his_o other_o creditor_n pay_v off_o and_o a_o provision_n afterward_o make_v for_o mrs._n take_v which_o sir_n robert_n offer_v to_o further_a so_o that_o it_o be_v not_o so_o seasonable_a nor_o proper_a at_o that_o time_n to_o question_v their_o title_n nor_o to_o object_v fraud_n against_o it_o nor_o be_v it_o proper_a for_o sir_n robert_n to_o object_n or_o controvert_v the_o fraud_n of_o it_o in_o equity_n there_o be_v sufficient_a remedy_n against_o it_o at_o the_o common-law_n which_o course_n too_o he_o afterward_o pursue_v when_o he_o find_v they_o proceed_v not_o in_o their_o agreement_n to_o get_v the_o act_n of_o parliament_n pass_v and_o the_o fraud_n more_o plain_o appear_v 4_o thly_a sir_n robert_n at_o the_o hear_n of_o this_o cause_n in_o chancery_n oppose_v the_o read_n of_o his_o exchequer-bill_n in_o evidence_n as_o be_v no_o regular_a proof_n or_o evidence_n either_o in_o law_n or_o equity_n suit_n a_o bill_n in_o equity_n be_v no_o evidence_n in_o another_o suit_n bill_n in_o equity_n be_v the_o invention_n and_o surmise_n of_o the_o council_n that_o draw_v they_o and_o the_o suggestion_n and_o allegation_n that_o be_v in_o they_o be_v indeed_o but_o of_o the_o nature_n of_o interrogation_n to_o enforce_v a_o discovery_n from_o the_o defendant_n but_o be_v no_o conclusion_n nor_o estopple_v to_o the_o party_n that_o exhibit_v they_o nor_o evidence_n against_o they_o who_o do_v not_o so_o much_o as_o sign_v they_o themselves_o nor_o shall_v sir_n robert_n bill_n in_o the_o exchequer_n control_v his_o indenture_n of_o mortgage_n whereby_o the_o fee-simple_a of_o the_o house_n in_o question_n be_v convey_v in_o possession_n to_o he_o and_o not_o a_o reversion_n only_o nor_o shall_v it_o overthrow_v his_o answer_n upon_o oath_n in_o this_o cause_n wherein_o he_o make_v title_n to_o the_o house_n in_o possession_n as_o be_v the_o purchaser_n of_o they_o for_o a_o valuable_a consideration_n note_n note_n and_o be_v indeed_o force_v to_o accept_v the_o mortgage_n by_o mr._n took_n defraud_v he_o of_o a_o former_a security_n which_o sir_n robert_n have_v for_o his_o money_n or_o else_o sir_n robert_n must_v have_v lose_v his_o money_n now_o that_o sir_n robert_n exchequer-bill_n ought_v not_o by_o the_o rule_n of_o law_n to_o have_v be_v allow_v for_o evidence_n no_o not_o in_o the_o chancery_n though_o between_o the_o same_o party_n appear_v by_o a_o print_a case_n by_o the_o resolution_n of_o a_o lord-chancellor_n too_o in_o the_o very_a like_o case_n in_o the_o main_a but_o the_o present_a case_n on_o sir_n robert_n part_n be_v much_o strong_a than_o that_o too_o on_o his_o side_n the_o case_n be_v mich._n 14._o e._n 4._o fitzh_n abr._n tit._n subpoena_fw-la plac_fw-la 15._o one_o tate_n be_v sue_v in_o chancery_n by_o a_o bill_n in_o equity_n as_o sir_n robert_n be_v and_o make_v to_o answer_v upon_o oath_n at_o the_o hear_v just_a as_o be_v in_o this_o present_a case_n a_o bill_n of_o tate_n than_o defendant_n exhibit_v by_o he_o in_o the_o same_o court_n too_o and_o for_o the_o same_o matter_n and_o thereupon_o so_o much_o the_o strong_a against_o tate_n be_v offer_v to_o be_v read_v which_o do_v contradict_v and_o differ_v from_o his_o answer_n by_o the_o chancellor_n by_o advice_n of_o the_o king_n sergeant_n tate_n bill_n be_v not_o to_o be_v regard_v for_o he_o be_v swear_v to_o his_o answer_n but_o not_o to_o his_o bill_n 5._o if_o sir_n robert_n exchequer-bill_n have_v be_v evidence_n as_o it_o be_v not_o yet_o it_o serve_v only_o to_o prove_v that_o in_o sir_n robert_n opinion_n at_o that_o time_n when_o his_o bill_n be_v exhibit_v mrs._n took_n deed_n of_o separate_a maintenance_n be_v not_o fraudulent_a or_o that_o he_o then_o have_v not_o discover_v the_o fraud_n this_o will_v then_o have_v be_v proper_a to_o have_v be_v offer_v upon_o the_o trial_n of_o the_o issue_n at_o common-law_n but_o be_v no_o ground_n for_o a_o decree_n and_o sir_n robert_n may_v change_v his_o opinion_n upon_o further_a discovery_n of_o the_o truth_n of_o the_o case_n for_o it_o be_v at_o most_o but_o his_o then_o apprehension_n of_o it_o it_o alter_v not_o the_o truth_n of_o the_o case_n nor_o the_o matter_n of_o fact_n in_o it_o and_o he_o be_v seduce_v into_o that_o good_a opinion_n of_o mrs._n took_n title_n to_o her_o separate_a maintenance_n by_o mrs._n took_n own_o deed_n which_o do_v affirm_v the_o yearly_a value_n to_o be_v 360_o l._n per_fw-la an._n which_o have_v it_o be_v true_a will_v have_v be_v sufficient_a for_o both_o their_o turn_n but_o in_o truth_n there_o have_v not_o be_v enough_o to_o pay_v the_o 200_o l._n per_fw-la an._n separate_a maintenance_n be_v but_o of_o late_a invention_n and_o bring_v many_o mischievous_a consequence_n after_o they_o and_o not_o one_o precedent_n of_o the_o chancery_n as_o it_o be_v believe_v can_v be_v produce_v where_o ever_o before_o this_o decree_n a_o separate_a maintenance_n have_v be_v countenance_v against_o a_o purchaser_n which_o purchase_n to_o the_o appellant_n sir_n robert_n atkyns_n never_o be_v make_v out_o of_o any_o greediness_n of_o profit_n mortgage_n sir_n robert_n be_v force_v to_o take_v this_o mortgage_n but_o he_o be_v mere_o drive_v to_o it_o to_o accept_v it_o as_o a_o far_a security_n after_o he_o have_v part_v with_o his_o money_n to_o the_o husband_n who_o have_v defraud_v sir_n robert_n of_o a_o former_a security_n as_o appear_v by_o the_o proof_n and_o either_o the_o husband_n or_o the_o wife_n or_o any_o friend_n of_o they_o on_o their_o behalf_n may_v still_o redeem_v if_o they_o please_v if_o it_o be_v do_v in_o some_o reasonable_a time_n sir_n robert_n will_v be_v willing_a to_o accept_v of_o his_o money_n again_o sir_n robert_n hope_v to_o be_v excuse_v for_o use_v this_o freedom_n with_o the_o chancery_n it_o be_v general_o know_v that_o long_o before_o this_o present_a occasion_n even_o while_o he_o himself_o sit_v in_o a_o court_n of_o equity_n establish_v by_o act_n of_o parliament_n he_o both_o in_o that_o court_n and_o in_o the_o high_a court_n the_o house_n of_o lord_n discharge_v his_o conscience_n by_o inveigh_v against_o the_o encroachment_n of_o court_n of_o equity_n to_o conclude_v the_o apellant_fw-la sir_n robert_n atkyns_n humble_o move_v the_o lord_n to_o take_v up_o the_o same_o resolution_n in_o this_o present_a case_n which_o appear_v in_o the_o precedent_n and_o example_n to_o be_v of_o high_a consequence_n as_o their_o noble_a ancestor_n and_o predecessor_n do_v in_o the_o twenty_o year_n of_o king_n henry_n the_o iiid_n when_o the_o statute_n of_o merton_n be_v make_v chap._n 9_o the_o the_o lord_n be_v press_v by_o all_o the_o bishop_n to_o make_v the_o ancient_a law_n of_o england_n to_o conform_v to_o the_o constitution_n of_o the_o church_n but_o in_o one_o point_n viz._n that_o child_n bear_v before_o matrimony_n may_v be_v account_v legitimate_a and_o inheritable_a to_o land_n all_o the_o earl_n and_o baron_n with_o one_o voice_n answer_v that_o they_o will_v not_o change_v the_o law_n of_o the_o realm_n which_o hitherto_o have_v be_v use_v and_o approve_v erratum_fw-la p._n 4._o l._n 30._o add_v the._n finis_fw-la