Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	word_n	writer_n	year_n	236	4	4.2777	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A56633	A commentary upon the second book of Moses, called Exodus by the Right Reverend Father in God, Symon, Lord Bishop of Ely.	Patrick, Simon, 1626-1707.	1697 (1697)	Wing P775; ESTC R21660	441,938	734

Sabbath therefore he giveth you on the sixth day the bread of two days You have no reason to seek it on the Sabbath being provided before-hand with as much as is sufficient for that day Let no man go out of his place The Jews say that a Man went out of his place if he went above Two thousand paces from his dwelling That is if he went beyond the Suburbs of his City XXXV Numb 5. Ver. 30. So the people rested on the seventh day The Reprehension which God gave them by Moses v. 28. and the solemn renewal of the Precept v. 29. wrought so much upon them that for the present they rested upon this day And they not having been used to this rest God did not immediately punish their Disobedience in going abroad to gather Manna though afterward he ordered a Man to be stoned for gathering Sticks on this day for he had often repeated this Law to them before that time Ver. 31. And the House of Israel called the name thereof Manna This is repeated again to show that the name which they gave it at first v. 15. continued to it afterward being so apt and proper to signifie God's Providence over them that they could find no better And it was like Coriander Seed Of a round sigure like that Seed v. 14. White Being like Bedolach as Moses saith XI Numb 7. which signifies Pearl as Bochartus shows in his Hierozoic P. II. p. 678. where he observes the Talmudick Doctors in the Title Joma expresly say it was like Margalith or Margarith i.e. Pearl The taste of it was like Wafers made with honey All things of a pleasant relish are compared in Scripture to Honey Whence those words of David XIX Psalm 11. CXIX 103. Onkelos saith Manna tasted like Escaritae which was a delicious Food at Rhodes as Bochart observes out of Julius Pollux between Bread and Cake like our Bisket I suppose which was so grateful that they who did eat it were never satiated but still desired more In the XI Numb 7 8. Manna is said to taste like fresh Oyl Which doth not contradict this for as Abarbinel and others observe the meaning is that when it first fell before it was prepared it tasted like Honey-wafers but when it was baked then it tasted like fresh Oyl And so the words XI Numb 8. plainly import they took it and beat it in a Mortar and baked it c. and the taste of it i. e. thus prepared was like the taste of fresh Oyl Nay the Jewish Doctors commonly say it had all manner of pleasant savours according to Mens different Palates and thence they fancy it is called v. 29. the Bread Mischne which we translate of two days because it was changed according to the diversity of those that did eat it Children young men and old Which conceit the Author of the Book of Wisdom follows XVI 20 21. Ver. 32. And Moses said This is the thing which the LORD commandeth I have this further Command to deliver from God concerning the Manna Take an Omer of it Just so much as was assigned to every one for his daily Bread v. 16. To be kept for your Generations For your Posterity in future Ages That they may see the Bread wherewith I have fed you c. For seeing with ones eyes saith Isaac Aramah mightily confirms a thing and leaves one in no doubt of it And he took care they should see both the Manna it self and the measure which he bountifully allowed to every one of them Ver. 33. And Moses said unto Aaron What God commanded Moses he now commands Aaron to do Take a Pot. He saith nothing of the matter of this Pot or Vrn which some say was an Earthen Pot others say of Lead Brass or Iron and Abarbinel thinks it was of Glass that one might see what was within But the Apostle hath setled this Controversie by calling it a Golden Pot IX Hebr. 4. and so do the LXX in this place And indeed all the Vessels of the Sanctuary being of Gold it was but reason that this which contained such a precious Monument of God's Mercy should be of the same Metal Lay it up before the LORD i.e. Before the Ark of the Testimony as it is explained in the next Verse Which shows that this Command was given after the building of the Tabernacle and is here mentioned because it belongs to the same matter which Moses relates in this Chapter Others suppose it was spoken by way of Prolepsis which seems not to me so probable Ver. 34. So Aaron laid it up When the Tabernacle was built Before the Testimony This is the same with before the LORD in the foregoing Verse For the Divine Glory dwelt between the Cherubims which were over the Ark which is commonly called the Ark of the Testimony XXX 6. XL. 3 5. But here and XXV 36. is simply called the Testimony by an Ellipsis or leaving out the first word which is very usual in other Instances For thus it is called the Ark of God's strength 2 Chron. VI. 41. but elsewhere the first word being omitted it is called only his strength LXXVIII Psalm 61. CV 4. And therefore the Ark is called the Testimony partly because there God gave them a special Token of his Dwelling among them and partly because the two Tables of Stone were in the Ark which are called the Testimony XL. 20. Where it is said Moses put the Testimony into the Ark and then immediately v. 21. he calls it the Ark of the Testimony Ver. 35. And the Children of Israel did eat Manna forty years Within a Month which wanted to make compleat forty years For it begun to fall just XXX days after they came out of Egypt on the XVth of April and ceased to fall on the XVth or XVIth of March the day after the Passover which they kept in the Fortieth year V Josh 11 12. Now in all Writers some days under or over are not wont to be considered when there is a round Number But there are those who fancy these words were put into this Book after Moses his death for which I can see no ground For it is certain he lived the greatest part of the Fortieth year after they came out of Egypt and brought them to the Borders of Canaan within sight of it I Dent. 3. XXXIV 1 2 c. And therefore may well be supposed to have added these words himself to this History as he did the foregoing v. 32. that all belonging to this matter might be put together in one place Vntil they came to a Land inhabited i. e. To Canaan or the Borders of it as it here follows For these words saith Aben-Ezra have respect to the Wilderness in which they now were which was not inhabited Vntil they came unto the Borders of the Land of Canaan That is saith he to Gilgal which was the Borders when they had passed over Jordan when they did eat of the Corn of the Land and had no

any but those who had been always bred up in a deep sense of his Divine Majesty Which gave them such Courage that as Chytraeus expresseth it in Herodotus his Phrase which is in a manner the same with St. Peter's V Acts 29. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they made account the things of God were to be preferred before those of Men and therefore would not obey the King's Command by doing contrary unto God's Ver. 18. And the King called for the Midwives Sent out a Summons to appear before him And said unto them Why have you done this thing c. Their being questioned for their Disobedience made their Constancy the more remarkable Ver. 19. For they are lively and are delivered ere the Midwives come in unto them It doth not appear that these Midwives told a lye but only concealed some of the Truth which is not unlawful but commendable when it is to preserve the Innocent For many of the Hebrew Women might be such as they here describe though not every one of them The Hebrew word chajoth signifies three things either vivaces i. e. lively or obstetrices Midwives as Kimchi tells us or animantia living Creatures The LXX follow the first notion and so do we which is very proper Aquila follows the second who translates this Passage thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they can do the Office of Midwives themselves and are brought to Bed before we can get to them Thus the Vulgar also take it They have skill in Midwifry And the Author of the Life of Moses as several other Jews do take it in the third sense expounding it thus They are like other living Creatures who do not need any Midwives to help their young ones into the World And so Rasi also and Theodotion who thus translates it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which doth not signifie as Gaulmyn observes they bring forth living Children but ad instar animantium pariunt they bring forth like Animals Such lively Women undoubtedly there have been and are still in some Parts of the World For Varro reports L. II. de R. R. cap. 10. that the Women of Illyricum when they found their Pangs coming were wont to go a little aside from the Work they were about and presently were delivered of a Child quem non peperisse sed invenisse putes which one would think they had found not brought forth out of their Womb. Which place our Gataker mentioning in his Cinnus p. 213. saith it is credibly reported by those who had lived there a great while that the Irish Women sometime rise from Table and are delivered and return to the Company again before all be taken away Ver. 20. Therefore God dealt well with the Midwives c. He rewarded their Services whereby the Children of Israel still more multiplied and waxed very mighty Ver. 21. Because the Midwives feared God he made them Houses These words seem to declare wherein God rewarded them which was in making them Houses Some indeed particularly Mr. Calvin refer this to the Israelites because the word them is of the Masculine Gender and therefore cannot they think be meant of the Midwives but must be interpreted by this means the Children of Israel were exceedingly increased But besides that this was said just before it is not unusual in Scripture when the Speech is of Women to use the Masculine Gender Thus Ruth 1. 8. prays for her Daughters in Law in these words the LORD deal kindly with you where in the Hebrew the Masculine Gender is used and not the Feminine But we need go no further for an instance of this than the very next Chapter to this II Exod. 17. where Moses is said to water their Flock speaking of Jethro's Daughters and the word for their is of the Masculine Gender It agrees also best with the whole story to take it so here that God made the Midwives Houses so the Chaldee and the LXX understand it that is gave them a numerous Offspring out of which arose many Families which in Scripture Language are called Houses XXX Gen. 30. When shall I make my self an House the same Phrase with this i. e. take care of my own Family XXV Deut. 9. IV Ruth 5. Or else the meaning may be he increased their Estate and gave them great Riches which the Psalmist may be thought to mean when he saith Except the Lord build the House i. e. preserve and increase the Estate of a Family their labour is in vain that endeavour it See also 2 Sam. VII 11. CXIII Psal 9. Some that take these Midwives to have been Egyptian Women proselyted to the Jewish Religion think the sense may be that they married to Israelites and God made their Families eminent in Israel Ver. 22. And Pharaoh charged all his People saying every Son c. Not being able to effect his end by the Midwives he commanded every Body to inform his Officers when any Hebrew Woman fell in Labour and appointed Searchers it 's likely to examine whether they were delivered of Male or Female and to act according to what is here ordered Some that understand the foregoing words of the Israelites make this the sense of the two last Verses Because the Midwives feared God and thereby the Families of the Israelites were increased not diminished Pharaoh took a new Course and charged all his People to see that done which the Midwives refused The Jews in the Book called The Life of Moses say that many of their People upon this Decree of Pharaoh resolved not to marry or not to come near their Wives and those who did were forced to have them brought to Bed alone and throw their Children into the Fields where the Angels took care of them c. But this is confuted by what follows in the next Chapter And yet they are so fond of such Fables that in one of their Medraschim or Books of Homilies they say God made Milk to come out of one Stone and Honey out of another to Suckle them while they lay hid in the Earth See Buxtorf of the Education of their Children Synag Judaic Cap. VII CHAP. II. Ver. 1. AND there went a Man of the House of Levi c. We are told both the Man's name and the Womans whom he married VI Exod. 20. XXVI Numb 59. Where Amram Grandson of Levi is said to have been Moses his Father and Jochabed Daughter of Levi to have been his Mother So Amram married his Father's Sister as the Text expresly tells us Which Moses was so ingenuous as not to conceal though it might not be for his Credit in future Ages when such Marriages were forbidden by that Law which he gave them from God though practised before the giving of his Law See Selden L. V. de Jure N. G. c. 9. The Jews also fancying his Mother Jochabed to have been born as soon as the Israelites came into Egypt make the Birth of Moses a Miracle because she must be by that account an Hundred and

thirty years old when he was born But it may as well be thought that she was born to Levi in his old Age by another Wife and so she was younger than her Nephew Amram and but his half Sister Which makes their Marriage no more strange than Abraham's Marriage with Sarah Besides it is not certain she was his Father's Sister in the strict sense of that word but might be only one of his Cosins who in Scripture are frequently called Sisters And then when it is said she was a Daughter of Levi the meaning must be his Grandaughter or the Child perhaps of one of his Grandaughters who in these Writings are commonly called Daughters And so all the Objections against this Marriage vanish and the first words of this Verse expound the last A Man of the House of Levi took to Wife a Daughter of Levi that is one of the same House or Family But see VI. 20. Verse 2. And the Woman conceived and bare a Son She had one before this viz. Aaron who it is probable was born before this Persecution began being three years elder than Moses VII 7. And when she saw him that he was a goodly Child His goodly Aspect which seems to have been an early indication of his future Greatness is taken notice of by Strangers particularly by Justin out of Trogus an ancient Heathen Historian L. XXXVI c. 2. where he saith That beside the Inheritance of his Father's knowledge whom he takes to have been Joseph etiam formae pulchritudo commendabat the gracefulness of his Person recommended him to others Insomuch that the whole Fable of Adonis among the Heathen was framed as Huetius conjectures out of this Story of Moses For Apollododorus relates L. III. how Venus admiring the great Beauty of the Infant took him away privily without the knowledge of the Gods and hiding him in an Ark delivered him to Proserpina c. See Demonstr Evang. Propos IV. Cap. III. n. 3. She hid him three Months R. Simeon in Pirke Elieser Cap. XLVIII saith she hid him in a Vault under ground But in Sota they say in the Gemara Cap. I. Sect. 38. he being hid in a secret inner Room of their House was in danger to be detected by his crying when some of the Egyptians came into the outer Room and brought a crying Child with them on purpose supposing the Israelites Infants would answer if any were in the House But there is no certainty of this Ver. 3. And when she could no longer hide him Some discovery being made of him by some means or other by their Neighbours or the search after new born Children being now more narrow and diligent she thought he could be no longer concealed and therefore resolved to expose him in the manner following She took for him an Ark of Bulrushes Or of Wicker for Kimchi observes the Hebrew word Gome signifies the lightest Wood. Patricides an Arabian Writer saith it was made of that which the Ancients call Papyrus and so the LXX and Josephus and Clemens Alexandrinus Strom. 1. p. 343. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which was a frutex that grew peculiarly upon the Banks of Nile as Salmasius shows in Solin p. 1002 c. And daubed it with Slime and with Pitch Of this word Slime see XI Gen. 3. It is not improbable that this was used within and Pitch without to keep the Water from coming into the Ark. And so I find in the Gemara of that Title in the Talmud called Sota Cap. I. Sect. 29. where this is said to have been an ancient Tradition Only they say as many of the Rabbins do that Chemar signifies Plaister not Bitumen because the bad smell of that they think would have been noisom to the Child R. Solomon's opinion is that it was pitcht both within and without and plaistred within over the Pitch And she laid it in the flaggs by the Rivers brink That it might not be carried away with the Stream but she might come in the Night and suckle it Some think that the Ark notwithstanding was made below in the form of a Boat that if it should chance to be carried from among the Flaggs upon the Shore it might swim in the River For it is certain the Egyptians made Ships of the forenamed reed as we find in Pliny and Solinus who both mention Papyraceae Naves and in Theophrastus who mentions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 speaking of Papyrus as Salmasius observes in his Plin. Exercit. p. 1003 1115 1116. Herodotus also mentions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in his Euterpe Cap. XCVI See XVIII Isa 2. Ver. 4. And his Sister stood afar off to wit what c. By her Mothers order no doubt that she might not seem to be set there on purpose to watch him We read of no other Sister he had but Miriam XXVI Numb 59. who therefore is thought to be the Person Ver. 5. And the Daughter of Pharaoh Called Thermutis by Josephus L. II. Antiq. c. 5. but by Artapanus in Eusebius his Praepar Evang. L. IX c. 27. called Meris or Merris Which is her name as Jacobus Capellus observes in the Fasti Siculi The same Artapanus there says she was married to Cenephres King of the Country above Memphis but had no Child by him Clemens Alexandrinus says the same that she was not only a married Woman but had been long married without being with Child 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but very desirous to have one L. I. Strom. p. 343. Came down to wash her self at the River Not for Pleasure but for Purification this being an ancient Rite of Religion in all Nations to cleanse themselves by washing their Bodies after any Defilement Thus Philo seems to understand it in his Book of the Life of Moses where speaking of this matter he uses the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is proper to Sacred Cleansing And it seems far more probable than that the scorching heat of the Weather caused by an extraordinary hand of God made her betake herself to the cool Streams for her Refreshment as the Tale is told in the Hebrew Book called The Life of Moses or that the desire of Children carried her hither the Waters of Nile being thought to make Women fruitful Clemens Alexandrinus seems to have put both these together Refreshment and Religion when he saith she came hither 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 L. I. Strom. p. 343. It is still a further fetch of Jonathan who would perswade us that at this time God had smote the Egyptians with a burning Ulcer which made their Flesh so hot that they could not endure it but run to the River to cool their Bodies And in Pirke Elieser Cap. XLVIII this Inflamation is said to have seized on Pharaoh's Daughter whom he calls Bathia Which is indeed the name of a Daughter of one Pharaoh 1 Chron. IV. 18. but to make her the Daughter of Pharaoh King of Egypt as G. Vorstius observes they do in Schemoth Rabba and Vaijra Rab. is altogether

consult for his Safety rather than basely either deny or excuse what he had done or ask pardon for it unto which no fear of the wrath of the King could have moved him Ver. 15. Now when Pharaoh heard this thing Which was soon brought to his ears as Moses suspected and aggravated extreamly by the great Men of the Court as Philo represents it L. I. de Vita Mosis He thought to slay him Not so much because he had killed the Man as because he pretended to assert the Liberty of the Israelites and to be their Deliverer Demetrius bears witness to this Story just according to what is here related in Eusebius's Praepar Evang. L. IX c. 29. And Moses fled from the face of Pharaoh Wisely foreseeing the Danger he avoided it by flight into another Country where he was out of his reach For though the time of Israel's Deliverance was not yet come he was assured that God intended to work it by his hand and therefore thought it prudent to reserve himself till he received a further Commission from God But though this flight of Moses be here so plainly affirmed yet the Jews are so sond of their own Conceits and so bold in their Invention that they say he was not only condemned to have his Head cut off but brought to the Block and when the Executioner came to do his Office his Sword would not enter Moses his Neck being by a Miracle turned into a Pilaster of Marble and from thence called his Son Eliezer c. So the Tale is told by the Author of Moses his Life What Pharaoh this was is not certain but Eusebius calls him Orus who succeeded Amenophis in whose time Moses was born and he is said to have reigned Two and forty years And dwelt in the Land of Midian Where some of Abraham's Posterity were setled XXV Gen. 2. in a part of Arabia Petraea And therefore Philo only saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he withdrew into the neighbouring Arabia Into which Country he chose to flee both because his escape was easie thither and because they were descended from the same Stock with himself and continued still good People or at least had some good Governours and Families among them as appears by what follows And he sat down by a Well To refresh himself and expecting it 's likely to meet some Company there at the time when the Flocks came to water Ver. 16. Now the Priest of Midian Or Prince as it is in the Margin For the word Cohen indifferently signifies either Priest or Prince but most anciently it signifies the latter a Prince For so it is used in the Book of Job XII 19. He leadeth Cohenim Princes away spoiled And in after times it continued to have the same signification David's Sons being called by this Name of Cohenim 2 Sam. VIII 18. which in 1 Chron. XVIII 17. is expounded were chief at the hand of the King And so Ira is called 2 Sam. XX. 26. Cohen a chief Ruler about David And so I think it is to be taken here for a Ruler or Governour See XLI Gen. 50. not of the whole Country of Midian but of some Province of it And it may be most truly rendred a Prince i. e. one of the Princes or Rulers of Midian But in ancient time Princes executed the Priesthood also as Plato observes they did among the Egyptians and the Consuls and Emperours of Rome were ambitious of the same Dignity by which means the word Cohen came to signifie both Though where the Place or Territory of which any Person was Cohen is mentioned there it always signifies him to have been Prince or Civil Governour of that place So S. Jarchi observes The word COHEN always denotes some Divine Ministry or Function except where there is an addition of some particular Principality to it as COHEN of Midian and COHEN of On referring to this place and that I now mentioned in Genesis where it signifies a Prince though the Priesthood might be joyned with it And so Artapanus in Eusebius L. IX c. 27. relating Moses his Flight into Arabia saith he came to Raguel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Ruler of those parts And the Jews in their German Translation of the Bible call him Heer Lord of Midian See our most Learned Selden L. I. de Synedr c. ult p. 648. I shall only add that it is most likely that this Prince or Priest was a Worshipper of the true God and not an Idolater for Moses we may be confident would not have married his Daughter if she had been bred in a false Religion Had seven Daughters and they came and drew Water c. He was but a small Prince it appears by this though it must be acknowledged it was a noble Employment in old time as I observed upon Genesis to look after Sheep and we must not imagine these young Women drew the Water themselves but had Servants to attend them and obey their Orders Ver. 17. And the Shepherds came and drove them away Some rude and idle Shepherds would have made use of the Water which they had drawn and had the benefit of their pains without any labour of their own This looks like an Argument that their Father was not a Prince for then one would think these Shepherds should not have dared to contest with them But it is as much an Argument that he was not a Priest for they were great Men also in those days And it seems probable to me that these were the Shepherds of some other greater Prince in those Countries who made thus bold with Jethro's Daughters and their Servants For one cannot think as I said that they alone looked after his Flock but were Overseers of those that did like Rebekkah and Rachel See Gen. XXIX 9. But Moses stood up and helped them c. This was an act as Maimonides suggests of the same Heroick Spirit mentioned before Ver. 12. which still rested on him and moved him here as it had done in Egypt And thus Philo also represents him as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 transported by such an Enthusiasm when he spake to the Shepherds that it after frighted them from their attempt Though it is not certain that he overcame them by Perswasions but the whole Discourse seems rather to imply that he forced them to desist which he could not do alone but at the head of those Servants that belong'd to these young Women and it is not improbable he had some Servants of his own who attended him in his Flight Certain it is that the Arabian's great Imployment was feeding of Cattle as Philo there notes L. I. de Vita Moses 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. and that not only Men but Women young Men and Virgins looked after them and not those only of the meaner sort 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but they that were of Noble Families Ver. 18. And when they came to Reuel their Father He is thought to be the same with Jethro III.

interprets it the Eternal that never dies who am faithful to my Promises and will be to you what I told your Fathers I would be Whatsoever I said in the days of Abraham concerning the giving the Land of Canaan I will certainly perform for I change not Thus shalt thou say to the Children of Israel I AM hath sent me unto you The former words were a Declaration of God's Nature to Moses and in these he bids him in brief only say to the Israelites that he was sent by him Who is That is as was said before necessarily Exists always was and ever will be Who alters not but by whatsoever Name he makes himself known is still the very same God Which was a Name not unknown to the Gentiles as one would think by the word EI which was inscribed in the front of the Delphick Temple as Plutarch tells us and was nothing else but the contraction of EIMI which signifies I AM. Or if we take EI to be an intire word as it is commonly thought signifying thou art Ammonius rightly understood it to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Plutarch reports his word in a Treatise on this Subject the most absolutely perfect Name and Compellation of God For God saith he in the other Inscription on the Temple speaks to us who approach him saying to every one KNOW THY SELF and we are taught to answer to him again in the words of this Inscription THOV ART ascribing to him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. that true undoubted and only Appellation which belongs to him alone For he only is we are not c. Thus he declares this word to express most perfectly the Divine Essence which is distinguished hereby from all false Gods See Eusebius L. XI Praep. Evang. c. 11. and in the two foregoing Chapters where he takes a deal of pains to show that Plato borrowed this Notion of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Being that is always but had no beginning from these words of Moses And Numenius a Pythagoraean speaks it more plainly when he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that which is is eternal and stedfast always the very same without variation And no wonder these Men if they met with this Passage in Moses were highly pleased with it for St. Hilary himself tells us that he lighting upon these words as he was musing about God and Religion before he was a Christian was struck with admiration there being Nothing so proper to God as to be And therefore he thought it worthy of God to say of himself I AM THAT I AM and HE THAT IS so he translates the last words hath sent me unto you L. I. de Trinitate Ver. 15. And said moreover unto Moses Thus shall thou say c. For a further Explication of what he had now said and a further Satisfaction of their Minds The LORD God of your Fathers the God of Abraham c. The Name JEHOVAH as we pronounce it seems to be in sense the same with Ehjeh before mentioned Which as it declares his Nature so the word God added to it expresses his Favour Care and Providence And consequently he bids Moses tell the Children of Israel that He who is the Eternal was the God of their Fathers of Abraham Isaac and Jacob To whom he had made many Promises that he would be gracious to their Posterity This was sufficient for them to know of him This is my Name for ever and this is my Memorial c. Some refer the first words this is my Name unto the foregoing Verse I AM and the next this is my Memorial to those which immediately preceed the LORD God of your Fathers which in truth include the whole Jehovah being the same with I am And the meaning is I will be for ever remembred celebrated praised and invoked by the Name of the LORD God of your Fathers c. Ver. 16. Go and gather the Elders of Israel together The word Elders in these Books sometime signifie the Men of the great Sanhedrin as they spake in after times or the Judges in the Highest Court XXI Deut. 2 c. Sometimes the Judges in the Lower Courts XIX Deut. 12. XXII 15. Sometimes it only signifies the Heads of the Tribes as here in this place For now there were no such Courts of Judicature constituted See Selden Vxor Hebr. L. I. Cap. XV. Some indeed particularly Corn. Bertram think it reasonable to suppose that the Israelites had Judges among them all the time they dwelt in Egypt though not mentioned in Scripture as they had no doubt a Form of Religion though we read nothing of it And Moses he thinks is here ordered to send for these who were their Rulers and administred Publick Affairs among them But there is this Argument against it that after this time when Moses had brought them out of Egypt there were no such Judges among them but Moses as we find XVIII Exod. judged all himself to his exceeding great trouble And therefore by Elders we are here to understand only the Wisest and gravest Men of the Nation who were in greatest esteem among them as Mr. Selden afterwards speaks L. I. de Synedr Cap. XV. p. 523 c. or as was said before the Heads of their Tribes The famous H. Grotius confirms this by a nice Observation that both here and Ver. 18. they are barely called Zikne not Hazikne because there was not as yet certum Collegium sed sola qualitas denotatur as he speaks L. de Imp. Sum. Potest circa Sacra Cap. XI n. 15. a certain Colledge or Society of them but their quality only is denoted And no doubt the word always signified Men of Dignity or chief Rank among others both among the Israelites and among the Egyptians as I have observed on XXIV Gen. 2. L. 6. And say unto them The Lord God of your Fathers c. See this explained Ver. 6. Hath appeared unto me Ver. 2 4. Saying surely I have visited you So Joseph when he died assured them God would do L Gen. 24. where I observed to visit them was to bring them out of Egypt And so it signifies here as is evident from what God said to Moses when he appeared to him v. 8. I am come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians Which was not yet actually done but so absolutely decreed in the Mind of God that he might say he had already done it Or the word Pakad may be translated here as it is elsewhere I have remembred you 1 Sam. XV. 2. that is so as to resolve to deliver them And then the next words may depend on this And that which is done to you in Egypt For the word Seen is not in the Original But either way it relates to what God saith to Moses Ver. 7 9. Ver. 17. And I have said Determined or resolved I will bring you out of the affliction of Egypt into the Land of the Canaanites c. See v. 9. Ver. 18 And

Prince of the Tribe of Judah VI. 23. For it is but a fancy of R. Solomon's that he is therefore called the Levite because the Levitical Order should have proceeded from him and the Priesthood been entailed on Moses his Family but because of Moses his backwardness to serve God in this present Imployment he in anger quite changed his Intention and advanced Aaron to the Priesthood I know that he can speak well Is Eloquent and can deliver his Mind in fluent words There are two things which compleat a Commander as Pericles speaks in Theucydides 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Wisdom and Eloquence which do not often meet in one Person but God is pleased to distribute these Gifts as he did to these two Brethren So Polydamas in Homer tells Hector God's way is not to give all Accomplishments to one Man but some to one and some to others Iliad IV. v. 730. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. which he expresses admirably again Odyss Θ v. 168. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Behold he cometh forth to meet thee c. By God's direction no doubt who suggested to him that Moses was coming by his order towards Egypt which was such comfortable News to him that when he saw him after such a long Separation it could not but be a very joyful Meeting The fulfilling of this Prediction was a new sign unto Moses that God would be with him Ver. 15. And thou shalt speak unto him and put words in his mouth Tell him from me what he is to speak And I will be with thy mouth and with his mouth Thou shalt have Directions from me what to say to him and I will enable him to speak to the People and to Pharaoh And will teach you what you shall do Instruct you in all your Proceedings Ver. 16. And he shall be thy spokesman to the People Acquaint them with what thou hast to deliver to them And he shall be even he to thee He doubles the words to denote that he should need no other Assistant but Aaron who being his Brother he might the more securely rely on his fidelity Instead of a mouth To speak what thou canst not so well deliver thy self And thou shalt be to him instead of God Deliver my Mind and Will to him The Chaldee translates the Hebrew word Elohim in this place a Prince or a Judge who hath the Power of Life and Death See Grotius in VII Acts 35. and L. de Dieu VII 1. For Moses by God's order and appointment executed all those Judgments upon Pharaoh which Aaron pronounced See Selden L. I. de Synedr cap. ult If Justin Martyr did not misapprehend Diodorus Siculus he saith the Jews called Moses a God For so he reports Diodorus his words Adhort ad Graecos p. 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which now are otherways in the Books of Diodorus Edit Steph. p. 59. where mentioning several Lawgivers that pretended to receive their Laws from God or some good Angel names Moses among the rest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who received his from the God called Jao So they pronounced that Name which we call Jehovah Ver. 17. And thou shalt take this Rod in thy hand The Rod mentioned v. 2. which is v. 20. called The Rod of God because it was an Ensign of Divine Authority and Power by which all the wonders were wrought Wherewith thou shalt do signs By stretching out so mean a thing as this Rod at God's Command great Miracles followed which demonstrated the Power of God and not of Man Ver. 18. And Moses went and returned From Horeb where he had all his Converse with God he returned to the Place where his Father in Law lived See v. 1. To Jethro In the Hebrew his Name is written Jether And the Tradition is in Semoth Rabba that he was once a Gentile and then his Name was Jether but being proselyted to the true Religion there was a Letter added to his Name as there was to Abrahant's and he was called Jethro And Mr. Selden observes he is called a Proselyte in the Gemaru Babylon and the first we sind mentioned in Scripture L. 2. de Jure N. G. c. 2. And said unto him let me go I pray thee He did not think it honest to leave his Service without his consent especially since he entertain'd him and gave him his Daughter when he was a Stranger to him And return unto my Brethren which are in Egypt To his Kindred and Country-men who called one another Brethren whom he had not seen many years And see whether they be yet alive He concealed his main design from Jethro not thinking it safe perhaps to trust him who though a good Man was not an Hebrew with his Commission or fearing he might discourage him from that Undertaking which he had already too much declined but now was fully resolved upon and therefore loth to be again disheartned It may seem strange that Moses in so long a course of time as Forty years should not have heard of the state of his Relations and Friends But it is to be considered that as he was afraid perhaps it should be known where he was so intercourse with Nations and very far distant was not so easie then as it is now adays And Jethro said to Moses go in peace He dismist him kindly and wisht him a prosperous Journey Ver. 19. And the LORD said to Moses in Midian Some translate it the LORD had said c. to show the Reason why he now desired to have leave to visit his Friends in Egypt However that be it is plain this was a distinct Appearance of God to him from that in Horeb for this was in Midian Where God who had set him no precise time before enjoyns him to be gone presently and assures him that there were none left in Egypt who designed to be revenged of him for the slaughter of the Egyptian So it follows For all the men are dead which sought thy life This is an incouragement which God reserved as a Reward of his Obedience having said nothing of it during the time of his Hesitancy and Reluctance Ver. 20. And Moses took his Wife and his Sons We read hitherto but of one Son born to him but it is plain he had another from XVIII 4. He carried his whole Family with him to let his Brethren see he was so confident of their Deliverance that he ventured not only himself but his dearest Relations in their Society And set them upon an Ass One Ass could not carry them all with every thing necessary for their removal therefore the singular number as is very usual is put for the plural Though one Ass might perhaps carry her and two Children one of which if not the other was very small See Drusius Quaestiones per Epistol 86. and Simeon de Muis in his Varia Sacra Asses are vile Creatures here with us but they were

his contemptuous disregard of it was very provoking So that God would forbear no longer than till the next Morning before he scourged him with this new Judgment Which was very grievous and noisom as appears by the following words especially by his willingness to grant more than he had done before that he might be rid of it Ver. 24. And the LORD did so Here is no mention of Aaron's stretching out his Rod as at other times but this was done immediately by God himself That the Egpytians might not imagine there was any secret Vertue in the Rod but ascribe all to the Divine Power This Plague was threatned about the XXVIIIth day of the sixth Month and inflicted on the XXIXth and removed on the XXXth And there came a grievous swarm of Flies c. Or a vast number of Flies for so the word Caved which we here translate grievous or heavy is used in L Gen. 9. See there And the Land was corrupted by reason of the swarm of Flies We are to understand here by the Land the Inhabitants of the Land whose Blood these Flies suckt and left such a poison in it that their Bodies swell'd and many of them died So the Psalmist understood it LXXVIII 45. There is something like this recorded in Heathen Stories particularly they say that when Trajan made War upon the Agarens he was so assaulted with Flies when he sat down to eat that he lookt upon them as sent by God and desisted from his Enterprise And that whole Countries have been infested with them appears from a number of Gods that were worshipped because they were supposed to have drove them away at Acaron and several other places mentioned by the Learned Aretius in the place above quoted from whence came the Names of Jupiter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and of Hercules 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Ver. 25. And Pharaoh called for Moses and Aaron c. Sent a Messenger to call them to him Go ye Sacrifice to your God in the Land He had consented to let them Sacrifice when he last sent for them v. 8. But he named no place and also quickly repented of the Concession But now he determines it to the Land of Goshen where he grants them Licence to offer Publick Sacrifice But this Moses tells him in the next Verse was not fit for them to accept nor was it what God demanded Ver. 26. And Moses said it is not meet so to do Besides that this is not the thing that God requires it is not prudent because it is not safe for us to do it For we shall Sacrifice the Abomination of the Egyptians to the LORD our God There is no Indication that I can find of any such Sottish Idolatry now among the Egyptians as was it is certain in after Ages but what seems to be suggested in this place which Learned Men have generally interpreted as if the Sense was this We must Sacrifice to our God Oxen Sheep and Goats which the Egyptians Worship and Adore and that would be such an abominable thing in their Account to kill their Gods that it would give them the highest Provocation Thus both the Chaldee Interpreters the Syriack St. Hierom and others which Bochartus himself approves of in his Hierozoic P. 1. L. II. Cap. XXXIV LIII and more largely P. 2. L. IV. Cap. XVII But there is an Objection lies against this Interpretation that long after Moses his time the Egyptians themselves did offer all the fore-mentioned Creatures to their Gods For Herodotus relates in his Euterpe Cap. XLI after what manner they Sacrificed an Ox in his time and though some parts of the Country abstained from Sheep yet they sacrificed Goats as on the contrary others abstained from Goats and sacrificed Sheep See upon XLIII Gen. 23. Therefore it may be a Question Whether these words do not refer only to the Rites and Ceremonies of Sacrificing and to the qualities and condition of the Beasts which were offered about which the Egyptians in after Ages were very curious For the same Herodotus tells us in the same Book Cap. XXXVIII how the Sacrifices were examined by the Priest and none allowed to be offered but those which had his mark upon them And so Plutarch in his Book de Isid Osir that the Egyptians thinking Typho to have been red sacrificed only such Oxen as were of a red colour making such an accurate Scrutiny 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that if a Beast were found to have one hair Black or white it was judged unsit for Sacrifice The forenamed Herodotus indeed saith they would not Sacrifice Cows because they were sacred to Isis which shows that in his time there was great Superstition about such Creatures so that none durst offer the least Violence to them But as we have no Evidence that in the days of Moses they were infected with such Opinions so their Sacrificing such Creatures as the Jews did long after his days and all Mankind had done from the beginning seems to be a prejudice against that sense of the words which is generally put upon them But there were so many various ways of Sacrificing in the World that it is very probable the Egyptians differed very much from the Israelites who might offer also it's likely such Creatures as the Egyptians thought unclean whereby they might be inraged at their Profaneness Maimonides fancies the Egyptians worshipped the Sign or Constellation called Aries and that this was the occasion of this Speech for which I can see no reason More Nevochim P. III. Cap. XLVI And will they not stone us We cannot gather from hence that there was such a Punishment among the Egyptians as stoning Men to death For he doth not speak here of Punishment by their Laws but of what might happen from a Popular Fury Ver. 27. We will go three days journey into the Wilderness c. So God had directed them and it was not lawful for them to Sacrifice in any place but where he appointed Philo gives this reason why they were to go into a Solitary place there to receive Commands from God about Sacrifice and all other parts of his Worship because God intended to give them a Law different from those of other Nations or rather quite opposite unto them In which there were so many singular Rites that they would have offended other People and seemed to them Prophane if they had exercised them among them De Vita Mosis p. 615. And thus Corn. Tacitus understood the design of Moses not to bring the Israelites to as near a Conformity as he could with the Gentiles which some now in these days fancy but to keep them at the greatest distance from other Nations by opposite Rites of Worship His words are remarkable L. V. Histor Cap. IV. Moses quo sibi in posterum Gentem sirmaret novos ritus contrariosque caeteris mortalibus indidit Profana illis omnia quae apud nos sacra rursum concessa

the Waters were turned into Blood And that Calamity was not so universal neither being only in the River and some think only near the Court as this Murrain which was all over the Country and did them a far greater Mischief But having accustomed himself to do evil he grew still more obstinate and hardned in Pride and Covetousness For he doth not so much as pray to be delivered from this Plague which had done all the Execution he thought that was designed and he intended perhaps to repair his loss out of the Flocks and Herds of the Israelites which haply might make him less affected with this wonder than he had been with some of the former Ver. 8. And the LORD said unto Moses and Aaron The former Plague having so little moved his proud and stubborn heart the Lord instantly without any further Message to him as being now in Process of Sentence says Dr. Jackson commands them to bring another Judgment upon the Egyptians more dreadful and noysom than any of the rest had been Take to you handfuls of Ashes of the Furnace In which Pharaoh had made them labour IV Deut. 20. which moved God to punish him and his People with this Plague for their cruel usage of his People there And let Moses sprinkle it The Jews think God imployed him only in Executing this Judgment being much heavier than all the foregoing But both he and Aaron being commanded to take Ashes in the words foregoing as we read they did v. 10. it is more probable they both sprinkled and so the meaning is let Moses as well as Aaron sprinkle it Towards Heaven To show that the Plague came from thence In the sight of Pharaoh That he might be convinced of it Ver. 9. And it shall become small dust in all the Land of Egypt c. Instead of these Ashes which they threw up into the Air there came down a small Sleet as we call it like that of Snow or the Hoar-frost which scalded the Flesh of Man and Beast and raised a Blister in every part upon which it fell The Poison of which penetrating into the Flesh made sore swellings like those we now call Bubo's Insomuch that as Philo understood it L. I. de Vita Mosis they were full of Blotches from Head to Foot Certain it is that the Hebrew word Schechni signifies an Inflammation that made a Tumor or Bile as we translate the word XIII Levit. 18 19. which turned into such a grievous Ulcer that Moses speaks of it afterwards as an unusual Plague which he calls the Botch of Egypt XXVIII Deut. 27. Dr. Lightfoot indeed observes that in the Book of Job II. 7 8. it signifies only a burning Itch or an inflamed Scab an intolerable dry Itch which his Nails could not scratch off but he was glad to make use of a Potsherd to scrub himself But then he confesses that this Schechni here spoken of was higher than that having Blains and Boils that broke out with it which Job's had not So that the Egyptians he thinks were vexed with a double Punishment at once aking Boils and a fiery Itch. But our Interpreters take it otherwise and say that Job also was smote with Boils which in conclusion perhaps had a Scab that itched very much Ver. 10. And they took Ashes of the Furnace c. This Plague was inflicted about the third Day of the seventh Month according to Archbishop Vsher's Computation who thinks it probable as many others do that from hence the Tale was spread among the Heathens that the Egyptians drove the Israelites out of Egypt because they were Scabby lest the Infection should spread all over the Country For they endeavoured in future Ages to make it be believed that what befel themselves was a Plague upon the Israelites Ver. 11. And the Magicians could not stand before Moses because of the Boils c. This Plague seized on them as well as the rest of the Egyptians and that in the Presence of Pharaoh as these words seem to import which perfectly confounded them For though since the Plague of Lice which they could not counterfeit we read of no attempt they ventured to make to vie Miracles with Moses and Aaron yet they still continued about Pharaoh it appears from this place and endeavoured to settle him in his Resolution not to let Israel go perswading him perhaps that though Moses for the present had found out some Secret beyond their skill they should at last be too hard for him But now being on a sudden smote with these Ulcers they were so amazed that we do not find they appeared again to look Moses in the face For now as the Apostle speaks their Folly was manifested to all Men 1 Tim. III. 8 9. In that they could not defend themselves from this terrible stroke whick publickly seizing on them before Moses in the sight of Pharaoh and all his Servants rendred them so contemptible that we never hear more of them Ver. 12. And the LORD hardned the heart of Pharaoh c. If we suppose that the Magicians who had hitherto confirmed Pharaoh in his obstinacy were forced to withdraw in great Confusion when they were smitten with the Boils one would have thought the next thing we should have heard would have been that Pharaoh relented But here is not the least token of that mentioned in this History but rather the express contrary that God was so angry with him that he himself hardned his heart which he had never done before This hardning therefore which is said to be God's doing was something sure very extraordinary Yet it was not an infusion of any bad Qualities or ungodly Resolutions into Pharaoh's heart but only that God did not vouchsafe him those Convictions that might have softned him and gave him up to his own hearts lusts and likewise ordered things so to fall out that he should hereafter be made by them more and more obdurate For he had hardned himself against five Plagues therefore God leaves him to himself and resolves he shall continue in his hardness Accordingly he doth not so much as desire to be freed from this Plague no more than he had done in the former which was nothing so grievous The effect of such Induration is well expressed by Dav. Chytraeus in these words Cor induratum est quod nec compunctione scinditur c. An hardned heart is neither cut by Compunction nor softned by any sense of Piety It is neither moved by Prayers and Intreaties nor yields to Threatnings nor feels the smart of Scourges It is ungrateful for Benefits treacherous to Counsels sullen to Judgments shameless to things most base fearless of Dangers For getful of things past negligent of things present improvident for the future In short it neither fears God nor reverences Man As the LORD had spoken unto Moses The Margin of our Bible directs the Reader to IV. 21. where God saith I will harden c. See there and III. 19. And observe

a while in the Air over the whole Country they came down and setled upon the Ground in every part of it Very grievous were they By their vast Numbers For so the word Caved I have often observed signifies and so the Vulgar Latin here translates innumerable Before them there were no such Locusts See v. 6. Neither after them shall be such i. e. Not in the Land of Egypt though in other Countries there might particularly in Judea when God brought this Plague upon it I Joel 2. Ver. 15. For they covered the Face of the whole Earth c. The word in the Hebrew which we translate Face signifying properly the Eye it induced Onkelos to translate this Passage they covered the Sun which is the Eye of the Earth That is there was such a thick Cloud of them before they fell that they darkned the Sun as when they were fall'n they darkned the Land as it here follows Or the meaning is there were such Numbers that they not only covered the Earth but the Sun also For many Authors mentions such prodigious Clouds of them as have so thickned the Sky that the Day hath been turned into Night See Bochart P. II. Hieroz L. IV. c. 5. And they did eat every Herb of the Land c. See v. 5. Ver. 16. Then Pharaoh called for Moses and Aaron in haste This Dr. Jackson not improperly calls another raving sit or phrenetical symptom into which this new Calamity threw him I have sinned against the LORD your God and against you Whom he had lately caused to be driven out of his Presence v. 11. but now humbles himself before them more than he had done at any time before For this was such a Plague as all Men accounted a manifest Token of the Divine Displeasure According to that of Pliny L. XI c. 29. Deorum irae pestis ea intelligitur This is taken for a Plague of the Anger of the Gods or as some Copies have it Mira pestis a wonderful Plague sent from above Ver. 17. Now therefore forgive I pray you my sin only this once c. Nothing could be spoken more humbly and seemingly penitent than this Supplication which includes in it also a Promise never to offend again But there was no Sincerity in it being the effect only of a great fright which extorted this Confession and Submission from him without any serious meaning to continue in this Resolution Thus we all naturally think of Repenting as Pellicanus here piously reslects when we are in great straits nay and promise it too till we are out of danger when we perform little of what we promised as our whole Life testifies That he may take away from me this death only We cannot gather from hence that the Locusts killed Men and Women as the Hail did for the Fields and the Trees c. are said to die as well as Men XLVII Gen. 19. XIV Job 8 c. But the Locusts destroying the Supports of Life by eating up the Corn and the Grass c. might by consequence be said to kill the People In both which regards Pharaoh might call them deadly Locusts Ver. 18. And he went out from Pharaoh and intreated the LORD Both Moses and Aaron were called to Pharaoh and therefore now went both out But one only is mentioned viz. Moses because by his Prayers this Plague was removed Ver. 19. And the LORD turned This is supposed to be done the next day as I observed v. 12. according to what is said VIII 29. A mighty strong West-wind Strong Winds are the only Remedy to free a Country from this Plague as Pliny hath observed For if they die in those Fields on which they settle the Air is so corrupted by the stench that it breeds Pestilential Diseases Which took away the Locusts and cast them into the Red-sea That which we call the Red-sea the Hebrews call the Sea of Suph i. e. of Flags as we translate the word Suph in the second Chapter of this Book v. 3. because it was full of a certain Weed which the Latines call alga and the Greeks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which some Travellers have affirmed to be of a red Colour and to make the Water appear as if it were red also from whence some fancy it was called the Red-sea Certain it is it had the Hebrew Name of Suph from hence there being such abundance of this Weed in that Sea that the Inhabitants of the Coast plucking it up out of the Water and laying it in heaps to be dried by the Sun it becomes so compact that they build Houses of it as Bochartus hath observed in his Phaleg L. IV. c. 29. But it is most likely to have had the Name of the Red-sea from this that what the Hebrews called the Sea of Suph the nearer Neighbours called the Sea of Edom from the Country which it washed viz. Idumaea 1 Kings IX 26. XXI Numb 4. From whence the Greeks who knew not the reason of the Name called it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Red-sea because Edom in Hebrew signifies red as we find XXV Gen. 29. Now this Sea which late Writers call Sinus Arabicus lies East of Egypt and therefore a West wind was most proper to drive the Locusts thither There remained not one Locust in all the Land of Egypt The Power of God appeared no less in sweeping them all away than in bringing them upon the Country for both were done at the instance of Moses Ver. 20. But the LORD hardned Pharaoh 's heart c. See IX 12. He left him to himself and did not move him to persist in his late good Resolution Ver. 21. And the LORD said unto Moses He left off now to treat with Pharaoh and only proceeds in the Execution of the Sentence of utter Destruction which he had decreed against him Stretch out thine hand towards Heaven See IX 22. That there may be Darkness over the Land of Egypt So that they should not see any thing at Noon-day Even Darkness that may be felt In the next Verse he calls it thick Darkness which was made I suppose by such clammy Foggs that they sensibly affected the Egyptians Ver. 22. And there was thick Darkness in all the Land of Egypt three days Some think that during this three days Darkness the Israelites were Circumcised when the Egyptians by reason of the great Horrour they were in all that time could take no Advantage of them And so Dr. Lightfoot expounds CV Psal 28. They rebelled not against his word but submitted to be Circumcised For the words seem to signifie some special piece of Obedience which they then performed The Author of The Life and Death of Moses will have it that they punished and cut off several wicked People among the Israelites themselves which they did at this time that the Egyptians might not know it and rejoyce at it But that which is more certain is that if the former Plague ended on the ninth day this Judgment

he doth that Pharaoh's eldest Son who was now slain had the Name of Osiris whose sudden Death by this stroke all Posterity lamented in one Night of the year Which was when the Moon was at full as he observes out of Apuleius which still confirms this Conjecture it being at a full Moon when this Slaughter was made and the Israelites delivered out of Egypt For there was not an House where there was not one dead If there were any Children in it Ver. 31. And he called for Moses and Aaron By some of his Servants whom he sent to them as v. 33. seems to signifie By Night He durst not stay till the next Morning for fear he should have been cut off also before that time And said Rise up One would think by this that they found them sleeping securely in their Beds when this deadly blow was given to the Egyptians And get you forth from amongst my People both you and the Children of Israel c. For he was sorely afraid if they staid any longer they would bring some greater Mischief upon him Go serve the LORD as ye have said He had several times made this Concession but was never so much in earnest as now Ver. 32. Also take your Flocks and your Herds c. Though his heart had been often hardned yet this Slaughter of all their First-born made such a deep impression upon him that he comes fully up to their Terms yielding for the present to all they had desired though he did not continue constant in this mind but soon revolted And bless me also Pray for me as the Chaldee translates it Ver. 33. And the Egyptians were urgent upon the People They that brought from Pharaoh a grant of all the Israelites desired and others also who had lost their Children pressed very hard upon them to accept it and that with all speed not out of love to the Israelites but for fear they should perish themselves if they did not leave their Country Pharaoh especially seeing his First-born the Heir of his Crown struck suddenly dead had reason to conclude the next blow would be at his own Life To send them out of the Land of Egypt This shows they were not meerly dismissed but intreated nay importuned to depart Such a change had this Slaughter and the general Outcry that followed upon it made in their hearts In haste They that were unwilling before to hearken to the Israelites Petition now make their Petitions to them and were so glad to be rid of them that they would not suffer them to delay their departure Nay made a Golden-bridge as we speak for their speedy passage out of Egypt v. 35 36. For they said we be all dead men They were desirous the Israelites should enjoy their Liberty rather than lose their own Lives Ver. 34. And the People took their Dough before it was leavened They seem to have newly mixed their Flowre and Water together and kneaded it into a Paste or Dough as we translate it but had not put any leaven into it nor had time to make it into Cakes and bake them Their kneading-troughs The Hebrew word comprehends both the Dough and the Thing wherein it was contained which in VIII 3. we translate Ovens and here Kneading-troughs in which their Dough was carried Being bound up in their Clothes The Hebrew word for Clothes signifies any thing that covers another or wherein it is wrapt as the Dough was in Linnen-clothes it is most likely for that is usual to keep it from the cold Air which was sharp in the Night and would have hindred its rising On their shoulders For we do not read of any Wagons or Horses they had for the Carriage of their Goods out of Egypt Ver. 35. And the Children of Israel did according to the word of Moses Who had commanded them from God to do as it here follows XI 1 2. which was their warrant and justified the Fact And they borrowed of the Egyptians c. So most understand it though some think it was a free gift which the Egyptians bestowed upon them when they were very desirous as we read before to have them gone out of their Country which made them not only intreat but hire them to depart So Jacobus Capellus ad A.M. 2503. They that had denied them leave to go away for a few days saith he now press them to depart with all speed quin praecibus Israelitas demulcent ac donis onerant Egyptii See III. 23. But it is commonly thought that the Egyptians imagined the Israelites only desired to appear as well adorned as they could before their God at the great Feast they were to hold in the Wilderness and so readily lent them these Jewels and sine Clothes to deck themselves withal which they hoped would be restored to them again as soon as the Sacrisice was over Ver. 36. And the LORD gave the People favour c. As he had promised III. 21. and see XI 3. So that they lent them such things as they required Though the Men borrowed as well as the Women XI 3. yet the Women are only mentioned III. 23. because they borrowed most and the Women and Maidens of Egypt might be the more willing to bestow their Jewels and Earings upon them that they might woo their Husbands Children and Relations to be gone with all speed And they spoiled the Egyptians God hath a Supream Right to all things and there was a just cause why he should transfer the Right of the Egyptians unto the Israelites See XI 2. Unto which add this Story which is told in the Gemara of the Sanhedrin that in the time of Alexander the Great the Egyptians brought an Action against the Israelites desiring they might have the Land of Canaan in satisfaction for all that they borrowed of them when they went out of Egypt To which Gibeah ben Kosam who was Advocate for the Jews replyed That before they made this Demand they must prove what they alledged that the Israelites borrowed any thing of their Ancestors Unto which the Egyptians thought it sufficient to say That they found it Recorded in their own Books mentioning this place Well then said the Advocate look into the same Book and you will find the Children of Israel lived four hundred and thirty years in Egypt pay us for all the labour and toil of so many Thousand People as you imployed all that time and we will restore what we borrowed To which they had not a word to answer Tertullian mentions such a Controversie or Plea between the two Nations L. II. advers Marcion where he relates this from an ancient Tradition See Mr. Selden L. VII de Jure Nat. Gent. c. 8. Besides this it is not impertinent to observe that the Egyptians were declared Enemies to the Jews now it is not unlawful to spoil an Enemy nor ought this upon that account to be called a Thest This reason Clemens Alexandrinus joyns to the former See L.

I. Stromat p. 345. D. But no body I think hath expressed this in better words and more full of sense than our famous Dr. Jackson Book X. upon the Creed Chap. 40. where considering God as become the King of this People in a proper and peculiar manner and considering also what unsufferable wrongs the King and People of Egypt had done unto this People of God who were now become his peculiar Subjects or Proprietary Leiges he concludes that this Fact even by the Course of Human Law or Law of Nations was more justifiable than Royal Grants of Letters of Mart or other like Remedies are against such other Nations as have wrong'd their Subjects or suffered them to be wrong'd by any under their Command without Restitution when they solemnly or by way of Embassy demanded it In short whatsoever the Hebrew Women took from the Egyptians they took and possessed by the Law of Reprisal that is by virtue of a Special Warrant granted by the LORD himself as he was now become in Special not only the God of his People but their King Ver. 36. And the Children of Israel journeyed from Rameses Whether this were a City or a Country the Israelites seem in this place to have made a general Rendevouz as we now speak it being well known to them for they were thereabout first planted XLVII Gen. 11. Vnto Succoth This day being the fifteenth of Nisan they began to keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread at this place called Succoth from the Booths or Tents which were here first erected no Houses being there wherein they continued while they lived in the Wilderness and many preferred them before Houses when they came to Canaan Whence we read so often such Expressions as these To thy Tents O Israel or They went every Man to his Tent. It is an idle fancy of R. Solomon upon this place that they travelled this day an CXX miles and that in an hour because it is said XIX 4. that God carried them on Eagles wings Some will have this place called Succoth because the Cloud of Glory began here first to overspread them About six hundred thousand on foot that were Men. i. e. Were Twenty years old and upward all fit for War Besides Children If we reckon all under Twenty years of Age with all the Women and old Men there could not be less than fifteen hundred thousand persons A vast increase in the space of a little more than two hundred years from LXX Persons that went down into Egypt Ver. 38. And a mixed multitude went up also with them Some think these were only a Rabble that marcht along with them imagining they would return at three days end Which when they saw they did not they began to mutiny and quarrelled with Moses c. as the Author of Dibre Hajamim tells the Story Others think that many Israelites had made Marriages with the Egyptians as some it is plain did XXIV Lev. 10. who now accompanied them at their Departure being loth to leave their Relations But it is most probable they were Proselytes of the Gate as the Jews call them who had renounced Idolatry but were not entred into the Covenant by being Circumcised See Selden L. I. de Synedriis c. 3. It is uncertain what number there was of these but it appears they were a multitude And Flocks and Herds and very much Cattle Some of which perhaps belonged to the mixed Multitude for they among the Egyptians that feared the LORD's word preserved their Cattle from the stroke of the Hail which destroyed all that was in the Field IX 20. Ver. 39. And they baked When they came to Succoth Vnleavened Cakes c. The Scripture often mentions such Bread XVIII Gen. 6. XI Numb 8. 1 Kings XVII 12. for it was not leavened They could not stay till it was leavened being thrust out in haste as they were preparing it v. 33. which doth not signifie that they put Leaven to it when they came to Succoth as Grotius understands it for that was inconsistent with the Feast of Vnleavened Bread which they were commanded to keep v. 15. and which it is reasonable to suppose they now observed as well as killed and eat the Paschal Lamb v. 6 28. Neither had they prepared themselves any victuals This justifies what I observed upon v. 15. that they lived a whole Month upon unleavened Bread till God sent them Manna to eat Ver. 40. Now the sojourning So the Hebrew word Moshab most certainly signifies not meerly dwelling as the Vulgar Latine renders it but dwelling like Strangers who are not in their own Country Thus Abraham is said to sojourn XX Gen. 1. and Isaac and Jacob XXVIII 4. And therefore whereas the Roman Copy of the LXX reads here 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the habitation the Alezandrian Copy hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the perigrination or sojourning as we well translate it Of the Children of Israel These words comprehend their Fathers Abraham Isaac and Jacob as is evident from hence that otherwise Israel himself should not be included in this sojourning who was the Person that brought them into Egypt and lived there with his Family seventeen years Nor is any thing more ordinary in Scripture than under the Name of the Father to comprehend all his Posterity and likewise when the Posterity is only mentioned to intend also their Fathers there being such a near Union between Parents and Children that they are considered as one Person XXVI Deut. 5 9. X Judg. 11 12. XII Hosea 4. and many other places And therefore the Samaritan Copy here rightly reads The Habitation of the Children of Israel and of their Fathers c. Which is not to be taken for a Translation of these words but an Interpretation And so some Copies of the LXX had it as St. Austin observes anciently and Drusius lately mentions an Edition wherein it was thus paraphrased 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they and their Fathers Who dwelt in Egypt Here also the Samaritan Copy hath it as an Explication no doubt not a literal Translation who dwelt in the Land of Canaan and in Egypt And so the Vatican Edition of the LXX The Habitation of the Children of Israel which dwelt in the Land of Egypt and in Canaan Which is no late Addition but was in ancient Copies for Aben Ezra testifies in his Commentary on this place that they thus explained it Which dwelt in Egypt and in other Countries as Drusius observes in his Quaesita per Epistolam 51. Was four hundred years That is from the time of Abraham's coming from Charran into the Land of Canaan when this sojourning began till their going out of Egypt was just four hundred and thirty years For from Abraham's coming to sojourn in Canaan to the birth of Isaac was twenty five years and Isaac was sixty years old when he begat Jacob who was an hundred and thirty years old when he went down into Egypt which Numbers put together make two hundred and fifteen

that according to the Hebrew Doctors no Man was to be admitted a Proselyte to partake of the Paschal Lamb unless his whole Family was Circumcised with him both Children and Servants Ver. 45. A Foreigner The Hebrew word Toschab literally signifies a Dweller or Inhabitant by which Name those pious Gentiles were called who renounced Idolatry though they did not embrace the Jewish Religion because they were permitted to settle among them and dwell in their Country which was not allowed to other Foreigners who continued Idolaters See Selden L. II. de Jure N. G. c. 3. c. 5. Where he observes Maimonides makes this Exception That no such Persons might dwell in Jerusalem because of the singular Holiness of that City but any where else they might with the Profession of Judaism And no hired Servant Some of them were Servants to the Jews and so dwelt in the same House with them and were called Hirelings when they bound themselves to serve their Masters for three years as the Jews gather from XVI Isa 14. Ver. 46. In one House shall it be eaten c. In the first Night wherein this Sacrifice was slain they were enjoyned not to stir out of Doors v. 22. and therefore not to carry forth ought of the Flesh abroad into another House Besides they were in such haste that they had no time to send Messengers from one House to another which Maimonides makes the ground of this Precept More Nev. P. III. c. 46. In after-times also that Law being in force v. 4. that lesser Housholds who had not Company enough to eat the Lamb up should joyn with some other it is here explain'd that for maintenance of Friendly Society they should not divide the Lamb and carry half of it to another House but all meet together in one and feast upon it Which the ancient Fathers looked upon as a Figure of the Unity of the Church of Christ This seems to be the most natural Interpretation that it should be eaten under one Roof But R. Simeon saith That God only bound them to eat in one Company or Society not in two but it was lawful for that Family or Society to eat it in two places if they pleased Halicoth Olam P. IV. Sect. 3. Neither shall ye break a Bone thereof The Jews fancy this Law doth not speak of the lesser Bones but only of those in which there was some Marrow So Maimonides in his Treatise on this Subject c. 10. sect 1. And indeed being eaten in haste they could not have time to break the Bones and suck out the Marrow which in the place before-named in his More Nevochim he makes the Foundation of this Precept Which was exactly fulfilled in the true Paschal Lamb of which this was a Figure when he was offered for us as St. John observes XIX 33 36. Ver. 47. All the Congregation of Israel shall keep it Women and Children as well as Men. In after times indeed only Men were bound to come up at the three Feasts XXIII 17. XXXIV 23. XVI Deut. 16. But devout People were wont to carry up their Wives and Children with them as appears by Elkanah 1 Sam. I. 3 4. and by Joseph who went up with the Blessed Virgin II Luke 41. And that place in Samuel informs us that their Sons and Daughters did eat of the Sacrifice Ver. 48. When a Stranger shall sojourn with thee and will keep the Passover c. See v. 43 44. No uncircumcised Person shall eat thereof Which is the reason some have thought why they observed no Passover as far as we can sind after that in the very next year that followed their coming out of Egypt because they were generally Uncircumcised But this seems to relate to Men of another Nation who though they were not admitted to eat of the Lamb unless they received Circumcision yet having renounced Idolatry the Jews say they might eat of the unleavened Bread and of the bitter Herbs Ver. 49. One Law shall be to him that is home-born c. Nothing could be more equal than this that no Man should enjoy this Priviledge who was not of their Religion but whosoever embraced it should partake of the same Benefits Ver. 50. Thus did all the Children of Israel They kept this Passover and afterwards another by a special direction IX Numb but afterward during their stay in the Wilderness they seem to have omitted it because they omitted Circumcision without which v. 48. they were not capable to partake of it As the LORD commanded Moses and Aaron so did they Observed it according to all the Rites here enjoyned though in future Ages several of them were omitted as peculiar to this time Ver. 51. And it came to pass the self same day c. On the day after they celebrated the Passover they began their March out of Egypt Which was a thing so notorious that the memory of it was preserved in Nations far distant from them though the Story was much corrupted for want of the Knowledge of these Sacred Records For Strabo mentions it to name no more but saith the Report was that the Jews were descended from the Egyptians which might be believed by Strangers because they dwelt so long in that Country and that Moses was an Egyptian Priest who had a certain part of that Country but being dissatissied with the present state of things forsook it and many Worshippers of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 followed him For he affirmed and taught that the Egyptians had not right Conceptions who likened God to wild Beasts and Cattle nor did the Asricans or Greeks conceive of him better who represented him like to Men 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For there is but this one only God that which comprehends us all and the Earth and the Sea which we call Heaven and the World c. In which words he makes Moses not so foolish as the Egyptians and other Nations but attributes a sensless Opinion to him that the World which we see is God if this be the right reading of his words But I rather think the place is corrupted and it should be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. For this is Moses his true Opinion with which he begins his Books that he only is God who made the Heaven and the Earth And this perfectly agrees with what follows in Strabo That no Image can be made of this God and therefore a Temple without any Image must be erected to him c. Which is not true if we take the visible World to be God for the Image of the Heaven and the Earth may be made as well as of a Man or a Beast However it is true which he adds That Moses perswaded many good Men and brought them into that Country where Jerusalem is the chief City where they lived a long time happily 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doing justly and being sincerely Religious Which is a notable Testimony from a Pagan to be noted aureis literis with Letters

Here he gives the reason for this Order that Pharaoh might be enticed to pursue them imagining they were in such Difficulties that they could not avoid falling into his hands They are entangled in the Land Perplexed or dubious not knowing which way to go The Wilderness hath shut them in They were cooped up he thought by the Sea and by craggy Mountains which it was impossible for them to pass especially being incumbred with a multitude of Women Children and Cattle Ver. 4. And I will harden Pharaoh 's heart He had hardned it before IX 12. X. 1. But now ordered things so that he was more sensless than ever he had been For having lately felt such an heavy stroke upon all the First-born as mollified his heart for the present and moved him to let Israel go it was the highest degree of Infatuation not to fear as formerly they had done XII 33. that the next blow if he pursued them would be at himself and his followers And I will be honoured upon Pharaoh and upon all his Host. Show my Power and Justice in their Destruction Which would not have been so visible had they died of the Pestilence when the Cattle died of the Murrain and Pharaoh's heart was first hardned as it was by hardning him so far as to follow the Israelites into the Red-sea where he and his whole Host was overthrown which made the terrour of the LORD's Wrath manifest to all the World That the Egyptians may know that I am the LORD Have the greatest demonstration of my irresistible Power VII 5. For the more strange the Infatuation was which led Pharaoh and his Host to such an ignominious Death the more apt the hearts of the People that remain'd would be to acknowledge the Hand of God therein And they did so They marched to this place on the XVIIth day of Nisan which was their third days Journey Jacobus Capellus thinks they rested this day being the Sabbath and came not hither till the XVIIIth Ver. 5. And it was told the King of Egypt that the People fled Some of the mixt Multitude that went along with them XII 38. seeing this strange turn it is likely forsook the Israelites and returned to Pharaoh to inform him that they had lost their way and were shifting for themselves by slight into dangerous places Or as it is commonly interpreted some Spies which Pharaoh had upon them seeing them leave the way to Horeb whither they desired to go three days Journey to offer Sacrifice concluded they never intended to return to Egypt but would run quite away from them This news we may suppose was brought to Pharaoh on the XVIIIth day And the heart of Pharaoh and of his Servants was turned against the People They had quite forgot their late Fears XII 33. which made such a change in them they would not suffer the Israelites to stay any longer in their Country but those Fears being vanished their Minds altered again and they repented they had dismissed them And said what have we done that we have let Israel go from serving us What a gross Errour have we committed in losing the Labour of so many Slaves Covetousness as I have observed often had a principal hand in hardning Pharaoh's heart Ver. 6. And he made ready his Chariot Caused it immediately to be made ready which we may suppose was done on the XIXth day when he began to pursue them And took his People with him All that were wont to attend him on such accasions 7. And he took six hundred chosen Chariots The best Chariots in Egypt which were always ready prepared for such Expeditions And all the Chariots of Egypt That could be got ready on a sudden for he had not time to muster all his force but made all the haste possible lest the Israelites should get out of the straits wherein they were and go so far away that he could not overtake them For which reason he pursued them with Chariots and Horsmen who could make larger marches than the Israelites on foot The strength also of this Kingdom consisted in Chariots which carried Men in them who sought out of them And every one knows that Egypt abounded with Horses as well as Chariots and that they were accounted very strong in these XXXI Isa 1. yet Bochartus thinks all besides the six hundred Chariots Royal were only Carriages for their Baggage Hierozoic P. I. L. II. c. 9. And Captains over every one of them This shows there were Men in them and that to every Chariot there Belonged a Troop of Horsmen we know not of what number who were commanded by a Captain The Hebrews say there were Fifty thousand Horsmen the Arabians make them as many more Ver. 8. And the LORD hardned the heart of Pharaoh King of Egypt As he said he would v. 4. And he pursued after the Children of Israel Of all the infatuated Resolutions to use the words of a famous Divine of our own Dr. Jackson Book X. chap. 11. that either King or People adventured on the pursuing of the Israelites with such a mighty Army after they had most earnestly intreated and urged them to leave their Country may well seem to every indifferent Reader the most stupid And so the Author of the Book of Wisdom justly censures it XIX 3. For whilst they were yet mourning and making Lamentations at the Graves of the Dead they added another foolish device and pursued them as Fugitives whom they had intreated to be gone Yet Josephus gives good hints that even this effect of Divine Infatuation was but such as hath seized upon worldly wise Princes and States-men in former Ages and may hereafter be inflicted upon more And the Children of Israel went out with an high hand Boldly and with assured confidence not sneakingly like Slaves or Fugitives So Onkelos understood it when he translated it bare-headed i. e. confidently fearing nothing having been delivered and conducted by the powerful hand of God as it is often repeated XIII 9 14 16. unto which some refer this Phrase and not to the Israelites See Drusius L. XVI Observat c. 2. Ver. 9. But the Egyptians pursued after them This did not discourage Pharaoh and his Servants who perhaps were of the same mind with the Syrians who fancied the God of Israel might not be alike powerful in all places but though he was stronger than their Gods in the Hills yet they might be too hard for him in the Plain 1 Kings XX. 23. So the Egyptians who had seen how much superiour Moses was to their Magicians might possibly thus reason with themselves as the same Learned Dr. expresses it Who knows whether all this Power was given unto Moses to be exercised only within the Meridian or Climes of Egypt or whether his Commission extend over Palestine and Midian They presumed at least that the LORD God of the Hebrews had not granted Moses such a Command over the Armies or Host of Men though he had done Wonders among

when they found any too difficult they were to refer it to be heard by Moses himself So R. Leviben Gersom explains it Every great Cause in which they know not what to judge they shall bring to thee and thou shalt show what is right or how it is to be decided There are those indeed who think there were several sorts of Causes that might not be brought before these Inferiour Courts but were to be reserved for Moses's hearing and judging These they make to be Four First All Sacred Matters or Things belonging unto God which they gather from v. 19. Secondly All Matters of Equity where the rigour of the Law was sit to be mitigated Thirdly All Capital Causes And lastly Such as the Chiliarchs i. e. Rulers of Thousands and the other Judges referred to him But this is said without ground for it is plain all sorts of Causes might be determined by the inferiour Courts if they were able to make an end of them whether Civil or Sacred Only those which were too difficult for them that is when they did not find a Law to direct them or it was obscure or they could not agree about the Punishment then they were to be brought before Moses So he himself charges not that the People should bring such Causes to him as they thought difficult but that the Judges themselves should bring them i. e. order an Appeal to him I Deut. 17. bring it unto me speaking to the Judges and I will hear it Which shows the Cause had been at the Bar of other Courts before and that it was not unlawful for them to meddle with it if they had been able to determine it And accordingly we read here below v. 26. that the Judges did so In short these words do not intimate that there were some Causes the other Judges might not try if they were able but only that such things as they found themselves not skilful enough to determine they should bring to him See Mr. Selden in the fore-named Book p. 633 c. But every small matter they shall judge Hitherto Moses but heard all Causes promiscuously great and small but Jethro well advises him to delegate the labour of judging all Causes liquidi juris as the Lawyers speak where the Right was clear and to reserve no part of the Judicature to himself but where the Law it self was either defective or obscure So shall it be casier for thy self c. Thou wilt ease thy self of a great burden by appointing others to take their share of it Ver. 23. If thou wilt do this thing and God command thee so If thou wilt follow this advice by God's approbation who was to be consulted whether he allowed it Then thou shalt be able to endure Thy days will be prolonged which otherwise will be shortned with this intolerable labour And the People go to their place in peace Go home very much satisfied with such quick dispatch and happy composure of their Differences Ver. 24. So Moses hearkened to the voice of his Father-in-law c. Followed his Counsel by God's approbation with whom no doubt he advised v. 23. Here the Samaritan Copy inserts those words of Moses I Deut. 9 c. I am not able to bear you my self alone the LORD your God hath multiplied you c. Which he spake indeed when he made this Constitution but did not set it down in this Book where he intended only a short account of these Transactions Ver. 25. And Moses chose able men c. Out of those who were presented to him by the People See v. 20. Ver. 26. And they judged the People at all Seasons Whensoever they resorted to them For some Court or other sate every day that was not appointed by God for other Business i. e. for Religion The hard Causes they brought to Moses c. It is plain by this that the Judges not the People brought the hard Causes unto Moses For the People could not know whether they might not have a Remedy nearer hand than by going to him on all occasions till they had tried Ver. 27. And Moses let his Father-in-law depart After he had staid some time with him and could not prevail with him to stay longer which he earnestly desired and go with them to see the Accomplishment of God's Promises to them as those words X Numb 29 c. are thought to signifie But perhaps that Hobab there mentioned was not Jethro himself but his Son whom Moses also perswaded not to return to his own Country for he makes no reply much less denies to stay with Moses when he pressed him the second time though he refused at first v. 32. But this I shall consider in that place And he went his way into his own Land To make his Children or the People of the Land Proselytes saith the Chaldee Paraphrase Which it's probable he indeavoured i. e. to bring them to true Religion and affected in some measure so that Piety was propagated in some Families among them to future Generations For the Rechabites came out of this Country 1 Chron. II. 55. whose vertue Jeremiah Praises in the latter end of the Jewish Church Chap. XXXV CHAP. XIX Verse 1. IN the third Month. Or in the third new Moon For the Hebrew word Chodesh signifies a new Moon as well as a Month nay that is the prime signification from whence the other is derived And so we are to understand it here that on the New Moon i. e. the first day of the third Month called Sivan after their coming out of Egypt they came into the Wilderness of Sinai Which was just XLV days after they departed out of Egypt For if we add to the XV. days of the first Month XXIX which made the second these put together with this New Moon make XLV Unto which if we add that day when Moses went up to God v. 3. and reported when he came down the Message God sent by him to the Elders of Israel and the next day after when he returned their Answer unto God v. 7 8. with the three days more which God gave them to prepare themselves for his coming down among them v. 10 11. there were just Fifty days from their Passover to the giving of the Law upon Mount Sinai which laid the Foundation of the great Feast of Pentecost The same day i. e. On the fore-mentioned New Moon of the third Month. Came they into the Wilderness of Sinai So called from that famous Mountain Sinai which gave the name to the Wilderness which lay before it This Mountain was also called Horeb IV Deut. 10. they being only different tops of one and the same Mountain but this higher than Horeb so that one may see the Red Sea from them as they that have travelled into those Parts affirm Who say it is now called by the Arabians Tur and by Christians the Mountain of St. Catherine Ver. 2. For they were departed from Rephidim c. They began to move from

this was and have been pleased to fancy that some Book which Moses wrote is lost When this plainly refers to what is said v. 4. where we read that Moses wrote all the words of the LORD that is the Commandments and Judgments mentioned in the four foregoing Chapters Which though they made no great Volume yet might be called a Book in their Language for even the Bill of Divorcement which they gave their Wives and was very short is called by this Name of Sepher a Book XXIV Deut. 1. Of the Covenant That they might remember upon what terms he would bestow upon them the fore-named Blessings he engages them in a Solemn Covenant to observe the Commandments and Judgments contained in this Book Ver. 8. And Moses took the blood That half of it which was in the Basons v. 6. And sprinkled it on the people As he had sprinkled one half on the Altar in token God was a Party in the Covenant so he sprinkled the other half on the XII Pillars which represented the Children of Israel in token that they were the other Party engaged in the same Covenant Thus our fore-named Primate and several others understand it and it carries some show of probability in it Yet I cannot think it unlikely that it was sprinkled upon the LXX Elders by whom the People consented if not upon all the People who stood next to the Altar and are here expresly mentioned The Apostle to the Hebrews IX 19. saith he sprinkled the Book as well as the People which is not here mentioned but supposed For when he went to sprinkle the Blood we must conceive he laid down the Book that he might be at more liberty for this other action And perhaps he laid it on one of the Pillars where it was sprinkled as they were together with the People whom they represented And said Behold the Blood of the Covenant which the LORD hath made with you concerning all these words Look upon your selves as obliged by this Blood to observe all the Commands which I have delivered to you in the words you have heard For there were two ways of making Covenants anciently both which were here used The first was after a Sacrifice had been offered to sprinkle the Blood of it upon both Parties who were to be Confederates which was done here v. 6 8. And secondly the Confederates thereupon proceeded to eat together some part of the Sacrifice which follows v. 11. where we find the Elders of Israel who represented the People did eat and drink in the Presence of God Ver. 9. Then went up Moses and Aaron Nadab and Abihu and LXX of the Elders of Israel These things being done they went up into the Mount as they were ordered v. 1. i. e. they went up to that part of the Mount where Aaron and his Sons and the Elders were appointed to come but no further Ver. 10. And they saw the God of Israel When Moses is commanded to come near unto the LORD v. 2. Maimonides acknowledges it may be understood of his local approach to the place where the Light or Glory of God then appeared More Nevoch P. I. c. 18. And therefore it is something strange that he expounds the Elders seeing God of their apprehension of him by their Understanding and not rather of their beholding some glimpse of that visible Majesty which was on the Top of the Mount For that I doubt not is the meaning as appears by what follows And so the Chaldee expounds it They saw the Glory of the God of Israel surrounded we may well suppose with an heavenly Host of Angels attending upon the SCHECHINAH or Divine Majesty as it was also called And there was under his feet This hath made some conceive that this visible Glory appeared in the form of a Man with his Back towards them standing upon a shining Pavement But this is contrary to IV Deut. 15. For though that be spoken of another time and place viz. the Giving of the Law which all the People heard but saw no Similitude yet if the Elders had afterward seen a Similitude it would have spoiled Moses his Argument they being the Representatives of the People This glorious Light therefore far surpassing all other had no form nor could be described by any Art and consequently by its feet is meant only the lower part of it which rested as it were upon a most glorious Pavement And thus the Divine Majesty is said to have had a Foot-stool which was the cover of the Ark though it had no Human shape As it were a paved work of Saphire stone The glorious Majesty of God was represented as having under it a Pavement sutable to it self very bright and shineing For there is a sort of Saphire called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 spotted with little points or pricks of Gold which shine like Stars interspersed in the Body of it See Salmasius in Solinum p. 131 203. Such was this Pavement as we may gather from the following words And as it were the body of Heaven in its clearness As clear as the purest and serenest Sky when it is all spangled with Stars All which signifies as I take it that the Glory of the LORD appeared far above the Glory of the Sun in its greatest brightness upon a Pavement sparkling like the Stars in the Heaven when it is most clear The LXX instead of the words saw the God of Israel have saw 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the place of the God of Israel As if they saw a Throne upon which there was a visible Majesty beyond all description And if this be admitted then this Throne may well be said to have feet standing upon such a glorious Pavement And so they translate it in the next Verse where this is repeated Ver. 11. And upon the Nobles of the Children of Israel i. e. The Elders before-mentioned v. 1 9. called here Atzilim to signifie that they were the prime and choicest Persons among the Israelites For Atzal signisies to separate and consequently atzilim imports Men distinguished from others either by their Birth Office or some excellent qualities He laid not his hand Did not hurt them Whereas it was the common Opinion That they who saw God though it was by one of his Angels should presently die The splendour of that glorious Light was so dazling that it was a singular favour it did not put out their Eyes as the Light wherein St. Paul saw our Saviour did his We are told v. 17. The sight of the Glory of the LORD was like devouring fire Which might put them in fear perhaps they had been scorched by it when it flasht out upon them but they found not the least hurt by it Thus Jonathan saith in his Paraphrase upon the XXXII Chapter that when Moses delayed to come down from the Mount the People fancied him to be burnt up by the fire which shone from the Presence of God which there appeared This sight of God which he vouchsafed to

several sorts of Purple he shows this had in it the brightest and most storid redness the manner of dying which he also there demonstrates See also Bochartus concerning these two words Thecelet and Argaman in his Hierozoic P. II. L. V. c. 10 11. Tholaat-shani we also rightly translate Scarlet as the same Brannius shows c. 15. of the fore-named Book And very probably makes the word Scarlet signifie as much as the Colour of Tyre For Sar or Sarra is Tyre and lacea is a red colour Abarbinel most absurdly makes this to be the native colour of Silk without any dye See Bochart Hierozoic P. II. L. IV. c. 27. p. 624. And fine linen The Hebrew word Schesch signifies that pure fine linen called Byssus So the Chaldee calls it butz Which was peculiar to Egypt as some fancy where their Priests were clothed with it and thence called linigeri But Philostrutus saith there was a Byssus among the Indians with which the better sort of People were clothed And Pausanias saith it grew in Elis and in no other part of Greece See Salmasius Plin. Exercit. p. 998. and what I have noted on XLI Gen. 42. And Goats-hair In the Hebrew there is only the word izim which signifies Goats but all Interpreters by a common Ellipsis understand it of their Hair And Jarchi saith it signifies the flower of Goats-hair or as we speak the down the very softest part of it And no other Wool as they call it was accepted for the use of the Sanctuary if we may credit Abarbinel but only this For the Wool of Lambs and Sheep was vile in comparison with this which was precious in the Eastern Countries where excellent Cloth was made of it not inferiour to Silk in softness and brightness as the same Braunius observes L. I. de Vestitu Sacr. Hebr. c. 9. Ver. 5. And Rams-skins died red Or red Ram-skins for such there were in the Eastern Countries which were naturally of that colour And Badgers-skins The Hebrew word Thecasim which we translate Badgers following those who think Thacas to be the same with the Latin word Taxus the ancient Interpreters take for a colour And Bochartus hath at large endeavoured to prove that it signifies a kind of Violet or Purple Colour So that God commands them to offer red and violet Rams-skins See Hierozoic P. I. L. III. c. 30. And Shittim-wood Kimchi saith this was the best kind of Cedar But Aben-Ezra takes it for the Wood of a Tree which grew in the Wilderness not far from Mount Sinai in that place where the Israelites sometimes incamped XXV Numb 1. called Shittim from this Wood unless the Wood were so called from the place where it grew And thus St. Hierom seems to have understood it For he saith upon III Joel that they were great Trees which were not to be found in the Roman Countries or in cultivated Places but in the Desert of Arabia only Out of which very broad Boards might be cut exceeding strong and of incredible smoothness and beauty And upon XLI Isa he calls it Lignum imputribile an incorruptible Wood as the LXX also here translate it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 very smooth excelling all Wood in firmness and brightness c. See Menochius L. V. de Repub. Hebr. c. 2. Ver. 6. Oyl for the light For the Lamp that was to burn continually in the Sanctuary Spices for anointing Oyl and for sweet Incense See XXX 23 c. and v. 34 35 c. Ver. 7. Onyx-stones Or Sardonyxes See 11 Gen. 12. And stones to be set in the Ephod and in the Brest-plate There were two Onyx-stones to be set in the Ephod XXVIII 9 10 c. and the other Stones whose names are there mentioned v. 17 18 c. were to be set in the Brest-plate These five Verses contain all the Materials which were to be used about the Sanctuary and the Garments of the Priests who were to attend there The only question is How they got such things in the Wilderness Some think they brought them with them out of Egypt as it is evident they did Gold Silver and Jewels And Abarbinel thinks they also trafficked with the neighbouring People while they remained here of whom they bought Oyl and Spices and Shittim-wood c. which is probable enough every thing being to be had for Money of which they brought good store from Egypt Ver. 8. And let them make me a Sanctuary Now follow Directions for the making an House for God and every thing belonging to it For so this place is sometimes called God's House or Habitation because there as Abarbinel observes the SCHECHINAH or Divine Majesty had its residence And it is called a Sanctuary or Holy Place because no uncircumcised or unclean Person might enter into it For under the Name of Sanctuary is comprehended as the Jews rightly understand it all the Courts belonging to it as well as the very House it self with all the Utensils or Sacred Vessels which are afterward prescribed for the Service of it That I may dwell among them God resolving to manifest himself as in a peculiar manner constantly present among them was pleased to order a Tent or Tabernacle to be built for him wherein while they sojourned in Tents in the Wilderness he dwelt among them in a visible manner by the SCHECHINAH or Habitation of the Divinity which was sixed here and was a special Type of God's future dwelling in Humane Nature In short this Sanctuary was his Palace saith Moses Nachmanides wherein he dwelt as their King And accordingly Schem Tob upon Maimon's More Nevoch P. III. c. 40. pertinently observes that God ordered all manner of things belonging to a Palace to be in this House particularly Ministers that constantly attended on him a Table with daily Provision all manner of Utensils such as Pots Spoons Forks c. a Closet proper to himself alone that the most Vulgar Understanding might conceive their King the LORD of Hosts continually resided there And indeed the Hebrew word Mikdash which we render Sanctuary sometimes signifies a Palace XXVIII Ezek. 18. and so Kimchi interprets it upon VIII Isa 14. Among them In the Hebrew in the midst of them For the Tabernacle when it was erected was placed in the midst of their Camps II Numb 17. Which was the reason that all unclean Persons were to be removed out of their Camp lest God who dwelt in it should be offended by the pollution V Numb 3. And this is the reason why God is said to walk among them XXVI Lev. 12. XXII Deut. 14. because he dwelt in that Tent which moved up and down as they did while they dwelt in the Wilderness Ver. 9. According to all that I shew thee the pattern of the Tabernacle and the pattern of all the Instruments thereof so shalt thou make it This signifies that God showed him a Model as we now speak of the House he was to make and of all the things belonging to it And accordingly he

Therefore Nachmanides more reasonably conceives that these Rings were indeed in the corners of the Ark but not in the higher as R. Solomon would have them but in the lower and therefore said here to be in the feet For the Scripture calling the top of every thing the head of it the bottom is commonly there called the feet And so the Ark by placing the Rings and Staves in the bottom was carried on high upon the Priests shoulders representing God who is highly exalted And two rings shall be on the one side of it and two rings on the other side of it That is in the length of it as Josephus expresly testifies and not in the breadth Ver. 13. And thou shalt make staves of Shittim-wood Of such a length that the Ark might be at a decent distance from those that carried it And overlay them with Gold With Plates of Gold as the Ark it self was v. 14. Ver. 14. And thou shalt put the staves into the rings by the sides of the Ark. The Hebrews say these staves were ten Cubits long That the Ark may be born with them Upon the shoulders of the Levites particularly the Sons of Korah See Numb IV. 4 5 6 c. VII 9. For it was a Crime to carry it any other way either in their Hands or drawn in a Cart. Compare 1 Chron. XIII 7. with XV. 15. Ver. 15. And the staves shall be in the rings of the Ark. Continue and remain in the Rings whence they were once put therein They shall not be taken from it When they set down the Ark they were not to take out the staves and put them in again when it was to be carried but let them as was said continue in the rings that there might be no danger of letting them fall which had been a great irreverence and because they would be best preserved and take less harm there than any where else and if they had occasion to remove the Ark suddenly all would be ready and the Levites were hereby kept from touching the Ark or coming nearer to it than the ends of the staves Ver. 16. And thou shalt put into the Ark the testimony which I will give thee The two Tables of Stone containing the Ten Commandments which are called the Testimony and the Two Tables of Testimony XXXI 18. because they testified what the Will of God was which they had consented to observe and were therefore publick authentick Instruments attesting the Covenant between God and them Whence the Ark which contained these is called the Ark of the Testimony as I observed above v. 10. v. 22. and in a great many other places of the XL Chapter And in one place it is called the Testimony XXX 36. and the Ark of the Covenant of the LORD X Deut. 8. because then Ten words were the principal part of the Covenant to which they stood obliged And perhaps the Book of the Covenant which Moses made with them XXIV 7. is comprehended under the name of the Testimony For though we read in 1 Kings VIII 9. there was nothing in the Ark save the two Tables of Stone c. yet the Apostle mentions some other things that were not in yet by or before the Ark IX Hebr. 4. But I assert nothing in this matter And shall only further observe that this direction for putting the Testimony or Tables of Stone into the Ark is given before any order is taken for making a Covering to it which follows after And therefore he was to put in the Law before the Cover was set on For though v. 21. this be mentioned again and put after the Cover is named yet the meaning is that he should set on the Cover having put in the Law And it is repeated that he should be very careful of this because the Cherubims were to protect and defend it Ver. 17. And thou shalt make a Mercy-seat The Hebrew word Capporet litterally signifies a Covering of any thing And that is the proper signification of this Mercy-seat as we translate it which was the Covering of the Ark. For it had no Door but was open at the top so that they might put the Tables of the Covenant into it and then it was to be fastned above by this Cover which any one may discern by its dimensions was exactly fit for it Others will have it called Capporet not from Capar to cover but from Cipper to expiate and render propitious And so indeed the Apostle calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the propitiatory because God here showed himself to be propitious and appeased by the Blood of the Sacrifices which was sprinkled before this place But the reason of this Translation may be because when Sins are pardoned they are said in Scripture to be covered The LXX put both these together in their Translation which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Of pure Gold Not of Wood crusted over with Gold but all as Abarbinel speaks of solid Gold because it was the Cover of the Ark in which were the Tables of the Covenant written with God's Finger than which nothing was more precious Two cubits and an half shall be the length thereof c. Which was the length of the Ark v. 10. as the breadth was a Cubit and a half both of that and this Which shows this was the Cover of the Ark being most exactly adapted to it Ver. 18. And thou shalt make two Cherubims of gold We read of Cherubims in the beginning of the World and have good reason to believe thereby is meant Angels See III Gen. 24. But in what shape they appeared we are not told nor is there the least signification of it here in this place but what we can gather from v. 20. So that I can only say this they were of such a shape as the Angelical Ministers appeared in which attended upon the Divine Majesty in the Mount or rather such as god showed Moses a pattern of whereby to represent these heavenly Ministers For both the Ark and all belonging to it were made according to the model God gave him not from any Egyptian pattern as some imagine Bochart seems to me to speak judiciously when he saith they were not Figures of Angels but rather Emblems whereby the Angelical Nature was in some sort expressed Hierozoic P. I. L. 2. c. 25. And were therefore ordered to be made as Maimonides conjectures that the Jews might be confirmed in the belief of the Existence of Angels which is the second Article of their Faith next to the belief of God And he commanded two to be made because if there had been but one it might have led them into a dangerous Errour that this was the Figure of God whereby they might have been inclined to worship it But there being two of them ordered with this Declaration the LORD our God is one God it led them into right thoughts that God had many of these Angelical Ministers Thus he More Nevoch P. III. c. 45. Of beaten

it to the Table A border of an hand-breadth round about Which came down below the Crown or Cornice as they now speak Though some think this Border was towards the bottom to joyn the feet more firmly together And thou shalt make a golden Crown to the border thereof round about Wheresoever this border was which I suppose was plated with Gold like the Table it had a Crown or a Cornice as an Ornament to it For this Crown was different from that mentioned in the foregoing Verse and was under the border as the other Crown was above it as Fortunatus Scacchus apprehends it Myrothec 2. c. 38. Ver. 26. And thou shalt make for it four rings of gold As there was for the Ark v. 12. only they were to be cast these to be made but how we are not told And put the rings in the four corners that are on the four feet thereof The Hebrew word here for Corners always hath that signification being quite different from that word which is used v. 12. when he speaks of the Ark. Which may well incline us to Josephus his opinion that these rings were not below as they were in the Ark but on the upper part of the Feet of the Table so that it was not carried up on high as the Ark was but hung down between the Priests on whose shoulders the staves rested Ver. 27. Over against the border shall the rings be c. Just below the Border and the Cornice before-mentioned v. 25. were these rings to be placed as the Border and its Cornice were placed below the upper Crown or Cornice which compassed the top of the Table v. 24. For places of the staves to bear the Table This expresses the use of the rings Ver. 28. And thou shalt make the staves of Shittim-wood and overlay them with gold Such as were made for the carriage of the Ark v. 13. That the Table may be born with them By the Priests upon their shoulders For the Tabernacle being a moveable House there was frequent occasions as they journeyed from one place to another to carry this Table along with them as they did all other things belonging to the House of God It is not ordered that the Staves should remain in the Rings as they did in those belonging in the Ark v. 15. because they might have been an hindrance to the Priests in their Ministration at this Table every day Therefore it is likely they were laid up in some place near it and put in when they travelled as they were ordered to be IV Numb 6. Ver. 29. And thou shalt make the dishes thereof It is not easie to give an account either of the form or of the use of these Keharoth which we translate Dishes i. e. Patins whereon to put the Bread which were XII Loaves XXIV Lev. 6. and the Frankincense which was to be set upon each row of Loaves v. 7. This is a plain sense if the Loaves stood upon Dishes and not immediately upon the Table as Fortunatus Scacchus thinks they did And therefore imagines they were full of fine flour of which the Bread was made or with Oyl which was to be mingled and used in their Sacrifices But this is more unlikely than the other the flour not being kept here in the holy place but in the outward Court And his reason for it is not solid which is That the Heads of their Tribes offered every one of them a silver Charger so we render the same word we here translate a Dish VII Numb full of fine flour mingled with Oyl But those were not for the use of this Table on which such large Dishes or Chargers could not stand there being no room for them Therefore at last he fancies them to have been Salt-cellars which were set upon the Table together with the Bread being used at all meals And Philo as he observes seems to be of this opinion who speaking of this Table in his Third Book of the Life of Moses saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 upon it were Loaves and Salts from whence he conjectures there were two Salt-dishes at least See his Myrothecium Sacror Elaeochrism c. 41. L. II. And spoons thereof If this be a true interpretation of the Hebrew word Cappoth their use was to put Incense into the Dishes and to take it out for that they contained incense is evident from VII Numb 14 20 26 c. Which makes the fore-named Author think this word should rather be rendred Vials which Pollux numbers among the Sacred Vessels and it is plain were used in offering Incense in the Temple for St. John saw the XXIV Elders having every one of them golden Vials full of Odours or Incense V Rev. 8. whence it is the LXX translate this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The form of which Fort. Scacchus in the place fore-mentioned hath adventured to describe And covers thereof Wherewith both the Loaves and the Incense were covered So it is commonly understood But Fortunatus Scacchus indeavours at large to prove that the Hebrew word kesoth is rightly translated by the LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which were Vessels used in their Libamina when they poured Wine upon the Sacrifice or upon the Altar when they sacrificed For Authors do not agree when this was done some saying the Wine was poured out after the Sacrifice was slain and laid on the Altar others that it was most commonly done before The manner being first to throw Frankincense into the Fire on the Altar then to pour out the Wine and then the Sacrifice was slain In which order Homer and Ovid report it as Cuperus observes in his Apotheosis Homeri p. 71. However this be it is certain from Hesychius Pollux and Suidas that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signisies such a Vessel And Josephus saith that when Pompey went into the Holy Place he saw there such Vessels as these together with the Table and Candlestick 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. L. I. de Bello Jud. c. 5. The only Objection against this is that there was no use for such Vessels in that place To which I think it may be truly answered that it was fit notwithstanding God's House should be furnished with all kinds of Utensils And bowls thereof So St. Hierom understands the Hebrew word menakioth which following the LXX he translates cyathos the form of which Fortunatus Scacchus in his fore-named Book cap. 44. hath indeavoured to make out and establish this as the certain meaning of the word But it is very hard to tell of what use they were here where no Drink was used and yet our Marginal Translation of the next word seems to favour it making these to pour out withal And indeed the Hebrew word signifies both to cover and to pour out But the former seems most proper here unless we take these to have been Bowls or such like Vessels set here meerly to signifie more compleatly that God kept House among them as we speak they being part

and such like Uses Lib. II. de Jure N. G. c. 8. And he shows L. IV. c. 5. out of the Misna in the Title Siklim and other Authorities That on the first day of the Month Adar men were appointed to sit in every City of Judea to receive this Payment Which is the Tribute mentioned by Titus in his Oration to the Jews wherein he puts them in mind how kind he had been to them in permitting them to take Tribute and to gather Gifts for God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Josephus L. VI. Halos c. 34. Ver. 14. Every one that passeth among them that are numbred from twenty years old and above shall give an offering unto the LORD Every Man was bound to offer whether Priest or Levite Israelite or Stranger except Women Servants and such as were under Age. Yet if any one of these did make a voluntary offering it was accepted only from a Gentile who was an Idolater they would not accept it as Maimonides tells us See Selden L. III. de Jure N. G. c. 4. p. 291. Ver. 15. The rich shall not give more and the poor shall not give less than half a shekel They were all equally concerned in this Tax being for the support of the daily weekly monthly and annual Sacrifices and for the providing Salt and Wood and the Shew-bread c. whereby all Israel came to have an interest in whatsoever was done at the House of God all the year long The Priestly Garments also were provided out of this Money and other things belonging to the Divine Service and to the Reparations of the House of God See Mr. Selden L. III. de Synedr c. 10. n. 2 3 4. Where he shows That if any thing remained in the end of the year after all these Charges defrayed it was spent in extraordinary Burnt-offerings which were called the second Sacrifices of the Altar When they give an offering unto the LORD to make an atonement for your souls Whence this Money is called in the next Verse Keseph Hakippurim the Money of Expiations Which made every Man though never so poor endeavour to raise it though he sold his Clothes to get it And he that failed to pay this Tribute was separated from the Congregation and not comprehended in the Expiation as R. Levi of Barcelona speaks Praecept CV that is was not partaker of the benefit of the Expiatory Sacrifices Ver. 16. And thou shalt take the atonement-money of the Children of Israel and shalt appoint it for the service of the Tabernacle of the Congregation See the Verse foregoing and X Nehem. 32 33. where we read of Ordinances made to charge themselves with the third part of a shekel for the fore-mentioned uses because the Expences were then so great that half a Shekel was not sufficient to maintain them That it may be a memorial for the Children of Israel before the LORD to make an atonement for their souls A Testimony of their Gratitude to God who graciously accepted this Acknowledgment of him and spared their Lives which by their Sins they had forfeited this being a Propitiation for them because it purchased Propitiatory Sacrifices to be offered on their behalf Ver. 17. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying See v. 11. Ver. 18. Thou shalt also make a laver of brass There is nothing said either here or XXXVIII 8. concerning the form or the bigness of it But we may probably think that though Solomon made a Sea of Brass much bigger than this Vessel which was to be carried about with them in their Travels in the Wilderness yet he made it of the same form and that was Circular as we read 2 Chron. IV. 2 3 c. And after their return from the Captivity of Babylon the Laver was restored as L'Empereur observes out of Maimonides in his Annotations on Codex Midoth c. 3. sect 6. but there is nothing to be found in the Talmudists concerning its Dimensions And his foot also of brass The Basis of it was so contrived as to receive the Water which run out of the Laver at certain Spouts To wash withal At those Spouts the Priests washed their hands and their feet before they entred upon their Ministration For if they had put their hands and feet into the Laver the Water in it would have been defiled by the first Man that washed therein And the Sea of Brass made by Solomon was so high that they could not put their feet into it And thou shalt put it between the Tabernacle of the Congregation and the Altar It stood according to the Talmudists between the Porch of the Temple and the Altar and consequently in the Tabernacle at the entrance of it but a little on the South-side and not just before the Altar That is it was placed like our Fonts which stand at the lower end of our Churches towards the Door So that the Priests coming into the Court immediately went to the Laver and there washed and then ascended to the Altar And thou shalt put water therein The Heathens were so Superstitious as to think there was a greater virtue in some Waters than in others for their lustration particularly the Greeks as Fort. Scacchus observes would admit of no other Water in some of their greatest Solemnities but that from the Fountain Calliroho But the Divine Institution was more simple requiring meerly Spring-water for all manner of Purifications only this Water here mentioned was put into a Vessel sanctified by a solemn Unction XL. 11. Ver. 19. For Aaron and his Sons shall wash their hands and their feet therein Which that it might be done more conveniently the Talmudists tell us there were twelve Spouts or Cocks in the form of a Womans Breast whence they call them Paps or Dugs to let the Water out of the Laver so that the twelve Priests who attended upon the daily Sacrifice might wash there all together See L'Empereur in the place above-named where he treats at large of this and of the Conveyance of Water into the Laver which in the Tabernacle at least while they were in the Wilderness was brought thither every day in other Vessels and put into it according to the Direction in the Conclusion of the foregoing Verse Every one knows that the Gentiles took great care of washing their hands before they sacrificed as appears by many places in Homer to name no other Authors who in the first Book of his Iliads speaking of the great Sacrifice that was preparing to be offered for the appeasing of Apollo saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 upon which words Eustathius observes it was the ancient custom before they sacrificed to wash their hands 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for none but those who were clean and pure might meddle with sacred things And again in the third Book 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They poured Water upon the hands of the Kings 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Eustathius as being about to Sacrifice But I do not find in any Author that

gate throughout the Camp They were not to go into their Tents where they who were sensible of God's Displeasure it may be presumed were bemoaning their sin but to kill every one they met in the Street And slay every man his Brother and every man his Companion c. All the Israelites were Brethren and they are commanded to spare none they met withal because they were near Relations or Friends or next Neighbours Some may imagine this too hazerdous an Undertaking the Levites being but a very small number in comparison with the People of Israel But having God's warrant they were consident none would have the Courage to oppose them for Guilt makes Men timorous and the Levites also found them as Men used to be at the conclusion of a Festival weary with their Dancing and Sports Besides there are those who by their being naked v. 25. understand they were unarmed for Aaron had disarmed them to their shame by setting up the Calf for them to dance about which made them lay aside all thoughts of their Arms and so were more easily slain by the Levites Ver. 28. And the Children of Levi did according to the word of Moses Who being under God their chief Ruler passed this extraordinary Sentence upon the Offenders without the common Process in Courts of Judgment as Mr. Selden observes L. II. de Jure N. G. c. 2. in the end of it And there fell of the people that day about three thousand men The Vulgar hath twenty three thousand contrary to the LXX as well as the Hebrew Text and all the Eastern Versions except the Arabick printed at Rome in this Age and manifestly out of the Vulgar Latin as Mr. Selden hath observed in the same place and Bochart shows largely to be against all the ancient Translations and Writers Hieroz P. I. L. II. c. 34. p. 353. Where he notes also out of Philo these three thousand to have been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the principal Ring-leaders of this Impiety In memory of these Disasters the Breaking of the Tables and this Slaughter the Jews keep a Fast every year on the XVIIth of Tamuz which by Jac. Capellus computation answers to the XVIth of our July Ver. 29. For Moses had said consecrate your selves to day to the LORD Or Moses said ye have consecrated your selves c. Which way soever we take it either as spoken before the Execution to encourage them to it or afterward to commend them for it the meaning is That this Act was as acceptable to God as a Sacrifice and had procured them the honour to wait upon him as his Ministers Every man upon his Son and upon his Brother This seems to signifie that some of the Tribe of Levi had also prevaricated to whom these pious Levites had no regard but killed them indifferently with the rest though they met with one of their own Children For which they are highly commended by Moses in his Blessing XXXIII Deut. 9. But it may signifie no more but that they went out with this sincere Resolution to spare none though never so dear to them That he may bestow upon you a blessing this day This Blessing was the Preferment of the Tribe of Levi to be God's Ministers in his House and to enjoy all the Tenth of the Land for an Inheritance XVIII Numb 21 24. Ver. 30. And it came to pass on the morrow Which was the XVIIIth day of Tamuz or our XVIIth of July That Moses said unto the people Whom he assembled together that he might make them sensible of their sin Ye have sinned a great sin He set their sin before them it is likely in all its aggravating Circumstances And now I will go up unto the LORD But he would not have them despair of recovering God's Favour though he could not absolutely assure them of it Peradventure I shall make an atonement for your sin That God might not inflict any further Punishment upon them Ver. 31. And Moses returned unto the LORD Not as yet to the place where he was before with the LORD for forty days but to some part of the Mount where he might put up his most fervent Prayers to God by which his Anger was turned away as well as by Sacrifices And said O this people have sinned a great sin He begins his Prayers with a Confession of their Guilt in a most pathetical manner And have made them gods of gold Contrary to the express repeated Command of God XX. 4 23. Ver. 32. Yet now Here follows his earnest and most affectionate Deprecation for them If thou wilt forgive their sin Be thou pleased or O that thou wouldest forgive them See Dr. Hammond upon XCV Psal not 6. Or if not blot me I pray thee out of thy Book which thou hast written Let me die rather than live to see the Evils that are coming on them if thou punish them as they deserve God hath no need of a Book wherein to Register and Record any of his purposes but the Scripture uses the Language of Men as the Jews speak who to this day retain this form of Speech in their Prayer wherewith they begin the new-New-year O our Father and our King write us in the Book of the best Life in the Book of Righteousness in the Book of Redemption They desire that is to be preserved that year in a happy condition free from sin from want and from danger See Theodorick Hackspan in his Annotations on this place Ver. 33. And the LORD said unto Moses Whosoever hath sinned against me him will I blot out of my Book This was all the Answer Moses could obtain That they only should perish who had offended the Divine Majesty Which doth not deny them a Pardon if they ceased to offend him Ver. 34. Therefore now go Speak no more of this matter but return to the Camp Lead the people unto the place of which I have spoken unto thee Take the Conduct of the People upon thee to the Land which I promised to bestow on them This supposes God would not punish them as they deserved though by the words following it appears he abated something of his wonted kindness to them Behold mine Angel shall go before thee Not the Angel spoken of XXIII 20. but some lesser Minister in the Heavenly Court as appears from the next Chapter v. 2. where he saith only I will send an Angel before thee viz. in the Pillar of Cloud and Fire XIII 22. Nevertheless in the day when I visit I will visit their sin upon them Upon the next occasion to punish other Offences I will further punish this Whence the saying of R. Isaac in the Gemara Sanhedrim c. 11. There hath no vengeance come upon the world in which there hath not been half an ounce of the first Calf To which R. Vschajah there hath respect in these words Till the days of Jeroboam the Israelites suckt but of one Calf but afterward of three That is their Punishment was

consider that this Nation is thy people I do not beg this meerly upon my own account but for those who have been redeemed by thee out of the Land of Egypt and have engaged themselves to be thine by a Solemn Covenant XXIV and now return unto thee by Repentance v. 6. Ver. 14. And he said My Presence shall go with thee In the Hebrew My face i. e. I my self as the LXX translate it My Majesty as the Chaldee He promises that is to continue with them as he had done hitherto and not meerly send an Angel to accompany them but to lead and guide them himself by the Pillar of the Cloud and his glorious Presence in the Tabernacle And I will give thee rest Some think these words are particularly spoken to Moses and signifie that God would give him ease in this Point and quiet his Spirit which was now very solicitous about his Departure from them by returning to them But as the foregoing words are a Promise that he would take the Conduct of the People again so is this that he would not leave them till he had brought them to their rest Ver. 15. And he said unto him If thy Presence go not with us Some translate the words for he i.e. Moses had said unto him i. e. to God if thy Presence c. So that these words and the following are the reason of God's Answer to him v. 14. And if they be not thus taken one would have expected Moses should rather have given God thanks for his gracious Promise than further pressed him to it But the 17th Verse doth not well agree with this and therefore these words are to be looked on only as part of what Moses said to God after his Promise that his Presence should go with him Which he acknowledged to be the greater favour because otherwise he had rather never stir from the place where they now were Carry us not up hence Let us go no further if thou thy self dost not lead and guide us in our way Ver. 16. For wherein shall it be known here that I and thy people have found grace in thy sight How shall all the People round about us be convinced that we are not abandoned by thee in this Wilderness Is it not in that thou goest with us Is not this the great Demonstration of it that thou leadest us in a Pillar of Cloud and Fire Day and Night So shall we be separated I and thy people from all the people that are upon the face of the Earth This will distinguish us while it continues with us from all other People whatsoever none of which have such a Token of thy Presence with them The Manna indeed continued all this time to descend for their Sustenance which was a miraculous food but it might have been ascribed to other Causes if this glorious Token of God's Presence had not still appeared among them Ver. 17. And the LORD said unto Moses I will do this thing also that thou hast spoken Distinguish you from all other People not only by leading you in a Pillar of Cloud and Fire but dwelling among you as I designed XXV 8. For thou hast found grace in my sight and I know thee by name He owns Moses still to be most acceptable and dear to him as he had been v. 12. and therefore at his Intercession promises to be perfectly reconciled and return to his People Ver. 18. And he said I beseech thee Having obtained so much favour of God he presumes to ask something beyond all this but with all humility Shew me thy Glory In the Hebrew the word is hareni make me to see to signifie apprehend with the understanding not with the bodily eye More Nevoch P. I. c. 4. For by Glory he there understands cap. 54. the Divine Essence which he makes Moses to be desirous to apprehend which is not likely such a Man as he should think possible For thus he explains himself in his Book de Fundamentis Legis c. 1. n. 10. Moses desired to know the truth of the Divine Essence as one Man knows another whose Face he beholds and his Image is so engraven in his Mind that he Exists there distinguished from all other Men So he begs that the Divine Essence might be distinct in his Mind from all other Essences till he knew the truth of it as it is in it self But he confesses in another place of that Book cap. 64. That by the Glory of the LORD is many times understood a created Light or Splendor whereby God miraculously set forth his Majesty XXIV 26. and other places And I can see no reason why it should not so signifie here and the meaning be That he desired to see that glorious Presence or Face of God as it is called which he promised should go with them not vailed in a Cloud but in its full Splendor and Majesty For hearing him speak from the SCHECHINAH he supposed perhaps that God appeared therein in some visible shape which he desired to be acquainted withal To confirm this it is observable that God himself in his Answer to Moses calls this Glory his Face v. 20. as he had done v. 14 15. And thus R. Jehudah in the Book Cosri Pars IV. Sect. 3. towards the latter end of it seems to have understood it See upon v. 29. Ver. 19. And he said I will make all my goodness pass before thee Which Maimonides thinks signifies his making Moses to understand the Nature of all Creatures and how they are knit and united together and after what manner they are governed both in general and particular because when God had made all his Works he saw that they were very good I Gen. 31. But that Text is a very slender ground for such an Interpretation The LXX seem to come nearer to the matter who interpret this passage 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will pass before thee with my Glory That is he promises to give him a Transient view of his Glory while it passed by him v. 22. though it could not be seen in its full Majesty And then the word tobhi which we translate my goodness must rather be rendred my beauty it being the same with glory only a softer word to express such a degree of its Splendor as would not hurt him but be delightful to him And thus the word tobh is used in the second Chapter of this Book v. 2. and 1 Sam. IX 2. Or if this be not the meaning all his goodness must signifie his gracious Intentions concerning the Children of Israel to whom he assures him he would fulfil all his Promises which was sufficient for him to know And I will proclaim the Name of the LORD before thee The LXX seem to have understood this right when they translated it I will call to thee by my Name saying the LORD is before thee That is lest when I pass by thee thou shouldst not observe it I will admonish thee by a Voice calling

at the Passover when they offered the first-fruits of barley harvest XVI Deut. 9. Ver. 23. Three times in the year shall all your Males appear before the LORD the God of Israel This likewise was explained XXIII 14 17. And nothing need be added but that these peculiar Laws are here repeated together with those that follow v. 25 26. upon this occasion because they were ordained to preserve the People in the Worship and Service of the true God from whom they had lately departed Who therefore puts them in mind in the last words of this Verse which was not said before that he was the God of Israel to whom they were devoted by especial Obligations Ver. 24. For I will cast out the Nations before thee Till this was done they were not bound to observe the Precept of appearing three times in the year before the LORD And will enlarge thy borders Beyond the Land of Canaan as he had promised before XXIII 31. Neither shall any man desire thy Land when thou shalt go up to appear before the LORD c. To remove all fear of their Mind that their Neighbours might Invade them when all the Men were gone and none but Women and Children and Old men left at home he adds this Promise to all he had made before or rather makes it a part of his Covenant which he now renews that he would lay such Restraints upon their Enemies that they should not so much as think of Invading them at those three Feasts much less make any actual Incursions into their Country Ver. 25. Thou shalt not offer the blood of my Sacrifice c. At the Passover See this fully explained XXIII 18. Ver. 26. The first of the first-fruits of thy Land thou shalt bring unto the House of the LORD thy God At Pentecost which was the Feast of First-fruits See XXIII 19. Thou shalt not seethe a Kid in its mothers milk This concerns the other great Feast that of Tabernacles See in the same place Ver. 27. And the LORD said unto Moses Having recited the principal part of his Covenant mentioned v. 10. he gives the following order Write thou these words From v. 11. to this place just as he did those words contained in the XXI XXII XXIII Chapters of this Book See XXIV 4. out of which these words are extracted as the chief things respecting the Worship of God which he requires him to write in a Book by it self For after the tenor of these words have I made a Covenant with thee and with Israel See XXIV 7. Where the Covenant containing these words and many other was Sealed with the Blood of a Sacrifice The Jews are so blind as to found their Oral Tradition upon this place and upon one small word Pi which signifies indeed mouth but withal is an expletive Particle denoting the manner and value of any thing as appears from XLIII Gen. 7. XXVII Lev. 18. and therefore here rightly translated the tenor of these words Yet R. Johannes in the very beginning of Halicoth Olam gathers from hence That God made a Covenant now with their Fathers concerning all the unwritten Laws delivered by word of Mouth Unto which which while they adhere they can never understand their Divine Writings For what can be more plain that the Covenant here mentioned was ordered to be written Ver. 28. And he was there with the LORD This saith Maimonides was the highest degree of Prophecy which none attained but Moses whose Thoughts were wholly taken off from all other things and fixed upon God while he was with him in the holy Mount that is asked and received Answers from the LORD More Nevochim P. III. c. 51. Forty days and forty nights As he had been at the first XXIV 18. Which was partly to make a new trial how they would behave themselves in his Absence and partly to give the greater Authority to the Laws he brought them from God which he renewed as we read in the end of this Verse And did neither eat bread nor drink water But was supported by Influences from the Almighty who kept up his Spirits in their just height without the common Recruits of Meat and Drink Which when they give us Refreshment likewise make us drowsie See XXIV 18. To which add what Maimonides saith in the place now named That the Joy wherewith he was transported made him not think of eating and drinking for his intellectual Faculties were so strong that all Corporal Desires ceased It seems to me very probable That during this time he saw again the Model of the Tabernacle and all its Furniture with every thing else he was ordered to make when he went first into the Mount from the beginning of the XXVth to the end of the XXXth Chapter which are briefly summed up XXXI 7 8 9 10 11. He seems also to have spent much of this time in Prayer to God for the People That he would restore them intirely to his Favour and bring them to their Inheritance IX Deut. 18 19 25 26. X. 10. And he wrote upon the Tables the words of the Covenant c. That is the LORD wrote as he said he would v. 1. not Moses who wrote the foregoing words in a Book but not these which were written by the Finger of God in the Tables of Stone So Moses tells us expresly X Deut. 4. Jacobus Capellus and others following the Hebrew Doctors imagine that Moses was three times with God in the Mount for the space of XL. days and that this was the last time Between which and the first they place another which they fancy is mentioned XXXII 30 31. compared with IX Deut. 18 c. But I see no solid ground for this for God called him up into the Mount but twice and he durst not have adventured to go so near him as he was both these times without his invitation Ver. 29. And it came to pass when Moses came down from Mount Sinai Which was upon the XXV of our August according to the former Computation v. 2. With the two Tables of Testimony in Moses hand when he came down from the Mount So he came down at the first XXXII 15. That Moses wist not that the skin of his face shone There was a radient Splendour in his Countenance which is the import of the Hebrew Karan which the Vulgar translates horned Not imagining that Moses had Horns but Rays of Light which imitated Horns And therefore the Hebrew word Karnaim signifies both and R. Solomon Jarchi upon this place calls these Rays on Moses's Face Horns of Magnificence as Mr. Selden observes L. II. de Jure N. G. c. 6. p. 292. It is not improbable that the Hair of his Head was inter-spersed with Light as well as that Rays came from his Face which perstringed the Eyes of Beholders And Painters had done more reasonably if instead of Horns upon Moses his Forehead they had represented him with a Glory crowning his Head as the Saints are usually

painted in the Roman Church Which perhaps came from the ancient Custom among the Heathen who thus represented their Gods as Tho. Bartholinus observes de Morbis Biblicis cap. 5. out of Lucian de Dea Syria where he saith she did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 carry Beams upon her Head Whence it was that the Roman Emperours who were raised so much above the rest of Mankind that they honoured them as a sort of Deities were thus represented as appears by many Testimonies particularly Pliny who in his Panegyrick to Trajan laughs and jeers at the radiatum Domitiani caput While he talked with him While he conversed so famaliarly with the Divine Majesty and both saw his Glory and heard him proclaim his Name v. 5 6 7. At his first being in the Mount there was no such Brightness left upon his Countenance for he did not see the Divine Majesty in so great a Splendour as he did now when the LORD upon his Petition vouchsafed him such a sight of his Glory as he could bear XXXIII 18 23. Which was so exceeding piercing that it altered the very Skin of Moses his Face and made it luminous Of which Moses doth not seem to have been sensible till some time after he came down from the Mount when Aaron as well as others were afraid to come nigh him having his Thoughts wholly possessed with the far more transcendent Glory of the Divine Majesty of which he had a Glimpse From this familiar Conference which Moses had with God it is likely the Heathen took occasion to invent the like Stories of their Zamolxis who pretended to receive his Laws from Vesta and Minos and Lycurgus who said they received theirs from Jupiter and Apollo with several others mentioned by Diodorus Siculus L. I. who then adds Moses had his from the God Jao so they pronounced the Name Jehovah But they had no such Testimony as this of their Communication with the Divine Majesty much less were their Laws confirmed by such Miracles as lasted for the space of XL. years under the Conduct of Moses in the sight of all People Ver. 30. And when Aaron and all the Children of Israel saw Moses behold the skin of his face shone This highly established his Authority and bred in them a Reverence to the Laws he brought that they were all Witnesses of the brightness or glory of his Countenance as the Apostle calls it 2 Cor. III. 7. which demonstrated he had been with God as he affirmed and had beheld the Glory of his Majesty and received from him the Tables of Testimony By all the Children of Israel in this Verse seems to be meant all the Rulers of the Congregregation mentioned in the next And they were afraid to come nigh him The Light which shone from his Countenance was so great that it dazled the Eyes of Beholders even of Aaron himself who did not know whether it would be safe to approach him This was an illustrious Testimony that he had been with God who dwells as the Apostle speaks in light inaccessible Ver. 31. And Moses called unto them Invited them to come near him and not to fear any hurt And Aaron and all the Rulers of the Congregation returned unto him Viz. After he had put a Vail upon his Face till which they could not steadfastly look upon it as the Apostle speaks 2 Cor. III. 7. the Light of it being so strong that it hurt their Eyes if they fixed them there And Moses talked with them Acquainted them with what he had seen and heard Ver. 32. And afterward all the Children of Israel came ●igh c. There was a general Assembly of all the Tribes summoned that he might deliver to them all that which he had received from God See XXXV 1. And he gave them in Commandment all that the LORD had spoken with him in Mount Sinai All the Orders he had given about the Building of the Tabernacle and the rest contained in the XXV XXVI Chapters and those that follow to the XXXII For at his first coming from the Mount finding them in an Apostacy from God he said nothing to them about these matters but in abhorrence of their foul Idolatry broke the Tables of Testimony which God had given him to deliver to them Ver. 33. And till Moses had done speaking with them he put a vail on his face This seems to belong as well to v. 31. as to the 32d and accordingly I have interpreted it Though there are those who think he perswaded Aaron and the Rulers to approach without a Vail but put it on when he spake to the People who were less able to bear it But there seems to be the same reason for both Aaron being no less afraid than any of them And the Majesty of his Countenance appeared sufficiently even when it was vailed for the brightness was not quite obscured though very much shaded by it Ver. 34. But when Moses went in before the LORD to speak with him he took the vail off till he came out He went into the Tabernacle where he spake with him face to face as a Man speaks to his Friend XXXIII 9 10 11. And he came out and spake unto the Children of Israel that which he was commanded This seems to relate unto the frequent occasions Moses had to go and consult with God in difficult Cases whose Mind he declared to them when he had received it Ver. 35. And the Children of Israel saw the face of Moses that the skin of Moses face shone c. Some great Men have thought that the brightness continued on Moses's Face till his death so that he spake to them with a Vail on his Face from this time as long as he lived Of which we cannot be certain though thus much is evident from this and the foregoing Verse that the Splendour of his Countenance did remain for some time after he came down from God's Presence in the Mount During which as oft as he went in to speak with God he took off his Vail and when he came out to speak with them he put it on until he went in to speak with God again as this Verse concludes How long it was before it vanished none can resolve Perhaps not till he had set up the Tabernacle and consecrated Aaron and his Sons and delivered all the Laws he had received about the Service of God which are recorded in the Book of Leviticus That is all the time they stayed near Mount Sinai from whence they removed a little more than half a year after this X Numb 11 12. CHAP. XXXV Verse 1. AND Moses gathered all the Congregation of the Children of Israel together Having told them what orders he had received from the LORD and sufficiently convinced them of his Authority XXXIV 32 33. he now proceeds to put them in Execution And in order to it he gathered Col-hadath all the Congregation which sometimes signifies all the Elders and Judges c. the prime Governours of

many Exceptions For they would have him make good what was torn by one Wolf alone because they think he might have been able to defend the Cattle against one though not against many If also he put the Oxen or Sheep into a Pasture wont to be infested with wild Beasts or Thieves or if he did not call in the help of his Neighbours c. in these and such like cases he was to make good that which was torn as Maimonides reports their Judgment See Bochart Hierozoic P. I. L. II. c. 44. Ver. 14. If a man borrow ought of his neighbour and it be hurt or die This the Hebrew Doctors think concerns such things as were lent to another out of kindness without any consideration for the use of them About which if there arose any controversie by reason of some maim that it received or its death it was to be determined by the Rule following The owner thereof being not with it he shall surely make it good These words and those in the beginning of the 15th Verse but if the owner be with it he shall not make it good seem to signifie that if the Owner was with the thing that was lent at the time of its hurt or death it was to be presumed he would do his best to preserve it and see it was not ill used and so must bear the loss But if he was not present at that time then the contrary was presumed that the borrower was in fault and therefore bound to make it good Which though it may seem hard was but necessary to make Men careful and do their best to preserve what was lent them in pure kindness R. Levi of Barcelona Praecept LVI interprets it quite another way in this manner That if the Owner was with it at the time it was borrowed though not present at the time of its hurt or death the borrower was free but if the Owner was present at the time of the hurt or death but not at the time of lending he was bound to make it good For the matter saith he depends upon the beginning of it Ver. 15. If it be an hired thing it came for his hire Some make the Hebrew word Sachir which we translate hired thing to relate unto the Person If he be a Mercenary i. e. the Man who lends agrees to let the borrower have it at a certain price c. But this is the same in effect with the sense of our Translation which makes this word relate to the thing it self which if it were borrowed with a Condition to pay so much for the use of it as the Lender demanded then the Man who hired it was not bound to make it good whether the Owner were present or not when it was hurt or died But the Owner was to run the hazard because of the hire which he received for the use of the thing Ver. 16. If a man intice a maid that is not betrothed and lie with her Whosoever lay with such a Maid in the City was thought to have been an inticer only unless Witnesses came and proved that he forced her because it might be well supposed her Voice would have been heard if she had cried out upon the Force in the City But if he lay with her in the Field where no Body could hear it was presumed to be a Rape Thus Maimonides and other Hebrew Doctors He shall surely endow her to be his wife This Law doth not say as the Old Translation hath it he shall ondow her and take her to be his Wife but only endow her to be his Wife that is give her such a Dowry that she might be his lawful Wife So the same Hebrew Doctors understand it who will not have it to be a Command that he should marry her though that was best but only that he should make Satisfaction for taking away her Virginity which was by paying so much in the nature of a Dowry as would render her fit to be his Wife if both of them could agree Yet so that if either he or she or her Father refused for it was in the power of any of these as they say to hinder the Marriage he paid this Mulct as the Dowry of a Virgin to her Father See Selden's Vxor Hebr. L. I. c. 16. There is another Law of this Nature XXII Deut. 28 29. but it speaks of a Virgin deflowred by force of which see there Ver. 17. If her father uiterly refuse to give her unto him Here is mention made only of the Father not of the Man that deflowred her who one would think should have been bound to marry her if she and her Father pleased And so Josephus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But if the Father of the Damosel did not like to give her to him he was to pay as here is directed He shall pay money according to the dowry of virgins That is saith Josephus fifty shekels 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as a Satisfaction for her Reproach L. IV. Archaeol c. 8. Ver. 18. Thou shalt not suffer a Witch to live This Law about Witches follows the other about Virgins because Witches among other practises helpt by ●vil Arts to allure and entice silly Virgins to consent to Mens Solicitations Epiphanius reports from one that saw it such a Magical Operation used by a Jew to procure the Love of a Christian Woman who was preserved from the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 power of his Witcheraft by the Seal of Christ as he calls the Sign of the Cross wherewith she fortified her self at the first attempt made upon her Haeres XXX n. 7 8. But such wicked Wretches did a world of other Mischief and therefore were to be put to death whether they were Men or Women The Scripture indeed mentions a Witch only saith the Gemara of the Sanhedrim c. 7. n. 10. because for the most part they were Women who were addicted to Magick So Maimonides also because the greater part of Evil Works are performed by Women therefore the Law saith Thou shalt not suffer MECHAS SHEPHA a Witch to live P. III. c. 37. More Nevochim Where he discourses of the sorts of Witchcraft and in general affirms that there were no Magical Works performed without respect to the Stars For such People held that every Plant had its Star and so had every Animal and all Metals For Example they said Pluck such a Leaf or such an Herb when the Sun or any other Planet is in such a place let such a Metal be melted under such a Constellation or such a Constitution of the Moon and then say such and such words and let a Fume be made with such Herbs or Leaves and that in such or such a form and then this or that will follow This was their Doctrine and such Works as these were the peculiar worship of the Stars who were delighted they fancied with such Actions Words or Fumes and for the sake of them would do

whatsoever was desired All this he saith he took out of their Books then extant from which he concludes That the Scope of the Law being that all Idolatry should be taken out of the World and that no vertue should be ascribed to any Star of doing good or hurt to Men which opinion led Men to their worship it necessarily followed that all Witches and Wizards should be put to death because they were Idolaters though after a peculiar and different way from that wherein the Vulgar worshipped Idols And he thinks that a Witch is rather mentioned than a Wizard though both intended because Men are naturally more tender towards the Female Sex and apt to favour them and therefore it is as if Moses had said Thou shalt kill even a Woman that is guilty of this Crime But afterward XX Lev. 27. he commands both Men and Women to be stoned Others of the Hebrew Doctors particularly R. Levi Barzelonita give this Reason why Witches were not to live Because they directly thwarted God most blessed who made all things when he created them for such and such purposes which they perverted and by devices of their own made to serve other ends which God never designed Praecept LXII But this they could not do without the help of Evil Spirits and therefore their Crime consisted in entering into a Familiarity and a League with them whose assistance upon such occasion they invoked which was in effect a renouncing of God This was an Impiety which had overspread the whole World especially the Eastern parts of it And as for the Romans we find a Law as old as the XII Tables against Witchcraft Apud nos in duodecine Tabulis cavetur ne quis alienos fructus excantassit as we read in Seneca L. IV. Nat. Quaest c. 7. where he mentions the like Law among the Athenians For the Greeks were extreamly addicted to this especially in Thessaly Of which none that I have read spake so plainly as Plato in his Eleventh Book of Laws p. 932 933. where he orders Punishments not only for those who destroyed others by Potions but for those who pretended to be able to revenge themselves or others 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 either by certain Inchantments or by Charms or by those Spells which are called Ties or Knots Concerning which he acknowledges it is hard to know any thing or to perswade others there is nothing in them For if a Man see any where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. waxen Resemblances made and set either at their doors or in the turning of the ways or at the Tombs of their Ancestors none can prevail with him to neglect these things because he knows not what efficacy is in them And therefore he would have even such People who used these sorts of Witchcrafts to be put to death if they were Professors of any sort of Knowledge as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but if they were simple People he leaves the Judges to punish them as they found reason Ver. 19. Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death This is so infamous a sin and such a dishonour to Nature and the Author of Nature as Conr. Pellicanus well glosses that it was not fit such a Person should live upon the face of the Earth but die without mercy See XVIII Lev. 23. XX. 15 16. where this is more largely handled Ver. 20. He that sacrificeth unto any god save unto the LORD only he shall be utterly destroyed Sacrifice being the principal act of Worship in those days includes in it all other acts of Worship and Divine Service which they were required to pay to the LORD alone XX. 2 3 c. but the Punishment of doing otherwise was not enacted till now Of which he treats more largely XVII Deut. 2 3 c. See there Ver. 21. Thou shalt neither vex a stranger nor oppress him Here are two distinct Commands The first of which not to vex a stranger the Hebrews will have to consist in not upbraiding him with his former state of Heathenism nor giving him any approbrious words as saying remember what thou wast or what thy father did And this was neither to be done to a Proselyte of Justice nor to a Proselyte of the Gate as far as Mr. Selden could judge of their opinion herein L. II. de Jure N. G. c. 4. The second not to oppress him consisted in not using him hardly in their dealings with him by making him pay for instance for any thing more than it was worth Which the same Mr. Selden L. VI. c. 5. p. 690. thinks the Hebrews were of opinion belonged only to their usage of Proselytes of Justice who were perfectly in their Communion But this is very unreasonable for as R. Levi Barzelonita himself observes by thus treating any Proselyte they might endanger their return to Paganism again out of indignation to be so despised and much more when they saw they were wrong'd Which God took care they should not be because they were more helpless than other Men and had fewer Friends Which is the reason that this Precept as the Jews themselves have computed is inculcated in one and twenty places See particularly XXIII 9. XIX Lev. 33. For ye were strangers in the land of Egypt There could not be a more powerful reason to more them to treat Strangers kindly than the remembrance of their own Oppressions in Egypt from which they were delivered by the meer Mercy of God which they ought to imitate Ver. 22. Ye shall not afflict any widow or fatherless child Give them no trouble either in word or deed as the same R. Levi interprets it Praecept LXV but in all their Commerce with them in buying felling or any other intercourse to treat them not only civilly but kindly and benignly And the reason of the Precept saith he is the same with the former because Widows and Orphans have few or none to protect them or plead their Cause and therefore the Law took care of them as if their Husbands and Parents were yet alive Ver. 23. If thou afflict them in any wise By giving them ill Language or by infulting over them or destroying their Goods much more if 〈◊〉 Man smote them he was liable to the Judgment of God as Nachmanides interprets it And they cry at all unto me A Child saith the same R. Levi cries to his Father and a Wife to her Husband but the Widow and the Fatherless cry unto me and I will hear them for I am merdiful I will surely hear them Punish you for your ill usage of them as it follows in the next Verse Ver. 24. And my wrath shall wax hot This signifies their Punishment should be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sent upon them from God who orders no Penalty to be inflicted by their Judges because he intended himself to be their Avenger and that in a very remarkable manner by serving them in their kind as it here follows And I will kill you with