soul. 2. It separates the heart from lusts and the world 3. Alters and changeth the customs of men 4. It keeps the heart up against all the power of the devil It quickneth the dull Psal. 119. 93 107. comforteth the feeble Rom. 15. 4. giveth light to the simple Psal. 19. 7. convinceth the obstinate 1 Cor. 12. 3. 14. 24. reproveth errors rebuketh vices 2 Tim. 3. 16. is a discerner of the thoughts 1 Cor. 14. 24 25. and aweth the conscience Iam. 4. 12. 10. The Candour and Sincerity of the Pen-men or Amanuenses respecting Gods glory only and not their own and in setting down not only the sins of others but their own slips and infirmities doth testifie that they were guided by the holy Ghost Moses shews his disobedience Numb 11. 11. Ionah his murmuring Ionah 1. 4. Ieremiah his fretting Ier. 20. 14. David shames himself in his Preface to the 51 Psalm St Mark wrote the Gospel out of Peters mouth and yet the denial of Peter is more expresly laid down by the Evangelist Saint Mark then any other and Paul sets down with his own Pen his own faults in a sharper manner then any other Matthew the Evangelist tels us of Matthew the Publican The Pen-men of the holy Scripture were holy men called sent inspired by the Spirit which had denied the world with the lusts and affections thereof and were wholly consumed with zeal for the glory of God and salvation of men 2 Pet. 3. 15. 2 Tim. 3. 16. Matth. 16. 17. Gal. 2. 11 12. Ephes. 2. 3 5. They learned not of men what they wrote Moses David Amos were Herdsmen Ieremiah was almost a childe Peter Iames and Iohn were in their ships other Apostles were unlearned before their Calling Acts 4. 13. Moses learned of the Aegyptians and Daniel of the Caldeans humane Arts and Sciences but they could not learn of them the knowledge of the true God they themselves being ignorant and grosse Idolaters Neither could they erre in that which they delivered for by them the Spirit of Christ and Christ himself did speak 1 Pet. 1. 11. 2 Pet. 1. 21. Acts 28. 25. 2 Cor. 13. 3. In their own judgement the most holy did erre as 1 Sam. 16. 1. and Nathan 2 Sam. 6. which errour is truly related in the Scripture but when they spake according to the guidance of the Spirit which did ever assist them in the penning of the Scripture they could not erre I have learned saith Augustine to Ierom to give this honour only to the Canonical Books firmly to believe that no author of thâ—m erred in writing from all others he expected proof from Scripture or Reason 11. The wonderful Consent singular Harmony and Agreement of the Scriptures shews that they came not from men but from God Luk. 1. 70. Acts 3. 18. Iohn 5. 46. each part sweetly agreeth with it self and with another and with the whole Acts 26. 22. 11. 17. Luke 24. 27 44. Iohn 5. 46. Matth. 4. 4. what was foretold in the Old is fulfilled in the New Testament If there seem any contrariety either in numbring of years circumstance of time and place or point of Doctrine The fault is in our apprehension and ignorance not in the thing it self and by a right interpretation may easily be cleared See D. Willet on Gen. 24. 38. Doctor Vane in his lost Sheep returned home Chap. 2. saith Seeing no man is infallibly sure that all the answers used to reconcile the seeming contradictions of Scripture are true no man can be assured by the evidence of the thing that there is that perfect Harmony in the Scriptures nor consequently that they are thereby known to be the word of God Moreover if we were infallibly assured that there were this perfect Harmony in the Scriptures yet this to me seemed not a sufficient proof that they are the Word because there is no reason forbids me to believe that it may not be also found in the writings of some men yea I make no question but it is to be found and that with lesse seeming contradiction then is in the Scripture yet no man accounts that this proves their writings to be the Word of God After he saith We believe it to be harmonious because it is the Word of God not to be the Word of God because it is harmonious which we do not infallibly see How well this agrees with what I have in the margent quoted out of Bellarmine who urgeth that as an argument to prove the Scripture to be from God let the intelligent Reader judge Vid. Aberic Gent. Ad. 1. Mac. Disput. c. 10. These considerations strengthen this Argument 1. The length of time in which this Writing continued from Moses untill Iohn to whom was shewed the last authentical Revelation which prevents all conceits of forgery since they were not written in one nor yet in many ages 2. The multitude of Books that were written and of Writers that were imployed in the service 3. The Difference of place in which they were written which hinders the Writers conferring together Two other Arguments may evince this Truth that the Scriptures were from God 1. Miracles both of 1. Confirmation which the Lord shewed by Moses Exod. 19. 16. 24. 18. 34. 29. the Prophets 1 King 17. 24. Christ himself and the Apostles for the confirmation of their Doctrine such as the devil was not able to resemble in shew The raising of the dead the standing still and going back of the Sunne the dividing of the red Sea and the Rivers the raining of manna in so great a quantity daily as to suffice all the multitude in the wildernesse the making of the barren fruitfull My works testifie of me saith Christ and Believe the works which I do if you will not believe me See Ioh. 15. 24. 2. Preservation of the Books of the Scripture from the fury of many wicked Tyrants which sought to suppresse and extinguish them but could not As God caused it to be written for the good of his people so by Divine Providence he hath preserved the same whole and entire Here we have three Arguments in one 1. The hatred of the Devil and his wicked Instruments against the Scripture more then any other Book Antiochus burnt it and made a Law That whosoever had this Book should die the death 1 Macchab. 1. 56. Yet secondly It was preserved maugre his fury and the rage of Dioclesian Iulian and other evil Tyrants Thirdly The miserable end of Iulian Antiochus Epiphanes Herod Nero Domitian and Dioclesian and other Persecutors of this Doctrine The Books of Salomon which he wrote of natural Philosophy and other knowledge the profitablest books that ever were the Canon excepted are perished but those alone which pertain to godlinesse have been safely kept to Posterity which is the rather to be observed since many more in the world affect the knowledge of natural things
the Author of the Old and New Testament The knowledge of the Hebrew much conduceth to the learning of those famous oriental Tongues the Chaldee Syriack Arabick and Aethiopick by reason of the great affinity which they have with their Mother The Books of the Old Testament may be divided several wayes in respect of the Style some were written in Prose some in Verse in respect of Time some were written before their being taken Captives into Babylon as Samuel Isaiah Hosea and many others some in the Captivity and some after as Haggai Zachary Malachi The Hebrews divide the Bible ex instituto Esdrae into three special parts 1. The Law the five books of Moses 2. The Prophets â— The former Ioshua Iudges two books of Samuel and two of the Kings so called because they speak of the first Prophets 2. The later 1. Greater three 2. Lesser twelve 3. The Hagiographa for want of a more special name by which title all the rest are understood and they are eleven Our Saviour himself mentions this most ancient distinction Luk. 24. 44. calling all the rest of the books besides the Law and Prophets Psalms Ubi Psalmi ponuntur pro omnibus libris qui Hagiographorum parte continentur ex quibus etiam in N. T. quaedam citantur tanquam impleta Buxtorf Tiberias cap. 11. In Masora quando vox aliqua ter duntaxat reperitur quidem in tribus his Scripturae partibus tum dicunt Ter occurrit Semel in Lege semel in Prophetis semel in Hagiographis Id. ib. All the Scriptures of the Old Testament in other places are comprized in the Law and Prophets Matth. 5. 17. 7. 12. and 11. 13. 20. 40. Acts 13. 15. 24. 14 26. 22. 28. 23. Rom. 3. 21. or Moses and the Prophets Luk. 24. 27. 16. 29. or in the Scriptures of the Prophets Rom. 16. 26. or the Prophets alone Luke 1. 70. 24. 25 27. Rom. 1. 2. Heb. 1. 1. the name Prophet being taken as it is given to every holy Writer The Jews and the Anâ—ient reckon twenty two Books in the Old Testament according to the number of the Letters of the Alphabet for memory sake Ruth being joyned with the Book of Iudges and the Lamentations being annexed to Ieremiah their Author Hebraeis sunt initiales medianae literae 22 finales quinque Quamobrem V. T. modò in 22. modò in 27. libros partiuntur All the books of both Testaments are sixty six thirty nine of the Old and twenty seven of the New Testament Some would have Hugo Cardinal to be the first Author of that division of the Bible into Chapters which we now follow No man put the Verses in the Latine Bibles before Robert Stephen and for the New Testament he performed that first being holpen by no book Greek or Latine Vide Croii observat in Nov. Test. c. 7. This Arithmetical Distinction of Chapters which we have in our Bibles was not from the first Authors Of which that is an evident token that in all the Quotations which are read in the New Testament out of the Old there is not found any mention of the Chapter which would not have been altogether omitted if all the Bibles had then been distinguished by Chapters as ours distinguishing of the Bible into Chapters and Verses much helps the Reader but it sometimes obscures the sense Dr Raynolds gives this counsel to young Students in the study of Divinity that they first take their greatest travail with the help of some learned Interpreter in understanding St Iohns Gospel and the Epistle to the Romans the summe of the New Testament Isaiah the Prophet and the Psalms of David the summe of the Old and in the rest they shall do well also if in harder places they use the judgement of some godly Writer as Calvin and P. Martyr who have written best on the most part of the Old Testament The Books of the Old Testament are 1. Legal 2. Historical 3 Poetical 4. Prophetical 1. Legal which the Hebrews call from the chief part Torah Deut. 31. 9. 33. 4. the Grecians from the number Pentateuch that is the five-fold volume the five Books of Moses Genesis Exodus Leviticus Numbers Deuteronomy all written by Moses as it is commonly agreed except the last Chapter in the end of Deuteronomy concerning his death written by Ioshua In which five Books are described the things done in the Church from the beginning of the world to the death of Moses Atque hîc finitur Pentateuchum historiam annorum 2552. cum dimidio ab initio mundi complectens R. Usserius in Annal. V. T. cap. 37. Vide Sims Paras ad Chron. Cathol cap. 1. The Sadduces as some say received no other Scripture but these five Books of Moses therefore Christ Matth. 22. 32. proves the Resurrection of the dead which they denied out of the second Book of Moses but Scultetus saith that they rejected not the Prophets lib. 1. exercit Evang. cap. 22. See my Annotat. on Matth. 22. 23. Anciently it was not the custome of holy Writers to adde Titles to what they had written but either they left their works altogether without Titles or the first words were Titles the Titles now in use as Genesis Exodus were prefixed according to the arbitrement of men and the like is to be thought of those before the Historicall Books of the New Testament as Matthew Mark Luke Iohn With the Hebrews the Titles of Books are taken sometimes from the subject Matter or Argument as in the Books of Iudges Ruth Kings Proverbs and others of that kinde sometimes from the Authors or Amanuenses rather as in the Books of Ioshua and the Prophets sometimes from the initial words with which the Books begin which Ierom follows The Books of Moses are denominated from the initial words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1. In Principio i. e. Genesis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. Haec nomina h. e. Exodus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. Et vocavit h. e. Leviticus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4. In Deserto i. e. Numeri 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 5. Verba sive Deuteronomium These are subdivided again into fifty four Sections that the reading of them may be finished in so many Sabbaths which is signified Act. 15. 21. Iunius Ainsworth and Amama with Calvin Cornelius a Lapide and Piscator have done well on the Pentateuch 1. Genesis In Hebrew Bereshith the first word of the Book by the Septuagint it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which appellation the Latine Church retained because it sets forth the first generation of things Chap. 2. 4. and of Adam or mankinde Gen. 5. 1. It consists of fifty Chapters and contains a History of two thousand three hundred and sixty nine yeares from the Creation of the World to the death of Ioseph The best Expositors of this Book are Mercer Rivet Paraeus Calvin Peter Martyr
Ioshua Iudges Samuel and the Kings Of the Latines liber Chronicorum q. d. Chronologicum which appellation Luther retains in the Dutch version of the Bible There is nothing certain of the Author of these Books though Esdras be thought to be the Author The first Book consists of twenty nine Chapters and contains a History of two thousand eight hundred and five years viz. from the Creation of the world even to the Kingdom of Salomon The second consists of thirty two Chapters and describes a History from the beginning of the Kingdom of Salomon even to the return out of the Captivity of Babylon The best Expositor on both the Chronicles is Lavater Twelfthly The two Books of Ezra they are counted for one Volume with the Hebrews the Greeks and Latines divide them into two Books and assign the first to Ezra the second to Nehemiah Ezra was so called from the Author which was a Scribe most skild in the Law of God as appears in Chap. 7. v. 1 6 and 11. The best Expositors of it are Iunius and Wolphius Nehemiah It is called by the Latines the second Book of Ezra because the History begun by Ezra is continued in it but usually Nehemiah because it was written by him and also because it contains the re-edifying of the City of Ierusalem caused by Nehemiah It consists of thirteen Chapters and contains a History of fifty five years viz. from the twentieth year of Artaxerxes to the Kingdom of the last Darius The best Expositors of it are Wolphius and Pilkinton The next Book is Esther called in Hebrew Megillath Esther the Volume of Esther Many of the Jews think this Book was written by Mordechai which those words in Chap. 9 20. and 23. seem to favour Isidore saith Ezra is thought to have written Esther but some say it was composed after by another Moses Camius saith it was written by the men of the great Synagogue Philo Iudaeus saith Ioachim a Priest of the Hebrews son of the high-Priest was the composer of it and that he did it at the intreaty of Mordecai the Jew It s remarkable that though the Book of Esther contain most admirable passages of Gods Providence in delivering of his Church yet in this Book alone of all the Books of holy Scripture the name of God is not so much as once mentioned Dr Drakes Chronol The Jews throw the Book of Esther to the ground before they reade it because the name of God is not there as their Rabbins have observed Dr Stoughtons Love sick Spouse It consists of ten Chapters and contains a History of ten or as others will of twenty years concerning the preservation of the Church of the Jewes in Persia by Esther Drusius Serrarius and Merlin have done well on this Book 3. Poetical Books Iob Psalms Proverbs Ecclesiastes Canticles to which some adde the Lamentations Those parts of Scripture which set forth strongest affections are composed in verse as those holy flames of spiritual love between Christ and his Spouse in the Canticles of Salomon The triumphant joy of Deborah after deliverance from Sisera's Army of Moses and Miriam after the destruction of Pharaoh the afflicting sorrows of Hezekiah in his sickness and the Lamentations of Ieremiah for the Captivity of the Jews The Book of Psalms is as it were a throng of all affections love joy sorrow fear hope anger zeal every passion acting a part and wound up in the highest strains by the Spirit of God breathing Poetical eloquence into the heavenly Prophet So the Book of Iob. whose subject is sorrow hath a composure answerable to the matter Passion hath most scope in Verse and is freest when tied up in numbers Iob There is great variety of judgement about the Author and Pen-man of this Book Some say it was one of the Prophets but they know not who Some ascribe it to Salomon some to Elihu many to Moses Hugo Cardinal Suidas and Pineda conceive that Iob himself was the Author of this Book and it is thus proved because when any Book is inscribed by the name of any person and there appears no urgent reason wherefore it could not be written by him such a person is to be thought the Author and not the matter of the Book as is manifest in the Book of Ioshua and those of the greater and lesser Prophets The Arabical speeches with which it abounds note that it was written by some man living near Arabia as Iob did Neither doth it hinder that Iob speaks of himself in the third person for Canonicall Writers are wont to do this out of modesty Numb 12. 3. Iohn 21. 24. It is conceived to be the first piece of Scripture that was written if Moses wrote it it is probable that he wrote it before the deliverance of the people of Israel out of Egypt while he was in Midian The main and principal subject of this Book is contained in Psal. 34. 19. Many are the afflictions of the righteous but the Lord delivereth him out of all We may divide the Book into three parts and so it sets forth 1. Iobs happy condition both in regard of externals and internals in the first five verses 2. Iobs fall his calamity from that to the seventh verse of the fourty second Chapter 3. Iobs restitution or restoring from thence to the end Beza Mercer Pineda Drusius Cocceius have well expounded it The Psalms are called in the Hebrew Sepher Tehillim a Book of Divine Praises in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so called from a musical Instrument used in singing of the Psalms which name the Latines have retained Vide Menochinm Hymns is the general Title for the whole Book of Psalms For though it be translated The Book of Psalms yet every one that knoweth that language knoweth the word is The Book of Hymns Christ with his Disciples sung an Hymn Matth. 26. 30. Mr Cottons Singing of Psalms a Gospel Ordinance c. 5. Psalmi dicti sunt Tehillim ab argumento praecipuo Etsi enim in libro hoc contineantur etiam petitiones necnon precationes hae tamen non adeo sunt frequentes his ipsis variae interspersae sunt laudationes Dei a Iustitia summa à misericordia potentia Dei desumtae It contains sacred Songs to be fitted for every condition both of the Church and Members It is called in the New Testament The Book of Psalms Luk. 20. 42. and 24. 44. Acts 1. 20. No Books in the Old Testament are oftner cited in the New then Isaiah and the Psalms that sixty times this sixty four They are in all an hundred and fifty in Greek an hundred fifty one Augustine and Chrysostom ascribe them all to David as the Author so do Theophylact Ludovicus de Tena Some think that after the Captivity Ezra collected these Psalms dispersed here and there into one Volume There are ten Authors whose names are put in the Titles of the Psalms
of Christs Birth Chap. 5. 2. It consists of seven Chapters Danaeus and Chythraeus have done well on it Nahum It is probable that he lived before the Babylonish Captivity and was contemporary to Micah but ninety years after Ionah It consists of three Chapters which contain both a prediction of the destruction of the Assyrians ch 1. and also an Explication of the causes of it Chap. 2. and 3. Danaeus is the best Expositor of this Book The Hebrews think that both Nahum and Habakkuk wrote in the times of Manasseh Both the order in which these Books were anciently placed and the things themselves which are contained in their writings do intimate as much Grotius Habakkuk Luctator It is probable that he lived about Ieremiahs time or a little before It consists of three Chapters Grinaeus and Danaeus have done well on him Zephany He prophesied in the times of Iosiah King of Iudah and was contemporary to Ieremiah He prophesieth especially of the overthrow of the Kingdome of Iudah It consists of three Chapters Danaeus hath done well on this Prophecy Haggai Chag signifieth a Feast in Hebrew his name signifieth Festivus laetus aut festum celebrans vel diligens quòd Templi Hierosolymitani aedificationem post Captivitatem maximè urserit He began to prophesie after the Babylonish Captivity in the second year of Darius King of Persia Ezr. 5. 1. Hag. 1. 1. Grinaeus and Danaeus have done well on this Zachary He prophesied after the Babylonish Captivity and followed Haggai within two moneths he handleth the same subject it consists of fourteen Chapters His Book is more large and obscure then any of the twelve Prophets Danaeus hath done well on the whole and Mr Pemble on nine Chapters Malachi Nuncius seu Angelus meus Mal. 4. 4 5 He was the last Prophet of the Old Testament See Grotius of him Tertullian cals him the Limit and Land-mark of both Testaments Limes inter vetus Novum Testamentum It consists of four Chapters Danaeus and Polanus and Stock have commented well on this Book So much concerning the several Books of the Old Testament CHAP. IV. Of the New Testament THe New Canon is that which the Christian Church hath had written in Greek from the time of Christ and his Apostles and it summarily containes the Word published by Christ and his righteous acts The History of which is in the four Books of the Evangelists the Examples in the Acts of the Apostles the Exposition in the one and twenty Epistles and lastly the Prophecy in the Revelation All the Books of the New Testament were written in Greek for divers Reasons First Because that Tongue in the time of Christ and his Apostles was the most excellent of all among the Languages of the Gentiles Secondly Because it was then most Common as Latine is now Tully shews Orat. pro Archia Poeta how far the Greek Tongue spread Thirdly Because in this Tongue all the Philosophy and Sciences of the Gentiles were written The Greek Tongue by the writing of Philosophers Orators Historians and Poets was fraught with the best learning which Heathenism afforbed It came to passe by the singular Providence of God that this Testament was written in one Tongue only for what Nation else would have yielded to another that the Scriptures in their Tongue were Authentick and so the seeds of debate might have been sown amongst them All almost agree in this That all the Books of the New Testament were written in the Greek Tongue it is only doubted concerning three of them the Gospel of Matthew Mark and the Epistle to the Hebrews Many affirm that the Gospel of Matthew was written by Matthew in Hebrew or rather in Syriack the Language used by Hebrews in the time of Christ and his Apostles that the Epistle to the Hebrews was written in Hebrew and Mark in Latine All the New Testament is penned from God in Greek The Reporters that St Matthew wrote in Hebrew or St Paul to the Hebrews never marked the Greek styles of both in Attique formes of speech that Salem hath not And the holy Ghost never translated Books but kept still the original of all that he would have translated Here be four Dialects the Attique Judean Thalmadique and Apostolique By ignorance of which much darknesse covereth dealers with the New Testament Broughtons Lords Family It is certain that the Primitive Church from the first times used the Gospel of Matthew written in Greek and counted it Authentical If any one say That the Latine Edition of Mark in the vulgar is not a version but the first Copy he may easily be refuted from the uniform style in it with other Latine Gospels and it will appear to any Reader that the Gospel of Mark which the Roman Church useth is later then the Greek and that the Latine was made from it For the Epistle to the Hebrews though many among the Ancient thought it was written in Hebrew yet all agree that the Greek Edition was in use thence from the first times of the Church Glassius saith Matthew wrote his Gospel first in Greek for his style agrees with Mark. Writers acknowledge that there is an Ancient Hebrew Copy of Matthew but upon good ground deny that it is the original truth for besides that by received Tradition it is held otherwise Matth. 1. 23. and other such like places do evince it for why should he writing in Hebrew interpret Hebrew words to them which understand that Language Hieron in quatuor Evangelia and Salmasius hold that Matthew was written in Hebrew Evangelium Matthaei Hebraicè ab auctore scriptum esse nemo non veterum tradidit Hebraeum illud Syriacum esse quod in usu tunc temporis in Iudaea fuit Hieronymus docet qui Evangelium Matthaei scriptum fuisse testatur Chaldaico Syroque Sermone Salmas de Helâ—enistica Erasmus Cajetan Calvin Iunius Whitaker Gomarus Causabone Gerhard deny that Matthew was written in Hebrew Chamier de canone l. 12. c. 1. saith we have the New Testament in Greek for although some contend that the Gospel of Matthew and the Epistle to the Hebrews was written in Hebrew yet saith he it is very uncertain and so propius fâ—lse I think saith Rivet that the Epistle to the Hebrews was written in Greek a Tongue then most common and which was used by many Hebrews which were called Hellenists That Mark should be written in Latine originally is improbable many of the reasons alledged to prove that Matthew was not written in Hebrew are of force here also the Jews at that time of the writing of the New Testament did speak Syriack and not Hebrew which Language is mixt consisting of Hebrew and Chaldee therefore saith Whitaker it is more probable that Matthew and he which wrote the Epistle to the Hebrews wrote in Greek because the Greek Tongue was not unknown to the Jews which were Hellenists Act. 6. 1. and other
not only the delineation and constitution of things created but also the Word of God and the Doctrine of the Gospel long since propounded to the Jews and so propounded as they could not but hear because it was published openly to all the whole world by the mystery of the holy Apostles out of the predictions of the Prophets Paul interprets the comparison propounded by the Prophet and teacheth That as certainly as the lines of heaven run forth into all the earth so certainly in these last times the Doctrine of the Gospel came forth into all the earth by the Apostles preaching and therefore the Apostle did not rashly change the word of the Prophet because the Hebrew Text in the Prophet was corrupt but purposely in stead of delineation the Apostle put in sonus having respect to the present accomplishment of the promise whereby God had fore-told that all the Gentiles should be converted to the communion of the Gospel and to this end he did foreshew that he would give unto them Preachers Coton urgeth two other places to shew that the Hebrew Text is corrupted Mat. 2. 23. and Mat. 27. Object Mat. 2. 23. He shall be called a Nazarene is no where found though the Evangelist say that it is written therefore it followeth saith he that the Hebrew original which we have is imperfect Answ. Saint Ierom saith That this place was objected to him above a hundred times and that he hath as often answered it viz. That if the Hebrew be imperfect having no such passage then is also that of the Septuagint and the Vulgar so that the Objection is not against the Hebrew but against the Scripture in what language soever it be Maldonat after he had well weighed divers opinions holds that of Ieroms for the most sure which is to draw Nazarene from Netzer a branch Isa. 11. 1. Iunius in his Parallels Piscator Dr Taylor Mr Dod go the same way Chrysostom and Theophylact because they cannot undo this knot cut it thus saying that many of the Books of the Prophets are lost Bucer thinketh that place Iud. 15. 5. is here noted Samson being a Redeemer as he was a figure of Christ and the Book of the Iudges was composed by divers Prophets Calvin Marlorat Beza Scultetus and Mr Perkins seem to encline to this opinion The last large Annotations mention both these Interpretations but adhere rather to the former Object The second place urged by Coton to prove the corruption of the Hebrew is Matth. 27. 9. The Evangelist cites Ieremiah for that which is to be found only in Zachary Answ. Iunius in his Parallels and Dr Taylor on the temptation bring six answers to reconcile these places 1. Some say it joyns together both one place in Ieremiah Chap. 18. 1 2 3. and that of Zachary but there is little or no agreement between them 2. Some say that it is not in Ieremiahs writings which are Canonical but in some Apocryphal Writings of Ieremiah which the Jews had and which Chrysostom confesseth he saw wherein these words were but it is not likely that the holy Evangelist would leave a Canonical Text and cite an Apocryphal or give such credit to it or seek to build our faith upon it and by our rule that Book should be Canonical which is cited by Christ or his Apostles 3. Some say that Matthew forgat and for Zaechary put down Ieremiah so Augustine and Erasmus but with more forgetfulnesse for holy men wrote as they were moved by Gods Spirit 4. Some think it the errour of heedless Writers who might easily so erre but all the oldest Copies and the most Ancient Fathers have the name of Ieremiah 5. Some say that Zachariah being instructed and trained up with Ieremiah did deliver it by tradition from Ieremiah and so Ieremiah spake it by Zachariah which might be true because it is said in the Text As was spoken by Ieremiah not written But sixthly the most compendious and likely way of reconciling is this that Zachariah and Ieremiah was the same man having two names which was very usual among the Jews as Salomon was called Iedidiah Iehoiachim Ieconias and Coniah Simon Peter Cephas and Bariona Matthew Levi. So far Iunius and D. Taylor See M. Robert Baily on Zach. 3. 1. p. 11. and last large Annotat. The best of the Popish Writers cannot deny but that the name Ieremiah the Prophet is put for Zachary either through the negligence of the Scribes or else it was inserted into the Text out of the Margent the Evangelist saying no more But that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Prophet as both Iansenius and Maldonat◠in loc do confesse Chamier distinguisheth of a two fold depravation one of Interpretation herein we excuse not nor defend the Jews Second of the letter herein they are to be patroniz'd against the Papists who thorow their sides strike at the very Scriptures and labour to overthrow their Authority The Hebrew Edition then notwithstanding these and such like frivolous Objections is sincere and uncorrupt and if any errors crept in through negligence or ignorance of the Pen-men which copied out the Books yet Bellarmine himself granteth they are of no great moment In matters pertaining to faith and manners saith he there is nothing wanting in the integrity of the Scriptures Vide Capel Critica Sac. l. 6. c. 2. Haud negare ausim temporum injuria descriptorum incuria errata quaedam sphalmata in textum Hebraeum irrepsisse Amama Antibarb Bibl. lib. 1. c. 1. What reasons can the Jesuites alledge why the Hebrew and the Greek which kept their integrity four hundred years together after Christ amidst as bitter Enemies as ever they had as troublesome and tempestuous times as ever were since should after in time of lesse danger and greater quiet lose not their beauty only but their chastity also And we marvel that the Jesuites are not afraid to suffer this blot to fall upon their Popish government which boasteth and saith It is the pillar of truth and yet hath had no better care to preserve the truth Objections of the Papists against the Purity of the Greek Text in the New Testament Object They instance in Rom. 12. 11. to be corrupt the Greek hath serving the time 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for serving the Lord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Answ. Many of the ancient Greek Copies and Scholiasts have also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Salmeron the Jesuite confesseth Serving the Lord and it appeareth in the Syriack Translation and who seeth not that it might rather be an oversight of the writer taking one word for another rather then a fault in the Text and the cause of the mistake saith Beza was the short writing of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which was taken by some for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereas they should have taken it for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 If we should admit the other reading we
the person if it be publick in regard of the means is not forbidden for it is lawful for one man with Scripture Toti resistere mundo saith the Glosse of the Canon-Law the meaning of this place is That the Prophets were no Interpreters or Messengers of their own mindes but Gods The Catholicks hold saith Chamier meaning still by that Title the Protestants that the Scripture is to be interpreted by private labour and industry viz. of Augustine Ierom Chrysostom but not in a private sense that is in a sense arising from the brain of the Interpreter It is true saith Cartwright against the Rhemists that the Scriptures cannot be expounded of every private spirit nor which is more of any private spirit nor yet of all private spirits together but only of those which are inspired of God viz. the Prophets and Apostles which are here opposed unto private Interpretation And therefore it is evident That the Exposition of the Scripture ought not to be fetched from Ecclesiastical either Fathers or Councels which speak not by Inspiration but from the Scriptures themselves what he meaneth he declareth in the next verse where he sheweth the reason of his saying namely that it must be interpreted as it was written and by as high Authority Seeing therefore it was first spoken by holy men which spake as they were led by the holy Spirit and were inspired of God it followeth that it must be interpreted by the same Authority The Interpretation therefore that is brought out of the Apostles and Prophets is not private although it be avowed by one man only On the other side that Interpretation which is not brought from thence although it have the allowance of whole general Councels is but private This is a principal meaning of our Saviour Christ when he willeth that we should call no man Father or Master in the earth that is in matter of Doctrine we should depend upon the Authority of no man nor of all men in the earth but only upon Christ and upon God Our reasons by which we prove that the chiefest Judgment and Authority of interpreting Scriptures is to be given not to the Church but to the Scriptures themselves and the holy Ghost 1. That which only hath power to beget faith that only hath the chiefest Authority of interpreting Scripture and of determining all Controversies concerning Faith and Religion but the Scriptures onely and the Holy Ghost have this force Rom. 10. 17. The Holy Ghost onely can infuse saving Faith into our hearts which is called by the Schoolmen Infusa Fides The Faith which we have from the Church is acquired and sufficeth not to a certain perswasion 2. The Scriptures cannot be interpreted but by the same Spirit wherewith they were written that Spirit is found no where but in the Scripture whosoever have promises from God to understand the Scripture may interprett it but so have all the faithfull 3. Christ himself makes the Scripture a Judge Iohn 12. 48. and still appealed to it 4. Although the Fathers were men indued of God with excellent gifts and brought no small light to understanding of the Scriptures yet learned men in our dayes may give a right sense of sundry places thereof which the Fathers saw not yea against the which perhaps they consent Hath any man living read all the Fathers Nay have all the men living read them Nay Can they shew them Can they get them I had almost said Can they name them In the Exposition of those words Tu es Petrus super hanc petram almost every one of the Fathers at least the most part of them and the best expound it of Peters faith yet the Papists understand it non de fide sed de persona Petri. Here they disagree themselves from the Fathers Iohn 10. 16. by the title of one Shepheard Augustine Chrysostome Ierome Cyril Theodoret Theophylact Euthimius Rupertus Cyprian and other Fathers agree that Christ is theredesigned but Stapleton saith the Pope is there meant In the Division of the Law they go clean contrary to the greatest part of the Fathers for they divide the Commandments as we do but the Papists make the two first one and the tenth two 2. They have no father to countenance them in this but Augnstine Revet de Authoritate Patrum c. 5 6 7. There were no writings of the Fathers for a time many of them wrote 400 years after Christ but some 500 and 600 years after Christ what rule had they before that time of interpreting Scriptures The Fathers were given too much to allegorizing Cajetane therefore in the Preface of his Commentaries upon the Books of Moses saith That the exposition of the Scripture is not tied by God to the sense of the Fathers therefore he admonisheth his Readers not to take it ill if he sometime dissent from the stream of the Fathers 4. The Doctrine of the Church must be examined by the Scriptures Acts 17. 11. If Pauls doctrine much more may the decrees of the Pope Church Councels be examined by the Scriptures 5. The interpretation of the Scripture is a gift freely given by God for the edification of the Church Rom. 12. 6. 1 Cor. 12. 10. therefore it is not tied to a certain kinde of men but common to the faithful 6. The faithful are commanded diligently to try and examine every doctrine 1 Thess. 5. 21. 1 Iohn 4. 1. which cannot be altogether done without interpretation What means must be used in the interpretation of Scripture The end of the Scripture we heard was to direct the Church to all saving truth The means to be used for the attaining of that end by the Minister is diligent study and humble Prayer by the People attentive reading hearing prayer and meditating First the Teachers must pray earnestly to God for his spirit to inlighen them Mat. 7. 7 8 9. Rom. 15. The Scriptures are understood by that spirit that dictated them Secondly The Pastors and Teachers of the Church must diligently and painfully study the Scriptures giving themselves to read compare place with place Iohn 5. 39. Search the Scriptures it is a metaphor taken from such as search for Gold and Silver Oar in the earth who will search and sift and break every clod to finde out the gold Solomon useth the same metaphor Prov. 2. 4. and to this diligence in searching doth the Apostle exhort Timothy 1 Tim. 4. 13. This diligence of often exprest in Scripture in the Old Testament by the phrase of meditating in the word Iosh. 1. 8. Psal. 1. 2. Thirdly they must labour for a competent knowledge in the original tongues the Hebrew and Greek in which the Scripture was written that so they may consult with the Hebrew Text in the Old and the Greek in the New Testament and see with their own not anothers eyes as Gen. 3. 15. The Papists read it corruptly She shall break here the original soon determines the
I maintain against the Antiscripturists and such as go about to take away all the Old Testament It was necessary that God should give us some outward signification of his will All creatures have a rule without themselves to guide them in their operations The Scripture is the Rule of Faith and Life Isa. 8. 20. All extraordinary wayes of revelation are now ceased we are to pray for a further Discovery of Gods minde in his Word Ephes. 1. 17. not to expect new Revelations ex parte objecti but ex parte Subjecti a farther clearing of the Scriptures to us Some say the Old Testament is a dead letter so is the New without the Spirit how can we convince the Iews but by the Old Testament the same Spirit spake in both Testaments Some turn the whole word into Allegories Others deny consequences out of Scripture to be Scripture nothing is Scripture say they but what is found there expresly What is necessarily inferred is Scripture as well as what is literally exprest Levit. 10. 1. The Apostle proves the Resurrection by consequence Paul and Apollo Act. 17. 3. 18. 28. proved to the Iews by the Scriptures that Jesus was the Christ although in those Scriptures these very words are not found but are deduced by a necessary consequence In the second Book I treat of God That place Exod. 34. 6 7. is as full a description of Gods Attributes as any in all the Scripture The Hebrew Doctors note that there are thirteen Attributes and but one that speaks of Iudgement that he will punish the sins of Fathers upon their Children all the other twelve are meerly wholly mercy and his Iustice is mentioned to invite men to lay hold on mercy All Principles Rules and Motions to Duty are to be found in God Gen. 17. 1. Joel 2. 13. The Heathens extolled the knowledge of a mans self E Coelo descendit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But Christians must chiefly study to know God 1 Chr. 28. 9. Jer. 9. 24. Joh. 17. 3. The understanding of the Angels is perfected by the Contemplation of the Excellencies that are in God We shall not be properly Comprehensores in Heaven although the Schoolmen sometimes say so yet we shall know God in a far more perfect manner then in this life 1 Cor. 9. 12. 2 Cor. 5. 7. If God were more known he would be more loved seared honoured trusted God is primum verum which satisfies the understanding and Summum bonum which satisfies the will Deo solo nos debemus frui rebus aliis â—â—i We ought to enjoy God alone and use the world We are said to enjoy a thing with which we are delighted for iâ— self to use that which we referre to another thing I will conclude this with that excellent Speech of Austine concerning Gods knowledge Non enim more nostro ille vel quod futurum est prospicit vel quod praesens est aspicit vel quod praeteritum est respicit sed alio mo do quodam à nostrarum cogitationum consuetudine longe alteque diverso In the third Book I handle the Works of God The serious considering of Gods Works is a great part of sanctifying his Name Besides the natural there is a spiritual use to be made of all the creatures Revel 12. 1. The Sunne points to Christ the Moon to the World the Starres to the Ministers of the Gospel How frequently did our Saviour take occasion from earthly things to teach men heavenly truths In the fourth Book I speak of the Fall of Man and so of Original and Actual Sins Some Divines hold that there are three parts of Original Sin 1. The guilt of Adams sin 2. The privation of original righteousness 3. The corruption of nature Of the imputation of Adams sinne to us Garissolius a learned and pious French Minister hath written a large Book He shews there the consent also of Reformed Churches therein but how great an agreement there hath been of Churches and Ecclesiastical Writers ancient and modern in this matter Andrew Rivet hath taught in a peculiar Book published upon that Argument Every man by nature hath likewise lost the Image of God and is born empty of Grace and Righteousness and wholly corrupt Rom. 3. 23 24. 5. 12. Rom. 1. 29. to the end Ephes. 2. 1. 4. 25. to the end 5. 3 4 9. 2 Tim. 3. 2. to the 6. Some say we are dead as we come out of the old Adams hand but through the undertaking of Iesus Christ all men are restored unto a State of Grace and Favour and that through common grace they may believe if they will But all unregenerate men are still under the state of death and there is no such intrinsecal power in them this man is regenerated say the Arminians and not that because he hath better improved his abilities but the work of Regeneration is an effect of special discriminating grace Some of our Divines say God hath left some few relicks of his Image in us since the Fall to leave us without excuse and as a Monument of his Bounty and in pity to humans Societies some Knowledge and some restraint upon the Conscience Others dislike this opinion and say That Righteousnesse in Adam was connatural but consisted not in any natural Abilities and that these remainders of Gods Image must be of the same kinde with what is lost and so good in Gods account and then man shall not be wholly flesh and so there will be something for Grace to graff upon which the Arminians lay hold on In the fifth Book I speak of Mans Recovery by Christ Phil. 2. 6. to the 1â— Heb. 9. 11. to the 15. Heb. 1. 3. Mark 10. 33 34. as he had the grace of Union and Unction so we through him when we are united to him we partake of his fulnesse Iohn 1. 14. By the first Adam we lost Gods Image Favour and Communion with him By the second Adam Gods Image is restored in us we are reconciled to God and have accesse to him yet he died not for all 1. The reason why none can lay any thing to the charge of Gods elect is Because Christ died for them Rom. 8. 33 34. if therefore Christ died for all none can lay any thing to the charge of a reprobate more then to the charge of Gods elect 2. Christ prayed only for those who either did or should believe in him and for whom he prayed for them only he sanctified himself John 17. 9 19. that is offered up himself in Sacrifice upon the Cross for them 3. If he died for all from the beginning of the world then he died for all those that already were damned 4. Then he hath merited salvation for all and shall they then fail of salvation In the sixth Book I speak of the Church and Antichrist There is much spoken in these dayes of the admitting of Members and of the
also 2. This tradition concerning the age of men did drive away as well the Ecclesiastick as the Lay persons Notwithstanding all this that hath been objected by the Papists we hold that the Scriptures ought to be translated into the Vulgar and mother Tongues of each Nation and that all men ought to read them and meditate diligently in them and that for these reasons 1. From the Commandment and will of God revealed in Scripture He hath commanded all that live in the Church to study the Scriptures and read them Deut. 11. 18 19. Ioh. 5. 39. He speaks not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in general They must try all things 2. From Gods intention which commanded it to be written for that end that it might be obvious to all Ioh. 20. 31. Rom. 15. 4. 3. Those are commended which did reade the Scripture as the Eunuch Acts 8. 22. the Bereans Acts 17. and dispraised which neglected it as the Israelites Hosea 8. 12. they are pronounced Blessed who diligently meditate in the Scriptures Psal. 1. 2. How unlike to Peter â—2 Pet. 1. 19. are those whith pretend to be his Successours 4. From the fact of the Apostles who as they publickly preached the mysteries of salvation to the people so also in their Epistles they commended the whole doctrine of salvation to be read by them The Epistles of the Romans Corinthians Galatians Ephesians were written to the people therefore to be read by them One Epistle of Iohn was written to Gaius a Lay-man another to the elect Lady 5. From the Profit and Necessity of this study men are illightned and converted by reading of the Scriptures Psal. 19. 8 9. they are directed by them as most faithfull counsellors in all their waies Psal. 119. 24. they are armed by them against the fiery darts of Satan Eph. 6. 16. One seeing a youth read the Scriptures said It was never well since such were permitted to turn over the Bible but he answered him in the Psalmists words Psal. 119. 9. 6. From the unanimous Conseâ—t of all the Fathers Chrysostom and Ierom especially who exhort the people to the private reading of the Scriptures and testifie that the Scriptures were publickly read in their Ecclesiastical Assemblies not in an unknown tongue but in a tongue understood by the people It was decreed by the Councel of Nice That no Christian should be without a Bible in his house And the Jews at this day suffer no house amongst them to be without the Bible Christ and his Apostles teaching and disputing before the people appeal to the Law and the Prophets without the name of the Author Book or Chapter because they knew the Bible Text to be familiar to the Israelites In an unknown tongue they cannot profit the people Ergo They ought to be translated into a Tongue known to the people 1 Cor. 14. The Apostle in divers verses treateth of this subject vers 6 7 19. He saith All things ought to be done in the Church for the edifying of the people that no man should speak in an unknown tongue without an interpreter and saith That he had rather speak five words and be understood then ten thousand words in an unknown tongue Those Arguments before urged for the peoples reading of the Scripture prove this also for they cannot reade them in every Nation unlesse they be translated into a Tongue they understand Christ and his Apostles taught the people the Scripture in their mother Tongue In the next age after the Apostles saith Grotius lib. 3. de veritate Religionis Christ. the New Testament was translated into divers Vulgar Tongues the Syriack Arabick Aethiopick and Latine which Versions are yet extant and differ not mainly from the Greek In the elder and purer times the Scriptures were translated into innumerable yea into all Tongues usual amongst men See Gregories Preface to the Notes on passages of Scripture The plain and usual words the phrase and manner of speech most frequented the comparisons and similitudes in Scripture most familiar taken out of the shops and fields from Husbandry and Houswifery from the Flock and the Herd shew that the Scriptures were written for the capacity and understanding of the unlearned Iohn 5. 39. a speciall place if it be indicative it shewes the custome of the Jewes if imperative it shewes what they ought to doe Many amongst us are to be blamed for not having the Scripture in their houses and for not reading it constantly in the same as they ought to do or else they read it as other Books not with such respect to it as the greatnesse of its Authour deserveth I mean with a desire and purpose to believe and obey all that they finde there which must needs be the Duty of those that confesse these writings come from God We should receive it with reverence believe it with confidence exercise our selves in it with diligence and delight practise it with obedience Reading the Scripture is a rehearsing out of the Book such things as are there written â—arely without any interpretation It is to be done publickly as it was in the Synagogues of the Jews who had the reading of the Law and Prophets amongst them The Prophets were read in their ears every day saith Paul and after the lecture of the Law and the Prophets in another place From hence hath been continued the custom of Lessons of the Old and New Testament to the same purpose saith Mr Thorndike We honour God more by a publick then a private reading of it 2. Pâ—ivately The godly Jews of Bâ—rea did search the Scriptures and both King and people are commanded to read the Law Deut. 17. 19. and 6. 7. 8. 9. What is written in the Law How readest thou Luke 10. 26. Matth. 12. 5. and 21. 16 42. Christ Peter and Paul in their preaching quote not the Chapter and verse only say Isaiah saith Isaiah is bold It is written in the Psalms because people should be so acquainted with the Scripture as to know where it is See Grotius on Heb. 4. 4. Some good Divines hold that the Scriptures barely read though preaching be not joined with it may be the instrument of Regeneration since the Doctrine of the Gospel is called The ministration of the Spirit Psal. 19. The Law of the Lord converteth the soul it is so when not preached The word is a means of conversion whether written preacht or lived 2 Cor. 3. 2 3. 1 Pet. 3. 1 2. Psal. 51. 13. But the Word of God is made effectual by the Spirit more often more ordinarily to beget a new life in the preaching that is the interpreting and applying of it then in the bâ—re reading 1 Tim. 4. 13. Matth. 28. 29. Christs custome was as we may collect out of Luke 4. where one instance is recorded to make us conceive his ordinary practice when he had read to interpret
most unjust means extort money from Gojim that is the Gentiles Paulus Fagius in his Annotat. on Deut. 17. 17. Scripture Arguments are the chiefest to convince an unbeliever Christ by divers Arguments Iohn 5. labours to convince the Jews that he was the Messiah promised 1. Iohn bare witnesse of him vers 33. 2. His works bare witnesse of him verse 36. 3. The Father did bear witnesse of him vers 37. 4. He produceth the Testimony of the Scriptures vers 39. They are they which testifie of me Will you not believe Iohn my miracles my Word from Heaven then believe the written Word If we believe not the Testimomy of Scripture nothing will convince us though one rise from the dead nor Christ himself if he were here in the flesh and should preach unto us Ioh. 5. ult The Lord in executing of his Judgements commmonly observes proportion and retaliation Antichrist is the greatest opposite to Gods Law and Word he is called therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Thess. 2. 8. The lawlesse one He is without Law above Law against Law He abuseth Scripture takes upon him to judâ—â— and interpret Scripture therefore it shall be his ruine 2 Thess. 2. 8. God shall destroy him with the Spirit of his mouth id est Verbo suo Beza God hath consecrated the Word to this purpose the end of it is not only to save but destroy being the savour of death to some and it is a fit instrument for such a work Antichrists strength is in mens consciences only this will pierce thither Heb. 4. 12. God useth the Word for the destruction of Antichrist these wayes 1. It discovers him his doctrine his errors 2. It hardens him 3. It condemneth him and passeth sentence against him CHAP. III. II. The Books of Scripture FRom the Divine â—lows the Canonical Authority of the Scripture The books of Scripture are called Canonical books say some from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word is used 2 Cor. 10. 13. Phil. 3. 16. Gal. 6. 16. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mark the double Emphasis this notable Canon because they were put into the Canon by the Universal Church and acknowledged to be divinely inspired by it and also are made a perfect Canon or Rule of all Doctrine concerning Religion Credendorum agendorum of Faith and Manners of all things which are to be believed or done toward salvation But Cameron thinks it is not termed Canonical because it is a Rule for that book saith he is called Canonical which is put into the Catalogue which the Ancients called a Canon of those writings which are esteemed Divine Becanus saith They are called Canonical both because they contain a Rule which we ought to follow in faith and manners and because they are put into the Catalogue of Divine books The Conditions of a Canon are these 1. It must contain Truth or be an expresse Form and Image of Truth which is in the Divine minde 2. It must be commanded sanctified and confirmed by Divine Authority that it may be a Canon to us in the Church These books were sanctified either commonly all of both Testaments by the Testimony of the Spirit and Church and Canon it self or the books of the Old Testament were specially and singularly confirmed by Word Signs and Event as the Pentateuch but the Prophetical books and Hagiographa before their carrying into Babylon by extraordinary sign the Cloud and Veil in the Temple 1 King 8. 10. Levit. 16. 2. and Gods answer by Ephod Urim and Thummim Exod. 28. 30. after their carrying away into Babylon by singular testimonies of events The books of the New Testament are confirmed by the Son of God revealed in flesh by his sayings and deeds Heb. 1. 2. and by the powerful Ministry of the Apostles by Signs Vertues and Miracles Mark 16. 20. There is a three-fold Canon in the Church Divine Ecclesiasticall and False The Divine Canon is that which properly and by it self is called the Word of God immediately inspired of God into the Prophets and Apostles This according to the divers times of the Church is distinguished into the Old and New Testament 2 Cor. 3. 6 14. this is a common division of the sacred Bible among Christians as in the version of Tremellius and Iunius Testamenti veteris novi Biblia sacra and the Geneva gives that Title to their Bible La Bible qui est toute la Saincte Escriture du viâ—l noveau Testament Augustine thinks they are better called Vetus novum Instrumentum Heinsius Grotius Vetus novum Foedus Vide Grotii Annotat. in libros Evangelii A Covenant is an Agreement between two a Testament is the Declaration of the Will of one It is called in regard of the Form Convention and Agreement between God and man a Covenant in regard of the manner of confirming it a Testament For 1. In a Testament or last Will the Testators minde is declared so is the Will of God in his Word therefore it is called a Testimony often Psal. 19. and 119. 2. Here is a Testator Christ a Legacy eternal life Heirs the Elect a Writing the Scripture Seals the Sacraments 3. Because it is ratified by the death of Christ Heb. 9. 16 17. The Books of the Old Testament are the holy Scriptures given by God to the Church of the Jews shewing them what to believe and how God would be worshipped The New Testament containeth the books which treat of salvation already exhibited and Christ already come in the flesh All the books of the Old Testament were written originally in Hebrew because they were committed unto the Hebrews Rom. 3. 2. except what Daniel and Ezra wrote in the Chaldee The Jewish Church receiving them from God kept them and delivered them to Posterity Many grave Authors hold That the Hebrew was the first Tongue and Mother of all the rest and it may probably be collected from the names of our first Parents It was called Hebrew saith Erpenius not from Heber of the Posterity of Shem as Iosephus Ierom and others think when it is manifest that he rather spake Chaldee then Hebrew because Abraham the Patriarch which drew his original from him was a Chaldean but it was so called saith Erpenius as all the Rabbins Origen and others testifie from the Hebrews which people arose from Canaan It is honoured with the Title of the Holy Tongue saith the same Erpenius because the most holy God spoke it to his Prophets delivered his holy Will written in it to the Church and because it is very probable from the opinion of great men that holy men shall use it with God hereafter in Heaven Vide Buxtorfium de Linguae Hebraeae origine Antiquitate Sanctitate There are many Hebraisms also in the New Testament many words and phrases rather used according to the manner of the Hebrews then the Greeks by which it is manifest that the same Spirit was
Testimonies of the Coming Incarnation Miracles Preaching Life Passion Death and Resurrection of Christ that he seems rather to write a History of things past then to prophesie of things to come and one cals him the fifth Evangelist Hence saith Senensis our Lord Jesus Christ made choice of this among all the Prophets first of all to read publickly and expound in the Synagogue of his own Countrey and in the New Testament he is oftner cited then all the rest of the Prophets He began to prophesie in the year 3160 seven hundred years before Christ was born Uzziah the King of Iudah yet reigning and came to the last times of Hezekiah Isa. 1. 1. and 39. 3. therefore he was almost contemporary with Hosea Amos and Micah and finished the course of his life under four Kings of Iudah viz. Uzziah Iothan Achaz and Hezekiah The Hebrews say he was of the Blood-Royal and that he was sawed to death with a wooden saw by Manasseh an idolatrous King after he taught sixty years His Prophecy consists of sixty six Chapters The best Expositors of it are Calvin Scultetus Forerius Mollerus Ieremiah This Book was alwayes esteemed as Canonical and written by Ieremiah He prophesied under Iosiah Iehoahaz Ioachim and Zedekiah His Prophecy consists of fifty two Chapters He prophesied partly in the Land of Iudea and partly in the Land of Egypt In the Land of Iudea he prophesied 41 years and afterward four years in Egypt See Iackson on Ier. 7. 16. p. 4 5. The best Expositors of it are Bullinger Polanus Lamentations It is called in Hebrew Echa i. Quomodo because it begins with this word The LXX translate it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. Lamentationes vel fletus for the Subject or Matter of it It contains sad and mourning complaints of the state of the Commonwealth of Israel into which it fell after the death of Iosiah It consists of five Chapters Nazianzen the Great never read this Book but he wept abundantly Ieremiah is thought to be the Author of it This was the last Prophet that the Lord sent to Iudah before the Captivity He was the fittest man to write a Book of Lamentations he had seen the City besieged stormed and sired the Temple destroyed great out-rage and cruelty committed The best Expositors of it are Peter Martyr and Udal Ezekiel Signifieth The strength of God or One strengthned by God He prophesied at the same time with Ieremiah Ezekiel in the City of Babylon Ieremiah at Ierusalem It consists of eight and fourty Chapters The best Expositors of it are Iunius Polanus and Villalpandus This Prophecy is full of Majesty obscurity and difficulty Calvin spent his last breath on this Prophet Daniel He wrote his Prophecy after the Captivity Chap. 1. 21. and 10. 1. while the visions are general and not dangerous to the Jews Daniel writeth in the Syriack tongue general over the East from Chap. 2. v. 4. to the eighth Chapter All the Chapters in Daniel from Chap. 2. 4. to the beginning of the eight are written in the Chaldee tongue and from the beginning of that Chapter to the end of the Book he writeth in Hebrew for the affairs that fell under the Chaldean Monarchy he registred in the Chaldee Tongue when the Kingdom was destroyed he wrote in his own native tongue the Hebrew Mr Lightfoot But when the oppressors are named the Medes and the Jews plainly described to be the people whom God defendeth then in the eighth Chapter and all after he writeth in Hebrew and hath a Commandment to keep close to the plain exposition in Chap. 1 2. 4. Some reckon Daniel among the Prophets but the Jews place it among the Hagiographa It consists of twelve Chapters the six first of which contain matters Historical the six last Prophetical The best Expositors of it are Polanus Iunius Willet Broughton Huit The Latines give the first place to the greater Prophets the Greeks to the lesser because there are many among them very Ancient Grotius The twelve lesser Prophets are so called because their Writings are briefer then the four first greater the Hebrews have them all in one Book the later Prophets spake more plainly precisely and distinctly touching the coming of the Messiah then the former Daneus Gualter Ribera Tarnovius and Drusius have done best on all the small Prophets Mercer and Livelie have done well on the five first of them Hosea Is the first among them whose Prophecy although it consist of more Chapters then Daniel yet the other is more prolix Hosheang noteth Salvator Saviour he is therefore so called because he published Salvation to the house of Iudah and spake of the Saviour of the world and was a Type of Christ our Saviour He prophesied before the Babylonish Captivity in the time of King Ieroboam under four Kings of Iudah Uzziah Iotham Achaz and Hezekiah and was contemporary as some say with Ionah 2 Kin. 14. 26. Isaiah Isa. 1. 1. Amos 1. 1. and Mic. 1. 1. all which prophesied destruction to the Kingdome of Israel It consists of fourteen Chapters The best Expositors of it are Zanchius Tremelius Paraeus Rivet and Livelie Diu vixit Osee Prophetam egit ut volunt Hebraei per annos 90 ita multos habuit Prophetas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ut Isaiam Ioelem Amosum Abdiam Ionam Michâ—am ut notat Hieronymus Ioel He prophesied in the time of Hezekiah it consists of three Chapters which contain partly exhortation to repentance and partly comfort to the penitent Danaeus Paraeus Drusius and Livelie are the best Expositors of it Amos Of a Shepherd he was made a Prophet Chap. 1. 1. and 7. 14. He was contemporary to Isaiah and Hosea He prophesied to the Kingdom of Israel or the ten Tribes Chap. 1. 1. and 3. 1. and 4. 1. and 5. 1. He utters a few things concerning the Kingdom of Iudah chap. 2 4. and 6. 1. It consists of nine Chapters Danaeus Paraeus Livelie and Drusius are the best Interpreters of it Dr Bensiâ—ld hath done well on two Chapters Obadiah He was almost contemporary to Ieremiah It is but one Chapter D. Rainoldâ— hath well expounded this Prophecy The destruction of the enemies of the Church is handled in the sixteen first verses the Salvation thereof by the Ministery of Pastors in the five last Ionah He prophesied in the time of Ieroboam 2 King 14. 25. Ierom proves by the authority of the Hebrews that he was contemporary with Hosea and Amos. It consists of four Chapters Abbot and King have both commented well in English on this Prophecy Micah Humiliatus sic dictus Propheta ab insigni miranda humilitate He prophesied in the times of Iotham Ahaz and Hezekiah Kings of Iudah as appears by the inscription Chap. 1. 1. and was almost contemporary with Isaiah with whom he agreeth in many things He exceeds all the Prophets in this one thing that he determines the place
Scripture were not inspired of God for as God is true so is his Word Ioh. 17. 17. sweetly agreeing with it self and every part with other these Books commend false things as true and approve things evil as right Iudith Chap. 9. v. 2. commends killing the Sichemites against Gen. 49. 6 7. 2 Maccab. 14 42. Razis is commended for killing himself the fact is not only related but commended also in these words nobly manfully and this commendation doth plainly shew that the Author thereof was not inspired of God When the Dâ—natists out of this Book urged that it was lawful for them to kill themselves as Razis did Augustine then was forced to acknowledge That the Authority of this Book was uncertain and questionable and proves it by the judgement of the Jewish Church Christ and the Christians Manifest Fables are told in some of them for true Histories as that of Toby Iudith Bel and the Dragon If any desire a particular confutation of the several Books of the Apocrypha I commend to his reading that learned Treatise of Dr Raynolds de libris Apocryphis who hath so exactly handled this subject that to write of it after him were to write Iliads after Homer or to draw a line after Apelles 5. The most ancient Fathers and Councels which lived the best and first five hundred years after Christ rejected the same Books which we doe Ierome on Matth. 23. saith concerning a Testimony cited out of the Apocrypha Hoc quoniam ex Scriptura nihil habet authoritatis eadem facilitate rejicitur qua profertur Because this hath no authority out of Scripture it may as easily be rejected as it is offered All that the Papists object for these Books in the general is That the third Councel at Carthage the Florentire Councel and that of Trent do approve the said Books to be Canonical as also Augustine and Innocentius To which it may be answered 1. That the Councel of Carthage was but a Provincial Councel and therefore it cannot binde the whole world Moreover in that Councel there are divers things which the Papists will not endure as in the 26 Canon there is a Decree that no Bishop shall be called chief or universal Bishop no not the Bishop of Rome how should the Papists binde us with the authority of that Councel with which they will not binde themselves 2. The Latine Fathers judged these Books fit to be read for example of life and instruction of manners but not for confirmation of faith or establishing any Doctrine 3. These Books are not Proto-canonical truly and properly Canonical inspired by God containing the immediate and unchangeable truth of God sanctified by him and given to the Church to be a perfect rule of sound doctrine and good life but Deutero-canonical or rather Ecclesiastical as they are styled In this sense Augustine and Innocentius are to be taken when they reckon these Books among the Canonicall 4. No Councel hath Authority to define what Books are Canonicall what not seeing Books truely Divine receive Authority from God himself and are to be esteemed of undoubted truth although all the world should bark against them These two Councels are of too late standing to oppose against the other ancient Councels which reject these Books The Councel of Trent was gathered and kept against all Civil and Ecclesiastical Right neither was there any forme of justice observed in it 1. It was not kept in a lawfull place for whereas it was intended against the Protestants and the Germans were the parties accused it ought to have been kept in Germany according to the request exhibited by the Body of the States of Germany assembled at Noremberg this equity was not observed the parties accused being called into Italy 2. In that Councel matters were concluded and the sentence passed the adversary not being heard speak nor so much as present for the Protestants might not be admitted to hearing neither could they obtain to propound their opinion in the Councel much lesse to avouch it by lawfull reasoning Sleidan fol. 29. and yet were condemned against Divine and Humane Law for they both forbid the condemning of any before he have lawfull liberty granted him to plead for himself 3. In that Councel the Accuser and Judge were the same for the Pope did accuse the Protestants of Heresie he did convocate the Councel he by his Delegates was President and Moderator in it and so together was Accuser Judge and Witnesse whereas the Reformation of the Pope was the thing in question Lastly All Councels ought to be free but in this Protestants might not propound their cause nor defend it neither might any thing be proposed but according to the minde of the Legates or otherwise then they approved no man had any voice in the Councel but such as were sworn to the Pope nothing was there determined which was not first concluded of at Rome by the Pope in the Colledge of Cardinals and sent from Rome to Trent whereupon this Proverb arose Spiritum Sanctum Roma per peram mitti Tridentum The holy Ghost came to Trent packt up in a Cloke-bag We hope therefore since the Apocrypha are justly rejected out of the Canon that hereafter they will neither have the honour to be bound with our Bibles nor read in our Churches The Apocrypha was never received by the Church of the Israelites before Christ his coming nor of the Apostolick and Primitive Church for more then three hundred years after as both Eusebius out of Origen and the Councel of Laodicea Can. 59. confirmed afterward by the sixth general Councel of Constantinople sheweth for the Greek Church and St Ierom for the Latine CHAP. VI. Of the Authentical Edition of the Scripture NOw we must enquire which is the Authentical Edition of holy Scriptures it being necessary that this heavenly truth committed to writing should be delivered in some form of words and in some language which may be understood Lawyers from whom the use of the word Authentick seemeth borrowed do call those instruments and writings Authentick which have a certain and just authority in themselves A Book or writing is Authentick either by Divine or humane institution those are by Divine Appointment and Institution authentical which have from God sufficient and absolute Authority to command and approve themselves worthy credit and faith in as much as God himself doth approve them by humane Institution such writings are held authentical which by the opinion and sentence of learned men in their several professions may be esteemed worthy credit and belief for themselves and for the truth in them There is a great diversity of Editions of holy Scripture all cannot be simply and perpetually Authentical in of and for themselves without reference unto another no more then many draughts of the same Lease or Deed or copy of one pardon can be Some amongst many are authentick whence the others are transcribed yea
we are not hereafter to expect or look for any fuller or more clear Revelation of Divine Mysteries then that which was then delivered 4. Christ is called a Mediator of the New Testament or the New Covenant Heb. 9. 15. because all things are established by him as they ought to continue for ever for that which is old decayeth and is ready to vanish but that which is new abideth Heb. 8. 13. 5. It pleased the Lord in great wisdom to reveal the Covenant of grace to the Church that she might not despair but obscurely at the first that she might earnestly long for the coming of that Messiah who was to make known what he had heard and seen of the Father which dispensation was needful that the grace of God might not be contemned as haply it would have been if God had fully revealed and made known his bounty unto man before he had seen his misery and the necessity thereof Our Saviour Christ for substance of Doctrine necessary to Salvation taught nothing which was not before in some sort contained in the writings of Moses and the Prophets out of whom he confirmed his Doctrine but that which was in them more obscurely aenigmatically and briefly he explained more excellently fully and clearly the Apostles proved their Doctrine out of the Book of Moses and the Prophets Act. 17. 11. and 26. 22. Luke 24. 27. Rom. 1. 2. Act. 28. 23. Sixthly All things necessary in that manner as we have spoken were taught and inspired to the Apostles by our Saviour Christ and there were no new inspirations after their times nor are we to expect further hereafter which we prove 1. By places of Scripture Ioh. 14. 26. he that teacheth all things omitteth nothing Christ said all things to his Apostles as appears Iohn 15. 15. and 17. 8. Iohn 16. 13. 2. By reasons drawn from thence 1. The plentiful pouring forth of the Spirit was deferred till the glorifying of Christ he being glorified it was no longer to be delayed Christ being exalted on the right-hand of God obtained the Spirit promised and that was not according to measure and poured the same in such abundance as it could be poured forth and received by men so that was fulfilled which was fore-told by Ioel 2. 28. Acts 2. 33. Iohn 3. 34 35. Acts 2. 16 17. 2. The Scripture and the Prophecies of the Old Testament do teach and declare That all Divine Truth should fully and at once be manifested by the Messias who is the only Prophet high-Priest and King of his Church there is no other Revelation promised none other needful besides that which was made by him Isa. 11. 9. Act. 3. 23 24. Ioel 2. 23. Vide Mercerum in loc therefore the last inspiration was made to the Apostles and none other to be expected The Doctrine of the Law and the Prophets did suffice to Salvation yet it did send the Fathers to expect somewhat more perfect 1 Pet. 1. 10. but to the preaching of the Gospel nothing is to be added we are not sent to wait for any clearer vision 3. So long as any truth needful to be known was unrevealed or not plainly taught the Lord did stir up some Prophet or other to teach the same unto the Church therfore the Lord surceasing to speak since the publishing of the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the delivery of the same in writing is unto us a manifest token that the whole will of God is now brought to light and that no new Revelation is to be expected Our seventh Proposition is Christ and his Apostles were able to propound and teach by lively voice that Doctrine which pertains to perfection Iohn 1. 18. and 11. 11 32. Iohn 8. 26 and the Apostles perfectly taught all things which are or shall be necessary for the Church Acts 20. 27. Gal. 1. 7 8 9. The Doctrine of repentance and remission of sins in the name of Christ doth summarily contain all things necessarily to salvation Act. 5. 31. and 11. 11. but this Doctrine the Apostles preached Act. 13. 38 39. Luke 24. 47. The Word of God is not only Milk for Babes but strong Meat for men of ripe years 1 Cor. 3. 1 2. Heb. 5. 14. and 6. 1 2. therefore it containeth not only matter of preparation but of perfection Our eighth Proposition is The summe and substance of that heavenly Doctrine which was taught by the Prophets and Apostles was by them committed to writing the holy Ghost giving them a commandment and guiding their hands therein that they could not erre so that the Word preached and written by them is one in substance both in respect of matter which is the will and word of God and inward form viz. the Divine Truth immediatly inspired though different in the external form and manner of delivery Our ninth Proposition is That nothing is necessary to be known of Christian over and above that which is found in the Old Testament which is not clearly anâ— evidently contained in the Books of the Apostles and Evangelists Our last Proposition is that all things which have been are or shall be necessary to the salvation of the Church to the end of the world are perfectly contained in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles long since divinely inspired writteâ— and published and now received by the Church of God so that no new Reveltion or Tradition beside those inspired published and comprehended in the Scripture are necessary for the salvation of the Church There are three opinions 1. Of the Papists who altogether deny it 2. Of the Socinians which would have all things expresly contained in Scripture and if it be â—â—â— totidem verbis they reject it 3. Of the Orthodox who say it contains all things expresly or by consequence Crocius in his Antiweigelius cap. 1. Quaest. 8. shews that private Revelation Dreams Conferences with Angels are not to be desired and expected in matters â—â— faith the Canon of the Scripture being now compleat The Weigelians talk of â—â— Seculum Spiritus Sancti as God the Father had his time the time of the Lâ—â— Christ his time the time of the Gospel so say they the holy Ghost shall â—â—â— his time when there shall be higher dispensations and we shall be wiser then the Apostles See Mat. 24. 14. and 28. 20. 1 Cor. 11. 26. See Mr Gillesp. Miscel. c. 10. Some say the Scriptures are but for the training up of Christians during their â—â—nority as Grammar rules for boyes and are not able to acquaint the soul â—â— the highest discoveries of God and truth And most corruptly they serve themselâ—â—â— with that expression of the Apostle 1 Cor. 13. 11. This Glasse say they is â—â—â— Scriptures through which we see something of God indeed whilst we are â—â—â—â—dren in understanding but very obscurely and brokenly and therefore say theâ—â—â— if ye would discern of God clearly and see him as he is ye must break the Glasse and look quite beyond Scriptures
when ye become men ye must put away these childish things Blow at the Root p. 82 83. The expresse testimonies of Scripture forbidding even Angels to adde any thing to those things which are commanded by the Lord do prove the perfection of the Scripture Deut. 4. 5 12. and 12. 32. and 30. 10. and 5. 12 13 14. and 28. 58. Ioshua 1. 7 8. Prov. 30. 5. wherefore the Apostle commands That no man presume above that which is written 1 Cor. 4. 6. 2 Tim. 3. 15 16. Divers reasons may be drawn from this last place to prove the perfection of the Scripture 1. The Apostle teacheth That the Scriptures are able to make a man wise to salvation therefore there needeth no further counsel nor direction thereunto but out of the Scriptures 2. The Scriptures are able to make the man of God that is the Minister of the Word perfect and compleat unto every work of his Ministery whether it be by teaching true Doctrine or confuting false by exhorting and putting forward to that which is good or dehorting from that which is evil Paul would not have us think that all and every writing viz. of Plato Aristotle is divinely inspired for in ver 15. he not only useth the plural number calling them the holy writings thereby to note the word of God and not one sentence or Book but all the sentences and Books of the Scripture and also useth the Article which hath force of an universal note therefore the Greek words the whole Scripture signifieth the whole altogether and not every part severally in this place 2. No one part of holy Scripture is able to make the Minister perfect therefore it must needs be understood of the whole body of holy Scripture wherein this sufficiency is to be found The Ancient Fathers and other Divines have from this place proved the perfection and sufficiency of the Scripture in all things necessary to salvation We do not reason thus as the Papists charge us it is profitable therefore it is sufficient but because 1. The Scripture is profitable for all these ends viz. to teach sound Doctrine to refute false opinions to instruct in holy life and correct ill manners therefore it is sufficient or it is profitable to all those functions of the Ministery that a Minister of the Church may be perfect therefore much more for the people Argumentum non nititur unica illa voce utilis sed toto sententiae complexu Chamierus Hitherto of the perfection of the Scripture absolutely considered now follows the sufficiency thereof in opposition to unwritten traditions or verities as the Papists speak D Davenant premiseth these things for the better understanding of the sufficiency of the Scripture 1. We speak of the state of the Church saith he in which God hath ceased to speak to men by the Prophets or Apostles divinely inspired and to lay open new Revelations to his Church 2. We grant that the Apostles living and preaching and the Canon of the New Testament being not yet sealed their Gospel delivered Viva Voce was no lesse a rule of Faith and Worship then the writings of Moses and the Prophets 3. We do not reject all the traditions of the Church for we embrace certain Historical and Ceremonial ones but we deny that opinions of faith or precepts of worship can be confirmed by unwritten traditions 4. We call that an opinion of Faith to speak properly and strictly when a Proposition is revealed by God which exceeds the capacity of nature and is propounded to be believed as necessary to be known to Salvation Fundamentall opinions are those which by a usuall and proper name are called Articles of Faith 5. What is not in respect of the Matter an Article of Faith may be a Proposition to be believed with a Theological Faith if you look to the manner of revealing as that the Sun is a great light the Moon a lesse Gen. 1. 16. that Rachel was beautifull Leah blear-eyed The Papists do not cease to accuse the Scripture of imperfection and insufficiency as not containing all things necessary to salvation The Councel of Trent Sess. 4. decret 1. saith That the Truth and Discipline is contained in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus The Papists generally divide the word of God into the word written and traditions They affirm that there are many things belonging to Christian faith which are neither contained in the Scriptures openly nor secretly This opinion is maintained by the Papists but it was not first invented by them The Jewish Fathers did use the traditions of the Elders and it hath been said of old Mark 75. Matth. 5. 21. for their errors and superstitions yea at length they affirmed that God gave to Moses in Mount Sinai the Scripture and the Cabala or a double Law the one written the other unwritten The Tridentin Fathers Sâ—s 4. do command Traditions to be received with the same reverend affection and piety with which we imbrace the Scripture and because one Bishop in the Councel of Trent refused this he was excluded In the mean space they explain not what those Traditions are which must be so regarded none of them would ever give us a List and Catalogue of those Ordinances which are to be defended by the authority of unwritten Traditions not of the Word committed to writing onely they affirm in general whatsoever they teach or do which is not in the Scripture that it is to be put into the number of Traditions unwritten The cause of it self is manifest That at their pleasure they might thrust what they would upon the Church under the name of Traditions Vide Whitak de Script contro Quaest. 6. c. 5. See also Moulins Buckler of Faith p. 51. Lindan the Papist was not ashamed to say That it had been better for the Church if there had been no Scripture at all but onely Traditions For saith he we may do well enough with Traditions though we had no Scripture but could not do well enough with Scripture though we had no Traditions Baldwin saith a Testament may be either Scriptum or Nuncupativum set down in writing or uttered by word of mouth But a Nuncupative Testament or Will made by word of mouth without writing must be proved by solemn witnesses The solemn witnesses of Christs Testament are the Prophets and Apostles Let Papists if they can prove by them that part of the Testament of Christ is unwritten Any indifferent Reader will conceive that the Scriptures make most for them who stand most for their Authority and perfection as all the reformed Divines do not only affirming but also confirming that the Scripture is not only a most perfect but the onely infallible rule of faith Titus 1. 2. Rom. 3. 4. God cannot lie and Let God be true and every man a lier that is subject to errour and falshood Every Article of Divine Faith must have a certain and
the Mysteries of the Revelation the exposition rather of modern Interpreters then Fathers is to be received because in our times not theirs there is an accomplishment of those Prophecies and many things were more clearly known by them in those days the Ceremonies and Types of Moses his Law were better perceived by the Jews then us God the Author of the Scripture could speak perspicuously for he is wisdom it self and he would speak so because he caused the Scripture to be written to instruct us to our eternal salvation Rom. 15. 4. and he commands us to seek in the Scripture eternal life We do not account the prophecy of Isaiah touching Christ which the Eunuch read to be a dark and obscure prediction but we know it was clear and plain enough though the Eunuch a raw Proselyte understood not the meaning of it The Fathers proved their opinions out of the Scriptures therefore the Scriptures are more clear then the writings and Commentaries of the Fathers To every one which readeth with humility and invocation of God the Book of the Apocalipse the obscurest and hardest Book to understand of all other blessedness is promised when it cannot befal to any that understandeth nothing it is manifest that the promise of blessedness includeth a warrant of understanding of it so much as is necessary to salvation We affirm that many places in the Scripture are very obscure and that either from the obscurity of the things as in the Prophecies of future things the event must interpret them as Daniels Prophecies of the four Monarchies were in times past very dark but easier since when all things were fulfilled so the coming of Antichrist in the New Testament drew the Fathers into divers opinions so even yet there are many things obscure in the Revelation which are not accomplished So those things which are spoken of the Messiah in the Old Testament are either not understood or not fully without the New Testament Sometimes the ambiguity of words breeds a difficulty as I and the Father are one the Arians understood it of a union of will as when Christ prayed Iohn 17. that the Disciples might be one Hitherto may be referred those places which are to be understood allegorically as the Canticles the first Chapter of Ezekiel 3. Some places are obscure from the ignorance of ancient Rites and Customs as that place 1 Cor. 15. 29. of Baptizing for the dead is diversly explained by Interpreters both old and new There are six Interpretations of it in Bellarmine l. 1. de purgatorio c. 8. Viginti praeter hujus loci expositiones deprehendo saith one in a Theological disputation De baptismo veterum Ambrose saith Paul had a respect to that custom of some who baptized the living for the dead Piscator and Bucane say The custom of the ancient Church is noted here who baptized Christians at the Graves that so it might be a symbole of their belief and confession of the Resurrection of the Dead Tarnovius proves that that rite was not in use in the Apostles time Calvin interprets it of those who were baptized when they were ready to die but Beza thinks by Baptizing is understood the Rite of Washing the bodies before the Burial that ablution used upon the dead as if the Apostle should thence confirm the Resurrection of the dead q. d. that that is a cold vain and foolish Ceremony if the dead should not rise again And truly it is certain that those words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being considered in themselves may as well be rendred Super mortuos as pro mortuis Andreas Hyâ—â—rius sheweth in a particular Tract what various opinions there are about this place Voetius hath written a Tract Dâ— insolubilibus Scripturae Estius and Dr Hall on the hard places of Scripture Divers reasons may be rendred why God would have many things in the Scripture obscure and difficult 1. To make us diligent both in Prayer to him to open to us the meaning of the Scriptures and likewise in Reading Meditating searching and comparing the Scriptures 2. To remove disdain from us we quickly slight those things that are easie 3. That we might more prize heavenly Truths gotten with much labor 4. To tame our arrogance and reprove our ignorance Ioh. 16. 12. 5. God would not have the holy Mysteries of his Word prostituted to Dogs and Swine therefore many a simple godly man understands more here then the great Rabbies 6. That order might be kept in the Church some to be Hearers some Teachers and Expounders by whose diligent search and travel the harder places may be opened to the people Here the Lamb may wade and the Elephant may swimme saith Gregory The Scriptures have both Milk for Babes and strong Meat for Men saith Augustine It is a note of a learned Interpreter That the benefit of knowing the Prophecies concerning the Church Christ before he was slain had it not so as he had after his death it was the purchase of the blood of Christ to have those things opened We do not therefore hold that the Scripture is every where so plain and evident that it needs no interpretation as our Adversaries do slander us and here they fight with their own shadow We confesse that the Lord in the Scriptures hath tempered hard and easie things together But this we affirm against the Papists First That all points of Faith necessary to Salvation and weighty matters pertaining to Religion are plainly set forth in the Scriptures Secondly That the Scriptures may with great profit and to good edification be read of the simple and unlearned notwithstanding the hardnesse of some places which in time also using the means they may come to the understanding of Therefore I might save that labour in answering the Arguments of our Adversaries since they are of no force against us nor indeed touch our cause proving onely that some places in the Scripture are difficult which we deny not But I shall first take off their Answers whereby they would evade the strength of our Reasons for the perspicuity of the Scripture and then refute their own Objections First When we urge divers places to prove the Scripture to be a Light the use of which is to dispell darknesse which it would not if it self were obscure Bellarmine answereth That those places are not to be understood of all the Scripture but only of the Commandments and that these also are called a Light not because they are easily understood although that be true but because being understood and known they direct a man in working 2. If it be understood of all the Scriptures they are called Light not because they are easily understood but because they illustrate the minde when they are understood But the Apostle Peter speaks not only of the Precepts of the Decalogue but of all the Scripture of the Old Testament which if it be Light much more shall the
pur Theol. Scriptura est instrumentum sacrum quo doctrina divina ac salutaris à Deo per Prophetas Apostolos Evangelistas sideliter perspicuè aâ— plenè in libris canonicis veteris aâ— novi Testamenti est tradita Walaeus loâ— commun Vide Traictâ— de L'escriture Saincte par Mestrezat â— 9. What power of humane understanding could have found out the incarnation of a God that two Natures a finite and an infinite could have been concentred into one Person that a Virgin should be a mother that dead men should live again Dâ— Taylor on Rom. 8. 9. 10. The Person and Offices of Iesus Christ the Mediator are both altogether wonderful Isa. 9. 6. 1 Tim. 2 5. 3. 16. God and man united in one Person to unite God and man in one Covenant The purity and integrity of the Law shew the Divinity of it Mat. 22. 37. 5â— 7. ch per tot and the sublimity of evangelâ—cal mysteries Eph. 3. 8 9 18 19. 1 Cor. 2. 7 9. Rom. 11. 33. The holinesse and purity of the Law of Moses in that it accuseth and condemneth all men of sin and prescribeth perfect righteousness Herein it surpasseth the laws of all Countreys Common-wealths Kingdoms what soever Mr Perkins How to live well Triplex ratio est qua nobis innotescat sacrorum librorum authoritas Prima Ecclesiae testimonium eos libros approbantis recipientis commendantis Secunda interna Spiritus Sancti persuasio eam ipsam authoritatem cordibus nostris insâ—ulpâ—ntis certâ—que persuadentis Tertiâ— ipsorum librorum ut ita dicam genius Summum gradum obtinet testimonium Spiritus inâ—imum verò testimonium Ecclesiae Chamierus de Canone l. 1. c. 1. John 7. 18 and 5. 41. and 8. 50 54. All other writings teach a man to place felicity at best in himself and in his own vertue These lift up to God and bid him place his felicity in him Philosophers set their own names to the Books which they wrote against vain-glory and therein sought it themselves There are Lumina orationis in the Sermons of the Prophets which surpasâ—e the eloquence of all the Heathen a Augustine was so delighted with the Oratory of Ambrose that he contemned the Scripture as neither learned nor eloquent enough yet aâ—terward wheâ— he saw his own shallownesse he admired the profundity of Gods holy oracles and held the stile of them very venerabâ—e b Licet tam verba quam res â—manuâ—nâ—ibus suis Spiritus Sanctus dictâ—vit attemperavit tamen se cujusque amanuensis sâ—ylo â—ujusque saeculi dialecto unde alius est Iesaiae alus Amosi stylus Alia Mosis alia Jobi alia Davidis alia Ezraei Haggaei Danielis c. Dialectus Amama Anti-Barb Bibl. l. 3. Totus sermo â— medio sumptus est vulgatus usitatus quamvis altiori grandisono genere uti poterat Christus tamen humili contentus est Lege Geneseos librum quà m sunt omnia submissâ—â— Equidem arbitror nullam linguam adeò inaffectatam esse adeò â—implicem familiarem Hinâ— Dialogismis narratiunâ—â—lis similitudinibus plena sunt omnia Biblia Humâ—redus de Interpretatione linguarum l. 2. p. 268 269. c Hoc ego ingenuè prositeor caput illud 53. Isa. ad â—idem Christianam me adduxisse Johan Isaac contra Lindan Augustine heard a supernatural voice saying Tolle lege tolle lege He fiâ—st fell upon that place Rom. 13. 12 13. Confess 8. c. 12. d Scriptura simpliciter absque probatione omnia dicit affirmat in aliis libris probantur omnia quae ibi dicuntur per rationes argumentationes Biblia affirmant Deum creasse coelum terrâ—m affirmat mundum habuisse principium nihil probat hoc significat illum qui loquitur in Biblâ—is dicit ista verba esse tantae Authoritatis quod ei debet credi simplici verbo fine aliquo probatione Raimund de Sabund in Theol. naturali e Moses multum dicit sed nihil probat * Vide Voeâ— Thes. de Ratione Humana in Rebus Fidei prâ—cipuè Vedel Rationale Theol. lib. 2. cap. 6. lib. 3. cap 17. per totum Est Divinatio ergo sunt Del. Tâ—lly The fore-telling of future things is an evident sign of a Divinity and for that cause this kinde of prediction is called Divination as if to tel what events are to happen were a proper sign of a Divinity or Deity See Sr Walter Rawleighs Ghost l. 1. c. 12 If there be a God he ought to be worshipped he cannot be worshipped unlesse he manifest himself unto us as he hath done in the Scripture Vide Kimedoncium de Scripto Dei verb. l. 2. c. 16. The Lord is therefore careful to set a Star or Sclah to the fulfilling of predictions thirty times in the New Testament it is said Then was fulfilled that which was fore-told by such a Prophet Idoneum testimonium Divinitatis veritas Divinationis Tertullianus Apolog. c. 10. f Cyrus was prophesied of an hundred years before he was born Isa. 44. 28. Iosias three hundred before his birth 1 King 13. 2. g The Oracles of the Gentiles needed Delio natatore the swimmer Apollo to expound them Verba oraculorum fermè ambigua quae facâ—lè interpretationem ex qualicunque eventu acciperent Cicero de Divinatione 2. Utrum eorum accidisseâ— inquit verum oraculum fuisset Grotius do veritate Religionis Christianae lib. 4. * The predictions of the Prophets differ much from the devillish Prophecies of the Heathen Deu. 17. 15 16 Psalm 2. The Promises and Threatnings exceed the limits of any mortal power to bestow or inflict everlasting life and death and to assure the accomplishment this is the only reason The Lord hath spoken or The zeal of the Lord of hosts will do it h Primum quodque verissimum Tertul. The Jewish Nation was the most ancient of all therefore the Scripture which was delivered to them Cameron de verbo Dei i Between Orpheus his writings which was the Heathens ancientest Poet and Moses are at least five hundred years B. Andrews Moses antiquissimus fidelissimus Historicus Erpenius Vide Vossium de Philologia l. 10. Simson Parascev ad Chron. Cathol c. 1. k Mr Burroughs on Hosea Hoc primum est omnium canticorum quae fuisse unquam facta vel cantata sive in sacris sive in exoticis literarum monumentis proditum sit Sims Chron. Cathol par 10. l See the powerfull working of it in Pharaoh Foelix those in Acts 2. 37. 41. See Rom. 1. 16. 1 Cor. 2. 3. 14. 25. Isa. 11. 6 7 8 9 Heb. 4. 12. Ps. 19. 7. m Non movent sacrae literae sed non persuadent cogunt agitant vim inferunt Legis rudia verba agrestia sed viva sed animata flammâ—a aculâ—ata ad imum spiritum penetrantia hominem totum potestate Mirabili transformantia Picus Mirandula ad Hermolaum Barbarum n They did as it
were Transcribere animas publish their own faults Dr Preston They dispraise all mankinde abase man and make him the vilest of all creatures except the devils 1 Tim. 1. 13. Revel 22. 8. o Matth. 9. 9. The Writers of the Scriptures wrote them when the world bare greatest hatred against them and yet never any durst write a Book against Moses in his time or against the Gospel in these dayes Acts 4. 13. Dan. 1. Exod. 5. 2. Levit. 18. 3. Ezek. 8. p Solls Canonicis dâ—bâ—tur fides Caeteris omnibus judicium Lutherus q Incredibilis quaedam planè divina conspiratio atque concordia tot virorum qui diversis locis temporibus linguis occasionibus sacra volu mina conscripserunt ut non tam ipsi Scriptores diversi quam uuius Scriptoris diversi calami fuisse videantur Bellar. Tom. 10. dâ— verbo Dei l. 1 c. 2. Amicae sunt Scripturarum lites The Socinians hold Dari in Scriptura res leviores minoris nullius momenti in quibus Scriptores sacri facilè errare potuerint dissidere inter se atque pugnare whom Hoornbeck in his Antisocinianismus confutes l. 1. c. 1. controv 1. Sect. 1. 2. c. This is one of the three hundred sixty seven places or as others â—eckon three hundred and seventy which are cited out of the Old Testament in the New Dr Prideaux on Acts 23. 5. See Bifield on 1 Pet. 1. 16 r Ezechiel prophetans in Babylone concordat cum Ieremia prophetante in Iudaea See Dr Hals Passion Sermon 2. Arguments extrinsecal acts of God and works of his providence about the Scriptures Num. 11. 9. 20. 10. Mark 16. 20. Joh. 3. 2. 2. 23. 10. 37. Acts 5. 12. Joh. 5. 36. In caecitate surditate natis Christus videndi audiendiusum non quem amiserant reddidit sed largitus est omniuo novum Deambulavit super â—umentes undas ut nos super solidam terram imperavit ventis mari tempestati parucrunt dicto Expulit daemones ex humanis corporibus abstulit lâ—pram roboravit membra compages humani corporis dissolutas sanavit omne genus morborum reddidit lucem vitam mortuis Lod. Viv. de veritate Fidei Christ. lib. 2. cap. 12. Many of the Bibles were taken from Christians and burnt in those cruel persecutions â—nder Dioclesian and Maximinianus his Collegue Deut. 31. 24. Jer. 36. 23 27 28. ult t Veritas odiunt parit u Cartwright in his Preface to the Confutation of the Rhem. Annotations on the New Testament Tertullian said That Gospel must needs be good which Nero persecuted x Many delivered the Bible to the Emperour to be burned whence the name of Proditores Traditores Bibliorum Sanguis Martyrum semen Ecclesiae Foecundi sunt Martyrum cineres Vide Lod. Viv. de verit 1. Fid. lib. 2. cap. 19. de verb. 1. People by seeing the sufferings of the Martyrs came more to look into and understand that profession then formerly which made them patiently endure such torments Qui enim scit illum intelligere potest non nisi grande aliquod bonum à Nerone damnatum Terrul Apolog. cap. 5. A precious Gospel that was purchased by the bloud of Christ and sealed with the bloud of Martyrs Miracula quae sunt à Deo muâ—tis notis distinguuntur à fictis miraculis daemoâ—â—m Nam daemon ut qui Deum odit nos à Deo vellet avertere omnia quaecunque potest Divina aemulatur Et tanto accuratius miracula quod videt eam rem maximè ad potentiam Divinitatis accedere quae est supra naturam Lod. Viv. de verit Fid Christ. l. â— c. 13. Miracula has habent notas rei ipsius veritas essentia qualitas modus actionis causa efficiens causa movens ante rem finis Ad hos tanquam ad lapides Lydios examinanda sunt miracula tum Christi sanctorum nempè divina tum ficta diabolica Idem ibid. vide plura y They are Miranda non miracula A maâ—vel or wonder is nature mightily improved a miracle is nature totally cross'd if not contradicted If miracles be ceased yet marvels will never cease Dr Hals Select Thoughts z There were six hundred thousand witnesses of the Seas rising up in wals Deut. 4. 3. See Mat. 27. 45. a See Dr Willet on Exod. 7. 9. what a miracle is and how true and false miracles differ And Dr Prideaux on Psal. 9. 16. the distinction between miracles signs prodigies and Portenta out of Aquinas Christi miracula tanta tam manisesta suerunt orbi â—t nulla unquam gens fuerit vel tam impudens vel tam Christo inimica infensa ut ea sit negare ausa Itaque Gentiles Iudaei Agareni omnes grandia mirabilia esse edita opera consitentur sed alii alias in causas referunt Agareni Deum authorem illorum fatentur Iudaei Gentiles daemonem Sed res ipsa clamat apertissimè Deo authore atque approbatore illa omnia esse acta Lod. Viv. de verit Fid. Christ. l. 2. c. 13. b When many agree in a thing and they wise and learned men and one generation after another this is much All those generally which professe Christian Religion consent in this main truth To which testimony these things give weight 1. To them were committed the Oracles of God Ro. 3. 2 2. They have constantly professed the truth in great misery whereas by the only denying thereof they might have been partakers both of liberty and rule 3. Notwithstanding the High-Priests and others persecuted the Prophets while they lived they yet received their writings as Prophetical and Divine c Vide Croii observat in Novum Testamentum cap. 15. By universal tradition we know much better that those Books were written by Christs Disciples who are sufficient witnesses of what he taught then the Aristotelians know that these were Aristotles works or the Academicks knew Plato's since Christians have both kept them with more care and in the acceptance of them used more caution as thinking them so much more important My L. Falkl. Reply concerning the infallibility of the Church of Rome part 2. Ecclesia totum mundum convertit sanguine oratione Luther Christian Religion's chiefest glory is that it increaseth by being persecuted and hath that advantage of the Mahumetan which came in by force In the two Dominions of France and the seventeen Provinces within the space of little more then five years under Charles the ninth of France and Philip the second of Spain two hundred thousand suffered as Martyrs See Foxes Martyrology Meteranus de rebus Belgicis and Fullers prophane State of the Duke of Alva p. 440. d A Martyr answered Bishop Bonner My Lord I cannot dispute but I can die for the truth Iohn Hus said when he had a Cap of paper wherein were 3 devils painted with the title Haerefiarcha Shall I grudge to wear this paper Cap for
Babylon the great Whore with all the Kingdoms of Antichrist The subject of it is two-fold 1. The present state of the Church 2. The future state of it The things which are and the things which shall be hereafter Revel 1. 19. The three first Chapters of this Book contain seven several Epistles to the seven several Churches of Asia the other following Chapters are a Prophetical History of the Church of God from Christs Ascension to his second coming The holy Ghost foreseeing what labour Satan and his instruments would take to weaken and impair the credit and authority of this above all other Books wherein he prevailed so far as some true Churches called the truth and authority of it into question hath backed it with a number of confirmations more then are in any other Book of Scripture First The Author of it is set in the fore-front or face of it The Revelation of Iesus Christ Chap. 1. vers 1. who professeth himself to be the first and the last vers 11. so in the several Epistles to the Churches in several styles he challengeth them to be his Thus saith he 1. That holdeth the seven starres in his right hand 2. He which is first and last which was dead and is alive 3. Which hath the sharp two edged Sword 4. Which hath eyes like a flame of fire and his feet like brass 5. Which hath the seven Spirits of God and the seven stars 6. He who is holy and true who hath the key of David 7. He who is Amen the faithful and true witness the beginning of the creatures of God Secondly The Instrument or Pen-man his servant Iohn the Evangelist the Apostle the Divine who for the farther and more full authority of it repeateth his name at least thrice saying I Iohn Chap. 1. 9. and 21. 1 2. and 22. 8. wheâ—â—â—â— in the Gospel he never maketh mention of his name there he writes the History of Christ here he writes of himself and the Revelations declared to him Thirdly In the last Chapter are five testimonies heaped together vers 5 6 7 8. 1. Of the Angels 2. Of God himself the Lord of the holy Prophets 3. Of Jesus Christ Behold I come shortly 4. Of Iohn I Iohn heard and saw all these things 5. The Protestation of Jesus Christ v. 18. Fourthly The matter of the Book doth convince the Authority thereof seeing everywhere the Divinity of a Prophetical Spirit doth appear the words and sentences of other Prophets are there set down part of the Prophecies there delivered are in the sight of the world accomplished by which the truth and authority of the whole is undoubtedly proved there are extant many excellent Testimonies of Christ and his Divinity and our redemption by Christ. Fifthly The most ancient Fathers Greek and Latine ascribe this Book to Iohn the Apostle Theophylact Origen Chrysostome Tertullian Hilary Austin Ambrose Irenâ—us To deny then the truth of this Book is contrasolem obloqui to gainsay the shining of the Sun it self The Chiliasts abuse many testimonies out of this Book but those places have been cleared long ago by the learned as bearing another sense See Dr Raynolds Conf. with Hart c. 8. p. 406. Calvin being demanded his opinion what he thought of the Revelation answered ingeniously saith one He knew not at all what so obscure a writer meant Se penitus ignorare quid velit tam obscurus scriptor Cajetane at the end of his Exposition of Iude confesseth that he understandâ— not the literal sense of the Revelation and therefore Exponat saith he cui Deus concesserit It consists of two and twenty Chapters the best Expositors of it are Ribera Brightman Paraeus Cartwright Fulk Dent Forbes Mede Simonds Foord 1. The Scriptures written by Moses and the Prophets sufficiently prove that Christ is the Messiah that was to come The Old Testament may convince the Jews which deny the New Testament of this truth Iohn 5. 39. They that is those parts of Scripture written by Moses and the Prophets there were no other Scriptures then written The 53 of Isaiah is a large History of his sufferings We have also another Book or Testament more clearly witnessing of Christ The Gospel is the unsearchable riches of Christ Ephes. 3. 8. So much may suffice to have spoken concerning the Divine Canon the Ecclesiastical and false Canon follow CHAP. V. Of the Books called Apocrypha SOme Hereticks utterly abolisht the Divine Canon as the Swingfeldians and Libertines who contemned all Scriptures the Manichees and Marcionites refused all the Books of the Old Testament as the Jews do those of the New as if they had proceeded from the Devil Some diminish this Canon as the Sadduces who as Whitaker and others hold rejected all the other Prophets but Moses some inlarge it as the Papists who hold that divers other Books called by us Apocrypha i hidden do belong to the Old Testament and are of the same authority with the other before named and they adde also their traditions and unwritten Word equalling it with the Scripture both these are accursed Rev. 22. 18. But against the first we thus argue Whatsoever Scripture 1. Is divinely inspired 2. Christ commandeth to search 3. To which Christ and his Apostles appeal and confirm their Doctrine by it that is Canonical and of equal Authority with the New Testament But the holy Scripture of the Old Testament is divinely inspired 2 Tim. 3. 16. where he speaks even of the Books of the Old Testament as is gathered both from the universal all writing viz. holy in the 15 verse and from the circumstance of time because in the time of Timothies infancy little or nothing of the New Testament was published 2. Christ speaks not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in general to search it Iohn 5. 39. this famous elogium being added That it gives testimony of him and that we may finde eternal life in it 3. Christ and his Apostles appeal to it and confirm their Doctrine by it Luke 24. 27. Rom. 3. 21. Acts 10. 43. and 17. 11. and 20. 43. and 26. 20. the New Testament gives testimony of the Old and Peter 2 Pet. 1. 19. of Pauls Epistles The Ecclesiastical Canon which is also called the second Canon followeth to which these Books belong Tobit Iudith first and second of the Maccabees Wisdom Ecclesiasticus Baruch Additions to Daniel and Esther for these neither contain truth perfectly in themselves nor are sanctified by God in the Church that they may be a Canon of faith and although abusively from custom they were called Canonical yet properly in the Church they are distinguished from the Canonical by the name of Apocryphal The false Canon is that which after the authority of the Apocrypha increased was constituted by humane opinion for the Papists as well as we reject for Apocryphal the third and fourth Book of Ezra the prayer of Manasses the third
and fourth of Maccabees as Thomas Aquinas Sixtus Senenfis Bellarmine and so the Councel of Trent confesse when they omit these and reckon up the whole Canon The state therefore of the controversie betwixt us and the Papists is Whether those seven whole Books with the Appendices be Sacred Divine Canonical We do not deny but many of these especially Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus are very good and profitable and to be preferred before all humane Tractates but that they are properly and by an excellency Canonical and of infallible truth out of which firm arguments may be drawn that we deny Those Books which the Jews of old and the Reformed Churches now reckon for truly Canonical in the Old Testament are received all even by our Adversaries for Canonical without any exception 2. For the Canonical Books of the New Testament there is no controversie between us and so far we agree but in the Old Testament whole Books are reckoned by them for Canonical which we hold Apocryphal The reason why these Books at first were added to holy Writ was this the Jews in their later times before and at the coming of Christ were of two sorts some properly and for distinction sake named Hebrews inhabiting Ierusalem and the holy Land others were Hellenists that is the Jews of the dispersion mingled with the Grecians These had written sundry Books in Greek which they made use of together with other parts of the Old Testament which they had in Greek of the Translation of the LXX when they now understood not the Hebrew but the Hebrews receive only the two and twenty Books before-mentioned Hence it came that the Jews delivered a double Canon of Scripture to the Christian Church the one Pure unquestioned and Divine which is the Hebrew Canon the other in Greek adulterate corrupted by the addition of certain Books written in those times when God raised up no more Prophets among his people Drus. praeterit l. 5. Annotat. ad Act. Apost c. 6. Jun. Animad in Bell. cont 1. lib. 1. c. 4. l. 2. c. 15. Sect. 21. Tertul in Apol c. 19. They are called Apocryphal i. secret and hidden not because the names of the writers are unknown by that reason Iudges and Ruth should be Apocryphal but because they were not wont to be read openly in the Church of God as the Canonical Books but secretly and in private by private persons or because their Authority was obscure and doubtful with the Ancient These Books our Church rejecteth as not written by Divine Inspiration for these reasons All the Canonical Books of the Old Testament were written by the Prophets but none of these Books were written by any of the Prophets for 1. The last of the Prophets of the Jews was Malachi Mal. 4. 4 5. between whom and Iohn Baptist came no Prophet Mark begins with the same words almost with which Malachi ended a good argument to prove that the New Testament is next to the Old But these Books were written by such who lived most of them after Malachi 2. All the Prophets wrote in Hebrew the language which the Jews understood but the Fathers affirm and Papists acknowledge that most of these Books were written in Greek Ergo being not written by the Prophets they are not Canonical 2. All the Books of the Old Testament were committed to the Jews and safely kept by them Rom. 3. 2. our Saviour Christ which reproved the Jews for corrupting the sense of the Scripture did yet never reprove them for rejecting those Books which were divinely inspired which sacriledge he would not have concealed yea our Saviour sendeth us unto the Scriptures as they received them Ioh. 5. 39. Ezra after the Captivity is reported to have gathered all the Books of holy Scripture and safely to lay them up If the Jews should have rejected or not received any Books being Canonical they had grievously erred which the Papists themselves will not affirm Yea there should have been some Canonical Books which no Church received for besides the Church of the Jews at that time there was none in the world The Canonical Books of the Old Testament were divided into Moses the Prophets and Psalms with which agreeth the old distribution of the Hebrews into the Law Prophets and Hagiographa 3. There are two wayes to know a Book to be Canonical one by the testimony of some Prophet or Apostle the other by the certain Testimony of them which did live when the Book was published who did witnesse that the Book was written by some Prophet or Apostle But these Books are known to be Canonical neither of these wayes they were rejected by the Jews who lived in the times when they were written our Saviour Christ nor his Apostles never commend these Books unto us as endited by the Spirit They are cited by Christ and his Apostles for the confirmation of their Doctrine All the Canonical Books in general Iohn 5. 39. and 10. 35. Rom. 16. 26 Luke 16. 29 31. and Chap. 24. 25 27 44. The most of all in special Genesis Matth. 19 4 5 6. Exodus Mat. 5. 21 27 33 38. Leviticus Gal. 3. 12. Numbers John 3. 14. Deuteronomy Acts 3. 22. Ioshua Heb. 11. 30 31. Iudges Heb. 11. 32. Ruth Mat. 1. 3. First of Samuel Matth. 12. 3. Second of Samuel Heb. 1. 5. First of Kings Mat. 12. 42. Second of Kings Luk. 4. 27. First of Chronicles Mat. 1. 3 7 10 13. Second of Chronicles Acts 7. 48. Ezra Matth. 1. 12 13. Iob 1 Cor. 3. 19. Psalms Act. 4. 25. Proverbs Heb. 12. 5 6 7. Isaiah Matth. 1. 23. Ieremiah Heb. 10. 16 17. Ezekiel Mat. 25. 35. Daniel Matth. 24. 25. All the lesser Prophets Acts 7. 42. and 15. 15 16. Hosea Mat. 12. 7. Ioel Act. 2. 12. Amos Act. 15. 16. Ionah Mat. 12. 40 41. Micah Mat. 10. 35. Nahum Rom. 10. 15. Habakkuk Rom. 1. 17. Haggai Heb. 12. 26. Zachary Matth. 21. 5. Malachi Luke 1. 16 17. These Books were not cited by Christ and his Apostles for confirmation of their Doctrine Object If they be not Canonical therefore because they are not cited then Nahum and Zephany are not Canonical Aratus Menander and Epimenides prophane Poets are Canonical because they are cited Acts 17. 28. 1 Cor. 15. 33. Titus 1. 12. Answ. They are not therefore not Canonical only because they are not cited but especially because they have not the characters of Divine Scripture 2. Nahum and Zephany are implicitely quoted when the Books of the Prophets are mentioned Acts 7. 41. and 15. 15 16. The Poets are not cited as Canonical but the Apostle applied himself to his hearers who did much esteem their authority Some have well concluded from Act. 10. 43. that the Apocrypha are not to be received as Canonical Scripture because they testifie not of Christ. 4. Those Books which contain manifest untruths contrary to the Word of God and the Books of holy