Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	aaron_n	belong_v	ecclesiastical_a	12	3	7.6867	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A07822	Salomon or A treatise declaring the state of the kingdome of Israel, as it was in the daies of Salomon Whereunto is annexed another treatise, of the Church: or more particularly, of the right constitution of a Church.	Morton, Thomas, of Berwick.	1596 (1596)	STC 18197.7; ESTC S112936	159,289	238

the Church should be at the call and commaundement of the secular power whereby they might be eyther wholly dispossessed of their places or continually troubled interrupted in ordering the affaires of the Church and the matters of God and finally iniuriously and contumeliously handled which thing the holines of their places and persons wil in no wise suffer For the answere of this doubt it is plaine in the word of God that all ecclesiasticall persons whatsoeuer yea the chiefe priestes in them the high priest himself the prince and head of the priestes who was the type of Christ the Oracle of God and on whom the whole glory and maiesty of the priesthood was bestowed was no lesse subiect to the iurisdiction of the kinge then he which had the basest place and calling in the common-wealth The trueth heereof appeareth by the lamentable tragedie of Abimelech 1. Sam. 2. who being summoned by Saule to appeare came with all the priestes that were with him and being come acknowledged Saul● to be his Lord Verse 12. and did not appeale frō his vniust sentence of death to any other power The same end befel his son Abiather who for that he tooke part with Adonia was by Salomon put out of his office and condemned to die 1. King 2.26 And likewise Zachariah the son of Ieh●ida 2. Chro. 24.21 Now although two of these kinges did impiously and tyrannically abuse their authority yet it doth appeare that they had authority ouer them yea not onely these examples but the course of the whole scripture and equitie it selfe doth shew that it ought to be so We knowe that euen Christ himselfe more holy in person and office then all the priestes men or angels in the world did throughout the whole course of his life submit himselfe to the ciuill power and at the end of it did suffer himselfe to be violently apprehended contu●eliously entreated yea vniustly cōdemned by the deputy of a heathen Emperour Likewise the Apostle Paule did appeale and subiect himselfe to the authority of Caesar. Neyther is there any cause or reason why it should be otherwise For howsoeuer the Romish prelates haue not only drawen out their neckes from the subiection of princes but also haue inuaded their thrones and subdued them vnder their feete and the whole cleargie say to the ciuill power come not near nor yet once touch me because I am holier then thou and think themselues too good to be iudged by any but by their owne ordinarie yet the trueth is that all persons as well ciuill as ecclesiasticall are and ought to be by the word of God equally subiect to the ciuill power For shall Christ himselfe and in him God himselfe stand before the iudgement seat of princes and shall sinfull men nay shall wretched wormes thinke them too prophane to be competent iudges in their causes no no the seruant is not aboue the master nor the creature aboue the creator and therefore we say with the Apostle that al soules that is euery man that hath a soule that none shoulde thinke himselfe exempted ought to be subiect to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 The ground of the contrary errour is an arrogant opinion which presumptuous men bearing function in the Church haue of their own holin●sse in respect of others whereas in the Church of God men who haue ciuil callings are no lesse holy then they who haue ecclesiastica● yea somtimes much more holy they who haue ecclesiastical holy callings being otherwise wicked prophane for it is truly said althoug● impiously applied by the rebellious company of Corah Numb 16.3 That not only Moses Aaron but euen the whole multitude of the common people much more the Lords annoynted is holy In the next place we are to search whether that as al persons so likewise al causes belonged to the authority of the King of Israell First of ciuill then of ecclesiasticall causes in the first kinde it is not needful that we should insist forsomuch as all men euen they who are most sparing and wary in giuing power to these kinges doe acknowledge that all ciuill causes did properly belong to their iurisdiction And so it was indeede For the king had authoritie to appointe all the publike officers of his kingdome who should be his counsellers at home or his Captaines abroad who shoulde be the iudges of the people and who of the chiefe senate in Ierusalem and good reason it was that he shoulde haue this power in these causes For seeing that his office was especially to iudge the causes of the people and to fight their battailes for the which purpose the people desired a king it could not be denied vnto him to appointe those to be his deputies whom he thought most able to discharge these dueties Yea further it belonged to him to call all publike assemblies and to order them to make peace with whom he would and to goe to battaile against whome ●e when 〈◊〉 thought good The trueth of this pointe doth 〈◊〉 plainely appeare throughout the whole storie that we need not insist in it Sect. X. NOwe we are to enquire what was the authoritie of the kinge in the matters of the Church to wit in ordering the state of religion and of the seruice of God Whereof there is greate question made whilest some doe wholly exclude him out of the Church not permitting him to intermeddle with any affaires belonging vnto it others suffer him to deale in these causes yet not to beare any great sway or to ouerrule in them and the third sort giueth vnto him the greatest part of that ecclesiasticall authoritie which belongeth to man The which distinction is necessarely to be considered for God hath not giuen to any man such ful and absolute authoritie in the Church as in the common-wealth for he hath made Christ the soueraign Lord and King of the Church to rule it by his owne lawes and worde Yet one parte of ecclesiasticall iurisdiction belongeth to men who are to establish the diuine lawes of the worship of God and to make ecclesiastical constitutions for that purpose But who hath authoritie to doe this there is all the controuersie In the first opinion or rather grosse and palpable errour are the Bishops of Rome with their adherentes who that they might through the Church enter into the common-wealth inuade the riches preferments and pleasures of kinges and vsurpe their states and crownes haue thrust out of the Church this king of Israell least that by his example other magistrates shoulde challenge to themselues ●uthoritie in causes ecclesiasticall In the second opinion are men otherwise syncere in iudgement who in a good meaning affection to the Church thinke it not safe or conuenient to permitte her wholly to the ciuill power and in a reuerent opinion of her iudge it vnmeete that ciuill rulers should order diuine matters and so make the Church say vnto the magistrate touch me not for I am more holy then thou

But we follow the thirde opinion thinking that the ecclesiasticall authoritie of this land was chiefely yea in a manner wholly in the handes of the king and that by his authority the state of religion in generall was wholly set vp maintained repaired and ordered yea ecclesiastical lawes for this purpose established howsoeuer in making them the aduise and consent of others were for diuers necessarie causes to be required The trueth heereof will easely appeare if we marke that God did deferre the building of his Temple the inlarging and beautifying of his worshippe vntill the time of the kinges of whome Dauid and Salomon which are in this respect to be counted the first Saule being reiected did make the state of religion most glorious established new orders and lawes and that by their owne authoritie although they had the worde of God both in themselues and from other prophets for their direction Yea the generall practise of all the kinges of Israel of whome euery one by his sole authority did either set vp or pul downe religion doth declare how much they had to doe in the gouerning of the Church and to passe ouer with silence the rest of the kinges let vs onely see how far Ezechia did meddle with Church affaires of whome we read 2. Chro. 29.3 That he opened the doores of the temple brought the priestes into it made a solemne oration vnto them teaching them their dueties and stirring them vp to the carefull perfourmance thereof then when the priestes had according to his direction clensed the temple before they doe any seruice in it they returne to the king to know what he would haue further done Verse 18. Then the king with the nobles came and brought a sinne-offering which the priest offered at the commaundement of the king verse 24. then verse 27. the king commaundeth that the whole burnt-offering should be offered Againe verse 31. he commaundeth that the peoples offeringes shoulde be brought in Further in the 30. chapter he held a councel sent his postes for the keeping of a passeouer yea which is worthy to be noted when as the people being vncleane did receiue the passouer Ezechias himselfe did publikely pray for them and so made them cleane verse 20. likewise chap 31. verse 2. Ezechia appointed sundry companies of the priestes and leuites after the diuersity of the ministrations to serue in the temple and commaunded the people to make prouision of all thinges needfull for them and verse 8. and 9. he came and viewed their prouision and questioned with the priestes about it And vers 11 He bad prepare the chambers in the Temple for store yea it is added verse 20. that according to this manner he did throughout all Iuda and that all the workes about the seruice of God were begunne and prosperously ended by him The same manner of ordering the state of the Church appeareth in the storie of Iosias and other Kinges wherein this may plainely be seene that whatsoeuer was done in Church matters was done by the commaundement and authoritie of the kinge The occasions of the contrary opinions whereby the authoritie of this kingdome in this behalfe is abridged and cut short eyther in whole or in part are these First for that it is thought that as ciuill and diuine temporall and eternall matters do not onely greately differ but also are opposite to each oother so that the common-wealth and the Church are two distinct yea contrary bodies gouerned and ordered by their seuerall heades as in this state they make the king to be the chiefe gouernour of the common-wealth and the high priest of the Church But it is farre otherwise for the Church is not heere a perfect bodie by it selfe but maketh the ciuil body more excellent happie For euen as when any people being rude and barbarous are brought to learning and all kinde of humanitie there is not a new state or body added vnto them but the former estate becommeth better so it is whenas any nation of infidels becommeth religious they haue not one head in respect of their religion and another in ciuill matters but one and the same for both But heereof more at large in the treatise of the publike Church Neyther ought we to thinke that eyther the office authoritie or person of this King was any way prophane or vnholy or in any respect vnfitte to intermeddle with diuine matters for he was and that by the institution of God more holy then o●hers As for the hurt which came to the Church by beeing permitted to wicked kinges to be ordered at their pleasure we confesse that it was very greate for many of them did cleane ouerthrow the true worshippe of God Yet there was no remedie for it in the handes of any saue onely of God who is and was able to turne the hearts of kings as the riuers of waters yea to shorten their daies if they continued obstinate in their wickednesse and to raise vppe in their places good and godlie kinges zealous of his glorie who abolishing all idolatrie and establishing the true religion by their soueraigne and absolute authoritie in ecclesiasticall causes did recompence the losse and comfort the griefe which the Church had by the wicked Kinges for if the peoele had resisted the wicked and idolatrous kinges in their proceedinges they shoulde haue diminished the authoritie of godlie kinges and by vsing violence against the wickednesse of the one shoulde haue bounde the hands and hindred the godly indeuours of the other And this is the cause why men vnto whome the good estate of the Church hath beene deare and pretious haue beene loth to permitte the ordering of Churche-causes to ciuill rulers because many of them haue beene open enemies to all religion and godlines and authors of all disorders Yea Emperours Kinges and Princes haue so horribly stained themselues and beene drunke with the blood of the seruantes of God which they ought to haue cherished and preserued and haue so often ouerthowen the Church which they shoulde haue built and maintained that many are afraide to commit the Church to their hands who haue oftner shewed themselues cruel wolues then careful sheepherds And therefore it hath beene said by many that princes should looke to their palaces and leaue the whole care of the Church to the ministers of the worde but we see the contrary in this example And therfore we ought not to speake vntruethes no not in the cause of God or to maintaine the state of religion in Israel by spoyling the king of that power which god hath giuen vnto him Lastly as touching ecclesiastical lawes which were to be made by men for the putting in practise of the worship of God it may seem that although the setting vp and pulling downe the reforming and deforming of religion were in the hands of the king yet to be very vnmeete that he should meddle in the making of them whereunto we answere that if the whole ordering of the