are more farre distant then are the things which are most contrarie should mutually passe one into another I denie not but that one qualitie may be changed into another and one substance into another because they haue one common matter but that in like sort qualitie may be changed into substance no thought of mans minde can comprehend and containe Philadelph Giue mee leaue to propound against you that which is holden by some concerning this point who say that the power which is in the seede is encreased by little and little vntill it come to full perfection Theophrast But I pray you tell mee by what acting force and prouoking power doe they say that encrease is giuen Philadelph Alexander answereth you that first there is infused into the seed a certaine beginning of motion which by a force taken from the begetting acteth vntill it come to some end and vntill by a continuing encrease it hath perfected it selfe and as it were entring the race ceaseth not vntill it come to the marke and end thereof vnlesse it be forcibly stayed in the course Theophrast You obiect and say that there is giuen to the begetting seede a certaine force and beginning of motion Doe they vnderstand that this beginning of motion is power Philadelph Yes verily they doe Theophrast And doe they say that the same beginning which is power doth acte continually and that it doth proceede from the first entred natures to the last consumated whereunto nothing can be added which we denie to be the highest and most perfect Philadelph They doe so Theophrast And doe they constantly affirme that this power is a quality Philadelph They affirme that Aristotle saith so Theophrast But no quality can at the first and by it selfe act but euery action belongeth to the forme that hath gotten substance which is a certaine efficient beginning Philadelph They denie not this Theophrast Seeing therefore they say that power is encreased by little and little vntill a perfect forme be made to what forme shall it first of all be ascribed Philadelph You must herein answere your selfe for I can goe no further Theophrast Wee say that in seede there are onely three things namely Matter Forme and Power Doth then that action of power leade at the first to the forme of seede Philadelph Whereto else should it leade Theophrast But that cannot be Philadelph What is the cause Theophrast Because whatsoeuer acteth acteth to this end that he may make the Patient obiect like himselfe neither doth the forme which is in the seede intend any other thing but that it may generate another seed out of it selfe Philadelph I knew this well enough before but the consequence of the matter hath enforced me not to denie it Now therefore I giue place and yet I affirme that the power which is in seede doth encrease it selfe by his owne force neither doth it desire any externall helpe For albeit the same power is thought to be a quality yet is it of a more high degree then are others for the which cause Aristotle hath called the same a Naturall power because as it is partaker of quality so also after a sort it is also partaker of Nature Wherefore in my opinion who so saith that the same can doe any thing of it selfe shall vtter no absurdity Theophrast These are wonderfull shifts be of what opinion you will onely know this If power doe act at the first and by it selfe when it encreaseth and finisheth it selfe it bringeth no other thing to passe but such another power as it is it selfe neither can it though it be encreased bring forme out of it selfe Out of the seed as out of the subiect is ingendered a liuing creature or a plant but there was neuer any in the ranke of the best Philosophers which held that powers should make forme or that a liuing creature is generated by the force of seede Philadelph And why so Theophrast That which is not yet but shall be hereafter is not now simply in being but how can that which is not be said to beget any other thing How then thinke you can it come to passe that the power which is in seede should procreate forme if as yet the same forme be not in it Or that the seede which is not yet that liuing creature should effect a liuing creature For if any thing be to be begotten out of these there must be some other thing put of necessitie which in act may obtaine forme and which may be the first efficient and chiefe cause of this procreation The which when Aristotle deepely considered hee decreed that there was a two-fold nature in the procreation of liuing creatures and of their off-spring One more imperfect which is made in seede and is not yet Another more perfect which being in act is simply such an effectrix as it is in that from whence the seede did spring The place is in the second booke concerning the procreation of liuing creatures where he putteth a difference betweene Nature and Art in these words Art is the beginning and the forme of that which is effected but yet in another The motion of Nature is in that which is effected proceeding from another nature which in act obtaineth the forme Therefore he holdeth that a nature is in the seede by which it is made and moued and the efficient nature in that which is in act This sentence Simplicius hath expounded more largely in these words or to this effect the nature and cause of euery motion maketh a subiect like it selfe and not another for as the nature of man maketh a man so the nature of seede can make nothing but seede For how shall that properly make a man which is in the seede which as yet is not the nature of man before such time as the man be made If the nature of the seede desireth to be changed and to haue a liuing creature perfected then properly the efficient and next cause is the paternall and maternall nature for the forme goeth before the act in the father and mother according to the which forme that which is in power is brought to act And by this meanes the nature of that which is generated if it be said to be efficient it is so efficient that the same is therewithall made And that nature hath properly the force of effecting which is such in act because nature is the procreatrix of that which is like it selfe Thus Philadelph you see that the force of the seed which we say is called power cannot be turned into the forme of a liuing creature how well so euer it fitteth it selfe or adorneth it selfe but there must be present a certaine thing as is such in act Philadelph These things which you haue now vttered seeme in my Iudgement most true But before you finish this matter it is conuenient that you explaine one thing which all Philosophers haue approued namely that the forme of euery thing is brought forth out of the power of the subiect
Theophrast When the power which is in the seed that is to say when the preparation to bring in forme is come by daily encrease to full perfection it hath also obtained therewithall the forme of substance For forme necessarily followeth that perfection and neuer leaueth it For this cause Aristotle calleth Forme oftentimes by the name of Entelechia in regard of perfection either because it is an inseperable companion of perfect power or else because it doth fulfill and perfect it wholy Therefore as we say that perfection so also according to vsuall speech we say that forme is brought out of the power of the matter Philadelph Then it seemeth to me that forme is extracted out of the precurrent power no otherwise then act commeth out of the habit Theophrast The comparison which you haue made is fit to the purpose for by long custome and vse a Musitian or Harper hauing gotten a habit in deuiding his parts on his Instrument looseth not that habit though he fleepe but can readily when he awaketh shew his former skill according to his owne will Therefore as the act proceedeth from the habit or skill because the act cannot shew forth it selfe except the habit be first perfectly gotten so in like manner it fareth in the procreation of things For it is not Power that imprinteth the forme but an externall cause which notwithstanding being without the helpe of power should not haue strength enough of it selfe Philadelph I perceiue you well it is as if one hauing Science vseth it not yet when he hath will to make vse thereof he contemplateth and is in act a man of Science euen so what subiect so euer hath perfect power to beget a thing when the externall force of the agent commeth the same hath present action and forme And hereunto agreeth Aristotle who saith he which knoweth any thing if he haue his minde actually occupied in contemplation yet he keepeth his habit and hath not lost his Science in contemplating but doth rather amend and perfect it euen so that which hath receiued perfect power when the forme commeth putteth not off the quality of power but addeth thereto an ornament a perfection Thus you see I wel vnderstand you not peruerting your meaning I will now briefly repeate what hath beene spoken hetherto for my better memorie and also to let you see how well I haue obserued for my further knowledge that which at my request you haue deliuered to this effect following A briefe repetition of all that hath beene spoken Of all the things which the parent Nature hath brought forth the first constitution is made out of the inferiour and subiect matter and forme of the which two for as much as forme is farre the more excellent it is more often called forme then matter And as we doe see that the thing begotten is nothing permanent or stable but doth sometime fall and vanish away so that forme by which the thing did flourish cannot perpetually abide and cleaue to the matter but remoueth it selfe sometime and that very sodainly which shall be the destruction thereof But before forme came into matter it desired a certaine ornature and preparation of the same without the which it cannot enter there This preparation is called Power the which power is not so much as a portion nor the least mite of the approaching forme but onely a fore-running preparation or ordering of the matter Whatsoeuer hath begotten any thing is thought to haue employed and bestowed this power sometime by it selfe alone sometime with the seed or with a certaine Seminarie agreeing and answering thereto Therefore seeing power is a manifold and varying preparation of the body both out of those foure incorrupt beginnings of things which are the Elements with the temper made in the smallest proportion and wholy annexed together and a feat and comely conformation of the body with an apt coniunction of the parts therewith as also all commoderation and conueniencie of the naturall and in-set spirit this whole order of powers dependeth on the faculties and force of the seed and of him that cast the seed then when all preparation is fully finished which is when power is consumated then by a certaine naturall and ineuitable necessity the forme commeth and sheweth it selfe outwardly This forme is altogether simple without any composition of the formes of the subiects and yet is able to doe and further many things according to the seuerall faculties which it hath They which measure all things by the senses and haue an eye onely to the neerest cause contend and stifly holde that the forme is stirred vp and brought forth from out of the power of the matter which opinion they defend with strong arguments For the efficient or genitorie when he begetteth another thing of his name or kinde by himselfe or by the meanes of his seed or seminarie doth neither make nor yet put in the forme thereof but is the cause of this concourse onely namely that forme may be in the matter And this is that which is said to be the cause of the begotten and of the genitour which hath begotten But yet there is a more high most excellent workmaister who giueth forme outwardly by a certaine inspired motion This is the summe which hath bin hetherto spoken for my instruction Theophrast I commend your memory and collection in this repetition CHAP. IIII. Philadelph BY that which hath beene hitherto discoursed it appeareth that three things are in the composition of euery naturall thing to wit Matter Forme Temperament whereof two as principles namely Matter and Forme doe make euery thing but Temperament is onely in Matter which Matter is congealed and compacted out of the mixture of the first Elements of the world Now therefore declare whether the powers and forces of all things proceeded from these three and no more Theophrast Aristotle speaking of efficient causes propundeth some altogether without reason and some endued with reason and therefore saith Whatsoeuer things are the efficients of contrary works are partakers of reason and euery thing is deuoyd of reason which is the beginning of one worke onely hereupon I frame this argument Of the naturall causes and faculties which are without reason one cause is the beginning of one effect neither can moe or diuers effects proceede from one and the same but we obserue and see many effects and the same much different and vnlike of euery simple and naturall body therefore these cannot be referred to one common beginning but there must needes be many causes of these Philadelph Although this one beginning hath diuers causes and faculties yet I ascribe all those to Temperament except you shew vnto me that of these some doe proceede from Matter and some from Forme Theophrast First then I take this as granted from you that there are certaine forces and faculties in temperament Philadelph Should I denie that which is confirmed by the testimonie and opinions of all Philosophers Theophrast And
hot and colde thinking that all things were made of these and by these makeeh it plaine by demonstration that those qualities are onely instruments of a certaine more superiour and principall cause which hee hath expressed by the name of nature For whosoeuer shall affirme that these secundarie qualities haue the prerogatiue in themselues to worke and shall attribute the cause power as it were of acting to the Axe or such like instrument and so the forme and perfection of the thing reiected shall passe by the true cause imputing that to the actions of the Instrument which neuerthelesse should remaine idle if they were not moued stirred vp by the force of forme the same I say shall much forget himselfe Philadelph If there be so great force power in forme that to the same chiefly all motion and action must be imputed then shall wee be enduced to thinke that the functions and qualities which euen now you referred to temperament and matter take not their originall by themselues but first from forme What cause haue you then to determine that they proceede from temperament and matter Theophrast They which soare no higher then the wing of common sense doe carie them will affirme that such functions and qualities spring from matter and temperament albeit forme hath the first place and preheminence we following these mens low pitch of conceit affirme that those qualities proceede from Matter and Temperament because they are effected by these as by instruments But what qualities and faculties I simply pronounce to be of forme those I affirme to haue no neede of the helpe of Instrument Philadelph Goe to then Are not matter and temperament which you propund as Instruments certaine furtherances forces of the efficient forme Theophrast No verely But as in any artificiall worke the Caruer or Smith is he which is the first and principall agent and who hath the power and faculty of acting which is his Art and strength of body but the Artificers instrument as Axe or Hammer is but an helper and in the instrument there is as it were a certaine borrowed helpe or force not which worketh but by which the worke is the better effected and to this end the well fashioned and sharpe Toole is a great furtherance euen so in like manner almost in the naturall working of things whereby they are brought to passe Forme is the first and chiefe efficient hauing in it the effecting power But Matter and Temperament are as helping instruments of the efficient cause and either of these to wit Matter and Temperament haue their power and faculty and an apt constitution by which the effect may more easely be brought to passe Therefore in euerie naturall body there are three efficient causes namely Forme Matter and Temperament euery of which haue their peculiar force whereby it worketh strongly or after a weake manner Forme of it selfe is the beginning of working neither doth it borrow any thing of the Instrument to haue being or the nature of beginning which commeth afterward as by accessarie meanes Forme therefore had the power and faculty of acting before such time as it acted by the Instrument euen as the Caruer before he worke any thing with his Toole hath ability and Art to effect the which faculty he taketh not from his Toole or Instrument Whereby it appeareth that the faculty which is naturally in euerie forme and which is called the property thereof is farre different from Matter and Temperament in force and vertue for a Caruer or Painter by his Science onely which is his faculty without the helpe of any Instrument can make an Image in his minde so in like manner the forme of a thing effecteth the thing without the helpe of Matter and Temperament And forasmuch as these three are mixed and conioyned in euery naturall body Formes can scarsly shew forth their forces apart and by themselues in effect but that therewith Matter and Temperament will expresse their supplie But on the contrary part Matter and Temperament cannot shew forth themselues without forme so that these in their seuerall kindes must be distinguished and not confounded CHAP. V. Philadelph YOur ternarie of Forme Matter and Temperament putteth me in minde of three principles which that great and ancient Philosopher Hermes Trismegistus hath deliuered that is to say Salt Sulphur and Mercurie which three hee appointeth as the onely naturall beginnings of all things created which agreeth not with Aristotles foure Elementarie principles How can these two opinions so different in number stand together Theophrast Aristotle had reason to appoint a quaternarie of Elements according to the number of the foure qualities hot colde drie and moyst as the first principles of all things as is to be seene in his second booke of Generation of liuing creatures Yet forasmuch as one can beget nothing of himselfe but three therfore three doe make one body by a compound made by a three-fold efficacie of the diuine word For God in the beginning as Moses testifieth made of nothing a Chaos deepe or waters which we please to call it animated with his spirit who being the great workmaister in the creation separated first light from darknesse and this Ethereall Heauen which we beholde as a quarta essentia or fourth eflence or most pure spirit or most spiritual simple created body Then be deuided waters from waters that is to lay the more subtill aterie and Mercuriall liquor from the more thicke clammy oyle-like or Sulfurous liquor After that Moses telleth vs that God separated from the more grosse waters the Earth which standeth apart by it selfe like Salt And thus in the bosome of the world God encluded these three simple bodies Salt Sulphur and Mercurie as the first formes of things Philadelph Doe the Philosophers the followers of Hermes exclude the Element of Fire in the composition of bodies elemented Theophrast In Genesis it is euidently to be seene that there is made mention of Heauen Earth and Water onely but of Fire and Aire no mention at all because these two are encluded vnder the other as vnder Heauen Fire and vnder the superiour waters Aire so that hereby it is plaine that there is no other fierie element but Heauen a fourth essence separated out of the more subtill matter and forme of the three elements which being so separated and extracted is no other thing but a pure Aetheriall and most simple fire most perfect and farre different from the three Elements as imperfect which Fire is the Author of all formes powers and actions in all the inferiour things of nature as the first in degree among the second causes and carieth it selfe like a Father toward his off-spring Philadelph What are the essences of these three Fire Aire and Earth Theophrast The first which is fire is a substance containing in it life and motion or the soule of the Elements The second which is Aire is a substance which hath in it the nourishing foment of life and the
of Iupiter who moueth about in 12. yeeres The seauenth Heauen is the Sphaere of Mars who signifieth his circular motion once in 12. yeeres The eight Heauen is the circle of the Sunne who goeth about the earth once in a yeere The ninth Heauen is that of Venus who maketh a reuolution once in 246. daies The tenth Heauen is the Orbe of Mercurie who moueth round about his circuit once in 330. daies The eleauenth being the lowest Heauen is that of the Moone who goeth about the earth once in 28. daies making in this manner 12. reuolutions in one yeere Thus you may perceiue the seuerall motions of the Heauens in their seuerall degrees Philadelph Shew me I pray you whether all these Heauens in generall or one more especiall is the cause of the procreation of the inferiour earthie and naturall bodies Theophrast Nunquā nimis dicitur quod nunquāsatis dicitur There is neuer too much spoken where the disciple is not weary in hearing Know therefore that as the Heauen which is called Primum mobile is the first of all motions which tendeth to place from which all other latter and succeeding motion as procreation alteration growing or augmentation and perishing or death doe come euen so that body which is carried about with a continuall motion and circuit must needes be the cause of all bodies procreated And it is a very ancient opinion of the Philosophers that the Sunne mouing Astrall influences is of greatest vertue and power which being placed by God in the middest of Heauen illumineth all things both aboue and also beneath it and with his beames maketh the whole world fruitfull euen to the very center of the same For as the fountaine of life in mans body is the center of his heart where that secret vitall spirit is contained from whence naturall heate doth spring heating illumining and quickning the rest of the members euen so the Sunne by his heate and light doth naturally quicken all the parts of the world both superiour and inferiour For in regard of his heate it is called the Heart of the world and in regard of his light it is called the eye of the world The Sunne is the most noble body of all things that are in the naturall Heauens and in the earth therefore in respect of the worthinesse thereof and vertuous power wherewith it is endued next vnto God it is called the parent of all things because the seminarie and formall vertue of all things is secretly comprehended therein Philadelph Then it seemeth that the Sunne by his continuall and yeerely course comming toward vs doth promote and set forward the procreation of things and going from vs doth cause their decay and perishing Theophrast It is very true which you say for it agreeth with Aristotle who determineth that the celestiall and mundane conuersion is the cause of those things which are begotten and which perish It is necessarie saith he that this whole world which compasseth the earth about be so continued with his superiour conuersions and motions that the whole vertue thereof may be gouerned thereby For that ought to be accounted the first cause from whence all things haue the beginning of motion And further saith he this cause is sempiternall neither hath it as touching place any determined end but is alwaies in the end Also in his booke de mundo hee calleth Heauen an Element farre differing from those foure knowne and common Elements which he affirmeth to be diuine and immortall and free from destruction But for as much as there is in the Heauens a double or two-folde reuolution and conuersion the one which is the most swift mundane motion which is finished in the space of 24. houres and the other whereby the seauen inferiour Orbes are turned backward by a contrary motion to that of the higher Heauen the first of these two going alwaies forward after one manner in a constant course without change cannot be the cause of life and death things so contrary But the latter carying about the wandring starres by the Zodiacke when it bringeth them to the North maketh the pleasant Spring and life of things but when it carieth these into the South it bringeth the fall of the leafe and the decay of things terrestriall By this perpetuall calculation of the Sunne and Starres the Heauen is maried to the Earth and the inferiour Elements doe ioyne with the superiour Philadelph Whatsoeuer is moued is moued of another What then is the cause of the generall motion of the Heauens in their seuerall Orbes Some haue thought that the celestiall bodies are moued of their proper formes Some according to Platoes opinion consent of the Philosophers haue denied them to be liuing creatures affirming that it is one of the greatest shew-tokens of life that those celestiall bodies haue the principall cause of their motion in themselues and that they stand not in neede of an externall mouer And for this cause not onely the most auncient Chaldean Astrologers but also the Chieftaines of the old Phisiologie as well Greekes as Egyptians as witnesseth Plato in his Cratilo and Epinomides and else-where haue thought that the Caelestiall Orbes haue life and Soule from whence motion proceedeth and that the whole world is quickned by an vniuersall Soule therein which they imagined to be sempiternall Yea this opinion was so setled in the mindes of the Atheniens that they condemned Anaxagoras of an irreligious conceit because hee durst affirme the contrary What say you to this Doe you agree to this Philosophie Theophrast I allow it not for it must be granted that God alone is the first mouer and chiefe cause of all motion and therefore men illumined with a more cleare light of the knowledge of God than the Philosophers had in stead of that imagined Soule of the world vnderstand a certaine created spirit which moued vpon the waters in the first creation which Spirit receiued power from God to quicken cherish and conserue all things in their kinde and order vntill the determined end of the same Therefore we may safely say that neither Heauen nor the Starres are animated as bodies organicall and for that cause cannot be meete habitacles for a Soule but are rather bodies regular and vniforme moued by a certaine naturall necessitie according to the wisedome of the Almighty For we know that God passeth the whole frame of the Earth Sea and Heauens who fulfilleth all in all And to preuent the great ruine thereof he hath of his great goodnesse and infinite wisedome appointed that generall Nature to defend and preserue this great worke by the vertue and moderation thereof And that by the continuall and yeerely reuolution of the eight Heauen and by the influences and vertues of the Starres Planets and Celestiall powers all things might be well gouerned and abide constant in their estate vntill the predestinated time of their dissolution And yet in such manner that God himselfe still ordereth all things in these secondarie offices according to
his owne secret will and predestination Philadelph Hereby it appeareth that God being the first Mouer and cause of all motion is himselfe immoueable because if hee were changeable then must he necessarily be moued of another but of another he is not moued nor can be for then could he not be the first mouer because that thing which should moue him must needes be before him and also because he not being immoueable should be moued of another and so in the mouing and moued there should be no end but a proceeding infinitely which Philosophie reiecteth And if we should imagine that he is moued of himselfe then must he be deuided into the part mouing of and by it selfe and into the part moued by it selfe and so by motion he shall be without forme Which to thinke of the most high and chiefe simplicity were too detestable and execrable Theophrast God no doubt is altogether immutable who without all question as he is eternall and immensurable so also hee is most simple and most perfect For this cause the eternity which is in God taketh from him all temporall motion because he is all in all And this immensurablenesse taketh from him motion in place because he is euery where and his exceeding perfection and simplicity taketh away motion to Forme because he needeth nothing being most fully complete Therefore in no sort God is subiect to change and motion but standeth stable for euer of whose stability the Prophet Dauid speaketh thus Thou changest them and they shall be changed but thou art one and the same for euer And Boetius very notably speaketh hereof thus O quiperpetua mundum ratione gubernas terrarum caelique sator qui tempus ab aeuo ire iubes stabilisque manens das cuncta moueri O thou which by a perpetuall order doest gouerne the world the maker of Heauen and Earth which commandest the times to proceede from the beginning and which remaining stable thy selfe doest giue motion to all things God therefore in whom all things liue moue and haue their being is the same which giueth formes to all things that be in the created Heauens and in the Earth he is the beginning the middest and the end of all things If then the Diuine power and vertue passe through and is effectuall in all things by which the same exist hath appointed the perpetuall beginnings deuiding through all natures their seuerall kindes and fulfilling them with their proper seeds by which they receiue the spirit of life will any man make doubt that there is any thing in Nature which is not truly diuine and so called Some say of olde Deorum plena sunt omnia all things are full of Gods It is then rashnesse vtterly to take away without reason this excellencie of the Diuinitie infused by God into all naturall things which opinion hath beene receiued by the constant tradition of all the ancients and it is more then madnes to acknowledge that there is some Diuine thing giuen to many things and yet not to vouchsafe the same a Diuine name Philadelph Let it be as you say that there is some diuine thing in things Naturall yet what manner of thing that Diuine thing is I well vnderstand not neither can I coniecture Theophrast Why can you not coniecture seeing in a naturall body there is nothing more excellent then a simple forme and nothing afore it And for as much as the residue which apperraineth to Matter are inferiour to Forme as vile and transitorie it followeth and you may easely perceiue that the simple forme of a thing is that Diuine thing which is sought after And whatsoeuer doth represent and expresse the nature thereof the same also is partaker in some measure of the Diuinitie Philadelph But what force or strength doe you suppose that simple Forme to be of things of nature which I must attribute to the force and vertue of the mixture of Elements Theophrast If the Elements and their qualities haue certaine vertues and faculties proper vnto them then must the vertues and faculties of the Diuinitie be farre greater which in a higher degree surmounteth all other in dignity and perfection Also all the functions and workes of this simple Forme may of vs easely be discerned and knowne But how and from whence they proceede and what is the substance of the effecting cause or faculty thereof is as much hidden and vnknowne to vs as is the essence of the Diuinitie We see that the Magnes or Loadstone hath in it an attractiue faculty to draw Iron to it that the stone Astroites moueth of it selfe if a little quantity of vinegar be put to it That the Estridge hath a power by swift concoction to digest Iron that a Pidgeon by his heate digesteth stones which a Lyon whose heate is more vehement cannot doe That a little fish called Echeneis otherwise Remora is able to stay a ship against any violence of Oare or winde in full saile that out of the ashes of a Phaenix another of the same kind should be procreated That the Salamander should be rather nourished by fire then consumed That the Camelion liuing by aire should turne himselfe into euery colour which he seeth That a Cockatrice in his eye should haue power to slay a man That a Viper or Scorpion should kill a man with poyson That an Adder should preuent the force of a charme by stopping his eare That the fish Ephemera should die the very same day that it began to liue of the which one daies Feauer beareth the name That the feathers of an Eagle mixed with other feathers should consume them That the wilde and fierce Elephant at the sight of a Ramme should be made tame That a Vine should not prosper growing neere to a Laurell Tree That the Almond Tree being solitarie beareth no fruit but growing with other plants is very fruitfull That there should be such familiarity betweene the Oliue and the Mirtle Trees that the branches of the Myrtle should so friendly embrace the boughes of the Oliue and both their rootes to ioyne together in one That the stone Tyrrhemus being whole swimmeth but broken sinketh That where the Glow worme creepeth in the night no Adder will creepe by day That Rheubarb should haue power to separate Choler Agarick Flegme and Epithimum Melancholy That Hemlocke and Hellebore should be to a man pestiferous and yet that the Quaile should be nourished with Helebore and the Starling with Hemlocke That the seuerall parts of a Hare should haue diuers Formes faculties to heale diuers diseases As the lungs those that be short winded the bloud to break the stone in the bladder or reines of a man the bone which is behinde the knee in the after legge to cleanse away sand and grauell the Mawe outwardly applied to retaine and stay a conception the haue to stanch bloud These and many moe such like are hidden in the Closet of Nature the vndoubted causes whereof no man is able to shew nor