THE Ancient Legal Fundamental and Necessary Rights OF Courts of Justice In their Writs of Capias Arrests and Process of Outlary And the Illegality many mischiefs and Inconveniences which may arrive to the People of England by the Proposals tendred to His Majesty and the High Court of Parliament for the abolishing of that old and better way and method of Justice and the establishing of a new by peremptory Summons and Citations in Actions of Debt By Fabian Philipps Esq Antonius Matheus in Praefat ad Lib de Auctâ—onibus Arduum est vetustis novitatem dare novis Autoritatem Dira per incantum Serpunt Contagia vulgus LONDON Printed for Christopher Wilkinson and are to be sold at his Shop at the Sign of the Black Boy in Fleet-street over against St. Dunstans Church 1676. The Contents of the Chapters Chap. 1. THe many mischiefs and inconveniences which may happen by an Act of Parliament if obtained for the more speedy recovery of Debts upon Bonds or Bills under the Debtors hands and seals in the manner as is by some desired Chap. 2. That the most part of that desired Innovation was borrowed from Mr. Elsliot's wicked Invention and a wild Systeme not long after framed and from some also now much disused part of the Civil Laws Chap. 3. The reason and necessity of the more frequent use of Writs of Arrest and Vtlary then was before the Statute of 25 E. 3. cap. 17. Chap. 4. The Ancient use as well as necessity of the Process of Arrest and Outlawry in this and other Nations Chap. 5. The Process of Arrest and Vtlary are a more gentle way of compelling men to pay their Debts or appear in Courts of Justice then that which was formerly used Chap. 6. The delays and inconveniences of the Process of Summons Pone distringas were a great if not the only cause of the disuse thereof Chap. 7. The Writs and Process of Arrest and Outlawry have increased preserved and encouraged Trade better secured the Creditors Debts and made the borrowing of Money more easie then it was before Chap. 8. The pawn and ingagement of the Body is most commonly a better security then Lands or personal Estate upon which the borrowing of Money was not only very troublesome but difficult Chap. 9. The difference betwixt borrowing of Money upon Lands and real Estate and the procuring of it upon personal security and that without trust and personal security Trade cannot well or at all subsist Chap. 10. The way of Capias and Arrest is no oppression or tyranny exercised upon the people since the making of the Statute of 25 E. 3. cap. 17. or hath been hitherto or may be destructive to their Liberties Chap. 11. That the wisest of the Grecian Commonwealths Athens and Sparta those great contenders for Liberty and preservers of it did in their establishments and methods of Justice neither understand or suspect any Tyranny or oppression to be in the necessary and modâ—rate use of the Process of Arrest Chap. 12. The troubles and seditions of the people of Rome concerning the whippings scourging selling for Bond-slaves and other cruelties used by Creditors in the suing and prosecution for their Debts and the troubles and endeavours of the Magistrates and Senators to appease them Chap. 13. That their Order made to pacifie a tumult was not perpetual or so much as intended to extend to an absolute freedom of the Debtors from Arrest or restraints of their persons until they appeared in Courts of Justice or gave bayl to do it Chap. 14. That the Statute of 25 E. 3. cap. 17. which giveth Process of Capias and Exigent in Actions of Debt and other Actions therein mentioned is not repealed either by the Acts of Parliament of 28 E. 3. or 42 E. 3. cap. 1. there being no inconvenience or prejudice to the Publique good in those kind of Law proceedings which might deserve a repeal by those or any other Acts of Parliament Chap. 15. That the Nation hath not been base or slavish ever since the making of the said Act of Parliament of 25 E. 3. cap. 17. Chap. 16. An examination of the Opinions of Sir Edward Coke in his report of Sir William Herberts Case touching the Process of Arrest used in our Laws and the many Errors appearing in that Book or Manuscript called the Mirrour of Justice and the fictitious matters and relations mentioned therein Chap. 17. That the late incessant needless complaints against our Laws and the proceedings in our Courts of Justice had in the bottom of it a design of overturning Monarchy and Government and to create Offices places imployments and profits to the contrivers thereof and their party Chap. 18. That neither Oliver Cromwell or his Son Richard the second Mock-Protector or little Highness did conceive it to be reasonable or had any intention to deliver up the Justice of the Nation to those ignorant giddy and ever-changing kind of Reformations Chap. 19. What occasioned the contrivance of the former Projects and groundless Complaints against our Laws since his Majesties happy Restauration Chap. 20. That the Proceedings at the Common Law desired by the new way of a peremptory Summons or the old by Writs of Summons Pone Distringas or Writs of Capias at the Plaintiffs pleasure are not consistent or agreeable one with the other and that Laws being to be binding are to be certain and positive not arbitrary Chap. 21. That it will not be for the Interest of the King and his people to give way to that Design which may open a passage to other Innovations and Contrivances as much if not more inconvenient and prejudicial CHAP. I. The many mischiefs and inconveniences which may happen by an Act of Parliament to be made for the more speedy recovery of Debts upon Bonds or Bills under the Debtors hands and seals in the manner as is by some desired THe Suggestions and that which should be the Causes or inducements to such an Act of Parliament are greatly mistaken or if there happen any such Evils as are pretended they are Raro Contingentia and do but seldom happen And when they do arise have their originals from other Causes but not from Arrests in Actions of Debt which by the shortest account are and have been of 374. years continuance by order and approbation of many Acts of Parliament but may be demonstrated to have been of a far greater Age and equal to that of the Eldest Court or Method of Justice in this or any other civilized Nation in the world The mischances happening by two or three Bailiffs in 20. or 30 jears killed most commonly upon the score of their own provocation rudeness and misdemeanors are when they do so happen in the unruly Suburbs of London towards Westminster for in the other too vast extent of them an Age or Century is scarce able to furnish out one of those evil accidents And within the City of London where Credit seems to be the Life and
Doth wast his Estate and intendeth to defraud his Creditors 9. Is a Gamester 10. Hath all the signs of a suspitious Person 11. Makes use of many Men to be bound or ingaged for him 12. Engageth himself in many business 13. Is looking out or providing for another Habitation 14. Is turned Informer 15. Keeps his Shop shut up 16. Is a Man of ill life or conversation 17. Or hath been so formerly 18. Hath been an Offender in Criminal matters 19. Lodgeth his Goods in some secret place 20. And is packing up to be gone But they that can dream of Tyranny and Oppression in our Proces of Arrest and Outlawry and know not how to prove it will rather then miscarry in their design of Metamorphosing our Laws and putting them into as many new fashions as the variety 〈◊〉 vanity of their Cloths and Habits wâ—ll if those accusations must vanish and never be able to make them any good return seek out some other way to alter or abrogate those kind of Law proceedings and therefore to pretend that the Statute of 25 E. 3. ca. 〈◊〉 giving Proces of Capias and Outlawry in Actions of Debt is either by the Act of Parliament of 28 E. 3. ca. 3. or 42 E. 3. ca. 1. repealed CHAP. XIV That the Statute of 25 E. 3 ca. 17. which giveth Proces of Capias and Bxigenâ— in Actions of Debt and other Actions therein mentioned is not repealed either by the Acts of Parliaments of 28 E. 3. ca. 3. or 42 E. 3. ca. 1. there being no indâ—â—venimâ—â— or prejudice to the publick good in those kind of Law proceedings which might deserve a repeal by those or any other Acts of Parliament WHen it cannot come within the virge of any probability that the said Statute of 25 E. 3. ca. 17. should in the same Parliament those grand Assemblies being then long before usually shout and of no long continuance be made when the Statute of 25. E. 3. ca. 4. was made That none should be taken by Petition or Suggestion to the King or his Councel but by 〈◊〉 Indictment Presentment or Proces made by Writ original If it had not been believed to have been consistent with it or the meaning of our Magna Charta ca. 29. or if the Statute of 25 E. 3. ca. 17. had been repealed by the shortly after following Statutes of 28 E. 3. or 4â— E. 3. ca. 1. such a repeal should not be taken notice of by those that lived in those times or near unto them or that if there had been any grievance found or perceived in that Statute of 25 E. 3. ca. 17. or that the said Statute of 28 E. 3. had repealed it the Statute made by the aforesaid King E. 3. in the 36. year of his Reign would have ordained the Confirmation of the great Charler and the Charâ—er of the Forrest and commanded that the other Statutes mode in his time and in the time of his Progenitors be well and surely holden and kept in all points or that the Citizens of London who in their Courts of Justice in their City have for so many Centuries of years last past to their very great advantages made use of the Proces of Arrest as a lawful and beneficial Custom and constrained all that were to enjoy the largely comprehensive Freedom of that City to take an Oath to maintain the Franchises and Customs thereof would have made it their business to get many an Act of Parliament to confirm them if they had supposed it to have been prejudicial to them And that the People of England should in so many several Ages since those pretended Acts of repeal not only have petitioned for several Acts of Parliament for Proces of Arrest and Outlawry in several Actions but through so many past Ages and Generations Arrest and imprison one another in the way to Justice and not at all think themselves guilty of betraying their own Liberties and never complain of it Or that the Justice of the Nation should in all that long course of time be so sleepy or mistaken as to continue and put in Execution an Act of Parliament repealed and maintain and continue a grievance Oâ— that our Ancestors who were not all restrained by that Statute of 25 E. 3. ca. 17. from the former more usual course of proceedings in Actions of Debt by Writs of Summons Pone and Distringas for there were Writs of Summons Pone and Distress made use of in Debt and Accompt after the making of that Statute where there was such a visibility of Estate as the Sheriff could not safely return that the Defendant had nothing whereby he might be summoned it having been in Easter Term in the 22 year of the Reign of King Edward the 1. declared to be a constant rule in Law Quod nullus qui habet terras debet arrestari per Corpus ad reddendum compitum set per terras cum habeat sufficientiam No Man that had Lands sufficient was to be arrested by his Body in an Action of Accompt as there may be at this day if the Plaintiffs have a mind unto it and would rather procede by a longer way about then a shorter And should of themselves have made an Election of the way of Capias Arrest or Outlawry and continue it for above three hundred fifty years without any thing like a complaint against it if they could have believed that that Act of Parliament of 25 E. 3. ca. 17. had been repealed and a long and undeniable experience had not informed them that it was a much better and expedite way of bringing Men to Justice or that if the Writs of Pone and Distress had been the better way the Statute made in the Seventh year of the Reign of King Henry the Fifth which was sixty-nine years after to give Proces of Arrest and Outlawry in Actions or Writs for forging of Charters or Evidences would have esteemed it to be for the Common good of the People to have enacted it or if after the making of that Statute the course of Capias Arrest and Outlawry had not been believed to be the most beneficial the Statute made in the 19th year of the Reign of King Henry the Seventh for giving of Proces of Arrest and Outlawry in Actions of the Case which was made 84. years after would have declared the way of Pone and Distress to have been the Cause of great delays or that the Act of Parliament made in the 23th year of the Reign of King Henry the Eigth for giving Proces of Capias in Writs of Annuity which was made twenty-eight years after the making of that Statute would have said there were many delayes in Actions of Annuities because no Writ of Capias did lie in that Action Acts of Parliament in those dayes and long before after having by our Kings been granted upon the Petitions and Request of their Subjects and penned advised or carefully perused
which Statutes will be best expounded by Sir Edward Coke who in his Exposition and Comment upon Magna Carta ca. 29. and all the other parts thereof for out of that most commendable Law those two Acts of Parliament of 28 E. 3. ca. 3. and 42 E. 3. ca. 3. do seem to have been drawn and are but as Confirmations of it saith that by the Law of the Land is to be understood the Common Law Statute Law and Customes of England which though they be in the Negative have no reference or contrary matter unto that of 25 E. 3. ca. 17. and do not prohibit the former allowed and due Proces of the Law or declare them to be contrary to Magna Carta or any Article or point thereof nor have any express words or so much as any preamble which may signfie any purpose that they had to repeal it for all that is forbidden by those two Statutes of supposed repeal is to prevent the mischiefs complained of by suggestions to the King and his Councel and that no man be disinherited put to death or out of his Land taken imprisoned or brought to answer but by due Proces â—f the Law according to the old Law of the Land And the Statute of 37 E. 3. ca. 18. giving an order of pursuing a Suggestion made unto the King doth mention the great Charter and the words therein contained That no Man be taken nor imprisoned nor put out of his Free-hold without Proces of the Law For if our Records and Law-books and the reason thereof and all that hath been learned and believed hitherto do not fail us those Statutes or either of them cannot be interpreted to intend to take away any lawful and necessary Arrests and Imprisonments in Actions of Trespas which were in use long before the making of Magna Carta or the arresting or restraining of the persons liberties of Defendants in Actions of Debt and the like or for a Contempt of the King or his Courts of Justice in not appearing when they were summoned or cited or when they had no visible Estate to satisfie or were likely to fly or run away the true intent and meaning of those Statutes of 28 E. 3. and 42 E. 3. tending rather to confirm and establish that Act of 25 E. 3. ca. 17. then to repeal or take it away the main scope or purpose of them being only to restrain any arbitrary Government or any Lawless proceedings of the People one against the other for it is impossible by any sense or reasonable Construction of those Statutes to conclude any the least design in them or either of them to take away or alter a Law or Custom of the Nation which was not then at all so much as complained of when by forbidding to do that which was against the Law they must of necessity be understood to allow of that which was the Law or consistent with it For it hath been said and never denyed to be a rule in our Common Law as well as in the Civil Law that Exceptio firmat regulam in Casubus non exceptis The exception or saving doth preserve and allow of that to be the Law which is excepted otherwise if the exception should be as certainly it is not nugatory and serves for nothing the meaning of our Magna Carta it self and all those very many Statutes of Confirmation afterwards enacted must be as they can never be rightly taken to be that be the matter or cause Civil or Criminal Treason Murder or Felony no Man is at all to be disseised or put out of his Lands arrested imprisoned or compelled to answer and the King who is sworn to administer Justice to his Subjects must by Magna Carta it self be denyed and debarred the use of means to do it and the People thereby put into a condition not to be able to obtain Justice one against another And if no Laws concerning Proces in Debt or other personal Actions which have been enacted or allowed by Acts of Parliament subsequent to those before mentioned and supposed repealing Acts of Parliament made in the 28. and 42 E. 3. or derived by necessary deduction from reason which ought to be the Soul and Constituting part of all Laws shall not be allowed or taken for Laws the Parliaments of England wherein all manner of grievances and many times very small and inconsiderable were seldom omitted to be complained of or petitioned against have by making of the Statute of 7 H. 5. for giving Proces of Arrest and Capias in Actions of forging of Charters of 9 H. 7. in Actions of the Case and 23 H. 8. in Actions of Annuity not only not remedied but enacted grievances and all our other Laws which have been since made concerning the taking or imprisoning of Mens Bodies in Actions of Debt or other Civil and personal Actions or been put in Execution have been no other then abuses and transgressions of the Law and all that so many learned conscientious and Reverend Judges of the Law and sworn to judge according to it have since those times done or permitted to be done in pursuance of those latter Laws have been but as so many great mistakings to the oppression of the People And the Parliament of 3 Car. primi whereof the very learned Selden and that great Lawyer Sir Edward Coke and many very worthy Men and Lovers of our English Laws and Liberties were Members some of which had not long before made themselves Prisoners to secure a pretended Liberty would have been guilty of a great oversight and inadvertency in not getting better Provisions in the Act of Parliament made upon that which was called the Petition of Right wherein that aforesaid part of Magna Carta ca. 29. and the Statutes of 37 E. 3. ca. 9. 17 R. 2. ca. 6. and the very Act of 28 E. 3. ca. 3. now so much insisted upon are confirmed And the Acts of Parliament of 37 E. 3. ca. 18. 38 E 3. ca. 9. 42 E. 3. ca. 3. and quoted in the margent of the said Act are declared to be good Laws and Statutes of the Realm and it was ordained That no Offender of what kind soever be exempted from the proceedings to be used and punishments to be inflicted by the Laws and Statutes of the Realm All those Acts of Parliament being then expounded and understood to be only intended against the Imprisonment of Men by the King or his Councel without cause shewn and the same Parliament did then procure diverse Acts of Parliament to be repealed but not that of 25 E. 3. ca. 17. which neither was repealed in that nor any other Parliament in Terms or words intelligible or by implication or otherwise and did never yet deserve to be so since the making thereof Nor would that Parliament labouring so much for liberty have at the same time allowed of that Act of Parliament of 25 E. 3. ca. 17. for the Proces of Capias and Exigent or Outlawry in Actions
by discountenancing the present Laws to loosen the bonds of government to the end that all disorder and confusion might breake in upon him And in his answer to the above mentioned 19. propositions sent unto him by both houses of Parliament the 2. of June 1642. Declared unto them that those that had the conduct of that affair thought fit to remove a troublesome rub out of their way viz. the Law to the end they might undermine the very foundation of it Which every day after grew more and more visible when they being called together to council and advise him could not by their Votes which they would make as binding and obligatory as if they were Laws made and established by their Soveraign wrest and take from him the Militia or Sword wherewith he should protect and defend his people took it to be not a little advantagious to their purposes to ravel and dislocate the method and proceedings of his Laws and Justice By which his Throne was established that by overturning the long approved Laws and Customs of the Kingdom upon which the best Monarchy in the World was built they might open a passage to let in that gain and Anarchy which they aimed at which being once made known to their Emissaries and so much encouragement given by their members of that which was then untruly called a Parliament who rather then fail of Petitions unto them from the sons of Zerviah and Shimei out of every Countrey City Corporation and Market Town caused Printed Bills to be affixed upon the Posts and Corners of the Streets in London whose multitudes of Inhabitants in Masters Apprentizes Tapsters and other Illiterate and Vulgar kind of people could readily afford them good store of such as had been borne or lived in every County City and Corporation of England and Wales to give a meeting at a place appointed to some Members of Parliament for the framing of Petitions unto it And thus the Hounds being uncoupled and let loose to chase the Royal Hart and the Presbyterian Ministers like Huntsmen busied in the ha loo lo ho ha loo loo so ho. Whooping and following to cheer and set them on and busying themselves to remove all things that might hinder the pursuit of their Petitions for the presenting whereof Pulpit Granado men were employed to procure them to be brought with 100 or 200 or more of the factious on Horseback with the Petitions ready printed or Tackt to their Hats or Hatbands with Swords by their sides The London Porterswere set on to Petition against the Militia when they were only told it was against the Watermen for carrying Trunks and other Burdens by Water And a Schoolmaster at Stamford was so wickedly Ingenious as to make his Boyes subscribe a Petition to that Parliament against Episcopacy as if their Parents had actually done it In the mean time the Diurnals News Books and seditious Pamphlets the Stationers Arrowes and Artillery were day by day shot to wound him and incense the people against him and some of the Parliament men were heard to say That they could not do their work without them And the design was carried on so prosperously as too many thought their time best of all bestowed to pull down or take in pieces either all our old Laws or such a part of them as might not only undermine the frame and constitution of the Monarchy but innovate and introduce so much of their own Modells and Inventions as might either directly lead to a republique or some new devices of Anarchy A Book called the pollution of University Learning printed in 1642. Marched in the van together with another Book called the Observator and his Jesuitical principles Quod efficit tale est magis tale and that the King was singulis Major but universis Minor and those kind of Engines were greatly incouraged in their attempts by a Book of Junius Brutus his vindiciae contra Tirannos translated out of Latine into English to infect the people with Treasonable Doctrines And a Book intituled Maxims Vnfolded That the Election of the Kings of England ought to be by the consent of the people The Royal and politique power in all Causes and over all persons is properly the Parliament The Oath of Supremacy binds not in Conscience to the King against the Parliament but the Pope And another book written by Mr. William Prynn an utter Barrister of Lincolnes Inne Entituled the Soveraigne power of Parliaments and Kingdoms Printed at London in the year 1643. Wherein with heaped quotations and much Learning and reading the wrong way he was willing to invite his Readers to believe that the Court of Parliament had a lawful power to question the Kings Patents Charters Commissions Proclamations Grants Warrants Writts and Commandments whether they be legal and to Cancell and repeale them that be illegal or mischievous and onerous to the subject not only without but against his consent It is lawful for the people submitting themselves to prescribe the King and his successors what Laws they please the Sheriffs of every County were antiently elected by the Freeholders and had power to raise the Militia that the Navy Ammunition Armes and Revenue of the King though they be in his possession are the Kingdoms That Kings and their great Officers Counsellors and Justices were at the first created and elected by the people that the King hath an absolute Negative voice in the passing of Bills of common right and Justice for the publique good that the Parliaments present necessary defensive war is just and lawfull both in point of Law Divinity and Conscience and no Treason or Rebellion the Parliament hath a right and Jurisdiction to impose Taxes and Contributions upon the subjects for defence of the King in case of the King his wilfull absence or Arming against them Seconded by a Book entituled Lex Rex written as believed by one Rutherford a Scottish Divine Printed at London by John Field and published in the year 1644. By the then usurped authority wherein he falsly endeavoured to maintaine against all the grounds and fundamentals of Law and Religion That Kings and their Families have no calling to the Crown but only by the people Royalty is not transmitted from Father to Son if the people may limit the King they give him the power who is the servant of the people both objectively and subjectively and is inferiour unto them who cannot make away their power but do retain the fountain power of making a King that to swear non self preservation and to swear self Murther is all one The King is a Fiduciary Life-Renter not a Lord or Heritor the conscience of the people is immediately subordinate to God not to the King mediatly or immediately the Judges are the immediate Vicars of God not of the King The Parliament hath more power then the King The Crown is the Patrimony of the Kingdom not of him who is King or of his Father The Parliament
represents his Client shall be suffered to make the summons or Citations and to be both Party Judge and Sheriff without an authentication of hand seal or stamp of any Court or their subordinate officers which no Court of Justice Christian or Heathen hath yet adventured to allow be hugely opposit to the rules and maximes as well of the Civil as the Comon Law used for more then one thousand years that nemo privatus Citare potest and bereave the high court of Chancery of those Rights which do truly and justly belong unto it and the Judges of all other the Courts and circuits of England and Wales who by an act of Parliament made in the thirteenth year of the Reign of King E. 1. and by ancient custom long before used are to have their Clericos Irrotulantes sworn and intelligent officers to record and make their writs and process Frustrate the Antiently well approved power of the court of Chancery in their process upon contempts when there shall be as there will always happen to be matters of Equity in cases of Fraud Combinations Hardships or Rigours of Law fit to be releived by the said court and a great deale more then were formerly if the Creditors shall by this new Model of common Law proceedings be let loose to act their own will and furies upon their insolvent or not punctually performing debtors and that high court shall upon contempts or disobedience of its process of Attachments or commissions of Rebellion have no power to punish them by arrest or imprisonment being the only meanes tueri Jurisdictionem to maintain and uphold its Authority and Jurisdictions The hands of Justice and coercive power authority of it will be paralitique manacled less in the laying by of the Sheriffs and their very necessary under Officers by whom the Law received its Execution which is as the life of it and might as well be made use of in the Summons Attachment or Process before Judgment as they are to be afterwards where there are and may be dangers of killing of men if ever there were so many as is informed by how much an execution after Judgment of Body or goods being unbaylable is more terrible and to be avoided by the debtor then that which is baylable and in many cases to be discharged by an appearance only to the action and if the Plantiffs or their servants the Attornies Clarks Constables or Porters must be the Sheriffs or their Bailiffs there may be more danger of resistance killing tumults and commotions then ever there was of Bayliffs and of more extortion and tricks in those that are not sworn then in those that are sworne and bound up by many Statutes and Acts of Parliament and the penalties thereof Or if arrests and the execution of Justice by the Sheriffs and their subordinate officers could be any primary or never failing efficient causes of the slâ—ughters seldom happening upon arrests or that to prevent it there will be any such necessity of laying aside or disuseing that necessary office of Sheriffs in the execution of Justice as well after judgment as before that of the raising the posse comitatus in cases of a forcible resistance of their taking possessions or levying the Kings debts is to be put under the same fate and neither Sheriff or Constable may arrest a felon but obey the like method of Summoning him at his house or Lodging to know if he be willing to be indicted come to his Trial and adventure a Hanging But no well built or grounded reason being likely to be found to support such reasonless and lawless opinions the Adorers of such Imagination may assure their disciples that Elias is to bring the reason and that until then they must expect it and may in the mean time do much better to give them leave to believe that Such a System of Infamy and Cruelty and an unmerciful credit tearing course of summoning publickly by papers left at the debtors Houses or Lodgings or which is worse fastned upon the outward doores which the malitious contrivances or tricks of ill affected or violent Plaintiffs if not prohibited by some severe penalties will too often prompt them unto and in the consequence bring an Inundation of ruins upon this Nation who do now more than half of them live upon credit and are so generally indebted as they will not be much wide or from the Mark who do believe that half the Lands and Estates real and Personal of the Kingdom sold to the utmost will not be enough to pay the debts thereof And by Suing out as it were Commissions of Bankrupt against all the Nation write Lord have mercy upon us upon too many mens doors and now there is so little money left them take a way the Credit that should help to support them Add affliction to affliction to all the Loyal nobility Gentry and Citizens that had impoverished themselves by their Loyalty and taking part with their King and his Laws and the Church of England and leave them to the invisible mercy of those that did help to Rob Plunder and Sequester them Bankrupt and undo most of the Tradesmen and be a meanes to help the over-hasty Creditors to a composition of four Shillings in the Pound or a great deal less when as otherwise with a little patience they might have had their whole debts pay'd unto them and make the unbridled fury of one Creditor to be a cause of the never payment of other Creditors debts When plaintiffs are many times as unreasonable as they are unmerciful insolent and unperswadable where they can either find or keep advantages and that many an Action as well as many a Plaintiff may be Malitious Oppressive Unjust and Vexatious and such a fancied speedy way of geting in debts may be very instrumental for the advance of evil purposes and knavish designs No Inhabitant of Wales where their Laws do already allow them an Iterum summons nor in the Cincque ports or any of the Counties palatine of Chester Lancaster or Durham will be able to borrow any money in London or out of their own Countries upon the best security when that those who shall be imployed to serve the Summons being not the Sheriffs officers may be in danger to be beaten and cannot be outlawed without several Writs of Capias Many Tradesmen do only subsist by their credits and take up great sums of money upon an opinion of their present abilities or future gain by which they do commonly give no other security then their Persons and by the advantages therof do many times by their industry attain unto great Estates but if the process of arrest be taken away they can hope no more to be so easily entrusted for that an Attachment of the person doth secure the plaintiffs debt either by present payment or causing other satisfaction which the proceedings by summons in this manner will never attain unto The fear and disgrace of a Process of
made in the eighth year of her Reign for that many of their malicious minds and without any just cause did procure divers of the Queens Subjects to be Arrested it was enacted that the defendants should recover their costs and damages where the Plaintiffs doe delay discontinue their Suits or be non Suited And by an Act of Parliament made in the one and thirtieth year of her Reign it was for the avoiding of secret outlawries in Actions personal ordained that upon every Writ of exigend awarded against any person three several Proclamations shall be made by the Sheriff of the County or place where such defendant inhabiteth first at the County Court the second at the Quarter Sessions and the third at the Church dore of the Parish where such Person inhabiteth And the like to be done in the County Palatine of Durham where as the Statute saith many men have without knowledge been outlawed to their utter undoings if some speedy remedy be the sooner provided but those misdoings were not not then accompted to be sufficient to bereave a Multitude or far greater number of the people of the good which they received by the process of Utlary By an Act of Parliament made in the three and fortieth year of Her Reign the procurers or makers of any Warrant to Summon Arrest or Attach any Person by his or their Body or Goods to appear in any of her Majesties Courts of Justice not having before an original Writ or Process to warrant the same shall be Imprisoned without Bail or mainprise and not be delivered until he shall have paid 10l to the Partie grieved besides his Costs and Damages and 20l. a peice for their offences to her Majestie her Heirs and Successors By an Act of Parliament made in the 21th year of the Reign of King James the Lands of him which Dieth in Execution shall be Chargeable with the Debt By an Act of Parliament made in the 13th year of his now Majesties reign reciting that by the antient and fundamental Laws of this Realm where any Person is Sued Impleaded or Arrested by any Writ Bill or Proces Issuing out of any his Majesties Courts of Record at Westminster at the Suit of any Common Person the true cause of Action ought to be set forth and particularly expressed It was ordained that where the true cause or certainty of Action is not expressed in any such VVrit Bill or Process the Sheriff shall take no greater Bond for any Defendants Appearance thereunto then of the Penalty of Forty Pounds Which in such a length of time and approbation of many Statutes and Acts of Parliament and of our Judges in Courts of Justice in the awarding and allowance of such kind of Writs and Process which as the Rolls and Records of the Court of Common Pleas in the 17th year of the Reign of Edw. the 2 and of former Kings Reigns do declare were not granted of Course as for the ease of the People they have been in later times by sworn and experienced officers but upon grave and deliberate advice upon Petitions or motions to the Judges and the names sometimes of the Chief Justice and at other times of the particular puisne Judge that granted them mentioned in the latter ends of the Entries thereof might if there had been no Vestigia or track of the necessary Process of Arrest to compel men to appear in Courts of Justice to be found a multis retro seculis ex longissima experientia observata in almost all the foregoing ages and wisdom of the Auntients abundantly serve to recal that humour or desire of novel experiments or imposing or practising upon our Laws and Liberties and conduct those Sons of Innovation to a better obedience and veneration of our Laws rules of right reason and necessity of maintaining the indispensable Antient Legal power and Authority of Justice in the blessings of that which we have already received and may hereafter receive by its due administration if we do not give entertainment unto the wild proposalls of those who in their plenty of Ignorance Obstinacy and Interest would have they know not what And bring upon the Nation and themselves and posterities the many sad effects and consequences it will produce and may give them to understand that having such a small assureance of an Infallibility they may do better to stop the Carrere of their so causeless prejudice against the Process of Capias and Arrest and observe what their Neighbour and other Nations have adjudged to be very necessary and unavoidable in their proceedings in Courts of Justice upon personal Actions Who have not so lost or forsaken the Antient Customes and Pathes of their Fore-Fathers but that the same or very like what is and hath been so long in use amongst us may be seen amongst many of the most civilized of them and was so early in the World as it seemes saith John Oldendorpius to be deduced from the Laws of God and Nature Right reason and necessity By an Edict or Law of Theodorico King or Emperour of the Gothes made in the year of our Lord God 497 Arrests of the Bodies of Defendants were allowed to be made By a Constitution of Charlemaigne whose dominion extended over the greatest part of Europe made about the year of our Lord God 780. the houses of those that with-held their Tythes were to be seized and if they opposed and presumed to enter again of their own authority the Ministers of the Common-wealth were to put them in Custody In the Empire of Germany more especially in famous Mart Towns and Imperial Cities as Frankford upon the Mayn Lipsich Norinberg c. saith John Koppen in Rangensdorff Chief Councellor to the Elector of Brandenburgh Arrests for Debt are frequently made and the Debtors Imprisoned and this saith he a vetustissimis Romanorum legibus originem sumpsit had it's begining from the most Antient Roman Laws a Clark in holy Orders and likely to run away a Debtor that hath no Land or is likely to remove away his Goods is a Prodigal or contumatious refuseth to appear and cannot give Sureties may by the Laws and practice of those Countries Jure Saxonico be Arrested and taken In Poland he that will not or cannot give Bayl to answer the Action is arrested In Russia when any of the officers of the Courts of justice do come to a Defendant if he give not Bayl he is to be detained in Custody In Geneva upon a return or Certificate that the Defendant hath nothing he is arrested The like course of Arrest and compelling of men to appear in Judgment is and hath been long ago practised in the Kingdomes of France Spain Hungary Scotland and in the Dukedom of Savoy and many other Places who do think that they have a great deal of Liberty as the Common-wealths of Venice Holland and the united Provinces the Hanse Towns Switzerland and Genoa
by the Reverend Judges of the Land and Councel in Law of our Kings and Princes before they were passed and ratified and that so many of our Fore-fathers who for so many years and Ages have in every year been arrested or voluntarily put in Bail to appear and avoid it should be so senseless as not to understand the said Act of Parliament of 2â— E. 3. ca. 17. to have been repealed if any such thing had been or deem it to be a grievance to be compelled to appear in a Court of Justice or that all the Plaintiffs in those kind of Actions should be so wicked as to continue that course and kind of Proces If they could have understood it to have been a grievance the Dean and Chapter of Lincoln would not have prescribed for a Liberty in their Court to Arrest in all personal Actions and the Lievtenant of the Tower of London the like nor the Judges have allowed those prescriptions and all Cities Burroughs and Corporations where they have connusance of Pleas would not upon a nihil habet returned for that is so alwayes done of course in Cities and Corporations to warrant their Arrests have claimed and exercised a power to Arrest as well Inhabitants as Forreigners coming thither or that the Judges of the Admiralty in Sea-faring and Maritime Causes would have permitted as they have anciently done Arrests to be made upon Debts Contracts Charter parties or the like or have been allowed to do it if it had deserved to have been called a grievance or that it ought not to have been done by the aforesaid supposed Acts of Repeal And that none of so many thousand or more then ten hundred thousand Defendants should by Pleas Demurrers or otherwise signifie so much or so many Advocates and so many learned Judges Serjeants and Sages of the Law which have been since the making of that Statute of 25 E. 3. for the giving of Proces of Outlawry in Actions of Debt should not of themselves have found out or have sought it from our Kings and their Parliaments some remedies or would not have forborn the granting or acting by such kind of Process if they had conceived that the Act of Parliament of 25 E. 3. ca. 17. had been replealed or that such kind of Process had been a grievance And that more then one hundred thirty and seven Parliaments which have been since the making of that Statute And so many Parliaments and Assemblies of Wise Men before and at the making of that Statute which met only to be wise and find out fit helps and remedies for grievances and things amiss should not foresee it to be a grievance or be so careless as not after to procure some Law or Act of Parliament to give the People ease in it or a fuller notice of the repeal thereof When in the Parliament of the 38th year of the Reign of King Edward 3. the Commons did pray that the King would not grant Protections whereby Men could not recover their Debts which was as they alledged A thing to the destruction of the People and against Common right Or that in so many Petitions in all those so many Parliaments for the redress of Grievances made and committed by Sheriffs Under-Sheriffs and their Bailiffs and that all Estates might enjoy their Liberties if no Law be to the contrary saving to all Men their rights and the justly denyed Petitions against the payment of Fines upon original Writs issuing out of the Chancery nor in that of the Commons in Parliament in the 46th year of the Reign of that King that Writs of Trespas in the Court of Common Pleas although long before then used might be made as well by that Court as by the Court of King Bench for that the Court of Kings Bench was removeable at the Kings pleasure and that the Great Charter and the Charter of the Forrest and all other Statutes made by the King and his Progenitors for the amendment of the Realm and tranquillity and ease of his People might be kept and duly put in Execution in all points Or in the Petitions of the Commons of the County of Kent to that King in the Parliament in the 50th year of his Reign against his Officers of the Castle of Dover for arresting by their Catchpoles out of their Jurisdiction or in the before mentioned great Complaint of the Clergy made in Parliament upon the death of Robert de Hauley in the 2d year of the Reign of King Richard the 2d slain at the High Altar in the Church of Westminster Abby when he being arrested and pursued by Bailiffs had taken Sanctuary there and the great debate thereupon before the King or at the making of the Act of Parliament in the Seventh year of the Reign of King Henry the Fourth that impotent persons outlawed might make their Attorneys and the Acts of Parliament made in the 10th and 18th years of the Reign of Henry the 6th upon complaints That Men were outlawed and could not know where to find either the Plaintiffs or their Attorneys and remedies ordained Or in the Petition in the Parliament in the 33th year of the Reign of King Henry the Sixth against the multitude of Attorneys in the City of Norwich and Counties of Norfolk and Suffolk for their inciting and stirring up the People to suites in Law there should be no mention of that supposed grievance by the Writs of Capias and Proces of Outlawry if it had then been thought or believed to have been one And that in the thirty times petitioning in several Parliaments of our Kings and Princes for the Confirmation of Magna Carta which as to that part of it in the Chapter or Article twenty-nine is the most excellent and the best of all our Laws The People of England should not understand the aforesaid Act of Parliament made in the 25th year of the Reign of King Edward the 3. for giving Proces of Arrest and exigent in Actions of Debts and other Actions therein mentioned if it could be interpreted to be any violation of it or that in all their Petitions for redress of grievances and procuring of good Laws to be made there appears nothing at all to have been alledged That by the Common Law the Person of a Debtor was not arrestable or that there is no positive Statute Law in force for the continuing of the Capias and Exigent against Persons in Debt and meerly Civil causes since the fancied repeal of the said Act of Parliament of 25 E. 3. ca. 17. by the said Statute of 28 and 42 E. 3. But they who are so loath to part with their causeless affrights or are so unwilling to loose the content of being the Founders of a change or alteration in the Body politique be it never so dangerous or of most certain evil consequences and are willing enough that their Fellow Subjects of whom they pretend to take so much care should
a magis and minus and variatioe of Circumstances in such kind of Offences which may either lessen or heighten them Nor do those Rules which are given by Bracton for the reason of Arrests or Restraints of liberty in personal Actions before judgment that a Habeas Corpus which amounteth in effect to a Capias or Restraint of the person or his liberty is presently to be granted propter privilegium eruce signatorum mercatorum in respect or favour of those that were to go to the Holy War or were Merchants or propter causam sive necessitatem for some urgent cause or necessity of dispatch or in Trespas propter atrecitatem injuriae the horridness or evil of the Offence or propter personam contra quem injuriatum est ut si injuriatus sit Domino Regi vel Reginae vel eorum liberis vel Fratribus vel Sororibus vel eorum Parentibus Propinquis in respect of the Person against whom the wrong is done as the King Queen their Children Brothers Sisters or their Parents or Kindred come up to the Rules of Justice for urgency of Affairs necessities or occesions considerations or respect of Persons can of themselves be no cause of making Justice which is not to be a respecter of Persons to be Eccentrick or go a step out of her way or to do any thing in one case which should not or ought not to be done in other Cases having the like ground of reason and justice attended with the same circumstances neither can atrocitas facti vel injuriae the grandeur and oughliness of the offence be the sole cause or ground of Arrest in common or petty actions of Trespas or for words if there could properly be any atrocitas or hainousness in them or where it is done involuntarily as in Cases of Trespass or damage done by a mans Cattle for Trespass may be greater or lesser and if every Trespass could be understood to be of the greater size or magnitnde and so horrid and enormous yet there can be no reason to make the Caption or Arrest to be in part of Corporal punishment before the Judge or Magistrate be ascertained of the guilt of the Party or instructed how to keep the order which the Laws of God Nature and Nations and our Magna Carta have enjoyned that is to say to punish only secundum quantitatem delicti according to the nature of the offence And that supposed ground or reason given by Sir Edward Coke will be as deficient that the Common Law of England abhorring all force as the capital Enemy to it subjects the body to imprisonment until it hath made agreement with the Party and fined to the King bring any better reason with it For if the King shall as he conceiveth punish force by a Capias to Arrest the body before the party be permitted to defend him-or a Tryal had by Jury whether he be guilty or not that would be more against Magna Carta then any Process of Capias or Arrest in Debt can be dreamed or fancied to be and a Capias pro fine after a Tryal and finding guilty will either shew that it was not the arresting of the body in Trespass which was intended or inflicted for the punishment but the Capias pro fine and if both the Capias in Trespass before Judgement and the Capias pro fine after Judgement should be inflicted for one and the same offence They would not be secundum modum sive quantitatem delicti proportionate to the offence and the Capias to Arrest would be before the King or his Courts of Justice could be ascertained that there was an offence Nor will that other cause or ground given by him in the Report of the said Sir William Herberts Case that the King may by the Common Law arrest the body of the Debtor for that Thesaurus Regis est vinoulum bellorum nervus The Money and Treasure of the King is the Bond of Peace and Sinuwes of War obtain the conclusion which he aims at For that were to make a King or supream Magistrate which ought to be Lex viva and Justice it self to destroy that which he was sworn to protect and give him licence to break Laws who is not in ordinary Cases against the Rules of Justice and right reason to give such a liberty to himself or any others or to do an act for an advantage or necessity which the even and adequate Rules of Justice common right or right reason cannot allow So as by the favour of so great an authoâ—â—ty in our Laws as Sir Edward Coke is and with as much reverence as is or can be due to so great a lover of the Laws of England and the veneration which he justly merits I must of necessity by what appears in the Cabinet and Treasury of time and Antiquity and what is clearly to be perceived in those pure streams which the Fountains of Justice and right reason have imparted unto Mankind assert what I have done and conclude that he was a man and hath as the best Authors may in their Books sometimes do which are not Scripture and Canonical erred in averring that there was no Process of arresting the body of a Debtor either before or after judgment until the Statute of 25 Ed. 3. which gave Process of Outlawry in Actions of Debt When in allowing Process of Arrest in debt in the Kings Case as he doth in Actions of Trespass he must acknowledge the same reason and necessity which is a just and rational coertion to appear before the Tribunals of Justice and of caution to be given to abide their judgments to be in Actions of Debt and other personal Actions And he himself in many of his Books and Writings hath as well as the Civil Law and our Common Law and the Law of Nations affirmed that the same Reason may claim the like Law For the reason that Joseph would have imprisoned his Brethren upon a suspition that they were come to espie the Land and kept Simeon a Prisoner until their words and denials were proved gives us the reason necessity and justice of arresting in personal Actions and Debt as well as Trespass until cause or caution be given of appearing in Courts of Justice and performing the judgments And that learned Judge could if he were now living very well remember that he hath often said as well as found that many of our Acts of Parliament are but declaratory of the Common Law and that which was long before used and understood to be as it was reasonable That the matter or thing excepted in an Act of Parliament is not included in any purvieu or provision of it but is out of the reach and gun-shot thereof and that when in the Statute of Magna Carta made in 9 H. 3. ca. 29. it is said That no Freeman shall be taken and imprisoned or be disseised of his Freehold or Liberties or free Customes or be outlawed or exiled