of God procureth divers plagues as here Moses feareth lest the people if they should not offer sacrifice and doe service unto God should be punished Simler So the Apostle affirmeth that the Corinthians were chastised some with sicknesse some with death for unreverent receiving of the Lords supper 1 Cor. 10.30 2. Observ. Many receive the Gospell joyfully at the first but after fall away Vers. 21. THe Lord looke upon you and judge At the first this people when Moses brought them a joyfull message of their deliverance were glad and thankfully received that gladsome tidings chap. 4.31 But now being more vexed and oppressed than before and not seeing their present deliverance they murmure against Moses Such is the propertie of many in these dayes that are content to receive the Gospell as long as it bringeth ease and prosperitie with it but in time of adversitie they fall away Ferus whom our Saviour compareth unto seed sowne in stony ground which as soone as it riseth is parched away with the heate of the sunne Matth. 13.5 3. Observ. The Gospell falsly challenged to be the cause of Gods judgements Vers. 21. YE have put a sword into their hand to slay us They lay the fault upon Moses and Aaron and make them the cause of their trouble So Achab charged the Prophet Elias that he troubled Israel Thus the heathen Idolaters accused the Christians as the causes of the plagues and famines that were in the world as blind superstitious people doe now lay the like imputations upon the Gospell whereas their superstition and Idolatrie procureth Gods judgements Simler 4. Observ. In the time of affliction we must fly unto God by prayer Vers. 22. MOses returned to the Lord c. By which example wee are taught in all our afflictions and necessities to have recourse unto God by prayer as the Apostle prescribeth If any man be afflicted let him pray Iam. 5.13 So the Prophet saith For my friendship they were my adversaries but I gave my selfe unto prayer Psal. 109.4 5. Observ. Some things fall out in shew contrarie to Gods promises in the beginning to trie our faith Vers. 23. ANd yet thou hast not delivered thy people The Lord after he hath made gracious promises to his servants doth suffer some things contrarie thereunto to fall out for the time for the triall of their faith and patience God promiseth unto Abraham to multiplie his seed as the starres of heaven and yet afterward bid him sacrifice his sonne in whom the hope of his seed was So God promised the Israelites prosperous successe against Benjamin yet at the first they were twice overcome David was annointed King in Sauls place yet hee was persecuted of Saul and driven from his countrie for a while but at the length the Lord made good to the full all his promises toward him Perer. CHAP. VI. 1. The Argument and method THis chapter hath two parts the first is a declaration or rehearsall of the charge which the Lord giveth unto Moses which containeth a double commandement or commission the first to goe unto the Israelites to promise them deliverance unto vers 20. The other unto Pharaoh to vers 14. In the former three things are shewed 1. The foundation of the peoples deliverance which consisteth in the power of God vers 3. his promises made to the fathers vers 4. his compassion upon the afflictions of the people vers 6. 2. The promise followeth partly to deliver them out of bondage vers 6.7 partly to bring them into the land of Canaan vers 8. 3. The effect is shewed that the people because they were afflicted hearkened not unto him In the other commission first the Lords commandement is set downe vers 11.2 Then Moses refuâ—â—â— vers 12. 4. The renewing of the commandement In the second generall part by way of digression is inserted the genealogie of Moses who came of Levi wherein first briefly the genealogie of the two elder sonnes of Iacob Ruben and Simeon is set downe vers 14.15 to make a way for Levi. Then the genealogie of Levi is expressed and of his three sonnes of Gershom vers 17. Merari vers 19. of Kohath and of his sonnes Amram of whom came Moses and Aaron who are specially insisted upon vers 25. to the end and of Izzari vers 21. and Vzziel vers 22. 2. The divers readings Vers. 3. I appeard c. in the name of God almightie I.G. in God shaddai V. as an almightie God B. being their God S. but the word name is fitly supplied as the other part of the verse sheweth but in my name Iehovah c. But in my name Iehovah was I not knowne B.G.I.V.A.P. better than my name Adonai H. my name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord. S. Vers. 7. That I Iehovah bring you out from the burdens of the Egyptians B. G. cum caeter rather from being under the burdens A. that ye be not subject to the burdens I. Vers. 8. Which I did lift up my hand to give it A. B. H. better than upon the which I lift up my hand to give it L. S. P. for upon is not in the text or for the which V. for also is added or which with lâ—ft-up hand I sware to give I. I sware is inserted Vers. 12. Gave them a commandement to the children of Israel V. L. I. or commanded them to the children of Israel A. P. better than concerning the children of Israel B. the preposition el signifieth to or then gave them a charge to goe to the children of Israel G. S. to goe is added Vers. 14. Chenoch and pallâ— A.P. rather than Chanoch I. for it is hatephpathah where pathah is assumed to sheva to helpe to pronounce it and it is better expressed with e than a as the Septuag Hanoch so also V.L. for it is expressed with the some points with the other Henoch Gen. 5. and rather than Henoch S.L.V.B.G. for it is written with cheth which is rather expressed with ch than h. Chetzron I. rather than Hesron L. B. or without an aspiration Esron S. or Hetzron V. or Chezron A P. The first letter is cheth which is as much as ch the other tsadi which is expressed by â—z Vers. 16. Kehath I. B. A. P. rather than Caath L. S. or Cahat V. or Kahath G. for it is with sheva which soundeth e. Vers. 18. The yeeres of the life of Kohath I.V.L. cum caeter rather than Kahath lived B. G. Vers. 25. Pinchas I.A.P. not Pinhas V. or Phinees L.S. or Phinehas G. for the middle letter is cheth ch but because of the better sound the last is used Vers. 27. These are they that spake to Pharaoh and in the end of the verse This is that Moses and Aaron I. V. L. S. cum caeter better than these are that Moses and Aaron which spake B. G. Vers. 29. And it was what day the Lord spake I. V. A. P. better than in the day that
that the Lord in sending these things flesh and bread which the people murmured for observeth the same order which they did in their murmuring they first complained for the want of their flesh poâ— and then for the scarcity of bread vers 3. QUEST XI Whether the rocke were first striken to bring out water or the flesh and bread first sent RVpertus here also moveth another doubt out of the 78. Psalme vers 20. Behold hee smote the rocke that the water gushed out c. can he give bread also and prepare flesh for his people For here the Prophet seemeth to invert the order of these miracles that first the rocke was smitten whereout the water gushed and that afterward the flesh and bread was given whereas the striking of the rocke followeth in the next chapter Exod. 17. 1. To this question he answereth by a distinction that Moses report of these miracles is historicall setting downe the order of time wherein they were done but the other in the Psalme is propheticall applied unto Christ the flowing of the waters out of the rocke signifieth the passion of Christ and the baptising into his death the Manna shadowed forth the Eucharist in the eating of his body now first we must be baptised in the name of Christ before we can be partakers of his body and bloud in the Eucharist 2. But wee need not for the dissolving of this question to runne unto any such mysticall sense for the people murmured twice for flesh once in the desert of Sin as is here expressed another time in Kibroth hattavah Num. 11. the first of these murmurings went before the smiting of the rocke in Râ—phidim the other followed after and of the latter speaketh the Prophet here when the Lord sent a fire among the people for their murmuring which was not done now but it happened afterward in the other murmuring as the story is extant Numb 11.1 And of the former sending of Manna and flesh speaketh the Prophet afterward in the same Psalme vers 24. Hee had rained 〈◊〉 Manna c. QUEST XII Why Moses biddeth Aaron to speake to the people and doth it not himselfe Vers. 9. ANd Moses said unto Aaron c. 1. Some thinke that Moses vouchsafeth not to speake unto this unworthy and unthankfull people and therefore appointeth Aaron to speake Pellican But this can be no reason because afterward Moses speaketh unto the people himselfe vers 15. 2. Some thinke that it was Aarons office to speake unto the people for God had made him Moses mouth chap. 4.16 and as Moses Prophet chap. 7.1 But although this order was observed in Egypt that the Lord spake to Moses Moses to Aaron Aaron to Pharaoh and to the Egyptians yet after they were come out of Egypt Moses used himselfe to speake unto the people as appeareth chap. 12.13 and 14. where it is said vers 31. They beleeved the Lord and his servant Moses 3. Therefore this rather was the cause why Moses thus spake unto Aaron because when these words were to be uttered Moses was to be with the Lord when his glory appeared in the cloud this then was the order wherein these things were done hitherto rehearsed in this Chapter First after the people had murmured then the Lord spake to Moses vers 4. which might be betimes in the morning after that Moses and Aaron spake to the people vers 6. then Moses gave that charge to Aaron of speaking further to the people vers â— This being done Moses went unto the place where the Lord appeared in the cloud Tostat. 4. Now Aaron spake unto all the Congregation either in calling the Elders and Rulers together who should speake to the people or else in causing himselfe proclamation to be made and notice to be given to the people which is most like for this might be sooner done and as all the people had murmured so it was fit they should all present themselves before the Lord. Tostat. ibid. QUEST XIII How the people are bid to draw neere before the Lord. Vers. 9. DRaw neere before the Lord. 1. The Lord in respect of his divine essence is every where and not in one place more than in another but by reason of some new effect and extraordinary manifestation of his presence he is said to be rather in one place than in another As here hee is said to bee in the cloud because there hee shewed his glory Tostat. 2. The people are called before the Lord which Pellican understandeth of the assembly and congregation where they should heare the Lords Prophets speake unto them but it is rather understood of Gods presence in the cloud that all the people should come forth of their tents and turne themselves toward the wildernesse and so behold the glory of God which appeared unto them as followeth in the tenth verse Tostat. Iun. For as yet there was neither Arke nor Tabernacle where they should appeare before the Lord. Simlerus QUEST XIV What cloud it was wherein the Lord appeared Vers. 10. THe glory of the Lord appeared in the cloud 1. Some thinke that this was not that cloud whereby the Lord directed the journeyes of his people but another because that cloud stood over the hoast but this was toward the wildernesse but this is no good argument for that cloud which did lead them went before them sometime neerer sometime further off 2. Others thinke that this was the cloud which rested upon Moses Tabernacle before the great Tabernacle was made which is mentioned chap. 33.7 but this is uncertaine Ex Tostat. 3. Therefore without further question it was none other cloud than that which was their guid which in the day was a cloudy piller in the night a piller of fire which was an evident testimony of Gods presence Iun. Oleaster Yet it is to be thought Gloriam Dei in solitâ— modo patefactam c. That the glory of God was manifested otherwise than it 〈◊〉 that iâ— in a more fearefull manner the more to terrifie the people Calvin Simler QUEST XV. When the Lord thus spake to Moses Vers. 11. FOr the Lord had spoken to Moses c. 1. Some thinke that Moses after he had given Aaron charge to speake to the people and was gone to appeare before the Lord that then the Lord spake thus to Moses which words he returning againe delivered to the people Tostat. But here is no mention that Moses spake those words in this place to the people only it is said The Lord spake or had spoken 2. Therefore it is the better opinion that the Lord had thus spoken unto Moses before he spake thus unto the people vers 6 7. but here it is expressely mentioned to shew Moses faithfulnesse that hee delivered nothing to the people but what he had received from God for here the very same words almost are rehearsed which Moses before had uttered to the people it is therefore better expressed in the prâ—terpluperfect tense
sinne of idolatrie as Tostatus confesseth that he sinned Nec tamen sequitur ex hoc quòd fuit idololatra and yet it followeth not hereupon that he was an idolater for howsoever Aaron thought in his heart the verie making of an idoll to be worshipped erecting of an altar and offering sacrifice unto it all which Aaron did doe proclaime him guiltie of externall idolatrie QUEST LXII Why idolatrie is called a great sinne THis great sinne 1. Idolatrie is counted a great sinne even in the highest degree because it is a sinne committed directly against God not as other sinnes of the second table which are done against our neighbour which are also against God because they are against his Law but not directly against Gods honor as the sins against the first table are 2. And among all the sins of the first table there is none which so directly impugneth the honour of God as idolatrie for he which taketh Gods name in vaine or prophaneth the Sabbath is an enemie to Gods honour but yet such an one denieth not the Lord to bee God as idolaters doe Tostat. qu. 33. 3. Like as then in a Common-wealth all offences are against the King because they are against his Lawes but those which are against his person are most directly against him and among them treason specially which is intended against his life of the same nature is idolatrie which is high treason against God 4. Thomas saith Tantum est aliquod peccatum gravius quanto longius per ipsum homo à Deo separatur A sinne is so much the more grievous the further wee are thereby removed from God but by infidelitie and idolatrie one is furthest separated from God 5. Idolatrie also is a great and grievous sinne in regard of the judgement and punishment which it bringeth with it for here Aaron as much as in him lay aâ—â—er fit ultimam cladem had brought upon them utter destruction Calvin if Moses had not turned the Lords wrath they had all beene at once destroyed QUEST LXIII Why Moses onely rebuketh Aaron and forbeareth further punishment NOw that Moses spared Aaron from further punishment and onely rebuked him 1. Some make this to be the cause for that the Lord had revealed unto Moses Aarons sinne in the mount before he came downe at what time Moses prayed also for him seeing the Lord bent to kill him Tostat. qu. â—5 But that intreatie for Aaron was afterward at Moses second going up to God when hee fasted fortie dayes and fortie nights as before at that time he saith he prayed for Aaron Deut. 9.20 And seeing at this time the Lord purposed to destroy all the nation and so Aaron could not escape Moses now onely prayed in generall for all Israel that God would not destroy the whole nation 2. Others thinke that Moses did after a milde manner reprove Aaron quiae sic arguendi praelati because Prelates and Ecclesiasticall Governours are so to be reproved Ferus he thinketh he was now the high Priest So also Oleaster calleth him Pontificem summum the chiefe Priest But as yet Aaron was not consecrated as Lippoman inferreth upon these reasons Quia non illi improperatur conspâ—râ—atum sacerdotium He is not upbraided with defiling of his Priesthood by this meanes neither doe we read of his reconciliation afterward which should not have beene omitted in such a case of irregularitie 3. Procopius thinketh that Aaron was both spared at this time and afterward likewise when he repined against Moses cum propter alias causas tum propter sanctos ex ejus lumbis prodituros Both for other causes as also for those holy mens sakes which should come out of his loynes But if this had beene the reason all the tribes should have beene spared likewise because out of all of them came holy and worthy men Judges Prophets or Kings 4. But the causes rather were these 1. Aaron confessed his sinne and therefore Moses inclined to favour him 2. Moses afterward intreated the Lord for him and the Lord at his instance forgiving his sinne the punishment also was remitted Simler 3. Adde hereunto that Aaron was now appointed to be high Priest order was taken for his priestly apparell and his office what it should be and how he and his sonnes should bee consecrated all which had beene in vaine if Aaron now had perished 4. Beside Moses had direction from God to put divers of the people to the sword for this offence but for Aaron hee had no such commandement 5. But Augustine yeeldeth the best reason Novit ille cui parcat c. God onely knoweth whom to spare for amendment and whom not to spare at all or for a time for his wayes and judgements are past finding out qu. 148. 5. Now whereas Tostatus further reasoneth that Moses by all likelihood had prayed for Aaron in the mount because then the Lord did specially reveale unto him his sinne for otherwise Moses had knowne nothing of Aarons doings as he did as it appeareth by this reprehension it may be answered that it is not necessarie for this cause to presuppose any such notice to have beene given unto Moses in the mount for either Moses might by examination and inquirie after hee came downe learne out the truth or which is rather like Moses Aaronem vicarium constituerat had left Aaron his deputie governour when he went up into the mount Simler and therefore he was sure that such a thing could not bee attempted in the host without Aarons permission at the least and sufferance QUEST LXIV What things are to be commended in Aarons confession what not Vers. 22. THen Aaron answered c. 1. Some things are to be commended here in Aarons confession 1. His modestie that being Moses elder brother yet hee calleth him Lord and submitteth himselfe unto him whereof these two reasons may be yeelded both because Moses was greater in office than Aaron both as a Prophet and Governour of Israel Tostat. qu. 32. and his owne conscience accused him agnoscebat sejure argui he knew he was worthily reproved 2. Aaron confesseth and acknowledgeth his fault in saying Let not the wrath of my Lord waâ— fâ—erce Agnoscit crimen hee therein yeeldeth himselfe to be in fault Borrh. 3. He maketh a full and large declaration of the manner rem gestam liberè confiâ—etur he freely openeth all the matter how it was done Pelarg. both what the people required and upon what reason and ground what he did and what came thereof rem ut gesta est simpliciter narraâ— he simply declareth the matter as it was done 2. But Aaron in some things sheweth his infirmitie 1. Peccatum culpam in alios trajicere studet Hee seeketh to turne over the sinne and offence upon others laying the fault upon the people Ferus 2. Aaron bewrayeth some hypocrisie that seeketh to extenuate his fault as much as he can being afraid nâ— aliquid de existimatione sua decodat lest he should lose any
swearing by his holinesse goodnesse c. doth pledge them that unlesse that be which he saith he will lose them and swearing by himselfe he bindeth his Godhead for the performance as though he should say in effect If this be not let me be no more God Calvin QVEST. XXI Why the Lord tooke an oath BUt further it will be asked what need God had to take an oath seeing the word of God is certaine of it selfe and need no confirmation and an oath is used in doubtfull cases but to God nothing is doubtfull or uncertaine an oath is used when the party cannot be credited without an oath but Abraham did beleeve God The answer then is this 1. The Lord sweareth not to any such end as though any more credit and certainty by his oath might bee wonne unto his promise 2. And yet wee take not this to bee a metaphoricall speech onely with Cajetan that God is said to sweare by himselfe 3. But the Lord taketh an oath ad ampliorem confirmationem fidei nostra for the better confirmation of our faith and hee doth it the Apostle saith ex abundanti more abundantly to shew the stablenesse of his counsell Heb. 6.17 Calvin 4. Where we may note the differences betweene this oath and other oathes 1. God taketh this oath willingly not forced thereto of any necessity 2. He sweareth by himselfe as having not a greater to sweare by and Philo sheweth the reason Solus de seipso asseverare potest quia solus ipse suam novit naturam He only can beare witnesse of himselfe because he only knoweth his owne nature 3. He also further saith Sententiae nostra ex juramento fides accedit ipsi juramento ex ipso Deo fides astruitur Our sentence is credited because of our oath but this oath is beleeved because of God that taketh it QUEST XXII Whether the promises here made are new or the old renewed Vers. 18. IN thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed 1. It is of all hands confessed that the other three promises were made unto Abraham before 1. That Abraham should be blessed Genes 12.2 2. That his seed should be multiplied as the starres and as the sand of the sea Genes 13.16 3. That his seed should possesse the gate of his enemies which is in effect the same with that Genes 13.12 all this land will I give thee c. God promised Abraham the land of the Canaanites which were his enemies 2. But Ambrose thinketh that this was a new blessing containing a promise of the Messiah lib. 1. de Abraham c. 8. Paulus Burgensis confirmeth the same by these reasons because Saint Paul rehearseth this as a speciall blessing concerning Christ urging these words in thy seed which are onely found here and the Lord confirmeth this by an oath as Zachary in his song maketh mention of this oath which hee sware to our father Abraham Luke 1.73 3. But these reasons are easily answered 1. Saint Paul citeth rather that promise made Genes 12.3 in thee shall all the Gentiles be blessed Galath 3.8 for hee speaketh of that promise which was made 430. yeares before the law which must needs be that former given to Abraham at the 75. yeare of his age but there will want 50. yeares of that summe if the account should begin at this time when Abraham was 125. yeares old And whereas Saint Paul also alludeth unto this place v. 16. and thy seed and so expoundeth one place by another he sheweth that in effect they are both but one promise 2. The adding of the oath maketh it not a new promise but confirmeth onely the former otherwise by this reason all these promises should be newly made seeing the oath goeth before them all and indeed not onely this promise of the Messiah but the other also concerning the possessing of the land of Canaan was ratified by an oath Exod. 13.5 Perer. 4. Wherefore here is no other promise made to Abraham but such as he had heard before but the same more amply and fully confirmed by an oath and againe renued both to Abraham and Isaack in which two respects this promise is more excellent than the former Calvin QUEST XXIII How Saint Paul applieth this word Seed only to Christ. 3 to the Galath HEre by the way it shall not be amisse to explane that place of Saint Paul Galath 3.16 where the Apostle presseth the word seed shewing that because he saith seed not seeds it must bee referred to one namely Christ. The Jewes doe make two principall objections against this place 1. They urge that this word metaphorically taken for the of-spring of men is a nowne collective never used in the plurall number but put in the singular only signifieth a multitude as likewise doth the word populus vulgus people commonalty c. Answer 1. True it is that the word Zeraugh in the singular number doth often signifie a multitude but sometime in Scripture it is restrained to one as Gen. 4.25 the name of seed is given to Seth the Lord hath appointed me another seed for Habel Genes 21.13 Ismael is called Abrahams seed Wherefore it is not enough to say that this word in the singular is sometime taken for a multitude unlesse they could shew it so to be used here Beza 2. The Apostle then being not ignorant of the phrase and usage of the Hebrew tongue doth not contend about the word but the sense that the word seed in this place is not taken for seeds that is many but for seed that is one specially Perer. 21. They object further that whereas it is said In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed this is but a forme of blessing by way of comparison like to that Gen. 48.20 God make thee as Ephraim c. Ans. 1. If this speech did onely shew a forme not the cause of blessing it need not have beene said in thy seed but in thee that is Abraham God make thee like Abraham 2. Where such formes of blessing are used they are restrained to Israel as in the place alleaged Gen. 48. In thee Israel shall blesse but here all nations shall bee blessed how should it come to passe that all nations should not blesse themselves but bee blessed but in being called to the knowledge of God which is by Christ wherefore these words shew the cause of blessing not the forme Calvin Now then their objections being thus answered I will shew the right meaning of the Apostle 1. I first reject Hieromes collection reproved by Erasmus Paulum hoc argumento abusum apud crassos Galataâ— that Paul abuseth this argument having to doe with the dull Galathians for it becommeth us not so to think of so grave an Apostle writing by the Spirit of God 2. Neither is it enough to say that Paul by the same Spirit whereby Moses did write did understand him to speake of Christ Cajetan in 3. ad Galat. for Paul having
to deale with the gain-saying Jewes would not so much stand upon his Apostolike illumination neither would they rest upon it 3. Neither is the word seed taken here not singularly for the person of Christ but collectively for the whole spirituall seed of Abraham the people of God consisting of the Jewes and Gentiles Beza for this sense seemeth to bee coact and not proper and the Apostle himselfe denieth it to bee understood of many but of one 4. Neither doth Saint Paul ground his argument upon the received opinion and confession of the Jewes which hee was experienced in being brought up under the feet of Gamaliel who all generally did hold this promise of blessing in Abrahams seed to be understood of the Messiah Perer. for thus the Apostles reasoning should be inverted and that made his conclusion which is his argument for the Apostle doth not reason thus This place is referred to the Messiah Ergo he saith not seeds but seed But thus rather standeth his argument In saying seed not seeds hee meaneth but one Ergo the Messiah that is Christ. 5. Wherefore if the Apostles words bee thorowly weighed and examined he enforceth two conclusions in this one sentence the first is that this place out of Moses must needs be interpreted not of all Abrahams seed confusedly but of some one specially the other is that this being evicted that the Lord in this promise speaketh but of one it will follow of necessity that this one must be Christ. For the first that Abrahams seed is not understood promiscuè for all his seed the Jewes themselves could not deny for this seed was first restrained to Isaack and Ismael excluded then in Isaack it was assigned to Iacob and Esau refused in Iacob this seed was singled out in Iuda when the other tribes were carried into captivity and never returned therefore seed here cannot bee taken for many but wee must still proceed in descending till we come to one in whom this blessing is performed Calvin For the second that this one must be Christ it will necessarily follow because none else can be named in whom all the Gentiles received this blessing for that place Psal. 72.17 All nations shall blesse him and be blessed in him cannot be understood of Salomon who was so farre from procuring a blessing to all nations that he brought a curse upon his owne nation and posterity when for his idolatry a rent was made in the Kingdome the smallest part falling to the share of his sonne Rehoboam And beside this Psalme is a propheticall song of Christ under the type of Salomon as vers 5. They shall â—eare him as long as the Sunne and Moone endureth vers 11. All Kings shall worship him vers 17. His name shall endure for ever These sayings cannot be uttered of Salomon or any other mortall man but onely are true of the Lord Messiah There being then none else found by whom the Gentiles were spiritually blessed in being called from their filthy idolatry to the knowledge and worship of the true God in being lightned with Scriptures brought to the acknowledgement and so remission of their sinnes but onely Christ none else in whom they beleeve whose name is blessed among them Who can this else bee but Jesus Christ the Messiah And thus it is evident that the Apostle hath reasoned strongly from this place that salvation commeth not by the Law but by faith in Christ which is the thing the Apostle in this place intendeth to prove QUEST XXIII Whether Abrahams obedience or Isaacks patience were more notable IT may seeme that Isaacks obedience in yeelding himselfe willingly to death was more excellent and worthy of note than Abrahams because it is a greater patience to suffer death for Gods cause than to inferre it Isaack also should have felt the sorrowes and pangs of death in his body which Abraham was onely to behold Notwithstanding these reasons Abrahams example of obedience excelled 1. Because he was to sacrifice his onely most beloved and innocent sonne which was no doubt more grievous unto him than if he had died himselfe 2. Isaacks death came unlooked for it should have beene finished at once Abrahams griefe as it pierced his heart three continuall dayes before so the remembrance of this fact would have continued still 3. The Scripture giveth sentence with Abraham which maketh mention in this place and others beside of Abrahams offering up of Isaack but ascribeth no part thereof to Isaack Now because that example of the King of Moab which offered up the King of Edoms sonne in sacrifice and not his owne as the common opinion is may be thought to resemble Abrahams fact here it shall not be amisse briefly to examine that place as it is set downe 2 King 3.27 QUEST XXIV Whether the King of Moab sacrificed his sonne and wherefore FIrst then 1. Neither is it like that the King of Moab having learned of his Priests that God prospered Israel because of Abrahams faith which doubted not to offer his sonne as Lyranus therefore he attempted to doe the like for at this time the Israelites did not so greatly prosper the kingdome being divided because of the idolatry of Salomon and diversly afflicted and the King of Moab offered not his owne son but the King of Edoms as it is expounded by Amos 2.1 For three transgressions I will not turne to Moab c. because it burnt the bones of the King of Edom as lime 2. Neither did the King of Moab this by the advice of the Priests after the example of Israel because they used to offer up their sons to Molech thinking to please the God of Israel hereby Burgens For the Israelites rather learned this idolatrous use of the Gentiles and the Israelites prospered not but were punished of God for such impieties 3. Nor yet did the King of Moab this to move the Israelites to commiseration when they should see to what misery and necessity he was brought to offer such a bloudy sacrifice as Tostat. and Vatab. for he did it rather to despight them as shall even now appeare 4. Nor yet did he offer this sacrifice only with an intent thereby to appease his gods and to procure their help which opinion indeed the heathen had of such wicked and devillish offerings Cajetan Perer. 5. But it is most likely that the King of Moab assaying to breake thorow to the King of Edom and could not tooke the Kings sonne of Edom that was to reigne after him and therefore is called the King of Edom Amos 2.1 and sacrificed him in the sight of his father to his great griefe Iunius QUEST XXV What was the cause of the indignation against Israel SEcondly where it followeth thus For that Israel was sore grieved and they departed from him or there was great indignation against Israel 1. This is not referred to the indignation or wrath of God as though the Lord should be offended with Israel sent a plague amongst them
died suddenly in the way and he had no time to carry her thither being in his journey Iacob had no need to make any such excuse to Ioseph ex Mercer 2. But these reasons may be yeelded why Iacob bringeth in mention hereof 1. To call to Iosephs remembrance that Rachel forsooke her fathers house and sojourned with Iacob in Canaan that Ioseph might hereby be stirred up to be willing much more to leave Egypt which was not his country Calvin 2. As also that hee might have a greater desire to the place of his mothers sepulture 3. Further in that Iacob buryed her in the way being so neare to the city because he would not bury her among Idolaters by the way he admonisheth Ioseph to detest the Idolatry of Egypt 4. But the cheifest reasons of the mentioning of this matter are one that seeing Rachel died leaving no great issue behinde her Iacob hopeth that Gods promise for the multiplying of his seed should be fulfilled in these two Mercer The other that seeing Ioseph was the eldest by his principall wife Iacob might shew how justly the birth-right was translated from Ruben to Ioseph and his sonnes Iun. QUEST IV. Why Iacob knew not Ephraim and Manasseh at the first and why Ioseph removeth them Vers. 12. ANd Ioseph tooke them away from his knees 1. Whereas Iacob before vers 8. asked who they were namely Manasseh and Ephraim it was not for that Iacob foreseeing that wicked Ieroboam should come of Ephraim and Iehu of Manasseh did therefore at the first take no knowledge of them but deferred his blessing as some Hebrewes imagine but the cause is shewed vers 10. because Iacobs eies were dim and he could not well see 2. Iacob caused them to be brought neere him that he might imbrace them they were not set upon the bed for they were some 22. or 23. yeares old being borne in the yeares of plenty some 4. or 5. yeares before Iacob came downe into Egypt who had beene there now 17. yeares 3. Ioseph tooke them not from his owne knees but from his fathers as the Latine text readeth though in the originall it be from his knees not his fathers knees that he might place them in order to receive their fathers blessing Mercer for Ioseph might perceive either by the naming of Ephraim before Manasseh or by Iacobs imbracing them that he more inclined to Ephraim before Manasseh and therefore with Iacobs leave removeth a little and presenteth them againe according to their age Iun. QUEST V. Of the translating of the birth-right from Manasseh to Ephraim what it signifieth Vers. 14. ISrael stretched out his right hand and laid it upon Ephraims head 1. Iacob feeling with his hands which was the elder and bigger for the words are he caused his hands to understand of purpose laid his right hand upon Ephraim in signe of preheminence Iun. for although among the Persians the left hand was the more honourable place as Xenophon reporteth of Cyrus that those whom he honoured most he placed at his left hand because it was most subject to danger yet the phrase and use of Scripture is otherwise as Salomon caused his mother to sit upon his right hand 1 King 2. And this is agreeable to nature to give the preheminence to the right hand which is quicker nimbler and readier for any worke Perer. 2. Iacob here transferreth the birthright from Manasseh to Ephraim as it was before conveyed from Esau to Iacob as the priesthood was translated from Abiathar to Zadock the regall dignitie from Saul to David so here there is a translation of the birthright 3. Which as it sheweth that God bestoweth his gifts without respect of persons so it might prefigure the calling of the Gentiles in stead of the Iewes who were as the eldest brother as the parable of the prodigall childe sheweth Luke 15. QUEST VI. The Angell that protected Iacob whether hee were Christ. Vers. 26. THe Angell 1. Although it â—ee somewhat too curious out of this place to prove the Trinitie because God is twice mentioned and the Angell in the third place 2. Yet I thinke rather with Calvin and Iunius that the Angell was Christ than with Mercerus that it was an Angell to whom Iacob ascribeth his deliverance as to Gods minister and that for these reasons 1. Because it is not unusuall in scripture to call Christ an Angell Malach. 1.1 2. The Angell which conducted the Israelites is called Iehovah Exod. 14.19 24. Saint Paul saith he was Christ 1 Cor. 10.4 9. 3. Because Christ was the Mediatour from the beginning of reconciliation and of all those covenants made betweene God and man Calvin 4. In this place this Angell is joyned in equall power of blessing with God and therefore hee cannot be any of the created Angels Iun. 3. Though Christ appeared in the forme and shape of an Angell yet hee tooke not upon him the nature of Angels but of man as the Angels appeared in the shape of men yet hee tooke not their nature Calvin QUEST VII The great increase of Ephraim and Manasseh Vers. 20. IN thee Israel shall blesse c. 1. Here Israel is taken not for the proper name of Iacob but for the name of the whole nation that came of him which hee saw by the spirit of prophecie should be given to his posteritie 2. In thee is not here taken casually as the Lord said to Abraham in thee shall all the families of the earth be blessed for Christ of Abraham was the cause and author of this blessing But it is only a forme of blessing which should be taken up in Israel the Lord blesse thee as Ephraim and Manasseh as the like is used Ruth 4.11 The Lord make the wife that commeth into thy house like Rachel and Leah 3. And indeed Ephraim and Manasseh increased abundantly in Egypt even as the fish as Iacob blessed them for at the going forth of Israel out of Egypt there were of Manasseh 42700. of Ephraim 32500. and al these perishing in the wildernesse there were at their entring into Canaan of Ephraim 42500. of Manasseh 32200. Muscul. so that in the space of 215. yeares there sprang out of Ioseph 75200. QUEST VIII What portion of ground it was that Iacob giveth to Ioseph Vers. 22. I Have given unto thee one portion above thy brethren 1. This portion was Sechem which neither is to bee understood spiritually that as Iacob gave Ioseph that place where hee buried the Idols Genes 35.4 So Christ should possesse the Gentiles that worshipped Idols so Augustine qu. 167. in Genes 2. Neither was it the citie only of Sechem which Iacob here giveth as Chrysost. hom 67 in Genes For Iacobs sons kept their sheep in Sechem Gen. 37.12 and so also possessed the grounds and fields belonging to the citie 3. Neither did hee only give that plat of ground which hee bought for 100. peeces of money Gen. 33.19 as Hierom. tradition Hebraic For that seemed to be no great circuit
untimely death or sicknesse it seemeth not unpossible that such a number by ordinarie meanes in the circuite of 215. yeeres might be multiplied for seventie persons in thirtie yeeres if they beget every one but one in a yeere will have 2100. Cut off the odde hundred and admit that the third part onely of the other number was apt for generation that is sixe hundred which make 300. couples or mariages those will beget in thirtie yeeres more which is the 60. yeere from their comming into Egypt nine thousand the third part hereof three thousand maketh fifteene hundred couples which having but every yeere one will beget the next thirtie yeeres which makes 90. in all 45000. hereof the third part 15000. will make 7400. couples leaving the odde hundred which will beget by the 12. yeere 222000. the third part whereof 74000. maketh 37000. couples and will beget by the 150. yeere 1110000 the third part hereof 370000. maketh 185000. mariages which will beget the next thirtie yeeres by the 180. yeere 5550000. whereof the third part 185000. which maketh beside the five odde thousand 920000. mariages which will beget by the 210. yeere 27600000. that is 27. thousand sixe hundred thousand Simler Though herein no miracle be admitted yet could it not be done without the exceeding blessing of God especially that notwithstanding their cruell bondage and sore labour yet they multiplied without number Perer. Somewhat about this time the children of Ephraim being increased went against the men of Gath to take away their cattell but presuming before the time they were slaine and Ephraim mourned for them 1 Chron. 7.21 Osiander QUEST VII Who this new King was that knew not Ioseph Vers. 8. THere arose a new King in Egypt 1. This new King was neither an Assyrian borne as Cajetano conjectureth upon these words of Isay chap. 52.4 My people went downe into Egypt to sojourne there and Asshur oppressed them without cause but the Prophet in this place toucheth both the oppressions of the Israelites in Egypt and under Asshur neither in the Egyptian Chronicles was there any Assyrian King either before Moses or for a thousand yeeres after till the reigne of Cambises the Persian 2. Neither could this King be Mephres in whose ninth yeere Ioseph should die and the bondage of Israel begin as Vincentius For seeing all the Patriarkes were dead before their affliction began of which number Levi elder than Ioseph by foure yeeres lived 137. yeeres Exod. 6. and so survived Ioseph who died at 110. yeeres 23. yeeres then could not Mephres be this King that began to reigne before Ioseph died 3. Neither was this King Ramesses as some thinke because one of the cities which the Israelites built was called by that name for Ramesses was King of Egypt in the time of the Trojane warre Plin. lib. 36. cap. 8. which was three hundred yeeres after the death of Moses if he reigned in Egypt in the time of Deborah as thinketh Eusebius he was 140. yeeres after Moses 4. But it is more probable that this King was Amemphis in whose 18. yeere Eusebius thinketh Moses was borne so also Hierome in Chronicis some call him Memnon the speaking stone whose image did use to speake at the Sunnes rise and so continued untill Christ Perer. Simler QUEST VIII Why this Pharaoh is called a new King HE is called a new King because he came of another family Ioseph or for that he brought in a new kind of government altering and changing the lawes as the Chalde Paraphrast and ruling after his owne pleasure Simler He knew not Ioseph either being borne after his time or having forgotten his benefits as Darius had Mardoches faithfulnesse Esther 6. Iunius Wherein his great ingratitude appeared for two great benefits Ioseph had procured one in generall in saving the whole land in the time of the famine the other to the Crowne in annexing to it the fift part of the revenewes of Egypt Perer. As also herein Iosephs modestie appeared that did not in his long time of honour which continued 80. yeeres raise up an honourable and wealthie state to his posteritie seeing his house was so soone obscured but as is most like he and his sonnes joyned themselves unto their brethren not hunting after the wealth of Egypt where they knew they were but strangers Simlerus QUEST IX The causes of the affliction of the Israelites Vers. 10. COme let us worke wisely with them c. 1. There were three causes why the Egyptians consulted to oppresse the Israelites first they envied their happinesse and prosperitie for God every way blessed them then they hated them for their religion in which regard the Hebrewes were an abomination to the Egyptians for they sacrificed those beasts which the Egyptians worshipped see Gen. 46.34 and Exod. 8.26 Thirdly they were afraid of them lest they should joyne with their enemies and rebell against them Perer. 2. And three things they feared lest they might take part with their enemies or rebell by their owne strength or make an escape out of the land Iun. They feared all these joyntly and every one in particular therefore it is better read disjunctively see before in the divers readings 3. They worke wisely or cunningly câ—â—ftily for so the word Chacham is taken both in the good bad part not as the Hebrewes imagine because they would not destroy them with the sword or fire lest God might be revenged of them in the same kind but devised by the water to destroy them whereby the Lord promised never to destroy the world againe but their craft is seene in attempting divers wayes to keepe them under that if they prevailed not by one meanes they might by another and in respect of themselves they worke wisely providing both for their owne securitie and for their profit in the service of the Israelites Simler Likewise they opprest them cunningly that they might not be accused of open and manifest tyrannie Osiander 4. Iosephus alleageth another cause of this affliction that about that time one of the Egyptian Priests foretold unto the King of one that should be borne who when hee once came to yeeres should worke much harme to the Egyptians and greatly exalt the people of Israel lib. 2. antiquit cap. 5. But this being his conjecture no such thing here insinuated by Moses may be more safely rejected than credited QUEST X. Of the hard affliction of the Israelites 12. THerefore they did set taskmasters over them c. 1. Divers wayes were the Israelites most grievously oppressed in Egypt 1. Philo writeth that they were caused to carrie burthens above their strength that they were forced to worke night and day that the same were constrained to be both workmen and servers they were employed in making brick digging and building insomuch that many of them died under their burthens and were not suffered to be buried and beside the most cruell men were set to be their taskmasters Phil. lib. 1. de vita Mosis
the first common and usuall as a signe of griefe and mourning as David came to Jerusalem barefoote 2. Sam. 15.30 The second civill as by putting off the shooe they signified the yeelding up of their right as it is prescribed Deut. 25.9 and practised Ruth 4.7 The third was religious which betokened the putting off of earthly carnall thoughts and the preparing of the minde for spirituall things Iun. in Analys 2. This putting off the shooes 1. some say was commanded Moses that he thereby should sanctifie that place by making bare his feete but the place was holy already because of Gods presence the place was not holy because Moses put off his shooes but because it was holy Moses is bid to put off his shooes 2. Ambrose thus applieth it that because the shooes are made of the skinnes of dead beasts Moses should put off all feare of death for feare whereof hee fled at the first time from Pharaoh 3. Cyprian would have thereby signified that Moses by putting off his shooes doth not challenge any right in the spouse of the Church but resigneth it to Christ the head and husband thereof for this was the custome that the next kinsman by putting off the shooe did surrender his right in the brothers wife deceased unto the next after him Ruth 4. 3. Because the putting on of the shooes did betoken haste as the Israelites were commanded to eat the Passeover with their shooes upon their feete therefore the putting them off betokeneth the contrarie not in haste but with due preparation Moses should approach Perer. 4. But the most likely signification is that all carnall thoughts set apart Moses should draw neere with reverence and spirituall preparation Ferus as into the house of God Eccle. 4 17. QUEST X. Why the Lord called himselfe the God of Abraham Isaac and Iacob Vers. 6. I Am the God of thy father the God of Abraham the God of Isaac and the God of Iacob 1. By thy father he meaneth Amram shewing that he was the God of them and of their seed and of all Israel being mindfull of his promise made to their fathers Simlerus 2. Abraham Isaac and Iacob are here named not so much in regard of their sanctity and excellent vertues for Abel Enoch and Noah were holy men in their time but for these causes are they especially named 1. Because to them specially were the promises made touching the land of Canaan 2. They were the next and immediate fathers of Israel 3. To them God more fully revealed himselfe and shewed his counsell 4. And principally for that those Patriarks had most evident prophesies of the Messiah as Abraham Gen. 22.18 that all the earth should be blessed in his seed and the same promise was renewed to Isaac Gen. 26.4 Iacob also prophesieth of the comming of the Messiah under the name of Shiloh 5. These three Patriarks are named to shew the efficacie of Gods promise made unto them the time now approching when they should see the accomplishment thereof Perer. 3. The name of God is thrice repeated and set before Abraham Isaac and Iacob both to expresse the mysterie of the Trinitie and to shew the speciall and particular care that God had of each of them being a gratious God unto them all and because unto them all were the promises made the certainty whereof by this repetition is insinuated Pererius QUEST XI Why Moses hid his face Vers. 6. THen Moses hid his face 1. For these causes wee find in Scripture that men have used to hide them for feare as Adam hid himselfe in Paradise for shamefastnesse as Rebeckah covered her selfe with the vaile when she saw Isaac Gen. 24. for reverence and humility as Elias covered his face when the Lord spake unto him 1. King 19. for weaknesse and impotencie as Moses face was covered from the Israelites because they were not able to behold the glory of his countenance Exod. 34. Perer. 2. For two of these causes Moses here covereth his face first as being guilty of his owne infirmity and weaknesse as being not able to behold the exceeding great glory of God as also of reverence Piscator 3. Moses is not mentioned here in direct words to have prayed or worshipped as wee read of others the servants of God when the Lord appeared unto them not that Moses either being astonished forgat it or disabled himselfe as not worthy but he inwardly in his soule adored the divine Majesty as the humility of his externall behaviour sheweth Simler QUEST XII How this text is alleaged by our Saviour in the Gospell to prove the resurrection of the dead NOw whereas our Saviour Christ Matth. 22. Mark 12. and Luk 20. alleageth this divine testimony I am the God of Abraham c. and inferreth thereupon he is the God of the living and not of the dead and so convinceth the Sadduces that held there was no resurrection the question is seeing that this scripture proveth onely the immortality of the soule which some of the Philosophers held and yet beleeved not the resurrection how this place was applied by our Saviour to prove the resurrection of the body First then it may bee answered that seeing Abraham Isaac and Iacob being departed out of this world are said to bee living unto God and these names were given unto them as consisting of soule and body this place sheweth that both their soules doe live actually with God and their bodies also in hope not being dead but onely asleepe Ireneus lib. 4. cap. 11. so also Chrysostome in 22. cap. Mat. 2. Some answer that by necessarie consequent the mortality of the soule being granted the resurrection of the body must follow because the soule naturally hath a desire to the body and cannot have true and full happinesse untill the bodie which was partaker of the labours and travels of this life with the soule bee made fellow also with it in joy which reason moved some of the Philosophers as the Pythagoreans and Platonists which held the soule to be immortall to dreame of the remigration and returne of the soule to the body thinking it impossible that the soule should for ever bee separated from the body sic Thomas lib. 4. contra Gent cap. 79. 3. But the best solution of all is Hieromes that against the Sadduces who denied the resurrection of the body onely for that they beleeved not the immortality of the soule it was a strong argument to convince them of error in denying the resurrection to take away the ground of their error in proving by this text the living and being of the soule this also is the solution of Cajetane QUEST XIII Why our Saviour specially urgeth this place against the Saduces FUrther though out of the old Testament divers other places might be alleaged more pregnant at the first sight than this to prove the resurrection of the dead as Hierome doth specially note that place Iob. 19. I know my redeemer liveth yet our Saviour
though hee were rude in speech yet he was not so in knowledge 2. Cor. 11.6 the power of S. Pauls speech consisted not in eloquence of words but in the wisdome of the spirit so Moses though defective in the manner of elocution yet might speake with gravity and wisdome and so bee powerfull in words 9. Wherefore notwithstanding this or what else is objected the most probable opinion is that Moses had some naturall impediment of speech as appeareth both by his owne excuse by the Lords answer by the coadjutorship of Aaron his brother an eloquent man vers 14. and because Moses after this saith he was a man of uncircumcised lips and whereas he saith here nor since thou hast spoken to thy servant his meaning is that if at this time when God spake unto him who was able to take away all impediment of speech yet his infirmity remained much more was it like afterward to continue Iunius QUEST VIII How God is said to make the deafe and dumbe Vers. 11. WHo hath made the dumb or the deafe 1. Wee refuse here the fables of the Hebrewes that when Pharaoh had appointed one to kill Moses he was striken blind that he could not see Moses and Pharaoh became both deafe and dumbe that though he espied Moses escape yet hee could not speake to have him stayed but it is evident by the story that Moses fled before hee was apprehended The Lord here speaketh in generall not of any one dumbe or deafe but that as hee sendeth these infirmities upon man so also hee is able to heale them 2. And although these infirmities are evill in respect of nature yet God is the author of them because they are good also in respect of the end which is to humble man and bring him to repentance and to set forth the glory of God as our Saviour saith of the blind man that his blindnesse came that the workes of God might be shewed upon him Simler QUEST IX How and wherefore the Lord was present with Moses mouth Vers. 12. I Will be with thy mouth 1. Although Moses was no eloquent man in outward speech as humane eloquence is accounted yet there was in him a grave and divine eloquence such as the Apostles were endued with the Lord promiseth the assistance of his spirit and to bee present with his mouth 2. But the impediment of his tongue the Lord doth not altogether take away both that Gods glory and power might appeare and that Moses should see how needfull the helpe and society of his brother was neither did Moses pray unto God to heale that infirmity but only useth it as an argument to decline his calling Simler QUEST X. Whom Moses meaneth that he would have sent Vers. 13. SEnd by the hand of him whom thou shouldest send 1. Lyranus thinketh that Moses meaneth his brother Aaron who was elder than he and fitter for his eloquent speech but no mention was made yet of Aaron whom Moses knew not to be alive as may be gathered vers 18. till the Lord first spake of him and promised hee should assist him 2. Rabbi Selomo taketh that hee meaneth Iosuah whom God revealed unto him should be the man that was to lead Israel into the promised land But beside that Iosuah is not yet spoken of this request of Moses would have shewed some emulation or envy toward Iosuah 3. Many of the ancient writers as Iustenus Martyr Tertullian Cyprian with others thinke that Moses here speaketh of the Messias that should be sent into the world so also Perer. But this seemeth not to be so fit both for that Moses not being ignorant of the prophesie of Iacob concerning the comming of Shiloh and how the Lord promised that he would raise up a Prophet like unto him Deus 18.18 which is understood of Christ could not yet expect the comming of the Messiah and this request for the comming of the Messiah proceeding of faith would not have provoked the Lords wrath Therefore Eugubinus opinion though Pererius checkt him for it is not herein to be misliked that neither would have those places of Scripture which are understood of the Messiah to bee referred to others for that savoureth of Judaisme nor yet that which is spoken of others to be applied to Christ which also would bewray curiosity and superstition 4. Therefore the plaine meaning of Moses is that wheâ—â—as God might find out many more fit than himselfe he would send by their hand that is ministery so he aimeth not at any one in particular to be sent but any other whosoever QUEST XI Whether Moses sinned in his so often refusall seeing God was angry with him Vers. 14. THen Iehovahs wrath was kindled 1. Neither doe we consent to some Hebrewes that doe aggravate Moses sinne as distrusting Gods word and therefore some say hee was punished in being deprived of the Priesthood which was given to Aaron some in that he was not suffered to enter into the land of Canaan Contr. But neither was the first a punishment for Moses still was the chiefe and gave Aaron direction and it was a comfort to Moses to have such a coadjutor and beside Aaron was the elder to whom the priesthood appertained Neither was Moses offence here the cause why he entred not into the land of Canaan but his disobedience at the waters of strife Simler 2. Neither on the other side is their opinion found that doe justifie Moses herein and commend his humility in refusing so weighty a calling as Gregorie who by Pauls example would have us ready to suffer adversities and by Moses to refuse prosperity And Hierome commendeth Esaâ—es readinesse after his lippes were purified and Moses unwillingnesse being guilty to himselfe of his owne infirmity Contra. 1. In that God was angrie with Moses it is evident he offended 2. And as S. Paul was willing to suffer adversity because it was Gods will the spirit so testified every where of him that bands and persecution did abide him so Moses should not have refused this charge seeing God so often had signified his will unto him 3. And if Esay did well after the Lord had purged his lippes being before unwilling to shew his readinesse then Moses did not well who after the Lord had promised to be with his mouth yet still persisted in his refusall 3. Thostatus granteth that Moses sinned yet it was a veniall and small sinne because wee reade of 〈◊〉 punishment that followed Cajetanus is of the same opinion and his reason is taken from the phrase here used The wrath of God was kindled as when a man is moved suddenly of choller than of set purpose Contra. In some sense we confesse that both this and all other of Moses sinnes and of all the elect are veniall in respect of Gods mercie in Christ that pardoneth them but otherwise in it owne nature neither this nor any other sinne is pardonable for the wages of sinne is death Rom. 6.23 in the justice of
to goe still to Pharaoh because hitherto he hath prevailed nothing and though the servants of Pharaoh before time were obstinate as their master was yet now they should be humbled as it followeth vers 7. Iun. 2. Though Moses is told before that Pharaoh shall not heare yet he is sent againe to make him inexcusable as in the Gospell Christ sendeth the leper to the Priest to be a testimonie against them Ferus 3. The hardnesse of Pharaohs heart is not the effect of the signes and wonders but the occasion of them for if Pharaoh had yeelded at the first then the Lord should not have needed to have contended with him by multiplying of his signes Simler This hardnesse of Pharaohs heart proceeded from his owne corruption and the Lord as a just Judge further punisheth him with his owne sinne but disposeth of it to his glory so then God in respect of the immediate act of hardning Pharaohs heart is said to harden it not positively by making his heart hard but negatively in not mollifying it but leaving of him to himselfe but as the hardnesse of heart is a punishment of Pharaoh and as it is referred and disposed of to Gods glorie the Lord also worketh positively and actively 4. So then this is the order of the causes here propounded the end of the hardning of Pharaohs heart is that God may shew his signes the end thereof that Gods works may be knowne in Israel and declared to their children and the chiefe end of all is That ye may know that I am the Lord Iunius QUEST II. How Moses is said to be a snare to the Egyptians Vers. 7. HOw long shall he be a snare unto us 1. The Septuagint put the article in the neuter Gender How long shall this thing be an offence but it is better understood of Moses he was as a snare and trappe unto them in respect of these grievous plagues and afflictions which he was the minister of Simler And therefore they are afraid of him as the bird is of the snare Iun. 2. They use three reasons to perswade Pharaoh first in respect of themselves they all smarted for one mans obstinacie in respect of Moses and the Israelites their request was reasonable they did but aske leave to goe to serve their God thirdly in regard of the whole land of Egypt which was almost destroyed Ferus 3. Though Pharaohs servants seeme for the time to be touched yet they were farre off true repentance and conversion unto God and they doe not leave for all this their superstition and Idolatry Simler and afterward their hearts were hardned againe when they with Pharaoh pursued after Israel to the red sea QUEST III. Of Pharaohs wish Let the Lord be so with you c. Vers. 10. SO let the Lord be with you as I let you goe 1. Some doe interpret these words as plainly spoken that Pharaoh wisheth indeed that God were no more mercifull unto them then they should finde him Genevens But this though it bewraieth an uncharitable minde in Pharaoh yet it sheweth that he had a reverend opinion of the divine assistance which he wisheth to be as farre from them as his affection was But Pharaoh had no such opinion of the God of Israel 2. Therefore it seemeth that these words are uttered with a kind of derision as if hee should say you boast much that you serve a mightie and great God well let him deliver you for I will not and so in effect he saith as he did at the first I know not the Lord chap. 5. Ferus 3. And yet unwittingly Pharaoh wisheth unto them the assistance of God indeed for he afterwards himselfe did let Israel goe and he wisheth God even so to be with them as he would let them goe which indeed came so to passe God was with them and so overruled Pharaohs heart that he was content to dismisse them Iun. Of the eight plague QUEST IV. Of the nature of Locusts and whether this plague were extraordinary Vers. 13. IN the morning the East wind brought the Locusts 1. Plinie writeth strange things of these Locusts as how the female dieth of a certaine worme that choketh her breeding betweene the jawes as soone as she hath brought forth her young that in India there are of them three foot long they are taken up with the wind and flie over the seas and fetch a great compasse to seeke food they are in such multitudes that they shadow the sunne where they light they feare the grasse by touching it and devoure up all yea they doe eat through the roofe of the houses They often flie over out of Africa into Italie In the region Cyreno there is a law thrice in the yeere to fight against them First in destroying their egges then the young and after when they are growne In the Isle Lemmis every one is appointed a certaine measure of Locusts which they shall kill and bring to the magistrate and they doe nourish birds of purpose to take their flight against them and so to destroy them In Necare and Syria they embattell themselves against them Thus much Plini lib. 11. cap. 29. Ex Perer. 2. But although these kinds of Locusts in those parts of the South and East countries are usuall yet this plague was extraordinarie both in respect of the divers kinds as Caterpillers Grashoppers Psalm 78.46 and their multitudes they covered the face of the earth vers 5. and as the Chalde Paraphrast expoundeth they shadowed the beames and light of the sunne beside otherwise then Locusts use to doe they did not onely consume and eat up the fields but filled also their houses Further these Locusts come at the time appointed To morrow I will bring Locusts upon thy coastes vers 4. In so short a time for such a multitude of Locusts to be gathered it was admirable Simler And lastly for them at that time of the yeere to come in the spring which is the breeding time whereas they usually doe strike over into other countries in harvest when the fruits of the earth begin to be ripe to seeke for food as Plinie writeth of them Propter famem exterâ—a pabula petere sciunt The inhabitants know that they seeke forren food for hunger immensos tract us permeant dira messibus contegunt nube they goe over divers countries and cover them as with a cloud hurtfull to the harvest Plin. ibid. QUEST V. Of the greatnesse of this plague of Locusts NOw the greatnesse of this judgement appeareth diversly 1. These Locusts came upon Egypt aâ— the Lords royall host and so are they called Ioel. 2.25 the Lords great host not in comparison of the superiour spirituall powers but in respect of weake men against whom the Lord can arme the least of his creatures Rupert and Pharaoh could better have resisted an hundred thousand men than these Locusts Ferus 2. The Locusts consumed all the herbes fruits of trees and every greene thing whatsoever the haile had left
land might be rid of them 4. Therefore it is best to understand death here generally both of the mortalitie of men and the destruction of the fruit and so to comprehend them both Iun. And so Pharaoh desireth for this once to be spared that if he keepe not promise with them afterward then he will desire no favour QUEST XI Of the mysticall application of this plague of Locusts FOr the mysticall application of this plague of Locusts first Origen thereby would have signified obstinate and disobedient men that cannot indure the government of God their King over them as the Locusts are said to have no King Prov. 30. 2. Augustine making a resemblance betweene this ninth plague and the ninth Commandement doth by Locusts that hurt by biting understand the false witnesse and the slanderous tongue and as the Locusts cannot flie of themselves but are carried by the wind so the false tongue is ruled by the spirit of Satan 3 Gregorie findeth out other applications as one while he thereby understandeth the people of the Jewes that like Locusts would leape forward that is make great profession of obedience but fall againe to the ground againe by the Locusts he understandeth the Gentiles that gathering in troupes as Locusts doe fight for the faith Likewise hee doth referre it to Christ that like as a Locust leaped out of the hands of his enemies and by his resurrection escaped out of the bands of death 4. In these applications we may observe three things first the varietie how one differeth from another in their conceits whereas Scripture is alway consonant Secondly the multiplicity of sense which is coined by one and the same man but the sense of Scripture is one Thirdly they accommodate the same Scripture to signifie contrary things as both good and evill whereas the Scripture as a fountaine doth not at one place send forth sweet and bitter 5. Therefore for the mysticâ—ll application leaving these fantasies and devices of men wee will have recourse to the Scripture it selfe which by biting flies and Locusts understandeth both the violent enemies of the Church such as by tyrannie and cruelty oppresse it as the Lord saith he will hisse for the Flie of Egypt and the Bee of Assur and they shall come and light upon the valleies Isa. 7.19 as also the spirituall enemies as false teachers Heretikes Seducers which are compared to Locusts that rise out of the smoke of the bottomlesse pit Apocal. 9.4 Rupert Simler QUEST XII How Moses turned himselfe going out from Pharaoh Vers. 18. THen he went out from Pharaoh 1. Moses is here understood though not expressed because he was the more principall and he at other times had removed the other plagues 2. This may serve to expound that other place vers 6. that Moses turned himselfe and went out from Pharaoh which some doe interpret according to the use and fashions of the East countries as it is observed in Turkey at this day that when they depart from the King for signe of reverence they goe backward and so they thinke that Moses did here But if Moses had gone backward then he had not turned himselfe at all and the word here used phanah signifieth to looke backe or turne the face Num. 16.42 They turned their face and looked toward the Tabernacle if Moses then departing from Pharaoh turned his face then was his backe toward the King 3. Wherefore the meaning of it is that Moses either went out in haste to dispatch that thing which he had foretold Simler Or hee went away in great indignation as not sustaining any longer to talke with such a wicked man as also by this his suddaine departing signifying that the Lord would deale no more with him by messages Ferus Of the ninth plague of the three dayes darknesse QUEST XIII Of the cause of the darknesse of Egypt Vers. 21. STretch out thine hand that there may be darknesse c. Concerning the cause of this darknesse 1. Neither was it caused by an eclipse of the sunne as Philo For though the sunne had beene eclipsed yet other starres might have given light but they had none at all and the eclipse of the sunne is generall this darknesse was onely in Egypt neither doth the sunne continue many houres in the eclipse much lesse three dayes 2. Neither was this darknesse in blinding of the eyes of the Egyptians as the Sodomites were blinded for to what purpose then should it bee said that it was palpable darknesse that might be felt 3. Neither was this darknesse onely a privation of the light of the sunne as Gloss. inter linear but there was some impediment in the aire because it is said it was a thicke and palpable darknesse 4. Neither yet was the cause of this darknesse onely in the aire which was incrassate and thickned with darke mists Paul Burgens Perer. For the stretching of Moses hand toward heaven sheweth that the beginning of this darknesse came from thence and that as at Iosuahs bidding the sunne was stayed in his motion so here by the power of God in the stretching out of Moses hand the sunne withdrew his light as he did in the passion of Christ. 5. So that two causes here concurred both the celestiall lights above were hindred from shining upon Egypt and the aire also was thickned with darke mists like as the cloud which went before Israel on the one side gave light to Israel and on the other it was darknesse to the Egyptians Lyranus Thostatus Cajetan Simler And unto this miracle the Prophet Amos seemeth to allude chap 8.9 In those dayes I will cause the sunne to goe downe at noone and I will darken the earth in the cleare day Ferus Two reasons are yeelded of the darknesse the suppressing of the light of the sunne the privative cause and the bringing of darknesse upon the aire the positive cause QUEST XIV How it is said the darknesse was felt Vers. 21. EVen darknesse that may be felt 1. The Chalde expoundeth the word mashash for recessit the darknesse of the night departed that is the darknesse of the night was obscured by this darknesse but the word properly signifieth to feele as Gen. 27.12 and so the Septuagint and Latine doe here read Paguin Montan. Vatabl. with the rest 2. Philo taketh this to be spoken in respect of the effect because it was so darke that they were faine to goe feeling up and downe but seeing they stirred not out of their places it seemeth that little feeling served their turne 3. Others thinke that it is an hyperbole onely to shew the greatnesse of the darknesse Pellican But where the words admit a plaine sense of themselves wee need not runne unto figures 4. Some thinke they were therefore called palpable not in respect of the darknesse which is properly the object of the sight not of the feeling and so cannot be felt but of the aire the subject of the darknesse which was thickned with grosse mists and
continue without nourishment but so did this 4. Our fire heateth so did not this for then the campe had never beene able to have indured it being so great a fire as that the whole campe was lightned by it 5. Our fire burneth but the fire sitting upon combustable matter as the covering of the Tabernacle the Curtaines and such like yet devoured them not 3. Beside these reasons the Scripture giveth testimonie hereunto Numb 9.16 it is called March the shew or appearance of fire it appeared as naturall fire yet was no such fire if it had beene properly fire it could not properly be called the appearance of fire 2. It is before shewed out of the Scripture that this firie piller and the cloudie piller were all one but a cloud is no fit subject or receptacle of naturall fire being rather inclined to moysture 4. Then this we affirme that it was a fire not onely so in phantasie and imagination but a fire indeed because it had the light of fire but yet no naturall ordinarie or elementall fire There are three sorts of fire a grosse thicke fire such as is in coales and red hot iron which burneth much but giveth small light there is another which both giveth light and burneth as a flame of fire a third which giveth light and burneth not such as is the starres which are usually called both by Ecclesiasticall and prophane writers coelestes ignes heavenly fires and of this sort was this fire which gave light but neither burned or gave heate God who first gave unto the fire his qualities to burne and give light can restraine the same operations and transferre them into another subject as the Lord in the beginning could cause the light to shine that made the day before the sunne was created and as he gave afterward this glorious light and shining brightnesse to the bodie of the sunne so it was an easie matter with God to give unto this cloud the light of fire being no naturall fire naturally the fire hath three properties to give light heate and to burne these properties the Lord can separate the one from the other and so suspend them from the fire the fire in the bush gave light but burned not the Egyptians fire in the time of the three dayes darknesse burned but gave no light the fierie oven gave light but gave no heate for their garments did not so much as smell of the fire Dan. 3.27 As in the naturall fire God can restraine the naturall properties so God can give the naturall properties thereof to that which is no naturall fire as here the light of fire was in this cloud which yet was no naturall fire QUEST XXVII Whether the piller of the cloud were moved by any naturall motion COncerning the motion of the cloudy and fiery piller that is was not naturall nor yet procured by any naturall cause it is evident by these reasons 1. Vapors and fire have either naturally a motion of their owne in ascending upward or in being violently forced by the aire and winde which motion is alwayes certaine that way which they are driven But this cloud when the campe stood still neither ascended nor descended neither was carried one way or other but continued steadie all in one place 2. This cloâ—d pointed out the Israelites journey so can no other cloud being of an uncertaine motion 3. It was beyond the ordinarie and naturall motion of a cloud that sometime this piller went before the Israelites sometime it came after as when the Egyptians pursued them sometime it staied in the midst of the campe upon the Tabernacle 4. This cloudie piller moved no faster than the campe could follow wherein were both women and children this could not a naturall cloud doe 5. This cloud was alwayes of one fashion like unto a piller but other clouds varie and alter their forme according either to the varietie of the matter whereof they are made or as they are forced together of the wind 6. But that this piller was not moved by any naturall cause but by the Lord himselfe the Scripture it selfe testifieth as chap. 14.19 The Angell of God which went before the host of Israel removed and went behind them also the piller of the cloud went from before them and stood behind the piller then moved and removed as the Angell of God called before Iehovah chap. 13.22 directed it and therefore it is said Numb 9.18 That at the commandement of the Lord they journied and at the commandement of the Lord they pitched They removed when the cloud removed and the cloud removed at the commandement of God and so consequently they removed or made stay at the commandement of God Perer. QUEST XXVIII Of the times of the removing and staying of the cloud NOw as touching the times of the removing and staying of the cloudie and fierie piller 1. It is not directly expressed that the fierie piller removed more than once in the night and that was when the Egyptians pursued after them Perer. because the night was the fittest time for rest and it seemeth that the campe journeying all the day did ordinarily take their rest in the night the speciall use then of the fierie piller was to give them light in the night that they might bee defended from the inconveniences which the darknesse of the night might have brought upon them it might also serve to direct them to travell in the night if they had occasion as when they went through the red Sea 2. Neither is it to be supposed that when the cloud removed the campe followed and rested not till they came to a place to pitch their tents in for whereas they sometime went forward a whole day together they could not hold out without some repast which could not bee done without stay for neither could they have time to dresse their owne meat which they did sometime seeth sometime bake for beside Manna it is certaine they did eat of other meats as of the flesh of their sheepâ— and cattell for part of their sacrifices their Priests did eat and the Offerer had part and to what end else served the heards and flockes of cattell than part for sacrifice but more for food likewise their Manna asked time to grind and bake it and prepare it as they thought good Exod. 16.23 Beside their cattell must have time sometime to feed all this could not be done without some stay therefore at the least once in the day if not twice it is like that the cloud staied that the people might refresh themselves and so goe forward againe 3. Therefore the cloud made three kind of staies one was but for a short time while the campe might refresh themselves the other was longer when they staied all night in a place but pitched no tents as they went three dayes journey from the red Sea till they came to Marah they pitched no tents neither had any mansion place till they came to Marah Exod. 15.22 and Numb
feare of the people vers 1. 2. The crying of the people unto God vers 10. 3. Their murmuring and expostulating with Moses because hee had brought them out of Egypt amplified both by their present feare of death and their former foolish prediction in Egypt vers 11 12. 4. The confident answer of Moses wherein he exhorteth them not to feare with a promise of deliverance and destruction of the Egyptians grounded upon Gods assistance vers 13.14 In the second part there is first the counsell of God to Moses containing both a commandement that they should goe forward vers 15. and a promise both of the safe passing of the Israelites thorow the red Sea with the instrumentall meanes prescribed the stretching out of Moses hand with the rod over the Sea vers 16. and the destruction of their enemies with the end thereof Gods glorie vers 17. and the effect the confession and acknowledgement by the Egyptians themselves of Gods power vers 18. 2. The performance and execution followeth first on the part of the Israelites where the causes are expressed of their safe conducting thorow the Sea both the principall Gods presence and working testified by the removing of the cloud vers 19.20 and the instrumentall either voluntarie in the stretching out of Moses rod or naturall which was the East wind vers 21. then is expressed the manner of their passing thorow the Sea vers 22. Secondly the other part of Gods promise is effected concerning the Egyptians where we have first the occasion the pursuit of the Egyptians vers 23. 2. The causes of their subversion first the hand of God upon them in striking them with feare and taking off their chariot wheeles vers 25. with the efficient thereof the Lord looked toward the host of the Egyptians vers 24. and the effect the flight of the Egyptians vers 21. Secondly the returning of the waters with the principall cause the power of God in commanding the instrumentall cause the ministerie of Moses Thirdly the effect followeth Pharaoh and his host are drowned vers 28. 3. The events follow first the saving of Israel in passing safe thorow the red Sea vers 29. Then the overthrow of their enemies whose carkasses they saw upon the Sea banke vers 30. Lastly the people beleeve God and reverence his minister Moses with the cause thereof the beholding of the great power of God vers 31. 2. The divers readings Vers. 2. Campe before the streits of Chiroth I. Piscat not before Pihahiroth A.P.B.G. cum cater for pi is here no part of the proper name as is evident Numb 33.8 where pi is omitted mippeâ—e hachiroth from the face or sight of Hachiroth where also Ha is the article prefixed no part of the name as the Septuagint read Eroth and the Chalde in that place Hiroth Vers. 5. and 11. What is this that we have done I.C.V. rather than why have we done this A.P. cum cater as Gen. 42.28 What is this that the Lord hath done unto us Vers. 9. All the horses and chariots of Pharaoh B. G. cum cater rather than the chariot horsemen I. for seeing the horses were the chiefe strength of the chariots who had not every one a rider but chariot men to guide them the originall word and sense is better retained Vers. 12. Is not this the thing that we said unto thee V. or did we not tell thee this thing B.G. is not this the word or saying I. cum caeter dabar signifieth both a word or thing their meaning is that the thing now answereth to their words then Vers. 17. And concerning me behold I will harden I. Piscat rather And I behold I will harden B.G.A.P. cum caeter vaani and I. He the nominative case is put absolutely though in this place it agree with the construction following yet elsewhere it doth not as Gen. 17.4 And I behold my covenant is with thee where unlesse it be read concerning me or some such word supplied the nominative case I will not agree with the sentence following Vers. 30. And the Israelites saw the Egyptians dead upon the Sea banks B.G.C.V. cum caeter rather than the Israelites saw the Egyptians dying in the Sea banke I. that is the Israelites standing upon the banke saw the Egyptians dying in the Sea for the word meeth signifieth dead rather than dying as chap. 12.33 we are all meet him dead men and the Hebrew comma or imperfect distinction at Egyptians sheweth that the last words on the shore are referred to the Egyptians dying not to the Israelites beholding and further the preposition ghal signifieth on or upon rather than in and the Sea useth to cast up the dead bodies on the shore Also if the Israelites saw the Egyptians yet alive how should Moses speech be true that they should never see them againe vers 13. that is alive 3. The Explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Of the place where they are commanded to pitch Vers. 2. THat they returne and campe before the streits of Chiroth 1. The reason why they are bid to returne or turne aside was as is shewed before chap. 13.17 because the Lord would not have them goe thorow the Philistims countrie 2. They are commanded to campe in a most incommodious place where they were hemmed in on every side betweene the Sea before them and on one side the Tower or Citie Migdol which was the Citie Hero a Garison of the Egyptians and the mountaines on the other side so that they had no way to passe but by the straits whereby they entred and so to returne upon the face of the enemies that pursued them Iun. Iosephus 3. This Chiroth were certaine craggie mountaines which run along unto the hill Casius Iun. and reach even to the Sea Iosephus which might be so called either of Chur because they were full of dens and caves or of Charath which signifieth to cut of the craggie rocks that seemed as hewne or cut Calvin 4. Baalzephon was a certaine plaine neere unto the Sea where the Idoll so called of the place was worshipped which hath the name of espying or looking there might be some watch Tower to observe the wayes that they might bee safe for the travellers Simler QUEST II. Why the Lord would have them pitch in so discommodious a place Vers. 3. FOr Pharaoh will say of the children of Israel 1. The Hebrewes thinke that the Egyptians had great confidence in this Idoll Baalzephon whereof they had this opinion that hee could fetch againe fugitives that were run away and that therefore they hearing that the Israelites were inclosed there thought them to bee in sure keeping of the Idoll Ex Simler But there is no such cause here touched the onely reason that moved Pharaoh to pursue them was to take advantage of the place thinking they were so hemmed in that they could by no meanes escape 3. The Egyptians might have pursued and overtaken them if they had pitched elsewhere
the daughters of Israel came out against Saul and David 2. Beside their instruments and gesture of dancing sheweth so much that they were by themselves 3. Neither is it to be thought that they sang only the ground of the song which for brevities sake only is expressed but the whole song Simler Calvin Ferus And so much seemeth to be insinuated in the Psalme 68.11 The Lord gave matter to the women to tell of the great armie They therefore did set forth in their song the whole manner of their deliverance and the overthrow of their enemies as Moses had done before this place of the Psalme Genebrard doth fitly applie unto this song of deliverance made by this company of women whose opinion also is that there were two companies one of the men the other of women singing by themselves Viri in uno choro cum Mose foeminae in alterâ— cum Maria celebrabant victoriam de Pharaone partam The men in one companie with Moses and the women in another with Marie or Miriam did celebrate the victorie of Pharaoh obtained 4. And whereas Miriam is said to answere the men that may be referred rather to the correspondencie of the like act of singing performed by the women and to the identitie and agreement of the song than restrained to their answering them by turnes as Simlerus giveth his opinion that while Moses sang this verse with the men Marie his sister appointeth a peculiar queere of women Et idem carmen pracinâ—us illis succinentibus priori virorum choro respondet And singing before them the same song doth answere to the former queere of men QUEST III. The end of the song of Moses THe end of this song of Moses was 1. To testifie their thankfulnes unto God for this great deliverance and that by this example others afterward should be stirred up to give like thanks unto God as the daughters of Israel did at the returne of Saul and David from the overthrow of Goliah and the Philistims 1. Sam. 18. and as Iehosaphat and the people blessed God in the same place where they had obtained the victorie 2. Chron. 20. Simler 2. This celebration of publike thanks doth make also very much for the truth of the historie for as Calvin saith Quibus mentiti essâ—nt cùm aliis alii testes essent To whom should they have lied seeing they were one witnesse to another neither did this song come abroad to other nations 3. This song was a notable type and resemblance of the spirituall joy of the Church for their deliverance by Christ as in the Revelation the Saints that had gotten victorie over the beast are said To sing the song of Moses the servant of God and the song of the Lambe saying great and marvellous are thy workes Lord God Almightie just and true are thy wayes thâ—â— King of Saints cap. 15.3 QUEST IV. Why the scripture speaketh so much against horse used in battell Vers. 1. THe horse and his rider hath he overthrowne in the sea 1. The singular is put for the plurall which is usuall in the Scripture and in this place with a speciall relation to Pharaoh himselfe in person overthrowne with his horse 2. We shall finde in Scripture that the pride and trust in horses in battell is much discommended as Psal. 20. Some put their trust in chariots some in horse but we will remember the name of the Lord our God Psal. 33.17 An horse is but a vaine helpe Psal. 76.6 At thy rebuke O God of Iacob both the chariots and horse are cast asleepe Psal 147.10 He hath no pleasure in the strength of an horse and among other sinnes of the people this is numbred for one Thir land was full of horses and their chariots were infinite Esay 2.7 3. The reason why horses are so much discommended Origen would have to be this the Law commandeth nothing concerning horses as it speaketh of asses because horses are ordained more for mens destruction but asses serve for labour and carrying of burdens and other necessarie uses and he addeth further Lascivi motus superbae cervicis animal equâ—s An horse is a lascivious and proud beast and therefore the Scripture compareth such unto horse Orig. hom 15 in Ios. Hierome giveth this reason Quia contra Dei imperium possidâ—tur Because it was against the commandement of God to possesse and multiplie horses Deut. 17. Hieron in 2. cap. Isaia Another yeeldeth this reason Habet Dominus noster equos habet diabolus suos c. The Lord hath his horse and so hath the devill but when the Prohpet desired that the eâ—es of the young man might bee opened hee saw chariots and horse but no riders Quia currus equi Angeli eorum aâ—censor Deus Because the Angels are the Lords chariots and horse and the Lord himselfe is their rider and on the other side the Devill is the rider of his horse Hieron in Psal. 77. Rupertus would have this the cause Hic mundus per equum Diabolus per ascensorem significetur Because the world is understood by the horse the Devill by his rider Philo goeth futher from the marke Equi sunt furor concupiscentia insessor aâ—riga intellectus The horse are rage and concupiscence the rider is the understanding and so he understandeth that prohibition allegorically Deut 17. That the King should not multiplie horses of the passions and affections of the minde Philo libr. de agricultur Ex Perer. 4. But the true cause indeed why the Scripture so much inveigheth against horse is not as though it condemned the necessary use of them and the defence and service by them in warre for Salomon had 40. thousand stalles of horses for his chariots 12. thousand horsemen 1. King 4.26 and therin sinned not But two reasons may bee rendred thereof the one politicall which concerned onely that people lest they might by this occasion go into Egypt to multiplie horses Deut. 17.16 which being a plaine countrie abounded with horse the other reason was morall because they did put their trust and confidence in horse Both these causes the Prophet joyneth together Isay 31. 1. Wâ— unto them that go downe into Egypt and stay upon horses And for this cause as Origen well noteth Filii Israel nunquam equis usi fuisse referuntur The children of Israel in all their battels against Canaan are never said to have used any horses Basil also toucheth the cause Quia jubebat Deus ut toti penderent à suo praesidio c. God commanded them wholly to depend upon his helpe Basil upon that place 2. Esay So then as simplie to number the people was not displeasing unto God for Moses numbred them but with an intent to rejoyce and put confidence in their numbers as David did so simplie it was not unlawfull for them to have horse but to place their trust and confidence in them QUEST V. How the Lord is said to be the strength and
purpose not to returne convey much away Simler 4. Now further it is to be observed that this 15. day of the second moneth when Manna was given was the same day which was prescribed for them to keepe the Passeover in that were uncleane Numb 9. signifying thus much that the true Manna was not given to the Jewes which observed the first legall pasch but to the Gentiles which were uncleane through their filthy Idolatry Christ the true Passeover was offered and this was the second pasch under the Gospell which succeeded the first pasch under the Law Ferus ex Gloss. ordinar QUEST III. Whether all the children of Israel murmured Vers. 2. ANd the whole congregation of the children of Israel murmured 1. The word Lun here used signifieth to persist as also to murmure but the latter is more proper they persisted obstinate and opposed themselves by their murmuring against Moses and Aaron 2. It is like that there were some godly persons among them that murmured not as Caleb and Ioshua but because they were but few in respect of the rest all are said to have murmured Lyran. and even the Saints also are not without some infirmities Ferus 3. The whole congregation therefore is said to murmure both because it was generall throughout the campe and in regard of the manner they assembled tumultuously against Moses and Aaron and shewed their discontent Simler 4. It is added in the desert to shew the cause of their murmuring the place where they were was barren and dry and yeelded no hope of any succour or comfort Iun. And beside their wretched nature appeareth that being in such misery and distresse which should have stirred them to prayer they fell to murmuring Simler 5. This famine then which they endured was the more grievous in these three regards because all their provision which they had brought out of Egypt was spent and there was small hope of any new supply in that vast and barren desert and beside the multitude was so great that a little provision would not suffice Borrh. 6. So for this cause all the congregation is said to murmure both to include the Levites who also murmured with the rest and there were beside other strange people mingled with the Israelites who set them on worke to murmure as we reade Numb 11.4 Tostat. quaest 1. QUEST IV. How they are said to have murmured against Moses and Aaron here and afterward against the Lord. AGainst Aaron and Moses Yet afterward verse 8. they are said to have murmured not against them but against the Lord the reason is this 1. Because they were the servants and Ministers of God and he which murmureth against Gods Ministers contemneth God himselfe Genevens And Moses so saith Vt adversus illum se scirent murmurasse qui illos miserat That they should know that they had murmured against him who had sent them August quâ—st 59. in Exod. 2. They are said then to murmure against Moses and Aaron because their speech was directly against them and to them but in effect it was against the Lord because not Moses and Aaron but the Lord had brought them out of Egypt which the Israelites repented them of and were discontented with Lyran. and beside that which they murmured for the want of flesh and of bread Moses could not give them but God Thostat quaest 1. QUEST V. Of the grievous murmuring of the Israelites Vers. 3. O That we had died by the hand of the Lord c. These murmuring and obstinate Israelites doe diversly offend 1. In their ingratitude in extenuating the benefits which they had received upon every occasion they looke onely unto their present state and place where they were and thinke not of the place of bondage whence they were brought Pellic. 2. They preferre carnall things before spirituall the flesh-pots of Egypt before the glorious presence of God who now shewed himselfe visibly among them Ferus 3. They preferre their miserable bondage in Egypt with their grosse flesh-pots before their glorious liberty being in some want whereas men will even with the losse of their lives redeeme their liberty Marbach 4. Yea they untruly accuse Moses and Aaron as though they had brought them out for their destruction whereas they did therein nothing of their owne head but as the Lord directed them Ferus Pellican 5. Yea they call their glorious vocation from bondage to liberty a death and destruction Borrh. QUEST VI. How the Israelites are said to have fit by the flesh-pots of Egypt WHen we sate by the flesh pots 1. The word sir signifieth both a pot and a thorne because they used to hang their pots upon hookes of iron or wood like unto thornes and so the meaning is that they sate by the pot hangers whereon they used to hang their pots Oleaster 2. Some thinke this is spoken because they had flocks of cattell in Egypt whereof they might have fed if they would but they did rather use to eat of fish and fowle which they had there in abundance Gloss. ordinar 3. But though the Egyptians abstained from the flesh of bullocks and sheepe it is like the Israelites had their fill and their fitting by the flesh pots both noteth their security Lyran. and their carnall voracity and greedinesse Sedebant affectuoâ—e They sate gaping over the pots Tostat. They had cattell in the desert but if they should have eaten of them they might soone have killed them all up 4. But it is very like that they speake somewhat lavishly in the commendation of Egypt as Dathan and Abiram did call it a land that flowed with milke and hony Numb 16.13 of purpose to disgrace and diminish the true praise of the land of Canaan which indeed was the land that flowed with milke and hony 5. Some thinke further that they had no such store of cattell in the wildernesse because of the want of pasture oâ— that they spared that kinde of flesh lest they should want for sacrifice but it is not like that this people had any such religious thought at this time therefore it is more probable that they longed not for such kinde of flesh which was at hand but for the flesh of fowles such as they used to eat in Egypt and they wanted now for the nature of discontented people is to loath such things as they have and to covet and desire that which they have not and in that the Lord giveth them quailes it seemeth hee satisfied their owne desire but to their further hurt in sending that kinde of flesh which they lusted after Sic fore Gloss. Ordinar QUEST VII In what sense the Lord saith he will raine bread from heaven Vers. 4. I Will cause bread to raine from heaven 1. Some thinke that by bread is understood generally any kinde of nourishment after the manner of the Hebrew phrase Gloss. ordinar Lyran. Oleaster But Augustines reason overthroweth this interpretation Nam isto nomine carnes complectuntur ipsa enim alimenta
thrir necessarie use as Tertullian calleth it Aquam comitem the water that did accompany them but this cannot be admitted for afterward Moses smote a rocke in another place Numb 20. and in another place they digged a well for water Numb 21.17 which needed not to have beene done if the water still followed them 3. Neither yet is it like that this water did onely satisfie their present necessity in that place Osiander For it came forth abundantly and so ran along and if in that place onely it had refreshed them that whole circuite being barren and drie they should oft soone againe have beene in distresse for want of water 4. Therefore I condescend to their opinion that thinke this was not Vnim diâ—i beneficium a benefit for one day or place but that they had use of this water afterward in their journeye Bâ—za 5. But whether this river or streame runneth still to this day and watereth all that valley which before was drie as Tostatus thinketh quast 3. I leave as doubtfull thinking rather that it ceased as the Manna did being appointed onely for a supplie of their present necessity QUEST XI What nation the Amalekites were and how they set upon Israel Vers. 8. THen came Amalek 1. The singular number is here put for the plurall Amalek for the Amalekites for one man could not bid battell to a whole host Tostat. 2. Amalek the father of this nation was the sonne of Eliphaz the sonne of Esau by his concubine Timna Gen. 36.12 Mention is made of the countrie of the Amalekites in Abrahams time Gen. 14.7 but that is by a prolepsis the countrie is called by that name which it had when Moses writ that storie not when these things were done Simler 3. Some take these Amalekites to bee the same with the Ismaelites and Saracens Gloss. ordinâ—r They rather belonged to the Idumeans or Edomites but dwelled apart from them in a part of Arabia by themselves Tostat. They inhabited the region Gobolitis and the citie Para Ioseph lib. 3. cap. 2. They are thought to be the same with the Arabians called Autai Zeigler 4. The manner how Amalek set upon Israel is declared Deut. 25.18 how they set upon the hinmost of them the tayle of the armie where followed the women and children when they were faint and weary whereas it had beene their part rather to have met them with bread and water Like as Shemei cast stones at David and railed upon him being already afflicted and pursued of his wicked sonne and as the Jewes insulted over Christ hanging in torment upon the crosse and gave him vineger and gall to drinke Marbach 5. These Amalekites were the first of all nations that set upon Israel when they came out of Egypt And therefore Balaam thus prophesieth of them Amalek the first of the nations his latter and shall be destruction Numb 24.20 As they were the first that assaulted Israel so their destruction should not be behind Ferus 6. Twice did the Amalekites encounter with Israel once by stealth striking the hinmost of them and this was in Rephidim another time they fell upon them being joyned with the Cananites while Israel abode in Cadesh barneah Numb 14. Tostat. 7. This Amalek is not unfitly by some made a representation and lively image of Satan who lieth in the way to hinder all true Israelites in their way to the heavenly Canaan Gloss. interlin QUEST XII The reasons which moved the Amalekites to set upon the Israelites THe causes why Amalek did thus lie in waite for Israel were these 1. Some thinke they did it Vt paterna abdicationis ultâ—res essent to revenge their father Esaus quarrell for the losse of the birthright Calvin But this was no wrong offered to Esau seeing he sold his birthright and so willingly left it and this revenge rather belonged to the Edomites if there had beene any wrong done which were the right offspring of Esau whereas the Amalekites came by a concubine Simler 2. Some thinke that the Amalekites did it of envie to hinder them from the possession of Canaan their promised inheritance Marbach But it is not like that they had any such perswasion that ever they should conquer Canaan but yet it is very like that there remained some envie and hatred in them against the Israelites as there was in Esau toward Iacob 4. Therefore the Amalekites might feare their owne countrie lest the Israelites should set upon them and therefore combined themselves with other nations against them to prevent all danger Ioseph 5. As also they not onely enterprised this of a malicious but of a covetous mind also as it is the manner of the Arabians to rob and spoile those that goe by the way thinking to enrich themselves by the prey and spoile of the Israelites these were the causes which moved the Amalekites 6. But on Gods behalfe the reasons were these that he might exercise his people with new crosses lest through ease and idlenesse they might wax wanton Pelarg. That they might have experience of the goodnesse of God which still added benefits to benefits Ferus That they might by this meanes â—e made more expert and animated against their enemies whom they should afterward encounter Lyran. Tostat. And by this meanes the Israelites also were furnished and provided of armour and other necessaries by the spoile of the Amalekites Ferus Lyranus Marbach QUEST XIII Why Moses goeth not himselfe to battell but appointeth Ioshua Vers. 9. ANd Moses said to Ioshua 1. Moses goeth not himselfe to battell propter senium because of his age he was now 80. yeare old Ferus 2. And Quia novit officium suum spirituale magis esse quà m mundanum c. He knew that his office was spirituall rather than worldly Marbach 3. Hee therefore appointeth Ioshua in his place whose courage and faithfulnesse hee had experience of Tostat. As also because he was to bring the people into the land of Canaan and to fight the Lords battels it was fit that the people should be used and acquainted with his government and command Simler 5. As also Moses stayeth behind that he might attend unto prayer and use spirituall meanes whith he knew would more prevaile than all externall force Simler 6. Beside this doth notably shadow forth the excellency and preeminence of the Gospell before the law for by this that Ioshua and not Moses encountereth with Amalek and prevaileth against him was prefigured Quod non lex nos ab hostibus liberaret sed Iesus Christus That not the law could deliver us from our enemies but Iesus Christ. Ferus QUEST XIV Whether this Hur were the sonne of Caleb Vers. 10. MOses Aaron and Hur or Chur went up 1. The opinion of some is that this Hur was the sonne of Caleb and Miriam Moses and Aarons sister who they say was also called Ephrata whom Caleb married after his wife Azuba 1 Chron. 2.20 Contra. But this cannot be for divers reasons 1. Miriam was elder
Numb 10.29 where Hobab is said to be the sonne of Reguel 2. Oleaster thinketh Iethro and Reguel to be the same so also Iosephus and that Hobab or Chobab was the sonne of Iethro and Reguel and brother to Zipporah And his reason that Iethro and Reguel are all one is because the same title is given to them both Iethro is said to be the Prince of Midian Exod. 3.1 and so is Reguel Exod. 2. Contra. 1. The reason why in one place the father is called the Prince in another the sonne is because the sonnes succeeded the fathers in the principalitie and Priesthood among the Gentiles as they did among the Jewes Lipoman in 2. Exod. Which thing was usuall in the primitive Church as Polycrates Bishop of Ephesus writing to Victor Bishop of Rome there sheweth that seven of his ancestors had beene Bishops in that place before him and he was the eighth Euseb. lib. 5. cap. 22. Pellican 2. Hobab could not be brother unto Zipporah for Numb 10.29 hee is called chothen the father in law of Moses which word though Oleaster contend to signifie a kinsman yet seeing Iethro is called by the same word chothen Exod. 3.1 it seemeth in the same sense also to be given unto Hobab 3. Therefore the truer opinion is that Iethro and Hobab were all one and Reguel was father unto Iethro and grandfather to Zipporah Moses wife Iun. Pellican as is before shewed cap. 2. quaest 26. 4. Some thinke that Iethro was a common name both to the father which was Reghuel and to the sonne which was Hobab Galas Exod. 3.1 But that is not like for Iethro onely hath this addition Moses father in law as it is ten times repeated in this Chapter But Reghuel is not so called Exod. 2. whose daughter Zipporah is said to be because the grandfathers with the Hebrewes are so called by the name of fathers I rest therefore in the former opinion as most probable 5. Concerning the word cohen which signifieth both Prince and Priest and whether Iethro were Prince or Priest or rather both see before cap. 2. quaest 27. It was an ancient custome that they which were Rulers and Magistrates to defend the people did execute also the Priests office by sacrifices and prayer to protect and direct them such an one was Melchisedeck and Iethro here Lippoman 6. Likewise whether Iethro were the worshipper of the true God is handled before chap. 2. quest 28. where it is resolved that he was a worshipper of the true God though not purely as Calvin saith Mihi videtur vitiatum fuisse aliqua ex parte illius sacerdotium It seemeth to me that his Priesthood had some blemish and was stained with superstition But it is not like that he sacrificed to Idols for Moses in all likelihood would not have married his daughter then or conversed with him so long Procopius saith that they worshipped the most high God as Melchisedeck did Nec tamen interim abstinebâ—nt ab idolatria But yet they abstained not from idolatrie But as Calvin saith there is difference betweene Idolatrie Et impurum Dei cultum degenerem in unae parte And the impure worship of God degenerating in some one part The religion then which Iethro professed was principally the worship of the true God yet intermingled with some superstitions of the idolatrous heathen though hee was not a professed Idolater QUEST II. How Iethro heard what the Lord had done for Moses and Israel WHen he heard all that God had done 1. Some thinke that Moses sent his wife out of the desert unto her father in law and that by this meanes Iethro had intelligence of Moses affaires Calvin But this to be unlikely shall be shewed afterward seeing it is very probable that Moses had sent backe his wife from the place where the child was circumcised by the way Exod. 4. 2. Some thinke that Moses had sent some message unto Iethro and so signified unto him what had happened Simler But the manner of speech When he heard giveth rather that he was led by some common fame and rumor though it is most like that Moses being now not farre from Midian would have sent to his father in law to his wife and children which were deare unto him if Iethro had not prevented him 3. Therefore the common fame and rumor which was spread among the nations moved Iethro to come Galas Especially seeing Midian was not far from Egypt bordering upon the red sea Simler And now Moses was not far from Midian being about mount Sinai where he had beene before time accustomed to keepe his fathers sheepe Tostat. From whence the report and rumour of the Israelites and their acts as the late victorie obtained against Amalek might easily be brought QUEST III. The causes which moved Iethro to come unto Moses Vers. 2. THen Iethro tooke Zipporah c. The causes which moved Iethro to take this journey were these 1. That he might congratulate and rejoyce for those great mercies and benefits which the Lord had vouchsafed unto Moses and all Israel Simler Which his joy is expressed afterward vers 9. Some of those benefits concerned Moses and the people in generall as the deliverance out of Egypt their passing thorow the red Sea the giving of Manna but some specially belonged unto Moses as that the Lord had made him the Captaine and guide of his people and had given him power to worke great miracles Tostat. Therefore both these are put together in the text When he had heard what the Lord had done for Moses and for Israel his people Iethro therefore came to shew and expresse his joy in both these respects 2. Beside another end of his comming was to bring unto Moses his wife and children Simler For he was not now farre off from the host of Israel the Citie of Midian being held to be but 16. miles distant from Rephidim where they had pitched last Pelarg. 3. Further though Iethro doubted not of the truth of those things which he had heard yet he is desirous to come to be an eye witnesse and present beholder of those great works which the Lord had done for them as of the cloudie and fierie piller of the Manna that fell dayly and the water that issued out of the rocke Simler 4. Yea he came to glorifie God to whom he offered sacrifice vers 12. Pellican and to joyne himselfe to the people of God wherein appeared Gods providence both toward Moses and Iethro that as he was a comfort and reliefe to Moseâ— in his exile for outward things so Moses should be a meanes for his spirituall good to bring him to the knowledge of God Ferus QUEST IV. When Moses had sent Zipporah away Vers. 2. AFter the sending her away 1. Some read after the sending that is of gifts either of Moses to his father in law Simler or of Iethro with his daughter Ex Lippoman But the pronoune ha is of the feminine gender and cannot agree to either
wicked as Abraham followed after the foure Kings that had taken Lot prisoner and delivered him out of their hands Gen. 14. 3. The manner also must bee considered that although the cause of warre be just yet that it be not rashly set upon but all other meanes must first be tried as Ezekiah before he would by force resist the King of Assyria sought to have pacified him by paying a certaine tribute 2 King 18.14 So the children of Israel before they assaulted their brethren the children of Benjamin by open warre because of the wickednesse of the Gibeonites committed against the Levites wife first required of them that those wicked men might be delivered into their hands which when they wilfully refused then they resolved to set upon them Iudg. 20.13 Ex Simlero 4. Confut. Against the Romanists that make difference betweene counsels and precepts IN the next place the Romanists are to bee dealt withall and here commeth first to be examined that assertion that whereas we affirme that even in this Commandement Thou shalt not kill that dutie of charitie is prescribed even in loving our enemies they affirme that this is no precept which we are bound to keepe but a counsell of perfection and a worke of supererogation Thom. Aquin. 2.2 qu. 25. art 9. Contra. 1. This derogateth from the authoritie of Christ to say that he gave counsell to his Disciples and did not by his authoritie command them 2. Seeing all the duties of charitie are required by the law for love is the fulfilling of the law it followeth that even this dutie also in loving our enemies is enacted by the law and not left free 3. Our Saviour adding further as a reason hereof that ye may bee children of your Father which is in heaven sheweth that wee cannot otherwise bee the true children of our heavenly Father unlesse we be like him herein even in loving of our enemies then it will follow that it is not a counsell of conveniencie but a precept of necessitie Ex Bastingio See more of this popish distinction of counsels and precepts Synops. Centur. 1. err 84. 5. Confut. Against the Popish distinction of mortall and veniall sinnes ANother assertion of the Romanists here to be taxed is that anger si sit talis motus ut deducatur ratio est peccatum mortale c. If it be such a motion as that the reason is drawne to consent it is a mortall sinne Si usque ad consensum non pervertitur ratio est peccatum venidle c. But if reason be not perverted to consent then it is a veniall sinne but if it bee not a mortall or deadly sinne in the nature and kinde thereof as is murther and adulterie then although there be a consent it is no mortall sinne Sic Thom. in opuscul This distinction of sinnes veniall and not veniall in their owne nature in respect of the greatnesse or smalnesse of the sinne is not to bee admitted for these reasons 1. In the respect of the nature of sinne which of it selfe deserveth death Rom. 6.23 The wages of sinne is death and sinne is the transgression of the law 1 Ioh. 3.4 and every transgression of the law is under the curse Galath 3.10 2. In respect of the infinite Majestie of God which to violate can bee no veniall sinne of it selfe considering also the perfect and absolute righteousnesse of God which cannot abide the least blemish or imperfection therefore in regard of the perfect righteousnesse and infinite Majestie of God no sinne committed against God can in it selfe bee veniall 3. And concerning this motion and passion of anger even when it is sudden and unadvised though there bee no further purpose or intendment to hurt it is guiltie of judgement Matth. 5.22 Where by the way it shall not bee amisse to note the difference here betweene Thomas Aquin and Bellarmine for Thomas holdeth this anger here spoken of to bee a deadly sinne in that he saith He that is angrie with his brother shall be guiltie of judgement it must be understood dâ— matu tendente in nocumentum c. of a motion tending to hurt where there is consent and so that motion is deadly sinne Sic Thomas in opuscul Ex Lippoman But Bellarmine affirmeth that this is a veniall sinne and so deserveth not everlasting damnation because hell fire is onely due unto the last to call one foole Bellarm. lib. 1. de purgator cap. 4. Contra. 1. Every mortall sinne deserveth damnation but in Thomas Aquins judgement as is shewed before this anger here spoken of is a mortall sinne Ergo. 2. The naming of hell fire onely in the last place sheweth not a divers kinde of punishment from the rest but a divers degree of punishment for otherwise judgement in Scripture â—s taken for damnation as Psal. 143.2 Enter not into judgement with thy servant for no flesh is righteous in thy sight So Rom. 2.1 In that thou judgest another thou condemnest thy selfe Here to judge and condemne are taken for all one to be culpable then of judgement is to bee guiltie of damnation 4. Yet we admit this distinction of veniall and mortall sinnes if it be understood not in respect of the nature of sinne but of the qualitie of the persons for unto those that beleeve all sinnes are veniall and pardonable through the mercie of God Rom. 8.1 There is no condemnation to those that are in Christ Iesus but to the wicked and unbeleevers all their sinnes are mortall Rom. 6.23 to them the stipend and wages of sinne is death See more also hereof Synops. Papis Centur. 4. err 6. 4. Morall observations 1. Observ. Not to be hastie to anger THou shalt not kill Our blessed Saviour expounding this Commandement Matth. 5.22 sheweth that even hee which is angrie unadvisedly transgresseth this precept which may bee a caveat unto furious cholerike and hastie men that they should bridle their intemperate affections and not give place to rage for as Chrysostome saith Si concedatur licentia irascendi datur causa homicidii faciendi If libertie be granted unto anger even cause many times will bee given of murther But if any man shall say when hee is angrie with a man for railing and reviling that hee is angrie with his sinne let him consider that when he heareth the name of God blasphemed he is not so much moved which sheweth that he is angrie in respect of his owne name and person which is called in question and not simply for the sinne Simler 2. Observ. The challenging of one another into the field forbidden ANd if it be simply unlawfull to kill then let such looke unto it that take it to be their honour and estimation to challenge one another into the field whereupon often ensueth murther for we have otherwise learned in the Scriptures Omnem cupiditatem seipsum ulciscendi vetitam esse That all desire for a man to revenge himselfe is unlawfull Simler For such doe usurpe the Lords office The
and in the time of Samuel Saul and David the Arke and Tabernacle were apart so that it seemeth in that confused and unsetled estate that the Law in that behalfe concerning the place of sacrifice was not so strictly observed QUEST XXII Whether it was lawfull to sacrifice before the Arke and at the Tabernacle while they were asunder NOw the place where the Lord did put the memoriall of his name was in the Tabernacle and Arke while they were placed together and when they were in two divers places it was lawfull to sacrifice before either of them 1. That it was lawfull to sacrifice where the Arke was is evident by the practise of the men of Bethshemesh that offered sacrifice at the returne of the Arke from the land of the Philistims 1 Sam. 6. So David sacrificed before the Arke when he brought it from the house of Ebed Edom 2 Sam. 6. and the reason is because the name of God was invocated or called upon where the Arke was 2 Sam. 6.2 And from the mercie seat which was upon the Arke of the Testimony did the Lord use to speake and give answers Numb 7.89 2. Likewise that it was lawfull to sacrifice where the Tabernacle was while the Arke was away is apparent 1. Because there was the brasen Altar whereon they offered their burnt offerings before the dore of the Tabernacle Levit. 17.6 which Altar followed alwayes the Tabernacle and not the Arke as Salomon found the Arke at Jerusalem but the Tabernacle with the furniture thereof he fetched from Gibeon 2 Chron. 1.3 4 5. 2. Where the Ministers of the Altar the Priests and Levits were there was it lawfull to offer sacrifice for they gave their attendance to that end but most of the Priests and Levits remained with the Tabernacle as Ahimelech with 85. more were at Nob where Saul put them to death while the Arke abode in the house of Abinadab who consecrated his sonne Eleazar to keepe it 1 Sam. 7.1 who alone sufficed not for all sacrifices and oblations of Israel it seemeth therefore that most of their sacrifices were brought then to the Tabernacle though the Arke at that time were in another place 3. Beside after the captivity of Babylon when the Arke was no more to be seene as some thinke hid by Ieremy 2 Macchab. 2 but as is most like lost in the captivity or burnt with the Temple they used to offer sacrifices for after the captivity they restored and renewed such necessary parts and implements as before were in Salomons Temple and were burnt together with the Temple they made like unto them afterward as mention is made of Luk. 1. how Zacharie burned incense before the Lord which was upon the golden Altar likewise Matth. 27. the vaile was rent which divided the most holy place from the Sanctuary when Christ gave up the ghost and seeing they offered sacrifices for which cause some sold doves in the Temple whom Christ cast out Matth. 12. they had also the brasen Altar only the Arke they had not for seeing the Tables of stone the pot of Manna and Aarons rod were all missing for the keeping whereof the Arke was principally made they had no cause to make a new Arke there being no farther use or service for it Tostat. quaest 43. QUEST XXIII How long the Arke was severed from the Tabernacle NOw because mention is made before of the parting and separation of the Arke and Tabernacle it shall not be amisse to shew how long the Arke was absent from the Tabernacle which time will be found to be not much under 100. yeeres as may bee gathered thus after the Arke returned from the country of the Philistims it remained in the house of Abinadab 20. yeeres 1 Sam. 6. and all the time of Samuels government and Sauls reigne who made 40. yeeres betweene them Act. 13.21 whereof those 20. yeeres were part then it was removed by David about the 8. yeere of his reigne to the house of Obed Edom where it continued three moneths and from thence to the house of David in Jerusalem where it stayed 32. yeeres and 11. yeeres more under Salomons reigne for when hee had finished the Temple in the 11. yeere of his reigne 1 King 6.38 he brought the Arke from Davids tent which hee had pitched for it into the Temple 2 Chron. 1.4 So all these yeeres being put together 40. yeeres of Samuel and Sauls government 40. yeeres under David and 11. yeeres of the reigne of Salomon will make 91. yeeres whereunto adde those seven moneths during which time the Arke so journed among the Philistims 1 Sam. 6.1 In which compasse and continuance of yeeres the Arke had these sundry removes first it being carried from Shiloh was seven moneths in the countrey of the Philistims from thence it was carried to Bethshemesh where 50. thousand and 70. persons were slaine for looking into the Arke 1 Sam. 6. then it removed to Kiriathiearim 1 Sam. 7. from thence to the house of Obed Edom and so to the house of David 2 Sam. 6. where it stayed till Salomons Temple was built these were the setling places and mansions of the Arke after it was severed from the Tabernacle till they were joyned together againe saving that sometime the Arke upon some speciall occasion was removed for a while as when they went out to battell as 1 Sam. 14.18 and so was brought to the place againe Sic fere Tostat. qu. 42. QUEST XXIV Of the removing of the Tabernacle AS the Arke was thus removed up and downe so also was Moses Tabernacle for first it was carried from place to place as long as the Israelites pitched their tents in the wildernesse and after they were come into the land of Canaan the Tabernacle remained a long time in Gilgal for thither came the Gibeonites to Ioshuah in Gilgal Iosh. 10. after that it was set up in Shiloh Iosh. 18.1 where it continued all the time of the Judges untill Samuel who understanding by the Spirit of prophecie that the Lord had rejected Shiloh removed the Tabernacle to Nob where Saul put 85. Priests to the sword from thence it seemeth the Tabernacle was translated to Gibeon where it continued untill Salomons Temple was finished from thence Salomon brought it into the Temple 2. Chron. 1.3 Tostatus qu. 42. QUEST XXV Of the places where it was lawfull or unlawfull to sacrifice NOw concerning the places wherein it was lawfull to sacrifice this distinction is to bee observed 1. That the ordinary place was in the Tabernacle when the Arke and it were together and both at the Tabernacle and before the Arke when they were divided as is before shewed 2. Extraordinarily it was lawfull for the Prophets to sacrifice elsewhere as did Samuel David Elias as is before declared quest 20. being thereunto directed by the Spirit of God 3. But in the high places it was unlawfull to sacrifice and therefore those Kings are commended which tooke away the high places and those reproved
procured three waies One is the ordinarie meanes whereby Satan by externall objects useth to tempt men thereby stirring and provoking their natural lust as David was inflamed at the sight of faire Bathsheba but here needeth no other sorcerie or inchantment than the corrupt inclination of a mans owne affection the devill doth but offer the occasion and shew the object hee draweth not the affection but the corruption of the heart of it selfe is ready to apprehend and lay hold of the object set before it Another way there is whereby the affection is stirred as when the evill spirit entereth and possesseth any with madnesse and phrensie for the time not changing the understanding or will but troubling the vitall spirits and inflaming the blood and so incensing unto lust The third way is when Satan entreth not to disquiet the bodie and trouble the spirits but externally offereth violence transporting and carrying by Gods permission bodies from place to place which is no hard thing for Satan to doe and so hee may bring one to the place where their lover is Tostat. qu. 13.3 But here two things are to be considered 1. That Satan directly cannot worke upon the heart of any in the immediate change or alteration of their affections but hee doth it by meanes either externall in moving by objects or by internall provocation and stirring of carnall lust 2. That he hath not the like power over the servants of God which he exerciseth over carnal men which are his owne vassals he ruleth in the children of disobedience as he listeth as the Apostle saith They are taken of him at his will 2 Tim. 2.26 But the faithfull doe resist him by faith 1 Pet. 5.9 So that his tentations cannot fasten upon them to intangle them further than God shall see it good for the triall of their faith This is made evident by that storie of Iustina the Virgin whom Cyprian then a dissolute young man and given to Art Magicke but afterward a most holy and constant Martyr loved exceedingly and when he was not able to prevaile with her by any allurements hee called for the Devils helpe to bring her unto him who by faith chased the evill spirit away Ex Tostat. qu. 13. QUEST XXXII Whether witches can indeed effect anything and whether they are worthie to bee punished by death NOw further by this sentence of the law which adjudgeth witches worthie of death they are found to be in error which thinke that witchcraft is nothing but nudum phantasma a verie phantasie that sillie women imagine they doe things which indeed they doe not but in their owne conceit and imagination First I will examine the objections which are made in the defence or at the least the excuse of these wicked women and in favour of them for the mitigation of their punishment 1. They say that this law is made de veneficis of such as kill and destroy by secret poisons and noysome herbes it concerneth not witches Answ. 1. Indeed the Septuagint reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Latine translateth maleficos workers of mischiefe but they are both in error for the Hebrew word mecashephah is put in the feminine whereas they both interpret it by the masculine And the word mecashphim is applied to those which worke by evill spirits and have confederacie with them as Exod. 7.10 it is given to the Egyptian Sorcerers and Magicians 2. The practice of poisoning belongeth to the sixth Commandement Thou shalt not kill whereas witchcraft here forbidden is a breach of the first Table Simler 2. These sillie women can effect nothing they imagine they doe many things but it is only in their owne conceit Answ. 1. True it is that they cannot effect what they would for the Lord restraineth the power of the devill by whom they worke as he did when the Sorcerers attempted to bring forth lice and could not Exo. 8. 2. Yet it cannot bee denied but that they effect many strange things by the operation of the devill as the Magicians of Egypt could turne their rods into the similitude of Serpents and water into the likenesse of blood and the witch at Endor could cause the likenesse of Samuel to appeare which was not in deed Samuel but the devill taking upon him his shape So it is no strange thing by the operation of Satan when they take a mans garments and beat them to cause the bodie of the man to feele the smart Simler 3. And if they did no hurt and could effect nothing why was this law ordained against them God gave no superfluous or unnecessarie lawes to his people nor without great reason 4. Though they should effect nothing yet their wicked desire and endevour thereunto is worthie to bee punished 3. Witches many times doe good and heale men of their infirmities and diseases therefore they deserve no such punishment Answ. 1. Indeed in the Civill law such a decree is extant made by Constantine Qui per incantationes intemperiem aeris grandinis evertit puniendus non est c. Hee which by inchantment turneth away the intemperate season of the aire and weather is not to bee punished But it is no marvell that such things were tolerated then when they came newly from Gentilisme wherein such things were not only suffered but honored and rewarded 2. We have a more perfect rule out of the Scriptures that no such unlawfull meanes are to bee used no not to a good end as to procure health or such like for this cause the Prophet reproved the King of Israel having received hurt by a fall because he sent to the god of Ekron for helpe And to this purpose Augustine saith well as he is cited in the Decrees Si aliquando sanare videntur languidos id Deipermissu sit ut homines probentur c. If they seeme sometime to heale the diseased it is done by Gods permission that men might bee thereby proved c. And againe hee saith Laque◠sunt adversarii mederi non possunt They are the deviles snares they cannot heale 4. Object But the meanes which they use are wholesome and medicinable as herbs and oyntments and therefore herein they are not to bee found fault with Answ. 1. For the most part they use such meanes whereof no naturall or apparent reason can be given as to burne the thatch of the house to cut off some part of the beast bewitched and burne it and such like Concerning such things Augustine giveth a good rule Remedia ligaturae qu◠medicorum disciplina condemnat non adhibenda c. Such remedies and ligatures which the skill of Physicke condemneth are not to be used 2. He saith further Ex traditione malorum angelorum sunt Such remedies had their beginning from the tradition of evill angels therefore hee concludeth that Phylacteria sunt animarum vincula Such Phylacteries things applied to or hung about the necke or other parts are but the snares of the soule
the appearing before the Judge at the latter day he which spendeth his time here in heaping up of wealth in gathering of riches Quia cunctae haec quisque moriens deserit ante Dominum vacuus apparet Because everyone leaveth these things when he dieth he appeareth empty before the Lord. QUEST XXXVIII In what place they appeared before the Lord while the Arke and Tabernacle were asunder Vers. 15. APpeare before the Lord. While the Arke and Tabernacle remained together there was no question at all but that comming to the Tabernacle they appeared there before the Lord but afterward when the Tabernacle and Arke were asunder as they continued at the least the space of 90. yeeres all the time of Samuel and Saul which was 40. yeeres and all Davids reigne till the eleventh yeere of Salomon when the Temple was finished 1 King 6.36 when the Arke and Tabernacle were joyned together againe 2 Chron. 5.5 The doubt is all this while of the separating and dividing of the Arke from the Tabernacle which was the place where the people assembled to keepe their â—easts 1. Simlerus thinketh that where the Arke was they assembled before the Lord. So also Iunius That thither the Tribes went up to keepe their solemnities 2. But herein the opinion of Tostatus is more probable that where the Sanctuary and Tabernacle was there was the place of the solemne assemblies in their feasts for these reasons 1. The Arke was taken from the Tabernacle by the Philistims and kept among them seven moneths and returned in the beginning of the wheat harvest which was about Pentecost If now their festivities were solemnized only before the Arke then at this time in the space of those seven moneths in the absence of the Arke it would follow that two of their great solemnities of the Pasch and Pentecost were omitted which is not to be granted 2. There the meeting of the people was where the Altar of burnt offerings was and the Priests gave their attendance but that was not where the Arke was placed but where the Tabernacle was pitched as is evident 1 Sam. 21. where Ahemelech the high Priest with other Priests were at Nob attending at the Tabernacle the Arke then remaining at Kiriâ—â—hiâ—aâ—im 1 Cor. 6.1 3. After the captivity in the second Temple the Arke was not being lost in the destruction of the Temple and yet there their festivities were kept 4. Now this concourse of the people to the Tabernacle rather than to the Arke was not because it was more worthy than the Arke for the Arke was more worthy of reverence than the whole Tabernacle but by reason of the other implements which went with the Tabernacle as the Altar and table of shew bread and the rest and because the Priests gave their attendance there But if the Tabernacle had beene destroyed and the Arke onely had remained then without all question the Priests and people would have flocked to that place Tostat quaest 28. 3. But it will be objected that the place where the Arke was must needs be that place where they appeared before the Lord because there the Lord manifested himselfe and from thence delivered his oracles not only while it remained with the Tabernacle Numb 7.89 but when it was apart 2 Sam. 6.2 But in this it may be answered that the Lord did not onely give answer from the Arke but from the Tabernacle also Exod. 29.42 and there Ahimelech asked counsell of God for David though the Arke were not there 1 Sam. 22.10 yea the Priest with his Ephod consulted with God though neither the Tabernacle nor Arke were present as David asked counsell of God by the Priest Abeathar that had the Ephod 1 Sam. 23.10 therefore that argument followeth not Tostat. ibid. 4. But though I herein consent with Tostatus that the solemne assemblies and sacrifices were in the place where the Tabernacle was rather than where the Arke was yet herein I dissent from him He thinketh that it was not permitted sacrificia habere nisi 〈◊〉 in loco to have sacrifices but in one place because by this occasion the rude people might have thought there had beene many gods if they should have sacrificed in many places and for this cause the rest of Israel tooke exception to the two tribes and halfe beyond Jordan because they erected an Altar supposing they had made it to sacrifice upon Contra. 1. But it is evident while the Arke and Tabernacle were divided that they offered sacrifices in both places as 1 Sam. 6.14 the men of Bethshemesh offered a burnt offering before the Arke rejoycing at the returne thereof And at Nob where David and the shew bread given him to what end should the Priests have given their attendance but for the sacrifices 2. Neither was there any feare of bringing in a plurality of gods by this meanes seeing all Israel knew that both the Arke and Tabernacle were made at the appointment of one and the same God of Israel by the hand of his servant Moses 3. And the reason is not alike concerning that Altar which was made by the two tribes and halfe which the other tribes had in jealousie because that was erected by the direction and advice of men but both the Arke and Tabernacle had their institution from God and therefore there could be no such feare for sacrificing to either of those places QUEST XXXIX What sacrifice â— commanded here not to be eaten with unleavened bread Vers. 18. THou shalt not offer the bloud of my sacrifice with leavened bread 1. Some doe understand this generally of all sacrifices which were to be offered without leaven Levit. 2.11 Pellican Oleaster And the other Law Neither shall the 〈◊〉 of my sacrifice remaine till the morning Some likewise understand of other sacrifices for although the flesh of the sacrifices might remaine till the next day adeps tamen incendi debebat eodem die yet the fat was to be burned the same day Cajetan As is prescribed Levit. 7.3 But it is better referred to the Paschall lambe as the Chalde Interpreter expoundeth that they should remove leaven out of their house before they offered the Passeover Tostat. Simler Calvin And by far 〈◊〉 principall is understood whatsoever remained of the Paschall lambe as is further declared Exod. 34.25 Iun. Where it appeareth that both these precepts are specially given concerning the Paschall Lambe 2. And the reasons thereof were theâ—e 〈…〉 c. Because the fat doâ—th easily corrupt and putrifie which was an 〈◊〉 thing that any part of the sacrifice should bee suffered to putrifie Gâ—llas As also lest the 〈…〉 the next day Sacerdotes comederâ—nt quod Dei â—â—at the Priests might eat 〈◊〉 which was the Lords 〈◊〉 Oleaster QUEST XL. When the Passeover was to be killed NOw concerning the place where the Passeover was to be offered 1. It must be considered that they were not in the yeerely keeping of the Passeover to doe as they did in the first
an inheritance upon him Ferus 2. Posset absque praemii ullius promissione praeciperâ— c. God might if it pleased him command without promise of any reward for he is debter unto none and when we have done all which we can wee doe no more than our duty but God to stirre up our dulnesse propoundeth ample and large promises Marbach 3. And these blessings of plenty health fruitfulnesse long life are here mentioned because they should acknowledge God the Author and giver of all these blessings which the Idolators asked of their Idols Gallas 4. First God promiseth to blesse their increase and store their bread and water both to give them abundance and to blesse the use thereof unto them for otherwise without Gods blessing abundance will soone come to nothing and because plenty is nothing without health Secondly he saith he will take away all sicknesse then because all this would not availe if they had no heires it is added that none should be barren and beside long life is promised for to enjoy these things but a short time were no perfect blessing and lastly victory is promised over their enemies for all these blessings had little helped unlesse they might have had quiet and peaceable possession of the land Ferus QUEST XLVII What is understood by the hornets Vers. 28. I Will send Hornets c. 1. Some doe understand this literally that as God sent frogs and lice upon the Egyptians so against the Canaanites he armed waspes and hornets to shew his power quod per minuta animantia suis auxiliatur that he can helpe his by weake and small beasts Theodoret. So also Procopius giving this note Deum à coelo de improviso suis missurum auxilium That God of a sudden can send helpe unto his out of heaven So also Cajetan Simler Calvin Gallas Pelarg. But Augustines reason may here be urged against this sense Non hoc logimus factum c. Wee doe not reade any such thing to have beene done neither in Moses time under Iosua the Judges or the Kings that hornets were sent against the Canaanites only the booke of Wisdome hoc dicit impleâ—um saith this was fulfilled chap. 12.8 Thou sendedst forerunners of thine host the hornets to destroy them by little and little But this may also be understood of that feare and terrour which God did smite the Canaanites with before the comming of Israel 2. R. Abraham and Aben Ezra by hornets understand a certaine disease which did consume the Canaanites where they hid themselves in their caves But the text saith that these hornets drave them out not that they wasted and consumed them 3. Pellican maketh a metaphoricall sense Ita attonitos eos reddam ut etiam vespae siat â—is superiores I will so astonish them that even flies and waspes shall be able to overcome them c. But Ioshua found the contrary when he was discomfited and fled before the men of Hai that he had not to deale as with flies and waspes 4. Therefore I prefer Augustines sense Vespae istae aculei timoris intelligendae sunt c. These waspes or hornets are to be understood to be those prickes of minde and terrours which made the Canaanites give place to the Israelites So also Lyranus saith they were Anxietates animi eos pungentes tanquam aculei Perplexity of minde which pricked them as sharpe pricks And this to be the meaning the former verse sheweth I will send my feare before thee vers 27. the accomplishment whereof is declared Iosh. 24.12 I sent my hornets before you which cast them out before you the two Kings of the Amorites not with thy sword c. that is the feare which God sent upon them not their sword discomfited them Iunius Piscator As Rahab confesseth When we heard it our heart did faint and there remained no more courage in us Iosh. 2.11 So also Borrhaius 5. Rupertus maketh this allegoricall sense by the hornets Quos scimus de aquino stercore nasci c. Which wee know to be bred out of dung are to be understood those base and contemptible meanes whereby God overcame the power of Satan c. He meaneth the Apostles who were counted as vile and base whereby the Gospell of the kingdome was published and propagated But the former sense is to be insisted upon as the most fit and consonant to the Scripture QUEST XLVIII Why God did not cast out the Canaanites all at once before the Israelites Vers. 29. I Will not cast them out from thy face in one yeere 1. No nor yet in 400. yeeres were they all cast out till the reigne of David and Salomon which the Lord did for divers causes one is here expressed lest the land should have growne to a wildernesse if it had beene dispeopled all at once and so husbandry and tillage would have beene neglected Gallas And the wilde beasts in the solitary places would have increased as Wolves Lions Beares which would have beene a great annoyance to the people Tostat. qu. 84. 2. Another cause was for their rebellion and murmuring for the which they were punished to wander up and downe in the wildernesse 40. yeeres Simler 3. Eorum culpae imputandum est c. It is to be imputed to their owne fault that the Canaanites were no sooner cast out because they were slothfull and negligent therein themselves as Ioshua telleth them If yee goe backe and cleave to the rest of these nations c. and shall make marriages with them know for a certaine that the Lord your God will cast ouâ— no more of these nations from before you c. Calvin 4. Neither would God cast them out all at once Vt essent qui peccantes arguerent ut â—rudirit in eis Israel That there might be some which should correct those which sinned and that Israel might be nurtured by them Rabanus For God used those nations as whips and scourges for his people when they fell away from him as he stirred up the King of Canaan against them Iud. 4. 5. Another reason was that the people might have some alwayes to exercise them that they should not be given over to sloth and idlenesse but be trained up in warre this cause is touched Iudg. 3.1 That he might prove Israel by them as many as had not knowne the warres of Canaan Marbach Pellarg But this reason is not mentioned here Ne impatientia defecissent c. Lest they might through their impatience have fainted Lippom. 6. And further God would not Vt citra praelia dominium terrae acquirant That they should without battell get the dominion of the land for those things which are hardly gotten we doe the more set by Pracopius 7. Hoc etiam utile fuit ad cohibendum eorum praceps defiderium This was also profitable to stay their preposterous desire that they should wait the Lords leisure and thinke not all at once to have their desire Like as now many wish
him as he is But yet this must be understood with three conditions the first is touched by Hierome Non solum Divinitutem Patris c. posse oculos carnis aspicere sed mentis That not onely the Divinitie of the Father but neither of the Sonne or holy Ghost can the eyes of the bodie see but of the minde c. So also Athanasius as he is cited by Augustine Deum omnino esse invisibilem c. nisi in quantum Spiritu mente nosci potest That God is altogether invisible but as he may be knowne in the Spirit and minde c. These then at this time saw not with their bodily eyes the essence of God but certaine visible signes onely and demonstrations of his presence Secondly we shall have a more full sight of God in the next world than in this as Augustine saith Nemo potest in hac vita videre sicuti est No man can see him in this life as he is Eâ— promittitur sanctis in alia vita To see God in his nature is promised in the next life c. So also Gregorie Quamdiu hic mortaliter vivitur c. As long as we live in this mortall life God cannot be seene in his nature c. Thirdly yet fully the Divine nature shall not be comprehended of the Saints no not in the next life as Augustine to this purpose citeth Ambrose interpreting that place of the Apostle Who onely hath immortaliter c. whom never man saw neither can see c. Si natura ipsim est invisibilitas sicut incorruptibilitas c. If it appertaine to the nature of God to be invisible as well as to be incorruptible that nature shall not be changed in the next world of invisible to become visible because he cannot of incorruptible become corruptible c. And againe upon those words of the same Apostle To the King everlasting immortall invisible c. hee writeth thus Vnde ego non audeo ista distinguere c. Therefore I dare not divide or distinguish these things which the Apostle hath joyned together to say To him that is incorruptible for ever in this world and the next but invisible not in the next world but onely in this Contrarie then to this orthodoxall doctrine of the Fathers agreeable to the Scriptures are these ventrous and bold positions That wee shall in the next life participate with Christs Godhead and be made capable of his Divine substance That there is not any thing of Gods which his Saints shall not see In which assertion Augustine doth directly oppose himselfe to all such Dogmatists and Novelists in these words Non quia Dei plenitudinem quisquam non solum oculis corporis sed vel ipsa mente aliquando comprehendit Not because the fulnesse of God any can comprehend at any time not onely with the eyes of the bodie but with the minde it selfe c. for it is one thing to see another to comprehend the whole in seeing c. Totum comprehenditur videndo quod ita videtur ut nihil ejus lateat videntem c. The whole is comprehended in seeing which it so seene that no part thereof is hid from the seer c. Here Augustine evidently testifieth that God cannot wholly be seene unlesse nothing in the Godhead should be hid unto us which here he manifestly denieth 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. Honour in this life no signe of Gods favour Vers. 1. COme up thou and Aaron Nadab and Abihu c. These two which are bidden to come up with Moses and Aaron afterward were slaine with fire from heaven which sheweth that preferment in this life is not alwayes a signe of Gods favour but that the wicked are often exalted and lifted up that they may have the greater fall as the Lord said he 〈◊〉 appointed Pharaoh to shew his power in him Ferus 2. Observ. We must 〈◊〉 upon the Lord 〈◊〉 patience Vers. 16. THe seventh day the Lord called to Moses God would not at the first call unto Moses but maketh him to wait six daye Ne 〈◊〉 familiaritate superâ—iret Lest he should was proud by too much familiaritie Oleaster Vt discamus patienter ferre c. And that we may learne to beare it patiently if God at the first doe not answer to our desire Lippoman As S. Paul therefore be sought the Lord thrice that the temptation of his flesh whereby he was buffered might depart from him 2 Cor. â—â— 8 3. Observ. Sufficient deputies to be left in the Magistrate or Ministers 〈◊〉 absence Vers. 14. IN that Moses leaveth Aaron and Hur in his place It sheweth that the like 〈◊〉 in Ministers God would blesse to leave able deputies in their place when they have just cause to be absent and the contrarie fault he will severely punish 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4. Observ. The 〈◊〉 of fasting and prayer CHAP. XXV 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter Moses beginneth to set forth such generall ceremonies as belonged to the Tabernacle then instituted for the publike service of God there are two parts thereof the preparation to vers 10. the description to vers 40. 1. In the preparation these things are expressed in the charge which God giveth to Moses 1. Who shall offer the things required namely the people vers 2. 2. What they shall offer vers 3 4 5 6. 3. To what end vers 8. 4. After what manner vers 9. 2. In the description First the Arke is appointed to be made both the bodie thereof 1. Of what matter vers 10. 2. Of what measure vers 10. 3. With what ornaments it must be overlaid with gold vers 11. 4. What adjuncts and appendants both of rings and barres vers 13 14 15. 5. And of the use thereof vers 16. As also the cover of the Arke 1. The matter vers 18. 2. Measure vers 18. 3. The fashion with Cherubims how to be made vers 19. and how to be placed vers 20. 4. The place of the cover vers 21. 5. The use vers 22. Secondly the Table is described 1. The matter 2. The measure and forme vers 23. 3. The parts thereof the crowne vers 24. The border vers 25. The rings vers 26. 4. The appendants the barres v. 28. 5. The appertenants the dishes cups goblets vers 29. 6. The use to set the Shew-bread upon vers 30. Thirdly the Candlesticke is appointed to bee made 1. The matter and after what manner to bee wrought of gold beaten with the hammer vers 31. 2. The parts six branches three on the one side and three on the other vers 32. 3. The forme and fashion with boules almonds knops and flowers to v. 37. 4. The use thereof vers 37. 5. The appertenances the snuffers and snuffe-dishes vers 37. 6. The quantitie of a talent of gold all this must be made vers 39. 2. The divers readings Vers. 4. Fine linnen G. rather than cotten or bombasine I. or silke caeter
have their ministerie the more reverenced and had in reputation Marbach As Iosephus writeth how Alexander the Great when the high Priest met him adorned with his Priestly attire reverenced him and adored the great God of heaven in him whose Priest he was 3. Beside the comelinesse and outward glorie of the Priestly attire there was another cause of their institution specialiâ— actiâ— ipsarum vestâ—um the speciall action and use of those garments for some of them were for some speciall ministration and service as the breastplate which was set with twelve precious stones in remembrance of the twelve tribes of Israel Tostat. quaest 1. 4. Ornatus exterior veri spiritualis defectum notavit The outward adorning noted the defect of the true spirituall ornaments c. Calvin And hereby was signified the insufficiencie of Aarons Priesthood 5. And God by this glittering shew of the Priestly garments voluit plâ—â— quam Angelicum 〈…〉 splâ—ndorem ostendere would set forth the more than Angelicall brightnesse of all vertues which should shine in Christ. 6. And as those vertues served ad vitia â—egenda to cover the faulâ—s of the bodie so wee are thereby taught that we must come before God not cloathed withouâ— owne righteousnesse but apparelled with Christs robes which shall make us to appeare comely in the light of God Simler QUEST VI. Of the cunning men that wrought in the Tabernacle Vers. 3. THou shalt speake to all cunning men whom I have filled 1. Although there might be men of ordinarie skill in the host yet that had not beene sufficient for this extraordinarie worke Coâ—munis peritia non satisfecisset huic operi Common skill had not beene answerable to this worke Gallas and therefore the Lord infused into them a speciall gift of understanding and dexteritie to worke in all kinde of curious worke 2. And it is probable that these principall and chiefe workmen had not onely their skill and knowledge increased which they were indued with before but that the Lord did wholly and absolutely infuse into them the knowledge of these Arts as the text is that God had filled them with the Spirit of wisdome Oleaster Like as the twelve Apostles were men altogether unlearned whom God used in the spirituall building up of the Church as these were emploied in the materiall Tabernacle 3. These were not onely endued with an understanding heart to invent curious works and give direction to others but their hands and other parts of their bodie were fitted accordingly for the execution and practice and finishing of these works And chap 31.4 it is said they were filled with wisdome c. to finde our curious works to worke in gold and silver c. They did not onely invent and finde them out but did also helpe to worke themselves Tostat. qu. 4. 4. It may be that such like works quotidie nunc fiunt c. are now made in many places but then in that simple age and rude time such things having not beene seene before these curious works seemed strange and admirable Tostat. qu. 2. QUEST VII Whether this gift of cunning and wisdome remained in the workmen after the Tabernacle was finished TOstatus here putteth forth a question whether after that the Tabernacle and the worke thereof was finished these cunning men still retained this gift of understanding in Sciences and Arts. 1. The negative part may bee thus proved that their knowledge and skill then ceased because there was no more use thereof after they had finished that worke for the which it was given them As also like as the gift of prophecie alwaies continued not with the Prophets but during that time onely wherein they prophesied 2. But Tostatus here answereth that though the worke were ended for the which the cunning men were indued with such wisdome yet it was not necessarie that the gift should be taken from them though the act were discontinued and againe there is difference betweene an habit of the minde and an act onely of the minde The Prophets had not a Propheticall habit infused but onely an actuall illumination was sent upon them while they prophesied and that illumination being intermitted they left prophesying and therefore he concludeth Deum non abstulisse habitus iâ—fusos That God did not take away from them the habits of these Arts and Sciences infused after the Tabernacle was finished quast 3. 3. But the more probable opinion is that this gift was neither altogether lost which they had received neither yet did it wholly remaine for these workmen were indued with a double facultie one was in the illumination of their minde to invent how to fashion the worke according to Moses direction and that platforme which was shewed in the mount the other was a dexteritie and agilitie in their hand to worke that which they had devised and invented The first of these being a propheticall gift and proceeding of a speciall instinct to invent and find out worke answerable to the patterne ceased and was intermitted in them after the Tabernacle was finished for it was an act rather of the minde than an habit neither was there any cause why that inward instinct should continue the end being atchieved wherefore it was first infused But the other facultie in their handiworke which was increased by their practice and experience and was confirmed by use and custome could not be so soone forgotten and laid aside it is not unlike but that the same remained still which they might have put in practice in other works and buildings if there had beene occasion offered QUEST VIII Of the number of the Priestly garments and ornaments Vers. 4. NOw these shall be the garments 1. Beda is of opinion that there were but eight kinde of garments in all which the high Priest was apparelled with namely these 1. The breast-plate or pectorall for the breast 2. The Ephod for the shoulders 3. The robe 4 And coat for the whole bodie 5. The Miter for the head 6. And the girdle for the waste 7. The linen breeches to cover the secret parts 8. And the plate of gold for the Miter whereof three the linen breeches the linen coat and the girdle were common to the inferiour Priests But Beda is greatly deceived and in these three points 1. The coat here named called cetoneth tashebets the embroidered coat was not common unto the inferiour Priests but peculiar to the high Priest vers 39. Moses is bid to make Aarons sonnes coats also cetâ—neth but they were not embroidered vers 40. 2. The high Priest also had a kinde of girdle proper to himselfe which was made of needle worke vers 39. and the inferiour Priests also had other girdles beside vers 40. 3. The other Priests also had bonnets which were of a divers fashion from the Miter which was made for the high Priest vers 40. 2. R. Salomon maketh but nine parcels of the Priestly attire and Ribera likewise namely foure which were common to all the Priests
because by that Ratio reddebatur de his qua â—nquirebamure A reason was given of those things which were inquired So also Ribera because it was fat idicum it prophesied of things to come Procopius because rationalis animi pars c. the reasonable part of the minde is placed in the heart which the breast-plate covered Vatablâ—s giveth this reason Quia exactaratione consideranda erant c. Because the things therein as the Vrim and Thuâ—miâ—â— were exactly and with deepe reason to be considered of the high Priest But this descanting upon the word is here superfluous seeing the Hebrew word coshen signifieth a pectorall or breast-plate and not as the Septuag and Latine translate 2. It is then called the breast-plate of judgement not as the Hebrewes because the high Priest found therein what the judgement of God was in that matter which was inquired upon for it shall afterward be shewed that the Vrim and Thummius were not given to that end nor yet because the high Priest in all weighty matters of judgement did put on the Ephod with the breast-plate Marbach for by that reason it might as well be called the Ephod of judgement neither because Aaron should in judgement have the people in remembrance when he went into the holy place Oleaster But it was therefore so called for that the high Priest did put it on when he consulted with the Lord about the causes of the people to give right judgement as Numb 27.21 He shall aske counsell for him by the judgement of Vrim before the Lord Iun. QUEST XX. Of the fashion of the breast-plate Vers. 16. FOure-square shall it be The breast-plate is thus described 1. For the manner of workmanship it must be of broidered worke like the Ephod 2. For the matter five things are required to the making thereof as before in the Ephod gold blew silke purple skarlet fine twined linen 3. For the forme and fashion it must be foure square every side of even length as appeareth by the foure orders of the stones and double it must be that it might be of more strength to hold and receive the stones ut firmius substaret auro that it might be the stiffer for the gold and precious stones Pellican 4. For the quantity it was an handbreadth which was halfe a cubit that is twelve fingers for if it had beene but the small handbreadth that is foure fingers it had not beene sufficient to cover the breast before Montan. Ribera Pelargus 5. The ornaments also of the pectorall are set forth which were twelve precious stones set in foure rankes or rowes QUEST XXI Of the twelve precious stones their names colours qualities and congruitie with the twelve Tribes Vers. 27. A Rubie Topaze and a Carbuncle in the first row In the severall application of these stones these foure things shall be observed 1. The name 2. The colour 3. The vertues and qualities 4. The congruity with the tribes of Israel A Rubie The first stone is called odeus of adam which signifieth to wax red Iosephus calleth it the Sardonix the Septuagint the Sardie it is most like to be the Rubie Montan. Genevens 2. The colour of it was red Oleaster as the signification of the word is rather than yellow of the colour of fire as Iunius taketh it for Pyrâ—pus the Carbuncle a precious stone like fire 3. They say it repelleth feare and cheareth and maketh bold Tostat. sharpeneth the wit and stancheth bloud at the nose Magirus 4. This stone they say stood for Ruben Montanus maketh an allusion betweene Ruben and the Rubie but Ribera giveth this reason that as the Sardie is red and somewhat of a fiery colour so he went into his fathers concubine igne libidinis incensus fuit and so was set on fire with concupiscence A Topaze 1. The Hebrew word is pitdah in which there are three radicall or principall letters p t d which being transposed t. p d make topad or topaz not much differing in sound Montan. It is so called of the place where it was found Topasos in Aethiopia Marbach Or the Isle Topazon gave the name to it as Plinie lib. 37. cap. 8. so called of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to seeke because it was much sought for Gloss. interlin would have it called Topazium as if we should say topadium that is of all colour but there is no reason of that etymology 2. Some take it to be of greene colour Montan. And so some of the Hebrewes thinke it to be the Smaragd Ribera out of Plinie lib. 37. cap. 8. alleageth that in greenenesse of colour it exceedeth all other precious stones But it is rather of yellowish colour mixt betweene gold and skie colour Isider Etymol 16. Tostat. Gloss. interlin There are two sorts of it one of the colour of gold which is more precious the other like unto saffron which is of the second sort Marbach And it seemeth to be of yellow colour because Iob 28.19 the Topaze of Aethiopia and the fine gold are named together 3. It is availeable against phrensie and lunacie and melancholy as Diascorides 4. Simeon is resembled to this stone not so much ob animum prasentem for his present and resolute minde which Ribera would have signified by the greene colour as because he was inflamed with ire and rage when he slue the Sichemites A Carbuncle 1. Iosephus with the Septuagint call it the Smaragd so also Iunius Vatabius the Chalde also and Latine Interpreter but that stone is of greene colour it seemeth rather to be the Chrysolitâ— Montan. or the Carbuncle Genevens The word is bareketh derived of barak which signifieth to lighten 2. It was then a precious stone that sparkled and glistred as the lightening which could not be of greene colour though the Smaragd be commended for the exceeding glistering brightnesse in so much that a Romane Emperour is said to have seene in his Smaragd the sword players as they did fight But because barak signifieth lightening as Ezech. 1.13 Out of the fire went barak lightning this stone being named thereof may better be taken for the Carbuncle or Chrysolite 3. The Carbuncle is of such exceeding brightnesse that it giveth light and shineth in the darke 4. Hereunto some resemble Levi Montan Tostat. But it is more like that Levi was omitted because the high Priest of Levi who was to weare this glorious breast-plate might stand for the whole Tribe then Iudah was rather named in the third place Ribera Pelarg. whose royall power streaming glory and princely dignity is more lively set forth in the shining Carbuncle or glistering Chrysolite Pelarg. than in the greene smaragd as Marbach And whereas the Carbuncle is so called of the similitude of fire licèt ignes non sentiant although these stones feele no fire themselves Plin. 37.7 by this property Messiah the Prince of Juda is shadowed forth who in that respect may be called apyrotus not to be vanquished or overcome with
the Romane Church teacheth doctrines contrarie to faith there it may worthily bee left 4. And will they have us to follow them in manners also The Pope and his Cardinals no marvell give such good example of life that it is pitie that they are not imitated They that know Rome and the generall prophanesse and licentious living there though never so much addicted to the Popish religion I think would be ashamed to follow their conversation 5. This ramme signifieth Christ by whose blood only we are purged our eares hands and all other parts sanctified of whom the Prophet speaketh Isai. 50.4 He will waken mine eare as the learned it is blaspemie therefore to applie it to Peter he sanctifieth not the eare Christ indeed healed the eare which Peter cut off I hope they will not say that Peters bloud doth sanctifie them 6. Oleaster giveth a better sense of this place Nihil aliud hujusmodi sanguinis respersione adumbrari video quam Sacerdotum punitionem c. I see nothing else shadowed forth by this sprinkling of bloud than the punishment of the Priests Si negligentiores in audiendis ejus mandatis c. If they should be negligent in hearing Gods Commandements and in the executing of their ministery c. Let the Pope and popelings therefore looke unto it that they smart not for it one day in neglecting Gods Commandements in respect of their owne traditions 4. Controv. Of the elevation of the host and of the signe of the crosse Sa. Vers. 24. THou shalt shake them to and fro The Latine text readeth Thou shalt sanctifie them elevating or lifting them up Whereupon Sa in his annotations would ground the elevation of the host in the Sacrament and Lyranus and Tostatus observe that the Priest shaking them to and fro and lifting them up and downe in this motion made as it were a signe of the crosse in the aire Contra. 1. Who taught them to borrow their ceremonies from the figures and types of the Law If such rites as shadowed forth Christ be still to be used to what end died Christ The Jewes that thinke Christ not yet to be come have some colour in retaining their legall ceremonies but seeing Christians doe beleeve that Christ the body and substance of the Law is come in him all those shadowes are determined 2. Neither was it yet revealed unto them how Christ should suffer and whereon hee should bee offered therefore it is not like that the moving of those things up and downe and to and fro had any such signification 3. Neither was the crosse of Christ of that fashion that as much should be left above the crossing in the head as under it in the feet so that the upright peece should be crossed in the middest after which similitude this motion of the Priests hands seemed to be up and downe and then sidewayes to and fro 5. Controv. Against the burying of Bishops in their Pontificials Vers. 29. ANd the holy garments which are Aarons shall be his sonnes after him It was not the fashion then among the Hebrewes as it is now among the Romanists for their high Priest to be buried in his priestly robes as now their Bishops are intombed in their pontificials Lippoman one of their owne Writers giveth this note hereupon Lest any should say Aaron shall use the pontificall vestures all his life time and when he dieth ipse eisdem indutus tumulabitur he shall be buried in them c. He seemeth closely to glance at that superstitious use practised among them Simlerus ghesseth well at the cause of this ridiculous usage I cannot tell saith he why they should doe so nisi fortè ut mortui fungantur munere suo quod vivi nunquam fecêre unlesse it be that they might exercise their function when they are dead which they never did being alive 6. Controv. Of the lawfulnesse of Ministers marriage and the legitimation of their children Vers. 29. SHall be his sonnes after him c. Tostatus here thus noteth that because in the old Testament the Priests had wives the sonnes succeeded their fathers as others did in civill principalities but now in the new Testament sacerdotes non habent uxores the Priests have no wives and therefore their sonnes succeed them not because they have no sonnes and if they have sometime sonnes illegitimi sunt they are illegitimate c. Tostat. qu. 16. Contra. 1. If the Priests of the Law had their wives of whom was exacted a greater legall purity in outward observations than now why should the Ministers of the new Testament be restrained in the times of the Gospell which hath given us liberty that were in bondage under the Law 2. Then the sonnes succeeded the fathers in the priesthood both because the tribes were distinguished and their families and kinreds divided that Christs line of Iudah might be continued and then the service of the Tabernacle consisting chiefly in externall observations required no such exactnesse but that the sonne might be fit to succeed his father in the priesthood especially God giving an extraordinary blessing unto that lineal succession but now it is not fit that children should alwayes succeed their fathers because the Gospell requireth a greater sufficiencie and the childe is not alwayes heire of his fathers gifts but where the sonne is endued with sufficient parts to take upon him his fathers charge there is no reason why he should be barred We see in these dayes that divers learned men Ministers and Professors under the Gospell have left behind them their sonnes men of worthy parts as Iosias Simlerus had a sonne of the same name who writ the Dedicatory Epistle to his fathers learned Commentaries upon Exodus David Pareus that learned man hath likewise his sonne Philip Pareus who hath written of Logike Kicherman the Author of his Logike and politike Systemata succeeded his father in Gymnasio patrio in his fathers schoole And divers such beside might be named 3. And doth he thinke indeed that the sonnes of Priests are illegitimate and unfit to succeed their fathers What thinketh he of divers Popes that were Priest sonnes as Bonifacius the first Felix the third Agapetus the first Sylvester Theodorus Hadrianus Benedict the 8. Iohn the 12. all which were the sonnes of Priests and Gratian addeth further Quà m plures etiam alii inveniuntur de sacerdotibus nati and divers beside are found to have beene borne of Priests 4. Indeed they which have sonnes and are not married which is no rare thing in the Popish Clergy doe leave an illegitimate seed behind them but such as are borne in lawfull matrimony are an holy seed of what calling soever their parents be for both marriage among all men is honourable Hebr. 13.4 and so consequently among Ministers and their children are holy 1 Cor. 7.14 They therefore that condemne their marriage and make their children illegitimate and so unholy doe contradict the holy Apostle and in a manner give him the
They for Israels cause were overthrowne and drowned in the red sea Therefore they had a greater spite at Israel than otâ—er nations and would have beene most readie thus to have objected Tostat. qu. 17. QUEST XXXVI In what sense the Egyptians would say The Lord brought them out to slay them Vers. 12. HE hath brought them out maliciously or of an evill minde Iun. Or for a mischiefe rather Vatab. Oleast To slay them in the mountaines 1. Not because the Egyptians might imagine that God could not slay them in Egypt the constellations of heaven and aspects of the planets hindring the destruction of the Hebrewes there and serving fitly in the wildernesse and mountaines for seeing no such constellation could hinder the servitude of the Israelites but that the Egyptians most cruelly oppressed them much lesse could it prevent Gods judgements And if the constellation had beene against the Hebrewes after they were come out of Egypt into the desert how came it to passe that the red sea gave way unto them the Egyptians there were drowned Manna from heaven was given and water out of the rocke all these things were for Israel in the desert and against the Egyptians Tostat. quast 18. 2. Neither doe the Egyptians so say because some of their Astrologers by calculating the time of the Hebrewes departure as some Hebrewes affirme did prognosticate because they went malo sydere in an evill signe that much bloud should be shed in Israel and that many of them should die in the wildernesse and therefore when Ioshua had circumcised the Israelites in Gilgal the Lord said he had taken away the shame of Egypt Iosh. 5.9 because that which the Egyptians had foretold was now turned ad sanctitatem non opprobrium not to their shame but their holinesse and honour Contra. 1. By shame is there meant no such thing but onely that their uncircumcision was then taken away which is called the shame of Egypt because therein they were like unto the uncircumcised Philistimâ— 2. And if it had beene spoken in any such sense this had beene to confirme and justifie the superstitious calculations and prognostications of the Egyptians 3. The Israelites indeed perished in the desert but not all onely those which were above twentie yeare old and they died not by any naturall death which onely may be foreseene and in some sort by prognostication ghessed at but their death was procured by their sinne then as their sinne being an act of their will could not by any such constellation bee foretold so neither could their extraordinarie death caused by their sinne be foreseene by any such meanes And this being an act of Gods justice like as mans will and the acts thereof are not wrought upon nor ruled by constellations much lesse are the Lords judgements which he worketh most freely Tostat. qu. 19. 3. Neither could the Egyptians say thus as though the Lord could not have destroyed the Israelites in Egypt seeing he plagued both the Egyptians and their gods or that he could not for want of power have brought them into the land of Canaan as the heathen would have objected Numb 14.16 For he that was able to overthrow Pharaoh and his host and all the power of Egypt and that wrought such great wonders for them in the desert was of power sufficient to plant them in the land of Canaan casting out their enemies before them Tostat. qu. 17. 4. But the Egyptians of malice onely without any ground nay against their owne knowledge Occasione saltem levissima licèt omnìa falsa cognoscerent quaecunque tamen possent in Deum Hebraeorum probra conjicerent Upon a light occasion although they knew all to be false would upbraid what they could the God of the Hebrewes Tostat. qu. 18. QUEST XXXVII Why Moses maketh mention in his prayer of Abraham Isaak and Iacob Vers. 13. REmember Abraham c. 1. The Hebrewes thinke that mention is made of these three to escape a treble punishment as if the Lord were to bring downe fire from heaven upon them Abraham was cast into the fire in Hur of the Chaldees if the Lord would punish with the sword Isaak had offered himselfe to be slaine in sacrifice by his father if with exile and banishment Iacob had before indured it and therefore these three are mentioned that by their merits and deserts the people might escape these three judgements Sic Lyran. Lippom. But Tostatus well refuteth this conceit 1. Because these three are mentioned as well when any blessing is craved of God as when any judgement is prayed against 2. God hath other judgements beside these whereby to punish his people therefore in other eases the mentioning of these had beene insufficient Tostat. qu. 20. 2. Yet Tostatus also misseth the marke saying that Iâ— meritis istorum fiebat salus posteris eorum For the merits of these their posteritie were preserved for Abraham himselfe was not justified by merits but by faith as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 4. Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for righteousnesse therefore much lesse was his posteritie saved by his merits 3. Therefore Moses in bringing in Abraham Isaak and Iacob only putteth God in minde of the promises made unto them which proceeded onely of the meere grace and favour of God toward them as the Lord himselfe saith Because the Lord loved you and because he would keepe the oath which hee had sworne to your fathers the Lord hath brought you out with a mightie hand Deut. 7.8 Simler Osiander QUEST XXXVIII How the Israelites are promised to possesse the land of Canaan for ever Vers 13. THey shall inherit it for ever 1. This promise that the Israelites should inhabit the land of Canaan for ever may diversly be understood 1. It is taken for a long time not limited nor determined and so they enjoyed that land many yeares about 1400. Tostat. qu. 20. 2. Or it may bee likewise understood during the time of the Law and ceremonies which were to continue but untill Christ as Aarons Priesthood is said to be for ever chap. 28.43 and the keeping of the Passeover is said to be an ordinance for ever Exod. 12.17 Tostat. 3. Or it may be applyed to the spirituall seed of Abraham which are the heires of the true Canaan Genevens aâ— not Gen. 13. vers 14. 4. But in these temporall promises a secret condition rather must be supplyed that if they had continued in obedience to Gods Commandements then they should have had a perpetuall inheritance in Canaan And this is the best interpretation as appeareth by the like Psal. 132.10 If thy sonnes keepe my covenant and my testimonies which I shall teach them thy sonnes also shall sit upon thy throne for ever Tostat. qu. 20. See this question handled more at large Hexapl. in Genes cap. 13. vers 12. QUEST XXXIX How the Lord is said to repent Vers. 14. THen the Lord repented of the evill 1. This is spoken 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according
as Moses serpent devoured the Magicians serpents sic diabolus consumitur amissis membris suis so the Devill is devoured his members being lost and taken from him So doth Rupertus understand by this image beaâ—en to powder Eos qui ex parte diaboli per poenitentiam confracti c. Those which having beene as of the body of the Devill are broken by repentance 8. Gregorie maketh this action propheticall to signifie the generall destruction of idols thorow the world Cernas oculis qui huiâ— vanitati erant prius dediti templa sua diruentes c. You may see with your eyes that they which trusted before in their idols doe now pull downe their temples And Procopius by the drinking thereof with the mouth understandeth the true confession of the faith quae ore fit which is done with the mouth whereby idolatrie is overthrowne But the other historicall reasons are rather to be insisted upon And this drinking of the water mixed with this powder was rather an evill signe unto them as the bitter water was unto the adulterous woman Numb 5. than a signification of any good QUEST LIX Whether by the drinking of the water any visible signe of difference was made among the people who had most deeply offended about the golden Calfe BUt some further affirme that this drinking of the water served to another end than that thereby some signe of difference might be made betweene the Ring-leaders unto this idolatrie and the rest that they might easily bee discerned of the Levites when they went up and downe in the host killing those whom they met 1. Therefore R. Salomon thinketh that this bitter water did cause their bellies to swell that were guiltie of this great sinne but to the rest it was pleasant and wholsome water like as the water of jealousie Numb 5. did cause the adulterous womans belly to swell and her thigh to rot but if shee were not guiltie it made her fruitfull 2. Others thinke that the signe was this everie ones beard that consented unto this idolatrie was coloured yellow like unto gold and by this marke the Levites knew them from others But if there had beene any such visible marke set upon them seeing most of the camp consented unto this sinne there should have beene more found guiltie and more slaine than three thousand vers 28. 3. Tostatus thinketh that there was some externall and visible signe caused by drinking of the water though he will not determine what it was because it was not like that the Levites would hand over head slay one with another And he thinketh that Aaron drinking of the water had not that marke because the Lord pardoned his sinne because hee was thereunto drawne by compulsion This instance of Aaron sheweth that the drinking of the water did make no such signe for then Aaron should have had it whose sin was not yet pardoned neither had Moses yet intreated for him having not yet examined him The Levites might know to make difference among the people some other way than by any such visible signe See more of this quest 70. following QUEST LX. How farre Moses fact herein is to be imitated BUt whereas Moses did not onely put downe this abominable idoll but made it altogether unprofitable for any use burning and beating it to powder the question is how farre Moses herein is to be imitated 1. Neither is their opinion to be approved which take this example of Moses to be extraordinarie in demolishing this golden Calfe for as Moses did take away this publike stumbling blocke so it belongeth unto Princes è mâ—dio tollere to remove out of the way whatsoever is done against the worship of God as Hesekiah did likewise breake downe the brazen Serpent after it began to bee abused to idolatrie Ferus Who addeth further I would we had now some Moses to take away the evils which are in the Church Non enim unum tantùm vitulum habemus sed multos For we have not one golden calfe but many Thus Ferus complaineth of the Papall Church 2. But this is extraordinarie in Moses example that he converteth not this golden idoll unto any use but consumeth it to powder Herein Christian Magistrates are not bound to follow Moses example for Moses fact herein was singular ad majorem detestationem c. for the greater detestation of idolatrie Now it is lawfull to convert things consecrate to idolatrie to some profitable use ut juventur membra Christi that the members of Christ may be helped and releeved Gallas 3. And in that Moses doth remove this idoll which none else attempted to doe yet it may bee thought that many in Israel were offended with it so magistratus officium est non privatorum hominum it is the office of the magistrate not of private men to take away idolatrous images Osiander QUEST LXI How Moses maketh Aaron the author and cause of this sinne Vers. 21. WHat did this people vnto thee that thou hast brought c. 1. Moses layeth this sinne upon Aaron though he were not the first author of it because hee being left in Moses place stayed not the people by his authoritie therefore he is worthily reproved tanquam author sceleris quod passus est admitti as the author of this sinne which he suffered to be committed Calvin so that permissio peccati aeque in vitio sit atque commissio the permitting of sinne is as well in fault as the committing Pelarg. 2. Here then the Hebrewes in seeking to excuse Aaron and the people as seduced by the Egyptians doe labour in vaine seeing Moses doth so straitly charge Aaron as a principall doer in it for if he had not grievously sinned why should Moses here make him the cause of this sinne and the Lord be so offended with him that he purposed to slay him if Moses had not intreated for him Deut. 9.20 And in these three things Aaron sinned 1. In not staying the people and stilling them 2. In that besides consenting unto them hee is an agent in making a Calfe for them 3. And being made hee approved it and set up an altar before it So that Aaron is no more here to be excused than Peter in the Gospell which denied his Master Oleaster 3. Yet Aaron sinned not as the people did but as there were degrees of offenders among the people some incouraged and perswaded others some only gave consent and were seduced by others perswasion to commit idolatrie and some did neither but onely went with the multitude for company to desire a Calfe to be made So Aarons sin differed from the rest timore ductus fabricavit vitulum hee made a Calfe being drawne by feare Tostat. qu. 33. And therefore Moses dealeth otherwise with Aaron than with the people Aaronem verbis redarguit populum cecîdit gladio Hee rebukes Aaron in words the people he slayeth with the sword Ferus 4. But yet Aarons sinne cannot bee so much extenuated as to free him from the
thing of his credit Simler 3. He sheweth his ignorance thinking himselfe excusable because hee was urged and compelled through the importunitie of the people to doe it Importunitas populi eos levare non potest c. The importunitie of the people cannot ease them any thing who should have beene more prudent and circumspect in their government Gallâ—s 4. In excusing hee accuseth himselfe for in that the people were bent to mischiefe hee ought to have beene so much the more vigilant over them And whereas they asked to have gods made to goe before them and alleaged they knew not what was become of Moses he should have told them that the Lord was their guide and have declared where Moses was Simler 5. In saying thereof came this calfe frigida exili narratione culpam tegere c. he goeth about by a cold and slender narration to hide his fault Calvin QUEST LXV Whether Aaron dissembled in not confessing plainly that he made the Calfe Vers. 24. I Did cast it into the fire and thereof came this Calfe 1. The Hebrewes seeking to excuse Aarons fault what they may say that he intended not to make a Calfe but cast in the golden eare-rings into the fire to consume them but by the operation of Satan working by certaine Egyptian Magicians in the camp the forme of a Calfe came forth But that Aaron had an intention to make a Calfe appeareth by the former narration vers 4. how Aaron after it was molten and cast caused it to be fashioned with a graving toole See more hereof quest 17. before 2. Some thinke that Aaron mentitur timâ—re perterritus maketh a plaine lie being overcome of feare Oleaster So also Lyranus But Aaron would have beene ashamed publikely to make a lye as though he had purposed to make a Calfe seeing it was not well knowne to all the people to be his doing 3. Tostatus is of opinion that Aaron herein is not faultie at all but that he simply confessed that hee made the Calfe being through feare of the people thereunto compelled Sed Scriptura qua breviloquâ— est c. hic eum breviter tangit But the Sripture which is compendious because the narration hereof was set downe before doth but briefly touch it here But it might as briefly have beene set downe that Aaron made the molten Calfe as it is expressed before vers 4. therefore the brevitie of speech is not the cause 4. Augustine thinketh that Aaron himselfe compendio locutâ—â— est used this compendious speech and that he lied not at all because Moses eum de mendacio non arguit doth not reprove him for lying But as Aaron is not convinced here of a manifest lye yet some colouring and dissimulation appeareth in his speech because he doth not plainly confesse hee did it Substantia facti narratur tantummodo faciendi He confesseth only the substance of the fact concealing the manner Moses reproveth him not for this dissembling no more he doth for any other infirmitie here shewed because he replieth not againe 5. Hugo de S. Victor would have the meaning of Aarons words to be this Thereouâ— came this Calfe opere scilicet hominis non miraculo by the worke of man not by any miracle But the manner of his speech sheweth that Aaron sought to extenuate his sinne 6. I therefore here rather consent to those which thinke that Aaron coloured his fault by this speech Râ—m ita refert ac si praeter ipsius intentionem formatus sic vitulus He so reporteth the matter as though the Calfe were formed beside his intention Marbach Iejune simpliciter narrat Hee maketh a drie and slender narration Simler Exili narratione culpam tegere c. By a slender report he would cover his sinne Calvin Quicquid sit attenâ—at quantum potest culpam Whatsoever it is in these words he extenuateth his sinne what he may Lippoman And this seemeth to be more likely because Aaron maketh a colourable defence and excuse of his fault thorowout as is shewed before quest 64. QUEST LXVI In what sense the people are said to be naked Vers. 24. MOses saw therefore that the people were naked c. 1. Some understand it of their jewels of gold which they were deprived of being bestowed upon the idoll Lyran. Hugo de S. Victor But we read in the next chapter that they were splendidè ornati they had goodly ornaments Calvin Marbach Therefore they were not stripped of all 2. Some thinke that they were disarmed for Aaron fearing some mutinie and rising among the people had taken away their armour Cajetan But in that it is said afterward that the Levites girded their swords to them vers 27. it appeareth that their weapons were not taken from them Simler 3. Some expound it of the manifestation of their sinne that whereas hitherto they were counted the true worshippers of God now they should bee knowne to be idolaters and so defamed among the Heathen R. D. Kimbi Oleaster Vatab. 4. Some giue this sense Aaron had made them naked that is laid all the fault upon the people 5. Or they were naked because they went about obstinately to defend their sinne but in this sense Aaron could not bee said to have made them naked for he would not have encouraged them to stand in defence of their sinne having himselfe confessed it 6. The Chalde translateth Moses saw the people were idle that is gave themselves to eating and drinking and playing and neglected the feares of warre which would have beene unto their shame if their enemies should encounter with them 7. But beyond the rest this is the most proper interpretation that they were naked gratia prasiâ—lio Dei of the favour help and assistance of God Iunius Nudatus erat gratia protectione they were naked of his favour and protection Ferus Therefore Si tunc corruissent hostes proculdubio eos ignomiâ—iosè delevissent If then the enemie had fallen upon them they had most shamefully foiled them Gallas As the Canaanites overcame the Israelites when they set upon them wilfully God being not among them Tostat. qu. 34. So also Calvin Significat rejectos esse à Deo Hee signifieth they were rejected of God under whose protection they were To the same purpose Osiander Borrhaius Lippoman Simlerus QUEST LXVII Why Moses stood in the gate and what gate it was Vers. 26. MOses stood in the gate of the camp 1. Cajetan thinketh that the camp had gates to enter in by Quia castra munita eranâ— tanquam civitas because the camp was fenced about like a citie and Simlerus thinketh that the camp was compassed about with a ditch and by the same there were certaine passages and entrances into the camp But that is not like that they alwayes entrenched themselves seeing they were to remove at all times as the cloud before them removed which was sometime the same day sometime within two dayes Numb 9.22 so that they could have no time to
and why 58. qu. Wherefore the people were compelled to drinke the powder of the Idoll 59. qu. Whether by the drinking of the water any visible signe of difference was made among the people who had most deepely offended about the golden Calfe 60. qu. How farre Moses fact herein is to bee imitated 61. qu. How Moses maketh Aaron the author and cause of his sinne 62. qu. Why Idolatrie is called a great sinne 63. qu. Why Moses onely rebuked Aaron and forbeareth further punishment 64. qu. What things are to be commended in Aarons confession what not 65. qu. Whether Aaron dissembled in not confessing plainely that he made the Calfe 66. qu. In what sense the people are said to be naked 67. qu. Why Moses stood in the gate and what gate it was 68. qu. VVhether all the Levites were free from consenting unto this idolatrie 69. qu. Of the authoritie which the Levites had to doe execution upon the idolaters and the rules prescribed them 70. qu. VVhether the Levites did not make some difference among the people as they went and killed 71. qu. VVhy none came unto Moses but onely of the tribe of Levi. 72. qu. Of the number of them which were slaine whether they were three thousand or twentie three thousand as the vulgar Latine readeth 73. qu. How the Levites are said to consecrate their hands 74. qu. Of the time when Moses came downe from the mount and when he returned againe 75. qu. VVhy Moses urgeth the greatnesse of their sinne 76. qu. Why Moses speaketh as it were doubtfully If I may pacifie him c. 77. qu. Why Moses againe intreateth the Lord seeing he was pacified before vers 14. 78. qu. What booke it was out of the which Moses wished to be raced 79. qu. How the Lord is said to have a booke 80. qu. VVhether any can indeed be raced out of the booke of life 81. qu. Of the two wayes whereby we are said to bee written in the booke of life 82. qu. VVhether Moses did well in wishing to bee raced out of the booke of life 83. qu. In what sense the Lord saith I will put out of my booke 84. qu. What day of visitation the Lord meaneth here 85. qu. When the Lord plagued the people for the Calfe 86. qu. Of the difference betweene the act of sinne the fault staine and guilt 87. qu. How God may justly punish twice for one sinne Questions upon the three and thirtieth Chapter 1. QUest At what time the Lord uttered his commination 2. qu. Whether the narration of Moses Tabernacle in this Chapter be transposed 3. qu. How God saith he will send his Angell and yet not himselfe goe with them 4. qu. Why the Lord saith hee will not goe with them himselfe lest he should consume them 5. qu. What ornaments they were which the people laid aside 6. qu. Why in publike repentance they used to change their habit 7. qu. Why the Lord thus spake unto Moses 8. qu. In what sense the Lord saith I will come upon thee 9. qu. VVhether the people put off their ornaments twice 10. qu. In what sense the Lord saith That I may know 11. qu. Why it is said They laid aside their good rayment From the mount Horeb. 12. qu. What Tabernacle Moses removed out of the campe 13. qu. Why Moses pitched his Tabernacle without the host 14. qu. How farre from the campe this Tent was removed 15. qu. VVhat is called the Tent of the Congregation 16. qu. Why the people stood up unto Moses and looked after him 17. qu. Whether there were two clouds or one to cover and conduct the host 18. qu. Why the Lord spake to Moses in a cloud 19. qu. How the Lord spake to Moses face to face 20. qu. Why Joshua is here called a young man 21. qu. Whether is here understood Joshua not to have departed from the Tabernacle 22. qu. When the Lord thus said to Moses 23. qu. How Moses desireth to know whom the Lord would send with them seeing hee had promised before to send his Angell 24. qu. Whether the sole government and leading of the people were here given to Moses without the administration of Angels as Burgensis thinketh 25. qu. When and where God thus said to Moses 26. qu. How the Lord is said to know Moses by name 27. qu. What Moses meaneth saying Shew me the way 28. qu. In what sense Moses saith That I may finde grace c. which he was assured of 29. qu. What is understood by Gods presence 30. qu. What rest the Lord promised to Moses 31. qu. Whether Moses here rested in Gods answer or begged any thing further 32. qu. Why Moses addeth Carrie us not hence seeing even in that place they had need of Gods protection 33. qu. Why it is added people upon the earth People upon the earth Gen. 25. 34. qu. Whether Moses desired to see the very divine essence of God 35. qu. VVhat imboldned Moses to make this request 36. qu. Whether Moses shewed any infirmitie in this request to see Gods glorie 37. qu. What the Lord meaneth by All my good 38. qu. How the Lord is said to passe by and why 39. qu. How the Lord is said to proclaime his name 40. qu. Why these words are added I will shew mercie c. 41. qu. Why the Lord is here doubled 42. qu. Of the divers kinds of mercie which the Lord sheweth 43. qu. Of the divers visions and sights of God 44. qu. Whether God may be seene with the eyes of the bodie in this life 45. qu. Whether wee shall see the divine nature with the eyes of our bodies in the next life 46. qu. Whether the divine essence can bee seene and comprehended by the minde of man in this life 47. qu. VVhether the Angels now or the soules of men shall fully see the divine substance in the next life 48. qu. VVhether Moses had a sight of the divine essence 49. qu. Of the meaning of these words No man shall see me and live 50. qu. VVhat place this was in the rocke which the Lord here speaketh of 51. qu. How the Lord is said to cover Moses with his hand 52. qu. VVhy the Lord covered Moses with his hand 53. qu. VVhy the Lord put Moses in the cleft of the rocke 54. qu. VVhat is here understood by the Lords back-parts 55. qu. VVhat manner of visible demonstration this was here shewed unto Moses 56. qu. VVhere the Lord promised that Moses should see his back-parts Questions upon the foure and thirtieth Chapter 1. QUest VVherefore the second tables were given 2. qu. VVhy the Lord saith to Moses Hew thee 3. qu. VVhether the Lord or Moses wrote in these tables and why 4. qu. VVhether Moses was to bee readie the next morning and why 5. qu. VVhy none are suffered to come up now with Moses 6. qu. VVhy their cattell are forbidden to come neere the mount 7. qu. VVho is said here to descend and how 8. qu. VVho
had beene the worke of the winde the waters would have beene driven all one way and the wind could not have so parted the waters as to make a way in the midst beside if the wind had caused it then when the wind ceased they would have returned againe but so did they not till Moses lift up his rod againe wherefore it was the Lords miraculous worke beyond the power or strength of any creature 3. Yet it pleased the Lord to use this creature to shew his power over all things which he hath made Calvin and this winde served not for the dividing of the water but rather for the drying of the ground after the waters were parted Cajetan QUEST XIII At what time of the night the Sea was divided NOw at what time the Sea was thus divided it may be thus gathered 1. It is evident that this was done in the night because the fierie cloud did give light onely in the night as it did now vers 20. and it was darke among the Egyptians 2. Whereas they used to divide the night into foure parts which they called watches of the night after the phrase of militarie discipline giving unto each watch three houres it seemeth also that the Sea was thus parted in the first watch in the beginning of the night for after the fierie cloud had changed his place Moses presently stretched his hand upon the Sea vers 21. 3. But whereas Pererius thinketh that it was past midnight in the beginning of the third watch before the Israelites descended into the Sea and that they staied on the shore till the wind had dried the ground for them to goe on which he thinketh was ceased before they entred for otherwise the wind would have beene troublesome unto them this his opinion seemeth improbable 1. As soone as the Sea was divided and a way made for the people it is like they followed and staied not on the shore because the Egyptians still pursued them they would therefore slacke no time 2. The Lord bid Moses that they should goe forward vers 15. it is like then they staied not five or six houres on the shore 3. The East wind did blow all night vers 21. therefore it was not laid before the Israelites went in for after that the Egyptians wheeles were taken off vers 25 as may be conjectured by the violence of the wind 4. Neither was this wind discommodious to the Israelites the walles of the water might keepe it from them or the Lord knew how to qualifie it toward them and to turne the rage thereof upon their enemies 5. Neither needed they to stay so long till the ground were dried for them hee that could make a way in the water for them to passe could also prepare the ground 4. Neither was it so long as Pererius imagineth before the Egyptians entred after the Israelites as about the end of the third watch which was toward the morning for seeing in the beginning of the fourth watch the Egyptians were overwhelmed by the returning of the waters vers 24. and before that the Egyptians were gone into the midst of the Sea vers 23. we must allow them more than two or three houres to reach so farre into the Seaâ—â— it may therefore rather be supposed that the Israelites going in in the first watch the Egyptians might follow them in the second for they were not farre from them as vers 9. it is said that Pharaoh and his host overtooke them camping by the red Sea and they were so neere that the Lord caused an extraordinary darknesse among the Egyptians to keepe them from the Israelites vers 20. QUEST XIV Whether one way were made in Sea or twelve for every tribe one FUrther it is a question whether there were one onely way and path made for the Israelites in the red Sea or for every severall tribe a severall way so that in all there should be twelve divisions of the red Sea for the twelve tribes Origene in his homilie upon this place writeth that this was an ancient tradition among the Hebrewes quod propria unicuique in mari aporta est via That every tribe had a peculiar way made for them in the Sea To this opinion subscribeth Thostatus divisum esse mare in duo deciâ— sectiones pro numero tribuum That the Sea was divided into twelve parts according to the number of the tribes Ab. Ezra upon this Chapter testifieth that this was an ancient tradition amongst them and Epiphanius Heres 64. This opinion both Origene and Thostatus doe ground upon that place Psalm 136.13 Which divided the red Sea into divisions Secuit mare in segmenta as Iun. translateth But Thostatus doth fully answer this objection that here the word translated divisions or parts in the plurall is so used according to the phrase of Scripture that useth the plurall sometime for the singular or else they are called divisions because of the greatnesse and largenesse of the division which sufficed as if there had beene many Cajetanâ— also addeth that they are called divisions in respect of the Sea which was divided into two parts Nam una incisio plures facit incisiones For one incision maketh many incisions as he giveth instance of a loafe being cut or divided with one cutting there are made two parts So the red Sea with one division was parted in twaine Origene urgeth also that place Psalm 68. There was little Benjamine with their ruler and the Princes of Iudah with their assemblie the Princes of Zebulon and the Princes of Neptalie whence he would inferre that all the tribes went thorow the Sea in their order But this may rather be referred to the publike and solemne thanksgiving afterward as mention is made of the singers and players of Instruments that went before vers 25. then to their marching thorow the Sea And the Prophet seemeth rather than both to describe the manner of their publike thanksgiving in the Sanctuarie as vers 24. They have seene O God thy goings in the Sanctuarie And he speaketh of those times when Benjamine in respect of the slaughter at Gibeah Iudg. 20. and of the civill warres with the house of David and with Iudah was much wasted that it was a small tribe in respect of the rest 2. Wherefore it is more consonant and agreeable to the Scripture that there was but one way made thorow the red Sea for the people to follow 1. Because if there had beene twelve sundrie paths it would have much amplified the miracle and it is not like the Scripture would have beene silent therein yea the Scripture affirmeth the contrarie that there was but one way made for all Israel as vers 12. The waters were a wall unto them on their right hand and on their left hand which sheweth that the water stood up betweene them but on two heapes and they walked betweene them 2. Divines doe hold that miracles are not to be multiplied without cause seeing then that one large
way sufficed for the whole host of Israel so many divisions had beene superfluous 3. This dividing of the tribes into severall quadrants had beene discommodious unto them for both they had no time to doe it the Egyptians so eagerly pursuing them and beside it would have weakned them to have beene divided into so many parts 4. And by this meanes they could not all have had Moses to bee their guide to goe before them which would have beene a dismaying unto them if the host had beene quartered out into so many parts And of this opinion that they all went one way thorow the Sea are Thostatus Lyranus Cajetane Ex Perer. QUEST XV. Which of the tribes first entred into the red Sea BUt this being made manifest that all the host of Israel went together the same way there is another doubt which of the tribes went first 1. Hierome upon the 12. of Hoshea saith that the Hebrewes doe hold that the tribe of Iudah entred first and that thereupon that tribe deserved to have the principalitie over the rest according to the prophesie of Iacob Genes 49.10 and to this purpose they alleage the words of the Prophet which they translate thus Iudah a faithfull witnesse descended with God into the Sea and is faithfull among the Saints Hosh. 11.12 But in this translation somewhat is added for in the Originall there is no mention at all of the Sea and the rest is corruptly translated for the word ghâ—dh signifieth here not a witnesse for then it should be ghedh but adhuc yet and the other word radh commeth of rudh to rule not of jaradh to descend so that this is the right translation of the words Iudah yet ruleth with God that is though Ephraim were fallen away from God yet Iudah continued upright and stedfast in the worship of God 2. Lyranus reporting the same opinion of the Hebrewes saith that they also affirme that Aminadab the Prince of Iudah was the first that went downe into the Sea and that the rest being animated by his example went in after him to which purpose they cite that place Cantic 6.11 My soule troubled me because of the chariots of Aminadab as the Latine readeth or My soule set me as the chariots of Aminadab as the Septuagint which they say had relation to Aminadabs valiant marching into the Sea before the people But the word amminadib is here no proper name but is taken for the willing people for the proper name Amminadab is all one word Numb 7.11 but here are two and the proper name is written nadab with chametz but here nadâ—b with jod some doe translate it the chariots of the noble Vatab. Montan but then it should be nedib it signifieth the willing people as Psal. 110.3 and the meaning is that the Church with her willing people maketh haste as being set upon chariots to come unto Christ. And further it is not to be thought that there were any chariots among the Israelites but that all went a foot the Lord leading them as sheepe after him 3. Therefore it is most like that the first which went into the sea was Moses himselfe for he was neerest unto the Sea when he stretched his hand over it and beside it was the part of a good Captaine in such extremitie to goe before his people to incourage them Iosephus also thus writeth hereof Moses primus progreditur hortatus Hebraeos ut alacriter sequantur per viam divinitus datam Moses first goeth forward exhorting the Hebrewes cheerfully to follow by the way which the Lord had made lib. 2. antiq Iud. cap. 7. QUEST XVI Whether the Israelites went thorow the middest of the red Sea or onely a part of it Vers. 22. THen the children of Israel went thorow the middest of the Sea 1. Some thinke that the Israelites did not goe thorow the Sea in the breadth thereof to the other side but fetched a compasse like a semicircle and arrived on the same side againe beyond the mountaines of which opinion are the Hebrewes to whom Thostatus consenteth using these reasons to confirme his opinion 1. The Egyptians bodies were cast up upon the shore where the Israelites arrived for they could not see them on the other side over all the breadth of the Sea but the Egyptians were neerer to their owne shore when they were drowned going into it but late in the night after the Isaaelites now the Sea useth to cast up things at the next shore 2. Againe it was after midnight when the Hebrewes went into the red Sea and about the morning were the Egyptians drowned in the space of five or sixe houres it is not like that the Hebrewes could goe all the breadth of the red Sea 3. This further appeareth that the Israelites returned to the same side againe because they pitched in the desert of Ethan when they went into the Sea and went three dayes journey in the â—ame desert of Ethan after they came out of the Sea Numb 33.8 which desert of Ethan is also called the desert of Sur Exod. 15.22 4. If they had gone over the red Sea they should have beene forced to have come over the Sea againe to gâ—t into the land of Canaan for they were further off from Canaan on that side toward Arabia than on the other toward Egypt and the red Sea did not bound the land of promise on the West but onely toward the East as the land is described and confined from the red Sea to the Philistims Sea Exod. 23.31 Contra. But these reasons may easily be answered 1. Though it be admitted that the Egyptians were neerer their owne coasts when they were drowned than the other side yet by the tempest and course of the water which came against them they might be and were carried to the other side for Cajetane well observeth that the Egyptians when their chariot wheeles were taken off fled away from Israel and fled against the waters that returned upon them vers 27. the violence of the waters then did drive them to the other side wherein Gods speciall worke also is to be seene that to the comfort of his people would have the Egyptians bodies cast up in their fight whereas usually bodies being drowned doe sinke in the waters and flote not 2. The Israelites were above five or six houres in going over the Sea they went all the night aâ— is shewed before quest 14. neither were they all passed over when the Egyptians were drowned as is shewed vers 29. for the Israelites walked on still 3. The desert of Ethan is so called on both the sides of the Sea both where the Israelites entred and where they arrived as Lyranus thinketh they were two deserts of the same name and Iunius well thinketh that both that desert on Egypts side is so called and where they travelled afterward when they had gone over Annot. cap. 13. v. 20. Ethan is not the same with the desert of Shur which bounded the Ismaelites countrie Gen.
had conceived that Moses were dead they would not have spoken so doubtfully as not knowing what was befallen him Lyranus And beside God would not have suffered Satan in the same place where hee gave them signes of his glorious presence in the clouds to have practised his cosening and counterfeit tricks 2. They shew their contempt not vouchsafing to call him by his name Contemptim virum illum appellabant c. They in contempt call him the man c. Lippoman 3. They also bewray their infidelitie that having daily experience how the Lord fed them with manna could not conceive how the Lord should preserve Moses alive also fortie dayes without any supplie of food from them Simler 4. They shew their oblivion and forgetfulnesse that having seene Moses goe up into the mountaine and entring into the thicke cloud talking with God they now begin to imagine that he might be consumed and devoured in those flames Osiander 5. This their apostasie and falling away from God and despising of his Prophet did prefigure their falling away afterward from Christ Ferus QUEST XII Why Aaron bad them pull off their earings Vers. 2. THen Aaron said plucke off the golden earings c. 1. Some thinke because the people made great account of their jewels and earings that Aaron by this meanes did thinke to have turned them from their purpose So Augustine Intelligitur illis difficilia pracipere voluisse ut isto modo ab illa intentione revocaret He may be thought to have commanded them hard things to revoke them from their intention c. So also Tostatus Lyranus 2. And Calvin further addeth that he required this lest they might have spoiled the Tabernacle to finde gold for this idoll and he might thinke the people would have beene more hardly drawne unto it because they had given so liberally unto the Tabernacle alreadie But Calvin is herein deceived for the Tabernacle was not yet made Moses being not come downe from the mount where he received instruction for the making of the Tabernacle 3. Further Aaron might thinke that the women would hardly have parted with their jewels and that there might have risen by this meanes some tumults and stirres in their families by which meanes this attempt should have beene stayed Siml Oleast And this is very like that Aaron used all meanes secretly to have put off the people but herein was his great fault that he dissembled in so weightie a matter and did not plainly and openly stay the people QUEST XIII Whether Aarons sin here is to be excused SOme goe about to excuse or extenuate Aarons offence here 1. Bernard alleageth that Aaron was forced thereunto Sceleratis tumultuantis populi contra volunt atem suam cessit clamoribus Hee gave way unto the wicked clamours of the people against his owne minde So also Theodoret Vitulum formaré necessario coactus est He was forced of necessitie to frame a calfe And so he excuseth himselfe afterward by the peoples outrage vers 22. But nothing should have compelled Aaron to doe evill he should have feared God rather than man and chosen to die before he would see God dishonoured 2. Ambrose saith Neque excusare tantum Sacerdotem possumus neque condemnare audemus We can neither excuse so great a Priest nor yet dare condemne him But seeing Moses did afterward sharply reprove him and the Lord would for this have slaine him Deut. 9. there is no question but that he most grievously sinned 3. Some alleage by way of excuse that all Aarons courses tended to have sought delayes till Moses comming in that he called for their earings which he thought would have beene gathered with much trouble and businesse then he casteth them altogether and melteth them and then caused it to bee fashioned with a graving toole after that he made an Altar and deferred the solemnitie till the next day Oleaster But all this being granted it is so farre from excusing Aaron that perfidiosior est assensus c. his consent is so much the more treacherous dissembling his conscience when he saw idolatrie so grounded and rooted in the people than if he had given a simple assent Iun. in Analys 4. Procopius saith Quasi convitienda exprobrat c. Aaron doth as it were upbraid them and scoffingly say unto them These are thy gods c. but neither were these the words of Aaron the people so said neither is it like that Aaron being afraid of them would have scoffed with them wherefore that Aaronâ— sinne was very grievous and inexcusable doth now follow to be shewed in the next question 5. Theodoret addeth Primo populi impetum verbis compâ—scere tentavit c. That first he tried to pacifie the heat of the people with words But this is not expressed in the text it may be he would have disswaded them but that he saw them so violently carried that there was no speaking unto them QUEST XIV Of the greatnesse of Aarons sinne AArons sin then is made manifest set forth by these circumstances 1. In respect of his person he had often conference with God and by him the Lord had wrought great works and miracles in Egypt therefore his example was so much the more dangerous and his fall the greater 2. The thing that hee consented unto was a breach of the first table it was not theft or adulterie or such like but wicked idolatrie for Spiritualia peccata graviora sunt Spirituall evils are more grievous Ferus 3. Quod propriis manibus accipit signum est effoeminati servilis animi In that he taketh their earings with his owne hands it was a signe of an effeminate and servile minde Calvin 4. He sinned also grievously in his dissimulation when for feare hee against his owne conscience dissembled and so betrayed the truth Iun. 5. Borrhaius addeth that he sinned two wayes beside in usurping a lawgivers office which belonged unto Moses and in bringing in new ripes and worship which God had not commanded But Aaron offended not in the first because Moses had left him governour in his place till he returned but in the latter his presumption was great 6. Aarons fall also appeareth in this that after he made a golden calfe seeing it to be pleasing unto the people he was so forward afterward both in making an Altar and proclaiming a solemnitie Pelarg. QUEST XV. Why it pleased God to suffer Aaron to fall NOw it pleased God to suffer Aaron to fall 1. Vt humiliaretur that he might be humbled lest hee might afterward have beene too much lifted up being called to bee high Priest Ferus 2. By this example we doe see Sanctissimos interdum faede labi c. that holy men may sometime grossely fall Borrh. 3. This sheweth that Aarons Priesthood was not perfect nor able fully to reconcile men unto God seeing he himselfe was a sinner Marb Quomodo unus captivus alium liberaret How should one captive deliver another Ferus
Or one sinner make reconciliation for another 4. And for this cause also it pleased God to suffer Aaron to fall Vt nemo de gratia sua praesumat that no man should presume of his gifts or strength but let him that standeth as the Apostle saith take heed lest he fall Ferus 5. And by Aarons presumption we see how dangerous a thing it is to bring any thing into Gods service without his warrant Borrh. QUEST XVI How the golden calfe is said to be fashioned with a graving toole Vers. 4. ANd fashioned it with a graving toole and made thereof a molten calfe 1. The word here translated a graving toole is chereth which is sometime taken for a bag or purse as 2 King 5.22 where it is said that Naaman bound two talents of silver in two bags gave them to Gehezi and so some thinke that Aaron put all the peoples jewels and earings in a bag together lest they might thinke he had converted any part thereof to his owne use Cajetan but the other word vajatâ—ar he fashioned is against this sense 2. But most usually chereth is taken for a penny style or graving toole and so some thinke that Aaron with this instrument did draw a patterne making the proportion of a calfe which the workmen should follow in their casting So R. Salom. Osiand Lyran. 3. Others thinke that with this instrument Aaron made a mould in clay or such like matter and the mettall cast into it received that forme Tost q. 10. Oleast 4. Simlerus maketh a double use of this graving toole Vnum in formandâ— typo alterum in perpoliendo operefuso One in making the mould the other in polishing the worke after it was cast 5. But I rather subscribe to Gallasius that thinketh here is an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a transposing of the words putting the latter first for the golden calfe was first cast and melted and then polished and trimmed with a graving toole as workmen use to doe 6. This calfe was made by Founders worke there are three wayes to make and frame things of mettall either by hammering and beating them to some fashion as the Cherubs upon the Arke were made or by joyning the peeces and joints together which are sunderly made or by casting and melting it in a mould and so was this golden calfe made Tostat. qu. 10. QUEST XVII Why Aaron caused the likenesse of a calfe to be made rather than of any other thing Vers. 4. A Molten calfe 1. Some of the Hebrewes give this ridiculous reason why the image of a calfe was made rather than of any other thing when the Israelites were comming out of Egypt and intended to bring out Iosephs bones with them as they did they say Nilus had overflowen the place where his bones were and so Moses did make the picture of a calfe in a certaine golden plate which floting upon the water shewed the place where Iosephs bones lay which plate they say was brought among other jewels to Aaron here and cast into the fire by vertue whereof the whole masse of gold was turned into the shape of a calfe But here are many fables couched together 1. It is a very tale that Iosephs bones were found out by any such meanes 2. The people onely brought their golden earings therefore no such plate 3. Neither was there any such vertue in that golden plate if there had beene any such to convert or change the whole masse 4. Neither was there any such cause seeing the molten calfe was cast in a mould Opere fusario by Founders worke as the Latine translator readeth 2. R. Abraham seemeth to thinke that this figure of a calfe was made rather than any other as apâ—est at that time to receive some divine and celestiall influence but though Aaron were at this present grossely blinded and deceived yet it were impietie to thinke that he was given to such superstitious astrologicall observations as to make figures to derive some secret supernaturall influence and vertue into by the celestiall constellations 3. Some thinke that Aaron caused a calfe to be made to deride them as Helias did Baals Priests supposing they would not be so absurd as to ascribe divine vertue unto a calfe Procopius But it seemeth that Aaron was in good earnest by that which followeth in that he set up an Altar and proclaimed an holy day 4. It is further alleaged by some that Aaron intended not to make any thing of the gold thinking that the fire might consume it but that the Egyptians which were in the campe by their art Magike and by the operation of the devill caused the image of a calfe to come forth Ex Fero. But it may appeare vers 24. by Aarons confession unto Moses that he intended to make them an image when he cast the mettall into the fire and to what end else served the graving toole but to fashion it he would not have polished and trimmed the devils worke 5. Some further thinke they would have a calfe made because the sacrifices of bullocks are the chiefest and thereby they thought the better to please God But it is not like that they had any such purpose at this time to doe that which was pleasing unto God seeing they had heard not long before the Lord by his owne mouth forbidding them to make any kinde of image to worship 6. It is therefore most like that Aaron according to the desire of the people made a Calfe like unto the Egyptian god Apis which they had seene the Egyptians to worship and therefore they were drawne by the corrupt imitation of them to have the image of a Calfe made Lyran. Calvin Simler Gallas Augustine addeth further that the Egyptians had set up the image of an oxe or bullocke by Iosephs tombe which they worshipped So the Interlinâ—â—ry glosse giveth this reason Quia bovem adoraverunt in Aegypto Because they had used to worship a bullocke in Egypt And the Egyptians used to worship their King being dead under the forme of a live bullocke Plin. lib. 8. cap. 46. QUEST XVIII Whether the Israelites thought indeed the golden Calfe to be the God that delivered them THen they said These be thy gods O Israel which brought thee out of Egypt 1. Procopius thinketh that these words were uttered by Aaron and that hereby he would have brought them to remember that God which had brought them out of Egypt But it is evident by the text that these were the acclamations of the people 2. Lyranus thinketh that the people attribuebat idolo did attribute unto this idoll it selfe those great wonders which God had wrought for their deliverance and therefore for honour of this idoll they speake in the plurall number as men used to doe to great persons But it is not like they were so mad as to thinke the golden Calfe brought them out of Egypt cum res esset inanimata it being a thing without life Ferus And men use to speake for more