raigne ouer them but God shoulde still bee their kinge But after that they had made a kinge neyther did the iudiciall lawes retayne their full force neyther did GOD himselfe appoynte Captaines ouer the Armies but all was done according to the will and commaundement of the kinges who although they did keepe the iudiciall lawe in parte and for the greate extremities in warre asked counsell of God yet they were free in both these respectes as we are afterwarde to declare more at large So that by the comming in of these kinges God himselfe if we may so basely speake of his glorious maiestie was put out of his office as hee himselfe doth confesse 1. Sam. 8.7 where hee speaketh to Samuell not to be grieued for that the people had cast off his and his sonnes gouernment for indeede saith God they haue not despised or cast awaie thee but mee and haue refused that I shoulde raigne ouer them In the seconde place the iudges had parte of this supreame authoritie who although in the greatest matters they were ouer-ruled by the worde of God yet in the ordinarie administration especially of warelike affaires they were the chiefe And therefore the state of the common wealth from Moses to Saule the first king is called the gouernment of the Iudges the which did wholly cease after that Saule was created king for the Captaines of the warre were either the kinges themselues or whom it pleased them to appointe So wee â—eade that Dauid placed and displaced Ioab at his pleasure Thirdlie the bodie of the people ioyning together in a general assembly had a part yea the greatest part of this authoritie and likewise the elders who were a compendious bodie of the people had their part especially in ciuill administration in the time of peace Iudg. 20. The children of Israel came together as one man to the Lord in Maspha to whome the leuite maketh his complaint as vnto them who had authoritie to reuenge the villanie done vnto him desiring them to determine of that cause as they did with greate seueritie The causes why the people and the elders had parte of this supreme authoritie were these First for that they did neuer giue the whole power ouer themselues into the handes of anie of the Iudges but onely did as it were vse them to be their Captaines and leaders in the time of warre the which beeing ended vsually the iudge returned to his owne house and priuate estate till the like necessitie called him abroade againe but during the time of peace they did not meddle much with ciuill iurisdiction but onely hearde those causes which were brought vnto them as to fitte arbiters because they were men renoumed eyther for their valour or because they were prophetes as were Debora and Samuell or had the office of the high prieste as had Ely Hence it is that in this booke of iudges there is no mention made of their ciuil iudgements or that they did cal together the Senate or the people vnlesse it were to warre or of any edictes which they made or of faults which they did redresse or punish Only of Samuel it is written that he went about the land to iudge the people and of Debora that the people brought their controuersies to her The second cause of the authoritie of the elders and people was the want a Iudge for whenas the Iudge died they did not streightway put another in his place vntill they had occasion giuen by warre during which time of vacation the elders and people in euery citie did iudge their owne causes and meeting together in a common asseÌ„bly did order publike matters although seldome and negligently as the people vse to gouerne So that they wanted a Iudge as often as they had one But when once they had a king created there did no more any supreame authoritie remaine either in elders or people all being giuen vnto the hands of the king who had no man which did participat with him in his authoritie For we are not to thinke that in this state the king was the chiefe gouernour and the elders senators and inferiour officers fellow gouernours and as it were his mates For all within the land of Israel were to the king meere priuate men so that if any had authoritie in respect of the people they had it all from him as from the fountaine all the officers of the kingdome all the Iudges of ciuill causes and the captaines of the armies were appointted by him Yea they were so farre from hauing any authoritie in respect of the king that all the people with their magistrates and officers of what kinde soeuer are vsually called the kinges seruantes so 2. Chro. 10.6 The counsellers of Salomon are saide to haue stood before his face to wit waiting and attending his pleasure so Esa. 37.5 Officers of the king and elderâ— of the priestes are called the kings seruantes For the state of this kingdome was not such a gouernment as both hath beene and is at this day in vse in many places where the people to auoide confusion and for the administration of iustice and of other publike affaires doe for one ouer them yea and giue vnto him although improperly the name of a king reseruing to themselues authority eyther to displace him at their pleasure or at the least to controll his doings which they thinke to be wrong to call him to account of his administration yea if need be to rise vp in armes against him and to lay violent handes vpon him This was no such gouernment but a kingdome both in name and in trueth wherein none had any iot of supreame authority saue the king onely Sect. V. BVT if it be graunted that there was no authoritie in the land which could associate it selfe with the authoritie of the king or any way intermeddle with his lawful administration as long as he did rule with religion and iustice for the glory of God the good of the people yet it may seeme that there was some authoritie to restraine him if at any time he should be imperious or vniust in his gouernment whereby he should be eyther brought to a lawfull manner of ruling or else if he were incorrigible deposed from his kingdome For otherwise the people might be miserably oppressed religion defaced yea all thinges turned vpside downe and in the ende the commonwealth vtterly ouerthrowen and therefore that both wisedome reason and necessitie iâ— the glorie of God and the good of men doe require that there should be in Israell some other authoritie eyther in the people or in the priestes in the senate or in the inferiour magistrates the which should neuer be eyther vsed or once mentioned but against those kinges which did degenerate into violent and bloody tyrantes euen as men vse a false vnder raine to pull in strong headed horses which otherwise woulde runne into some pit so destroy both themselues the riders This reason taken
the Church should be at the call and commaundement of the secular power whereby they might be eyther wholly dispossessed of their places or continually troubled interrupted in ordering the affaires of the Church and the matters of God and finally iniuriously and contumeliously handled which thing the holines of their places and persons wil in no wise suffer For the answere of this doubt it is plaine in the word of God that all ecclesiasticall persons whatsoeuer yea the chiefe priestes in them the high priest himself the prince and head of the priestes who was the type of Christ the Oracle of God and on whom the whole glory and maiesty of the priesthood was bestowed was no lesse subiect to the iurisdiction of the kinge then he which had the basest place and calling in the common-wealth The trueth heereof appeareth by the lamentable tragedie of Abimelech 1. Sam. 2. who being summoned by Saule to appeare came with all the priestes that were with him and being come acknowledged Saulâ— to be his Lord Verse 12. and did not appeale froÌ„ his vniust sentence of death to any other power The same end befel his son Abiather who for that he tooke part with Adonia was by Salomon put out of his office and condemned to die 1. King 2.26 And likewise Zachariah the son of Iehâ—ida 2. Chro. 24.21 Now although two of these kinges did impiously and tyrannically abuse their authority yet it doth appeare that they had authority ouer them yea not onely these examples but the course of the whole scripture and equitie it selfe doth shew that it ought to be so We knowe that euen Christ himselfe more holy in person and office then all the priestes men or angels in the world did throughout the whole course of his life submit himselfe to the ciuill power and at the end of it did suffer himselfe to be violently apprehended contuâ—eliously entreated yea vniustly coÌ„demned by the deputy of a heathen Emperour Likewise the Apostle Paule did appeale and subiect himselfe to the authority of Caesar. Neyther is there any cause or reason why it should be otherwise For howsoeuer the Romish prelates haue not only drawen out their neckes from the subiection of princes but also haue inuaded their thrones and subdued them vnder their feete and the whole cleargie say to the ciuill power come not near nor yet once touch me because I am holier then thou and think themselues too good to be iudged by any but by their owne ordinarie yet the trueth is that all persons as well ciuill as ecclesiasticall are and ought to be by the word of God equally subiect to the ciuill power For shall Christ himselfe and in him God himselfe stand before the iudgement seat of princes and shall sinfull men nay shall wretched wormes thinke them too prophane to be competent iudges in their causes no no the seruant is not aboue the master nor the creature aboue the creator and therefore we say with the Apostle that al soules that is euery man that hath a soule that none shoulde thinke himselfe exempted ought to be subiect to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 The ground of the contrary errour is an arrogant opinion which presumptuous men bearing function in the Church haue of their own holinâ—sse in respect of others whereas in the Church of God men who haue ciuil callings are no lesse holy then they who haue ecclesiasticaâ— yea somtimes much more holy they who haue ecclesiastical holy callings being otherwise wicked prophane for it is truly said althougâ— impiously applied by the rebellious company of Corah Numb 16.3 That not only Moses Aaron but euen the whole multitude of the common people much more the Lords annoynted is holy In the next place we are to search whether that as al persons so likewise al causes belonged to the authority of the King of Israell First of ciuill then of ecclesiasticall causes in the first kinde it is not needful that we should insist forsomuch as all men euen they who are most sparing and wary in giuing power to these kinges doe acknowledge that all ciuill causes did properly belong to their iurisdiction And so it was indeede For the king had authoritie to appointe all the publike officers of his kingdome who should be his counsellers at home or his Captaines abroad who shoulde be the iudges of the people and who of the chiefe senate in Ierusalem and good reason it was that he shoulde haue this power in these causes For seeing that his office was especially to iudge the causes of the people and to fight their battailes for the which purpose the people desired a king it could not be denied vnto him to appointe those to be his deputies whom he thought most able to discharge these dueties Yea further it belonged to him to call all publike assemblies and to order them to make peace with whom he would and to goe to battaile against whome â—e when 〈◊〉 thought good The trueth of this pointe doth 〈◊〉 plainely appeare throughout the whole storie that we need not insist in it Sect. X. NOwe we are to enquire what was the authoritie of the kinge in the matters of the Church to wit in ordering the state of religion and of the seruice of God Whereof there is greate question made whilest some doe wholly exclude him out of the Church not permitting him to intermeddle with any affaires belonging vnto it others suffer him to deale in these causes yet not to beare any great sway or to ouerrule in them and the third sort giueth vnto him the greatest part of that ecclesiasticall authoritie which belongeth to man The which distinction is necessarely to be considered for God hath not giuen to any man such ful and absolute authoritie in the Church as in the common-wealth for he hath made Christ the soueraign Lord and King of the Church to rule it by his owne lawes and worde Yet one parte of ecclesiasticall iurisdiction belongeth to men who are to establish the diuine lawes of the worship of God and to make ecclesiastical constitutions for that purpose But who hath authoritie to doe this there is all the controuersie In the first opinion or rather grosse and palpable errour are the Bishops of Rome with their adherentes who that they might through the Church enter into the common-wealth inuade the riches preferments and pleasures of kinges and vsurpe their states and crownes haue thrust out of the Church this king of Israell least that by his example other magistrates shoulde challenge to themselues â—uthoritie in causes ecclesiasticall In the second opinion are men otherwise syncere in iudgement who in a good meaning affection to the Church thinke it not safe or conuenient to permitte her wholly to the ciuill power and in a reuerent opinion of her iudge it vnmeete that ciuill rulers should order diuine matters and so make the Church say vnto the magistrate touch me not for I am more holy then thou
Necodemus a maister in Israell Iho. 3.10 Neither did they looke so much for forgiuenes of sinnes and eternall life by the Messias thinking to be iustified by keeping the law as for temporall commodities And lastly they denied the doctrine of the death of Christ for they held that the Messias should not dy Iohn 12.34 That these and other such errours were popular and common in the Church of the Iewes we may both gather out of their saying recorded by the euangelists as also by their continuall silence in these matters the which we doe not reade that any of them doe mention vppon any occasion And lastly by the open confession of the Iewes in all ages since the comming of Christ. For it is plaine that they holde euen to this day those opinions which they receaued from their auncestours and were commonlie helde of that nation Notwithstanding all which errours we thinke as it is generally thought that the people of the Iewes professing generally faith in the Messias to come were then the true Church and the people of God but this confession will not serue now in the time of the Gospell to make them a Church because they doe reiect Christ himselfe in his very person As for the hereticall Churches since the time of the gospell as the Church of Arians papists or any other maintaining grieuous errours contrarie to the worde of God it seemeth that they are to be accounted the Churches of God because they doe all hold the foundation of the Gospell which is faith in Iesus Christ the sonne of God and the sauiour of the world CHAP. VIII Of a Priuate Church Sect. 1. What a priuate Church is HItherto we haue entreated in generall of a particular church now we are to speake of the kindes of it which are two in number to wit priuate publick A priuate Church is a company of Christians seruing God together in the midst of infidels or there where the whole multitude or the whol body of the people generally publickly considered abideth in infidelity Of this kind of churches we haue many examples First from the beginning vntill the daies of Moses in all which time the Churches were priuate Secondly after the nation of the Iewes did cease from bâ—ing a Church for from their comming out of Egipt vntill the time wherein they reiected christ and the gospel they were a publick church til the dayes of Constantine the great all the chuâ—ches of the christans were priuate For we doe not read of any one citie or countrie within al that time being about .300 yeares did publickly embrace the gospell but a fewe in respect of the infidels in this and that citie as in Ierusalem Antioch Corinth Rome and the rest So that al the churches planted by the Apostles Euangelists or any other in the first ages of the gospel were priuate Thirdly of this kinde are those churches at this day if there be any such which are amongst the Turkes or any other kind of infidels Out of the which examples we may gather that the cause of this priuat estate of the church was in the first ages of the world the smal nuÌ„ber of the tru worshippers of God is in these latter ages the infidelitie of magistrates who being themselues infidels do not go about to bring their subiects to the faith but are perhaps content to tolerate the same within their dominions and that for some ciuill respect as namely to make their cities and countries more resorted vnto for encrease of the tribute due vnto them for the preseruation of peace or for some other such consideration Lastly the cheife cause of these priuate Churches is to be taken from the very nature of the Gospell the which being contrary to mans reason is hardly beleeued and therefore it is vsually receaued only of a fewe As it is written Rom. 10.16 who hath beleeued our report that is very fewe in respect of the infidels do beleeue the doctrine of the Gospell For howsoeuer the force of ciuill authoritie and other outward respects make the gospell to be generally receaued in many places yet this generall profession is contrary to the nature of the gospell the which hardly and seldome is truly receaued as hath bene said But here it may easely be obiected that no Church can be called priuate seing that we haue here before defined a church in generall by the publick seruice of God We answere confessing that euerie church is publick in respect of the seuerall members of it yea although it be in a priuate house or family or in the most secrete corner that can be And yet a church contained within a priuate place and consisting of a small company may truly and fitly be called priuate in respect of that Church which consisting of the whole body of the people doth not lurke in a corner but is openly established amongst all and in euerie place Yet the ministerie of the word and al other actions of such a church are to be counted publick and not priuate So that this kinde of Churches is called priuate from the subiect because they are in priuate places but the subiect of the other kindes is a publick citie or countrie Sect. 2. Of the the specials in planting a publicke Church NOW that we see what a priuate Church is we are in the next place to come to the specials in the planting of it And first we are to declare by whom this kinde of Church ought to be founded as for the secondarie workers to wit the ministers of the worde we haue spoken of them in the generall treatise of planting a Church So that here we are to search out â—he first workers in this action who are the chiefe in that they begin the worke and procure the ministrie of the worde The answere is that euery man may be the chiefe and first builder of a Church so farre foorth as his calling power and authority doth stretch So that in this case priuate men may be lawfully and are vsually the first and chiefe builders Yea it is not onely lawfull but that wherunto the duetie which we owe both to God to seeke his glory and to men to seeke their saluation doth necessarelie binde vs that if God giue vs occasion the Church standing in neede of our helpe we be not wanting in this behalfe For so we are to vnderstande that this is to be done whenas the Câ—urch is destituâ—e of christian magistrates and likewise of other gouâ—rnours and teachers As it is in those places where eyther there is no Câ—â—rch aâ— all or else so decayed that there remâ—inâ—th nothing but the professiâ—n of religion amongest some fewe In the which case it is lawfull for any christian whom God hath endued with the zeale of his glorie and the saluation of his brethren and also witâ— some measure of knowledgâ— how this thing ought to be done to labour both in bringing tâ—ose who are infidels to the
profession of the faith and also to bâ— a meanes to continue them together in the same so it is recorded Act. 8.4 That the Church which was at Ierusalem being dispeâ—sed they did preach the worde euerie man labouring as he had occasion offered So we reade that Prisciâ—la and Aquila had a Church in their owne house which we may wel thinke to haue beene gathered and constituted by them for that they are saide to haue preached the gospell diligently and to haue conuerted many Rom. 16.4 1. Cor. 16.19 So Colossians 4.15 the Apostle saluteth Nympha and the Church which was in his house and although it be not mentioned that these men were the founders of these Churches within their owne houses yet this doctrine may be proued by that generall rule of the worde the which layeth this charge vppon euery man that he build the Church and establish the true worship of God so far as his authoritie doth stretch By this rule as euery man is to make himselfe the temple of the holy ghost so masters of families and rulers of cities and countries are bounde to be the first founders of the Church in those places where they haue to doe yea they may lawfully preach the word to any other when occasion is offered Yet whenas they haue wonne any to the profession of Christ who are not of their owne families or gathered them together beeing dispersed abroad to serue God together then they are to commit the further building of it to those who shall be appointed and chosen to teach and order the said congregation And if they themselues be thought meetest for that purpose then are they no more priuate men but ecclesiasticall rulers Also this is to be considered that whenas it pleaseth God to put into any mans heart this desire and purpose to goe about the building of any such priuate Church he or they if they be more then one are to communicate their purpose to those who doe alreadie beleeue and professe the faith neere to that place that their consent and approbation of their doings may be vnto them a kind of calling and also confirme and encourage them in the saide work And in this manner it is not vnlawful for priuate men to be the first builders founders of a priuate Church consisting not onely of their own families but also of any other whose hearts it shall please God to moue to beleeue the gospell and to ioyne with them in the profession of it But in conuerting others there is great wisedome to be vsed forasmuch as ciuill rulers who are not themselues of the Church although they doe giue a toleration for a priuate Church within their dominions yet they wil hardly suffer their subiectes to be turned to any newe religion so that they who doe take in hande this worke are to consider that they haue not such libertie as were to be wished and therefore they ought with peace and quietnesse to vse that libertie which God hath graunted vnto them rather then by passing the limits of their calling to venture the losse of that which they haue So that they are to builde chiefely by gathering together those who doe alreadie professe the faith and that by priuate teaching as occasion is offered and as for others to vse all lawfull meanes to allure them to the liking of their profession as is an honest and vnblameable life whereby they may get the fauour of all men as the Church had Act. 2.47 Then to be readie to receaue all that come vnto them and louingly and mildly to conferre with them of those pointes wherof they doubt Thus did the apostle Paule at Rome for the space of two yeares remayning in an hired house priuatly receaue all that came vnto him did preach the Gâ—spell with all boldâ—esse without any hindrance the which he could neuer haue done in that place if he had gone about openly publickly to chaunge the state of religion to bring the people of Româ— to the profeâ—sion of the Gospel Sect. 3. Of the state of it being planted AS great care is to be vsed in the gathering of a priuate Church so likewise continuing it this alwaies is to be obserued that they liue in obedience to all ciuil lawes and constitutions so that they be no cause of disturbâ—nce to the publick state of the place where they liue For to this ende are all those exhortations which are made concerning obeying magistrates rulers whether high or loâ— Râ—m 13.1 Peter 2.17 in many other places for the Churches were then in those places where heathen magistrates ruled Yea christians liuing in this estate although they ought to desire the company of their brethren professing the faith rather then of infidels which are strangers from God and also as much as they can to haue their continuall conuersation with them yet they ought not to abhorre or fly the company of those who are not of the Church whenas by iust occasion it is offered For so we see the Apostle writeth to the Coâ—inthians 1.7.12 that the beleeuing husband should not put away the vnbeleeuing wife being content to remaine with him So also we may obserue that the christians were often inuited by infidels to their banquets 1. Cor. 10.27 And as for the sinnes and corruptions which we shall see in them we may and ought to vse greater patience towardes them then towardes those that doe professe the gospell So Paule writeth 1. Cor. 5.12 what haue I to doe to iudge them that are without doe not ye iudge those who are within and therefore we may lawfully leaue their faultes and sinnes vnreproued Yet in all our dealinges with them we must aime at their conuersion and then it will be for the glorie of God and our owne comfort which if it be onely for our temporal commodity cannot be without the offence of our brethren whereunto a speciall regarde is to be had and also to our owne hinderance in regarde of comfort and edification in the knowledge and obedience of Christ. Furtheâ— in these priuate Churches this is to be obserued that they most vsually consist of the most syncere and faithfull christians For in them none are compelled to professe the faith but all are such as do willingly of their owne accord embrace the gospell Act. 2.41 So many as willingly receaued the worde were baptized Yea this also may be an argument of their soundenâ—sse in the profession of the trueth for that liuing amongest infidels they cannot but incurre the hatred of many yea oftâ—ntimes euen of the ciuill rulers themselues by taking vpon them the profession of the gospell and so sustaine many iniuâ—ies and hurtes in regarde of thinges belonging to this temporall life and manifolde molestations scoffes yea reproches in regarde of the seâ—uice of God Againe this is to be noted that these priuate Churches are for the most part more pure perfect orderly and free then publiâ—ke Churches are For