done by the Church as such but what is spirituaâ—… And although the people of God shall have just cause to make war against Antichrist and his party yet it shall be upon a natural and civil account for their just liberties opposed and invaded by them Therefore I say that in a way of righteousnesse his people may obtain the possession of the gate of their enemies One course which God taketh to fulfil this his promise is by multiplying them As by blessing he will multiply the seed so by multiplying them he will cause them to possesse the gate of their enemies And by this means that dominion and power which they shall at last obtain shall need no force either to get or to maintain it but it shall naturally fall upon them as from other causes so also by reason of their number even according to the law of nature and common rules of righteousnesse and justice Therefore is it said Esai 2. 3. that in the last days when the mountain of the Lords House that is the Church shall be established in the top of the mountains and exalted above the hills and all Nations shall flow unto it and when Christ shall judge among the Nations that they shall beat their swords into plow-shares and their speares into pruning hooks Nation shall not lift up sword against Nation neither shall they learn war any more What course the Lord will take also to lessen the number of the wicked before that day come I shall not now discusse although the Scripture is not silent in it but what by destroying the one and what by multiplying the other the number of the seed of Abraham will in time be such as that in a way of righteousnesse and justice the possession of the enemies gate will be theirs Therefore I say God hath need of such a number for a fulfilling of his promise And this is one reason why he so exceedingly multiplies the seed of Abraham Quest 4. As to the fourth Question why that should be part of his promise also that Abrahams seed should at last obtain such power I need to say no more but that this was his promise from the beginning even to our first Parents that the righteous should subdue the wicked at the last Gen. 3. 15. The seed of the Woman shall bruise the Serpents head And afterward renewed to the Sonnes of Noah Shem and Japheth Gen. 9. 27. God shall perswade Japheth and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem and Canaan shall be his servant that is Jews and Gentiles shall make one Church and the wicked of the world shall be under their authority and power as hath been shewed Therefore I say this their possessing the gate of their enemies is but what the Lord hath even from the beginning engaged himselfe to do for his people And in Abrahams Covenant we have but the same repeated only with this addition namely the manner how this seed shall obtain this power Thus you have the reasons of the point Now before I come to application it will be necessary that I answer one objection more which is this Obj. Our Saviour saith his Kingdome is not of this world Joh. 18. 36. How then shall his Saints obtain such possession and power so as the Kingdome and Dominion and the greatness of the Kingdome under the whole Heaven shall be given to them and the Kingdomes of the Earth become the Kingdomes of the Lord and of his Christ To this I answer Answ That notwithstanding all this yet it is most true that the Kingdom of Christ is not of this world nor ever shall be It is a spiritual an heavenly Kingdome The matter of it the laws the power and the end of his Kingdome are all spiritual Whatever is of this world is fading and hath a period set for its continuance but the Kingdome of Christ is everlasting Thy throne O God is for ever and ever Psal 45. 6. Therefore when it is said That the Dominion and the Kingdome under the whole heaven shall be given to the Saints of the most High and the Kingdomes of the earth become the Kingdomes of the Lord and of his Christ the meaning is not that the Kingdome of Christ shall then be of this World or shall cease to be a spiritual Kingdome or that the Kingdomes of the world shall cease to be of this world that is the one shall not cease to consist of that which is natural both for the Matter Order Power and End of the Kingdome nor the other cease to consist of that which is spiritual and heavenly for that were for it to degenerate and to be deposed from its glory But as a man when he is made a subject of Jesus Christ in his conversion is made a spirituall man a new creature not but that he is the same man in nature still but such a work is wrought in him as he is equivalently another man yea as much another in effect as if he had been annihilated and a new man made out of the dust for though he be the same man in nature still yet by Union and Communion with Christ he is acted by another principle of life to what he was before namely by the quickening spirit of the second Adam 1 Cor. 15. so that whereas before he was onely of the first Adam now he is of the second before was only of the earth earthy now he is also of the Lord from Heaven So when the Kingdomes of the earth are become the Kingdomes of the Lord and of his Christ they will be the same Kingdoms in nature still and the same things done and upon the same grounds of common justice yet because the people of God will be so multiplied as theirs will be the power it will be equivalent to such a change as if they did cease to be the Kingdomes of the earth and were turned into the Kingdome of Christ The Kingdomes of Christ and of the world will ever be distinct in their Nature and Use yet such influence will the Kingdome of Christ have upon Commonwealths as they will be as it were swallowed up into it And indeed as our Saviour alledged that unto the Roman Governour when he was accused for an enemy to Cesar and for which it is evident he put him to death because he made himself a King alledged I say for his defence that his Kingdome was not of this World and therefore would be no interruption unto Cesars so may it be alledged still against the jealousies and hard thoughts which men are apt to have of the people of God because of this Doctrine that the time will come when the seed of Abraham shall possess the gate of their enemies I say it may be alledged that the Kingdome of Christ is not of this World and therefore no cause of any jealous thoughts that his subjects should be any disturbance to the Kingdomes of this World Justice and righteousnesse and obedience to
utter dark sayings of old Who is it that speaketh thus It is Christ of whom this was a prophesie as we see Matth. 13. 35. All these things spake Iesus in parables that it might be fulfilled that was spoken by the Prophet saying I will open my mouth in parables I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world And as in the Psalme he saith Give eare O my people to my Law so when he had spoken his parable Matth. 13. 9. he addeth He that hath an eare to hear let him hear Well what is this Law that Christ will teach his people For we see the Psalme is a prophesie wherein Christ is brought in teaching his Disciples Law The Law that he teacheth is this He relateth the history of the Israelits how they provoked and tempted God and how he punished them in the Wildernesse and in Canaan how they being afflicted did repent and then sinned yet more and were not stedfast in his Covenant and what the carriage of the Lord was towards them all along in his dispensing punishments or mercy to them This he calleth his teaching his people his Law and this he saith he would declare to them that they might set their hope in God and not forget the works of God but keep his commandements and might not be as their Fathers a stubborn and rebellious generation that set not their heart aright v. 6 7 8. And this is the scope of Christ in the parable of the sower where he sheweth what befalls unfruitfull hearers some as the High-way some as the Stony some as the Thorny ground which the Holy Ghost makes parallel with that Psalm 78. in Matth. 13. 3. So as by that Psalme it is supposed that when he instructed and tutoured his people in the Wildernesse and in Canaan under the administrations of the Old Testament dispensing punishments and favours as a Father to his Children as occasion served he then taught his people his law and so as should serve for the ages after Christ as he saith vers 5. of that Psalm He established a testimony in Jacob and appointed a law in Israel which he commanded our Fathers that they should make them known to their Children that the Generation to come might know them even the children which should be born who should arise and declare them to their Children even in the ages after Christ for you see the Psalme is a prophesie to be then fulfilled The reason of this is because however the Law of the Old and that of the New Testament in circumstances and in the particular duties required do differ yet as to the substance or general nature of the Law they are one and the same As for instance the generall nature of the Law in both we have in the words of our Saviour Luke 10. 28. This doe and thou shalt live And of the Apostle Rom. 10. 5. The man that doth those things shall live by them So Nehem. 9. 29. and Ezek. 20. 11. The Law prescribes that rule and method of service which God hath set and sanctified in order to our enjoyment of life and blessednesse in and from himselfe More particularly three things there are in the generall nature of the Law and in respect of each of them it is one and the same to us as it was to them 1. A commanded rule or method of service to God Heb. 9. Then verily the first Covenant or Testament had also Ordinances of Divine Worship This word also supposeth both the one and the other to have such Ordinances of Divine Worship 2. That this rule or method of service so commanded is holy consisting of such things as have in their use a spiritual efficacy above the common course of nature Such were theirs to them and such are ours to us The Law is holy the Commandement holy Rom. 7. 12. and the Law is spiritual v. 14. Even those duties which are naturaly moral being now to be performed to a spiritual and supernatural end together with other institutions namely in order to enjoy communion with and life in God are spirituall and holy 3. These Ordinances or Commandements to be observed under penalties both corporal and spiritual the word life comprehends both which is our case as well as theirs 1 Cor. 10. 1. They were all baptized and did all eat the same spiritual meat and did all drink the same spiritual drink yet fell in the Wilderness for their lusting for their Idolatry Fornication tempting God and murmuring Now says the Apostle all these things happened unto them for examples and were written for our admonition upon whom the ends of the world are come Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed least he fall namely as they fell So Psal 95. applied by the Apostle to us of the New Testament Heb. 3. 4. Tempt not God nor provoke him as they did in the Wilderness least he swear against you in his wrath as he did against them And this he speaketh to beleevers as hath been shewed whom he calls the people of his pasture and sheep of his hand Psal 95. Holy brethren pertakers of the Heavenly calling Heb. 3. 1. whom also he supposeth to be in Christian Churches Heb. 13. 7. And we find that the profanation of the Sacrament by the Corinthians was punished also by corporall sicknesse and death 1 Cor. 11. For this cause many are weak and sickly among you and many are fallen a sleep Therefore I say the Law is a command to be observed upon penalties and rewards Psal 2. 12. Heb. 6. 10. onely to us his rewards and punishments are more in that which is spiritual and less in things corporal then they were to them Nor is this to be under a covenant of works It is true the Law to man in the state of Innocency before the Gospel was added was a covenant of works but ever since both to them before and to us after Christ the Law hath been as it were incorporated with the Gospel as thereby become part of the Covenant of grace Therefore the Law given by Moses is called the Testament of Christ as well as the Law given to us by Christ himself that the Old Testament this the New and both confirmed by his blood that in the type by the blood of Bulls and Goats this in the answer-type by his owne blood Heb. 9. 16. Where a Testament is there must also of necessity be the death of the Testatour whereupon nether the first Testament was dedicated without blood Now the Testament of Christ so confirmed must needs be of the covenant of grace not of works Therefore also what Moses saith of the Law given by him Deut. 30. 12. 14. It is not in Heaven that thou shouldst say who shall go up for us to Heaven and bring it unto us that we may hear it and do it but the word is very nigh unto thee in thy mouth and in thy heart c. This
they all are separated things But we finde not in the new Testament what it is but in the old we must search and there we finde it often made opposite to that which is common that is which is and worketh onely within the common road of nature therefore we finde that then a thing is separated when it is set apart for a supernaturall efficacy and end of which nature all the Ordinances of the worship then were and are so still So for the Sabbath where shall we find that the first day of the week is to be remembred and kept holy as the Rest day of the Lord as the Seventh day was if you have not recourse to the fourth Commandement where the command is fixed upon the generall duty of remembring and keeping the Rest day whatever that day fall to be as was before observed Page 75. I might give many such instances I shall name but one more and that is this the applying of the token of Abrahams Covenant to infants which must have been more particularly appointed in the new Testament had not the command of God when he gave to Abraham that Covenant and the seal thereof been so expressely fixed upon the generall duty of keeping the token of the Covenant yea whatever that token prove to be for God did intend to change it as was shewed And withall the application of it to the Infant so expressely made an essential part thereof as being that wherein was signified and sealed that branch of Abrahams Covenant which made it to be his and to differ from what was given before in reference to which also and to the seals thereof he was called the Father of them that believe and therefore receiv'd both the one and the other both for himselfe and us as was shewed before namely a blessing upon families in order to the multiplying of the spiritual seed Which being considered the silence of the new Testament in this matter of Infant-baptisme is an argument rather for it then against it because had it not been taken for granted and as a thing commonly received by all the Churches from the light of the old Testament that this token of Abrahams Covenant should also be applyed unto Infants those who had so many questions and disputes to be decided by the Apostles had never let so great a priviledge go so quietly without so much as a question put about it And it had been necessary that the Lord should have given a caution for leaving Infants out of this new administration that we might have known his minde had he so intended Vse 4. Hence we see a reason why the Apostle faith of the children of beleeving parents that they are not common or uncleane but holy 1 Cor. 7. 14. one reason is because they come under this word of blessing from God in as much as that word was confirmed not only unto Abraham but also to all beleevers Blessing I will bless thee and thou shalt be a blessing and in thee shall all the families of the earth be blessed That which God blesseth he sanctifieth and separateth from that which is common or unclean As it is said of the Sabbath day he blessed the Sabbath day and sanctified it that is made it a day which should not be reputed common but holy Nor are the children of beleevers under a blessing onely in a common way of providence as he blesseth the corne and the beasts of the field as hath been shewed although according to the ordinary course of causes and things in nature it must be acknowledged a blessing to be born and brought up of beleeving parents for if that were all it would not make their children holy It is said that Christ upholdeth all things by the word of his power Heb. 1. 3. so as the common course of things in nature is not without a word of blessing from God The earth which drinketh in the raine that cometh oft upon it and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed receiveth blessing from God Heb. 6. 7. So Psal 107. 38. yet here is no holiness in all this because this is done in the common course of nature and that which maketh any thing to be holy is something which is spiritual and supernatural or separated from that common road And this is the case of Infants of beleeving parents they are not onely under a word of common providence but also under such a particular word of blessing from God by meanes whereof beleevers are made blessings to their children in that which is spiritual and supernatural even to the conversion of their soules to God without which word of blessing all prayers and good example or meanes of education whatsoever are not so effectual thereunto Hence it is that the Apostle puts that difference between the Gentiles and the Jewes as between a wild Olive and a good Olive tree Rom. 11. 24. If thou wert cut out of the Olive tree which is wild by nature and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good Olive tree That which made this difference was not to be found in that which was meerly natural for the Jewes were borne in originall sinne and corrupted thereby as much as the Gentiles but in something supernatural namely because the Jewes though they were sinful too yet they were under the means of grace and they had God engaged by covenant to them and their children for their good But as for the Gentiles he left them to their natural condition without such means to mend them nor was God engaged so to them for their good but they were under the curse of God therefore they grew wild as a tree in the Wildernesse that hath none to order it And so were all those that came of them such children of such parents alike under the curse of God in sinne and not looked after or regarded by the Lord as it is said Acts 14. 16. He in times past suffered all the Gentiles to walk in their own ways And whereas the Jews are called the natural branches of this good Olive tree and are said to be Jewes by nature and not sinners of the Gentiles Gal. 2. 15. this is not spoken because this difference was from nature onely and not from that which is supernatural but because this priviledge they had by birth according to the covenant of God with Abraham And we see by that of the Apostle Rom. 11. that look what priviledge the Jewes had of this kind the beleeving Gentiles do now enjoy since their being graffed into the same Olive tree from whence the Jewes for a time are broken off and that when the Jewes shall be again graffed into it they shall enjoy the same again as was shewed p. 39 40 41 c. Therefore I say this is one thing which makes this difference between the children of beleevers and of unbeleevers that they are holy and these common or unclean because they are under such a word of
blessing which these are not yea though we cannot with certainty affirm of this or that Infant of a beleever that it is inherently holy yet holy as thus separated and differenced from those who are common by that word of blessing from God under which they are As we cannot upon certainty affirm of any particular person in the Church that he is inherently holy because he may make a lye in his confession yet of every such person we can say he is in that sense holy namely as separated unto God in that relation and thereby differenced from those who are common or uncleane To this I adde that as it is a necessary qualification in the confession of one who is received into Church relation that therein be held forth in words and actions that which giveth a positive ground of hope that he is inherently holy so in this promise of God to Abraham concerning his purpose of election so by families as hath been shewed we have no less ground of hope concerning Infants of beleevers In the one we have a persons own profession concerning his spiritual state and interest in Christ 1 Cor. 7. 14. Matth. 10. 14. in the other we have what God himself professeth how he hath separated them unto himself and made them part of his kingdom and partakers of the blessing of his covenant And as a person of ripe years is received to baptisme not because he is certainly known to be inherently holy but upon his profession to be such wherein both himself and the Church may be deceived so upon that which God hath said concerning Infants are they to be received also Nor let it seem strange that those who are made holy from a word of blessing from the Lord are by him appointed to have the seale of that word and covenant by which they are so made holy as in the former use was proved that he hath so commanded and appointed Which also is another reason why such children are by the Apostle called holy namely because they are not onely within the covenant of Abraham but also are appointed of God to be a subject recipient of the seale of that covenant The seale is holy and those to whom it is applyed must be so or else it is profaned and made common As for that interpretation given of that place by some els were your children unclean but now are they holy to be meant that else their children were bastards but now they were legitimate It cannot be the meaning of the Apostle because so the Apostle had answered nothing to the satisfaction of those who had put the Question to him about putting away an unbeleeving Wife For it seems the Corinthians had written to him and had put certain questions to be answered by him as we see vers 1. whereof that was one Now for him to say that a beleeving Husband might lawfully keep his Wife still though an unbeleever else were their children bastards had been to leave them as dark and unsatisfied as before for that had been but idem per idem or barely to affirm the thing But it is evident the Apostle bringeth that of the childrens being holy as an argument to prove their lawful continuance in that relation notwithstanding one of them was an unbeleever Nor can we suppose the Apostle would so reason that except one of the married couple be a beleever their children are bastards Moreover the holinesse here mentioned is supposed to be such as the unbeleever contributeth nothing to it he is sanctified he doth not sanctifie therefore cannot be meant of legitimacy of birth which must be as well from the one as from the other since marriage is an ordinance not peculiar to the Church of God but common unto all mankind By this answer of his it appears that it was a Jewish scruple that did trouble them namely whereas under the Law it was a sinne for one of the Church of the Jewes to marry a strange Wife that is one who was not of the Church and in such case they were commanded to put away their Wives and to separate themselves from them as being polluted by them as we see in Ezra 10. 11. 9. 12. as it was also the sinne of the old world that the sons of God that is they of the Church did take in marriage the Daughters of men that is of the posterity of Caine Such was the Law of the communion of Saints also in the Church even in those dayes Therefore the Corinthians put the Question to the Apostle whether now also in the times of the New Testament one of the Church might continue in Wedlock with one not of the Church but an infidell To this the Apostle answereth that if the unbelieving Wife was not sanctified in or by the believing Husband that is if any Church-Law was thereby broken so as their continuance in that relation was not lawful but did cause pollution to the beleever that then their Children must not be reputed holy but unclean or common so as if they would deny the Wife mariage communion upon that account they must deny their children all spiritual communion in the Church For such was the Law to the Jewes Ezra 10. 3. They put away their Wives and such as were born of them also and that according to the command of Ezra and according to the Law By that which they granted he proves that which they did question Obj. If it be objected that upon this account not onely children of beleevers but also Nations must be reputed holy because the promise is that beleevers shall be blessings also unto Nations To this I answer Answ The case is not the same for children are immediately under this word of blessing in the familie relation as the people of God in the Church are immediately under that blessing which the Lord commandeth out of Sion But as for Nations they are under it in a more remote capacity by means of what the Saints are in their families and in the Church Therefore although such as are of the Church and the children also of such families are holy yet it followeth not that therefore the Nation should be holy To this I adde that children are in the power of parents and at their disposing and so as when they in their sanctification or being made holy give up themselves to God by faith and obedience to his ordinances their children are therein vertually given up also in as much as a beleever in some respect giveth up to God together with himself all in his power Now this cannot be said of any nation whatsoever Obj. It will be objected yet further That the Jews are said to be holy even the whole people of the Jews who now are unbeleevers Rom. 11. 16. If the first fruit be holy the lump is also holy and if the root be holy so are the branches yet have they no right to baptisme and therefore that this holiness of the children of