the man Christ Iesus not excepted This conclusion followeth immediately out of three positions generally held and stifly maintained by that Church The first that the Pope liue hee as hee list cannot erre in matters of faith and manners when hee speaketh ex Cathedra that we are bound infallibly to belieue whatsoeuer he so speakes without examination of his doctrine by Gods word or euident externall signe or internall experiment of Gods spirit speaking in him The second that wee cannot assure our selues the Scriptures are the Oracles of God but by the infallible testimony of the Visible Church The third that the true sense and meaning of Scriptures in cases doubtfull or controuersed cannot be vndoubtedly known without the infallible declaration of the same Church CHAP. I. What restraint precepts for obedience vnto the Priests of the Law though seeming most vniuersall for their forme did necessarily admit And how vniuersall Propositions of Scriptures are to be limited 1 SEing wee vndertake to proue that no such authority as the Romish Church doth challenge was euer established on earth The answering of those arguments drawne from the authority of the Priestes in the olde Testament may to the iudicious seeme at the first sight needlesse yet because such as they set the fairest glosses vpon if wee looke into the inside or substance are fullest fraught with their owne disgrace and ignominy It will not be superfluous to acquaint the Reader with some particulars prefixing some generall admonitions to the yonger sort for more commodious answering of all that can be brought of like kind 2 Their common places of consening the world especially smatterers of Logicke or schoole learning with counterfeit proofes of Scripture is either from some vniuersall precept of obedience to the people or generall promises of infallibility made to the Priests in the old Testament Such as come vnto the Scriptures hauing their mind dazled with notions of vniuersale primum or other Logicke rules true in some cases thinke the formerprecepts being for their forme vniuersall may admit no exception limitation or restraint otherwise the holy Ghost might breake the rule of Logicke when as they admit many restraints nor alwayes from one but ofttimes from diuerse reasons from these following especially God sometimes inioynes obedience as wee say in the abstract to set vs a patterne of such true accurate obedience as men should performe vnto authority it selfe or vnto such gouernours as neither in their liues nor in the seat of iudgement would decline either to the right hand or to the left but square all their proceedings to the exact rule of Gods word Vnto such gouernours continuall and compleat obedience was to bee performed because the parties gouerned vpon examination should alwayes finde them iumpe with the law of God vnto which absolute obedience as hath beene shewed is due Nor doth the word of God in setting out such exact obedience lie open to that exception which Polititians take against Philosophers as if it as Philosophers doe did giue instructions onely for happy men of Aristotles making or for the Stoickes wise men who can no where bee found but in Platoes common-wealth whose Metropolis is the Region of Eutopia For the ancient Israel of God had this prerogatiue aboue al the nations of the earth that their Priests lips whilest they themselues were clothed with righteousnesse and bare holinesse vnto the Lord in their breasts should still preserue knowledge and bee able to manifest the will of God vnto the people not onely by interpreting the generall written law but by reuelations concerning particular facts of principall moment as may bee gathered from that law Also thou shalt put in the breast plate of iudgement the Vrim and the Thummim which shall be vpon Aarons heart when hee goeth in before the Lord And Aaron shall beare the iudgement of the children of Israel vpon his heart before the Lord continually 3 To omit the various interpretations and diuers opinions of this brest-plates vse why it was called the breast plate of iudgement Iosephus and Suidas in my mind come neerest the truth That the Reuelation by it was extraordinary that Gods presence or iuridicall approbation of doubts proposed was represented vpon the pretious stones that were set therein is probable partly from the aptnesse of it to allure the Israelites vnto Idolatry partly from that formality which the Egyptians in imitation of the Ephods ancient vse amongst the Iewes retained long after in declaration of the truth in Iudgement For Diodorus tels vs that the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or chiefe Iudge in that famous and venerable Egyptian high Court or Parliament did weare about his necke in a golden chaine Insigne a tablet of pretious stone or if the Reader bee disposed to correct the translator 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which they called as the Septuagint did Aarons breast-plate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 on which hee stedfastly looked while matters were debating as Suidas saith the High Priest did on his breast plate whilest they asked counsell of God and whilest hee gaue sentence turned it vnto the beter cause exhibited as the fashion was in that Court in writing in signe the truth it selfe did speake for it that the Vrim or Thummim were more then an Embleme yea an Oracle of iustice and right iudgement is apparant out of Scripture When Ioshua was consecrated to bee Israels chiefe gouernour in Moses stead he was to stand before Eleazar the Priest ordained to aske counsell for him by the iudgement of Vrim before the Lord So did Abiathar certifie Dauid of Sauls malitious resolution against him and the Lords of Keylahs treachery if hee should trust vnto them So againe Dauid is assured of victory by the iudgement of Vrim and I Thummim if he would follow the Amalakites that had burnt Ziglag 4 Such Priestes as these were to bee absolutely obeyed in answeres thus giuen from the mouth of God And it is most probable that the parties whom these answeres did concern had perfect notice of the Reuelation made to the Priests howsoeuer the truths of such answeres being confirmed by experiment in those dayes they were to vndertake what the Priests appointed and to obey his aduice at least by cautelous obedience vntill the euent did proue the truth But neither was this certaine manifestation of Gods will so absolutely promised vnto the Priests but not liuing according vnto the direction of Gods law hee might faile in his Oracles Nor was this peoples prerogatiue aboue others without all limit that if they liued no better then others did they should as often as they asked counsell of God infallibly know whether the answere were from him or no albeit there were no defect in the Priest For this reason the Lord answered not Saul when hee asked counsell of him neither by dreames nor by visions nor by Vrim nor by the Prophets for Saul was now cast off by God not willing to vouchsafe
to doe according to all that they informe thee According to the Law which they shall teach thee and according to the iudgement which they shall tell thee shalt thou doe thou shalt not decline from the thing which they shall shew thee neither to the right hand nor to the left And that man that will doe presumptuously not hearkning vnto the Priest that standeth before the Lord thy God to minister there or vnto the Iudge that man shall die and thou shalt take away euill from Israel so all the people shall heare and feare and doe no more presumptuously 2 This precept admits of many restrictions any one of which doth take away all the force of our aduersaries obiections First it may without preiudice to our cause bee granted although it cannot out of these words bee necessarily inferred that God here prescribes obedience in the abstract such as was to bee performed vnto those Priests and Iudges that liued according to that patterne which hee had set them Thus may this precept of obedience for the extent be vniuersall and concern all causes whatsoeuer spirituall or temporall doubts of conscience or matters of this life in all which such gouernours wereto bee obeyed but conditionally if they were such as God in his law required they should be vnto such as you heard before hee gaue illuminations extraordinary such as the parties that were to obey might haue perfect notice of But how great soeuer the extent of this precept be not one fyllable in it makes more for absolute obedience vnto spirituall then vnto ciuill gouernors for it is said indefinitely thou shalt doe according to that thing which they eyther spirituall or temporall of that place which the Lord hath chosen shall shew thee And againe the words are disâ—unctiue That man that will doe presumptuously not hearkening vnto the Priest or vnto the Iudge that man shall die whether the Priest were to be supreme Iudge or no it is not said at the least the High Priest was not the chiefe man alwayes in the Councell for hee was not alwayes admitted into the supreme Consistory or Sanhedrim which is established in this place yet Bellarmine will haue the b definitiue sentence belong vnto the Priest and the execution of it to the ciuill magistrate so indeed the present Romish Church in spirituall cases would bee iudge and make Christian Princes her hangmen but their practise must not be taken for an infallible exposition of that Law whence they seeke to iustifie their practise quite contrary to the practise of the Iewish Church and Synagogue Nor doth Bellarmine or any other beside the base parasiticall Canonists or the Popes trencher chaplaines deny but that in many ciuill causes the Prince or temporall Magistrate hath a definitiue sentence can hee then gather out of any circumstance of this place that onely spirituall causes are here meant nay hee confesseth that the law is generall concerning all doubtes that might arise out of the law yea it is most probable that it onely concernes ciuill controuersies and Bellarmines reason to proue that it includeth spirituall causes or matters of religion is most idle The occasion of this Law saith hee was for them that did serue other Gods as appeares out of the beginning of the Chapter now the seruice of other Gods is a point of Religion But what though Moses in the former part of this Chapter speake of Idolaters must this law therefore concerne Idolaters In the former part hee speaketh onely of Idolaters but this law is not onely for them by Bellarmines confession Yea the circumstances of the place and the expresse law against Idolaters mentioned before euince that in this Chapter as in the former he first sets downe lawes concerning the true seruice of God and in the latteâ— part giues precepts for the obseruation of the second Table the maintaining of loue by the finall composition of all controuersies that might arise betwixt neighbours In the former law Idolaters are sentenced to death and Idolatry saith Bellarmine is a point of Religion Was the Priest alone then to giue sentence and the ciuill Magistrate onely to execute it There is not the least pretence for it out of this Text. Any ordinary Magistrate might execute him that was lawfully conuicted of this crime nor was it so hard a matter to iudge who was an Idolater amongst the Iewes as it is to determine what is an heresie amongst the Romanists This was to be proued by witnesses not by Logicall proofe or force of speculatiue reason Had the cunningest Iesuite in the world been taken amongst them kneeling down before an Image and praying to it all the distinctions in the master of sentences or Aquinas or both their Commentators could not haue redeemed him against two honest men that would haue sworne hee would haue done thus much there had beene no appeale from any City in Iudah vnto any higher Court his doome had been read in the gates and without them hee should as Homer speakes haue put on a stony coat 3 That the Kings of Iudah were only to execute the Priests definitiue sentence in all hard controuersies is a positioÌ„ wel deseruing execution without appeale at Princes hands And no doubt but it did so amongst the Iewes The former Court as is most probable was to cease when they had a King amongst them And Moses in the former Chapter after he had giuen the other law for ending controuersies giues the law for the election of their king if so bee they would haue one as if the former Court had then ceased to bee the supreme Tribunall seeing all Subiects might appeale vnto the King from it in which this Soueraignty did before reside as being the supreme Tribunall whence there could be no appeale 4 The King in the Law concerning his qualification is commanded to haue the Law of his God written out And it shall bee with him and he shall read therein all the dayes of his life that hee may learne to feare the Lord his God and to keepe all the words of his Law and these Ordinances for to doe them that his heart bee not lifted vp aboue his brethren and that he turne not from the commandement to the right hand or to the left Was hee to take all this pains onely that hee might learne to execute the Priestes definitiue sentence This any heathen might haue done But the Kings of Israel albeit they were not to meddle in the execution of the Priests office were notwithstanding to bee so well skilled in Scriptures as to bee able to iudge whether the Priest did according to that Law which God had set him to follow and to controle his definitiue sentence if it were euidently contrary to Gods word which both were absolutely bound to obey 5 It may perhaps here be obiected that the King had no such assurance of infallibility in iudgement as the Priest had therefore it was requisite he should rely vpon the
had that Lycurgus lawes were from Apollo Yet is it here further to be considered that the Israelites might with farre lesse danger haue admitted Moses lawes then wee may the Popes without any examination for diuine seeing there was no written law of God extant before his time whereby his writings were to bee tryed No such charge had been giuen this people as he giues most expresly to this purpose Now therefore hearken O Israel vnto the ordinances and to the Lawes which I teach you to doe that yee may liue and goe in and possesse the land which the Lord God of your fathers giueth you Yee shall put nothing vnto the word which I command you neither shall yee take ought there from that yee may keepe the commandements of the Lord your God which I command you But was the motiue or argument by which hee sought to establish their beliefe or assent vnto these commandements his owne infallible authoritie no but their owne experience of their truth as it followeth Your eyes haue seene what the Lord did because of Baal-Peor For all the men that followed Baal Peor the Lord thy God hath destroyed euerie one from among you but yee that did cleaue vnto the Lord your God are aliue euery one of you this day so gracious and mercifull is our God vnto mankind and so farre from exacting this blind obedience which the Pope doth chalenge that hee would haue his written word established in the fresh memory of his mighty wonders wrought vpon Pharaoh and all his host The experiment of their deliuerance by Moses had beene a strong motiue to haue perswaded them to admit of his doctrine for infallible or at the least to haue beleeued him in his particular promises When the snares of death had compassed them about on euery side they see no way but one or rather two ineuitable wayes to present death and destruction the red sea before them and a mighty host of bloud behind them the one seruing as a glasse to represent the cruelty of the other they as who in their case would not cry out for feare He that could haue foretold their strange deliuerance from this eminent danger might haue gotten the opinion of a God amongst the Heathen yet Moses confidently promiseth them euen in the middest of this perplexity the vtter destruction of the destroyer whom they feared Feare yee not stand still and behold the saluation of the Lord which he will shew to you this day for the Egyptians whom you haue seene this day you shall neuer see againe The Lord shall fight for you therefore hold you your peace Notwithstanding all this Moses neuer enacts this absolute obedience to be belieued in all that euer he shall say or speake vnto them without farther examination or euident experiment of his doctrine For God requires not this of any man no not of those to whome hee spake face to face alwayes ready to feed such as call vpon him with infallible signes and pledges of the truth of his promises For this reason the waters of Marah are sweetned at Moses prayer And God vpon this new experiment of his power and goodnes takes occasion to reestablish his former couenant vsing this semblable euent as a further earnest of his sweet promises to them If thou wilt diligently hearken O Israel vnto the voice of the Lord thy God and wilt doe that which is right in his sight and wilt giue eare vnto his commandements and keepe all his ordinances then will I put none of these diseases vpon thee which I brought vpon the Egyptians for I am the Lord that healeth thee As if hee had said This healing of the bitter waters shall bee a token to thee of my power in healing thee Yet for all this they distrust Gods promises for their foode as it followeth cap 16. Nor doth Moses seeke to force their assent by fearefull anathemaes or sudden destruction but of some principall offenders herein For God will not haue true faith thunderblasted in the tender blade but rather nourished by continuance of such sweet experiments for this reason he shewers down Manna from heauen I haue heard the murmuring of the children of Israel tell them therefore and say At euening ye shall eat flesh and in the morning you shall be filled with bread and yee shall know that I am the Lord your God For besides the miraculous manner of prouiding both Quailes and Manna for them the manner of nourishment by Manna did witnesse the truth of Gods word vnto them They had been vsed to grosse and solid meates such as did fil their stomackes and distend their bellies whereas Manna was in substance slender but gaue strength and vigour to their bodies and serued as an embleme of their spirituall food which being inuisible yet gaue life more excellently then these grosse and solid matters did So saith Moses Therefore hee humbled thee and made thee hungry and fed thee with Manna which thou knewest not neither did thy Fathers know it that he might teach thee that man liueth not by bread onely but by euery word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the Lord. 6 Yet in their distresse so fraile is our faith vntill it be strengthned by continuall experiments they doubt and tempt the Lord saying Is the Lord amongst vs or no Nor doth Moses interpose his infallible authority or charge them to belieue him against their experience of their present thirst vnder pain of eternall damnation or sufferance of greater thirst in hell such threates without better instruction in Gods word and the comfort of his spirit may bring distrusts or doubts to vtter despaire and cause faith to wither where it was wel nigh ripe they neuer ripen strengthē any true and liuely faith Moses himselfe is faine to crie vnto the Lord saying What shall I doe vnto this people for thy be almost readie to stone me As the Papists would doe to the Pope were hee to conduct them through the wildernesse in such extremity of thirst able to giue them no better assurance of his fauor with God then his Anathemaes or feed them onely with his Court-holy-water or blessings of mind But euen here againe God feedes Israels faith with waters issuing out of the rocke making themselues eye-witnesses of all his wonders that so they might belieue his wordes and promises nay himselfe from their owne sense and feeling of his goodnesse and truth of his word 7 Though no Law-giuer or Gouernour whether temporal or spirituall especially whose calling was but ordinary could possibly before or since so well deserue of the people committed to his guidance as this great General already had done of al the host of Israel were they vpon this consideration forthwith to belieue whatsoeuer hee should auouch without further examination signe or token of his fauour with God without assured experience or at the least more then probable presumptions of his
there any thing too hard for me The Lord had stricken Iacob with the wound of an enemy and with a sharpe chastice meÌ„â— for the multitude of his iniquities wherefore hee cryed for his affliction and said My sorrow is incurable not considering who it was had done all this vnto him for because the Lord had killed they must belieue hee would make aliue againe Their present wounds inflicted contrary to the rules of politique defence where the best pledges of their future health beyond all hope of State-Surgeons And this is the very Sâ—ale of Ieremiahs assurance from the Lords own mouth Thus sayeth the Lord like as I haue brought all this great plague vpon this people so will I bring vpon them all the good I haue promised them And the fields shall be possessed in this land whereof ye say It is desolate without man or beast and shall be giuen into the hand of the Caldeans Men shall buy fields for siluer and make writings and seale them and take witnesses in the land of Beniamin and round about Ierusalem So absolute and all-sufficient was Moses law in particular actions much more in generall or doctrinall resolution that God himselfe for confirmation of his Prophets this distrustfull peoples faith in a point by humane estimate most incredible thought it sufficient to be a remembrance to the Law-giuer For the Lord here saith to Ieremiah concerning this particular Moses many generations before had vniuersally foretold Now when all these things shall come vpon thee either the blessing or the curse which I haue set before thee and thou shalt turne into thine hart among all the nations whither the Lord thy God hath driuen thee then the Lord thy God will cause thy Captiues to returne and haue compassion vpon thee and will returne to gather thee out of all the people where the Lord thy God had scattered thee Though thou wâ—rst cast vnto the vttermost part of heauen from thence will the Lord thy God gather thee and from thence will he take thee And the Lord thy God will bring thee into the land which thy fathers possessed and thou shalt possesse it and he will shew thee fauour and will multiply thee aboue thy fathers By this rule of Moses according to the prediction of Ieremiah doth Nehemiah afterwards frame his prayers to God direct his enterprise for restauration of Ierusalem Wee haue grieuously sinned against thee and haue not kept the commandements nor the statutes nor the iudgements which thou commandest thy seruant Moses I beseech thee remember the word that thou commandest thy seruant Moses saying Ye will transgresse and I will scatter you abroad among the people But if yee turne vnto me and keepe my commandements and doe them though your scattering were to the vttermost part of the heauen yet will I gather you from thence and will bring you vnto the place that I haue chosen to place my Name there Now these are thy seruants and thy people c. O Lord I beseech thee let thine eare now hearken to the praier of thy seruants who desire to feare thy name and I pray thee cause thy seruant to prosper this day and giue him fauour in the presence of this man He saw the truth of Moses diuine predictioÌ„ confirmed by the Kings present grant of his petition speedy restauration of Ierusalem albeit a Prophet by profession had disswaded the enterprise as likely to proue dangerous to his person CHAP. VIII That the societie or visible Company of Prophets had no such absolute authority as the Romish Church vsurpes 1 DId the Records of antiquity afford vs any the least presumption to thinke that absolute beliefe or obedience might safely be tendered by inferiors as due to any visible Company of men without examination of their proposals by Moses writings since they were extant the society of Prophets in all respects the Romanists can pretend had the most probable title to this prerogatiue Their professioÌ„ or calling was publike and lawfull their distinction from all others eminent their persons and places of residence visible and knowne their promises for enioying the extraordinary presence or illuminations of Gods spirit peculiar many of them venerable for their integrity in ciuill dealings and sanctity of priuate life some of them endued with the gift of miracles In all these and many like considerations that fraternity or collegiate society might iustly haue pleaded all the priuiledges a publike spirit can grant to one sort of men before others For if the more or lesse expresse testimony of Gods word for extraordinary assistance of his spirit or the different measure of his illumination or manner of immediate teaching be that which makes som mens spirit more publike then their brethrens this difference was greater betweene the Priests or Prophets and people of old then since God spake vnto the world by his sonne yet what Prophet did once intimate the necessity of his proposall for notifying the truth of Scriptures What one did euer bewray the least desire to haue his interpretations of them vniuersally held authentique or his particular predictions absolutely assented vnto without further triall then his bare assertion without examination of them by Moses doctrine already establisâ—ed 2 Had they beene the infallible Church representatiue had their assertions though giuen by ioinct consent ex Cathedra or in the most solemne manner vsed in those times beene of such authority as the Romanist would perswade vs a Councell of their Prelates lawfully assembled is Gods people had stood bound to embrace whatsoeuer a maior part of that profession had resolued vpon but this inference though necessarily following the supposed premises the Iesuit I know dare not affirme lest Ahabs bloud vntimely shed by confidence in their infallibility cry out against him Yet Bellarmine too well knowing the liquorish temper of this present age for the most part acquainted with none but table-talke Diuinity to bee such as will swallow down any doctrine bee it neuer so idle prophane or poisonous so it bee sauced with pleasant conceit and merriment would put vs of with this iest That as in Saxonie one Catholiques verdict were to be taken bâ—fore sowre hundred Lutherans so should one of the Lords Prophets haue beene followed in those times before fiue hundred of Baals And Ahab no doubt had so done had not the Diuell taught his Diuines then as hee hath done Bellarmine and his fellowes since to take vniuersality as a sure note of the Church traditions and customes of the Elders for the rule of faith and which is the vndoubted Conclusion of such premisses to follow a multitude to any mischiefe So mightily did the opinion of a maior part being all men of the same profession sway with the superstitious people of those times that Ahabs Purseuant conceiued hope of seducing Micaiah whilst they were on the way together by intimating such censures of schisme of heresie of
mans mind is sometimes more accustomed to shew more then seauen Watchmen that sit aboue in an high Tower And aboue all this pray to the most High that he will direct thy way in truth Had they thus done without partiality to their corrupt affections or without all respect of persons in which Christian faith cannot bee had Moses law had beene a lanterne vnto their feet for the discerning of true Prophets and those discerned had beene a light vnto latter ages for discerning the true Messias 6 The euidence of this truth not without cause so often inculcated will better appeare if wee consider â—ow most propheticall predictions of particular alterations were but determinations of Mosaicall generalities out of which they grow as branches out of the stocke As for example The Lord told Moses before his death and he gaue it to Israel for a song to be copied out by all That when they went a whoring after the Gods of a strange land forsaking him he would forsake them and hide his face from them After Ieâ—oiadahs death Zechariah his sonne seeing the Princes of Iudah leauing the house of the Lord to serue Groues and Idols albeit hee were moued as the Text saith by the spirit of God yet onely applies Moses generall prediction to the present times Thus saith God Why transgresse yee the commandement of the Lord Surely yee shall not prosper because yee haue forsakeu the Lord he also will forsake you Saint Paul himselfe vseth his own aduise not the Lords authority in such points as were not euidently contained in Moses law Vnto the married command not I but the Lord Let not the wife depart from her husband for so Moses had expresly commanded But to the Remnant I speake not the Lord If any brother haue a wife that belieueth not if shee be content to dwell with him let him not forsake her And againe concerning Virgins I haue no commandement of the Lord but I giue mine aduise as one that hath obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithfull This was his iudgement and as he thought warranted by the spirit of God yet hee prescribes it not as a generall rule of faith to all but rather leaues euery man to bee ruled by his conscience and the analogie of Moses law So likewise though God vse an extraordinary reuelation to instruct Saint Peter in the free vse of meates forbidden by Moses yet hee perswades him it by manifesting the true meaning of another clause of the same law for what hee vttered vpon this instruction and the experiment answerable thereto was but a further specification of what Moses had said I perceiue of a truth saith S. Peter that God is no accepter of persons Moses had said The Lord your God is God of Gods and Lord of Lords a great God mighty and terrible which accepteth no persons nor taketh reward who doth right vnto the fatherlesse and widdow and loueth the stranger giuing him sood and rayment 7 These passages sufficiently enforme vs that the extraordinary spirit wherewith the Apostles themselues were aboue the measure of Gods former messengers inspired oftimes onely made the stems whether of the tree of life or of knowledge planted by Moses to blow and flourish in them by little and little after the manner of naturall growth it did not alwayes bring forth new ones in an instant as the earth did at the first creation Much more vsually did prophesies during the standing of the first temple spring out of Mosaicall predictions If wee compare his writings with latter prophesies not long before the Babylonish captiuity though hee had departed this life before their fathers entred into the land of promise yet hee speakes vnto this last generation as an intelligencer from a farre Country that great preparation was made against them but who should bee the executioners or managers of mischiefe intended hee leaues that to such Prophets as the Lord should raise them vp for the present Ieremy and Ezechiel vpon his admonition following his direction are sent by God as it were to scowre the coast to discrie when the Nauy comes for what Coast it is bound and how neare at hand Here had the people faithfully examined their hearts by Moses law whether not guilty of such sinnes as deserued the plagues threatned by him they had quickly assented vnto Moses writings and the Prophets words For as consciousnesse of their sinnes in generall might cause them feare some plague or other indefinitely threatned by their Lawgiuer whose writings they best belieued so might the diligent obseruation of their particular transgressions and their progresse in them haue taught them to presage the determinate manner of their plagues and punishments foretold by the present Prophet For God in his vsuall course of iustice so suites his punishments to the most accustomary habits or predominant sinnes as vnto men religiously obseruant of times and seasons the growth and processe of the one will giue a certaine crisis of the other Besides euery age hath peculiar signes subordinate to the generall predictions of good or euill foretold by Gods messengers whereby the faithfull learne to know the day of their visitation and as Salomon saith to hide themselues in latibulo altissimi from the plague if not by their hearty repentance godly prayers and religious endeauors to preuent it And because wee in this age are not so well acquainted with the particular signes of former times wherein true Prophets liued it is hard for any liuing now though easie to all the faithfull then to giue any certaine or particular rule how the truth of their prophesies might haue beene at least probably knowne before the euent did finally and absolutely approue them Would to God wee could discerne the signes of times present and the Lord of his infinit mercy giue vs grace to know the day of our visitation But of this argument elsewhere by Gods assistance It shall suffice in the next place to shew that our Sauiours doctrine was by the same meanes to be discerued CHAP. X. That the Soueraignety giuen by Iesuites to the Pope is greater then our Sauiours was 1 IT is a Rule in Diuinity whatsoeuer can rightly be conceiued as an absolute perfection hath reall existence in the Almighty From this notion of the Deity swimming in the braines of such as in heart deed make the Pope their Lord God doe the parties thus affected vsually take whatsoeuer power might possibly be deligated by God to any as actually granted vnto his holinesse And thus I imagine some Iesuite or other when hee shall bethinke himselfe will except against our disputes in this present cause Deny you cannot that God can and what if hee should expresly grant such authority as the Pope now challengeth would your arguments conclude him to bee Antichrist or the doctrine we teach to be blasphemous On the contrary seeing our Sauiour Christ did neuer either practise or challenge seeing neither Moses
nor the Prophets did euer so much as once intimate such absolute power should be acknowledged in that great Prophet of whome they wrote wee suppose the imagination of the like in whomsoeuer cannot bee without reall blasphemie Yet suppose Christs infallibility and the Popes were in respect of the Church Militant the same the Popes authoritie would be greater or were their authoritie but equall his priuiledges with God would bee much more magnificent then Christs That which most condemned the Iewes of infidelity in not acknowledging Christ as sent with power full absolute from God his father were his mightie signes and wondâ—rs his admirable skill in Gods word alreadie established but chiefly his sacred life and conuersation as it were exhibiting vnto the world a visible patterne or coÌ„spicuous modell of that incomprehensible goodnesse which is infallible Now if we compare his powerfulnesse in words and workes with the Popes imperfections in both or his diuine vertues with the others monstrous vices to equalize their infallibilities were to imagine God to bee like man and Christ at the best but as his faithfull seruant the Pope his Minion his Darling or some of his age For such is our partialitie to our owne flesh that oftimes though the Wise man aduise to the contrarie a lewde and naughtie sonne in that hee is a sonne hath greater grace and priuiledges then the most faithfull seruant in the fathers house So would the Iesuites make God dote vpon the Pope whose authoritie bee his life neuer so vngracious if they should denie to bee lesse then Christs in respect of vs their practises enioyned ex Cathedra would confute them For much sooner shall any Christian though otherwise of life vnspotted be cut off from the congregation of the faithfull for denying the Popes authoritie or distrusting his decrees then the Iewes that saw Christs miracles for contradicting him in the dayes of his flesh or oppugning his Apostles after his glorification Nor bootes it ought to say they make the Popes authoritie lesse then Christs in respect they deriue it from his rather because they euidently make it greater then Christs was it cannot bee truly thence deriued or if it could this onely proues it to bee lesse then the other whilest onely compared with it not whilest wee consider both in respect of vs for Christs authoritie as the Sonne of Man in respect of vs is equall to his Fathers whence it is deriued For the Father iudgeth no man but hath committed all iudgement vnto the Sonne 2 But wherein doe they make the Popes authoritie greater then Christs First in not exempting it from triall by Christs and his Apostles doctrine neither of which were to be admitted without all examination of their truth for as you heard before Gods word was first vttered in their audience established by euident signes and wonders in their sight and presence of whom beliefe and obedience vnto particulars was exacted And it is a rule most euident and vnquestionable that Gods word once confirmed and sealed by experience was the only rule whereby all other spirits and doctrines were to bee examined that not Propheticall visions were to bee admitted into the Canon of Faith but vpon their apparent consonancie with the word alreadie written The first Prophets were to be tried by Moses the latter by Moses and their Predecessors Christs and his Apostles by Moses and all the Prophets for vnto him did all the Prophets giue testimonie The manifest experiments of his life and doctrine so fully consonant to their predictions did much confirme euen his Disciples beliefe vnto the former Canon of whose truth they neuer conceiued positue doubt 3 Againe there had beene no Prophet no signes no wonders for a long time in Iudah before our Sauiours birth yet hee neuer made that vse either of his miracles or more then Propheticall spirit which the papists make of their imaginary publike spirit he neuer vsed this or like argument to make the people relie vpon him How know yee the Scriptures are Gods word How know yee that God spake with Moses in the Wildernesse or with your Fathers in Mount Sinai Moses your Fathers and the Prophets are dead and their writings cannot speake Your present Teachers the Scribes and Pharises doe no wonders Must you not then belieue him whome daily you may behold doing such mightie workes as Moses said to haue done that Moses as your fathers haue told you was sent from God that Gods word is contayned in his writings otherwise you cannot infallibly beleeue that there was such a man indeed as you conceiue hee was much lesse that he wrote you this Law least of all can you certainely know the true meaning of what hee wrote Hee that is the onely sure foundation of faith knew that faith grounded vpon such doubts was but built vpon the sand vnable to abide the blasts of ordinarie temptations that thus to erect their hopes was but to prepare a rise to a grieuous downefall the ready way to atheisme presumption or despaire For this cause hee doth not so much as once question how they knew the Scriptures to be Gods word but supposing them knowne and fully acknowledged for such he exhorts his hearers to search them seeking to prepare their hearts by signes and wonders to embrace his admirable expositions of them And because the corruption of particular morall doctrines brought into the Church by humane tradition would not suffer the generality of Moses and the Prophets already belieued to fructifie in his hearers hearts and branch out vniformely into liuely working faith he laboured most to weede out Pharisaisme from among the heauenly seed as euery one may see that compares his sermon vpon the Mount with the Pharises glosses vpon Moses If the particular or principall parts of the law and Prophets had beene as purely taught or as clearely discerned as the generall and common principles His Doctrine that came not to destroy but to fulfill the law in words and works had shined as brightly in his hearers hearts at the first proposall as the sunne did to their eyes at the first rising For all the morall duties required by them were but as dispersed rayes or scattered beams of that diuine light and glory which was incorporate in him as splendor in the body of the sunne Nor was there any possibility the Iewes beliefe in him should prosper vnlesse it grew out of their generall assent vnto Moses doctrine thus pruned and purged at the very roote Had yee belieued Moses saith our Sauiour yee would haue belieued me for he wrote of me but if yee belieue not his writings how shall yee belieue my words For which cause they were in conscience bound to examine his doctrine by Moses and the Prophets otherwise they might haue belieued the sauing truth but falsly and vpon decitfull grounds The stronger or more absolute credence they had giuen vnto his words or workes without such examination the more
the best Oracles that people knew These faire warnings concurring with the Egyptians consciousnesse of their vnmercilesse practises against poore Israel still thriuing in despight of policie could not but witnesse euen to the most vnnaturall men amongst them that the God of Iacob and his seed was a father to the fatherlesse an help to the helpelesse a God of mercy and a God of strength willing and able to right such as suffered wrong to succour all in distresse that with faith and patience commended their cause vnto his patronage The most deuoutly superstitious or idolatrous might at the least more then probably haue gathered that the God of Moses was greater then any they or their cunning Magitians worshiped But it is a curiosity incidēt to superstitious hypocrites at their first entrāce into Gods schole scrupulously to demand full satisfaction in all doubtes or difficulties can be suggested and as if they sought to obtaine mercy by way of bargaine not by faith or fauour to haue their assurance precisely drawne and fully sealed before they surrender vp the least part of their interest in any pleasure commoditie or custome long enioyed though neuer so destitute of reason As in this case imagine some Romish Schooleman or Iesuite had been in such fauour in Pharaohs Court as that crew is now in too many Princes what other collections could wee imagine he would haue made but these How doe these wonders proue the God of Israel to be so great a God as Moses boasts of Hee hath more skill wee see in these particulars then the Gods adored by vs Egyptians therefore in all or more in these then the Gods of any other nation These were stranger works indeed then we expected such poore silly fellowes could haue wrought but may not others by the same reason work more strange hereafter And to speake the truth more that victory Moses had ouer the Egyptians could not proue vnto the naturall man so long as he considered the wonders onely in themselues without any concurrence of other circumstances or truth presupposed then that this God of Israel was greater then any other hee yet knew of not greater then any that might manifest himselfe hereafter Notwithstanding these few documents or essaies of his power compared with the end and occasions for which they were exhibited were so fully conformable to those naturall notions euen the heathen had of the Deity that no man free from passion or preiudice of their meane estate for whose good the cunningest were thus foiled at their owne weapon and the mightiest among the Egyptians plagued but might haue seene the finger of a good a iust and mercifull God in all their troubles had hee in sobrietie of spirit seriously consulted his owne heart And who so syncerely had glorified his name according to this measure of knowledge ot apprehension of his iustice to him no doubt more had beene giuen daily of this bread of life 4 The Iewes I am perswaded could haue giuen as many instances of Diuels cast out by Beelzebub the Prince of Diuels as might haue defeated any induction gathered from the manifold practise of such works considered alone to proue the diuine powers assistance Most apparently most malitious notwithstanding was their application of such instances to our Sauiour whose vsuall manner of dispossessing wicked spirits of those mansions wherein they had reuelled most did abundanrly witnesse hee wrought by the finger of God who onely was greater then that strong man whom hee vanquished bound and spoiled of his goods seruants and possessions For though Diuels sometimes suffer themselues to be commanded by men neither of greatest wisdome best place nor fashion yet this they doe as any well instructed in Gods law or illuminated with the notions of good and euill will easily discerne alwayes with purpose to bring men vnto a perpetual acknowledgement of som diuine power in them or to performance of some Magicall seruice vnto them no otherwise then cheating mates or cunning gamesters can be well content to suffer bunglers beate them the first or second set in hope to entise them holde play longer or for greater wagers On the contrary the onely fee our Sauiour demanded for all his admirable cures in this kind was the parties should giue such glory vnto God alone as that infernal crew most detested but which the law of Moses so highly esteemed by his calumniators did purposely require in defiance of Beelzebub and all the powers of darknesse The end of euery particular dispossession was such and the multitude of legall confessions sincerely vttered by poore soules set free so many as his bitterest aduersaries owne consciences could not but witnesse against themselues that all the chiefe titles of Satans wonted triumphes ouer Gods people were vtterly ouerthrowne that hee could not vrge them eyther vnto such blasphemies against God or outrages against themselues or their neighbours as hee most delighted in Besides few or no instances could I thinke bee brought of Diuels cast out in any Magitians name in Christs they were and as it seemes by such as had better acquaintance or more alliance with his accusers then with himselfe Thus much our Sauiour in my coniecture intimates in that speech By whom then doe your children cast them out therefore they shall be your iudges Which words I neither would refer to Christs Disciples as some good Interpreters doe nor as others vnto such exorcists as those mentioned Acts 19. verse 15. which attempting to throw out this strong man were ouerthrowne in their owne play but vnto such as Iohn complained of Master wee saw one casting out Diuels in thy name which followed not vs and wee forbad him This man though no Disciple was neither so ill disposed in himselfe nor so malitiously affected to our Sauiour as these Iewes were as appeares by our Sauiours answere vnto Iohn Forbid him not for there is no man that can doe a miracle in my Name that can lightly speake euill of me for whosoeuer is not against vs is on our part In the same words hee concludes his disputation against the Iewes in the forecited place 5 Such as this man was none of Christs followers but rather a friend as seems of his accusers yet vsing Christs not Beelzebubs Name to cast out Diuels were competent witnesses of his heauenly vertue and his aduersaries malitious partiality Many other circumstances well knowne then not now especially the long want of miracles more then prophesies before his comming did manifest their malice to bee more impudent shamelesse then wee in such distance of time can discerne That finger of God from such signes of the time as wee in generall may suppose farre more apparent in his victories ouer Sathan himselfe then in Moses ouer his Schollers the Enchanters especially whiles compared with knowne Prophesies of the Messias did point him out to bee the womans seed ordained of olde to bruise the Serpents head to bee the sonne of man appointed
to erect the euerlasting kingdome foretolde by Daniel vnto whose and other prophesies he referres his enemies in that speech But if I by the spirit or as Saint Luke reades by the singer of God cast out Diuels then is the Kingdome of God come vnto you Yet were not all his miracles of this kind thus considered so effectuall to confirme the faithfull or so pregnant to condemne all vnbelieuers as the former rule of Moses For this cause after the former dispute ended he gaue his aduersaries such a signe as if it did follow would infallibly proue him to bee that great Prophet Moses there speakes of and consequently leaue them lyable to Gods heauy iudgement without excuse for not hearkning vnto him Of which hereafter 6 Here I may once for all conclude that the power of doing miracles was as effectuall to assure such as did them of saluation as sight of them done was to establish spectators in sauing faith But the power of casting Diuels out or doing greatest miracles was no infallible pledge of saluation to such as did them much lesse could the acknowledgement of this diuine power in them breede full assurance of true faith in others but onely serue as a meanes to cause them relie vpon the Law and Prophets as their onely rule and to taste and proue the bread of life proffered to them by our Sauiour which alone could ascertaine them by their names were written in the booke of life But to proceede by the former rule 7 If others by experiments answerable to it were knowne to bee true Prophets Christ likewise by his knowne supereminency in that which approued them was to be acknowledged for the Prince of Prophets Now if wee reuise the historie of the olde Testament how few Prophets shall wee finde endowed with the gift of miracles such as were did exercise their power rather among Idolaters then true professors So when Gods messengers were brought to as open competition with Baals Priests in the King of Israels as Moses had beene with the Enchanters in Pharaohs Court Elias makes his calling as cleare as the light by calling downe fire from heauen which Baals Priests attempting in most furious manner could not effect but Elias professed thus much before as Baals Priests no question had done so as the euent answering to his prediction not to the others did by Moses rule demonstrate him to be them not to be Prophets of the liuing God But when the like controuersie was to be tried betweene Zidkiah and his foure hundred complices on the one part and Michaiah on the other before king Ahab in whom Elias late miracles and later threates had wrought such a distast of Baal and such a liking of the truth in generall as hee would not consult either any professed seruant of the one or open oppugner of the other for his future successe Michaiah as was obserued before appeales to this law of Moses as most competent Iudge betweene such as iointly did embrace it If thou returne in peace the Lord hath not spoken by me as if he had said what Moses there doth hee hath not put his word in my mouth And hauing brought his controuersie to this triall he desires the people to contestate the issue thus ioyned and hee said hearken all yee people From this and many like cases ruled by the former expresse and pregnant law of Moses Ieremy pleades his warrant being born downe by the contradictions of Hananiah a professed Prophet of the Lord as hee was but of greater fauour in the Court because hee prophesied peace vnto the present state and good successe to the Proiects then on foot Euen the Propeth Ieremiah said So be it the Lord so doe the Lord confirme thy words which thou hast prophesied to restore the vessels of the Lords house and all that is carried Captiue from Babel into this place But heare thou now this word that I will speake in thine eares and in the eares of all the people The Prophets that haue beene before mee and before thee in times past prophesied against many Countries and against great kingdomes of warre and of plagues and of pestilence And the Prophet which prophesieth of peace when the word of the Prophet shall come to passe then shall the Prophet bee knowne that the Lord hath truly sent him Ezechiel likewise referres himselfe to the same triall amongst such as were professed hearers of the word in generall which they would not obey in particular And loe thou art vnto them as a iesting song of one that hath a pleasant voice and can sing well for they heare thy words and doe them not And when this commeth to passe for loe it will come then shall they know that a Prophet hath beene among them 8 From these debatements we may gather in what cases the former rule held for certaine First negatiuely it was vniuersally true for hee that prophesied any thing which came not to passe did sufficiently proue himselfe to bee no true Prophet but a counterfeit So did not euery prediction of what afterwardes came to passe necessarily argue it to haue beene from God Yet as the force and vertue of many things not such of themselues became euident from vicinity or irriation of their contraries so though God permitted some to foretell strange euents for triall of his peoples faith yet this power hee restrained when the controuersie came to a former triall then hee caused the true Prophets words to stand whiles the predictions of the false and the Princes bloud which relied vpon them fell to the ground like Dagon before the Arke So as the fulfilling of what the one and frustrating of what the other had said did sufficiently manifest the one had spoken of himselfe presumptuously the other what the Lord had put into his mouth Hence is the determination easie what meanes this people had to discern amongst true Prophets which was that Great one in all things like to Moses First if euents foretold did sufficiently testifie of his diuine spirit his owne witnesse of himselfe would bee authentike because a true Prophet could hardly lie or make himselfe greater then he was This is an argument which directly confutes such as acknowledge Christ to haue been a Prophet sincere in doctrine mighty in deedes and yet denie him to be the Prince of that profession the great mediator of the new Couenant both which hee often auouched Besides the quantity of that spirit whose sincere quality manifested him to bee a Prophet would notifie his excessiue Greatnesse in that ranke and order or more directly to the question 9 The great Prophet there spoken of was to be knowne by his similitude with Moses who was as the symbole or proportional meane betweene him and lesser Prophets Others in these few gifts wherein they resembled their father came farre short of him Christ in all farre exceeded him Others were all of Iacobs line raised vp by
grace it selfe would rather haue held the Negatiue For if wee beleeue as the Papists generally instruct vs that wee our selues all priuate spirites may erre in euery perswasion of faith but the Church which onely is assisted by a publike spirite cannot possibly teach amisse in any Wee must vpon termes as peremptory and in equall degree beleeue euery particular point of faith because the Church so teacheth vs not because wee certainely apprehend the truth of it in it selfe For wee may erre but this publike spirite cannot And consequently wee must infallibly belieue these propositions Christ is the Redeemer of the world not Mahomet There is a Trinity of persons in the diuine nature for this reason only that the Church commends them vnto vs for diuine reuelations seeing by their arguments brought to disproue the sufficiency of Scriptures or certainety of priuate spirites no other means possible is left vs. Nay were they true wee should be onely certain that without the Churches proposall wee still must be most vncertain in these and all other points because the sonnes are perpetually obnoxious to error from which the mother is euerlastingly priuiledged The same propositions and conclusions we might condicionally belieue to be absolutely authentike vppon supposall they were Gods word but that they are his word or reuelations truly diuine wee cannot firmely belieue but onely by firme adherence to the Churches infallible authority as was in the second Section deduced out of the Aduersaries principles Hence it followes that euery particular proposition of faith hath such a proper causall dependance vpon the Churches proposall as the conclusion hath vpon the premisses or any particular vpon it vniuersall Thus much Sacroboseus grants 3 Suppose God should speake vnto vs face to face what reason had wee absolutely and infallibly to belieue him but because wee know his words to bee infallible his infallibility then should be the proper cause of our beliefe For the same reason seeing he doth not speake vnto vs face to face as hee did to Moses but as our aduersaries say reueales his will obscurely so as the Reuealer is not manifested vnto vs but his meaning is by the visible Church which is to vs in stead of Prophetes Apostles and Christ himselfe and all the seuerall manners God vsed to speake vnto the world before he spake to it by his onely sonne this Pantheas infallibility must bee the true and proper cause of our beliefe And Valentian himselfe thinks that Sara and others of the old world to whom God spake in priuate eyther by the mouth of Angels his sonne or holy spirit or by what meanes soeuer did not sinne against the doctrine of faith or through vnbeliefe when they did not belieue Gods promises They did herein vnaduisedly not vnbelieuingly Why not vnbelieuingly because the visible Church did not propose these promises vnto them 4 If not to belieue the visible Churches proposals be that which makes distrust or diffidence to Gods promises infidelity then to belieue them is the true cause of belieuing Gods promises or if Sara and others did as Valentian sayth vnaduisedly or imprudently in not assenting to diuine truthes proposed by Angels surely they had done only prudently and aduisedly in assenting to them their assent had not beene truely and properly beleefe So that by this assertion the Churches proposall hath the very remonstratiue roote character of the immediat and prime cause whereby wee beleeue and know matters of faith For whatsoeuer else can concurre without this our assent to diuine truthes proposed is not true Catholike beliefe but firmely beleeuing this infallibility we cannot erre in any other point of faith 5 This truth Valentian elsewhere could not dissemble howsoeuer in his professed resolution of faith hee sought to couer it by change of apparrell Inuesting the Churches proposall onely with the title of a condition requisite yet withall so dissonant is falsity to it selfe making it the reason of beleeuing diuine Reuelations If a reason it be why wee should belieue them needs must it sway any reasonable mind to embrace their truth And whatsoeuer inclines our minds to the embracement of any truth is the proper efficient cause of beliefe or assent vnto the same Yea efficiency or causality it selfe doth formally consist in this inclination of the mind Nor is it possible this proposall of the Church should moue our minds to embrace diuine Reuelations by any other meanes then by belieeuing it And beliefe it selfe being an inclination or motion of the mind our minds must first be moued by the Churches proposall ere it can moue them at all to assent vnto other diuine truthes Againe Valentian grants that the orthodoxall or catechisticall answere to this interrogation Why doe you belieue the doctrine of the Trinity to be a diuine reuelation is because the Church proposeth it to me for such Hee that admits this answere for sound and Catholike and yet denies the Churches proposall to bee the true and proper cause of his beliefe in the former point hath smothered doubtlesse the light of nature by admitting too much artificiall subtlety into his braines For if a man should aske why do you belieue there is a fire in yonder house and answere were made Because I see the smoake go out of the Chimney should the party thus answering in good earnest peremptorily deny the sight of the smoake to bee the cause of his beleefe there was a fire hee deserued very well to haue eyther his tongue scorched with the one or his eyes put out with the other Albeit if wee speake of the things themselues not of his beliefe concerning them the fire was the true cause of the smoake not the smoake of the fire But whatsoeuer it be Cause Condition Circumstance or Effect that truly satisficeth this demand Why doe you belieue this or that it is a true and proper cause of our beleefe though not of the thing beleeued If then we admit the Churches proposall to bee but a condition annexed to diuine reuelations yet if it bee an infallible medium or meane or as our aduersaries all agree the only mean infallible whereby we can rightly beleeue this or that to be a diuine reuelation it is the true and only infallible cause of our beleefe That speech of Valentian which to any ordinary mans capacity includes as much as we now say was before alleadged That Scripture which is commended and expounded vnto vs by the Church is eo ipso euen for this reason most authentike and cleare He could not more emphatically haue expressed the Churches proposall to be the true and prime cause why particular or determinate diuine reuelations become so credible vnto vs. His second Sacroboscus hath many speeches to be inserted hereafter to the same effect Amongst others where Doctor Whittaker obiects that the principall cause of faith is by Papists ascribed vnto the Church he denyes it onely thus far What we beleeue