tryall hereof shall not be by Record as in the former case but by a Jury of 12. men and the reason of the diversity is because in this case the Dignity is accrewed unto her by marriage which the Lawyers tearme matter in fact and not by any record Cookes 6. part 53. a. But a noble Woman by Marriage though she take to her a second Husband a man of meane degree yet shee may keepe two Chaplaines according to the Proviso in the Statute of 21. H. 8. c. 13. for and in respect of the honour which once she had viz. at the time of the retayner and every such Chaplaine may purchase lycense and dispensation Cookes 4. part 117. Cowels Instutions lib. tit 10. 15. but her Chaplaines may not be nonresident afterwards And forasmuch as the retayning of Chaplaines by Ladies of great estates is ordinary and neverthelesse some questions in law have beene concerning the true understanding of the said Statute law I thinke it not impertinent to set downe some subsequent resolutions of the Judges touching such matters Anne Baronesse of Mount Eagle in her Widdowhood did retaine two Chaplaines according to the Statute and one of them had but one Benefice and therefore did obtaine a dispensation with a confirmation from the Queene according to the tenour of the said Statute but before he was presented to his second Benefice the Lady did take to Husband Henry Lord Compton whereby she did forsake her former dignity of Baronesse of Mount-Eagle and afterward the said Chaplain did accept a second Benefice and was therunto admitted and inducted and the Judges have resolved that the Chaplain hath done nothing herein but according to the meaning of the Statute and that the Ladies marriage between his Retainer and acceptance of his second benefice was no Countermand Revocation or determination of that Retainer which the Lady lawfully then did make but that she living he might proceed to the filling up of the qualification Causa origio est materia negoti for though the wife of a Noble-man during the covecture cannot by Law rerain a Chaplain to be quallified according to the statute because by Intendment her Husbands Chaplains are sufficient for that Office yet forasmuch as the Retainer was lawfull then she was widdow that being the principall matter shall enable him to take use and benefice after her marriage for though the husband and wife are but one person in Law yet as the Text is sunt animo duo in carne uno Bracton lib. 5. fol. 363 a. And in this case by the death of the Lord Compton her first Retainer was not determined for without any neer Retainer her said Chaplain may take his second benefice and also for that cause so long as the said Chaplains do attend upon their said Lady in her House they shall not be endammaged for Non-residency Cooks 4. part 117. fol. 90 76. That which remains concerning the further exposition of this statute you may read before in the title of priviledge of Lords So long that the wife of a Duke be called Dutchesse or of an Earl be a Countesse and have the fruition of all the Honours appertaining to that estate with kneeling tasting serving and the rest and so long shall a Barons widow be saluted Lady and a Knights wise also by the courteous Speech of England quandiu Maj. aut viduitas vic durant except she happen to relaps with an Adulterer for as the Laws of this Kingdome do adjudge that a woman shall lose her dower in that case viz. west cap. B. F. N. B. fol. 150. H. Perk. fel. 70. Kitchin 162. b. as Ruto Lands and Tenents so justly so doth the Laws of Gentry and Noblenesse give sentence against such a woman advanced to Titles of Dignity by the husband to be unworthy to enjoy the same when she putting her husband out of mind hath subjected her self to another If a Lady which is married come through the Forrests he shall not take any thing but a Dutchesse or a Countesse shall have advantage of the statute de Charta Forest 11. Art during the time that she is unmarried Cromptons Court fol. 167 b. Wheras it is contained in the great Charter amongst other things in the Form which followeth no Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned or deseised of his Free-hold or his Liberties or Free-customs or shall be outlawed or banished or in any wise destroyed nor go upon him but by the lawfull judgment of his Peers or by the Law of the Land In which statute is no mention made how women Ladies of great estate because of their Husbands Peers of the Land married or sole that is to say Dutchesse Countesse or Barronesse shall be put to answer or before what Iudges they shall be judged upon an Inditement of Treason or Fellonyes by them committed or done because wherof it is an Ambiguity in the Law of England before whom and by whom such Ladies so endicted shall be put to answer and be judged by our said Soveraign Lord the King willing to put out such Ambiguities and Doubts hath declared by Authority aforesaid that such Ladies so endicted or hereafter to be endicted whether they be married or sole therof shall bee brought in answer and put to answer and judged before such Iudges and Peers of the Realm as Peers of the Realm should be if they were endicted of any Treasons or Fellonyes done or hereafter to be done and in like manner and Form and in none otherwise Anno 2. H. 6. Cap. 9. Which statute was but a Confirmation or Declaration of the common Law vide Cooks 6 part 52. b. This is a Rule in the civill law si filia R. nubat alicui dom vel Comiti dicetur semp Regalis As amongst Noble women there is a difference of degrees so according to their distinct excellentnesse the law doth give speciall Priviledges as followeth By the statute of 25. E. 3. cap. 2. It is High Treason to compose or imagine the death of the Queen or to violate the Kings Companion The Kings Espouse is a sole person exempted by the common law and she may purchase by Fee-simple or Make leases or Grants without the King she may plead and be impleaded which no other married woman can do without her husband Cook 4 part 23. B. Theol. lib 1. cap. 4. 24. E. 3. 63. vide Bracton 363. a. All Acts of Parliaments for any cause which any way may concern the Queen and her Capacity are such statutes wherof the Judges ought to take recognisance as of generall statutes for though the matter do only concern the Capacity of the Queen yet it doth also concern all the subjects of the Realm for every subject hath interest in the King and none of his Subjects who are within his Lawes in divided from the King being his head and Soveraigne so that his businesse and things do touch all the Realme and as all the Realme hath interest in the King so and
signified unto the late Queene upon the Petition oâ— the sister and heire of Gregory late Lord Dacres deceased may appeare Moreover in the same Pedegree of the said Lord Dacres it is expressed that Thomas sometimes Lord Dacres had issue Thomâ—s his eldest son Ralph his second sonne and Humphrey his third sonne Thomas the eldest dyed in the life time of his Father having Issue Ioan his daughter and heire who was marryed unto Sir Richard Fines Knight And after Thomas Lord Dacres her Grandfather and Father unto the said Sir Ralph and Humphrey dyed After whose death Henry 6. by his Letters Patents bearing date at Westminster 7. Novem. Anno 7. regni reciting the said Peâ—egree and Marriage doth by his Lettâ—rs Pattents accept declare and repute the said Richard Fines to be Lord Dacres and one of the Barons of his Realme But afterward in the timâ— of Edw 4. the said Humphrey Dacres after the attaindor of the said Ralph and himselfe by an Act of Parliament which was in 1. Ed. 4. and after the death of the said Ralph and after the reversall of the same Act by another Act 12. Edw. 4. the said Humphrey made challenge unto the said Barony and to divers Lands of the said Thomas his Father whereupon both parties after their title had been considered in Parliament submitted themselves unto the Arbiâ—rement of King Edw. 4. and entred into Bond each â—o other for the performance thereof Whereupon the said King in his award under his Privie seale bearing date at Westminster 8. April Anno regni 13. did award that the said Rich Fines in the right of Ioan his wife and the Heires of his body lawfully begotten should be reputed had named and called Lord Dacres and that the said Richard Fines and the Heires of his body by the said Ioane begotten should keepe have and use the same state and place in every Parliament as the said Thomas Dacres Knight late Lord Dacres had used kept c. that the heires of the body of the said Thomas acres Knight late Lord Dacres lawfully begotten should have and â—old to them their Heites the Mannor of Holbech And furthermore the said King did award on the other part that the said Humphrey Dacres Knight and the Heires males of the said Thomas late Lord Dacres should be reputed had named and called the L. Dacres of Gillesland And that he and the heires males of the said Thomas then late Lord Dacres should have use and keepe the place in Parliament next adioyning beneath the said place which the said Rich Fines Knight Lord Dacres then had and occupied and that the heires of the body of the said Ioan his wife should have and occupie And that the Heires males of the said Thomas Dacres late L. Dacres should have to them to the heires males of their bodies begotten the Mannor of Jothington c. And so note that the name of the ancient Barony namely Gile sland remained unto the Heire male unto whom the land was entailed Moreover this is specially observed if any Baron by writ doe dy having none other issue then Female and that by some speciall entail or other assurance there be an heire male which doth enioy all or agreat part of the lands possessions and inheritances of such Barons deceased the Kings of this Realme have used to call to the Parliament by writ as Baron such here male omitting the Husband or issuâ— male of such heire female and this also appeareth by a notable controversie in the time of Henry 7. betweene Sir Robert Willoughby Lord Brooke and Richard Lord Latimer for the Barony of Latimer which in effect was The said Lord Brooke did challenge the Barony of Latimer as cosen and Heire to Elizabeth his great grandmother who was sister and heire to Iohn Nevill Lord Latimer who died without issue and hereupon exhibited a Petition to Henry 7. in Parliament whereto Richard then Lord Latimer was called to answer because he then enjoyed the said title and dignity The said Richard Lord Latimer by his answer did shew that it was true that after the death of the said Iohn Nevill Lord Latimer dying without issue the said Elizabeth was the sister and next heire and married unto Sir Thomas Willloughby Knight second son of the Lord VVilloughby but Henry 6. for that the said Iohn Nevill was dead without issue and that the next heire was female did therefore call to the Parliament George Nevill Knight second sonne of Ralph Earle of Westmerland to bee Lord Latimer as Cozen and next heire male of the said Iohn Nevillâ— Lord Latimer which George was grandfather of the said Richard Lord Latimer namely Father of Henry Lord Latimer Father of the said Richard In debate of which cause the question now in hand whether a Barony by writ may descend unto the heires females was advisedly considered of by the said King and his Nobility in Parliament and in the end adjudged with the said Richard Lord Latimer which President doth afford us two Iudgements in this point one in the time of Hen. 6. when the writ was directed to the said Sir George Nevill whereby he was summoned as Lord Latimer to the Parliament and as heire Male and not the said Sir Thomas Willoughby Knight husband of the said Eliz. heirâ— male And the second judgement was given in the time of Henry 7. wherby the Barony was adiudged vnto the said Richard Lord Latimer comming of the speciall heire male against the said Lord Brooke descended of the generall heire male But here the President before remembred of the Barony of Dacres may bee obiected to incounteâ— this confusion For there was an heire female married unto Sir Richard Fines who by the declaration of Hen. 6. was Baron of Dacres in the right of his wife and there was also Ralph and Humphrey the heires males before whom the heire female was preferred by the censure of Henry 6. and Edward 4. This obiection is easily answeared For although Hen. 6. through the Princely favour which he bare unto Sir Richard Fynes had declared him to bee Lord Dacres in the right of his wife yet notwithstanding did Ralph Dacres being heire male unto the then Lord Dacres deceased be are also the name of Lord Dacres by that name was attainted in Parliament Wherefore the reason why the heire male could not bee regarded was the said attainder of the said Ralph and Humfrey his brother and therefore when Humphrey 12. Edw. 4. laboured to have the said attainder reversed he submitted himselfe vnto the Arbitrament of the King who to satisfie both Competitors because both had well deserved of him after he had admitted them to his favour he allowed the one to be Lord Dacres the other to be Lord Dacres of Gillesland thus much concerning the second point whether a Barony by writ may discend unto the heire female or not As concerning the third point admitting such discent to bee to the heire female when there
Steward shall declare unto the people the cause why the King hath assembled thither those Lords and him and perswade him to answere without feare and then hee shall cause the Clarke of the Crowne to read his endictement unto him and aske him if hee bee guilty or not whereunto when hee hath answered not guilty the Clarke of the Crowne shall aske him how hee will bee tryed and then hee will say by God and his Peeres and then the Kings Sergeants and Attourney will give evidence against him whereunto when the Prisoner hath made answere the Constable shall bee commanded to retire the Prisoner from the Barre to some other place while the Lords doe secretly conferre in the Court together and then the Lords shall rise out of their places and consult amongst themselves and what they affirme shall bee done upon their Honour without any oath to bee ministred unto them and when they all or the greatest part of them bee agreed they shall returne to their places and sit downe and then the High Steward shall aske of the youngest Lord by himselfe if he that is arraigned bee guilty or not of the offence whereof hee is arraigned and then of the youngest next him and so of the residue one by one untill hee have asked them all and every Lord shall answere by himselfe and then the High Steward shall send for the Prisoner againe who shall bee led to the Barre to whom the High Steward shall reherse the verdict of the Peeres and give judgement accordingly Stamford Pleas del Coronae lib. 3. cap. 1. Poulton 188. The antiquity of this kind of triall by the opinion of the last recited Authours is grounded from the Statute of Magna charta so called not in regard of the quantity but in regard of the waight thereof Cooke Epistle to the 8. part fol. 2. c. 29. beginning thus Nullus liber homo c. nec supereum ibimus nec super eum mittemus nisi per legale judicium parvu ' suorum But I take it to bee more ancient then the time of Hen. 3. as brought into the Realme with the Conquerour being answerable to the Norman and French Lawes and agreeable with the Customes Fewdall where almost all the controversies arising betweene the Soveraigne and his vassall are tried per judicium Parvu ' suorum And if a Peere of the Realme upon his arraignement of treason doe stand mute or will not answere directly judgement shall bee given against him as a Traytour convicted and hee shall not bee pressed to death and thereby save the forfeiture of his lands for treason is out of the Statute of Westminster the first c. 12. 15. E. 4. 33. Dyer 205. and 300. But if hee bee arraigned upon an indictement of fellony hee may bee mute Iâ— appeareth by this Statute of Magna charta that a Peere of the Realme shall bee tried by his Peeres onely in case where hee is indicted at the Kings suite of treason or fellony for the words of the Statute bee Wee will not passe or sit in judgement upon him but by his Peeres But if an Appeale of murder or other fellony bee sued by any Common person against a Peere of the Realme hee shall bee tried by Common persons and not by his Peeres Stam. Pleas del Coron lib. 3. cap. 1. Brooke triall 142. Poulton 188. 6. This Priviledge hath some restraints as well in regard of the person as in the manner of proceedings As touching the person First the Archbishops and Bishops of this Realme though they bee Lords of the Parliament if they bee impeached of such an offence they shall not bee tried by the Peeres of the Realme but by a jury of Knights and other substantiall persons upon their oaths the reason thereof alleadged is for as much as Archbishops and Bishops cannot passe in like cases upon the triall of any other of the Peeres for that they are prchibited by the Common and Ecclesiasticall Lawes to bee Judges of life and death and reason would that the other Peeres should not trie them for this triall should bee mutuall for as much as is performed upon their Honours without any oath taken And so by the way you may see the great regard the Law hath to the word of a Peere of the Realme when hee speaketh upon his Honour even in a case concerning the life of a man and that of a Peere and therefore ought they much more to keepe their words and promises in smaller matters when they engate their Honours for any fast cause or consideration Crompton Courts 13. Secondly as touching the Persons no temporall Lords but they that are Lords of the Parliament shall have this kind of triall and therefore hereout are excluded the eldest Sonne and Heire apparant of a Duke in the life of his Father though he bee called an Earle and it was the case of Henry Howard Earle of Surrey Sonne and Heir apparent of Thomas Duke of Suffolke in 38. H. 8. which is in Brooks abridgement treason likewise the Son and Heir apparant of an Earl though he be called Lord or Baron And all the younger Sonnes of the Kings are Earles by birth though they have no other creation but shall not be partakers of this or other priviledges incident to the Lords of the Parliament Thirdly those that are Barons of the Nobility of Ireland or of Scotland if upon the like offence committed in England they be apprehended in England they shall not have their triall by Peeres no though they were borne within England for they received their dignity from a King of their Nations But if the King of England at this day do create one of his subjects of Scotland to be Viscount Roâ—hester within England or by ordinary summons under his great Seale doe call him to his upper House of Parliament do assign him a place and to have a voice there in his great Councell amongst the Lords and Peeres of the Realme he shall thereby also be a Peere of the Realme and be partaker with them in all priviledges and thus much concerning the restraint of the said priviledges in respect of the person as touching the manner of proceeding it appeareth by the said statute of Magna charta c 29. that a Peere of the Realme shall be tried by his Peeres only in case where he is indicted at the Kings suite of treason of fellony for the words of the statute be Nec super eum ibimus But if an appeale of murder or other fellony be sued by any Common person by a Peere of the Realme he shall be tried by Common persons and not by his Peeres Stam. Pleas del Corone lib. 3. cap. 1. Pâ—ulton 118. and so was Fines Lord Dacres tried in aâ—peale of murder 33. H. 8. Brooke Abridgement trials 142. The Nobility of this Realme enjoy that priviledge that they are not to be impanelled in any Iury or Inquests to mâ—ke tryall or Enquiry upon their corporall oathes betweene party and party for
Marquesse Earle Vicount or Baron do as the manner is by his Letters Parents give unto such new created Noblemen an Annuity or Rent for the support of his degree which they call creation Money this is so annexed unto the Dignity that by no grant assurance or any manner of Alienation it can be given from the same but is still incident and a support of the same Creation Dyer fol. 2. c. Jn all Cases wherein Suite of Law a Baron or Peere of the Realme is to be amerced other then a Duke his amercement is no â—esseâ—â—â—a 100. s. 9 E. 4. 9. 21. E. 4. 77. 38. E. 3. 31. 9. Hâ— 6. 21. but the amercement of a Duke is 10. l. 19. E. 4. 9. â— H. 6. 7. although the Statute of Magna Charta Chap. 14. be in the negative viz. Comites at Barones non â— merciantur nisi per pures suos et non nisi secundum modum delicti and yet the usage hath reduced it into a certainty also by the same Statute it appeareth that such amercements should be afferred per pures suos but for that it were troublesome to assemble Barons for so small a matter such amercements in times past hath beene afferred by the Barons of the Exchequer who sometimes were Barons of the Realme as is before in this Treatise mentioned and hereof writeth Bracton Lib. 3. Tract 2. chap. Fol. 116. viz. Comitet vero vel Barones non sunt amerciandi nisi per paces suos secundum modum delicti hoc per Barones de Scacario vel coram ipso Rege Vid. Cooke 8. part 39. sequentiae this Section is to be omitted because it is more fitly to be written hereafter If a Plaintiffe recover against a Peere of the Realme in an Action of debt or trespasse upon such a Plea pleaded by him or other default in him so that a Fine thereby doth grow to the King and thereupon a Capias per Fine issueth out against him this shall not prejudice that Nobleman so as the Plaintiffe may thereby take advantage by prayer that he shall abide in Execution for the Plaintiffe neither without his prayer not though he doe pray it by the opinion of Brian Justice 14. H. 7. 21. VVhereas by a Statute made 32. H. 8. Cap. 16. Jt is enacted that the Subjects of the Realme shall not keepe in their Families or Houses above the number of Foure Strangers borne neverthelesse by a proviso in the said Act every Lord of the Parliament hath his priviledge allowed unto him to keepe in his Family the number of six Strangers borne any thing in that Act to the contrary notwithstanding By the Statute of 24. H. 8. Cap. 13. a. A Priviledge was granted to the Nobility according to their degrees concerning their Apparell but because by a Statute made in the first Yeare of the King that now is Chap. 25. all Lawes and Statutes made concerning Apparell are taken away I leave further to speake of that matter 1. Jac. cap. 25. By the Statute of 5. R. 2. cap. 12. The King our Soveraigne Lord of his Royall Majesty defendeth the passe utterly of all manner of people aswell Clarkes as others in every Port and other Towne and place upon the Coasts of the Sea upon the paine of forfeiture of all their goods except onely the Lords and other great men of the Realme and true and Noble Merchants and the Kings Souldiers and every person then is before excepted which after publication of this Ordinance made shall passe out of the said Realme without the Kings speciall Lycence which Lycence the King willeth and commandeth that it be not from henceforth made but in one of the Ports vnder written that is to say London Sandwich Dover Southampton Plimouth Dartmouth Bristoll Yarmouth St. Buttolphe Kingstone upon Hull Newcastle upon Tine and the other parts and passages towards Ireland and the Iles pertaining to England shall forfeit towards the King as much as he hath in goods as afore is said but because this Statute is also taken away by a late Act of Parliament made in the fourth yeare of King James cap. 1. J doe not set downe this for one of the Priviledges appertaining to the Nobility at this day But Phillip Earle of Arundel Sonne of Thomas Duke of Norffolke was taken upon the Sea passing into France about the 30. yeare of the late Queene and was fined in the Star-chamber to a great summe because he did not take Shipping at one of the Ports mentioned Cromptons Courts 31. Whereas by the Statute of 2. H. 2. Parl. 2. cap. 1. Jt is ordained that the Justices of Peace in every County named of the Cuâ—rum should be resident in the Shieres wherein they are Justices there is a Proviso whereby the Lord and Peeres of the Realme named in such Commission are excepted By the Statute of 1. E. 6. cap. 12. amongst other things it is enacted that in all and every case and Cases where any of the Kings Subjects shall and may upon his Prayer have the Priviledge of his Clergie as a Clarke Convict that may make purgation in all those Cases and every of them and also in every Case and Cases of Fellony wherein the priviledge and benefit of Clergie is taken away by this Statute wilfull malice and poysoning of malice prepensed onely excepted the Lord and Lords of the Parliament and Peere and Peeres of the Realme having place and voyce in Parliament shall by vertue of this Act of Common grace upon his and their Requests and Prayer alleadging that he is a Lord or Peere of the Realme claiming the benefit of this Act though hee cannot reade without burning of the Hand losse of Inheritance or corruption of his blood bee adjudged deemed taken and used for the first time onely to all Jnstructions intents and purposes as a Clarke Convict which may make purgation without any further or other benefit of the Clergy to any such Lord or Peere from thenceforth at any time after for any cause to bee allowed adjudged or admitred any Law Custome Statute or any thing to the contrary notwithstanding By this Statute a Lord of the Parliament shall have the priviledge of his Clergy where a common person shall not viz. for the breaking of a house by day or night for robbing of any in the high way and in all other cases excepted in the Statute of 1. E. 6. 12. saving in wilfull murder and poysoning But in all other cases wherein Clergy is taken away by any Statute made since the said Statute of 1. E. 6. he is in the same Degree that a common and inferior person is but the Court will not give him the benefit of this Statute if he doe not require it Jf the Lord of the Parliament doth confesse his offence upon his Arraignment or doth abjure or is ourlâ—wed for Fellony it seemes that in those cases he may have the benefit of this Statute viz. his Clergy for that by the Statute of 18.
Land-lord and that by the space of two yeares whereupon he doth bring a writ of Cessavit which is his remedy given him by the Law thereby to recover the inheritance of the land but the said Lord for the saving of his tenancy being minded to pay all the arrerages before judgment given against him as by the Law hee ought to doe in this case hee must come in proper person and not by Atturney 15. H. 7. 9. b. If a noble man in contempt of any processe which hath beene awarded from out of any the Kings Courts doth make rescous and wilfully doth refuse to obey the said writ and the same his offence doth appeare of record to the Court by the Sheriffs returne there may be and shall be awarded against him a Capias 1 H. 5. Case ult 27 H. 8. 22. Cooks 6. part 54. If any Lord doe depart this Realm as Ambassadour or otherwise by the Kings licence or without licence and doe not returne at the Kings Commandement or upon the Kings writ under his privy Signet the King may seize his lands goods and chattells Dyer 108. b. 17. the Dutchesse of Suffolks case If a Lord arrested upon a Supplicavit for the peace doe wilfully refuse to obey the arrest and make rescous upon his returne shall issue an attachment against the said Lord for his contempt to take his body and this is the way to obtaine peace against any Lord of the Parliament whereas the party could not have an attachment against him if the Subpoena had beene duly served and peaceably accepted although the said Lord had not appeared thereunto Cromptons Justice of Peace 134. If a Lord of the Parliament doth with force and arms detaine a man in prison in his House or elsewhere the remedy is in such cases by himselfe or his friends abroad at liberty to have a writ called de homine replegiando to deliver him but if the Lord to prevent the execution thereof and of malice doe keep or convey away this man so wrongfully imprisoned so privily as that the Sheriffe cannot execute his said writ then will the Court award a Witheram whereby the Sheriffe shall attach and arrest the body of the said Lord and imprison him untill he doe deliver his said prisoner 11 H. 4. 15. All Lords are compellable to take the Oath mentioned in the Statute of 3 Jac. 4. vide the Statute 7 Jac. cap. 6. who have authority to minister the said Oath to them Bracton lib. 5. fol. 337. 6. H. 3. 351. writing of essoines delivereth this learning that if a Baron that holdeth by Baron tenure have his absence excused by essoine he which casteth such essoine or excuse ought to finde surety that the said essoine is true but in case of common persons it shall rest upon the credit and integrity of the Essoinee and so is the use at this day The Statute of magna charta cap. 1â— is quod liber homo non amercietur pro parvo delicto nisi secundum modum illius delicti pro magno delicto secundum magnitudinem delicti nulla praedictarum misericordiarum ponatur nisi per Sacramentum proborum legalium hominum de vicinate and accordingly is the Law thereunto at this day But the subsequent words in the said Statute viz. Comites Barones non amercientur nisi per pares suos non nisi secundum modum delicti are not in use for whether the offence be great or small for which they are to be amerced their amercement must be certaine viz. of a Duke ten pound and of any other of the Nobility Also whereas the amercement should be offered per pares the use is to offer them by the Barons of the Exchequer Cooks 8. Rep. 40. Bracton lib. 3. Tractat. 2. cap. 1. fol. 116. b. When a Peere of the Realme is arraigned in Appeale of Fellony he shall not have that priviledge to bee tried by his Peere as he should in case of Inditement but must undergoe the ordinary triall of twelve men Stamford Pleas of the Crowne lib. 3. cap. 1. Brook triall 142. Ferdinando Poulton 188. b. Read the book of Entries title appeale Sect. 7. also in Case of an Inditement the Defendant though a Peere of the Realme may not challenge any of his Triers either peremptorily or upon causes which in like cases permitted to all other common persons The Judgement to be given against any Lord of the Parliament in case of Felony or Treason shall be no other than according to the usuall judgement given against common persons and although the execution be not pursuant but with the losse only of their heads yet that is by the speciall grace of the King and not ex debito as by the examples of Thomas Lord Dacre 33. H. 8. and of the Lord Sturton 2 Mariae may appeare Brook tit Jury 48. By attainder of Treason or Fellony is corruption of blood so that their Children may not be heires unto them nor unto any of their Ancestors And if hee were a noble man before he is by the attainder made ignoble and not only himselfe but also his Children having no regard unto the Nobility which they had by their birth and this corruption is so strong and high that it cannot be saved by the Kings pardon or otherwise than by authority of Parliament Stamford Pleas del Coronae lib. 3. cap. 34. But here it is to bee observed that Nobility is not a thing substantiall but meere accidentall for that may be present or absent without corruption of the Subject whereof it dependeth for experience sheweth that the passage of honourable titles are restrained by exorbitant crimes when as nature in the meane while cannot bee thrust away with a fork Wherefore although the Lawyers doe terme and call that extinguishment of Nobility which hapneth by such hainous offences committed as corruption of blood neverthelesse they use not this manner of phrase and speech as though Nobility were naturally and essentially in the humour of blood more than any other hereditary faculty but because the right of inheritance which is by degree of communication of blood directed is by that meanes determined and ended and also in regard of the hatred and detestation of the crime it is called corruption of blood note in Dyer 16. Eliz. 332. the Lord Charles Howards case If one be made a Knight in a forraigne Kingdome by a forraigne Knight yet he is to be so stiled in this Realme in all legall proceedings but if a man be created by the Emperour an Earle of the Empire or into any other title of dignity he shall not beare this title here in England Cooks 7. part 16. 20. E. 46. If there be a Father and Sonne and the Father is seised of lands holden in Capite or otherwise by knightly service the King doth create the same Duke and Earle or of any other degree of Nobility and afterwards the Father dieth his Sonne being within the age
of dignity and the Entry of Capias alias plures was according to the said originall but in the Exigent and Proclamation and in the Entry of it the Defendant was named according to his degree of Dignity upon a Writ of Errour after judgment doubt was if this might be amended in another Court then where the originall was made and at last it was resolved by all the Court that the Record should be amended by the Cursitor and made according to the Note or Title delivered unto him by the Plaintiffes Attorney Cook 8. part fol. 15. b. It appeareth in our Book of Law that the highest and lowest Dignity are uniuersall For as if a King of a Forreign Nation come into England by leave of the King of this Realm as it ought to be in this case he shall sue and be sued in the name of a King 11. Ed. 3. Test Breccon 473. So shall he sue or be sued by the Name of a Knight whersoever he received that degree of Dignity 20. Ed. 4. 6. H. 6. 14. but otherwise it is as if a Duke Marquesse Earl or other Title of Honour given by any Forreign King yea though the King by Letters Pattents of safe conduct do name him Duke or by any other his forreign Title of Dignity For experience sheweth that Kings joyned in league together by a certain mutuall anâ— as it were a Naturall power of Monarchs according to the Law of Nations have denized one anothers subjects and Ambassadors graced with this title of Honour Therefore though a Knight receive his Dignitie of a Forraigne Prince he is so to be stiled in all Legall proceedings within England Vide Cooke 7. part fol. 16. b. And Kings were wont to send their sonnes to their Neighbour Princes to receive Knighthood at their hands Vide Selden fol. 331. 308. thinking that it was more honourable to take Armes of some other lest affection might seeme to prevent judgement when the father gave them that honour Thus was our King H. 2. sent unto David King of Scots and Malcombe also king there sent unto our H. 2. and our king to the king of Castile to take of them Military or Civill Armes for the tearmes and phrases they used in that age for the making of a knight Vide Camden 174. 8. vide Selden fol. 315. And knights in all forraigne Countries have ever place and precedencie according as they are ancient knights which priviledge is deemed to Noblemen for be they never so ancient in forraigce Countries they shall goe before as Puesneys The degree of knighthood is not onely a Dignitie and honour to the party for so it is termed in Brooke title Additions fol. 44. but honourable for the kingdome and therefore it hath been an ancient Prerogative of the kings of this Realm at their pleasure to compell men of worth to take upon them this degree upon the payment of a Fine as appeareth in Ann. 7. H. 6. 15. Fitzh Abridg. tit Im. 12. and by the Statute a. 1. Ed. 2. de militibus But we see by experience in these daies that none are compelled thereunto and that is the reason wherefore if the Plaintiffe be made knight hanging the Writ it shall abate because hâ— hath changed his name and that by his owne act Vide Cooke 7. part f. 27. b. part 10. b. 1 Ed. 6. cap. 7. contrary And for that cause also by the common Law not only the king but every Lord of a Manor ought to have of every of his tenants a reasonable fine to make his eldest son knight Vide Bracton fol. 36. b. and all lands are subject to these aides except onely ancient Demeasnes and grand and petty serjeantly tenures as the Law hath been anciently delivered Vide Fiszh Nat. bre f. 83. a. and Selden f. 13. where it is also said one that wrote a little after the statute of West the first allowes as a good barre to the avowry for the tenant to plead that the father himself is no knight so that one not knighted cannot claime the aide of his own Tenants Briton de Prises de Avers And it was not at the liberty of the Lord to make more or lesse of his Tenants by the common Law in this case but by the statute at Westminster 1. cap. 35. it is put into certainty viz. forasmuch as before this time reasonable and to make one son knight or to marry his daughter was never put into certainty nor how much should be taken at that time whereby some levyed unreasonable aide and more often then seemed necessary whereby the people were sore grieved And it is therefore provided that from henceforth a whole knights fee be taken but 20. s. and of more more and of lesse lesse after that rate and that none shall levie such aide to make his son knight untill the sonne be 15. yeares of age nor to marry his daughter untill she be of the age of 7. yeares and of that there shall be mention made in the kings Writs formed on the same if any one will demand it and if it happen that the Father after he had leavied any such aid of his Tenants did before he hath marryed his Daughter the Executors of the Father shall be bound to the daughter for so much as the Father received for the Aid And if the Fathers goods be not sufficient his heir shall be charged therwith unto the daughter and this Heir is so incident that although the Lord do confirm unto the Tenant to hold by fealty and certain Rent and release unto him all other services and demands yet he shall have the aid to make his eldest Son Knight Anno 40. E. 3. f. 22. Finches book 24. but the King was not bound by the statute beforementioned because the King was not named in that statute and therfore by the statute 25. E. 3. cap. 11. The Kings aids were brought to a like value Selden fol. 3. 30. The intention of the Law is that an heir within the age of 21. years is not able to do Knight-service till his full age of 21. years Littleton lib. 2. cap. 4. f. 22. But such a presumption of Law doth give place to a judgment and proof to the contrary as Bracton saith Sabilitur presumptioni donec probetur in contrarium And therfore the King who is the Sovereign and Supream Judge of Chivalry hath dubbed him Knight he by this hath judged him able to do him Knight-service and all men concluded not to say to the contrary therfore such an heir being made Knight either in the life of his Father or afterwards during his minority shall be out of ward and custody both for Lands and for his body or marriage by the ancient common Law by reason also that the Honour of Knight-hood is so great that it is not to be holden under by any yet if the King do create any such an Heir within Age a Duke or Marquesse Earl Count Viscount or Baron by this