all other kinde of punishment whatsoever Cajetan And this their health is expressed by these actions of life as Hagar argueth her life by another action of life Gen. 16.13 I have seene after him that seeth Iun. So also Gallas Simler 7. Before they were sprinkled with bloud Gods hand was in some sort upon them in terrifying them Whosoever touched the mountaine should die But now after their sprinkling they are cheared and refreshed and are not forbidden the sight of God which signifieth that we onely have accesse unto God by the bloud of Christ Rupertus Ferus QUEST XXV Whether this were a new commandement or the other mentioned vers 1 2. repeated Vers. 12. ANd the Lord said unto Moses c. 1. Some thinke that this is the same commandement repeated which was given unto Moses before vers 1 2. Iun. Tostatus addeth further that when the Lord said to Moses vers 2. Moses himselfe alone shall come neere to the Lord that Moses then 〈◊〉 know that he should goe up to receive the Tables for to what end should Moses have gone forth of the campe accompanied with Aaron and the rest if it had not beene to some end qu. 15. Contra. Yes it was sufficient that God called Moses and bade him come up into the mount though he at the same time had not shewed the end of his comming as chap. 19.24 when God bade him come up the cause is not shewed why he was called the Commandements of God are simplie to be obeyed though it please not the Lord alwayes to shew a reason thereof 2. Wherefore I thinke rather that this was a divers commandement from the former and given him at a divers time Piscator Osiander 1. Cajetane reason is Mandat non solùm ascendere in montem sed morari in eo He biddeth him not onely to come up into the mountaine but to abide there c. which was not said to him before 2. Calvin addeth further that after Moses with his companie were gone up and had seene this vision Altius evehitur Moses c. ut cognoscerent c. Moses is carried up higher that they should know that Moses would have gone no further but at Gods commandement c. It was requisite therefore that Moses should bee called againe and sequestred from the rest that he might not bee thought to have presumed without a warrant 3. Severus maketh a mysterie of it that Moses being gone up with Aaron and the rest Iterum aâ—diâ—â— heareth againe come up And by these two ascendings hee understandeth the two senses of the law the literall and spirituall 4. Ferus maketh this application of it Hic jam tertio vocatur Moses in montem c. Moses is the third time called into the mount to shew that he which is set over the people of God ought often to ascend in prayer 5. Rupertus also understandeth here two ascendings using this reason It is said before vers 9. that Moses and Aaron with the rest ascended but not that they ascended unto the Lord as here the Lord saith Come up to me c. So also Hugo de S. Victor Come up to me which must be so understood that De colle in quo erat ad altiora montis procedâ—ret c. From the hill where he was hee should proceed higher into the mountaine QUEST XXVI What is signified by Moses going up to the mountaine COme up to me into the mountaine 1. Beda draweth this place unto a mysticall sense Moses is called up to the mountaine Vt ex altitudine loci colligat quà m excelsa sit lex That by the height of the place he should gather how high and removed from humane capacitie the law was which he was to receive As our blessed Saviour in the Gospell called his Apostles into the mountaine Matth. 5. and after his resurrection he also appeared in the mountaine when he gave commission to his Apostles to goe and preach the Gospell to all the world but here is the difference because the law which Moses was to receive was but given unto one people therefore Moses onely was called up but the Gospell being appointed to be preached to all the world Christ called all his Apostles to him up into the mountaine 2. Rupertus maketh this ascending up of Moses into the mount a figure of Christs ascending up unto God Non in montem terrenum sed in ipsum coelum Not into an earthly mountaine but into heaven to receive not the killing letter but the quickening Spirit as the Apostle saith He ascended up on high led captivitie captive and gave gifts unto men c. 3. Ferus doth thus moralize it that he which will behold God and give himselfe to contemplation must terrena haec inferiora despicere c. despise these inferiour and terrene things as Moses leaving the campe below ascended up into the mount QUEST XXVII Of the tables of stone whereof they were made and wherefore given Vers. 12. I Will give thee tables of stone 1. The fabulous Jewes imagine that these tables of the law were made of the Saphire a pretious stone Lyran. and that when Moses had broken them comming downe from the mountaine he gathered up the fragments and broken peeces and sold them whereby he was greatly enriched Thus these blinde Jewes are not ashamed to blemish their great Prophet Moses with the note of covetousnesse from the which he was most free Tostat. quaest 16. 2. As frivolous is that other conceit because they are said to be of stone that the tables were but one stone which sometimes seemed but one sometime two for in that they are called tables it sheweth they were more than one of one stone they might bee both that is of one kinde of stone and yet the tables were two 3. These tables of stone were created of God for that speciall use as Exod. 32.16 they are said to be the worke of God it is not improbable that they were noviter creata created of God anew as Tostatus but it is not like that they were written by the Angell which Tostatus thinketh to have spoken in Gods person in the mount for as God prepared the tables themselves so hee caused the writing they were the worke of God for the matter and the writing of God for the manner Exod. 33.16 4. All the lawes which God gave his people were not there written but onely the morall precepts the rest Moses writ sustained in the dayes of his flesh Pelarg. 2. This fast was kept by Moses and the like by 〈…〉 Christi idoneum haberet 〈…〉 That the humanitie of Christ might have a sufficient testimonie for unlesse Moses and Helias had fasted fortie dayes some might have doubted of the humanitie of Christ in holding out so miraculous a fast So Rupertus and Ferus following him 3. And these fasted to this end ut tanto miraculo homines mali c. that men being moved by so great a miracle should not contemne their
A reason was given of those things which were inquired So also Ribera because it was fat idicum it prophesied of things to come Procopius because rationalis animi pars c. the reasonable part of the minde is placed in the heart which the breast-plate covered Vatablâ—s giveth this reason Quia exactaratione consideranda erant c. Because the things therein as the Vrim and Thuâ—miâ—â— were exactly and with deepe reason to be considered of the high Priest But this descanting upon the word is here superfluous seeing the Hebrew word coshen signifieth a pectorall or breast-plate and not as the Septuag and Latine translate 2. It is then called the breast-plate of judgement not as the Hebrewes because the high Priest found therein what the judgement of God was in that matter which was inquired upon for it shall afterward be shewed that the Vrim and Thummius were not given to that end nor yet because the high Priest in all weighty matters of judgement did put on the Ephod with the breast-plate Marbach for by that reason it might as well be called the Ephod of judgement neither because Aaron should in judgement have the people in remembrance when he went into the holy place Oleaster But it was therefore so called for that the high Priest did put it on when he consulted with the Lord about the causes of the people to give right judgement as Numb 27.21 He shall aske counsell for him by the judgement of Vrim before the Lord Iun. QUEST XX. Of the fashion of the breast-plate Vers. 16. FOure-square shall it be The breast-plate is thus described 1. For the manner of workmanship it must be of broidered worke like the Ephod 2. For the matter five things are required to the making thereof as before in the Ephod gold blew silke purple skarlet fine twined linen 3. For the forme and fashion it must be foure square every side of even length as appeareth by the foure orders of the stones and double it must be that it might be of more strength to hold and receive the stones ut firmius substaret auro that it might be the stiffer for the gold and precious stones Pellican 4. For the quantity it was an handbreadth which was halfe a cubit that is twelve fingers for if it had beene but the small handbreadth that is foure fingers it had not beene sufficient to cover the breast before Montan. Ribera Pelargus 5. The ornaments also of the pectorall are set forth which were twelve precious stones set in foure rankes or rowes QUEST XXI Of the twelve precious stones their names colours qualities and congruitie with the twelve Tribes Vers. 27. A Rubie Topaze and a Carbuncle in the first row In the severall application of these stones these foure things shall be observed 1. The name 2. The colour 3. The vertues and qualities 4. The congruity with the tribes of Israel A Rubie The first stone is called odeus of adam which signifieth to wax red Iosephus calleth it the Sardonix the Septuagint the Sardie it is most like to be the Rubie Montan. Genevens 2. The colour of it was red Oleaster as the signification of the word is rather than yellow of the colour of fire as Iunius taketh it for Pyrâ—pus the Carbuncle a precious stone like fire 3. They say it repelleth feare and cheareth and maketh bold Tostat. sharpeneth the wit and stancheth bloud at the nose Magirus 4. This stone they say stood for Ruben Montanus maketh an allusion betweene Ruben and the Rubie but Ribera giveth this reason that as the Sardie is red and somewhat of a fiery colour so he went into his fathers concubine igne libidinis incensus fuit and so was set on fire with concupiscence A Topaze 1. The Hebrew word is pitdah in which there are three radicall or principall letters p t d which being transposed t. p d make topad or topaz not much differing in sound Montan. It is so called of the place where it was found Topasos in Aethiopia Marbach Or the Isle Topazon gave the name to it as Plinie lib. 37. cap. 8. so called of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to seeke because it was much sought for Gloss. interlin would have it called Topazium as if we should say topadium that is of all colour but there is no reason of that etymology 2. Some take it to be of greene colour Montan. And so some of the Hebrewes thinke it to be the Smaragd Ribera out of Plinie lib. 37. cap. 8. alleageth that in greenenesse of colour it exceedeth all other precious stones But it is rather of yellowish colour mixt betweene gold and skie colour Isider Etymol 16. Tostat. Gloss. interlin There are two sorts of it one of the colour of gold which is more precious the other like unto saffron which is of the second sort Marbach And it seemeth to be of yellow colour because Iob 28.19 the Topaze of Aethiopia and the fine gold are named together 3. It is availeable against phrensie and lunacie and melancholy as Diascorides 4. Simeon is resembled to this stone not so much ob animum prasentem for his present and resolute minde which Ribera would have signified by the greene colour as because he was inflamed with ire and rage when he slue the Sichemites A Carbuncle 1. Iosephus with the Septuagint call it the Smaragd so also Iunius Vatabius the Chalde also and Latine Interpreter but that stone is of greene colour it seemeth rather to be the Chrysolitâ— Montan. or the Carbuncle Genevens The word is bareketh derived of barak which signifieth to lighten 2. It was then a precious stone that sparkled and glistred as the lightening which could not be of greene colour though the Smaragd be commended for the exceeding glistering brightnesse in so much that a Romane Emperour is said to have seene in his Smaragd the sword players as they did fight But because barak signifieth lightening as Ezech. 1.13 Out of the fire went barak lightning this stone being named thereof may better be taken for the Carbuncle or Chrysolite 3. The Carbuncle is of such exceeding brightnesse that it giveth light and shineth in the darke 4. Hereunto some resemble Levi Montan Tostat. But it is more like that Levi was omitted because the high Priest of Levi who was to weare this glorious breast-plate might stand for the whole Tribe then Iudah was rather named in the third place Ribera Pelarg. whose royall power streaming glory and princely dignity is more lively set forth in the shining Carbuncle or glistering Chrysolite Pelarg. than in the greene smaragd as Marbach And whereas the Carbuncle is so called of the similitude of fire licèt ignes non sentiant although these stones feele no fire themselves Plin. 37.7 by this property Messiah the Prince of Juda is shadowed forth who in that respect may be called apyrotus not to be vanquished or overcome with the fire of affliction Of his government as the Prophet saith
beginning of the creation or being of things 2. Neither is it to be understood causally in the beginning that is for the beginning as for Israels cause or for the law as the Hebrewes for God created all things for himselfe Prov. 16.4 It is also a forced exposition by this beginning to understand Christ although the doctrine bee most sound that all things were created by him 4. Nor yet as Abeâ— Ezra is this clause in the beginning used here syntactice in construction with the next word as though this should be the sense in the beginning of creating or when God created and so the sense should bee suspended till the second or third verse for then hee would have said barâ— in the infinite not bara in the praeâ—ertence as it is vsed Chap. 5.1 5. Wherefore Moses saith in the beginning in respect of the things created that in that beginning when God purposed to create the world hee made first heaven and earth of nothing Mercer Iunius QVEST. III. Hebrewes curious observations Vers. 1. GOd created heaven and earth c. 1. The Hebrewes have here many curious observations which I will not stand upon as 1. by the letters of the two first words bereshith bara they note the time from the beginning of the world untill the Messiah Aleph and beth signifie 3000. râ—sh shin tau 900. jod 10. that is â—910 which doth not much differ from the just time according to the computation of some from the creation to the Messiah 2. They note the duration or continuance of the world for 6000. yeeres because aleph is six times found in the first verse 3. By the 7. words of the first verse they would have signified the 7. dayes of the weeke and the 7. planets These observations are more curious than profitable 2. So is that question which is controversed among the Rabbins whether the heaven or earth were made first they thinke that heaven being first named was first made but that reason is not firme for the earth is named before the heavens Gen. 2.4 and the manner of the Scripture is to mention that last which is treated of first as in the second verse Moses beginneth againe to speake of the earth Paguin Wherefore it is most like that God made the heavens and earth together in their first matter as the cup and the cover as in an egge the yolke and the white as in a circle the center and circumference Mercer And this first creating of the heaven and earth was a part of the first dayes worke Luther For otherwise the Lord had not made all things in six dayes contrary to the Scripture Exod. 20.11 QVETS IIII. How the earth is said to be without forme and void Vers. 2. THe earth was without forme 1. The earth is here so called by way of preoccupation for it was not yet so called till the third dayes worke vers 10. Vatab. 2. The heaven was also without his forme though not altogether so confused as the earth for there being no light yet created both the heaven and earth were unformed and imperfect 3. The earth is said as yet to be tohu and bohu emptinesse and vacuity this tohu was not that materia prima which the Philosophers dreamed of and bohu to be the forme of things not yet applied to the matter as though the heavens and earth had beene made of some precedent matter whereas indeed God made the heaven and earth of nothing which long continued not in this imperfect estate the light being the same day created 4. The darknesse here spoken of was neither the element of fire as some Hebrewes imagine which if it bee is bright and transparent neither is it the same with tohu before mentioned as R. Levi neither was it any thing created and a farre greater darknesse than that which afterward was called the night wherein there is some light of the starres but it was a meere privation of light afterward created 5. The waters here mentioned which covered the deepe as a garment in the beginning Psal. 104. 6. were before comprehended vnder the name of earth as all the inferiour elements beside as the superiour parts of the world are insinuate by the heaven Mercer QVEST. V. What is meant by the Spirit moved upon the waters THe Spirit of God moved c. By the Spirit here 1. wee neither understand an Angell which is the dreame of Cajetanus for God needed not the ministery of Angels in making the world 2. Nor yet the wind as Tertullian lib. cont Hermog 3. Nor the aire as Theodoret. qu. 8. in Genes If God had no use of the Angels to make the world much lesse of inferiour creatures 4. But this was the Spirit of God whereby the creatures were fostered and formed Iob. 26.13 His Spirit hath garnished the heavens QVEST. VI. What was the light created the first day Vers. 2. GOd said let there be light c. Some doe thinke that this was a spirituall no naturall or corporall light August lib. 1. in Genes ad lit c. 3. Rupert 1. lib. de Trinitat c. 10. but that cannot be seeing this light made a visible and apparent difference betweene the day and night 2. Some thinke it was the perfect light of the Sunne which was created the first day but afterward rehearsed to bee made in the fourth Catharinus but this is contrarie to the text for the Sunne was made the fourth day 3. Others thinke that it was a bright and lightsome cloud which was carried about and gave light to the world as Beda Lyranus Magister Sentent c. 4. Others that it was a light without a subject afterward fastened to the body of the Sunne as Basil. homil in Genes 6.5 Others that it was an exceeding bright shining light such as no mortall nature could behold being whole and altogether and therefore it was afterward dispersed into divers bodies of the Sunne Moone and Starres so Nazianzene Theodoret qu. 14. in Genes 6. Some thinke it was the light of the Sunne yet imperfect afterward perfected inlarged and beautified Aquinas part 1. qu. 67. art 4. Thus we see how variable and inconstant mens opinions are when they search into curious matters and enquire after hid things but it sufficeth us to know that God made the light before the Sunne that we should not attribute that to the creature which was the worke only of the Creator what manner of light it was where placed how it moved how long it continued because in Scripture there is no certainty busily to search it were curiosity it is most like that it was a certaine light which was not extinguished when the Sunne was created but rather increased Vatab. Mercer And it is not unlike but that this light proceeded from the element of fire as thinketh Damascene lib. 2. de sid c. 7. and Iunius as an effect thereof and whereas it may be objected that this light was moveable from one hemispheare to another as causing
usuall food before the floud as it is now as seemeth to thinke Dominicus à Soto a Popish Writer for when as yet the earth and plants were not corrupted by the floud but retained their naturall force and vigour they yeelded more sufficient nourishment so that the eating of flesh was not then so necessary and as the more delicate use of some plants as the use of Wine by Noah was brought in afterward so much flesh of fowles and beasts did grow in request after the floud which was not covered before 5. Wherefore the sounder opinion is that not onely the eating of flesh was permitted before the floud but used not onely among the prophane race but with the faithfull though with greater moderation Our reasons are these 1. Because there is made no new grant neither in this nor in the rest as of multiplying and bearing dominion c. but onely the ancient privileges granted to man confirmed 2. The distinction of cleane beasts which it was lawfull for them to eat and the uncleane whereof they might not eat Levit. 13.8.3 It is evident by the oblation of Abel who offered the first fruit of his sheepe and the faâ— of them but it had beene no praise to Abel to offer the fatlings if he used not to eat of them it had beene all one to God whether to offer leane or fat but herein Abel is commended because he preferred the service of God before his owne private use and therefore Iustinus well collecteth Si anâ—e posuit Abel utilitatisâ—a Deum non dubium quia solitus fit ex labore suo utilitatem percipere If Abel did preferre God before his profit certainly he did reape profit of his labour and to the same purpose he alleageth that saying of the Apostle Who feedeth a flocke and eateth not of the milke thereof 1 Cor. 9.7 and by the same reason also of the flesh thereof 4. In that expresse mention is here first made of eating of flesh it is not as one well resolveth quantum ad usum in respect of the use sed quantum ad necessitatem in regard of the necessity The food of flesh beganne now to be more necessary because the plants and herbs had lost the first naturall vigour and strength QVEST. IIII. Whaâ— the meaning is of eating the flesh with the life or bloud 4. BVt flesh with the life thereof that is the bloud c. 1. This word anima in Hebrew nephesh translated life is taken foure wayes in Scripture first for man as the soule that sinneth shall die Ezek. 18. Secondly for the reasonable soule feare not those that can kill the body but cannot kill the soule Matth. 10. Thirdly it is taken for the inferiour part of the soule that is the affection as thou shalt love the Lord with all thy heart and soule Matth. 22. Fourthly it is taken for the life as a good shepherd will lay downe his life for his sheepe Ioh. 10. and so it is taken in this place for the bloud is the seat and chariot of the life and vitall spirics 2. These words are neither figuratively taken as Eugubinus thinketh for the shedding of mans bloud because he that killeth a man seemeth to devour his flesh for in this sense the words should have no coherence at all with the former verse and where words may be taken in their proper sense without any inconvenience a figure is not to be enforced neither is it all one to eat flesh with the bloud thereof and to eat things strangled as Chrysostome collecteth for the Apstoles distinctly speake of bloud and things strangled Act. 15. Neither is the eating of live flesh here onely prohibited as Cajetanus conjectureth or of hot bloud as Mercer for from this bruitish kinde of food the very nature of man abhorreth and therefore it needed not so especially to be provided for by precept But here generally the eating of the bloud with the flesh is forbidden whether together with the flesh alive or dead or separated from the flesh as to drinke it or to eat it as now the use is in confected meats QVEST. V. Wherefore the eating of bloud was prohibited NOw whereas the eating of bloud was forbidden both before the Law and under the Law Levit. 17. and after the Law in the beginning of the Gospell Act. 15. it shall be profitable to consider the causes of this prohibition First it was forbidden before the Law 1. Not so much for decencie and comelinesse or for that bloud is a grosse and heavy food 2. But either that aforehand by these ceremoniall precepts mens minds might be prepared the better to beare the yoke of the Law which afterward should be promulgated 3. Or rather that by this precept of abstaining from bloud men might be the more terrified from the shedding of mans bloud sic Chrysost. Secondly this law was revived Levit. 17.11 12. whereof two reasons are given one civill because the life of the flesh is the bloud that they should forbeare from all shew of cruelty and so much the more detest the shedding of mans bloud the other religious because I have given the bloud to offer at the Altar the bloud the organ of life is holy unto God the Author of life and therefore they should not pollute or prophane it by devouring thereof Thirdly the Apostles did forbid the eating of things strangled and bloud 1. Not because among the Gentiles suffocated things were held to be the food of evill spirits as Origen writeth for it is not like that the Apostles would ground their decree upon such heathenish fantasies 2. Neither by bloud is homicide forbidden and by things suffocated uncleane as some thinke for the Apostles would not use obscure and mysticall tearmes in their decree and these things were already provided for by law among the Gentiles 3. Neither did the Apostles forbid these things onely to restraine intemperancie for many kinds of food are more delicate and to be defiâ—ed than these 4. But Augustine sheweth the true cause of this prohibition Quâ—dideo fâ—ctum est quia elâ— gere voluerunt Apostoli pro tempore rem facilem c. This was decreed because the Apostles for a while would chuse some easie thing not burdensome to the observers which the Gentiles might observe in common with the Iewes c. Thus Augustine disputing against Faustus This the Apostles did onely for a time lest the beleeving Jewes who could hardly all at once be removed from the legall rites might have beene offended at the libertie of the Gentiles but now this cause being removed and there being no such feare this decree also is expired QVEST. VI. How this prohibition dependeth of the former verse Vers. 5. FOr surely I will require your bloud c. 1. Which words are neither an exposition of the former verse as Eugubinus who by the eating of flesh with the bloud understandeth figuratively the shedding of mans bloud 2. Neither is the
qui solum de omissa circumcisione jurae culpanda sunt It is fit that none should be punished but they which had committed the fault but infants can commit no fault therefore the punishment here designed doth belong onely unto the adulti that they onely be worthily punished which onely are rightfully blamed for the omission of circumcision Now put baptisme in the place of circumcision and this sentence is most true as well of the one as of the other that as there is no cause why an infant should perish for want of circumcision which is not his fault so neither for the not having of baptisme If then the ceremonies of the Law were not urged with such strict necessity there is no cause to impose such a yoke now under the liberty of the Gospell Morall Observations 1. Observ. Affection may sometime be blinded even in the righteous Vers. 18. O That Ismael might live c. 1. Though Abraham neither doubted to receive a sonne by Sarah and so prayeth for Ismael 2. Neither yet feared lest Ismael should have died another sonne being promised as some thinke 3. But onely desireth that Ismael together with the promised childe might be blessed and doth in thus praying acknowledge himselfe unworthy of such an extraordinary blessing holding himselfe contented if it so pleased God with this sonne which he had already had Mercer 4. Yet Abraham sheweth his humane infirmity and blinde affection toward Ismael And thus we see that oftentimes righteous men may be blinded in their affections as Isaack was towards Esau whom he would have blessed Ioseph toward Manasses before whom Iacob preferred Ephraim the younger Gen. 48. So Samuel was deceived in taking Eliab the eldest brother of David for the Lords anointed 1 Sam. 16.6 1 Observ. Of the true joy of the spirit Vers. 17. ABraham laughed Oukelos readeth rejoyced and indeed this laughter of Abraham proceeded not of incredulity but shewed the great gladnesse of heart which he conceived upon this promise of the Messiah which should come of his seed of this joy our Saviour speaketh in the Gospell Your father Abraham rejoyced to see my day he saw it and was glad Ioh. 8.56 There is no joy then to the joy of the spirit neither any gladnesse like to that which ariseth of our hope of salvation in Christ. 3. Observ. Abrahams obedience in keeping circumcision Vers. 23. ABraham tooke Ismael c. Abrahams obedience diversly appeareth 1. in that he deferreth not the time but the selfe same day circumâ—â—seth his family 2. In that he circumciseth all the males of his house omitting none 3. He performeth this ministery and service chiefly himselfe wherein he might use also the helpe of others for he alone was not able to circumcise 318. persons for so many he had in his house 4. He refuseth not to be circumcised at the age of 99. yeares This example of faithfull and obedient Abraham teacheth us how diligent we ought to be in keeping Gods commandements and how exact in celebrating the mysticall rites and Sacraments of religion 4. Observ. The duty of the masters of families FUrther In that Abraham circumciseth his whole family it sheweth what the duty of parents and masters of families is to see that all in their house be brought to the knowledge of God for this cause is Abraham commended of God Gen. 18.18 And the law the charge of keeping holy the Sabbath both for the children servants strangers and sojourners in the house is laid upon the governour of the family Exod. 20.10 Abraham also beginneth with his owne sonne Ismael and so should parents give good example to others in their governing of their owne children Mercer 5. Observ. The righteous had in remembrance with God Vers. 24. ABraham was 99. yeare old c. The Scripture doth most exactly set downe the yeares of Abrahams life in five severall places He was 75. years old when he went out of Haran Gen. 12.4 He was 86. when Ismael was borne Gen. 16.16 Ninetie nine when he received circumcision Gen. 17.24 an hundred yeare old when Isaack was borne Gen. 21.5 And the whole time of his life is set downe an hundred and seventy five yeares Gen. 25.7 This is done to none other end but to shew us that the righteous are had in remembrance with God that their yeares dayes moneths yea the haires of their head before him are numbred Perer. 6. Observ. Contrary religions not to be suffered in one Kingdome Vers. 12. HE that is borne in thy house and bought with thy money must needs be circumcised Mercerus well collecteth hereupon that neither Kings in their kingdomes nor fathers in their families should tollerate any contrary religion but bring all under their charge to the obedience of faith first this is agreeable to the precept and commandement of God in Scripture 1. For the charge of keeping holy the Lords day is laid upon the father of the house both for himselfe and all that are within his gate Exod. 20.10 but Idolaters and superstitious persons cannot sanctifie or keepe holy the Sabbath to the Lord. 2. The Lord commandeth that if any person shall entice to Idolatry or any City shall set up a new worship the one should be killed the other destroyed Deut. 13.9.13 3. To this belongeth that precept of the Lord To seperate the precious from the vile Ier. 15.19 true worshippers must be severed discerned from false 4. This is the meaning of the Law Levit. 19 19. Not to sow the field with divers seeds nor to weare a garment of divers things so divers religions and professions in one Kingdome are not to be admitted or suffered likewise Moses saith Deut. 12.10 Thou shalt not plow with an Oxe and an Asse together which Saint Paul thus expoundeth 2 Cor. 6.14 Be not unequally yoaked with Infidels c. what communion betweene light and darknesse c. Secondly this hath beene the practice of the Church in all ages to cast out the leaven of contrary doctrine and profession In the time of Enos before the floud the servants of God and true worshippers beganne to call upon the name of God that is to serve the Lord apart in their holy assemblies and to separate and divide themselves from the prophane generations of Cain Ismael is cast out of Abrahams house because he was a scorner of Isaack as all Idolaters are of true worshippers Iacob reformeth his house and putteth away the strange gods Gen. 35.2 Iosua maketh the Gibeonites hewers of wood and drawers of waters for the house of God Iosua 9.13 David expelleth the Idolatrous Jebusites out of Jerusalem 2 Sam. 5.8 Asa put Maacah his mother from her regiment because she was an Idolatresse and brake downe her Idoll 2 Chron. 15.16 Iosias put downe the Chemarims a sect of Idolatrous Priests 2 King 23.5 Zerubbabel would not suffer the adversaries of Iudah to build the Temple with them but refused their service which they offered Ezra 4.3 According to the
not to be stood upon 2. Some think that these children began to be borne in the beginning of the first seven yeares as R. Levi but the text overthroweth that conceit for Iacob went not into Lea till he had ended his terme of seven yeares vers 21. Some thinke that these and the rest of the children were borne to Iacob in the last seven yeares and the six yeares beside of Iacobs service but the story is otherwise that all Iacobs children were borne before he entred into a new covenant to stay still with Laban his two seven yeares being expired Genes â—0 25 But it is more probable that all Iacobs children only Benjamin excepted that was borne in the land of Canaan that is eleven sonnes and one daughter were brought forth in the compasse of the last seven yeares for it is not necessary to assigne their birth successively one to be borne after another but that their mothers might be with childe at once and so it is not improbable that foure women in seven yeares might bring forth 11. or 12. children Mercer 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. God directeth even the least actions of his servants Vers. 1. IAcob lift up his feet that is he went cheerefully and willingly and in that mention is made of so small an action as the lifting up of his feet we learne that even the least and ordinary actions of the faithfull are directed by the spirit of God and guided by his providence Mercer as our Saviour taketh knowledge of Nathaniels sitting under the figge tree Ioh. 1.48 so the Apostle saith that all things worke together for the best to them that love God Rom. 8.28 2. Doct. Men may hold the truth in generall and yet faile in particular Vers. 15. SHouldest thou serve me for nought Laban here speaketh reason and seemeth to know what is just and right but afterward he failed and recompenced Iacob but meanely for his faithfull service as Iacob complaineth Thou hast changed my wages ten times Gen. 31.41 Thus we see that carnal men may hold generall principles a right but when it commeth to their owne particular then they are blinded with selfe-love Calvin So dealt Herod with Iohn Baptist he did acknowledge him to be a just and holy man yet to please his wives daughter commanded him to be beheaded 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Custome not to be pretended where greater enormities are admitted Vers. 26. IT is not the manner of this place to give the younger before the elder He pretendeth a custome in the lesse matter in the meane time he transgresseth the custome and all good order in a thing of greater importance in thrusting upon a man in the night one sister for another thus after the like manner the Romanists object the custome of the Church against the marriage of Ministers whom they call Priests and in the meane time they breake all good order while for want of the due remedie fornication and uncleane lust is suffered to be practised amongst them Muscul. 2. Confut. Iacobs polygamie and marriage of two sisters not justifiable Vers. 30. SO entred he into Rachel also This multiplicity of wives which is called polygamie is diversly excused 1. Augustine saith Nulla lege prohibebatur it was forbidden by no law quandâ—mos erat crimen non erat It was no fault when the custome was so as in times past it was a shame for the Romans to have talares tunicas side garments but now every one of honest sort doth weare them Aug. lib. 22. cont Faust c. 47. Contra. 1. Though there were no written law in those times yet their owne conscience grounded upon the light of nature and the faithfull tradition of the fathers might have discerned it to be a fault seeing that God in the beginning for one Adam made but one Eve and Lamech of the wicked race is the first found in Scripture to have had two wives 2. And though custome may be pretended for many wives yet to marry two sisters there was no such custome Mercer 3. The example of long garments is nothing like for it is a thing indifferent which may be thought comely or uncomely as time and place doth vary but that which is simply unlawfull and against the first institution as polygamie is cannot be borne out by any custome 2. Some say that polygamie is after a sort against nature yet so as it may be dispensed with as it is like after the flood to Noah this indulgence was given Perer. in 29. Gen. numer 31. Contra. 1. If Noah had beene dispensed with for many wives then had there beene greatest cause to have used that liberty and if polygamie for propagation were tolerable God might have preserved in the arke more than for every man one woman 2. Against a written law and institution as this is of having one wife Gen. 2.24 A man shall leave father and mother and cleave to his wife not wives a dispensation unwritten cannot be admitted 3. Divers allegories are made of Iacobs two wives Augustine by Leah figureth the people of the Iewes by Rachel the Gentiles Rupertus saith contrary that Rachel was a type of the Iewes Leah of the Gentiles August ser. 80. de tempor Rup in Gen. 29. Gregorie by Leah interpreteth the active life by Rachel the contemplative Homil. 14. in Ezech. ex Perer. Contra. 1. By the diversitie of these allegories it appeareth they are mens collections and humane devices and therefore cannot excuse the transgression of a divine ordinance 2. And though these allegories might be warranted by the Scripture yet thereby is not the fact justified Christs comming for the suddennesse thereof in Scripture is compared to the comming of a theefe yet I trust thereby is not a theeves sudden approching approved 3. This then is the resolution of this question 1. that Iacob shewed his infirmity in this not double but quadriple marriage yea and the same incestuous in the marriage of two sisters 2. yet Labans fault was greater than Iacobs who by his craft induced him unto it 3. God in his deepe providence used this oversight of Iacob as a meanes greatly to increase and multiply his seed 4. Iacob and the rest of the Patriarkes in their manners and generall example of life but not in some particular acts such as this is are to be imitated Mercer 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. Education of children in labour Vers. 9. RAchel came with her fathers sheepe for she kept them Thus in that simple age did they bring up their children not idly and wantonly but in labour and houshold workes Laban had many servants beside in his house yet he setteth this faire damzell to keepe his sheepe though this be not an example now to men of good sort and place thus to imploy their daughters for the particular yet they should follow it so far to provide that their children bee industriously brought up and not to give them the reines of licentious liberty
Priest as the Hebrewes imagine for he died ten yeares before Iacob was borne who was now above 100. yeare old and therefore Melchisedeck could not have a daughter so young to beare children neither was this punishment arbitrary in Iudah and inflicted without law according to his pleasure Burgens for Iudah had no such authority there nor yet as Lyranus and Tostatus was she worthy of the fire because she had committed not simple fornication but adultery because she was by law obliged to the third brother and so in a manner espoused for it was not adultery for the widow of the brother to marrie with some other than the surviving brother else Naomi would never have advised her daughters in law to get them other husbands in their owne Countrey Ruth 1.9 But I rather thinke that Thamars adultery was in this that she had played the whore whereas Iudah had betrothed and espoused her to Selah and that Iudah who never was minded to give Selah to Thamar fearing lest he might die also as is evident vers 11. was very forward to take this occasion to be rid of Thamar that Selah might not marrie her 3. But herein appeareth Iudahs too much rigour and injustice that before the matter was examined gave sentence and was partiall the truth being knowne in his owne cause and further it was a savage part to put to death a woman great with childe which is contrary both to divine and humane lawes for it is written Deut. 24.16 The fathers shall not bee put to death for the children nor the children for the fathers but if Thamar had now died the infant had died with her The Romans had a law that the execution of a woman with childe should be deferred till she had brought forth the same also was practised among the Athenians Aeltan lib. 5. And therefore Claudius the Emperour is noted for his cruelty that spared not to put to death women with childe Perer. ex Dion lib. 57. QUEST XI Wherefore the Midwife useth a red threed and what colour it was of Vers. 28. THe midwife bound a red threed c. 1. It is so rather to be read than with Oleaster a twine or double threed the word sani here used commeth indeed of sanah that signifieth to double which is rather to be referred to the double die and colour than the double matter Iun. Tostatus also is much deceived here that taketh it not for a red but a blacke colour twice died ex Perer. 3. The Midwife tied this red threed as a marke of the first-borne because he first put forth his hand and the purple colour very well agreeth to the birth-right or eldership Muscul. QUEST XII Whence Pharez was so called and whereof he is a type Vers. 29. HOw hast thou broken thy breach upon thee 1. Hierome is deceived that of this word pharatz that signifieth to breake or divide thinketh the Pharises to have taken denomination whereas they had their name rather of Pharas which signifieth to disperse or separate because they were separate from other in profession of life and their apparell Mercer 2. This story hath bin diversly allegorized by the fathers some by Pharez understand the beleeving Gentiles by Zarah the Israelites and by the red threed their bloudy circumcision sacrifices sic Iren. Cyril Some contrariwise will have Phares to signifie the Jewes Zarah the beleeving Gentiles Chrysost. 3. But this Phares is more fitly a type and figure of Christ who hath broken downe the partition wall and hath broken the power of hell and death Mercer And by this strange and extraordinary birth the Lord would have Iudah and Thamar admonished of the sin which they had committed and to be humbled thereby though he in his mercie had forgiven it Calvin 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The difference betweene the apparelling of widowes and wives Vers. 14. SHe put her widowes garment off c. It seemeth that it was the use in those dayes for widowes to be knowne from wives by their mourning and grave apparell in which case more is permitted to women that are married whom the Apostle alloweth to adorne themselves with comely and sober apparell without pride or excesse 1 Timoth. 2.9 to please and content their husbands but widowes having no husbands to whose liking they should apparell themselves ought not to decke themselves to please other mens eyes Luther 2. Doct. Friendship ought alwayes to be joyned with pietie Vers. 20. IVdah sent a kid by the hand of his friend This Hâ—rah Iudahs friend did performe an evill office in being as it were a broker for Iudah who should neither have requested any dishonest or uncomely thing of his friend nor the other yeelded unto it love truth and piety ought not to be separated as Saint Iohn saith Whom I love in the truth Epist. 3.1 Muscul. 3. Doct. Adultery in former times punished by death Vers. 24. LEt her bee burnt We see that even among the Canaanites adultery was judged worthy of death for Iudah inventeth no new kinde of punishment but speaketh according to the law and custome of that Countrey So the Lord himselfe said to Abimelech that had taken Sarai unto him Behold thou art but a dead man for this c. Gen. 20.3 Now although this law as peculiar to that Countrey bindeth not now neither in respect of the kinde of death for by Moses law onely the Priests daughter if she played the whore was burned Levit. 21.9 the rest were stoned nor yet in the inequality of the law for the women offending were burned the men escaped as appeareth in Iudah Calvin whereas both adulterers and adulteresses are alike guilty and though then there was greater cause of keeping their seed uncorrupt for preserving of their lives and the distinction of families in which respect it may be thought somewhat of the former rigour and severity may be abated yet this example condemneth the security and connivence of magistrates in these dayes in the punishing of this sinne when as faults of lesse nature are more severely censured than adultery And whereas the president of our Saviour is urged by some for the mitigation of the punishment of adultery because he would not condemne the woman taken in adulterie it doth not serve their turne for this mercie Christ shewed not to cleare or exempt the adulteresse leaving her to the magistrate but partly to shew that he came not to be a judge in such causes as neither in other like businesses as dividing of the inheritance Luk. 12.14 partly by this example he would teach what is to be required in the person of an accuser not to bee guilty of that crime whereof he accuseth others 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. That it is not lawfull upon any occasion to marrie the brothers wife Vers. 8. GOe into thy brothers wife Because in this place as also Deut. 25.5 it is permitted to naturall brethren to marry the wives of their brother deceased Bellarmine
Iudah that particular tribe and not the whole nation of the Iewes it should seeme that Iudah also in this place should be taken in the same sense 2. These words also of Iacobs prophecie untill Shiloh come may bee understood of that time when the certaine terme and number of years should be revealed of Shilohs comming which was shewed unto Daniel in the first yeare of King Darius Daniel 9.1 To whom Cyrus permitted the regiment of Babylon who reâ—gned together with him from which time there are reckoned 70. weekes that is 490. yeares which weekes begin in the first yeare of Cyrus when the Edict went forth for the returne of the Iewes and end in the passion of Christ at this time c. At this time Zerubbabel prince of Iudah was captaine of the people Ezra 2 2. and unto this time after the scepter was given to Iudah in David it was not removed but onely during the captivitie of Iudah when it is like also that the heads of Iudah bare the greatest sway over their brethren I leave this interpretation to the judgment of the learned neither doe I much insist upon it seeing the prophecie of Iacob rather aymeth at the historicall comming of the Messiah than the prediction of his comming 3. Some doe take the word shebet here not for a Scepter but for the tribe as Iunius and Oleaster translate the tribe shall not depart from Iudah this opinion may seeme probable for these reasons 1. the word is so taken in this chapter for a tribe vers 28. these are the tribes shibteâ—â— and it is very rare or not at all used in Moses for the scepter 2. Thus this prophecie was evidently fulfilled for till our Saviour Christs time the line of Iudah especially from David was exactly kept as may appeare by the genealogie set downe by S. Matthew and S. Luke but after Shiloh was come the policie and government of the Iewes was within one generation dissolved and the line and stocke of Iudah not regarded but shuffled and confounded with the rest neither can the Iewes tel at this day of what tribe they are descended I therefore herein approve of Calvins judgement who understandeth this prophecie of the policie and common-wealth of the Iewes which presently after the Messiahs comming was overthrowne 3. But it will bee objected that the tribe of Levi continued till Christs time as well as Iudah Perer. I answer that Levi was none of the 12. tribes neither had his peculiar lot as the rest had but according to the prophecie of Iacob hee was dispersed in Israel againe though some of the Levites kept their pedigree yet most of them could not prove their descent as it appeareth Ezra 2.62 these sought their writing of the genealogies but they were not found therefore were they put from their Priest-hood and further mention is made that the names of the chiefe fathers of the Levites were written unto the dayes of Iohanan and some of them to the reigne of Darius the last King of Persia Nehem. 12.22 23. it seemeth then that after that their genealogies were not kept 4. Some understand this prophecie of the 70. Elders called Sanedrim which were elected out of Iudah to whom the cognizance of the weightiest causes and establishing of lawes appertained who were of such supreme authoritie that they convicted Herod who hardly escaped the sentence of death for his contumacie these Sanedrim continued untill Herod who not long before Christs birth rooted them all out and then Herod himselfe was absolute King sir Mercer This interpretation joyned with the former I preferre before the rest for in this sense Iudah shall be taken for the particular tribe and the word shebet signifieth sometime the authoritie of the Judge and magistrate as Iudg. 5.14 Amos 1.6 The meaning then of this prophecie is that Iudah should bee possessed of the regall or at the least the chiefe authoritie untill Messiah come QUEST XIV Of the abundance of vines and wine promised to Iudah Vers. 11. HE shall binde his asse foale to the vine c. 1. Wee doe not with Oâ—kelos by the asse and foale understand the parents and children that should cleave unto the law as tyed to the vine and by the washing of their garments in wine that the Princes should bee cloathed in purple by the eyes the hills which should bee full of vines and by the teeth the fields white with corne 2. Neither need wee here run to allegories as to make the binding of the asse to the vine to insinuate the calling of the Gentiles to Christ and by the blood of the grape to understand the blood of Christ by the which wee are washed from our sinnes by the eyes the Prophets and Apostles by the teeth the Doctors and Pastors of the Church whose office it is to prepare the spirituall food for the people 3. Nor yet is that mysticall sense proper to this place to signifie the abundance of spirituall knowledge in the Church under Christ. 4. And with Hierome literally to understand the colt which the Apostles found tyed which they loosed and brought to Christ seemeth to be forced 5. Wherefore the meaning is no more but this to shew that in Iudahs lot there should bee vines of that greatnesse as they might serve to binde their asses unto Perer. and they should be as common as shrubbes and bushes to the which they use to tye their Cattell Iun. Calvin And that they should bring their asses to their vineyards to load them with grapes Mercer Yea and such plenty of wine they should have that they might use it in stead of water to wash their garments Mercer and it should bee excellent wine such as maketh the eyes of them that drinke it red and such store of good pastures should bee in Iudahs portion that they might eat milke in great abundance Iun. QUEST XV. Of the situation of Zabulun Vers. 13. ZAbulun shall dwell by the sea side 1. Iacob rehearsed not his sonnes according to the order of their birth for Zabulun was the tenth sonne first he nameth the sonnes of Leah together then the sonnes of the concubines Zabulun is set before Isachar who was the elder in respect of the situation of the countrey for Isachar had his lot betweene Zabulun and Dan Mercer Zabuluns border did not extend to Zidon for it is like mention would have beene made thereof Iosh. 19. where the dwelling of Zabulun is bounded Perer. Neither is the meaning that they should only traffike with the Sidonians as Andr. Masius but that their side and coasts should bee over against Sâ—don situated by the sea and full of havens Iun. 3. This tribe of Zabulun was famous because of the mount Tabor where Christ was transfigured and the citie Nazareth where Christ was conceived Luke 1.26 and brought up Math. 2.23 there also Christ began to preach Matth. 4.15 to the people that sat in darknesse he began there where was greatest need for they that dwell
poenitentiam That he which committed adulterie after publike penance should finally be denied the Communion In Hieromes time it seemeth that adulterie was punished by death who in a certaine epistle maketh mention of a young man qui adulterâ—i insimulatus ad mortem trahitur who being accused of adultery was led forth to death yet Augustine as is shewed before reasoneth against it but of all other Origen writeth most plainly Apud Christianos si adulterium fuerit admissum c. Among Christians if adulterie be committed it is not commanded that the adulterer or adulteresse bee punished with corporall death c. neither therefore was the law cruell then neither now doth the Gospell seeme to bee dissolute but in them both the benignitie of God appeareth yet by a divers dispensation then by the death of the bodie the people was rather purged from their sinnes than condemned but unto us sinne is purged not by corporall punishment but by repentance and it is to be seene unto lest our punishment be greater whose vengeance is laid up for the next world when as they were absolved from their sinne by the paying of the punishment as the Apostle saith how much more punishment is he worthy of that treadeth under foote the Sonne of God Two reasons Origen yeeldeth of this his opinion that there is now a mitigation of the rigour of Moses law because then it served as an expiation of their sinnes prefiguring the death of Christ as S. Paul applieth that sentence Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree which is generally delivered by Moses to the particular death of Christ Galat. 3.13 but now the expiation of sinne is by repentance and remission of sinnes in Christ. Againe now a greater punishment abideth the contemners of the Gospell even eternall in the next world and therefore corporall death is not so much inflicted now for God punisheth not twice for the same thing as Origen in the same place alleageth Yet although we contend that the capitall punishment of Moses law may now be dispensed with in some cases upon the reasons before alleaged this is not either to condemne those Common-wealths which doe reteine still and practise the severity of Moses law against adulterers who therein sinne not but as Ambrose saith of the Apostles that asked for fire to come downe upon the Samaritanes Nec discipuli peccant legem sequentes Yet did not the Disciples offend following the law neither to excuse those places where this sinne is too easily and lightly punished as Erasmus complaineth in his time Nunc adulterium lusus magnatum est Now adulterie is but a sport of great men Where adulterie is not capitally punished yet great severity otherwise should be used as it was decreed in the Elibâ—rin Councell that he which having a wife committed adulterie should be under penance five yeeres can 〈◊〉 He that did sinne that way after should not bee received to the peace of the Church till his dying 〈…〉 that did commit adulterie after penance should never be restored to the communion of the Chuâ—â—â— c. 7. These or such like severe constitutions this wanton and lascivious age hath need of that this overflowing sinne might be kept in with higher bankes than now it is So then I conclude this point with Cyprian who speaking of divers kindes of Ecclesiasticall censure used in divers places thus writeth Manente concordia vinculo actum suum disponit dirigit unusquisque Episcopus c. The bond of amity remaining still every Bishop so directeth and disposeth his owne act that he is thereof to give account unto God The like may bee said of Princes and Magistrates in their dominions and regiments that the difference in publike punishments all intending the glorie of God and the brideling of sinne is no cause to breake peace or breede jelousie betweene Christian states Now for the other part that Moses Judicials doe bind negatively that is where Moses Law inflicteth not death there Christian Magistrates are not to punish with death the reasons are these 1. Because then the regiment of the Gospell should exceed in terror the strictnesse and severitie of Moses Law 2. God is that one Lawgiver that saveth life and destroyeth Iam. 4.12 he gave life and he only hath right to take it away God hath created man in his image Gen. 9.6 which image is expressed in mans soule animating the bodie This image then is not to be defaced and dissolved but by warrant and direction from God therefore the equitie of the Judicials of Moses ought to be a rule either by generall direction or particular president to all Magistrates in what cases and for what sinnes they are to deprive the offendors of their life But here it will be objected that if this be so then all those Common-wealths are in error which punish theft by death which by Moses law is satisfied by making restitution Exod. 22.2 Ans. Even by Moses law some kinde of theft received a capitall punishment as if it were a violent theft as it was lawfull to kill a theefe breaking into the house Exodâ—s 22.2 or a wanton theft as David judged him worthy to dye that having many sheepe of his owne tooke by violence the onely sheepe which his poore neighbour had 2. Sam. 12.5 Likewise publike theft and sacrilege in Achan was punished by death Iosh. 7. But that simple theft when a man stealeth only to satisfie his hungrie soule or to supply his present necessitie should be proceeded against to the losse of life it seemeth hard And as I take it the lawes of this land have used a good consideration herein that such small felons should escape by their booke wherein to my understanding greater clemencie and favour in some Judges were more commendable who require an exactnesse of such simple clerkes unlesse they bee such as are worthy for other former evill demerits to be cut off as rotten members There is a saying in the law Favores sunt ampliandi Where favour is intended it should be the largest way extended It were also to be wished that a greater valuation were yet set than of the usuall rate in such small fellonies when a man is to bee judged for his life By Dioclesians law some kindes of theft are charged with restitution of foure fold by another authentike law the theefe is adjudged to bee beaten with clubbes By the Decrees Qui fecâ—rit furtum capitale c. Hee that committed any capitall theft as in breaking into an house in stealing a beast or some other thing of price if he were a Clergie man he was to be under penance seven yeeres if a lay man five if it were a small theft he was to make restitution and to doe penance one yeere By any of these or the like constitutions sufficient provision might be made against simple theft But it can no wayes be justified that such simple theft should bee more straightly
hee were rude in speech yet he was not so in knowledge 2. Cor. 11.6 the power of S. Pauls speech consisted not in eloquence of words but in the wisdome of the spirit so Moses though defective in the manner of elocution yet might speake with gravity and wisdome and so bee powerfull in words 9. Wherefore notwithstanding this or what else is objected the most probable opinion is that Moses had some naturall impediment of speech as appeareth both by his owne excuse by the Lords answer by the coadjutorship of Aaron his brother an eloquent man vers 14. and because Moses after this saith he was a man of uncircumcised lips and whereas he saith here nor since thou hast spoken to thy servant his meaning is that if at this time when God spake unto him who was able to take away all impediment of speech yet his infirmity remained much more was it like afterward to continue Iunius QUEST VIII How God is said to make the deafe and dumbe Vers. 11. WHo hath made the dumb or the deafe 1. Wee refuse here the fables of the Hebrewes that when Pharaoh had appointed one to kill Moses he was striken blind that he could not see Moses and Pharaoh became both deafe and dumbe that though he espied Moses escape yet hee could not speake to have him stayed but it is evident by the story that Moses fled before hee was apprehended The Lord here speaketh in generall not of any one dumbe or deafe but that as hee sendeth these infirmities upon man so also hee is able to heale them 2. And although these infirmities are evill in respect of nature yet God is the author of them because they are good also in respect of the end which is to humble man and bring him to repentance and to set forth the glory of God as our Saviour saith of the blind man that his blindnesse came that the workes of God might be shewed upon him Simler QUEST IX How and wherefore the Lord was present with Moses mouth Vers. 12. I Will be with thy mouth 1. Although Moses was no eloquent man in outward speech as humane eloquence is accounted yet there was in him a grave and divine eloquence such as the Apostles were endued with the Lord promiseth the assistance of his spirit and to bee present with his mouth 2. But the impediment of his tongue the Lord doth not altogether take away both that Gods glory and power might appeare and that Moses should see how needfull the helpe and society of his brother was neither did Moses pray unto God to heale that infirmity but only useth it as an argument to decline his calling Simler QUEST X. Whom Moses meaneth that he would have sent Vers. 13. SEnd by the hand of him whom thou shouldest send 1. Lyranus thinketh that Moses meaneth his brother Aaron who was elder than he and fitter for his eloquent speech but no mention was made yet of Aaron whom Moses knew not to be alive as may be gathered vers 18. till the Lord first spake of him and promised hee should assist him 2. Rabbi Selomo taketh that hee meaneth Iosuah whom God revealed unto him should be the man that was to lead Israel into the promised land But beside that Iosuah is not yet spoken of this request of Moses would have shewed some emulation or envy toward Iosuah 3. Many of the ancient writers as Iustenus Martyr Tertullian Cyprian with others thinke that Moses here speaketh of the Messias that should be sent into the world so also Perer. But this seemeth not to be so fit both for that Moses not being ignorant of the prophesie of Iacob concerning the comming of Shiloh and how the Lord promised that he would raise up a Prophet like unto him Deus 18.18 which is understood of Christ could not yet expect the comming of the Messiah and this request for the comming of the Messiah proceeding of faith would not have provoked the Lords wrath Therefore Eugubinus opinion though Pererius checkt him for it is not herein to be misliked that neither would have those places of Scripture which are understood of the Messiah to bee referred to others for that savoureth of Judaisme nor yet that which is spoken of others to be applied to Christ which also would bewray curiosity and superstition 4. Therefore the plaine meaning of Moses is that wheâ—â—as God might find out many more fit than himselfe he would send by their hand that is ministery so he aimeth not at any one in particular to be sent but any other whosoever QUEST XI Whether Moses sinned in his so often refusall seeing God was angry with him Vers. 14. THen Iehovahs wrath was kindled 1. Neither doe we consent to some Hebrewes that doe aggravate Moses sinne as distrusting Gods word and therefore some say hee was punished in being deprived of the Priesthood which was given to Aaron some in that he was not suffered to enter into the land of Canaan Contr. But neither was the first a punishment for Moses still was the chiefe and gave Aaron direction and it was a comfort to Moses to have such a coadjutor and beside Aaron was the elder to whom the priesthood appertained Neither was Moses offence here the cause why he entred not into the land of Canaan but his disobedience at the waters of strife Simler 2. Neither on the other side is their opinion found that doe justifie Moses herein and commend his humility in refusing so weighty a calling as Gregorie who by Pauls example would have us ready to suffer adversities and by Moses to refuse prosperity And Hierome commendeth Esaâ—es readinesse after his lippes were purified and Moses unwillingnesse being guilty to himselfe of his owne infirmity Contra. 1. In that God was angrie with Moses it is evident he offended 2. And as S. Paul was willing to suffer adversity because it was Gods will the spirit so testified every where of him that bands and persecution did abide him so Moses should not have refused this charge seeing God so often had signified his will unto him 3. And if Esay did well after the Lord had purged his lippes being before unwilling to shew his readinesse then Moses did not well who after the Lord had promised to be with his mouth yet still persisted in his refusall 3. Thostatus granteth that Moses sinned yet it was a veniall and small sinne because wee reade of 〈◊〉 punishment that followed Cajetanus is of the same opinion and his reason is taken from the phrase here used The wrath of God was kindled as when a man is moved suddenly of choller than of set purpose Contra. In some sense we confesse that both this and all other of Moses sinnes and of all the elect are veniall in respect of Gods mercie in Christ that pardoneth them but otherwise in it owne nature neither this nor any other sinne is pardonable for the wages of sinne is death Rom. 6.23 in the justice of God 2.
against their enemies and yet that was no hinderance or let to their circumcision 2. There is great difference betweene the transgression of one man which might easily bee censured without danger and the sinne of all the people which could hardly bee redressed for Moses knew them to be a stifneâ—ked and rebellious people 3. Therefore it cannot be otherwise held but that the omission of circumcision in the people was a transgression of the covenant and that the people did of contempt and disobedience omit it beside the excuse of their removing campe as Augustine well judgeth quaest 6. in Ioshuah for the people continually murmured and wished to be in Egypt and thought to returne thither and many of them were Idolaters therefore it was no marvell if they casting off the yoke of obedience and despising the covenant of God regarded not likewise the signe thereof Iun. Beside it must be considered that the commonwealth and Church were not then setled neither the passeover nor sacrifices or other rites were then observed duly according to the order prescribed and therefore Moses saith that when they were come into their inheritance Yee shall not doe after all these things which we doe here this day that is every man whatsoever seemeth good in his owne eyes Deut. 12.8 QUEST XXIV What moved Moses to deferre the circumcision of his child IT is further doubted what should bee the cause why Moses deferred the circumcision of his child 1. The cause whereof some impute unto Moses father in law that Moses did forbeare the circumcision lest it might have beene an offence unto him Tharg Hieros but the stay seemeth rather to have beene in his wife as shall afterward appeare 2. Aben Ezra thinketh that the child was not eight dayes old when Moses set forward in his journey and that he would not circumcise him by the way because he made haste Contra. But it is not like if Moses having beene married forty yeeres had a child so young that he would have adventured to travell with his wife having beene so lately delivered neither if circumcision had beene deferred because of Gods service would the Lord have beene so angry with him Simler 3 Some judge that Moses might thinke circumcision not to bee so necessary in a strange land especially Moses wife being a stranger and so his sonnes Israelites but by the halfe bloud Ferus But Moses could not be so ignorant for as he was perswaded that his seed was within the covenant so he knew that the signe of the covenant belonged unto him 4. Wherefore the most probable conjecture is that after Moses had circumcised one of his children his wife tooke such offence at it that to content her he did forbeare to circumcise the other and this may appeare by the circumstance of the text because shee with such indignation calleth Moses a bloudy husband shewing her discontent and dislike of circumcision Iur. Piscator Pellican Simler QUEST XXV Why the Lord correcteth Moses by the way and not before NOw â—he reasons why the Lord did thus urge Moses by the way and not before may bee these 1. Because Moses had now taken a publike office and charge upon him and he was unfit to be a rulâ—r in the Church of God that could not order his owne familie as the Apostle sheweth 1. Tim. 3.5 thâ—refore it would have beene a great offence and scandall unto all Israel if Moses the minister of circumcision should have any uncircumcised in his house Iun. Perer. 2. While Moses was under his father in law he was not at his owne liberty as now and therefore it is more exactly required of him now than before Ferus 3. The Lord doth it also at this time to trie his obedience whether this correction laid upon him would make him give way and start from his calling Ferus QUEST XXVI Whether Zipporah circumcised her sonne with a sharpe knife Vers. 25. ANd Zipporah tooke a sharpe knife 1. Some thinke that circumcision among the Jewes was ministred with no iron instrument but only of stone and thinke that Zipporah in this place circumcised her sonne with a sharpe stone as the Chalde Septuagint and Latine reade so Augustine Bernard with others But seeing no such instrument is specially prescribed Gen. 17. where circumcision is instituted it seemeth there was no such necessity of using a stone onely 2. Others doe thinke that it was indifferent to use either a sharpe knife or stone but in this place they say it was done with a sharpe flint because the word tzur signifieth a rocke or stone and Iosh. 5. hee is bid to prepare knives of stone and this circumcising with a stone did more lively resemble the spirituall circumcision by Christ who is the Rocke so Hugo S. Victor and Thostatus and Thomas Contr. 1. Though the word tzur doe usually signifie a rocke or stone as Ezech. 3.9 yet in some places it is taken for that which is sharpe as Psal. 89.44 tzur charbo the edge of his sword the same words inverted are used Iosh. 5.2 Charboth tzurim sharpe knives which are so called tzurim because they were in sharpnesse like to a sharpe stone Piscator or were sharpned with flints or whetstones Osiand 2. And seeing Zipporah was in haste a sharpe knife such as they were not without was readier at hand than a sharpe stone which unlesse it had beene prepared of purpose would not have served that turne and whence should Iosuah have so many sharpe stones to circumcise above 600. thousand Iosh. 5. Therefore as Pererius thinketh that the Sichemites because of their number were circumcised with knives and swords rather than stones so it is more like so many thousands of Israelites were 3. And for the correspondencie of the type and the substance if it had consisted in the likenesse of the instrument Saint Paul speaking so much of circumcision would not have omitted it 3. Therefore upon the reasons before alleaged 1. both because a knife was readier Zipporah being in haste and a knife being at hand was a fitter instrument than a stone Iunius 2. And it had put the child to more paine to hackle off his foreskin with a stone 3. Neither was it possible to finde so many sharpe stones to circumcise 600. thousand as Ioshuah did we conclude that Zipporah did this cure with a knife not with a stone QUEST XXVII Whether both Moses sonnes or one only were uncircumcised and upon what occasion Vers. 25. ANd cut away the foreskin of her sonne 1. Cajetanus thinketh that the singular number is put here for the plurall and that both Moses sonnes were uncircumcised because Zipporah at this time calleth Moses a bloudy husband as now first having experience of bloudy circumcision But it is not like that Moses eldest sonne who might now be toward forty yeeres old was so long uncircumcised and whereas before vers 20. Moses is said to take his sonnes and here mention is made only of a sonne the
procureth divers plagues as here Moses feareth lest the people if they should not offer sacrifice and doe service unto God should be punished Simler So the Apostle affirmeth that the Corinthians were chastised some with sicknesse some with death for unreverent receiving of the Lords supper 1 Cor. 10.30 2. Observ. Many receive the Gospell joyfully at the first but after fall away Vers. 21. THe Lord looke upon you and judge At the first this people when Moses brought them a joyfull message of their deliverance were glad and thankfully received that gladsome tidings chap. 4.31 But now being more vexed and oppressed than before and not seeing their present deliverance they murmure against Moses Such is the propertie of many in these dayes that are content to receive the Gospell as long as it bringeth ease and prosperitie with it but in time of adversitie they fall away Ferus whom our Saviour compareth unto seed sowne in stony ground which as soone as it riseth is parched away with the heate of the sunne Matth. 13.5 3. Observ. The Gospell falsly challenged to be the cause of Gods judgements Vers. 21. YE have put a sword into their hand to slay us They lay the fault upon Moses and Aaron and make them the cause of their trouble So Achab charged the Prophet Elias that he troubled Israel Thus the heathen Idolaters accused the Christians as the causes of the plagues and famines that were in the world as blind superstitious people doe now lay the like imputations upon the Gospell whereas their superstition and Idolatrie procureth Gods judgements Simler 4. Observ. In the time of affliction we must fly unto God by prayer Vers. 22. MOses returned to the Lord c. By which example wee are taught in all our afflictions and necessities to have recourse unto God by prayer as the Apostle prescribeth If any man be afflicted let him pray Iam. 5.13 So the Prophet saith For my friendship they were my adversaries but I gave my selfe unto prayer Psal. 109.4 5. Observ. Some things fall out in shew contrarie to Gods promises in the beginning to trie our faith Vers. 23. ANd yet thou hast not delivered thy people The Lord after he hath made gracious promises to his servants doth suffer some things contrarie thereunto to fall out for the time for the triall of their faith and patience God promiseth unto Abraham to multiplie his seed as the starres of heaven and yet afterward bid him sacrifice his sonne in whom the hope of his seed was So God promised the Israelites prosperous successe against Benjamin yet at the first they were twice overcome David was annointed King in Sauls place yet hee was persecuted of Saul and driven from his countrie for a while but at the length the Lord made good to the full all his promises toward him Perer. CHAP. VI. 1. The Argument and method THis chapter hath two parts the first is a declaration or rehearsall of the charge which the Lord giveth unto Moses which containeth a double commandement or commission the first to goe unto the Israelites to promise them deliverance unto vers 20. The other unto Pharaoh to vers 14. In the former three things are shewed 1. The foundation of the peoples deliverance which consisteth in the power of God vers 3. his promises made to the fathers vers 4. his compassion upon the afflictions of the people vers 6. 2. The promise followeth partly to deliver them out of bondage vers 6.7 partly to bring them into the land of Canaan vers 8. 3. The effect is shewed that the people because they were afflicted hearkened not unto him In the other commission first the Lords commandement is set downe vers 11.2 Then Moses refuâ—â—â— vers 12. 4. The renewing of the commandement In the second generall part by way of digression is inserted the genealogie of Moses who came of Levi wherein first briefly the genealogie of the two elder sonnes of Iacob Ruben and Simeon is set downe vers 14.15 to make a way for Levi. Then the genealogie of Levi is expressed and of his three sonnes of Gershom vers 17. Merari vers 19. of Kohath and of his sonnes Amram of whom came Moses and Aaron who are specially insisted upon vers 25. to the end and of Izzari vers 21. and Vzziel vers 22. 2. The divers readings Vers. 3. I appeard c. in the name of God almightie I.G. in God shaddai V. as an almightie God B. being their God S. but the word name is fitly supplied as the other part of the verse sheweth but in my name Iehovah c. But in my name Iehovah was I not knowne B.G.I.V.A.P. better than my name Adonai H. my name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord. S. Vers. 7. That I Iehovah bring you out from the burdens of the Egyptians B. G. cum caeter rather from being under the burdens A. that ye be not subject to the burdens I. Vers. 8. Which I did lift up my hand to give it A. B. H. better than upon the which I lift up my hand to give it L. S. P. for upon is not in the text or for the which V. for also is added or which with lâ—ft-up hand I sware to give I. I sware is inserted Vers. 12. Gave them a commandement to the children of Israel V. L. I. or commanded them to the children of Israel A. P. better than concerning the children of Israel B. the preposition el signifieth to or then gave them a charge to goe to the children of Israel G. S. to goe is added Vers. 14. Chenoch and pallâ— A.P. rather than Chanoch I. for it is hatephpathah where pathah is assumed to sheva to helpe to pronounce it and it is better expressed with e than a as the Septuag Hanoch so also V.L. for it is expressed with the some points with the other Henoch Gen. 5. and rather than Henoch S.L.V.B.G. for it is written with cheth which is rather expressed with ch than h. Chetzron I. rather than Hesron L. B. or without an aspiration Esron S. or Hetzron V. or Chezron A P. The first letter is cheth which is as much as ch the other tsadi which is expressed by â—z Vers. 16. Kehath I. B. A. P. rather than Caath L. S. or Cahat V. or Kahath G. for it is with sheva which soundeth e. Vers. 18. The yeeres of the life of Kohath I.V.L. cum caeter rather than Kahath lived B. G. Vers. 25. Pinchas I.A.P. not Pinhas V. or Phinees L.S. or Phinehas G. for the middle letter is cheth ch but because of the better sound the last is used Vers. 27. These are they that spake to Pharaoh and in the end of the verse This is that Moses and Aaron I. V. L. S. cum caeter better than these are that Moses and Aaron which spake B. G. Vers. 29. And it was what day the Lord spake I. V. A. P. better than in the day that the Lord
commendation of himselfe But no such supposition iâ— here necessarie for Moses here ascribeth nothing to himselfe but onely sheweth how â—hey were set apart of God for this great worke neither is all kind of boasting unlawfull namely such as is referred to the glory of God as Saint Paul did say of himselfe that he laboured more than all the Apostles 2. As Aaron iâ— in the former verse set before Moses as having the preeminence of nature because he was eldest so here Moses is set before Aaron as having the preeminence of grace who was first called and from whose mouth Aaron was to receive direction and by whose hand Aaron was consecrated to the Priesthood Pellican QUEST XVI In what sense Moses saith he was of uncircumcised lips Vers. 30. I Am of uncircumcised lips and how should Pharaoh heare me c. 1. Whereas the Septuagint read of a small voyce Augustine moveth this doubt that Moses should be said to have so small a voice as though Pharaoh onely had not beene able to heare them quâ—st 7. in Exod. But this doubt ariseth upon ignorance of the originall for the true reading is I am of uncircumcised lips 2. As circumcision properly signifieth the cutting off that which is superfluous in the bodie and so consequently of any superfluitie in any power or facultie so uncircumcision signifieth the remaining of that superfluous part either in any part or power of the bodie or of the soule so because Moses stammered in his speech and so doubled many superfluous syllables in that sense he saith his lips that is his words uttered by his lips were uncircumcised Iun. But that which is uncircumcised is also taken for that which is polluted and defiled as S. Stephen saith Act. 7. that the Iewes were of uncircumcised hearts and eares Perer. But this is diligently to be marked that God notwithstanding Moses so oft complaineth of this naturall defect and imperfection yet would not take it from him but giveth him the supplie of his brother Aarons eloquence that Moses should not be sufficient of himselfe Perer. 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Knowledge still increased the neerer they approched to the time of the Messias Vers. 3. BVt by my name Iehovah was I not knowne The Lord did more fully reveale himselfe to Moses than to Abraham David saw more than Moses of Christ as it is extant in the Psalmes and evident by the particular prophesies of the Messiah Daniel saw more than David describing the very time of the Messiahs comming The Apostles saw more than the Prophets which desired to see those things which they saw and did not see them Matth. 13. Thus we see that still in processe of time knowledge increased and more still was added unto it and the neerer they came unto the time of the Messiah the greater was the light Gregor homil 16. super Ezechiel 2. Doct. God performeth his promises for his owne mercy and truths sake Vers. 4. AS I made my covenant with them The onely cause that moveth the Lord to be gratious to his people is the remembrance of his covenant which proceeded from his love there was nothing in this unthankfull people to procure the love of God toward them So the Apostle saith Herâ—iâ— iâ— love not that we loved God but that he loved us 1 Ioh. 4.10 Piscat 5. Places of confutation 1. Conf. Of certaine Hereticks that take exception to the authoritie of the booke of the Canticles Vers. 3. I Appeared unto c. by the name of almightie God Certaine Heretikes because God was knowne to Abraham by his name Shaddai to Moses by his name Iehovah and there is no booke in Scripture beside the Canticles wherein some of these names of God are not found have impiously taken exception upon this reason against this booke Contra. True it is that in the Canticles which are indited to set forth the sweet spirituall love betweene Christ and his Church the fearefull and terrible names of God are omitted in stead of omnipotent the Church calleth Christ her Spouse peaceable and lovely for Lord her Spouse her beloved for Iehovah that ineffable name she compareth him to a bundle of Myrrhe and to an Ointment powred out so Christ also giveth unto the Church amiable termes as Sister Spouse the Dove and such like and this is the cause why those fearefull names are omitted in that bookes Perer. And for the same cause Christ in the Gospell setteth not forth God under the names of Adâ—nai Shaddai Iehovah as in the Law but under the name of God and our Father because the Gospell bringeth peace and comfort not feare and terror sic Zeigler 2. Conf. Of the Iewes that attribute great force to the letters of the name Iehovah BVt by my name Iehovah was I not knowne The Jewes ascribe much unto this name affirming that by the vertue thereof miracles may be wrought and that Christ did thereby effect his great works they attribute unto this name power to cast out deuils to adjure spirits to heale diseases and hereupon Magicians in their devilish invocations abuse the names of God Elohim Adonai Iehovah Contra 1. Words have no vertue or propertie beside the signification If by words pronounced any thing bee effected it proceedeth of faith not of the sound of the words if any words of themselves wrought any thing most like the words of prayer yet not the words but the prayer of faith saveth Iam. 5.15 If it be answered that the uttering of the name of Iehovah to such purposes is with faith I replie that it cannot be because faith is grounded upon the word but they have no warrant out of the word that the syllables of the name Iehovah have any such force 2. Indeed in the name of Iehovah that is by faith in his name many great works have beene done but not by vertue of the letters and syllables As the seven sonnes of Sceva a Jew by the bare name of Iesus could doe nothing Acts 19.14 but by faith in his name were miracles wrought Act. 3.16 3. Christ wrought miracles not by words and syllables but because he was Iehovah the Lord of life and power himselfe he by his owne power brought forth these wonderfull works 4. Iosephus writeth that Alexander meeting Iaddâ—a the high Priest in his priestly garments having the name of Iehovah in his forehead did fall downe at his feet and worshipped But this was not done by vertue of those letters but by the power of God for being secretly asked of Parmenio why hee whom all men adored fell downe at the high Priests feet answered Non hunc se adorare sed Deo cujus pontifex esset honorem illum habuisse That he worshipped not him but yeelded that honour to God whose Priest he was 6. Places of morall use 1. Observ. The greater light of the Gospell requireth greater faith Vers. 3. BVt by my name Iehovah was I not knowne This then was a just rebuke unto the Israelites that
have forgotten it 2. That in this while they might see whether there were any blemish or defect in the lambe 3. That they might by the sight of the lambe be stirred up to a thankfull remembrance of their deliverance expected 4. To confirme them in the assured confidence of Gods assistance against the Egyptians that whereas they abhorred all these which did kill sheepe either for meat or sacrifice or any other cattell which they superstitiously adored yet the Israelites did foure dayes set apart their paschall lambes to that end without any danger or hurt intended by the Egyptians Pererius Ferus 2. This preparation of the lambe foure dayes before was peculiar only for this time and first passeover because afterward the cause was taken away for neither was there feare lest they should forget to take a Lambe for the Passeover and beside they needed no time to examine the wants and defects of the Lambe being experienced by their daily sacrifices how to make choice of the fittest beasts therefore where the law of the Passeover is repeated as Levit. 23. Deut. 16. the rite of preparing the Lambe foure dayes before is omitted 3. Iosephus is here found to be in an error that saith the lambe was to be prepared upon the 13. day against the 14. when as it is manifestly expressed that it was to be set apart upon the tenth day Perer. QUEST VII Whether a Lambe were killed in every house and how mâ—ny went to the eating of a Lambe LEt every man according to the house of the fathers c. 1. This name of house in Scripture is diversly taken sometime it signifieth all the nation of Israel which is called the house of Iacob Psal. 114. sometime for a whole tribe as the house of Iudah the house of Levi. But here it is taken more strictly for every family contained in their severall houses as appeareth vers 4. where one houshold or family was too little for the eating of a lambe there two neighbours were to joyne together 2. Every particular man is not charged to provide a lambe but the masters of the families onely Ferus 3. Yet not every housholder did provide a lambe as where the houshold was too little for in that case they were to joyne with their neighbours which was done in two respects both in regard of the povertie of such as were not able to provide a lambe and lest that if in every small family they should kill a lambe somewhat thereof might remaine untouched which was against the law of the Passeover neither were there more than one lambe killed in any one house 4. What number was allowed to the eating of a lambe is uncertaine The Hebrewes thinke that tenne were allotted to a lambe but that seemeth not to be generally observed for the lambs were not all of one bignesse nor every mans stomacke and eating alike yet Iosephus seemeth to confirme this opinion of the Hebrewes who writeth that Cesâ—ius the Governour of Judea being desirous to certifie Nero of the number of the Jewes dealt with the high Priest who by the number of the paschall lambs which were killed amounting unto two hundred fiftie and six thousand and counting ten to every lambe he gathered the whole summe of thirtie hundred thousand and seventie thousand that were gathered together at the celebration of the Passeover Ioseph lib. 7. de bello Iud. cap. 17. QUEST VIII Whether beside the paschall lambe there were any other solemne sacrifices NOw whether beside these particular lambes which were slaine in every house there was beside some publike solemne sacrifice it may be questioned But it is not like that there was any such at this time because Moses did so propound his request unto Pharaoh that they might goe three dayes journey to offer sacrifice unto God in the wildernesse therefore it is not like that they kept any publike solemne service of God in Egypt afterward in the time of Hezekiah and Iosias there were many solemne sacrifices offered at the Passeover but they must be distinguished from the Passeover it selfe which was eaten on the 14. day at night but these solemne sacrifices were offered on the 15. day the first solemne day of the Feast Simler QUEST IX Of the divers acceptations of the word evening Vers. 6. THey shall kill it in the twilight or betweene the evenings It is to be considered that the word vespera evening is taken two wayes 1. properly for the space betweene the Sun set and the shutting in of the day light altogether as Iudg. 19.9 it is called the lodging of the day and vers 14. the going downe of the Sunne and this may appeare both by the derivation of the Latine word vespera which is derived of vesper which is Venus starre and both goeth before the Sunne rise thereof called Lucifer the day starre and followeth immediatly his setting and is also called Vesper or Hesperus after the Greeke beside the Hebrew word ghereb signifieth a commixtion when as the day light and the darknesse seeme to be mingled together so that properly the evening signifieth the twilight which at Jerusalem where the pole is elevated almost 32. degrees continueth about the space of an houre and â—5 minutes Or the evening is taken more generally and so sometime it signifieth all the time from the declining of the Sunne in the afternoone till the setting thereof some time it signifieth the whole night as Gen. 1.5 the evening and morning were of the first day the beginning of the day and the night are taken for the whole Thostat Iun. It signifieth also sometime the latter part of the night toward the morning as where it is said Matth. 28.1 that in the evening 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Sabbath when the first day of the weeke began to dâ—wne Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to see the Sepulchre Marke readeth that they came 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 very early in the morning But Pererius taketh exception here to Thostatus affirming that in the first place the evening is taken for the day being the end thereof and the morning for the night being the end also thereof and in the other place the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dawning signifieth the beginning of the next day which the Jewes did begin to reckon from the evening as Luke 23.54 the same word is used where the Evangelist saith That day was the preparation and the Sabbath appeared or dawned 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Contra. 1. The evening is rather taken for the night both because there was darknesse before there was light and so the night was first and then the day as also because in Scripture the civill day is counted from evening to evening Iun. and the beginning of a thing is more properly taken for the whole than the end 2. It is not denied but that the word dawning is sometime taken for approching or drawing neere but seeing S. Marke expoundeth S. Matthewes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
gathered in the fruits of the yeere Simler And this moneth when all things began to revive and spring was answerable unto the state of the Israelites who now were revived by their joyfull deliverance from the winter and boistrous stormes of Egypt Borrh. QUEST V. Why the Israelites are charged to keepe the Passeover in the land of Canaan and not before Vers. 5. NOw when the Lord hath brought thee into the land of the Cananites 1. Hence it is evident that the Israelites were not bound to keepe the passeover in the wildernesse neither do we reade that they kept it more than once there in the second yeere Numb 9. and the next passeover was kept under Iosuah Ios. 5. eight and thirty yeeres after Simler The reason whereof might be this because they were not circumcised after they came out of Egypt for the space of 40. yeeres and the law was that no uncircumcised person should eat of the passeover this also signifieth that we shall not keepe our full and perfect passeover till we come into our heavenly Canaan Pellican 2. The reasons why they are charged to keepe the passeover in that plentifull land that abounded with milke and hony was partly to stirre them up to be thankfull unto God for his benefits and abundant liberality Calvin As also to admonish them that they should remember God in their prosperity and take heed that their full estate did not make them forget him 3. But now in that so fruitfull and pleasant a country as Palestina was is become barren and desolate this judgement hath befallen the Jewes and their country for their sinnes Pellican 4. Five nations only are here named that inhabited Canaan the Cananites Hittites Amorites Hivites Jebusites but the rest also are understood Iun. QUEST VI. Whether the keeping of the passeover was the cause of their deliverance or that the cause of the other Vers. 8. BEcause of that which the Lord did unto me 1. Some doe make this the sense of the place and read thus For this did the Lord doe so unto mee Septuagint Chalde Iun. Vatab. and would have this to be the meaning that God did shew all these wonders in Egypt and deliver them from thence to the end that they should keepe a memoriall of them 2. Others doe reade thus as is set downe supplying the word which and make this the reason of keeping the passeover because the Lord delivered them out of Egypt Simler Calvin Latine Genevens Pagine Montan. And this seemeth to be the more agreeable exposition both for that the cause of a thing goeth before the use thereof the wonders which the Lord did were first done and then the passeover commanded in remembrance thereof this was because of the other rather than the other because of this And againe the children aske not a reason of those things which the Lord did for them but they demand the cause of their service which they performe unto God as is shewed chap. 12.26 and chap. 13.14 Piscator QUEST VII How these things should be as signets upon their hands Vers. 9. IT shall be for a signe upon thine hand c. 1. This phrase is not only used as a similitude that they should alway have the benefits of the Lord in remembrance as a thing alwayes in their sight and that the passeover should as a signet on their head and as a frontlet betweene their eyes call to their remembrance their deliverance out of Egypt Sic Simler Pellic. though in the Proverbs this phrase is used in that sense by way of similitude as Prov. 1.9 They shall be as ornaments to thy head and as chaines to thy necke and chap. 6.21 Bind them to thy heart and tye them to thy necke And by these three to put it on the hands and forehead and to have it in the mouth are signified the faith in the heart the confession in the mouth and the operation of the hands whereby we expresse our thankfulnesse unto God Borrh. 2. Yet this is not all the meaning of this place but it is like also that they used some externall signe as in wearing signets upon their hands and frontlets upon their browes to put them in minde of the Law of God as for the same cause they were commanded to make fringes upon their garments Numb 15.38 And as they were commanded to write the Law upon the postes of their doores so also to binde them 〈◊〉 signets to their hands Deut. 6.6 for like as the Idolatrous nations did weare earings and frontlets in honour of their Idols as the Romane Gentrie were knowne by their rings and their Priests and their wives by their tutuli their foretops so the Lord would have the Israelites to use these ornaments as ensignes of their profession Simler Thus M. Calvin approving the first exposition yet assenteth also unto this if any man thinke that Moses alludeth unto those Qui tarditatis suae conscii subsidia memoriae sibi conficiunt non repugno Which because of their dulnesse doe use these things as helpes to their memory I will not gainsay Iunius also giveth this note Deut. 6.8 upon these words Thou shalt bind them as a signe to thine hand Typus accurata observationis atque perpetuae This was a type of the exact and continuall keeping of the Law Therefore there is no inconvenience to thinke that as they used fringes upon their garments so also frontlets and signets that should be alwayes in their eyes to put them in minde of the Law of God as reverend Beza very well noteth also Erat hic ritus quem postea Iudaei suis superstitionibus contaminarunt a Domino constitutus ut esset veluti 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 legis beneficiorum This rite which afterward the Iewes corrupted with their superstitions was appointed of God that it should be as a remembrance and monument of the Law and of the benefits which the Lord had bestowed upon them Annot. in Matth. 23.5 3. Yet this being admitted I cannot see how the Jewes out of this place can prove that use and custome of writing some part of the law in scroules of parchment and so binding them to their foreheads and to the wrests of their hands as they doe at this day Simler For whereas they write in those parchments certaine sacred lections which they call parashoth Beza which are the foure places where mention is made of these signes upon their hands and frontlets betweene their eyes two out of this Chapter vers 9. and 16. two out of Deut. chap. 6.8 and chap. 11.18 what warrant can they shew for the excerpting of these foure texts rather than any other this seemeth then to be a tradition of their owne without any ground in Scripture 4. But that superstitious use of the Jewes who doe place the greatest part of their religion in carrying about with them their tephillim and zizim their frontlets and fringes as they call them thinking that thereby they are preserved from evill
much away Simler 4. Now further it is to be observed that this 15. day of the second moneth when Manna was given was the same day which was prescribed for them to keepe the Passeover in that were uncleane Numb 9. signifying thus much that the true Manna was not given to the Jewes which observed the first legall pasch but to the Gentiles which were uncleane through their filthy Idolatry Christ the true Passeover was offered and this was the second pasch under the Gospell which succeeded the first pasch under the Law Ferus ex Gloss. ordinar QUEST III. Whether all the children of Israel murmured Vers. 2. ANd the whole congregation of the children of Israel murmured 1. The word Lun here used signifieth to persist as also to murmure but the latter is more proper they persisted obstinate and opposed themselves by their murmuring against Moses and Aaron 2. It is like that there were some godly persons among them that murmured not as Caleb and Ioshua but because they were but few in respect of the rest all are said to have murmured Lyran. and even the Saints also are not without some infirmities Ferus 3. The whole congregation therefore is said to murmure both because it was generall throughout the campe and in regard of the manner they assembled tumultuously against Moses and Aaron and shewed their discontent Simler 4. It is added in the desert to shew the cause of their murmuring the place where they were was barren and dry and yeelded no hope of any succour or comfort Iun. And beside their wretched nature appeareth that being in such misery and distresse which should have stirred them to prayer they fell to murmuring Simler 5. This famine then which they endured was the more grievous in these three regards because all their provision which they had brought out of Egypt was spent and there was small hope of any new supply in that vast and barren desert and beside the multitude was so great that a little provision would not suffice Borrh. 6. So for this cause all the congregation is said to murmure both to include the Levites who also murmured with the rest and there were beside other strange people mingled with the Israelites who set them on worke to murmure as we reade Numb 11.4 Tostat. quaest 1. QUEST IV. How they are said to have murmured against Moses and Aaron here and afterward against the Lord. AGainst Aaron and Moses Yet afterward verse 8. they are said to have murmured not against them but against the Lord the reason is this 1. Because they were the servants and Ministers of God and he which murmureth against Gods Ministers contemneth God himselfe Genevens And Moses so saith Vt adversus illum se scirent murmurasse qui illos miserat That they should know that they had murmured against him who had sent them August quâ—st 59. in Exod. 2. They are said then to murmure against Moses and Aaron because their speech was directly against them and to them but in effect it was against the Lord because not Moses and Aaron but the Lord had brought them out of Egypt which the Israelites repented them of and were discontented with Lyran. and beside that which they murmured for the want of flesh and of bread Moses could not give them but God Thostat quaest 1. QUEST V. Of the grievous murmuring of the Israelites Vers. 3. O That we had died by the hand of the Lord c. These murmuring and obstinate Israelites doe diversly offend 1. In their ingratitude in extenuating the benefits which they had received upon every occasion they looke onely unto their present state and place where they were and thinke not of the place of bondage whence they were brought Pellic. 2. They preferre carnall things before spirituall the flesh-pots of Egypt before the glorious presence of God who now shewed himselfe visibly among them Ferus 3. They preferre their miserable bondage in Egypt with their grosse flesh-pots before their glorious liberty being in some want whereas men will even with the losse of their lives redeeme their liberty Marbach 4. Yea they untruly accuse Moses and Aaron as though they had brought them out for their destruction whereas they did therein nothing of their owne head but as the Lord directed them Ferus Pellican 5. Yea they call their glorious vocation from bondage to liberty a death and destruction Borrh. QUEST VI. How the Israelites are said to have fit by the flesh-pots of Egypt WHen we sate by the flesh pots 1. The word sir signifieth both a pot and a thorne because they used to hang their pots upon hookes of iron or wood like unto thornes and so the meaning is that they sate by the pot hangers whereon they used to hang their pots Oleaster 2. Some thinke this is spoken because they had flocks of cattell in Egypt whereof they might have fed if they would but they did rather use to eat of fish and fowle which they had there in abundance Gloss. ordinar 3. But though the Egyptians abstained from the flesh of bullocks and sheepe it is like the Israelites had their fill and their fitting by the flesh pots both noteth their security Lyran. and their carnall voracity and greedinesse Sedebant affectuoâ—e They sate gaping over the pots Tostat. They had cattell in the desert but if they should have eaten of them they might soone have killed them all up 4. But it is very like that they speake somewhat lavishly in the commendation of Egypt as Dathan and Abiram did call it a land that flowed with milke and hony Numb 16.13 of purpose to disgrace and diminish the true praise of the land of Canaan which indeed was the land that flowed with milke and hony 5. Some thinke further that they had no such store of cattell in the wildernesse because of the want of pasture oâ— that they spared that kinde of flesh lest they should want for sacrifice but it is not like that this people had any such religious thought at this time therefore it is more probable that they longed not for such kinde of flesh which was at hand but for the flesh of fowles such as they used to eat in Egypt and they wanted now for the nature of discontented people is to loath such things as they have and to covet and desire that which they have not and in that the Lord giveth them quailes it seemeth hee satisfied their owne desire but to their further hurt in sending that kinde of flesh which they lusted after Sic fore Gloss. Ordinar QUEST VII In what sense the Lord saith he will raine bread from heaven Vers. 4. I Will cause bread to raine from heaven 1. Some thinke that by bread is understood generally any kinde of nourishment after the manner of the Hebrew phrase Gloss. ordinar Lyran. Oleaster But Augustines reason overthroweth this interpretation Nam isto nomine carnes complectuntur ipsa enim alimenta sunt for so also the flesh
should be comprehended in this word for they were also a kind of nourishment but the flesh and bread here promised were two distinct things as is evident vers 8. 2. Neither is yet bread here taken properly for that which is made of corne for of that kinde Manna was not 3. Therefore the name bread is here taken for that which should be in steed of bread as the foundation and stay of other meates which should serve to strengthen mans heart as bread doth Psalm 104.14 and for that they were to use it as bread in grinding it and baking it and making cakes of it Numb 11.9 Tostat. 4. It is said to raine from heaven because it came downe in the manner of raine or snow out of the aire which is called by the name of heaven as Psal. 8.8 they are called the fowles of heaven 5. And hereby the Lord signifieth the great abundance of this heavenly bread which should overflow and fall every where as the raine that both poore and rich might have enough and in that it came from heaven hee would teach them that although the earth was barren below that he could command the heavens above to nourish them that they should no more be so diffident or distrustfull Ferus QUEST VIII Why they are commanded every day to gather this bread GAther that which is sufficient for every day 1. What this sufficiency was is afterward expressed vers 16. for every one a gomer full Tostat. 2. And as God promiseth to send it so they are required to gather it whereby is signified that although God doe send bread and other necessaries for the sustentation of man yet hee must doe his diligence in the labour and travell of his vocation Ferus 3. And here the Lord promiseth only sufficiencie not superfluity that they should not give themselves to immoderate appetite and gluttony Pellican 4. And further the Lord promiseth bread not for yeeres or moneths but for every day for it selfe that they should depend upon Gods providence day by day Genevens And for this cause the Hebrewes thinke that the seventh yeere of rest was appointed in the law wherein they should neither sow nor reape that as well the rich as poore should that yeere depend upon Gods providence And agreeable unto this rule is that petition in the Lords prayer Give us this day our daily bread where our Saviour teacheth us daily to depend upon God for our food Oleaster QUEST IX How the Lord is said by this to have proved his people and to what end Vers. 4. THat I may prove them 1. This probation of them was not to that end that the Lord should have experience of them for their froward nature was well enough knowne to him but as Augustine saith ut ipsis hominibus ostenderet to make them knowne to themselves and others Tostat. 2. Some referre this probation or triall to that particular law and precept of gathering but a certaine portion of Manna every day to see whether they would beleeve Gods promise and depend upon him Sic Vatab. Borrha Galas Tostat. Rupert 3. Some understand it as well of that precept as of the other not to gather any upon the Sabbath as the Lord tried Adams obedience in that one prohibition not to eat of the forbidden fruit Simler 4. Some will have it taken more largely of all the precepts and commandements touching Manna which were eight in all 1. To gather Manna in the morning 2. To gather that which was sufficient 3. Not to exceede in eating the measure of a gomer 4. Not to leave any till the morrow 5. Upon the 6. day to gather double so much 6. To reserve one gomer for the Sabbath 7. To eat that measure so reserved upon the Sabbath 8. To keepe a gomer of Manna for a monument to posterity Lyranus 5. But it is better to take it in a more generall sense The Lord as hee had tried them before with crosses and adversity so now hee will prove them by his benefits to see whether they will afterward walke in his feare and in obedience before him Sic Ferus Calvin Osiand Pelarg. And thus by this particular benefit God would prepare them to the obedience of his law which should be given afterward Oleaster QUEST X. Why the flesh was given in the evening the bread in the morning Vers. 8. AT even shall the Lord give you flesh to eat c. 1. The reason why both the flesh and bread were not given together as the Ravens brought unto Elias bread and flesh at once both morning and evening 1. King 17. some take to be mysticall Augustine applieth it to Christ who was sacrificed in the evening and rose againe in the morning being the true bread which is given us from heaven Rupertus by the flesh in the evening signifieth the carnall rites of the law by the bread in the morning the faith of the Gospell Ferus by the flesh given in the evening understandeth the incarnation of the Sonne of God in the evening that is toward the end of the world who came to redeeme us and by the bread in the morning when they should see the glory of God the glory of immortality in the next life 2. But leaving these mysticall applications which may be as many and divers as their heads are thaâ— devise them some other thinke that the reason was this because these times were best agreeable unto the things the evening was fittest for the fall of the quailes which being wearied by the â—â—ight of the day doe light upon the ground at night and the morning was the fittest time for the Manna which fell with the dew and if it were not gathered betime it melted with the heat of the Sunne Lyranus These reasons are misliked by Tostatus the first because the quailes came not by any naturall instinct but sent of God by an extraordinary wind and the Manna which was hardned by the fire and melted by the heat of the Sunne had not that property by any naturall quality for then it should have melted by any heat whatsoever as we see butter and oyle doth and other liquid things therefore it was a supernaturall quality which was given to Manna to melt with one kind of heat and not with another But Tostatus hath not thus answered Lyranus reason concerning the falling of Manna in the morning for howsoever that were a supernaturall quality in the Manna yet iâ— appeareth de facto that it did melt by the heat of the Sunne then was the morning the fittest season to gather it in before the Sunne waxed hot The morning then serving best for Manna what other time could bee â—itter for the rayning of flesh than the evening for together they could not come if the flesh had fallen with the Manna it could not have beene gathered 3. But the best solution is which is touched by Lyranus also and subscribed unto by Tostatus that the Lord in sending
from heaven or such bread as hee might bring from Midian beside bread they did also eat of the remainder of the peace offerings Tostat. 2. Before God Oleaster expoundeth before the Tabernacle but as yet the Tabernacle was not built as is shewed before quast 7. nor Aarons Priesthood instituted as Cajetan well noteth here Non interfuit Aaron ut sacrificaret sed ut conviva Aaron was not present as a sacrificer but as a ghest 3. Others doe expound before God In gloriam honorem Dei to the honour and glory of God Simler Calvin So also Origen Omnia quâ— Sancti faciunt in conspectu Dei faciunt All that the Saints doe they doe in the sight of God as the Apostle saith Whether you eat or drinke c. doe all to the glory of God 4. But somewhat more is insinuated here that as after the Tabernacle was built before the Arke was said to be in the presence of God so now because they were assembled in Moses Tabernacle where the cloudy piller rested they are said to eat before the Lord who manifested himselfe in that piller Tostat. quaest 4. in cap. 18. QUEST XVI How the people came to Moses to aske of God Vers. 15. THe people come unto me to seeke God c. and I declare the ordinances of God and his lawes 1. Some expound it that they enquired of God by Moses Oleaster But it is not like that in every small matter Moses consulted with God for them for although the Lord cannot be wearied and he is ignorant of nothing yet for reverence of the divine Majesty they were to forbeare in small matters Tostat. So also Augustine Nunquid per singula credendum est eum consulere solere Deum It is to be thought that for every thing he used to consult with God 2. Some interprete because the sentence of Moses being their lawfull Judge was the sentence of God in asking of Moses they asked of God Cajetan And to the same purpose Augustine moving the question how Moses maketh mention here of the lawes of God seeing there were none as yet written maketh this answer Nisi praesidentem menti suae Dominum consuleret c. Vnlesse he had consulted with God the president of his mind he could not have judged justly Moses therefore was the interpreter of the will and sentence of God revealed unto him so judged according to his lawes 3. But this phrase to seeke God insinuateth a further matter that when they had any weightie businesse which either concerned God or the state of the common-wealth then they went to seeke an answer of God as the phrase is used 1 Sam. 9.9 Iun. So then here is a distinction of causeâ— noted in the greater and weightie affaires they consulted with God by Moses as Iethro saith afterward vers 19. Be thou unto the people to Godward and report their causes unto God but the smaller matters Moses judgeth himselfe which were afterward by the advice of Iethro transmitted over to the inferiour officers QUEST XVII Why the Lord would have Moses to take his direction from Iethro Vers. 19. HEare now my voyce Augustine here moveth a question why the Lord would have his servant Moses to whom he so often spake to take this direction from a stranger to the which he maketh this answere that God hereby would teach us 1. Per quemlibet hominem detur consilium veritatis non debere contemni That by whomsoever any true counsell is given it should not bee contemned 2. Againe God would haue Moses thus admonished Ne eum tentet superbia c. lest that sitting in that high seate of judgement Moses might have beene somewhat lifted up and therefore this was done to humble him 3. Rupertus goeth yet further and sheweth that this fact of Iethro was answerable to that saying in the Gospell That the children of this world are wiser in their generation than the children of light So Iethro for civill government and worldly affaires was wiser than Moses but in things belonging unto God Moses went beyond him Ferus addeth that hereby Moses was humbled Videns se non omnia scire seeing that he knew not all things but was advised by a stranger to take a better course in politike administration than he himselfe could thinke of QUEST XVIII What causes Iethro would have reserved to Moses BE thou for the people to Godward 1. Some thinke that here is a distinction made by Iethro of the spirituall and temporall power the first he would have still reside and rest in Moses as best exercised in spirituall things the other to bee passed over to others Ferus But the chiefe temporall power remained in Moses still after the choice made of the inferiour officers hee was the chiefe Prince and Magistrate notwithstanding nay rather hee resigned afterward his ordinarie spirituall power unto Aaron retaining the temporall still 2. Others thinke that whereas Moses was both a Lawgiver to the people and a Judge also that the first power he reserved still but the other part of executing judgement in particular cases according to those lawes he transmitted over to the officers Ex Simler But this is not true neither for Moses gave the sentence against the blasphemer Numb 24. and against him that violated the Sabbath Num. 5. 3. Wherefore the distinction here made is neither of divers kinds of offices as the spirituall and temporall nor yet of divers parts and functions of the same office as in making and executing of lawes but the difference was of causes small and great the one to bee reserved to Moses hearing the other to be committed to the officers to be chosen And so afterward they came to Moses when any difficult and hard matter fell out as when one blasphemed God in the host Levit. 24. they brought him to Moses likewise when they found one gathering of sticks upon the Sabbath they referred the matter to Moses Numb 15.33 In the cause also of Zelopechads daughters they resorted to Moses Numb 37. 4. And in those weightie matters two things were required of Moses first that hee should consult with God and then declare unto the people the will of God and shew them the ordinances and lawes of God vers 20. the ordinances or as the Latine Interpreter readeth ceremonies did onely appertaine unto God the lawes were of two sorts either such as concerned both God and man as the morall commandements the first table whereof commandeth our dutie toward God the second our dutie to our neighbour or such which onely concerned the affaires and controversies among men as the Judicials Tostat. quaest 5. 5. Herein then consisted Moses office 1. That he should report unto God the requests and demands of the people and so pray for them 2. To report unto the people the will and pleasure of God both Quantum ad cultum Dei what hee required concernnig his service and to shew them the way which they should walke
morall and ceremoniall lawes So that these Judicials were the very bond of the other lawes and kept the people in order and obedience Vrsinus Catech. 2. These lawes doe thus differ 1. The Morall are generall grounded upon the law of nature so are not the other 2. They are perpetuall to endure for ever so doe not the other 3. The Morals require both externall and internall obedience the other onely externall The Morall were the principall and other lawes were to give place unto them and they were the end unto the which the other tended Vrsin 3. Yet these three the Morall Judiciall and Ceremoniall are not severally but joyntly handled by Moses so that among the Morals there are found some Ceremonials and among the Judicials both Morall and Ceremoniall lawes Lyran. And the Moral law contained in the ten Commandements was delivered by the Lords owne voice to the people the rest they received by Moses from God Tostat. quest 1. QUEST III. Of the validity of the lawes Morall Ceremoniall Iudiciall which are abrogated which are not COncerning the validity of these lawes 1. The Ceremonials are utterly abolished so that there is now no place for them under the Gospell neither can they be revived without derogation to the Gospell of Christ as the Apostle saith If yee be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing Galath 5.2 for when the body is come the shadowes must be abolished but the ceremonies were shadowes the body is Christ Coloss. 2.17 Their Temple signified the Church of God their holy place heaven their sacrifices the passion of Christ their expiations the remission of sinnes these things then being fully exhibited and fulfilled in Christ have now no more place in the Church Ferus Againe the ceremonies served only for that carnall people which were as children kept in bondage under the elements and rudiments of the world Galath 4.3 But now we are no longer under tutors and governours the time appointed of the Father being expired but are set free and redeemed by Christ. Ferus Another reason of the abolishing of them is in respect of that people to whom they were prescribed as a marke and cognizance to discerne them from all other nations but now this distinction being taken away and the wall of partition being broken downe both Jew and Gentile being made all one in Christ that also is abolished which discerned them from other people for the causes being changed for the which the law was made there must needs follow also an alteration of the law it selfe Vrsin 2. The Judicials are neither abolished nor yet with such necessity injoyned the equity of them bindeth but not the like strict severity as is shewed before at large in the generall questions prefixed before the first chapter whither I referre the Reader 3. The Morall law remaineth full in force still and is not abrogated Quoad obedientiam in respect of obedience which thereunto is still required now under the Gospell Sed quoad maledictionem but in respect of the curse and malediction which Christ hath taken away So that it is most true which our blessed Saviour saith he came not to dissolve the law but to fulfill it Matth. 5. Hee hath fulfilled it 1. In his owne person in keeping it 2. In paying the punishment for us which was due by the law to the transgressors thereof 3. In enabling us by his grace to walke in obedience to the law Vrsin QUEST IV. Of the difference betweene the Morall and Evangelicall law BUt though the Morall law bee now in force and bind us to obedience as well as it did the Jewes yet there is great difference betweene the law and the Gospell 1. In the knowledge and manifestation thereof for to the Morall law wee have some direction by the light of nature but the knowledge of faith in Christ by the Gospell is revealed by grace 2. The law teacheth what we should be by faith and grace in Christ we are made that which the law prescribeth and the Gospell effecteth in us 3. The conditions are unlike the law tieth the promise of eternall life to the condition of fulfilling the law in our selves the Gospell to the condition of faith apprehending the righteousnesse of Christ. 4. The effects are divers the law worketh terrour the Gospell peace and comfort Vrsin The law revealeth sinne the Gospell giveth remission of sinnes Ferus So that the one is lex timoris the law of feare the other is lex amoris the law of love which also hath a threefold difference yet further 1. Lex timoris facit observantes servos the law of feare maketh the observers thereof servile but the law of love maketh them free 2. The law of feare is not willingly kept but by constraint the law of love voluntariò observatur is willingly observed and kept 3. The one is hard and heavy the other easie and light Tom. opuscul 8. QUEST V. Of the manifold use of the law in the fourefold state of man TOuching the use of the Morall law it is to be considered according to these foure states of man as he was in his creation and state of innocency in his corrupt and decayed nature as hee is restored by grace and as he shall be in the state of glorification 1. Man in his innocency received two benefits by the knowledge of the law which was graft in him by creation that thereby hee was made conformable to the image of God and so directed that he should not have swarved from the will of the Creator and beside he thereby had assurance so long as he walked in obedience of certaine eternity never to have tasted of death corruption or mutability in his state for he that keepeth the law shall live thereby Vrsin 2. In mans corrupt state the law serveth both to restraine the evill and therefore the Apostle saith that the law is not given to a righteous man but to the lawlesse and disobedient 1. Tim. 1.9 as also to discover unto them their sinnes for by the law commeth the knowledge of sinne and therefore the Apostle saith Without the law sinne is dead Rom. 7.9 that is it is not knowne to be sinne Ferus 3. In man regenerate the law is a rule of righteousnesse and a lanterne to their feet as David saith 2. It teacheth the true knowledge of God 3. It assureth a man that walketh therein of his election 2. Pet. 1.10 If ye doe these things yee shall never fall 4. It sheweth what benefit wee have received by Christ the renuing of that image wherein man was first created Coloss. 3.10 5. In the state of glorification the law shall have that use which it had before mans fall to shew the conformity in those glorified creatures in their holy obedience with the blessed will of their glorious Creator Vrsin QUEST VI. Why it pleased God now and not before to give his written law to the world IT followeth now to bee considered why it pleased God to give
now his law unto his people seeing from the beginning of the world there was no written law but as it was by the law of nature inprinted in their hearts 1. God did not therefore now first give unto his people the Morall law written as though he were either mutable in changing his first determination or that in processe of time he had found out a more profitable way than hee knew before as some wickedly have objected Sed quia superfluâ—â—â— fuit hoc fieri stante adhuc lege natura But because this was superfluous and needlesse to be done the law of nature yet standing firme By the light of nature before the floud they discerned good from evill just from unjust and therefore the old world that sinned against this law of nature was justly punished of this law printed in the heart the Apostle speaketh They shew the effect of the law written in their hearts their conscience also bearing them witnesse and their thoughts accusing one another or excusing Rom. 2.15 Now then when this law of nature began more and more to bee obscured and iniquity to abound the Lord thought it needfull to give unto the people a written law Lippom. Ex collation Patrum 2. Another cause of giving the law was Ne sibi homines aliquid defuisse quererentur scriptum est in tabulis îquod in cordibus non legebant Lest that men should complaine that somewhat was wanting that was written in tables which was not written in the hearts August in Psal. 57. Therefore to take away all excuse and pretext of ignorance the Lord gave his written law 3. Another end of giving the law was to prepare and make a way for the Gospell Vt te ad faciendum legem de tuo vires non habere monstraret c. To shew that thou hast not strength of thy selfe to doe the law and so being poore and beggerly shouldest flee unto grace Augustine likewise in Psal. 118. 4. Further the law was given as a supply of the weakenesse and ignorance of man that whereas there was no certaine rule before to know what was good what was evill but men according to their blind fansies and carnall imaginations placed happinesse some in one thing some in another the law was to correct their erroneous opinions and to teach one constant and sure rule of truth and vertue And further such was their errour that though in civill and politike matters the wise among the Heathen by the light of nature and experience attained to some perfection yet they were utterly ignorant of the true knowledge and worship of God which is set forth in the law Tostat. quest 1. 5. Further because the law of nature was more and more obscured the Lord would have his law written in tables of stone that it might ever be kept and remembred and be no more drowned in oblivion Ferus And though those tables of stone wherein the law was written are not now to be found yet the copy of the same law is extant in the Scriptures there to be seene and read which shall continue to the end of the world 6. Lastly The Lord in giving this law to this people therein sheweth his love to his people committing unto them the greatest treasure in the world as Moses saith What nation is so great that hath ordinances and lawes so righteous as all this Law which I set before you this day Deut. 4.8 QUEST VII How the Lord spake all these words and why Vers. 1. GOd spake all these words saying 1. Some thinke that God is said to speake whereas it was an Angell in respect of the opinion of the people that thought Moses spake with God Paul Burgens But it is before shewed chap. 19. quest 40 that it was God himselfe that spake these words who nameth himselfe Jehovah vers 2. which name is not given to any Angell yet this word also is said to have beene spoken by Angels Hebr. 2.2 because God did therein use the ministry of the Angels in framing of that audible voice which was heard So that the Angels speake not now as in the person of God as his messengers as at other times but here they attended only as Ministers Longe aliter hic loquitur quà m ad patres adhuc locutus est the Lord speaketh farre otherwise here than hee spake hitherto to the Fathers Ferus But to them hee spake by the ministry of Angels This question also is well decided by Cajetane You will aske saith he how God is said to speake Cùm ista locutis fieres per Angelum c. Seeing this speech was framed by an Angell The answer is ready Quia ipse Dominus loquebatur in Angelo ad populum c. Because the Lord himselfe spake in the Angell to the people not as the King speaketh by his Embassador or Interpreter Sed ut presens mens in Angelo formans verba hujus sermonis magis quam Angelus But as present in the Angell and so framing the words of his speech rather than the Angell So Cajetane So that God spake as the Author and enditer the Angell spake as the tongue or pen-man of God 2. The Hebrewes have this opinion that this was that great Angell of such eminency Vt citra essentiam Divinam Angelus faciei nominetur that setting the Divine essence aside he is called the Angell of Gods presence Isay 63.9 Paul Burgens addition 1. Nay this Angell of Gods presence that heard them when they cried in their troubles and saved them as there the Prophet saith was none other than Iehovah himselfe the Lord Christ as S. Paul expoundeth 1. Cor. 10.9 Let us not tempt Christ as some of them tempted him and were destroyed of Serpents And in this Angell was the very divine essence of God as the Lord saith Exod. 23.21 My name is in him 3. Burgeus Reason to prove that it was an Angell and not God himselfe that spake because he saith in the third Commandement Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vaine in the third person not in the first as Thou shalt not take my name in vaine and so likewise in the fourth Commandement Which sheweth saith hee that it was an Angell that spake and not God This reason is of small force and may easily be answered 1. The Lord useth the third person because although now the Lord as present in Majesty spake by voice yet this law was to bee delivered afterward written in tables of stone which being a perpetuall monument unto the people of the Lords will was more fitly expressed in the third person because the Lord would no more in like manner as now deliver the law with his owne mouth 2. Beside in the first and second Commandement the Lord useth the first person Thou shalt have no other Gods before mee and I am the Lord thy God a jealous God 3. And further it is observed to be an Hebraisme and an usuall phrase in Scripture that the Lord
cognitione carent quae cognitio non alia re quà m fide in Christum constet Which want the knowledge of Christ which knowledge consisteth in nothing else than in faith in Christ. Marbach Commentar in hunc locum Against this opinion that faith in Christ is not commanded in the Morall law the reasons follow afterward but first the question must further be explaned 1. First then we are to distinguish of faith which is of foure kindes or sorts 1. There is fides initialis or fundamentalis the faith of beginnings or the fundamentall faith whereof the Apostle speaketh Hebr. 11.6 That he which commeth unto God must beleeve that God is c. And this kinde of faith toward God the Apostle referreth to the doctrine of beginnings Heb. 6. 1. This faith apprehendeth onely the being and essence of God to know him to be the only Lord. 2. There is another faith called fides miraculorum the faith of miracles touched by the Apostle 1. Cor 13.2 If I had all faith so that I could remove mountaines 3. There is fides historica an historicall faith which beleeveth all things to bee true that are written in the Scriptures in which sense S Iames saith The Devils beleeve and tremble they beleeve there is a God and that all is true which the Scripture speaketh of God of his justice power punishing of sinners rewarding of the righteous 4. There is beside these a justifying faith whereof S. Paul maketh mention In that I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Sonne of God who hath loved me and given himselfe for me Galath 2.20 This faith is the life of the soule whereby hee which beleeveth is able in particular to apply unto himselfe the merits of Christs death Now this is the difference betweene these foure kindes of faith the first apprehendeth the essence and being of God the second the faith of miracles his power the third which is the historicall faith his truth the fourth namely the justifying faith his mercie The three first to beleeve God to be to beleeve him to bee omnipotent to beleeve him to be just and true are included in the first precept Thou shalt have no other Gods c. but not the last wherein is the errour of the Romanists that make all these kindes of faith the same in substance differing only in property which if it were true then it were possible for them that have the one faith to have the other and so Devils also which in some sort doe beleeve should also be capable of justifying faith But this matter that all these kindes of faith are not the same in substance nor of like nature with the justifying faith is shewed elsewhere whither I referre the Reader 2. Further we are to distinguish of the law for it is taken sometime more largely either for all the Scriptures of the old Testament as Luk 16.17 It is more easie that heaven and earth should passe away than that one title of the law should fall So Ioh. 15.25 It is written in their law they have hated mee without a cause which testimony is found in the Psalmes Psal. 35.19 or else the law is taken for all the bookes of Moses and so the Law and Prophets are named together Matth. 7.12 This is the Law and the Prophets But the law is sometime taken more strictly for the Morall law whereof the Apostle speaketh Rom. 7. I knew not sinne but by the law and so S. Paul opposeth the law of workes to the law of faith Rom. 3.27 Now as the law is taken generally either for all the old Scriptures written by the Prophets or for the writings of Moses it cannot be denied but that faith in Jesus Christ is in this sense both contained and commanded in the law for of Christ the Lord spake by the mouth of his Prophets Luk. 1.70 And Moses wrote of Christ as our Saviour saith Had yee beleeved Moses yee would have beleeved me for Moses wrote of mee Ioh. 5.45 But as the law is taken strictly for the Morall law the law of workes which containeth only the ten words or Commandements so we deny this justifying faith to bee commanded in the law 3. Indirectly or by way of consequent it will not bee denied but that this faith also is implied in the law because we are bound by the law to beleeve the Scriptures and the whole word of God for this is a part of Gods worship to beleeve his word to be true and so some define faith Est certa persuafio qua assentimur omni verbo Dei nobis tradita It is a certaine perswasion whereby wee give assent to all the word of God Vrsin And so by this precept wee are bound to receive all the promises and doctrines concerning Christ delivered in the old and new Testament But directly as a part and branch and so a worke of the law wee deny justifying faith to be in this precept or any other prescribed or commanded The reasons are these 1. The Morall law and the Gospell differ in the very nature and substance for the one is naturally imprinted in the heart of man the other is revealed and wrought by grace The first the Apostle testifieth where he saith The Gentiles which have not the law do by nature the things contained in the law Rom. 2.14 The other also is witnessed by the same Apostle Rom. 2.24 We are justified freely by his grace The argument then may be framed thus The morall law is graft in the heart of man by nature but faith in Christ is not by nature but by grace above nature for if it were naturall all men should have faith which the Apostle denieth 2. Thessal 3.2 Faith then in Christ belongeth not to the law Therefore it is strange that Bellarmine confessing in another place that pracepta decalogi sunt explicationes juris natura that the precepts of the decalogue are the explications of the law of nature Lib. 2. de Imaginib Sanctor cap. 7. could not inferre hereupon that the precepts of faith and of the Gospell are no explications of the law of nature and therefore have no dependance of the morall law Ambrose useth this very argument Nemo sub lâ—ge fidem constituat lex enim intra mensuram ultra mensuram gratia Let no man place faith in the law for the law is within the measure and compasse of nature but grace is beyond measure Ambros. in 12. Luc. 2. The effects of the law of works and the law of faith are divers for the one worketh feare the other love and peace as the Apostle saith Ye have not received the spirit of bondage to feare againe but yee have received the spirit of adoption whereby we crie Abba Father Rom. 8.17 Againe the Apostle saith The letter killeth the Spirit giveth life 2 Cor. 2.6 Thus then the argument standeth the same thing cannot bee the instrument of contrary things of life and death peace
immutable and perpetuall but such was the institution of the Sabbath Answ. The proposition is not true for the fathers before Moses used to offer sacrifices Circumcision was given to Abraham even from the beginning there was a difference betweene cleane and uncleane beasts and yet all these being types and figures of things to come are abrogated by Christ. Simler 3. Object The lawes given before mans fall in the state of his innocencie could bee no types of the Messiah being not yet promised and therefore they doe bind all Adams posteritie such was the sanctifying of the Sabbath Answ. 1. Such lawes the ground whereof was printed in the soule of man in the creation as are all morall precepts are perpetuall but not all in generall given unto Adam as was the prohibition to eat of the tree of life Vrsin 2. But it may be further answered that the Sabbath was not instituted before mans fall for he is held to have fallen upon the sixth day the same day wherein he was created as it is at large handled in that question upon the 3. of Genesis 3. This law of sanctifying the Sabbath in substance remaineth still though the ceremonie of the day be changed 4. Object The keeping of the Sabbath is called an everlasting covenant Exod. 31.16 it is therefore to remaine for ever Answ. 1. So Circumcision is called an everlasting covenant because they were to continue till the comming of the Messiah and so long as the Common-wealth of Israel continued to them it was perpetuall but now their state being dissolved the covenants made with them are expired also Simler 2. It is called everlasting in respect of the signification and substance thereof our rest in Christ and so it remaineth still and shall for ever as the Kingdome of David in the Messiah shall never have end Vrsin 5. Object The reason and cause of the law is immutable namely the memoriall of the creation therefore the law it selfe also and seeing the knowledge of the creation is necessarie so also is the symbole and monument thereof the celebration of the seventh day Answ. 1. The cause or reason of a law being immutable the law it selfe also is immutable if it bee so tied unto the law as that it cannot stand if the law be changed but so is it not here for the creation may as well be remembred upon another day as upon the seventh Vrsin 2. All the sacrifices and ceremonies of the law were symboles and signes of necessary things as Circumcision the paschall Lambe of the Circumcision of the heart and of the Messiah which things remaine still but the symboles are abolished Simler Now then that Christians are not bound unto the Jewish Sabbath it is evident by these reasons 1. By the doctrine of the Apostles Galath 4.10 You observe dayes and moneths times and yeares I am in feare of you lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vaine and by name S. Paul speaking of the Sabbaths saith They were shadowes of things to come but the bodie is in Christ Coloss. 2.16 2. The Apostles by their example shewed that the Jewish Sabbath was determined for they began to keepe the first day of the weeke Act. 20.7 and 1 Cor. 16.2 3. All types and shadowes were but to continue untill the bodie came which was Christ but the Sabbath was one of those shadowes 4. The Sabbath was a note of cognizance and a worke of distinction and difference betweene the Israelites and other people which difference and partition is now taken away in Christ for now there is neither Jew nor Grecian but all are one in Christ Galath 4.28 Ex Vrsin In Gregories time there were Qui die Sabbati aliquid operari prohiberent which did prohibite to doe any worke upon the Sabbath or Saturday whom he refelleth thus Quos quid aliud nisi Antichristi praedicatores dixerim c. whom what else should I call than the preachers of Antichrist who when he commeth shall cause both the Sabbath and the Lords day to be kept without doing any worke for because he shall faine himselfe to die and rise againe hee shall cause the Lords day to be had in reverence and because he shall compell them unto Judaisme he shall likewise command the Sabbath to be kept And thus he concludeth Nos quod de Sabbato scriptum est spiritualiter accipimus c. We spiritually observe that which is written of the Sabbath for the Sabbath signifieth rest Verum autem Sabbatum Redemptorem nostrum habemus and we have our Redeemer and Saviour our true Sabbath 2. Cont. Against the Iewes carnall observing of the Sabbath BEside this that the Jewes would enforce upon us their Sabbath they have another errour in the manner of keeping their Sabbath which they solemnize in taking their ease in eating and drinking and giving themselves over to all pleasure and licentiousnesse for as Burgensis reporteth of them The Jewes thinke they are bound upon every Sabbath to eat thrice that is one dinner and two suppers and in so doing they shall escape the punishment of hell Burgens addition 4. Contra. 1. Thus their forefathers kept an holy day to the golden Calfe in eating and drinking and rising up to play God will not be so served 2. The way to Paradise is a strait and narrow way by many afflictions we must enter into the Kingdome of heaven not eating and drinking and taking our pleasure 3. Augustine saith Quanto melius foeminae eorum lanam facerent quà m in neomeniis saltarent How much better might their women spinne than dance in their new moones Tract 4. in Ioan. 4. Chrysostome also thus proveth that the Sabbath is not â—tii but spiritualis actionis materia not an occasion of idlenesse but of spirituall exercise because the Priests were by the law upon that day to offer double sacrifice but if it were a day of ease Oportebat Sacerdotem omnium maximè otium agere it was meet that the Priest most of all should take his ease then Concion de Lazaro 3. Cont. Of the Iewes superstition in the precise and strict keeping of the Sabbath rest AGaine the Jewes were superstitiously addicted to the corporall rest which they would not breake upon any occasion as our Chronicles doe make mention of a Jew that being fallen into a jakes refused to be taken out thence upon their Sabbath day and the next day being the Lords day the Governour would not suffer him to be pulled out upon that day because it was the Christians Sabbath and so the wilfull Jew there perished Of the like strictnesse were some among the Christians in keeping of the externall rest upon the Lords day therein imitating the Jewes as Gregorie in the fore-cited place writeth how some did forbid any to wash themselves upon the Lords day whom he thus confuteth 1. Si pro luxu animi ac voluptatis quis lavari appetit c. If any man desire to be washed of wantonnesse and pleasure it
should not be soone provoked because rage is a sinne before God and so deserveth punishment and for that every man desireth libertie but he that is given to anger is not Dominus sui ipsius Master of himselfe 2. He must take heed ut 〈◊〉 in ira permaneat that he continue not long in anger Psal. 4. Be angrie and sinne not Ephes. 4. Let not the Sunne goe downe upon your wrath 3. Men must bee carefull ne procedat primò in corde that anger proceed not first in the heart for then it turneth to hatred and he that hateth his brother is a manslayer for Se interficit spoliando se charitate alium He killeth himselfe by spoyling himselfe of charitie and another also 4. Ne procedat in verbo It must not proceed in word for he which calleth his brother foole is in danger of hell fire Matth. 5. 5. Ne procedat in opere It must not proceed unto the deed for in every worke wee must consider two things Facere justitiam misericordiam To doe justice and shew mercie but he which is angrie can doe neither For the first the Apostle saith that the wrath of 〈◊〉 doth not accomplish the righteousnesse of God Iam. 1.20 It is reported of Plato that hee should say to his servant that had offended him Punirem te nisi essem iratus I would punish thee if I were not angrie And he that is angrie can shew no mercie as it is said of Simeon and Levi in their rage they killed a man Gen. 49. Thom. in opuscul QUEST VIII Of rayling and reviling NExt unto the inward rage and heat of the affections followeth the outward indignation expressed by words gesture and other signes and the third degree is when men fall to plaine railing backbiting slandering threatning as these three are thus expressed by our blessed Saviour Whosoever is angrie with his brother unadvisedly shall be culpable of judgement and whosoever saith unto his brother racha shall be worthie to be punished by a counsell and whosoever shall say thou foole shall be worthie to be punished with hell fire Matth. 5.22 1. Here our Saviour maketh three degrees of anger or rage the one in the sudden heat and boyling of the affection inwardly without cause the second in the shewing of this indignation outwardly by any disdainfull words as in calling one racha that is idle head light braine for so rik in the Hebrew to the which this Syrian word agreeth both in sound and sense signifieth light value Iun. Matth. 5.22 As also this indignation may bee expressed by other signes as by grinning frowning spitting and such like Simler Then the third degree followeth in open railing as calling one foole with other termes of reviling 2. As our Saviour maketh difference of the sins so also he sheweth divers degrees of punishment alluding unto the politike forme of judgement for first there was the session or judgement of three who judged of small causes then of 23. who determined more waightie matters then of 71. before whom the high Priest or a false Prophet and sometime a whole tribe was convented and judged Beza So he that is angrie shall be censured in the secret judgement of God he that sheweth his indignation by opprobrious words shall be held guiltie before all the assemblie of the heavenly Angels and Saints he that raileth and revileth shall bee judged worthie of hell fire that is of the greatest punishment Marlorat For they used foure kinds of punishments among the Jewes whereby they put malefactors to death strangling the sword stoning and fire of the which the last was the worst Beza 3. For he that raileth and revileth tres quasi uno ictu occidit killeth three as it were with one blow himselfe him that giveth credit and the third whom he slandereth and revileth Basting QUEST IX Whether beating and wounding though there be no killing be not forbidden here THe externall act followeth not only of killing but in offering any other violence with the hand in beating wounding striking and such like 1. Here commeth to be examined the opinion of R. Salomon that in this precept only murther is forbidden but other violent wrongs in maimes wounds shedding of bloud beatings and such like hee thinketh onely afterward to bee restrained in the Judicials 2. Against this opinion these reasons are enforced 1. The Judicials only concerned the Israelites and did not bind the Gentiles but even among them these kind of violent assaults were unlawfull therefore they are forbidden not by the Judicials only but by the Morall law Tostat. qu. 21. He also urgeth this reason The things which were forbidden by the Judicials of Moses only it was no sinne for the Israelites to doe before those Lawes were given them that is before they came to Mount Sinai but it was unlawful before for them one to smite another as for the same cause Moses reproved an Hebrew that did his brother wrong and smote him Exod. 2.13 therefore these wrongs were not only prohibited by the Judiciall law 3. Burgensis giveth this reason Quia facit contra charitatem Because he that smiteth or woundeth though he kill not doth against charity as he also doth which killeth though in an higher degree So also Lippoman 4. Tostatus further giveth this rule Omnia quae pertinent ad idem genus reducuntur ad idem prâ—ceptuum All that belongeth to the same kinde is to be referred to the same Commandement as all wounding beating smiting tendeth to the hurt of our brother in his body as killing likewise doth QUEST X. Why actuall murder is such an hainous sinne before God NOw followeth the greatest transgression among the rest which is the taking away of a mans life 1. For if hatred envy railing wounding and the like are counted murder before God in respect of the will and purpose much more murder it selfe which is the scope and end whereat all the former wrongs and injuries drive for if those things are displeasing unto God because they often bring forth murder the effect it selfe must needs bee more hainous Basting 2. Another reason which amplifieth the sinne of murder is because the Lord by this meanes seeth Imaginem suam violari that his image is violated which is given as a reason of this precept Gen. 9.6 Calvin 3. And againe it is an unnaturall sinne because man is as our owne flesh as the Prophet saith Isai. 58.7 Hide not thy selfe from thine owne flesh but no man ever hated his owne flesh as the Apostle saith Calvin Yea the murderer herein is crudelier Lupâ— more cruell than the Wolfe for as Aristotle writeth 4. Animalium Give unto a Wolfe the flesh of another Wolfe and he will not eat it yet one man preyeth upon another and devoureth another Thomas 4. Hominum societas violatur by this meanes the societie of man is violated which that it may be preserved the Lord forbiddeth all shedding of bloud Galas 5. Polluitur foedatur terra
may bee some blemish and imperfection in the manner seeing our best actions are stained as the Prophet saith All our righteousnesse is 〈◊〉 filthie clouts Isai. 64.4 3. If veniall sin be taken for a small offence wee denie not but that such blemishes are found in matrimoniall duties which are tolerated and covered in mariage according to that excellent saying of Augustine Libidinis voluptas non propter nuptias cadit in culpam sed propter nuptias accipit veniam The pleasure of lusts doth not take blame because of mariage but for mariage sake doth receive pardon Lib. 1. de concupis cap. 15. 4. But mortall or deadly sin in mariage there is none that is in his sense haynous and grievous for if his meaning be that the fleshly desire would extend it selfe to another that is coveteth strange flesh this is not incident unto any act of mariage but is a violating of mariage by adulterous and unchaste thoughts And if there could be any sâ—ch mortall and deadly sin in the duties of mariage what is become of that saying of the Apostle concerning the giving in mariage Hee sinneth not 1 Cor. 7.36 which also may bee understood of the duties of mariage Augustine hath this worthie saying Sicut bono uti malè malum est ita maleâ—ti bene bonum est benè utitur bono continentiam dedicans Deo bono utitur malè continentiam dedicons idolo malo utitur male concupiscentiam relaxans adulteriâ— bene utitur malo concupiscentiam restringâ—â—s connubio As it is evill to use a good thing evill so it is good to use an evill thing well as hee useth a good thing well that dedicateth his continencie unto God hee useth a good thing evill that dedicateth his continencie to an Idoll hee useth an evill thing evill that doth loose the reines of his concupiscence to adulterie he useth an evill thing evill who restraineth his concupiscence to matrimonie August cont Pelag. 1.19 If he doe an evill thing well that limiteth and keepeth his concupiscence within the bounds of mariage hee then cannot sinne mortally V. Confut. Against Tostatus that would not have simple fornication punished by humane lawes AGainst Tostatus here also worthily exception is taken who justifieth this defect and imperfection in humane lawes he meaneth such as are practised among the Romanists which doe not punish simple fornication these are his words Injustissima civilis lex esset qua â—eretrices tolleret That should be a most unjust Civill law which should take away strumpets and punish simple fornication c. Wee will see and examine his reasons 1. Civill lawes are only to restraine such sins whereby justice is violated and injurie done unto another but in fornication there is no act of injustice Non est ibi aliqua persona cui inferatur injuria There is no person there to whom any injurie can bee done Contra. There is a manifold wrong committed in single fornication 1. They offer wrong and dishonour unto Christ in making the members of Christ the members of an harlot 1 Cor. 6.15 2. They injurie themselves in sinning against their owne bodies in defiling and polluting them ibid. vers 18. 3. They doe wrong unto their posteritie bringing upon them the shame of bastardie making them illegitimate and disenabling them to inherit 2. If humane lawes should punish fornication it would give occasion unto adulterie incest Sodomitrie seeing the most in a common-wealth are weake and imperfect and if they were restrained from this smaller vice they would fall into greater enormitieâ— Contra. 1. As though God hath not appointed a remedie against fornication and all other uncleannesse by lawfull matrimonie shall men make themselves wiser than God and seeke to cure one evill by another 2. And thus the divine order is perverted among the Romanists for they restraine mariage and give way unto fornication and therefore it is no marvell if among them such unnaturall lusts doe reigne Bernard well sheweth the reason thereof Tolle de Ecclesia honorabile conjugâ—um c. Take away from the Church honorable matrimonie he saith not take away harlots and brothel houses as Tostatus doth shal ye not replenish it with incestuous persons with concubinaries Sodomiticall vices c. supeâ— Cant. serm 66. 3. Humane lawes are not to forbid all sinnes because Homo legem ponens non potest dare gratiam praeservativam c. because man making a law cannot give preseruing grace to keepe it and this was the cause why Lex Mosis non prohibâ—bat omnia vitia Moses law did not forbid all vices because therein was no grace given or helpe ministred to avoid them therefore some things were permitted among them as to take usurie of the Gentiles to give a bill of divorcement and such like So Tostatus quaest 23. Contra. 1. By this reason humane lawes should forbid no sins because Gods word not mans law giveth grace to abstaine from any sin 2. Neither is there any sin forbidden in the new Testament against the morall law which is not prohibited in the old as it may appeare by our blessed Saviours interpretation of the law Mat. 5. wherein he giveth no new law but only expoundeth the old 3. Though Moses law gave no grace to keepe it yet because it was a Schoolemaster to bring us unto Christ Gal. 3.19 it was fit it should be a perfect law and containe a strict rule of all righteousnesse that men the rather should bee driven unto Christ seeing themselves to come so farre short 4. The toleration of some things among the Israelites for their hardnesse of heart sheweth not a defect in the law but an imperfection in them that could not bee subject to the perfect rule of the law 5. And concerning the punishment of fornication it was not omitted in Moses law for although fornication with one were recompenced with marriage and paying of the dowrie Deut. 22.24 yet if a daughter in Israel did play the whore she was stoned to death ibid. vers 21. And seeing the law saith There shall not bee a whore of the daughters of Israel Deut. 23.17 how dare any defend the tolerating and suffering of whores in a Christian Common-wealth 4. Morall observations 1. Obser. Against shamelesse adulterers that thrust themselves into the Congregation of the Lords people THou shalt not commit adulterie This sin being so haynous in the sight of God whereby both the ordinance of God is perverted and matrimoniall faith mutually given violated and the Temples of the holy Ghost defiled hereby their impudencie unshamefastnesse and profanenesse is evident that being guiltie of this sin dare presume to come into the Lords house to offer themselves to heare the Word to receive the Sacraments or communicate in any other exercise of religion against whom the Prophet thus enveigheth Will you steale murther commit adulterie c. and come and stand before me in this house whereupon my name is called and say wee are delivered though wee have done all these
Arke and Tabernacle were apart so that it seemeth in that confused and unsetled estate that the Law in that behalfe concerning the place of sacrifice was not so strictly observed QUEST XXII Whether it was lawfull to sacrifice before the Arke and at the Tabernacle while they were asunder NOw the place where the Lord did put the memoriall of his name was in the Tabernacle and Arke while they were placed together and when they were in two divers places it was lawfull to sacrifice before either of them 1. That it was lawfull to sacrifice where the Arke was is evident by the practise of the men of Bethshemesh that offered sacrifice at the returne of the Arke from the land of the Philistims 1 Sam. 6. So David sacrificed before the Arke when he brought it from the house of Ebed Edom 2 Sam. 6. and the reason is because the name of God was invocated or called upon where the Arke was 2 Sam. 6.2 And from the mercie seat which was upon the Arke of the Testimony did the Lord use to speake and give answers Numb 7.89 2. Likewise that it was lawfull to sacrifice where the Tabernacle was while the Arke was away is apparent 1. Because there was the brasen Altar whereon they offered their burnt offerings before the dore of the Tabernacle Levit. 17.6 which Altar followed alwayes the Tabernacle and not the Arke as Salomon found the Arke at Jerusalem but the Tabernacle with the furniture thereof he fetched from Gibeon 2 Chron. 1.3 4 5. 2. Where the Ministers of the Altar the Priests and Levits were there was it lawfull to offer sacrifice for they gave their attendance to that end but most of the Priests and Levits remained with the Tabernacle as Ahimelech with 85. more were at Nob where Saul put them to death while the Arke abode in the house of Abinadab who consecrated his sonne Eleazar to keepe it 1 Sam. 7.1 who alone sufficed not for all sacrifices and oblations of Israel it seemeth therefore that most of their sacrifices were brought then to the Tabernacle though the Arke at that time were in another place 3. Beside after the captivity of Babylon when the Arke was no more to be seene as some thinke hid by Ieremy 2 Macchab. 2 but as is most like lost in the captivity or burnt with the Temple they used to offer sacrifices for after the captivity they restored and renewed such necessary parts and implements as before were in Salomons Temple and were burnt together with the Temple they made like unto them afterward as mention is made of Luk. 1. how Zacharie burned incense before the Lord which was upon the golden Altar likewise Matth. 27. the vaile was rent which divided the most holy place from the Sanctuary when Christ gave up the ghost and seeing they offered sacrifices for which cause some sold doves in the Temple whom Christ cast out Matth. 12. they had also the brasen Altar only the Arke they had not for seeing the Tables of stone the pot of Manna and Aarons rod were all missing for the keeping whereof the Arke was principally made they had no cause to make a new Arke there being no farther use or service for it Tostat. quaest 43. QUEST XXIII How long the Arke was severed from the Tabernacle NOw because mention is made before of the parting and separation of the Arke and Tabernacle it shall not be amisse to shew how long the Arke was absent from the Tabernacle which time will be found to be not much under 100. yeeres as may bee gathered thus after the Arke returned from the country of the Philistims it remained in the house of Abinadab 20. yeeres 1 Sam. 6. and all the time of Samuels government and Sauls reigne who made 40. yeeres betweene them Act. 13.21 whereof those 20. yeeres were part then it was removed by David about the 8. yeere of his reigne to the house of Obed Edom where it continued three moneths and from thence to the house of David in Jerusalem where it stayed 32. yeeres and 11. yeeres more under Salomons reigne for when hee had finished the Temple in the 11. yeere of his reigne 1 King 6.38 he brought the Arke from Davids tent which hee had pitched for it into the Temple 2 Chron. 1.4 So all these yeeres being put together 40. yeeres of Samuel and Sauls government 40. yeeres under David and 11. yeeres of the reigne of Salomon will make 91. yeeres whereunto adde those seven moneths during which time the Arke so journed among the Philistims 1 Sam. 6.1 In which compasse and continuance of yeeres the Arke had these sundry removes first it being carried from Shiloh was seven moneths in the countrey of the Philistims from thence it was carried to Bethshemesh where 50. thousand and 70. persons were slaine for looking into the Arke 1 Sam. 6. then it removed to Kiriathiearim 1 Sam. 7. from thence to the house of Obed Edom and so to the house of David 2 Sam. 6. where it stayed till Salomons Temple was built these were the setling places and mansions of the Arke after it was severed from the Tabernacle till they were joyned together againe saving that sometime the Arke upon some speciall occasion was removed for a while as when they went out to battell as 1 Sam. 14.18 and so was brought to the place againe Sic fere Tostat. qu. 42. QUEST XXIV Of the removing of the Tabernacle AS the Arke was thus removed up and downe so also was Moses Tabernacle for first it was carried from place to place as long as the Israelites pitched their tents in the wildernesse and after they were come into the land of Canaan the Tabernacle remained a long time in Gilgal for thither came the Gibeonites to Ioshuah in Gilgal Iosh. 10. after that it was set up in Shiloh Iosh. 18.1 where it continued all the time of the Judges untill Samuel who understanding by the Spirit of prophecie that the Lord had rejected Shiloh removed the Tabernacle to Nob where Saul put 85. Priests to the sword from thence it seemeth the Tabernacle was translated to Gibeon where it continued untill Salomons Temple was finished from thence Salomon brought it into the Temple 2. Chron. 1.3 Tostatus qu. 42. QUEST XXV Of the places where it was lawfull or unlawfull to sacrifice NOw concerning the places wherein it was lawfull to sacrifice this distinction is to bee observed 1. That the ordinary place was in the Tabernacle when the Arke and it were together and both at the Tabernacle and before the Arke when they were divided as is before shewed 2. Extraordinarily it was lawfull for the Prophets to sacrifice elsewhere as did Samuel David Elias as is before declared quest 20. being thereunto directed by the Spirit of God 3. But in the high places it was unlawfull to sacrifice and therefore those Kings are commended which tooke away the high places and those reproved being otherwise good Kings that suffred them to remaine 4.
pay 25. asses that is so many three farthings which mulct being too easie one Lucius Neratius in a bravery used of purpose â—o beat and buffet those with his fists whom he met and caused his man presently to pay him the penaltie of the law whereupon the Pretors of Rome devised to impose a greater mulct and punishment for such assaults and batteries Gâ—ll. lib. 20. ex Calvin Marbach QUEST LII Who should beare the charges if a servant had done the hurt HE shall beare his charges But what if one servant had beaten another or a servant had smitten a free man that hee kept his â—ed upon it 1. In this case either the master of the servant was to beare the charges or else he was to deliver his servant and he was to serve or to be sold to make it good if hee had not of his owne to make satisfaction as the like order was taken for theft Exod. 21.3 2. But here is a further doubt what if the servant that did the hurt were an Hebrew who could not be sold over for more than six yeares and it might so fall out that there remained but one yeare untill the seventh being the yeare of remission came and so his service for so short a time could not make sufficient recompence The answer is that in this case the servant might be sold to serve six yeares more after the yeare of remission as in the case of theft if hee had not wherewithall of his owne to make satisfaction but for longer than six yeares he could not be sold nor more than once But if the servant were a Gentile he might be absolutely sold over to serve a longer time 3. Now if the charge would not come to the value or worth of six yeares service in this case the servant was to serve no longer than till his service would make sufficient amends as if a mans service for six yeares were esteemed at six pounds and the charges of healing arise to three then the servant was to bee sold over onely to serve three yeares which would countervaile the charge Tostat. quaest 23. QUEST LIII What servants this law meaneth and what kinde of chastisement is forbidden Vers. 20. IF a man smite his servant with a rod c. 1. This law is concerning such servants as were no Hebrewes for them they were not to use so hardly and cruelly Levit. 25.38 neither could the Hebrew servant be said to be their money for hee was not absolutely sold but onely for a time Tostat. 2. This case is propounded if the master smite with a rod or any other thing which is not likely to kill but if he smite him with a sword or casting of a stone or such like if the servant die whether under the masters hand or afterward the master shall be surely punished that is shall die for it because in smiting his servant with a deadly weapon it appeareth that he intended to kill him Simler Tostat. quaest 23. 3. And in case it be evident that the servant die of that beating within a day or two the master was likewise to be punished for it but if as the Hebrew phrase is hee stand a day or two after that is be whole and sound that he may goe about his businesse Simler Nam stare tantâ—ndem valet ac vigere omnibus integris membris For to stand is all one as to be perfect and sound in all the parts and members Calvin then the master was free So also expoundeth Procopius Vbi ex vulnere vel verbere convaluerit servus c. Where the servant recovereth of the stripe or wound though he afterward die the master is held to be innocent Likewise Thomas Aquin. Si â—asio certa esset lex poenam adhibuit c. If the hurt be certaine and evident the law appointeth a punishment for a maime the losse of his service vers 26. for the death of the servant the punishment of manslaughter but where the hurt is uncertaine the law inflicteth no mulct incertum enim erat â—trum ex percussione mortuus c. For it is uncertaine whether he died of the beating 4. This law for servants was more equall than that cruell custome of the Romanes that give unto masters power over their servants life as in Augustins time Vedius Polliâ— used to cast his servants that offended into the fish ponds but afterward this cruell custome was mitigated for Antoninus made a law that hee which killed his servant without cause should die for it as if he had slaine anothers servant Galas And Adrianus the Emperour banished one Vmbra a matron for five yeares for handling her maids cruelly Ex Simler 5. But whereas this law giveth libertie to the master to beat his servants though it were extremely so that death followed not wee must consider that this law requireth not an absolute perfection Sed Deus se accommodaviâ— ad 〈◊〉 populi c. But God applieth himselfe to the rudenesse of the people tolerating many things among them for the hardnesse of their hearts Galas QUEST LIV. The meaning of this clause For he is his money FOr he is his money 1. That is bought with his money hee seemeth to have punished himselfe sufficiently in the losse of his servant Iun. 2. But if this reason were 〈…〉 way the 〈◊〉 to be punished though his servant died under his hand for hee 〈◊〉 iâ— his money 3. For answer to this objection a servant is to be considered two wayes as he is a man and as he is made apt and fit â—o labour the servant oweth not to his master his life but his labour therefore if the master take away the life of the servant directly as if he die with beating under his hand the master is to be punished for it for as hee loseth a servant so the politike state is deprived of a man and herein hee doth wrong to the Common-wealth But if the master indirectly procure his servants death as in overcharging him with labour in denying him competent food in immodeâ—â—te correcting him now the master is not guiltie of his servants death for now puâ—iâ—â—at eum tanquam possessionem suam ut eâ—â—enâ—â—ret he did punish him as his possession and servant to amend and correct him not as a man therefore the reason holdeth in this indirect kinde of killing He is his money c. and not in the other Tostat. quaest 23. QUEST LV. Whether this law meane the voluntarie or involuntarie hurt done to a woman with childe Vers. 22. ALso if men strive and hurt a woman with childe 1. Some Hebrewes thinke that this case here put is of involuntarie hurts and killing as a man striving against his will hurteth a woman with childe and shee dieth for this the man was not to die in their opinion but to redeeme his life with a peece of money Contra. But where any slaughter is committed altogether against ones will as if a man shoot an arrow and kill a
woman with child or shee be behind him and he knew it not and hee hurteth her with his heele that she die in this case the man deserved no punishment at all no not so much as a pecuniary mulct to be inflicted which yet is appointed by this law where death followeth not therefore this law meaneth not any such act which is altogether involuntarie Tostat. quaest 24. 2. Neither is this law to be understood of murther altogether voluntarie as if a man of purpose should smite a woman with child and shee die for this was provided for before what punishment should be laid upon him that committed wilfull murther 3. This law therefore is made concerning such violent acts as were of a mixt kinde partly voluntarie partly involuntarie as if a man striving with one and seeing a woman with child within the danger cared not whether shee was hurt or no Tostat. Or if striving with a man he thrust him upon a woman with child Galas Or a woman comming to rescue her husband receiveth hurt by the other that striveth Lyran. In this case if death followed in the woman with child the 〈…〉 to die foâ— it 4. And the reasons are these 1. Because adfuit laedendi animuâ— he that so striveth had a minde and intent to hurt Simler Consilii ratio habenda est his counsell and intention must be considered which was to assault the life of another and by this occasion he killeth one whom he intended not to hurt Iunius Piscator 2. Againe Vxor una carâ— est cum viâ—o quem intendeâ—â— pâ—râ—utere The wife is one flesh with her husband whom he intended to smite Lyran. 3. And beside instance is given of a woman with child who neither could shift for her selfe and a double danger is brought both upon her her child which she went with therefore in this case the law provideth that such oversights should be severely punished Tostat. q. 25. QUEST LVI Whether the death of the infant be punished as well as of the mother Vers. 22. ANd death follow not c. 1. Some thinke that this is to be understood onely of the death of the woman and not of the child Osiander That if the child died and not the woman he was onely to pay a peece of money not to lose his life for it and their reason is because he deserved not so great a punishment that killed an infant in the wombe as he that did stay a perfect man Oleaster who findeth fault with Cajetane for understanding the law indifferently of the woman and her child 2. But Cajetanâ— opinion is to be preferred for like as it is a more heinous thing to kill a man in his owne house than in the way so is it a prodigious thing to suffocate an infant in the mothers wombe qui nondum est in lucem editus which is not yet brought forth into the light of this world Calvin And againe Foetus quamvis in utero inclusus homo est The infant though yet inclosed in the wombe is a man Simler And the child in the wombe is yet a part of the person of the woman so that if there be corruptioâ—â—tius perâ—oâ—a aut partis a destruction of the whole person or of a part Iun. he that so hurteth a woman with child in her owne person or her childs is subject to this law QUEST LVII Whether this law extendeth it selfe to infants which miscarie being not yet perfectly formed NOw it being agreed that this law as well comprehendeth the infant that perisheth as the woman that beareth it yet there remaineth a question whether if the childe in the wombe bee yet imperfect and so not endued with sense and life that in this case though the woman die not but onely lose her birth he that did the hurt is to suffer death 1. Some hold the affirmative that if any child whatsoever by this meanes miscarrie the offender is subject to this law 〈…〉 propâ—â—qua est effectui The iâ—fant being now formed is so neere unto the effect thâ—â— is the life that who causeth the same to miscarrie may be said to have killed a man Gallas And therefore by the Civill law he that of purpose procured the birth to miscarrie if he were a meane person was condemned to the metall mines if a noble person to banishment Cicero also in his oration pro Cluentiâ— reporteth of one Milesia a woman who being hired of the heires in reversion to destroy the infant that shee went with had a capitall puishment therefore inflicted upon her Ex Simlero But these lawes were made against such as did of purpose seeke to destroy infants in the wombe and cause abortion of them here the cause is divers where the fruit of the wombe miscarrieth by some chance 2. Therefore this penaltie was onely by the law inflicted when as the infant perished that was endued with life So Augustine thinketh using this reason Nondum potest dici anima viva in eo corpore quod sensu caret c. The living soule cannot be said to be yet in that bodie which wanteth sense qu. 80. in Exod. And thus the Septuagint interpret If the infant came forth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not yet formed c. which forming of the infant beginneth fortie dayes after the conception as Procopius Cajetane giveth this reason why in such a case when the birth commeth forth imperfect the sentence of death is not inflicted quia homo in potentia non est homo because a man onely in possibilitie is not a man quia tunc non occiditur homo non est homicidium and because then a man is not killed it is no manslaughter Tostat. And the word jeladim sons signifieth as much that the law meaneth formed and perfect infants Simler And it is put in the plurall because a woman may have more infants than one in her wombe at once for otherwise why should one give life for life or soule for soule seeing such imperfect births are not yet endued with life soule As Augustine saith In Adam exemplum datum est c. An evident example is given in Adam quia jam formatum corpus accipit animam that the bodie when it is now fashioned receiveth the soule and not before For after Adams bodie was made the Lord breathed into him the breath of life So August lib. quaest vet nov Testam qu. 23. as he is alleaged Caus. 32. qu. 2. cap. 9. QUEST LVIII Why the action is given unto the husband Vers. 22. ACcording as the womans husband shall appoint him c. 1. Because the injurie is done unto the man in that his issue is cut off and because hee is the head of the woman the law referreth the prosecution of this wrong unto the husband Tostat. 2. But the taxation of the mulct is so referred to the man as yet if he should exceed a just proportion the Judges in their discretion are to moderate it Gallas 3. Tostatus
thinketh that these were not the ordinarie Judges of the Hebrewes sed arbitri constituti ex voluntate partis utriusque but arbitrators chosen by the will and consent of both parties quest 24. But that part of the law which followeth Thou shalt render life for life which is spoken to the Judge to whom the sword was committed sheweth that this authoritie also of setting the pecuniarie punishment is referred to the civill Magistrate QUEST LIX Whether the law of retalion be literally to be understood Vers. 24. EYe for eye tooth for tooth c. 1. Some doe thinke that this law of retalion is not to be understood according to the letter but an estimation was to be made by money so R. Salomon to whom consenteth Tostatus upon these reasons 1. Because in some of these kinds as if a foot should bee taken from him that perished his neighbours foot it might so fall out that together with the foot hee should lose his life and so there should be more than a retalion 2. And againe in the former law vers 18. where one upon anothers smiting lieth downe on his bed but riseth againe the other was onely to beare his charges there the law of repercussion and retalion tooke no place and so is it to be understood here 3. Favorinuâ— thus reasoned against this law of retalion as Aulus Gellius bringeth him in lib. 20. cap. 1. that it was impossible to be kept for if the like should be inflicted for the like as one wound for another they must take heed that the like wound in every respect should be made neither longer nor deeper if it were then a new retalion should bee offered unto the other that prosecuted the action and so there should be no end Contra. 1. The like may bee objected concerning the cutting off of other members as of the eares and hands which are inflicted by the lawes of divers countries for divers times death followeth in the amputation of such parts and yet the law intendeth not death He then may thanke himselfe that deserved such mangling of his members neither is the severitie of the law to give way because of some inconvenience which is feared And yet further thus much may bee added that where in such tetalion death was like to follow where death was not intended that in this case much was left to the discretion of the Judge that compensation might bee made in another kinde as by pecuniarie satisfaction 2. The other instance is not to the purpose for the law speaketh of such hurting when as there is no losse of any member for in that case they are referred to this law but when the body was otherwise hurt and bruised without any corruption of the parts and members then the smiter in that case was to beare his charges that rested and lay upon his bed by his meanes 3. The other objection is frivolous for it was not in the private mans hand that was wounded to make what wound he thought good againe but it was in the Judges power to order it 2. Therefore the more probable opinion is that this law is literally to be understood that he which had spoiled his neighbours eye hand foot should suffer the like himselfe as may appeare by these reasons 1. Because the first clause here set downe vers 23. Thou shalt pay life for life is literally intended not that he should pay mony for his life but he should lose his life indeed 2. Our blessed Saviour so expoundeth this law Matth. 5.38 Yee have heard it hath beene said an eye for an eye c. which libertie being given unto the Magistrate onely every private man did arrogate to himselfe to seeke revenge as he thought good and therefore our blessed Saviour correcteth that error But I say unto you resist not evill c. Now if this retalion and recompence had beene made in money and not in inflicting the like hurt they had not resisted evill or sought revenge 3. Other forren lawes also borrowed this law of retalion from Moses as among the Romanes in their twelve tables this law is extant Si membrum ruperit nisi cum eo pacit talio esto c. If he have broken a member unlesse he agree with him let there be a retalion 3. Yet this law is so literally to be understood as that it was lawfull notwithstanding to turne the like punishment into a pecuniarie mulct Iosephus thinketh it was in his choice that was hurt whether hee would be satisfied in money or have the like punishment inflicted So also Bâ—rrhaius But it is not like that it was left wholly to his choice but that it rested in the Judges discretion as before in another case the womans husband was to set the summe but the Judges were to moderate it vers 22. 4. Therefore it is like that it was in the Judges power to award either the like penaltie or a compensation in money as afterward vers 29.30 If a mans oxe used to gore chanced to kill any the owner was to die or pay a ransome of money And the reasons of this commutation are these The difficultie in the strict law of retalion that it could hardly alwayes be observed according to the letter as if hee were weake and sickly that was to lose a member he was like to lose his life also with it and if a poore man had lost an arme it was more profitable for him to have amends made him in money than to have anothers hand cut off and if the Judge should upon every ones humorous desire have taken away from one an arme or a legge this would have nourished revenge It is like then upon these reasons that the Judges as they saw cause did make a change and commutation of this penaltie with money as the Pretors did among the Romanes 5. Yet although it were in the Judges power to make a commutation of the like punishment with a pecuniarie mulct the law of retalion notwithstanding is set downe 1. Both for more certaintie because one rule could not serve for all pecuniarie taxations which might be aggravated or diminished in the discretion of the Judge according to the divers circumstances 2. As also if a mulct of money had beene set then the mutilation of the members being not warranted by the letter of the law could not have beene inflicted 3. As also this severitie in the amputation or cutting off the like part doth imprint a greater terror than if any summe of money though never so great had beene imposed Simler QUEST LX. Whether the law of retalion were just and equall BUt against the law of retalion it will be thus objected 1. That sometime there may be great inequalitie in the persons and then such equall and like requitall is not just as if a subject should smite a Magistrate and wound him it is not sufficient for the other to be wounded againe And in the law of retalion there is no respect whether one did
Allaricus when Rome was taken gave commandement that all they which fled to the Churches of S. Paul and S. Peter should have their lives Simler 3. But on the contrary thus it is objected against such Sanctuary places 1. That by this meanes the â—ourse of Justice is hindred when malefactors are sheltred and rescued from the Magistrate by the immunity and privilege of the place 2. Servants are encouraged to be contemptuous and disobedient to their masters finding succour elsewhere 3. And anthrifty and carelesse debtorâ— by such devises will seeke to defraud their creditours 4. And herein was a great abuse committed in former times of superstition that their Sanctuary places were open to all kinde of malefactors As thus it standeth deciâ—ed Aâ—reâ—aneus 1. c. 3. Homicidas adulteros fures sive quoscunque reâ—â— c. Murtherers adulterers theeves or any other trespassers as the Ecclesiasticall Canons decret and the Romanâ— Law appointeth it is not lawfull to draw out of the Church or the Bishops house but upon oath first given 〈…〉 poenarum gâ—nere sint securi that the parties so taken out should be secure from all kinde of punishment 4. Now then to moderate the excesse and abuse herein neither is it fit that all such Sanctuaries should be stripped of their privileges as Tibeâ—iâ—â— the Emperour did as Sâ—â—â—onius and Tacitus doe write But such places of Gods service are meet still to be had in reverence according to that Law of Arcadius Irruens in Templum vel Menistros capite punitur c. That hee which did assault the Church or the Ministers should be capitally punished Cod. lib. 1. tit 6. leg 10. Yet the privilege of such places would thus be moderated and limited 1. That they should not bee open to all offenders but onely to such as trespassed of ignorance and sinned unwittingly and such as were empoverished by casualty rather thâ—◠〈◊〉 owne default 2. That the number of such privileged places should be restrained as it is already in the refoâ—â—ed Churches seeing to all the 12. Tribes of Israel there were allowed but six Cities of 〈◊〉 3. He which was rescued in the Cities of refuge was but there a while till his cause was tried 〈…〉 guilty he was delivered up so it is fit that such as sought the Sanctuary should notwithstanding ansâ—er the Law As it was decreed by the Imperiall Lawes as Cod. 1. l. 1. tit 15. leg 5. Iudaei confugieuâ—es ad Eâ—â—â—â—sias suscipi non debent c. Jewes fleeing to the Churches ought not to be received unlesse first they pay their debts Ibid. leg 5. maneri possunt vel citari in Ecclesia c. they may be summoned and cited in the Church and being so cited they are bound to make answer c. 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. Of the love which parents ought to beare toward their children Vers. 5. I Love my wife and my children c. Hence appeareth the great love which a man ought to beare toward his wife and children that he should endure much wrong yea and chuse rather to serve with them than to have his liberty and freedome without them Oleaster which condemneth the carelesnesse of such parents which preferre their owne case and pleasure before the safety of their children worse herein than the bruit beasts even then the savage and cruell Beare which rageth being robbed of her whelpes Prov. 17.12 2. Obser. Of the duty of children toward their parents Vers. 15. HE that smiteth his father or his mother vers 17. and he that curseth his father c. shall dye the death He that abused his parents in word or in deed that gave them but a tip or a reviling word was to be put to death which sheweth how much the Lord abhorreth stubbornnesse and disobedience to parents Little thought of by too many in our dayes and the rather because that continually in the Church there is not a beating of these points of Catechisme into childrens heads and hearts by carefull Ministers O that they would bee once drawne to doe this duty in their severall Churches soone should they find the fruit of it and the greatnesse of their sinne in so long neglecting it B. Babing 3. Observ. Masters not to be cruell toward their servants Vers. 20. IF a man smite his servant or his maid with a rod and he dye c. Upon this text Rabanus thus noteth Sicut disciplina opus est in eruditione subjectorum c. As discipline is needfull in the erudition of those that are in subjection Ita discretione opus est in exhibitione correpâ—â—onum c. So also discretion is needfull in the exhibiting of correction c. neither parents should provoke their children by too much rigour nor yet masters shew themselves cruell toward their servants as here the Law punisheth the immoderate severity of masters yea the Apostle would have masters put away threatning from their servants Ephes. 6.9 4. Observ. A wrong in deed must be recompenced in deed Vers. 26. HE shall let him goe free for his eye Chrysostome hereupon thus inferreth If thou hast chastised any beyond measure Injuriae peccatum beneficio est dissolvendum c. The sinne of wrong must be dissolved by a benefit Alioquin nisi quem factis laesisti factis placaveris siue causa eras 〈◊〉 Dominum Otherwise whom thou hast wronged in deed if thou doest not appease by thy deeds in vaine doest thou pray unto God c. Hom. 11. in Matth. As then the wrong is done so the amends or recompence must be made he that hath offended in word must by his words and confession acknowledge his fault but he which hath offred wrong in deed must also make some satisfaction for iâ— in deed as here the master for putting out his servants eye was to give him his liberty and freedome for it 5. Observ. Superiours are charged with the sinnes of inferiours committed by their negligence Vers. 29. IF the oxe were wâ—nt to push in time past c. As by this Law the owner of the oxe was to make good the hurt which was done by his oxe through his negligence because he kept him not so God imputeth the sinnes of the children to their fathers and of the subjects to the Magistrate si 〈◊〉 negligentia cessatum fuerit c. if through their negligence that is of the parents or governours the children or subjects faile in their duty as is set forth in the example of Holâ— 1 Sam. 2. who was punished for his remisnesse toward his children by which meanes he was made accessary to their sinne Lippoâ—â—â— CHAP. XXII 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter other politicke and civill Lawes are delivered which are of two sorts either concerning every ones private duty to vers 28. or the publike vers 27. to the end of the Chapter The private duties are of two sorts either touching prophane or sacred actions Of the first sort are these 1. Concerning theft either
any that saw it done though he could shew no part it sufficed Lyran. Tostat. 3. And a third way to prove it where the other two faile was by his owne oath as may be gathered vers 11. If no man did see it 〈◊〉 oath of the Lord shall be betweene them c. Lyran. QUEST XVII Of the Law of borrowing and lending when the thing lent is to be made good when not Vers. 14. IF a man borrow ought of his neighbour 1. Here the third case is put of lending and borrowingâ— the two former cases were of committing any thing to one to keepe either without a reward vers 7 8. or for some consideration vers 10 11. Lyran. 2. In the Law of lending and borrowing more is required than in the other for then the borrower receiveth a benefit and therefore tenetur de levissima culpa he is tied to make it good upon the least fault Tostat. But when any thing is committed to ones trust the owner receiveth a benefit and not the keeper 3. This Law seemeth chiefly to be meant of such things as have life which are lent because it followeth if it be hurt or dye and of such other dead things as may be used without the corruption or consumption of them as garments houshold-stuffe and such like but all things which belong to meat and drinke are corrupted and changed in the use as wine bread flesh and cannot be restored againe in the same substance the lending of these things is called 〈◊〉 the possession whereof is transferred to the borrower the lending of the other is called coâ—â—â—datâ—â— when not the possession but the use only of the thing is granted to another of which kinde this Law must be understood Tostat. qu. 8. 4. Now this case is put that if the lender be present when his oxe 〈◊〉 asse or other beast decayeth the borrower shall not make it good for both he is an eye witnesse that his beast was not abused by the user and therefore decayed not by his default Tostat. As also praesent rei sua providere potuit being present he might have prevented the danger himselfe if it were to be helped Gallas But if the owner be not by the borrower shall make restitution because carelesse men commonly use but hardly such things as they borrow in the absence of the owner and therefore this Law meeteth with their unhonest dealing herein 5. Beside other cases are supplied by humane Lawes when the borrower is not bound to make good the thing borrowed as the Civill law is Commodatorius non tenetur decasâ— fertuito nisi se adstrinxerit The borrower is not bound where a chance happeneth unlesse he have bound himselfe Unto which may be added or unlesse it be by his owne default or he keepe the thing borrowed longer than the time appointed Tostat. quaest 8. For the Law is that if a man borrow a certaine thing for a time to use for some purpose though the worke be not finished for the which he borrowed it at that time which is set it must notwithstanding be restored commodatum ad tempus c. a thing lent for a time as to make a woollen web for a yeere Finito anno licèt non completo lanificio restituitur The yeere being ended though the worke be not finished it must be restored And as the borrower is tied to his time so is the lender if he lend any thing for a certaine time which the borrower useth for some businesse the lender cannot require it before that time expired because the borrower might thereby greatly be hindered in his businesse Tostat. QUEST XVIII Why such a strait Law is made for the borrower NOw though it might seeme hard that the borrower was bound to make good the thing borrowed though not lost by his default yet it pleased the Lord thus to ordaine that they might be as carefull to keepe their neighbours things as their owne that they might be the readier one to lend unto another for their necessity this facility and readinesse to lend is by divers Lawes enjoyned 1. That they should be willing to lend though the seventh yeere of remission approched Deut. 15.9 2. That they should take no pawne of their brother for that which he borrowed of such things as he lived by as the upper and nether milstone Deut. 24.6 And if they did to restore it presently As it followeth here vers 26. if they tooke a mans rayment to pledge they should restore it before the sunne set 3. They were commanded not to be too greedy in exacting that which was borrowed as they were not to goe into the house to fetch it but to stand and aske it at the doore Deut. 24.11 12. 4. If the yeere of remission came before the borrower were able to repay that which he had borrowed they were 〈◊〉 â—â—mit all Deut. 15.2 Probabile enim erat◠〈◊〉 illi qui commedè reddere posseut aute septimum annum redderent c. For it was probable that they which could conveniently restore the thing borrowed would doe it before the seventh yeere and not of purpose defraud the creditor and lender See Thomas For this cause therefore that they might be more willing to lend one unto another this Law requireth an exact care in the borrower to preserve that which is lent and to restore it And so the Ciâ—ill law also is Nemo commodatum retineat sub praetextu debiti c. That no man should keepe backe the thing lent pretending debt QUEST XIX Why the hirer is not to make good the thing hired as when it is borrowed Vers. 15. IF it be an hired thing c. 1. Some make this all one Law with the former and take it to be a reason given why the borrower is not to make good that which is lost in the presence of the owner because it came that is was hired for his money So Simler Vatab. Lippom. Oleaster 2. But I rather consent herein to Lyranus Tostatus Gallasius Iunius that make this a divers Law from the former that speaketh of lending freely this of hiring and letting out for money and therefore he that hireth a thing for his money minus tenetur de custodia animalis is lesse bound than the borrower to the safe keeping of the thing so hired Lyran. And the reason is because locatio sit ad utilitatem locatoris the letting out for money is for the profit of him that letteth Tostat. So Cajetane expoundeth well Absque distinctione prasentiae vel absentiae Domini non tenebitur conductor ad solvendum animal casu confractum c. Here without any distinction of the presence or absence of the master the hirer is not bound to make good the beast which is by chance hurt or dead because it came for his hire 3. Yet in this case also tenebitâ—r de dolo vel lata culpa the hirer shall be bound if he used deceit or were in a manifest
permitted Deut. 24.1 if there seemed unto him cause after put her away and the reason of this difference may be this he that taketh a wife willingly will not put her away without cause but he that taketh her against his minde never loved her and so upon every occasion would be ready to send her away whether there were cause or not if he were not by Law restrained of his liberty Tostat. qu. 10. QUEST XXIV What was to be done if the fornicatour were not sufficient to pay the dowrie HE shall endow her c. But what if the man which had committed this wrong to a maid were not able to endow her the question is what course was then to be taken 1. If he were a free man and an Hebrew he was to be sold as in the case of theft vers 3. and to serve so many yeeres as might raise this stocke or dowry for the maid but longer than for six yeeres he could not be sold for all Hebrewes were to be set free in the seventh 2. If he were a free Gentile he might be sold for his life or for so many yeeres as sufficed to make up the dowry 3. If he were an Hebrew servant if his master refused to pay so much money as might serve for the dowry then he was to deliver up his servant to be sold over for so many yeeres as might recompence the dowry before the yeere of remission came and if the yeeres which remained were not sufficient he might be sold over againe 4. If he were a stranger or Gentile being a servant then he might be set over to serve his whole life Tostat. quaest 12. QUEST XXV What if the fornicatour refused to take the maid to wife BUt yet further it will be enquired what if the maids father would consent and yet the party will neither take her nor endow her 1. By the Civill lawes if he be a noble person he should be banished that had defloured a virgin if of base condition he should be whipped and if they ravished a maid against her will in that case they were to suffer death By the Canon lawes if one refused to marry her whom he had defiled he was to be throughly whipped and excommunicate and enjoyned penance till he had fully satisfied 2. And though this be omitted in Moses Law yet so much may be inferred and collected by the letter of the Law that as he was necessarily to endow her for the future of the Indicative moode semper inducit dispositionem necessariam doth alwayes imply a necessary disposition so he was of necessity to marry her like as in another case of forcing a maid he was to be compelled to take her to wife and never to put her away Deut. 22.30 Tostat. quaest 11. QUEST XXVI Whether this Law were generall without any exception NOw although this Law be propounded generally if a man entice a maid he was to endow her and marry her yet there were some exceptions to be made 1. For whereas the Israelites were charged to take them wives out of their owne tribe Numb 36. it is evident that if the maid were of another tribe then the man could not take her to wife but because this case was very rare and unusuall seeing the tribes after they were setled in Canaan when these Lawes were to take place dwelt every one apart by themselves and so there was no feare of such unlawfull entercourse and commixtion betweene a man and maid of divers tribes the Law therefore is silent in this point for ad ea qua raro accidunt jura non adaptantur lawes are not applied to those cases which fall out seldome 2. If he were a Gentile and a stranger of another religion which committed this sinne with a maid neither could she in this case bee given him to wife because they were forbidden to make marriages with such Deut. 7.3 And the Israelitish women were to match in their owne tribe and therefore not with strangers 3. If an Hebrew servant had trespassed herein neither could he have the maid to wife whom he had abused for he was first to endow her which a servant could not doe for either he had fold himselfe into servitude because he was poore or was sold by the Magistrate to make satisfaction for some offence which he had committed and therefore being poore he had not wherewithall to endow her and so could not take her to wife 4. Beside if it were the Priests daughter with whom he had wrought this folly she could not become his wife for she was in this case to be burned Levit. 21. And the man likewise by equity of the same Law being guilty of the same offence 5. Yea if the high Priest himselfe had defloured a maid he could not take her to wife because he was forbidden by the Law to marry any polluted or an harlot Levit. 21. vers 14. 6. If also one had defiled a maid neere of his kin being within the degrees of marriage forbidden they were both to suffer death for it Levit. 20. and therefore could not marry together This Law therefore being generally propounded must yet be interpreted and expounded according to other Lawes for they must all be made to agree together Tostat. qu. 12. QUEST XXVII How farre this positive Law against fornication doth binde Christians now ANd as this Law did not hold generally in the old Testament so neither is it now necessary that whosoever hath committed fornication should be compelled to marry the maid so abused 1. For though it were admitted that this Judiciall and positive Law of Moses were in force still yet some exceptions must needs be admitted as if they are to neere of kin for no such marriage can be allowed within the limited degrees As Saint Paul willed the young man that had committed fornication with his fathers wife to be excommunicate for that fact 1 Cor. 5. he was not suffered to marry her Againe if a Christian maid should commit fornication with an Infidell with a Turke Jew or Heretike in this case the rule of the Gospell will not allow marriage for Christians must marry only in the Lord 1 Cor. 7.39 therefore not with those which are blasphemers of God and enemies to true religion and the Apostle saith Be not unequally yoked with Infidels 2 Cor. 6.14 2. But Tostatus bringeth in two other exceptions as if the maid defiled be either a professed Nunne and so devoted to Monasticall and single life or the man entred into orders unto the which the vow of single life is annexed in neither of these cases can saith he marriage be admitted after fornication committed Tostat. quaest 12. Contra. But against both these exceptions I will oppose the holy judgement of the Apostle and touching the first I urge that Apostolicall saying It is better to marrie than to burne 1 Cor. 7.9 If then Nunnes are subject to this burning as it appeareth they are by their secret
money or stuffe to keepe c. As God would have his people to be faithfull in keeping and restoring such things as were committed to their trust so much more should we shew our faithfulnesse in these things quae ipse apud nos deponit which he committeth unto our trust and credence as in using well to his glorie the gifts and graces which we have received as S. Paul saith to Timothie That worthie thing which was committed unto thee keepe through the holy Ghost 2 Tim. 1.14 Marbach This also may be applied unto that care and faithfulnesse which Pastors ought to shew in diligent feeding of the Lords flocke committed unto them Simler 2. Observ. Experience of misery causeth us to pittie the miserable Vers. 21. FOr ye were strangers Optima pietatis magistra experta indigentia c. Our owne experience of want and necessitie is the best instructer and teacher of mercie Oleaster They then which have beene in miserie themselves and know not how to pitie others in the like case shew themselves to be of a vile nature and of an hard and cruell disposition the Scripture saith of Christ himselfe In that hee suffred and was tempted he is able to succour them that are tempted Heb. 2.18 3. Observ. Against cruell Creditors that keepe their debtors in prison Vers. 27. FOr it is his covering onely If the law judge it a cruell thing to take a mans covering for a pledge which should keepe him from the cold of the night how much doth their crueltie exceed which cast their poore debtors into prison there to lie in cold iron naked and hungrie without comfort Simler Which hard dealing is reproved in the parable in him that cast his fellow servant in prison for debt not to come out thence till he had paid it Matth. 18.30 CHAP. XXIII 1. The Method and Argument THere are two parts of this Chapter 1. Certaine lawes are propounded first Civill to vers 10. then Ecclesiasticall from thence to vers 19. 2. Then followeth a generall exhortation to obedience to Gods Commandements thence to the end of the Chapter The Civill lawes are of two sorts either generall concerning all sorts of men to vers 6. or speciall touching the office of Judges vers 6. to 10. The generall likewise are either of particular politicke duties namely these foure 1. Not to receive a false rumour 2. Not to be a false witnesse 3. Not to follow a multitude to pervert the truth 4. Not to be partiall in an unjust commiseration toward the poore in his cause vers 3. either of the generall duties of charitie as what is to be done toward ones enemies oxe or asse being found going astray or lying under his burthen vers 4 5. The speciall lawes concerning a Judge are these 1. Not to overthrow a poore mans right vers 6. 2. Not to heare a false matter 3. Not to condemne the innocent vers 7. 4. Not to receive rewards vers 8. nor to oppresse strangers vers 9. The Ecclesiasticall lawes follow of two sorts 1. Concerning the festivall times 1. Of the yeare of rest vers 10 1. 2. Of the day of rest vers 12. 3. Of the three feasts of the yeare to vers 17. 2. Then follow certaine lawes belonging to the service of God 1. Of their appearing before God 2. Of leavened bread 3. Of the fat of the sacrifices 4. Of the first fruits 5. Of not â—â—â—thing the kid in the dammes milke to vers 19. The second part containeth an exhortation to obedience 1. Concerning their state present that they should be obedient to the Angell which conducted them which was Christ Jesus with two reasons thereof 1. From the feare of those judgements and revenge which the Angell should otherwise take of them vers 21. 2. From the benefits which he should procure for them if they did obey vers 22.23 2. Then he sheweth how they should walke in the service of God afterward when they were come into the land of Canaan and root out all Idolatrie vers 24. which exhortation is strengthened with divers promises 1. Of plentie 2. Of health 3. Of fruitfull 〈◊〉 4. Of the casting out of their enemies before them with the meanes whereby vers 28. and the manner how by little and little vers 29 30. 5. Of the dilating of their borders vers 31. with removing two impediments thereof the making of covenant with the Canaanites and suffering of them to dwell among them 2. The divers readings Vers. 1. Thou shalt not carrie a false report I.A. better than thou shalt not receive L.S.V.G.P.G. nasha signifieth the first rather here because in that sense as well the author as reporter of a false tale is here reproved as Thou shalt not have to doe with any false report B. Vers. 2. Thou shalt not follow the mightie I. So Oleaster better than the many or the multitude B. G. cum caeter rabbius signifieth both the mightie and many the first rather because of the opposite part in the next verse dal the poore which is set against the mightie Vers. 5. Thou shalt put it downe with it I. better than wilt thou leave it with him V. A. with an interrogation for lawes use not to be set forth interrogatively or thou shalt helpe him up with it B. G. cum câ—ter the word ghazab signifieth to leave lay aside not to helpe so also Oleaster See the question following upon this verse Vers. 8. Gifts blind the seeing B.V.A.P.I.S. better than the wise L.C.G. the word is pikechim the seeing that is the wise that is the sense but not the interpretation Vers. 24. Thou shalt not bow thee downe to their gods I. A. P. better than bow downe to c. for the verbe is in hithpael or than thou shalt not worship their gods or idols V.L. cum cater for shacah signifieth to bow downe and the preposition â— lamed signifieth to 3. Questions discussed QUEST I. Of raysing or reporting false tales Vers. 1. THou shalt not report a false tale 1. Some doe read Thou shalt not receive because the word nasha doth as well signifie to beare and sustaine as raise and lift up So read the Chalde Septuagint Latine with others Oleaster Lyranus Calvin also and Simlerus doe preferre this sense But it is better translated Thou shalt not raise a false tale Iun. As the like law is given Levit. 19.16 Thou shalt not walke about with tales and this generally comprehendeth as well the first author of a false report as the bearer and carier and so Lippoman also interpreteth well Non siâ— author falsi rumeris aut fingas in cerdo c. Be not the author of a false report or faine it in thine heart c. 2. Some doe referre it to the person of the Judge that he should not punish any because of an evill report spread of him Osiander Or Vt non audiatur una pars in absentia alterius c. That one part should not be heard in
forth and opened in simple and plaine speeches not in eloquent passionate or affected words 2. And as passions may be procured in Judges by speech so also by the sight of the persons as if when the poore suiter lamenteth and complaineth and appeare to be very miserable though he say nothing Tostat. quaest 3. 3. The word dal signifieth not onely one which is poore in substance but any other kinde of way as they which are sicke and pined away are called dallim as Ammon was thus poore and pined with love toward Thamar 2 Sam. 13. Oleaster So not onely the poore but all other miserable and forlorne persons are here understood as the widow fatherlesse strangers and such like Tostat. quaest 3. 4. Simplie it is not forbidden to respect a poore man but in his cause in matter of judgement nothing must be done either for rich or poore praeter merita causae beside the merit and desert of the cause Tostat. Cum agitur paupertas sublevandus est When his povertie is pleaded the poore is to be helped Cum agiturjus publicum deponenda est persona pauperis When the publike right is in question the poore person must be laid aside Borrh. 5. And the reason is because it is better praehonorare veritatem to preferre and more honour the truth Lyranus 6. Although it be not often seene that a poore man is preferred before a rich in his cause yet sometime it falleth out ut ambitio impellat Iudicem c. that the Judge through ambition that he may be spoken of will respect the poore major interdum est pauperum aâ—dacia temeritas c. and sometime the poore are more bold rash and readie to move suits than the rich Calvin And therefore this law provideth for such clamorous poore QUEST VI. How persons are accepted in judgement and how farre the poore may be respected IN his cause c. 1. The person of the poore is not to be accepted in regard of his cause depending in judgement Persons are accepted two wayes in judgement 1. When as the Judge aliter distribuit quà m lex mandat doth determine otherwise than the law commandeth but where no certaine law is set prescribing the manner and forme which is to be followed in that behalfe there can bee no acception of persons And therefore though God in the beginning did elect some and not others quia non cogitur aliqualege because he had no law to compell him hee therein accepted no mans person as a man giving almes having no rule set him how much he shal give may distribute unto one more than unto another and yet be no accepter of persons 2. Another way ones person is accepted in judgement when more is given to one than to another either of a benefit or punishment otherwise than is due As if a man sue for an hundred pound wherein he can prove but 80. due of just debt if the Judge shall give him 90. pound he taketh ten from the one and giveth it to the other more than is due and so he is an accepter of the person of the one more than of the other And thus a poore man is not to be respected in judgement 2. Two waies is mercie shewed unto the poore in his cause when one facit illi bonum quod non habet doth for him or giveth him that good which he hath not or when the Judge so defendeth the poore ut nemoâ—ollat e◠〈◊〉 quod haber that no bodie take from him that good which he hath the first way the Judge cannot have respect unto the poore without partialitie and perverting of justice to give unto him that which of right doth not belong unto him but the other way he may to see that the poore be not oppressed in judgement as it followeth afterward vers â— Thou shalt not overthrow the right of the poore in his suit And unto this kinde of commisâ—ration it belongeth that the Judge is willing to heare the cause of the poore man and to receive his complaint for how otherwise should he doe him right and defend him from wrong if he should stop his eares against the crie of the poore Tostat. qu. 4. QUEST VII Why mercie is to be shewed toward the enemies oxe and asse Vers. 4. IF thou maâ—â— thine enemies oxe c. 1. Because civill suits and controversies for the most part proceed of evill will and enmitie therefore unto the former lawes are annexed these two caveats to cut off enmitie and to maintaine love and friendship Simler 2. Though an instance be onely given of the enemies oxe or asse yet it must be understood de omni domestico animali of every domesticall beast in like manner Lyran. And of whatsoever belongeth unto our neighbour Lippoman 3. Neither is this law made concerning oxen or asses as the Apostle saith in another case Doth God take care for oxen 1 Cor. 9. But the speciall intendment of this law is that there might be reconciliation among men It was some pleasure to the beast which might otherwise be devoured of some wilde beast if it were not brought home and to the owner which might also lose his beast Tostatus But the speciall scope of this law is First because the Jewes were cruell to teach them to shew and exercise mercie toward bruit beasts Vt eo facilius inducerentur c. That they might more easily bee induced to shew it toward men Lippoman Et ut hac ratione odientis animum sibi conciliet And that by this meanes hee might winne the heart of his enemie if he were not altogether implacable Isidor 4. There are two words here used aâ—ab which signifieth to be an enemie and shana to hate one may hate not being hated but an enemie is said to be where there is mutuall enmitie on both sides It is an easier matter to doe good to one that hateth where there is no hatred shewed againe than to an enemie that is hated againe therefore both words are used that wee should shew kindnesse as well where there is a mutuall and reciprocall hatred and enmitie as where one is hated and hateth not againe Tostat. quaest 3. 5. God by this law doth not either command or permit that men should bee enemies but being imperfect of themselves and subject to enmitie hee sheweth how they should become friends as when it is said in the Psalme Be angrie and sinne not we are not willed to be angrie but if we chance to be angrie we are taught how to moderate it that wee sinne not in our immoderate anger Tostatus quaest 3. 6. By this law we learne that there are two kinds of injustice one of them qui inferunt injuriam which offer wrong unto their neighbours the other of them qui non propulsant injuriam which doe not keepe wrong from them when it is in their power Borrh. 7. And further this law sheweth the agreement betweene Christ and Moses and betweene the new and old
Judges and pervert their words then it is not safe to receive any gift in that kinde which is given for the furtherance of ones cause No it is not lawfull for a Judge to take a gift to give right judgement Nam de vendâ—tione justi judicii veniretur ad venditionem nequissimi Lest from selling of just judgement they should fall to sell unjust judgement Tostat. And as it is unlawfull to sell justice so it is also to buy as S. Paul might have beene delivered for a reward Act. 24.25 but he chose rather to answer at Rome And in the ancient Church they were noted which did give money for their liberty that they might not be compelled to be present at the Gentiles idolatrous sacrifices Simler 4. So then howsoever the Canon law and the practice of the Church of Rome doth tolerate small gifts yet it is the safest way not to accept of any at all And herein the ancient Romane lawes are to be preferred which as is extant in their 12. Tabulae capite puniendum Iudicem c. did decree that Judge to be punished with death which tooke money to give sentence in a cause Dioclesian also made a Law that a sentence pronounced by a corrupt Judge ipso jure infirmam esse by the Law should be void and to be suspended by appeale Lystat being asked why he received not gifts of the Messerians answered Quia in lege justitiae peccatur Hee should have offended against the Lawes of justice Innocentius also hath a good saying speaking of corrupt Judges Vos non attenditis merita causarum sed personarum non jura sed munera non quod ratio dictet sed quod voluntas affectet non quod licâ—at sed quod lubeat c. pauperum causam cum mora negligitis divitum causam cum instantia promovetis c. You doe not consider the merit of the cause but of the persons not right but gifts not what reason enditeth but what will affecteth not what is lawfull but what you list c. the cause of the poore you neglect by delaying the cause of the rich you are diligent in promoting therefore Tostatus here resolveth and concludeth well that howsoever the Canons doe tolerate the receiving of small gifts yet it is better Si volunt effugere conscientiae scrupulum ut nihil omnino accipiant If they will avoid the scruple of conscience that they take nothing at all 5. A gift then is of great force it prevaileth much as the Wise-man saith in the Proverbs chap. 17.8 A reward is as a stone pleasant in the eyes of them that have it it prospereth whither soever it turneth As a precious stone shineth every way so a gift is available to any purpose Gifts doe much hurt in private matters as Amphiarans wife being corrupted with a precious jewell betrayed him and Procris chastity was overcome with a gift but in publike affaires gifts doe much more hurt as well in civill as Philip King of Macedonia non tam armis quam auro expugnavit libertatem Graecia did not so much by force and armour as by gifts and treasure overthrow the liberty of Greece As also in Ecclesiasticall matters where simonie doth as much hurt as bribery in the Common-wealth for they which by corrupt meanes attaine to the great preferments of the Church must needs also corruptly administer the same Aâ— the Prophet Ezechiel noteth the false Prophets which for handfuls of barley and peeces of bread did prophesie false things chap. 13.18 Simler Therefore seeing the Spirit of God hath set it downe that gifts and bribery doe corrupt and blinde Nimia eorum est impudentia c. They are very impudent and shamelesse that will make their boast notwithstanding that though they receive gifts they can give right judgement Gallas QUEST XVII Why strangers are not to be oppressed in judgement Vers. 9. THou shalt not oppresse a stranger 1. Some thinke that this is a repetition of the former Law chap. 22.21 Thou shalt not doe injury to a stranger that it may appeare quanta cura domino sint peregrini c. how carefull God is of strangers Lippom. And because the Israelites were given to be inhumane and hard toward strangers as the Jewes are to this day that contemne all people beside themselves the Lord saw it necessary often to inculcate this precept Simler But rather I thinke with Cajetane and Gallasius that this is a new Law Illud communiter hoc specialitèr datur judicibus testibus accusatoribus That was given in generall this in particular to Judges witnesses accusers 2. And to this end God so provided in his wisdome that the Israelites and their fathers should be strangers and sojourners in other countries as in Canaan and Egypt ut captivitatis peregrinationis miseriam discerent to learne by experience what the misery of captives and strangers was that they might the better know how to have pity on the like Nemo libentius hospitem sine tecto suo introducit hospitio c. No man more willingly receiveth him into his house that wanteth lodging than he that was sometime without lodging himselfe no man sooner feedeth the hungry and giveth the thirsty drinke than he that felt hunger and thirst himselfe c. August 3. And whereas it is added You know the heart of a stranger the meaning is how full of care and griefe they are that you need not afflict them more Simler that they are destitute of friends and had need to be so much the more pitied Tostat. and seeing strangers are no inhabitants but such as passe thorow the country they should not be stayed nor hindred ut iter suum posset exequi that they may finish their journey Lyran. You know also by your selves their hearts how ready they are to call unto God for helpe against their oppressors as you did in Egypt Simler QUEST XVIII Of the divers festivals of the Hebrewes Vers. 10. SIx yeeres thou shalt sow thy land c. The Hebrewes had divers kindes of festivall dayes which all tended to the honour of God Now impendimus honorem Deo c. wee doe give honour unto God either for an eternall benefit and so they had juge sacrificium every dayes sacrifice or for some temporall which is either generall as of our creation in remembrance whereof they kept the seventh day holy or of our preservation ideo erat festum Neomemae therefore they kept the feast of the new Moone every moneth or speciall as of some speciall benefit and deliverance in remembrance whereof they had their festivals of weekes as Pentecost of moneths as the seventh moneth of yeeres as the seventh yeere and the seventh seventh yeere which was the Jubile Thomas QUEST XIX Why the land was to rest the seventh yeere Vers. 11. BVt the seventh yeere thou shalt let it rest c. 1. The land is said to rest in two respects First in a metaphoricall sense as we are
and necessary or just cause doe so require c. otherwise the Law doth forbid all unlawfull swearing as well as the Gospell 3. And the reason why they ought not to sweare by strange gods is ne frequenti juramento iâ—â—â—cantur ad cultâ—â—◠〈◊〉 c. lest that by often swearing they be induced to worship them Glos. interliâ—â—â—â— 4. And as an Hebrew then and so a Christian now was not himselfe so neither were they to compell a Gentile to sweare by them yet as Augustine determineth it is lawfull for a Christian recipere ab eo juramentum in Deo suo c. to receive an oath of a Gentile by his god to confirme some covenant or contract se Gentilis obtularis se facturum if the Gentile doe of himselfe offer it Lyran Tostat. QUEST XXV Whether a Christian may compell a Iew to sweare by his Thorah which containeth the five bookes of Moses VPon this occasion how farre a Christian may compell another of a contrary religion to sweare as a Jew or Turke Tostatus bringeth in divers questions which it shall not be amisse here briefly to touch as first whereas it is an usuall thing with the Jewes at this day to sweare upon their Thorah which is nothing else but a volume containing the five bookes of Moses yet bound up in silke and laid up very curiously in their Synagogue whereout they use to read the lectures of the Law the question is whether it be lawfull for a Christian Judge to urge a Jew to take his oath upon his Thorah for upon the Gospels he will rather dye than take an oath For the resolution of this doubt divers things are to be weighed and considered 1. That there is great difference betweene the Idols and 〈◊〉 gods of the Heathen and the Jewes Thorah for this 〈◊〉 a part of Gods word and containeth nothing but the truth and it is all one as if the Jew did lay his hand upon the Pentateuch or five bookes of Moses as any Christian may take his oath upon the Gospels or any other part of Gods word 2. And like as a Christian laying his hand upon the Gospels doth not 〈◊〉 by the bookâ— for 〈◊〉 were unlawfull in giving the honour due to the Creator unto a creature but hath relation unto God whose verity and truth is contained in that booke So a Jew swearing upon his Thorah yet sweareth by God the Author of the Law and in so doing sinneth not 3. Yet it may so fall out that a Jew may sinne in swearing upon his Thorah as having an opinion that all the contents of that booke as namely the ceremonials are yet in force which are abolished in Christ and yet the Judge may not sinne in requiring the Jew to sweare upon his Thorah for he doth not consider of those things quae sunt in voluntate agentis sed de ipso actis which are in the minde and intent of the doer but of the act it selfe therefore the act of it selfe being lawfull a Jew may be required to doe it Sic Tostat. qu. 14. QUEST XXVI Whether a Iew may be urged to sweare in the name of Christ. BUt as the Jew may be urged to sweare upon his Thorah which they hold to be a booke of truth as Christians doe yet the case is not alike if a Christian should compell a Jew to sweare in the name of Christ for although Christ be in deed and in truth very God yet the Jewes hold him to be worse than any Idoll and therefore the Jew in taking such an oath should doe against his conscience and consequently commit a great sinne or if a Jew should require a Christian to sweare by the name of Christ whom he holdeth to be no God nor yet a good man therein the Jew should also sinne against his conscience for it skilleth not a thing to be so or so indeed dum aliter concipiatur as long as a man otherwise conceiveth and is perswaded in his minde Tostat. qu. 15. QUEST XXVII Whether a Saracene may be urged to sweare upon the Gospels or in the name of Christ. NOw although a Jew cannot be compelled without sinne to sweare in the name of Christ whom he holdeth worse than an Idoll or upon the Gospels which they thinke containe nothing but fables yet the reason standeth otherwise for a Saracene or Turke he may be required to sweare in the name of Christ or upon the Gospels And the reason is because the Saracens have a good opinion of Christ and beleeve that he was sent of God and that he was a great Prophet and a good man and for the most part they doe assent unto the Gospels and beleeve that Christ spake the truth And therefore they in taking such an oath doe not against their conscience and therein sinne not Now if it be objected that the Saracens differ more from the Christians than the Jewes and therefore can no more lawfully take an oath in the name of Christ than the Jewes the answer is that although the Jewes consent with the Christians touching the canonicall bookes of the old Testament as the Saracens doe not yet as touching Christ they doe totally dissent from the Christians and so doe not the Saracens Tostat. qu. 17. QUEST XXVIII Whether a Christian may sweare upon the Iewes Thora BUt it hath beene before shewed that a Jew may be without sinne urged to sweare upon his Thora which is nothing but the Pentateuch containing the five bookes of Moses another question is moved whether a Christian may safely take his oath upon the Jewes Thora And that it is not lawfull so to doe it may be thus objected 1. It is a sinne Iudaizare to Iudaize to doe as the Jewes doe as to be circumcised to observe the Jewish Sabbath and such like But to sweare upon the Thora is to Iudaize that is to doe as the Jewes doe Ergo c. Answ. 1. To Iudaize is not simply to doe that which the Jewes doe but that which they alone doe and none other as to beleeve that which they only beleeve as that the ceremonies of the Law are still in force or to doe that which they only doe as to be circumcised and to abstaine from certaine kinde of meats as Saint Paul chargeth Saint Peter that he compelled the Gentiles Iudaizare to Iudaize concerning their meats for he did eat with the Gentiles before the Jewes came and afterward he withdrew himselfe from them otherwise to beleeve as the Jewes and others also beleeve and to doe likewise as to hold the world to have beene created the Israelites to have beene delivered and all other things in the Scriptures to be true as they are there set downe this is not to Iudaize 2. So because the Thora which is the Pentateuch is not only received of the Jewes but of the beleeving Gentiles and the truth of the Law we subscribe unto as well as the Jewes therefore simply to take an oath upon their Thora
were Eldad and Medad Gloss. interlinear But this cannot be for those seventy Elders were appointed after the campe was removed from Sinai and pitched in Kibrath Hattavah which was the next station beyond Sinai Numb 33.16 But now the Israelites remained at mount Sinai 2. Some are of opinion that these seventy Elders were appointed when Iethro gave counsell to Moses that is six out of every tribe which make 72. but the even number is set downe Simler But those Captaines over the people which were chosen according to Iethro his direction were heads over thousands hundreds and fifties chap. 18.25 they were then more than seventy 3. Neither were these seventy such as before time the people had chosen out for their Rulers answerable unto the number of soules that went downe with Iacob into Egypt as Calviâ— seemeth to thinke for it seemeth that before Iethro gave that advice to Moses there were no such Governours and Rulers over the tribes because Moses then needed not to have wearied himselfe in hearing their causes himselfe alone 4. Wherefore these were no speciall Elders that before were elected and chosen out but such as Moses did single out upon this occasion out of the more honourable sort of the people and therefore they are called vers 11. eetzilee separated or selected And Tostatus holdeth this as a reason because the word Elders ziene in the Hebrew hath no article set before it as is usuall in that language when any speciall persons of note are named But though his reason doe not alwayes hold yet his opinion seemeth of the rest to be most probable Tostat. qu. 3. QUEST III. Why Moses went up into the mount alone Vers. 2. ANd Moses himselfe alone shall come neere to the Lord c. 1. Here are three degrees or orders appointed to be observed in their comming neere unto God the people stand farre off and come not neere at all Aaron and his two sonnes and the seventy Elders ascend with Moses to some part of the mountaine but Moses himselfe only goeth up unto God vers 12. Calvin Lippoman 2. Rabanus maketh this morall application of it that as the seventy Elders went not up with Moses so unusquisque perpendat discrete vires suaâ— ut ultra non praesumat that every one doe discreetly examine his strength and not presume beyond his knowledge 3. For the mysticall sense Procopius maketh Aaron here a type of Christ who stood aloofe off and contemned not our humane nature sed descendens ad nos inter nos moratur but descending dwelt among us c. But this application can in no wise be fit that Aaron should be here a type of Christ who went not up unto God but Moses did for who should have freer accesse unto God than our Mediatour and intercessor therefore Moses here rather signifieth the Law which is perfect and pure in it selfe yet is not able to bring us to God as these ascended not with Moses but were left behind Simler QUEST IV. Whether all the people in generall were assembled Vers. 3. ANd all the people answered c. 1. Sometime the whole congregation is understood to be the Elders only and principall men that stand for the rest of the people as chap. 12.3 the Lord biddeth Moses to speake to all the congregation and yet he onely spake unto the Elders vers 21. But here we rather understand that all the multitude was called together for as we reade that when the Law was confirmed and ratified the whole assembly came together not only the Elders and Officers but even their children and wives yea the strangers unto the hewer of wood and drawer of water Deut. 29.10 11. so was it requisite that at the first receiving of the Law all the whole multitude should come together to give their generall consent 2. If it be objected that it was not possible that so many hundred thousand as there were in Israel could assemble in such sort to heare the voice of one man we may either say that God might give an extraordinary strength unto Moses voice that it might be heard round about Tostatus Or though all the people were not within hearing themselves at once yet one might receive it from another and so give their consent or one company might succeed another to heare Oleaster QUEST V. Why the Lord requireth the peoples consent to his Lawes Vers. 3. ALL that the Lord hath said will we doe 1. Though God might by his soveraigne right impose what Lawes he thought good without the peoples consent because they were bound to obey whatsoever the Lord commanded yet the Lord thought good to require their consent because otherwise they might be lesse culpable if they had not obeyed those Lawes which were thrust upon them against their will 2. And although they had twice before chap. 19.8 and 20.19 promised their obedience yet that was but in generall before the Lawes were published and therefore it was necessarie that a particular consent should be had now unto the severall Lawes which were propounded 3. God knew before they would consent but that was not sufficient unlesse they also expressed it themselves that they might afterward be left without excuse Tostat. 4. The people are to be commended for their readinesse but yet they knew not how impossible it was to keepe the Law and therefore cannot be excused of rashnesse Iun. Of this sudden promise of obedience which the Israelites had soone forgot Hierome thus writeth Melius est non promittere quam promissa non facere c. It had beene better for them not to have promised at all than not to performe their promise And Gregorie herein compareth the Jewes unto Locusts Subiâ—o saltuâ— daâ—tes protiâ—â—s ad 〈◊〉 codemes c. Which doe of a sudden give a spring and forthwith fall upon the ground againe QUEST VI. What Lawes they were which Moses wrote in a booke Vers. 4. ANd Moses wrote all the words of the Lord. 1. R. Salomon thinketh that Moses first rehearsed and afterward wrote the whole booke of Genesis and all Exodus unto this place But this cannot be 1. The Rabbin himselfe thinketh that Moses rose the next day and built the Altar how could he then write these two bookes without a great miracle in one day which we are not without great necessity to bring in to make or devise miracles where no cause is were great presumption Lyran. 2. It is said he wrote all the words of God and so consequently only the words of God but the history of Genesis and Exodus containe many things beside the words of God therefore there was no cause either to rehearse or write all the contents of these two bookes Tostatus 2. Cajetanes opinion is with whom consenteth Osiander that Moses did write all the former Lawes contained in the 21 22 23. chapters and the ten Commandements beside with all those Lawes set forth in the 12. and 13. chapters and his reason is
three conditions the first is touched by Hierome Non solum Divinitutem Patris c. posse oculos carnis aspicere sed mentis That not onely the Divinitie of the Father but neither of the Sonne or holy Ghost can the eyes of the bodie see but of the minde c. So also Athanasius as he is cited by Augustine Deum omnino esse invisibilem c. nisi in quantum Spiritu mente nosci potest That God is altogether invisible but as he may be knowne in the Spirit and minde c. These then at this time saw not with their bodily eyes the essence of God but certaine visible signes onely and demonstrations of his presence Secondly we shall have a more full sight of God in the next world than in this as Augustine saith Nemo potest in hac vita videre sicuti est No man can see him in this life as he is Eâ— promittitur sanctis in alia vita To see God in his nature is promised in the next life c. So also Gregorie Quamdiu hic mortaliter vivitur c. As long as we live in this mortall life God cannot be seene in his nature c. Thirdly yet fully the Divine nature shall not be comprehended of the Saints no not in the next life as Augustine to this purpose citeth Ambrose interpreting that place of the Apostle Who onely hath immortaliter c. whom never man saw neither can see c. Si natura ipsim est invisibilitas sicut incorruptibilitas c. If it appertaine to the nature of God to be invisible as well as to be incorruptible that nature shall not be changed in the next world of invisible to become visible because he cannot of incorruptible become corruptible c. And againe upon those words of the same Apostle To the King everlasting immortall invisible c. hee writeth thus Vnde ego non audeo ista distinguere c. Therefore I dare not divide or distinguish these things which the Apostle hath joyned together to say To him that is incorruptible for ever in this world and the next but invisible not in the next world but onely in this Contrarie then to this orthodoxall doctrine of the Fathers agreeable to the Scriptures are these ventrous and bold positions That wee shall in the next life participate with Christs Godhead and be made capable of his Divine substance That there is not any thing of Gods which his Saints shall not see In which assertion Augustine doth directly oppose himselfe to all such Dogmatists and Novelists in these words Non quia Dei plenitudinem quisquam non solum oculis corporis sed vel ipsa mente aliquando comprehendit Not because the fulnesse of God any can comprehend at any time not onely with the eyes of the bodie but with the minde it selfe c. for it is one thing to see another to comprehend the whole in seeing c. Totum comprehenditur videndo quod ita videtur ut nihil ejus lateat videntem c. The whole is comprehended in seeing which it so seene that no part thereof is hid from the seer c. Here Augustine evidently testifieth that God cannot wholly be seene unlesse nothing in the Godhead should be hid unto us which here he manifestly denieth 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. Honour in this life no signe of Gods favour Vers. 1. COme up thou and Aaron Nadab and Abihu c. These two which are bidden to come up with Moses and Aaron afterward were slaine with fire from heaven which sheweth that preferment in this life is not alwayes a signe of Gods favour but that the wicked are often exalted and lifted up that they may have the greater fall as the Lord said he 〈◊〉 appointed Pharaoh to shew his power in him Ferus 2. Observ. We must 〈◊〉 upon the Lord 〈◊〉 patience Vers. 16. THe seventh day the Lord called to Moses God would not at the first call unto Moses but maketh him to wait six daye Ne 〈◊〉 familiaritate superâ—iret Lest he should was proud by too much familiaritie Oleaster Vt discamus patienter ferre c. And that we may learne to beare it patiently if God at the first doe not answer to our desire Lippoman As S. Paul therefore be sought the Lord thrice that the temptation of his flesh whereby he was buffered might depart from him 2 Cor. â—â— 8 3. Observ. Sufficient deputies to be left in the Magistrate or Ministers 〈◊〉 absence Vers. 14. IN that Moses leaveth Aaron and Hur in his place It sheweth that the like 〈◊〉 in Ministers God would blesse to leave able deputies in their place when they have just cause to be absent and the contrarie fault he will severely punish 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4. Observ. The 〈◊〉 of fasting and prayer CHAP. XXV 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter Moses beginneth to set forth such generall ceremonies as belonged to the Tabernacle then instituted for the publike service of God there are two parts thereof the preparation to vers 10. the description to vers 40. 1. In the preparation these things are expressed in the charge which God giveth to Moses 1. Who shall offer the things required namely the people vers 2. 2. What they shall offer vers 3 4 5 6. 3. To what end vers 8. 4. After what manner vers 9. 2. In the description First the Arke is appointed to be made both the bodie thereof 1. Of what matter vers 10. 2. Of what measure vers 10. 3. With what ornaments it must be overlaid with gold vers 11. 4. What adjuncts and appendants both of rings and barres vers 13 14 15. 5. And of the use thereof vers 16. As also the cover of the Arke 1. The matter vers 18. 2. Measure vers 18. 3. The fashion with Cherubims how to be made vers 19. and how to be placed vers 20. 4. The place of the cover vers 21. 5. The use vers 22. Secondly the Table is described 1. The matter 2. The measure and forme vers 23. 3. The parts thereof the crowne vers 24. The border vers 25. The rings vers 26. 4. The appendants the barres v. 28. 5. The appertenants the dishes cups goblets vers 29. 6. The use to set the Shew-bread upon vers 30. Thirdly the Candlesticke is appointed to bee made 1. The matter and after what manner to bee wrought of gold beaten with the hammer vers 31. 2. The parts six branches three on the one side and three on the other vers 32. 3. The forme and fashion with boules almonds knops and flowers to v. 37. 4. The use thereof vers 37. 5. The appertenances the snuffers and snuffe-dishes vers 37. 6. The quantitie of a talent of gold all this must be made vers 39. 2. The divers readings Vers. 4. Fine linnen G. rather than cotten or bombasine I. or silke caeter shas H. Vers. 5. Badgers skinnes I.V.A.P.C. or skinnes of
worthily bee left 4. And will they have us to follow them in manners also The Pope and his Cardinals no marvell give such good example of life that it is pitie that they are not imitated They that know Rome and the generall prophanesse and licentious living there though never so much addicted to the Popish religion I think would be ashamed to follow their conversation 5. This ramme signifieth Christ by whose blood only we are purged our eares hands and all other parts sanctified of whom the Prophet speaketh Isai. 50.4 He will waken mine eare as the learned it is blaspemie therefore to applie it to Peter he sanctifieth not the eare Christ indeed healed the eare which Peter cut off I hope they will not say that Peters bloud doth sanctifie them 6. Oleaster giveth a better sense of this place Nihil aliud hujusmodi sanguinis respersione adumbrari video quam Sacerdotum punitionem c. I see nothing else shadowed forth by this sprinkling of bloud than the punishment of the Priests Si negligentiores in audiendis ejus mandatis c. If they should be negligent in hearing Gods Commandements and in the executing of their ministery c. Let the Pope and popelings therefore looke unto it that they smart not for it one day in neglecting Gods Commandements in respect of their owne traditions 4. Controv. Of the elevation of the host and of the signe of the crosse Sa. Vers. 24. THou shalt shake them to and fro The Latine text readeth Thou shalt sanctifie them elevating or lifting them up Whereupon Sa in his annotations would ground the elevation of the host in the Sacrament and Lyranus and Tostatus observe that the Priest shaking them to and fro and lifting them up and downe in this motion made as it were a signe of the crosse in the aire Contra. 1. Who taught them to borrow their ceremonies from the figures and types of the Law If such rites as shadowed forth Christ be still to be used to what end died Christ The Jewes that thinke Christ not yet to be come have some colour in retaining their legall ceremonies but seeing Christians doe beleeve that Christ the body and substance of the Law is come in him all those shadowes are determined 2. Neither was it yet revealed unto them how Christ should suffer and whereon hee should bee offered therefore it is not like that the moving of those things up and downe and to and fro had any such signification 3. Neither was the crosse of Christ of that fashion that as much should be left above the crossing in the head as under it in the feet so that the upright peece should be crossed in the middest after which similitude this motion of the Priests hands seemed to be up and downe and then sidewayes to and fro 5. Controv. Against the burying of Bishops in their Pontificials Vers. 29. ANd the holy garments which are Aarons shall be his sonnes after him It was not the fashion then among the Hebrewes as it is now among the Romanists for their high Priest to be buried in his priestly robes as now their Bishops are intombed in their pontificials Lippoman one of their owne Writers giveth this note hereupon Lest any should say Aaron shall use the pontificall vestures all his life time and when he dieth ipse eisdem indutus tumulabitur he shall be buried in them c. He seemeth closely to glance at that superstitious use practised among them Simlerus ghesseth well at the cause of this ridiculous usage I cannot tell saith he why they should doe so nisi fortè ut mortui fungantur munere suo quod vivi nunquam fecêre unlesse it be that they might exercise their function when they are dead which they never did being alive 6. Controv. Of the lawfulnesse of Ministers marriage and the legitimation of their children Vers. 29. SHall be his sonnes after him c. Tostatus here thus noteth that because in the old Testament the Priests had wives the sonnes succeeded their fathers as others did in civill principalities but now in the new Testament sacerdotes non habent uxores the Priests have no wives and therefore their sonnes succeed them not because they have no sonnes and if they have sometime sonnes illegitimi sunt they are illegitimate c. Tostat. qu. 16. Contra. 1. If the Priests of the Law had their wives of whom was exacted a greater legall purity in outward observations than now why should the Ministers of the new Testament be restrained in the times of the Gospell which hath given us liberty that were in bondage under the Law 2. Then the sonnes succeeded the fathers in the priesthood both because the tribes were distinguished and their families and kinreds divided that Christs line of Iudah might be continued and then the service of the Tabernacle consisting chiefly in externall observations required no such exactnesse but that the sonne might be fit to succeed his father in the priesthood especially God giving an extraordinary blessing unto that lineal succession but now it is not fit that children should alwayes succeed their fathers because the Gospell requireth a greater sufficiencie and the childe is not alwayes heire of his fathers gifts but where the sonne is endued with sufficient parts to take upon him his fathers charge there is no reason why he should be barred We see in these dayes that divers learned men Ministers and Professors under the Gospell have left behind them their sonnes men of worthy parts as Iosias Simlerus had a sonne of the same name who writ the Dedicatory Epistle to his fathers learned Commentaries upon Exodus David Pareus that learned man hath likewise his sonne Philip Pareus who hath written of Logike Kicherman the Author of his Logike and politike Systemata succeeded his father in Gymnasio patrio in his fathers schoole And divers such beside might be named 3. And doth he thinke indeed that the sonnes of Priests are illegitimate and unfit to succeed their fathers What thinketh he of divers Popes that were Priest sonnes as Bonifacius the first Felix the third Agapetus the first Sylvester Theodorus Hadrianus Benedict the 8. Iohn the 12. all which were the sonnes of Priests and Gratian addeth further Quà m plures etiam alii inveniuntur de sacerdotibus nati and divers beside are found to have beene borne of Priests 4. Indeed they which have sonnes and are not married which is no rare thing in the Popish Clergy doe leave an illegitimate seed behind them but such as are borne in lawfull matrimony are an holy seed of what calling soever their parents be for both marriage among all men is honourable Hebr. 13.4 and so consequently among Ministers and their children are holy 1 Cor. 7.14 They therefore that condemne their marriage and make their children illegitimate and so unholy doe contradict the holy Apostle and in a manner give him the lye See more Synops. Câ—ntur 1. â—â—r 77. 7. Controv. That
Pythagoras appeareth to be ridiculous and foolish who condemned all such sacrificing of beasts as the Poet describeth it in this manner Nec satis est quod tale nefas committitur ipsos Inscripsére Deos sceleri numenque supremum Cade laboriferi credunt gandere juvenci They thinke it not enough themselves evill for to do But make the gods above as parties thereunto As though they joyed to see a painfull bullock slaine to be But herein was Pythagoras errour and ignorance that he could not conceive Deum sine expiatione 〈◊〉 placari that God could not be appeased without some expiation and atonement made The bloud of these sacrifices then shadowed forth the bloud of Christ the only sacrifice of atonement whereby God was well pleased not that he delighted in the death of that just one but in his obedience wherein Gods justice was satisfied indeed take Christ away and then the sacrifices of beasts nihil differunt à profana carnificina differ nothing from a prophane shambles Calvin 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. A Bishop must be gentle and full of clemencie Vers. 7. ANd anoint him Disce Sacerdos Dei esse misericors Learne thou which are Gods Priest and Minister to be mercifull and given to pity for the which cause the Priests of the old Law were anointed Oleaster Which property of gentlenesse Saint Paul requireth in his Bishop No striker not given to filthy lucre but gentle no fighter It is more seemely for a Christian Bishop to win by clemencie than to force by rigour and severity 2. Observ. Ministers must both teach and live well Vers. 20. ANd put it upon the lap of Aarons eare c. The laying the bloud on the right eare of Aaron signifieth the right hearing of the Word on the right thumbe that they should not be hearers of the Word only but doers on the right toe that their conversation should be aright B. Bab. as S. Paul would have his Bishop unreproveable 1. Tim. 3.2 3. Observ. No delayes to be used in Gods service Vers. 34. IF ought remaine till the morning c. As the holy flesh was to be eaten the same day so hereby the Lord would shew sibi alacriter esse inserviendum that we must serve him cheerefully not to use any delayes or procrastinations in his service Simler As the Prophet David saith I made haste and delayed not to keepe thy Commandements Psal. 119.60 CHAP. XXX 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter is first described another object of the service of the Priests namely the Altar of incense to vers 11. Secondly such things as were necessary for their Ministery 1. Money to be collected vers 11. to 17. 2. A laver to wash them in to vers 22. 3. The anointing oile for consecration to vers 33. 4. The sweet perfume for sacrifice to vers 38. In the description of the Altar of incense are set forth 1. The matter vers 1. forme and fashion vers 2. 2. The parts the crowne and barres to vers 6. 3. The situation of it vers 6. 4. The use daily vers 7.8 anniversary vers 10. In the second part 1. The collection of the money is appointed in generall by whom it should bee given what and to what end vers 12. then in particular what shall be given vers 13. by whom vers 14.15 to what end vers 16. 2. The laver is described 1. The matter and forme vers 18. 2. The place vers 18. 3. The use for the Priests to wash in vers 19 20. 4. The danger if they doe it not vers 21. 3. The holy oyntment is appointed to be made 1. The matter vers 23 24. 2. The forme vers 25. 3. The use to anoint both the holy things to vers 30. and the holy persons vers 30. 4. Punishment iâ— threatned to those which should prophane this ointment to vers 34. 4. The holy perfume also is commanded to be made 1. Of what matter vers 34. 2. After what manner vers 35. 3. How it must be used vers 36. 4. The punishment of those which doe abuse and prophane it 2. The divers readings Vers. 3. The top thereof B.G.V.I.A.P. better than the grate thereof I.S. gag signifieth the â—op or roofe Vers. 4. On either side B. or the two sides V.I.P.A.C.S. better than per singula latera on everie side L.G. Vers. 6. Where I will meet with thee B.I.P.A. better than where I will speake with thee L. or appoint my wâ—rd with thee C. or covenant with thee V. or appoint with thee G. the word commeth of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 jaghad to meet with or to appoint a time Vers. 10. Aaron shall make reconciliation B.G.I. cum caâ—er not Aaron shall pray L. the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 caphar to reconcile Vers. 19. Shall wash their hands c. thereat G. or out of it I.V.P.A.S.C. better than in it B.L. minimenum out of it H. Vers. 23. Five hundred sicles B.G.V.A.P. cum cater not five hundred pounds I. for it had beene too great a proportion for an him of oyle And beside vers 24. mention is made of the shekel after the shekel of the Sanctuarie Vers. 33. Take c. stacto onycha galbanum B.I.C.L.S.P. better than myrrh and cleare gumme G. for myrrh is called before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mâ—r Vers. 34. Spices and pure frankincense B.G.V.A.P. better than to referre it to gallaâ—â—â— of sweet savour L. S. C. for a distinction commeth betweene or nard with the leaves I. the word i◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sammim spices so taken vers 23. Vers. 34. Everie one by it selfe alone I. So also Oleaster better than of each a like weight B. G. cum cater 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 badadh signifieth alone Levit. 13.45 3. The questions discussed QUEST I. Why the narration of the making of the golden Altar is transposed Vers. 1. THou shalt make an Altar c. 1. The Hebrewes well observe that in the sacred histories we should not alwayes looke to have things set downe in that order of time wherein they were done as the altar of incense was made before the priestly apparell as is evident chap. â—7 â—5 and chap. 28. yet it is prescribed to be made after 2. Iunius giveth this reason why the same order is not observed in the prescription which was in the making preparing of these things because first the things are described wherein the service and ministerie of the Priests consisted and then the common instruments and sacred things belonging to their service as the perfume and perfume altar money and the holy oyntment and so though the order of time he not kept yet the order of nature seemeth to bee observed But then it is like if the things are set downe in the narration as the nature of them required that the same course should have beene much more kept in the framing and making of them 3. Tostatus thinketh rather that the order of nature is
this golden Altar which Moses made and that which Salomon erected 1. Some thinke that Salomon made a new Altar of incense as Comestor Tostat. qu. 16. in cap. 6. 1. Reg. because this was made of Shittim wood but Salomons of Cedar But Ribera answereth that it is not said that Salomon made the golden Altar of Cedar but onely covered it with Cedar 1 King 6.22 that is enlarged it lib. 2. cap. 8. de Templ 2. But Beda and Lyranus are farre wide who thinke that Salomon made the Altar of incense of stone which was covered over with Cedar Osiander The text before alleaged is evident that it was of Cedar there is no mention made of stone 3. Iunius his opinion is that it was the same Altar and readeth thus Obduxit altare Câ—drinum He laid over the Altar of Cedar not with Cedar but gold as it followeth ibid. v. 22. but the Altar which Moses made was of Shittim wood the Cedar is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or enrit seemeth then they were two divers kinds of wood 4. Ribera therefore thinketh that 〈◊〉 first did enlarge the golden Altar with Gods 〈◊〉 and then covered it with gold so that it was the same Altar but enlarged So also Borrhaius For the words of the Text are he covered the golden Altar with Cedar and Iosephus writeth evidently that Salomon did build a new brazen Altar but of making a new golden Altar he maketh no mention Ribera ibid So some things were made new by Salomon as the brazen Altar and the brazen sea or lover ten golden candlesticks ten tables 2 Chron. 4. Some things he only beautified and enlarged as the Arke over the which he made two Cherubims beside those upon the Mercie seat 1 King 6.23 Likewise he enlarged the Altar of incense for one Altar might serve to burne incense upon though for other services the number of vessels and instruments was increased according to the proportion of the Temple which was larger than the Tabernacle QUEST XV. Whether it were lawfull to number the people and wherein David offended Vers. 12. WHen thou takest the summe of the children of Israel c. 1. Simply then it is not unlawfull to number the people which may be done upon two necessarie occasions as when either a publike collection is to be made of tribute or subsidie money unlesse account should be taken the burthen should lye upon a few and others should escape Againe when any great warres are taken in hand it is fit that the people should be mustered that choice may be made of such as are fit for warre Tostat. qu. 9. 2. But then Davids example will be objected with whom God was offended for the numbring of the people To this divers answers are made 1. Augustine thinketh David did evill therein to number the people quia Deus non jusserat because God commanded him not But this is no sufficient reason for then it should be unlawfull for Princes now to number the people they having no speciall warrant from God 2. Simlerus saith that God was angrie with David because non curavit Domino persolvi tributum hee did not cause this tribute here appointed to bee given unto God So also Beda But this was not the cause neither for neither did Moses when he numbred the people which he did thrice Exod. 38. Numb 10. and 26. Neither is it like that David was so ignorant of the Law 3. Oleaster maketh this the reason because the Lord promised to multiply the seed of Abraham as the starres of Heaven and the sand of the sea without number therefore he was angrie whensoever they were numbred But by this reason they should never have beene numbred at all rather this might tend to Gods glorie in seeing by the numbers of the people how the Lord performed his promise 4. This rather was the cause of Gods indignation because David numbred the people for an evill end ad gloriam suam for his owne glorie to rejoyce and as it were to put confidence in their multitude Tostat. qu. 9. Therefore Haec sive superbia sive temeritas sive ingratitudo this either pride or rashnesse or ingratitude was severely punished Calvin QUEST XVI Whether this collection of money were commanded only at this time or were to continue WHen thou takest 1. Some thinke though here be no certaine time expressed when this account of the people should be taken whether everie yeare or everie fifth yeare as the ancient Romans used to doe yet this is certaine that whensoever the people was numbred this summe of halfe a sicle of everie one was collected Simler Lippoman thinketh also that they were often numbred ut gratia Dei agnosceretur c. that the grace and goodnesse of God might bee acknowledged in multiplying his people And it is the received opinion of the Hebrewes that this precept for the collection of this summe was perpetuall and anniversarie toward the charge of repairing the Tabernacle and maintaining of the sacrifices and other services So also Calvin in 17. Matth. vers 24. 2. But Iunius opinion is more probable with whom agreeth Beza annot in Matth. 17.24 that this was a precept only for this time and not to continue afterward which he confirmeth by these reasons 1. From the end and use of this money which was to acknowledge their late redemption and deliverance out of the bondage of Egypt 2. Moses himselfe did not exact this summe when hee numbred the people againe Numb 1. and the third time Numb 26. 3. This money was not to be spent in the sacrifices which were consumed but in the worke of the Tabernacle which was permanent and remained and so it was as a memoriall for them before the Lord vers 16. And of this money now collected which came to 100. talents of silver and 1775. shekels were made the sockets of the Sanctuarie and of the veile the hookes also and the fillets of the pillars Exod. 38.26 27. So that the end of this collection being extraordinarie and for this time only toward the building of the Tabernacle and the instruments thereof it was not to be perpetuall 4. And if this proportion had beene perpetually to be observed for everie one to pay halfe a shekel toward the Tabernacle Nehemiah would not have appointed another rate that everie one should pay the third part of a shekel by the yeare toward the service of Gods house Nehem. 10.32 3. But this further may be added though this manner of collection was not enjoyned as ordinarie and perpetuall yet upon the like occasion as to repaire the ruines of the Temple they might raise Moses tax upon the people as Ioash did 2 Chron. 24.9 which was upon the like extraordinarie occasion which ceasing the collection also was intermitted as Ioash said to the Priests that having received money of the people yet were slacke to repaire the decayed places of the Temple Receive no more money of your acquaintance except yee deliver
to minister so it is like they had a care to keepe them cleane during their Ministerie 4. Neither did the Priests onely wash themselves thereat but they also washed their sacrifices the inwards and such other parts which were not to be carried forth into any profane place to be washed Tostatus Lippoman Ribera QUEST XXVI Of the mysticall application of the laver wherein the Priests washed BY this washing of their hands and feet 1. Beda understandeth the lavacre of Baptisme wherein we are first received into Christs Church as the Priests first washed their hands and feet before they entred into the Tabernacle 2. But because Baptisme is ministred once onely whereas the Priests did wash often he rather would have thereby understood ablutionem compunctionis lachrymarum the washing of compunction or contrition and of teares so often as we come before the Lord. 3. And thereby was signified the spirituall washing and cleansing of the soule which the faithfull in the old Testament well understood as David saith Psal. 51.7 Wash me and I shall be whiter than snow and the Prophet Isay alluding unto this rite saith Wash you make you cleane chap. 1.16 Simler 4. And for this cause our Saviour reproved the Pharisies for being addicted so superstitiously unto their outward washings wherein they committed a double fault both in bringing in other kindes of washing than were prescribed in the Law and in being addicted only to the outward ceremony Simler 5. And by the hands our works are signified by the feet the affections that we should both cleanse our hearts and be holy in our workes when we come before the Lord Tostat. qu. 11. 6. And in that the Priests washed their hands and feet Hac ablutione apertam impuritatis confessionem edebant They did by this washing give an evident confession of their impuritie and uncleannesse Gallas 7. The Heathen had such a custome to wash themselves when they sacrificed to their gods as this was a proverb among them Sacra non tractanda illotiâ— manibus That holy things must not be handled with unwasht hands Calvin 8. Therefore like as men doe not sit downe at their owne table but first they wash their hands so wee must not presume to come neere the Lords table with unprepared affections and uncleane hearts Simler Wee must be inwardly washed by the Spirit of grace the water of life whereof our Saviour speaketh Ioh 4.14 Marbach QUEST XXVII The difference betweene Moses laver and Salomons great sea of brasse NOw to finish up this matter concerning the laver these differences may bee observed betweene it and the great brazen sea which Salomon made and other vessels to the like use 1. They differed in the quantitie and large capacitie Salomons was ten cubits wide and five cubits deepe it contained 200. baths 1 Kin. 7.26 being filled after the ordinarie manner but 3000. baths 2 Chro. 4.5 that is if it were filled up to the brim So Cajetanus and Ribera doe well reconcile these places The bath was of the same capacitie for liquid things that the Epha was for dry containing each of them ten pottles or thereabout foure or five gallons And therefore because of the great capacitie it was called a sea But the laver that Moses made was nothing so big for it had not beene portable 2. They were divers in fashion Moses laver stood but upon one foot the other was borne upon twelve oxen And it was cast with knops and flowers and wilde cucumers 1 King 7.24 But this laver is not so appointed to be made it seemeth it was plaine 3. There was also some difference in the number Moses caused but one laver to be made Salomon beside the great molten sea made ten other caldrons or small lavers 2 Chron. 4.6 because in Salomons Temple there was more use of such vessels than in Moses Tabernacle 4. Their uses also were divers Moses laver served both for the Priests to wash thereat and to wash the sacrifices but Salomons great sea served onely for the Priests to wash in the other appertained to the sacrifices 2 Chron. 4.6 QUEST XXVIII Of the spices that went toward the making of the oyntment Vers. 23. TAke unto thee principall spices c. 1. Here are two confections appointed to be made the first of things more liquid and moist and the same to bee tempered with oyle to make an oyntment of to the making whereof in generall were required the principall or head spice or drug which Iunius inclineth to thinke to be the Balme which is the principall among such precious drugs and therefore is called of the Arabians Belsuaim as having dominion or excelling among such things but that there is no quantitie expressed of this as of the rest that follow neither were they yet come to the land of Canaan where great store of Balme was it is therefore the generall name rather of these spices and drugs which are named afterward in particular 2. The first is myrrh which Oleaster taketh for balme but the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mar sheweth it to be myrrh There is another word tzeri which is taken for balme Ierem. 8.22 There were two kindes of myrrh one which of it selfe distilled out of the tree and therefore it is called mar deror myrrh of libertie that is freely flowing Paguine Oleaster or right myrrh without mixture Iun. Vatab. There was another which came of the cutting of the barke of the tree which was not so good Lyran. The myrrh tree groweth in Arabia five cubits high Strabus writeth that the fume thereof would breed incurable diseases in that countrey nisi fumo storaâ—iâ— occurrerentpunc but that they correct it with the perfume of storax c. But it is not like that if it were so dangerous and offensive that the Lord would have prescribed it to make the holy oyntment of These properties rather it hath it is good to healâ— wounds to dry up rheâ—me to care a stinking and unsavourie breath to cleere the voyce Plin. lib. 12. cap. 8. Pelargus 3. The next is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 kinemon cynamom whereof because there are two kindes one that is verie sweet and pleasant the other of no great smell therefore it is added here sweet cynamom R. Salomon Lyran. It cureth the biting of venomous beasts it helpeth the dimnesse of the sight Dioscorid lib. 1. cap. 13. Pelarg. But whether it be the same cynamom which is in use among us it is doubted it seemeth to be of another sort Simler For our cynamom is rather pleasant to the taste than smell whatsoever it was it is certaine it gave a pleasant smell Pro. 7.17 I have perfumed my bed with myrrh alâ—â—s and cynamom 4. The third kinde is keneh which signifieth a cane it is calamus odâ—ratus sweet calamus which was a kinde of reed or cane of verie sweet savour Genevens It groweth like a shrub in India about two cubits high Strabus It is full of
we doe not reade that any marble was used in the Tabernacle Tostatus saith though no marble went to the making of the Tabernacle yet they might have skill to worke therein because it belongeth to perfect workemen to have skill to do some things which they have no need to doe quest 7. Contra. This wisdome and understanding was given them To worke in all manner of workmanship and to make all which the Lord commanded vers 6. Therefore seeing they were not commanded to do any thing with marble that belonged not to their skill 2. But Tostatus addeth further that some workes are expressed which they did not as in diversitate lignorum to worke in divers kinds of wood whereas they wrought onely in Shittim wood and some kinds of worke are omitted which they did as in curious weaving and embroydering Contra. The Latine Interpreter here doth not translate right the words are bacharosheth ghetz in the workmanship of wood or timber the text speaketh not of diversitie of wood and yet they being able to cut and carve in one kind of wood had skill to doe it in another 3. Indeed some of their workes are here omitted which the Septuagint supplieth here To worke in blew silke purple scarlet fine twined linen but none of this is found here in the originall yet chap. 35.35 mention is made of all these whence a supplie may be made here Simler 4. It is not to be imagined that all these workes went only thorow the hands of Bezaleel and Aholiab who is joyned with Bezaleel but that there were many workmen beside which were taught and instructed by them chap. 35.34 5. There were two chiefe and principall workemen Bezaleel and Aholiab that were directers to the rest and taught them to worke chap. 35 34. And of these two it seemeth that Bezaleel was the most excellent workeman whose gifts and faculties are first of all described by themselves QUEST VII Whether the wise in heart received a new gift or increase rather of the old Vers. 6. IN the hearts of those which are wise hearted have I put wisdome c. 1. The opinion of the most is that God in these increased only those gifts which they had before as their naturall parts and their skill in arts which they had learned and gave them a further degree of wisdome and knowledge in those kind of workes as he had done to Bezaleel and Aholiab Genevens Tostat. qu. 7. Osiander But it is rather to be thought that God altogether furnished them for this worke that as the Apostles were taken from among the unlearned sort to build the spirituall Church of Christ so these were altogether unfit of themselves to have enterprised this businesse if the Lord had not endued them with the Spirit of wisdome lest they might have ascribed part of the worke to themselves And further whereas they are said to be filled with the Spirit of wisdome chap. 35.31 this phrase insinuateth that this gift of skill was inspired it was not then in them before in part for then they should not have been filled with the Spirit of wisdome but received part onely 2. Oleaster maketh this difference Deum implesse duos praecipuos artifices sapientia scilicet nova c. That God had filled the two principall workemen with new wisdome and anxisse eam eis qui eam ante habuerunt c. And that hee increased the same to those which had it before But by this means the inferiour artificers should have had more helps than the other both naturall and supernaturall whereas the other had only supernaturall 3. Simlerus giveth this interpretation In the hearts of all that are wise hearted have I put wisdome to make that God bestowed two things upon them artem à me hahent in hunc finem c. they have both the skill and art from me and to this end to make c. so they were wise hearted but they were wise of Gods making But that this phrase to bee wise in heart sheweth not any speciall and extraordinarie gift of art infused unto them is evident chap. 35 25. where the women that did spinne with their hands are said to bee wise hearted 4. Therefore Iunius giveth a better interpretation calling these wise in heart industrious now two things are required to make one industrious and so wise in heart one is willingnes and the other is aptnes and agilitie to any worke as both these are touched chap. 35.21 Every one whose heart made him willing and vers 25. The women that were wise hearted spunne with their hands So God gave unto them first a willing heart and they which had any aptnes to do artificiall workes were then endued with an extraordinarie gift of wisdome to do the workes of the Tabernacle they received speciall grace to know how to worke according to the paterne given them and willingnes 〈◊〉 to exercise their gifts to Gods glorie in setting forward the worke of the Tabernacle So M. Calvine He had given them aptnes and insight Vt eorum dexteritas semen quoddam esset That their dexteritiâ— should be but a certaine seed QUEST VIII Why Moses was not made fit to do the worke of the Tabernacle NOw if it be inquired why Moses received not this gift of wisdome seeing hee might best have knowne how to frame those things having seene the fashion of them in the mount it may bee thus answered that although it had been no hard thing with God to have given Moses wisdome to do such things yet for these reasons the Lord saw it was not fit 1. Because Moses was to oversee and direct everie mans worke and to approve and allow of it being done and therefore it was not meet that he should have been a labourer with them himselfe 2. And beside Moses was to attend the publike government to speake unto the people and to judge their causes therefore he could not being letted by publike affaires have been spared for those works And as it pleased God to direct his father in law to give him counsell to appoint under-officers and governours and not to undertake the whole burthen of government himselfe so it was requisite that the finishing of this worke should be transmitted over to other and the chiefe direction and oversight only to belong to Moses Tostat. qu. 8. QUEST IX Of the garments of ministration what they were Vers. 10. ALso the garments for Ministration and the holy garments for Aaron the Priest and the garments for his sonnes c. 1. Some do understand by the garments of Ministration the holy garments for Aaron as Tostatus following therein the Latine Translater and the Septuagint who reade only the holy garments for the Ministerie of Aaron c. Whereas there are three distinct garments spoken of bigdâ—e haserad garments of Ministration and bigdee hakedesh holy garments for Aaron 2. Oleaster understandeth vestes inferiores seu communes the inferiour or common Priests garments which remained exutic
consumitur amissis membris suis so the Devill is devoured his members being lost and taken from him So doth Rupertus understand by this image beaâ—en to powder Eos qui ex parte diaboli per poenitentiam confracti c. Those which having beene as of the body of the Devill are broken by repentance 8. Gregorie maketh this action propheticall to signifie the generall destruction of idols thorow the world Cernas oculis qui huiâ— vanitati erant prius dediti templa sua diruentes c. You may see with your eyes that they which trusted before in their idols doe now pull downe their temples And Procopius by the drinking thereof with the mouth understandeth the true confession of the faith quae ore fit which is done with the mouth whereby idolatrie is overthrowne But the other historicall reasons are rather to be insisted upon And this drinking of the water mixed with this powder was rather an evill signe unto them as the bitter water was unto the adulterous woman Numb 5. than a signification of any good QUEST LIX Whether by the drinking of the water any visible signe of difference was made among the people who had most deeply offended about the golden Calfe BUt some further affirme that this drinking of the water served to another end than that thereby some signe of difference might be made betweene the Ring-leaders unto this idolatrie and the rest that they might easily bee discerned of the Levites when they went up and downe in the host killing those whom they met 1. Therefore R. Salomon thinketh that this bitter water did cause their bellies to swell that were guiltie of this great sinne but to the rest it was pleasant and wholsome water like as the water of jealousie Numb 5. did cause the adulterous womans belly to swell and her thigh to rot but if shee were not guiltie it made her fruitfull 2. Others thinke that the signe was this everie ones beard that consented unto this idolatrie was coloured yellow like unto gold and by this marke the Levites knew them from others But if there had beene any such visible marke set upon them seeing most of the camp consented unto this sinne there should have beene more found guiltie and more slaine than three thousand vers 28. 3. Tostatus thinketh that there was some externall and visible signe caused by drinking of the water though he will not determine what it was because it was not like that the Levites would hand over head slay one with another And he thinketh that Aaron drinking of the water had not that marke because the Lord pardoned his sinne because hee was thereunto drawne by compulsion This instance of Aaron sheweth that the drinking of the water did make no such signe for then Aaron should have had it whose sin was not yet pardoned neither had Moses yet intreated for him having not yet examined him The Levites might know to make difference among the people some other way than by any such visible signe See more of this quest 70. following QUEST LX. How farre Moses fact herein is to be imitated BUt whereas Moses did not onely put downe this abominable idoll but made it altogether unprofitable for any use burning and beating it to powder the question is how farre Moses herein is to be imitated 1. Neither is their opinion to be approved which take this example of Moses to be extraordinarie in demolishing this golden Calfe for as Moses did take away this publike stumbling blocke so it belongeth unto Princes è mâ—dio tollere to remove out of the way whatsoever is done against the worship of God as Hesekiah did likewise breake downe the brazen Serpent after it began to bee abused to idolatrie Ferus Who addeth further I would we had now some Moses to take away the evils which are in the Church Non enim unum tantùm vitulum habemus sed multos For we have not one golden calfe but many Thus Ferus complaineth of the Papall Church 2. But this is extraordinarie in Moses example that he converteth not this golden idoll unto any use but consumeth it to powder Herein Christian Magistrates are not bound to follow Moses example for Moses fact herein was singular ad majorem detestationem c. for the greater detestation of idolatrie Now it is lawfull to convert things consecrate to idolatrie to some profitable use ut juventur membra Christi that the members of Christ may be helped and releeved Gallas 3. And in that Moses doth remove this idoll which none else attempted to doe yet it may bee thought that many in Israel were offended with it so magistratus officium est non privatorum hominum it is the office of the magistrate not of private men to take away idolatrous images Osiander QUEST LXI How Moses maketh Aaron the author and cause of this sinne Vers. 21. WHat did this people vnto thee that thou hast brought c. 1. Moses layeth this sinne upon Aaron though he were not the first author of it because hee being left in Moses place stayed not the people by his authoritie therefore he is worthily reproved tanquam author sceleris quod passus est admitti as the author of this sinne which he suffered to be committed Calvin so that permissio peccati aeque in vitio sit atque commissio the permitting of sinne is as well in fault as the committing Pelarg. 2. Here then the Hebrewes in seeking to excuse Aaron and the people as seduced by the Egyptians doe labour in vaine seeing Moses doth so straitly charge Aaron as a principall doer in it for if he had not grievously sinned why should Moses here make him the cause of this sinne and the Lord be so offended with him that he purposed to slay him if Moses had not intreated for him Deut. 9.20 And in these three things Aaron sinned 1. In not staying the people and stilling them 2. In that besides consenting unto them hee is an agent in making a Calfe for them 3. And being made hee approved it and set up an altar before it So that Aaron is no more here to be excused than Peter in the Gospell which denied his Master Oleaster 3. Yet Aaron sinned not as the people did but as there were degrees of offenders among the people some incouraged and perswaded others some only gave consent and were seduced by others perswasion to commit idolatrie and some did neither but onely went with the multitude for company to desire a Calfe to be made So Aarons sin differed from the rest timore ductus fabricavit vitulum hee made a Calfe being drawne by feare Tostat. qu. 33. And therefore Moses dealeth otherwise with Aaron than with the people Aaronem verbis redarguit populum cecîdit gladio Hee rebukes Aaron in words the people he slayeth with the sword Ferus 4. But yet Aarons sinne cannot bee so much extenuated as to free him from the sinne of idolatrie as Tostatus confesseth that he sinned Nec
tamen sequitur ex hoc quòd fuit idololatra and yet it followeth not hereupon that he was an idolater for howsoever Aaron thought in his heart the verie making of an idoll to be worshipped erecting of an altar and offering sacrifice unto it all which Aaron did doe proclaime him guiltie of externall idolatrie QUEST LXII Why idolatrie is called a great sinne THis great sinne 1. Idolatrie is counted a great sinne even in the highest degree because it is a sinne committed directly against God not as other sinnes of the second table which are done against our neighbour which are also against God because they are against his Law but not directly against Gods honor as the sins against the first table are 2. And among all the sins of the first table there is none which so directly impugneth the honour of God as idolatrie for he which taketh Gods name in vaine or prophaneth the Sabbath is an enemie to Gods honour but yet such an one denieth not the Lord to bee God as idolaters doe Tostat. qu. 33. 3. Like as then in a Common-wealth all offences are against the King because they are against his Lawes but those which are against his person are most directly against him and among them treason specially which is intended against his life of the same nature is idolatrie which is high treason against God 4. Thomas saith Tantum est aliquod peccatum gravius quanto longius per ipsum homo à Deo separatur A sinne is so much the more grievous the further wee are thereby removed from God but by infidelitie and idolatrie one is furthest separated from God 5. Idolatrie also is a great and grievous sinne in regard of the judgement and punishment which it bringeth with it for here Aaron as much as in him lay aâ—â—er fit ultimam cladem had brought upon them utter destruction Calvin if Moses had not turned the Lords wrath they had all beene at once destroyed QUEST LXIII Why Moses onely rebuketh Aaron and forbeareth further punishment NOw that Moses spared Aaron from further punishment and onely rebuked him 1. Some make this to be the cause for that the Lord had revealed unto Moses Aarons sinne in the mount before he came downe at what time Moses prayed also for him seeing the Lord bent to kill him Tostat. qu. â—5 But that intreatie for Aaron was afterward at Moses second going up to God when hee fasted fortie dayes and fortie nights as before at that time he saith he prayed for Aaron Deut. 9.20 And seeing at this time the Lord purposed to destroy all the nation and so Aaron could not escape Moses now onely prayed in generall for all Israel that God would not destroy the whole nation 2. Others thinke that Moses did after a milde manner reprove Aaron quiae sic arguendi praelati because Prelates and Ecclesiasticall Governours are so to be reproved Ferus he thinketh he was now the high Priest So also Oleaster calleth him Pontificem summum the chiefe Priest But as yet Aaron was not consecrated as Lippoman inferreth upon these reasons Quia non illi improperatur conspâ—râ—atum sacerdotium He is not upbraided with defiling of his Priesthood by this meanes neither doe we read of his reconciliation afterward which should not have beene omitted in such a case of irregularitie 3. Procopius thinketh that Aaron was both spared at this time and afterward likewise when he repined against Moses cum propter alias causas tum propter sanctos ex ejus lumbis prodituros Both for other causes as also for those holy mens sakes which should come out of his loynes But if this had beene the reason all the tribes should have beene spared likewise because out of all of them came holy and worthy men Judges Prophets or Kings 4. But the causes rather were these 1. Aaron confessed his sinne and therefore Moses inclined to favour him 2. Moses afterward intreated the Lord for him and the Lord at his instance forgiving his sinne the punishment also was remitted Simler 3. Adde hereunto that Aaron was now appointed to be high Priest order was taken for his priestly apparell and his office what it should be and how he and his sonnes should bee consecrated all which had beene in vaine if Aaron now had perished 4. Beside Moses had direction from God to put divers of the people to the sword for this offence but for Aaron hee had no such commandement 5. But Augustine yeeldeth the best reason Novit ille cui parcat c. God onely knoweth whom to spare for amendment and whom not to spare at all or for a time for his wayes and judgements are past finding out qu. 148. 5. Now whereas Tostatus further reasoneth that Moses by all likelihood had prayed for Aaron in the mount because then the Lord did specially reveale unto him his sinne for otherwise Moses had knowne nothing of Aarons doings as he did as it appeareth by this reprehension it may be answered that it is not necessarie for this cause to presuppose any such notice to have beene given unto Moses in the mount for either Moses might by examination and inquirie after hee came downe learne out the truth or which is rather like Moses Aaronem vicarium constituerat had left Aaron his deputie governour when he went up into the mount Simler and therefore he was sure that such a thing could not bee attempted in the host without Aarons permission at the least and sufferance QUEST LXIV What things are to be commended in Aarons confession what not Vers. 22. THen Aaron answered c. 1. Some things are to be commended here in Aarons confession 1. His modestie that being Moses elder brother yet hee calleth him Lord and submitteth himselfe unto him whereof these two reasons may be yeelded both because Moses was greater in office than Aaron both as a Prophet and Governour of Israel Tostat. qu. 32. and his owne conscience accused him agnoscebat sejure argui he knew he was worthily reproved 2. Aaron confesseth and acknowledgeth his fault in saying Let not the wrath of my Lord waâ— fâ—erce Agnoscit crimen hee therein yeeldeth himselfe to be in fault Borrh. 3. He maketh a full and large declaration of the manner rem gestam liberè confiâ—etur he freely openeth all the matter how it was done Pelarg. both what the people required and upon what reason and ground what he did and what came thereof rem ut gesta est simpliciter narraâ— he simply declareth the matter as it was done 2. But Aaron in some things sheweth his infirmitie 1. Peccatum culpam in alios trajicere studet Hee seeketh to turne over the sinne and offence upon others laying the fault upon the people Ferus 2. Aaron bewrayeth some hypocrisie that seeketh to extenuate his fault as much as he can being afraid nâ— aliquid de existimatione sua decodat lest he should lose any thing of his credit Simler 3. He sheweth his ignorance thinking
himselfe excusable because hee was urged and compelled through the importunitie of the people to doe it Importunitas populi eos levare non potest c. The importunitie of the people cannot ease them any thing who should have beene more prudent and circumspect in their government Gallâ—s 4. In excusing hee accuseth himselfe for in that the people were bent to mischiefe hee ought to have beene so much the more vigilant over them And whereas they asked to have gods made to goe before them and alleaged they knew not what was become of Moses he should have told them that the Lord was their guide and have declared where Moses was Simler 5. In saying thereof came this calfe frigida exili narratione culpam tegere c. he goeth about by a cold and slender narration to hide his fault Calvin QUEST LXV Whether Aaron dissembled in not confessing plainly that he made the Calfe Vers. 24. I Did cast it into the fire and thereof came this Calfe 1. The Hebrewes seeking to excuse Aarons fault what they may say that he intended not to make a Calfe but cast in the golden eare-rings into the fire to consume them but by the operation of Satan working by certaine Egyptian Magicians in the camp the forme of a Calfe came forth But that Aaron had an intention to make a Calfe appeareth by the former narration vers 4. how Aaron after it was molten and cast caused it to be fashioned with a graving toole See more hereof quest 17. before 2. Some thinke that Aaron mentitur timâ—re perterritus maketh a plaine lie being overcome of feare Oleaster So also Lyranus But Aaron would have beene ashamed publikely to make a lye as though he had purposed to make a Calfe seeing it was not well knowne to all the people to be his doing 3. Tostatus is of opinion that Aaron herein is not faultie at all but that he simply confessed that hee made the Calfe being through feare of the people thereunto compelled Sed Scriptura qua breviloquâ— est c. hic eum breviter tangit But the Sripture which is compendious because the narration hereof was set downe before doth but briefly touch it here But it might as briefly have beene set downe that Aaron made the molten Calfe as it is expressed before vers 4. therefore the brevitie of speech is not the cause 4. Augustine thinketh that Aaron himselfe compendio locutâ—â— est used this compendious speech and that he lied not at all because Moses eum de mendacio non arguit doth not reprove him for lying But as Aaron is not convinced here of a manifest lye yet some colouring and dissimulation appeareth in his speech because he doth not plainly confesse hee did it Substantia facti narratur tantummodo faciendi He confesseth only the substance of the fact concealing the manner Moses reproveth him not for this dissembling no more he doth for any other infirmitie here shewed because he replieth not againe 5. Hugo de S. Victor would have the meaning of Aarons words to be this Thereouâ— came this Calfe opere scilicet hominis non miraculo by the worke of man not by any miracle But the manner of his speech sheweth that Aaron sought to extenuate his sinne 6. I therefore here rather consent to those which thinke that Aaron coloured his fault by this speech Râ—m ita refert ac si praeter ipsius intentionem formatus sic vitulus He so reporteth the matter as though the Calfe were formed beside his intention Marbach Iejune simpliciter narrat Hee maketh a drie and slender narration Simler Exili narratione culpam tegere c. By a slender report he would cover his sinne Calvin Quicquid sit attenâ—at quantum potest culpam Whatsoever it is in these words he extenuateth his sinne what he may Lippoman And this seemeth to be more likely because Aaron maketh a colourable defence and excuse of his fault thorowout as is shewed before quest 64. QUEST LXVI In what sense the people are said to be naked Vers. 24. MOses saw therefore that the people were naked c. 1. Some understand it of their jewels of gold which they were deprived of being bestowed upon the idoll Lyran. Hugo de S. Victor But we read in the next chapter that they were splendidè ornati they had goodly ornaments Calvin Marbach Therefore they were not stripped of all 2. Some thinke that they were disarmed for Aaron fearing some mutinie and rising among the people had taken away their armour Cajetan But in that it is said afterward that the Levites girded their swords to them vers 27. it appeareth that their weapons were not taken from them Simler 3. Some expound it of the manifestation of their sinne that whereas hitherto they were counted the true worshippers of God now they should bee knowne to be idolaters and so defamed among the Heathen R. D. Kimbi Oleaster Vatab. 4. Some giue this sense Aaron had made them naked that is laid all the fault upon the people 5. Or they were naked because they went about obstinately to defend their sinne but in this sense Aaron could not bee said to have made them naked for he would not have encouraged them to stand in defence of their sinne having himselfe confessed it 6. The Chalde translateth Moses saw the people were idle that is gave themselves to eating and drinking and playing and neglected the feares of warre which would have beene unto their shame if their enemies should encounter with them 7. But beyond the rest this is the most proper interpretation that they were naked gratia prasiâ—lio Dei of the favour help and assistance of God Iunius Nudatus erat gratia protectione they were naked of his favour and protection Ferus Therefore Si tunc corruissent hostes proculdubio eos ignomiâ—iosè delevissent If then the enemie had fallen upon them they had most shamefully foiled them Gallas As the Canaanites overcame the Israelites when they set upon them wilfully God being not among them Tostat. qu. 34. So also Calvin Significat rejectos esse à Deo Hee signifieth they were rejected of God under whose protection they were To the same purpose Osiander Borrhaius Lippoman Simlerus QUEST LXVII Why Moses stood in the gate and what gate it was Vers. 26. MOses stood in the gate of the camp 1. Cajetan thinketh that the camp had gates to enter in by Quia castra munita eranâ— tanquam civitas because the camp was fenced about like a citie and Simlerus thinketh that the camp was compassed about with a ditch and by the same there were certaine passages and entrances into the camp But that is not like that they alwayes entrenched themselves seeing they were to remove at all times as the cloud before them removed which was sometime the same day sometime within two dayes Numb 9.22 so that they could have no time to make any such ditch or trench Tostat. qu. 34. 2. Who
giveth this reason why the Lord would see all the males thrice in the yeere quia pater cupit filios videre c. because a father desireth to see his children often which are nursed in another place Like as now then in England foure times in a yeere many come up two hundred miles to the Termes two whereof fall out neerer together the Summer Termes than the Jewes two feasts of the Pasch and Pentecost So they might with more ease come up thrice not much above halfe that way 8. But yet the ascending of the males thrice every yeere must be understood with some limitations and conditions 1. Cessante infirmitate if they were not letted and hindred by sicknesse for they were not to be carried up they must goe up of themselves Oleast 2. Non obligabat tempore suspecti belli It did not binde when there was any suspicion of warre Cajetan If there were no danger at their setting forward they were to feare no danger till they returned upon Gods promise but if the enemies were at their gates they were to intermit the feast yea if it were the Sabbath for their owne safegard And these promises must be understood with a condition if they did keepe the Law of God their enemies should have no power or desire to invade them Simler Vers. 25. Thou shalt not offer the bloud c. These two verses the 25 26. are the same with vers 18 19. chap. 23. therefore to that place I referre the Reader where the 41 42 43. questions doe fully explaine the sense and meaning of these verses that it is not needfull to make rehearsall of the same things here QUEST XLVI Whether Moses were twice or thrice forty dayes in the mount with God Vers. 28. HE was there with the Lord forty dayes c. 1. Some thinke that Moses was thrice forty dayes with the Lord because there is thrice mention made of Moses being with the Lord forty dayes in the mount Deut. 9. vers 9 18 25. And thus they cast the time that Moses went up the third day of the third moneth which answereth to our May and that he came downe the 17. of June and on the 18. day was the golden calfe burnt on the 19. day he went up the second time and in the beginning of August he was called up the third time for to receive the second tables and so he came downe about the tenth day of September which was the day of reconciliation Borrh. Contra. 1. There is indeed mention made Deut. 9. thrice of Moses being with the Lord forty dayes and forty nights but vers 29. there is a repetition only of his second being with the Lord which Moses spake of before vers 18. for otherwise if as often as this is mentioned so many forty dayes Moses should have beene with the Lord he must have beene with him not only thrice but foure times forty dayes because Deut. 10.10 the next chapter following Moses againe saith I tarried in the mount as at the first time forty dayes and forty nights Tostat. cap. 33. qu. 3. 2. It is not like that Moses at his first comming downe stayed but one day with the people for in so short a time Moses could not remove the Tabernacle without the campe and cause the people to put off their best rayment which things were done before his second going up unto God chap. 33.5 to vers 12. 3. And it is not like the Lord being already reconciled to his people whereof the writing of the tables the second time was a signe that Moses came downe against the day of reconciliation to that end to reconcile the people unto God 2. Wherefore Moses was not thrice forty dayes with the Lord in the mount but onely twice which make 80. not 120. dayes Gregoris giveth this reason Moses ut legem percipere mereretur bis quadragintà dies jejunavit Moses that he might be thought worthy to receive the Law fasted twice forty dayes c. The cause of Moses fasting was to be prepared to receive the Law Hoc jejunium eodem quò prius pertinere simus ad confirmationem legis foederis This fasting of Moses we know was to the same end to confirme the Law and the covenant Gallas Seeing then Moses received the Law but twice and he was called up to that end to receive the tables of the Law it must needs follow that he was but twice forty dayes with God in the mount So Helias likewise fasted forty dayes qui legis instaurandae Minister fuit which was the Minister of restoring the Law and our blessed Saviour fasted forty dayes to deliver the new Law of the Gospell therefore as Cajetane also noteth Hoc fuit secundum jejunium c. this was the second not the third fast of Moses when he went up to receive the second tables QUEST XLVII Of the shining of Moses face Vers. 29. MOses wist not that the skin of his face shone bright c. 1. The Latine Interpreter readeth Moses knew not quod cornuta esset facies that his face was horny whereupon grew the common errour that Moses is usually pictured with hornes And the Jewes deride the Christians because they picture Moses with hornes more like a Devill than a man this errour ariseth by mistaking of the word keren which signifieth a horne but karan to shine which is the word here used 2. Some take upon them to justifie the Latine translation Quod emitteret radios tanquam cornua Because Moses face streamed forth beames like as hornes Tostat. quaest 24. Lyran. Sicut radii á Solo derivati cornu speciem prase ferunt Like as the beames of the Sunne doe cast abroad like unto hornes Lippoman But I rather approve here Cajetanes judgement Nihil cornutum ad literam significatur According to the letter there is nothing that hath the signification of an horne but rather that Moses face did shine bright So also Thomas quod melius dicitur it is better said that his face was shining than hornie 3. Tostatus maketh mention of a certaine ignorant Rabbin that saith Moses countenance is said to be horny because it was so dried up with this forty dayes fast that nothing but the skin was left upon the bones which did sticke out ut acuta velut cornua viderentur that they seemed to be sharpe as hornes But this is affirmed without any wit or reason for Moses neither eating or drinking the space of forty dayes and forty nights was preserved miraculously by God for naturally a man cannot live without meat and drinke above fifteene dayes then the Lord by the same power was able to keepe Moses body without any decay or diminution at all 4. Wherefore the meaning of this place is that Moses face shined as the Chalde paraphrast The brightnesse of his face was multiplied the Septuagint interpret 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his face was glorious as S. Paul also calleth it the glory of Moses
here gave his people 44. qu. Why the Lord at this time gave his people a law 45. qu. Who is said here to tempt 46. qu. Of the divers kinds of temptations 47. qu. Of the difference betweene good and bad temptations 48. qu. Wherein the Lord at this time proved his people 49. qu. What diseases of Egypt he meaneth 50. qu. Whether Job being a righteous man felt not of the diseases of Egypt 51. qu. In what sense the Lord saith I am thy healer 52. qu. Of the fountaines and Palme trees in Elim 53. qu. Of the mysticall signification of the twelve fountaines and seventie Palme trees 54. qu. Of divers errors and oversights of Josephus Questions upon the sixteenth Chapter 1. QUest Of the desart of sin 2. qu. Of the time when the Israelites came into the desart of sin 3. qu. Whether all the children of Israel murmured 4. qu. How they are said to have murmured against Moses and Aaron here and afterward against the Lord. 5. qu. Of the grievous murmuring of the Israelites 6. qu. How the Israelites are said to have sit by the fleshpots of Egypt 7. qu. In what sense the Lord saith he will raine bread from heaven 8. qu. Why they are commanded every day to gather this bread 9. qu. How the Lord is said by this to have proved his people and to what end 10. qu. Why the flesh was given in the evening the bread in the morning 11. qu. Whether the rocke were first stricken to bring out water or the flesh and bread first sent 12. qu. Why Moses biddeth Aaron to speake to the people and doth it not himselfe 13. qu. How the people are bid to draw neere before the Lord. 14. qu. What cloud it was wherein the Lord appeared 15. qu. When the Lord thus spake to Moses 16. qu. What manner of fowles were sent whether they were Quailes 17. qu. Whether the comming of Quailes were a naturall worke 18. qu. VVhether this storie of the sending of the Quailes and that Numb 11. be all one 19. qu. Whether the Manna were a kinde of dew 20. qu. Whether the Manna were a naturall meteor 21. qu. Whether the Manna lay about the campe onely and not within it 22. qu. Whence it was called Manna 23. qu. VVhy the Manna is said to be the bread of Angels 24. qu. Of the measure Gomer how much it contained 25. qu. How one measure of Manna sufficed for every ones eating 26. qu. Why a Gomer was appointed for every head 27. qu. Whether the people transgressed in gathering some more some lesse 28. qu. How it came to passe that none had over that gathered more nor none had any lacke that gathered lesse 29. qu. How the Manna grew to bee corrupt with wormes 30. qu. How the Sun is said to wax hot and of the melting of Manna 31. qu. How they gathered twice so much upon the sixt day 32. qu. What moved the Rulers to come and tell Moses that the people had gathered double 33. qu. Of the meaning of the 23. verse and whether they dressed upon the sixth day that which was reserved for the seventh 34. qu. Whether the observation of the Sabbath were now first instituted 35. qu. Of the rest of the Sabbath 36. qu. The description of Manna the quantitie fashion colour and taste thereof 37. qu. Whether the Manna had a divers relish according to every ones taste 38. qu. When Moses spake to Aaron concerning the pot of Manna to be set before the Lord. 39. qu. By whom this clause was added of the Israelites eating of Manna fortie yeares Questions upon the seventeenth Chapter 1. QUest Why some mansion places are omitted here 2. qu. Of penurie and want of water which the Israelites here indured 3. qu. Why it pleased God to prove his people with thirst 4. qu. How the people are said to tempt God 5. qu. Of Moses feare lest he should be stoned 6. qu. Why Moses is bid to take the Elders with him 7. qu. Why Moses is bid to take his rod. 8. qu. Whether it be all one storie of smiting the rocke Exod. 17. and Numb 20. or divers 9. qu. Of the mount Choreb 10. qu. Whether the water out of the rocke did still follow the Israelites 11. qu. What nation the Amalekites were and how they set upon Israel 12. qu. The reasons which moved the Amalekites to set upon the Israelites 13. qu. Why Moses goeth not himselfe to battell but appointeth Joshua 14. qu. Whether this Hur were the sonne of Caleb 15. qu. Whether Moses lifted up his hands in prayer 16. qu. How Moses hands were heavie 17. qu. Of the supporting and bearing up of Moses hands 18. qu. What this Amalek was and of whom descended 19. qu. What booke this was wherein Moses is commanded to write this storie 20. qu. Why Moses is commanded to rehearse it to Joshua 21. qu. Whether Amalek were wholly destroyed by Saul 22. qu. Of the building of the Altar and the name thereof 23. qu. Of the meaning of these words Thy hand is upon the throne of Jah Questions upon the eighteenth Chapter 1. QUest Whether Jethro and Rehuel or Reghuel were the same man 2. qu. How Jethro heard what the Lord had done for Moses and Israel 3. qu. The causes which moved Jethro to come unto Moses 4. qu. When Moses had sent Zipporah away 5. qu. Of Moses two sonnes 6. qu. How Moses was delivered from the sword of Pharaoh 7. qu. At what time Jethro came to Moses before the Law given in mount Sinai or after 8. qu. Wherefore Jethro sent before to Moses 9. qu. Of the manner of Moses entertainment 10. qu. Why Moses declareth all these things unto Jethro 11. qu. Of Jethro his joy and rejoycing 12. qu. Whether Jethro had before this the knowledge of the true God 13. qu. Of the meaning and true reading of the 11. verse 14. qu. Whether Jethro offered himselfe burnt offerings 15. qu. In what sense they are said to eat bread before the Lord. 16. qu. How the people came to Moses to aske of God 17. qu. Why the Lord would have Moses to take his dirrction from Jethro 18. qu. What causes Jethro would have reserved to Moses 19. qu. Of the qualities and properties required in good Magistrates 20. qu. How the Rulers over thousands hundreds c. are to be counted 21. qu. Of the number of these Officers and of their continuance and succession 22. qu. The difference betweene Moses office and the rest 23. qu. Of the meaning of these words And God command thee 24. qu. In what sense the people are said to goe quietly to their place 25. qu. Whether these Officers were chosen by Moses 26. qu. Whether these Officers were of equall authoritie or one subordinarie to another 27. qu. Of the difference betweene these Officers and the seventie Elders Numb 10. 28. qu. At what time Jethro tooke his leave of Moses Questions upon the ninteenth Chapter 1. QUest Of what
powder of the Idoll 59. qu. Whether by the drinking of the water any visible signe of difference was made among the people who had most deepely offended about the golden Calfe 60. qu. How farre Moses fact herein is to bee imitated 61. qu. How Moses maketh Aaron the author and cause of his sinne 62. qu. Why Idolatrie is called a great sinne 63. qu. Why Moses onely rebuked Aaron and forbeareth further punishment 64. qu. What things are to be commended in Aarons confession what not 65. qu. Whether Aaron dissembled in not confessing plainely that he made the Calfe 66. qu. In what sense the people are said to be naked 67. qu. Why Moses stood in the gate and what gate it was 68. qu. VVhether all the Levites were free from consenting unto this idolatrie 69. qu. Of the authoritie which the Levites had to doe execution upon the idolaters and the rules prescribed them 70. qu. VVhether the Levites did not make some difference among the people as they went and killed 71. qu. VVhy none came unto Moses but onely of the tribe of Levi. 72. qu. Of the number of them which were slaine whether they were three thousand or twentie three thousand as the vulgar Latine readeth 73. qu. How the Levites are said to consecrate their hands 74. qu. Of the time when Moses came downe from the mount and when he returned againe 75. qu. VVhy Moses urgeth the greatnesse of their sinne 76. qu. Why Moses speaketh as it were doubtfully If I may pacifie him c. 77. qu. Why Moses againe intreateth the Lord seeing he was pacified before vers 14. 78. qu. What booke it was out of the which Moses wished to be raced 79. qu. How the Lord is said to have a booke 80. qu. VVhether any can indeed be raced out of the booke of life 81. qu. Of the two wayes whereby we are said to bee written in the booke of life 82. qu. VVhether Moses did well in wishing to bee raced out of the booke of life 83. qu. In what sense the Lord saith I will put out of my booke 84. qu. What day of visitation the Lord meaneth here 85. qu. When the Lord plagued the people for the Calfe 86. qu. Of the difference betweene the act of sinne the fault staine and guilt 87. qu. How God may justly punish twice for one sinne Questions upon the three and thirtieth Chapter 1. QUest At what time the Lord uttered his commination 2. qu. Whether the narration of Moses Tabernacle in this Chapter be transposed 3. qu. How God saith he will send his Angell and yet not himselfe goe with them 4. qu. Why the Lord saith hee will not goe with them himselfe lest he should consume them 5. qu. What ornaments they were which the people laid aside 6. qu. Why in publike repentance they used to change their habit 7. qu. Why the Lord thus spake unto Moses 8. qu. In what sense the Lord saith I will come upon thee 9. qu. VVhether the people put off their ornaments twice 10. qu. In what sense the Lord saith That I may know 11. qu. Why it is said They laid aside their good rayment From the mount Horeb. 12. qu. What Tabernacle Moses removed out of the campe 13. qu. Why Moses pitched his Tabernacle without the host 14. qu. How farre from the campe this Tent was removed 15. qu. VVhat is called the Tent of the Congregation 16. qu. Why the people stood up unto Moses and looked after him 17. qu. Whether there were two clouds or one to cover and conduct the host 18. qu. Why the Lord spake to Moses in a cloud 19. qu. How the Lord spake to Moses face to face 20. qu. Why Joshua is here called a young man 21. qu. Whether is here understood Joshua not to have departed from the Tabernacle 22. qu. When the Lord thus said to Moses 23. qu. How Moses desireth to know whom the Lord would send with them seeing hee had promised before to send his Angell 24. qu. Whether the sole government and leading of the people were here given to Moses without the administration of Angels as Burgensis thinketh 25. qu. When and where God thus said to Moses 26. qu. How the Lord is said to know Moses by name 27. qu. What Moses meaneth saying Shew me the way 28. qu. In what sense Moses saith That I may finde grace c. which he was assured of 29. qu. What is understood by Gods presence 30. qu. What rest the Lord promised to Moses 31. qu. Whether Moses here rested in Gods answer or begged any thing further 32. qu. Why Moses addeth Carrie us not hence seeing even in that place they had need of Gods protection 33. qu. Why it is added people upon the earth People upon the earth Gen. 25. 34. qu. Whether Moses desired to see the very divine essence of God 35. qu. VVhat imboldned Moses to make this request 36. qu. Whether Moses shewed any infirmitie in this request to see Gods glorie 37. qu. What the Lord meaneth by All my good 38. qu. How the Lord is said to passe by and why 39. qu. How the Lord is said to proclaime his name 40. qu. Why these words are added I will shew mercie c. 41. qu. Why the Lord is here doubled 42. qu. Of the divers kinds of mercie which the Lord sheweth 43. qu. Of the divers visions and sights of God 44. qu. Whether God may be seene with the eyes of the bodie in this life 45. qu. Whether wee shall see the divine nature with the eyes of our bodies in the next life 46. qu. Whether the divine essence can bee seene and comprehended by the minde of man in this life 47. qu. VVhether the Angels now or the soules of men shall fully see the divine substance in the next life 48. qu. VVhether Moses had a sight of the divine essence 49. qu. Of the meaning of these words No man shall see me and live 50. qu. VVhat place this was in the rocke which the Lord here speaketh of 51. qu. How the Lord is said to cover Moses with his hand 52. qu. VVhy the Lord covered Moses with his hand 53. qu. VVhy the Lord put Moses in the cleft of the rocke 54. qu. VVhat is here understood by the Lords back-parts 55. qu. VVhat manner of visible demonstration this was here shewed unto Moses 56. qu. VVhere the Lord promised that Moses should see his back-parts Questions upon the foure and thirtieth Chapter 1. QUest VVherefore the second tables were given 2. qu. VVhy the Lord saith to Moses Hew thee 3. qu. VVhether the Lord or Moses wrote in these tables and why 4. qu. VVhether Moses was to bee readie the next morning and why 5. qu. VVhy none are suffered to come up now with Moses 6. qu. VVhy their cattell are forbidden to come neere the mount 7. qu. VVho is said here to descend and how 8. qu. VVho proclaimed the name Jehovah God or Moses 9. qu. VVhy the name
so doubtfully as not knowing what was befallen him Lyranus And beside God would not have suffered Satan in the same place where hee gave them signes of his glorious presence in the clouds to have practised his cosening and counterfeit tricks 2. They shew their contempt not vouchsafing to call him by his name Contemptim virum illum appellabant c. They in contempt call him the man c. Lippoman 3. They also bewray their infidelitie that having daily experience how the Lord fed them with manna could not conceive how the Lord should preserve Moses alive also fortie dayes without any supplie of food from them Simler 4. They shew their oblivion and forgetfulnesse that having seene Moses goe up into the mountaine and entring into the thicke cloud talking with God they now begin to imagine that he might be consumed and devoured in those flames Osiander 5. This their apostasie and falling away from God and despising of his Prophet did prefigure their falling away afterward from Christ Ferus QUEST XII Why Aaron bad them pull off their earings Vers. 2. THen Aaron said plucke off the golden earings c. 1. Some thinke because the people made great account of their jewels and earings that Aaron by this meanes did thinke to have turned them from their purpose So Augustine Intelligitur illis difficilia pracipere voluisse ut isto modo ab illa intentione revocaret He may be thought to have commanded them hard things to revoke them from their intention c. So also Tostatus Lyranus 2. And Calvin further addeth that he required this lest they might have spoiled the Tabernacle to finde gold for this idoll and he might thinke the people would have beene more hardly drawne unto it because they had given so liberally unto the Tabernacle alreadie But Calvin is herein deceived for the Tabernacle was not yet made Moses being not come downe from the mount where he received instruction for the making of the Tabernacle 3. Further Aaron might thinke that the women would hardly have parted with their jewels and that there might have risen by this meanes some tumults and stirres in their families by which meanes this attempt should have beene stayed Siml Oleast And this is very like that Aaron used all meanes secretly to have put off the people but herein was his great fault that he dissembled in so weightie a matter and did not plainly and openly stay the people QUEST XIII Whether Aarons sin here is to be excused SOme goe about to excuse or extenuate Aarons offence here 1. Bernard alleageth that Aaron was forced thereunto Sceleratis tumultuantis populi contra volunt atem suam cessit clamoribus Hee gave way unto the wicked clamours of the people against his owne minde So also Theodoret Vitulum formaré necessario coactus est He was forced of necessitie to frame a calfe And so he excuseth himselfe afterward by the peoples outrage vers 22. But nothing should have compelled Aaron to doe evill he should have feared God rather than man and chosen to die before he would see God dishonoured 2. Ambrose saith Neque excusare tantum Sacerdotem possumus neque condemnare audemus We can neither excuse so great a Priest nor yet dare condemne him But seeing Moses did afterward sharply reprove him and the Lord would for this have slaine him Deut. 9. there is no question but that he most grievously sinned 3. Some alleage by way of excuse that all Aarons courses tended to have sought delayes till Moses comming in that he called for their earings which he thought would have beene gathered with much trouble and businesse then he casteth them altogether and melteth them and then caused it to bee fashioned with a graving toole after that he made an Altar and deferred the solemnitie till the next day Oleaster But all this being granted it is so farre from excusing Aaron that perfidiosior est assensus c. his consent is so much the more treacherous dissembling his conscience when he saw idolatrie so grounded and rooted in the people than if he had given a simple assent Iun. in Analys 4. Procopius saith Quasi convitienda exprobrat c. Aaron doth as it were upbraid them and scoffingly say unto them These are thy gods c. but neither were these the words of Aaron the people so said neither is it like that Aaron being afraid of them would have scoffed with them wherefore that Aaronâ— sinne was very grievous and inexcusable doth now follow to be shewed in the next question 5. Theodoret addeth Primo populi impetum verbis compâ—scere tentavit c. That first he tried to pacifie the heat of the people with words But this is not expressed in the text it may be he would have disswaded them but that he saw them so violently carried that there was no speaking unto them QUEST XIV Of the greatnesse of Aarons sinne AArons sin then is made manifest set forth by these circumstances 1. In respect of his person he had often conference with God and by him the Lord had wrought great works and miracles in Egypt therefore his example was so much the more dangerous and his fall the greater 2. The thing that hee consented unto was a breach of the first table it was not theft or adulterie or such like but wicked idolatrie for Spiritualia peccata graviora sunt Spirituall evils are more grievous Ferus 3. Quod propriis manibus accipit signum est effoeminati servilis animi In that he taketh their earings with his owne hands it was a signe of an effeminate and servile minde Calvin 4. He sinned also grievously in his dissimulation when for feare hee against his owne conscience dissembled and so betrayed the truth Iun. 5. Borrhaius addeth that he sinned two wayes beside in usurping a lawgivers office which belonged unto Moses and in bringing in new ripes and worship which God had not commanded But Aaron offended not in the first because Moses had left him governour in his place till he returned but in the latter his presumption was great 6. Aarons fall also appeareth in this that after he made a golden calfe seeing it to be pleasing unto the people he was so forward afterward both in making an Altar and proclaiming a solemnitie Pelarg. QUEST XV. Why it pleased God to suffer Aaron to fall NOw it pleased God to suffer Aaron to fall 1. Vt humiliaretur that he might be humbled lest hee might afterward have beene too much lifted up being called to bee high Priest Ferus 2. By this example we doe see Sanctissimos interdum faede labi c. that holy men may sometime grossely fall Borrh. 3. This sheweth that Aarons Priesthood was not perfect nor able fully to reconcile men unto God seeing he himselfe was a sinner Marb Quomodo unus captivus alium liberaret How should one captive deliver another Ferus Or one sinner make reconciliation for another 4. And for this
cause also it pleased God to suffer Aaron to fall Vt nemo de gratia sua praesumat that no man should presume of his gifts or strength but let him that standeth as the Apostle saith take heed lest he fall Ferus 5. And by Aarons presumption we see how dangerous a thing it is to bring any thing into Gods service without his warrant Borrh. QUEST XVI How the golden calfe is said to be fashioned with a graving toole Vers. 4. ANd fashioned it with a graving toole and made thereof a molten calfe 1. The word here translated a graving toole is chereth which is sometime taken for a bag or purse as 2 King 5.22 where it is said that Naaman bound two talents of silver in two bags gave them to Gehezi and so some thinke that Aaron put all the peoples jewels and earings in a bag together lest they might thinke he had converted any part thereof to his owne use Cajetan but the other word vajatâ—ar he fashioned is against this sense 2. But most usually chereth is taken for a penny style or graving toole and so some thinke that Aaron with this instrument did draw a patterne making the proportion of a calfe which the workmen should follow in their casting So R. Salom. Osiand Lyran. 3. Others thinke that with this instrument Aaron made a mould in clay or such like matter and the mettall cast into it received that forme Tost q. 10. Oleast 4. Simlerus maketh a double use of this graving toole Vnum in formandâ— typo alterum in perpoliendo operefuso One in making the mould the other in polishing the worke after it was cast 5. But I rather subscribe to Gallasius that thinketh here is an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a transposing of the words putting the latter first for the golden calfe was first cast and melted and then polished and trimmed with a graving toole as workmen use to doe 6. This calfe was made by Founders worke there are three wayes to make and frame things of mettall either by hammering and beating them to some fashion as the Cherubs upon the Arke were made or by joyning the peeces and joints together which are sunderly made or by casting and melting it in a mould and so was this golden calfe made Tostat. qu. 10. QUEST XVII Why Aaron caused the likenesse of a calfe to be made rather than of any other thing Vers. 4. A Molten calfe 1. Some of the Hebrewes give this ridiculous reason why the image of a calfe was made rather than of any other thing when the Israelites were comming out of Egypt and intended to bring out Iosephs bones with them as they did they say Nilus had overflowen the place where his bones were and so Moses did make the picture of a calfe in a certaine golden plate which floting upon the water shewed the place where Iosephs bones lay which plate they say was brought among other jewels to Aaron here and cast into the fire by vertue whereof the whole masse of gold was turned into the shape of a calfe But here are many fables couched together 1. It is a very tale that Iosephs bones were found out by any such meanes 2. The people onely brought their golden earings therefore no such plate 3. Neither was there any such vertue in that golden plate if there had beene any such to convert or change the whole masse 4. Neither was there any such cause seeing the molten calfe was cast in a mould Opere fusario by Founders worke as the Latine translator readeth 2. R. Abraham seemeth to thinke that this figure of a calfe was made rather than any other as apâ—est at that time to receive some divine and celestiall influence but though Aaron were at this present grossely blinded and deceived yet it were impietie to thinke that he was given to such superstitious astrologicall observations as to make figures to derive some secret supernaturall influence and vertue into by the celestiall constellations 3. Some thinke that Aaron caused a calfe to be made to deride them as Helias did Baals Priests supposing they would not be so absurd as to ascribe divine vertue unto a calfe Procopius But it seemeth that Aaron was in good earnest by that which followeth in that he set up an Altar and proclaimed an holy day 4. It is further alleaged by some that Aaron intended not to make any thing of the gold thinking that the fire might consume it but that the Egyptians which were in the campe by their art Magike and by the operation of the devill caused the image of a calfe to come forth Ex Fero. But it may appeare vers 24. by Aarons confession unto Moses that he intended to make them an image when he cast the mettall into the fire and to what end else served the graving toole but to fashion it he would not have polished and trimmed the devils worke 5. Some further thinke they would have a calfe made because the sacrifices of bullocks are the chiefest and thereby they thought the better to please God But it is not like that they had any such purpose at this time to doe that which was pleasing unto God seeing they had heard not long before the Lord by his owne mouth forbidding them to make any kinde of image to worship 6. It is therefore most like that Aaron according to the desire of the people made a Calfe like unto the Egyptian god Apis which they had seene the Egyptians to worship and therefore they were drawne by the corrupt imitation of them to have the image of a Calfe made Lyran. Calvin Simler Gallas Augustine addeth further that the Egyptians had set up the image of an oxe or bullocke by Iosephs tombe which they worshipped So the Interlinâ—â—ry glosse giveth this reason Quia bovem adoraverunt in Aegypto Because they had used to worship a bullocke in Egypt And the Egyptians used to worship their King being dead under the forme of a live bullocke Plin. lib. 8. cap. 46. QUEST XVIII Whether the Israelites thought indeed the golden Calfe to be the God that delivered them THen they said These be thy gods O Israel which brought thee out of Egypt 1. Procopius thinketh that these words were uttered by Aaron and that hereby he would have brought them to remember that God which had brought them out of Egypt But it is evident by the text that these were the acclamations of the people 2. Lyranus thinketh that the people attribuebat idolo did attribute unto this idoll it selfe those great wonders which God had wrought for their deliverance and therefore for honour of this idoll they speake in the plurall number as men used to doe to great persons But it is not like they were so mad as to thinke the golden Calfe brought them out of Egypt cum res esset inanimata it being a thing without life Ferus And men use to speake for more honour sake in the plurall number in the first and second