disturb the House shall pay the like Forfeiture And it is further ordered that the Business then in Agitation being ended no new Motion of any new Matters shall be made without leave of the House 5 Dec. 1640. Id. 84. Ordered that no Bills have their second Reading but between Nine and Twelve 10 Dec. 1640. Id. 92. Declared for a constant Rule that those that give their Votes for the Preservation of the Orders of the House shou'd stay in and those that give their Votes otherwise to the introducing of any new Matter or any Alteration should go out 8 Sept. 1641. Id. 392. See how far an Order of this House is binding In March 1627. Rush Coll. vol. 1.513 Resolved that is the ancient and undubitable Right of every Freeman that he hath a full and absolute Property in his Goods and Estate that no Tax Tallage Loan Benevolences or other like Charge ought to be commanded or levied by the King or any of his Ministers without common Consent by Act of Parliament March 1627. Id. 513. Resolved that no Freeman ought to be detained or kept in Prison or otherwise restrained by the Command of the King or Privy-Council or any other unless some Cause of the Commitment Detainer or Restraint be expressed for which by Law he ought to be committed detained or restrained Resolv'd Id. 513. that the Writ of HabeasCorpus may not be Detain'd Deny'd but ought to be granted to every Man that is committed or detained in Prison or otherwise restrained tho' it be by the Command of the King the Privy-Council or any other he praying the same Resolved that if a Freeman be committed or detained in Prison or otherwise restrained by Command of the King the Privy-Council or any other no Cause of such Commitment Detainer or Restraint being expressed for which by Law he ought to be committed detained or restrained and the same be returned upon a Habeas Corpus granted for the said Party then he ought to be delivered or bailed 2 April 1628. Resolved Id. 523. that no Freeman ought to be confined by any Command from the King or Privy-Council or any other unless it be by Act of Parliament or by other due Course or Warrant of Law King James I. having in 1621. Rapin Vol. 2. No. 54. p. 208.209 for some Words spoken by him in the House it occasioned a Remonstrance of the Commons to the King therein complaining of Breach of Privilege and asserting their Liberty of Speech and Debate to be their antient and undoubted Right and Inheritance receiv'd from their Ancestors c. This they sent to the King by twelve Members at the Head of whom they affectedly set Sir R. Weston a Privy-Counsellor one whom they conceiv'd had incens'd the K. against them who were receiv'd very roughly and their Remonstrance rejected But some Days after the K. sends 'em a long Answer in Writing wherein towards the Conclusion he objects against the stiling their Privileges Id. p. 211. their antient and undoubted Right and Inheritance and wishes they had said i. e. commands 'em to acknowledge that their Privileges were derived from the Grace and Permission of him and his Ancestors The House on reading this Answer plainly perceiv'd the King's Aims The Commons Protestation in Vindication of their Privileges Ibid. p. 211. 212. c. and knowing the Parl. was going to be prorogued or dissolv'd drew up a Protestation in Order to vindicate their Privileges viz. The Commons now assembled in Parl. being justly occasion'd thereunto concerning sundry Liberties Franchises and Privileges of Parliament amongst others here mentioned do make this Protestation following That the Liberties Franchises Privileges and Jurisdiction of Parliament are the antient and undoubted Birth-right and Inheritance of the Subjects of England and that the arduous and urgent Affairs concerning the King the State and the Defence of the Realm and of the Church of England and the Maintenance and making of Laws and Redress of Mischiefs and Grievances which happen daily within this Realm are proper Subjects and Matter of Counsel and Debate in Parliament And that in the handling debating and proceeding in those Businesses every Member of the House of Parliament hath and of Right ought to have Freedom of Speech to propound treat reason and bring to Conclusion the same and that the Commons in Parliament have like Liberty and Freedom to treat of these Matters in such Order as in their Judgment shall seem fittest See of the Terms Parliament and Prerogative Id. p. 213. and that every Member of the said House hath like Freedom from all Impeachment Imprisonment and Molestation other than by Censure of the House it self for or concerning any speaking reasoning or declaring of any Matter or Matters touching the Parliament or Parliament-Business and that if any of the Members be complained of and questioned for any Thing said or done in Parliament the same is to be shewed to the King by the Advice and Assent of the Commons assembled in Parliament before the King give Credence to any private Information But the K. being inform'd of this Protestation call'd a Council and sending for the Commons Journal in Presence of the Judges c. with his own Hands tore it out of the Journal and in a few Days after dissolved the Parliament but this did not deter the Commons from insisting on their Claim And in his Son's Reign it was asserted with a Witness and is now confirm'd by the Claim of Right and other Statutes Mar. 12. 1700. the House Journal Dom. Com. on a Report of that Part of the K's Speech which related to the Hanover Succession agreed with the Committee in these Resolves viz. 1. That all Things relating to the well governing of this Kingdom which are properly cognizable in the P. Council shall be transacted there and all Resolutions taken thereupon shall be sign'd by the P. C. 2. That no Person whatsoever that is not a Native of England Scotland or Ireland or of the Dominions thereunto belonging or who is not born of English Parents beyond the Seas altho such Person be naturaliz'd or made a Denizen shall be capable to be of the P. C. or a Member of either H. of P. or to enjoy any Office of Place or Trust either Civil or Military P. Council 3. That no such Person c. shall be capable of any Grant of Lands Tenements or Hereditaments from the Crown to himself or any other in Trust for him 4. That upon the further Limitation of the Crown in Case the same shall come to any Person not being a Native of this Kingdom of England this Nation be not oblig'd to engage in any War for the Defence of any Dominions or Territories not belonging to the Crown of England without the Consent of Parliament 5. That whoever shall hereafter come to the Possession of this Crown shall join in Communion with the Church by Law establish'd 6. That no Pardon shall be pleaded to any Impeachment in Parliament 7. That
and heard the better of all the Clerks of the House sit before him in a lower Seat who read Bills Petitions c. The Speaker's Office is when a Bill is read Modus tenend Parl. 37. Smith 's Common-wealth 86. Hakewel 138 139. Sir Simon d'Ewes Jour 43.44 as briefly as he may to declare the Effects thereof to the House That Day that the Speaker being approved by the King cometh down into the Commons House to take his Place the Custom is to read for that time only one Bill lest unpast the last Sessions and no more This is done to give him Seisin were as it of his Place 1 Jac. 1. Scobel 19. Sir Edward Philips was chosen Speaker and the same Day before he was presented to the King he signed a Warrant as Speaker Note by Command of the House for Election of another Person in the Place of Sir Francis Bacon being chosen in two Places A general Order hath usually been made in the Beginning of the Session Id. 20. to authorize the Speaker to give Warrants for new Writs in Case of Death of any Member or of double Returns where the Party makes his Choice openly in the House during that Session Where such general Order is not made Ibid. Writs have issued by Warrant of the Speaker by Vertue of special Order upon Motion in the House Oftentimes on the first Day of the Meeting of the House Scobel 18. as soon as the Meeting of the House as soon as the Speaker hath been approv'd and sometime before such Persons as have been doubly return'd have made their Choice 43 Eliz. Mr. Johnson said Towns 191.192 The Speaker may ex Officio send a Warrant to the Clerk of the Crown who is to certifie the Lord Keeper and so make a new Warrant The Speaker said Ibid. Sir Simon d'Ewes Jour 627. Col. 2. That I may inform you of the Order of the House the Warrant must go from the Speaker to the Clerk of the Crown who is to inform the Lord Keeper and then to make a new Writ This Proposition I hold Ibid. Vide Sir S. d'Ewes Jour 627. Col. 2. That our Speaker is to be commanded by none neither to attend any but the Queen per Sir Edward Hobby The Warrant is to be directed to the Clerk of the Crown in Chancery Scobel 20. Vid. Tow. Col. 216.217 Vide Sir S. d'Ewes Jour passim Scobel 65. Petyr 's Misâ—ell Parl. 140. by Order of Parliament 13 Novemb. 1601. May 1604. Resolved That no Speaker from henceforth shall deliver a Bill of which the House is possessed to any whosoever without Leave and Allowance of the House but a Copy only It is no Possession of a Bill except the same be delivered to the Clerk to be read or that the Speaker read the Title of it in the Chair 5 Car. 11. 1628. Râ—b Col. 66â— The Speaker being moved to put the Question then proposed by the House he refused to do it and said That he was otherwise commanded from the King 2 Martij The Speaker was urged to put the Question who said See Sâ—â—dens Lise I have a Command from the King to adjourn till the Tenth of March and to put no Question and endeavouring to go out of the Chair was notwithstanding held by some Members the House foreseeing a Dissolution till a Protestation was publish'd When the Queen made an Answer to the Speaker's Speech Towns Col. 263. Vide Sir S. d'Ewes Jour 6â—â— Col. 1.2 Towns Col. 61. he with the whole House sell upon their Knees and so continued till she bid them stand up 35 Eliz. Mr. Speaker was sent for to the Court where the Queens Majesty her self gave him Commandment what to deliver to the House The Speaker was commanded upon his Allegiance not to read any Bills touching Matters of State or Reformation in Causes Ecclesiastical Id. 63. 16 Car. 1. 1640. Apr. 16. Rush Col. 1127. The Speaker received Command from the King That His Majesties Speech shou'd be entred in the Journal of the Commons House of Parliament Whereupon the House passed a declarative Vote That they did not expect that this shou'd be performed by other Speakers but upon the like special Command or by the Order of the House Eodem Die Resolved Id. 1137. That it was a Breach of Priviledge of the House for the Speaker not to obey the Commands of the House and that it appeared the Speaker did adjourn the House by the Command of the King without the Consent of the House which is also a Breach of the Priviledge it was therefore ordered that this should be presented to His Majesty 1 Jac. 1. 1603. Ordered Scobel 65. Petyt 's Miscol Parl. 140. That it shou'd be precisely registred as the Judgment of the House that no Speaker from henceforth shou'd deliver a Bill whereof the House stands possessed to any whomsoever without Allowance and Leave But that he had Power and might either shew it or deliver a Copy if it seems meet to him But yet it was admitted Id. 142. that a Copy may be delivered or it may be shewed to His Majesty If upon Division of the House Hakewel 145. it appear that the Members are equal the Speaker hath always the casting Voice upon all Questions 44 Eliz. upon the Question Towns 321.322 Vide Sir S. d'Ewes Jour 683. Col. 2. Whether Mr. Speaker had a Voice It was said by Sir Walter Raleigh and confirmed by the Speaker himself That the Speaker is foreclosed of his Voice by taking of that Place which it had pleased them to impose upon him and that he was to be indifferent to both Parties He was seconded by Mr. Secretary Cecil The Speaker hath no Voice in the House Arc. Parl. 18. Smyth 's Common-wealth 86. Rush Col. 3. p. v. 1. p. 35. nor will they suffer him to speak in any Bill to move or disswade it It was resolved by Vote in the last Parliament says Mr. Harbottle Grimston in his Speech Nov. 9. 1640. That the Speaker refusing to put the Question being thereunto requir'd by the House or to adjourn the House upon any Command whatsoever without the Consent and Approbation of the House it self were Breaches and Violations that highly impeached our Priviledges Ordered Id. p. 42. That Mr. Speaker be intreated to be here this Afternoon viz. 10 Nov. 1640. to sit by at the great Committee of Irish Affairs and if there be Cause to resume the Chair Nov. 20. 1640. Id. p. 53. This Day the House ordered the Speaker should sit in the Afternoon Note The Speaker is said to be not only the Mouth but the Eyes and Ears of the House And hence it was That when King Charles I. commanded the Speaker on his allegiance to discover certain Transactions c. in the House he justly reply'd That he had neither Eyes to See Ears to Hear nor Mouth to Speak but as the House shall direct him See also several Letters Messages c. of that Prince to and by the
agreed That regularly he cannot be compelled out of Parliament to answer Things done in Parliament in a Parliamentary Course but it is otherwise where Things are done exorbitantly for those are not the Acts of the Court. No Privilege is allowable in Case of the Peace betwixt private Men 2 Nalson 450. much more in Case of the Peace of the Kingdom Privilege cannot be pleaded against an Indictment for any Thing done out of Parliament Ibid. because all Indictments are contra Pacem Domini Regis Privilege of Parliament is granted in regard of the Service of the Commonwealth Ibid. and is not to be used to the Danger of the Commonwealth All Privilege of Parliament is in the Power of Parliament Ibid. and is a Restraint to the Proceedings of other inferior Courts but is no Restraint to the Proceedings of Parliament 16 Car. 1 Resolved Rush 2 vol. 2d Part. 1147. That the Lords voting the propounding and declaring Matter of Supply before it was moved in the House of Commons was a Breach of Privilege of the House Dec. 1641. Resolved 2 Nalson 729. That the setting of any Guards about this House without the Consent of the House is a Breach of the Privilege of this House and that therefore such Guards ought to be dismissed Resolved upon the Question Id. 743. Nemine Contradicente That the Privileges of Parliament were broken by his Majesty's taking Notice of the Bill for suppressing of Soldiers being in agitation in both Houses and not agreed on Resolved upon the Question Ibid. Nemine Contradicente That his Majesty in propounding a Limitation and provisional Clause to be added to the Bill before it was presented to him by the Consent of both Houses was a Breach of the Privilege of Parliament Resolved upon the Question Ibid. Nem. Con. That his Majesty expressing his Displeasure against some Persons for Matters moved in the Parliament during the Debate and Preparation of that Bill was a Breach of the Privilege of Parliament Whereas his Majesty 2 Nalson 823. in his Royal Person the 4th of Jan. 1641. did come to the House of Commons with a great Multitude of Men armed in a warlike Manner with Halberts Swords and Pistols who came up to the very Door of the House and placed themselves there and in other Places and Passages near to the House to the great Terror and Disturbance of the Members then there sitting and according to their Duty in a peaceable and orderly Manner treating of the great Affairs of both Kingdoms of England and Ireland and his Majesty having placed himself in the Speaker's Chair did demand the Persons of divers Members of the House to be delivered unto him It was thereupon declared by the House of Commons Ibid. That the same is a high Breach of the Rights and Privileges of Parliament and inconsistent with the Liberty and Freedom thereof and therefore the House doth conceive they could not with Safety of their own Presons or the Indemnities of the Rights and Privileges of Parliament sit there any longer without a full Vindication of so high a Breach of Privilege and a sufficient Guard wherein they might confide The Lords cannot proceed against a Commoner Sleden's Jud. p. 84. but upon a Complaint of the Commons But Note as to Freedom from Suits and Arrests Stat. 12 13. Wil. 111. that in the Parliament of 12 13 William the Third an Act passed entitled An Act for preventing any Inconveniencies that may happen by Privilege of Parliament Which enacts Sect. I. That any Person may prosecute any Peer of this Realm or Lord of Parliament or any of the Knights Citizens and Burgess of the House of Commons for the Time being or their or any of their menial or other Servants or any other Person entitled to the Privilege of Parliament in any of the Courts of Record at Westminster or high Court of Chancery or Court of Exchequer or the Dutchy Court of Lancaster and in the Court of Admiralty and in all Causes Matrimonal and Testamentary in the Court of Arches the Prerogative Courts of Canterbury and York and the Delegates and in all Courts of Appeal from and after the Dissolution or Prorogation of any Parliament until a new Parliament shall meet or the same be reassembled And from and after any Adjournment of both Houses for above fourteen Days until both Houses shall meet or reassemble And that the said Courts respectively shall and may after such Dissolution Prorogation or Adjournment proceed to give Judgment and make final Orders Decrees and Sentences and award Execution thereon any Privilege of Parliament to the contrary notwithstanding Sect. II. Provides against subjecting the Person of any Knight Citizen or Burgess or any other intitled to the Privilege of Parliament to be arrested during the Time of Privilege Nevertheless allowing the Liberty that any Person having Cause Action or Complaint against any Peer of the Realm or Lord of Parliament so that after any Dissolution Prorogation or Adjournment as aforesaid or and before any Session of Parliament or Meeting of both Houses as aforesaid shall and may have such Process out of the Courts of King's Bench Common Pleas and Exchequer against such Peer or Lord of Parliament as he might have had against him out of the Time of Privilege And if any Person having Cause of Action against any of the said Knights Citizens or Burgesses or any other intitled to Privilege after any such Dissolution Prorogation or Adjournment or before any such Sessions or Meeting of both Houses ut supra he shall and may prosecute such Knight Citizen or Burgess or other such privileged Person in the said Courts of King's Bench Common Pleas or Exchequer by original Bill and Summons Attachment and Distress infinite out of the same Courts who are respectively impower'd to issue the same against him or them until the Defendant shall enter a Common Appearance or file Common Bail to the Action according to the Course of each Court. And that any Person having Cause of Suit or Complaint may in the Time aforesaid exhibit any Bill of Complaint against any Peer of the Realm or Lord of Parliament or against any Knight Citizen or Burgess or other Person so intitled to Privilege in the Chancery Exchequer or Dutchy Court and proceed thereon by Letter or Subpoena as usual And upon leaving a Copy of the Bill with the Defendant or at his House or Lodging or last Place of Abode may proceed thereon and for Want of an Appearance or Answer or for Non-Performance of any Order or Decree or for Breach thereof may sequester the real or personal Estate of the Party as is used and practised where the Defendant is a Peer of the Realm but shall not arrest or imprison the Body of any of the said Knights Citizens or Burgesses or other privileged Person during the Continuance of Privilege of Parliament Sect. III. That where any Person by reason of Privilege of Parliament is stayed or prevented from prosecuting any Suit
the King might refuse the Return of him and for that Cause he was removable out of the House And therefore the Lord Chief Justice said That in the 35th of Henry the Sixth it was so adjudged in Parliament which answers the Precedents vouched by the Commons of that Time And also he said That in the first Year of Henry the Seventh it was adjudged in Parliament That Persons outlawed or attainted could not sit in Parliament without Restitution by Act of Parliament And he said That though the Books do not warrant his Saying yet the Parliament Roll which he had seen does warrant it which any Man might see 3. They resolved at the Instance of the King himself That the Party could not be discharged from the Outlawry without a Scire Facias sued against the Party Creditor Plantiff in Debt and Justice Windam for that Purpose recanting his former Opinion said That he upon perusing of his Books and by Reasons of the Law was of Opinion with his Companions 4. As for the Statute of the 31st of the Queen concerning Proclamation to be made in the County c. they all resolved as before Times it had been resolved That no Outlawry by that Statute was void until a Judgment declaring That there was no Proclamation issued forth to the County where the Party was Resiant at the Time of the awarding of the Exigent 5. As for the Statute of 7 Hen. 4. which enacts That the Indenture shall be only the Return of the Sheriff the Judges said That was true that such was the Statute and that that was his Return for so much but that Statute doth not restrain the Sheriff from returning any other Thing material which disables the Parties chosen 6. It was held That the Indorsement of the Writ comprehending the Matter of the Outlawry was material and not a Nugation 7. And lastly they resolved That by the Return of the Sheriff it apeared that Sir Francis Goodwyn was the same Person who was outlawed 31 Eliz. by the Name of Francis Goodwyn Esquire and 39 Eliz. by the Name of Francis Goodwyn Gentleman and that by the Words of the Return scilicet Idem Franciscus Goodwyn Miles Vtlagatus existit c. And they also agreed That no Person outlawed ought to have his Privilege of the Parliament-House and that all the Precedents vouched by the Commons were after the Parties were Members of the House and not before they were returned But notwithstanding these Resolutions scilicet the Resolution of the Judges the Commons House hold clearly That Sir Francis Goodwyn was well received into Parliament and the King commanded them to confer together and resolve if they could of themselves and if they could not resolve to confer with the Judges and then to resolve and when they were resolved then to deliver their Resolution to his Council not as Parliament-Men but as his Privy Council by whose Hands he would receive the Resolution and for that Purpose he left them behind him he himself being to ride to Royston a hunting And to pursue the Commandment of the King the Commons House clearly resolved That what they had done was well and duly done and they were of Opinion clearly against the Judges as to the Matter of the Outlawry and that Ratione of the Precedents And also that the Parliament only had to do with the Sheriff's Returns of Members of Parliament and that the Returns ought not to be made till the first Day of the Parliament and therefore They would not confer with the Judges But they appointed a Committee to consider of the Reasons to be delivered to the Council for the Satisfaction of the King which Committee by the Assent of all the House of Commons sent to the Lords this Resolution following videlicet As to what the King taxed the House for That they meddled with the Sheriff's Return of Members of Parliament being but one half of the Body the Lords being one and the principal Part of the Parliament's Body Note This Resolution was writen in Parchment and so delivered to the Council of the King not as Parliament-Men but representing the King's Person and a Copy thereof was kept in the House As to that they answered That all Writs for the Election of Members of Parliament were returned into the Parliament-House before 7 Hen. 4. at which Time it was enacted That all such Returns ought to be made in Chancery and that appeared by the Records from the Time of Edward the First until the said Year of the Seventh of Henry the Fourth And therefore the Parliament must of Necessity have only meddled with the Returns till the making of the said Statute of the Seventh of Henry the Fourth at which Time the Place of the Return was altered and enacted to be in Chancery but yet that did not take away the Jurisdiction of the Parliament to meddle with the Returns of the Members of Parliament but that remained as it was before And this was manifest as well by Reason as by Use For that Court is to meddle with Returns where the Appearance and Service of Members is to be made and used but in the Parliament only the Appearance and Service are to be made and used and therefore in the Parliament only are the Returns to be examined and censured Likewise ever since the making of the said Statute of the Seventh of Henry the Fourth the Clerk of the Crown attends the Parliament every Day till the End of it with all the Writs and Returns and at the End of the Parliament he brings them into the Petty-Bag The Precedents also do warrant this intermeddling with Returns for the Parliament as in the Twenty-ninth of the Queen a Writ issued forth to the Sheriff of who made a Return before the Day into Chancery and the Chancellor upon that Return containing such Matter as this Writ now contains sent a second Writ to the said Sheriff who thereupon made a new Election and that second Writ was also returned and both the Writs and Returns brought into Parliament and there censured by the Parliament That the first should stand and that the second Election was void and that the Chancellor hath no Power to award a second Writ nor to meddle with the Return of it and divers other Precedents were shewn by the Commons to the same Effect videlicet In the Nine and twentieth of Queen Elizabeth one And in the Three and fortieth of Queen Elizabeth another And in the Thirty fifth of the Queen two Whereof one was upon the Return of the Sheriff that the Party first elected was Lunatick and thereupon the Parliament examined it and upon Examination thereof they found the Return true and gave a Warrant for another Writ As to the Matter That they were but one half of the Body to that they said That though in the making of Laws they were but an half Body yet as to Censuring of Privileges Customs Orders and Returns of their House they were an entire
received no little Advantage from a Manuscript of that judicious and learned Judge the late Mr. Justice Price who having been many Years a Member of the House of Commons had made divers curious historical Collections with several Notes and References relating to the Subject Matter hereof And in this Edition the Reader may find collected from authentick Records and Histories all that is necessary to be known touching the Rights and Privileges of Parliaments and in a great Measure the legal Prerogatives of the Prince and just Liberties of the People The CONTENTS CHAP. I. Of Parliaments in general Shewing their Antiquity Names Natures Kinds and Qualities British Saxon c. Ordinarily annual and without Summons Extraordinary on Summons pro arduis c. Of the three Estates Bishops no essential Part excluded elected created by Patent Commons ever represented and how Their Right to a Free Election of all Magistrates c. and Consent to all Aids and Taxes This Right invaded by the Norman Kings William I. and II. Reslored by Henry I. Of English Parliaments in his Time who the Magnates and Barones Regni then were Of Coronation Oaths c. Page 1. CHAP. II. Of the Dignity and Excellency of Parliaments The Supream Power of the Kingdom and when Free Protectors of the People's Rights and Preservers of the legal Government and Constitution Of the three Estates and to what End assembled Lords and Commons anciently sate together The highest Court of Justice c. Page 49. CHAP. III. Of the Power and Authority of Parliaments superior to the Law may judge the Greatest remove evil Ministers redress Grievances of all Kinds Their three Powers viz. Consultive Legislative and Judicial their absolute Power over all Persons c. Page 66. CHAP. IV. and V. Of the Power Authority and Jurisdiction of the House of Peers distinct from the Commons Page 90 101. CHAP. VI. and VII Of the seperate Powers and Authorities of the House of Commons both in general and in particular Cases Page 109 114. CHAP. VIII Shews their Power over their own Members and how executed c. Page 136. CHAP. IX Treats of the Election of Members of the House of Commons in general and of the several Statutes relating thereto Page 149. CHAP. X. Shews who may be Electors and theâ—r Rights Duties and Manner of Election with the Statutes and Oaths referring thereto Page 156. CHAP. XI Who may be elected their Qualifications and Duties c. with such Statutes Oaths c. as concern the same Page 180. CHAP. XII Of the Returns to Parliament and of Amendments of Returns the Sheriffs and other Officers Duty therein with such Statutes and Oaths as relate thereto Page 226 CHAP. XIII and XIV Of the Manner of Election of the Speaker of the House of Commons and of the Business and Duty of the said Speaker Page 263 272. CHAP. XV. and XVI Of Orders to be observed in and by the House of Commons or the Members thereof Page 278 285. CHAP. XVII Of the Manner of passing Bills c. in the said House Page 306. CHAP. XVIII XIX and XX. Concerning Committees in general as also of the Orders Powers and Proceedings of Grand Committees and of Standing Committees c. Page 327 336 341 CHAP. XXI Of Sessions of Parliament what makes a Session as also of Prorogations and Adjournments Page 347 Note CHAP. XXII Of the proper Laws and Customs of Parliament and of Acts and Ordinances Page 358. CHAP. XXIII Of the Privilege of Parliament with the Statutes for regulating it c. Page 379. The APPENDIX being the Case of Sir Francis Goodwyn admitted a Member though returned outlawed c. Concluding with divers additional Pariculars relating to the Privileges and Duties of Parliaments Page 415. Lex Parliamentaria OR A TREATISE OF THE LAW and CUSTOM OF THE PARLIAMENT of England c. CHAP. I. Of Parliaments in General their Definition constituent Parts c. with a brief Inquiry into the Original and Nature of our British Saxon and Norman Parliaments THE Word Parliament Minshew in verbo Parlamt in French Parlement and in Spanish and Italian Parliamento is Spelm. Gloss verbo Debate See Coke on Littl. p. 110.164 in its principal Part deriv'd from the French Parler to speak and as Lord Coke and some Others conceive The General Council or National Assembly of this Kingdom is so call'd Spelm. Gloss in verbo Parlament Hales of Parliaments 122. Elsing of Parliaments 167. 4 Inst 8. Bohun's Collection 353. because every Member thereof should in the Matters there debated Parler la Mente i. e. Freely speak his Mind And tho some Authors have oppugned this Derivation yet tis evident from the very Nature and Essence of a Parliament That every Member thereof ought to speak his Mind freely in what relates to the Publick Welfare And this Freedom of Speech is now constantly claimed by the Speaker of the House of Commons at the first Meeting of every New Parliament and in insisted on as a Claim of Right The Word Parlament is in France now taken for one of those High Courts of Justice in that Kingdom Minshew ut supra See Vincent Lupanus lib. 2 c. Parliament No. 28. wherein Men's Causes and Differences are publickly heard and determined without further appeal Of these Parliaments there are Seven viz. 1. Paris now superiour to the Rest 2. Vide Du Haillan Pasquier c. of the Fr. Parlements Tholouse 3. Grenoble 4. Aix 5. Bourdeaux 6. Dijon 7. Roan whereto some add an 8th viz. Rhenes in Bretaigne But with us in England or rather Great Britain The universal Assembly of all the Estates of the Kingdom i. e. The King Sir Tho. Smith De Repub. Angl. lib. 2. c. 1.2 Lords and Commons wherein every Freeman of the Kingdom is said to be present either in Person or by Representation and who are met together for debating of Matters touching the Commonwealth especially for the enacting of Laws and Statutes is properly called a Parliament Cro. Jur. f. 1. c. Cambd. Brit. 6. c. 4 Inst 1. and such Laws and Statutes when agreed on are significantly term'd Acts of Parliament Indeed various Authors Of the three Estates viz. 1. King Cotton's Records 709.710 4 Inst 1. Hales of Parliaments 1. Finch's Nemotecnia lib. 2. c. 1.2 The Lords Sadler's Rights of the Kingdom p. 79. to 93. Kelway's Reports 184. Stamf. P. Cor. 153. See Bagshaw's Reading p. 17. to 21. have had various Sentiments and even Acts of Parliament differ about the three Estates some alledging the King to be the Head of but not included in the Number assert That the three Estates are 1st The Lords Spiritual 2dly The Lords Temporal And 3dly The Commons but Others more rationally say The King is one of the three Estates which compose the Parliament and that the second Estate is constituted of both the Spiritual and Temporal Lords jointly for say they Tho the Archbishops and Bishops are denominated Spiritual yet they sit in Parliament as Temporal
Barons only i. e. By Reason of the Temporal Baronies annexed to their Bishopricks and not as they are Spiritual Persons And they further urge in Confirmation of their Opinion 1. That no Bishop notwithstanding his Election Consecration Confirmation c. can be a Lord of or sit in Parliament till the King has granted to him the Temporalities of the Bishoprick 2. N. B. Tho this Stat. was repealed by Q. Mary yet that Repeal was repealed by Q. Elizabeth c. As the Parliamt at Bury 24 E. 1. 1 Eliz. all the Acts about Religion passed Dissentientibus Episcopis See Journal Dom. Procer 11 H. 7.27 Bro. Par. 107. Kelway 184. 3 The Commons See hereafter See Sadler's Rights p. 79. to 93. That by Virtue of the Stat. 1 E. 6. c. 2. still in Force The King may constitute Bishops by his Letters Patent only without any Election or Consecration and 3. That Parliaments have been and may be held Excluso Clero exclusive of the Bishops and Clergy and that some of our most beneficial Statutes have been enacted whereto the whole Body of the Clergy dissented all which they say prove the Bishops to be no essential Part or any of the three Estates of Parliament And in Trinity Term 7 H. 8. tis agreed by all the Judges of England That the King may well hold his Parliament by himself and his Lords Temporal and Commons without any Bishops or Spiritual Lords at all The third Estate of which we shall herein principally treat is on all Hands confess'd to consist of the Knights Citizens and Burgesses with the Barons of the Cinque-Ports all which being at this Day elected by the free Votes of the Freemen of Great Britain are properly esteem'd the Representative Body of the People and constitute that Part of the Parliament usually called the House of Commons N. B. The antient Modus Tenendi Parl. reckons up six Degrees or Orders of Parliament but that Division cannot be denominated six Estates The Numbers of the Commons Numb of Commons formerly See Mr. Willis's Preface to his 1 Vol. of Net Parl. Prynn of Parliamentary Writs I find to have been formerly variant according as the Sheriffs of Counties from what Motive is uncertain were pleased to direct their Precepts to the several Cities or Burros within their respective Counties or as the same Sheriffs made their Returns thereupon But indeed another Cause of this Variation was That it was usual for the Prince on his Accession to the Throne to grant Charters to antient Demesne Vills and other popular Towns thereby erecting 'em into free Burros and this consequently gave 'em a Right to be represented in Parliament And by this Artifice among others the Crown advanced its Interests in the House of Commons For it must be confess'd That by the antient Constitution there were no Representatives of the Commons as Commons in Parliament besides the Knights for the Shires the Barons for the Cinque Ports Crompt of Courts f. 2.3 c. Stat. 23. H. 6. c. 11. the Citizens for the Cities and the Burgesses for the ancient Burros only and that the Elections for all those were to be made by such Persons only as were possess'd of Lands or Tenements held by them as Freeholds or free Burgage Tenures which consequently excluded all Villeins and Copyholders Stat. 12. R. 2. c. 12. Crom. 2.3.4.5 Bro. Ant. Dem. 43â— as also Tenants in antient Demesne which were but the King's Villeins and the Tenants and Dependants of other Lords Parl. 96. Reg. 261. Nat. Bre. 14. from being either the Electors or elected of the House of Commons Indeed the Practice of increasing the Number of the Representatives of the Commons See Bohun's Col. per Tot. began very early viz. Temp. Johan if not before for I find it a Practice of that Prince to grant usually in Consideration of Money c. Charters to Antient demesne Towns as generally all Sea-Port Towns were thereby erecting 'em into free Burroughs The Representative of London and West p. 14. 10 p. 21. Spelm. in voce Major and hence it was as I conceive That Bridport Dorchester Harwich Helstone Kingston upon Hull and divers other antient demesne Towns came to be erected into free Burros which originally had no Right of being represented in Parliament But whatever Methods were then taken to encrease the Number of the House of Commons I find their Number to be much the same from the End of H. the 6th's Reign Fortescue p. 40. to the Beginning of that of H. the 8th viz. about 300. That H. 8. MS. Penes Authorem added to their Number 38. King Ed. 6. added to their Number 44. Queen Mary added to their Number 25. Queen Elizabeth added to their Number 62. King James the 1st added to their Number 27. And King Charles the 1st about 10. or 12. so that at the Time of the Restoration of King Charles 2. I find their Numbers to have been about 500. But the Commons about that Time restrained this mischievous Practice for the Future so that they declared the Elections made by Virtue of that Prince's Charters void and as Chester had been enabled to send two Members for the County and two for the City by Virtue of a Sta. 34.35 St. 34.35 H. 8. c. 13 St. 25. C. 2. c. 9. H. 8. so an Act past in the 25 Car. 2. enabling Durham to send four Members in like Manner and thus the Number of the House of Commons stood at 513 till the Union of the Kingdoms of England and Scotland when by Virtue of the Union Act St. 5. An. c. 8. forty-five Scottish Members were added which made the whole Number of that House to be 558 as it now stands Mr. Prynn and Others observe Denominations of Parliam Prynn's Rights of the Com. c. p. 99. 99. Spelm. Glossary in verb. Parlam Debata That our Ancestors had many Expressions and Phrases which signify'd a Parliamentary Assembly as Magnates Regni Omnes Regni Nobiles Proceres et Fideles Regni Universitas Regni Communitas Regni Discretio Totius Regni Generale Concilium Regni and many others varying the Stile in successive Ages till at length it came to be fix'd in the Word Parliament See divers Records and Precedents touching this Matter in the Appendix to Mr. Petyt's Miscellanea Parliamentaria Mr. Prynn also says Prynn's Truth triumphing over Falshood c. f. 69. Petyt's Antient Rights c. p. 68. That by many antient Precedents before the Conquest it is apparent that all our pristine Synods and Councils were nought else but Parliaments and that our Kings Nobles Senators Aldermen Wisemen Knights and Commons were usually present and voted in them as Members and Judges And Mr. Lambard Sir Robert Atkyns's Argument p. 18. see hereafter in his Archaeion maintains That Parliaments were used in the Saxon Times as in the Time of King Ina Ann. 712 and other Saxon Princes and that they then consisted of King Lords and Commons And that the
of the Realm and every particular Member thereof either in Person or by Representation upon their own Free Elections are by the Laws of this Realm deemed to be personally present 1 Jac. 1. c. 1. Sir Edward Cook in his Epistle to the 9th Report says There is a threefold End of this great and honourable Assembly of Estates First That the Subject might be kept from offending that is That Offences might be prevented both by good and provident Laws and by the due Execution thereof Secondly That Men might live safely in Quiet And thirdly That all Men might receive Justice by certain Laws and Holy Judgments that is to the End that Justice might be the better administred that Questions and Defects in Laws might be by this High Court of Parliament planed and reduced to a Certainty and that Claims of Right might be adjudged and determined This Court being the most supream Court of this Realm is a Part of the Frame of the Common Laws and in some Cases doth proceed legally according to the ordinary Course of the Common Law The House of Lords cannot exercise any Power as an House of Parliament Sir R. Atkin's Argument f 51. or as a Court for Error without the House of Commons be in Being at the same Time Both Houses must be prorogued together and dissolved together By the Law Ib. 59. Parliaments ought to be very frequent Before the Conquest as it is untruly call'd by the Law Parliaments were to be held twice a Year as appears by King Edgar's Laws So it was ordained by King Alfred By the Stat. of 4 Ed. 3. c. 14. Parliaments ought to be once a Year and oftner if need be And in 36 Ed. 3. c. 10. to be once a Year without Restriction if need be By 16 Car. 2. c. 1. these Acts are declared to be in Force And further it is declared and enacted That the holding of Parliaments shall not be discontinued above three Years at the most The Parliament is a Court of very great Honour and Justice Plow Com. 398. 11 Col. 14 The Parliament can do no Wrong 6 Col. 27. Sir R. Atkyne Arg. 60. of which no Man ought to imagine a Thing dishonourable An Offence committed in Parliament is a very very high Offence but the higher it is the more proper it is for their Judicature and that Court is arm'd with a Power to punish the highest Offences and the highest Offenders Yet a Parliament may err Plow Com. 397. 9 Col. 106. Ibid. for they are not infallible but the Law hath provided a Remedy against those Errors and a way to reform them A subsequent Parliament may reform the Errors of a preceeding Parliament But to say that they will be partial Ibid. or unjust or corrupt or do any Thing out of Malice is to raise a Scandal upon the whole Nation Ibid whose Representative they are If any Offence whatever be committed in the Parliament by any particular Member See Husband's Collections ante p. 1. p. 67. it is an high Infringment of the Right and Privilege of Parliament for any Person or Court to take the least Notice of it till the House it self either has punish'd the Offender or referred them to a due or proper Course of Punishment To do otherwise would be to make the Highest Court an Offender and to charge them with Injustice Their Right and Priviledge so far extends Ib. 61. that not only what is done in the very House sitting the Parliament but whatever is done relating to them or in pursuance of their Order during the Parliament is no where else to be punish'd but by Themselves or a succeeding Parliament tho done out of the House Either House doth ever for the most part shew it self so careful to keep firm Correspondence with the other Sir Simon d'Ewes Journal 186. as that when a Bill hath pass'd either of the said Houses and is sent to the other it doth for the most part pass and is neither dash'd nor alter'd without very great Cause upon mature deliberation and usually also not without Conference desir'd and had thereupon that so full Satisfaction may be given to that House from which the Bill so rejected or alter'd was sent Pessima Gens humani Generis always abhorr'd a Parliament Preface to Petyt's Miscel Parlementar And the Reason thereof is demonstrative because they all knew they shou'd then be call'd to an impartial and strict Account and be punish'd according to their Demerits It was said by the Lord Bacon to Sir Lionel Cranfeild Ibid. newly made Lord Treasurer That he would recommend to his Lordship and in him to all other great Officers of the Crown one considerable Rule to be carefully observ'd which was Remember a Parliament will come The King at no Time stands so highly in his Estate Royal Petyt 's Miscel Parliament 6. Vide Cromp. Jur. 10. as in the Time of Parliament wherein the King as Head and they as Members are conjoyn'd and knit together in one Body Politic So as whatsoever Injury during that Time is offer'd to the meanest Member of the House is to be judged as done against the King's Person and the whole Court of Parliament The Prerogative of Parliament is so great Ibid. That all Acts and Processes coming out of any inferior Courts must cease and give place to that the highest Statutes in England are made not only by the Princes Pleasure Fortescue 42. but also by Assent of the whole Realm So that of Necessity they must procure the Wealth of the People and in no wise tend to their hindrance It cannot otherwise be thought Ibid. but that they are replenish'd with much Wit and Wisdom seeing they are ordain'd not by the Device of one Man alone or of a hundred wise Counsellors only but of more than three hundred learned Men now 558 that ought to be freely Elected by the People Acts of Parliament are made with such Gravity Wisdom 11. Co. 63. Fortesc c. 18. c. 40. and Universal consent of all the Realm and for advantage of the publick Wealth that they are not from the General and ambiguous Words of a Subsequent Act to be abrogated Acts of Parliament have been tender of racking the King's Subjects for Words 1. Mod. Rep. 234 and the Scripture Discountenances Mens being made Transgressors for a Word Every Proviso in an Act 1. Siderf 155. is not a determination what the Law was before for they are often added for the Satisfaction of those that are ignorant of the Law The King of England can neither by himself or his Ministers Fortescu p. 84. impose any Tallages or other Burdens on his Subjects or alter their Laws or make new Laws without Assent of the whole Kingdom in Parliament CHAP. III. Of the Power and Authority of Parliaments THE Parliamentary Power Hollinsh Vol. 1. p. 173. as it is in the Legislative Capacity consisting of the Agreement and Act of all the three Estates King Lords and Commons to make it Binding it imports no
this Realm and with every one of them as the Quality of the Persons and Matter shall require And also the said Laws and every of them to abrogate adnul amplifie or diminish as it shall be seem to the King and the Nobles and Commons of this Realm present in Parliament meet and convenient for the Wealth of this Realm The Power and Jurisdiction of the Parliament for making of Laws in proceeding by Bill 4 Inst 36. is so transcendent and absolute as it cannot be confined either for Causes or Persons within any Bounds Si Antiquitatem spectes est vetustissima si Dignitatem est honoratissima si Jurisdictionem est capacissima The whole Parliament which should best know its own Power affirms Speed's Hist f. 914 Rot. Parl. 1 R. 3. In Cotton's Abridgment f. 713 714 that the Court of Parliament is of such Authority and the People of this Land of such a Nature and Disposition as Experience teacheth that the Manifestation and Declaration of any Truth or Right made by the Three Estates of this Realm assembled in Parliament and by Authority of the same maketh before all other things most Faith and certain quieting of Mens Minds and removeth the Occasion of Doubts Parliamentum omnia Potest says the 4 Inst 74.76 The Parliament is of an absolute and unlimited Power in things Temporal Sir Rob. Atkyns's Argument c. 50. Ibid. within this Nation The Parliament hath the highest and most sacred Authority of any Court it hath an absolute Power It is the highest Court in the Realm as is acknowledged by our most learned and gravest Writers and Historians A Man gives Land to one and to his Heirs Males Crompton 20. b. Dr. and Student in that Case his Heirs Females shall also inherit and this was adjudged in Parliament One of the fundamental and principal Ends of Parliaments was Petit's Preface to Ancient Rights c. p. 41. for the Redress of Grievances and easing the Oppressions of the People And the Mirror of Justices says 6.1 p. 4. and 5. That Parliaments were instituted to hear and determine the Complaints of the wrongful Acts of the King the Queen and their Children and especially of those Persons against whom the Subjects otherwise could not have common Justice for wrongs so by them done Covient per droit que le Roy ust Companions pur oyer et terminer aux Parliaments trestouts les breues et plaints de Torts de le Roy de la Roigne Horn's Mirror p. 9. et de lour Enfants et de Eux specialment de que Torts len ne poit aver autrement Common droit i. e. The King ought by Law to have Companions or associates to hear and determine in Parliament of all Writs and Plaints of all Torts or Wrongs as well of the King as of the Queen and their Children and especially of those Great Ones where one cannot otherwise have Common right for those wrongs The greater the Persons are Sir Rob. Atkyns Argument p. 45. if they are in the Rank of Subjects they must be subject to the King's Laws and they are the more proper for the Undertaking and Encounter of this High Court It will not be impar congressus King John had resign'd up the Crown of England to the Pope Id. 37. by the Hand of Pandulphus his Legat Mat. Paris and sordidly submitted to take the Crown at his Hand again Rot. Parl. 40. E. 3. No 7. 8. at a yearly Tribute In the Reign of our Noble King Edward the Third the Pope demanded this Rent and all the Arrears But the Prelates Dukes Counts Barons and Commons resolved that neither the King nor any other could put the Realm nor the People thereof into Subjection sans l'assent de eux without their Assent This intimates Sir R. Atkyn's Arg. p. 50. that with their joynt Consent the Crown may be disposed of And it was the highest Resolution in Law in one of the highest Points in Law concerning the King's claim of an Absolute Power and in a Time when the Pope was in his Meridian Height It is the proper Work of this Supreme Court to deal with such Delinquents Ibid. as are too high for the Court of King's Bench or other ordinary Courts Daughters and Heirs apparent of a Man or Woman 4 Inst 36. may by Act of Parliament inherit during the Life of the Ancestor Ante 69. It may adjudge an Infant or Minor to be of full Age. Ibid. It may Attaint a Man of Treason after his Death Ibid. It may Naturalize a meer Alien Ibid. and make him a Subject born It may bastard a Child Ibid. that by Law is Legitimate viz. begotten by an Adulterer the Husband being within the four Seas It may Legitimate one that is Illegitimate Ibid. and born before Marriage absolutely It may Legitimate secundum quid etiamque simpliciter 21 Rich. 2. The Lords Appellants accused the Duke of Gloucester of Treason Selden's Judicature 91. and tho' they knew he was dead they pray'd the King that he might be brought to his Answer The King sent his Writ c. they desired Judgment and had it So Robert Possington was impeached at the Parliament at Westminster Id. 95. and found Guilty long Time after he was dead and so forfeited his Estate John of Gaunt Duke of Lancaster had by Catherine Swinford 4 Inst 36. Cotten's Record p. 363. before Marriage four illegitimate Children Henry John Thomas and Joan. At the Parliament holden 20 Rich. 2. the King by Act of Parliament in Form of a Charter doth Legitimate the three Sons and Joan the Daughter Thomas Cromwel Vide post 4 Inst 36. Earl of Essex was attainted by Parliament and forth-coming to be heard and yet never call'd to answer in any of the Houses of Parliament and resolved by the Judges that if one be Attainted by Parliament it can never come in question after whether he were call'd or not call'd to answer for the Act of Attainder being pass'd by Parliament did bind Where by Order of Law a Man cannot be Attainted of High-Treason Id. 39. unless the Offence be in Law High-Treason he ought not to be Attainted by general Words of High-Treason by Authority of Parliament as sometimes hath been used but the High-Treason ought to be especially exprest seeing that the Court of Parliament is the highest and most honourable Court of Justice and ought to give example to inferior Courts Acts against the Power of the Parliament subsequent bind not Id. 42. It is against the Power and Jurisdiction of the Parliament the Liberty of the Subject and unreasonable i. e. Illegal The Stat. 11. Rich. 2. c. 5. Id. 42. That no Person should attempt to revoke any Ordinance then made was repealed for that such Restraint is unreasonable c. An Act 11 Rich. 2 c. 3. Ibid. That no Man against whom any Judgment or Forfeiture was given shou'd sue for Pardon or Grace c. was holden to be unreasonable without Example and against the Law and
utterly disabled from being a Justice of Peace By Parliament Ib. p. 46. the Spanish Frauds were discovered and by an Act of Parliament the two Treaties i. e. touching the Spanish Match and for restoring the Palatinate both which had cost the King and his Subjects much Money and much Blood were Dissolved and Annihilated And we may remember says the same Author That that sage Councellor of State Sir William Cecil Lord Burley and Lord Treasurer of England was oft Times heard to say He knew not what a Parliament might not do which saying was approved by K. James 1. and is cited by him in one of his publick Speeches The Parliament says one is of an absolute and unlimited Power in all Things Temporal within this Nation Sir Robers Atkins's Argument p. 50. Bract. fo 34. Fleta p. 2. 17. Another says Parliamentum omnia potest Bracton and Fleta both affirm Rex habet Superiorem in Regno Scilicet Curiam suam i. e. Comites Barones doubtless the Lords and Commons qui apponuntur Regi ut si Rex sine Fraeno i. e. sine Lege fuerit Debent ei Fraenum apponere c. Nay some great Authors have asserted Quod Concilium hoc i. e. Parliamentum Facultatem habet Deponendi Regem Malum Substituendi Novum See Mat. Paris per Watts pag. 498. Knighton de Eventibus Angliae p. 2683. in the Decem. Scriptores and that this Power is claimed ex antiquo Statuto c. Knighton has a remarkable Passage concerning the Execution of that antient Statute in the Cases of E. II. and R. II. which at this Time I forbear to Transcribe or Translate Note It appears by Mat. Paris p. 99. c. That the Commons were then i. e. 15 H. II. summoned to the Parliament held at Clerkenwell and that they also were a Part of the Parliament in the Time of K. H. I. See before p. 34. 35. c. CHAP. IV. Of the House of Lords in general THE House of Peers Rushw eol vol. 3. part 1. p. 777. are the hereditary Counsellors of the King and Kingdom as the House of Commons are the representative Body of the whole Commons of the Kingdom There certainly cannot in the whole World be seen a more illustrious Court Nalson 566. than this high and honourable Assembly of Peers in Parliament nor any Thing of greater Benefit and Advantage to the Subjects of this Monarchy No Lord of Parliament can sit there Sir Simon d'Ewes's Jour 11. Col. 1. till he be full One and twenty Years unless by special Grace of the Prince and that very rarely unless they be near upon the Age of Twenty one Years at least A Bishop elect may sit in Parliament Ibid. ante 3 4 43 44. as a Lord thereof i. e. if called thereto by Writ Q. For he is not properly a Peer or even a Bishop till his Temporalties are granted to him If the King by his Writ calleth any Knight or Esquire to be a Lord of the Parliament 4 Inst 44. he cannot refuse to serve the King there in communi illo Consilio for the Good of his Country It lies in the Favour of the Prince Sir Simon d'Ewes Journal 2.4 Col. 2. to make Heirs of Earldoms Members of the upper House by summoning them thither by Writ but then they take not their Place there as the Sons of Earls but according to the Antiquity of their Fathers Baronies The Archbishop of Canterbury is the first Peer of the Realm Id. 140. Col. 1. The Earl-Marshal's Place in Parliament is betwixt the Lord Chamberlain Id. 535. Col. 2. and the Lord Steward See the Statute No Man ought to sit in that high Court of Parliament 4 Inst 45. but he that hath Right to sit there If a Lord depart from Parliament Id. 44. without License it is an Offence done out of the Parliament and is finable by the Law 4 June 1642 Rushw Col. Vol. 3. part 1.737 Post upon an Order of the House of Lords to those Lords that had left the Parliament and repaired to the King at York requiring their Appearance as Delinquents in the Answer they returned to it there are these Words We do conceive that it is the apparent usual and inherent Right belonging to the Peerage of England that in the highest Misdemeanors whatsoever no Peer is to answer to the first Charge but in his own Person and not upon the first Charge to come to the Bar. Any Lord of the Parliament 4 Inst 12. by License of the King upon just Cause to be absent may make a Proxy 43 Eliz. 1601 Towns Col. 135. Vide Sir Simon d'Ewes Journal 605. agreed by the Lords That the antient Course of the House is That the Excuses of such Lords as shou'd happen to be absent from the House upon reasonable Occasions ought to be done by some of the Peers and not by other Information Anno Domini 1626 Rushw Col. Vol. 1. p. 365. 2 Car. 1. resolved upon the Question by the whole House Nemine dissentiente That the Priviledge of this House is That no Lord of Parliament the Parliament sitting or within the usual Time of Priviledges of Parliament is to be imprisoned or restrained without Sentence or Decree of the House unless it be for Treason or Felony or refusing to give Surety of the Peace N. B. This was upon the King's having committed the Earl of Arundel to the Tower without expressing the Cause of his Commitment All the Priviledges which do belong to those of the Commons House of Parliament Hakewell 82. a fortiori do appertain to all the Lords of the upper House for their Persons are not only free from Arrests during the Parliament but during their Lives Nevertheless the original Cause is by Reason they have Place and Voice in Parliament And this is manifest by express Authorities grounded upon excellent Reasons in the Books of Law A Proxy is no more than the constituting of some one or more by an absent Lord Sir Simon d'Ewes Journals 5. Col. 2. to give his Voice in the upper House when any Difference of Opinion and Division of the House shall happen for otherwise if no such Division fall out it never cometh to be question'd or known to whom such Proxies are directed nor is there any the least Use of them save only to shew prove and continue the Right which the Lords of the upper House have both to be summon'd and to give their Voices in the same House either in their Persons or by their Proxies As many Proxies as any Peer hath Ibid. Col. 2. so many Voices he hath beside his own and if there be two or three Proxies constituted by one absent Lord as is frequent then always the first named in the same is to give the Voice if he be present and if absent then the second sic de reliquis It is plain by the antient Treatise Ibid. 6. Col. 1. Modus tenendi Parliamentum That if a Peer neither came to the Parliament nor sent
a Proxy upon his Writ of Summons he forfeited 100 l. if an Earl 100 Marks if a Baron 100 s. c. It seldom happeneth Towns Col. 4.39 40 42. That any Bishop doth nominate fewer than three or two Proctors nor any Temporal Lord more than one John Archbishop of Canterbury Id. 34. had this Parliament five Proxies 1 Eliz. a Lord of Parliament by License obtained of the Queen to be absent 4 Inst 12 13 made a Proxy to three Lords of Parliament one of which gave Consent to a Bill the other two said Not Content And it was by Order of the Lords debated among the Judges and Civilians Attendants and conceiv'd by them That this was no Voice and the Opinion was affirmed by all the Lords That it was no Voice 2 Car. 1. 1626. the House of Peers made an Order Rush Col. 269. That after this Session no Lord of this House shall be capable of receiving above two Proxies or more to be numbred in any Cause voted In the Lords House Arc Parl. 12. Smith's Common-wealth 87. the Lords give their Voices from the puisne Lord seriatim by the Word Content or Not Content 4 Inst 34. First for himself and then severally for so many as he hath Letters and Proxies A Bill had three Readings in one Forenoon Towns Col. 11. in the House of Lords Towns Col. 9. Where a Committee of Lords is selected out to meet with another Committee of the House of Commons neither the Judges being but Assistants nor the Queen's Council being but Attendants of and upon the House were ever nominated a Joynt-Committees with the Lords But when the Lords among themselves do appoint a Committee to consider of some ordinary Bill especially if it concern Matter of Law it hath been antiently used and may still without Prejudice to the Honour of the House that the King's learned Council but especially the Judges may be nominated as Committees alone or as Joynt-Committees with the Lords January 19. 1597. 39 Eliz. it was resolved Towns Col. 94. Sir Simon d'Ewes Jour That the Order and Usage of this House was and is that when any Bills or Messages are brought from the lower House to be preferr'd to the upper House the Lord Keeper and the rest of the Lords are to rise from their Places and to go down to the Bar there to meet such as come from the lower House and from them to receive in that Place their Messages or Bills Contrariwise when any Answer is to be delivered by the Lord Keeper c. In passing of Bills Arc. Parl. 5. if the Not Contents be most then the Bill is dash't i. e. the Law is annihilated and goeth no further If the Contents be the most then the Clerk writeth underneath Soit baile aux Commons i. e. Let it be delivered or sent to the Commons 3 Car. 1. 1626. resolved upon the Question Rush Col. 365. That the Priviledge of this House is that no Lord of Parliament the Parliament sitting or within the usual Time of Priviledges of Parliament is to be imprison'd or restrain'd without Sentence or Decree of the House unless it be for Treason or Felony or refusing to give Surety of the Peace Giving the Lye to a Peer Nalson 380. Hakewel 84. Vide Kel wey 184. Vid. Lord Hollis's Letter Vid. Lord Hollis's Remains Vid. contra Hunt's Argument for the Bishops Right c. Vid. Grand Question concerning Bishops Right per totum is a Breach of Priviledge Ever since the Conquest the Archbishops and Bishops have no Title to have Voice and Place in Parliament but only in respect of their Temporal Baronies where they are present quousque perveniatur ad Diminutionem Vitae c. When a Question is had of the Attainder of any Peer Hakewel 84. Vid. contra Hart ut supra per tot Vid. Grand Question concerning Bishops Right c per tetum or other in Parliament the Archbishops and Bishops depart the higher House and do make their Proxies for by the Decrees of the Church they may not be Judges of Life and Death 11 Rich. 2. Divers Lords and others being appealed of Treason and other Misdemeanors the Prelates absented themselves during the Trial Selden of Judicature p. 150. Vid. there the Protestation of the Bishops Ibid. 151. having first made Protestation saving their Right to be present in Parliament The Protestation I think intends That they could not be present by Reason of the Common Law and by Reason of an Ordinance made at the Council at Westminster in 21 Hen. 2. by which all Clergymen were forbidden agitare Judicium Sanguinis upon Pain to be deprived both of Dignities and Orders For surely as I think they might otherwise have been present both by the Common Law and by the Law of God Sed Quere All the Lords Spiritual and Temporal Selden's Judicature c. 39. 11 Rich. 2. claimed as their Liberty and Franchise that the great Matters moved in this Parliament and to be moved in other Parliaments in Time to come touching the Peers of the Land ought to be admeasured adjudged and discussed by the Course of the Parliament and not by the Civil Law nor by the Law of the Land used in the more base Courts of the Realm which the King granted in full Parliament The Proceeding against a Peer in Parliament is not necessary Id. 53. Q. It appears that the Lords cannot of themselves judge a Common Person for an Offence Id. 61. for he is no Peer according to that of 4 E. 3. Numb 26. 1 Rich. 2. Id. 123. The Lord Beauchamp was sworn and examined and the Duke of Lancaster being one of the Committee was diligently examin'd before the rest of the said Committee but not sworn ad testificandum Vid. rost Earls and Dukes are not sworn on Trials c. in Parliament In Judgments on Delinquents in Parliament Id. 132. the Commons might accusare petere Judicium and the King assentire but the Lords only did judicare The King's Assent ought to be to capital Judgments Id. 141. Vid. Id. 144 14â— 148 154 158. and the Lords Temporal to be only Judges therein and not the Lords Spiritual but in Misdemeanors the Lords Spiritual and Temporal are equal Judges and the King's Assent is not necessary Id. 136. yet it seemeth that the King's Assent is necessarily required in capital Causes and Judgments If a Peer be committed to Prison the Gentleman Usher hath the Charge of him thither and the Serjeant attending on the Great Seal How Lords of Parliament shall be placed in the Parliament Vide Stat. 31 Hen. 8. c. 10. Vid. 4 Inst 362. Rot. Parl. 3 H. 6.10 Arcana Parl. 70. and other Assemblies and Conferences of Council A Peer of the Realm shall be tried in an Appeal by Knights c. and not by his Peers because it is at the Suit of the Party Brook 142 153. Otherwise it is in an Indictment of Treason or Felony for that it is at the Suit of the King The
Duke of Somerset in the Time of Ed. 6. was tried for Felony and Treason by his Peers upon an Indictment Id. 71. for it is the Suit of the King When a Lord of Parliament is tried by his Peers 1 Hen. 4.1 Id. 72. they shall not be Sworn to say their Verdict but they shall give their Verdict upon their Honour and are not charged but upon their Honours And 6 Maij 1628. Sir Wm. Jones's Rep. 154 155. It was ordered on the Question Nem. Dissen That the Nobility of this Kingdom and Lords of the upper House of Parliament are of antient Right to Answer in all Courts as Defendants upon Protestation of Honour only and not upon the common Oath An order of the House of Lords was in 1640. Cursus Cancel 112. That the Nobility of this Kingdom and Lords of the upper House of Parliament and the Widows and Dowagers of the Temporal Lords shall Answer in Chancery c. upon Protestation of Honour only but altho their Honour may bind their Conscience in Equity yet Evidence upon their Honour ought not to be admitted in any Court of Law And we must here Note That even Lords of Parliament or Peers of the Realm in giving Evidence to a Jury or in their Depositions in Chancery c. are to be Examined on Oath A Lord of Parliament shall have Knights upon his Trial in every Action 27 Hen. 8. f. 27. A Lord of Parliament may be Outlawed for Murder 27 Hen. 8. f. 17. If a Lord of Parliament makes a Rescous 27 H. 8.27 a Capias shall be taken out against him if the Sheriff return the Rescous otherwise it is in Case of Debt A Capias ad Satisfaciendum does not lyc against a Lord of Parliament 11 H. 4.15 27 Hen. 8.27 for the Law presumes that he has Assets An Attachment is not grantable by the Common Law Dyer 316. Statue Law Custom or Precedent against a Lord of Parliament and the Lord Cromwel by Order in the Parliament-Chamber was discharged of such Process In a Praemunire against a Lord of Parliament Arc. Parl. he ought to appear in his proper Person and not by Attorney unless he has a special Writ of Chancery De attornato faciendo CHAP. V. The Power of the House of Lords A Peer of the Realm being Indicted of Treason or Felony 4 Inst 23. or Misprision of Treason may be Arraigned thereof in Parliament a Lord Steward being appointed and then the Lords Spiritual shall make a Procurator for them and the Lords as Peers of the Realm during the Parliament are Judges whether the Offence be Treason c. that is supposed to be committed by any Peer of the Realm and not the Justices Vide a Letter sent by nine Lords Rush Col. 3. Stat. vol. 1. f. 737. Ant. 42. to the Parliament June 4 1642 who had gone from their House and repaired to the King at York wherein they say We do conceive that it is the apparent usual and inherent Right belonging to the Peerage of England that in the highest Misdemeanour whatsoever no Peer is to Answer to the first Charge but in his Place in his own Person and not upon the first Charge to come to the Barr. In 1553. primo Mariae Burn. His Ref. vol. 2. p. 253. The Bill of Tonnage and Poundage was sent up to the Lords who sent it down to the Commons to be reformed in two Provisoes that were not according to former Precedents How far this was contrary to the Rights of the Commons who now say that the Lords cannot alter a Bill of Money I am not able to determine Die Mercurij 25 Novembris 1692. It is Resolved upon the Question by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal that for the future when there shall be a Devision in the House upon any Question the Contents shall goe below the Barr and the Not Contents stay within the Barr And it is Ordered that this Resolution be added to the Roll of standing Orders of this House Die Lune 7. Decembris 1691. It is Ordered by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament Assembled that for the future upon giving Judgment in any Cases of Appeals or Writs of Error in this House the Question shall be put for Reversing and not for Affirming And that this be added to the Roll of standing Orders 30. Jan. 1640. Rush Col. 3. part vol. 1 p. 165. Upon a Debate in the Lord's House touching the Power of conveying away of Honour it was Nemine contradicente Resolved upon the Question that no Person that hath any Honour in him as a Peer of this Realm may alien and transfer the same to any other Person See Sir B. Shower's Cases in Parliament 1.2 c. See many notable Judgments by the Lords at the Prosecution of the Commons Rush Col. passim Nalson and in later Times Error serra sue in Parliament Vid. Crom. 18. Error Vid. infra Parliament poet prendre Recognizance Brook 137. Error Error shall be sued in Parliament and the Parliament may take a Recognizance If a Judgment be given in the King's Bench 4. Inst 21. either upon a Writ of Error or otherwise the Party grieved may upon a Petition of Right made to the King in English or in French and his Answer thereto Fiat Jusstitia let Justice be done have a Writ of Error directed to the Chief Justice of the King's Bench for removing of the Record in praesens Parliamentum c. And hence it may be presum'd that Writs of Error in Parliament were originally Returnable before the Commons as well as the Lords See Yelverton's Rights of the Commons and Hales of Parliaments p. 18. to 23. When one sueth in Parliament to Reverse a Judgment in the King's Bench he sheweth in his Bill which he exhibiteth to the Parliament some Error or Errors whereupon he prayeth a Scire Facias Id. 22. The Proceeding upon the Writ of Error is only before the Lords in the Upper House Secundum Legem Consuetudinem Parliamenti The Case between Smith and Busby in a Writ or Error Resolved 2 Nalson 716. 'twas decidable in no other Court but in Parliament If any Question be moved in Parliament for Priviledge 4 Inst 363 or Precedency of any Lord of Parliament it is to be decided by the Lords of Parliament in the House of Lords as all Priviledges and other Matters concerning the Lords House of Parliament are November 1641. 2 Nalson 625. Resolved by the House Nemine contradicente that it belongs to the House of Peers by the antient Laws and Constitutions of this Kingdom to interpret Acts of Parliament in Time of Parliament in any Cause that shall be brought before them Julij 12. 1641. 2. Nalson 381. An order of the Lords for Relief of a Feme-Covert and her Children against a Husband refusing to Cohabit The Sentence pronounced by the Lords upon Sir Giles Mompesson Rushw Col. 27.28 and Sir Fracis Michel for Projectors Upon Complaints and Accusations of the Commons Selden's Judicature
as may appear for an Instance in their Declaration or Protestation to Edward the Third in Parliament which concludes thus For they will not be obliged by any Statute or Ordinance made without their Assent In a MS. M. S. Penes W. Bohun p. 5 6. Treatise written by Mr. Rymer entitled an Inquiry into the antient Method of passing Bills in Parliament I find it to have been the usual Practice Temp. Ed. 3ij c. See Annis Edw. 3. 14 15 16 20 21 22. 36. 33 c. For the Commons to have first their Petitions and Bills answered i. e. their Grievances Redress'd and then to Grant their Aids and Supplies But note These Matters often proceeded pari Passu And sometimes Aids were granted by the Commons on express Condition That the King Grant the Petitions Exhibited to him c. But in 47 E. 3. The Subsidy or Aid Ibid. p. 7. is commanded to be first Treated on or Debated which says my Author I remember not to have been in any other Parliament whatsoever save that of 7 R. 2. And Note 11 R. 2. The Commons Demand it as of Right not to Grant Subsidies till the End of the Parliament To give Subsidies upon Subsidies is not usual In the 18 H. 3. Rush vol. 1. p. 190. There was one Punished for pressing for more Subsidies when Subsidies had been Granted before in that Parliament And note See Cottons Records p. 17. 198. If any new Project was proposed in Parliament for raising Subsidies or Supplies the Commons usually reply'd thereto That they were not Instructed by their Principals in that Matter or that they durst not consent to such Tax c. without Conference with their Countries A Member of Parliament may charge any great Officer of State with any particular Offence Rush Col. 690. If any Lord of Parliament Spiritual or Temporal 4 Inst 24. have committed any Oppression Bribery Extortion or the like the House of Commons being the general Inquisitors of the Realm coming out of all Parts thereof may examine the same and if they find by the Vote of the House the Charge to be true then they transmit the same to the Lords with the Witnesses and the Proofs 1 Jac. 1. 1603. Petyt's Miscel Parl. 64. The Bishop of Bristol publishing a Book tending to make Division and Strife Wrong and Dishonour both to the lower House and the Lords themselves was complain'd of by the Commons to the Lords and he made his Recantation 1. That he had erred 2. That he was sorry for it 3. If it were to do again he would not do it 4. But protested it was done of Ignorance and not of Malice 7 Jac. 1. 1609. Vide Rvsh Hist Col. 4 Car. Dr. Cowel writ a Book perniciously asserting certain Heads to the Destruction of Parliaments and the Fundamental Laws and Government of the Kingdom and was complained of by the Commons to the Lords who resolved to Censure his Errors and Boldness Ibid. And afterwards the Book was burnt by Proclamation Vide Dr. Manwaring's Case Rush Col. Nalson Vide Petyt's Miscel Part 74. Vide Dr. Montague's Case in Rushworth Nalson Petyt's Miscell Part 82. Note The Case of Dr. Burnet Bishop of Salisbury who for writing and publishing a Book Entitled King William and Queen Mary Conquerors was Censured in Parliament and as I think on the Commons Address Removed from being Preceptor to the Duke of Gloucester c. Note also Bishop Fleetwood's Preface censured and burnt by Order of the House of Commons And see Nalson's Col. p. 9. and 43. ten Bishops at once sent to the Tower by the Lords c. 4 Junij 19 Jac. Petyt's Miscel Parl. 120. The Commons House of Parliament this Day adjudged Randolph Davenport Esq for his Offence in Mis-informing the House in a Cause wherein he was produced as a Witness to be committed Prisoner to the Tower for the space of one whole Month and then to be Discharged paying his Fees 19 Jac. 1. Id. 160. Ordered by the Commons House of Parliament That the Serjeant of Arms attending this House shall attach the Body of John Churchill one of the Deputy-Registers of the Chancery and him shall take into his Custody and bring him to this House on Monday Morning next at Eight of the Clock and the said Serjeant is in the mean time to keep him so as none be suffer'd to speak with him but in the hearing of the Serjeant Vide ad hoc Rush Collect. passim Vide Nalson's 2 Volumes Vide Selden's Judicature c. Vide Sir Robert Atkyns's Argument c. Vide Petyt's Preface to Mis Parliamentaria Thomas Long gave the Mayor of Westbury four Pounds to be elected Burgess 4 Inst 23. Vide Sir d'Ewes Jour 182. who thereupon was elected This Matter was examin'd and adjudged in the House of Commons secundum Legem Consuetudinem Parliamenti and the Mayor fined and imprisoned and Mr. Long removed i. e. expelled the House for this corrupt Dealing was to poison the very Fountain it self See several Orders and Resolutions of the House of Commons against Bribery and Corruption in electing Members c. in Bohun's Collection of Debates c. pa. 28. 55. 275. 281. 340. c. particularly the Journal of the Commons for 1701. viz. Mar. 6.7.13.17.18.20.30 April 29. c. Arthur Hall Ibid. Vid. Sir Simon d'Ewes Jour 212. Post 89 c. a Member of the House of Commons for publishing and discovering the Conferences of the House and writing a Book to the Dishonour of the House was upon due Examination secundum Legem Consuetudinem Parliamenti adjudged by the House of Commons to be committed to the Tower for six Months Post 87. fined at five hundred Marks and expelled the House 23 Apr. 1. Mariae Ibid. Call'd Marington by Scobel 113. Muncton struck William Johnson a Burgess of B. return'd into the Chancery of Record for which upon due Examination in the House of Commons it was resolved That secundum Legem Consuetudinem Parliamenti every Man must take Notice of all the Members of the House returned of Record at his Peril And the House adjudged Muncton to the Tower Injuries offer'd to the Members Scobel 113. and their Servants during the Session have been usually punished by the House upon Complaint 29 Febr. 1575 one Williams Ibid. Vid. Sir Simon d'Ewes Jour 251. Col. 2. for assaulting a Burgess of this House was upon Complaint sent for by the Serjeant and brought to the Bar and committed to the Serjeant's Ward 28 Nov. Ibid. 1601 complaint being made by Mr. Fleetwood a Member of the House that one Holland a Scrivener and one Brooks his Servant had evil entreated and beaten the Servant of the said Mr. Fleetwood in his Presence they were both sent for by the Serjeant and brought to the Bar and for the said Offence committed for five Days to the Serjeant 12 Febr. 18. Jac. 1 Mr. Lovel Ib. 114. a Member of the House informed That one Darryel threatned his Person that for
cause why they sent Burgesses of Parliament and all the Proceedings thereupon are Coram non Judice illegal and void And the Right of sending Burgesses to the Parliament is questionable in Parliament only and the Occasioners Procurers Note and Judges in such Quo Warranto's and Proceedings are punishable as in Parliament shall be thought consonant to Law and Justice And note See Bohun's Inst Legalis 186.190 c. The Practice and Proceedings on Quo Warranto's Mandamus's and some other Prerogative Writs seem to have been an Invention of the Judges in order to draw the Rights and Privileges of Burroughs and Corporations as well as of the People under the Cognizance of B. R. c. Where the Articles against the Delinquents are ex Parte Domini Regis Selden 's Judicature 118. there the Commons cannot reply nor demand Judgment for the Suit is the King's and not theirs In Trewinnard's Case Id. 39. Dyer 60 61. The Priviledge of the Commons is termed the Priviledge of Parliament and the Judgment given in that Case by the House of Commons is there said to be The Judgment of the most High Court of Parliament Sir Robert Atkyn's Argument 35. which proves they are not without a Judicial Power The King cannot take notice of what is done in the Commons House Id. 53. or deliver'd to them but by the House itself and that is one of the Laws and Customs of Parliament In 31 Hen. 6. Id. 55. When the Commons requested the King and Lords to restore their Speaker to them c. The Judges being demanded of their Counsel therein See this Case reported at large in Bohun's Debates in Parliament p. 276. c. Ibid. after mature deliberation they answer'd It was not their part to judge of the Parliament which may judge of the Law The Reason to judge of the Law signifies that they the Parliament can judge whether a Law be good or not in order to approve it and to re-enact it or to repeal a Law c. In 1621. Ibid. The House of Commons made a Protestation against all Impeachments other than in their House for any thing there said or done It was said by Mr. Justice Crook Id. 58. Rush Col. Vol. 1. f. 663. That regularly a Parliament-Man cannot be compelled out of Parliament to answer Things done in Parliament in a Parliamentary Course See Sir R. Atkins's Argument per Totum If it be done in a Parliamentary Course what Occasion can there be to answer for it But who shall judge what is a Parliamentary Course but a Parliament Not Judges of the Common Law for the Parliamentary Course differs from the Rules of the Common Law 27 Eliz. 1584 ordered Sir Simon d'Ewes Jour 347 Col. 2. That the Serjeant of this House do forthwith go to the Common Pleas Bar and charge the Recorder then pleading there to make his present Repair unto this House for his Attendance See and Note the Case of Judge Thorp Cottons Rec. 74 and 316. who 25 E. 3. was condemn'd to Death and to forfeit all his Lands and Goods for Bribery i. e. receiving 20 l. from a Person who had a Cause depending before him Note in the Parliament 11 R. 2. commonly called The Wonder working Parliament all the Judges as they were sitting in Westminster-Hall were arrested c. by Order of Parliament And the like happen'd to several Judges in the Convention Parliament upon the Revolution but Quere if their Commitment was by the Lords and Commons or by the Commons only See also the Journal of the House of Commons Journal of the Commons An. 1680. Anno 1680 several Orders and Resolutions of the Commons against divers of the Judges and others for encouraging Addresses c. in Order to obstruct the Meeting and Sitting of that Parliament And see there December the 30th the following Resolutions of that House viz. 1. That the several Writings Papers and Proceedings relating to such Members of the late Long Parliament of Pensioners who receiv'd Allowances out of the Monies appointed for secret Services be produced to this House 2. Nem. Contr. That no Member of this House shall accept of any Office or Place of Profit from the Crown without the Leave of this House nor any Promise of any such Office or Place during his being or continuing a Member of this House 3. That all Offenders herein be expell'd this House See there also the Report and Censure of the the Proceedings of divers of the Judges of Westminster-Hall viz. Sir Francis North Sir W. Scroggs Justice Jones and Baron Weston whereupon the House came to the following Resolutions viz. 1. That the Discharge of the Grand Jury of the Hundred of Osulston in Com. Middx by the Court of B. R. in Trin. Term last before the last Day of the Term and before they had finished their Presentments was arbitrary and illegal destructive to publick Justice a manifest Violation of the Oaths of the Judges of that Court and a Means to subvert the fundamental Laws of the Kingdom and to introduce Popery 2. That the Rule made by the Court of B. R. in Trinity Term last against Printing of a Book called The Weekly Pacquet of Advice from Rome is illegal and arbitrary the Judges thereby usurping to themselves Legislative Power to the great Discouragement of the Protestants and countenancing of Popery 3. That the Court of King's Bench in the Imposition of Fines on Offenders have of late Years acted arbitrarily illegally and partially favouring Papists and Persons popishly affected and excessively oppressing his Majesty's Protestant Subjects 4. That the refusing sufficient Bail in those Cases wherein the Persons committed were Bailable by Law was illegal and a high Breach of the Liberties of the Subject 5. That the Expressions in the Charge given to the Grand Jury by Baron Weston were a Scandal to the Reformation and tending to raise discord between His Majesty and his Subjects and to the Subversion of the antient Constitution of Parliaments and of the Government of this Kingdom 6. That the Warrant mentioned in the Report i. e. for Harry Carrs Commitment c. was arbitrary and illegal And then follow the several Resolutions for Impeaching the Judges above-named See also Ibid. Jan. 3. and the Articles against Scroggs c. And Jan. 4. 1680 resolved Nem. Cont. That such Members of this House who in this Time of imminent Danger do absent themselves without Leave of the House are to be reputed Deserters of their Trust and Neglecters of that Duty they owe to this House and their Country 27 Eliz. 1584 John Bland a Currier for making dishonourable Reflections on the House of Commons brought to the Bar and pardoned upon his Submission paying twenty Shillings Fee to the Serjeant and taking the Oath of Supremacy Eodem An. Id. 368. Col. 1. A Warrant for a Writ of Priviledge awarded for setting at Liberty John Pepler Servant to Sir Philip Sidney a Member of this House now Prisoner for Debt in the Compter in
London 28 29 Eliz. 1586 Id. 397. Col. 1. resolved by the whole Body of the House That the discussing and adjudging of Differences about Elections only belonged to the said House That tho the Lord Chancellor and Judges were competent Judges in their proper Courts yet they were not Judges in Parliament 31 Eliz. 1588. Id. 451. Col. 1. Thomas Drury committed to the Serjeant's Custody was brought to the Bar and discharged paying his Fees for speaking Dishonourably of the Proceedings of the House 23 Eliz. 1580. Ibid. 283 Col. 1. A Member of the House stood Indicted of Felony Adjudged That he ought to remain of the House till he were Convicted for it may be any Man's Case who is Guiltless to be Accused and thereupon Indicted of Felony or a like Crime 18 Eliz. 1575. Petyt's Miscel Parl. 16.18 Edward Smalley was upon the Question adjudged by the House to be Guilty of Contempt and abusing the House by fraudulent Practise of procuring himself to be Arrested upon Execution of his own Assent and Intention to be discharged as well of his Imprisonment as of the said Execution And Matthew Kirtleton adjudged Guilty of Confederacy with the said Smalley Whereupon they were both Ordered to the Tower And the said Smalley to remain there for a Month and after till he gave sufficient Assurance for Payment of a hundred Pounds to the Creditor and forty Shillings for the Scrjeant's Fees 4 Ed. 6. Criketoft Id. 96. for the confederating in the Escape of one Floyd was committed to the Tower and afterwards difcharged paying his Fees 1 Jac. 1. Id. 98. Bryan Tash a Yeoman of his Majesties Guard for keeping the Door of the Lobby of the upper House against several Members of the House of Commons brought to the Bar of the House and upon his Submission and Confession of his Fault dismissed paying the ordinary Fees to the Clerk and Serjeant 20 Jac. 1. Id 104. Dr. Harris for mis-behaveing himself in Preaching and otherwise with respect to Election of Members of Parliament call'd to the Bar as a Delinquent and admonish'd to confess his Fault there and in the Country and in the Pulpit of his Parish Church 3 Car. 1. Mr. Burgess a Minister Id. 104.105 for abusing his Function in the Duty of Catechising c. sent for by a Messenger commited to the Tower and upon humble Submission deliver'd In the same Parliament Id. 105.106 Sir William Wray Mr. Langton Mr. John Trelawny and Mr. Edward Trelawny Deputy Lieutenants for Cornwal for assuming to themselves a Power to make Knights of the Shire defaming such as stood to be chosen sending for the Train'd Bands menacing the Country c. were committed some to the Tower some to the Serjeant till they made a Submission and Recognition in the House and in the Country In the same Parliament One Levet Id. 106.107 for peremptorily exercising a Patent in Time of Prorogation which was adjudg'd a Grievance by the House in the last Session order'd to be sent for by the Serjeant at Arms. As to the Powers exercised by the House of Commons Anno 1640 in restraining the Excesses of Episcopal Jurisdiction and redressing other Grievances arising from Ecclesiastics See Mr. Tindal's Translation of Rapin vol. 2. pa. 361.363 c. CHAP. VIII Of the Power of the House of Commons over their own Members See the precedent Chapter p. 130 132. Scelel 72 THO' Freedom of Speech and Debates be an undoubted Priviledge of the House yet whatsoever is spoken in the House is subject to the Censure of the House and where they find cause Offences of this kind have been severely punish'd by Calling the Persons to the Bar to make Submission Committing him to the Tower the usual Prison to which the Commons do send Delinquents expelling the House disabling him to be a Member during that Parliament and sometime of any suture Parliament 17 Maij 1572. Ibid. Vide d'Ewes Jour 212. Vid. Petyts Misceell Parl. 12 13 c. Upon sundry Motions made by divers Members of the House it was ordered That Arthur Hall Esq for sundry Speeches used by him in the House and abroad should be warned by the Serjeant to be at the House on Monday following and at the Bar to answer Matters charged against him and all such Persons as had noted his Words either in the House or abroad were forthwith to meet and set down the same Words in Writing and deliver the same to the Speaker On Monday Mr. Hall being brought to the Bar by the Serjeant was charged with several Articles and confessed his Folly and humbly submitted himself to the House and was remitted 8 Febr. 1585. Peter Wentworth Id 73. Vide Sir Simon d'Ewes Journal 244. Col. 1 Esq one of the Burgesses for Tregony in the County of Cornwal was for violence and wicked Words uttered by him in the House touching the Queen sequester'd and being brought to the Bar by the Serjeant to whom he was committed received this Judgment by the Mouth of the Speaker That he shou'd be committed close Prisoner to the Tower till the House take further Consideration concerning him 4 Febr. 1580. Id 74 75 Vide Sir Simon d'Ewes Jour 296 297 298. Vid. Petyts Miscell Par. a. p. 20 ad p. 63. Ante 71. 23 Eliz. Complaint was made in the House against Arthur Hall Esq spoken of before who had caus'd a Book to be Printed wherein were published the Conferences of the House and in it was contained Matter of Reproach against some particular Members of the House derogatory to the General Authority Power and State of the House and prejudicial to the Validity of the Proceedings of the same The Matter was referr'd to a Committee to examine and upon Report thereof and bringing Mr. Hall to the Bar several Times to Answer he was sentenced by the House to be committed to the Tower as the Prison to this House there to remain for the space of six Months and so much longer as until he shou'd himself willingly make a Retraction of the said Book to the satisfaction of the House or of such Order as the House shou'd make during that Session That the said Arthur Hall shou'd be fined to the Queen Five hundred Pounds for his said Offence That he shou'd be presently severed and cut off from being a Member of this House during this Parliament and a Writ to Issue for Election of a new Burgess for the Borough of Grantham in his stead Vide post 143. and Bohun's Coll. That the said Book shou'd be deemed and adjudged False and Erroneous Thereupon the said Mr. Hall was brought to the Bar to whom Mr. Speaker in the Name of the whole House pronounced the said Judgment in Form aforesaid and the Serjeant was commanded to take Charge of him and to convey him to the Tower and deliver him to the Lieutenant of the Tower by Warrant of this House to be signed by the Speaker Note Ibid. It appeareth by the Journal 21 Nov. 1586. That he
and must be amended there Sed aliter nunc Every Sheriff or other Officer St. 33 H. 8. c. 1. in Ireland returning any Knight Citizen or Burgess chosen in any other Manner than is prescribed in the Statute to forfeit a 100 l. Vide Post If one be duly Elected Knight 4 Inst 49. It cites in the Margin Rot. Parl. 5 H. 4. n. 38. Citizen or Burgess and the Sheriff Return another the Return must be reformed and amended by the Sheriff and he that is duly Elected must be Inserted for the Election in these Cases is the Foundation and not the Return 18 Jac. 1. Scobel 115. The Sheriff of Leicestershire having Returned Sir Thomas Beaumont upon Report from the Committee for Elections that Sir George Hastings was duly chosen the Sheriff was ordered to Return Sir George Hastings to the Clerk of the Crown and he to accept it and file it 21 Jac. 1. Ibid. Upon Report from the Committee of Privileges That in the Election of Mr. John Maynard for Chippingham John Maynard was Chosen but by a Mistake Charles was afterward written in stead of John It was Resolved The Return shou'd be amended without a new Writ and that the Bailiff shou'd do it and not the Clerk of the Crown and that it shou'd be sent down to the Bailiff in the Country and he to Return John Maynard Esq the first Burgess 1. Febr. 1640. Ibid. It being Resolved That the Election of Mr. Erle for one of the Burgesses of Wareham is a good Election Ordered That the Officer when the Return was made or his Deputy or the Electors shou'd amend the Return But the next Day it was Ordered That Edward Harbin the late Mayor of Wareham 's Deputy shou'd come to the Bar of the House and amend the Return 20 Febr. 1640. Ibid. 116. The Bailiff of Midhurst in Sussex came to the Bar being sent for by Order of the House and amended one of the Indentures of Return of Burgesses for that Town and the other was taken off the File If a Sheriff shall Return One for Knt. of the Shire who was unduly Simon d'Ewes Jour 283. Col. 2. or not at all Elected yet he that is so Return'd remains a Member of the House till his Election be declared Void Of double Returns England and new Writs Ex Memorials of Parliament That if any Sheriff be henceforth negligent in making his Returns of Writs of Parliament St. 5 R. 2. c. 4. Sheriffs neglecting to make Returns or leaving out the Returns of Cities or Borought shall be amerced or otherwise punished as in old Times or that he leave out of the said Returns any Cities or Boroughs which be bound and of old Time were wont to come to the Parliament he shall be amerced or otherwise punished in manner as was accustomed in the said Case in times past That from henceforth in order to the Elections of Counties at the next County after the Delivery of the Writ England Proclamation shall be made in full County of the Day and Place of the Parliament St. 7. H. 4. c. 15. Proclamation to be made at the next County-Court after the Delivery of the Writ to the Sheriff for the Election of knights of the Shires and that all they that be there present as well Suitors duly summoned for the same Cause as other shall attend to the Election of the Knights for the Parliament and then in the full County they shall proceed to the Election freely and indifferently notwithstanding any Request or Commandment to the contrary And after they be chosen Sheriff's Return after the Election shall be by Indenture containing the Persons chosen sealed by the Electors and annexed to the Writ the Names of the Persons so chosen be they present or absent shall be written in an Indenture under the Seals of all them that did choose them and tacked to the same Writ which Indenture so sealed and tacked shall be holden for the Sheriff's Return of the said Writ touching Knights of the Shires In Writs of Parliament hereafter to be made this Clause shall be put Et Electionem tuam in pleno Comitatu factam sub sigillo tuo sigillis eorum qui electioni illi interfuerant nobis in Cancellaria nra ad diem locum in brevi contentu certifices indilate England Forasmuch as in the Statute 7 H. 4. ch 15. no Penalty was ordained or limited in special upon the Sheriffs of the County if they make any Returns contrary of the same Statute St. 11. H. 4. c. 1. Of Returns made by Sheriffs contrary to the Statute 7 H. 4. c. 15. Justices of Assize impower'd to inquire and on Inquest and Proof made thereof such Sheriffs to pay 100 l. to the King It is ordained that the Justices assigned to take Assizes shall have Power to inquire at their Assizes of such Returns made and if it be found by Inquest and due Examination before the same Justices that any such Sheriff hath made any Return contrary to the Tenor of the said Statute the same Sheriff shall incur the Penalty of 100 l. to be paid to our Lord the King That all Sheriffs shall have their Answer and Traverse to Inquests and Offices St. 6 H. 6. c. 4. Sheriffs shall have their Traverses to Inquests c. upon the St 7.4 c. 15. 11 H. 4. c. 1. before any Justices of Assizes hereafter to be taken upon the Stat. 7 Hen. IV. chapter 15. and 11 Hen. IV. ch 1. and the said Sheriffs shall not be endamaged unto our Lord the King or his Successors for any such Inquest taken until they be duly convict according to the Form of Law That such are to be chosen Knights of the Shire as have the greatest Number of them that may expend 40 s. by Year and above England and shall be returned by the Sheriffs of every County St. 8 H. 6. c. 7. See Cromp. Juris 3. Hakewell 48. Knights for Parliament by Indentures sealed betwixt the said Sheriffs and the said Choosers And every Sheriff of the Realm of England shall have Power to examine upon the Evangelists every such Chooser how much he may expend by the Year And if any Sheriff return Knights to Parliament contrary to the said Ordinance the Justices of Assizes in their Sessions shall have Power thereof to inquire And if by Inquest the same be found before the Justices and the Sheriff thereof be duly attainted he shall incur the Penalty of 100 l. to be paid to our Lord the King and also that he have Imprisonment by a Year without Mainprize or Bail And that in every Writ hereafter to go forth Quere mention shall be made of this Ordinance That every Sheriff St. 23 H. 6. c. 15. Sheriff after the Receipt of the Writ to deliver a Precept under his Seal to every Mayor Bailiff c. of the Cities and Boroughs within his County reciting his Writ and commanding them to choose c. after the Delivery of any Writ of Election shall
made in like Manner and Form to all Intents Constructions and Purposes as is used within the County Palatine of Lancaster or any other County and City within England which said Knights and Burgesses and every of them shall be returned by the said Sheriff into the Chancery of England in due Form and upon like Pains as is ordained that the Sheriff or Sheriffs of any other County should make their Return England Sheriff of Chester to make like Returns and on like Pains as other Sheriffs That the Burgesses of all Cities Stat. 35 H. 8. c. 11. Mayors Bailiffs c. of the twelve Shire-Towns in Wales and of Monmouth-Shire shall summon the Burgesses as well of all other Cities Boroughs and Towns in those Counties as of Burgesses of those Towns themselves to come to Elections Boroughs and Towns in the twelve Shires within Wales and County of Monmouth not finding Burgesses for the Parliament themselves and contributary to Wages of Burgesses of such Shire Towns shall be lawfully admonished by Proclamation or otherwise by the Mayors Bailiffs and other Head Officers of the said Towns or by one of them to come and give their Elections for the Electing the said Burgesses at such Time and Place lawful and reasonable as shall be assigned for the same by the said Mayors Bailiffs and other Head Officers of the said Shire Towns or by one of them That the County Palatine of Durham may have two Knights for the same County St. 25 C. 2. c. 9. Writ of Election under the Great Seal for Elections in Durham to be directed to the Bishop of Durham c. and his Precept thereon to the Sheriff of that County and the City of Durham two Citizens to be Burgesses for the same City to be elected by Writ to be awarded by the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper to the Lord Bishop of Durham or his Temporal Chancellor of the said County England and a Precept to be thereupon grounded and made by the said Lord Bishop or his Temporal Chancellor to the Sheriff of the said County and the same Election to be made in Manner following viz. the Elections of the Knights to be made by the greater Number of the Freeholders of the said County Palatine which shall be present at such Elections as is used in other Counties of this Kingdom and that the Election of the said Burgesses for the City of Durham to be made by the major part of the Mayor Aldermen and Freemen of the said City which shall be present at such Elections which said Knights and Burgesses Sherish of Durham to make like Returns and under like Pains as other Sheriffs St. 7 and 8 W. 3. c. 7. continued by St. 12 and 13 W. 3. c. 5. False Returns illegal and prohibited and all made contrary to the last Determination of the Right of Election in the House of Commons adjudged a false Return so elected shall be returned by the said Sheriff into the Chancery in due Form and upon the like Pains as be ordained for the Sheriff or Sheriffs of any other County in like Cases That all false Returns wilfully made of any Knight of the Shire Citizen Burgess Baron of the Cinque-Ports or other Members are against Law and are hereby prohibited and in case that any Person or Persons shall return any Member for any County City Borough Cinque-Port or Place contrary to the last Determination in the House of Commons of the Right of Election in such County England City Borough Cinque-Port or Place such Return is hereby adjudged a false Return The Party so grieved to wit He that shall be duly elected for any County Officers c. making such false Return liable to an Action at the Suit of any duly elected in any of the Courts at Westminster with double Damages and full Costs City Borough Cinque-Port or Place by such false Return may sue the Officers and Persons making or procuring the same and every or any of them at his Election in any Court of Record at Westminster and shall recover double Damages with his full Costs Any Officer that shall wilfully Officers c. falsly c. making double Returns liable to the like Action falsly and maliciously return more Persons than are required to be chosen by the Writ or Precept on which any Choice is made the like Remedy may be had against him or them and the Party or Parties that willingly procure the same by the Party grieved All Contracts Contracts Bonds c. given to procure the Return of any Member adjudged void and such as make or give them to procure any false or double Return forfeit 300 l. one third to the King another to the Poor of the County City c. and a third to the Informer with his Costs to be recovered by Action of Debt c. wherein no Essoign c. Promises Bonds and Securities whatsoever hereafter made or given to procure any Return of any Member or any thing relating thereto be adjudged void and that whoever makes or gives such Contract Security Promise or Bond or any Gift or Reward to procure such false or double Return England shall forfeit 300 l. one third Part to his Majesty another third Part to the Poor of the County City Borough or Place concern'd and one third Part to the Informer with his Costs to be recovered in any Court of Record at Westminster by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information wherein no Essoign Protection or Wager of Law allowed nor more than one Imparlance The Clerk of the Crown to keep a Book of Entry of every single and double Return and of every Alteration and Amendment in every such Return whereto all Persons to have Access and take Copies of so much as desired at a reasonable Fee And if the Clerk of the Crown makes not such Entry in Six Days after any Return or alters any Return without Order of the House of Commons or gives a Certificate of any Person not returned or wilfully neglects or omits his Duty herein to forfeit 500 l. for each Offence to the Party grieved to be recovered as aforesaid and lose his Office England and be for ever incapable of holding it Every Information or Action brought upon this Statute Informations or Actions on this Statute to be brought within two Years after the Cause shall be brought within the Space of two Years after the Cause of Action shall arise That when any New Parliament shall at any Time hereafter be Summoned or called Staf. 8 W. 3. c. 25. Writs of Summons to Parliament to have forty Days between the Teste and Returns and be issued with all Expedition and delivered to the proper Officer to whom its Execution belongs who shall indorse thereon the Day he received it and within three Days issue out his Precept to the like proper Officer of each Borough c. who shall also indorse the Day of his Receipt of the Precept in the former's Presence and proceed to Election in
and every the Sheriffs Mayors G. Britain Bailiffs and other Officers The Act to be read by the Sheriff c. after reading the Writ to whom the Execution of any Writ or Precept for electing any Members belongs shall at the Time of such Election immediately after the Reading of such Writ or Precept read or cause to be read openly before the Electors there assembled this present Act and every Clause therein contained and the same shall also openly be Read once in every Year at the General Quarter Sessions of the Peace after Easter and at the Quarter Sessions after Easter and on electing Magistrates c. for any County or City and at every Election of the chief Magistrate in any Borough Town Corporate or Cinque-Port and at the annual Election of Magistrates and Town Counsellors for every Borough in Scotland That every Sheriff Under-Sheriff Wilful Offence forfeits 50 l. Mayor Bailiff and other Officer to whom the Execution of any Writ or Precept for the electing of Members doth belong for every wilful Offence contrary to this Act shall forseit 50 l. to be recovered with full Costs as before directed Provided Prosecution to commence within two Years That no Person shall be made liable to any Incapacity Disability Forfeiture or Penalty by this Act unless Prosecution be commenced within two Years after such Incapacity c. incurred or in Case of a Prosecution the same be carried on without wilful Delay any Thing herein to the contrary After a Recital of the St. 7.8 St. 6. G. 11. c. 23. W. 3. and the Inconveniencies of County Courts being adjourned to Mondays Fridays or Saturdays it enacts That no County Court in England shall be adjourn'd to a Monday Friday or Saturday and all Adjournments and Acts done at such Courts so adjourn'd to be null and void any Law Custom or Usage to the contrary Provided That any County Court begun holden on or adjourned to any Day not prohibited by this or the said former Act for electing any Knight of the Shire for any County or for hearing and determining Causes or for such other Matters and Business as are usually transacted at County Courts may be adjourned over from Day to Day tho' the same may happen to be on a Monday Friday or Saturday until such Election or other Matters be fully finished any thing therein to the contrary c. CHAP. XIII Election of the Speaker THE Speaker is he that doth prefer and commend the Bills exhibited to the Parliament Arc. Parl. 3. Smyth's Common-wealth 75. and is the Mouth of the Parliament It is true 4 Inst 8. Smyth's Common-wealth 75. See Bohun's Coll. 352. contra the Commons are to choose their Speaker but seeing that after their Choice the King may refuse him for avoiding of expence of Time and Contestation the Use is as in the Conge d'Eslier of a Bishop that the King doth name a discret and learned Man whom the Commons elect But without their Election no Speaker can be appointed for them 4 Inst 8. because he is their Mouth and trusted by them and so necessary as the House of Commons cannot sit without him And therefore a grievous Sickness is a good Cause to remove the Speaker Id. 8. and choose another So in 1 Hen. 4. Sir John Cheyny discharged and so William Sturton So in 15 Hen. 6. Sir John Tyrrel removed So March 14. 1694. Sir John Trevor The first Day each Member is called by his Name Modus tenend Pal. 35. every one answering for what Place be serveth That done they are willed to choose their Speaker who tho' nominated by the King's Majesty is to be a Member of that House Their Election being made he is presented by them to the King sitting in Parliament 35. So Sir Thomas Gargrave 1 Eliz. So Christopher Wray 13 Eliz. So Robert Bell 14 Eliz. See Bohun's Coll. 352 353. So John Puckering 27 Eliz. So George Snagg 31 Eliz. So Edward Coke 35 Eliz. So Yelverton 39 Eliz. So John Crook 43 Eliz. So Sir Thomas Crew 19 Jac. 1. So Sir Heneague Finch 1 Car. 1. cum multis aliis The Speaker ought to be religious Towns Coll. 1.4 honest grave wise faithful and Secret These Virtues must concur in one Person able to supply that Place The long Use hath made it so material Elsyng 154 that without the King's Commandment or Leave they cannot choose their Speaker Sed aliter ab Antiquo Surely the Election of the Speaker was antiently free to the Commons Id. 155. to choose whom they would of their own House which appears in this that the King never rejected any whom they made Choice of Vide contra Sir Simon d'Ewes Journ 42. Col. 1. where he saith That 28 Hen. 6. Sir John Popham was discharg'd by the King i. e. on his excuse and thereupon the Commons chose and presented William Tresham Esq who made no Excuse See the like of Paul Foley in Bohun's Collection 353. The Cause of Summons being declared by the King or Chancellor Elsing 151 Cook 12 115. Smyth's Common-wealth 79. the Lord Chancellor confers first with his Majesty and then in his Name commands the Commons to assemble in their House and to choose one of their Members to be their Speaker and to present him to his Majesty on a Day certain Upon which the Commons shall presently assemble themselves in the Lower House Co. 12.115 and he is to be a Member of their Parliament The Commons being thereupon assembled in their House Elsyng 152 Vid. Town Coll. 174. See Bohun ut Supra one of the Commons puts the rest in mind of their Charge given in the Upper House touching the choosing of a Speaker and then doth of himself commend one unto them and desires their Opinions to be signified by their Affirmative or Negative Voices and if any Man stand up and speak against him so named alledging some Reason he ought to name another Some Person when the generality of Members are come Scobel 3. Vid. Town 174. Vide Sir S. d'Ewe's Jour passim and sit doth put the House in mind that for their better proceeding in the weighty Affairs they are come about their first Work is to appoint a Speaker and re-commends to the House some Person of Fitness and Ability for the Service and Dignity which usually hath been one of the long Robe If more than one Person be named for Speaker Scobel 3. and it be doubtful who is more generally chosen sometime one of the Members standing in his Place doth by Direction or Leave of the House put a Question for determining the same or the Clerk at the Board So it was in the first Session 1 Jac. 1. Scobel 4. when Sir Edward Philips the King's Serjeant at Law was first named by Mr. Secretary Herbert as fit for that Place and the Names of others were mention'd but the more general Voice run upon Sir Edward Philips and a Question being put he was by general Acclamation chosen Speaker When the Speaker
Process by White above twenty Days before the Beginning of this Parliament holden by Prorogation mistaken for Adjournment and in respect that the House was divided about it in Opinion Mr. Speaker with the Consent of the House the sooner to grow to some Certainty of the Judgment of the House in this Cause moved these Question to the House viz. First Whether they would limit a Time certain or a reasonable Time to any Member of the House for his Privilege The House answered a Convenient Time Secondly Whether Mr. Martin was arrested within this reasonable Time The House answered Yea. Thirdly If White should be punished for arresting Martin The House answered No. Because the Arrest was twenty Days before the Beginning of the Parliament and unknown to him what would be taken for reasonable Time But the principal Cause why Mr Martin had his Privilege was for that White the last Session mistaken for Meeting of Parliament arrested Mr. Martin and then knowing him to be returned a Burgess for this Honse discharged his Arrest And then afterwards Mr. Martin again returning out of his Country to London to serve in this House Mr. White did again arrest him and therefore this House took in evil Part against him his second Arrest and thereupon judged that Martin should be discharged of his second Arrest out of the Fleet by the said Mr. White 12 Martii Id. 102. 1606. Complaint was made by Mr. James a Burgess of Parliament That his Horse standing at his Inn was taken by the Post-Master's Servant Both the Post-Master and his Servant were sent for and brought to the Bar. Moreton the Post-Master appearing to be ignorant of what his Servant had done and disavowing it was by Order of the House discharged But upon the Testimony of a Witness at the Bar that he told the Servant when he took the Horse that a Member of Parliament was Owner of it the Servant was committed In Dec. 1606. Thomas Finch Memorials p. 101 102. a Servant to Sir Nicholas Sandys one of the Burgesses for Quinborough was arrested during the Adjournment which being conceived to be a great Contempt to the Privilege of the House an Habeas Corpus was awarded to bring him to the House and he was accordingly brought and also one Knight who procured the Arrest and Harrison the Yeoman The Excuse was That Finch was an Attorney at Law but it being avowed by Sir Nicholas Sandys That Finch lay in his House solicited his Causes and received Wages from him and it being insisted on That all menial and necessary Servants are to be privileged and Instance given of a Precedent of the Baron of Walton's Solicitor and Huddleston's Solicitor in the Time of Queen Elizabeth Upon the Question Finch was privileged and delivered according to former Precedents During the Adjournment Ibid. 102. a Suit was prosecuted in the Court of Wards against Nicholas Pots Esq and Francis Wethered Gent. Committees of a Ward which concerning Mr. Nicholas Davys Servant to the then Speaker as Assignee of the Ward The Speaker writ a Letter to the Court to make known That he was one of his Clerks and nearest Servants and that the Privilege was now as warrantable as in the Time of sitting and prayed the Court to take Notice of it During another Adjournment in March following Id. 103. the Speaker warranted by the general Order at the Desire of Sir Edmund Ludlow who was summoned to attend the Execution of a Commission out of the Chancery writ a Letter to the Commissioners to excuse his Attendance and that he should not be prejudiced by his Absence In May 1607. Ibid. during an Adjournment the Speaker directed a Letter to the Lord President and Council at York to stay Proceedings in a Suit there against Talbot Bowes a Member of the House 29 Feb. 1575. Id. 113. One Williams for assaulting a Burgess of this House was upon Complaint sent for by the Serjeant and brought to the Bar and committed to the Serjeant's Ward 23 April Ibid. 1 Mar. One Monington for striking William Johnson a Burgess was sent for and confessing it was committed to the Tower 28 Nov. 1601. Ibid. Towns Col. 259. Vide Sir Simon d'Ewe 's Jour 658. Col. 1. Complaint being made by Mr. Fleetwood a Member of the House That one Holland a Scrivener and one Brook his Servant had evil intreated and beaten the Servant of the said Mr. Fleetwood in his Presence they were both sent for by the Serjeant and brought to the Bar and for the said Offence committed for five Days to the Serjeant And that they should pay double Fees 12 Feb. 18 Jac. 1. Mr. Lovel Memorials 114 a Member of the House informed That one Darryel threatened his Person that for a Speech spoken by him in the House he should be sent to the Tower during the Parliament or presently after Darryel was sent for by the Serjeant to answer it to the House and upon Testimony of it he was committed to the Serjeant till Thursday following and then to acknowledge his Fault or be committed to the Tower 16 Jun. 1604. Complaint being made of one Thomas Rogers a Currier dwelling in Coleman-Street for abusing Sir John Savill in slanderous and unseemly Terms upon his Proceedings at a Committee in the Bill touching Tanners c. he was sent for by the Serjeant at Arms to the Bar to answer his Offence 1 Car. 1. 4 Inst 48. The Sheriff for the County of Buckingham was chosen Knight for the County of Norfolk and returned into the Chancery and having a Subpoena served upon him at the Suit of the Lady C. pendente Parliamento upon Motion he had the Privilege of Parliament allowed to him by the Judgment of the whole House of Commons 43 Eliz. 1601. Towns Co. 195. Vide Sir Simon d'Ewe 's Jour 629. Col. 1. This Day a Page was brought to the Bar whom Sir Francis Hastings had caused to be committed for that as he went down the Stairs the Page offer'd to throng him But upon is Hastings his Intreaty speaking very earnestly for him and upon the Page's Submission upon his Knees at the Bar he was discharged 44 Eliz. 1601. Towns Col. 229. Vid. Sir Simon d'Ewe 's Jour 643 Col. 2. Mr. William Morris Burgess for Beaumaris coming on his Way to London his Man was arrested at Shewsbury Ordered That the Bailiff and he that procured the Arrest and the Serjeant be sent for 44 Eliz. 1601. Towns Col. 225 226. The Solicitor of one Langton a Burgess for Newton in Lancashire was arrested at the Suit of one Musket a Taylor and committed to the Compter Agreed by the House That both Musket and the Serjeant should pay the Solicitor's Costs and Damages and be imprisoned three Days in the Serjeant's Custody and to pay the Serjeant attending this House his Fees The Parliament shall not give Privilege to any Member contra morem Parliamentarium Rush Col. 663. to exceed the Bounds and Limits of his Place and Duty And all
by him commenced he shall not be barred by any Statute of Limitation nor non-suited dismist or his Suit discontinued for want of Prosecution but shall from Time to Time on the rising of the Parliament be at Liberty to proceed to Judgment and Execution Sect. IV. That no Action Suit Process Order Judgment Decree or Proceedings in Law or Equity against the King's original and immediate Debtor for Recovery or obtaining of any Debt or Duty originally and immediately due or payable to his Majesty his Heirs or Successors or against any Accomptant or Person answerable or liable to render an Account to his Majesty his Heirs or Successors for any Part or Branch of their Revenues or other original and immediate Debt or Duty or the Execution of any such Process Order Judgment Decree or Proceedings shall be impeached stayed or delayed by or under the Colour or Pretence of Parliament Yet so that that the Person of any such Debtor or Accomptant or Person answerable or liable to account being a Peer of this Realm or Lord of Parliament shall not be liable to be arrested or imprisoned by or upon any such Suit Process Order Judgment c. or being a Member of the House of Parliament shall not during the Continuance of the Privilege of Parliament be arrested or imprisoned by or upon any such Order Judgment Decree Process or Proceedings Sect. V. Provided That this Act or any Thing therein shall not extend to give any Jurisdiction Power or Authority to any Court to hold Plea in any real or mixed Action in any other Manner than it might have been done before the making of this Act. Jovis Bohun's Collection pag. 27. 13 Feb. 1700. Resolved That no Member have any Privilege in any Case where he is only a Trustee Resolved Nem. Cont. That no Peer of the Realm hath any Right to vote in the Election of any Member to serve in Parliament And Declared by the House as a standing Order Ibid. That no Member have any Privilege except for his Person only against any Commoner in any Suit or Proceeding at Law or Equity for any longer Time than the House shall be actually sitting for the Dispatch of Business in Parliament Martii Ibid. pag. 230. 28 Nov. 1699. Resolved That no Member of this House acting as a Publick Officer hath any Privilege of Parliament touching any Matter done in Execution of his Office APPENDIX The Report of a Case happening in Parliament in the first Year of King James the First which was the Case of Sir Francis Goodwyn and Sir John Fortescue for the Knights Place in Parliament for the County of Bucks Translated out of the French IN this Case after that Sir Francis Goodwyn was elected Knight with one Sir William Fleetwood for the said County which Election was freely made for him in the County and Sir John Fortescue refused notwithstanding that the Gentlemen of the best Rank put him up the said Sir John Fortescue complained to the King and Council-Table he being one of them to wit one of the Privy Council that he had been injuriously dealt with in that Election which does not appear to be true But to exclude Sir Francis Goodwyn from being one of the Parliament it was objected against him That he was Outlawed in Debt which was true scilicet he was outlawed for sixty Pound the 31st of Queen Elizabeth at the Suit of one Johnson which Debt was paid and also the 39th of Eliz. at the Suit of one Hacker for sixtteen Pounds which Debt was also paid and that notwithstanding this the King by the Advice of his Council at Law and by the Advice of his Judges took Cognisance of these Outlawries and directed another Writ to the Sheriff of the said County to elect another Knight in the Place of the said Sir Francis Goodwyn which Writ bore Date before the Return of the former And this Writ recites N. B. Here the King assumes the Power of judging and determining the 〈◊〉 of Members Parliament Sed 〈◊〉 That because the said Sir Francis was outlawed prout Domino Regi constabat de Recordo and for other good Considerations which were well cognisant to the King and because he was Inidonious for the Business of the Parliament therefore the King commanded the Sheriff to elect one other Knight in his Room which Writ was executed accordingly and Sir John Fortescue elected And at last Day of the Return to wit the first Day of the Parliament both Writs were return'd the first with the Indenture sealed between the Sheriff and the Freeholders of Bucks in which Sir Francis Goodwyn and Sir William Fleetwood were elected Knights for the Parliament and also the Sheriff returned upon the Dorse of the Writ That the said Sir Francis was outlawed in two several Outlawries and therefore was not a meet Person to be a Member of the Parliament House The second Writ was returned with an Indenture only in which it was recited That Sir John Fortescue by reason of the second Writ was elected Knight Both these Returns were brought the third Sitting of the Parliament to the Parliament House by Sir George Copping being Clerk of the Crown And after that the Writs and Returns of them were read it was debated in Parliament Whether Sir Francis Goodwyn should be received as Knight for the Parliament or Sir John Fortescue And the Court of Parliament after a long Debate thereupon gave Judgment That Sir Francis Goodwyn should be received And their Reasons were these First because they took the Law to be That an Outlawry in Personal Actions was no Cause to disable any Person from being a Member of Parliament and it was said That this was ruled in Parliament 35th of Queen Elizabeth in the Parliament House in a Case for one Fitz-Herbert Another Precedent was 39 H. 6. Secondly The Pardons of the 39th of Queen Eliz. and 43 Eliz. had pardoned those Outlawries and therefore as they said he was a Man able against all the World but against the Party Creditor and against him he was not But in this Case the Parties were paid Also Thirdly it was said That Sir Francis Goodwyn was not legally outlawed because no Proclamation was issued forth to the County of Bucks where he was Commorant and Resiant And therefore the Outlawry being in the Hustings in London and Sir Francis Goodwyn being Comorant in Bucks the Outlawry no Proclamation issuing to the County of Bucks was void by the Statute of the 31st of the Queen which in such Cases makes the Outlawries void Fourthly It was said that the Outlawries were 1. Against Francis Goodwyn Esq 2. Against Francis Goodwyn Gent. And 3. The Return was of Francis Goodwyn Knight Et quomodo constant that those Outlawries were against the said Sir Francis Goodwyn For these Reasons also they resolved That the Outlawries were not any Matter against Sir Francis Goodwyn to disenable him to be a Knight for the County of Bucks Fifthly It was said That by the Statute
Body as the Upper House was for their Privileges Customs and Orders which continual and common Usage hath approved of As to their Charge of having used Precipitancy and Rashness they answered That they used it in such a Manner as in all other Cases they were wont to do scilicet To have first a Motion of the Matter in Controversy and then they caused the Clerk of the Crown to bring the second Day the Writs and Returns and they being thrice read they proceed to the Examination of them and upon Examination gave Judgment which was the true proper Course of the Place As to the House's not having used the King well the Thing being done by his Command they say That they had no Notice before their Sentence that the King himself took any special Regard of that Case but only that his Officer the Chancellor had directed his second Writ as formerly had been done As to the Matter of the Outlawry they said That they understand by his Royal Person more Strength and Light of Reason from it than ever before and yet it was without Example That any Member of the House was put out of the House for any such Cause but to prevent that they had prepared a Law That no outlawed Person for the Time to come should be of the Parliament nor any Person in Execution should have the Privilege of Parliament But they said further That Sir Francis Goodwyn was not outlawed at the Day of his Election for he was not Quinto Exactus the five Proclamations never had been made which Proclamations they in London always spare except the Party or any for him require it and that Exigent was never returned nor any Writ of Certiorari directed to the Coroners to certify it but after his Election which was a Thing unusual the Money being paid and the Sheriffs being long since dead to disenable the said Goodwyn to serve in Parliament that the Exigent was returned and the Names of the deceased Sheriffs put thereto Et ex hoc fuit without doubt that Goodwyn could not have a Scire Facias for there was no Outlawry against him and by Consequence the Pardons had discharged him And they farther shewed to the King That if the Chancellor only could examine Returns then upon every Surmise whether it were true or false the Chancellor might send a second Writ and cause a new Election to be made and thus the free Election of the County should be abrogated which would be too dangerous to the Commonwealth For by such Means the King and his Council might make any Man whom they would to be of the Parliament-House against the Great Charter and the Liberties of England It is found among the Precedents of Queen Elizabeth's Reign Rush 3 vol. pag. 591. on whose Times all good Men look with Reverence that She committed one Wentworth a Member of the House of Commons to the Tower sitting the House only for proposing That they might advise the Queen in a Matter which she thought they had nothing to do to meddle in Quere If not in advising her to marry This notorious Infringement of their Liberties and Privileges See Sir Matthew Hâ—â—'s of Parliament pag. 206 216 217.218 c. in the latter End of Queen Elizabeth seems to be what the Commons complained of and mention in that famed Remonstrance or Declaration of their Privileges printed and directed to King James the First in the Beginning of his Reign viz. Anno Dom. 1604. Wherein they tell that King That they bore with some Things in the latter Times of Queen Elizabeth in regard of her Sex and her Age and not to impeach his Majesty's Succession under whom they then hoped to have them redressed and rectified Whereas on the contrary in that very first Parliament of his Majesty they found That the whole Freedom of the Parliament and Realm had been on all Occasions mainly hewed at As That the Freedom of their Persons in Election had been impeached The Freedom of their Speech prejudiced by often open Reproofs That particular Persons Members who had spoken their Consciences in Matters proposed to the House noted with Disgrace c. That a Goaler had contemned the Decrees and Orders of the House Some of the higher Clergy to write Books against them even fitting in Parliament The inferior Clergy to inveigh against them in their Pulpits c. After which they roundly assert That the Prerogative of Princes may easily See the Force of a Precedent once fixed in the Crown 2 Inst 61. Houâ—â—shead 1 Tom. pag 135. and do daily grow and increase But the Privileges of Subjects are for the most Part at an everlasting Stand They may by good Providence and Care be preserved but being once lost are not to be recovered but with much Disquiet and Disorder Vide ibid. plura To conclude this Treatise as I begun it give me leave to add There is nothing ought to be so dear to the Commons of Great Britain as a Free Parliament that is a House of Commons every Way free and independent either of the Lords or Ministry or c. Free in their Persons Free in their Estates Free in their Elections Free in their Returns Free in their assembling Free in their Speechs Debates and Determinations Free to complain of Offenders Free in their Prosecutions for Offences and therein Free from the Fear or Influence of others how great soever Free to guard against the Incroachments of arbitrary Power Free to preserve the Liberties and Properties of the Subject and yet Free to part with a Share of those Properties when necessary for the Service of the Publick Nor can he be justly esteem'd a Representative of the People of Britain who does not sincerely endeavour to defend their just Rights and Liberties against all Invasions whatsoever See further touching the Rights and Duties of Parliaments in Rapin's History Vol. II. Book XXII especially Page 583 and 595. Sed quae sunt Jura si non Libere Fruantur FINIS Books lately Printed MODERN Entries in English Being a select Collection of Pleadings in the Courts of King's-Bench Common-Pleas and Exchequer viz. Declarations Pleas in Abatement and in Bar Replications Rejoinders c. Demurrers Issues Verdicts Judgments Forms of Continuances Discontinuances and other Entries and of entering Judgments c. in all personal Actions and also all Kinds of Writs Original and Judicial Translated from the most authentick Books but cheifly from Lutwich's Saunders's Ventris's Salkeld's and the Modern Reports and from other Cases lately try'd and adjudg'd and wherein Writs of Error have been brought and Judgments affirm'd Together with Readings and Observations on the several Cases in the Reports as well relating to the Precedents herein as to all other Cases incident to each particular Title and the same abridg'd in a methodical Order To which are added References to all the other Entries in the Books with three distinct Tables one of the Precedents the second of the Cases abridg'd and the third of the Names of the Cases By a Gentlman of the Inner-Temple The Law of Uses and Trusts collected and digested in a proper Order from the Reports of adjudged Cases in the Courts of Law and Equity and other Books of Authority Together with a Treatise of Dower To which is added A compleat Table of all the Matters therein contained And The Law and Practice of Ejectments Being a compendious Treatise of the Common and Statute Law relating thereto To which is added Select Precedents of Pleas special Verdicts Judgments Executions and Proceedings in Error with two distinct Tables to the Whole The Second Edition carefully corrected and revised by the Author The Attorney's Pocket Companion Or A Guide to the Practisers of the Law In two Parts Being a Translation of Law Proceedings in the Courts of King's-Bench and Common-Pleas Containing a Collection of the common Forms beginning with the Original and ending with the Judicial Process Together with an historical as well as practical Treatise on Ejectment To which is also added The Law and Practise of Fines and Recoveies and several other Precedents with some Remarks on the Forms of the Habeas Corpora and Jurata now in Use In two Vols
of 7 H. 4. which prescribes the Manner of the Election of Knights and Burgesses it is Enacted That the Election shall be by Indenture between the Sheriff and the Freeholders and that the Indenture shall be the Return of the Sheriff It was also said That the Precedents do warrant this Judgment viz. 1. One Precedent of 39 H. 6. where a Person outlawed was adjudged a sufficient Member of Parliament Another 1 Eliz. and at that Time one Gargrave who was a Man learned in the Law was Speaker and of the Queen's Council 2. Another was the Case of one Fludd in the 23d of the Queen who being outlawed was adjudged That he should be privileged by Parliament and at that Time the Lord Chief Justice Popham was Speaker And 3. In the 35th of Elizabeth there were three Precedents scil one of Fitz-Herbert another of one Killegrew being outlawed in fifty two Outlawries and the third of Sir Walter Harecourt being outlawed in eighteen Outlawries But after this Sentence and Judgment of the Parliament the King's Highness was displeased with it because the second Writ emanavit by his Assent and by the Advice of his Council And therefore it was moved to the Judges in the Upper-House Note Whether a Person outlawed could be a Member of Parliament who gave their Opinions that he could not And they all except Williams agreed That the Pardon without a Scire facias did not help him but that he was outlawed to that Purpose as if no Pardon had been granted And upon this the Lords sent to the Lower-House desiring a Conference with them concerning this Matter which Conference the Lower-House after some Deliberation denied for these Reasons 1. Because they had given their Judgment before and therefore they could not have Conference de re Judicata as in like Manner they did 27 Queen Eliz. upon a Bill that came from the Lords and was rejected by Sentence upon the first Reading Sir Walter Mildmay being then of the Privy Council and of the House 2. Because they ought not to give any Accompt of their Actions to any other Person but to the King himself This Answer the Lords did ill resent and therefore refused Conference in other Matters concerning Wards and Respite of Homages and Purveyors and also they sent to the King to inform him of it But before their Messengers came to the King two of the Privy Council scilicet Sir John Stanhope and Sir John Herbert were sent to the King by the Lower-House to inform him that they had heard that his Grace was displeased with the House for their Sentence given for Sir Francis Goodwyn as well as in the Matter of the Sentence which was as they heard said to be against Law as also for the Manner of their Proceedings being done hastily without Calling to it either Sir John Fortescue or his Council or without making his Grace acquainted with it And therefore they desired his Grace to understand the Truth of this Matter and also told him That they were ready with his good Leave with their Speaker to attend his Majesty to give him Satisfaction about their Proceedings But the King told them they came too late and that it ought to have been done sooner calling the House Rash and Inconsiderate But yet notwithstanding he was content to hear their Speaker in the Morning at Eight of the Clock Upon this Message Committees were chosen to consider of the Things and Matters aforesaid which should be delivered to the King in Satisfaction of the Sentence given by the House which afterwards were considered of and digested by the Speaker and Committees in three Points viz. 1. In the Reasons and Motives of their Resolutions 2. In the Precedents which were those I before have reported 3. And in Matters of Law Which were those Matters of Law also before reported by me with another Addition That in the Time of Henry the Sixth the Speaker of the Parliament was arrested in Execution at the Suit of the Duke of York and the Question being put to the Judges at that Time See Bohun's Col. p. 277. Whether the Speaker ought to have his Privilege it was said by them That they were Judges of the Law and not Judges of Parliament The Reasons and Motives were the free Election of the County the Request of one of the House the double Return of the Sheriff with a Commemoration of the Length of the Time since the Outlawries and with that the Payment of the Debts To this Report the King answered That he now ought to change his Tune which he used in his first Oration scilicet Thanksgiving to Grief and Reproof But he said That it was as necessary they should be reproved as congratulated and therefore he cited a parcel of Scriptures wherein God had so done with his People Israel nay with King David the People whom he tendered as the Apple of his Eye and David who was a Man after his own Heart He said It seems antiently to be a Privy Counsellor was incompatible with being a Member of Parliament or Publick Counsellor That since Sir Francis Goodwyn was received by the House upon Reasons and Motives inducing the House thereunto so the King upon Reason too took Consideration of Sir John Fortescue being one of the Council an ancient Counsellor a Counsellor not chosen by the King but by his Predecessors and so he found him and therefore he endeavoured to grace him being the only Man of them that had been disgraced the King protesting that he would not for any Thing in the World offer unjustly any Disgrace to any Man in the Nation Besides he did not proceed rashly as they had proceeded but upon Deliberation with double Advice as well with that of his Council as with that of his Judges And in his answering the Precedents Quere If the King himself was not here too over weening he said That those were his own proper Records and to use them against himself was over-great Weenings But in Precedents he said that they ought to respect Times and Persons and therefore said That Henry the Sixth's Time was troublesome he himself Weak and Impotent And as for the other Precedents they were in the Time of a Woman which Sex was not capable of Mature Deliberation and so he said where Infants are Kings whom he called Minors For the Law Part he referred to the Answer of his Judges who by the Lord Chief Justice gave these Resolutions They all unanimously agreeing in them 1. That the King alone and not the Parliament House had to do with the Returns of the Members of Parliament for from him the Writs issued and to him the Sheriff is commanded to make his Returns but when a Man is returned and sworn the Parliament-House hath to do with him and the Sheriff ought to Return the Outlawry if he knew it before his Return 2. They resolved clearly Thatan outlawed Person cannot by the Law be a Member of the Parliament-House but for that Cause