the Church should be at the call and commaundement of the secular power whereby they might be eyther wholly dispossessed of their places or continually troubled interrupted in ordering the affaires of the Church and the matters of God and finally iniuriously and contumeliously handled which thing the holines of their places and persons wil in no wise suffer For the answere of this doubt it is plaine in the word of God that all ecclesiasticall persons whatsoeuer yea the chiefe priestes in them the high priest himself the prince and head of the priestes who was the type of Christ the Oracle of God and on whom the whole glory and maiesty of the priesthood was bestowed was no lesse subiect to the iurisdiction of the kinge then he which had the basest place and calling in the common-wealth The trueth heereof appeareth by the lamentable tragedie of Abimelech 1. Sam. 2. who being summoned by Saule to appeare came with all the priestes that were with him and being come acknowledged Saulâ— to be his Lord Verse 12. and did not appeale froÌ„ his vniust sentence of death to any other power The same end befel his son Abiather who for that he tooke part with Adonia was by Salomon put out of his office and condemned to die 1. King 2.26 And likewise Zachariah the son of Iehâ—ida 2. Chro. 24.21 Now although two of these kinges did impiously and tyrannically abuse their authority yet it doth appeare that they had authority ouer them yea not onely these examples but the course of the whole scripture and equitie it selfe doth shew that it ought to be so We knowe that euen Christ himselfe more holy in person and office then all the priestes men or angels in the world did throughout the whole course of his life submit himselfe to the ciuill power and at the end of it did suffer himselfe to be violently apprehended contuâ—eliously entreated yea vniustly coÌ„demned by the deputy of a heathen Emperour Likewise the Apostle Paule did appeale and subiect himselfe to the authority of Caesar. Neyther is there any cause or reason why it should be otherwise For howsoeuer the Romish prelates haue not only drawen out their neckes from the subiection of princes but also haue inuaded their thrones and subdued them vnder their feete and the whole cleargie say to the ciuill power come not near nor yet once touch me because I am holier then thou and think themselues too good to be iudged by any but by their owne ordinarie yet the trueth is that all persons as well ciuill as ecclesiasticall are and ought to be by the word of God equally subiect to the ciuill power For shall Christ himselfe and in him God himselfe stand before the iudgement seat of princes and shall sinfull men nay shall wretched wormes thinke them too prophane to be competent iudges in their causes no no the seruant is not aboue the master nor the creature aboue the creator and therefore we say with the Apostle that al soules that is euery man that hath a soule that none shoulde thinke himselfe exempted ought to be subiect to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 The ground of the contrary errour is an arrogant opinion which presumptuous men bearing function in the Church haue of their own holinâ—sse in respect of others whereas in the Church of God men who haue ciuil callings are no lesse holy then they who haue ecclesiasticaâ— yea somtimes much more holy they who haue ecclesiastical holy callings being otherwise wicked prophane for it is truly said althougâ— impiously applied by the rebellious company of Corah Numb 16.3 That not only Moses Aaron but euen the whole multitude of the common people much more the Lords annoynted is holy In the next place we are to search whether that as al persons so likewise al causes belonged to the authority of the King of Israell First of ciuill then of ecclesiasticall causes in the first kinde it is not needful that we should insist forsomuch as all men euen they who are most sparing and wary in giuing power to these kinges doe acknowledge that all ciuill causes did properly belong to their iurisdiction And so it was indeede For the king had authoritie to appointe all the publike officers of his kingdome who should be his counsellers at home or his Captaines abroad who shoulde be the iudges of the people and who of the chiefe senate in Ierusalem and good reason it was that he shoulde haue this power in these causes For seeing that his office was especially to iudge the causes of the people and to fight their battailes for the which purpose the people desired a king it could not be denied vnto him to appointe those to be his deputies whom he thought most able to discharge these dueties Yea further it belonged to him to call all publike assemblies and to order them to make peace with whom he would and to goe to battaile against whome â—e when 〈◊〉 thought good The trueth of this pointe doth 〈◊〉 plainely appeare throughout the whole storie that we need not insist in it Sect. X. NOwe we are to enquire what was the authoritie of the kinge in the matters of the Church to wit in ordering the state of religion and of the seruice of God Whereof there is greate question made whilest some doe wholly exclude him out of the Church not permitting him to intermeddle with any affaires belonging vnto it others suffer him to deale in these causes yet not to beare any great sway or to ouerrule in them and the third sort giueth vnto him the greatest part of that ecclesiasticall authoritie which belongeth to man The which distinction is necessarely to be considered for God hath not giuen to any man such ful and absolute authoritie in the Church as in the common-wealth for he hath made Christ the soueraign Lord and King of the Church to rule it by his owne lawes and worde Yet one parte of ecclesiasticall iurisdiction belongeth to men who are to establish the diuine lawes of the worship of God and to make ecclesiastical constitutions for that purpose But who hath authoritie to doe this there is all the controuersie In the first opinion or rather grosse and palpable errour are the Bishops of Rome with their adherentes who that they might through the Church enter into the common-wealth inuade the riches preferments and pleasures of kinges and vsurpe their states and crownes haue thrust out of the Church this king of Israell least that by his example other magistrates shoulde challenge to themselues â—uthoritie in causes ecclesiasticall In the second opinion are men otherwise syncere in iudgement who in a good meaning affection to the Church thinke it not safe or conuenient to permitte her wholly to the ciuill power and in a reuerent opinion of her iudge it vnmeete that ciuill rulers should order diuine matters and so make the Church say vnto the magistrate touch me not for I am more holy then thou
nation and prince whoÌ„ he vsed as scourges for the misdemeanor of these kings wherof more hereafter Now we are to answer to the examples which may seeme to be contrary to this rule the which if they be indeed contrary to it yet they do not take away this truth for a few wrong actions caÌ„not preiuâ—ice a law yea a long practise and custome of right But let vs see what they are First the people do seem to haue resisted Saul in that they saued Ionathan from death wherunto he was euen deuoted by the kings solemne oth promise we answere that they did perswade the king by reason not resist him by force as doth appeare by their words 1. SaÌ„ 14.45 but the example of Libna is more plaine the which rebelled against IehoraÌ„ because he did forsake the Lord. 2. Chr. 21.10 but this one example is not sufficient for it is not approued but only barely mentioned by the writer of the story yea many actions in the scripture are coÌ„mended as proceding from a godly mind which in straight examinatioÌ„ would be found vnlawful Thirdly the deposing of Athalia 2. Chro. 23. maketh not against vs. For we do heere speak of a lawful king but she was a meer vsurper because she was not of Dauids seed Lastly as touching the coÌ„spiracies made against Ioas for killing Zacharias the son of Iehoida 2. Chr. 24.25 against Amasia for forsaking the lord 2. Chr. 25.27 the writer of the story doth not meane that the conspirators were moued by those reasons or had any purpose of reuenging those offences moued by other sinister respects not mentioned but that God brought those feareful iudgments vpon these kings for the foresaid sins Sect. VII IT may heere be asked what shoulde then be the issue of the violence and tyranny which any of these kinges might perhaps vse what ordâ—â— was taken and what was the behauiour of loyal subiectes in such cases we answere that the weapons which God gaue vnto his people wherewith to defend themselues against the tyrannie of their lawfâ—ll kinges were these The first is wisedome carefully to auoyde all occasions of the kinges anger and iniurie and because that they who are disposed to be iniurious to their subiectes neuer want occasions which they take where none is offered therefore the next remedie is to auoyde and decline from the violence or iniury it self Thus did Dauid by flying into dens caues and mountaines keepe himselfe from the rage of Saule The thirde remedie where the second is wanting is patience to suffer with a quiet minde the violence or iniustice of the king which could not be by wisedom eyther preuented or auoyded The last remedie is to appeale from the vniust sentence of the king not to any man or to any court heere on earth but to the king of kinges euen to God himselfe whose eares are alwaies open to heare those who are oppressed this remedie is the last and therfore not to be vsed but in cases of greatest extremitie when as the violence is too too grieuous shamefull and to mans infirmity altogether intollerable This meanes did Samuell commend vnto the people whereby they shoulde ease themselues of those intollerable burdens of tributes which their king would lay vpon them 1. Sam. 8.18 saying then you beeing thus oppressed by your king shall not rebell against him but shall cry vnto the Lord. Where it is added that God wil not heare them when they câ—y this is mâ—nt that they could not afterwards put down their kings neyther be freed from their tyranny which by their own wilfulnes they had brought vpon themselues otherwise God doth heare those who being intollerably iniured by their kinges do appeale vnto him So we read 2. Chro. 4.22 that when as Zacharias was stoned by the commaundement of king Ioas hee appealed to God and commended his cause to him Where the spirit of God hath carefully noted that God receiued his appeale so that within one yeare he sent the Armies of the Syrians who destroyed his princes and spoyled Ierusalem Yea the seruants of the king by the iust iudgement of God although vnlawfully coÌ„spired against him killed him for the death of Zacharias Yea this was the vsuall meanes wherby God did punish the sinne and represse the rage of idolatrous kings euen the power of forraine princes into whose handes he did often giue these kings of Iuda with their people and kingdome but did neuer by his word arme any of their subiects against them therin as in al other his actions obseruing decorum which is the rule of seemlines or ciuil order honesty vnto the which it is agreeable that kings should be chastened controlled not by their subiectes and inferiours but by other kings which are their equals Sect. VIII LAstly it may be obiected that it is a verie vnlike matter that this people with their wise elders and senatours were or could be so farre ouerseenâ—s that liuing vnder a moderate gouerment in the which either they neuer had any iniury offered vnto them by their rulers or if they had might easely haue it redressed by some other lawful authority would permit themselues their wiues and children landes and libertie to any such authority vnder the which they were subiect to iniury yea in such sort as that they had no refuge to fly vnto in any extremitie no superiour authority to appeale vnto no stronger power to oppose and finally which both might easely be come tyrannicall and beeing so could not by any meanes which they could vse be eyther ended or amended Whereunto we answere first as before that heere we doe onely make a bare narration what was done leauing it to those who professe skill in these matters to iudge whether it were wisely done or no. Secondly that we may giue some reason hereof that this was done according to the simplicitie of the first ages of the world wherein men were much more innocent then they are in these daies and did not so easely inferre iniury to others and therfore not feare to receiue hurt from others Whereby it came to passe that men did both safely and securely permiâ—â—hemselues into thâ— handes of others eyâ—her kinges Lordes or masters or any other rulers without making couenantes with them and taking caution of them for their security But the state of the worlde is much altered for nowe men are growen to that hight and ripenes of craft deceit dissimulation violence and all other kindes of wickednesse that almost euerie man feareth and suspecteth each other neyther will haue any dealinges with any other without greate pledges of securitie Heereof it hath come to passe that these greate monarchies endued with absolute power were farre more vsâ—d in the first ages of the worlde then in the times following wherein wee see that although a monarchicall state be thought more excellent and commodious then any other kinde of gouernment yet men dare not giue vnto it this ample and
the Church of God that he doe by all means labour to aduance the Gospell of Christ and to beautifie his Church If nothing preuaile then we arâ— to commend the cause to the Lorde who can easely mouethe heartes of rulers the which he doth sometimes by some iudgement or plague laide vpon them or their lande as we read that Elias made Achab put away idolatrie by bringing an extreame famine vpon his whole lande But what is to be done in this case if that none of these meanes hauing beene discreetly faithfully and importunatelie vsed can preuaile that there ought not any outward force to be vsed against the will of the ruler vnlesse it be in such a gouernment wherein the rulers may after a sorte be ruled it hath beene declared There remaineth nothing to be done vnlesse the Church vse her censure of excommunication against her disobedient sonne thus obstinatelie hindering this worke But heerein there are manie thinges to be considered And first whether this censure may lawfully be vsed against the rulers or rather exercised vpon them For the answere whereof we are to consider that as there is but one saluation and one glorie both for rulers and subiectes so also there is but one meanes appointed by God in his Church to attaine thereunto belonging equally to all that be within the Church of what state or condition soeuer they be And therefore as the preaching of the worde the administration of the sacramentes so likewise ecclesiasticall censures tending to the same ende doe belong to all that be of the Church Yea it is a thing most commendable in a prince that whenas no man can compell him to it of his owne accorde he submitteth himselfe vnto all the ordinances of God and by this means giueth exaÌ„ple vnto the people of obedieÌ„ce But although it may lawfully be done yet there are so many incoÌ„modities which would follow the vse of it that it wil be found seldome or neuer conuenient to be done For first by this meanes the ciuill ruler who doth professe himselfe to be a fauourer of the Church although he be not a sound friend may be alienated quite from it and so cast away all care of furthâ—ring the building of it By the which meanes the Church may come vtterly to ruine being destitute of his helpe who is the builder of it it being a publick church as most commonly it is where the ciuill ruler is a member of it Secondly it is greatly to be feared least that by this meanes the ciuill authoritie receaue some disgrace the authority dignity maiestie wherof if it be of that kinde ought by all meanes to be maintained In regard of the first inconuenience we are to consider the disposition of the prince and the present state of the Church and not to doe it till that by mature deliberation it be found to be for the good both of the one and of the other For otherwise if the whole state of the Church shal be â—azarded by this meanes we ought not to doe it It is better to haue an imperfect or corrupt state of a Church with the fauour of the ruler then none at all by his displeasure Yea also in this respect it is needfull that he doe first acknowledge himselfe subiâ—ct to the censures of his Church before they can be vsed on him that so by his owne confession at least in his conscience he may approue their doeing to be both agreeable to the worde of God and also not repugnant to that loyaltie which they owe vnto him Which if he doe not then this censure cannot be vsed because all lawes and constitutions take hold of thâ—m who are vnder the same not of those who are not In regarde of the second inconuenience these cautions are to be vsed First that it be not done but vpon a great vrgent euident cause as whenas his hindering of the building of the church is not so much of ignorance as of malice pride and some such corruption in him Secondly that it be not suddainly done but that first all patience be vsed by forebeareing and expecting the chaunging of his minde to acknowledge the trueth Thirdly that vnlesse it be needfull to be otherwise it be done by the secret opinion and estimation of men accounting him not worthy the name of a Godly and Christian prince or of a faithfull brother rather then by the open and publick promulgation of the sentence of excommunication So we read 1. Sam. 15.30.31 that when as Samuell did after a sort excommunicate Saule the first king of the Iewes by declaring him to be foresaken of God and cast out of his fauouâ— yet he had care to keepe the dignitie or rather the maiestie of his person and calling before the people and therefore he did at his request go with him and honor him with his companie in the sight of the wâ—ole people And lastly that if it be needfull that the sentence of excommunication should be openly pronounced yet that there be added a declaration of the nature of this censure to wit that it doth not touch his ciuill gouernmenâ— or derogate any iot from the maiesty of his person the authoritie of his place and calling the obedience which his subiects owe vnto him saue onely that a Christian godly vertuous and religious prince who is zealous in aduancing the glory of God and procuring the good of his Church ought more highly to be esteemed more chearfully obeyed and more intirely loued then an infiddel or then a wicked and obstinate ruler proffessing faith For whenas we make it lawfull to excommunicate the the ciuill ruler we do not meane any popishe kind of excommunication whereby the pope doth curse and depose all those princes which shake off the yoke of his corrupt and prophane worshippe for the nature of excommunication is farre from the nature of a curse it being onely a mere separation from the outward society of the church which doth not in any respect touch or diminish his authoritie as hath been said otherwise it were not lawfull to excommunicate the ciuil ruler for so much as we are flatly forbidden by the word of God to curse the ruler of the people Therefore did Paule call backe that speach vttered against the high priest malitiously hindering the building of the Church Act. 23.5 Sect. 8. Of the Church hindered by the ministers of the word AS the ministers of the word of God are the proper builders of the Church so they are often vsed by sathan as a meanes to hinder the same And no doubt but that they are most fit instruments for this purpose and whenas they are so set most daungerous and pernitious hinderers of this worke As if the woolfe can haue the shepheard to put the sheepe into his mouth what need he any more for the vtter destroying of the whole flocke and yet this kind of hinderers is verie ordinary as we may see throughout the whole scripture
For so the building of the materiall temple was hindered by false prophets Nehe. 6. Yea none did so importunatly hinder or so spitefully entreate the true prophets of God as did the false prophets and the whole company of worldly carnal minded priestes Thus we se. 2. Chro. 18.23 that Zedekia did to Micha and Iere. 20.1 Pashur to Ieremie the priestes Scribes pharises to our sauiour Christ the false Apostles to Paule Such were those foolish vaine-glorious preachers at Corinth who swelling in a fond opinion and a foolish vse of humane wisdome did build vpon the good foundation of the sincere plaine and simple doctrine of the trueth hay stuble wood and such things as would be afterwards consumed with the fire that is would be found in examination to haue no substance of true religion These did seeme to build as well yea much more then the apostle but they were deceitfull workers and by this working did greatly hinder the true building of the church For if there were no builders all men that do professe the faith would seeke for some but these deceitfull builders perswade men that they are the true ministers of Christ and no maruail when as Sathan himselfe that foule and lothsome spirite doth transforme himselfe into an Angell of light and so they hinder them of faithfull and painfull teachers Lastly these hinderers may be knowen by their fruites as Christ teacheth vs Math. 7.15.16 euen by their dissolute liues the which they spend in seeking not the saluation of men and Gods glory but their owne pleasure ease commoditie yea riches and preferment Yea this their hypocrisie is to be detected least otherwise their purpose of hindering the Church do preuaile and that both by word when occasion serueth and also by the contrary sinceritie of the true builders Thus Christ dealeth with the Scribes and Pharisies Math. 23. and in many other places Sect. 9. Of an imperfect state of a Church WHenas the building of the Church is hindred by any meanes it commeth to passe that the state of it is imperfect corrupt or both For although in Christ the Church be perfect and pure yet she being in this worlde is often otherwise An imperfect state of a church is when as some part of the gouernment of the church is wanting as if the ministerie of the worde be wanting or if the ministers doe seldome and negligently preach the worde of GOD vnto the people Yet not the wantes that are in any fewe men but those which are generall and tollerated by the publick lawes or the common consent of the church make an imperfect state The imperfection is so much the more grieuous as the offices or functions of the offices which are wanting are more needfull in the church And therefore whenas there is no preaching ministerie in the Church the want is great and the case most lamentable because God hath ordained that his church should be built and his seruants saued by preaching the which being wanting the ordinary meanes of faith and of saluation is also wanting The want of any office is to be supplied by that which is nearest vnto it so did the leuites supplie the want of the priestes being by reason of their legall vncleannesse not meete to sacrifice 2. Châ—o 29.34 Yea that which is publickly wanting is priuately to be supplied what part of Gods worship or any thing belonging to it soeuer it be Yet we must not rest herein but carefully labour for a ful and perfect form of gouernment wherof how much is wanting so much of the meanes of our saluation is wanting And therefore we are heere to consider howe we may liue in an imperfect Church and how we ought to forsake it For the first we neede not doubt but that we may lawfully remaine in a Church the which wanteth some office or function appointed by God yea that our seruice wil be in some measure accepted of God who winketh at the infirmities and imperfections of his faithfull seruantes whether priuate or publicke Euen as he did at the passouer offered by Ezechias and the people wherein many thinges required by the law were wanting yea the Church seldome attaineth and keepeth so absolute perfect as that nothing is wanting in it Thus many of the Churches in the daies of the Apostles wanted some offices which were afterwardes supplied And in the ages following the troubles and persecutions of the Church made many wantes in it the which may be borne with these conditions First when as they are not so great but that notwithstanding them we haue the meanes of saluation edificarion Secondly if that the want be not wilfull but constrained and necessarie as when the Iewes intermitted the vse of circumcisioÌ„ in the wildernes Lastly if that we doe still aime at a perfect state coÌ„sidering that the other is neyther so auailable for the glory of God vnto whome we should not offer any lame blinde or maimed sacrifice or any imperfect seruice or yet so effectuall for our saluation For although a man may preserue his naturall life with bread and water yet he ought to desire the vse of other creatures seruing for his purpose that he may liue in strength and vigour of bodie and minde Sect. 10. Of a corrupt state of a Church specially of idolatrous worship A Corâ—upt state is whenas in steede of the true and sincere gouernment appointed by God a false gouernment contrary to the word of God hindeâ—â—ng the edification of the Church is publikely established or vsed or whenas some part of the gouerment is corrupted The causes of this estate are these first an imperfect state for the want of any part of the gouernment breedeth corruption For where there is no teaching there must needs be generall ignorance and many errours in iudgement where powerfull exhortation is not vsed there the graces of the spirit belonging to the practise of christianity are wanting and where the censures of the Church are not in force there dissolutenesse in the liues of men must needes preuaile The second cause is the reliques of the former false worship being not wholly abolished the which are like vnto a roote left in the earth and to a wound or sore the which being not wel clensed will fester and send forth much corruption Hence came that corruption of popery to wit from the reliques of Iudaisme and heathenisme and so that leauen hauing once infected the whole lumpe of the Church we knowe that although the substance of it be taken out yet the taste and sowernesse of it doth remaine in many places The kindes of a corrupt state are many as are the parts of the syncere gouernment For the first the ministry of the Church may be many waies out of order as if it be sufficient and destitute of giltes needful or if the manner of execution of it be corrupt as when it is turned into vaine ostentation and to an vnprofitable affection of learning reading wit
of the same ciuill power THus much of the voluntarie coniunction of particular Churches vnder the gouernment of councels now followeth the necessarie coniunction of them so called because it is not in their power to shake off that common authoritie whereunto they are subiect This necessarie coniunction hath place then whenas diuerse particular Churches are tyed together in obedience to the same ciuill authoritie by the which they are ruled as hath beene declared in the former chapter Yea it may be seene almost in all publick Churches the which vsually consist of so great a number of professours as cannot possiblie be contained within the compasse of one Câ—urch for if any one populous citie doe generally professe the gospell it must of necessitie be deuided into diuers particular Churches much more a christian country nation or kingdome cannot but containe in it many particular Churches All which although they haue their proper rulers or teachers and orders as free Churches haue yet they haue also a common gouernment and lawes proceeding from the ciuill power to the obedience whereof they are all bound For in publicke Churches the ciuill power hath the greatest sway in gouerning by the which being one the whole Church and euery particular assembly is brought to a conformitie both in doctrine as also in gouernment yea it is requisite needfull that it should be so for otherwise if euery particular Church did differ from the rest in gouernment the whole Church could not be ordered without great trouble and confusion But yet this common gouernment of the magisâ—â—ate doth not take away the grouernment of particular Churches no more then the councels whereof we haue spoken do from free Churches This is to be done by the authoritie of the ciuill ruler yet by the aduise of others In the choise of whom as it is lawfull for the prince to call or passe ouer whom he thinketh meete or vnmeete so it will be conuenient for the good of the Church the which it is not lawfull for him eyther wholly to neglect or lightly to regard to call of all sortes of men those who are endued with best giftes yet so that some be had out of euery particular Church as if they were free Churches And especially the ministers of the word are to be called for the reasons declared in the former section when they by his authoritie are gathered together he is to take vnto himselfe the ruling of the whole action vnlesse it be needful that he delegate his authoritie to some other and by praying for the blessing of God vpon their consultations declaring the cause of their meeting to begin it Then he is to propound in the first place those wants faults and corruptions of the Ch. which he himselfe hath obserued would haue supplied and taken away to shewe the manner how he thinketh it most meet to be done which being done he is to giue liberty to euery one present to speake their mindes freely of those things which he hath propounded as also of any other thing which they thinke good for the Church that which is agreed vpon doth appeare to al or to the most of them right meete to be decreed he is to establish giuing vnto it the vertue of an ecclesiastical law the which the whole Ch. ought to obey That which cannot be agreed vpon is to be deferred to another time of meeting which ought to be somuch the sooner as the matters controuersed are of greater importance for more mature deliberation with themselues and others will make that cleare and euident which before was doubtfull If there be any thing which neyther can be agreed vpon by the consent of the greater part neither yet deferred without great hurt to the Church the chiefe ruler may with the consent of some of the councell decree and enact that which they thinke needfull to be done Yet he is not to vse this authority in this manner but vpon vrgent necessitie for many inconueniences do follow the enacting of ecclesiasticall laweâ— without the full consent of the councell yea the suspitioÌ„ of tyrannizing ouer the Ch. of God is by al meanes to be auoyded In regard wherof many christian Emperors rulers did resigne their authoritie which they had in gouerning the ch to these councels insomuch that they had the ful power not only of aduising lawes but also of enacting or the giuing vnto them the force of laws But as hath bene shewed this mâ—y easely turne to the hurt of the Ch. and therefore it ought not wholly to bâ— followed yet it sheweth how great regard ciuil rulers ought to haue of the iudgement aduise of those who are godly wise and learned in the ordering of the Churches subiect vnto them And therefore that which the councell thinketh good to be done or the greater part of them ought to be greatly regarded Yet if the chiefe ruler cannot be brought to giue his assent vnto it it cannot haue the force of an ecclesiastical lawe or be imposed vpon the whole Ch. in that name As touching the number wherof any national councel doth consist there caÌ„not any be defined but it must be left to the appointmeÌ„t of the chief ruler to whom the deposing authorizing of this whole action doth belong Yet it ought to be proportionable to the quantity of the Ch. to the number of the particular Churches so that if some be had out of euery one of theÌ„ it wil make the lawes enacted to be much more willingly receaued obeyed whenas it shal be knowen that some of theÌ„ selues did in the name of the rest consent vnto them And especially this is requisite in respect of the chiefe end and vse of these councels both in free and publicke churches whereof we will briefly speake The which is to bring the whole Church to a conformitie of doctrine this is needfull and good to be done and that for these causes first for the repressing of heresies which doe continually arise in the Church For the which purpose the generall consent of the Church is very forcible for eyther the consent and iudgement of the whole Church will be of great waight to take the said heresies out of the mindes of those who doe maintaine them or else the authoritie by which the trueth oppugned is publickly established will be able to remooue the maintainers of them out of the Church Secondly this forme of doctrine agreed vpon by many will be effectuall to strengthen and confirme those who are weake in the faith and not fully grounded in some pointes of christian religion Yea it may be a meanes to helpe forward those who haue not as yet taken vpon them the profession of the gospel Not that we ought to build our faith vpon the authority of men but for that we ought to take from the Church a confirmation of our faith seeing we may be greatly helped and strengthned by this meanes And lastly this forme of