Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	according_a	account_n	accuse_v	13	3	7.4993	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A26169	The fundamental constitution of the English government proving King William and Queen Mary our lawful and rightful king and queen : in two parts : in the first is shewn the original contract with its legal consequences allowed of in former ages : in the second, all the pretences to a conquest of this nation by Will. I are fully examin'd and refuted : with a large account of the antiquity of the English laws, tenures, honours, and courts for legislature and justice : and an explanation of material entries in Dooms-day-book / by W.A.	Atwood, William, d. 1705?; Atwood, William, d. 1705? Reflections on Bishop Overall's Convocation-book.	1690 (1690)	Wing A4171; ESTC R27668	243,019	223

and correct and that in other matters they share with the King in every part of the Soveraignty He adds If we have need of farther proof the name Parliament which all our Ancient Histories give the Assembly of States may furnish us with one This is the name which the English give this Assembly which partakes of the Soveraignty with their King The French and the Ancient Britains had the same Laws and the same Language they Governed themselves by States gave the same name to their Assemblies And without doubt they had the same Authority Nay it is certain that the States had formerly in France the same Power that the Parliaments have in England As this Author makes the Liberties of the English Nation and the Power of its Parliament an Argument of the Right of the French Nation Bodin who wrote after their Parliament at Paris had taken the place of the Assembly of States makes England a parallel to France Turky Persia Muscovy Bodin de Repub lib. 2. c. 4. ed. A Lyon p. 302. Ib. Cap. 3. p. 286. This was H. 2. for the absolute Soveraignty of their Princes but that he was little acquainted with the History of the Govenment of England appears in that he supposes that Henry who procured his Son to be Crowned in his life time to have been the Son of W. 1. Bodin p. 300. Even where a Prince is the most absolute he admits That if he Govern Tyrannically he may be lawfully killed by a Foreign Prince and that it is a noble and magnificent action for a Prince to take Arms to rescue a people unjustly oppressed by the cruelty of a Tyrant as did the Great Hercules who went about the World exterminating the Monsters of Tyrants and for his high exploits has been Deified So did Dion Timoleon Aratus and other generous Princes who have bore the Title of Chastisers and Correcters of Tyrants This says he was the sole cause for which Tamerlain Prince of the Tartars denounced War against Bajazet King of the Turks And when he Besieged Constantinople said he came to chastise his Tyranny and deliver his afflicted people And in fact he vanquished him in a pitch'd Battel in the Plain of Mount-Stellian and having killed and put to flight Three Hundred Thousand Turks he kept the Tyrant in a Golden-Cage till he died Ib. p. 301. And in such case it matters not whether the Virtuous Prince proceed against the Tyrant with Force or Art or way of Justice True it is if the Virtuous Prince has taken the Tyrant he will have more Honour if he make his Process and punish him as a Murderer or Parricide or Robber rather than to make use of the Law of Nations against him This passage in Bodin shews beyond contradiction That if he were now alive and not of the Romish Superstition he would have extolled and justified the Heroick undertaking of King William for the delivery of this Nation But the ground of the justification is That even the most absolute Soveraign may injure his Subjects as no doubt but he would if he treated them contrary to natural equity and his own established Laws Jovian p. 226. whereas the Author of Jovian having set up an Imperial Power above all Political Constitutions says In this Realm the Sovereign cannot wrong or injure his Subjects but contrary to the Political Laws And by consequence not at all if the Political Laws are to give way to the Imperial Wherefore I wonder not to find him a Subscriber to the late Bishop of Chichester's Paper which condemns Swearing Allegiance to our present King and Queen But Bodin as he justifies our King William in freeing us from an oppressing Monarch no less clears the Subjects of England in joyning with him upon supposition that the Constitution of our Government is not rightly understood by him Bodin p. 301. But says he as to Subjects we ought to know whether the Prince be absolutely Soveraign or whether he is not absolutely Soveraign For if he is not absolutely Soveraign it is necessary that the Soveraignty be in the people or in the Lords In this case there is no doubt but it is lawful to proceed against the Tyrant by way of Justice if we can prevail against him or by way of Deeds and Force if we cannot have Reason otherwise as the Senate did against Nero in one case and against Maximin in another so that the Roman Emperors were nothing else but Princes of the Common-wealth that is to say the First and Chief the Soveraignty remaining with the people and the Senate As I have shewn this Common-wealth may be called a Principality Altho Seneca speaking in the person of his Scholar Nero says I alone among all Men living am elected and chosen to be God's Vicegerent on Earth I am Arbiter of Life and Death I am able at my pleasure to dispose of the estate and quality of any Man True it is that in fact he usurped this Power but of right the State was but a Principality where the people were Soveraign As also is that of the Venetians who condemned to death their Duke Falier and put to death others without form or figure of Process Insomuch that Venice is an Aristocratical Principality where the Duke is but Cheif and the Soveraignty remains with the States of the Venetian Noblemen And in the like Case the German Empire which also is but an Aristocratical Principality where the Emperor is chief and first the Power and Majesty of the Empire belongs to the States who in the year 1296. deposed the Emperor Adolph and after him Wenceslaus in the year 1400. in form of justice as having jurisdiction and power over them How much soever Bodin was mistaken in relation to the Government of England he seems herein less a Stranger to that of the German Empire The Learned Conringius in his account of the German Judicatures Hermanni Conringii Excercit De Judiciis p. 251. tells us 't is difficult to give an account of them for some Ages next after the time of the Francs But beginning with the Causes of Kings themselves whom he shews according to Ancient Custom to have been subject to some jurisdiction upon the account of their Government The Causes says he Ib. p. 252. of their Kings belonging to the administration of the Government as anciently so afterwards were frequently agitated in the Great Councils of the Kingdom So the Emperor H. 4. was accused in a Great Council and by its Authority divested of his Royal Dignity The same befel Otto 4. and * This about the year 1251. No new Emperor was chosen till Anno 1273. after Twenty two years vacancy Prideaux Introd p. 245. Frederic 2. But says he Two things sometimes hapned much differing from the ancient Usage One is That the Power of the Council of all the States began to pass to the Electors only after Charles 4. Novo more The Duke of Bavaria made

one that Reigns to profess himself bound by the Laws Our own Authority does so depend upon the Authority of Law And in truth for the Governing Power to submit to Law is greater than Empire And by the Promulgation of this present Edict we make known to others what we will not allow our selves That J. 2. had before his Departure broken the Fundamental Laws and that now he not only ceases to protect but before the Judgment pass'd upon the Breach was in a Kingdom which foments and strengthens a Rebellion in Ireland part of the Dominions belonging to the English Crown I think no body will deny Nor till they can answer what I have shewn of the mutual Contract continued down from the first Erection of the Monarchy here ought they to deny that he thereby broke the Original Contract which bound the People to him and him to them What results from this Breach is now more particularly to be considered That it is a Discharge from all Allegiance to him requir'd by any Law and confirmed by any Oaths is evident not only from the former Authorities but from the Condition going along with such a mutual Contract as I have prov'd to be with us between Prince and People Or rather to use the Words of the Learned Pufendorf The Obligation is not so much dissolv'd as broken off Peufendorf de Officio Hominis Civis p. 201. by the perfidiousness of either Party for when one does not perform that which was agreed on neither is the other bound to performance For the Prior Heads of things to be perform'd in Contracts are in the subsequent by way of Condition As if it should be said I will perform if you will perform first This he more fully explains in another Book Pufend. Elementa Juris prudentiae p. 85 94. Vid. Puf Supr de Interregnis p. 274. where he distinguishes between an Obligation imperfectly mutual as he supposes it to be between an Absolute Prince and his Subjects and one perfectly mutual as he takes it to be where the People have conferr'd a Power on any Terms Of such Obligations he says These since they have a mutual respect to the things agreed on Pufend. Elementa Juris prud p. 94. and suppose mutual Faith it is evident That if one Party violate the Faith which he plighted the other is no more bound And therefore he is not perfidious who stands not to those Contracts which the other has broken For all the Heads of one and the same Contract run into each other by way of Condition c. In that Book of his which is counted the Standard of the Law of Nations Pufend. de Jure Gentium p. 1105. he asserts it to be lawful for Subjects to oppose their Prince by Force which is a sufficient departure from Allegiance if he goes about Modum habendi potestatem immutare V. Grot. de Jure Belli Pacis de summitatem habendi plenitudine p. 62. Dissertationes de Interreg p. 272. Supra i. e. to change that Manner in which he by the Contract enjoys the Power from less to more absolute And in his Tract de Interregnis cited above he allows of this If the King abdicate all Care of the Commonwealth becomes of an hostile mind towards his Subjects or manifestly departs from those Rules of Governing upon the observance of which as upon a Condition the Subjects have suspended their Obedience Nor is the German Author Knichin less plain whose Words are If the Magistrate have absolute and full Majesty due Subjection ought by no means to be denied him thô he be impious Rudolphi Godofredi Knichen opus polit f. 1226. Nor may he be cast out and another substituted in his room Much less can a new form of Government be introduced But if he were Constituted by the People under certain Pacts and Promises sworn to him by the People and therefore is bound to certain Rules of Laws and either to do or avoid any thing contain'd in those Contracts whether Fundamental Laws or things particularly concerted as for Example the Emperor in our Empire They not being observ'd but studiously enormously and obstinately violated the hopes of amendment after many of the Subjects Prayers and Admonitions plainly vanishing he may rightfully be removed by the States and People c. The Reason is because he was Promoted to the Government by such Agreement and that sworn to according to the Laws of the Agreement or Contract The Nature of which consists in this That if that Party for whose sake or cause they are Constituted violate them the other Party of very Right is freed from the Observance of those things which are granted by such Laws Philippi Paraei Vindicatio p. 50 and 51. Nor does Philip Paraeus come short of this in his Defence of his Father David where he speaks very particularly of the Effect of the mutual Compact Sir R. Poyntz his Vindication of Monarchy Ed. Anno. 1661. What is said by the Learned Knight Sir Robert Poyntz to disable such Authorities as I have Cited in truth confirms them The Doctrine of the Civilians concerning the nature of Contracts he handles with Judgment but if he fails in applying their Distinctions the Foundation of our Government being different from that which he goes upon then he will prove an Authority on my side P. 86. The Doctors of the Law says he are much perplexed in debating these two Rules in Law One is That in vain he requireth the performance of a promise or contract to whom he refuseth the performance of that which he ought on his part to perform The other is That a Man is not bound to perform his Oath if that be not performed in consideration whereof he did swear And unto these Rules they assign divers Exceptions and Limitations One is That regularly ubi contractus est perfectus c. and a mutual Obligation arises 't is not rescinded by the failure of either Party And that in contractibus innominatis Innominal Contracts such as are without any Condition expressed it is not lawful agere ad resolutionem Contractûs P. 86. to act towards the Dissolution of the Contract by reason of a Contravention on one side sed vel ad implementum contractûs vel ad interesse but either towards the compelling performance or the obtaining satisfaction for the breach The Contract between Prince and People he supposes to be both 1. A perfect Contract and 2. An innominal one Consequently indissoluble notwithstanding any Breach on the King's side But if it be look'd on barely as a perfect Contract without Consideration of its being without Condition expressed by the same Reason even the Rebellion of a Subject would not discharge the King's Duty to protect him any more than the King 's subverting the Constitution will discharge the Subjects Allegiance Which shews that this is meant only of Instances which are not of the Essence of the Contract

upon the Innocent Prince E. 5. in whose Name he first took the Government upon him and either terrified or cheated the People into a Compliance with his Pretences Tho I have not the vanity to believe that any thing of my own can weigh with them who have thought otherwise before especially if they have listed themselves on a Side contrary to that which no Disadvantages can make me repent of Yet I cannot but hope that the Authorities which I have produc'd will occasion some consideration till they are either evaded or disprov'd And being all legal Objections are answered nor can any scruple of Conscience be here pretended without much less against Law What hinders but that we should exert our utmost in the Service of that Lawful Government from which we receive Protection and may expect Rewards for vertue at least the Defence of it if we do not madly quit the ground which we have gain'd from them who have hitherto made Vertue the greatest Crime Wherefore for us now to look back after we have set our hands to the Plow would be not only to distrust that Providence which has given such a wonderful Encouragement to Perseverance but were enough to tarnish all our Actions with the Imputation of making the publick Interest a Pretence for carrying on our own 'T is an happiness indeed when they are twisted and thrive together But the Cause is such as a man ought not to fear to dye nay to starve for it And how improsperous soever a man's endeavours for this may prove yet it may be a comfort to have sown that Seed which may grow up for the benefit of future Ages Nor ought he to repine because another man hath guilded over his Name by what he has got by the ruin of his Country or may have insinuated himself again into Opportunities to betray it Let it be enough for him how much soever slighted and contemn'd while he lives to embalm his Memory by a steddiness to Truth and the Interest of his Country not to be shaken by cross accidents to himself or the Publick Cause Let him still act uniformly while others live in perpetual Contradictions or Varieties their Actions and their Principles thwarting themselves or each other or varying with the State-weathercocks Let them violate the Laws out of Loyalty unchurch all Protestant Churches but their own out of Zeal against Popery narrow the Terms of Communion to spread the National Religion confine all advantages to that Communion for the Publick Good make their King the Head of a Party to strengthen his hands against his Enemies Deliver up Charters and Retake them gelt of their Noblest Priviledges in performance of their Oaths to preserve them fight against their King and yet urge the Obligation of Oaths requiring an unalterable Allegiance to his Person assert that the Power is inseparable from him and yet may in his Absence without his Consent be transferr'd to a Regent not to be Reassumed when he should think fit to return grant that he has broken the Contract yet contend that he retains that Power which he received from the Contract Or that tho the Contract be broken the Throne is not vacant Or if it be vacant yet an Heir has a Right and so it is vacant and not vacant at the same time Or that after one has broken a Condition upon which he took an Estate to himself and his Heirs in Fee-Simple or Tail another shall enjoy it as Heir to him and that in his Life-time invite a Deliverer yet reject the Deliverance Upon such Principles as these I find an Eminent English Prelate censur'd as a Deserter of his Church for going about Letter to the B. of L. according to his great Learning to justifie the Oaths taken to the present Government And thus the Cause of J. 2. is made the Cause of the Church of England Certain it is whatever is now pretended 't is more difficult to justifie the taking up or promoting Arms against a Deliverer than an Oppressor And if Arms against the last were lawful even with the prospect of involving Thousands in the Miseries of War much more are they in Defence of that Power which has restor'd those Liberties which the other Invaded and reassured the Publick Peace And whoever first engaged and now draw back not only brand themselves for Traitors but make it evident that Ambition Revenge or some ungenerous Design animated their Undertakings And as I doubt not but they will meet with their due Reward perhaps that Success which has attended the Heroical Actions of our present King may go further with such men to keep them to their Duty than the most demonstrative Proofs of Right which they generally measure by the Event And as no Cause or Action is just in their eyes which is not prosperous they in the language of the Poet are always on the side of the gods But few are in this Point such Philosophers as Cato Victrix causa Diis placuit sed victa Catoni FINIS APPENDIX N. I. Vid. sup CAP. I. F. 4. Thô those Authors which I have referr'd to in the Book have sufficiently expos'd Sir Robert Filmer's Notions yet the following Observations made by me some Years since upon the first applying of my Thoughts to such Studies may be more suited to meaner Capacities at least they who will not give themselves time to read those Elaborate Treatises may be diverted with this Summary of Inconsistencies which Numbers swallow down as blind Men do Flies Sir Robert Filmer and some of our Divines plaid against one another in relation to Ecclesiastical and Civil Power and Sir Robert against Himself SInce Sir Robert Filmer's Writings are recommended to the World by the Elogium of the Infallible Dr. Heylin Vid. Heylin 's Ep. to Sir Ed. Filmer Certamen Ep. p. 208. Ut sup Cap. 1. that Man that professed in print that he could not reckon the early Death of the Wonder of his and following Ages Edw. the 6 th for an Infelicity to the Church of England Pref. to Hist of Ref. You cannot but think that this his Monarch in Politicks whose Death he laments was not so ill principled in himself nor inclin'd to embrace such Counsels but that his Affections to the Church were as exemplary as his Books have manifested them to be to the State But me-thinks Dr. Heylin by subscribing to Sir Robert's Judgment in Politiques and consequently to his Anarchy of a mixt Monarchy does thereby confess that the Church is wholly subject to the Law of the State and that the Civil Power is comprehensive of the Ecclesiastical the dividing of the Power being utter Anarchy and Confusion Nay that excellent Discourse call'd Patriarcha Ep. to Sir Edw. Filmer which the Doctor by way of Prophesy for I am sure 't is not to be imagin'd in the way of Nature tells us would when publish'd give such satisfaction to all our great Masters in the Schools of Polity that all

Ordinary nor is not so to be receyvid but it must recyve a Tryal directly by th' Ordinary whose Certificate must proceede accordinge to such mater as may informe a Truthe or ells it must receyve the Tryall by a Jury of twelve Men according to the common usage of Tryalles And whoe can thinke if the cause of eny such separation stirred upon no just Motion but onely of corrupte or fleshly disposition shuld come now in question that either eny Ordinary or ells eny Jury in so playne and open Bastardy wold either so farre forgeete or hazard theimselfes or elles exceede the Bondes of their Dutyes to God their Countrey or all honest Reputation to the World to certify such Issues to be ligitimate wherby no Controversy shuld be decyded but rather dangerously encreased and the whole Government of such a Noble Realme therby brought unto a double Bastardy as the case now standith For touchinge th' Issues betweene the Duke and the French Queene yf question be askyd whether they be lawfull answer is made They are not because the Duke was first lawfully marryed to the Lady Mortymer and contynued with her aboue seven Yeres and that he was maryed after to the French Queene duringe the sayd Lady Mortymer's Lyfe whoe overlyved the byrth of all the French Queenes Children Which answer by our Law cleerly distroyeth the seconde Mariage and makith it voyde and so all the Issues cleerly Bastardes And this is th' absolute Judgementof our Lawe so as now th' Issues of the French Queene cannot eny way help theimselfes but they must first destroy the first maryage which our Lawe will never disallowe untill it be first disanulled And therfore yf the Duke of Suff. had had eny Issue by the L. Mortimer those Issues shuld haue ben allowed his Heyres by our Lawe notwithstandinge the Mariage after with the French Queene And therfore for that the French Queenes Issues rest dissabled in poynt of Common Lawe they must make theimselfes able by some such proofe as may satisfye the same Lawe before they can be receyvid And yf they seeke their relief by eny dispensation from Rome as is sayd it servith not although ther wer a Dyvorce to be proovyd by eny such Instrument And it is most true that they ar able to proove no lawfull Devorce within the Realme though by search it hath not onely ben perceyvid but is evidently to be provyd howe meny corrupte and subtile attemptes by sundry meanes hath ben taken in hande to cowntenance those matches with the French Queene and other as by a supposition of a Sute sued betweene one Anne Browne and the said Charles Brandon wherof shuld aryse the displeasure betweene the Lady Mortimer and the said Charles her Husband seven Yeres and more after their Mariage During which time the said A. B. God wotte never tooke it so earnestly as she once complaynid to the Lawe or ever thought of the Mater nor as it seemith wold ever haue done yf in this tyme the sayd Charles had not consumyd the sayd Lady Mortimers Welth and Lyvelyhoode and found her Yeres not answerable to his Yeouth and wanton Disposition for satisfyenge wherof this Acquayntance that Bely risinge and these Practises after hapt with the same Anne Wherof riseth now these feeble-groundid Histories this Speche and these Devices that she forsooth shuld be precontracted to him before and had a Childe which Childe eight Yeres after is knowen well inoghe was but two or three Yeres olde at the moste A strange case and yet she had it at seventeen or ninteen and was but twenty at the tyme of this supposed Divorce when the sayd Charles and she came togither Well I say no more for the Case is skant worth the speakinge of but yf this Mater wer to be shewid ye shuld see such a patron of a Divorce as they that faynest wold have it wold soonest be ashamyd to countenance their Title upon the same and yet these Passages thus hapt in these Dayes and in that Lyfe from better to worse advoutry upon advoutry and such other stuff But how vayne is it to wryte or to occupy yow with these Digressions as with what mought haue ben what is supposed to haue bene or such other vayne and frivolous practises or shifts as heerafter may be when it behoovith so much presently to consyder what in this case properly may and ought to be And therfore because it is one of the most assuryd wayes to understand what the Lawe willeth or is in eny question to admitte that the Mater were at present to be decided by dewe course of Lawe with all the Pollicies that on bothe partes may be used for their most avayle and purpose and so to bringe the same in Forme of Lawe to such a poynt as judgement may be therof gyven rightly Take heerin for Ensample that I. S. made a Gifte of Lande to Charles Duke of Suff. and the Frenche Queene after their Mariage and the Heires of their Bodyes and now the same I.S. bringith his Action of Forme-downe in reverter for the same Lande agaynst the Lady K. and her Sister and the resydue of that Lyne and supposeth that the Land ought to him to revert for lacke of Issue lawfully begotten betweene the Duke and the French Queene and they come and pleade by way of Barr the Mariage betweene the French Queene and the Duke and convey the Pedegree lineally Wherunto I. S. replieth and shewith a former Maryage with the Lady Mortimer and averrith her Lyfe after their Birth And the Lady K. and the rest cannot by Lawe maynteyne their Barr and destroy his Title unlesse they pleade a lawfull Divorce and yf they pleade eny such yet the same shall not be under the Pope's Bulle but by the Certificate of th' Ordinary and for that th' Ordinary hath no Recorde or other lawfull Proofe wherupon he can lay eny Foundation to certify any lawful Divorce therfore the Certificate cannot be avaylable And so to conclude ther is no doubt in the troth of the case and by lyke reason no doubt in Lawe if you will allowe the Proceedinges accordinge to troth but that the Bastardie remaynith and is not able to be purged And yf the Bulle shuld have ben to make the Children of the sayd Queene and Duke of Bastardes legitimat besydes the Reasons before alledgid which ar as effectuall in this purpose as in the other yet it is most true that such legitimation had ben of no more force or Vertue heere in this Realme of Englande then they be of in those Contreyes that ar at the Pope's Obedience And who soever is legitimated ther of the Pope is not to be understandid for all that to be legitimate to inherite but in the Lands that do belonge vnto the Churche (i) Imo in ca. per venerabilem qui filii sint legi And besydes who soever is legitimate and abled generally to eny Dignitie is not in that neither to be understandid legitimatid vnto