cause of this difference is in readinesse to wit in the one faith was fore-seene in the other vnbeleefe was foreseene Did Saint Paul seeme to Arminius eyther not to be quick of vnderstanding or to be scrupulous without cause But least he should be compelled to say this he hath deuised I know not what subtilties and monsters of interpretations Such as are these Of him that calleth that is of Faith And of God that sheweth mercy that is that iustifieth not for workes but for Faith which mercy notwithstanding is common to many reprobates Then also that speech I will haue mercy on whom I will haue mercy by cuius whom hee would haue qualium what sort of men to be vnderstood And it is not of him that willeth to wit righteousnesse is not For he denyeth that these are to be vnderstood of saluation as if saluation were of him that willeth Euen as to haue mercy if Arminius be beleeued is not to saue but to giue the meanes to righteousnesse And many more such like which are eyther inconuenient or wrested which we haue examined in the 15. chapter XI Adde to these that which is in the eleuenth to the Romanes Rom. 11.5 At this present there is a remnant according to the election of Grace By this remnant or reserued portion are vnderstood those Iewes who cleaued to Christ and who did not fall from the couenant with the rest We haue here therefore the cause why these perseuered in the Faith and haue not fallen from grace to wit because the reseruation was made according to the election of grace Therefore perseuerance in Faith is according to the election of grace and not election according to perseuerance in Faith as Arminius would haue it Arminius that he might shift off this place saith that it is here spoken of election to righteousnesse not of election to Faith which although it be false yet it doth not infringe the force and euidence of this place For whosoeuer is elected to righteousnesse is elected to Faith And surely I cannot sufficiently maruaile at that which Arminius saith Pag. 222. What is that which is by grace Armin. in Perk. pag. 222. It is election to Faith nothing lesse but it is election to righteousnesse as if there were any righteousnesse without Faith Or as if he who refuseth Faith doth not also refuse righteousnesse Surely these things sound of Socianisme and doe shew that there is vnder them some hidden vlcer Also what is it to the purpose to contend that it is here spoken of election to righteousnesse seeing according to Arminius this is not certaine by the will of God but doth depend on mans free-will XII Arnoldus Pag. 346. dealeth more warily He thinks that it is spoken here of the reiection of the Iewes and taking in of the Gentiles But the word remnant or reseruation doth confute this for from hence as also from the former verses it is manifest that he doth enquire the cause why a few of the Iewes onely a remnant doe belong to the couenant being afterwards to explaine how the Gentiles were engrafted into the place of the rest which were reiected and cut off Finally against these places of Scripture the Arminians although they be acute and witty men doe so flye the encounter they doe fight so recoylingly they doe so intangle themselues that they seeme eyther to be vnwilling to be vnderstood or to distrust their owne cause Furthermore if they say true no man yet had vnderstood what Christian Religion is CHAP. XXII The same Election in respect of Faith fore-seene is confuted by Reason I. REason it selfe doth agree to the Scripture For if perseuerance in Faith be considered in Election as a thing already performed no man is elected but he is considered as dead and as hauing finished his course for no man can be said to haue perseuered vntill the end but hee which is come vnto the end II. Hence also it appeareth that Arminius is contrary to himselfe For hee saith Election is of them that beleeue But they that are dead cease to beleeue Therefore that Arminius might be constant to himselfe hee ought to say that Election is of them that cease to beleeue and not of them that beleeue III. Also if election to glory be made for some fore-seene vertue Christ himselfe as hee was man was not predestinated to glory for he was not carried to such a height of glory for the fore-seeing eyther of faith or workes or any vertue for whatsoeuer vertue or holinesse is in Christ as he is man doth flow from the personall vnion with the diuinity and from the purity of his conception by which he was free from originall sinne Therefore this his holinesse cannot be said to be fore-seene but to be decreed Nor was he predestinated for holinesse but to holinesse And that the election of the head should be contrary to the election of the members and that the head should be elected to vertue the members for vertue no reason doth admit IV. Adde to these that while election is said to be for faith fore-seene there is appointed an election which doth not belong to infants that are taken away by an immature and vntimely death because they want faith V. Yea election for faith fore seene cannot be called election but it is an admission and receiuing of them who come to Christ by Faith and of them who by their free-will vsing Grace well doe first choose God in whom they put their trust before they be chosen by God Christ on the contary side saith Iohn 15.16 Ye haue not chosen me but I haue chosen you The Arminians while they contend that it is here spoken onely of election to their Apostâ—ship doe not obscurely confesse that this place doth hurt them if it be there spoken of election to saluation their will is therefore in the worke of saluation that God be chosen by man before man be chosen by God Goe to then let vs grant that it is here spoken onely of election to their Apostleship for that doth not a little further our cause For if the Apostles were elected to their Apostleship not for any fore-seene vertue but were elected to receiue those vertues and gifts by which they might execute their Apostleship it is much more likely that man is not elected to saluation for any fore-seene vertue seeing eternall saluation is a farre greater benefit then the Apostleship and further remoued from the power of man and more exceeding our capacity and therefore it is a thing whereunto we haue much more neede of the helpe of God and which is lesse in the power of mans free-will then the obtaining of an Apostleship VI. By the same doctrine faith in Christ is made a thing of mans free-will in the power whereof it is to vse grace or not to vse it to beleeue or not to beleeue and to vse or not to vse those powers to beleeue which are giuen vnresistably Surely Arminius had
is spoken of the Antecedent will of God by which God will haue mercy vpon some for so they speake that is vpon such as beleeue and not of his Consequent will by which he hath determined precisely and absolutely to haue mercy on this or that man And yet they forgetting themselues say that this Antecedent will may be resisted when notwithstanding Saint Paul saith in the same place Who can resist his will Either therefore let Arminius deny that the Antecedent will of God is a will but rather call it a wish desire or affection or if he doth contend that it is a will let him confesse that it cannot be resisted To which purpose excellently Saint Austen Enchared Cap. 95. Our God in heauen doth whatsoeuer things hee will both in heauen and earth which is not true if hee hath willed some things and hath not done them And which is more vnworthy of him hath not therefore done them because the will of man hath hindred that the Almighty should not doe what hee willed XIV Arminius indeede doth confesse that God doth not want power to fulfill that Antecedent will whereby he doth earnestly desire all men to be saued But it is not true saith he that the thing which he doth wish seriously desire that he will effect the same by what meanes soeuer he is able but by those meanes by which it is decent and conuement that he should effect it The Father wisheth and doth earnestly desire that his Sonne would obey mâ—n but he doth not violently draw his Sonne to obedience and a little after The similitude of a Merchant who doth desire his wares should be safe and yet casteth them into thâ— sea doth very well square and agree to the purpose God doth earnestly desire that all men should be saued but compelled by the stubborne and incorrigible malice of some men will haue them make losse of their saluation For although God doth earnestly will and intend the saluation of all and singular men yet he will not then put forth his omnipotency least hee should force mans free-will I answere Nothing is effected by these similitudes for they are plaine dissimâ—litudes Arminius vseth examples of men which cannot be made partakers of their vowes but by meanes that are not conuenient and of them who are oftentimes disappointed of their intention But to God there are neuer wanting iust and conuenient meanes by which he should obtaine that which he intends neither can he be disappointed of his intent But you say if God should exercise his omnipotency in conuerting man he should force mans free-will and compell mans voluntary liberty But that I deny For he can without constraint so bend the will that it should follow of its owne accord Without constraint hee suddenly changed the minde of Esau Gen. 33. and the minde of Saul 1 Sam. 19.23 and the minde of the Aegyptians Psal 105.25 and of Kings Pro. 21.1 If God doth make this change of the will in wicked men the liberty of mans free-will vntouched how much more may hee doe it in good and faithfull men God without constraint did change the heart of the Theefe on the Crosse and so doth he of all from whom hee takes their stony heart and giues them an heart of flesh Ezek 36.26 and of those who when they were dead in sinne hee raised vp with a spirituall resurrection Ephes 2.5 We shall see Arminius is of opinion that the vnderstanding is vnresistably indued with light by God and that God doth vnresistably giue power of beleeuing the Gospell to all men to whom the Gospell shall be preached and that hee drawes their affections But when the minde hath fully receiued in this perswasion and the affections doe stir vp the will it is impossible but their will should moue it selfe whether the minde instructed by God doth appoint it and whether the appetite doth force it for these are the onely incitements of the will neither is it moued by any other impulsion The schoole and followers of Arminius are also of opinion that the Elect are drawne of God by effectuall and powerfull grace the effect whereof is most sure because God doth draw them in a congruent and fit time and manner in which he knoweth they will infallibly follow him calling them And yet the Arminians meane not hereby that any force is offred to the will of man but that it is so vehemently affected with a morall and sweet perswasion that it followeth of its owne accord The example of the Theefe doth seeme to mee to be notable aboue all the other whose heart so suddendly changed in a time of aduersity when the faith of the Apostles themselues did shake is an euident lesson how great the efficacie of the holy Spirit is on them who are called by the purpose of God Rom. 8.28 But of this efficacy of calling it shall be spoken more at large in his proper place XV. Hence appeares with how prepostrous diligence Arminius hath turned his wit to the defence of free-will For there lay open to him a most sure and plaine way whereby God might shew forth his power in the conuersion of man without the diminishing of our liberty Nor while hee doth patronize and defend free will ought he to strike against the wisedome and perfection of God whom hee would frustrate and disappoint of his owne end and naturall desire and wish those things which he knowes hee shall not obtaine and propound an end to himselfe which shall neuer be XVI In the meane while the prudent reader shall easily discerne whereto that similitude of the marchant making losse and casting his wares into the sea with his owne hands may belong For Arminius doth not onely expressely say that God is compelled to doe something which he had not intended for the marchant did not intend to doe this but doth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nolens volens betweene willing and nilling but also by these hee doth insinuate that God being driuen from that better end which he had propounded to himselfe turned himselfe to another end lesse to be wished which things whether they be spoken by prudent men to the reproach of God or by vnwise men through ignorance it doth strike horror into pious mindes XVII But in this distinction of the will of God into Antecedent and Consequent the first whereof doth goe before the other doth follow mans will this is farre the worst thing that by it the will of man is made to goe before the election of God For according to Arminius God by his antecedent will would saue all men and giue them power of beleeueing in Christ but by his consequent will doth elect or reprobate seuerall men according as hee fore-knowes their faith or infidelity A deadly doctrine by which the election of man doth depend vpon mans will and our faith is made the cause and not the fruite of our election and man chooseth God and applyeth himselfe to God before he is
p. 86. doth roundly affirme that sinne is the meritorious cause of reprobation So Arnoldus p. 151. Election and reprobation of particular persons were made in respect of the fore-sight of faith and incredulity Arnoldus Can any suspect your fidelity that you take the word ex equiuocally in reprobation to note the cause but in election to note the condition It must needes be therefore that they acknowledge that the elect are appointed to saluation for faith fore seene because they beleeue and that fore-seene faith is the cause of the election of particular persons IV. But there is no difference whether you say that Election doth rest on faith fore-seene or that it doth rest on the fore-seeing of faith for both wares faith is made the cause of election in the latter it is made the neerest cause in the former it is made the remote cause for fore-seene faith is made the cause of fore-seeing it and the fore-seeing it is made the cause of election For why doth God fore-know that they will beleeue vnlesse because they will beleeue and why doth he elect vnlesse because he fore-knoweth they will beleeue These are the words of Arminius against Perkins p. 142. In that God fore-knowes he therefore fore-knowes because it will afterward be V. The same men a little after against the Walachrians doe vse although fearefully the word depending that they might make election depending on faith And although say they that word of depending which we are neuer wont to vse in this argument be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 easily subiect to calumny yet if a maleuolent minde be absent it cannot be drawne to the least suspicion of any absurdity Yes it may be drawne to the greatest For Greuinchouius himselfe Pag. 198. doth acknowledge that dependency strictly taken doth argue causality and the dependency of a superiour by an inferiour And truely these men doe not obscurely declare how willingly they would vse this word if they did not feare our pursuite VI. There is extant a Treatise of Greuinchouius with this Title Of election * ex for faith fore seene but that word ex from or for doth not onely note priority but also causality For who would endure a man that should say that Tiberius was from Octauius Augustus or that this yeare is from the former because one went before the other A man that is not vnskiifull of the Latine doth sufficiently know that the praeposition ex is not fit to note onely the priority of faith vnlesse besides the priority there is also some efficiency or dependency Wherefore the same man page 24. hath these words It is altogether conuenient to the nature of lawes and prescribed conditions that the will of the Iudge should be moued to giue the reward by the required and performed condition This performed condition the Arminians say to be faith which if we beleeue them is considered in election as performed They will therefore haue God to be moued by this fulfilled condition that he should giue the reward which if it be true faith is plainely the cause both of decreeing and giuing the reward because it is that which moueth the Iudge VII So in the conference at the Hage the Arminians doe contend that God doth not elect without respect of qualities which thing is true not onely of faith but also of repentance so it be taken thus that God in electing considered men as they that by his gift and bounty would beleeue and be renewed in repentance If you take this respecting otherwise it must needes be that this respecting is the cause for one is said to choose any thing in respect of some quality or vertue who by that qualitie or vertue is moued to choose it otherwise he would not VIII Nay what That the Arminian conferrers at the Hage p. 86. doe vse the word Cause God sendeth his word whether it seemeth good to him not according to any absolute decree but for other causes lying hid in man Then is man the cause why hee is called whence it comes that he is the cause also that he is elected For that which is the cause why God doth call a man to saluation is plainely the cause why God will saue him for these are things connexed and knit together The same men page 109. It is absurd to put the absolute will of God in the decree of election for the first and principall cause that it should goe before the other causes to wit Christ faith and all other causes Here you heare that faith is put among the causes of election wherefore Arnoldus page 53. doth leaue it in the middle whether faith ought to be called the cause or the condition Whether saith hee faith should be called the condition or whether it should be called the cause it alwayes being laid downe for granted that it is the gift of God this alone is the question how faith hath respect to election And a little before he had said If any should say that in the decree of election faith hath the respect of a cause yet he should not thereby deny that it is the gift of God Not obscurely insinuating how prone hee was to that part and perceiued that hee was not rashly to be blamed who hath called faith the cause of our election IX Adde to these that Arnoldus page 186. and the rest with him doe contend that faith is not of those that are elected but that the election is of those that are faithfull We truely out of Saint Paul to Titus chap. 1. v 1. say that faith is of the elect which we so take because election is the cause of faith to which our assertion seeing they oppose theirs as contrary whereby they say that election is of them that are faithfull what else would they but haue faith to be the cause of our election X. Let also the moment and force of their reasons be weighed and considered In the conference at the Hage they professe that they doe not refuse to write with great letters and to subscribe that election is made by Christ without any consideration of good workes And yet doe the same men euen to loathing beate vpon this that Election is the decree of sauing them that beleeue that there is no man elected by God but in respect of faith But I would know why they so earnestly exclude the consideration of workes from election seeing that the earnest endeauour of good workes is a condition no lesse fore-required to saluation then faith Who by these things doth not see that faith is not laid downe by them meerely as a fore-required condition For if faith were thus considered by them it is plaine that the study and endeauour of good workes had beene ioyned and placed in the same degree with faith XI And if God electeth to saluation not those whom he absolutely decreed but those whom hee fore-saw would beleeue it is plaine that God in election hath respect to some dignity and
worth which is in these but not in them But it is not likely that any wise man doth choose the best men for any other cause then because they are the best For if the goodnesse of the faithfull doe goe before election hee should doe very ill that should elect them for any other cause then because they are good XII And certainely whensoeuer any thing is promised to a man vnder a condition which is in the power of mans free-will it is plaine that the fulfilling of the condition by mans free-will is the cause why the promise is fulfilled and the Arminians doe contend that God doth giue yea and that hee is bound to giue grace and sufficient power to beleeue but to vse that grace or not to vse it is in the power of mans free-will XIII Neither is it a hard thing to draw from them that which I would haue For let the Schoole and followers of Arminius tell me what moued God by his consequent will to choose Simon Peter rather then Simon Magus why Gregory rather then Iulian They haue nothing to answer but that it was done because God fore-saw faith in them and incredulity in these Therefore although they should get it granted that by their doctrine fore-seene faith is not made the cause why God hath appointed this man to saluation yet they must needes confesse that according to Arminius fore-seene faith is the cause of the difference betweene the elect and the reprobate and therefore the cause why this man is preferred before the other which surely is no other thing then to be the cause of election For euery election is comparatiue and doth inferre the reiection of one or more XIV So when they deny that by the will of God electing the number of the elect is certaine and determined it must needes be that they would haue mans will to be the cause why the number is such a number and so euery man is the cause why hee is of the number of the elect and therefore also the cause of his owne election XV. Although therefore they would haue this suspicion remoued from them yet they will neuer wipe out this blot by which they are contumelious against God and doe weaken the firmenesse and strength of faith As they which make the eternall election and good pleasure of God to depend on mans free-will will haue saluation to be of him that willeth of him that runneth they doe place some worth vertue in man which is the cause why saluation in the eternall counsell of God is appointed to one rather then to another Whence it comes that faith doth shake and saluation is vncertaine as that which although God doth certainely fore-know yet he doth not certainely and infallibly will it for Election is not an act of the fore-knowledge but of the will of God and this will how can it be certaine if it doth depend on an vncertaine thing to wit on mans will But these things by the way for they shall be more exactly examined in their place CHAP. XVIII The decree of generall election is searched into by which Arminius will haue all men to be elected to saluation vnder the condition of faith I. WE haue taught in the fift Chapter that the antecedent will of God as Arminius hath receiued it after Damascen is a meere forged deuise and a thing contumelious against God This foundation being taken away that vniuersall election common to all men vnder the condition of faith to be performed doth fall downe For this generall election Arminius will haue to belong to the antecedent will of God II. Whereunto adde those things which we haue spoken Chapter 12. where we haue dissolued and vnloosed the chaine of the foure decrees in which the Arminians doe comprehend the whole doctrine of Election There we haue shewed that the second decree by which saluation is not decreed to particular persons but it is determined that they shall be saued who shall beleeue is not the decree of prouidence nor predestination but is the rule of the Gospell which doth prescribe and set downe the way to saluation III. This question is put to slight onely by the name of election for Election cannot be of all men he doth not choose that taketh all Neither in the time of the deluge had Noah beene chosen that hee should liue in the deluge if no man had perished by the flood He is elected who is preferred before others the rest being eyther despised or lesse accounted of IV. And seeing in all the points of faith wee ought to be wise and taught out of the Scriptures much more in so high an argument which doth exceede our capacitie Let therefore the Arminians shew by what place of Scripture all men are said to be elected by that election which is opposite to reprobation for of that it is spoken here and not of the election of seuerall men by the consequent will of God Who euer heard it said that Pharaoh or Iudas did any way belong to the election of God Saint Peter indeede 2. Epist Chap. 1. doth ioyne calling to election commanding vs to make our calling and election sure that is by the earnest endeauour of good workes to effect that the sence of our effectuall calling and the perswasion of our election may daily be increased in vs But he will not therefore haue our calling and election to be the same nor will hee haue all that are any waies called to be elected Yea many are called but few chosen Matth. 20.16 V. That also is to be obserued that by this generall election it is not decreed who are to be saued but what manner of men are to be saued and that the Arminians draw the ninth chapter to the Romanes to proue this where it is plainely spoken of the good pleasure of God and his mercy towards some seuerall and peculiar persons whom it seemeth good to God to choose For those words I will haue mercy on whom I will haue mercy speake of some certaine men and not of what qualified men for then he had said Miserâ—tor qualium I will haue mercy on men so qualified and not cuius or quorum of whom Neither had the example of Isaac and Iacob who were particular persons beene applied to explaine the election not of particular persons but the election eyther of all or of men so qualified VI. But I would learne of the Arminians whether Iudas or Pilate whether the high priests and the Scribes by the instigation and accusations of whom our Sauiour was crucified were elected conditionally and comprehended in that generall election If they were not comprehended then that generall and conditionall election which they would haue to be extended to all men falleth to the ground On the other side if Iudas and those high priests were conditionally elected the decree of God concerning the crucifying of Christ could not be absolute because it was done by men which were conditionally elected vnder a
vertue and not saluation it selfe Then also Paul expounds how wee are holy to wit in charity nor in the fruition and enioying of glory He vnderstands the dueties of charity which are exercised in this life vnto which to be exhorted after this life is needelesse Finally by their so various and diuers expositions which ouerthrow one another they doe sufficiently confesse that they haue nothing wherein they may be constant And because they cannot master vs by the weight of their expositions they endeauour to ouerwhelme vs by the multitude of them It is of small importance that from this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is blamelesse they gather that it is spoken of the perfection after this life For the Apostle will haue vs to be blamelesse euen in this life as Philippians 2.15 Where he commands vs to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 blamelesse and harmelesse in the midst of a crooked and peruerse generation Certainly when the Apostle saith that we might be blamelesse in charity it is manifest that he doth not speake of the Saints enioying glory where there is no place for reprehension nor for exhortation to the duties of charitie There is no little force in the following verse He predestinated vs to the adoption of children by Iesus Christ Out of this place I thus reason Those whom God predestinated to adoption he hath predestinated also to the spirit of adoption to be giuen them and this is nothing else but to predestinate them to faith for the spirit of adoption is it that beareth witnesse in our hearts that we are the sonnes of God Rom. 8. and this testimony is faith it selfe It is true indeede that God appointeth no man to adoption but whom God considereth as one that by his gift will be faithfull but the same may also be said of those that are appointed to faith which is appointed to none but whom God considereth as one that will be faithfull And surely they are grosely deceiued who thinke that the faithfull are appointed to the adoption of children seeing in that they are faithfull they are already children This Saint Iohn teacheth chapter 1. To them that beleeued he gaue this prerogatiue to be the sonnes of God II. Agreeable to this place are also many other 1 Cor. 7.25 I haue obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithfull not because he considered me as already faithfull Iohn 15.16 I haue chosen you that you should bring forth fruit therefore he did not choose vs considered as already faithfull and therefore as already bearing fruit Should wee imagine that Christ speakes here onely of the election of the Apostles to their Apostleship I thinke there is none of so impudent a face who can deny that the same thing may be spoken of any of the elect whereof there is none whom God hath not elected that hee might be godly and good euen as also there is no man who is not of a shamelesse countenance who will deny that all the following documents and lessons doe belong to all the faithfull These things I commend you that you loue one another If the world hate you you know that it hath hated me firsh c. III. Not vnlike this is that which the Apostle saith 2 Thes 2.13 God hath chosen you to saluation by sanctification of the spirit and beleefe of the truth He saith that we are elected to obtaine saluation by faith not for faith and so faith is after election and a certaine medium or middle thing betweene election and saluation IV. The words of Ananias to S. Paul Act 22.14 are consonant to this God hath chosen thee that thou shouldst know his will by which knowledge faith and assent to the Gospell is vnderstood for Saint Paul was not elected more to know the Gospell then to beleeue the Gospell Paul therefore was elected to beieeue and so his election was before his faith V. The same Apostle 1 Thessa 1.3 praising the faith and charitie of the Thessalonians doth fetch the cause of these vertues from election it selfe Remembring without ceasing your worke of faith and labour of lone as knowing that you are elected of God Here the Arminians doe willingly stumble in a plaine way for by Election they will haue Calling to be vnderstood which if it be true the reprobates themselues will be elected as being also called Then also Saint Paul is deluded as if hee were not in his right minde For what neede Paul tell the Thessalonians that he knew they were called by the Gospell seeing Saint Paul himselfe preached the Gospell to them He were a ridiculous Grammarian who should tell his Schollers that he had taught I know you haue learned Grammer Arnoldus pag. 66. doth suspect that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 knowing is to be referred to the Thessalonians themselues But the good man hath dealt too negligently here for he doth not see that by this meanes the Greeke speech would be made incongruous and not agreeing for then it must haue beene read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that it might agree with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is in the former verse But distrusting this exposition he hath smelt out that by the word election excellency ought to be vnderstood which truely is an intollerable license seeing election differeth from excellency by the whole praedicament for election is an action excellency is a quality or a relation Surely if it be lawfull to bring such portents and monsters of interpretation what will there be in the holy Scripture which may not be deluded or depraued Let Arnoldus bring another place where Excellency is vnderstood by the word Election For although he that is elected may be taken for him that excelleth yet you shall neuer finde Election to be so taken for Excellency Neither ought it to seeme a maruaile that Paul saith he knew of the election of the Thessalonians for God might reueile that to him concerning the Tessalonians which he reuealed concerning the Corinthians Acts 18.10 I haue much people in this citie Or if that doth not please it may be said that Saint Paul when he saw the Gospell receiued by the Thessalonians with very great ioy and much fruite easily perswaded himselfe that many of that people belonged to the election of God VI. The same Apostle in the beginning of his Epistle to Titus calleth himselfe the Apostle according to the faith of Gods elect It is plaine that faith is said to be of the elect because it is peculiar to the elect or else it were not rightly adorned with this elogy commendation and that by the confession of Vorstius himselfe Collat. cum piscat Sect. 118. Faith saith hee is called the faith of the elect of God Titus 1. because faith is a proper marke of the elect c. But why is faith peculiar to the elect is it because as many as haue true faith are elected by God But the Arminians deny this for they write of the Apostasie of the Saints
beleeue is of grace therefore to be able to beleeue is not of grace There is indeede naturally in man a possibility of hauing or receiuing faith but it is not in him by nature to be able to beleeue for these things doe very much differ The first notes the susceptability and possibility of receiuing faith the other signisieth the actiue power and faculty of beleeuing which surely is not in man by nature but is onely from grace XXVI Arnoldus pag. 271. layeth this to our charge as a very great errour that we say that the regenerate man cannot doe any good vnlesse hee be moued by grace Truely a great crime and that which is common to vs with the Apostle who doth pronounce that we are not sufficient of our selues to thinke any thing as of our selues but all our sufficiency is of God 2 Cor. 3.5 The same Arnoldus pag. 447. doth make the vse of grace subiect to mans will It is determined saith he that the vse of grace is subiect to mans will that man may vse it or not vse it according to his naturall liberty And a little after he doth confesse that the effect of the mercy of God was made by Arminius to be in the power of man but such a man as is already strengthened with grace To vse which grace or not to vse it to beleeue or not to beleeue he thinkes is in the power of mans free-will Finally the Arminians will haue the efficacy that is the efficiency and working power of it to depend on free-will Arnoldus against Bogermannus pag. 263. and 274. All the operations of grace which God doth vse to worke our conuersion being granted yet the conuersion it selfe doth remaine so free in our power that we may not be conuerted that is that we may conuert or not conuert our selues Greuinchouius pag. 198. I say that the sffect of grace after the ordinary and vsuall rule doth depend on some act of free will as on a foregoing conâ—ition without which it is not The same man pag. 203. and 204. doth say that there câ—n no other common cause be guten of the whole why this grace should beâ—essectuall rather in Paul or Peter then in another then the liberty of the will Perkins said As there can no good either be or be done vnlesse God doth it so there can no euill be auoided vnlesse God hinder it This true and holy sentence Arminius carpeth at and doth depraue pag. 113 and for the words can be auoided he puts is auoided for he saith that there is in all men power of doing good and auoiding euill and that a man may auoide euill and abstaine from sinne although God doth not hold him from it but that the act it selfe is partly from grace and partly from free-will which as it pleaseth doth either admit or refuse grace Here the words of Arnoldus pag. 381. The good vsing of free-will is principally from grace but yet so that man himselfe doth vse well his owne free-will and the liberty of vsing or not vsing grace is left to him For these sectaries are of opinion that the power of beleeuing is vnresistably giuen to all and that the act of beleeuing is so helped by grace that it is left to mans free-will to beleeue in act or not to beleeue to vse grace either well or ill XXVII And they deny that faith is from grace alone but that it is partly from grace and partly from free-will Greuinchouius pag. 208. and 210. It is manifest that free-will and grace are together causes in part And pag. 211. We ioyne grace and free-will together as causes in part He must so speake who saith that Election is for faith fore-seen For God would be very vnfitly said to fore-see that which he alone is to do for this is not to fore-see but to decree Hitherto also pertaineth that conditional decree of sauing men if they shal beleeue for by this it is placed in the power of man to beleeue For this were a foolish decree I will saue him if I shall giue him faith Arminius against Perkins pa. 223. and 224. saith that the totall cause why one beleeueth and another not is the will of God and the free-will of man Arnoldus pag. 228. saith that Arminius gaue the chiefe part of the working of faith to grace viz. because in the working of faith he will haue free-will to haue a part which part that it is not the least yea that it is the greatest in the sence of the sectaries although they would make another shew Arminius and after him Arnoldus pag. 125. doth sufficiently acknowledge We deny saith he that this difference of calling grace is not placed so much in mans free-will as in the will of God And truely in the conuersion of man free-will must haue the chiefe part if it be true that the Arminians contend for to wit that the efficiency and working power of grace doth depend on free-will and that the right vse of grace is made subiect to mans will And that which Arnoldus saith pag. 444. That God doth so worke in man that in the meane while man is not wanting to himselfe he can conuert himselfe And Greuinchouius against Ames pag. 205. Grace doth not determine and conclude vnlesse free-will worke with it in which respect and manner what if we should say that the efficacy of grace doth after a certaine manner depend vpon free-will as concerning the euent If therefore the efficacy of grace as concerning the euent that is the effect doth depend on mans free-will it must needes be that free-will hath farre the greater part in our conuersion and regeneration The same man pa. 214. In comparing betweene themselues Arnold pa. 234. 235. the effectuall helpe of God and the insluence of free-will there is no priority betweene them both And seeing it is in the power of free-will so to vse grace that he may beleeue and obtaine faith we being by faith the sonnes of God Gal 3.26 It appeareth if we may credit Arminius that to be made the sonnes of God is a thing proper to free-will and although it cannot be done without the helpe of grace yet the effect doth depend on mans will So that God is willingly indebted to man for hee is beholding to free-will that he hath sonnes XXVIII This is the malicious and blacke iuyce of the fish Loligo and this is their most pestilent doctrine of which what is to be iudged it is easie to coniecture by those speeches which euery where meet vs in the bookes of these sectaries That Lydia opened her owne heart when yet as Luke witnesseth Act. 16.14 God opened the heart of Lydia And that a man doth separate himselfe although Saint Paul saith who seperates thee 1 Cor. 4.7 And that an vnregenerate man is not altogether dead in sinne and that God doth giue man power of beleeuing if he himselfe will when yet God giueth both to will and to doe Phil.
Scripture I. THis doctrine which doth place in an infidell and vnregenerate man grace which either mediately or immediatly may suffice to the obtayning of faith or saluation without any knowledge of the Gospell and faith in Christ doth pull vp Christian Religion by the rootes and is contrary to Scripture and experience II. First of all it must needes be that all doctrine in matter of our saluation which doth not rest it selfe on the testimony of the scripture must fall to the ground But the Scripture doth no where say that God is bound to giue increases of grace to them who haue rightly vsed naturall light and vnderstanding It doth no where say that a man without faith can rightly worship God It doth no where say that God is bound to giue to all men mediately or immediatly power to beleeue and fulfill those things which are commanded in the Gospell It doth no where say that supernaturall grace is giuen to all men by which they may rightly vse naturall light It doth no where say that the Gentiles who are ignorant of Christ are led by the holy Ghost These are the forgeries of idle men whom an euill itching of wit and a bad custome of disputing hath ceased on III. This doctrine is confuted by all those places of Scripture by which we haue proued that an vnregenerate man doth want free-will in those things which belong to saluation For thereby it is proued that an vnregenerate man hath not power of beleeuing and cannot worship God with that worship which is pleasing to him nor dispose himselfe to regeneration IV. Adde to these the testimony of the Apostle Ephes 2.12 where speaking of the Gentiles before the word of God had beene made knowne to them he saith that they were without Christ hauing no hope and without God in the world You see that they who are without Christ haue not God and how can they be said to be without God whom these Sectaries say haue sufficient grace by the helpe whereof they may beleeue and worship God and vse rightly the light of nature Surely these things cannot stand together V. The same Apostle Rom. 10.14 saith How shall they beleeue in him of whom they haue not heard By these words he doth plainely enough teach that the Gentiles to whom Christ was not knowne could not beleeue But Arminius will haue the power of beleeuing to be giuen mediately or immediately to euery man VI. The Apostle proceedeth How shall they beleeue in him of whom they haue not heard and how shall they heare without a preacher and how shall they preach except they be sent Let these words be weighed and considered of Saint Paul is of opinion that Christ cannot be beleeued in vnlesse the Gospell be heard and that the Gospell cannot be heard vnlesse preachers be sent This being laid downe I say that God doth doe nothing in vaine but he should in vaine giue power of beleeuing the Gospell to all vnlesse he should send those who should preach the Gospell now to the greater part of men he doth not send the preachers of the Gospell therefore he doth not giue to them all the power of beleeuing nor sufficient grace to beleeue VII The same Apostle 2 Tim. 1. saith that God hath called vs with a holy calling not according to our workes but according to his owne purpose and grace The Arminians therefore doe falsely thinke that God doth giue supernaturall light and the knowledge of his Gospell to them who by free-will haue rightly vsed sufficient grace and the light of nature For if this were true our calling should be altogether for workes and according to workes For the good vsing of sufficient grace and of that light which is naturally engrafted in man is a good worke for the beholding of which the Arminians will haue God to call man by the Gospell and to enlighten him with greater vnderstanding The Arminian conferrers at the Hage pag. 86. doe say That God doth send his word whether it seemeth good to him not according to any decree but for other causes lying hid in man These men will haue the cause why God should send his word to some rather then to others to be in man himselfe and not in the good pleasure of God Which speach doth plainely make man to be called in respect of workes and according as man is affected and fitted to obey him calling when yet it is manifest by experience that the most vnworthy and worst affected men are often called by the word of the Gospell as the Romanes the Corinthians c. And where sinne abounded there grace abounded Rom. 5. That it might not be of him that willeth nor of him that runneth but of God that sheweth mercy Rom. 9. VIII Christ saith Iohn 15.5 Without me you can doe nothing That which is said to the Apostles is said to all for as many of vs as are without Christ can doe nothing These Sectaries doe offend against this saying of Christ when they teach that they who haue not knowne Christ and who doe want faith may beleeue and worship God with a worship pleasing to him and may doe the will of the father IX Whom God hateth from the wombe to them he doth not giue sufficient and sauing grace for this were to loue them But God hated Esau from the wombe Rom. 9.13 therefore he did not giue him sufficient and sauing grace For although Malachy speaketh these things of a temporall reiection yet it sufficeth to the present matter that this reiection as Arminius confesseth is laid downe by Saint Paul as a type of the spirituall reiection So that there are some whom God hath reiected with a spirituall reiection before they haue done either good or euill therefore hee doth not giue them sufficient meanes to faith or to saluation for this cannot be made to agree with hatred X. Were those Israelites furnished by God with sufficient grace to whom God himselfe Deut. 29.2 doth say that among so many miracles he did not giue a heart to vnderstand nor eyes to see God hath not giuen you a heart to perceiue and eyes to see and eares to heare vnto this day This place hath driuen Arnoldus to his shifts therefore hee seeketh for helpe from his audacity For those words I haue not giuen you a heart to perceiue he saith haue no other meaning then that ye haue not a heart And these words I haue not giuen you hee doth quite blot out yet a while after by the weakenesse of his forehead as being ashamed of it leauing this exposition he doth adde Although God hath not giuen them such eyes and eares it doth not follow that God was vnwilling to giue these things to them but God was willing to gine these things to them and they were wanting to themselues by their pride ignorance and sluggish dulnesse But hee doth not cleare himselfe by this yea rather hee doth more entangle himselfe For I demand whether they had an
his posterity which he had receiued for himselfe and his posterity Not to giue supernatural light to the minde is not to put into the will although peruersenesle of will doth afterwards follow the blindenesse of the minde For the will being destitute of this light and of the knowledge of supernaturall good things cannot moue it selfe to things vnknowne but onely to things that are present and knowne such as are the pleasures of the body riches c. Which although they be naturally good yet they turne the will from the study and desire of supernaturall things Then also selfe-loue which is naturally good and necessary doth beginne to be morally euill because it doth inuade that place which is due to the loue of God Hence is that pronenesse to euill which is in that inordinate selfe loue which supernaturall illumination doth not direct which light God not giuing to the soule doth not therefore put sinne into it No otherwise then if one doth take away from the Traueller the light of the Sunne by putting darkenesse betweene be doth not force the Traueller to stragle nor doth turne him from the right way but onely he doth take away that without which the right way cannot be knowne XVIII The temper of the body doth increase this contagion For it is found by experience that sanguine men are bloudy and libidinous cholericke men are rash and angry melancholicke men are suspicious and stedfast in their purposes deepely hiding their malice blacke and yealow choller are as sparkes and tinder put to the appetite by which it catcheth flames and burnes And according to the temper of the body one laughes vnder the scourge another weepes with a blow The humours of the body therefore are not causes but prouocations of sinne neither doe they compell the will but allure it nor doe they impresse sinne on the soule but doe put forward the sinfull soule and there being may waies open to sinne they doe incline the soule hither rather then thither CHAP. XI Whether the power of beleeuing the Gospell is lost by the sinne of Adam I. IT is demanded whether by the sinne of Adam we haue lost the power of beleeuing the Gospell Arminius that maruailous artificer of deuising doth deny it For that he might proue that God is bound to giue to euery man power of beleeuing in Christ and obtaining faith he doth contend that Adam before his fall had not power of beleeuing in Christ nor was it needfull for him therefore we could not loose in Adam that which Adam himselfe had not He saith also that faith was not commanded by the law and therefore Adam was not bound to faith because onely the law was giuen to him he addeth also that no man can beleeue but he that is a sinner And if Adam did not receiue power wherby if he fell he might rise again he did not receiue power of beleeuing the Gospell by which we rise out of this fall II. Seeing these things tend thither that Arminius might make a way for himselfe to that impious and vngodly opinion whereby he affirmes that God is bound to giue to all men power of beleeuing and that God is prepared to giue faith to all men if they themselues will This question is of no small moment nor to be perfunctoriously and lightly handled III. We therefore contend against Arminius that mankinde by the sinne of Adam together with their originall purity and righteousnesse lost also the power of beleeuing in Christ For by the fall of Adam we lost the power of louing God and of obeying him Now saith doth include the loue of God and it is a certaine kinde of obedience IV. Adam indeede before his fall was not bound to beleeue in Christ because he was not declared to him neither then was there neede but he was bound to beleeue euery word of God whatsoeuer should afterward be this bond passed to his posteritie but it had not passed if Adam had not beene tyed to the like bond So the israelites in the time of Dauid were not bound to beleeue Ieremy foretelling the instant captiuity into Babylon because Ieremy then was not neither was it needfull for them to know this and yet the Iewes in contemning the prophesie of Ieremy violated that law by which the same people was held and bound in the time of Dauid Hee were a foole who would say that hee that hath lost his sight hath not lost the power of seeing that house which was built foure yeares after or that hee that is blinde by his owne fault hath not lost the faculty of seeing the collyria or plaisters which the Physitian bringeth him some moneths after Surely Adam before his fall had power of beleeuing in Christ after the same manner that he had then power of succouring and helping the sicke and miserable although before the fall there was no misery nor could there be Adam was in the remote power to beleeue the Gospell as a sound man is in the remote power to vse the remedies of a disease that will or may come But that he did not beleeue in Christ it was not because it did exceede the power giuen him by God but because it was not needefull Finally seeing Adam by his incredulity lost the power of beleeuing the word of God it must needes be that hee lost also the power of beleeuing that word by which God was to bring a remedy to this euill V. In vaine doth Arminius thinke that it is vnaptly spoken if it be said that Adam had power of beleeuing when hee had no neede which power was taken from him when hee began to haue neede of it For neither was the power of beleeuing wanting to Adam nor was it taken from him but hee willingly lost it when he lost the power of obaying God And God of his meere grace doth restore the same to whom he will not because we will but because he worketh in vs that we will VI. But that is ridiculous which Arnoldus cap. 14. doth say that Adam before his fall did not receiue power by which he might rise if he should fall For that power whereby men rise after the fall is not giuen before the fall seeing the power is lost by the fall but after the fall is repaired There is no doubt but that Adam before his fall had strength whereby he might rise againe if hee had not lost it by his fall Arnoldus therefore thus speakes as if I should say that hee to whom God hath giuen sound and cleare eyes hath not receiued power by which he might see with those eyes after he is made blinde VII Finally as many as are the posterity of Adam are bound to fulfill the law this is a naturall debt and the law commands vs to loue God and to obey him and therefore to beleeue him speaking Whensoeuer then Christ is preached the doctrine of the Gospell cannot be refused but with the contempt of the Gospell the law also is
be for sin But to reprobate men to be willing to condemne are the same thing euen as to elect to be willing to saue is the same thing Therefore God doth not reprobate vnlesse it be for sinne IV. Furthermore it cannot be denied but that reprobation or reiection of the creature from God is the punishment which can be inflicted on the reasonable creature because eternall torments doe necessarily follow it which if we get to be granted it will thence follow that it is not the part of infinite goodnesse and highest iustice to forsake his owne creature and that not because he hath sinned but because it so seemed good to God that hee might seeke matter for his glory out of the desertion and forsaking of the soule which hee created Can the father who knoweth that the happinesse of his sonne depends on him without the crime of cruelty and want of naturall affection forsake his sonue that is innocent and found guilty of no wickednesse especially if by this forsaking his son should fall into eternall torments and by it be made not onely most miserable but also most wicked V. Neither should God deale iustly if he should giue more euill to the creature by infinite parts then he hath giuen good To which when he had giuen esse a beeing a while after without any fault of it he gaue it male esse an euill and miserable being for euer Indeede if God should onely take away that he hath giuen and should bring the creature to nothing there were no cause at all of complaining But to giue an infinite euill to that creature to whom he gaue a finite good and to create man to that end onely that he might destroy him that out of this destruction he might get glory to himselfe the goodnesse and iustice of God abhorreth VI. Yet this is the most grieuous thing that by this eyther reprobation or desertion of man being considered without sinne the innocent is made not onely most miserable but euen most wicked For the auersion and turning away of the will doth necessarily follow the denying of the spirit of God and seeing according to this opinion God hated man that was made by him before man hated God it cannot come to passe but that the hatred of God whereby he hates man by the same opinion should be made the cause of that hatred whereby man hates God and so God should be made the author of sinne VII And if God hated Esau being considered in the vncorruptible masse as not a sinner it must needes be that God hates the innocent creature and hatred in God although it is not an humane affection nor a perturbation yet it is a sure and certaine will of punishing and punishment cannot be iust if it be without offence neither can a man be iustly punished vnlesse he be considered as a sinner VIII If any man should say that God is obnoxious or subiect to no lawes and therefore his actions are not rightly examined according to the rule of iustice seeing hee is tyed to no rules I will anfwere that the nature of God is more mighty then any law That naturall perfection by which it is impossible that God should lie or that he should sinne is also the cause why he could not hate his guiltlesse creature or appoint man to eternall torments for no fault of his Yea if these things were true it were the part of a wise man to suppresse these things not to moue this anagyris or offensiue matter and rather to command silence or ignorance to themselues then to breake into these secrets which being declared doe cast in scruples and doubts and yeeld occasion to the aduersaries of defaming the true religion and by which no man is made fitter to the duties of a Christian or of a ciuill man or to any part of piety IX That could not escape which should say that by reprobation men are not appointed to damnation but onely are passed by or not elected Thus they seeke gentler words that by them the same thing might be said for it is all one whether God doth appoint a man to damnation or doth that from which damnation must necessarily follow Whosoeuer God doth not elect whether hee be said to be omitted and passed by or to be reprobated hee is alwaies excluded from the grace of God damnation doth certainely follow this excluding because without the grace of election there is no saluation For seeing it is manifest to all that men by election are appointed to saluation I would haue it told mee to what they that are not elected but passed by are appointed Surely if election doth appoint men to saluation it is plaine that by reprobation which is called omission or passing by the rest are excluded from saluation and appointed to destruction X. And if God haue appointed the innocent creature to destruction it must needes be that hee hath appointed it to sinne without which there can be no iust destruction and so God would be the impulsiue and mouing cause of sinne Neither could man iustly be punished for that sinne to which he is eyther precisely appointed or compelled by the will of God XI That the decrees of God are eternall and that he hath fore-knowne all things from eternity doth not hinder this opinion which doth maintaine God in election and reprobation to haue considered man as fallen before he considered him as condemned For although the decrees of God are certaine yet there is some order among them as the eternall decree of ouerthrowing the world by fire was in order after the decree of creating the world So although God from eternity had appointed the wicked to punishment yet nothing hinders but that the consideration whereby hee considered men as sinners should be in order before that whereby hee considered men as reprobate or appointed to punishment XII Neither doth it follow of the opinion of the reuerend Synod and the confession of our Churches by which man fallen is the obiect of predestination that God created man to an vncertaine end or to haue missed of that end which he propounded to himselfe The last end propounded to God was the illustration and setting forth of his glory by the manifestation of his goodnesse and iustice that hee might come to this end hee decreed to create man iust but mutable and free The fore-knowledge of the fall of man doth follow this decree not in time but in order and election and reprobation doth in order follow this fore-knowledge XIII They are very farre from the truth which would haue God in electing and reprobating to haue considered man as not created for they doe as much as if they should say that God considered man as nothing and therefore as not man Surely in that very thing that they call him a man they call him somewhat but to consider something as nothing is a thing well-nigh a dreame He that will saue or punish a man must necessarily first haue
obserued that the Apostle speaking of reprobates doth say that they are vessels 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fitted or prepared to destruction He doth not say that God prepared or sitted them least he should seeme to say that God put sinne in them by which they might be prepared to destruction but when he speaketh of the elect hauing turned his speech saith that God prepared them for glory which God doth by giuing them the spirit and faith It is not without consideration that the Apostle would not after the same manner speake in both places viz. because God found some vessels fitted to destruction but made others vessels appointed to glory and that by hauing mercy on them X. Saint Austen is expresse to this purpose For in sixe hundred places either explaning or touching this place of Saint Paul hee doth vnderstand by the name Masse the Masse corrupted and polluted with sinne So Epist 105. Because that whole Masse is iustly condemned iustice hath giuen that contumely and disgrace that is due and grace doth giue that honour which is not due and in the same Epistle The vniuersall Masse is iustly condemned of sinne and a little after If they are the vessels of wrath which are made for that destruction which is duâ—ly giuen to them let them impute this to themselues because they are made of that Masse which for the sinne of one man is iustly and deseruedly condemned of God He doth repeate the same thing Epist 106. and Encherid cap. 98 99. and 107. where he calleth it the Masse of destruction See also the 2. lib. against the two Epistles of the Pelagians cap. 7. and lib. 5. against Iulian cap. 3. Neither did euer any among the ancient thinke that Paul speakes of the sound and not corrupted Masse CHAP. XV. That Arminius doth willingly darken the words of the Apostle which are cleare and expresse ARminius with a carefull subtilty but with an vnhappy successe hath written a Treatise vpon the ninth Chapter to the Romanes for hee doth torment the Apostle and doth as it were with wracks draw from him against his will what things he thinks may make for the patronage of his errour of Election for faith fore-seene I. He faines that the Apostles minde is to teach that they onely of the Iewes were to be reckoned the sonnes of Abraham who letting passe iustification by the law doe follow after righteousnesse and faith and the purpose according to Election hee denyeth to be the decree of the election of seuerall men but the generall and condition all decree of sauing all who were to beleeue By which decree Arminius will haue all men to be elected conditionally which surely is no election seeing election is not but of seueral men who are chosen out of the multitude others being reiected II. I confesse indeede that the doctrine of election by free grace doth make the way to the doctrine of righteousnesse by faith yet all this dispute of Saint Paul concerning election which reacheth from the sixt verse to the thirteenth doth not deale of iustification by faith neither would the Apostle proue in this place that man is iustified by faith or that God doth elect those which apprehend Christ by faith But by the doctrine of election doth frame to himself an entrance to the treatise of iustification by faith which afterwards he addes Hee would here proue this one thing that man is not truely the sonne of the promise by the workes of the law but by the election of free grace and by the mercy of God for it is manifest that here workes are not opposed to faith but to election and to God calling So Verse the 11. he doth not say not by workes but by faith but he saith not by workes but by him that calleth So Verse 16. when he had said It is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth hee doth not adde but of him that beleeueth What then but of God that sheweth mercy III. For when it is spoken of the cause why of two that are equally conceiued in sinne such as were Esau and Iacob God should preferre the one afore the other the onely mercy of God and the election by grace is to be considered and not faith which is not the cause but the effect of our election neither doth it goe before election but followeth it So Saint Paul 1 Cor. 7.25 saith that he obtained mercy from God to be faithfull and not because he was after to be so Wherefore Saint Paul in all this speech wherein hee speaks of the cause of the difference which God makes betweene two that were by nature alike makes no mention of faith But this Treatise being finished he doth descend verse 30. to the righteousnesse of faith as to the fruit which doth follow election IV. But Arminius for the safegard of his cause doth change the words of Saint Paul and doth thrust in something of his owne Pag. 27. For in the place of that which Saint Paul saith not of workes but of him that calleth he doth substitute these his words feigned by himselfe not of worke but of faith whereby God calling should be obeyed when notwithstanding in all that disputation which dealeth concerning election there is no mention made of faith neither doth the least steppe thereof appeare V. It is meruailous how much Arminius doth abuse the examples of Isaac and Ishmael and also of Iacob and Esau He doth contend that they are here propounded not as examples but as types of them who followed after righteousnesse by workes not by faith Certainely there must be some agreement betweene the type and the thing signified by the type But who euer heard it said that Ishmael would haue beene iustified by the workes of the Law and not by faith seeing at that time the law was not giuen neither were these differences of iustification by the law and by faith knowne neither is it credible that Ishmael euer thought of or regarded these things Therefore Arminius doth as much as if Nimrod should be made a type of the Pharisaicall righteousnesse Can the night be a type of the light or can Esau whom the Apostle Heb. 12.16 calleth prophane and therefore also a despiser of the Law be a type of them who being set on fire with the zeale of the Law would be iustified by their workes But it is worth the labour to here why he would haue Esau be a type of the sonnes of the flesh and of them which affâ—ct rightâ—ousnesse by workes Because saith he he was first borne O acutely spoken He should haue said because he was red or because he was a hunter I am ashamed to refute these things and yet in these figments and forgeries the good man doth place the chiefe safegard of his doctrine of election for faith fore-seene VI. Then also see how licentiously he mookes the Apostle For when he layeth downe Ishmael and Esau not as examples of reâ—ection by the secret counseâ—l of God
as Arnoldus doth imagine nothing would thereby be derogated from the wisedome of God The father doth often decree to giue something to his children before he hath determined on what condition or by what labour In this place Arnoldus hath stuffed in many things of vnresistablenesse and of reprobation which wee haue put off to another place Therefore from the wisedome of God he passeth to the iustice of God which he doth contend to be violated by vs. XXV Therefore Pag. 224. hee beginneth with a calumny You determine saith he that God decreed to saue some men without the beholding of Faith I say he doth falsely accuse vs For although God doth not elect vs for faith yet hee doth elect vs to faith and faith is a part of the definition of election But if of two that are alike sinners he electeth one to saluation not considering obedience as a thing already performed but electing him to performe obedience God shall not therefore be vniust for concerning his owne he doth what he will according to that I will haue mercy on whom I will haue mercy c. It is enough that although he giueth to the one the grace that is not deserued yet he imposeth no punishment on the other but what is due In the meane while the Papists haue cause to reioyce who haue sound a patron of merit in Arnoldus For it is said to be merit when the reward is giuen to any one for righteousnesse Eternall life is a reward and that it might be giuen for righteousnesse Arnoldus will haue it giuen for the beholding of obedience performed therefore it is giuen to him that merits it XXVI It is idle which he addeth Pag. 225. By the decree whereby God hath decreed to giue saluation to none but to him that beleeueth he sheweth that he doth rather loue obedience then the creature But contrarywise by your decree God is made to loue men although they be sinners rather then righteousnesse which is contrary to iustice Surely these things are knit together with a very wicked art For first he imagines that we teach that God will saue other men then beleeuers Secondly he doth craithy compare that loue wherewith God loueth obedience with that loue wherewith God loueth the creature seeing the loue of obedience which is the very iustice of God is rather to be compared with the loue wherewith God loueth his goodnesse and mercy For although God loueth his owne iustice more then the creature yet hee doth not loue his iustice more then his goodnesse by which he doth doe good to the creature for God doth no lesse giue cleare and certaine proofes and effects of his goodnesse then of his iustice which goodnesse is also a kinde of iustice if iustice be taken not strictly for that vertue by which rewards are giuen to the iust and punishments to the vniust but for that generall vertue wherby God doth doe all things conueniently and as it is meete And although all things are equall in God yea all the attributes of God are one vertue and the very essence of God yet the Scripture doth extoll the goodnesse of God with farre greater praises then his iustice So in the Law God doth visite the iniquity of the fathers vpon the children vnto the third and fourth generation but doth extend his mercy to thousands of generations So Psal 36. The iudgements of God are compared to the mountains and his goodnesse to the deepe And Psalme 30. His goodnesse is extended to a life or an age but his anger is restrained to a moment Saint Iames doth consent to this Chap. 2. v. 13. saying that mercy doth boast it selfe and glory ouer iustice because God hath manifested to vs more euident arguments of his goodnesse then of his iustice God is therefore rightly called Optimus maximus The most good and the most great but most good is set first and then most great And if you would repeate the matter from the beginning you shall finde that in the first place the decree of creating is to be laid downe in which there is goodnesse but not iustice XXVII Arnoldus doth more largely presse the same things Chap. 9. where he saith that the iustice of God is violated by vs while wee will haue God to haue ordained men to saluation without the beholding of any obedience which as I haue already said is not our opinion I confesse indeede that God doth loue his owne iustice more then man but I deny that he doth more loue the manifestation or execution of his iustice then the manifestation of his mercy and goodnesse towards man God doth more loue that which is due to him by the creature then hee doth loue the creature it selfe But he doth not more loue that which is due to him from the creature then hee doth loue that which he oweth to himselfe to wit the manifestation of his glory by doeing good to the creature Surely there was danger that God could not maintaine his iustice vnlesse these innouators had issued forth who patronize his iustice preferring it before his goodnesse and wisedome And this is the place where Arnoldus will haue God to be a debtor Iustice saith he doth appoint that God should giue to the creature performing obedience that which is his Neuer was any thing said more harsh by the most vehement maintainers of mans merits Surely Arnoldus is prepared to say to God giue me that which is mine for this thy iustice requireth O proudely spoken But let vs proceede to other things XXVIII A little after he doth endeauour to proue that we offend against the same goodnesse of God in the doctrine of reprobation But wee haue appointed a peculiar chapter for the examining of these things as also there shall be a place of examining those things which he doth euery where without order stuffe in of Reprobation and of Free will and of Christ the foundation of election XXIX It is not to be omitted that it is familiar with the Arminians to inuey against the doctrine of Election which is beleeued in our Churches and that vnder the pretence of piety and exhortation to good workes For they say that precise election doth extinguish all the endeauour of good workes prayers hearing of the word and doth takeaway euery pious enterprise For if one beleeue that hee were predestinated to faith and to good workes hee will leaue the care to God of mouing man infallibly and would shake off all wholsome feare because hee is perswaded that his saluation cannot be lost nor his faith cast off These and other things borrowed from the Pelagians and still warme from the anuile of the papists they carry about as it were the Circousean pompe with a great clamour Also these craftie men speake this as men taught by experience For they say that while they were of opinion with vs they felt that vice growing on them by this doctrine and that a languor and diminishing of the loue of
them to iust and deserued punishments for their sinnes IV. The definition of Thomas doth not please me who saith that the decree of Reprobation is the will of permitting one to fall into sinne and of laying vpon him the punishment of damnation for his sinne For the permission whereby God doth permit doth not belong to predestination but to his prouidence although it serue to predestination V. It is the opinion of the Arminian sect that Reprobates may be saued For saith Arminius that decree is not of the power but of the act of sauing Very ill spoken For where the act of God is determined by his decree in vaine is the power by which this act may be resisted This opinion doth draw with it other opinions no better then it selfe for errors are tyed together among themselues like serpents egges For if a Reprobate may be saued he that is not written in the booke of life may effect that hee be now written in and so the number of the elect will not be certaine nor the decree of Reprobation be irreuocable and peremptory as they speake vnlesse after finall perseuerance in incredulity Also hence it will follow that a reprobate may if he will obtaine faith and conuert himselfe whence it would come to passe that faith should not be of the meere grace of God which wee shall see hereafter to be the opinion of Arminius VI. God is after the same manner the cause of Reprobation as the iudge is the cause of the punishment of them that are guilty and sinne is the meritorious cause Seeing therefore the consideration of sinne doth moue the iudge and the iudge doth condemne to punishment it appeareth that sinne is the remote cause of damnation and not onely a condition necessarily fore-required and that the iudge is the next and neerest cause VII Furthermore although sinne be the cause of appointing to punishment yet it is not the cause of the difference betweene the Elect and Reprobate For examples sake Two men are guilty of the sâ—me crime and it pleaseth the king to condemne one and to absolue and free the other his sinne indeede that is condemned is the cause of his punishment but it is not the cause why the king is otherwise affected to the other then to him seeing the fault on both sides is alike The cause of the difference is that something thing steppeth betweene which doth turne the punishment from one of them which in the worke of predestination is nothing else but the very good pleasure of God by which of his meere good pleasure he gaue certaine men to Christ leauing the rest in their inbred corruption and in the curse due vnto them For which difference it is great wickednesse for vs to striue with God seeing hee is not subiect nor bound to any creature and punisheth no man vniustly giuing to one the grace that is not due and imposing on the other the punishment that is due VIII Here it is demanded what is that sinne for which God doth reprobate to wit whether men are Reprobated onely for the sinne which is deriued from Adam and for that blot which is common to Reprobates with the elect or whether they are also reprobated for the actuall sinnes which they are to commit in the whole course of their life The answere is at hand For although naturall corruption be cause sufficient for Reprobation yet it is no doubt but that God hath decreed to condemne for the same cause for which hee doth condemne and hee doth condemne the Reprobates for the sinnes which they haue committed in act For in hell they doe not onely beare the punishment of originall sinne but also of actuall sinnes Therefore also God hath appointed them to damnation for the same sinnes Now to Reprobate and to appoint to punishment are all one God doth so execute any thing in time according as he from eternity decreed to execute it Now he doth punish in time for actuall sinnes therefore also hee decreed from eternity to punish for them Thence it is that the punishments of the men of Capernaum was to be greater then the punishment of the Sodomites and the punishment of him that knew the will of his master greater then the punishment of him that knew it not because there is a great difference betweene the actuall sinnes for which they are punished Nothing hindreth that God considering a man lying in his naturall corruption and deprauation should not also consider him as poluted with those sinnes which he was to commit by that naturall deprauation IX Arminius doth not thinke that any man is Reprobated for originall sinne for he contends that Christ hath obtained the remission of it for all mankinde But he will haue man to be reprobated onely for the fore-seeing of actuall sinnes that is for the breach of the law and the contempt of grace In which thing he doth seeme not to be constant to himselfe For seeing all actuall sinnes doe flow from originall sinne it cannot be that the cause and fountaine of actuall sinnes should be remitted by God and yet the sinnes that flow from thence should not be remitted As if God should forgiue a man intemperance but should punish him for adultery for actions doe flow from habits and naturall inclinations as the second acts doe flow from the first X. Without doubt incredulity and the reiection of the Gospell are among the sinnes for which any one is reprobated For by this reiection we sinne against the Law by which God will iudge vs For the law commandeth that God be loued with all our heart and that he be obeyed in all things and without exception and therefore also that he be beleeued when he speaketh and that hee be obeyed when hee commandeth vs to beleeue whatsoeuer it shall be which he shall eyther command or shall say XI That hee should be Reprobated for reiecting the Gospell and despising the grace of Christ to whom the Gospel was neuer preached is against all reason For whom the Gospell doth not saue it leaueth vnder the law to be iudged by it which law doth then binde a man to beleeue in Christ when Christ is preached to him Nor is it the Schoole master to Christ but to them who haue meanes to come to the knowledge of Christ After the same manner as the law did not binde them to belecue the prophecy of Ieremy who neuer heard of the name of Ieremie nor could it be knowne to them XII And although reprobation cannot be said to be the cause of sinne because sinne goeth before reprobation yet it cannot be denied but that reprobation is the cause of the denying of grace and of the preaching of the Gospell and of the spirit of adoption which is peculiar to the elect For seeing this denying is a punishment it must needes be that it is inflicted by the will of a iust iudge These are the words of Arminius Page 58. against Perkins Effectuall grace is denyea by
XX. Arnoldus addeth Your doctrine determines that God doth exact faith from the reprobates and that he decreed to condemne them if they should not beleeue when yet it is impossible for them that they should beleeue in Christ with a sure perswasion of minde not onely because God doth not giue them power of beleeuing but also because if thâ—y were furnished with power to beleeue yea if they should beleeue in Christ they would beleeue that which were false because Christ hath not died for them But it is contrary to the iustice of God to exact such an obedience and then to punish the creature for not performing such an obedience which is absolutely impossible to the creature He doth abundantly repeate the same thing in other places but especially Page 261. and 262. Here are many things faise First it is false that faith is exacted and required of all the reprobates for it is required onely of them to whom the Gospell is preached Neither is it true that faith is absolutely and without condition required of all those to whom the Gospell is preached for it is required vnder a condition to wit that they be conuerted and repent But if they doe not repent we teach and cry out that the benefit of Christ doth not pertaine to them and that they hope and beleeue in Christ in vaine so long as they are aduerse and contrary to God inuiting them to repentance And it is also false that God is vniust if he command them to beleeue and obey who for their inbred deprauation cannot beleeue and obey and to whom God doth not giue power of beleeuing for man himselfe hath brought this impotency and disability on himselfe and this deprauation in man is voluntary and God exacting from man that he should beleeue him speaking by Christ doth require nothing which man doth not owe For to obey the law is a naturall debt For God speaking by Christ cannot be refused or contemned but the law also is broken as we haue already taught at large in many places especially Chap. 11. Where we haue taught that the power of beleeuing was giuen vs in Adam and that Adam had it before the fall but an occasion of vsing it was wanting And therefore also this power was lost in Adam Page 262. in Tileaum Nor is God bound to restore it as Arnoldus setting lawes to God himselfe would haue it By these things also we meete with that false accusation wherewith Arnoldus doth pursue vs Page 230. Ye determine saith he that faith is required of reprobates and yet that the meanes to performe obedience to faith are precisely denyed For it is not required of all but of them to whom Christ is made knowne nor is it required of these absolutely but with condition of repentance Neither is any thing required of them although they be reprobates but what they owe. XXI But Arnoldus doth adde to this a foule calumny wherewith he would odiously burâ—en our cause Ye will haue saith he faith to be required of the reprobates that they might be made inexcusable and their damnation might be aggrauated Wee say indeede that their damnation is thereby made the greater but we doe not say that this end was propounded by God So when we say that one goeth forth to warre that he may be slaine wee signifie what is to happen not what end should be intended And it is not for vs to enquire scrupulously into the end which God propounded to himselfe Yet these two ends are certaine to wit to require of man what is due and also by this meane to bring the elect to saluation XXII He doth bend at vs another dart Page 286. Your doctrine saith he doth repugne the Euangelicall threates For seeing the intent of God in the propounding of them is that men should be driuen from impenitency and so should be saued You on the contrary side teach that God doth deny to some men the meanes that are necessary to repentance because he hath determined not to saue them First it may be doubted whether there are any Euangelicall threats for the threatnings which are contayned in the bookes of the Gospell are not a part of the Gospell For seeing the word Euangelium Gospell doth signifie a good message I doe not see how threatnings can belong to a good message They who beleeue not the Gospell shall be punished not by the Gospell but by the law But howsoeuer it be I see nothing here which doth repugne these threates by which God doth intend to require from man that which is due and that which the law it selfe requireth to wit that God be obeyed Seeing that the denying of grace and of the restoring of the powers which man by his owne fault lost doth very well agree with such a declaration of threatnings These things are not repugnant to propound life to man on the condition of obedience and not to restore to man those powers of obedience which hee lost by his owne fault XXIII Neither are these things repugnant to propound life to any one vnder a condition and to appoint the same man to death for his fore-seene disobedience XXIV The same man since Arminius Page 269. for that which he addeth concerning Infants shall hereafter be handled doth thus inuey against our opinion Your opinion saith he causeth that publike prayers cannot be offered to God as it is meete they should to wit with faith and confidence that they shall profit all them that heare the word because according to your opinion amongst them there are many whom God not onely will not haue to be saued but whom he will haue to be condemned by his absolute eternall and immutable will which goeth before all things and causes Yet the Apostle commandeth that prayers be made for all men and addeth this reason because it is good and acceptable to God who would haue all men to be saued and come to the knowledge of the truth XXV I answere that it is falsely supposed by Arminius that publike prayers ought to be poured out with this confidence that they shall profit all them that heare the word This faith were rash and not resting on the word of God especially seeing the ministers of the word haue for the most part known many that are disobedient and openly prophane nor doe they doubt but that besides these there are many that are sicke and ill affected with inward and hidden vices who yet make a shew of piety Certainely the similitude of the seede sowne into diuers ground and of a differing disposition and with an vnlike successe doth in this case bring more feare then confidence And yet because the secrets of reprobation are vnknowne to vs we doe rightly pray for all because we hope well of euery one I doe not see whereto this obiection belongs vnlesse to stop and stay the Reader with a childish declamation because this very obiection doth no lesse pursue Arminius who although he will not haue the
the death of Christ are not bound to beleeue that Christ dyed for them which yet are the greatest part of the world Neither are they to whom Christ is preached bound to beleeue absolutely and without condition that Christ died for them but on this condition if they be conuerted For if they shall perseuere in impenitency they are bound to beleeue that the death of Christ doth nothing pertaine to them XV. Arminius pag. 77. against Perkins and his sectaries doe repeate and heape vp these things euen to tediousnesse If there be any for whose sinnes God would not haue satisfaction to be made to himselfe by the death of Christ then in no right can faith be required of them nor can Christ be made their iudge neither can the reprobate be blamed for refusing the grace of redemption because it did not pertaine to him I answere all these things are grounded on this false supposition that faith is required of all men for wee haue already taught that it is not required of them who neuer had any meanes to know Christ as also that they to whom Christ is preached are not bound absolutely and without condition to beleeue that they are redeemed by the death of Christ but on this condition that they be conuerted They to whom the Gospell hath not beene preached shall not be condemned for the reiection of the Gospell but for the breach of the Law of which iudgement Christ by his father is appointed to be the Iudge who doth leaue vnder the Law those whom he doth not saue by the Gospell But they who by their incredulity haue refused the grace offred them by the Gospell are iustly condemned for refusing that grace not because they haue reiected that which pertaineth to vnbeleeuers and impenitent persons but because hauing despised the condition they haue neglected that which was offered to them vnder the condition of beleeuing which condition although they cannot fulfill by their naturall powers yet it is their debt for man himselfe by his owne fault brought vpon himselfe the disabilitie of beleeuing which disability God is not bound to cure in all Of which thing it is largely spoken Chap. 11. But say they Reprobates cannot be blamed for despising that grace which doth not belong vnto them But they are quite out of the way For reprobates cannot be accused for despising grace if they did despise it because they knew it did not belong vnto them But they therefore reiect it because they loue not Christ and they are led to the contempt of it by their owne will For Reprobates doe not therefore beleeue because saluation doth not belong vnto them but rather saluation doth not belong vnto them because they doe not beleeue and they draw destruction to themselues by their owne incredulity and impenitency It is true indeede that reprobation is the cause why God will not giue faith and repentance to this or that man But it is not the cause which doth put in and breâ—de impenitency and incredulity in man Wherefore that speech of Christ Iohn 10.16 Yee beleeue not because ye are not of my sheepe is so to be taken as if hee had said Therefore God doth not giue you faith which is peculiar to the elect because yee are not elected XVI This is the obiection of Greuinchouius P. 19. If election be before the obtayning of saluation then God first decreed of the communicating of saluation before he decreed of the obtaining of it But I am so far from thinking this to be absurd that I beleeue it is plainely necessary For it is alwaies first thought of the end before of the meanes to the end The saluation of man was the end God propounded to himselfe that this was the end is hence manifest because this is last in execution Therefore God first thought of giuing saluation before he thought of the obtayning of saluation by Christ because this is the meanes by which he doth leade vs to saluation XVII The same man Page 87. doth thus dispute They to whom this price being fit to saue them is offered if they themselues will embrace it for them also it is payed by the purpose of God But it is offered to Reprobates on this condition if they will embrace it therefore it is payed also for them by the purpose of God I answere that the minor part is not vniuersally true for this price is not offered for all the Reprobates and the maior part doth offend against the rules of precognition or supposition which will haue the subiect of euery Axiome or sentence to be or to haue being For examples sake this sentence Whosoeuer fulfilleth the law is saued is not false But the falshood of it is in the presupposition whereby it is presupposed That some men fulfill the Law The Maior of this Sylogisme hath the same fault For the subiect of it is imaginary and not existent For the subiect is this They to whom this price is offered to embrace it if they will I deny that there are such men to be found For this price is not offered to the Reprobates if they will embrace it seeing it is most certaine that they will not and that they cannot will of which disabilitie man himselfe is the cause Neither is this price offered to the Elect if they will but God in offering that price doth worke in them that they should will XVIII And when they speake of the sufficiency of the death of Christ as they extoll the efficacy of it so they say that it is sufficient not onely for men but also for the diuells Which if it be true it must needes be that God doth take away and cut off something from the price of the death of his Sonne and doth shorten the efficacy of it But although I know that the price and dignity of the death of Christ doth not depend on his humane nature but on the infinite excellency of his diuine nature yet I denie that his death is fit for the redemption of diuels because the iustice of God requireth that man who sinned should beare the punishment and it was needfull that the mediator betweene God and man should haue reference to both in the communion of his nature Therefore to saue man he tooke not the Angels but the seede of Abraham Heb. 2. And if the death of a man is sit to satisfie for the sinnes of Angels then the torments of an Angell if Christ had taken the nature of Angells had beene fit to satisfie for the sinnes of man Finally when it is spoken of the fitnesse is not to be disputed of the sufficiency For otherwise it might also be disputed whether the death of Christ be sufficient to saue Horses or Beetles and to giue them immortality which surely is not without impietie XIX These in a manner are the arguments wherwith these innouators do defend themselus But they doe exagitate and wrong our opinion after their owne manner which is euill for they change it
instructed in the doctrine of the Gospell but that strong natured and laborious Origen who had the Scripture at his fingers ends being vnable to endure Martyrdome chose rather to burne incense to the Diuell Many among miracles and in the midst of the light of the Gospell are incredulous as the men of Capernaum or else are giuen to their belly and gluttony as daily experience doth witnesse Neither doth this therefore come to passe because some of the vnregenerate are more capable of morall perswasion then others seeing all men are altogether auerse from God and dead in sinnes Also you may see the most wicked men and worst affected to be conuerted to the faith of Christ as the Romanes the Corinthians c. that God hath chosen the foolish things of the world and where sin hath abounded there grace hath abounded On the other side you may see many not so euilly disposed as the men of Tyre and Sydon that are not called by the preaching of the Gospell then which there is no other perswasion more wholesome There are some ages in which the gate of the Church is wide open and there is a great concourse of people in it as the Apostle teacheth 1 Cor. 16.19 A great doore and effectuall is opened to me And 2 Cor. 2. When I came to Troas to preach the Gospell a doore was opened to me of the Lord. On the contrary there are some times in which the passage to the Church is as it were stopped vp and the efficacy of the Gospell doth seeme to be diminished when the Pastors of the Church doe finde much stubbornenesse in the people a brawnie skin drawn ouer their consciences the hardnesse whereof doth turne and blunt the edge of preaching This doth not happen because in some ages men are borne better or because God doth vse other meanes and instructions to the teaching of them then of others but because it seemed good to God to soften the hearts of these and to reueale to them his arme and his power of saluation and to fasten the sword of the word of God with greater force into their mindes and that according to his good pleasure and election of grace Eâ—â—y â—3 Rom. 1. by which as many as are appointed to eternall life doe beleeue Acts 13. By this motiue God himselfe did stirre vp the minde of Saint Paul being at Corinth and did exhort him to speake freely Feare not saith he but speake and hold not thy peace for I am with thee and no man shall set vpon thee to hurt thee for I haue much people in this Citie CHAP. XLVI The certainty of the conuersion of the Elect is proued and that Grace cannot be ouercome I. THe chiefe foundation of our opinion of the certainty of the conuersion of the elect and of the inseperable grace of God wee place in the immutable certainty of the election of God For seeing that God by his certaine and determined decree appointed some certaine men to saluation as wee haue at large proued it must needes be that they whom he appointed to the end hee appointed also to those meanes without which no man is saued to wit Faith and Repentance This decree seeing it cannot be hindred it is certaine that the faith of the elect cannot so be hindred that they should finally fall away The truth of which doctrine while these Sectaries doe oppugne they doe cast themselues into absurd and enormious opinions such as are these That Election is not irreuocable nor peremptory before death That those that are elected may be reprobated That the number of the elect is not certaine and determined by the decree and will of God but that their number may be encreased and diminished That all men are conditionally elected That God is often disappointed of his intention wish and desire Which dreames full of feuer-like subtiltie and vaine dotages that I may speake no worse of them are as I thinke abundantly confuted by vs. II. Wee haue heard Saint Paul Ephes 1.3.4 teaching that the grace of God is giuen according to election Hence it appeareth that the grace of God which is giuen to the elect can no more be hindred then election it selfe For the effects of an immutable cause cannot but be most certaine Vaine and voide were that election which should be made destitute of those meanes without which there is no saluation and obserue that Saint Paul speaketh of the holy and faithfull Ephesians least any Arminian should say that the Apostle speaketh of vniuerâ—all Election Finally as many places of Scripture as there be which teach that they doe beleeue that are ordained to eternall life Acts 13. that they alone come that is doe beleeue who are giuen to Christ by the father that is are elected to saâ—uation in Christ Iohn 6. and that all that are predestinated are called iustified and glorified Rom. 8. and that God hath elected vs to holinesse Ephes 1. and not by holinesse or for holinesse they doe all plainely proue that faith and holinesse doe so depend on Election and so â—leaue to it that it cannot be but that he who is elected must at length be conuerted The faith of the elect cannot altogether be blotted out and finally be extinguished but the election of God must also be wiped out and must perish Whosoeuer God calleth by his purpose shall certainely come because God neuer faileth of his purpose III. Agreeable to these things are the words of the same Apostle Rom. 8.14 As many as are led by the spirit of God are the sonnes of God Here I demand whether it is possible that he who is the sonne of God should be made the sonne of the diuell If there is any modesty left in them they dare not say this openly although it doth plainely enough follow from their opinion by which they determine that the elect may be reprobated This therefore being laid downe that the sonnes of God cannot be made the sonnes of the diuell I demand whence is this impossibilitie of falling away and why cannot hee who is led by the spirit of God which is called the spirit of adoption be made the childe of the diuell The cause of this impossibility must either be the election of God or mans free-will but not mans free-will as we haue at large proued therefore it is the election of God by which it commeth to passe that it is an impossible thing that the faith of the elect should be finally lost and extinguished IV. And with what great efficacie God doth worke in mens hearts the Apostle teacheth Ephes 1.19 where hee wisheth that it were made knowne to the Ephesians What is the exceeding greatnesse of his power to vs ward who beleeue according to the working of his mighty power The Apostle doth purposely heape vp emphaticall and significant words whereby he might declare that power and effectual strength farre differing from the phrase of Arminius in whose writings these speeches are often found that
chosen of God Whence it comes to passe that on the one side mans pride is blowne vp as it were with bellowes and on the other side faith is vndermined as it were with trenches and confidence doth decay For what certainty can there be of our saluation if our election depend vpon so instable a thing But of these things more at large in their proper place Now those examples with which Arminius doth support that double will of God are to be examined XVIII God saith he by his antecedent will would stablish the throne of Saule for euer but by his consequent will he would ouerthrow it as it is 1. Sam. 13 13. but there is no such thing to be found for Samuell doth not say that God would stablish the kingdome of Saule but he saith God had established thy kingdome for euer betweene which there is a great deale of difference If God had established it it had beene his will to stablish it But because hee did not establish it it is certaine it was not his will to establish it XIX There is no more force at all in the other example Christ saith hee by his antecedent will would gather the Iewes as a Hen gathereth her chickens but by his consequent will hee would scatter them through all nations Math. 22.37 But this place signifieth quite another thing Christ speakes to Hierusalem and saith that hee would haue gathered his children together but Hierusalem her selfe resisted with all her power Hierusalem is one thing and her children another who here are expresly distinguished from the citty By Hierusalem vnderstand the Priests the Leuites the Scribes and the prince of the people for these did most of all withstand Christ By the children of Hierusalem understand the people Christ saith that hee would haue gathered together these children neither is it to be doubted but that he gathered together many of them although the rulers were vnwilling This place therefore maketh nothing for that Antecedent will which these men would haue not to be fulfilled when indeede it was fulfilled as much as seemed good to God Then also these words how often would I they misvnderstand them of the Antecedent will which is the decree of God when to will is here nothing else then to inuite and command So Saint Austen thinkes Encherid Chap. 97. Or rather saith he shee indeede would not haue had her children to be gathered together by him but euen shee vnwilling hee gathered those of her children whom he himselfe would 〈◊〉 XX. The other examples are vnworthy that we should stay long vpon them By his Antecedent will saith he those were called to the wedding which by his Consequent will were declared vnworthy By his Antecedent will hee without the wedding garment is inuited by his Consequent will hee is cast out By his Antecedent will the Gospell is offered to the Iewes by his Consequent will it is taken away In all these things that will of God whereby men are called is no other thing then to command and inuite not to decree that by his Antecedent will which afterward hee hath broken off by his Consequent will XXI Neither are wee scrupulously to enquire why God hath called them whom hee knoweth will not follow The end why God doth this is euident to wit to require of men that which they owe. To search any farther into the intent of God is to make God obnoxious to accounts and to breake into his secrets XXII It is not to be ouerpassed that Arminius will haue God equally desire to saue all men by his Antecedent will but when he is prepared to the effect execution of that will he doth those things which are contrary to that will For hee preacheth the Gospell to those that are very wicked as to the men of Capernaum he doth deny that fauour to those that are lesse wicked as to the men of Tyrus Sydon and he doth suffer many wilde people and stupid with their barbarous cruelty to be ouerwhelmed in darkenesse But why so because saith hee their Ancestors refused the Gospell O ridiculous reason Should hee that doth equally desire the saluation of all be hindred with so light an impediment and which is contrary to his iustice as shall afterward be taught Thus though Arminius doth teach that God would by his Antecedent will saue all seuerall men it is yet manifest by experience that God through many ages hath denyed and doth yet deny to most nations those meanes without which they cannot be saued and doth onely supply those meanes which meanes alone none euer vsed well XXIII But God saith he seeing hee is very good by nature cannot but wish well to all men by his Antecedent and primary will as being created after his own image These things were spoken by them rightly agreeably to the nature of God if we were borne without originall sinne But seeing the image of God is almost blotted out and in place of it the image of the Diuell hath succeeded no reason doth compell vs to beleeue that God is willing to saue all and singular men but the holy Scripture doth teach that some are saued by the meere grace of God and by election according to his purpose the rest being left in their naturall perdition and appointed to damnation for those sinnes which they were to commit of their owne accord XXIV All these things are not therefore spoken that we should reiect this distinction of the wil of God into his Antecedent and Consequent will For we know that among the decrees of God some are before and some are after in order But wee denie that there are two decrees of God betweene which mans will steppeth in as if mans will came betweene the decree of creating man and the decree of condemning certaine men But we denie that the will of man doth so come betweene the two decrees of God that the first or Antecedent decree is broken off by the will of man and that God is compelled to absist from that end which he had propounded to himselfe and which he did seriously intend We deny also in the worke of our election the precise will of God to depend on the fore-seeing of any power or action of mans free-will or the Consequent will of God to be suspended on mans will Concerning which thing it shall be diligently spoken in the proper place CHAP. VI. Of the sinne of Adam I. GOD hauing created man enlightned his minde with a supernaturall light and adorned his will with righteousnes and holinesse but so that he was mutable for otherwise God had created a God and not a man for not to be able to change is a prerogatiue peculiar to God whereby he is distinguished from all created things II. Arminius whom the old way hath alwaies displeased Articul Perpend Pag. 18. is of opinion That an inclination to sinning was in man before his fall although not so vehement and inordinate as now it is If this be true