their trust is committed the Ministery of Reconciliation of this key Saint Ambrose thus Behold sins are forgiven by the holy Ghost Ecce quia per Spiritum Sanctum peccata donantur homines autem in remission em peccatorum Ministerium suum exhibent non jus alicujus potestatis exercent neque enim in suo sed in Patris Fihi Spiritus Sancti peccata dimittuntur isti rogant divinitas donat humanum enim obsequium sed Munificentia supernae est potestatis Ambr. l. 3. de Spir. S. cap. 19. but men contribute their Ministery toward the Remission of sin but exercise no right of any power for sins are not remitted in their name but in the name of the Father the Son aâ—d the Holy Ghost they supplicate and pray God grants and pardoneth the service is from man but the bounty from an higher power So then the higher power is the key of authoâ—ity and the humane service is the key of Ministery These several keys were well known to Scotus who writeth thus Authoritas judiciaria sententiandi coelum huic aperiendum vel apertum esse tripliciter intâ—lligitur 1. Authoritas simpliciter principalis solius Dei 2. Non Princâ—palis sed praecellens solius Christi quâ—tatum ad duplicem prae minentiam 1. unam quidem in universaâ—itate causarum judicaâ—darum 2. aliam in siâ—mitate sementiae dâ—siâ—itivae utraque praeeminâ—nia potest conâ—nircilli qui omnia mâ—rita dâ—â—â—rita novit quae sunt â—ausae propâ—er quas coeluÌ„â—st aperiendu vel claudenduÌ„ habet etià voluâ—taâ—eÌ„ inseparaâ—iliter conformem justitiae divinae propter pâ—imuÌ„ pâ—rest in omnibus causis sentâ—â—tiarâ— quia omâ—â—es novit propter secuadum potâ—st ejuâ— sententia sâ—aplicitâ—r esse fiâ—ma irrevocabilis quia semâ—er justa Non potest haec Clavis esse in ecclesiâ— Militante qâ—ia nullus in ecâ—lesia novet omnes causaâ—â—udiciarias nec habet voluntatem imâ—nutabilitâ—r justam 3. Paâ—ticulaâ—is quantâ—m ad causas cognoscendas infirma quantum ad sententiam ferendam puta quia ipsa fit aliquando revocabilis si quando praeter lâ—gem divinam judicat potest ergò esse in ecclesia una clavis coelum aperiendi sc autoritas sententiandi particulariter non irrevocabiliter coelum esse apertum Scot. l. 4. dist 19. Sect. Haec secunda Judicial authority in censuring heaven to be open or to be opened to any man or not is understood in a threefold sense 1. as the most principal and absoluâ—e residing in God onely 2. not as the most principal but a very excellent authâ—rity appertaiâ—ing unto Christ by a double preeminence which he hath 1. â—ver all causes as one who knoweth all mens hearts and can judge thereof 2. in the validity of his sentence definitive as ever just and never to be repealed which prerogative can onely sort with him who knoweth how well or ill all men have deserved for heaven stands open and shut towards us according as our deserts are as also in regard the will of Christ is and ever was undividedly conformable to divine justice for the first reason He may be a Judge in all causes who knoweth all things and for the second his sentence is firm and irrevocable because alwayes just The militant Church is not capable of this key because there is not any member in that Church endowed with so ample intellectuals as to know all causes nor hath a will so confirmed in justice as therein to be immutable 3. There is a particular authority to hear causes but weak to give sentence and is many times revocable as pronounced besides the law of God there may be then in the Church a certain key to open heaven that is the authority of sentencing in particular and yet heaven not irrevocably open unto any Thus much Scotus from whose testimony clearly stream these deductions 1. The Ministerial key in the custody of the Church is not so ample and firm as that excellent key which is upon Christs shoulder and those words As my Father sent me so send I you relate to the certainty of the Commission and not to the extent thereof 2. That there is not in the Militant Church therefore not at Rome such a key as can fit all wards or such a Judge as can take cognizance of all causes nor is there that Oecumenical jurisdiction intituling Rome above all and unto all nor do all causes turn upon that Rota 3. That there is no mortal Judge either Ecclesiâ—stical or Civil so confirmed in justice Clavis triplex 1. Authoritatis istam habet solus Dâ—us qui solus dimittit peccata authoritativè 2. Excellentiae quaÌ„ solus homo Christus habet ia quantum essecâ—uÌ„ Sacramentorum potest dare siâ—e Sacrameatis 3. Clavis Ministerii istam clavem habent Sacerdotes per quam ligant solvunt Raymond sum tract 4. de Poenit. but that he may swerve and deviate from that rule Nullus in Ecclâ—sia saith Scotus In the Church no not one but hath a will subject to change the Pope then that boasteth of the infallibility of his keys either is not of the Church or above it And as this Schoolman hath expressed the differential properties of these keys so a Canonist the several titles and persons to whom they appertain The key saith he is tripartite 1. of Authority and that is in the hands of God alone who onely forgiveth sins with authority 2. Of Excellency which the man Christ hath insomuch that he without the Sacraments can confer the effect and benefit of the Sacraments 3. Of the Ministery and this key is in the custody of the Priests by virtue whereof they bind and loose The Church then must rest contented and good cause she hath so to do with this Ministerial key for the first authentical key posuit pater in potestate sua the Father hath put in his own power for the excellent key omnem potesâ—atem dedit filio he hath given that power to his Son and for the Ministerial key habemus thesaurum istum in vasis fiâ—â—ilibus 2 Cor. 4.7 we poor Clergy-men are rich in this treasure the vessels containing the same are earthly but the key is from the Lord and heavenly the excellency of this power is from God the Ministery from us onely And that we may not be thought to accomplish any thing as from our selves 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theophil Com. in 1 Cor. 4. but that every one who seeth it may say it is wholly of God nipping withall the false Apostles who ascribed all unto themselves as Theophilact piously admonisheth And indeed we need not be ambitious of further dignities 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Chrys 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God having highly honoured our Order with this depositum for to which of the Angels said he at any time To thee will I give the keys c. and whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in
non est justitia imma potest esse sine justitia ita potestas vel authoritas cognoscendi in aliqua causa potest esse sine cognitione aliqua Scot. lib. 4. dist 19. whereby they have power to make inquisition into and examine the case of the Penitent as a man that standeth by may know as much Law as he that sitteth upon the Bench although he hath not a Commission to examin the truth of a cause then in question according to his skill as the Judge hath for saith Scotus that authority whereby the Judge possesseth himself with the true information of the matter depending although it may require skill and discretion to manage the same aright even as the key of power requireth justice in the right use thereof notwithstanding as the power to judge is distinguishâ—d from Justice and may be found where there is no justice as in Pilat so the power and authority to take cognizance of a cause may ofttimes be without any discretion or science at all aâ— in Festus and Fâ—lix Saint Pauls Judges the gift then of knowledge and understanding is not the key but the guide thereof and the authority rightly placed when a man of understanding is in place The Second is the Authority of censuring 2. Clavis Potestatis or the key of power which we call the power of absolution consisting in the solemn denunciation of the Sentence for the former key which investeth the Priest with authority to discern Claves sunt discernendi scientia potentia judicandi i. e. solvâ—ndi ligandi usus harum Clavium 1. discernere ligandos solvâ—ndos 2. dein ligare solvere Magislr l. 4. dist 18. and examine between leprosie and leprosie is but preparatory maturing onely and ripening the sinners case for sentence Judicium sumitur prouâ— significat actum Judicis ut Judex est jus dicit i. e. juridicam sentâ—ntiam pronuaciat Apol. pro Jure Princip pag. 173 174. final determination being the scope thereof wherein the Priest after a full notice and examination of the sinners case and comparing the same with the law of God the rule to direct his hand and key judgeth according to that law and pronounceth the sentence judicial I say as delegated from God whose Commissioner for such causes he is and proceedeth not as a Witness to give in Evidence nor as a Herauld or Crier or Pâ—rsevant to make intimation of the Magistrates decree as a Messenger onely but as a Judge though subalternate clothed with authority from Christ and Christ from his Father to give the sentence The Father saith Chrysostome hath given all power unto the â—on and I set that they 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrys 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tom. 6. p. 16. the Priests to have been made partakers of all that power by the Son for witnesses discover and declare the fact and Judges proceed according to their evidence for example whether such a Murder were committed or no the eye-witnesses are the evidence as present and observing the fact although the Magâ—strate denounce the sentence and punishment The Penitent then becomes a selfe-accuser and witness and the Priest turns the key according to Gods law whose Deputy and Steward in that case he is Nor doth this power to be a Judge contradict his office as a Minister for as Magistrates are the (a) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 13.4 Ministers of God and bear not the sword in vâ—in so are Ministers the Magistrates of God and bear not the keys in vain But of this there will be occasion to say something in the exercise of this power whether it be judicial or no. Onely thus as the Magistrate is a temporal Mâ—nâ—ster and the end of his power the preservation of publick peace and tranquility so is the Mâ—nister a Spiritual Magistrate to procure the salvation of souls and the enlargement of Gods kingdome and as the Magistrates sword is Terrestrial punishing evil doers and protecting such as do well so is the Ministers key Celestial binding the obstinate and loosing penitent offenders And it goeth well with Church and State when the Ecclesiastâ—cal Ministery and Civil government keep the bounds God hath set them and in truth the mutual incroachments and confusions of these two powers have been the occasions of all the alterations and combustions in Christendome For as when the roof of the Temple rent in sunder not long after followed the ruine of the Temple it self So if these two principal beams and Top-rafters the Prince and the Priest rent asunder the whole frame of Christian religion will be shaken The abuse of the keys hath occasioned the Civil Magistrate to abridg in some cafes the lawful use thereof and when the Church-men began to use them like swords the Sword-men seized upon them as belonging to their Regiment Know then O Priest what the inscription is that is ingraven upon thy keys They are the keys of the kingdome of heaven and remember that he who gave the keys to Peter said unto the same man put up thy sword into thy sheath And let the Magistrate be afraid to draw too near unto this holy ground to handle the Censer and approach unto the Altar or to Usurp upon the true function of the keys 2. Chro. 26.16 which appertain not unto them but unto the Priests that are consecrated left they participate in the judgment and leprosie of Vzziah As the Spiritual keys are of the kingdome of heaven because they open and shut the same to different offenders Revel 1.18 so are they of Death and Hell too from the dire effects thereof to such as are impenitent for Hell hath gates as well as Heaven and the same key that shutteth Heaven-gates openeth Hell and where the gates of heaven are opened thosâ— of hell are shut Now heaven is opened and hell shut when a sinner is loosed and absolved in like manner hell is opened and heaven shut when a sinner is bound and his sins retained The next thing we are to consider Whatsoever thâ—u shalt bind on earth c. It had been more correspondent to the Metaphor 2 Of Absolutioâ— legation and use of the keys to have used the termes of opening and shutting as did Esaias the Prophet and John the Divine but the Holy Ghost hath chosen to express this power under the words of binding and loosing Esay 22.22 Rev. 3.7 to signifie the miserable estate of such to whom heaven is shut up as remaining bound with the cords of their own sins Nempè ut intelligamus quam misera sit conditio illorum quibus Coâ—lum clauditur manent enim ol stâ—icti pecâ—aturum vinculis Contrà verò quà m beati suntillâ— quibus apertum est coelum qui scilicet à filio Dei libâ—â—nti sunt sint ipsius cobaeredes Beza Annot. in Matth. 16. and contrariwise the blessed condition of those to whom heaven is opened as freed by the Son of God that
the order for the visitation of the sick the said particular absolution being read his Majesty exceedingly well approved it adding that it was Apostolicall and a very good Ordinance in that it was given in the name of Christ to one that desired it upon the clearing of his conscience And herein the English Church is associated by her sister Churches of the Reformation The Augustan Confession The Church ought to impart absolution unto such as have recourse unto repentance Ecclesia redeuntibus ad poenitentiam impertire absolutionem debeat Harm Confes S. 8. quòd absolutio privata in Ecclesiis retinenda sit Ib. art 12. and that private absolution is to be retained in the Churches Absolutionem ex potestate Clavium remissione peccatorum per Ministerium Evangelii à Christo institutum singuli expetere possint à Deo suo consequi se sciant quando haec à Ministris eis praestantur accipere ab his tanquam rem à Deo ad commodandum ipsis salutariter inserviendum institutam cum siducia debeant remissione peccatorum sine dubitatione frui secundum verbum Domini Cui peccata remiseris remittuntur Harmon Confes c. 5. The Church of Bohemia All persons may specially crave absolution from the power of the keys through the Ministery of the Gospel instituted by Christ and may know for certain that they obtain the same from their God And when it is performed by the Minister unto them they ought to receive it at their hands with confidence as a thing instituted by God and serving for their profit and salvation thereby enjoying beyond all question forgiveness of sin according to the word of the Lord whose sins thou forgivest they are forgiven And the Saxon Church We affirme the rite of private absolution to be retained in the Church Affirmamus ritum privatae absolutionis in Ecclesia retinendum esse constanter retinemus propter multas graves causas de hac fide commonefacere nos absolutio debet eam confirmaâ—e sicut confirmabatur David audita absolutione Dominus abstulit peccatum tuum ità tu scias vocâ—m Evangelii tibi quoque annunciare remissionem quae in absolutione tibi nominatim proponitur non fingas nihil ad te pertinere Evangelium sed scias ideò editum esse ut hoc modo salventur homines side amplectentes Evangelium mandatum Dei aeternum immotuÌ„m esse ut ei credas Art 16. and we for many weighty causes constantly retaine the same Of this belief absolution ought to admonish us and to confirm the same as David was upon the hearing of his absolution The Lord hath taken away thy sin so mayest thou perceive the voice of the Gospel to declare unto thee also forgiveness which by name is proposed unto thee in absolution Thou mayest not feign the Gospel to appertain nothing unto thee but know that it is therefore set forth that by this meant men by faith imbracing the Gospel may be saved and Gods commandment abiding for ever and never to be removed that thou mayest believe the same So the Transmarine Churches herein lend us the right hand of fellowship And thus much for the power of loosing Binding thâ— other part of their office and power is in binding For the Lord saith Ambrose hath given the like power in binding as in loosing Dominus par jus solvendi voluit esse ligandi qui utrumque pari conditione permisit ergo qui solvendi jus non habet nec ligandi habet Ambr. l. 1. de poen c. 3. and hath granted the same upon the like condiâ—ion therefore he that hath not the power of absolution hath not the power of ligation Thereby the Father refuting the Novatians Hereticks of his time and of whom we shall hear some news anon that arrogated unto themselves the power of binding but not of loosing and affirmed the Church to have power to cast out a sinner but not to call in a Penitent Ligandi facultas mandatum Evangelii Ministris datur quanquâ—m notandum est hoc Evangelio esse accidentale quasi praeter naturam Calvin harm in Matth. 16. whereas both these properties are belonging to one key The Church is armed with this power though loth to strike and never but in the case of necessity the inâ—quity of men forcing her to use this weapon it being not so natural to the Gospel but accidental onely to lock up sinners in their offences And having in a readiness to revenge all disobedience saith the Apostle when your obedience is fulfilled 2 Cor. 10.6 q d. Revenged of the false Apostles we could be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theoph. in 2 Cor. 10 p 400. and would but for that you which are obedient are mingled with them we forbear lest some strokes might fall upon you also Where note that this key is turned upon the disobedient onely and often respited for their sake who are obedient This power of binding being rather privative than positive for the guilt of sin binds the sinner over unto punishment and the Priest is said to bind when be finds no cause to loose those bonds Insomuch that whether you respect the private exercise of these keys upon private notice of a sinners state or the publick practick thereof in the Censures of the Church the Ministerial power of binding is declarative onely or applying Gods threats generally expressed in his Law upon refractory transgressors So upon the point the Priest is said to bind when he looseth not and as induration of the heart blinding of the eyes stopping of the ears c. are not to be understood of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Damasc Orat. fid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pag. 127. Graecè as effecting and working the same but permitting and dispensing therewith onely It being the usual guise of the Scripture to call the permission of God his effect and operation So the Priest is said to bind when he permitteth onely and that upon just cause the sinner to remain in the same pickle he found him And as Henâ—y the VIII King of England is reckoned of for the Founder of Christs-Church in Oxford because he let it stand In that sense do Priests bind leaving obstinate sinners standing upon the same termes they formerly did in a fearfull expectation of Judgment except Repentance come betwixt that we need not make any longer stay upon this subject The handling of this part viz. the power of the keys in binding and loosing so at large shall excuse the brevity of that which followeth to be considered in the other parts and members of this promise SECT II. The Contents Peter seised of the keys to the use of the Church Power of absolution conferred and confined unto Priests Laicks using the same not in case of office but necessity and where they are the parties grieved Bonds of the soul and sin onely loosed
speech of the Apostle warranting his restitution is urged by this Father against these Hereticks To whom ye forgive any thing I forgive also for if I forgave any thing Cur igitur Paulum legunt Novatiani si eum tam impi è arbitrantur errasse ut jus sibi vendicaret Domini sui sed vendicavit acceptum non usurpavit in debitum Ambr. l. 1. de Poen c. 6. to whom I forgave it for your sakes I forgave it in the person of Christ Why do saith he the Novations then read Saint Paul if they imagine he erred so impiously as to usurp upon his Lords right but he challenged what he received and incroached not upon what belonged not unto him The Church then of old hath maintained her own which she hath ever executed Hitherto our industry hath sweat in discoursing upon that ministerial power 2. The properties of the power of the keys which Christ in his Gospel hath deposited to the Stewards and Dispensers of the Mysteries of God Our discourse must continue in laying down the properties belonging to this power wherein first it occurreth 1. Absâ—lution whether absolute or conditional whether Absolution pronounced from the Priest be absolute or standeth upon some conditions to make it powerful and efficacious for answer whereunto we must know that Priestly absolution is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the sole and self-working cause of remâ—ssion but that more and more principal Agents and remarkable conditions belong thereunto For as the Cardinal observeth upon that Quaere whether the Sacraments confer grace there is a concurrency 1. of Gods will in the use of an external and visible sign 2. and of the passion of Christ as the meritorious cause Bellar. lib. 2. de Sacram. in genere cap. 1. Sect. igiturut intelligamus 3. also the power and intention of the Miâ—ister in consecrating the same according to Gods word as a remote cause 4. then faith and repentance disposing the Communicant in the right and profitable use thereof 5. and lastly the actual participation of the Sacrament So likewise that remission of sins may ensue upon Priestly absolution there is required the will and good pleasure of God to confer this pardon the suffering of Christ to deserve the same and a well-disposed heart in the Penitent whereby all obstacles are removed that may hinder the operation thereof It being a received rule that Physick works not upon an indisposed Patient The effect indeed is attributed to Priestly absolution it being Gods ordinance wherein he hath resolved to declare his mercy For example 1. let wood be dried 2. fire stricken from a flint 3. applied to the wood and so burn it is not driness in the wood nor striking fire on the flint nor applying of the fire but the fire it self that burneth So it is not in God that willeth nor in Christ that meriteth nor in the sinner that repenteth nor in the Priest that absolveth but in the divine Ordinance consisting in the strength and true use of all of these that remitteth sins And as our Lord said unto the blind men in the Gospel Believe ye that I am able to do this Matth. 9.28 29. upon whose affirmative answer that they believed he said according to your faith be it unto you so is the absolution of the Minister efficacious according to the faith and repentance of him that receiveth it Such conditions the Ancients held to be requisite namely Hierome commenting upon those words of Daniel Dan. 4.24 It may be God will pardon thy sins rebuketh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the temerity of such as are so absolute and peremptory in their absolutions When Blessed Daniel saith he who knew things to come doth doubt of the Sentence of God they do a rash deed that boldly promise pardon unto sinners Cum B. Daniel praescius futurorum de sententia Dei dubitet rem temerariam faciunt qui audacter peccatoribus indulgentiam pollicentur Hieron in Dan. 4. And Saint Basil The power of forgiving is not absolutely conferred 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Basil 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pag. 486. Gracè but upon the obedience of the Penitent and consent of him that hath care of his soul The same resolution had place in the Schooles So Aquinas When the Priest saith I absolve thee he sheweth the man not onely significatively Cùm dicit ego te absolvo ostendit hominem absolutum non solùm significativè sed effectivè licèt possâ—t impediri ex parte recipientis Sed sufficiat generalis revelatio fidei per quam remittuntur peccata esset autem perfectior expositio Ego te absolvo i. e. sacramentum absolutionis tibi impendo Aquin. part 3. Qu. 84. art 3. ad Quintum but effectually to be absolved Although that effect may be hindred on his part that receiveth absolution where a general revelation of faith may suffice by which sins are forgiven but the more perfect exposition is I absolve thee that is I bestow upon thee the Sacrament of absolution clearly differencing between the administring of the Sacrament of absolution and conferring the effect thereof viz. remission of sins And Canus the better to lay open and resolve this doubt distinguisheth betwixt the giving of absolution and the effect thereof his words are these In respect of the Priest Distinguo ex parte Sacerdotis Dei absolventis absolutus quidem manet sed ex parte poenitentis ponentis obstaculum absolutio Sacerdotis praesentem non habet effectum and God that doth assoile the party may remain absolved whereas in respect of himself the party peccant putting an obstacle thereunto the absolution of the Priest may take no present effect and informes us further that Great difference must be made betwixt remission of sins Remissia peccatorum 1. quae habet annexam justificationem 2. Judicialis est continens sententiam cujus virtute quis solvitior à peccatis in tali peccatorum judicio remissivo in quem sensum Sacerdos non semper peccata remittit Sacerdos absolvens fictum verum absolutionis Sacramentum impendit quantum in se est veram formam imponit cujus effectus tâ—â—c quidem impeditur per indispositionem Recipientis nec sensus formae Sacramentalis est Ego te absolvo i. e. do absolutionem quae nunc effectum suum habeat remissionis peccatorum sed sensus est Ego judicialem absolutionem impendo quae vi suâ potens sit te absolvere si tu velis fructum ejus obtinere Quemadmodum si absolutionis sententiam proferret Judex quâ liberareris à carcere in quo postea tu voluntate tuâ manere vis si eâ—o extrinsecù clave januae seram aperirem tu volens intùs obicem opponeres Ego verè januam aperui Canus Relec. de poen part 6. pag. 930 931. to which the grace of Justification is ever annexed and the sentence wherein such a remission is
past and for which signes of sorrow appear in the Penitent never extending the same to future sins for to cry Peccavi I have sinned may be the voice of a Penitent but Peccabo I will sin never now where there is a resolution to sin there with safety can lie no absolution Then if such sins are to be lock'd under secrecy which are confessed in ord ne ad claves with relation to absolution and remission It will follow that peccata committenda sins purposed to be committed and in fieri to be done not in fa â—o done already although spoken of in confession are not so necessary to be concealed Panormitan puts the case A certain man confessed unto the Priest Quidam fuit confessus Sacerdoti quòd intend bat interficere Sempronium vel aliud malesicium committere quòd non poterat abstinere Nunquid Sacerdos peccet revelando Innocentius instat concludâ—t quod hoc peccatum non dicitur detectum in poenitentia tum quia peccatum est committendum non commissum tum quia non habet contritionem Undè Sacerdos dâ—bet quantùm cautiùs potest revelare ut peccatum impediatur â—ene hoc semper menti quod peccatum commissum non committendum dicitur detegâ— in Poenitentia Panorm supra 5. de poenit remiss c. Omnis utriusq n. 24. that he had a mind to kill Sempronius or to do some other mischief and that be could not hold his hand The Question is whether the Priest offendeth in revealing the same oâ— no Innocentius instanceth and at length coâ—cludeth that this sin cannot be said to be detected in a repentant way as well because the sin confessed remaineth to be committed and is not committed already as also because the sinner had no contrition wherefore the Priest ought as warily as he may to reveal the samâ— that the sin may be prevented for keep this alwayes in mind that sin committed and not to be committed is commanded to be concealed in Penance And Frier Angelo when any one confisseth that he will do a mischief Quando quis confitetur se velle faccre aliquod malum quia istud non est dictum in poenitentiali foro ut ideò propter rationem istius Sacramenti non tenetur celare sed quando vergeret in periculum communitatis vel alterius tum si nullo modo cessaret talis quin illud faciat credo sine praejudicio quòd non solùm potest immo tenetur revelare ei quâ— potest prodesse non obesse ut mâ—lo obviâ—tur Sum. Angel v. Confe ult nu 7. because the same is not opened in the consistory of Repentance wherefore the Priest is not tied by virtue of that Sacrament to conceal the same but when it shall verge and incline to the prejudice and danger either of the whole Commonalty or of any man in particular then if the sinner cannot be taken off but that be will needs do it I am of opinion without prejudice to any that the Priest not onely may but is tied to â—eveal the same to such an one as will further and not hinder the prevention of further mischief This Canonist maketh the purposed evil to be of two sorts 1. either when the damage may light upon the sinners own head alone 2. or which may redound to the prejudice and hurt of others the former the Priest may reveal if he please but the later he is bound to discover for the crossing and averting thereof And the first School-man our Countrey man Alexander of Hales thus A man may confess a sin not present Potest quis confiteri peccatum non tamen ut praesens sed potius ut est â—n proposito de futuro ut cum dicit se velle fornicari nolle desistere dico ergo quòd non tenetur celare simpliciter nec si Sacerdos talâ—m confessionem revelaret posset condemnari tanquam violator sigilli confessionis tamen quia hoc species esset mali infamia sequeretur propter hoc credo et si non tenetur de jure talem confessionem occultare debet tamen celare ratione publicae honestatis nisi inconveniens aliquod grave sequeretur tunc enim credo quòd non esset talis confessio penitùs tacenda nec tamen publicè revelanda propter periculum infamiae sed cautè secretò alicui qui possit vellet prodesse innotescenda Alex. Halens part 4. Qu. 28. nu 2. art 2. in Resp but yet to come and in purpose as that he will commit fornication and not forbear I say therefore that the Priest is not bound simply to conceal it nor may he for any such detection be justly condâ—mned as a violater of the seal of Confession Yet because it may seem to have an outward shew of evil and infamy may follow thereupon for that cause I am thus minded that although by law he is not tied to hide such a confession yet he should do well to conceal it for publick honesties sake except some grievous inconvenience may like to ensue upon the same then I believe that such a Confession ought not altogether to be silenced nor yet openly to be published for dread of infamy but cautelously and secretly to such an one that can make good use of the discovery wherein he would seem to be more circumspect and cautelous in the manner of the detection than those Canonists whereas the following School-men Scotus and Biel are so strict upon the matter that purposed sins and not committed come under the seal of secrecy also Non solùm peccata commissa sed etiam committenda in confessione detecta sunt tanquam secreta celanda Biel l. 4. d. 21. Qu. 1. Conclus 3. And again it is not lawful for a Priest in any case come what will come to reveal confession whether the party confessing be Penitent or not In nullo casu licet Sacerdoti revelare confessionem sive confitens poeniteat sive non sive confiteatur peccata jam opere perpetrata sive perpetranda sive sit peccatum in moribus sive in fide Biel sup resp ad dub 2. whether he confess sins already committed or which he hath a mind and resolution to commit whether it be a sin in faith or in behaviour And the Modern Divines in the Roman Church are no way moderate herein but so Stoicall and stiff for the seal as let the sin be what it will whether past or to come it skils not whether the welfare of Church or State depend thereon 't is not material Heaven and Earth shall pass away rather than the seal of Confession shall be opened A Ghostly Father saith a late Sorbonist Car estant en le place de Dieu il n'a point de bouche pour reveler ce qu'il a entendu Os habent non loquentur Et le Sceau de la confession est si important religieux que pour rien du Monde il