Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n aaron_n abimelech_n moses_n 14 3 6.3244 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A42583 An essay toward the amendment of the last English-translation of the Bible, or, A proof, by many instances, that the last translation of the Bible into English may be improved the first part on the Pentateuch, or five books of Moses / by Robert Gell ... Gell, Robert, 1595-1665. 1659 (1659) Wing G470; ESTC R21728 842,395 853

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

in the sin renders the sin so sinful that after-offenders are excused if not à toto at least à tanto their sin comparatively is said not to be as touching the first sin Adam was not deceived but the woman being deceived was in the transgression 1 Tim. 2.14 And therefore Aaron was not smitten with leprosie but Miriam only though no doubt some regard was also had to his high Priesthood as Exod. 32. Nor was Adam so severely punished as Eve nor she as the Serpent Now as the Scripture here notes the first sinner as most guilty so likewise elsewhere as Numb 16.1 where our Translation joyns the conspirators altogether in one act but the Hebrew first appropriates the sin to the ringleader of it as I shall there shew The judicious Reader may observe many other like examples It is true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies because But does it not also signifie Super occasiones upon occasions Whereas therefore Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses upon two occasions 1. Because Moses had married an Ethiopian woman 2. Because the Lord had not spoken only by Moses but also by them it cleares the text if we render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 upon occasions And whereas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies as well causes as occasions So Gen. 21.25 Abraham reproved Abimelech upon just cause but Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses upon occasion only which were no just causes Therefore Arias Montanus turns the words Gen. 21.25 Super causas for the causes but this place Super occasiones upon occasions The first occasion was Moses had taken an Ethiopian woman We read of no other wife of Moses in Scripture but Zipporah though Josephus understands this of another wife an Ethiopian whereas Zipporah was a Midianitess Howbeit this is easily satisfied in that the Midianites dwelt among the Ethiopians as the Hebrews were accounted Egyptians because they dwelt in Egypt Gen. 50.11 Moses also Exod. 2.19 And the Midianites were esteemed Cushites or Ethiopians because they dwelt among them The Apostle tels us that Moses was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for a testimony of those things which should be spoken afterward Hebr. 3.5 that by what he made or caused to be made and what he wrote or taught the people by it he might testifie the will of God as 1 Cor. 1.6 2 Tim. 1.8 Revel 1.2 Hence the Tabernacle was called the Tabernacle of witness And what Moses did wrote or taught more obscurely with a vail on his face was to be declared afterward more fully and clearly according to the degrees of divine manifestation to such as are capable of them So that all who came after Moses must for doctrine and life speak no other thing then he did and his writings must be the test to prove others by The first occasion of Miriam her detraction from Moses was the Ethiopian woman either because he took her to wife who was a stranger from the Common-wealth of Israel though Midian descended from Abraham by Keturah Gen. 25.2 or because having married her he yet abstained from conjugal society with her as the Chald. Paraphrast saith he put away his fair wife whom he so cals by antiphrasis It s probable the contention began between the women and the beginning of strife is like the letting forth of waters saith Solomon which spreads it self to overwhelm the name and reputation of Moses The Ethiopians although properly one nation Gen. 2.13 yet that a very large one is used to signifie the Gentiles whose more proper sinnes were intemperancy of all kindes as Luxury Drunkenness Incontinency c. And therefore they who live in those sins are said to work 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the will of the Gentiles walking in lasciviousness lusts excess of wine c. 1 Pet. 4.3 And when the Prophet compares the people to the Ethiopians as in regard of their sins so in respect of their habitual continuance in them he chargeth them with drunkenness and whoredom Jer. 13.12.23.27 Hence it is that Bacchus the Heathens god of wine and excess of wine hath his name from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the son of Cush And therefore David not willing plainly to name Saul the son of Kish the Benjamite 1 Sam 9.1 he implyes him more secretly under the name of Cush the son of Jemini Psal 7. in the title for his unchangeable like sins As where the Poet not daring to speak out concerning Caelius a riotous Roman saith Dic quibus in terris Tres pateat Caelî for Caelii spacium non amplius ulnas Tell in what lands The grounds of Caelius are but three Elns Which three remain'd unsold as reserved for his grave Hence it is also that the Ethiopians and Israelites are opposed as Jewes and Gentiles Amos 9.7 Are ye not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Amos. 9. v. 7. as the sons of the Ethiopians unto me O ye sons of Israel which our Translators call Children When therefore Moses is said to have taken to wife an Ethiopian woman hereby he prefigured him whom the Lord would raise up like unto Moses who would reject his disobedient impenitent and incorrigible people and give them a bill of Divorce and should grant the Gentiles repentance unto life Acts 11 18. and take out of the Gentiles a people to his name Acts 15.14 so to be called as a wife by her husbands name This was an occasion of great obloquy and contradiction of sinners against the spiritual Moses John 7.35 Acts 22.21 22. The other occasion of speaking against Moses was the eminency of his gift of prophesie which occasioned the envie of Miriam and Aaron and their derision of him For so that may be understood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 what hath the Lord spoken only only in Moses for so both words signifie only or what hath the Lord spoken only forsooth in Moses Hath he not spoken also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in nobis in us So very often our Translators render by or with 2 Sam. 23. v. 2. Zach. 1. v. 14.19 Hebr. 1.1 which should be turn'd in as 2 Sam. 23.2 Zach. 1.14.19 2.3 Hebr. 1.1 and elsewhere Such emulation and envie hath alwayes been among those of an inferiour dispensation against those who have been of a more eminent and higher which comes to pass by reason of acidia or laziness in spiritual things They under the letter of the Law and Prophets envie and detract from those who are lead by the Spirit of God How much more when a perverse spirit is mingled with a meer literal understanding Then Ismael mocks and persecutes Isaac Shimei curseth David and the Jewes encourage one another falsely to accuse and detract from Jeremy under pretence of the Law the Priest and Prophet who taught otherwise then Jeremy did Jer. 18.18 Manifold examples of this kinde we read of the Scribes learned only in the letter and the precise Pharisees zelotical high Priests and Elders who have contradicted and blasphemed the spiritual Moses as
glorious mark set before us all Priests and people Ephes 4.13 A perfect man the measure of the age of the fulness of Christ Ye are by your place and profession neer unto God his friends and intimate ones whose duty it is to be middle men between God and his people who are also a people neer unto him Psal 148.14 Whose office it is to burn incense to our God to make prayers and intercessions for the people It is therefore expected of us that we should be more holy more sober more righteous more godly then other people are This is necessary if we consider the end of our prayer For it is the prayer of a righteous man that avails much James 5.10 And intercession is such a kinde of prayer as must avail very much since it is made for the Priest himself and for the whole congregation It s meet therefore that he be an eminently righteous man and zealous such an one as Phineas who stood up and prayed and so the plague ceased Psalm 106.30 the words are he executed judgement nor is there any mention made of prayer in the story Numb 25. though the words will bear both senses and imply that an intercessors prayer must be operative and the mediator himself a righteous man zealously executing justice and judgement Without holiness no man shall see the Lord no not when he is best pleased And shall we think that some remiss degree of holiness will suffice a Priest an Intercessor for Gods people and their Agent with God to see God obtain grace and mercy from God for himself and the people and that when God is most displeased with them when as the people are so is the Priest then where is that Shepherd that will stand before me saith the Lord Jer. 49.19 All the sons of Levi were holy and zealous in Gods cause Exod. 32. yet all of them could not hold Gods hand It was to Moses only that God said Let me alone Nor can we be so uncharitable as to imagine that all men were wicked in Jerusalem when God sought for a man that should stand in the gap and could finde none Ezech. 22.30 No no he sought some excellent man some Moses some Samuel some Daniel to stand before him It s well if an ordinary just man can obtain his own pardon in a common Judgement Lot was a righteous man 2 Pet. 2.7 but he was delivered out of Sodom at the instance and intercession of a more eminently righteous man than he And therefore we read that when God destroyed the Cities of the Plain that God remembred Abraham and sent Lot out of the midst of the overthrow when he overthrew the Cities in which Lot dwelt Gen. 19.29 As for profane men they are as unserviceable intercessors in the gap as a dry bush to keep out a flame of fire from devouring the stubble 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 These are far from righteousness Esay 46.12 and far off from God We are neer unto God and intercessors for other men wherefore far be it from us that we should be like other men that it should be true of us Like people like Priest Hos 4.9 Or that we draw neer unto God with our mouth and honour him with our lips but our heart should be far from him Matth. 15.8 Far be it from us that it should be truly spoken of us which yet some of the people say that there is much Lording and Domineering over one another and over the people although we be brethren although we be not Bishops If it be so that we can be prowd without a title how neer to God soever we imagine our selves to be he beholds us afar off Or what some say that some of us are neer men covetous if so we are neerer Mammon than we are to the true God That we are as passionate and have as little rule of our affections yea some of us less then other men have If so how can we be said to be neer unto God or neerer then other men It is true what Hierom writes Vehementer Ecclesiam Dei destruit meliores esse Laicos quàm Clericos It s very destructive to the Church that the people should be better men then the Priests Howbeit I hope none of the people can say of any of us that we have erred through wine that we have gone out of the way through strong drink as those Levitical Priests are thought to have done I hope there is no such Beast that toucheth the mountain of the Lord. We well know the Apostles admonition Be not drunk with wine wherein there is excess but be filled with that wine wherein there can be no excess the Spirit of God I know there are among us some I hope many mortified men who need Pauls exhortation to Timothy drink no more water but use a little wine for thy stomacks sake and thine often infirmities 1 Tim. 5.23 But if any such intemperate men there be among us as some say there are I shall direct the Apostles exhortation unto them with some little change Drink more water and use but little wine Let the Potitii and Pinarii the drinking Priests and hungry gluttenous Priests as the old Priests of Hcrcules were called saith Festus let such be Priests to them who are no gods 2 Chron. 13.9 In the mystical Temple of the true God the sons of Zadoc every way righteous men must be neer unto him to minister unto him Ezech. 44.15 But there is a drunkenness and not with wine Esay 29.9 a surfeting with the giddy spirit of opinion kindled in our own imaginations or borrowed of our neighbours neer home such a drunkenness I fear there is too much among us and that such boutefeus and incendiaries there are who bring their own strange wilde fire into the Church of God and zealously offer up their own 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their own will-worship unto God Shall such escape the just judgement of God Our God hath his spiritual judgments under the Gospel figured by those under the Law but more dreadful then those Such was the judgement on these two Priests The fire burnt their bodies not their clothes There is a kinde of thunder which burns not the Chest but melts the money in it hurts not the flesh but consumes the bones And such are Gods spiritual judgements they touch not mens bodies but seiz upon their souls Non quoties peccant homines sua fulmina mittit God sends not thunder and lightning alwayes to destroy ungodly men but such judgements as are much heavier as hardness of heart impenitency treasuring up wrath against the day of wrath contempt of Gods Word and Commandement from which good Lord deliver us Let these Boutefeus who kindle their own fire and compass themselves about with sparks walk in the light of their fire and in the sparks which they have kindled but this shall they have of Gods hand they shall lie down in sorrow Esay 50.11 O my brethren Let
of Antony the Monk that when he was assaulted by the Devil he made use of those two first verses of Psalm 68. parallel to Numb 10.35 And there is no doubt but soveraign use may be made of this Scripture upon every assault and temptation of the evil one When this is enlarged to men of contrary mindes to us whether Jewes Turks or Christians by profession too often men out of self-love partially endear themselves or fansie themselves to be endeared unto Christ as his friends and out of private hatred conceive others whom they hate to be the enemies of God and Christ when its possible to be quite otherwise Yet hence arise debates contentions enmities and most wars among pretending Christians Meantime its little understood and less regarded that the carnal minde is an enemy against God that the friendship of this world is an enemy against God Gods enemies are out fleshly lusts which fight against our souls c. O how needful is it to pray unto the Lord that he would arise up in us and scatter these which are his and our truest enemies and that they who hate him and us may flee from his wrathful face It is the Lords works as to scatter his enemies even all out carnal lusts and the spiritualities of wickedness so likewise is it his work to cause to return gather and unite all his scattered friends his ten thousands thousands of Israel to one another and to himself to return himself unto the ten thousands thousands of Israel That is the second object of Moses his prayer For so largely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word here used may signifie And thus the latter part of Moses's prayer may be two wayes understood 1. Return O Lord the ten thousand thousands of Israel to one another and to thy self 2. By a Supplement Return O Lord unto the ten thousands thousands of Israel The senses are both good our Translators take notice only of the latter The former work is the causing all Israel to return one to other and to himself The later is the Lords return unto his Israel so returned and gathered one to other and to himself These are two great acts of Gods grace and favour toward his people The former the Lord accomplisheth by Eliah the Tisbite that is the Turner who causeth to return according to what the Prophet saith of him That he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children and the heart of the children to the fathers Mal. 4.6 This may occasion a long but no impertinent discourse Our Lord Matth. 17.11 12. distinguisheth a twofold coming of Eliah the Tisbite One Eliah saith he is already come the other shall come These two comings of Eliah answer to the two comings of Christ 1. In the flesh 2. In the Spirit So that before each coming of our Lord we read an express promise of his fore-runner Mal. 3.1 and 4.5 Eliah in his first coming was coursly entertaind by Herod Herodias and Salome Matth. 14. That Elias the Tisbite is yet to come is much opposed by many who endeavour to confound our Lords words as that they were to be understood of one Elias and one coming of that Elias Against this I oppose the very context our Lord saith Matth. 17.11 Elias cometh or shall come and shall restore all things But Ver. 12. he saith I say unto you that Elias is already come How can these be understood otherwise then either of a twofold Elias or at least of a two-fold coming of one Elias If further proof of this be needful both Jewes and Christians understand the fourth of Malachy ver 6. of Elia's second coming in the end of the world Thus the Jewes say of Elias that he must appear to Israel in their bannishment to bring them again into their own land And therefore when they administer circumcision they set an empty chair for Elias wherein some say he sits invisibly And as the Jewes testifie this so the Fathers also of the Greek and Latin Church understand our Saviour to speak of the second coming of Christ and the coming of Elias before him Thus S. Cyril Chrysostom Theodoret Euthymius Tertullian Hilary Anselm Hugo Lyra Tho. Aquinas c. And reason there is both in regard of Gods promise by Mal. 4.6 and our Lords prediction Matth. 17.11 12. and a kinde of necessity in regard of Christ and they who are Christs 1. In regard of Christ for if Christ coming in the flesh must have a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a forerunner much more must Christ in the spirit have his forerunner 2. In regard of those who are Christs for if that handful of men in Judea needed an Elias how much more all the ten Tribes Ecclus 48.10 Yea how much yet more all other kingdomes nations and peoples all the ten thousands thousands of Israel Since Moses prayes that the Lord would return reduce and restore the ten thousands thousands of Israel it appears that Israel for the present is in an averse and evil state of which Moses praies for a change unto a good condition The averse and evil state of Israel from which Moses prayes for a change to be made supposeth a former good condition wherein Israel had been and from which they had been depraved and corrupted So that the office of Elias the Tisbite comprehends three things whereof two supposed the third expressed the first supposed is That all things with Israel have been in a good state 2. That all things with Israel have been depraved and corrupted 3. It is prayed that Elias would reduce and restore all things from their averse and evil estate to their first good condition All which are contained in that full word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 used in our Lords speech Matth. 17.11 Elias shall come and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he shall restore or return all things unto their first good estate 1. All things have bin in a good estate with Israel Such their Creator made them Genesis 1.31 Ecclus 39.16 So saith Solomon of Adam That God made him upright Eccles 7.29 This rectitude and uprightness in man 1. in regard of God is a due conformity unto his will in a pure and holy worship and service 2. In regard of our neighbour the due performance of justice and judgement 3. In regard of every mans self sobriety temperance and continency All which are comprised in those three Adverbs 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 soberly righteously godlily Tit. 2.12 Are all things in this good condition in our Israel Are they so among us I believe no man I am sure no honest man will say so The Cobler would have taught his Crow to flatter Domitian and those times by saying 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Omnia bene All things are well But the Crow could not learn that lesson nor be untaught the Dorie broad dialect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Omnia crunt bene All things shall be well The like we may say and its all we can hope for
John 5. v. 39 40. As the learned Scribes could tell where Christ should be born but themselves went not forth Matth. 2. Ye search the Scriptures c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word appears by the context to be Indicative not Imperative but ye will not come unto me that is believe in me that ye might have life John 5.39 40. Signe The way lies Southward toward the perfect day Numb 14.17 Who will believe that we travail thitherward when our faces are toward the North and the dark land As for means conducing hereunto the Spies who searched the land went from the Wilderness of Zin to Rehob that is from the bushy and thorny way to largeness and latitude v. 21. That no doubt is the way through straits and difficulties We went through fire and water say such travailers and thou broughtest us to a ●arge place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a place of refreshment Psal 66.12 that 's meant by Rehob here 2 Esdr 7.7 Therefore Rehob was the inheritance of the Tribe of Asher Josh 19.24.28 Judges 1.31 that is bliss and happiness as Asher signifies The afflictions and sufferings of Christ must precede our salvation by Christ 2 Cor. 1.5 6. through the narrow to the broad God shewes the worst first Cut off the right hand c. Strait is the gate and narrow is the way c. The common method of the world is quite otherwise whereby we are first assured of life salvation the holy land and then commanded to perform these hard duties afterward 2. They shall bear their iniquityes the word we turn iniquity is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is commonly here understood Metonymically as the effect put for the cause But I see no reason but hereby we may understand the iniquity it self or the guilt of it For howsoever the Lord at the intercession of Moses had remitted the everlasting punishment Num. 14.20 Yet might they be made to feel the burden of their sin according as the Lord threatens in my text And Num. 27.3 The daughters of Zelophe had though they acquit their father of the conspiracy of Korah yet they confess that he died in the wilderness and died in his own sin He bare his iniquity according to Gods sentence in the text although I deny not but that the Metonymical meaning also hath place here when they are said to bear their iniquity in that their carkasses fell in the wilderness Hebr. 3.17 3. According to the dayes wherein they searched the land even fourty dayes each day for a year they shall bear their iniquities even fourty years The reason of this seeming great excess of punishment is because sin is not to be looked at according to the time wherein it is acted but 1. According to the person offended 2. According to the holy and just law violated and the just penalty of that law 3. According to the means of grace offered whereby the sin might have been avoided 4. According to the obligation of the person offending The Lord proportions and measures out the punishments of sin according to the nature extent and degree of continuance in sin Thus he dealt with Tyre and Sidon with Sodom and Gomorrha and with his own people The most just and merciful God in his punishments usually goes less and not to the full extent of his threatnings Chronologers who have exactly counted the years of Israels punishment in the Wilderness they finde it to fall short some moneths of full fourty years And the holy people who ought to be like their God being commanded not to exceed fourty stripes for the greatest fault Deut. 25.3 They Commonly out of equity remitted at least one St. Paul among his sufferings testifies this practice of the Jewes 2 Cor. 11.24 But in bestowing of rewards the mercifull God usually exceeds his promises Esay 35. Where the Lord foretells what miracles the Son of God should work in the dayes of his flesh we read not of casting out Devills nor curing the lepers both which we read frequently done by him The Lord promised David that after he should sleep with his fathers his Son should sit upon his throne but he brought that to pass while David was yet a live and his eyes seeing it 1. Hence it appears that the sin of a day may bring on us a years punishment yea many years yea an eternity if not timely repented of and forsaken 2. The quadragesima of sin may bring a quadringentessimum yea a seculum yea a seculum seculorum of Judgement 3. Hence it followes that there is an everlasting punishment remaining for incorrigible and impenitent disobedient men This is evident from hence because the Lord remitted and pardoned this people their sin as appears Num. 14. ver 20. Yet here the Lord denounceth a punishment against the same sinners 4. It s clear therefore that when God hath forgiven sin as to the everlasting punishment He may and often doth reserve a temporall This is evident as out of the text so by Nahans transactions with David 2 Sam. 12. And the reason is because there is no sin unles timely repented of but its deadly So saith the Lord Jer. 46.28 I will chastise thee in measure and not leave thee wholly unpunished 1. By this means he works further repentance and humiliation in the party sinning 2. It renders the sinner more cautious and wary for the time to come because the rod of Gods correction is upon him 3. It declares that there is a God that judgeth the earth Psal 58.11 4. It is for example unto others that they may hear and fear and do no more wickedly 5. We learn hence that the Purgatory and temporal punishment for sin may be safely admitted in this life 6. Hence its evident that some are judged here that they may not perish with the world 1 Cor. 11. for the destruction of the flesh that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord. 1. This reproves their erroneous judgement who think that because God punishes men here a long time therefore he will punish them for ever 2. Those who conclude that they may sin impunè because they see no hurt come of it for the present It s impossible but that they should be punished for it either temporally or eternally 4. The Lord saith to his people in covenant with him ye shall know my breach of promise The words thus translated contain in them these two I cannot call them divine truths but false Axioms 1. The Lord breaks his covenant and promise 2. The Lord will make his people in covenant with him know his breach of promise or covenant Both which as they are most false and absurd so must this translation be which contains them both to say the best of it be most absurd and false These words are variously rendred by divers Translators The Vulg. Lat. and Pagnin turns them thus Cognoscetis ultionem meam my vengeance Munster Irritationem meam my provocation Vatablus and the