Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	abandon_v	christian_a	picture_n	32	3	11.4459	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A64611	The summe of Christian religion, delivered by Zacharias Ursinus first, by way of catechism, and then afterwards more enlarged by a sound and judicious exposition, and application of the same : wherein also are debated and resolved the questions of whatsoever points of moment have been, or are controversed in divinitie / first Englished by D. Henry Parry, and now again conferred with the best and last Latine edition of D. David Pareus, sometimes Professour of Divinity in Heidelberge ; whereunto is added a large and full alphabeticall table of such matters as are therein contained ; together with all the Scriptures that are occasionally handled, by way either of controversie, exposition, or reconciliation, neither of which was done before, but now is performed for the readers delight and benefit ; to this work of Ursinus are now at last annexed the Theologicall miscellanies of D. David Pareus in which the orthodoxall tenets are briefly and solidly confirmed, and the contrary errours of the Papists, Ubiquitaries, Antitrinitaries, Eutychians, Socinians, and Arminians fully refuted ; and now translated into English out of the originall Latine copie by A.R.	Ursinus, Zacharias, 1534-1583.; Parry, Henry, 1561-1616.; Pareus, David, 1548-1622. Theologicall miscellanies.; A. R.	1645 (1645)	Wing U142; ESTC R5982	1,344,322	1,128

that the worshipping of them be avoided But we are to uphold the contrary namely that the images and pictures of God or the Saints are not to be tolerated in Christian Churches but utterly to be abolished and removed from the sight of men whether they be worshipped or no. Eight causes of suppressing images in Christian Churches 3. Why images and pictures are to be abolished in Christian Churches THe chiefe causes for which images and pictures are to be abandoned our Churches are The express cōmandement of God is that they should not bee made at all Because that images should be made and set up in Christian Churches it is quite contrary to the expresse commandement of God Thou shalt not make to thy selfe any graven image nor the likenesse of any thing c. And whereas God will have no images made whereby to represent him or at which to worship him in like manner will he not have them retained or kept which are made by others They are instrumēts of Idolatry Because in time of Popery they were the occasion and instruments of horrible Idolatry They are commanded to be abolished if they be made Exod. 23.24 and 34.13 Num. 33.52 Deut. 7.5 Because God precisely commanded all Idols to be abolished and all the corruptions of the true worship of God and of the true doctrine to testifie his wrath and anger against Idolatry The profession of sincere religion so requireth Deut. 7.5 6. 1 John 5.21 In respect of our confession of the sincere worship of God and of our hatred against Idolatry This confession whereby we professe our selves not to be Idolaters consisteth not onely in words but also in actions and in outward shewes and signes Yee shall overthrow their Altars and breake downe their pillars and yee shall cu● downe their groves and burne their graven images with fire For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God Fly Idols namely in heart profession and signes The example of zealous godly Princes herein 1 King 15.13 a King 10.30 18.4 13. Because for the taking away and abolishing of Idols certaine zealous and godly Kings are praised in the Scripture as Asa Jehu Ezekias Josias To avoide offence superstition and Idolatry among our selves For avoiding of offence and perill of superstition and Idolatry lest by retaining of ancient images or by substituting and adding new the same danger come to the Church and to the ignorant people thereby which in times past we see to have issued hence on our Progenitors and Ancestors To avoid the offence of the Jews and other enemies of Christianity That the enemies of the Church by this spectacle having so great a shew of Idolatry be not the more alienated from the Church so that they despite and reproach therefore the truth of God Of this danger God himselfe fore-warneth us in that dreadfull judgement on the Israelites for sparing the Canaanites Judges 2.3 Wherefore I say also I will not cast them out before you but they shall be as thornes unto your sides and their gods shall be your destruction So verily the Jews at this day because they see Images and Pictures in the Churches of those that professe Christianity are greatly offended in so much that they prove the more averse from Christianity Their evill successe who of ancient maintained Images We see that Images never brought any good to them which had them but even Gods owne people was for the most part seduced thereby as we may see often in the sacred Story especially in the booke of Judges and in the Kings and in the Prophets So prone and ready is our nature unto this evill which hath after ensuing it most grievous punishments as those which the Lord reciteth by Moses Levit. 26.30 besides many others I will destroy saith he your high places and cut away your Images and cast your carcasses upon the bodies of of your Idols and my soule shall abhorre you In like manner also the Angel of the Lord upbraiding the Israelites that they had made a league with the Idolatrous Cananites Judges 2.3 saith Wherefore I will not cast them out before you but they shall be as thornes unto your sides and their gods shall be your destruction For these causes pictures and Images may not be tolerated in Christian Churches but must be taken downe and abolished yea though they be not worshipped 4. How and by whom Images are to be abolished Two things to be observed in abolishing Images IN abolishing and banishing Images two things are diligently to be observed The preaching of Gods true worship before their abolishment That the doctrine concerning the true worship of God be preached before the abolishing of Idols So we reade that Josias did who first commanded Gods Law to be read before all the people and afterward proceeded to the execution of it I meane the suppression and deposition of all Idolatrous abominations For a change in externall matters without declaration and understanding of the causes for which the change must goe on 2 King 23.2 either maketh them Hypocrites or alienateth and changeth their minds and affections from them who are authors of the change Let the word therefore goe before and the Idols will fall to the ground The abolishment must be executed not by private men but by publique authority The Images and the seats of Images their Altars and the like instruments of Idolatry must be taken away not by private men but by publique Authority whether of Magistrates or of the people it the right of Empire and Soveraignty belong unto them and in those places where the Church hath chiefe rule and dominion For so hath God commanded the Israelites and so we reade that the Israelites and their godly Kings put in practice and so also Paul Acts 17.8 being but a private man seeing and disliking the Idols of the Athenians Ephesians and others did not yet himselfe pull them downe and abolish them nor exhort Christians to pull them downe but onely to avoid them because indeed neither himselfe was a Magistrate neither had the Church there the sway and soveraigne authority 1 Cor. 5.12 13. and in this case he giveth this rule What have I to do to judge them also which are without Doe ye not judge them that are within But God judgeth them that are without Object 1. The books of lay-men or the unlearned are profitable and therefore to be retained in Churches Images are the books of the unlearned Therefore they are profitable and may be retained in Churches Answ 1. Such books of lay-men are profitable as are delivered unto them by God But Images are forbidden them by God 2. The Minor is false Habac. 2.18 Zach. 10.2 For the Prophets teach far otherwise as An Image is a teacher of lyes The Idols have spoken vanity Whence we may thus reason We ought not to speake vaine things or

it by an order changeable some by an unchangeable order and therefore in respect of some it is contingent and in respect of some necessary For as the originals or causes of contingency in things are that liberty which is in the will of God and Angels and Men and the mutable nature of the matter of the elements together with the readinesse or inclination thereof to divers motions and formes so the cause of absolute necessity in God is the very unchangeable nature of God but the cause of that necessity which is only by consequent is the divine providence or decree coming between those things which are in their owne nature mutable and also the nature of things created which is framed and ordained of God to certaine effects and yet subject to the most free will and government of God either according or besides or contrary to this order which himselfe hath made In respect therefore of second causes some things are necessary which are done by causes alwaies working after one sort as the motion of the Sun the burning of any matter put into the fire if it be capable of burning some things are contingent which have causes working contingently that is apt and fit to produce or to forbeare producing divers and contrary effects as the blasts of windes the locall motions of living creatures the actions of mens wils But in respect of the first cause that is of the will of God all things which are or are done in Gods externall or outward workes are partly necessary partly contingent Necessary as even those things which have second causes most changeable as that the bones of Christ on the Crosse were not broken by the Souldiers by reason of the unchangeablenesse or the decree and providence of God Contingent by reason of the liberty of his eternall and unchangeable decree and the execution thereof even those things which as concerning their own nature have second causes most unchangeable as the motion of the Sun and shadowes If therefore by contingency they meane the changeablenesse of effects What contingency is denied which they have by the natures of second causes or by the power and liberty of God it doth not follow that things are contingent because of that necessity which they have by the providence of God For this doth not take away but preserveth rather the nature order and manner of working in second causes ordained by God But if by contingency they meane the changeablenesse of second causes and effects so floating and wavering that they are not ruled and governed by Gods providence any such contingency the Scripture doth not admit or approve Whether the motions of a creature are contingent or necessary Hereby we also understand When it is demanded concerning the motions and effects of creatures whether they are to be termed necessary or contingent that some verily are more rightly and properly called contingent than necessary though both contingent and necessary are wrought by divine providence For they are rather to be called such as they are of their own nature and by the nature of their neerest causes than as they are in respect of Gods providence which is a cause more removed and farther off And nothing is more either certain or manifest than that according to the nature of second causes some things should be changeable some unchangeable yet by the power of God though all things in the creatures may be changed they are made notwithstanding unchangeable because of the certainty of his decree and divine providence So likewise we answer concerning fortune and chance What fortune and chance is denied For if by these names be understood such causes or events by accident as have no cause which is proper and by it selfe a cause they ought to be far abandoned from the Church of Christ But if wee understand thereby a cause which is by it selfe a cause and proper though unknowne to our senses and reason or such causes by accident which have notwithstanding some secret proper cause adjoyned nothing hindereth in respect of second causes which are causes by accident and in respect of our judgment whereby we attain not to the proper and that which is by it selfe the cause of these events that to be or to be a thing fortuning or done by chance which in respect of Gods providence cometh to passe by his most accurate and unchangeable counsell and decree according to those sayings Mat. 10.29 Pro. 16.33 One Sparrow shall not fall on the ground without your Father And The lot is cast into the lap c. The fifth Sophisme of the inutility or unprofitablenesse of means God is effectuall in working by means which himself hath freely ordained THat which shall be unchangeably and necessarily by the will and providence of God in vain to the furthering or hindering of that are means applyed as the use of the ministery the magistrates lawes exhortations promises threatnings punishments prayer our study and endeavours But all things are done by the decree of God unchangeably neither can they which work by the providence of God work otherwise then they doe Therefore all those means are vain and fruitlesse Answ It is not necessary that the first and principall cause being put the second and instrumentall cause should be removed and taken away In vain are second causes and means applyed if God had determined to execute his decrees without means neither had commanded us to use them But seeing God hath decreed by those means in some to work faith and conversion some to bridle and keep under means and some to leave excuselesse and hath for that cause commanded us to use them they are not in vain used and applyed yea when there cometh no profit by these yet they profit to this that they leave the wicked without excuse As therefore the Sun doth not in vain daily rise and set neither are the fields in vain sowed and watered with the rain neither bodies in vain with food refreshed though God createth light and darknesse bringeth forth the corn out of the earth and is the life and length of our dayes so neither are men in vain taught or do study to conform their life unto doctrine though all available actions and events proceed only from God for God from everlasting decreed as the ends so the means also and prescribed them unto us whereby it seemed good to him to bring us unto them Wherefore we using those means doe well Three causes why we must use means and obtain profitable and fruitfull events but if wee neglect them either by our fault we deprive our selves or others of those blessings offered by God or if God even in this contempt of his word have mercy on us or others yet our conscience accuseth us of open and grievous sin Wherefore we must use means 1. That wee may obey God therein who both hath decreed ends and ordained means to those ends and prescribed them unto us neither tempt

the substance of bread and wine is quite abolished and the accidents onely remaine 7. The end of the Supper is the confirmation of faith in Christ and his one onely sacrifice The end of the Masse is a confirmation of that opinion of workes meritorious for their very working and performance and a deniall of Christs sacrifice 8. The Supper teacheth us that Christ is to be adored above in heaven The Masse-mongers adore him under the formes of bread and wine These differences prove that the Popish Masse in the foundation and ground thereof is nothing else but a deniall of CHRISTS onely sacrifice and an horrible Idolatry They further point out unto us many causes for which the Popish Masse ought to be suppressed abolished and abandoned far out of the Church Nine causes why the Masse is to be abolished of which are these here expressed 1. The Popish Masse is a manifold corrupting or rather abolishing of the whole rite instituted by Christ For it taketh away the cup from the people and admitteth many childish toyes unknowne to the Apostles and never practised by religious antiquity when as notwithstanding no creature hath any power to institute any Sacraments or to change and abolish the constitutions and ordinances of God 2. The Masse taketh away the signe and Sacrament it selfe because it transformeth the signe into the thing signified For it denieth that there is any bread and graine remaining but saith it is the flesh and bloud of Christ substantially which is flat repugnant to the nature of a Sacrament which admitteth not that the substance of the signes be abolished nor requireth a physicall connexion of the signes and things signified and therefore no transubstantiation or corporall presence in the Supper but leadeth us unto Christ crucified and now reigning in heaven and thence communicating himselfe unto us 3. The opinion of Merit in the worke done is grounded on the Masse For the Masse-Priests feigne that the Masse is a propitiatory sacrifice which for its own worth doth merit even by the worke it selfe wrought that is through the externall right and action both for him that celebrateth and for others remission of sins Whereas even Moses sacrifices had not this property or power but the only sacrifice of the Son of God once offered for us whereunto the Lords Supper leadeth and directeth us and from which the Masse with-draweth us In what sense the Fathers call the Supper a sacrifice The Fathers indeed sometimes call a supper a Sacrifice and so it is but an Eucharisticall or thanksgiving sacrifice not a propitiatory sacrifice as the Papists dreame And the Supper verily is even that same sacrifice which Christ offered in such sort as the bread is that body which Christ gave for us but sacramentally But our Masse-Priests will have the Masse to be not the same sacrifice which Christ offered but diverse and different from it For they terme it a sacrifice without blord whereby is obtained remission of sins Therefore in very truth they deny Christs bloody sacrifice whilst they deny that Christ hath perfectly merited remission of sinnes and invent another sacrifice for the purging of sin howsoever in words they professe that they offer no other sacrifice then that which Christ offered For it is one thing for the same sacrifice to be often offered which cannot be verified of Christs sacrifice and another thing for one sacrifice to be once offered and that sufficient to take away all sins which the Scripture affirmeth of Christs sacrifice For these speeches are contradictory This sacrifice alone is sufficient for remission of sins and This sacrifice with others is offered for sins 4. In this errour another lurketh whereas they beare us in hand that by their Masses they are able to obtaine remission of sins and redemption of soules for such as are absent dead or in Purgatory though Gods word contrariwise reach that we shall be cloathed in heaven if we be found cloathed and not naked on earth and that we shall be judged as we are found in our departure out of this life Cont. Demet. For saith Cyprian When we are once deceased and have departed this life there is no place for repentance no effect of satisfaction here life is either lost or gained here we procure eternall salvation by our worship of God and fruit of faith 5. Hereof also is hatched another fancy seeing they feigne that by that worke of offering the sacrifice in the Masse they do not only merit remission of sins but other benefits also as healing of sick men sheep horses oxen swine c. Wherefore they feigne that in the Masse corporall blessings and different in kinde from those which are promised in the Gospel and sealed by the Sacraments are imparted unto them 6. The Masse is repugnant to Christs Priest-hood because he is the onely High Priest who hath power to offer himselfe The Pope with his companions most impudently pulleth this honour to himself For these deceivers and lying men feigne with great contumely and despite to Christ that they offer againe Christ unto the Father and that they alone are worthy men to offer Christ unto his Father when yet no man no Angel neither any creature is of that dignity and worthinesse as that he may sacrifice the Sonne of God For the Priest is above the sacrifice they therefore who will be the Priests to offer Christ mount and lift themselves above him Object The Priests slay not but offer only and present the Son unto the Father that for his sake he may remit us our sinnes and so they only apply that one and only sacrifice of Christ Ans It is enough that they say that they offer Christ with their hands For it remaineth that they make themselves Priests and so place themselves above Christ the Son of God Neither is it materiall that they deny that they slay Christ Many things were offered of old by the Priests which were not slain neither were of that quality but were only offered as cakes and liquid offerings and burnt offerings and other such like The Jewes indeed slew Christ but it cannot thence be affirmed that they did sacrifice him but Christ himselfe was willingly slaine and therefore sacrificed himselfe Christ through the eternall spirit offered himselfe without spot to God Heb 9 1● Heb. 9.28 and verily he offered himselfe once a sacrifice unto his Father for us Christ was once offered to take away the sins of many and to them that looke for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation Christ after he had offered one sacrifice for sins Heb. 10.12 A propitiatory sacrifice cannot be without bloud sitteth for ever at the right hand of God Now the Papists contrary to these manifest places of Scripture will have Christ to be often offered in the Masse For they say they sacrifice him indeed but slay him not But a propitiatory sacrifice cannot be without slaughter for Without shedding of

withall or for some dangerous kind of ornament 2. Whether all worshipping at Images be forbidden and may not in any sort be defended TO this question we make answer out of the second part of the commandement which simply forbiddeth us to impart divine honor and worship to Images and pictures not onely that which is given thereby or referred to creatures but also which is referred to the true God Thou shalt not bow downe to them nor worship them Object 1. We worship not the Images say the Papists but God of whom those are signes and tokens according to those versicles of the second Nicene Councel That which the Image sheweth is God the Image it selfe is not God Look on the Image but worship in thine heart that which thou beholdest therein and according to those of Thomas Whensoever thou passest by the Image of Christ see thou doe obeisance yet worship not the Image but worship that which the Image representeth Answ 1. We deny that Images are signes of God because God cannot be truely signified by them seeing he is immense and though he could yet he ought not because he hath expressely forbidden them and because it is not in the power of any creature to ordaine or establish any signes whereby to signifie God but onely in the will and pleasure of God Answ 2. In this argument our adversaries tender and alledge unto us a false and needlesse cause For not onely the worshipping of Images is the cause and forme of Idolatry but even the very worship of God also which is given to Images or other creatures besides or contrary to his word 1 Kings 12.28 Exod. 32.5 as the story of Aarons and Jeroboams calves doth sufficiently declare For though these men said Behold O Israel thy gods which brought thee up c. To morrow shall be the holy day of the Lord yet God both detested and severely punished those worships as horrible and abominable Idolatry Wherefore howsoever Idolaters pretend the name and honour of God yet in Idols not God but the Devill is worshipped according as Paul testifieth of the Gentiles 1 Cor. 10.12 These things which the Gentiles sacrifice to Idols they sacrifice c. though even they also in their worshippings pretended the name and honour of God Object 2. The honour which is given unto the signe is the honour of the thing signified Images are a signe of God Therefore the honour which is given unto Images is also given unto God Answ We againe deny the Minor or distinguish of the Major thus The honour of the signe is also the honour of the thing signified namely when the signe is a true signe that is ordained by him who hath authority to ordaine it and when also that honour is given to the signe which the right and lawfull author of it will have done to the signe For not the will of him that honoureth but of him that is honoured is the rule which must prescribe the due honour Now whereas God hath forbidden both these namely that Images should be erected to him and that himselfe should be honoured at Images erected to him or to any creatures he is not honoured but contumeliously wronged and reproached when any honour done to images is fastned on him Repl. Whatsoever contumely is done to the signe that redoundeth on God although the signe be not instituted by his commandement Therefore the honour also that is given to the signe redoundeth on God although that honour be not commanded to be given to the signe Answ This reason doth not follow because then are contrary things rightly attributed to contraries when the contrariety of the attributes dependeth of that according to which the subject is opposed and not of some other thing So we grant that contumely against God followeth indeed the contumely against the signe albeit the signe were not instituted by God but not simply in respect of the signe it selfe unto which that contumely was done but in respect of his corrupt and bad will who by shewing contumely against the sinne which is thought to represent God purposeth himselfe and is minded to despite with contumely and reproach God himselfe For to the shewing of despite and contumely against God it sufficeth if there be any intent or purpose of departing from his commandement But if through a desire that we have to avoide Idolatry we detest Images and other false reputed signes of God by this contumely done to the signes we rather promote further and advance Gods glory But the honour of God doth not follow the honour of the signe except both the honour and the signe be ordained by God because it is not the intent and purpose of honouring God that sufficeth to the doing of honour unto God but the manner also which himselfe hath prescribed whereby to be honoured is required and must be observed Object 3. It is lawfull to honour the Images of noble renowned and well-deserving men Therefore much more is it lawfull to honour the Images of blessed Angels and Saints Ans 1. To the Antecedent we answer That honour of monuments is lawfull which is a gratefull and honourable memory of those whose monuments they are and also that which is applyed to the use which themselves would justly have it and not to the worship of them or to the worship of God by their monuments yea and the defacing and utter razing of those monuments if necessity require such a change so it be done without any will or desire of despighting or dishonouring them whose monuments they are is also lawfull But by no meanes may we attribute divine honour unto them such as that is which these Papists yeeld unto their Idols whether they cloak it with the name of adoration and worship or veneration and service 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. The images or monuments of notable men must be such as have not been drawne into Idolatry for if so we are not to honour them but to suppresse them altogether after the example of the brasen Serpent which Ezekias brake in peeces 2 Kings 18.4 Num. 11.8 9. when it was abused to Iolatry though in former times it were kept as a monument of Gods goodnesse shewed in the wildernesse in healing by the aspect or beholding of it them that were bitten with the fiery Serpents Quest 98. But may not Images be tolerated in Churches which may serve for the use of the common people Answ No. For it is not seemly that we should be wiser then God who will have his Church to be taught with the lively preaching of his word a Rom. 1.17 2 Pet. 1.19 2 Tim. 3.16 17. and not with dumb images b Jer. 10.8 c. Hab. 2.18 19. The Explication THis is their demand who grant that indeed the picture and images of God and Saints are not to be adored but maintaine that they are to be retained in Christian Churches as the books of lay-men and for other causes also so