Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	aaron_n	authority_n	priesthood_n	22	3	10.8021	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A20683	A defence of church gouernment Dedicated to the high Court of Parliament. Wherein, the church gouernment established in England, is directly proued to be consonant to the word of God, and that subiects ought of dutie to conforme themselues to the state ecclesiasticall. Together with, a defence of the crosse in baptisme; as it is vsed in our Church, being not repugnant to the word: and by a consequent, the brethren which are silenced, ought to subscribe vnto it, rather then to burie their talents in the ground. By Iohn Doue, Doctour of Diuinity.	Dove, John, 1560 or 61-1618.	1606 (1606)	STC 7081; ESTC S110107	58,733	80

as to him did appertaine as appeareth by the story of the Gospel But thus I prooue that Bishops ought to be Lords Our Sauiour being asked whether a man might put away his wife answereth negatiuely his argument of proofe being drawne from the law of nature saying Ab initio non fuit sic from the beginning it was not so Likewise the argument Mat. 19. followeth Bishops ought to be Lords and Ecclesiasticall persons to exercise ciuill authority quoniam ab initio fuit sic because frō the beginning it was so From Adam to Moses it was so from Moses to our Sauiour Christ the Apostles it was so with them it was so and from them it hath continued so vntill this time excepting onely the times of persecution when the course of the Gospel was interrupted and there was no setled state of a Church No meruaile though in time of persecution they were not held for Lords for then they were not allowed to be Citizens nor thought worthy to liue in a Common wealth The Pagan Emperours helde them for seditious persons troublers of the state and of all men most worthy of death Our question is not what then was of fact but what ought to haue beene of right It must not seeme strange that Saint Iohn or Saint Paul could not be in authority vnder Nero Domitian nor the godly Bishops vnder the ten persecutions sceing our Sauiour was not allowed any authority vnder Herod nor Pilat nor Augustus nor Tiberius No meruaile though Titus could not be held as a Lord in the Kingdome of Creete seeing that neither Iehoahaz being lawfully anoynted King of Iuda could not reigne 2. Reg. 25. 2. Rug. 24 as a King being taken captiue by Pharao nor Iehoiakim nor Sedechias being oppressed by Nebuchadnezer From Adam vnto Moses he that was the eldest of euery Gen. 1. 26 Gen. 2. 23 Gen. 4. 3. 4 familie was both the king and the priest ouer his own family among Gods people So Adam was a king because God gaue him absolute power ouer the whole world he was also a priest for hee offered sacrifice Caine and Abel brought to him their sacrifices that he might offer in their behalfe they are onely saide to haue offered as Asa the King and all the people are saide to haue offered when the Priest did offer in 2. Chr. 15 their behalfe Henoch seeing the children of God to fall daily from faith to infidelity which was the cause of the deluge published against them the sentence of excommunication saying The Lord commeth which is the most grieuous kinde of excōmunicatiō And S. Paul did borrow that form of him Iudae v. 14 where he writ Hee that loueth not the Lord Iesus let him be an athema marannatha cursed vntill the Lords comming And Moses 1. Cor. 16 did reckon vp so long a catalogue of all the eldest sonnes descended from Adam before the flood to this end that it Gen. 5. might appeare vnto whom from time to time the Lord committed the care of gouerning instructing the Church Noah a king was a preacher of righteousnesse one hundred and twenty yeares before the flood hee offered sacrifice after the flood That Iethro the father in law of Moses was both a 2. Pet. 2. 5 1. Pet. 2. 19 4. 16. Gen. 8. 20. Numb 3. 12. 12. 8. 16. 17. prince a priest likewise Iob in the land of Huz no learned man will deny And that none might offer sacrifices but the eldest and Princes of euery family it appeareth by the writings of Moses because God said he would take the tribe of Leui to be seperated for his seruice as a redemption of all the rest of the first borne of Israel In which words hee did but call to remembrance the time of nature wherein the eldest were all his that is they were consecrated for the offering of sacrifice vnto him When Melchisedech was King and Priest of Salem Ge. 14. 18 Abraham also was King and Priest ouer his own family It was saide of him Thou art a great Prince of God among vs Gen. 23. 6 Ge. 18. 19. Ge. 22. 10 Gen. 17. Ge. 26. 24 And he taught them Gods word he erected an altar and offered sacrifice To him first was committed the sacrament of circumcision and he circumcised his sonne Isaac Isaac his heire crected an altar and offered cacrifice for the exercise of his faith Iacob after him did the like taught purity of religion and how Idolls were to be abolished Ge. 35. 11. In the daies of Moses vnder the time of the law when priesthood was appropriated to one peculiar tribe of Leui and the Bishoprick to one certaine family Moses and Aaron both being priests Moses the yonger brother had the chiefe authority in ciuill businesses Aaron the elder in Ecclesiasticall causes but all supreame authority was committed to these two priests Moses and Aaron That Moses was a priest Exod. 24. 6. 7. 8. it is euident because all the whole tribe of Leui were then consecrated ●o holy priesthood whereof hee was one hee in particular offered sacrifice preached Gods word consecrated Exod. 40. Numb 20. Aaron to be an high priest and Eleazar in his place when he was dead consecrated the altar which none could doe without sacrilege but a priest Yet he was the supreame ciuil Magistrate And in his absence 40. daies he substituted Aaron the priest in his roome to heare ciuill causes and supply the place of a ciuill Magistrate Phinees the high priest Numb 25. was a Captaine in warre and busied himselfe with secular affaires and it pleased God so much that the priesthood was conferred not onely vpon him but also his posterity Samuel the Prophet who ministred before the Lord in a linnen Ephod was also the chiefe ciuil Magistrate and in his own person did ride his circuit as a Iudge euery yeare ouer all the 1. Sam 12. 18. 1. Sam. 7. 1. Sam. 8. land All the daies of the Iudges which was about two hundred ninety and nine yeares from the death of Iosua vnto Eli the priest there was no certaine supreame ciuill magistracie in any but in the high priests or Bishops among the people When the people desired a king of God they cōsulted with Samuel in that secular busines After those 299. yeares of the Iudges Eli the Bishop reigned as supreame ciuill Magistrate 40. yeares so did Samuel after him the space of 40. yeares Afterward when Saule was by him annointed King yet Samuel ruled ioyntly with Saule so long as he liued and indeed bore the greatest sway in the realme because Saule had little more then the title of a King during the life of Samuel and was to doe nothing without allowance from him How the Clergie among Gods people busied themselues with the affaires of the temporal●ie and howe much they pleased God in so doing it appeareth by these examples Numb 31 6. 26. Numb

Prophets haue foretolde and especialle Esay where he saith Esa 60. Thine heart shall be astonished and inlarged because the multude of the Sea shall be conuerted vnto thee and the riches of the Gentiles shall come vnto thee the multitude of Camel●s shall couer thee the Dromedaries of Midian and of Ephah they of Sheba shall bring gold and incense and shew forth the praise of the Lord c. Surely the Isles shall wayte for me and the Shippes of Tha●sis as at the beginning that they may bring thy sonnes from farre and their siluer and their gold with them to the name of the Lord and to the holy one of Israel because he hath glorified thee The sonnes of strangers shall build vp thy walls and their Kings shall minister vnto thee c. The Nation of the Kingdome that will not serue thee shall perish and those Nations shall be vtterly destroyed the glory of Lebanon shall come vnto thee the firre the elme the boxe to beautifie the place of my sanctuarie for I will glorifie the place of my feete The sonnes of them that afflicted thee shall come and bowe vnto thee all they that despised thee shall fall downe at the soules of thy feete c Thou shalt sucke the milke of the Gentiles thou shalt sucke the breastes of Kings c. That the Reader may be yet better satisfied Flacius Iilyricus In claui scripturae diuideth glory to be two folde the one of God the other of men and as for the glory of God it cannot be vnderstood in this place but of men onely because hee speaketh onely of the glory of the Ministers of the olde and new Testaments which were onely men Againe hee diuideth the glory of men either into that which is eternall in heauen or temporall vpon the earth but the latter onely is vnderstood because it is the glory of the ministery which ministery is temporall and must cease after this life euen as also then faith and hope must cease onely loue must indure Thirdly he diuideth this temporall glory of men into gloriam fame 1. Cor. 13 bonitatis rei the glory of wordes and of matter and substance the glory of wordes or fame which consisteth in the fame and good report of other men which is chiefly in them which doe glorifie vs and not in our selues which are glorified and magnified but the glory which is not in wordes but substance which indeed is the cause why men doe praise and magnifie vs is our riches honour authority all outward ornaments which stirre vp the outward senses and mens affections to admiration of our persons places and calling is onely to be vnderstood in this place as appeareth by these reasons First the glory of fame is defined by Illyricus and also by Melancthon in his common places to be Approbatio conscientiae nostrae rectè iudicantis al●crum rectè iudicantium The testimony of a good conscience approuing vs that we haue walked sincerely and the report of other men consenting in iudgement with vs that wee haue so walked But in that sense wee cannot be more glorious then Aaron and Moses and the Priestes of the old Testament because they were men of as holy life as wee and walked euery way as sincerely in their calling as wee doe in our vocation and were as pleasing to God and as well approoued of Gods people as we be Secondly it were vnworthy of the Maiesty of the holy Ghost to play the so phister in this place and to vse aequiuocation of the word glory as if by their glory and ours he did not vnderstand one and the same thing for then it were no iust comparison For the things which be compared together must agree in that thing in which they be cōpared therfore being cōpared in glory they must agree in the same glory only they must differ secundū magis minus being compared not in the positiue but in the comparatiue degreee one must be more glorious then another So then the glory of one being outward in pompe and state the glory of the other must also be so but in a greater measure Thirdly if some men should be so ignorant as to say that the glory of our ministery consisteth in this that it is the ministery of the spirit of life of righteousnesse and of that which must remaine I answer that cannot be for then the glory of the ministery of the olde Testament should consist in letters death condemnation c but that is disproued by the text it selfe which sheweth that these things were the subiect of that ministery but the glory consisted in the brightnesse of Moses his face therefore I say spirit life righteousnesse are the subiect of our ministery and not the glory of it the cause why it ought to be so much the more glorious then the old priesthood was Fourthly if we consider the scope and drift of Saint Paul in that place it was to magnifie himselfe and credit his calling that so it might not be brought into contempt as poore and beggarly which were inglorious For saith thee Doe wee beginne to praise our selues Neede we as some other an epistle of commendation Hee answereth that hee needeth not to commend himselfe hee needeth not mans commendation to credite his ministery for as much as his calling is of sufficient credite of it selfe and his owne person credited by it three manner of waies First by the Corinthians themselues to whom hee did minister Secondly by that which was inward in his ministery as spirit life righteousnesse Thirdly by that which was outward and apparent to the eye and that was glorie Now lest any man should obiect out of Saint Chrysostome Theophilactus Aquinas and others that in their interpretation of that place of Saint Paul they affirme that the glory of his ministery was no such glory as was visible and subiect to outward senses I confesse that when Saint Paul wrote that epistle it was not so of fact although it was so of right It could not be then outwardly glorious by reason of the present persecution the ministery of the Gospel being not established by Princes Therefore the Apostle spake not so much of the glory which then was as of that which in the peace and prosperity of the Church should afterward be when the world was conuerted For his words are these P●s o●ch● mallon e diaconia tou pneumatos estai en doxe how shall not the ministration of the spirit bee more glorious where hee speaketh in the future tence as of a thing in due time to be performed and not present And therefore where he speaketh in the present tence in the next verse Pollo mallon perisseu●i e diaconia tes dicaiosunes en doxe much more doth the ministration of righteousnesse exceede in glory as it is a figure called enalloge temporis where one tense is vsed for another as it appeared by the euent which is the best interpreter of all