the old and new Lippom. panes azymi munditiam vita the unleavened bread betokeneth the holinesse of life without the leaven of maliciousnesse as S. Paul expoundeth 1 Cor. 6. 2. The solemne washing of Aaron and his sons did signifie the Sacrament of Baptisme and as they doe not put on their garments untill first the filth of the flesh be washed away Sic nisi in Christo novi homines renaseantur So unlesse they become new men in Christ they are not admitted unto holy things Hierom. They which come unto God must first bee purged and cleansed from their sins Pelarg. And hereby more specially was signified in this solemne washing with water the publike Baptisme of Christ which though he needed not in respect of himselfe yet thereby he would consecrate that Sacrament for us Osiander 3. By the putting on of the Priestly garments after they were washed is signified the putting on of Christ cum tunicas polliceas deposuerimus after we have put off our old vestures Hierom. So Procopius applieth those words of the Apostle Put on the Lord Iesus Christ So also Pelarg. 4. By the oyle wherewith Aaron was annointed Beda understandeth Gratiam Spiritus sancti The grace of the Spirit And Hierom here applieth that saying of the Prophet David Psal. 45. God even thy God hath annointed thee with the oyle of gladnesse above thy fellowes Therefore was Aaron onely annointed in the head and none of the rest because Christ received the Spirit beyond measure and the holy Ghost descended and lighted upon him when he was baptized Matth. 3. Osiander QUEST X. Why the Priests lay their hands upon the head of the beast Vers. 10. AAron and his sons shall put their hands upon the head c. 1. Augustine by this ceremonie understandeth the receiving of power Vt ipsi etiam aliquid consecrare possent that they also might consecrate afterward unto God So also Lyranus But because the people also did use to lay their hands upon their sacrifices which they brought Levit. 4. who received thereby no power to sacrifice this seemeth not to be the meaning 2. Iunius thus expoundeth it Quasi seipses sisterent sacrificarent Iehovae As though they did present themselves to bee sacrificed unto God yet not in their owne person but Christs But this cannot be the meaning for the former reason because the people did also lay on their hands who were therein no type of Christ that sacrificed himselfe for us 3. Some thinke that by this ceremonie in imposing of their hands they did resigne their right in that beast Tostat. Et destinarunt illud ut fieret sacrificium and ordained it to be a sacrifice Osiander 4. But there is more in it than so they hereby confesse that they were worthie to die in Gods justice for their sins Sed ex divina misericordia mors in animal transferebatur But by the divine mercie their death was transferred upon the beast Lyran. wherein Christ is lively shadowed forth who died for us Simler QUEST XI Of the divers kinds of sacrifices and why some kinde of beasts were taken for sacrifice and not other Vers. 11. SO thou shalt kill the calfe c. 1. There were three kinde of sacrifices which were usually offered the first was called holocaustum a burnt offering because it was wholly consumed upon the Altar and this kinde was offered specially ad reverentiam majestatis for reverence of the divine majestie to testifie our obedience and service The second was the sacrifice for sin whereof part was burned upon the Altar part was for the Priests use unlesse it were a sin offering for the Priest or the people in which cases all was consumed on the Altar The third sort were peace offerings which were offered in signe of thanksgiving for some benefit received or to be received whereof part was burnt upon the Altar part was for the Priest and the rest was for the offerer Thom. 2. Now although there were many cleane birds and beasts yet there were onely two kinde of the one the pigeon and turtle dove and three of the other bullocks sheepe and goats which were taken for sacrifice whereof Philo giveth this reason because both among the fowles and beasts these are of the meekest and mildest nature the pigeon and turtle dove and amongst the beasts these three sorts are tamest when we see that whole heards and flocks of them may be driven by a boy and they have neither pawes or clawes to hurt as ravenous beasts nor yet armed with teeth to devoure wanting the upper row wherein appeareth the harmlesse disposition of these creatures Philo addeth further that these beasts of all other are most serviceable unto mans use sheepe and goats for cloathing and food and bullocks beside the use of their flesh for meat and their skins for leather they serve with their labour in the tilling of the ground To these may a third reason bee added because the land of Canaan most abounded with these kinds of fowles and beasts they are prescribed for sacrifice And a fourth also may be this they were not to offer of wilde beasts because they could not easily bee had and hardly are they gotten alive for which cause they were not appointed to offer fishes which could not so easily be taken and very hardly alive but their sacrifices must be brought alive Riber 3. Now in the consecration of Aaron and his sons all these sacrifices are offered a bullocke for a sinne offering one ramme for a burnt offering and another for a peace offering QUEST XII Why the bloud was laid upon the horns of the Altar Vers. 12. THou shalt take of the bloud and put it upon the hornes c. 1. The bloud here was not used to confirme any league or covenant betweene God and his people as chap. 24. for in that case first the words and articles of the covenant were read before the bloud was sprinkled and beside each partie betweene whom the covenant was made were besprinkled not onely the Altar which represented God but the people also But here neither of these is performed there is no covenant rehearsed neither are the people sprinkled with the bloud 2. There was then another use beside this of the sprinkling of bloud which was to purge and cleanse and so to pacifie and appease as this reason is yeelded why they should not eat the bloud because the Lord had given it to be offered upon the Altar to be an atonement for their soules Levit. 17.11 And not onely the Altar of burnt offering was cleansed by bloud but the whole Tabernacle the high Priest in the day of reconciliation sprinkled the bloud upon the Mercie seat and before the Mercie seat the Altar and Tabernacle also to purge them from the sins and trespasses of the people Levit. 16.16 Therefore the Apostle saith Almost all things by the law are purged with bloud Heb. 9.22 The bloud of the sacrifices then was put upon
the text saith I haue given you every tree c. For 1. it is evident out of the Scripture that divers kinds of trees were created in Paradise for beauty and ornament which bare no fruit for food as the Cedar and Firre tree Ezek. 31.8 The Cedâ—rs in the garden of God could not hide him no Firre tree was like his branches 2. This generall permission to eat of every tree concludeth not a necessity of fruit-bearing in every tree but a liberty to eat of all which were fit for food excepting only the tree of knowledge of good and evill Gen. 2.17 QVEST. XXXV Whether the flesh of beasts were eaten before the floud LIkewise we refuse the opinion of Beda that neither man nor beast did eat of any flesh but onely of the fruits of the earth before the floud neither doe wee allow the iudgement of Thomas Aquinas who thinketh that the beasts which are now devourers of flesh should have used that kind of food in the state of mans innocency 1. part quaest 96. artic 1. The latter opinion wee reiect because if man had not transgressed there should have beene no death in the world Rom. 5.12 Sinne entred into the world by one man and death by sinne if there should have beene no death in the world because no sin I see not how death should have entred upon other creatures especially this violent death by slaughter as the Apostle also saith Rom. 8.22 That every creature groaneth with us and travelleth in paine together to this present so that this bondage of paine and corruption which maketh man and beast groane together was laid upon them together Neither doe I see how Basils opinion can stand hom 11. in Gen. that man in his innocency though hee should not have used the beasts for food yet might haue slaine them to take knowledge of their inward parts and to helpe his experience that wayes or it should have beene lawfull unto him to kill them in hunting for his delight as Pererius thinketh lib. 4. in Gen. p. 663. for this slaughter and killing of beasts upon what occasion soever whether for food for knowledge or pleasure belongeth unto the bondage of corruption which by sin was brought into the world The other opinion seemeth probable especially because of these two places of Scripture first for that the beasts and fowles lived in the Arke not of flesh but of other food than usuall as Noah is bidden to take of all meat that was eaten Gen. 6.21 for there being only one couple of uncleane beasts and seven couple of cleane preserved in the arke out of these there could not be food of flesh sufficient for the rest and after the cattell went out of the Arke there was no other food for them all flesh being destroyed but onely by the fruits of the earth Secondly the first permission to eat flesh that we reade of was after the floud Gen. 9.3 Everything that moveth and liveth shall be meat for you as the greene herb But these objections may be easily answered To the first we answer 1. that the beasts which did devoure flesh did also feed of herbs and so Noah might provide for them according to their eating 2. Though they did use altogether to live of flesh yet I thinke that for that present time and some while after all beasts might returne to the first food appointed in the creation this being a second creation and renewing of the world so that upon this extraordinary occasion and urgent necessity it cannot be gathered what was the ordinary food of beasts before no more than it can bee inferred that because beasts of contrary natures as the lion and calfe beare and cowe woolfe and lambe leopard and kid did lye together Isay 11.6 that there was no enmity betweene them before To the second place our answer is that there that liberty is onely renewed as is the blessing to increase and multiply vers 1. and the prohibition of shedding mans bloud vers 5. at the hands of a mans brother will I require the life of man for before the floud the bloud of Abel was required at the hands of his brother Caine. Notwithstanding therefore these objections I thinke it more probable that both man and beast after the transgression before the floud did use indifferently both the fruits of the earth and the flesh of beasts for food the grounds of this opinion are these 1. That one beast did not raven upon another in the state of mans innocency two principall reasons may be given one because as yet no death was entred into the world the other for that man bearing perfect rule and dominion over the creatures did keepe them in order but after mans fall both these causes were taken away for not onely death entred upon man but the other creatures were brought into the same bondage and were killed for sacrifice as Abel offered of the fat of the sheep Gen. 4 3. if it were lawfull then to slay beasts why not to eat of their flesh And againe man having lost his soveraignty over the creatures they then began one to rage upon another as not standing now in the like awe and feare of man as before this cause is touched by the Prophet Habbac 1.14 Thou makest man as the fishes of the Sea and as the creeping things that have no rule over them that is which doe one consume and devoure another because they have no governour this rule the beasts fishes and fowles had shaken off immediately upon mans fall and not only after the floud 2. Seeing in the old world two great sinnes abounded carnall lust and concupiscence Gen. 6.2 and tyranny and oppression vers 4. there were gyants or tyrants in the earth and tyranny and oppression brought forth bloudshed for which cause the prohibition of shedding of mans bloud is so straightly forbidden after the floud that God will require it at the hands of every beast and of a mans brother Gen. 9.5 How is it like that they would abstaine from killing of beasts that spared not to spill the bloud of men or from eating of flesh which is more apt to provoke unto lust than the simple fruits of the earth 3. If the flesh of beasts was not eaten before the floud what then became of the increase of cattell how was not the earth over-run with them This reason was given why the Lord would not at once but by little and little destroy the Canaanites before the Israelites lest the beasts of the field should increase upon them Deut. 7.22 because they both helped to destroy the cruell beasts and did eat the uncleane as swine and such other both which by their multitudes otherwise might have beene an annoyance to the Israelites But greater feare was there of overspreading the earth with increase of beasts before the floud if no such provision had beene made to diminish their number 4. But that place most of all confirmeth our opinion
4. And yet Athenaeus reporteth that Hiero King of Sicilie caused a ship to be made of such bignesse that there went unto it as much timber as sufficed to make 60. other ships three hundred workmen beside labourers were employed one whole yeere in this worke there were in it three divisions one above another and twenty rankes of oares it had also within it a fish-pond wherein were great and small fish the received report of this great galliasse may move them not to be so incredulous concerning the Arke Vers. 10. Noah begat three sonnes c. Because Noah was five hundred yeare old before he begat any children and afterward abstained an hundred yeare for so long it was to the floud and begat no more children hence Pererius inferreth that the gift of continency is not impossible against certaine heretikes as he calleth them meaning protestants Contra. 1. It is untrue that we affirme this gâ—ft to be impossible but we say that it is rare neither is in every mans power to obtaine as they teach that any man that will may have that gift it followeth not because Noah had that gift of abstinence that all therfore are capable of it S. Paul saith every man hath his proper gift of god one after this manner another after that 1 Cor. 7.7 it is then a proper gift to some not common to all 2. And though Noah was a chast and temperate man in marriage yet it may be doubted whether he continued so long unmarried or did forbeare so long after 6. Places of exhortation and morall duties nt 1. Vers. 2. The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were faire We see the fruits of such marriâ—ge as is enterprised only upon a carnall appetite and with persons of a diverse profession therefore the Apostle saith be not unequally yoaked c. 2. Vers. 3. My spirit shall not alwayes strive c. Gods mercy appeareth that threatneth before he punisheth that by his threatning men might learne to amend â—ut nobis correctis miâ—as ad opus minime perducat that we being amended his menacing need take no effect Chrysost. so the Apostle saith despisest thou the riches of the bountifulnesse of God c. not knowing that the bountifulnesse of God leadeth thee to repentance Rom. 2.4 3. Vers. 4. There were Giants By this we see that they which fall away doe run â—rom one extreme to another as these which were in outward profession the sonnes and worshippers of God falling away became cruell and outragious tyrants of such the Apostle saith that it is impossible that they which were once lightned if they fall away should be renued by repentance Heb. 6.5 6. 4. Vers. 9. Noe was a just man in his â—ime Though all the world even where Noe lived were given unto wickednesse yet the Lord preserved him We learne therefore that although we be environed on every side with the wicked yet we should not doubt but that the Lord is able to preserve his and that therefore as the Apostle saith we should shine as lights in the world in the midst of a naughty crooked nation Phil. 2.15 CHAP. VII 1. The Method THis Chapter hath two parts 1. of the entrance of Noah and the creatures into the â—rke from v. 1. to v. 10. 2. concerning the floud 1. God prescribeth what Noah should doe for himselfe vers 1. for the â—easts and fowles as touching their number of some to take seven of some â—wo for their kinde male and female vers 3. the reason expressed vers 4. Then Noah sheweth his obedience in entring himselfe vers 6.13 and the â—easts vers 8 9. the creeping things and fowles shew their obedience in comming vers 14.15 Gods providence in shutting of them up vers 16. 2. First the causes of the floud are set forth vers 11. secondly the manner in the time when it came after seven dayes vers 10 how long it prevailed forty dayes vers 12. how farre it exceeded vers 20. how long it continued before it abated that is an 150. dayes vers 24. thirdly the effects of the floud it beareth up the Arke vers 17. it destroyeth all flesh beside those in the Arke vers 21. to 23. 2. The grammaticall or literall sense v. 5. yet 7. dayes S. before 7. dayes that is expired T. after 7. dayes cater v. 4. I will destroy all the resurrection 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 S. all the substance caet heb teâ—hem a substance or living body any thing that riseth from the ground v. 8. the seven and twenty day S. the seventeenth day caet v. 10. and upon the seventh day T. after seven dayes caet v. 13 in this day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 S. in articulo in the point or article of this day H. Ch. in the selfe saâ—day B.G.T. in the body of this day heb gneâ—sem a body v. 14. every bird of every feather wanting in the S. the rest have it v. 16. God shut his Arke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without S. God shut him in deforis without H. God protected over him Ch. shut him in round about B. shut him in G. God occlusit pro eo shut up for him T. bagnado over him heb The explanation of doubts or theologicall explication QVEST I. Why Noah prayed not for the old world as Abraham did for Sodome Vers. 1. THey have seene righteous before me c. 1. He was not onely righteous in respect of men but before God his righteousnesse was in truth 2. Whereas before Moses added that hee was just and upright Gen. 2.9 the Hebrewes hence gather because he is not here also said to bee upright but only just that he is commended only because hee was not unjust and cruell towards men But seeing it is said he was just before God the other addition need not for God seeth the heart 3. The Hebrewes doe further extenuate Noahs faith some saying that he thought not that God would destroy the world but that he threatned onely some that Noah only prayed for himselfe and not for the world as Abraham did for the Sodomites and therefore for these his oversights hee afterward offered sacrifice But they blame Noah without cause the reason why he prayed not as Abraham did for others for that hee saw them incorrigible and already God had given sentence that the world should be destroyed but when Abraham prayed for Sodome no sentence was as yet gone forth against them The sacrifice which Noah offered afterward was an oblation of thankesgiving for his deliverance not a deprecation for any such particular offence Mercer QVEST. II. Of the difference of cleane and uncleane beasts Vers. 2. OF every cleane beast c. 1. Some beasts were counted cleane some uncleane not simpl◠〈◊〉 respect of their nature and creation for God saw that all things were good neither in regard onely of mans use because some were more fit for food than others but chiefly by the
THe wickednesse of the Amorites is not yet full c. 1. The Amorites are named whereas there were other people of the Canaanites because they were the most mighty among the rest both in power and stature of body whose height was like the height of Cedars Amos 2.9 and they excelled in wickednesse and therefore the Prophet setting forth the wickednesse of Israel saith their father was an Amorite Ezech. 16.2 2. Neither did the punishment of this people depend upon any fatall necessity before the which they could not be punished but upon Gods will and purpose who would not cut them off at the first but in his just judgement permitted them till they came to the height of iniquity 3. Some by sinnes here understand the punishment of sinne which God suspended for a time but the other sense is better to take the word properly for the wickednesse of that people which was not yet ripe which God deferreth to punish both to make them excusable that despise so long a time of repentance and to justifie his owne judgements which he sendeth not without just cause 4. And there are foure arguments or marks of the ripenesse of sinne and the nearenesse of Gods judgements 1. the quality of the sinnes themselves when they are such as are directly against God as superstition Idolatry the offering up of their owne children in the fire against the law of nature as in unnatural uncleannesse such as reigned among the Sodomites against humane society as in cruelty and oppression as in the old world Gen. 6.11 2. The generality of sin when not a few but the whole multitude are corrupt so in Sodome were not to bee found ten righteous men 3. The impudency of sinners that are not ashamed openly to transgresse and to boast of their sinne as the Prophet complaineth of the Israelites they have declared their sinne as Sodome they hide them not Isa. 3.9 4. When they are incorrigible and past amendment as Pharaoh and the Aegyptians when they were not humbled with those ten grievous plagues the Lord overthrew them in the red sea Perer. QVEST. XVII Why Euphrates is called the great river Vers. 18. FRom the river of Aegypt to the great river of Euphrates 1. Euphrates is called the great river not as the Talmudists thinke because it confined the holy land but either for that it was the greatest river in Asia as Danubius is in Europe Nilus in Africa in India Ganges and Indus or for that it was one of the rivers that came through Paradise as for the same cause Tigris or Hiddekel is called the great river Dan. 10.4 2. The river of Aegypt is not Nilus as R. Salomon and Mercer for the bound of Palestina never extended so farre but it is a river which runneth out of Nilus betweene Pelusium and Palestina thorow a great desart and falleth into the Mediterranean sea this river is called Sithor as Aben Ezra of the troubled and blacke water Iosuah 13.3 which it borroweth of Nilus which for the same cause is called melas black it is termed also the river of the wildernesse Amos 6.14 the same which the Septuagint call Rinocolura Isa. 27.12 because it did run along by that city so called of the cutting or slitting of noses which punishment King Artisanes inflicted upon malefactors and sent them to inhabite that city Diodorus Siculus lib. 2. and of this opinion is Epiphanius that this river of Aegypt is the river Rinocolura to whom Lunius assenteth Iosu. 13.3 It seemeth to bee an arme of the river Nilus commonly called Carabus which is distant some five dayes journey from Gaza toward Aegypt Perer. ex Masio in Iosua 13. QVEST. XVIII How the land of Canaan is said to be given to Abraham Vers. 18. VNto thy seed c. But v. 7. the Lord said to give thee this land to inherit it and cap. 13.15 both are joyned together I will give it unto thee and thy seed for ever c. Now seeing Abraham had not so much as the breadth of a foot Act. 7.4 how was this land given to Abraham 1. Some thinke it was given to Abraham in right to his seed in possession or to him because it was given to his seed for as the sonne belongeth to the father so what is given or promised to the son concerneth the father 3. but therefore is this land said to be given to Abraham though hee never had possession thereof but his seed because for his sake and the love of God toward him it was given to his seed as Moses saith because he loved thy fathers therefore hath he chose their seed after them Deut. 4.37 QVEST. XIX Whether the Israelites ever enjoyed the whole countrey Euphrates FRom the river of Aegypt to the river Euphrates c. But whereas the land of Canaan is otherwise confined Numb 34.8 where it is not extended beyond Hamath which is a great way on this side Euphrates and the usuall limitation and border was from Dan to Beersheba 1 King 4.25 which as in length not above 160. miles and in breadth from Joppe to Bethlem not above 46. miles as Hierome witnesseth epist. 129. ad Dardan a great question is here moved how their borders could reach to Euphrates 1. Some thinke that there were two countries promised to Abrahams seede the lesse of Canaan which they possessed and a larger extending to Euphrates upon condition if they walked in obedience which condition because they performed not they never injoyed that countrey sic Hier. like as in the Gospell saith he the Kingdome of heaven is promised to the obedient but if they performe not obedience they shall misse of the reward nequaquam erit culpa in promittente sed in me qui proâ—issâ—â— acceperâ— non merui and yet the fault shall not be in him that promiseth but in mee that am not worthy to receive the promise Hieron ibid. to whom subscribeth Andreas Masius in c. 1. Iosue 2. Augustine is of another opinion that the promised land was of two sorts the lesse which comprehended the land of Canaan which the Israelites possessed under Iosua the other which reached to Euphrates which was not under their dominion till David and Salomons time who reigned over all Kingdomes from the river that is Euphrates and from Tipsack which was a City upon that river afterward called Amphipolis even unto Azzah or Gaza 1. King 4.21.24 August qu. 21. in Iosue to whom agree Cajetane and Oleaster and Iunius upon this place and this seemeth to bee the better opinion for wee are not to thinke but that this promise made so solemnely to Abraham accordingly tooke effect 3. Whereas it is objected that all the country to the river Euphrates was never given unto Israel no not in Salomons time because they did not expell thence the inhabitants and plant the Israelites there as they had done in Canaan First Augustine answereth that concerning the Cities which were a farre off they were commanded if they would
it 5. Wherefore there remaineth onely this way to reconcile these places which for my part I doubt not but to preferre before the rest Saint Stephen in this place abridgeth two histories one of Abrahams buying a Sepulcher the other of Iacobs purchase of a peece of ground from Hemor so that his meaning is that Iacob and the fathers were buried part in Sichem part in the Sepulcher in Hebron these words then of Emor of Sichem must be referred to the first words They were removed to Sichem sie histor Scholast Iun. parall the words then comming betweene and were put in the Sepulcher which Abraham bought for money must be read with a parenthesis and the sense suspended to make a perfect sentence The like example where two histories are abridged and joyned together we have Exod. 12.40 The dwelling of the children of Israel while they dwelled in Egypt was 430. yeares in which summe is comprehended not onely their dwelling in Egypt for so long they were not sojourners there but in Canaan in a land not theirs and yet the one is named the other understood so then as the saying is true In sensu diviso non composito dividing the sense and sentence concerning their abode both in Egypt and Canaan in like manner in this place the sentence must be divided and part referred to Abrahams purchase part to Iacobs 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Lawfull to weepe for the dead so it be done in measure Vers. 2. ABraham came to mourne for Sarah and to weepe for her It is lawfull then to mourne and lament for the dead so it be done in measure and moderately Man is not as a stocke or a stone to be without all naturall passions or affections We see that our Saviour himselfe also wept going to Lazarus grave which they interpreted to proceed from his love Ioh. 11.35 Saint Paul forbiddeth not to sorrow at all but not as men without hope 1 Thes. 4.13 Wherefore that saying of Solon Mors mea ne careat lachrymis c. Let not my death want teares so it be done temperately is to be preferred before that of Ennius Nemo me lachrymis decoret c. Let no man weepe for me Perer. 2. Doct. Our mourning for the dead must be in measure Vers. 3. ABraham rose up from the sight of the corps c. Lest that he might be overcome of griefe he removeth the object thereof which teacheth us that we should keepe a measure in our griefe not to mourne as the heathen doe that have no hope of the resurrection or as those passionate women which wept for their children and would not bee comforted Matth. 1.16 It is well observed that the Egyptians mourned for Iacob seventy dayes Ioseph but seven dayes Gen. 50.3.10 to shew a difference betweene the excessive griefe of men that have no hope and the moderate sorrow of the faithfull 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against prayer and sacrifice for the dead ABraham rose up from the sight of the corps The Latine text readeth ab officio funeris from the funerall office or duty by which Pererius would prove that the Patriarks used to fast and pray and offer sacrifice for the dead in cap. 23. Gen. Num. 12. which is a corrupt doctrine grounded upon a corrupt text for the originall maketh no mention of any office but onely that Abraham rose up from the sight of the corps and the text saith not he came to fast or pray but to mourne for Sarah 2. Confut. Against Purgatory AGaine Bellarmine saith Contineri implicite mentionem purgatorii That the mention of Purgatory is here implied and that for this cause onely Iacob and Ioseph desired that their bones might be removed into the land of promise because they knew that their sacrifice should be offered for the dead de Purgat lib. 1. cap. 11. Contra. 1. And is not this now a goodly argument Abraham rose up from the sight of the corps Ergo Sarah was in purgatory 2. If the fathers went to purgatory then the bosome of Abraham a place of rest and comfort Luk 16.25 must be purgatory for thither the fathers went 3. What a bold assertion is this to say that the fathers for that cause desired to be buried in the land of promise when as the Scripture directly sheweth this to have beene the cause the profession of their faith and hope that the land of promise should be given them as Ioseph saith God will surely visit you and you shall carry my bones hence Gen. 50.25 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. Against ambitious desire of honour Vers. 6. THou art a Prince of God among us c. Abraham had said before of himselfe I am a stranger and a forreiner among you the more Abraham humbleth himselfe the more he is exalted of them Thus honour fleeth away from them that hunt after it and it is cast upon them that seeke it not as the shadow followeth the body so here it falleth out to Abraham according to the saying in the Proverbs It is better that it be said unto thee come up hither than to be put lower in the presence of the Prince Prov. 25.7 for Abraham in humbling himselfe is more honoured before the Prince of the people here 2. Observ. Wisdome and circumspection to be used in contracts Vers. 17. IN the sight of the Hittites The field is made sure to Abraham in the sight of many witnesses Abraham provideth for his security and quietnsse afterward that this purchase might be sure to him and his without question whereby we learne that it is lawfull for the faithfull wisely to provide and foresee for themselves and to be wary and circumspect in all their doings Muscul. according to that saying of our Saviour To be wise as Serpents and innocent as Doves Matth. 10.16 CHAP. XXIV 1. The Method THis Chapter hath three parts First the sending of Abrahams servant to provide a wife for Isaack with Abrahams instructions and his servants oath from vers 1. to vers 10. The second sheweth the servants behaviour in his journey 1. His prayer unto God vers 11.15 2. The fruit of his prayer in meeting with Rebecca vers 15. to 29. 3. His entertainment vers 30. to 34. 4. The delivering of his message vers 35. to 48. 5. The good successe thereof in obtaining their consent for Rebecca to vers 61. The third part setteth forth the returne of Rebecca with Abrahams servant and her receiving and welcome by Isaack vers 61. to the end 2. The divers readings v. 7. To thee and thy seed S. to thy seed caeter v. 8. Thou shalt be innocent from this curse C. from this oath cat shebagnah an oath v. 10. Carrying somewhat of all his masters goods with him S.H.B. carrying in his hand the best of all his masters goods C. for he had all his masters goods in his hand T.G. and all his masters goods in his hand P. he v. 10. Into Syria neare to Euphrates C.
30.5 Muscul. 4. Observ. Not good to make haste to be rich Vers. 13. THe man waxed mighty and still increased Isaack was not made rich at once but hee increased by degrees for the wise man saith He that maketh haste to be rich shall not be innocent Prov. 28.20 Men should not therefore strive suddenly to be rich but wait patiently for his blessing Perer. 5. Observ. Envy for good things Vers. 14. THe Philistims had envy at him c. They had no reason to envy at him and to send him away whom they saw to bee blessed of God But as Chrysostome saith Ita se habet invidiâ— nihil cum ratione operatur Such is the nature of envy it doth nothing with reason Bonis proximi magis quam propriis malis intabescit invidia Envy rather pineth at other mens goods than her owne evill Hom. 52. in Gen. Such was the envy of Cain toward Abel that slew him because his owne workes were evill and his brothers good 1 Ioh. 3.12 6. Observ. The Kingdome of God must first be sought Vers. 25. HE built an altar c. First Moses maketh mention of the building of an altar for the service of God and afterward of the digging of the well which sheweth that first of all things must be sought that belong to the worship of God as our Saviour saith Seek ye first the Kingdome of God and the righteousnesse thereof c. Calvin CHAP. XXVII 1. The Argument or Contents THis Chapter sheweth the purpose of Isaack intending to blesse Esau vers 1. to 5. and the disposing of the blessing to Iacob by Gods providence and the preventing or disappointing of Esau in the rest of the Chapter where concerning Iacobs obtaining of the blessing we are to consider 1. The meanes which was the counsell and device of Rebeckah vers 5. to 18. 2. The execution or putting of the same in practice by Iacob vets 18. to 27. 3. The successe which God gave unto it Isaack giveth Iacob the blessing vers 27. to vers 30. In the rejecting of Esau 1. his griefe and sorrow is expressed for the losse vers 31. to 37. 2. his importunity to receive a blessing of his father which hee had to vers 41. 3. His hatred toward Iacob because of the blessing and his malicious purpose to take away his life vers 41. 4. Iacobs deliverance from his brothers cruelty by departing into Mesopotamia through the counsell of his mother 2. The divers readings v. 9. goe to the sheep and bring two kids S.C. goe to the flock cat tsun signifieth a flock of sheep or goats two of the best kids H. faire and tender S. two kids of the goats caeter that is sucking kids T. v. 13. It is told me by prophecie that the curse shall not come upon thee C. the curse be upon me cat v. 23. his hairy hands did expresse the likenesse of the elder brother H. his hands were rough or hairy as his brothers hands cat v. 29. the sonnes of thy father S. of thy mother caet v. 33. he wondred C. was afraid and wondred beyond measure H. he was in an ecstasis or trance S. he was greatly afraid T.B.G.P. heb charad to tremble v. 38. Isaack being pricked in heart Esau cried out c. S. Esau lift up his voyce and wept cater v. 39. the fatnesse of the earth shall be thy blessing H. thy dwelling cat v. 40. it shall come to passe that thou shalt put off his yoke S.H. when his sonnes shall transgresse the wâ—rds of the law thou shalt take away the yoke C. when thou hast mourned thou shalt breake the yoake T. when thou hast got the mastery thou shalt breake his yoke B.G.P. he roâ—h to beare rule to mourne I preferre the latter see q. 13. following v. 41. Esau was angry S. Esau hated Iacob caet heb satam to hate v. 42. doth threaten to kill thee H.S. lie in wait to kill thee C. â—oth comfort himselfe against thee by killing thee caeâ— nacham to comfort v. 43 flye to my brother Laban in Haran caeter to Mesopotamia to my brother Laban in Aran. S. 3. The Explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Of the cause of Isaacks blindnesse and of his age Vers. 1. ISaack was old and his eyes dimme vers 2. I know not the day of my death c. 1. Isaacks blindnesse neither was caused by the smoke of the sacrifices which Esaus wives offâ—red to their idols as the Hebrewes nor yet was he by any extraordinary worke of God smitten blind although God disposed of his blindnesse so that thereby his purpose tooke place concerning Iacob but Isaack was now very old being of 137. yeares and blindnesse is incident to old age as other infirmities of the senses as of the hearing the taste as Barzillai confesseth to David 2 Sam. 19. Moses example whose eyes were not dim at 120. yeares Deut. 34.7 is extraordinary 2. Isaack thinketh his end at hand not as the Hebrewes thinke because he was within five yeares of his mothers age that is 123. Whereas Sarah died at 127. for Isaack was now 137. yeares of age Iacob being now 77. yeare old at what time hee went into Mesopotamia as is shewed before qu. 19. in chap. 25. But Isaack who lived after this 43. yeares doth daily meditate of his end Mercer Perer. 3. Though Isaack was blind and weake in his eyes yet it seemeth his body was of a strong constitution seeing he was able to eat of wild flesh which is of harder digestion Pererius QUEST II. Wherefore Isaack biddeth Esau prepare him meat which he did love Vers. 4. MAke me some savoury meat that my soule may blesse thee c. 1. Some thinke that it was the manner of those dayes that the eldest before he received his fathers blessing did performe some service Lyran. But this no where appeareth in Scripture 2. Some thinke 〈◊〉 this was done that Esau might seeme to deserve his fathers blessing Thom. Anglic. But spirituall blessings such as Isaack bestowed upon Iacob cannot be merited by temporall service 3. Gregory compareth the Jewes to Esau which sought by their owne workes to please God the Gentiles to Iacob that found a more compendious way by faith Hom. 6. in Ezechiel 4. Some by Esaus portion of meat to the which a spirituall blessing is promised doe signifie the duty of the people in paying temporall things for receiving spirituall 5. Rupertus by Isaack promising a blessing for a temporall meat shadoweth forth such Bishops in the Church as doe for temporall rewards sell spirituall blessings 6. But Isaack blind in eyes and blind in affection doth herein shew his partiall love to Esau the Lord in his secret providence over-ruling this action and disposing this occasion to the effecting of his owne purpose QUEST III. Why Isaack preferred Esau for the blessing before Iacob Vers. 4. THat my soule may blesse thee c. 1. Neither is it like as Ramban and other Hebrewes
Ambrose The third is their impudent behaviour and continuall solliciting as here this unshamefast woman did day by day move and provoke Ioseph Vers. 10 ex Perer. 4. Observ. The occasion of evill to bee avoyded Vers. 10. HE hearkened not unto her to lie with her or bee in her companie Ioseph would avoid all occasions that might draw him into the least suspition of evill Muscul. So the Apostle saith Abstaine from all appearance of evill 1 Thess. 1.22 He that will not be inticed to adulterie drunkennesse and such like must shunne and avoid the companie of such 5. Observ. The unstable affections of the wicked Vers 14. SHee called to the men of the house This wicked womans love was turned into hatred such was Amnons filthie love or lust rather toward Thamar whom he hated as much after his uncleane act as hee doated upon her before 2 Sam. 13.15 Such are the affections of the wicked variable inconstant inhumane unstedfast 6. Observ. God visiteth his children even in prison Vers. 21. THe Lord was with Ioseph and shewed him mercie c. Though Ioseph was closed up in the darke dungeon yet God was his light and comfort as it is in the Psalme Vnto the righteous ariseth light in darkenesse Psal. 102.4 Visiâ—at deus in carcere suos God doth visit his even in prison as Christ saith in the person of his members I was in prison and ye did not visit mee Matth. 25. Thus God visited Paul and Silas being fast in the stocks in the inner prison when at midnight they sung a Psalme unto God Act. 16.25 CHAP. XL. 1. The Method or Argument THis chapter sheweth first what favour Ioseph found for the time present at the hands of the keeper and how he was set over the other prisoners vers 1. to vers 5. Secondly how by the interpretation of certaine dreames he made away for his deliverance and preferment following where first the dreames are rehearsed unto him the dreame of Pharaohs chiefe Butler apart as also the dreame of the chiefe Baker then Ioseph expoundeth the dreames the interpretation of the one was good of the other unhappie lastly is shewed the divers successe of these dreames according to Iosephs interpretaâ—â—â—n vers 19. to the end 2. The divers readings v. 1. It happened that two Eunuches offended H. the rest have not this clause but onely that the Butler and Bakâ—r offended The chiefe Butler and chiefe Baker S. The Butler and Baker caet v. 1 The Butler and Cooke T. Butler and Baker caet aphah signifieth to bake and to seeth and dresse meat it appeareth v. 17 that he had charge of the Kings meat v. 2. Pharaoh was angrie with them H. angrie with his two Eunuches S. two princes C. officers G. B. Courtiers T. Saris signifieth both and Eunuch and geâ—ded man as likewise a principall officer or man in authoritie v. 3. He sent them into the prison of the Captaine of the souldiers H.C. of the chiefe steward G. B. praefecti satellitum master of the guard T. principis lanionum the chiefe slaughter-man P. see before chap. 37.36 of the divers readings of the word tabach v. 3. In the place where Ioseph lay S. lay bound caet the house of them that were bound where Ioseph lay bound G. the round tower T. Soâ—ar a round vaulted place v. 5. They dreamed both a dreame the same night H. both one dreame in one night S. every one his dreame catâ—r Their visions were of their dreame S. each mans dreame of a divers interpretation S. according to the interpretation thereof câ—t The Butler and Baker of the King of Egypt which were bound in prison all have this clause but the Latin v. 13. Pharaoh shall remember thee C. remember thy service H. thine office S. â—â—mber thy head or â—eavie thine head T. lift up thy head B.G.P. heb v. 16. Three baskets of meale S. filled with principall or white bread C. three white baskets G. P. three white wicker baskets B. baskets full of holes T. char signifieth white and full of holes v. 17. All kinde of baken meats for Pharaoh cat all kind of meats dressed by the art of coquerie T. see before v. 1. v. 23. He forgot his interpreter H. remembred not Ioseph but forgâ—t him caet 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. What the offence was of Pharaohs chiefe Butler and Baker Vers. 1. THe Butler offended c. 1. This Butler and Baker that offended were not the under officers and therefore they which were set over them were punished as R. Ephraim Carus thinketh for it had not beene justice to punish one for an others fault but the same parties which offended were committed 2. Neither was this their offence because Pharaoh found a flye in the cup and a little stone in the bread as some Hebrewes imagine it is not like that so wise a Prince would punish so small offences with death some thinke they had attempted the chastitie of Pharaohs daughters but it is most like that it was some conspiracie or treason against the life of Pharaoh as we reade in the booke of Esther that two Eunuchs conspired against Assuerus Mercer QUEST 2. How the chiefe Butlers head is said to be lift up Vers. 13. WIthin three daies shall Pharaoh lift up or leavie thy head c. 1. Iunius exposition here is too curious that referreth this to that use and custome of tables made with rowes and ranks of holes with pegges against the which were written the names of the officers with their ministerie and services and that this peg is called the head and the boord or table the base or seat to the which the peg should be removed which signified the restoring of him to this place againe 2. I had rather with Mercerus understand by lifting up or leavying the head the numbering of him among the rest as the phrase is used Exod. 30.12 When thou liftest the head of the children of Israel that is takest the summe of them 3. But we neede not search further than with Musculus to take the plaine and ordinarie sense who by lifting up or leavying the head understandeth his advancement and restoring to his former condition as the head of Ioachim King of Iudah is said to be lift up when he was delivered out of prison 2. King 25.27 QUEST III. Whether Ioseph offended in making request to the Butler to remember him Vers. 14. HAve me in remembrance c. 1. The Hebrewes doe reprehend Ioseph for trusting to this meanes of his deliverance say that for this cause he was chastised with two yeares longer imprisonment to the same purpose writeth Augustin serm 82. de temp But although Ioseph was content to use the meanes which was offered yet there is no doubt he relied upon Gods providence still theerfore Ioseph is here reprehended without cause 2. Neither doth he make sale of his spirituall and propheticall gift
hee were rude in speech yet he was not so in knowledge 2. Cor. 11.6 the power of S. Pauls speech consisted not in eloquence of words but in the wisdome of the spirit so Moses though defective in the manner of elocution yet might speake with gravity and wisdome and so bee powerfull in words 9. Wherefore notwithstanding this or what else is objected the most probable opinion is that Moses had some naturall impediment of speech as appeareth both by his owne excuse by the Lords answer by the coadjutorship of Aaron his brother an eloquent man vers 14. and because Moses after this saith he was a man of uncircumcised lips and whereas he saith here nor since thou hast spoken to thy servant his meaning is that if at this time when God spake unto him who was able to take away all impediment of speech yet his infirmity remained much more was it like afterward to continue Iunius QUEST VIII How God is said to make the deafe and dumbe Vers. 11. WHo hath made the dumb or the deafe 1. Wee refuse here the fables of the Hebrewes that when Pharaoh had appointed one to kill Moses he was striken blind that he could not see Moses and Pharaoh became both deafe and dumbe that though he espied Moses escape yet hee could not speake to have him stayed but it is evident by the story that Moses fled before hee was apprehended The Lord here speaketh in generall not of any one dumbe or deafe but that as hee sendeth these infirmities upon man so also hee is able to heale them 2. And although these infirmities are evill in respect of nature yet God is the author of them because they are good also in respect of the end which is to humble man and bring him to repentance and to set forth the glory of God as our Saviour saith of the blind man that his blindnesse came that the workes of God might be shewed upon him Simler QUEST IX How and wherefore the Lord was present with Moses mouth Vers. 12. I Will be with thy mouth 1. Although Moses was no eloquent man in outward speech as humane eloquence is accounted yet there was in him a grave and divine eloquence such as the Apostles were endued with the Lord promiseth the assistance of his spirit and to bee present with his mouth 2. But the impediment of his tongue the Lord doth not altogether take away both that Gods glory and power might appeare and that Moses should see how needfull the helpe and society of his brother was neither did Moses pray unto God to heale that infirmity but only useth it as an argument to decline his calling Simler QUEST X. Whom Moses meaneth that he would have sent Vers. 13. SEnd by the hand of him whom thou shouldest send 1. Lyranus thinketh that Moses meaneth his brother Aaron who was elder than he and fitter for his eloquent speech but no mention was made yet of Aaron whom Moses knew not to be alive as may be gathered vers 18. till the Lord first spake of him and promised hee should assist him 2. Rabbi Selomo taketh that hee meaneth Iosuah whom God revealed unto him should be the man that was to lead Israel into the promised land But beside that Iosuah is not yet spoken of this request of Moses would have shewed some emulation or envy toward Iosuah 3. Many of the ancient writers as Iustenus Martyr Tertullian Cyprian with others thinke that Moses here speaketh of the Messias that should be sent into the world so also Perer. But this seemeth not to be so fit both for that Moses not being ignorant of the prophesie of Iacob concerning the comming of Shiloh and how the Lord promised that he would raise up a Prophet like unto him Deus 18.18 which is understood of Christ could not yet expect the comming of the Messiah and this request for the comming of the Messiah proceeding of faith would not have provoked the Lords wrath Therefore Eugubinus opinion though Pererius checkt him for it is not herein to be misliked that neither would have those places of Scripture which are understood of the Messiah to bee referred to others for that savoureth of Judaisme nor yet that which is spoken of others to be applied to Christ which also would bewray curiosity and superstition 4. Therefore the plaine meaning of Moses is that wheâ—â—as God might find out many more fit than himselfe he would send by their hand that is ministery so he aimeth not at any one in particular to be sent but any other whosoever QUEST XI Whether Moses sinned in his so often refusall seeing God was angry with him Vers. 14. THen Iehovahs wrath was kindled 1. Neither doe we consent to some Hebrewes that doe aggravate Moses sinne as distrusting Gods word and therefore some say hee was punished in being deprived of the Priesthood which was given to Aaron some in that he was not suffered to enter into the land of Canaan Contr. But neither was the first a punishment for Moses still was the chiefe and gave Aaron direction and it was a comfort to Moses to have such a coadjutor and beside Aaron was the elder to whom the priesthood appertained Neither was Moses offence here the cause why he entred not into the land of Canaan but his disobedience at the waters of strife Simler 2. Neither on the other side is their opinion found that doe justifie Moses herein and commend his humility in refusing so weighty a calling as Gregorie who by Pauls example would have us ready to suffer adversities and by Moses to refuse prosperity And Hierome commendeth Esaâ—es readinesse after his lippes were purified and Moses unwillingnesse being guilty to himselfe of his owne infirmity Contra. 1. In that God was angrie with Moses it is evident he offended 2. And as S. Paul was willing to suffer adversity because it was Gods will the spirit so testified every where of him that bands and persecution did abide him so Moses should not have refused this charge seeing God so often had signified his will unto him 3. And if Esay did well after the Lord had purged his lippes being before unwilling to shew his readinesse then Moses did not well who after the Lord had promised to be with his mouth yet still persisted in his refusall 3. Thostatus granteth that Moses sinned yet it was a veniall and small sinne because wee reade of 〈◊〉 punishment that followed Cajetanus is of the same opinion and his reason is taken from the phrase here used The wrath of God was kindled as when a man is moved suddenly of choller than of set purpose Contra. In some sense we confesse that both this and all other of Moses sinnes and of all the elect are veniall in respect of Gods mercie in Christ that pardoneth them but otherwise in it owne nature neither this nor any other sinne is pardonable for the wages of sinne is death Rom. 6.23 in the justice of God 2.
procureth divers plagues as here Moses feareth lest the people if they should not offer sacrifice and doe service unto God should be punished Simler So the Apostle affirmeth that the Corinthians were chastised some with sicknesse some with death for unreverent receiving of the Lords supper 1 Cor. 10.30 2. Observ. Many receive the Gospell joyfully at the first but after fall away Vers. 21. THe Lord looke upon you and judge At the first this people when Moses brought them a joyfull message of their deliverance were glad and thankfully received that gladsome tidings chap. 4.31 But now being more vexed and oppressed than before and not seeing their present deliverance they murmure against Moses Such is the propertie of many in these dayes that are content to receive the Gospell as long as it bringeth ease and prosperitie with it but in time of adversitie they fall away Ferus whom our Saviour compareth unto seed sowne in stony ground which as soone as it riseth is parched away with the heate of the sunne Matth. 13.5 3. Observ. The Gospell falsly challenged to be the cause of Gods judgements Vers. 21. YE have put a sword into their hand to slay us They lay the fault upon Moses and Aaron and make them the cause of their trouble So Achab charged the Prophet Elias that he troubled Israel Thus the heathen Idolaters accused the Christians as the causes of the plagues and famines that were in the world as blind superstitious people doe now lay the like imputations upon the Gospell whereas their superstition and Idolatrie procureth Gods judgements Simler 4. Observ. In the time of affliction we must fly unto God by prayer Vers. 22. MOses returned to the Lord c. By which example wee are taught in all our afflictions and necessities to have recourse unto God by prayer as the Apostle prescribeth If any man be afflicted let him pray Iam. 5.13 So the Prophet saith For my friendship they were my adversaries but I gave my selfe unto prayer Psal. 109.4 5. Observ. Some things fall out in shew contrarie to Gods promises in the beginning to trie our faith Vers. 23. ANd yet thou hast not delivered thy people The Lord after he hath made gracious promises to his servants doth suffer some things contrarie thereunto to fall out for the time for the triall of their faith and patience God promiseth unto Abraham to multiplie his seed as the starres of heaven and yet afterward bid him sacrifice his sonne in whom the hope of his seed was So God promised the Israelites prosperous successe against Benjamin yet at the first they were twice overcome David was annointed King in Sauls place yet hee was persecuted of Saul and driven from his countrie for a while but at the length the Lord made good to the full all his promises toward him Perer. CHAP. VI. 1. The Argument and method THis chapter hath two parts the first is a declaration or rehearsall of the charge which the Lord giveth unto Moses which containeth a double commandement or commission the first to goe unto the Israelites to promise them deliverance unto vers 20. The other unto Pharaoh to vers 14. In the former three things are shewed 1. The foundation of the peoples deliverance which consisteth in the power of God vers 3. his promises made to the fathers vers 4. his compassion upon the afflictions of the people vers 6. 2. The promise followeth partly to deliver them out of bondage vers 6.7 partly to bring them into the land of Canaan vers 8. 3. The effect is shewed that the people because they were afflicted hearkened not unto him In the other commission first the Lords commandement is set downe vers 11.2 Then Moses refuâ—â—â— vers 12. 4. The renewing of the commandement In the second generall part by way of digression is inserted the genealogie of Moses who came of Levi wherein first briefly the genealogie of the two elder sonnes of Iacob Ruben and Simeon is set downe vers 14.15 to make a way for Levi. Then the genealogie of Levi is expressed and of his three sonnes of Gershom vers 17. Merari vers 19. of Kohath and of his sonnes Amram of whom came Moses and Aaron who are specially insisted upon vers 25. to the end and of Izzari vers 21. and Vzziel vers 22. 2. The divers readings Vers. 3. I appeard c. in the name of God almightie I.G. in God shaddai V. as an almightie God B. being their God S. but the word name is fitly supplied as the other part of the verse sheweth but in my name Iehovah c. But in my name Iehovah was I not knowne B.G.I.V.A.P. better than my name Adonai H. my name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord. S. Vers. 7. That I Iehovah bring you out from the burdens of the Egyptians B. G. cum caeter rather from being under the burdens A. that ye be not subject to the burdens I. Vers. 8. Which I did lift up my hand to give it A. B. H. better than upon the which I lift up my hand to give it L. S. P. for upon is not in the text or for the which V. for also is added or which with lâ—ft-up hand I sware to give I. I sware is inserted Vers. 12. Gave them a commandement to the children of Israel V. L. I. or commanded them to the children of Israel A. P. better than concerning the children of Israel B. the preposition el signifieth to or then gave them a charge to goe to the children of Israel G. S. to goe is added Vers. 14. Chenoch and pallâ— A.P. rather than Chanoch I. for it is hatephpathah where pathah is assumed to sheva to helpe to pronounce it and it is better expressed with e than a as the Septuag Hanoch so also V.L. for it is expressed with the some points with the other Henoch Gen. 5. and rather than Henoch S.L.V.B.G. for it is written with cheth which is rather expressed with ch than h. Chetzron I. rather than Hesron L. B. or without an aspiration Esron S. or Hetzron V. or Chezron A P. The first letter is cheth which is as much as ch the other tsadi which is expressed by â—z Vers. 16. Kehath I. B. A. P. rather than Caath L. S. or Cahat V. or Kahath G. for it is with sheva which soundeth e. Vers. 18. The yeeres of the life of Kohath I.V.L. cum caeter rather than Kahath lived B. G. Vers. 25. Pinchas I.A.P. not Pinhas V. or Phinees L.S. or Phinehas G. for the middle letter is cheth ch but because of the better sound the last is used Vers. 27. These are they that spake to Pharaoh and in the end of the verse This is that Moses and Aaron I. V. L. S. cum caeter better than these are that Moses and Aaron which spake B. G. Vers. 29. And it was what day the Lord spake I. V. A. P. better than in the day that the Lord
Augustine would hereby understand the Poets of the Gentiles which as by the crooking of frogs so by their vaine babling have brought in many impious and deceitful fables 2. Grâ—gorie Nyssenus maketh these frogs a type and figure of the Epicures and licentious life which entereth into Pharaohs house that is most aboundeth in the houses of Princes and great men 3. Ferus doth take it in the better part that hereby the conversion of a sinner is set forth God sendeth frogs upon the land when he sheweth a man his owne filthinesse 4. But that other application of Ferus is more apt who by the crooking of frogs understandeth Hereticks that doe open their mouth against the truth as Revel 16.13 the uncleane spirits that came out of the mouth of the Dragon and false Prophet are resembled unto frogs such crauling frogs are the popish Monkes and Friers that are sent forth from the mouth and spirit of Antichrist to crooke against the truth Borrh. 5. Beside the historicall application of this plague is this that these frogs are spued out of Nilus the glorie of Egypt where their greatest delight was from thence commeth their confusion Simler And as in Nilus they drowned the children so from thence their punishment taketh beginning and as they abhorred the sight of the infants so they are constrained to indure the ugly sight of deformed frogs and vermin QUEST IX Why Pharaoh appointeth Moses to morrow Verse 10. THen hee said to morrow 1. Some understand it of the time when Pharaoh would let the people go but it appeareth by Moses offer in the former verse leaving to Pharaoh the time when he should pray for him that Pharaoh accordingly named the next day to that end 2. Which time he setteth not Moses as giving him some space for his prayer Simler For Pharaoh had no such devotion to consider what time was meetest for his prayer 3. But the very cause was this hee might thinke that Moses offered himselfe at this time which he saw by some constellation or aspect of the starres to bee fit for his working and therefore putteth him to another day or Pharaoh might thinke this to be some naturall worke and not sent of God and therefore would stay a while and see whether the frogs might goe away of themselves without Moses prayer Pellican Perer. QUEST X. Why the Lord did not remove the frogs quite Vers. 14. ANd they gathered them together by heapes 1. The Egyptians had beene able of themselves to have destroyed these frogs but that God armed them against them and their number was so infinite that they could not resist them like as the history of the Bishop of Ments is famous that was destroyed of rats and mice following him into the midst of the river of Rhene where yet the Rats tower so called is to bee seene Simler And our English Chronicles also doe make mention of a young man pursued by â—oades who could by no meanes bee defended from them but being hanged in the top of a tree in a trunke they crauled up thither and devoured him 2. God could either have cast these frogges into the river againe or caused them to vanish but it pleased him they should remaine in heapes as a spectacle to the Egyptians both to shew that it was a true miracle and that the stinke thereof in 〈◊〉 noses might put them in mind of their sinne that made them stink before God Ferus QUEST XI The difference of the third plague of lice from the former Vers. 17. ALl the dust of the earth was lice 1. In this plague there goeth no commination or denouncing before for because Pharaoh had mocked with God and his Ministers and had hardned his heart he was worthy of no admonition Simler 2. This plague is brought out of the earth as the two first out of the water for the Egyptians were worthy to be punished in both because they had shewed their cruelty in both in destroying the infants in the water and in oppressing the Israelites by working in clay and therefore out of the clay and dust are they punished Simler 3. In the other plagues in the first the Lord sheweth his power in changing the nature of the creatures in the second in commanding them in the third in using them as instruments of his revenge the first plague was horrible to the sight in seeing the bloudy waters the second was both horrible to the sight and troublesome the third was both these and brought griefe and vexation beside Ferus QUEST XII Whether the third plague was of lice NOw what manner of plague this was whether of lice or some other shall briefely bee examined 1. The Hebrew word is cinnim which the Latine translateth sciniphes and the Septuag 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 derived with some small change from the Hebrew Origen whom Augustine followeth taketh them for certaine small flies with wings that can scarse bee seene as they flie yet with their stings doe pricke very sharpely 2. Alberâ—us Magnus saith that they have the taile of wormes the head and wings of flies and are ingendred in fenny places and doe specially follow and light upon men Lib. 26. de animalib this description agreeth to those flies which we call gnats 3. Suidas taketh it to be a worme that eateth wood 4. Pererius thinketh it was a new kinde of vermine not knowne before 5. But I thinke rather with Iosephus that they were lice so also Iun. Vatab. Pagnin Montan. translate so R. Salomon understandeth the word cinnim and they were such lice as did cleave and swarme upon the body that would not be killed with any oyntment or other medicine as Iosephus but they did gnaw upon their flesh much like to the lowsie disease that Sylla and the two Herods died of Simler And Philo saith they did not only sting the flesh but entred in at the eares and nostrils and pained the eyes and though most of them were of this kinde of vermine of lice which came of the slime and dust resembling the same in colour also Oleaster yet it is like that other vermine as gnats and other biting flies and vermine were mingled among them Borrh. QUEST XIII Why the Lord plagued the Egyptians with lice ANd whereas God might have turned by his great power the dust of the earth into Lions and Beares which should have destroyed the people yet it pleased him for these causes to punish them with this contemptible vermine 1. Because the Lord would not consume them all at once but give them space to come to repentance Philo. 2. And that by this meanes the haughty pride of the Egyptians might bee abated seeing that God was able to punish them by such contemptible and base creatures as proud Tyrants are most daunted when they are quailed by weake and impotent meanes as Abimelech thought it a dishonour unto him to be killed by a woman Ferus 3. This plague also served to keepe them in awe for if God
much away Simler 4. Now further it is to be observed that this 15. day of the second moneth when Manna was given was the same day which was prescribed for them to keepe the Passeover in that were uncleane Numb 9. signifying thus much that the true Manna was not given to the Jewes which observed the first legall pasch but to the Gentiles which were uncleane through their filthy Idolatry Christ the true Passeover was offered and this was the second pasch under the Gospell which succeeded the first pasch under the Law Ferus ex Gloss. ordinar QUEST III. Whether all the children of Israel murmured Vers. 2. ANd the whole congregation of the children of Israel murmured 1. The word Lun here used signifieth to persist as also to murmure but the latter is more proper they persisted obstinate and opposed themselves by their murmuring against Moses and Aaron 2. It is like that there were some godly persons among them that murmured not as Caleb and Ioshua but because they were but few in respect of the rest all are said to have murmured Lyran. and even the Saints also are not without some infirmities Ferus 3. The whole congregation therefore is said to murmure both because it was generall throughout the campe and in regard of the manner they assembled tumultuously against Moses and Aaron and shewed their discontent Simler 4. It is added in the desert to shew the cause of their murmuring the place where they were was barren and dry and yeelded no hope of any succour or comfort Iun. And beside their wretched nature appeareth that being in such misery and distresse which should have stirred them to prayer they fell to murmuring Simler 5. This famine then which they endured was the more grievous in these three regards because all their provision which they had brought out of Egypt was spent and there was small hope of any new supply in that vast and barren desert and beside the multitude was so great that a little provision would not suffice Borrh. 6. So for this cause all the congregation is said to murmure both to include the Levites who also murmured with the rest and there were beside other strange people mingled with the Israelites who set them on worke to murmure as we reade Numb 11.4 Tostat. quaest 1. QUEST IV. How they are said to have murmured against Moses and Aaron here and afterward against the Lord. AGainst Aaron and Moses Yet afterward verse 8. they are said to have murmured not against them but against the Lord the reason is this 1. Because they were the servants and Ministers of God and he which murmureth against Gods Ministers contemneth God himselfe Genevens And Moses so saith Vt adversus illum se scirent murmurasse qui illos miserat That they should know that they had murmured against him who had sent them August quâ—st 59. in Exod. 2. They are said then to murmure against Moses and Aaron because their speech was directly against them and to them but in effect it was against the Lord because not Moses and Aaron but the Lord had brought them out of Egypt which the Israelites repented them of and were discontented with Lyran. and beside that which they murmured for the want of flesh and of bread Moses could not give them but God Thostat quaest 1. QUEST V. Of the grievous murmuring of the Israelites Vers. 3. O That we had died by the hand of the Lord c. These murmuring and obstinate Israelites doe diversly offend 1. In their ingratitude in extenuating the benefits which they had received upon every occasion they looke onely unto their present state and place where they were and thinke not of the place of bondage whence they were brought Pellic. 2. They preferre carnall things before spirituall the flesh-pots of Egypt before the glorious presence of God who now shewed himselfe visibly among them Ferus 3. They preferre their miserable bondage in Egypt with their grosse flesh-pots before their glorious liberty being in some want whereas men will even with the losse of their lives redeeme their liberty Marbach 4. Yea they untruly accuse Moses and Aaron as though they had brought them out for their destruction whereas they did therein nothing of their owne head but as the Lord directed them Ferus Pellican 5. Yea they call their glorious vocation from bondage to liberty a death and destruction Borrh. QUEST VI. How the Israelites are said to have fit by the flesh-pots of Egypt WHen we sate by the flesh pots 1. The word sir signifieth both a pot and a thorne because they used to hang their pots upon hookes of iron or wood like unto thornes and so the meaning is that they sate by the pot hangers whereon they used to hang their pots Oleaster 2. Some thinke this is spoken because they had flocks of cattell in Egypt whereof they might have fed if they would but they did rather use to eat of fish and fowle which they had there in abundance Gloss. ordinar 3. But though the Egyptians abstained from the flesh of bullocks and sheepe it is like the Israelites had their fill and their fitting by the flesh pots both noteth their security Lyran. and their carnall voracity and greedinesse Sedebant affectuoâ—e They sate gaping over the pots Tostat. They had cattell in the desert but if they should have eaten of them they might soone have killed them all up 4. But it is very like that they speake somewhat lavishly in the commendation of Egypt as Dathan and Abiram did call it a land that flowed with milke and hony Numb 16.13 of purpose to disgrace and diminish the true praise of the land of Canaan which indeed was the land that flowed with milke and hony 5. Some thinke further that they had no such store of cattell in the wildernesse because of the want of pasture oâ— that they spared that kinde of flesh lest they should want for sacrifice but it is not like that this people had any such religious thought at this time therefore it is more probable that they longed not for such kinde of flesh which was at hand but for the flesh of fowles such as they used to eat in Egypt and they wanted now for the nature of discontented people is to loath such things as they have and to covet and desire that which they have not and in that the Lord giveth them quailes it seemeth hee satisfied their owne desire but to their further hurt in sending that kinde of flesh which they lusted after Sic fore Gloss. Ordinar QUEST VII In what sense the Lord saith he will raine bread from heaven Vers. 4. I Will cause bread to raine from heaven 1. Some thinke that by bread is understood generally any kinde of nourishment after the manner of the Hebrew phrase Gloss. ordinar Lyran. Oleaster But Augustines reason overthroweth this interpretation Nam isto nomine carnes complectuntur ipsa enim alimenta sunt for so also the flesh
have want Philip. 4.12 2. Observ. Against the unprofitable gathering of riches Vers. 20. SOme reserved of it till the morning and it was full of wormes This sheweth that they which corruptly gather riches shall have no profit by them they both scrape them together in this life without comfort and heape them up to their punishment afterward as the Prophet saith to cruell covetous men Thou hast consulted shame to thine owne house by destroying many people and hast sinned against thine owne soule for the stone shall crie out of the wall and the beame out of the timber shall answer it we unto him that buildeth a towne with bloud c. 3. Observ. Worldly and carnall men acknowlege not Gods gifts Vers. 15. THey wist not what it was This is the difference betweene the godly and the wicked they thankfully acknowledge the gifts of God and know from whom they receive them but the other as bruite beasts use the things present before them not praising the Author thereof Oleaster And therefore men of this world are said to have their bellies filled with hid treasure Psal. 17.14 for it is hid unto them who it is that feedeth and filleth their bellies and in this respect the Prophet maketh the unthankfull and ignorant people worse than the oxe That knoweth his owner than the asse which knoweth his masters cribbe but Israel hath not knowne my people hath not understood c. Isay 1.2 4. Observ. Gods benefits are to be had in remembrance Vers. 32. FIll a gomer and keepe it for your posteritie that they may see the bread c. God will not have his worthie and singular benefits to bee committed to oblivion but alwayes thankfully remembred as for the same cause Christ commanded the remainder of the broken meat to be kept which filled 12. baskets after he had fed the multitude that that singular miracle might be had in thankfull remembrance Oleaster 5. Observ. Where ordinary meanes are offered extraordinary must not be sought Vers. 35. THey did eat Manna till they came to the borders c. As soone as they came to helpe themselves sufficiently with the fruits of the earth the Manna ceased which sheweth that extraordinary meanes must not be expected where ordinary are at hand Piscat For this cause our blessed Saviour repelled the tempter which would have had him make bread of stones which was an extraordinary and unwonted way for food CHAP. XVII 1. The method and Argument THis Chapter treateth of two distresses which the Israelites fell into the one of thirst the other of warre In the description of the first these things are orderly declared 1. Their penurie and want of water vers 1. 2. The effects thereof their murmuring begun vers 2. and continued and confirmed vers 3. 3. The remedie against this calamitie 1. Begged and asked of God by Moses prayer vers 4. 2. Promised by the Lord with a description of the manner how Moses accompanied with the Elders should smite the rocke with his rod vers 5. 3. Effected accordingly vers 6. 4. A consequent whereof is this that Moses imposeth a name upon the place to be a memoriall of this miracle In the other part these particulars are set downe 1. The attempt of Amalek against Israel vers 8 2. The manner of resistance partly by externall meanes the preparation of Ioshua against Amalek vers 9.10 partly by spirituall the prayer of Moses with his gesture the lifting up of his hands the letting downe of his hands with the divers event thereof vers 10. and the supporting of his hands vers 11. 3. The successe of this battell the discomfiting of Amalek 4. The event the decree of God against Amalek vers 12. testified by Moses both by his fact in building an Altar and by his speech vers 16. 2. The divers readings Vers. 1. According to the appointment of God I. or word of God L.S.P. commandement or precept of God V.B.G. mouth of God A.H. Vers. 3. To kill me and my children I.V.B.A.P. rather than kill us and our children L.S.G. the word is othi mee not us Vers. 4. Yet a little and they will stone me I.A.P.L.S. they are almost readie to stone me B.G.V. They give the sense rather than the words Vers. 7. He called the place Massa and Meribah I.A.V.G. not Messah and Meribath B. he called the place tentation and contention S.A. he called the place tentation L. Here the other word is wanting and they are proper names not common and appellative Vers. 8. Then came Amalek B.G. cum caeter the Amalekites I. but in the originall it is put in the singular yet taken for the plurall as it is usuall in Scripture Vers. 14. From under heaven B.G.V.A. rather than under heaven L. here the preposition signifying from is omitted or lest it be under heaven A. or from the earth under heaven I. or from that which is under heaven S. These render the sense rather than the words Vers. 15. And he called it Iehovah nissi G. that is the Lord is my banner V. or my banner is of Iehovah I. better than the Lord is my exaltation or lifting up A.L. or my refuge S. or the Lord is he that worketh miracles for me B.C. for ness signifieth a streame or banner Vers. 16. The hand is on the seate of God B. or the hand is on the throne of the Lord. A.P. better than the Lord hath sworne G. or lift up his hand to sweare V. the sense rather than the words or with a secret hand the Lord fighteth S. or because the hand of Amalek is against the throne of Iah I. here Amalek is added or the hand is onely of the Lord solius Domini L. Here one word is mistaken for another solius for solii 3. The explanation of doubtfull and difficult questions QUEST I. Why some mansion places are omitted here Vers. 1. THey camped in Rephidim 1. They came from the wildernesse of Sin by divers countries for betweene Sin and Rephidim there were two stations beside here omitted Dophka Alush Numb 33.13 14. Iun. 2. Sin is here taken for one speciall station but it is the name in generall of all that desert unto Sinai Gloss. ordin 3. These two stations are omitted and many beside for whereas there are 42. mansion places reckoned in all Num. 33. not above 15. are specially mentioned before in the historie as it is set forth in this booke and Numbers because those places are specially noted wherein any notable accident befell as in Marah the bitternesse of the water in Elim the Palme trees in the desert of Sin the Manna in Rephidim the issuing of the water out of the rocke and some other beside Tostat. quast 1. 4. There are also more names of places rehearsed in the storie than are numbred in the Catalogue of their stantions Num. 33. as Mattanah Nahaliel Bamoth Numb 21. but all those were not the names of the mansion
calleth it Aquam comitem the water that did accompany them but this cannot be admitted for afterward Moses smote a rocke in another place Numb 20. and in another place they digged a well for water Numb 21.17 which needed not to have beene done if the water still followed them 3. Neither yet is it like that this water did onely satisfie their present necessity in that place Osiander For it came forth abundantly and so ran along and if in that place onely it had refreshed them that whole circuite being barren and drie they should oft soone againe have beene in distresse for want of water 4. Therefore I condescend to their opinion that thinke this was not Vnim diâ—i beneficium a benefit for one day or place but that they had use of this water afterward in their journeye Bâ—za 5. But whether this river or streame runneth still to this day and watereth all that valley which before was drie as Tostatus thinketh quast 3. I leave as doubtfull thinking rather that it ceased as the Manna did being appointed onely for a supplie of their present necessity QUEST XI What nation the Amalekites were and how they set upon Israel Vers. 8. THen came Amalek 1. The singular number is here put for the plurall Amalek for the Amalekites for one man could not bid battell to a whole host Tostat. 2. Amalek the father of this nation was the sonne of Eliphaz the sonne of Esau by his concubine Timna Gen. 36.12 Mention is made of the countrie of the Amalekites in Abrahams time Gen. 14.7 but that is by a prolepsis the countrie is called by that name which it had when Moses writ that storie not when these things were done Simler 3. Some take these Amalekites to bee the same with the Ismaelites and Saracens Gloss. ordinâ—r They rather belonged to the Idumeans or Edomites but dwelled apart from them in a part of Arabia by themselves Tostat. They inhabited the region Gobolitis and the citie Para Ioseph lib. 3. cap. 2. They are thought to be the same with the Arabians called Autai Zeigler 4. The manner how Amalek set upon Israel is declared Deut. 25.18 how they set upon the hinmost of them the tayle of the armie where followed the women and children when they were faint and weary whereas it had beene their part rather to have met them with bread and water Like as Shemei cast stones at David and railed upon him being already afflicted and pursued of his wicked sonne and as the Jewes insulted over Christ hanging in torment upon the crosse and gave him vineger and gall to drinke Marbach 5. These Amalekites were the first of all nations that set upon Israel when they came out of Egypt And therefore Balaam thus prophesieth of them Amalek the first of the nations his latter and shall be destruction Numb 24.20 As they were the first that assaulted Israel so their destruction should not be behind Ferus 6. Twice did the Amalekites encounter with Israel once by stealth striking the hinmost of them and this was in Rephidim another time they fell upon them being joyned with the Cananites while Israel abode in Cadesh barneah Numb 14. Tostat. 7. This Amalek is not unfitly by some made a representation and lively image of Satan who lieth in the way to hinder all true Israelites in their way to the heavenly Canaan Gloss. interlin QUEST XII The reasons which moved the Amalekites to set upon the Israelites THe causes why Amalek did thus lie in waite for Israel were these 1. Some thinke they did it Vt paterna abdicationis ultâ—res essent to revenge their father Esaus quarrell for the losse of the birthright Calvin But this was no wrong offered to Esau seeing he sold his birthright and so willingly left it and this revenge rather belonged to the Edomites if there had beene any wrong done which were the right offspring of Esau whereas the Amalekites came by a concubine Simler 2. Some thinke that the Amalekites did it of envie to hinder them from the possession of Canaan their promised inheritance Marbach But it is not like that they had any such perswasion that ever they should conquer Canaan but yet it is very like that there remained some envie and hatred in them against the Israelites as there was in Esau toward Iacob 4. Therefore the Amalekites might feare their owne countrie lest the Israelites should set upon them and therefore combined themselves with other nations against them to prevent all danger Ioseph 5. As also they not onely enterprised this of a malicious but of a covetous mind also as it is the manner of the Arabians to rob and spoile those that goe by the way thinking to enrich themselves by the prey and spoile of the Israelites these were the causes which moved the Amalekites 6. But on Gods behalfe the reasons were these that he might exercise his people with new crosses lest through ease and idlenesse they might wax wanton Pelarg. That they might have experience of the goodnesse of God which still added benefits to benefits Ferus That they might by this meanes â—e made more expert and animated against their enemies whom they should afterward encounter Lyran. Tostat. And by this meanes the Israelites also were furnished and provided of armour and other necessaries by the spoile of the Amalekites Ferus Lyranus Marbach QUEST XIII Why Moses goeth not himselfe to battell but appointeth Ioshua Vers. 9. ANd Moses said to Ioshua 1. Moses goeth not himselfe to battell propter senium because of his age he was now 80. yeare old Ferus 2. And Quia novit officium suum spirituale magis esse quà m mundanum c. He knew that his office was spirituall rather than worldly Marbach 3. Hee therefore appointeth Ioshua in his place whose courage and faithfulnesse hee had experience of Tostat. As also because he was to bring the people into the land of Canaan and to fight the Lords battels it was fit that the people should be used and acquainted with his government and command Simler 5. As also Moses stayeth behind that he might attend unto prayer and use spirituall meanes whith he knew would more prevaile than all externall force Simler 6. Beside this doth notably shadow forth the excellency and preeminence of the Gospell before the law for by this that Ioshua and not Moses encountereth with Amalek and prevaileth against him was prefigured Quod non lex nos ab hostibus liberaret sed Iesus Christus That not the law could deliver us from our enemies but Iesus Christ. Ferus QUEST XIV Whether this Hur were the sonne of Caleb Vers. 10. MOses Aaron and Hur or Chur went up 1. The opinion of some is that this Hur was the sonne of Caleb and Miriam Moses and Aarons sister who they say was also called Ephrata whom Caleb married after his wife Azuba 1 Chron. 2.20 Contra. But this cannot be for divers reasons 1. Miriam was elder than Moses by 13. or
Arke and Tabernacle were apart so that it seemeth in that confused and unsetled estate that the Law in that behalfe concerning the place of sacrifice was not so strictly observed QUEST XXII Whether it was lawfull to sacrifice before the Arke and at the Tabernacle while they were asunder NOw the place where the Lord did put the memoriall of his name was in the Tabernacle and Arke while they were placed together and when they were in two divers places it was lawfull to sacrifice before either of them 1. That it was lawfull to sacrifice where the Arke was is evident by the practise of the men of Bethshemesh that offered sacrifice at the returne of the Arke from the land of the Philistims 1 Sam. 6. So David sacrificed before the Arke when he brought it from the house of Ebed Edom 2 Sam. 6. and the reason is because the name of God was invocated or called upon where the Arke was 2 Sam. 6.2 And from the mercie seat which was upon the Arke of the Testimony did the Lord use to speake and give answers Numb 7.89 2. Likewise that it was lawfull to sacrifice where the Tabernacle was while the Arke was away is apparent 1. Because there was the brasen Altar whereon they offered their burnt offerings before the dore of the Tabernacle Levit. 17.6 which Altar followed alwayes the Tabernacle and not the Arke as Salomon found the Arke at Jerusalem but the Tabernacle with the furniture thereof he fetched from Gibeon 2 Chron. 1.3 4 5. 2. Where the Ministers of the Altar the Priests and Levits were there was it lawfull to offer sacrifice for they gave their attendance to that end but most of the Priests and Levits remained with the Tabernacle as Ahimelech with 85. more were at Nob where Saul put them to death while the Arke abode in the house of Abinadab who consecrated his sonne Eleazar to keepe it 1 Sam. 7.1 who alone sufficed not for all sacrifices and oblations of Israel it seemeth therefore that most of their sacrifices were brought then to the Tabernacle though the Arke at that time were in another place 3. Beside after the captivity of Babylon when the Arke was no more to be seene as some thinke hid by Ieremy 2 Macchab. 2 but as is most like lost in the captivity or burnt with the Temple they used to offer sacrifices for after the captivity they restored and renewed such necessary parts and implements as before were in Salomons Temple and were burnt together with the Temple they made like unto them afterward as mention is made of Luk. 1. how Zacharie burned incense before the Lord which was upon the golden Altar likewise Matth. 27. the vaile was rent which divided the most holy place from the Sanctuary when Christ gave up the ghost and seeing they offered sacrifices for which cause some sold doves in the Temple whom Christ cast out Matth. 12. they had also the brasen Altar only the Arke they had not for seeing the Tables of stone the pot of Manna and Aarons rod were all missing for the keeping whereof the Arke was principally made they had no cause to make a new Arke there being no farther use or service for it Tostat. quaest 43. QUEST XXIII How long the Arke was severed from the Tabernacle NOw because mention is made before of the parting and separation of the Arke and Tabernacle it shall not be amisse to shew how long the Arke was absent from the Tabernacle which time will be found to be not much under 100. yeeres as may bee gathered thus after the Arke returned from the country of the Philistims it remained in the house of Abinadab 20. yeeres 1 Sam. 6. and all the time of Samuels government and Sauls reigne who made 40. yeeres betweene them Act. 13.21 whereof those 20. yeeres were part then it was removed by David about the 8. yeere of his reigne to the house of Obed Edom where it continued three moneths and from thence to the house of David in Jerusalem where it stayed 32. yeeres and 11. yeeres more under Salomons reigne for when hee had finished the Temple in the 11. yeere of his reigne 1 King 6.38 he brought the Arke from Davids tent which hee had pitched for it into the Temple 2 Chron. 1.4 So all these yeeres being put together 40. yeeres of Samuel and Sauls government 40. yeeres under David and 11. yeeres of the reigne of Salomon will make 91. yeeres whereunto adde those seven moneths during which time the Arke so journed among the Philistims 1 Sam. 6.1 In which compasse and continuance of yeeres the Arke had these sundry removes first it being carried from Shiloh was seven moneths in the countrey of the Philistims from thence it was carried to Bethshemesh where 50. thousand and 70. persons were slaine for looking into the Arke 1 Sam. 6. then it removed to Kiriathiearim 1 Sam. 7. from thence to the house of Obed Edom and so to the house of David 2 Sam. 6. where it stayed till Salomons Temple was built these were the setling places and mansions of the Arke after it was severed from the Tabernacle till they were joyned together againe saving that sometime the Arke upon some speciall occasion was removed for a while as when they went out to battell as 1 Sam. 14.18 and so was brought to the place againe Sic fere Tostat. qu. 42. QUEST XXIV Of the removing of the Tabernacle AS the Arke was thus removed up and downe so also was Moses Tabernacle for first it was carried from place to place as long as the Israelites pitched their tents in the wildernesse and after they were come into the land of Canaan the Tabernacle remained a long time in Gilgal for thither came the Gibeonites to Ioshuah in Gilgal Iosh. 10. after that it was set up in Shiloh Iosh. 18.1 where it continued all the time of the Judges untill Samuel who understanding by the Spirit of prophecie that the Lord had rejected Shiloh removed the Tabernacle to Nob where Saul put 85. Priests to the sword from thence it seemeth the Tabernacle was translated to Gibeon where it continued untill Salomons Temple was finished from thence Salomon brought it into the Temple 2. Chron. 1.3 Tostatus qu. 42. QUEST XXV Of the places where it was lawfull or unlawfull to sacrifice NOw concerning the places wherein it was lawfull to sacrifice this distinction is to bee observed 1. That the ordinary place was in the Tabernacle when the Arke and it were together and both at the Tabernacle and before the Arke when they were divided as is before shewed 2. Extraordinarily it was lawfull for the Prophets to sacrifice elsewhere as did Samuel David Elias as is before declared quest 20. being thereunto directed by the Spirit of God 3. But in the high places it was unlawfull to sacrifice and therefore those Kings are commended which tooke away the high places and those reproved being otherwise good Kings that suffred them to remaine 4.
his judgement Galas And by the Law Cornelia among the Romans he which had killed another with sword or poison or by false testimony lost his head if he were of the better sort if of meaner condition he was hanged on the crosse or cast unto wild beasts Simler 5. And the reason of this severity was because murtherers deface the image of God in man and they lay violent hands to take away his temporall life for whom Christ died to give him eternall Marbach 6. But it must be understood that the murtherer was to dye by the hand of the Magistrate it was not lawfull for every one to kill him Iun. For the murther was first to be tried out by witnesses which could not be done but before the Judge Simler QUEST XXXVII In what sense the Lord is said to offer a man into ones hand Vers. 13. IF a man hath not laid wait but God hath offred c. Neither can a man take away the life of another though he doe willingly attempt it unlesse God deliver him into his hands yet this is the difference that where a man intendeth not to kill and yet killeth illic tantùm Deus fecit there God only did it Hîc autem Deus homo propter voluntatem facientis sed non fecit Deus ut homo Here man and God doe it because of the will of him that did it though God otherwise doth it than man So Augustine quaest 79. in Exod. 2. So God is said to offer or as the Hebrew phrase is to cause him to run upon his hand when it is done nolente imprudente homine man not willing nor minding it Iun. And so this act seemeth to be casuall or accidentall unto man which are so called non quia nullam causauâ— habent not because they have no cause for that is impossible that any thing should be done without a cause but because causarum confluentium ordâ— nobis est incognitus the order of causes concurring is unknowne unto us Tostat. 3. Although the cause appeare not to us why the Lord suffred him that is so offred to ones hand to be slaine yet we are not to doubt but that it is most just Ex causa occulta permisit interfici c. God suffred him to be slaine upon some hid cause Lyran. occulta aequitate by an hid equity justo judicio paravit illum occidendum he ordained him to be slaine in his just judgement Cajetan Vel pro sceleribus vel ad emendationem purgationem malorum quae egerat Either for his wickednesse or for the amendment or purging of the evils which he had done Tostat. quaest 15. 4. Rupertus here giveth instance how after this manner Saul was twice delivered into Davids hand in the cave and when he tooke the speare and water pot from him and further saith that permissu legis poterat illum occidere by the suffrance of the Law he might have killed him and gone afterward to some of the Cities of refuge But there is great difference betweene this offring of a man into ones hand here spoken of and that oblation of Davids enemy unto his hand for Moses speaketh here of such an unlooked for event whereby one is slaine that opportunity offred to David was to trie his patience not to give him any warrant to kill and if David had taken that opportunity to slay Saul and had therein followed the carnall counsell of his servants he had sinned in laying his hands upon the Lords anointed for if Davids heart smote him for taking away a peece of Sauls garment how would it have tormented him if he had taken away his life Neither were the Cities of refuge appointed for wilfull murthers such as this should have beene seeing that there was enmity before betweene Saul and David QUEST XXXVIII What places of refuge were appointed I Will appoint him a place to flie unto c. 1. This place during the sojourning of the Israelites in the desert was the Tabernacle as appeareth in the next verse where mention is made of the Altar but after they came into the land of Canaan there were six Cities of refuge appointed three beyond Jordan and three of this side Iun. 2. But yet it seemeth that the Tabernacle afterward and the Temple was still a place of refuge as appeareth by Ioab who fled into the Temple and tooke hold of the hornes of the Altar which notwithstanding could not privilege him QUEST XXXIX Why the Lord appointed places for such to flie unto NOw the reasons why the Lord appointed Cities of refuge were these 1. Lest that the innocent party might be slaine by the friends of him whom he had killed before his cause was heard therefore he was appointed to flie to one of the Cities that the manner of the slaughter might be there considered of by the Judges Simler 2. And to this end it was so appointed that he might stay there to the death of the high Priest Iun. who was a type of our blessed Saviour by whose precious death we are all set free 3. And this was done ut mentem corum hac ratione medeatur c. to heale and allay the minde and fury of those which otherwise would delight in murther Theodoret. For by his absence and in continuance of time the rage of those that sought his life would be qualified and therefore God provideth that they should not be still provoked by the continuall fight of him 4. And further by this that hee which killeth one unwittingly is appointed to flie it is shewed quòd reus poenae efficitur that yet he is guilty of some punishment Theodoret. So that involuntary killing was punished with a kinde of banishment among the Israelites Simler So likewise among the Athenians such kinde of manslaughter was censured 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with one yeeres exile Galas And so among the Israelites he that escaped unto one of the Cities of refuge was not to goe out of the limits and bounds of the City if he did it was lawfull for the kinsmen of the man that was slaine to kill him Simler QUEST XL. What is to be counted wilfull murther Vers. 14. BVt if a man come praesumptuously c. 1. The word 〈◊〉 signifieth to deale arrogantly insolently to be lift up with swelling pride as Psal. 124.5 it is applied unto the swelling waves of the sea Oleaster and two things must concurre in wilfull murther it must be done wittingly and willingly Hic non solum inâ—â—ntio occidendi sed mentis utraque pars intellectus voluntas describitur Here not only the intention of killing but either part of the minde is understood the understanding in doing it with guile and the will in presuming Cajetane 2. Cajetane thinketh further that this is a divers law from the first generall prohibition of killing vers 12. for here the law speaketh of killing a neighbour or companion there of any man there no word is expressed of the intention
their own experience they might learne to have compassion on others Simler For the law of nature teacheth not to doe that unto another which we would not have offered to our selves Cajetan They in Egypt would not have had the Egyptians to deale so hardly with them and God punished the Egyptians for their sakes let them take heed then by those judgements which â—ell upon the Egyptians lest they bee punished in like manner for afflicting strangers Simler 4. Other reasons beside may bee added as that strangers as well as they were created according to Gods image and they have the same common father and let them remember the uncertaintie of mans condition Qua variis casibus est exposita c. which is exposed to divers chances they doe not know how soone they may bee driven to sojourne in a strange countrey Marbach 5. The evill entreating of strangers was odious even by the light of nature among the heathen Plato affirmeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that God is a revenger of wrongs and injuries done unto strangers in so much as those cities were famous which were kinde to strangers as the Athenians the Lucari Egineta which were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lovers of strangers And they were noted of infamy that used strangers hardly as the Lacedemonians with others Galass QUEST XXXIX Why widowes and orphans are not to be oppressed Vers. 22. YEe shall not trouble any widow 1. As the former law enjoyned pity and commiseration to be shewed toward strangers that were in misery so this provideth for such as are in misery being not strangers as Widowes and orphans Tostat. 2. And although none at all are to be wronged and afflicted yet these especially must not bee hurt Quia defensorem non habent Because they have none to defend them Chrysost. Carâ—â—do patre seâ— marito c. The one wanteth a father the other an husband Cajetan 3. The Lord here threatneth that he will be revenged of such as oppresse the widow and fatherlesse and three punishments are threatned they shall be smitten with the sword and the other two are sequels hereof their wives shall become widows and their children fatherlesse Tostat. 4. Which punishments are procured by these degrees the widowes and fatherlesse being oppressed doe cry unto God for prayer made in time of affliction is most fervent then though men regard not their teares and prayers yet God will Pellican And his anger will wax hot against them because they oppresse those whom God favoureth and loveth as wee use to bee angry with those which hurt either our selves or our friends whom we love Borrh. QUEST XL. How and by what meanes prayers are made effectuall Vers. 23. SO hee call and cry unto mee c. Divers causes and occasions there are set forth in Scripture which doe procure the exaudition and hearing of our prayers 1. When two consent together and offer up their prayers with one accord their voyce is heard Matth. 18.19 2. Prayer made in faith is effectuall as the Apostle saith The Prayer of Faith shall save the sicke 3. Continuance and perseverance in prayer is availeable Luk. 11.8 Because of his importunity he would arise and give him as many as he needed 4. Prayer joyned with almes and deeds of charity is so much the more respected with God Act. 10.4 Thy prayers and thy almes are come up in remembrance before God 5. Fasting joyned with prayer maketh it more fervent Matth. 17.21 This kind cannot goe out but by prayer and fasting 6. And the greatnesse of affliction Psal. 118.5 I called upon the Lord in trouble and he heard mee As in this place the Lord heareth the cry of the widowes and fatherlesse that call unto him Lippom. ex collationibus Patrum And here they cry Non tantum sono vocis quantum intentione cordis c. Not so much by sound of voice as in the intention and elevation of their hearts Thomas QUEST XLI Why usury is called biting Vers. 25. THou shalt not oppresse him with usury The word nashach whence is derived neshech usury signifieth to bite usury then is called a biting 1. Because as the biting of a Serpent parum percipitur in principio c. is but little felt in the beginning but afterward the whole body is inflamed upon that biting So usury is not felt in the beginning but at the last devorat totam hominis substantiam c. It devoureth all a mans substance So R. Salom. ex Lyran. 2. Or because the usurer tanquam hirudâ—â—â—nem succum sanguinem exugit c. as an horse-leach sucketh out all the juyce and bloud Galass 3. Morsus serpentis non sinit dormâ—re The biting of a serpent will not suffer one to sleepe neither will usury suffer the man that is incumbred therewith to be at rest Simler 4. And it may be so called in respect of the greedy desire of usurers which live upon the poore and eat them up by usury tanquam canis famelicus alios mordendo seipsum pascens as an hungry dog by biting and devouring others feeding himselfe Calvin 5. Usury is called a biting Quia lethaliter moâ—det eos qui ea gravantar because it biteth and gripâ—â—h those to death which are oppressed with it QUEST XLII VVhat usurie is HEnce it is evident that usury is unlawfull But before the severall points belonging to this question can be discussed first we must see what usury is 1. Plus ex mutuâ— velle quam mutuatum sit iniquum est To desire more by lending than was lent is wicked Cajetan He then counteth that usury when any thing is received for loane more than that which was lent 2. Vsura est lucrum quoâ—â—â—nipeâ—â—r soliâ—◠〈…〉 causa Usury is a gaine which is taken only for lending Vrsinus Quicquid 〈…〉 What gaine soever was given beside the principall whereupon it is called in the Hebrew turbith that is increase of the multiplying Calvin 3. After the same manner was usury defined in 〈…〉 as Carthag 3. c. 16. Nullus clericorum amplius accipiat quam cuiquam accomodavit That 〈◊〉 of the Clergy should receive more than he hath lent Augustine thus describeth an usurer Si plus quâ—m 〈◊〉 expectas accipere foenerator es If thou looke to receive more than thou hast given thou art an usurer So also Concil Lateranens Vsury is thus defined Quando ex usurei quae non germinat nullo labore nullo sâ—â—ptâ— nullo periculo lucrum conquiri studetur c. When by the use of a thing which increaseth not gaine is sought without any labour cost or hazard QUEST XLIII Of divers kinds of usuries THere were divers kinds of usury 1. As that which was called Vsura centesima the usury of the hundreth part quae aquiparatur sorti in anno which did rise to bee equall to the principall in one yeare 2. Then there was Dimidia centesimae halfe of the hundreth part 3. Terria
licour and moist fruits And so the sense is perfect comprehending all kinde of fruit that reneweth and increaseth 5. The vulgar Latine readeth primitias decimas c. Thy first fruits and thy tithes thou shalt not defer to pay But the sense is rather given than the words for in the originall there is no mention either of tithes or first fruits The Chalde referreth it only to the first fruits of corne and wine and the Septuagint likewise so also Iunius But it may generally be understood both of their first fruits and their tithes because they were to offer both and the words are generall Thine abundance and thy licour thou shalt not keepe backe Oleaster 6. They must not deferre the offering of such things Non diffâ—ratur debitâ— pars in alterum annum The part which was due should not be put off till another yeere Cajetane but they should give willingly readily and with a cheerefull minde QUEST LIV. Of the difference of first fruits and tithes FIrst fruits and tithes which were offered by the people under the old law divers waies differed 1. In respect of the end and use first fruits were offered ex speciali causa in recognitionem divini beneficâ—i of a speciall cause for the recognition or acknowledging of the divine benefit as confessing that they receive all from the hands of God As the people are taught in what manner they should offer their first fruits when they were come into the land of Canaan Deut. 26.10 And now loe I have brought the first fruits of the land which thou O Lord hast given mee But the tithes were given to the Levites for their maintenance for their service in the Tabernacle Numb 18.21 2. The first fruits were a kinde of oblation because they were offered unto God Sacrifices and oblations were thus distinguished Sacrifices were they quando circa res Deo oblatas aliquid fit when somewhat was done about those things which were offered unto God as when the beasts sacrificed were killed but that was said properly to be an oblation when any thing was offered etiamsi nihil circa ipsum fiat although nothing be done unto it beside the bare oblation as when they offered bread or wine Now first fruits were as an oblation presented and offered unto God but tithes were not properly oblations quia non immediate Deo sed ministris divini cultus exhibentur c. Because they are not immediatly yeelded unto God but unto the ministers of the divine worship 3. The first fruits were due onely to Aaron and his sonnes the Priest Numb 18.13 14. the tithes belonged unto the Levites ibid. vers 21. 4. The quantitie of the tithes was set and determined which were the just tenth part Sed primitiva non erant speciali numero definita The first fruits were not defined of what special number they should be but were left to the discretion of the offerer Yet the Hebrewes have a certaine tradition that they should not exceed the 40. part nor be under the 60. part as they doe gather thus They were commanded in the offering of their first fruits to give unto their Priests the sixt part of an Epha or Bath which contained three bushels for the Ephah was the tenth part of the Chomer which contained thirtie bushels the sixt part of the Epha being about halfe a bushell was just the 60. part of the Chomer So Hierome QUEST LV. Of the divers kinds of tithe NOw there were divers kinds of tithes as they are thus observed by Hierome 1. There was the tenth of all their increase which was due unto the tribe of Levi from all the rest of the tribes Numb 18.21 2. The Levites out of their tenths offered a tenth as an heave offering unto God which was given to Aaron and the rests of the Priests Numb 18.28 and this was called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the second tenth 3. There was another tithe which every one divided and set a part in his barne to eat when they went up to Jerusalem wherewith they made merrie both they and their houshold and invited the Priests and Levits thereunto this tenth part if the way were too long they might turne into money and bestow it as they thought good when they came to Jerusalem Deut. 14. vers 23 24. 4. There was beside all these a fourth kinde of tithe quaâ— pauperibus recondebant c. which they laid up for the poore they were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the poores tithe these tithes were laid up every three yeares and they were for the poore Levites for the stranger fatherlesse and widow Deut. 14.26 Hierom. ibid. QUEST LVI Reasons why tithes ought to be payed THou shalt not keepe backe or deferre to give 1. Si tardius dare peccatum est quanto magis non dedisse If to be slacke in giving be a sinne much more not to give at all Augustin 2. Tithes therefore are to be rendred thereby to acknowledge God to be the giver and author of all good things which we receive Consideret quia omnia Dei sunt per quae vivit sive terra sive slumina sive semina Let man consider that all is Gods whereby he liveth whether it be the earth the flouds or seed Augustin ibid. So also Tostatus By giving first fruits and tithes of all things Protestamur Deum esse qui ista nutriverit c. We professe that it is God who hath nourished the fruits of the earth by giving raine in due season quaest 18.3 Decimae sunt tributa â—gentium animarum redde ergo tributa pauperibus offer libamina Sacerdotibus c. Tithes are the tributes of hungrie and penurious soules render therefore the tribute to the poore bring offrings unto the Priests Augustin Tithes are given for the maintenance and sustentation of the Ministers of Gods service which if they be withdrawne the Ministers of God should be pinched with want and so the service of God be neglected 4. Another reason is taken from the equitie and easinesse of this precept that whereas God in regard that all commeth from him might have required nine parts and given to the owner the tenth because all is his the ground the raine the seed the sunne yet hee hath dealt most liberally in contenting himselfe onely to receive the tenth Quid faceres si novem partibus sibi sumptis decimam tibi reliquisset What wouldest thou have done if he had taken nine parts to himselfe and left onely the tenth for thee 5. Further the paying of the tenth as God hath appointed is a meanes to procure Gods blessing as Exod. 30.12 Every one shall give a redemption of his life c. that there be no plague among them c. Non soluâ—â— abundantiam fructuum recipies sed etiam sanitatem corporis consequeris c. Thou shalt not onely receive abundance of increase but health also of bodie c. Quare per avaritiam duplici te benedictione fraudas
be free then Pilate who condemned Christ being by false witnesse and the malice of the Jewes accused whom he knew to be an innocent man giving this testimonie of him I find no fault in him at all Ioh. 19.4 should notwithstanding herein have beene without fault Therefore upon these reasons the former conclusion of Lyranus standeth sound and good that a Judge sinneth in giving sentence against the innocent condemned and cast by false evidence if hee in his conscience knew him to be innocent And that he ought rather in this case to give over his office and dignitie if there be no other way to deliver the innocent rather than to be guiltie of his bloud QUEST XIV A Iudge is not bound of his knowledge to condemne a man not found guiltie in publike judgement BUt as the Judge is bound in conscience to deliver the innocent whom he knoweth so to be that yet is found guiltie through malice and envie notwithstanding it dâ—th not follow that hee should likewise condemne him that is cleared in publike judgement whom he knoweth in his private knowledge to be guiltie of the crime as of murther adulterie whereof he was accused but by favour and partialitie acquited and the reasons of this difference are these 1. The law is more readie to spare than to punish to extend favour than to shew rigour according to that rule in the law Odia restringi decet favores convenit ampliari Hatred is fit to be restrained and fafour to be enlarged Tostat. 2. In condemning a man of his owne knowledge he doth more than in dismissing the innocent for here he doth not absolve him by any sentence but onely suspendeth the sentence of condemnation and giveth over his place rather than he will give sentence against him but here he giveth sentence against the other 3. If he should condemne any upon his private knowledge onely he should doe it as a private man but so he hath no power to condemne Lyran. 4. Yet the Judge knowing the partie accused to be guiltie may by some meanes so worke and give such direction that his wickednesse may be found out but of his owne knowledge without further processe or evidence in judgement he cannot condemne him whom he knoweth to be guiltie QUEST XV. What a dangerous thing it is for a Iudge to take gifts Vers. 8. THou shalt take no gift 1. That is the Judge when any cause of his is in hand who bestoweth the gift upon him otherwise for the Prince or Magistrate to take a present or gift of acknowledgement which the subjects and inferiours doe offer to shew their dutie and thankfulnesse it is not here forbidden nay those wicked and unthankfull men that brought Saul no presents are reproved 1 Sam. 10.27 Osiander 2. And a difference is to be made betweene Judges and Advocates for these may safely take their fee so they exact not more than is due unto them because both they have not their set stipends as Judges have and beside they are but pleaders not givers of sentence and so the danger is the lesse whereas Judges have their certaine solarie appointed them and in their sentence definitive the cause standeth or falleth Tostat. 3. This also must bee understood of extraordinarie and unusuall gifts for inferiour Judges have by order certaine fees allowed them in every cause which they may safely take in some places they have publike allowance maintenance and revenues wherewith they ought to be contented as Nehemiah was allowed the bread of the Governour though he tooke it not chap. 5.15 4. And not he only which receiveth silver and gold sed etiam qui propter landom judicat male munus acciple c. but he also which for praise doth judge unjustly receiveth a reward August And there are three kindes of taking of gifts munus à corde est captata gratia à cogitatione c. there is a gift from the heart when a man thinketh to winne favour munus ab ore a gift from the mouth in praise and commendation munus ex manu a gift out of the hand by receiving of a reward Gregor QUEST XVI Whether all kinde of gifts are unlawfull 1. SOme thinke that all gifts are not unlawfull which are given to Judges and they make this difference some gifts are for gaine and lucre as silver gold and such like some are for meat and drinke and these were by some Lawes allowed to be taken especially after sentence given And these circumstances further they would have considered in gifts 1. Who giveth if the rich to him that is poore it is so much the more suspicious 2. The quantity of the gift if it be but small it is not like to corrupt the minde and therefore Tostatus saith Ecclesia Romana non consuevit in his interpretari accipientem delinquere vel donantem The Church of Rome useth not to interpret that the giver or taker offend in these small gifts But it is no marvell that their Church which loveth gifts so well according to the saying Omniae venalia Romae All things are saleable at Rome doth give such a favourable interpretation of bribery 3. The time of giving must be considered if one give unto him in his necessity it is not presumed that he did it to corrupt his mind as to releeve his want Tostat. As though it be not so much more like to corrupt the Judge when he receiveth a gift in his great necessity 2. Therefore this text seemeth to condemne all gifts great or small given to whomsoever rich or poore and whensoever being given to obtaine favour in their cause for a generall reason is given because all such gifts doe blind the eyes and judgement of the wise which are here called the seeing and as the word ghiver in piel signifieth doe not only blind but pull out their eyes as in the same mood it is said Ierem. 52.11 That the King of Babel put or pulled out the eyes of Zedekiah Oleaster And in another sense the word ghur signifieth evigilare to awake so gifts cause the eyes of the prudent to awake and attend upon the unrighteous cause Oleaster But the other sense is more fit here they are said to blind their eyes either that their judgement being corrupted they see not what is just or right as lovers are blinded in that which they love or though they see what is just yet they are turned by gifts to give wrong judgement against their owne conscience Simler These gifts also pervert the words of the just their heart also is first perverted but mention is made of words because principalis subversio c. est in verbis Iudicis the principall subversion and overthrow of the righteous cause is in the words of the Judge Tostat. qu. 8. They are called still righteous though now corrupted because they were so indeed before and seeme to be so still to themselves and others Simler 3. Wherefore if all gifts doe blind the eyes of
is not to play the Jew but a Christian may as lawfully doe it as to sweare upon the Gospels or any other part of the divine Scriptures 2. Dare favorem errori Iudaeorum c. To give way or shew favour unto the errour of Jewes is sinne but a Christian swearing upon the Thora should give way unto the Jewish errour Ergo. Answ. To sweare upon the Thora where any scandall or offence may grow unto the weake or any occasion of hardning to the Jew it is unlawfull yet this sheweth not but that where no such danger is simply so to take an oath is not unlawfull 3. To make this a lawfull act then for a Christian to take an oath upon the Jewes Thora these things must be considered 1. If he sweare upon it not as upon any other booke of the same contents that is comprehending the five bookes of Moses but as it is a monument of the Jewes bound up in silke and laid up in their Synagogue so is it not lawfull because to be addicted to such superstitious observations is sinne 2. Though there be no difference betweene their Thorah which is written in Hebrew and our Pentateuch in Latine or English in respect of the substance but one indifferently may lay his hand upon the one or the other for there is no difference of languages before God yet if a man make difference in his owne opinion thinking the one not as lawfull as the other herein he should offend doing against his owne conscience 3. Or if an Hebrew should require a Christian to sweaâ—e upon his Thorah rather than upon the Gospels it were not lawfull for hereby we should confirme him in his errour 4. Or if one Christian should require another to sweaâ—e rather upon the Jewish Thorah than upon the Gospels it were not safe so â—o doe because such an one giveth occasion of suspition that he doth not firmely and stedfastly beleeve the contents of the Gospell 5. But if a Christian of himselfe without any such motion made by another doe willingly take his oath upon the Thorah either of necessity because there is no other booke of Scripture present or because he maketh no difference betweene one booke of Scripture and another he may doe it lawfully so it be done without offence unto others Sic Tostat. quaest 16. QUEST XXIX That it is not lawfull for a Christian to sweare upon the Turkes Alcaron or Mahomets thigh nor for a Turke himselfe BUt though a Christian may sweare upon the Jewes Thora the former considerations being observed yet is it altogether unlawfull for him to sweare either upon Mahomets thigh which is kept as an holy relique among the Saracens and Turkes or upon their Alcaron 1. The first is evident because this being a morall precept to sweare by the name of God only and not by the name of any strange gods bindeth all beleeving people for ever now to sweare by Mahomets thigh is to sweare by a strange god and therefore it is unlawfull as well for the Jew as the Christian to take such an oath seeing they are both bound to keepe the morall precepts and Commandements Tostat quaest 19. 2. The other also is unlawfull as it may thus be shewed for an oath is made three wayes either 〈◊〉 God alone without any other externall signe or symboll which is a lawfull and sufficient oath or by the creature alone which is an unlawfull oath for so the glory which is onely due unto God should be given unto the creature or by God and some creature together with reference unto God as when in taking an oath the hand is laid upon a booke But such a creature is used as an externall symboll in an oath as in quo nihil est mendacii wherein there is no lye and it must immediat è nos ducere in cognitionem Dei bring us immediatly to the knowledge of God therefore we lay not our hand upon a stone because it hath no instruction in it as a booke hath But the Gospell hath both these properties there is no falsehood or untruth in it and it doth bring us immediatly and directly to the knowledge of God The Turkes Alcaron hath neither for both it containeth many falsehoods fables and untruths and it can never bring us to the knowledge of the true God having many errours in it So then a Christian taking his oath upon the Alcaron thereby should confesse all to be true which is there contained and so blaspheme God and beside give great offence unto Christians and so secondly his brethren therefore it were better for a Christian to chuse rather to dye than to take such a blasphemous oath Tostat. qu. 20. The like judgement is to be given of the Jewes Talmud which containeth many fables and blasphemies against Christ. And for the same reasons before alleaged even a Turke or Saracen sinneth in taking an oath upon Mahomets thigh though he directly make it not God because he useth such an unholy superstitious and abominable thing in taking of a sacred oath likewise he offendeth in swearing upon his Alcaron which containeth abominable lies and the same most pernicious even concerning the end of all our happinesse in blessednesse in the next world which their Alcaron placeth and maketh to consist in the carnall pleasures of eating and drinking and the use of women Tostat. quaest 21 22. QUEST XXX Why three feasts are only named wherein they had more Vers. 14. THree times thou shalt keepe a feast unto mee in the yeere 1. They had divers other festivall dayes beside these three which are here named the Pasch called the feast of unleavened bread Pentecost named the feast of first fruits and the feast of Tabernacles called here the feast of gathering fruits in the end of the yeere which said three feasts are not named because they were more strictly observed than the rest for the Sabbath was more straitly kept wherein it was not lawfull to kindle a fire Exod. 35.3 nor consequently to doe any worke about preparing of their meat neither in the feast of reconliation was it lawfull to doe any worke at all Levit. 23.28 whereas in other feasts only servile workes are forbidden and in the feast of the Passeover such workes as were about their meat and drinke were permitted Exod. 12.16 But therefore are these three feasts named because in them onely the people were bound to come up before the Lord. 2. And these three were speciall feasts above the rest for these causes 1. Because in them onely the people were required to appeare before the Lord. 2. Speciall oblations were offered in these feasts In the Passeover was offered a sheafe of the first fruits Levit. 23.10 in the feast of Pentecost they presented the first fruits of their wheat harvest faire flower baken with leaven Levit. 23.17 And in the feast of Tabernacles they were commanded to make them boothes of boughes ibid vers 40. 3. Those feasts excelled the other in respect of the
he which spendeth his time here in heaping up of wealth in gathering of riches Quia cunctae haec quisque moriens deserit ante Dominum vacuus apparet Because everyone leaveth these things when he dieth he appeareth empty before the Lord. QUEST XXXVIII In what place they appeared before the Lord while the Arke and Tabernacle were asunder Vers. 15. APpeare before the Lord. While the Arke and Tabernacle remained together there was no question at all but that comming to the Tabernacle they appeared there before the Lord but afterward when the Tabernacle and Arke were asunder as they continued at the least the space of 90. yeeres all the time of Samuel and Saul which was 40. yeeres and all Davids reigne till the eleventh yeere of Salomon when the Temple was finished 1 King 6.36 when the Arke and Tabernacle were joyned together againe 2 Chron. 5.5 The doubt is all this while of the separating and dividing of the Arke from the Tabernacle which was the place where the people assembled to keepe their â—easts 1. Simlerus thinketh that where the Arke was they assembled before the Lord. So also Iunius That thither the Tribes went up to keepe their solemnities 2. But herein the opinion of Tostatus is more probable that where the Sanctuary and Tabernacle was there was the place of the solemne assemblies in their feasts for these reasons 1. The Arke was taken from the Tabernacle by the Philistims and kept among them seven moneths and returned in the beginning of the wheat harvest which was about Pentecost If now their festivities were solemnized only before the Arke then at this time in the space of those seven moneths in the absence of the Arke it would follow that two of their great solemnities of the Pasch and Pentecost were omitted which is not to be granted 2. There the meeting of the people was where the Altar of burnt offerings was and the Priests gave their attendance but that was not where the Arke was placed but where the Tabernacle was pitched as is evident 1 Sam. 21. where Ahemelech the high Priest with other Priests were at Nob attending at the Tabernacle the Arke then remaining at Kiriâ—â—hiâ—aâ—im 1 Cor. 6.1 3. After the captivity in the second Temple the Arke was not being lost in the destruction of the Temple and yet there their festivities were kept 4. Now this concourse of the people to the Tabernacle rather than to the Arke was not because it was more worthy than the Arke for the Arke was more worthy of reverence than the whole Tabernacle but by reason of the other implements which went with the Tabernacle as the Altar and table of shew bread and the rest and because the Priests gave their attendance there But if the Tabernacle had beene destroyed and the Arke onely had remained then without all question the Priests and people would have flocked to that place Tostat quaest 28. 3. But it will be objected that the place where the Arke was must needs be that place where they appeared before the Lord because there the Lord manifested himselfe and from thence delivered his oracles not only while it remained with the Tabernacle Numb 7.89 but when it was apart 2 Sam. 6.2 But in this it may be answered that the Lord did not onely give answer from the Arke but from the Tabernacle also Exod. 29.42 and there Ahimelech asked counsell of God for David though the Arke were not there 1 Sam. 22.10 yea the Priest with his Ephod consulted with God though neither the Tabernacle nor Arke were present as David asked counsell of God by the Priest Abeathar that had the Ephod 1 Sam. 23.10 therefore that argument followeth not Tostat. ibid. 4. But though I herein consent with Tostatus that the solemne assemblies and sacrifices were in the place where the Tabernacle was rather than where the Arke was yet herein I dissent from him He thinketh that it was not permitted sacrificia habere nisi 〈◊〉 in loco to have sacrifices but in one place because by this occasion the rude people might have thought there had beene many gods if they should have sacrificed in many places and for this cause the rest of Israel tooke exception to the two tribes and halfe beyond Jordan because they erected an Altar supposing they had made it to sacrifice upon Contra. 1. But it is evident while the Arke and Tabernacle were divided that they offered sacrifices in both places as 1 Sam. 6.14 the men of Bethshemesh offered a burnt offering before the Arke rejoycing at the returne thereof And at Nob where David and the shew bread given him to what end should the Priests have given their attendance but for the sacrifices 2. Neither was there any feare of bringing in a plurality of gods by this meanes seeing all Israel knew that both the Arke and Tabernacle were made at the appointment of one and the same God of Israel by the hand of his servant Moses 3. And the reason is not alike concerning that Altar which was made by the two tribes and halfe which the other tribes had in jealousie because that was erected by the direction and advice of men but both the Arke and Tabernacle had their institution from God and therefore there could be no such feare for sacrificing to either of those places QUEST XXXIX What sacrifice â— commanded here not to be eaten with unleavened bread Vers. 18. THou shalt not offer the bloud of my sacrifice with leavened bread 1. Some doe understand this generally of all sacrifices which were to be offered without leaven Levit. 2.11 Pellican Oleaster And the other Law Neither shall the 〈◊〉 of my sacrifice remaine till the morning Some likewise understand of other sacrifices for although the flesh of the sacrifices might remaine till the next day adeps tamen incendi debebat eodem die yet the fat was to be burned the same day Cajetan As is prescribed Levit. 7.3 But it is better referred to the Paschall lambe as the Chalde Interpreter expoundeth that they should remove leaven out of their house before they offered the Passeover Tostat. Simler Calvin And by far 〈◊〉 principall is understood whatsoever remained of the Paschall lambe as is further declared Exod. 34.25 Iun. Where it appeareth that both these precepts are specially given concerning the Paschall Lambe 2. And the reasons thereof were theâ—e 〈…〉 c. Because the fat doâ—th easily corrupt and putrifie which was an 〈◊〉 thing that any part of the sacrifice should bee suffered to putrifie Gâ—llas As also lest the 〈…〉 the next day Sacerdotes comederâ—nt quod Dei â—â—at the Priests might eat 〈◊〉 which was the Lords 〈◊〉 Oleaster QUEST XL. When the Passeover was to be killed NOw concerning the place where the Passeover was to be offered 1. It must be considered that they were not in the yeerely keeping of the Passeover to doe as they did in the first institution in Egypt every one killed it in his owne
three conditions the first is touched by Hierome Non solum Divinitutem Patris c. posse oculos carnis aspicere sed mentis That not onely the Divinitie of the Father but neither of the Sonne or holy Ghost can the eyes of the bodie see but of the minde c. So also Athanasius as he is cited by Augustine Deum omnino esse invisibilem c. nisi in quantum Spiritu mente nosci potest That God is altogether invisible but as he may be knowne in the Spirit and minde c. These then at this time saw not with their bodily eyes the essence of God but certaine visible signes onely and demonstrations of his presence Secondly we shall have a more full sight of God in the next world than in this as Augustine saith Nemo potest in hac vita videre sicuti est No man can see him in this life as he is Eâ— promittitur sanctis in alia vita To see God in his nature is promised in the next life c. So also Gregorie Quamdiu hic mortaliter vivitur c. As long as we live in this mortall life God cannot be seene in his nature c. Thirdly yet fully the Divine nature shall not be comprehended of the Saints no not in the next life as Augustine to this purpose citeth Ambrose interpreting that place of the Apostle Who onely hath immortaliter c. whom never man saw neither can see c. Si natura ipsim est invisibilitas sicut incorruptibilitas c. If it appertaine to the nature of God to be invisible as well as to be incorruptible that nature shall not be changed in the next world of invisible to become visible because he cannot of incorruptible become corruptible c. And againe upon those words of the same Apostle To the King everlasting immortall invisible c. hee writeth thus Vnde ego non audeo ista distinguere c. Therefore I dare not divide or distinguish these things which the Apostle hath joyned together to say To him that is incorruptible for ever in this world and the next but invisible not in the next world but onely in this Contrarie then to this orthodoxall doctrine of the Fathers agreeable to the Scriptures are these ventrous and bold positions That wee shall in the next life participate with Christs Godhead and be made capable of his Divine substance That there is not any thing of Gods which his Saints shall not see In which assertion Augustine doth directly oppose himselfe to all such Dogmatists and Novelists in these words Non quia Dei plenitudinem quisquam non solum oculis corporis sed vel ipsa mente aliquando comprehendit Not because the fulnesse of God any can comprehend at any time not onely with the eyes of the bodie but with the minde it selfe c. for it is one thing to see another to comprehend the whole in seeing c. Totum comprehenditur videndo quod ita videtur ut nihil ejus lateat videntem c. The whole is comprehended in seeing which it so seene that no part thereof is hid from the seer c. Here Augustine evidently testifieth that God cannot wholly be seene unlesse nothing in the Godhead should be hid unto us which here he manifestly denieth 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. Honour in this life no signe of Gods favour Vers. 1. COme up thou and Aaron Nadab and Abihu c. These two which are bidden to come up with Moses and Aaron afterward were slaine with fire from heaven which sheweth that preferment in this life is not alwayes a signe of Gods favour but that the wicked are often exalted and lifted up that they may have the greater fall as the Lord said he 〈◊〉 appointed Pharaoh to shew his power in him Ferus 2. Observ. We must 〈◊〉 upon the Lord 〈◊〉 patience Vers. 16. THe seventh day the Lord called to Moses God would not at the first call unto Moses but maketh him to wait six daye Ne 〈◊〉 familiaritate superâ—iret Lest he should was proud by too much familiaritie Oleaster Vt discamus patienter ferre c. And that we may learne to beare it patiently if God at the first doe not answer to our desire Lippoman As S. Paul therefore be sought the Lord thrice that the temptation of his flesh whereby he was buffered might depart from him 2 Cor. â—â— 8 3. Observ. Sufficient deputies to be left in the Magistrate or Ministers 〈◊〉 absence Vers. 14. IN that Moses leaveth Aaron and Hur in his place It sheweth that the like 〈◊〉 in Ministers God would blesse to leave able deputies in their place when they have just cause to be absent and the contrarie fault he will severely punish 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4. Observ. The 〈◊〉 of fasting and prayer CHAP. XXV 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter Moses beginneth to set forth such generall ceremonies as belonged to the Tabernacle then instituted for the publike service of God there are two parts thereof the preparation to vers 10. the description to vers 40. 1. In the preparation these things are expressed in the charge which God giveth to Moses 1. Who shall offer the things required namely the people vers 2. 2. What they shall offer vers 3 4 5 6. 3. To what end vers 8. 4. After what manner vers 9. 2. In the description First the Arke is appointed to be made both the bodie thereof 1. Of what matter vers 10. 2. Of what measure vers 10. 3. With what ornaments it must be overlaid with gold vers 11. 4. What adjuncts and appendants both of rings and barres vers 13 14 15. 5. And of the use thereof vers 16. As also the cover of the Arke 1. The matter vers 18. 2. Measure vers 18. 3. The fashion with Cherubims how to be made vers 19. and how to be placed vers 20. 4. The place of the cover vers 21. 5. The use vers 22. Secondly the Table is described 1. The matter 2. The measure and forme vers 23. 3. The parts thereof the crowne vers 24. The border vers 25. The rings vers 26. 4. The appendants the barres v. 28. 5. The appertenants the dishes cups goblets vers 29. 6. The use to set the Shew-bread upon vers 30. Thirdly the Candlesticke is appointed to bee made 1. The matter and after what manner to bee wrought of gold beaten with the hammer vers 31. 2. The parts six branches three on the one side and three on the other vers 32. 3. The forme and fashion with boules almonds knops and flowers to v. 37. 4. The use thereof vers 37. 5. The appertenances the snuffers and snuffe-dishes vers 37. 6. The quantitie of a talent of gold all this must be made vers 39. 2. The divers readings Vers. 4. Fine linnen G. rather than cotten or bombasine I. or silke caeter shas H. Vers. 5. Badgers skinnes I.V.A.P.C. or skinnes of
A reason was given of those things which were inquired So also Ribera because it was fat idicum it prophesied of things to come Procopius because rationalis animi pars c. the reasonable part of the minde is placed in the heart which the breast-plate covered Vatablâ—s giveth this reason Quia exactaratione consideranda erant c. Because the things therein as the Vrim and Thuâ—miâ—â— were exactly and with deepe reason to be considered of the high Priest But this descanting upon the word is here superfluous seeing the Hebrew word coshen signifieth a pectorall or breast-plate and not as the Septuag and Latine translate 2. It is then called the breast-plate of judgement not as the Hebrewes because the high Priest found therein what the judgement of God was in that matter which was inquired upon for it shall afterward be shewed that the Vrim and Thummius were not given to that end nor yet because the high Priest in all weighty matters of judgement did put on the Ephod with the breast-plate Marbach for by that reason it might as well be called the Ephod of judgement neither because Aaron should in judgement have the people in remembrance when he went into the holy place Oleaster But it was therefore so called for that the high Priest did put it on when he consulted with the Lord about the causes of the people to give right judgement as Numb 27.21 He shall aske counsell for him by the judgement of Vrim before the Lord Iun. QUEST XX. Of the fashion of the breast-plate Vers. 16. FOure-square shall it be The breast-plate is thus described 1. For the manner of workmanship it must be of broidered worke like the Ephod 2. For the matter five things are required to the making thereof as before in the Ephod gold blew silke purple skarlet fine twined linen 3. For the forme and fashion it must be foure square every side of even length as appeareth by the foure orders of the stones and double it must be that it might be of more strength to hold and receive the stones ut firmius substaret auro that it might be the stiffer for the gold and precious stones Pellican 4. For the quantity it was an handbreadth which was halfe a cubit that is twelve fingers for if it had beene but the small handbreadth that is foure fingers it had not beene sufficient to cover the breast before Montan. Ribera Pelargus 5. The ornaments also of the pectorall are set forth which were twelve precious stones set in foure rankes or rowes QUEST XXI Of the twelve precious stones their names colours qualities and congruitie with the twelve Tribes Vers. 27. A Rubie Topaze and a Carbuncle in the first row In the severall application of these stones these foure things shall be observed 1. The name 2. The colour 3. The vertues and qualities 4. The congruity with the tribes of Israel A Rubie The first stone is called odeus of adam which signifieth to wax red Iosephus calleth it the Sardonix the Septuagint the Sardie it is most like to be the Rubie Montan. Genevens 2. The colour of it was red Oleaster as the signification of the word is rather than yellow of the colour of fire as Iunius taketh it for Pyrâ—pus the Carbuncle a precious stone like fire 3. They say it repelleth feare and cheareth and maketh bold Tostat. sharpeneth the wit and stancheth bloud at the nose Magirus 4. This stone they say stood for Ruben Montanus maketh an allusion betweene Ruben and the Rubie but Ribera giveth this reason that as the Sardie is red and somewhat of a fiery colour so he went into his fathers concubine igne libidinis incensus fuit and so was set on fire with concupiscence A Topaze 1. The Hebrew word is pitdah in which there are three radicall or principall letters p t d which being transposed t. p d make topad or topaz not much differing in sound Montan. It is so called of the place where it was found Topasos in Aethiopia Marbach Or the Isle Topazon gave the name to it as Plinie lib. 37. cap. 8. so called of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to seeke because it was much sought for Gloss. interlin would have it called Topazium as if we should say topadium that is of all colour but there is no reason of that etymology 2. Some take it to be of greene colour Montan. And so some of the Hebrewes thinke it to be the Smaragd Ribera out of Plinie lib. 37. cap. 8. alleageth that in greenenesse of colour it exceedeth all other precious stones But it is rather of yellowish colour mixt betweene gold and skie colour Isider Etymol 16. Tostat. Gloss. interlin There are two sorts of it one of the colour of gold which is more precious the other like unto saffron which is of the second sort Marbach And it seemeth to be of yellow colour because Iob 28.19 the Topaze of Aethiopia and the fine gold are named together 3. It is availeable against phrensie and lunacie and melancholy as Diascorides 4. Simeon is resembled to this stone not so much ob animum prasentem for his present and resolute minde which Ribera would have signified by the greene colour as because he was inflamed with ire and rage when he slue the Sichemites A Carbuncle 1. Iosephus with the Septuagint call it the Smaragd so also Iunius Vatabius the Chalde also and Latine Interpreter but that stone is of greene colour it seemeth rather to be the Chrysolitâ— Montan. or the Carbuncle Genevens The word is bareketh derived of barak which signifieth to lighten 2. It was then a precious stone that sparkled and glistred as the lightening which could not be of greene colour though the Smaragd be commended for the exceeding glistering brightnesse in so much that a Romane Emperour is said to have seene in his Smaragd the sword players as they did fight But because barak signifieth lightening as Ezech. 1.13 Out of the fire went barak lightning this stone being named thereof may better be taken for the Carbuncle or Chrysolite 3. The Carbuncle is of such exceeding brightnesse that it giveth light and shineth in the darke 4. Hereunto some resemble Levi Montan Tostat. But it is more like that Levi was omitted because the high Priest of Levi who was to weare this glorious breast-plate might stand for the whole Tribe then Iudah was rather named in the third place Ribera Pelarg. whose royall power streaming glory and princely dignity is more lively set forth in the shining Carbuncle or glistering Chrysolite Pelarg. than in the greene smaragd as Marbach And whereas the Carbuncle is so called of the similitude of fire licèt ignes non sentiant although these stones feele no fire themselves Plin. 37.7 by this property Messiah the Prince of Juda is shadowed forth who in that respect may be called apyrotus not to be vanquished or overcome with the fire of affliction Of his government as the Prophet saith
worthily bee left 4. And will they have us to follow them in manners also The Pope and his Cardinals no marvell give such good example of life that it is pitie that they are not imitated They that know Rome and the generall prophanesse and licentious living there though never so much addicted to the Popish religion I think would be ashamed to follow their conversation 5. This ramme signifieth Christ by whose blood only we are purged our eares hands and all other parts sanctified of whom the Prophet speaketh Isai. 50.4 He will waken mine eare as the learned it is blaspemie therefore to applie it to Peter he sanctifieth not the eare Christ indeed healed the eare which Peter cut off I hope they will not say that Peters bloud doth sanctifie them 6. Oleaster giveth a better sense of this place Nihil aliud hujusmodi sanguinis respersione adumbrari video quam Sacerdotum punitionem c. I see nothing else shadowed forth by this sprinkling of bloud than the punishment of the Priests Si negligentiores in audiendis ejus mandatis c. If they should be negligent in hearing Gods Commandements and in the executing of their ministery c. Let the Pope and popelings therefore looke unto it that they smart not for it one day in neglecting Gods Commandements in respect of their owne traditions 4. Controv. Of the elevation of the host and of the signe of the crosse Sa. Vers. 24. THou shalt shake them to and fro The Latine text readeth Thou shalt sanctifie them elevating or lifting them up Whereupon Sa in his annotations would ground the elevation of the host in the Sacrament and Lyranus and Tostatus observe that the Priest shaking them to and fro and lifting them up and downe in this motion made as it were a signe of the crosse in the aire Contra. 1. Who taught them to borrow their ceremonies from the figures and types of the Law If such rites as shadowed forth Christ be still to be used to what end died Christ The Jewes that thinke Christ not yet to be come have some colour in retaining their legall ceremonies but seeing Christians doe beleeve that Christ the body and substance of the Law is come in him all those shadowes are determined 2. Neither was it yet revealed unto them how Christ should suffer and whereon hee should bee offered therefore it is not like that the moving of those things up and downe and to and fro had any such signification 3. Neither was the crosse of Christ of that fashion that as much should be left above the crossing in the head as under it in the feet so that the upright peece should be crossed in the middest after which similitude this motion of the Priests hands seemed to be up and downe and then sidewayes to and fro 5. Controv. Against the burying of Bishops in their Pontificials Vers. 29. ANd the holy garments which are Aarons shall be his sonnes after him It was not the fashion then among the Hebrewes as it is now among the Romanists for their high Priest to be buried in his priestly robes as now their Bishops are intombed in their pontificials Lippoman one of their owne Writers giveth this note hereupon Lest any should say Aaron shall use the pontificall vestures all his life time and when he dieth ipse eisdem indutus tumulabitur he shall be buried in them c. He seemeth closely to glance at that superstitious use practised among them Simlerus ghesseth well at the cause of this ridiculous usage I cannot tell saith he why they should doe so nisi fortè ut mortui fungantur munere suo quod vivi nunquam fecêre unlesse it be that they might exercise their function when they are dead which they never did being alive 6. Controv. Of the lawfulnesse of Ministers marriage and the legitimation of their children Vers. 29. SHall be his sonnes after him c. Tostatus here thus noteth that because in the old Testament the Priests had wives the sonnes succeeded their fathers as others did in civill principalities but now in the new Testament sacerdotes non habent uxores the Priests have no wives and therefore their sonnes succeed them not because they have no sonnes and if they have sometime sonnes illegitimi sunt they are illegitimate c. Tostat. qu. 16. Contra. 1. If the Priests of the Law had their wives of whom was exacted a greater legall purity in outward observations than now why should the Ministers of the new Testament be restrained in the times of the Gospell which hath given us liberty that were in bondage under the Law 2. Then the sonnes succeeded the fathers in the priesthood both because the tribes were distinguished and their families and kinreds divided that Christs line of Iudah might be continued and then the service of the Tabernacle consisting chiefly in externall observations required no such exactnesse but that the sonne might be fit to succeed his father in the priesthood especially God giving an extraordinary blessing unto that lineal succession but now it is not fit that children should alwayes succeed their fathers because the Gospell requireth a greater sufficiencie and the childe is not alwayes heire of his fathers gifts but where the sonne is endued with sufficient parts to take upon him his fathers charge there is no reason why he should be barred We see in these dayes that divers learned men Ministers and Professors under the Gospell have left behind them their sonnes men of worthy parts as Iosias Simlerus had a sonne of the same name who writ the Dedicatory Epistle to his fathers learned Commentaries upon Exodus David Pareus that learned man hath likewise his sonne Philip Pareus who hath written of Logike Kicherman the Author of his Logike and politike Systemata succeeded his father in Gymnasio patrio in his fathers schoole And divers such beside might be named 3. And doth he thinke indeed that the sonnes of Priests are illegitimate and unfit to succeed their fathers What thinketh he of divers Popes that were Priest sonnes as Bonifacius the first Felix the third Agapetus the first Sylvester Theodorus Hadrianus Benedict the 8. Iohn the 12. all which were the sonnes of Priests and Gratian addeth further Quà m plures etiam alii inveniuntur de sacerdotibus nati and divers beside are found to have beene borne of Priests 4. Indeed they which have sonnes and are not married which is no rare thing in the Popish Clergy doe leave an illegitimate seed behind them but such as are borne in lawfull matrimony are an holy seed of what calling soever their parents be for both marriage among all men is honourable Hebr. 13.4 and so consequently among Ministers and their children are holy 1 Cor. 7.14 They therefore that condemne their marriage and make their children illegitimate and so unholy doe contradict the holy Apostle and in a manner give him the lye See more Synops. Câ—ntur 1. â—â—r 77. 7. Controv. That
with a reservation of their punishment vers 34. 2. The divers readings Vers. 1. Gathered themselves together against Aaron B.G.L.P. upon Aaron A.H. to Aaron I.V.C.S. ghal upon or against Vers. 12. For a mischiefe B.V. rather than maliciously G.B. craftily L. with a mischievous intent I. with maliciousnes S. C. in maliciousnes A. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 beraghah to a mischiefe Vers. 15. So Moses turned him B.G.I.L.V. Moses looked backe P.C. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 phanah signifieth both to turne and looke but the first rather here because of the word following he went downe Vers. 18. It is not the noise which the strong make nor the noise which the weake make I. the voice of them which crie out strength or the voice of them which crie out weaknes S.A.H. better than the voice of them which answer strongly or of them which answer weakely V. or the noise of them which have the victorie or of them which are overcome G.B. or the crie of them which exhort to fight or of them which compell to flie L. Vers. 28. Three thousand men B. G. cum caeter three and twentie thousand L. very corruptly See 72. qu◠following Vers. 29. When every one shall be upon his sonne I.A.H. better than every one upon his sonne B.G. cum caeter for here the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when is omitted Vers. 32. And now whether wilt thou forgive them their sinne I. if thou wilt c. A.H. better than and now forgive them their sinne B.G. cum caeter for here the conjunction 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 im is omitted in the translation Vers. 35. Because they procured the calfe which Aaron made or made the calfe which Aaron made B.G. cum caeter for that which they did to the calfe which Aaron made I. But the preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 eth is seldome a signe of the Dative but of the Accusative case because they worshipped the calfe which Aaron made C. the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gashah to make 3. The questions discussed QUEST I. Whether Moses had signified unto the people when hee would returne Vers. 1. WHen the people saw that Moses tarried long c. 1. R. Salomon here is of opinion that Moses when he went away told the people that he would returne after 40. daies but they were deceived in the account and reckoned that day wherein Moses ascended so that in the end of 39. daies they then consulted to make them gods 2. Contra. But this assertion can stand by no meanes 1. It was not knowne unto Moses himselfe how long he should stay when he went from them for he himselfe staied six daies in the mount before he was called up to the top chap. 14.16 If he had set them a certaine time he would not have spoken ambiguously but plainly that they might have knowne certainly when to expect his returne 3. At the least though they had mistaken a day they would have waited for him so long after the appointed time 4. Neither could all this be done in the space of one day the people to gather their earings and Aaron thereof to make a golden Calfe and beside Aaron putteth off the solemnitie to the next day all this could not be done upon the 40. day therefore it is like that they began this wicked enterprise upon the 35. day or thereabout and that Moses had not given them any direction for his returne Tostat. qu. 2. Liran QUEST 2. Whether the Egyptians were the first beginners and motioners of this idolatrie Vers. 2. WHen the people saw 1. R. Salomon againe some what to excuse here this fact of the Israelites saith that the Egyptians which went out with the Israelites did egge and intice them and set them a worke to make this golden image as they likewise provoked the people to fall a lusting for flesh by their example Numb 11.4 2. Contra. 1. But howsoever at other times the strangers that were mingled among them might set them a murmuring it is like here that the Israelites themselves were most forward in this wicked enterprise for the name of people is given unto them whereas the other are not simplie called the people but with some other addition as chap. 12.38 A great multitude of sundrie sorts of people and Numb 11.4 A number of people that was among them fell a lusting c. 2. They themselves speake of their bringing out of Egypt by Moses but Moses brought the Israelites out the rest were not so much brought ou◠as voluntarily came forth being mingled among the people 3. The people also themselves were subject and prone to idolatrie as S. Stephen sheweth out of the Prophet Act. 7.43 yea he saith directly vers 39. that they were their fathers that said unto Moses Make us gods c. Tostat. qu. 1. 4. S. Paul also so expoundeth it of the Israelites 1 Cor. 10.7 Neither be ye Idolaters as were some of them So not all the people but onely some of them were guiltie of this sinne of idolatrie for it is like that they whom Moses armed afterward to slay their brethren were not consenting thereunto Iun. 5. The Levits vers 29. did consecrate their hands every one upon his son and brother they were then their owne brethren and consequently Israelites who were ringleaders of this mischievous exploit QUEST III. The occasions of idolatrie in generall and particularly of the idolatrie of the Israelites here Vers. 1. THat Moses tarried long c. Here we are to consider of the occasions and causes of idolatrie which are either generall or particular in this place which moved the Israelites to fall into this follie 1. The generall are these 1. Feare in extremitie and distresse maketh men run to wicked devices and to erect unto themselves gods as the mariners in Ionas ship being in danger called every one upon his god 2. Another cause is ignorant imitation of things not rightly understood as because Abraham at Gods commandement would have offered his son Isaac unto God the heathen idolaters likewise did sacrifice their owne children with bloudie hands unto their idols 3. A third cause is foolish doting love and affection as Salomon doting upon his wives was by them enticed and seduced to idolatrie It is written that Alexander so loved Ephestio that he decreed divine honour to be given him 4. A fourth cause is good hap and prosperitie as the Atheniens having obtained a victorie against the Persians at Marethe onely with the helpe of ten thousand men seeing at that time in the aire a spirit in the likenesse of Pan which terrified their enemies they afterward worshipped him and built him a Temple B. Babington 2. The particular causes and occasions of this idolatrie which deceived the Israelites were these 1. The first was absentia ducis the absence of their Captaine 2. Curiositas their curiositie that not being contented with those things which Moses had taught them must
consumitur amissis membris suis so the Devill is devoured his members being lost and taken from him So doth Rupertus understand by this image beaâ—en to powder Eos qui ex parte diaboli per poenitentiam confracti c. Those which having beene as of the body of the Devill are broken by repentance 8. Gregorie maketh this action propheticall to signifie the generall destruction of idols thorow the world Cernas oculis qui huiâ— vanitati erant prius dediti templa sua diruentes c. You may see with your eyes that they which trusted before in their idols doe now pull downe their temples And Procopius by the drinking thereof with the mouth understandeth the true confession of the faith quae ore fit which is done with the mouth whereby idolatrie is overthrowne But the other historicall reasons are rather to be insisted upon And this drinking of the water mixed with this powder was rather an evill signe unto them as the bitter water was unto the adulterous woman Numb 5. than a signification of any good QUEST LIX Whether by the drinking of the water any visible signe of difference was made among the people who had most deeply offended about the golden Calfe BUt some further affirme that this drinking of the water served to another end than that thereby some signe of difference might be made betweene the Ring-leaders unto this idolatrie and the rest that they might easily bee discerned of the Levites when they went up and downe in the host killing those whom they met 1. Therefore R. Salomon thinketh that this bitter water did cause their bellies to swell that were guiltie of this great sinne but to the rest it was pleasant and wholsome water like as the water of jealousie Numb 5. did cause the adulterous womans belly to swell and her thigh to rot but if shee were not guiltie it made her fruitfull 2. Others thinke that the signe was this everie ones beard that consented unto this idolatrie was coloured yellow like unto gold and by this marke the Levites knew them from others But if there had beene any such visible marke set upon them seeing most of the camp consented unto this sinne there should have beene more found guiltie and more slaine than three thousand vers 28. 3. Tostatus thinketh that there was some externall and visible signe caused by drinking of the water though he will not determine what it was because it was not like that the Levites would hand over head slay one with another And he thinketh that Aaron drinking of the water had not that marke because the Lord pardoned his sinne because hee was thereunto drawne by compulsion This instance of Aaron sheweth that the drinking of the water did make no such signe for then Aaron should have had it whose sin was not yet pardoned neither had Moses yet intreated for him having not yet examined him The Levites might know to make difference among the people some other way than by any such visible signe See more of this quest 70. following QUEST LX. How farre Moses fact herein is to be imitated BUt whereas Moses did not onely put downe this abominable idoll but made it altogether unprofitable for any use burning and beating it to powder the question is how farre Moses herein is to be imitated 1. Neither is their opinion to be approved which take this example of Moses to be extraordinarie in demolishing this golden Calfe for as Moses did take away this publike stumbling blocke so it belongeth unto Princes è mâ—dio tollere to remove out of the way whatsoever is done against the worship of God as Hesekiah did likewise breake downe the brazen Serpent after it began to bee abused to idolatrie Ferus Who addeth further I would we had now some Moses to take away the evils which are in the Church Non enim unum tantùm vitulum habemus sed multos For we have not one golden calfe but many Thus Ferus complaineth of the Papall Church 2. But this is extraordinarie in Moses example that he converteth not this golden idoll unto any use but consumeth it to powder Herein Christian Magistrates are not bound to follow Moses example for Moses fact herein was singular ad majorem detestationem c. for the greater detestation of idolatrie Now it is lawfull to convert things consecrate to idolatrie to some profitable use ut juventur membra Christi that the members of Christ may be helped and releeved Gallas 3. And in that Moses doth remove this idoll which none else attempted to doe yet it may bee thought that many in Israel were offended with it so magistratus officium est non privatorum hominum it is the office of the magistrate not of private men to take away idolatrous images Osiander QUEST LXI How Moses maketh Aaron the author and cause of this sinne Vers. 21. WHat did this people vnto thee that thou hast brought c. 1. Moses layeth this sinne upon Aaron though he were not the first author of it because hee being left in Moses place stayed not the people by his authoritie therefore he is worthily reproved tanquam author sceleris quod passus est admitti as the author of this sinne which he suffered to be committed Calvin so that permissio peccati aeque in vitio sit atque commissio the permitting of sinne is as well in fault as the committing Pelarg. 2. Here then the Hebrewes in seeking to excuse Aaron and the people as seduced by the Egyptians doe labour in vaine seeing Moses doth so straitly charge Aaron as a principall doer in it for if he had not grievously sinned why should Moses here make him the cause of this sinne and the Lord be so offended with him that he purposed to slay him if Moses had not intreated for him Deut. 9.20 And in these three things Aaron sinned 1. In not staying the people and stilling them 2. In that besides consenting unto them hee is an agent in making a Calfe for them 3. And being made hee approved it and set up an altar before it So that Aaron is no more here to be excused than Peter in the Gospell which denied his Master Oleaster 3. Yet Aaron sinned not as the people did but as there were degrees of offenders among the people some incouraged and perswaded others some only gave consent and were seduced by others perswasion to commit idolatrie and some did neither but onely went with the multitude for company to desire a Calfe to be made So Aarons sin differed from the rest timore ductus fabricavit vitulum hee made a Calfe being drawne by feare Tostat. qu. 33. And therefore Moses dealeth otherwise with Aaron than with the people Aaronem verbis redarguit populum cecîdit gladio Hee rebukes Aaron in words the people he slayeth with the sword Ferus 4. But yet Aarons sinne cannot bee so much extenuated as to free him from the sinne of idolatrie as Tostatus confesseth that he sinned Nec
tamen sequitur ex hoc quòd fuit idololatra and yet it followeth not hereupon that he was an idolater for howsoever Aaron thought in his heart the verie making of an idoll to be worshipped erecting of an altar and offering sacrifice unto it all which Aaron did doe proclaime him guiltie of externall idolatrie QUEST LXII Why idolatrie is called a great sinne THis great sinne 1. Idolatrie is counted a great sinne even in the highest degree because it is a sinne committed directly against God not as other sinnes of the second table which are done against our neighbour which are also against God because they are against his Law but not directly against Gods honor as the sins against the first table are 2. And among all the sins of the first table there is none which so directly impugneth the honour of God as idolatrie for he which taketh Gods name in vaine or prophaneth the Sabbath is an enemie to Gods honour but yet such an one denieth not the Lord to bee God as idolaters doe Tostat. qu. 33. 3. Like as then in a Common-wealth all offences are against the King because they are against his Lawes but those which are against his person are most directly against him and among them treason specially which is intended against his life of the same nature is idolatrie which is high treason against God 4. Thomas saith Tantum est aliquod peccatum gravius quanto longius per ipsum homo à Deo separatur A sinne is so much the more grievous the further wee are thereby removed from God but by infidelitie and idolatrie one is furthest separated from God 5. Idolatrie also is a great and grievous sinne in regard of the judgement and punishment which it bringeth with it for here Aaron as much as in him lay aâ—â—er fit ultimam cladem had brought upon them utter destruction Calvin if Moses had not turned the Lords wrath they had all beene at once destroyed QUEST LXIII Why Moses onely rebuketh Aaron and forbeareth further punishment NOw that Moses spared Aaron from further punishment and onely rebuked him 1. Some make this to be the cause for that the Lord had revealed unto Moses Aarons sinne in the mount before he came downe at what time Moses prayed also for him seeing the Lord bent to kill him Tostat. qu. â—5 But that intreatie for Aaron was afterward at Moses second going up to God when hee fasted fortie dayes and fortie nights as before at that time he saith he prayed for Aaron Deut. 9.20 And seeing at this time the Lord purposed to destroy all the nation and so Aaron could not escape Moses now onely prayed in generall for all Israel that God would not destroy the whole nation 2. Others thinke that Moses did after a milde manner reprove Aaron quiae sic arguendi praelati because Prelates and Ecclesiasticall Governours are so to be reproved Ferus he thinketh he was now the high Priest So also Oleaster calleth him Pontificem summum the chiefe Priest But as yet Aaron was not consecrated as Lippoman inferreth upon these reasons Quia non illi improperatur conspâ—râ—atum sacerdotium He is not upbraided with defiling of his Priesthood by this meanes neither doe we read of his reconciliation afterward which should not have beene omitted in such a case of irregularitie 3. Procopius thinketh that Aaron was both spared at this time and afterward likewise when he repined against Moses cum propter alias causas tum propter sanctos ex ejus lumbis prodituros Both for other causes as also for those holy mens sakes which should come out of his loynes But if this had beene the reason all the tribes should have beene spared likewise because out of all of them came holy and worthy men Judges Prophets or Kings 4. But the causes rather were these 1. Aaron confessed his sinne and therefore Moses inclined to favour him 2. Moses afterward intreated the Lord for him and the Lord at his instance forgiving his sinne the punishment also was remitted Simler 3. Adde hereunto that Aaron was now appointed to be high Priest order was taken for his priestly apparell and his office what it should be and how he and his sonnes should bee consecrated all which had beene in vaine if Aaron now had perished 4. Beside Moses had direction from God to put divers of the people to the sword for this offence but for Aaron hee had no such commandement 5. But Augustine yeeldeth the best reason Novit ille cui parcat c. God onely knoweth whom to spare for amendment and whom not to spare at all or for a time for his wayes and judgements are past finding out qu. 148. 5. Now whereas Tostatus further reasoneth that Moses by all likelihood had prayed for Aaron in the mount because then the Lord did specially reveale unto him his sinne for otherwise Moses had knowne nothing of Aarons doings as he did as it appeareth by this reprehension it may be answered that it is not necessarie for this cause to presuppose any such notice to have beene given unto Moses in the mount for either Moses might by examination and inquirie after hee came downe learne out the truth or which is rather like Moses Aaronem vicarium constituerat had left Aaron his deputie governour when he went up into the mount Simler and therefore he was sure that such a thing could not bee attempted in the host without Aarons permission at the least and sufferance QUEST LXIV What things are to be commended in Aarons confession what not Vers. 22. THen Aaron answered c. 1. Some things are to be commended here in Aarons confession 1. His modestie that being Moses elder brother yet hee calleth him Lord and submitteth himselfe unto him whereof these two reasons may be yeelded both because Moses was greater in office than Aaron both as a Prophet and Governour of Israel Tostat. qu. 32. and his owne conscience accused him agnoscebat sejure argui he knew he was worthily reproved 2. Aaron confesseth and acknowledgeth his fault in saying Let not the wrath of my Lord waâ— fâ—erce Agnoscit crimen hee therein yeeldeth himselfe to be in fault Borrh. 3. He maketh a full and large declaration of the manner rem gestam liberè confiâ—etur he freely openeth all the matter how it was done Pelarg. both what the people required and upon what reason and ground what he did and what came thereof rem ut gesta est simpliciter narraâ— he simply declareth the matter as it was done 2. But Aaron in some things sheweth his infirmitie 1. Peccatum culpam in alios trajicere studet Hee seeketh to turne over the sinne and offence upon others laying the fault upon the people Ferus 2. Aaron bewrayeth some hypocrisie that seeketh to extenuate his fault as much as he can being afraid nâ— aliquid de existimatione sua decodat lest he should lose any thing of his credit Simler 3. He sheweth his ignorance thinking
himselfe excusable because hee was urged and compelled through the importunitie of the people to doe it Importunitas populi eos levare non potest c. The importunitie of the people cannot ease them any thing who should have beene more prudent and circumspect in their government Gallâ—s 4. In excusing hee accuseth himselfe for in that the people were bent to mischiefe hee ought to have beene so much the more vigilant over them And whereas they asked to have gods made to goe before them and alleaged they knew not what was become of Moses he should have told them that the Lord was their guide and have declared where Moses was Simler 5. In saying thereof came this calfe frigida exili narratione culpam tegere c. he goeth about by a cold and slender narration to hide his fault Calvin QUEST LXV Whether Aaron dissembled in not confessing plainly that he made the Calfe Vers. 24. I Did cast it into the fire and thereof came this Calfe 1. The Hebrewes seeking to excuse Aarons fault what they may say that he intended not to make a Calfe but cast in the golden eare-rings into the fire to consume them but by the operation of Satan working by certaine Egyptian Magicians in the camp the forme of a Calfe came forth But that Aaron had an intention to make a Calfe appeareth by the former narration vers 4. how Aaron after it was molten and cast caused it to be fashioned with a graving toole See more hereof quest 17. before 2. Some thinke that Aaron mentitur timâ—re perterritus maketh a plaine lie being overcome of feare Oleaster So also Lyranus But Aaron would have beene ashamed publikely to make a lye as though he had purposed to make a Calfe seeing it was not well knowne to all the people to be his doing 3. Tostatus is of opinion that Aaron herein is not faultie at all but that he simply confessed that hee made the Calfe being through feare of the people thereunto compelled Sed Scriptura qua breviloquâ— est c. hic eum breviter tangit But the Sripture which is compendious because the narration hereof was set downe before doth but briefly touch it here But it might as briefly have beene set downe that Aaron made the molten Calfe as it is expressed before vers 4. therefore the brevitie of speech is not the cause 4. Augustine thinketh that Aaron himselfe compendio locutâ—â— est used this compendious speech and that he lied not at all because Moses eum de mendacio non arguit doth not reprove him for lying But as Aaron is not convinced here of a manifest lye yet some colouring and dissimulation appeareth in his speech because he doth not plainly confesse hee did it Substantia facti narratur tantummodo faciendi He confesseth only the substance of the fact concealing the manner Moses reproveth him not for this dissembling no more he doth for any other infirmitie here shewed because he replieth not againe 5. Hugo de S. Victor would have the meaning of Aarons words to be this Thereouâ— came this Calfe opere scilicet hominis non miraculo by the worke of man not by any miracle But the manner of his speech sheweth that Aaron sought to extenuate his sinne 6. I therefore here rather consent to those which thinke that Aaron coloured his fault by this speech Râ—m ita refert ac si praeter ipsius intentionem formatus sic vitulus He so reporteth the matter as though the Calfe were formed beside his intention Marbach Iejune simpliciter narrat Hee maketh a drie and slender narration Simler Exili narratione culpam tegere c. By a slender report he would cover his sinne Calvin Quicquid sit attenâ—at quantum potest culpam Whatsoever it is in these words he extenuateth his sinne what he may Lippoman And this seemeth to be more likely because Aaron maketh a colourable defence and excuse of his fault thorowout as is shewed before quest 64. QUEST LXVI In what sense the people are said to be naked Vers. 24. MOses saw therefore that the people were naked c. 1. Some understand it of their jewels of gold which they were deprived of being bestowed upon the idoll Lyran. Hugo de S. Victor But we read in the next chapter that they were splendidè ornati they had goodly ornaments Calvin Marbach Therefore they were not stripped of all 2. Some thinke that they were disarmed for Aaron fearing some mutinie and rising among the people had taken away their armour Cajetan But in that it is said afterward that the Levites girded their swords to them vers 27. it appeareth that their weapons were not taken from them Simler 3. Some expound it of the manifestation of their sinne that whereas hitherto they were counted the true worshippers of God now they should bee knowne to be idolaters and so defamed among the Heathen R. D. Kimbi Oleaster Vatab. 4. Some giue this sense Aaron had made them naked that is laid all the fault upon the people 5. Or they were naked because they went about obstinately to defend their sinne but in this sense Aaron could not bee said to have made them naked for he would not have encouraged them to stand in defence of their sinne having himselfe confessed it 6. The Chalde translateth Moses saw the people were idle that is gave themselves to eating and drinking and playing and neglected the feares of warre which would have beene unto their shame if their enemies should encounter with them 7. But beyond the rest this is the most proper interpretation that they were naked gratia prasiâ—lio Dei of the favour help and assistance of God Iunius Nudatus erat gratia protectione they were naked of his favour and protection Ferus Therefore Si tunc corruissent hostes proculdubio eos ignomiâ—iosè delevissent If then the enemie had fallen upon them they had most shamefully foiled them Gallas As the Canaanites overcame the Israelites when they set upon them wilfully God being not among them Tostat. qu. 34. So also Calvin Significat rejectos esse à Deo Hee signifieth they were rejected of God under whose protection they were To the same purpose Osiander Borrhaius Lippoman Simlerus QUEST LXVII Why Moses stood in the gate and what gate it was Vers. 26. MOses stood in the gate of the camp 1. Cajetan thinketh that the camp had gates to enter in by Quia castra munita eranâ— tanquam civitas because the camp was fenced about like a citie and Simlerus thinketh that the camp was compassed about with a ditch and by the same there were certaine passages and entrances into the camp But that is not like that they alwayes entrenched themselves seeing they were to remove at all times as the cloud before them removed which was sometime the same day sometime within two dayes Numb 9.22 so that they could have no time to make any such ditch or trench Tostat. qu. 34. 2. Who
powder of the Idoll 59. qu. Whether by the drinking of the water any visible signe of difference was made among the people who had most deepely offended about the golden Calfe 60. qu. How farre Moses fact herein is to bee imitated 61. qu. How Moses maketh Aaron the author and cause of his sinne 62. qu. Why Idolatrie is called a great sinne 63. qu. Why Moses onely rebuked Aaron and forbeareth further punishment 64. qu. What things are to be commended in Aarons confession what not 65. qu. Whether Aaron dissembled in not confessing plainely that he made the Calfe 66. qu. In what sense the people are said to be naked 67. qu. Why Moses stood in the gate and what gate it was 68. qu. VVhether all the Levites were free from consenting unto this idolatrie 69. qu. Of the authoritie which the Levites had to doe execution upon the idolaters and the rules prescribed them 70. qu. VVhether the Levites did not make some difference among the people as they went and killed 71. qu. VVhy none came unto Moses but onely of the tribe of Levi. 72. qu. Of the number of them which were slaine whether they were three thousand or twentie three thousand as the vulgar Latine readeth 73. qu. How the Levites are said to consecrate their hands 74. qu. Of the time when Moses came downe from the mount and when he returned againe 75. qu. VVhy Moses urgeth the greatnesse of their sinne 76. qu. Why Moses speaketh as it were doubtfully If I may pacifie him c. 77. qu. Why Moses againe intreateth the Lord seeing he was pacified before vers 14. 78. qu. What booke it was out of the which Moses wished to be raced 79. qu. How the Lord is said to have a booke 80. qu. VVhether any can indeed be raced out of the booke of life 81. qu. Of the two wayes whereby we are said to bee written in the booke of life 82. qu. VVhether Moses did well in wishing to bee raced out of the booke of life 83. qu. In what sense the Lord saith I will put out of my booke 84. qu. What day of visitation the Lord meaneth here 85. qu. When the Lord plagued the people for the Calfe 86. qu. Of the difference betweene the act of sinne the fault staine and guilt 87. qu. How God may justly punish twice for one sinne Questions upon the three and thirtieth Chapter 1. QUest At what time the Lord uttered his commination 2. qu. Whether the narration of Moses Tabernacle in this Chapter be transposed 3. qu. How God saith he will send his Angell and yet not himselfe goe with them 4. qu. Why the Lord saith hee will not goe with them himselfe lest he should consume them 5. qu. What ornaments they were which the people laid aside 6. qu. Why in publike repentance they used to change their habit 7. qu. Why the Lord thus spake unto Moses 8. qu. In what sense the Lord saith I will come upon thee 9. qu. VVhether the people put off their ornaments twice 10. qu. In what sense the Lord saith That I may know 11. qu. Why it is said They laid aside their good rayment From the mount Horeb. 12. qu. What Tabernacle Moses removed out of the campe 13. qu. Why Moses pitched his Tabernacle without the host 14. qu. How farre from the campe this Tent was removed 15. qu. VVhat is called the Tent of the Congregation 16. qu. Why the people stood up unto Moses and looked after him 17. qu. Whether there were two clouds or one to cover and conduct the host 18. qu. Why the Lord spake to Moses in a cloud 19. qu. How the Lord spake to Moses face to face 20. qu. Why Joshua is here called a young man 21. qu. Whether is here understood Joshua not to have departed from the Tabernacle 22. qu. When the Lord thus said to Moses 23. qu. How Moses desireth to know whom the Lord would send with them seeing hee had promised before to send his Angell 24. qu. Whether the sole government and leading of the people were here given to Moses without the administration of Angels as Burgensis thinketh 25. qu. When and where God thus said to Moses 26. qu. How the Lord is said to know Moses by name 27. qu. What Moses meaneth saying Shew me the way 28. qu. In what sense Moses saith That I may finde grace c. which he was assured of 29. qu. What is understood by Gods presence 30. qu. What rest the Lord promised to Moses 31. qu. Whether Moses here rested in Gods answer or begged any thing further 32. qu. Why Moses addeth Carrie us not hence seeing even in that place they had need of Gods protection 33. qu. Why it is added people upon the earth People upon the earth Gen. 25. 34. qu. Whether Moses desired to see the very divine essence of God 35. qu. VVhat imboldned Moses to make this request 36. qu. Whether Moses shewed any infirmitie in this request to see Gods glorie 37. qu. What the Lord meaneth by All my good 38. qu. How the Lord is said to passe by and why 39. qu. How the Lord is said to proclaime his name 40. qu. Why these words are added I will shew mercie c. 41. qu. Why the Lord is here doubled 42. qu. Of the divers kinds of mercie which the Lord sheweth 43. qu. Of the divers visions and sights of God 44. qu. Whether God may be seene with the eyes of the bodie in this life 45. qu. Whether wee shall see the divine nature with the eyes of our bodies in the next life 46. qu. Whether the divine essence can bee seene and comprehended by the minde of man in this life 47. qu. VVhether the Angels now or the soules of men shall fully see the divine substance in the next life 48. qu. VVhether Moses had a sight of the divine essence 49. qu. Of the meaning of these words No man shall see me and live 50. qu. VVhat place this was in the rocke which the Lord here speaketh of 51. qu. How the Lord is said to cover Moses with his hand 52. qu. VVhy the Lord covered Moses with his hand 53. qu. VVhy the Lord put Moses in the cleft of the rocke 54. qu. VVhat is here understood by the Lords back-parts 55. qu. VVhat manner of visible demonstration this was here shewed unto Moses 56. qu. VVhere the Lord promised that Moses should see his back-parts Questions upon the foure and thirtieth Chapter 1. QUest VVherefore the second tables were given 2. qu. VVhy the Lord saith to Moses Hew thee 3. qu. VVhether the Lord or Moses wrote in these tables and why 4. qu. VVhether Moses was to bee readie the next morning and why 5. qu. VVhy none are suffered to come up now with Moses 6. qu. VVhy their cattell are forbidden to come neere the mount 7. qu. VVho is said here to descend and how 8. qu. VVho proclaimed the name Jehovah God or Moses 9. qu. VVhy the name
so doubtfully as not knowing what was befallen him Lyranus And beside God would not have suffered Satan in the same place where hee gave them signes of his glorious presence in the clouds to have practised his cosening and counterfeit tricks 2. They shew their contempt not vouchsafing to call him by his name Contemptim virum illum appellabant c. They in contempt call him the man c. Lippoman 3. They also bewray their infidelitie that having daily experience how the Lord fed them with manna could not conceive how the Lord should preserve Moses alive also fortie dayes without any supplie of food from them Simler 4. They shew their oblivion and forgetfulnesse that having seene Moses goe up into the mountaine and entring into the thicke cloud talking with God they now begin to imagine that he might be consumed and devoured in those flames Osiander 5. This their apostasie and falling away from God and despising of his Prophet did prefigure their falling away afterward from Christ Ferus QUEST XII Why Aaron bad them pull off their earings Vers. 2. THen Aaron said plucke off the golden earings c. 1. Some thinke because the people made great account of their jewels and earings that Aaron by this meanes did thinke to have turned them from their purpose So Augustine Intelligitur illis difficilia pracipere voluisse ut isto modo ab illa intentione revocaret He may be thought to have commanded them hard things to revoke them from their intention c. So also Tostatus Lyranus 2. And Calvin further addeth that he required this lest they might have spoiled the Tabernacle to finde gold for this idoll and he might thinke the people would have beene more hardly drawne unto it because they had given so liberally unto the Tabernacle alreadie But Calvin is herein deceived for the Tabernacle was not yet made Moses being not come downe from the mount where he received instruction for the making of the Tabernacle 3. Further Aaron might thinke that the women would hardly have parted with their jewels and that there might have risen by this meanes some tumults and stirres in their families by which meanes this attempt should have beene stayed Siml Oleast And this is very like that Aaron used all meanes secretly to have put off the people but herein was his great fault that he dissembled in so weightie a matter and did not plainly and openly stay the people QUEST XIII Whether Aarons sin here is to be excused SOme goe about to excuse or extenuate Aarons offence here 1. Bernard alleageth that Aaron was forced thereunto Sceleratis tumultuantis populi contra volunt atem suam cessit clamoribus Hee gave way unto the wicked clamours of the people against his owne minde So also Theodoret Vitulum formaré necessario coactus est He was forced of necessitie to frame a calfe And so he excuseth himselfe afterward by the peoples outrage vers 22. But nothing should have compelled Aaron to doe evill he should have feared God rather than man and chosen to die before he would see God dishonoured 2. Ambrose saith Neque excusare tantum Sacerdotem possumus neque condemnare audemus We can neither excuse so great a Priest nor yet dare condemne him But seeing Moses did afterward sharply reprove him and the Lord would for this have slaine him Deut. 9. there is no question but that he most grievously sinned 3. Some alleage by way of excuse that all Aarons courses tended to have sought delayes till Moses comming in that he called for their earings which he thought would have beene gathered with much trouble and businesse then he casteth them altogether and melteth them and then caused it to bee fashioned with a graving toole after that he made an Altar and deferred the solemnitie till the next day Oleaster But all this being granted it is so farre from excusing Aaron that perfidiosior est assensus c. his consent is so much the more treacherous dissembling his conscience when he saw idolatrie so grounded and rooted in the people than if he had given a simple assent Iun. in Analys 4. Procopius saith Quasi convitienda exprobrat c. Aaron doth as it were upbraid them and scoffingly say unto them These are thy gods c. but neither were these the words of Aaron the people so said neither is it like that Aaron being afraid of them would have scoffed with them wherefore that Aaronâ— sinne was very grievous and inexcusable doth now follow to be shewed in the next question 5. Theodoret addeth Primo populi impetum verbis compâ—scere tentavit c. That first he tried to pacifie the heat of the people with words But this is not expressed in the text it may be he would have disswaded them but that he saw them so violently carried that there was no speaking unto them QUEST XIV Of the greatnesse of Aarons sinne AArons sin then is made manifest set forth by these circumstances 1. In respect of his person he had often conference with God and by him the Lord had wrought great works and miracles in Egypt therefore his example was so much the more dangerous and his fall the greater 2. The thing that hee consented unto was a breach of the first table it was not theft or adulterie or such like but wicked idolatrie for Spiritualia peccata graviora sunt Spirituall evils are more grievous Ferus 3. Quod propriis manibus accipit signum est effoeminati servilis animi In that he taketh their earings with his owne hands it was a signe of an effeminate and servile minde Calvin 4. He sinned also grievously in his dissimulation when for feare hee against his owne conscience dissembled and so betrayed the truth Iun. 5. Borrhaius addeth that he sinned two wayes beside in usurping a lawgivers office which belonged unto Moses and in bringing in new ripes and worship which God had not commanded But Aaron offended not in the first because Moses had left him governour in his place till he returned but in the latter his presumption was great 6. Aarons fall also appeareth in this that after he made a golden calfe seeing it to be pleasing unto the people he was so forward afterward both in making an Altar and proclaiming a solemnitie Pelarg. QUEST XV. Why it pleased God to suffer Aaron to fall NOw it pleased God to suffer Aaron to fall 1. Vt humiliaretur that he might be humbled lest hee might afterward have beene too much lifted up being called to bee high Priest Ferus 2. By this example we doe see Sanctissimos interdum faede labi c. that holy men may sometime grossely fall Borrh. 3. This sheweth that Aarons Priesthood was not perfect nor able fully to reconcile men unto God seeing he himselfe was a sinner Marb Quomodo unus captivus alium liberaret How should one captive deliver another Ferus Or one sinner make reconciliation for another 4. And for this
cause also it pleased God to suffer Aaron to fall Vt nemo de gratia sua praesumat that no man should presume of his gifts or strength but let him that standeth as the Apostle saith take heed lest he fall Ferus 5. And by Aarons presumption we see how dangerous a thing it is to bring any thing into Gods service without his warrant Borrh. QUEST XVI How the golden calfe is said to be fashioned with a graving toole Vers. 4. ANd fashioned it with a graving toole and made thereof a molten calfe 1. The word here translated a graving toole is chereth which is sometime taken for a bag or purse as 2 King 5.22 where it is said that Naaman bound two talents of silver in two bags gave them to Gehezi and so some thinke that Aaron put all the peoples jewels and earings in a bag together lest they might thinke he had converted any part thereof to his owne use Cajetan but the other word vajatâ—ar he fashioned is against this sense 2. But most usually chereth is taken for a penny style or graving toole and so some thinke that Aaron with this instrument did draw a patterne making the proportion of a calfe which the workmen should follow in their casting So R. Salom. Osiand Lyran. 3. Others thinke that with this instrument Aaron made a mould in clay or such like matter and the mettall cast into it received that forme Tost q. 10. Oleast 4. Simlerus maketh a double use of this graving toole Vnum in formandâ— typo alterum in perpoliendo operefuso One in making the mould the other in polishing the worke after it was cast 5. But I rather subscribe to Gallasius that thinketh here is an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a transposing of the words putting the latter first for the golden calfe was first cast and melted and then polished and trimmed with a graving toole as workmen use to doe 6. This calfe was made by Founders worke there are three wayes to make and frame things of mettall either by hammering and beating them to some fashion as the Cherubs upon the Arke were made or by joyning the peeces and joints together which are sunderly made or by casting and melting it in a mould and so was this golden calfe made Tostat. qu. 10. QUEST XVII Why Aaron caused the likenesse of a calfe to be made rather than of any other thing Vers. 4. A Molten calfe 1. Some of the Hebrewes give this ridiculous reason why the image of a calfe was made rather than of any other thing when the Israelites were comming out of Egypt and intended to bring out Iosephs bones with them as they did they say Nilus had overflowen the place where his bones were and so Moses did make the picture of a calfe in a certaine golden plate which floting upon the water shewed the place where Iosephs bones lay which plate they say was brought among other jewels to Aaron here and cast into the fire by vertue whereof the whole masse of gold was turned into the shape of a calfe But here are many fables couched together 1. It is a very tale that Iosephs bones were found out by any such meanes 2. The people onely brought their golden earings therefore no such plate 3. Neither was there any such vertue in that golden plate if there had beene any such to convert or change the whole masse 4. Neither was there any such cause seeing the molten calfe was cast in a mould Opere fusario by Founders worke as the Latine translator readeth 2. R. Abraham seemeth to thinke that this figure of a calfe was made rather than any other as apâ—est at that time to receive some divine and celestiall influence but though Aaron were at this present grossely blinded and deceived yet it were impietie to thinke that he was given to such superstitious astrologicall observations as to make figures to derive some secret supernaturall influence and vertue into by the celestiall constellations 3. Some thinke that Aaron caused a calfe to be made to deride them as Helias did Baals Priests supposing they would not be so absurd as to ascribe divine vertue unto a calfe Procopius But it seemeth that Aaron was in good earnest by that which followeth in that he set up an Altar and proclaimed an holy day 4. It is further alleaged by some that Aaron intended not to make any thing of the gold thinking that the fire might consume it but that the Egyptians which were in the campe by their art Magike and by the operation of the devill caused the image of a calfe to come forth Ex Fero. But it may appeare vers 24. by Aarons confession unto Moses that he intended to make them an image when he cast the mettall into the fire and to what end else served the graving toole but to fashion it he would not have polished and trimmed the devils worke 5. Some further thinke they would have a calfe made because the sacrifices of bullocks are the chiefest and thereby they thought the better to please God But it is not like that they had any such purpose at this time to doe that which was pleasing unto God seeing they had heard not long before the Lord by his owne mouth forbidding them to make any kinde of image to worship 6. It is therefore most like that Aaron according to the desire of the people made a Calfe like unto the Egyptian god Apis which they had seene the Egyptians to worship and therefore they were drawne by the corrupt imitation of them to have the image of a Calfe made Lyran. Calvin Simler Gallas Augustine addeth further that the Egyptians had set up the image of an oxe or bullocke by Iosephs tombe which they worshipped So the Interlinâ—â—ry glosse giveth this reason Quia bovem adoraverunt in Aegypto Because they had used to worship a bullocke in Egypt And the Egyptians used to worship their King being dead under the forme of a live bullocke Plin. lib. 8. cap. 46. QUEST XVIII Whether the Israelites thought indeed the golden Calfe to be the God that delivered them THen they said These be thy gods O Israel which brought thee out of Egypt 1. Procopius thinketh that these words were uttered by Aaron and that hereby he would have brought them to remember that God which had brought them out of Egypt But it is evident by the text that these were the acclamations of the people 2. Lyranus thinketh that the people attribuebat idolo did attribute unto this idoll it selfe those great wonders which God had wrought for their deliverance and therefore for honour of this idoll they speake in the plurall number as men used to doe to great persons But it is not like they were so mad as to thinke the golden Calfe brought them out of Egypt cum res esset inanimata it being a thing without life Ferus And men use to speake for more honour sake in the plurall number in the first and second