Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	act_n	faith_n	justification_n	3,419	5	9.8335	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A09277	Vindiciæ gratiæ. = A plea for grace More especially the grace of faith. Or, certain lectures as touching the nature and properties of grace and faith: wherein, amongst other matters of great use, the maine sinews of Arminius doctrine are cut asunder. Delivered by that late learned and godly man William Pemble, in Magdalen Hall in Oxford.	Pemble, William, 1592?-1623.; Capel, Richard, 1586-1656.	1627 (1627)	STC 19591; ESTC S114374	222,244	312

the Morall Law 110 Faith Legall and Euangelicall the same in substance and differ only in the vse and obiect 111 The excellencie of Faith 158 What Faith or beleefe is in generall 159 How it agrees with and differs from knowledge opinion 160. c. Three grounds of the certaintie of assent in Faith 164. 206 The first 206 The second 220 The third 222 Faith a degree beyond beleefe being an assent with confidence and reliance 170 Faith taken in a speciall sence as it is Christian Faith described 171 Diuers acceptions of it ibid. 172 The obiect of Faith described 172. c. The subiect euerie reasonable creature 197. 198 Faith is in the whole heart euen in the will as well as in the vnderstanding 199. 230 Faith which Papists call iustifying is the faith of diuels and reprobates 237 Faith foolishly distinguished by Papists into formed and vnformed 237 Faith without works differs in nature from Faith with workes 238 Particular assent in Faith and the root and cause of it 241 The obiect of it two-fold 244 Faith of the Elect wherein it differs from Faith of Hypocrites 247 Faith vnfained 253. 254 Faith of Hypocrites doth not assent to all Diuine truth at all times 147. 148. c. Faith implicit of Papists confuted 194 Faith in the particular promise of grace defined 257 The iustifying act therof propounded proued 258 How it is wrought 259 The comfort of it 260 Faith of the Elect by what degrees of assent and essentiall differences it is distinguished from other Faith 226 Temporarie Faith 227 The causes of it 228. 229 G GOD as Creator how far he may be knowne to naturall men 65 Goodnesse of the naturall man not generall 80 It resp●cts others more then himselfe 79 Grace what the habit of it is 7 It is infused all at once 10. 11 The actions of it appeare sooner or later stronger or weaker in some 9 It is so firmely wrought in the Elect that it shall neuer be blotted out 34 Grace preuenting assisting inciting helping 13 By what meanes Grace may be quenched 37 Grace sufficient for conuersion not giuen to the Gentiles while they are out of the Church 55. 56. 57 Nor to all Christians in the visible Church 88. 89. c. Grace of conuersion friuolously distinguished into sufficient and effectuall 89 Grace sufficient to conuersion is alwayes effectuall and effectuall Grace onely is sufficient 91 Grace giuen to those who are within the Church set forth in the diuers kinds thereof 94 Grace doth not rectifie inferiour faculties first 127 Grace sufficient to beleeue and turne to God is no other but the Grace of regeneration 92. 93 It is not giuen to all 93 Grace preparatiue to conuersion how it may be resisted 140. 141. c. H HOly Spirit giuen two wayes 26 I IGnorance of the very time of our conuersion no iust cause of doubting fear that we are not conuerted and why 44 Illumination both naturall and spirituall described 94 95 When it is not sufficient for sanctification of the heart 101. c. Common Illumination not giuen to all hearers of the Word 100 Image of God wherein Adam was made 4 Implicit faith of Papists confuted 194. c. Infants dying without Baptisme may be saued 45 Infants are charitably supposed to be regenerate in Baptisme 45 Why they may not receiue the Lords Supper 49. 50 Infusion of grace hath no concurrence of mans naturall abilities but onely requires in him a passiue capacity to receiue 32 K KNowledge of Christian Religion must be alwayes increasing and fruitfull Preface 14 Knowledge meere naturall of the Morall Law brings little practise 70 Knowledge more certaine then beleefe in things of the same kind 166 Perfect Knowledge takes away all beleefe 167 Knowledge by sight so far as sight goes takes away faith 191 Knowledge distinct and explicit of Diuine things necessarie to the being of faith 192 L LAw morall how far it may be knowne to a naturall man 66. 68 Learned men vnsanctified fit to make hereticks pr. 19. 20 Loue of God reacheth to the Elect before they be regenerate 17 Considered in it selfe it differs from the manifestation of it to vs 18 Gods Loue to our persons and actions 19 Light of nature well vsed by the Heathen doth not bind God in Iustice to giue them supernaturall light 84 MEanes of common faith 229 Meditation of what things will stir vs vp to praise Gods rich grace and mercy in our conuersion 38 Ministers dutie in preaching the Word 113 Miraculous faith ground on immediat reuelations 173 Motions naturall and spirituall which are wrought by the Word described 95. 96 NAturall man cannot by the most industrious vse of all helpes naturall attaine to the least knowledge of God as he is mans Redeemer in Christ 64 His knowledge of God confined within two limits 65 How far his knowledge of God as Creator reacheth 65 He neuer goeth so far in practise as he might and as he knowes he ought to doe 71 He neither knowes the cause nor can iudge aright of the nature of sin 74. 75 His vertue and goodnesse how far it goes and is approued of God 76 He cannot possibly desire grace and mercy and why 84 Necessitie doth well stand together with libertie in the will regenerate 156 OBedience of regenerate men how it is made irregular 152 Obscuritie in the obiect of faith as it is held by the Papists confuted 187. 188. c. Obseruation of Gods mercies iudgments on our selus or other a speciall meanes to increase faith 223. P PAssions and affections naturall not subiect to reason 124 Plainnesse of speech and matter to be vsed in preaching of Gods Word Pref. 22. 23 Priesthood of Christ and how Christ and Aaron agree and differ Pref. 23 Promises the obiect of faith 170 QValities in the reasonable soule differ three wayes according to the threefold state of man 4. 5 REgeneration improperly ascribed to the Word 97 Regenerat man hath in him two contrarie qualies grace and corruption as he is spirituall he neuer resists the worke of grace 148 Resistance of grace in Regenerat men whence it flowes 151 How the preuailing act of it is taken away 152 VVhy it preuailes many times 153 Religion breeds ciuility knowledg of all arts 68. 69 Righteousnesse of the naturall man not acceptable to God 81 Rather negatiue then positiue 79 More outward then inward 76. 77 SAnctification how it goes before iustification 21 It is infused into Infants 43 VVrought in a maner meerely supernaturall 29 Sanctification how it hath mans free-will concurring to it two waies 31 Man not a moral agent in it 33. 34 Schollars how made complete Pref. 20. 21. c. Scriptures freed from Popish imputations of obscurity 177. 178. c. How they are certainly knowne to be Gods VVord 208. 209 By themselues 213 and by the Spirit 214. 215 Sin what a snare it hath layd to intrap wicked men 139 Spirit how far

hath the generall custome and consent of the times and Church wherein wee live whereby men are they know not how nor upon what firme grounds drawne to beleeve those things which they see others hold and maintaine fortruth Lastly 3. Some extraordinary worke or event confirming the truth of Religion So did Miracles in the time of Christ and his Apostles perswade many to beleeve who were notwithstanding farre from being true beleevers as Ioh. 2. 23. Many beleeved in his name when they saw the miracles which hee did but t was not good crediting of them that beleeved only upon miracles therefore Christ would not commit himselfe to them ver 24. And thus the Magitian when he saw the signes and great wonders which were done by the Apostles he beleeved and wondred when yet his heart was not right in the sight of God Act. 8. 13. 21. By these and the like meanes is this imperfect and generall kinde of Faith wrought in men destitute of all inward grace and holinesse Such motives as these cause this assent but there is no Internum principium no roote in themselves as our Saviour speakes Mat. 13. 21. whence this beliefe springeth no thorough sanctification of the soule conforming all the powers thereof unto the puritie and holinesse of divine things and inclining the affections to a constant embracing thereof These men like Religion well and commend it as men doe costly Iewells set forth to sale but when it comes to the point that this Good Pearle of great price is to be bought then if God will let them have it at their owne rates there 's a match made they 'le beleeve and be religious if God withall will spare them the use of some sinnes and pleasures they love well but if it must be purchased at Gods price with the sale of all that they have they are no merchants for such a hard bargaine with the yongue man they shrinke away sorrowfull that heaven cannot be had at a cheaper rate Thus when it comes to the proofe in particular application and practice this kinde of faith vanisheth away and comes to just nothing Thus you have the explication of this first degree of Faith withall you see that this faith falls greatly short of that perfection which is required unto that saith which is saving and justifying Neverthelesse our Adversaries of the Romish Church maintaine that this assent is that justifying Faith whereof the Scriptures speake Their opinion touching this point is sufficiently declared by Becanus who followes the rest of that rabble Hee Theol. Schol. Tom. 3. cap. 8. q. 1. disputing of the act of justifying Faith rejects the Lutherans opinion who place Faith in the will and make it to be Fiduciam de misericordia Dei propter Christum and saith that the doctrine of the Catholikes is this that faith belongs to the understanding and is nothing else but Credere sive assentiri eis quae à Deo revelata sunt Thence hee setteth downe this Conclusion § 6. Actus fidei consistit in assensu quo quis assentitur alicui propositioni à Deo revelatae propter authoritatem revelantis In this definition there are two parts 1. the Object of this assent Propositions revealed by God 2. The essentiall difference of this act taken à formaliratione credendi and that is to beleeve propter authoritatem revelantis By this saith Becanus Cap. 8. q. 2. § 2. assensus fidei constituitur in sua specie essentiall that is the assent of Faith is made supernaturall and justifying when wee beleeve things because God hath revealed them for saith he if articles of faith be beleeved upon other motives as upon mans authority c. then this assent of faith is naturall as in Heritickes and Divells So then according to Popish doctrine that faith which justifies us is nothing but a bare assent of the minde to such things as God reveales because of Gods authority that revealed them Than which explication of the nature of justifying faith nothing can be poorer and more below the majestie of so high a grace as faith is I will trouble you but with two reasons proving that this kinde of assent is not that faith whereby wee are justified 1. The act of justifying faith must needs be supernaturall such as cannot bee done without the aide of speciall grace of Gods spirit But unto this assent there is required no such speciall grace therefore it is not an act of justifying faith The Major is evident and granted by the Schooleman Cap. 8. 4. 4. that something there is in faith above nature requiring a supernaturall cause whereto the Scriptures plainely inforce him Eph. 2. 8. By grace yee are saved thorough Faith and that not of ourselves it is the gift of God Phil. 1. 29. Vnto you it is given for Christ that not only yee should beleeve in him but also suffer for his sake So Ioh. 6. 45. Wherefore § 3. he teacheth that this act of assent must be supernaturall partly in regard of the Object id est divine revelations and partly in regard of the principium or cause by which it is produced id est non per solas naturae vires sed per auxilium gratiae Wee agree then in the Proposition For the assumption That there needes not any speciall grace of the Spirit to worke this bare assent unto the truth of divine revelations this wee prove out of the same Schoolemens doctrine who teach that the Vnderstanding assents not unlesse the Will command it because say they the act of beleeving is absolutely in our treewill Cap 8. q. 5. Well be it so But now say wee the Will may without the helpe of grace command the assent of the Vnderstanding which wee prove thus Whatsoever the Vnderstanding by the only light of Nature judges to be honest that the Will can desire by the only strength of nature But by the only light of Nature the Vnderstanding judges that it is an honest thing to beleeve Gods authority revealing any thing to us therefore the Will by the only strength of Nature may desire this act of beleeving and so consequently there 's no need of Grace to move the Will to command the Vnderstanding T is Becanus owne argument against himselfe cap. 8. q. 5. § 9. Whereto he would faine giue an answer if hee could tell how Something he sayes to that Minor proposition whereof he thus distinguisheth The Vnderstanding by the only light of Nature judges it a thing honest to beleeve Gods authority when hee reveales any thing Via ac modo naturali not when he reveales any thing Via ac modo supernaturali Beleeve it a rare distinction and full of mystery Divine Revelations are of two sorts supernaturall and naturall Againe when God reveales his will to us by naturall meanes then the very light of Nature teacheth us that 't is honest to beleeve his authority But if hee reveale things to us by supernaturall meanes the light of nature

though till then wee shall not be so thoroughly heated with it 2. Betweene Gods love to our persons Gods love to our qualities actions A distinction which God well knowes how to make and wee should sometimes learne to use it not hating mens persons because of some infirmities Parents I am sure are well skilled in putting this difference betweene the vices and persons of their children those they hate these they love and when for their vices they chastise their persons they remember with much compassion that t is a childe whom they have under the rod. To the point the cause is alike betweene God and the Elect his love to their persons is from everlasting the same nor doth their sinnefulnesse lessen it nor their sanctity increase it Because God in loving their persons never considered them otherwise than as most perfectly holy and unblameable in Christ. But Gods love to their qualites works then begins when both the one and other become holy by the grace of conversion before which time and after too God is angry even with his Elect and testifies his hatred of their sins as much as of any others by manifold chastisements upon their persons for their offences Wherefore though Paul were a chosen vessell dearely beloved of God for his person even then when in ignorant zeale hee furiously persecuted the Church yet for his conditions they were hatefull and highly displeasing to God till after his conversion Most true it is that sin doth justly make that person hatefull in whom it is and it doth so in the reprobate whose sinnes God hates and for their sinnes their persons which he alwaies beholds polluted in their uncleannesse yet in the Elect whom hee hath loved for ever this difference of affection is manifest God approves of their persons whilst hee disallowes their corruptions and when his fiercest wrath was shewed against the sinnes of the Elect in the person of Christ then did God most compassionately love the persons both of Christ and of all the Elect. Wherefore God might easily take away his Image from Adams nature yet not his favour from his person which he loved as elect in Christ whilst yet he punished his transgression sharply and we see nothing more common in Christian observation than for men after such time as they are converted and assured of Gods tender love unto them yet then to feele the bitterest stormes of his displeasure raised up against them for their sinnes Hence then it appeares that our effectuall Vocation and Conversion is justly to be accounted a fruit or effect of Gods singular favour towards the persons of his Elected with whom being actually reconciled in Christ having justified them from all their sinnes by his merits he afterwards sends forth his holy Spirit into their hearts calling them from darknesse to light from under the power of Satan and their corruption to the libertie of Gods sonnes that being thus sanctified they may be made meet to be partakers of the inheritance with the Saints in light And whereas that place of the Apostle Heb. 11. 6. Without faith it is impossible to please God may breed a doubt against this which hath beespoken as seeming to imply that before our actuall Conversion and Beleeving wee are no way at all pleasing unto God nor beloved of him For the removing of this scruple wee are according to the second distinction understand this place of the Actions not to the Persons of the Elect. Towards their Persons hee beareth perpetuall good-will but this is secret they feele it not nor doth so much appeare vnto them or others till their conuersion when only God declares himselfe to bee pleased both with their persons and actions But for their actions t is certaine no worke whatsoeuer any of the Elect doth before the infusion of sauing faith can bee done according to Gods will and so be pleasing vnto him Of which ordinary course of pleasing of God in our Workes according to his reuealed will this place is to be interpreted and that out of the place it selfe for it is apparant the Apostle giues a reason why Abels Sacrifice pleased God not Cains why Enochs life and religious walking with God was pleasing to him namely because they had faith in and by which they performed those seruices acceptably Without which faith it is impossible saith the Apostle to please God namely in any Worke that we goe about he addes the reason For he that cometh to God whether in sacrifices prayers or any other religious duties to be performed to God he must beleeue that God is that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him Here therefore is nothing against that Love of God which he alwaies beares towards his Elect in Christ through whom they are pleasing vnto him when yet their works please him not And thus much of the Moving cause of our Effectuall Vocation viz. Gods Love and Actuall Reconciliation with the Elect. From hence I deduce two corollaries 1. That Sanctification and Inberent righteousnesse goes before our Iustification and imputed righteousnesse but with a distinction of a double justification 1. In Foro Diuino in Gods fight and this goeth before all our sanctification for even whilst the elect are unconverted they are then actually justified freed from all sin by the Death of Christ God so esteemes of them as free and hauing accepted of that Satisfaction is actually reconciled to them By this Iustification we are freed from the guilt of our Sins and because that is done away God in due time proceeds to give us the grace of Sanctification to free us from sins corruption still inherent in our Persons 2. In Foro Conscientiae in our owne sense which is but the revelation and certaine declaration of Gods former secret act of accepting Christs righteousnesse to our justification The manifestation of which to our hearts and consciences is the only ground of all our peace and comfort and it followes our Sanctification upon and after the Infusion of Saving Faith the only instrument of this our Iustification This distinction is needfull to be obserued as giving light to many things and without it I know not what reasonable construction can be made of these words of Tilenus Synt. part 2. cap. 45. Thes. 38. Perperam absurdè prorsus inter effecta Sanctificationis numer atur justificatio quae illam naturâ praecedit neque enim sanctificatur quisquam nisi jam justificatus omninoque necesse est ut arbor bona sit priusquam bonos ferat fructus If he meane that no man is sanctified but he that is first justified in Gods sight by Christs righteousnesse accepted for him t is true but if that none is sanctified but he that is first justified in his owne sense through the apprehension of Christs righteousnesse by faith t is apparantly false seeing a man cannot have Faith nor use faith till he be first sanctified And the reason hee gives

the worke of Gods Spirit when hee intends to bestow this first grace of Sanctification upon a sinner This of Habituall Conversion in the internall renovation of all the faculties which cannot be resisted or hindered in the next place we are to consider of Conversion as it is our act consisting in the operations and exercises of all gracious habites infused as when we actually beleeue repent and doe other good workes This Active Conversion is nothing but the practice of Sanctification when being made holy and good wee doe good and holy workes as a man after he is raised from death or restored to health performes the actions of a living of a healthy man For that similitude of S. Austins is certaine Non ideo currit rota ut sit rotunda c. as a wheele runs not that it may be round but because it is round so the will beleeves not that it may be regenerate but because it is regenerate And therefore that is an errour of the coursest bran when our adversaries make the act of Beleeving to go before our Sanctification whereas nothing is more certain than this that all holy actions whether of Faith or any other grace come from that common root of holinesse infused into our soules Now then touching these actions proceeding from grace inherent the question is how farre they are in mans power to refuse the doing of them and the question may bee laid generally touching all good workes inward or outward thus Whether or no that man who is truely sanctified may refuse to doe any good and holy worke at all for if any one be in his power to refuse it all may be in his power by the same reason But yet because Faith is a principall grace and all the dispute is touching the act thereof we may restraine the question unto it though whatever can bee spoken of mans power about the action of Faith is appliable to all other gracious actions whatsoever The question therefore is thus Whether after that a man is once sanctified and regenerate it be in the freedom of his will to choose whether he will actually beleeve and assent to the Promise or not For the explication of this point How farre every good action is in a godly mans power to doe or leave it undone you are to note that there is a double beginning or Cause of every gracious action in a man regenerate 1. The spirit of God by his exciting and Cooperating grace 2. Man himselfe renued and sanctified in all his faculties The former is termed Principium à quo the latter Principium quod man worketh but hee must be moved thereto and assisted by the Spirit of grace both together concurre to the producing of every holy action I say both together for although man in his first conversion was meerely passive Gods spirit working all without mans helpe yet Man in performance of any holy act is not meerely Active able to doe all of himselfe without Gods helpe No he is partly Passive partly Active Passive as hee stands in need of Gods grace to stirre up guide and strengthen the endevour of each faculty in the doing of good Active in as much as being thus helped by Grace himselfe willingly moves himselfe to every godly worke Now by reason of this concurrence of man with God these operations of grace are properly called Mans worke not Gods worke in man So that when a regenerate man beleeves this act though it be caused by Gods Spirit yet it is done and exercised by Man voluntarily moving himselfe in that action and therefore wee say it is Man that beleveth not Gods spirit that beleeveth as if the act of beleeving were wrought in mans Will by the Spirit of God in the same sort as Iugglers worke strange motions in their Puppets which seeme to doe wondrous feats but t is an unseene hand that 's the cause of all Such grosse conceits should not have beene devised by ingenuous mindes and put upon so plaine and cleere doctrine as that is touching the concurrence of Gods grace with our strength in all Holy actions whatsoever The point is easie to him that will understand Every good desire and good worke is partly from man because he wills it hee workes it but principally from Gods Spirit because hee makes Man to will and to worke it Without which cooperating grace man by Habituall inherent grace could doe no good worke at all according to that of Christ Ioh. 15. 5. Without mee yee can doe nothing and of the Apostle Phil. 1. 6. He that hath begun the good worke will also performe it and againe Phil. 2. 13. It is God that worketh in you both the will and the deed even of his good pleasure and againe 1 Cor. 15. 10. I have laboured more abundantly than they all yet not I but the grace of God which is in me These things thus explaned we are yet further to note that in a man Regenerate there are two contrary qualities inherent in every Faculty 1. Grace in a rectified holy inclination to goodnesse infused into it 2. Corruption in a vitious Quality disposing it to evill These two Qualities abide in the regenerate and oppose one another till sinne be finally overcome abolished by death Vpon these undeniable grounds let us proceed to declare what is a regenerate mans resistance that hee makes against the working of Grace in hindering the performance of any good worke which you shall perceive by these two conclusions 1. A man regenerate so farre forth as hee is Spirituall never resists the worke of Grace but is constantly most willing and forward to the performance of all holy actions None can be so ignorant in the mystery of Sanctification as to deny this therfore they tell ●…ge wonders in Divinity who teach that mans 〈…〉 put in aequilibrio hanging like a beame upon 〈…〉 to bow either way and indifferently disposed to 〈◊〉 good or evill A very dreame it is contrary to all S●…●●d ●●perience whereby we are taught that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ●●ing regenerate and made spirituall as it is so 〈◊〉 so farre from standing upon termes of indifferencie deliberating whether it shall yeeld or whether it shall denie obedience whether it shall beleeve or not beleeve c. as on the contrary it doth most constantly and eatnestly desire in all things to obey alwayes A man whose eye God hath truly inlightened and touched his heart by the finger of his sanctifying Spirit doth not stand in a mammering shall I shall I shall I beleeve shall I obey were I best doe this good worke or shall I let it alone No all his desire is now for godlinesse the weight and strength of his resolutions and affections leane wholy to obedience his will chooseth the good with full purpose to cleave to that only turning it selfe from evill with much hatred and detestation This constant determination of the spirituall will unto obedience and that only is a thing most manifest in