Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n accusation_n accuse_v act_n 18 3 5.5155 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A08989 Christian see to thy conscience or a treatise of the nature, the kinds and manifold differences of conscience, all very briefly, and yet more fully laid open then hitherto by Richard Bernard, parson of Batcombe in Somerset-Shire. Anno 1630. Bernard, Richard, 1568-1641. 1631 (1631) STC 1928; ESTC S113805 87,184 494

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

present we haue an example in Saint Paul who had his Conscience witnessing with him for his present estate 1. Cor. 4. 4. for his words and also for the inward affection of the heart Ro. 9. 1. 2. The like wee haue in Peter after his fall whose Conscience after repentance vnfained made him to appeale to Christ touching his loue his conscience encouraged him to say to Christ Thou knowest that I loue thee Ioh. 21. 15. 16. 17. Thus we see how Conscience witnesseth for vs for time past and present Some mens consciences may beare witnesse for the time past as Hymeneus and Alexanders and Demas might but not for the present because they fell away But a Pauls conscience will witnesse for the time past and time present too 2. Tim. 1. 3. Heb. 13. 18. Touching the time to come conscience is not altogether silent not that it can witnesse for vs what wee yet neuer thought spake or did but in respect of our resolution for the time to come it can witnesse with vs that wee doe resolue to doe well and endeauour it as Paul speakes Act. 24. 16. and as Iob said that his heart should not reproach him so long as he liued Iob 27. 6. 2. For the thing it beares vs witnes of which is both for matter manner For matter Nehemiah his conscience stood for him Nehem. 13. 14. 22. for manner Saint Pauls in his teaching 2. Cor. 1. 12. that it was in godly simplicitie and sincerity so Abimelechs conscience witnessed for his integrity and innocency in taking Sarah Gen. 20. 6. For both matter and manner in Hezekiah Isai 38 3. he walked with God and this he did vprightly Labour to haue Conscience witnesse both for many mens consciences will witnesse for them that they haue been at Church heard the Word prayed sung Psalmes receiued the Sacraments but it will not witnesse for them for the name of doing but rather condemne them for their vnpreparednes their hypocrisie meere formality c. Section 2. Of Conscience witnessing against vs. THis act of Conscience is called accusing Ro. 2. 15. and as in excusing it hath regard to time and thing so here in this likewise Concerning the time First past it accused Iosephs brethren of that which was committed long before Gen. 42. 21. so it did Shimei 1. Kin. 2. 44. Dauid 2. Sam. 24. 10. Adonibezek Iudg. 1. 5. and the Iewes Act. 2. 37. Secondly for the time present it wrought vpon the Scribes and Pharisies Ioh. 8. 7 9. So vpon Belshazzar Dan. 5. 6. the Lepers of Samaria 2. King 7. 9. and vpon Felix Act. 24. 25. accusing them for their sinfull courses wherein they liued as also of their irresolution to mend for the time to come As touching matter and manner Conscience will not halt It will tell Dauid of his blood-guiltinesse 2. Sam. 12. Psal 51. and it will accuse Iudas for his treason As also other for the ill manner and by-end in their otherwise good actions as Hamor and Sichemites for receiuing circumcision for worldly and carnall respects Iehu for his counterfeit zeale Scribes and Pharisies for their fasting praying giuing of almes Simeon and Leui for pretending Religion to bee reuenged some for following Christ for loaues Ioh. 6. 22. 24. and the Iewes for their hypocriticall fasting for a day Isai 38. And thus much for the fifth act and office of Conscience Section 3. Of some questions propounded and answered concerning the accusation of Conscience Quest 1. WHether this power to accuse was in Adam before his fall Answ It was but not in act because there was in him no matter or cause wherby conscience should accuse him yet that it had power it is cleare for presently vpon his transgression it accused him And the Text saith that their eyes were opened that is the eye of the Vnderstanding and the eye of the Conscience by which they knew what they had committed against God Their eyes were opened but no new qualitie wrought in the soule other then they had before Quest 2. If aptnesse to accuse was in the Creation it may bee asked Whether it bee now an euill Conscience that accuseth Answ It is not simply euill First because this power was and is from God Secondly because God doth approue of it when it accuseth rightly 1. Ioh. 3. 23. Thirdly because herein it is as Gods Register booke by which he will proceed against the wicked at last day Reuel 20. Fourthly because it is a meanes of much good through Gods blessing as of sorrow for sin of feare to offend and becomes as a preparatiue to repentance sometime Act. 2. 37. Fiftly because it is in the best of Gods children and a blessed meanes to worke in them renewed repentance vpon a fall Quest 3. If it be not to be called an euill Conscience whether may it be termed a good Conscience Answ From the accusation simply it cannot bee called a good conscience First because it is a defectiuenesse in respect of that peace which man had in the Creation and shall enioy in heauen Secondly because it followeth vpon Adams fall as a punishment for sinne here and the worme in hell hereafter Thirdly for that all the wicked haue an accusing conscience but not a good conscience Therefore the conscience from the very act of accusing cannot haue the name of either a good or an euill conscience but as the person is in whom it is For if hee bee euill his conscience is euill though in some thing it excuse him and if he bee a good man his conscience is good though it sometime accuse him CHAP. 16. Of the sixth act and office of Conscience WHen Conscience hath eyed well Man made him acquainted with himselfe written downe his thoughts his doings and sayings accused or excused him then it sits downe as a iust Iudge of Oyer and Terminer to heare and determine to giue sentence against which there is no appeale to be made This sentence is twofold either to acquite and absolue or to bind and condemne Rom. 14. 22. 1. Co. 11. 31. 1. Ioh. 3. 20. 21. In condemning it makes him see his sinne and so causeth him to thinke and speake basely of himselfe and of his ill deeds as Dauid did I haue done very foolishly 2. Sam. 24. 10. and was as a beast Psal 73. 22. and to confesse with the prodigall sonne that he is vnworthy to bee called Gods childe Luk. 15. Lastly it will make him apply as iustly deserued the hand of God against him as Ionah did Chap. 1. 12. and Dauid 2. Sam. 24 17. and withall to acknowledge the Lord to be righteous as did Rehoboam 2. Chron. 12. 6. In absoluing it doth not reproach a man Iob 27. 6. but doth make him stand vpon his innocency wherin he is guiltlesse as it did Dauid against Sauls malice enuy and false accusations This Iudge let vs take notice of and labour for absolution from it and beware of its sentence of condemnation for God will